US20110021555A1 - Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and shorter dosing regimens for treating actinic keratoses - Google Patents

Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and shorter dosing regimens for treating actinic keratoses Download PDF

Info

Publication number: US20110021555A1
Authority: US; United States
Prior art keywords: imiquimod; day; formulation; lower dosage; dosage strength
Prior art date: 2008-12-19
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.): Abandoned

Application number

US12/636,613

Other languages

English (en)

Inventor

Michael T. Nordsiek

Sharon F. Levy

James H. Lee

James H. Kulp

Kodumudi S. Balaji

Tze-Chiang Meng

Jason J. Wu

Valyn J. Bahm

Robert Babilon

Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)

Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp

Original Assignee

Graceway Pharmaceuticals LLC

Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)

2008-12-19

Filing date

2009-12-11

Publication date

2011-01-27

Family has litigation

First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=42316709&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20110021555(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

2009-12-11 Priority to US12/636,613 priority Critical patent/US20110021555A1/en

2009-12-11 Application filed by Graceway Pharmaceuticals LLC filed Critical Graceway Pharmaceuticals LLC

2009-12-17 Assigned to GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC reassignment GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: MENG, TZE-CHIANG, BABILON, ROBERT, BAHM, VALYN S., KULP, JAMES H., NORDSIEK, MICHAEL T., WU, JASON J., BALAJI, KODUMUDI S., LEE, JAMES H., LEVY, SHARON F.

2011-01-27 Publication of US20110021555A1 publication Critical patent/US20110021555A1/en

2011-07-08 Priority to US13/179,336 priority patent/US20110263633A1/en

2011-07-08 Priority to US13/179,402 priority patent/US20110263634A1/en

2011-07-08 Priority to US13/179,315 priority patent/US8222270B2/en

2011-07-08 Priority to US13/179,363 priority patent/US20110257217A1/en

2011-07-12 Priority to US13/181,507 priority patent/US20110257219A1/en

2011-07-12 Priority to US13/181,499 priority patent/US8236816B2/en

2011-07-13 Priority to US13/182,433 priority patent/US8299109B2/en

2011-07-17 Priority to US13/184,556 priority patent/US20110263636A1/en

2011-07-18 Priority to US13/184,579 priority patent/US20110263637A1/en

2011-12-13 Assigned to MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION reassignment MEDICIS PHARMACEUTICAL CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC

2012-08-06 Priority to US13/568,003 priority patent/US9370509B2/en

2016-06-20 Priority to US15/187,751 priority patent/US10238644B2/en

2019-02-05 Priority to US16/268,230 priority patent/US11318130B2/en

Status Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

FMXMBMHIIMLSIT-QOXPIQJESA-N BP=O.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.O=BP(=O)(O)O.O=BP(=O)=O.O=BP=O.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S Chemical compound BP=O.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.O=BP(=O)(O)O.O=BP(=O)=O.O=BP=O.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S FMXMBMHIIMLSIT-QOXPIQJESA-N 0.000 description 1
LVJJCHYBMFXBTP-QOXPIQJESA-N C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S Chemical compound C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.C.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S.[2H]S LVJJCHYBMFXBTP-QOXPIQJESA-N 0.000 description 1
DOUYETYNHWVLEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N CC(C)CN1C=NC2=C1C1=C(C=CC=C1)N=C2N Chemical compound CC(C)CN1C=NC2=C1C1=C(C=CC=C1)N=C2N DOUYETYNHWVLEO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1

Images

Classifications

- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
- A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
- A61K31/395—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
- A61K31/435—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom
- A61K31/47—Quinolines; Isoquinolines
- A61K31/4738—Quinolines; Isoquinolines ortho- or peri-condensed with heterocyclic ring systems
- A61K31/4745—Quinolines; Isoquinolines ortho- or peri-condensed with heterocyclic ring systems condensed with ring systems having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. phenantrolines
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
- A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
- A61K31/395—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
- A61K31/435—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom
- A61K31/4353—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom ortho- or peri-condensed with heterocyclic ring systems
- A61K31/437—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom ortho- or peri-condensed with heterocyclic ring systems the heterocyclic ring system containing a five-membered ring having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. indolizine, beta-carboline
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K31/00—Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
- A61K31/33—Heterocyclic compounds
- A61K31/395—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
- A61K31/435—Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having six-membered rings with one nitrogen as the only ring hetero atom
- A61K31/47—Quinolines; Isoquinolines
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/06—Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite
- A61K47/08—Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite containing oxygen, e.g. ethers, acetals, ketones, quinones, aldehydes, peroxides
- A61K47/10—Alcohols; Phenols; Salts thereof, e.g. glycerol; Polyethylene glycols [PEG]; Poloxamers; PEG/POE alkyl ethers
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/06—Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite
- A61K47/08—Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite containing oxygen, e.g. ethers, acetals, ketones, quinones, aldehydes, peroxides
- A61K47/12—Carboxylic acids; Salts or anhydrides thereof
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K47/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
- A61K47/06—Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite
- A61K47/08—Organic compounds, e.g. natural or synthetic hydrocarbons, polyolefins, mineral oil, petrolatum or ozokerite containing oxygen, e.g. ethers, acetals, ketones, quinones, aldehydes, peroxides
- A61K47/14—Esters of carboxylic acids, e.g. fatty acid monoglycerides, medium-chain triglycerides, parabens or PEG fatty acid esters
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
- A61K9/0012—Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
- A61K9/0014—Skin, i.e. galenical aspects of topical compositions
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
- A61K9/06—Ointments; Bases therefor; Other semi-solid forms, e.g. creams, sticks, gels
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K9/00—Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
- A61K9/70—Web, sheet or filament bases ; Films; Fibres of the matrix type containing drug
- A61K9/7023—Transdermal patches and similar drug-containing composite devices, e.g. cataplasms
- A61K9/703—Transdermal patches and similar drug-containing composite devices, e.g. cataplasms characterised by shape or structure; Details concerning release liner or backing; Refillable patches; User-activated patches
- A61K9/7038—Transdermal patches of the drug-in-adhesive type, i.e. comprising drug in the skin-adhesive layer
- A61K9/7046—Transdermal patches of the drug-in-adhesive type, i.e. comprising drug in the skin-adhesive layer the adhesive comprising macromolecular compounds
- A61K9/7053—Transdermal patches of the drug-in-adhesive type, i.e. comprising drug in the skin-adhesive layer the adhesive comprising macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. polyvinyl, polyisobutylene, polystyrene
- A61K9/7061—Polyacrylates
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P17/00—Drugs for dermatological disorders
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P17/00—Drugs for dermatological disorders
- A61P17/02—Drugs for dermatological disorders for treating wounds, ulcers, burns, scars, keloids, or the like
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P17/00—Drugs for dermatological disorders
- A61P17/12—Keratolytics, e.g. wart or anti-corn preparations
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P35/00—Antineoplastic agents

Definitions

the present invention relates to pharmaceutical formulations and methods for the topical or transdermal delivery of 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine, also known as (aka) 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine, aka imiquimod, to treat actinic keratosis with shorter durations of therapy, than currently prescribed for the commercially available Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, as now approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”).
FDA U.S. Food & Drug Administration
the present invention is directed to lower dos0age strength imiquimod formulations to deliver an efficacious dose for treating actinic keratosis with an acceptable safety profile, but with a dosing regimen that is shorter and more convenient for patient use than the dosing regimen currently approved by the FDA for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
Actinic keratosis is a precancerous (premalignant) skin disorder caused by or associated with chronic exposure to radiant energy, such as sunlight. Actinic keratosis lesions are small, red, rough spots or lesions occurring on sun exposed areas of the skin. Actinic keratosis lesions possess many of the same cellular changes observed in a skin cancer called squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Research shows that a mutated version of the p53 gene is found in sun-damaged cells in the body and is present in more than about 90% of people who have AKs and squamous cell carcinomas. Although most actinic keratosis lesions do not actually become cancerous, some lesions can become malignant.
SCC squamous cell carcinoma
actinic keratosis develops in skin cells called “keratinocytes”, which are the cells that constitute about 90% of the epidermis, the outermost layer of skin.
keratinocytes are the cells that constitute about 90% of the epidermis, the outermost layer of skin.
Chronic sun exposure over time, generates mutations in these cells and causes the cells to change in size, shape, the way they are organized, and the way they behave.
the cellular damage can even extend to the dermis, the layer of skin beneath the epidermis.
Actinic keratosis lesions generally measure in size between about 2 to about 6 millimeters in diameter, AK lesions can range in color from skin-toned to reddish and often have a white scale on top. On occasion, AK lesions will form into the shape of animal horns. When this occurs, the AKs are known as “cutaneous horns.”
Actinic cheilitis can be characterized by a diffuse scaling on the lower lip that cracks and dries. In some cases, the lips will have a whitish discoloration on the thickened lip.
Actinic keratosis is generally more common after age 40, because actinic keratosis take years to develop. However, even younger adults may develop actinic keratosis when living in geographic areas that are exposed to high-intensity sunlight year round, such as Florida and Southern California.
Actinic keratosis has become a significant health care issue in the United States of America. It is/estimated that over 20 million Americans suffer from actinic keratosis, and that that number continues to grow. In fact, actinic keratosis is so common today that treatment for actinic keratosis ranks as one of the most frequent reasons people consult a dermatologist.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,751,087 discloses the use of a combination of ethyl oleate and glyceryl monolaurate as a skin penetration enhancer for nitroglycerin, with all three components being contained in the adhesive layer of a transdermal patch, wherein this U.S. patent is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,722,941 discloses readily absorbable pharmaceutical compositions that comprise a pharmacologically active agent distributed in a vehicle comprising an absorption-enhancing amount of at least one fatty acid containing 6 to 12 carbon atoms and optionally a fatty acid monoglyceride. Such compositions are said to be particularly useful for increasing the absorption of pharmacologically active bases, wherein this U.S. patent is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,746,515 discloses a method of using glyceryl monolaurate to enhance the transdermal flux of a transdermally deliverable drug through intact skin, wherein this U.S. patent is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007/0123558, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2004/087614, U.S. Patent Publication No. 2002/147210, and WO2008US53522 disclose topical formulations and/or topical and transdermal delivery systems containing 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine, wherein each are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
a 5% imiquimod cream commercially available under the brand name Aldara®, to treat certain dermal and mucosal associated conditions, such as (1) the topical treatment of clinically typical, nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratosis (AK) on the face or scalp in immunocompetent adults, (2) topical treatment of biopsy-confirmed, primary superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) in immunocompetent adults, and (3) the topical treatment of external genital and perianal warts/condyloma acuminate in patients 12 years or older.
AK clinically typical, nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratosis
sBCC primary superficial basal cell carcinoma
Aldara® is the brand name for an FDA-approved 5% imiquimod cream, which is an immune response modifier.
Each gram of the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream contains 50 mg of imiquimod in an off-white oil-in-water vanishing cream base consisting of isostearic acid, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, white petrolatum, polysorbate 60, sorbitan monostearate, glycerin, xanthan gum, purified water, benzyl alcohol, methylparaben, and propylparaben.
the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream is packaged in single-use packets or sachets, each containing 250 mg of cream, equivalent to 12.5 mg of imiquimod.
imiquimod is known as 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine or 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine.
Imiquimod has a molecular formula of C 14 H 16 N 4 and a molecular weight of 240.3.
the chemical structural formula for imiquimod is as follows:
Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment is not without limitation, including an unsimplified and lengthy dosing regimen.
the treatment regimen for actinic keratosis using FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream consists of applying the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream two times per week for a full 16 weeks to a defined/limited treatment area on the face or scalp (but not both concurrently).
the surface treatment area for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream is limited to approximately 25 cm 2 (e.g., a 5 cm ⁇ 5 cm area, which may be of any shape; the treatment area does not have to be square) and is defined as one contiguous area.
the number of AK lesions treated with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream per treatment area is generally between about 4 and about 8. Because the treatment area is quite small, less than one single-use Aldara® packet or sachet (250 mg of total cream, of which 12.5 mg is imiquimod) is generally used per application. Inconsistencies in both compliance and therapeutic results frequently occur with the treatment of actinic keratosis with FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream due to the lengthy treatment period, i.e., 16 weeks, the complicated dosing regimen, i.e., twice weekly, and the high incidence of application site reactions.
the treatment area was not restricted and patients were allowed to use one or two sachets per application.
the size of the treatment areas and number of sachets applied were not reported.
the median number of AK lesions at baseline was 7.
the authors further reported that 829 patients entered the study and that, overall, the complete clearance rate was 68.9% (571/829), the partial clearance rate (percentage of patients with ⁇ 75% reduction in the number of baseline AK lesions) was 80.2%.
the authors acknowledged that local skin reactions (LSRs) and application site reactions (ASRs) were the most commonly reported adverse events, and that four patients discontinued from the study due to LSRs or ASRs.
LSRs local skin reactions
ASRs application site reactions
this study compared the initial and 12-month clinical clearance, histological clearance, and cosmetic outcomes of topically applied 5% imiquimod (IMIQ) cream, 5% 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) ointment and cryosurgery for the treatment of AK of patients who were randomized to one of the following three treatment groups: one or two courses of cryosurgery (20-40 seconds per lesion), topical 5-FU (twice daily for 4 weeks), or one or two courses of topical imiquimod (three times per week for 4 weeks each).
the treatment area was confined to one anatomic area of 50 cm 2 or less.
imiquimod 5% cream was administered once daily three times per week in cycles for treatment of actinic keratoses on the head.
imiquimod 5% cream was administered three times per week for four weeks followed by four weeks of rest (cycle 1) to AK lesions on the head. If AK lesions remained visible at the end of cycle 1, a second treatment cycle was instituted.
the present invention overcomes the above-mentioned limitations associated with the treatment of actinic keratosis with FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream through the discovery of novel and improved imiquimod treatment regimens of short duration, lower dosage strength imiquimod pharmaceutical formulations, and simplified dosing regimens to treat actinic keratosis.
the present invention provides for new and improved substantially less-irritating lower dosage strength imiquimod pharmaceutical formulations, which are suitable for daily application in connection with substantially condensed treatment regimens and substantially expanded treatment areas, for topical and/or transdermal administration of an effective amount of imiquimod to treat subjects who are diagnosed with clinically typical, nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratosis (AK), preferably on the face or balding scalp of immunocompetent patients.
AK nonhyperkeratotic actinic keratosis
the present invention provides for new and improved actinic keratosis treatments, wherein: (1) treatment periods of the present invention are substantially shorter in duration, i.e., up to six weeks and preferably up to four weeks, than the current FDA-approved 16-week treatment regimen for actinic keratosis treatment; (2) dosing regimens of the present invention are substantially simpler, i.e., one application daily each day for up to six weeks and preferably up to four weeks, than the current dosing regimen, i.e., once-a-day but only twice per week for 16 weeks, for the current FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream for actinic keratosis treatment; (3) treatment areas of the present invention are substantially larger, i.e., up to about 250 cm 2 , than the current FDA-approved treatment area, i.e., up to about 25 cm 2 , for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream for actinic keratosis treatment; (4) number of AK lesions being treated in
the present invention provides for new and improved actinic keratosis treatments that cover larger treatment areas, have short durations of therapies, use lower imiquimod dosage strengths, have simplified daily dosing regimens, and have a lower incidence of application site reactions, as compared to treatment of actinic keratosis with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, as currently approved by the FDA.
the present invention thus provides numerous surprising advantages over current FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream therapy for actinic keratosis treatment.
the present invention provides for (1) an expanded imiquimod treatment area estimated to be approximately 200-250 cm 2 , e.g., the full face or entire balding scalp, (2) a shortened treatment regimen, i.e., up to about 6 weeks and preferably up to about 4 weeks, (3) a simplified dosing regimen, i.e., once daily on each day of the treatment period, (4) low systemic imiquimod blood levels even though the treatment area is vastly expanded and the dosing frequency is increased, (5) treatment of an increased number of clinical lesions per treatment period, e.g., about 5 to about 20 AK lesions or more, and (6) a lower subject incidence of application site reactions, even though there is an increase in imiquimod surface area penetration due to the expanded treatment area and increased applied amounts in accordance with the present invention, during the topical treatment regimen of actinic keratosis, than
the present invention overcomes certain of the limitations associated with the treatment of actinic keratosis with FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream and addresses current medical needs for (1) a larger treatment area (full face or balding scalp: >25 cm 2 vs. up to 25 cm 2 for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream), (2) a shorter treatment period, e.g., two 2-week or two 3-week treatment cycles with an interim 2-week or 3-week no-treatment period sandwiched between them, respectively, vs. the full 16-week treatment regimen for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream), (3) a more intuitive dosing regimen (daily dosing vs. twice weekly dosing for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream) and (4) less or a lower incidence of application site reactions.
a larger treatment area full face or balding scalp: >25 cm 2 vs. up to 25 cm 2 for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream
a shorter treatment period e.g., two 2-
the less-irritating lower dosage strength imiquimod pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention may comprise:
a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle for imiquimod which vehicle comprises a fatty acid, such as isostearic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, linoleic acid, unrefined oleic acid, refined oleic acid, such as Super Refined® oleic acid NF (e.g., a highly purified oleic acid, i.e.; an oleic acid which has low polar impurities, such as peroxides, a low peroxide value and is marketed by CRODA; see e.g., www.crodausa.com) and a combination thereof, in a total amount of about 3 percent to about 45 percent by weight based on the total weight of the formulation.
a fatty acid such as isostearic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, linoleic acid, unrefined oleic acid, refined oleic acid, such as Super Refined® oleic acid NF (e
the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention are uniquely designed to have physical and chemical stability, solubility, emollient properties and dose proportionate delivery similar to or better than Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream. More specifically, the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention, especially those wherein the vehicle comprises an isostearic acid as the fatty acid, are believed to generally have similar or improved skin emolliency at the application site and dose proportionate release rates as to both the release rates of the imiquimod and the total amount of imiquimod released, relative to the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention are concentration influenced and have similar release rates to the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream. Additionally, the greater the amount of imiquimod in the formulation, the faster and the greater the total amount of imiquimod is released, evidencing that the amount in and the rate of release from the formulations are imiquimod concentration dependent.
the lower dose strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention deliver different cumulative amounts to the stratum corneum and epidermis, i.e., local skin delivery, than the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream
such lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations are believed to have a proportional and linear relationship that is similar with the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream as to both the rate of imiquimod release and the total amount of imiquimod released and delivered locally to the skin over time, so that the imiquimod concentrations in the formulations of the present invention, the imiquimod release rates and the amount of imiquimod unabsorbed and delivered to the stratum corneum and epidermis, which has been released from the formulations, are generally proportional and linear to the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention are uniquely designed to be stable and fall within the range of the specifications for the commercially available Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, such as to viscosity, pH, and stability, including microscopic and macroscopic stability.
the imiquimod present in the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention especially those wherein the vehicle comprises an isostearic acid as the fatty acid, (monograph range: 90 to 110%) and benzyl alcohol (monograph range: 50 to 105%) remain within limits at both about 25° C. and about 40° C. over about a one month period and within limits at both about 25° C.
the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention especially those wherein the vehicle comprises an isostearic acid as the fatty acid, remain stabile for about six months at about 25° C. and about 40° C., and also remain stable with respect to macroscopic and microscopic appearance, viscosity (monograph range: 2,000 to 35000 cPs) and pH (monograph range 4.0 to 5.5).
the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention are uniquely designed to meet the requirements specified in both United States Pharmacopeia (“USP”) and the European Pharmacopeia (“EP”) as to preservative efficacy and remain free of degradation products when stored at about 25° C./60% RH, about 30° C./65% RH and about 40° C./75% RH over about one, about two, about three and about six months and analyzed at about 318 nm wavelength.
USP United States Pharmacopeia
EP European Pharmacopeia
the present invention also contemplates lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations, that have unique pharmacokinetic profiles when used, for example, in connection with the short durations of therapy to treat actinic keratosis in accordance with the present invention.
a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of the present invention when approximately 500 mg of such a formulation (about 18.75 mg imiquimod) or less is applied daily for 21 days to a treatment area of about 200 cm 2 on the face or balding scalp, achieves steady state by about week 2, e.g., between about day 8 and day 14, and provides an in-vivo serum profile selected from the following (See FIG. 54 ):
a Day 21 T max of from about 4 hours to about 16 hours and preferably a mean T max of about 7.4 hours with a standard deviation (“SD”) of about 3.5, a median T max of about 9 hours and a geometric mean T max of about 6.6 hours and a coefficient of variation (“CV”) of about 48%;
SD standard deviation
CV coefficient of variation
a Day 21 C max of from about 0.07 to about 0.6 ng/ml and preferably a mean C max of about 0.3 ng/ml with a standard deviation of about 0.16, a median C max of about 0.35 and a geometric mean C max of about 0.27 ng/ml and a coefficient of variation of about 49%;
a mean peak serum concentration is achieved with a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28. More specifically, a mean peak serum concentration of about 0.323 ng/ml is achieved with a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28 after about 18.75 mg of imiquimod is applied to a treatment area of about 200 cm 2 on the face or balding scalp each day for 21 days.
the present invention contemplates lower dosage strength formulations that are pharmaceutically equivalent, therapeutically equivalent, bioequivalent and/or interchangeable, regardless of the method selected to demonstrate equivalents or bioequivalence, such as dermatopharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic methodologies, microdialysis, in vitro and in vivo methods and/or clinical endpoints.
the present invention contemplates lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations that are bioequivalent, pharmaceutically equivalent and/or therapeutic equivalent, especially, 2.5% and 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations that are bioequivalent, pharmaceutically equivalent and/or therapeutically equivalent, when used daily in accordance with the short durations of therapy of the present invention to treat actinic keratosis, e.g., used on treatment areas, namely, full face or balding scalp, that are between greater than about 25 cm 2 and about 250 cm 2 on a daily basis for up to about six weeks, including the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks 2-cycle treatment regimen, and preferably up to about 4 weeks, including the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks 2-cycle treatment regimen.
the present invention contemplates: (a) pharmaceutically equivalent lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations which contain the same amount of imiquimod in the same dosage form; (b) bioequivalent lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations which are chemically equivalent and which, when administered to the same individuals in the same dosage regimens, result in comparable bioavailabilities; (c) therapeutic equivalent lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations which, when administered to the same individuals in the same dosage regimens, provide essentially the same efficacy and/or toxicity; and (d) interchangeable lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention which are pharmaceutically equivalent, bioequivalent and therapeutically equivalent.
lower dosage strength(s) refers to a pharmaceutical formulation containing imiquimod in an amount of between about 1.0 percent and about 4.25 percent by weight based on the total weight of the formulation and preferably a pharmaceutical formulation containing imiquimod in an amount of about 2.5% or about 3.75%.
short duration(s) of therapy refers to the daily topical application of an effective amount of imiquimod to a defined treatment area diagnosed with AK lesions for a total on-treatment period of up to about 6 weeks, depending upon which lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention is selected for daily application, and more preferably a total on-treatment period of up to about 4 weeks, wherein an optional defined intervening rest period (no treatment) of up to about 3 weeks, and more preferably a rest period (no treatment) of up to about 2 weeks, may be taken at some point during the treatment period, to treat actinic keratosis.
the “short durations of therapy” may include, by way of example, a total duration of 9 weeks (3 weeks on, 3 weeks off, 3 weeks on), and more preferably 6 weeks (2 weeks on, 2 weeks off, 2 weeks on) from beginning of dosing to the end of dosing, inclusive of the rest period. Nevertheless, it should be understood by those versed in this art that the 2-cycle treatment regimens with a rest period sandwiched in between are preferred.
the “short durations” of therapy may also include an 8 week examination period (no further treatment) following the treatment period.
short duration(s) of therapy of the present invention also refers to a two-cycle treatment regimen that involves either a 4-week or 6-week treatment regimen, wherein each treatment cycle consists of two or three weeks of once-daily applications of an effective amount of imiquimod, for each day of the cycle, separated by a 2-week or 3-week no-treatment period, respectively, such as follows:
the short durations of therapy are used in combination with the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention
the treatment area can be expanded, e.g., to treat greater than about 25 cm 2 , areas as large as approximately 200 cm 2 -250 cm 2 or more (e.g., full face or balding scalp) may now be treated
the number of AK lesions to be treated is higher, e.g., to between about 5 and about 20 AK lesions or more per treatment area.
the expanded treatment area and increased number of AK lesions can be effectively treated with lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations without inducing significant local skin reactions or irritation in the treatment area or treatment limiting adverse events which could result in premature therapy termination or significant voluntary rest periods of several days that are generally associated with higher concentrations of imiquimod therapy. It is also surprisingly found that as much as between about 250 mg and 500 mg or more of a low dosage strength imiquimod formulation may be used per application in accordance with the present invention, especially when the short durations of therapy are used in combination with the low dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention.
the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream approved by the FDA for actinic keratosis concerns a treatment area defined as one contiguous area of approximately 25 cm 2 on the face (e.g., forehead or one cheek) or the scalp, treating no more than about 4 to about 8 AK lesions per treatment area, a dosing schedule of only twice per week for a full 16 weeks to the defined treatment area on the face or scalp (but not both concurrently) and the application of no more than 250 mg of Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream formulation to the treatment area per application.
local skin reaction sum scores and mean local skin reaction erythema scores that are generated during the short durations of therapy with lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations in accordance with the present invention create unique bimodal or camelback patterns which parallel the 2-cycle imiquimod treatments of the present invention, wherein (1) the highest local skin reaction sum score and the mean local skin reaction erythema score generally and characteristically occur or peak during or at the end of the first cycle of treatment, (2) the local skin reaction sum score and the mean local skin reaction erythema score return to normal or baseline or about normal or baseline at the end of the no treatment period between cycles, (3) the local skin reaction sum score and the mean local skin reaction erythema score are again experienced by the subject during or at the end of the second cycle of treatment at generally but not necessarily a reduced score, as compared to the local skin reaction sum score and the mean local skin reaction erythema score during the first cycle of treatment, and (4) the local skin reaction sum score and the mean local skin reaction erythema score generally return to normal or base line shortly
Example 28 When the bimodal or camelback pattern of local skin reaction sum score and mean local skin reaction erythema score are plotted as 2-dimensional graphs, wherein the local skin reaction sum score and the mean local skin reaction erythema score are measured on the vertical axis and the subject visits during the imiquimod 2-cycle therapy are measured on the horizontal axis, the unique bimodal or camelback patterns are observed. See, e.g., FIGS. 18 , 18 A-B, 20 , and 20 A-B.
imiquimod therapy compliance should be significantly improved and the therapeutic results, e.g., complete clearance or partial clearance or reduction of AK lesions, more consistently achieved.
the efficacy achieved by the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations when used in either of the short durations of therapy, e.g., two-week or three-week 2-cycle treatment regimens, of the present invention for treatment of actinic keratosis as to total clearance, partial clearance and a reduction in the number of AK lesions is, statistically significant over placebo. See, e.g., FIG. 51 .
the efficacy achieved for treatment of actinic keratosis as to complete clearance or partial clearance of AK lesions is basically statistically equivalent between the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations two-week or three-week 2-cycle treatment regimens of the present invention when the same lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations are used in accordance with either 2-cycle treatment regimen and compared with one another between the two 2-cycle treatment regimens. See, e.g., FIG. 51 .
the efficacies that are achieved for complete clearance and partial clearance for either lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation, i.e., 2.5% or 3.75%, when they are used in either a two-week or three-week 2-cycle treatment regimen in accordance with the present invention are at about a 95% confidence level and a P value of less than about 0.001 versus placebo. See FIG. 51 .
the efficacy P value that is achieved for partial clearance for a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation versus a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation that is utilized in accordance with a two-week or three-week 2-cycle treatment regimen of the present invention is about 0.047 or about 0.034, respectively. See, e.g., FIG. 51 .
the efficacy P value that is achieved for a percent reduction in the number of AK lesions for a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation versus a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation that is utilized in accordance with a two-week or three-week 2-cycle treatment regimen of the present invention is about 0.048 or about 0.133, respectively.
the 0.133 P value is not statistically significant. See, e.g., FIG. 51 .
the P values that are achieved for (a) complete clearance, (b) partial clearance and (c) a reduction in the number of lesions, for the two-week 2-cycle treatment regimens and the three-week 2-cycle treatment regimens of the present invention are (a) about 0.462 General Linear Model (“GLM”) and about 0.499 (LA), (b) about 0.233 (GLM) and about 0.164 (LA), and (c) about 0.635 (GLM), respectively. See, e.g., FIG. 52 .
both 2-cycle treatment regimens of the present invention provide efficacious dosing regimens with acceptable safety profiles, that are short and more convenient for patient use than the dosing regimen currently approved by the FDA for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, to treat actinic keratosis
the 2 week 2-cycle treatment regimen of the present invention is preferred.
the short durations of therapy and lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention are believed to be optimized to treat actinic keratosis.
the short durations of therapy and lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention are designed to achieve efficacy, stability and release rates profiles that are at least essentially equivalent to and linear with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, respectively, but with an improved acceptable safety profile.
acceptable safety profile it is meant herein to mean that treatment of actinic keratosis with a short duration of therapy and a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation in accordance with the present invention, including the 2-cycle treatment regimens, does not cause treatment limiting side effects or rest periods in an appreciable number of subjects undergoing actinic keratosis therapy to a level that causes premature termination of treatment.
acceptable safety profile also refers to treatment of actinic keratosis with a short duration of therapy and a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention with a lower subject incidence of application site reactions as compared with treatment of actinic keratosis with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
a low dosage strength imiquimod formulation i.e., about 3.75%
treatment regimen in accordance with the present invention to treat actinic keratosis diagnosed in male or female subjects or in subjects with Type I, II or III skin, about 10 lesions or less at baseline, or with lesions on the face or scalp, equivalent or comparable clearance rates, inclusive of complete clearance and partial clearance, are achieved. See, e.g., FIGS. 31 , 33 , 33 A, 34 , 34 A, 35 and 35 A-B.
a low dosage strength imiquimod formulation i.e., about 3.75%
a 2-cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week or a 2-cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week treatment regimen in accordance with the present invention, to treat actinic keratosis diagnosed in subjects who are 65 years of age or older or in subjects who have greater than 10 lesions at baseline
the 2-cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week treatment regimen is more effective. See, e.g., FIGS. 32 , 32 A, 34 and 34 A.
the salient elements of a pharmaceutical formulation according to the present invention are (a) imiquimod and (b) a fatty acid, e.g., isostearic, palmitic, stearic, linoleic, unrefined oleic acid or refined oleic acid, such as Super Refined® oleic acid NF (e.g., a highly purified oleic acid, i.e., an oleic acid which has low polar impurities, such as peroxides, a low peroxide value and is marketed by CRODA; see e.g., www.crodausa.com) and mixtures thereof.
a fatty acid e.g., isostearic, palmitic, stearic, linoleic, unrefined oleic acid or refined oleic acid, such as Super Refined® oleic acid NF (e.g., a highly purified oleic acid
a pharmaceutical formulation of the invention can be in any form known to the art, such as a cream, an ointment, a foam, a gel, a lotion or a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition, each form containing the necessary elements in particular amounts and further containing various additional elements.
a cream of the invention contains an effective amount of imiquimod, such as between about greater than 1 percent and about 4.25 percent by weight of imiquimod, based on the total weight of the cream; about 5 percent to about 30 percent by weight of fatty acid, based on the total weight of the cream; and optional ingredients such as emollients, emulsifiers, thickeners, and/or preservatives.
An ointment of the invention contains an ointment base in addition to imiquimod and fatty acid.
An ointment of the invention contains an effective amount of imiquimod, such as between about greater than 1 percent and about 4.25 percent by weight of imiquimod; about 3 percent to about 45 percent, more preferably about 3 percent to about 30 percent by weight fatty acid; and about 40 percent to about 95 percent by weight ointment base, all weights being based on the total weight of the ointment.
an ointment of the invention can also contain emulsifiers, emollients and thickeners.
a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition of the invention contains imiquimod, fatty acid, and an adhesive.
the adhesives utilized in a pressure sensitive adhesive composition of the invention are preferably substantially chemically inert to imiquimod.
a pressure sensitive adhesive composition of the invention preferably contains an effective amount of imiquimod, such as between about greater than 1 percent and about 4.25 percent by weight of imiquimod; about 10 percent to about 40 percent by weight, more preferably of about 15 percent to about 30 percent by weight, and most preferably about 20 percent to about 30 percent by weight of fatty acid; all weights being based on the total weight of the pressure sensitive adhesive composition.
pressure sensitive adhesive compositions of the invention can also contain one or more skin penetration enhancers.
the total amount of skin penetration enhancer(s) present in a pressure sensitive adhesive composition of the invention is preferably about 3 percent to about 25 percent by weight, and more preferably about 3 percent to about 10 percent by weight based on the total weight of the pressure sensitive adhesive composition.
a pressure-sensitive adhesive coated sheet material of the invention can be made from a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition of the invention in the form of an article such as a tape, a patch, a sheet, or a dressing.
a lower dosage strength formulation of the present invention may be used to topically and/or transdermally administer an effective amount of imiquimod to effectively treat, actinic keratosis with short durations of therapy and with an acceptable safety profile.
lower dosage strength formulations according to the present invention can be applied to any suitable location, for example, topically to dermal, lip and/or mucosal surfaces.
the therapeutic effect of imiquimod may extend only to the superficial layers of the dermal surface or to tissues below the dermal surface.
Lower dosage strength formulations of the present invention that contain about 2.5% imiquimod or about 3.75% imiquimod by weight based on the total weight of the formulation are most preferred. It should also be understood that lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention, which have dose proportionate release rates as to both the release rates of the imiquimod and the total amount of imiquimod released, relative to the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, are also preferred.
an amount of imiquimod present in a formulation of the present invention will be an effective amount when a formulation of the present invention is applied daily in accordance with a short duration of therapy as described herein to a targeted area diagnosed with actinic keratosis and permitted following each individual application to remain in contact with the targeted area for a sufficient time to allow an effective amount of imiquimod to clear such a disease or lesions of the disease, to partially clear the number of lesions of such a disease, to reduce the number of lesions, to prevent the recurrence of such a disease without inducing treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events, including unscheduled rest periods caused by such treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events, in an appreciable number of people undergoing treatment.
an effective amount when treating actinic keratosis in accordance with the present invention, an effective amount will achieve a partial clearance in AK lesions as a targeted endpoint, e.g., at least about 40% and preferably at least about 50% and more preferably at least about 60% and still more preferably at least about 70% and most preferably at least about a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with baseline, or at least about 60% and preferably at least about 70% and even more preferably at least about 80% and most preferably at least about 90% median reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with baseline as a secondary endpoint, or at least about 25% complete clearance and preferably at least about 30% complete clearance and even more preferably at least about 35% complete clearance and most preferably at least about 45% complete clearance of the AK lesions as a primary endpoint.
results from use of the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations in accordance with the short durations of therapy of the present invention demonstrate that lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations dosed once daily for two week or three week 2 cycle treatment periods are effective and well-tolerated treatments for actinic keratosis on the face or balding scalp.
the condensed dosing regimens of the present invention allows for short treatment periods, minimizing exposure to imiquimod and further supporting an improved benefit-risk profile, as compared with FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream 16 week, twice-weekly therapy.
Benefits of treatment with the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations in accordance with the short durations of therapy of the present invention include complete clearance or partial clearance ( ⁇ 66%, preferably ⁇ 75%, even more preferably ⁇ 88% and even more preferably ⁇ 95%) of AK lesions for a majority of the subjects that are treated. See Example 24 and FIGS. 51 and 52 .
complete or partial clearances of AK lesions are achieved as follows: (1) ⁇ 35% (57 of 160 subjects) complete clearance is achieved for a 2-week 2 cycle treatment using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention; (2) ⁇ 30% (49 of 160 subjects) complete clearance is achieved for a 2-week 2 cycle treatment using a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention; (3) ⁇ 34% (55 of 162 subjects) complete clearance is achieved for a 3-week 2 cycle treatment using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention; and (4) ⁇ 25% (41 of 164 subjects) complete clearance is achieved for a 2-week 2 cycle treatment using a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention; whereas (5) ⁇ 59% (95 of 160 subjects) partial clearance is achieved for a 2-week 2 cycle treatment using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention; (6) ⁇ 48% (77 of 160 subjects) partial clearance is achieved for a 2-week 2 cycle treatment using a
LSRs local skin reactions
FIGS. 16A-20 , 20 A-B and 29 and 40 the treatment is well tolerated and there is a marked lower subject incidence of application site reactions, e.g., see FIGS. 14A-E , 28 , 28 A-B, 41 and 41 A, as compared with the longer FDA-approved Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment regimen, i.e., 16 weeks, twice weekly, for AK therapy.
This same larger “treatment area” of the present invention may be defined as an area of greater than 25 cm 2 (e.g., a treatment area greater than a 5 cm ⁇ 5 cm area in any shape) and up to between about 200 cm 2 and 250 cm 2 or more on the face (e.g. forehead or one cheek) or on the balding scalp, including the full face or entire balding scalp.
the number of AK lesions to be treated in the treatment area may range from about 5 to about 20 or more. It should be also appreciated by those versed in this art that the present invention also affords the added benefit of the uncovering and clinical appearance and subsequent complete or partial eradication of incipient (subclinical) AK lesions in the treatment area.
the lower dose strength imiquimod formulations and the short durations of therapy when practiced in accordance with the present invention, will increase subject tolerance and compliance, improve the therapeutic results, e.g., complete clearance or partial clearance or reduction of AK lesions, lower subject incidence of application site reactions (see, e.g., FIGS. 28 , 28 A-B, 41 and 41 A), and reduce voluntary rest periods (see, e.g., FIGS. 39 and 39A ) during therapy, as compared to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream if applied to the same larger treatment area in accordance with the present invention.
the expanded, treatment area of the present invention will be much more weighted to non-lesional/normal skin than previously experienced with the smaller treatment area treated with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
the concentration of imiquimod applied is between about 1 percent to about 4.25 percent by weight based on the total weight of a formulation of the present invention.
an effective amount of imiquimod should be applied once per day for at least up to about 6 weeks, e.g., once per day for a full 2 or 3 weeks (14 or 21 days) to a diagnosed or defined treatment area on, for example, the face or balding scalp (cycle 1), then stopped or discontinued for 2 or 3 weeks (14 or 21 days), a scheduled rest period, followed by application again once per day for a full 2 or 3 weeks (14 or 21 days) to the defined treatment area (cycle 2) to achieve a secondary and more preferably a primary endpoint, e.g., to achieve at least about a 75% reduction in AK lesions as a targeted secondary endpoint and more preferably complete clearance of the AK lesions as a primary endpoint.
an effective amount of imiquimod applied to the treatment area will not only achieve a secondary or primary endpoint, but will also induce a lower subject incidence of application site skin reactions and a fewer number of voluntary rest periods taken by the subjects under going treatment, e.g., no more than about 11% and more preferably no more than about 7% of the subjects will take one or more rest periods during the short two-week 2-cycle treatment period or no more than about 17% and more preferably no more than about 27% of subjects will take one or more rest periods during the short three-week 2-cycle treatment period. See, e.g., FIGS. 21 , 39 and 39 A.
FIG. 1 shows efficacy measures of complete clearance rates by study for studies GW01-0702, GW01-0703, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705 for the 2-cycle 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 (2 weeks) treatment regimen and for the 2-cycle 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 (3 weeks) treatment regimen;
FIG. 1A is a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for a two-week treatment cycle regimen concerning ITT population for studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704.
Complete clearance is defined as the absence of clinically visible or palpable AK lesions in the treatment area.
Partial clearance is defined as at least a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with Baseline.
P values are from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by analysis site, taking 2 treatment groups at a time. The P values marked with ** are statistically significant using Hochberg's modified Bonferroni procedure.
LOCF Last observation that is carried forward. Confidence intervals are calculated using exact binomial statistics. As used in this FIG. 1A , “2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28 and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 2 shows efficacy measures of complete clearance, by time point, for studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 for the 2-cycle 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 (2 weeks) treatment regimen.
“Complete Clearance” refers to the rate of complete clearance of AK lesions
“Cyc 2 Start” refers to the start of the second cycle
“4 Weeks Post” refers to 4 weeks post treatment
“EOS” refers to End of Study
FIG. 2A shows a rate of complete clearance vs. study week an ITT population for study GW01-0702. Points that are marked with ** shows statistically difference from placebo.
Rate of Complete Clearance refers to rate of complete AK lesion clearance
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo
FIG. 2B shows a rate of complete clearance vs. study week of an ITT population for study GW01-0704. Points that are marked with ** shows statistically difference from placebo. Points marked with ## show statistically significant difference between active treatments.
Rate of Complete Clearance refers to rate of complete AK lesion clearance
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo
FIG. 3 shows efficacy measures of complete clearance, by time point, for studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 for the 2-cycle 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 (3 weeks) treatment regimen.
“Complete Clearance” refers to complete clearance of AK lesions
“Cyc 2 Start” refers to the start of the second cycle
“4 Weeks Post” refers to 4 weeks post treatment
“EOS” refers to End of Study. See also FIGS. 2A and 2B ;
FIG. 3A shows a rate of complete clearance vs. study week of an ITT population for study GW01-0703. Points that are marked with ** shows statistically difference from placebo. Points marked with ## show statistically significant difference between active treatments.
Rate of Complete Clearance refers to rate of complete AK lesion clearance
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo
FIG. 3B shows a rate of complete clearance vs. study week of an ITT population for study GW01-0705. Points that are marked with ** shows statistically difference from placebo. Points marked with ## show statistically significant difference between active treatments.
Rate of Complete Clearance refers to rate of complete AK lesion clearance
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo
FIG. 4A shows rates of partial clearance at end of study of a two-week treatment cycle regimen of an ITT population for studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
L refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“H” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28, Placebo, and that the bars marked with ** show statistically significant difference from placebo, whereas the bars marked with ## show statistically significant difference from 2.5%.
the vertical blue lines indicate 95% confidence limits;
FIG. 4B shows a rate of partial clearance at week 14 for an ITT population for study GW01-0702. Partial clearance is defined as at least a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with baseline. The bars marked with ** show statistically significant difference from placebo. Dark black vertical lines represent 95% confidence intervals on the rates.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 4C shows a rate of partial clearance at week 14 for an ITT population for study GW01-0704. Partial clearance is defined as at least a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with baseline.
the bars marked with ** show statistically significant difference from placebo.
the bars marked with ## show statistically difference between active treatments. Dark black vertical lines represent 95% confidence intervals on the rates. In this FIG.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline), “2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28, and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 4D shows a rate of partial clearance at week 17 for an ITT population for study GW01-0703. Partial clearance is defined as at least a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with baseline. The bars marked with ** show statistically significant difference from placebo. Dark black vertical lines represent 95% confidence intervals on the rates.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 4E shows a rate of partial clearance at week 17 for an ITT-population for study GW01-0705. Partial clearance is defined as at least a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with baseline. The bars marked with ** show statistically significant difference from placebo. Dark black vertical lines represent 95% confidence intervals on the rates. In this FIG.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline), “2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28, and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
Start of Cycle 2 refers to the start of the second cycle
4 Weeks Post refers to 4 weeks post treatment
8 Weeks Post refers to 8 weeks post treatment
FIG. 5 shows efficacy measures of partial clearance, by time point, for studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704. See also FIG. 37A .
Partial Clearance refers to partial clearance of AK lesions (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
Cyc 2 Start refers to the start of the second cycle
4 Weeks Post refers to 4 weeks post treatment
EOS refers to End of Study
2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 refers to a two week, 2-cycle treatment, as through out the figures and the specification;
FIG. 5A shows a rate of partial clearance vs. study week for an ITT population for study. GW01-0702. The points marked with ** shows statistically difference from placebo. The points marked with ## shows statistically difference between active treatments.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo;
FIG. 5B shows a rate of partial clearance vs. study week for an ITT population for study GW01-0704.
the points marked with ** shows statistically difference from placebo.
the points marked with ## shows statistically difference between active treatments.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of AK partial lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo;
FIG. 6 shows efficacy measures of partial clearance, by time point, for studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705.
Partial Clearance refers to rate percent of partial clearance of AK lesions (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline), “Cyc 2 Start” refers to the start of the second cycle, “4 Weeks Post” refers to 4 weeks post treatment, and “EOS” refers to End of Study. See also FIG. 37A ;
FIG. 6A shows a rate of partial clearance vs. study week for an ITT population for study GW01-0703.
the points marked with ** shows statistically significant difference from placebo.
the points marked with ## shows statistically significant difference between active treatments.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline);
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28,
B % refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28, and
C refers to placebo;
FIG. 6B shows a rate of partial clearance vs. study week for an ITT population for study GW01-0705.
the points marked with ** shows statistically significant difference from placebo.
the points marked with ## shows statistically significant difference between active treatments.
Rate of Partial Clearance refers to rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo;
FIG. 7 shows efficacy measures of mean % change from baseline count, by study, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705. See also FIG. 9A ;
FIG. 8 shows efficacy measures of mean % change from baseline count, by time point, for studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704.
% Count Reduction refers to the percent reduction in AK count from Baseline
Cyc 2 Start refers to the start of the second cycle
4 Weeks Post refers to 4 weeks post treatment
EOS refers to End of Study. See also FIG. 9A ;
FIG. 8A shows a median percent change from baseline AK lesion count vs. study week for an ITT population for study GW01-0702.
the points marked with ** shows statistically significant difference from placebo.
the points marked with ## shows statistically significant difference between active treatments.
Median Percent Change refers to median percent change in AK lesion count from Baseline
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo
FIG. 8B shows a median percent change from baseline AK lesion count vs. study week for an ITT population for study GW01-0704.
the points marked with ** shows statistically significant difference from placebo.
the points marked with ## shows statistically significant difference between active treatments.
Median Percent Change refers to median percent change in AK lesion count from Baseline
A refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
B % refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
C refers to placebo
FIG. 9 shows efficacy measures of mean % change from baseline count, by time point, for studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705.
“Mean % Change from Baseline Count” refers to the mean percent reduction in AK count
“Cyc 2 Start” refers to the start of the second cycle
“4 Weeks Post” refers to 4 weeks post treatment
“EOS” refers to End of Study. See also FIGS. 8A and 8B ;
FIG. 9A shows a summary of AK lesion Count for an ITT population regarding GW01-0703.
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values are from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, that is stratified by analysis site, taking two treatment groups at a time. The P values marked with ** are statistically significant using Hochberg's modified Bonferroni procedure. Lesion counts which are recorded as ‘indeterminate’ are excluded from analysis;
FIG. 9B shows a summary of AK lesion Count for an ITT population regarding GW01-0705.
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28 and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values are from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, that is stratified by analysis site, taking two treatment groups at a time. The P values marked with ** are statistically significant using Hochberg's modified Bonferroni procedure. Lesion counts which are recorded as ‘indeterminate’ are excluded from analysis;
FIG. 10 shows efficacy measures of clearance rates, by subject sex, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
“Rate of Clearance” refers to the rate of complete AK lesion clearance
FIG. 10A shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for male and female subpopulations for combined two-week treatment cycle studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 for an ITT population using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values for percent change in AK lesion count are from the analysis of variance (GLM) including effects of dose, subpopulation, and interaction;
FIG. 10B shows a summary of primary efficacy variable, rate of complete clearance at week 17 (end of study) subgroup analysis n/N (%) for study GW01-0703 using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 10C shows a summary of primary efficacy variable, rate of complete clearance at, week 17 (end of study) subgroup analysis n/N (%) for study GW01-0705 using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 11 shows efficacy measures of clearance rates, by subject treatment area, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
“Rate of Clearance” refers to the rate of complete AK lesion clearance
FIG. 12 shows efficacy measures of median percent change from baseline between 0 and ⁇ 100 for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
Percent Change refers to the median percent by which there is a change in the number of AK lesions using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28 in either a two, 2-cycle or a three week, 2-cycle treatment;
Median Percent Change refers to the median percent change in number of AK lesions from baseline
Start of Cycle 2 refers to the start of the second cycle
4 Weeks Post refers to 4 weeks post treatment
8 Weeks Post refers to 8 weeks post treatment
P refers to placebo
FIG. 13 shows efficacy measures of mean percent change from baseline between 0 and ⁇ 80 for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705 using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
Percent Change refers to the mean percent change in number of AK lesions from baseline
Cyc 2 Start refers to the start of the second cycle
4 Weeks Post refers to 4 weeks post treatment
EOS refers to End of Study (8 weeks post treatment);
FIGS. 13A-G show a summary of percent change from baseline in number of AK lesions by visit for combined studies for an ITT population using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values are from the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, that is stratified by analysis site, taking two treatment groups at a time.
the P values marked with ** are statistically significant using Hochberg's modified Bonferroni procedure;
FIGS. 14A-E show a summary of treatment-emergent adverse events n (%) of subjects in descending order of incidence in a 3.75% or 2.5% two-week or three-week treatment cycle group where the adverse events are considered treatment related by the investigator for combined studies for an ITT population using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the counts reflect number of subjects in each treatment group reporting one or more adverse events that map to the MedDRA system organ class. A subject may be counted only once in each row of the table.
Treatment-related includes Probably Related and Related.
a treatment-emergent AE is an AE with onset date on or after day 1 of treatment;
FIG. 15 shows safety measures of incidence of treatment-related adverse events for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
H refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
L refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
V refers to vehicle. See also FIGS. 14A-14E ;
FIGS. 16A-C show a summary of local skin reactions (LSR) for most severe reaction grade during study overall for combined studies for an ITT population using a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation in 2 week or 3 week two-cycle therapies in accordance with the present invention. Because a subject in the two-week 3.75% treatment group, a subject in the three-week 2.5% treatment, a subject in the 3.75% treatment group and two subjects in the three-week placebo group do not have post-baseline visits, they are excluded from the analysis;
FIG. 17 shows safety measures of LSR AUC sum score for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
H refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
L refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 17A shows a summary of local skin reactions (LSR) area under the curve of sum of LSR scores (days) for combined studies for an ITT population using either a 2.5% or a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values are from the analysis of variance (GLM) including effects of dose, regimen, and analysis center within regimen.
the time period for the AUC extends to eight weeks after the end of treatment for both the two-week treatment cycle regimen (week 14) and the three-week treatment cycle regimen (week 17). Only subjects who receive treatment in both treatment cycles are included in this analysis;
FIG. 18 shows safety measures of LSR sum score, by time point, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705;
FIG. 18A shows a mean LSR sum score vs. study time point for two-week treatment cycle regimens for an ITT population using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
Bsl baseline
EoC1 end of cycle 1
SoC2 start of cycle 2
EoC2 end of cycle 2
L2 2.5% two-week cycle regimen
H2 3.75% two-week treatment cycle regimen
P2 placebo two-week treatment cycle regimen
FIG. 18B shows a mean LSR sum score vs. study time point for three-week treatment cycle regimens for an ITT population using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
Bsl baseline
EoC1 end of cycle 1
SoC2 start of cycle 2
EoC2 end of cycle 2
L3 2.5% three-week cycle regimen
H3 3.75% three-week treatment cycle regimen
P32 placebo three-week treatment cycle regimen
FIG. 19 shows safety measures of incidence of severe LSR erythema for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
H refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation
L refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
V refers to vehicle. See also FIGS. 16A-C ;
FIG. 20 shows mean LSR erythema score, by time point, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705;
FIG. 20A shows LSR mean score vs. study week for erythema for an ITT population for study GW01-0702.
A refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation
B refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28 and C refers to Placebo;
FIG. 20B shows a LSR mean score vs. study week for erythema for an ITT population for study GW01-0704.
A refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation
B refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28 and C refers to Placebo;
FIG. 21 shows safety measures of incidence of rest periods for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705. See also FIG. 30 ;
FIG. 22 shows safety measures of rate of study discontinuation, for safety reasons, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
H refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
L refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
V refers to vehicle;
FIG. 23 shows a summary of select safety parameters associated with applications of the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod cream formulations of Example 23 that are used in 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week, 2-cycle regimens and used in 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week 2-cycle regimens.
the results demonstrate the overall acceptable safety profile of both the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 according to either of the 2 or 3 week cycle regimens.
the safety results suggest a preferable safety profile when either the 2.5% or the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is used in a 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week, 2-cycle regimen versus a 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week, 2-cycle regimen.
FIG. 24 shows improvement in the Investigator Global integrated photodamage score from baseline for a two week 2-cycle treatment period (2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks).
Study 1 refers to the GW01-0702 study and Study 2 refers to the GW01-0704 study herein through-out.
Pbo refers to placebo and “Imiq” refers to imiquimod;
FIG. 25 shows meta-analysis efficacy of pooled clearance rates for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705;
FIG. 25A shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for combined studies, analysis within regimen for an ITT population using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
Complete clearance is defined as the absence of clinically visible or palpable AK lesions in the treatment area.
Partial clearance is defined as at least a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area compared with Baseline.
P values are from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by analysis site, within regimen, taking 2 treatment groups at a time. The P values marked with ** are statistically significant using Hochberg's modified Bonferroni procedure.
LOCF Last observation that is carried forward. Confidence intervals are calculated using exact binomial statistics;
FIG. 26 shows an efficacy comparison of complete clearance rates, by study, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
“2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2” refers to a two week, 2-cycle therapy and “3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3” refers to a three week, 2-cycle therapy. See also FIG. 25A ;
FIG. 27 shows efficacy comparison of partial clearance rates, by study, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705.
“2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2” refers to a two week, 2-cycle therapy and “3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3” refers to a three week, 2-cycle therapy. See also FIG. 25A ;
FIG. 28 shows safety comparison of incidence of adverse events for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705, as compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
“2 weeks” refers to a two week
2-cycle therapy refers to a three week
2-cycle therapy refers to placebo
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIGS. 28A-B show a number (%) of subjects in phase 3 studies with treatment-emergent adverse events with incidence greater than 1% in the 3.75% imiquimod two-week treatment cycle group for an ITT population. Counts reflect number of subjects in each treatment group reporting one or more adverse events that map to the MedDRA system organ class. A subject may be counted once only in each row of the table. A treatment-emergent AE is an AE with onset date on or after day 1 of treatment. As used in these FIGS. 28A-B , “2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28 and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 29 shows a comparison of the incidence of severe erythema [(a local skin reaction (LSR)] for studies GW01-0703, 6WO1-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705, as compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
LSR local skin reaction
H refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
L refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
V refers to vehicle
2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 refers to a two week, 2-cycle treatment regimen and “3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3” refers to a three week, 2-cycle treatment regimen. See also FIG. 16A ;
FIG. 30 shows safety measures of incidence of rest periods for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-6705, as compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
H refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
L refers' to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28
V refers to vehicle
2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 refers to a two week, 2-cycle treatment regimen
3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 refers to a three week, 2-cycle treatment regimen. See also FIG. 21 ;
FIG. 31 shows efficacy measures of clearance rates, by subject sex, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705. See also FIGS. 10A-10C ;
FIG. 32 shows efficacy measures of clearance rates, by subject age, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705. See also FIGS. 10B-10C ;
FIG. 32A shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for age subpopulations over and under 65 for combined two-week treatment cycle studies (GW01-0702 and GW01-0704) for an ITT population for active treatment only using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values for percent change in AK lesion count are from the analysis of variance (GLM) including effects of dose, subpopulation, and interaction.
GLM analysis of variance
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
FIG. 33 shows efficacy measures of clearance rates; by subject skin type, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705. See also FIGS. 10B-10C ;
FIG. 33A shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for Fitzpatrick skin type subpopulations for combined two-week treatment cycle studies (GW01-0702 and GW01-0704) for an ITT population for active treatment only using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values for percent change in AK lesion count are from the analysis of variance (GLM) including effects of dose, subpopulation, and interaction.
GLM analysis of variance
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“I”, “II”, “III”, “IV” “V” or “VI” refer to Fitzpatrick skin type
FIG. 34 shows efficacy measures of clearance rates, by subject Baseline count, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705. See also FIGS. 10B-10C ;
FIG. 34A shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for baseline lesion count subpopulations for combined two-week treatment cycle studies (GW01-0702 and GW01-0704) for an ITT population for active treatment only using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values for percent change in AK lesion count are from the analysis of variance (GLM) including effects of dose, subpopulation, and interaction.
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28 and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 35 shows efficacy measures of clearance rates, by subject treatment area, for studies GW01-0703, GW01-0702, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705. See also FIGS. 10B-10C ;
FIG. 35A shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for location of treatment area (face or balding scalp) subpopulations for combined two-week treatment cycle studies (GW01-0702 and GW01-0704) for an ITT population for active treatment only using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values for percent change in AK lesion count are from the analysis of variance (GLM) including effects of dose, subpopulation, and interaction.
GLM analysis of variance
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“Face” and “Balding Scalp” refer to the treatment area
FIG. 35B shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints for location of treatment area (face or balding scalp) subpopulations for combined two-week treatment cycle studies (GW01-0702 and GW01-0704) for an ITT population using a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28.
the P values for percent change in AK lesion count are from the analysis of variance (GLM) including effects of dose, subpopulation, and interaction.
GLM analysis of variance
FIG. 36 shows percent complete clearance compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
study 1 refers to GW01-0702 study and study 2 refers to GW01-0704 study.
Pbo refers to placebo
Imiq refers to imiquimod
Aldara refers to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream. See also FIG. 1 ;
FIG. 36A shows percent complete clearance compared with placebo.
study 1 refers to GW01-0702 study
study 2 refers to GW01-0704 study
study 3 refers to GW01-0703 study
study 4 refers to GW01-0705 study.
“Pbo” refers to placebo and “Imiq” refers to imiquimod;
FIG. 37 shows percent partial clearance compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
study 1 refers to GW01-0702 study and study 2 refers to GW01-0704 study.
Pbo refers to placebo
2.5% Imiq refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
3.75% Imiq refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
Aldara refers to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream. See also FIG. 4A ;
FIG. 37A shows a partial clearance compared with placebo.
study 1 refers to GW01-0702 study
study 2 refers to GW01-0704 study
study 3 refers to GW01-0703 study
study 4 refers to GW01-0705 study.
“Pbo” refers to placebo
“2.5% Imiq” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75% Imiq” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 38 shows AK median % reduction compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
study 1 refers to GW01-0702 study and study 2 refers to GW01-0704 study.
Pbo refers to placebo
2.5% Imiq refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
3.75% Imiq refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
Aldara refers to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream
FIG. 38A shows AK median % reduction compared with placebo.
study 1 refers to GW01-0702 study
study 2 refers to GW01-0704 study
study 3 refers to GW01-0703 study
study 4 refers to GW01-0705 study.
“Pbo” refers to placebo
“2.5% Imiq” refers to a 2:5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75% Imiq” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
Aldara refers to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream
FIG. 39 shows rest periods for the 2-cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 (2 week) treatment regimen, as compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
“Pbo” refers to placebo
“2.5% Imiq” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75% Imiq” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“Aldara” refers to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream
FIG. 39A shows selected safety parameters for combined two-week, two-cycle studies (GW01-0702 and GW01-0704) or three-week, two-cycle studies (GW01-0703 and GW01-0705).
“2.5% Imiq” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75% Imiq” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
Tx refers to treatment
FIG. 40 shows local skin reactions (“LSRs”); % of subjects with severe LSRs for the 2-cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 (2 week) treatment regimen, as compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
LSRs local skin reactions
Pbo refers to placebo
2.5% Imiq refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
3.75% Imiq refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
Aldara refers to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream. See also FIG. 16A-C ;
FIG. 41 shows a comparison regarding the incidence of selected common adverse events for the 2-cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 (2 week) treatment regimen, as compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
“Pbo” refers to placebo
“2.5% Imiq” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75% Imiq” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
Aldara refers to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream
NS refers to not specified
FIG. 41A shows incidence of most common (greater than 1%) treatment-related adverse events for combined two-week studies (GW01-0702 and GW01-0704) or three-week studies (GW01-0703 and GW01-0705);
FIG. 42 shows benefit/risk for the 2-cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 (2 week) treatment regimen, as compared with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
“Severe ery” refers to severe erythema
“App site rxns” refers to application site reactions
“Rest Periods” refers to the percent of patients who took rest periods during the study in addition to the two week rest period (no treatment period) sandwiched between the 2-cycles of two week treatments
“Complete Clear” refers to the rate of complete AK lesion clearance
Partial Clear refers to the rate of partial AK lesion clearance (defined as at least about 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline)
“% Reduction” refers to median percent reduction in AK lesions
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
“3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28
FIG. 43 shows a clinical case study of a 39 year old white male in which a 2.5% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, to treat actinic keratosis;
IMIQ 2.5% imiquimod
FIG. 44 shows a clinical case study of a 74 year old white male in which a 2.5% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, to treat actinic keratosis;
IMIQ 2.5% imiquimod
FIG. 45 shows a clinical case study of a 66 year old white female in which a 3.75% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, to treat actinic keratosis;
IMIQ imiquimod
FIG. 46 shows a clinical case study of a 73 year old white male in which a 3.75% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, to treat actinic keratosis;
IMIQ imiquimod
FIG. 47 shows a clinical case study of a 70 year old white male in which a 2.5% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks to treat actinic keratosis;
IMIQ 2.5% imiquimod
FIG. 48 shows a clinical case study of a 65 year old white female in which a 2.5% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks to treat actinic keratosis;
IMIQ 2.5% imiquimod
FIG. 49 shows a clinical case study of a 79 year old white male in which a 3.75% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks to treat actinic keratosis;
IMIQ imiquimod
FIG. 50 shows a clinical case study of a 78 year old white male in which a 3.75% imiquimod (IMIQ) formulation is used in a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks to treat actinic keratosis; and
FIG. 51 shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints in which (a) the results of the GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 (2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2) studies for each imiquimod formulation strength, i.e., about 2.5% or about 3.75% w/w, that are used in the studies are combined, respectively, (b) the results of the GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 (3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3) studies for each imiquimod formulation strength, i.e., about 2.5% or about 3.75% w/w, that are used in the studies are combined, respectively, and (c) the analysis is within regimen ITT populations. Complete clearance is defined as the absence of clinically visible or palpable AK lesions in the treatment area.
Partial clearance is defined as at least about a 75% reduction in the number of AK lesions in the treatment area as compared with Baseline.
P values are from Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test, are stratified by analysis site, within regimen, taking 2 treatment groups at a time. The P values that are marked with ** are statistically significant using Hochberg modified Bonferroni procedure.
LOCF last observation carried forward. Confidence intervals are calculated using exact binomial statistics. In this FIG. 51 , “2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28 and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28. See also FIG. 25A ;
FIG. 52 shows a summary of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints from combined studies and an analysis across regimens for the ITT Population.
Column (1) P values for all parameters are from the analysis of variance based on a General Linear Model (“GLM”) including effects of dose, regimen, and analysis site within regimen.
Column (2) P values are based on a logistic analysis of the effects of dose, regimen, and analysis site.
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28 and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 53 shows a summary of an Investigators Global Integrated Photodamage (“IGIP”) score for the (a) GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 studies, (b) GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 studies and (c) combined studies, i.e., GW01-0702, GW01-0703, GW01-0704 and GW01-0705 studies, for a two-week 2-cycle treatment period (2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks) and a three-week 2-cycle treatment period (3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks) for the Intent-To-Treat (“ITT”) population.
“2.5%” refers to a 2.5% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28 and “3.75%” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28;
FIG. 54 shows a summary of serum pharmacokinetic parameters at day 21 for a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Examples 23-28, PK population.
the serum analyte is imiquimod.
the calculation of accumulation ratio (RAUC, RCmax) and effective half-life for accumulation (T1 ⁇ 2 and T1 ⁇ 2 eff), is restricted to subjects who take all seven doses during the week of treatment and who take at least 80% of the prescribed doses during the prior two weeks.
the PK parameters are not calculated for subject 001-619 and subject 001-608. There is no concentration data for subject 001-619, and subject 001-608 did not take all required doses during the 21 days of treatment.
“Imiquimod” refers to a 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Examples 23-28. See also Example 25;
FIG. 55 shows a calibrated graticule scale at ⁇ 400 magnification; where the 10 ⁇ m, 50 ⁇ m and 100 ⁇ m divisions are indicated;
FIG. 56 shows a schematic representation of a Franz cell
FIG. 57 shows a summary of microscope pictures of eight 2.5% w/w imiquimod formulations, i.e., formulations 113, 246, 247, 248, 249, 251, 252 and 253 (the formulations continued into the stability program are included for the 1 kg batches in TABLE 18 and FIG. 64 );
FIG. 60 shows a total amount of imiguimod that is recovered following mass balance for each formulation (See also Tables 35-40 for statistical analysts) (mean ⁇ sd, refer to Table 34 for n numbers of each sample);
FIG. 61 shows a total amount of imiquimod recovered for each formulation in the receiver fluid, epidermis and dermis combined (mean ⁇ sd, refer to Table 34 for n numbers of each sample);
FIG. 62 shows a total amount of imiquimod recovered for the averages of each imiquimod concentration from each of the skin matrices.
the present invention relates to a pharmaceutical composition
a pharmaceutical composition comprising imiquimod and a pharmaceutically acceptable vehicle for imiquimod, which vehicle comprises a fatty acid.
vehicle comprises a fatty acid.
the phrase “substantially less-irritating” designates formulations that do not cause unacceptable skin irritation in conventional repeat skin irritation tests in albino rabbits such as that described in Draize et al., “Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Food, Drugs and Cosmetics”, prepared by the Division of Pharmacology of the Food and Drug Administration, published originally in 1959 by the Association of Food and Drug Officials of the United States, Topeka, Kans. (2nd printing 1965), incorporated herein by reference.
bioequivalence or bioequivalent refers to lower dosage strength formulations in which they are pharmaceutically equivalent and their bioavailibilities (rate and extent of absorption) after administration in the same molar dosage or amount are similar to such a degree that their therapeutic effects, as to safety and efficacy, are essentially the same.
bioequivalence or bioequivalent means the absence of a significant difference in the rate and extent to which imiquimod becomes available from such formulations at the site of imiquimod action when administered at the same molar dose under similar conditions, e.g., the rate at which imiquimod can leave such a formulation and the rate at which imiquimod can either cross the stratum corneum and/or become available at the site of action to treat actinic keratosis.
there is a high degree of similarity in the bioavailabilities of two imiquimod pharmaceutical products (of the same galenic form) from the same molar dose that are unlikely to produce clinically relevant differences in therapeutic effects, or adverse reactions, or both.
bioequivalence as well as “pharmaceutical equivalence” and “therapeutic equivalence” are also used herein as defined and/or used by (a) the FDA, (b) the Code of Federal Regulations (“C.F.R.”), Title 21, and/or (c) Health Canada.
bioavailability or bioavailable means generally the rate and extent of absorption of imiquimod into the systemic circulation and, more specifically, the rate or measurements intended to reflect the rate and extent to which imiquimod becomes available at the site of action or is absorbed from a drug product and becomes available at the site of action.
pharmaceutical equivalence or pharmaceutically equivalent refers to lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations of the present invention that contain the same amount of imiquimod, in the same dosage forms, but not necessarily containing the same inactive ingredients, for the same route of administration and meeting the same or comparable compendial or other applicable standards of identity, strength, quality, and purity, including potency and, where applicable, content uniformity and/or stability.
therapeutic equivalence or therapeutically equivalent it is meant herein to mean those lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations which (a) will produce the same clinical effect and safety profile when practicing the short durations of therapy to treat actinic keratosis in accordance with the present invention and (b) are pharmaceutical equivalents, e.g., they contain imiquimod in the same dosage form, they have the same route of administration; and they have the same imiquimod strength.
therapeutic equivalence means that a chemical equivalent of an imiquimod lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention (i.e., containing the same amount of imiquimod in the same dosage form) when administered to the same individuals in the same dosage regimen will provide essentially the same efficacy and toxicity.
T max it is meant herein to mean the time when the maximum imiquimod serum concentration is reached at steady state following topical application of a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention, i.e., when the rate of imiquimod absorption equals the rate of imiquimod elimination. In other words, the time that C max is observed for imiquimod.
C max it is meant herein to refer to the maximum imiquimod serum concentration that is reached at steady state following topical application of a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention, i.e., when the rate of imiquimod absorption equals the rate of imiquimod elimination. In other words, it is the maximum serum concentration; the highest serum concentration observed during the imiquimod dosing or sampling interval.
C max it is meant herein to refer to the minimum measurable imiquimod serum concentration; e.g., imiquimod serum concentration that is observed immediately prior to dosing on Days 7, 14, 21 and 22 (24 hours post-dose).
T 1/2 it is meant herein to mean the time required for half of the quantity of maximum imiquimod serum concentration to be eliminated once steady state is achieved following topical application of a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention.
the apparent elimination half-life for imiquimod that is calculated as about 0.693/ ⁇ z in accordance with Example 24.
AUC 0-24 it is meant herein to mean the area under the serum imiquimod concentration versus a 24 hour time curve following topical application of a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention, i.e., a measure of imiquimod exposure over a 24 hour period.
the area under the imiquimod serum concentration versus time curve from 0 to 24 hours, that is calculated using the linear trapezoid rule or extrapolated to 24 hours in cases where reportable values are not obtainable up to that time point.
AUC 0-t it is meant herein to mean the area under the imiquimod serum concentration versus time curve, from 0 to the time of the last non-zero concentration on Day 1; that is calculated using the linear trapezoid rule.
R AUC it is meant herein to mean the accumulation ratio; that are calculated as the AUC 0-24 value during multiple-imiquimod dose administration divided by the AUC 0-24 value following the first dose (i.e., Day 21/Day 1); or the accumulation ratios that are calculated for an imiquimod metabolite only if sufficient non-zero time points are available to reasonably estimate AUC 0-24 .
R Cmax it is meant herein to mean the accumulation ratio; calculated as the C max value during multiple-dose administration divided by the C max value following the first dose (i.e., Day 21/Day 1)
⁇ z EFF it is meant herein to mean the effective elimination rate constant, calculated as ⁇ ln(1 ⁇ 1/R AUC )/tau.
T 1/2 EFF it is meant herein to mean the effective half-life for accumulation; calculated as 0.693/ ⁇ z EFF .
⁇ z it is meant to refer to an elimination rate constant, i.e., the rate at which imiquimod disappears from the site of measurement once steady state is achieved following topical application of a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention.
the apparent elimination rate constant that is calculated using linear regression on the terminal portion of the ln concentration versus time profile.
geometric mean it refers a statistical average of a set of transformed numbers often used to represent a central tendency in highly variable data. It is calculated from data transformed using powers or logarithms and then transformed back to original scale after averaging.
geometric mean ratio it refers to a ratio of two geometric means, where the “geometric LS mean test” is the numerator of the geometric mean ratio, and the “geometric LS mean reference” is the denominator of the geometric mean ratio.
RH relative humidity
centipoise centipoise
ITT intent-to-treat population
EOS End of Study
V vehicle
Studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 are duplicative studies that investigate 2-week treatment cycles, wherein the 2-week treatment cycles are separated by a two week rest period (no treatment) (2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2), and studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 are duplicative studies that investigate 3-Week treatment cycles, wherein the 3-week treatment cycles are separated by a three week rest period (no treatment) (3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3). See flow diagrams depicted in Table 64 herein below.
L2 refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation that is described in Examples 23-28 and the figures and that is used in connection with studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704.
L3 refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation that is described in Examples 23-28 and the figures and that is used in connection with studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704.
H2 it refers to a 2.5% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation that is described in Examples 23-28 and the figures and that is used in connection with studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705.
H3 it refers to a 3.75% lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation that is described in Examples 23-28 and the figures and that is used in connection with studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705.
2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 refers to a two-week, 2-cycle AK treatment regimen, wherein (1) during the first 2 weeks (the first cycle of treatment), a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention is applied once daily each day to an AK treatment area, (2) during the second 2 weeks, there is a rest period in which no treatment occurs, and (3) during the third 2 weeks (the second cycle of treatment), the same formulation is again applied once daily each day to the same AK treatment area, In other words, during the first 2 weeks, treatment is on, during the second 2 weeks, treatment is off, and during the third 2 weeks, treatment is on again,
3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 refers to a three-week, 2-cycle AK treatment regimen, wherein (1) during the first 3 weeks (the first cycle of treatment), a lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention is applied once daily each day to an AK treatment area, (2) during the second 3 weeks, there is a rest period in which no treatment occurs, and (3) during the third 3 weeks (the second cycle of treatment), the same formulation is again applied once daily each day to the same AK treatment area, In other words, during the first 3 weeks, treatment is on, during the second 3 weeks, treatment is off, and during the third 3 weeks, treatment is on again,
the present invention provides pharmaceutical formulations such as creams, ointments, foams, gels, lotions and adhesive coatings that contain imiquimod and a fatty acid such as isostearic, linoleic, unrefined oleic acid, refined oleic acid, such as Super Refined® oleic acid NF (e.g., a highly purified oleic acid, i.e., an oleic acid which has low polar impurities, such as peroxides, a low peroxide value and is marketed by CRODA; see e.g., www.crodausa.com) and mixtures thereof.
the formulations of the invention provide desirable skin penetrability of the imiquimod.
the compound imiquimod is a known antiviral agent that is also known to induce interferon biosynthesis. It can be prepared using the method disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,689,338, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
the compound can be used to treat actinic keratosis.
the amount of imiquimod present in a formulation of the present invention will be an effective amount to treat actinic keratosis to achieve total AK lesion clearance or partial AK lesion reduction or clearance, to prevent the recurrence of such a disease and/or to promote immunity against such a disease with an acceptable safety profile.
An example of an effective amount of imiquimod in a formulation of the present invention is between about 1.0 percent and about 4.25 percent by weight based on the total weight of a formulation, more preferably between about 1.5%, 1.75%, 2.0%, 2.25%, 2.5%, 2.75%, 3.0%, 3.25%, 3.5%, 3.75%, 4.0% and 4.25%, even more preferably between about 2.0%, 2.25%, 2.5%, 2.75%, 3.0%, 3.25%, 3.5%, 3.75% and 4.0%, and still even more preferably between about 2.5%, 2.75%, 3.0%, 3.25%, 3.5% and 3.75%.
Imiquimod formulations of the present invention that contain about 2.5% imiquimod or about 3.75% imiquimod by weight based on the total weight of the formulation are most preferred.
a shortened period or duration will be for reduced periods of time effective to treat actinic keratosis as discussed herein above, e.g., up to six weeks, again depending upon the lower dosage strength imiquimod formulation of the present invention that is selected for daily application, and preferably up to four weeks.
short periods of treatment with lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations for treating actinic keratosis include:
a fatty acid such as isostearic acid, palmitic acid, stearic acid, linoleic acid, refined Oleic acid, such as Super Refined® oleic acid NF (e.g., a highly purified oleic acid, i.e., an oleic acid which has low polar impurities, such as peroxides, a low peroxide value and is marketed by CRODA; see e.g., www.crodausa.com), an unrefined oleic acid blended with effective amounts of antioxidants or mixtures thereof are incorporated into formulations of the present invention.
Super Refined® oleic acid NF e.g., a highly purified oleic acid, i.e., an oleic acid which has low polar impurities, such as peroxides, a low peroxide value and is marketed by CRODA; see e.g., www.crodausa.com
the total amount of fatty acid present in a formulation is preferably between about 3 percent and about 45 percent by weight based on the total weight of a formulation. It should be understood that when oleic acid is selected as a fatty acid, that stability may present issue. Thus, stabilizers, such as anti-oxidants and the like, may be required to preserve pharmaceutical elegance and stability over the life of the oleic acid formulation.
a pharmaceutical formulation of the invention can be in a form such as a cream, an ointment, a foam, a gel, a lotion, a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition, or other forms known to those skilled in the art, each particular form containing imiquiniod and fatty acid in particular amounts, and optionally containing various additional elements.
the preferred amounts of drug and fatty acid, and the amounts and types of optional elements used in formulations of the invention are discussed below with particular reference to creams, ointments and adhesive compositions.
a cream according to the invention contains 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine and fatty acid.
the amount of 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine present in a cream is preferably about 0.5 percent to about 9 percent by weight, and more preferably about 1 percent to about 5 percent by weight, based on the total weight of the cream.
the total amount of fatty acid present in a cream of the invention is preferably about 3 percent to about 45 percent by weight, and more preferably about 5 percent to about 25 percent by weight, based on the total weight of the cream.
a cream of the present invention can contain emollients, emulsifiers, thickeners, and/or preservatives.
Emollients such as long chain alcohols, e.g., cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol and cetearyl alcohol; hydrocarbons such as petrolatum and light mineral oil; or acetylated lanolin can be included in a cream of the invention.
a cream can contain one or more of these emollients.
the total amount of emollient in a cream of the invention is preferably about 5 percent to about 30 percent, and more preferably about 5 percent to about 10 percent by weight based on the total weight of the cream.
Emulsifiers such as nonionic surface active agents, e.g., polysorbate 60 (available from ICI Americas), sorbitan monostearate, polyglyceryl-4 oleate, and polyoxyethylene(4)lauryl ether or trivalent cationic a cream of the invention.
a cream can contain one or more emulsifiers. Generally the total amount of emulsifier is preferably about 2 percent to about 14 percent, and more preferably about 2 percent to about 6 percent by weight based on the total weight of the cream.
thickeners such as Xanthum gum, Guar gum, Veegum gumTMK (available from R. T. Vanderbilt Company, Inc.), and long chain alcohols (i.e. cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol or cetearyl alcohol) can be used.
a cream can contain one or more thickeners. The total amount of thickener present is preferably about 3 percent to about 12 percent by weight based on the total weight of the cream.
Preservatives such as methylparaben, propylparaben and benzyl alcohol can be present in a cream of the invention.
the appropriate amount of such preservative(s) is known to those skilled in the art.
an additional solubilizing agent such as benzyl alcohol, lactic acid, acetic acid, stearic acid, salicylic acid, any alpha-hydroxy acid such as glycolic acid, or hydrochloric acid can be included in a cream of the invention.
the amount present is preferably about 1 percent to about 12 percent by weight based on the total weight of the cream.
a cream of the invention can contain a humectant such as glycerin, skin penetration enhancers such as butyl stearate, and additional solubilizing agents.
a cream consists of an oil phase and a water phase mixed together to form an emulsion.
the amount of water present in a cream of the invention is about 45 percent to about 85 percent by weight based on the total weight of the cream.
the oil phase of a cream of the invention can be prepared by first combining the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine and the fatty acid (if the cream contains benzyl alcohol it can also be added at this point) and heating with occasional stirring to a temperature of about 50° C. to 85° C.
the water phase can be prepared by combining all other ingredients and heating with stirring until dissolution appears to be complete.
the creams of the invention are generally prepared by adding the water phase to the oil phase with both phases at a temperature of about 65° C. to 75° C.
the resulting emulsion is mixed with a suitable mixer, apparatus to give the desired cream.
An ointment of the invention contains an ointment base in addition to 1-isobutyl-1H-itnidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine and fatty acid.
the amount of 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine present in an ointment of the invention is preferably about 0.5 percent to about 9 percent, and more preferably about 0.5 percent to about 5 percent by weight based on the total weight of the ointment.
the total amount of fatty acid present in an ointment of the invention is preferably about 3 percent to about 45 percent, and more preferably about 3 percent to about 25 percent based on the total weight of the ointment.
a pharmaceutically acceptable ointment base such as petrolatum or polyethylene glycol 400 (available from Union Carbide) in combination with polyethylene glycol 3350 (available from Union Carbide) can be used.
the amount of ointment base present in an ointment of the invention is preferably about 60 percent to about 95 percent by weight based on the total weight of ointment.
an ointment of the invention can also contain emollients, emulsifiers and thickeners.
emollients, emulsifiers, and thickeners and the preferred amounts thereof described above in connection with creams are also generally suitable for use in an ointment of the invention.
An ointment according to the invention can be prepared by combining 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine with fatty acid and heating with occasional stirring to a temperature of about 65° C.
the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine appears to be completely dissolved, the remaining ingredients are added and heated to about 65.° C. The resulting mixture is mixed with a suitable mixer while being allowed to cool to room temperature.
a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition of the invention contains 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine, fatty acid, and a pressure sensitive adhesive polymer.
the amount of 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine present in a pressure sensitive adhesive composition of the invention is preferably about 0.5 percent to about 9 percent by weight, and more preferably about 3 percent to about 7 percent by weight based on the total weight of the adhesive composition.
the amount of fatty acid present is preferably about 10 percent to about 40 percent by weight, more preferably about 15 percent to about 30 percent by weight, and most preferably about 20 percent to about 30 percent by weight, based on the total weight of the adhesive composition.
the adhesive polymer utilized in a pressure sensitive adhesive composition of the invention is substantially chemically inert to 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine.
the adhesive polymer is preferably present in an amount of about 55 percent to about 85 percent by weight based on the total weight of the composition.
Suitable adhesive polymers include acrylic adhesives that contain, as a major constituent (i.e., at least about 80 percent by weight of all monomers in the polymer), a hydrophobic monomeric acrylic or methacrylic acid ester of an alkyl alcohol, the alkyl alcohol containing 4 to 10 carbon atoms. Examples of suitable monomers are those discussed below in connection with the “A Monomer”. These adhesive polymers can further contain minor amounts of other monomers such as the “B Monomers” listed below.
Preferred adhesives include acrylic pressure-sensitive adhesive copolymers containing A and B Monomers as follows: Monomer A is a hydrophobic monomeric acrylic or methacrylic acid ester of an alkyl alcohol, the alkyl alcohol containing 4 to 10 carbon atoms, preferably 6 to 10 carbon atoms, more preferably 6 to 8 carbon atoms, and most preferably 8 carbon atoms. Examples of suitable A Monomers are n-butyl, n-pentyl, n-hexyl, isoheptyl, n-nonyl, n-decyl, isohexyl, 2-ethyloctyl, isooctyl and 2-ethylhexyl acrylates. The most preferred A Monomer is isooctyl acrylate.
Monomer B is a reinforcing monomer selected from the group consisting of acrylic acid; methacrylic acid; alkyl acrylates and methacrylates containing 1 to 3 carbon atoms in the alkyl group; acrylamide; methacrylamide; lower alkyl-substituted acrylamides (i.e., the alkyl group containing 1 to 4 carbon atoms) such as tertiary-butyl acrylamide; diacetone acrylamide; n-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone; vinyl ethers such as vinyl tertiary-butyl ether; substituted ethylenes such as derivatives of maleic anhydride, dimethyl itaconate and monoethyl formate and vinyl perfluoro-n-butyrate.
acrylic acid methacrylic acid
acrylamide methacrylamide
the preferred B Monomers are acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, the above-described alkyl acrylates and methacrylates, acrylamide, methacrylamide, and the above-described lower alkyl substituted acrylamides.
the most preferred B Monomer is acrylamide.
the pressure-sensitive adhesive copolymer containing A and B Monomers as set forth above preferably contains the A Monomer in an amount by weight of about 80 percent to about 98 percent of the total weight of all monomers in the copolymer.
the A Monomer is more preferably present in an amount by weight of about 88 percent to about 98 percent, and is most preferably present in an amount by weight of about 91 percent to about 98 percent.
the B Monomer in such a copolymer is preferably present in the pressure-sensitive adhesive copolymer in an amount by weight of about 2 percent to about 20 percent, more preferably about 2 percent to about 12 percent, and most preferably 2 to 9 percent of the total weight of the monomers in the copolymer.
the adhesive copolymer comprises about 60 to about 80 percent by weight (and preferably about 70 to about 80 percent by weight) of the above-mentioned hydrophobic monomeric acrylic or methacrylic acid ester of an alkyl alcohol (i.e., Monomer A described above) based on the total weight of all monomers in the copolymer; about 4 to about 9 percent by weight based on the total weight of all monomers in the copolymer of a reinforcing monomer selected from the group consisting of acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, an alkyl acrylate or methacrylate containing 1 to 3 carbon atoms in the alkyl group, acrylamide, methacrylamide, a lower alkyl-substituted acrylamide, diacetone acrylamide and N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone; and about 15 to about 35 percent by weight (and preferably about 15 to about 25 percent by weight) of vinyl acetate based on the total weight
an alkyl alcohol i.e., Mono
the above described adhesive copolymers are known, and methods of preparation therefore are well known to those skilled in the art, having been described for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 24,906 (Ulrich), the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
the polymerization reaction can be carried out using a free radical initiator such as an organic peroxide (e.g., benzoylperoxide) or an organic azo compound (e.g., 2,2′-azobis(2,4-dimethylpentanenitrile), available under the trade designation “Vazo 52” from DuPont).
a free radical initiator such as an organic peroxide (e.g., benzoylperoxide) or an organic azo compound (e.g., 2,2′-azobis(2,4-dimethylpentanenitrile), available under the trade designation “Vazo 52” from DuPont).
pressure-sensitive adhesives such as those described above are inherently rubbery and tacky and are suitably heat and light stable, there is no need to add tackifiers or stabilizers. However, such can be added if desired.
a pressure sensitive adhesive composition of the invention can also contain one or more skin penetration enhancers such as glyceryl monolaurate, ethyl oleate, isopropyl myristate, diisopropyl adipate and N,N-dimethyldodecylamine-N-oxide, either as a single ingredient or as a combination of two or more ingredients.
the skin penetration enhancer(s) preferably form a substantially homogeneous mixture with the pressure sensitive adhesive polymer or copolymer.
the total amount of skin penetration enhancer(s) present in a pressure sensitive adhesive composition of the invention is preferably about 3 percent to about 25 percent by weight, more preferably about 3 percent to about 10 percent by weight based on the total weight of the adhesive composition.
the skin penetration enhancer is a single ingredient, it is preferably a skin penetration enhancer such as isopropyl myristate, diisopropyl adipate, ethyl oleate, or glyceryl monolaurate.
a combination skin penetration enhancer is used, it is preferably a combination such as: ethyl oleate with glyceryl monolaurate; ethyl oleate with N,N-dimethyldodecylamine-N-oxide; glyceryl monolaurate with N,N-dimethyldodecylamine-N-oxide; and ethyl oleate with both glyceryl monolaurate and N,N-dimethyldodecylamine-N-oxide.
a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition of the invention can be prepared by combining dry adhesive, 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine, fatty acid, and skin penetration enhancer(s) with an organic solvent.
the preferred organic solvents are methanol and ethyl acetate.
the total solids content of the adhesive coating is preferably in the range of about 15 percent to about 40 percent, and more preferably in the range of about 20 to about 35 percent based on the total weight of the adhesive coating. The resulting mixture is shaken or mixed for a period of about 20 to 72 hours.
the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine be in micronized form (i.e., particle size of 1-2 microns in diameter).
the mixture can be heated during shaking.
the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine is combined with the fatty acid and shaken at 40° C. until there appears to be complete dissolution. The remaining ingredients are added and the mixture is shaken for a period of about 20 to 72 hours.
the pressure-sensitive adhesive compositions described above are preferably coated onto one surface of a suitable backing of sheet material, such as a film, to form a pressure-sensitive adhesive coated sheet material.
a pressure-sensitive adhesive coated sheet material of the invention can be prepared by knife coating a suitable release liner to a predetermined uniform thickness with a wet adhesive formulation. This adhesive coated release liner is then dried and laminated onto a backing using conventional methods.
Suitable release liners include conventional release liners comprising a known sheet material, such as a polyester web, a polyethylene web, or a polystyrene web, or polyethylene-coated paper, coated with a suitable silicone-type coating such as that available under the trade designation Daubert 164Z, from Daubert Co.
the backing can be occlusive, non-occlusive or a breathable film as desired.
the backing can be any of the conventional materials for pressure-sensitive adhesive tapes, such as polyethylene, particularly low density polyethylene, linear low density polyethylene, high density polyethylene, randomly-oriented nylon fibers, polypropylene, ethylene-vinylacetate copolymer, polyurethane, rayon and the like.
Backings that are layered, such as polyethylene-aluminum-polyethylene composites are also suitable.
the backing should be substantially non-reactive with the ingredients of the adhesive coating.
the presently preferred backing is low density polyethylene.
the pressure-sensitive adhesive coated sheet material of the invention can be made in the form of an article such as a tape, a patch, a sheet, a dressing or any other form known to those skilled in the art.
an article in the form of a patch is made from an adhesive coated sheet material of the invention and applied to the skin of a mammal.
the patch is replaced as necessary with a fresh patch to maintain the particular desired therapeutic effect of the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine.
bioequivalent or interchangeable lower dosage strength imiquimod topical formulations include those 3.75% imiquimod formulations that have comparable in-vivo serum profiles, i.e., wherein the following in-vivo parameters are either the same or may vary up to about ⁇ 25% or more (See also FIG. 54 ), when such 3.75% formulations are topically administered daily to the same individuals in the same dosage regimen in accordance with the short durations of therapy, such as the two-cycle therapies, of the present invention:
a Day 21 T max of from about 4 hours to about 16 hours and preferably a mean T max of about 7.4 hours with a standard deviation (“SD”) of about 3.5, a median T max of about 9 hours and a geometric mean T max of about 6.6 hours and a coefficient of variation (“CV”) of about 48%;
SD standard deviation
CV coefficient of variation
a Day 21 C max of from about 0.07 to about 0.6 ng/ml and preferably a mean C max of about 0.3 ng/ml with a standard deviation of about 0.16, a median C max of about 0.35 and a geometric mean C max of about 0.27 ng/ml and a coefficient of variation of about 49%;
a Day 21 C min of from about 0.06 to about 0.4 and preferably a mean C min of about 0.20 with an SD of about 0.11, a median C min of about 0.19 and a geometric mean C min , of about 0.17 and a coefficient of variation of about 55%;
a Day 21 RC max of from about 0.5 to about 5 and preferably a mean RC max of about 3 with a standard deviation of about 1.5, a median RC max of about 2.7 and a geometric mean RC max of about 2.4 and a coefficient of variation of about 54%;
the lower dosage strength imiquimod pharmaceutical formulations of the present invention can be formulated into any form known to the art, such as a cream, an ointment, a foam, a gel, a lotion or a pressure-sensitive adhesive composition or patch, it should be understood that the creams, ointments, foams, gels and lotions may be packaged into any suitable container, such as unit-dose sachets or packets or multi-dose tubes or containers.
a packaged amount of an imiquimod pharmaceutical formulation contemplated by the present invention includes any suitable amount, such as about 250 mg to about 500 mg or more, and preferably about 250 mg, about 300 mg, about 350 mg, about 400 mg, about 450 mg or about 500 mg unit-dose sachets or packets.
LucidolTM 70 initiator mixed with 2.3 kg ethyl acetate were charged to the reactor. The reaction was continued until the percent conversion was greater than 98 percent as measured by gas chromatographic evaluation of residual monomer concentration.
the resulting polymer solution was diluted to 25-28 percent solids with ethyl acetate/methanol (90/10) and had a measured Brookfield viscosity of 17,000-21,000 centipoises using spindle #4 at 12 rpm. The polymer had a measured inherent viscosity of 1.3-1.4 dllg in ethyl acetate.
a 25-30 percent solids solution of the isooctyl acrylate:acrylamide (93:7) adhesive copolymer in ethyl acetate/methanol (90:10) was coated onto a two-sided release liner using a knife-coater and coating at 0.5 mm in thickness.
the adhesive-coated laminate was dried first at 82° C. for 3 minutes and then at 116° C. for 3 minutes. The dried adhesive coating was then stripped off the release liner and placed in a glass bottle. The foregoing procedure results in a reduction of the amount of any residual monomer in the adhesive copolymer.
a master batch was prepared by combining 621.0 g of isooctyl acrylate, 41.4 g of acrylamide, 165.6 g of vinyl acetate, 1.656 g of 2,2′-azobis(2,4-dimethylpentanenitrile) (available from the DuPont Company as VazoTM52), 884.52 g of ethyl acetate and 87.48 g of methanol.
a 400 g portion of the resulting solution was placed in an amber quart bottle. The bottle was purged for two minutes with nitrogen at a flow rate of one liter per minute. The bottle was sealed and placed in a rotating water bath at 45° C. for twenty-four hours to effect essentially complete polymerization.
the copolymer was diluted with 250 g of ethyl acetate/methanol (90/10) to 26.05% solids and had a measured inherent viscosity of 1.27 dl/g in ethyl acetate at a concentration of 0.15 g/dl. Its Brookfield viscosity was 5580 centipoise.
a cream according to the present invention is prepared from the following ingredients:
the glycerin, methylparaben, propylparaben and water were weighed into a 4 liter glass beaker then heated on a hot plate with stirring until the parabens isostearic acid and 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine were weighed into an 8 liter stainless steel beaker and heated on a hot plate until the amine was in solution (the temperature reached 69° C.).
the benzyl alcohol, cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, polysorbate 60 and sorbitan monostearate were added to the isostearic acid solution and heated on a hot plate until all material was dissolved (the temperature reached 75° C.).
the water phase was added to the oil phase.
the mixture was mixed with a homogenizer for 13 minutes then put into a cool water bath and mixed with a 3 inch propeller for 40 minutes (the temperature was 29° C.).
the resulting cream was placed in glass jars.
Example 3 Example 4
Example 5 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine
Isostearic acid 10.0 10.0 5.0 5.0 Benzyl alcohol 2.0 Cetyl alcohol 1.7 Stearyl alcohol 2.3 Cetearyl alcohol 6.0 6.0 6.0
Polysorbate 60 2.55 2.55 2.55 2.55 Sorbitan monostearate 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.45 Brij TM 30 a 10.0
Example 9 1-isobuty1-1H-imidazo- 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine Isostearic acid 10.0 25.0 10.0 6.0 Benzyl alcohol 2.0 2.0 Cetyl alcohol 2.2 1.7 Stearyl alcohol 3.1 2.3 Cetearyl alcohol 6.0 6.0 Polysorbate 60 2.55 3.4 2.55 2.55 Sorbitan monostearate 0.45 0.6 0.45 0.45 Brij TM 30 a 10.0 Aqueous Phase Glycerin 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Methylparaben 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Propylparaben 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 Purified water 67.78 60.48 79.78 79.78 a Brij TM 30 (polyoxyethylene(4) lauryl ether) is available from ICI Americas, Inc.
a cream according to the present invention is prepared from the following ingredients in the following Table 3:
the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine and the isostearic acid were weighed into a glass jar and heated with occasional stirring until the amine was dissolved (the temperature reached 68° C.).
To this solution was added, the petrolatum, mineral oil, aluminum stearate, cetyl alcohol, WitconolTM 14, acetylated lanoline and propylparaben.
the mixture was heated to 75° C.
the methylparaben and water were combined and heated until the paraben dissolved (the temperature reached 61° C.).
the VeegumTM K was added to the aqueous solution and heated at 75° C.
An ointment according to the present invention is prepared from the ingredients in the following Table 4:
the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine and the isostearic acid were placed in a glass jar and heated with stirring until the amine was dissolved. The remaining ingredients were added and the resulting mixture was heated to 65° C. and then mixed while being allowed to cool to room temperature.
Example 11 Using the general procedure of Example 11 an ointment containing the ingredients in the following Table 5 is prepared.
Creams of the present invention are prepared using the ingredients shown in Table 6.
the Example 1 except that benzyl alcohol was used with the isostearic acid to dissolve the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine.
Example 14 Example 15 Amount % by Amount % by Amount % by Oil Phase Weight Weight Weight 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c] 50 5.0 4.85 quinolin-4- amine Isostearic acid 25.0 25.0 24.3 Benzyl alcohol 2.0 2.0 1.94 Cetyl alcohol 2.2 2.2 1.16 Stearyl alcohol 3.1 3.1 1.75 Petrolatum 3.0 2.91 Polysorbate 60 3.4 3.4 4.13 Sorbitan monostearate 0.6 0.6 0.73 Stearic acid 9.71 Aqueous Phase Glycerin 2.0 2.0 1.94 Methylparaben 0.2 0.2 0.19 Propylparaben 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
a cream according to the present invention is prepared from the ingredients in the following Table 7:
the isostearic acid and 0.8 g of 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine were combined in a glass jar and heated with stirring until the amine had dissolved.
the remaining oil phase ingredients were added to this solution and the mixture was heated to about 70° C.
the aqueous phase ingredients were weighed into a separate beaker and heated with stirring until the amine and the parabens had dissolved. With both phases at about 70° C., the water phase was added to the oil phase and mixed with a propeller until the mixture cooled to room temperature.
the formulation was coated at a thickness of 20 mils onto a 5 mil Daubert 164Z liner.
the laminate was oven dried for 3 minutes at 105° F., for 2 minutes at 185° F., and for 2 minutes at 210° F.
the resulting adhesive coating contained 59.1 percent 93:7 isooctyl acrylate:acylamide adhesive copolymer, 15.0 percent isostearic acid, 20.0 percent ethyl oleate, 3.0 percent glyceryl monolaurate and 2.9 percent 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine.
the material was then laminated with 3 mil low density polyethylene backing and die cut into 2.056 cm.sup.2 patches.
Example 17 Using the general method of Example 17 the formulations shown below are prepared. 1-Isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine that had been ground with a mortar and pestle was used.
the adhesive was the 93:7 isooctyl acrylate:acrylamide copolymer prepared in Preparative Method 1 above.
the solvent was 90:10 ethyl acetate:methanol. All formulations in the following Table 8 were mixed at room temperature.
Example 20 1-isobutyl-1H- 5.0 3.0 3.0 imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine Ethyl oleate 5.1 5.0 8.0 Isostearic acid 10.0 10.0 6.0 Oleic acid 20.0 20.0 13.0 Glyceryl monolaurate 1.5 1.5 1.5 N,N-dimethyldodecylamine- 1.0 1.1 3.0 N-oxide Adhesive 57.4 59.3 65.4
Example 18 A formulation with the same components in the same proportions as Example 18 is prepared using a different method.
the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]-quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine was combined with the oleic and isostearic acids and shaken at 40° C. until there was complete dissolution of the 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine or 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine.
the remaining ingredients were added and shaken a 40° C. for 72 hours. Patches measuring 2.056 cm.sup.2 were prepared by the general method of Example 17.
Creams are prepared in accordance with the present invention using the ingredients shown in this Example 23.
the work area, all vessels and equipment is initially cleaned prior to commencing manufacture.
a 2 L glass container and paddle stirrer blade are placed onto a balance and the weight is recorded.
the paddle is then removed from the vessel.
the isostearic acid and benzyl alcohol are weighed directly into the 2 L glass container.
the imiquimod is then weighed into the 2 L glass container and a spatula is used to ensure the imiquimod is wetted with the isostearic acid and benzyl alcohol mixture.
the 2 L container is then heated in a water bath to about 55 ⁇ 5° C. while stirring with a Heidolph mixer (Note: aluminum foil is placed around the top of the vessel and the paddle for the mixer, to limit evaporation).
the solution is visually inspected to confirm the imiquimod has fully dissolved prior to mixing with cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, white petrolatum, polysorbate 60 and sorbitan monostearate.
Cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, white petrolatum, polysorbate 60 and sorbitan monostearate are then weighed directly into the 2 L container and mixing is continued at about 55 ⁇ 5° C. until the oil phase is completely in solution.
about 2 L of water are placed into a beaker and heated to 55 ⁇ 5° C. while stirring with a magnetic follower. Briefly, about 500 ml of the heated water is transferred into a 1 L beaker and placed into the water bath maintained at about 55 ⁇ 5° C.
Half of the amount of glycerin required for the final formulation is then weighed into the beaker along with the total amount of methylparaben and propylparaben to the water (where both methyl and propyl paraben are weighed into weighing boats first, a pipette is used to remove a portion of the heated water to wash out the weighing boats to ensure total transfer of both the propyl- and methylparaben into the aqueous phase).
the mixture is continuously stirred at about 55 ⁇ 5° C. (this is the aqueous phase).
the remaining glycerin is then added to a 28 ml vial and the xanthan gum is added and mixed using a small overhead mixer (IKA®-Werke Lab Egg) with paddle attachment for about 10 min.
the glycerin and xanthan mixture are then added slowly into the vortex of the aqueous phase, and a further aliquot of about 20 ml of heated water is used to rinse the vessel out into the water phase to ensure complete transfer.
the water phase is then heated and mixed at about 55 ⁇ 5° C. until the xanthan gum mixture is fully and evenly dispersed into the aqueous phase.
the temperatures of both the water phase and oil phase are both maintained at about 55 ⁇ 5° C.
the aqueous phase is then transferred into the oil phase and the speed of the Heidolph mixer is increased during addition.
the mixture is then homogenized on high speed for about 3 min and transferred immediately back to the Heidolph mixture; however, the contents of the homogenized sample, about 2 L, are mixed at about room temperature and allowed to cool to about 35° C.
the container and contents and the paddle from the overhead mixer are then re-weighed and the weight of the paddle and 2 L beaker, as determined above, are subtracted to determine the total weight of the formulation remaining.
the total weight (about 1 kg) of the cream is then made up to weight with heated water (Note: water evaporated during heating, which needs to be corrected at this point).
the mixture is then transferred back onto the Heidolph mixer at about room temperature and mixed until the temperature of the formulation is below about 28° C.
the lid of the container is then placed onto the vessel and stored at room temperature.
the lower dosage strength formulations of this Example 23 are believed to be stable and consistent with the specifications for the commercially available Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream. More preferably, low dosage formulations of this Example 23, especially as to those lower dosage strength formulations wherein the vehicle comprises an isostearic acid as the fatty acid, are believed to have the following:
the amount of imiquimod that is recovered from the formulations at any of the above-mentioned temperatures and time points is between about 90 to about 110% w/w thereby demonstrating good homogeneity;
the formulations of the present invention are also within specifications for the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, i.e., between 1.0% w/w and 2.1% w/w, at any of the above-mentioned temperatures and time points as to benzyl alcohol content.
the formulations of the present invention are within the range of the specifications for the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, i.e., between 2000 cPs and 35,000 cPs, when they are stored at 25° C./60% RH and analyzed over a six month period; pH Stability.
the formulations of the present invention are within the range of the specifications for the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, i.e., between pH 4.0 and pH 5.5) when they are stored at 25° C./60% RH and analyzed over a six month period;
Preservative Efficacy Test (“PET”).
the formulations of the present invention demonstrate sufficient reductions in colony forming unit counts for each of the organisms with which the formulations are inoculated, i.e., S. aureus, E. coli, Ps. Aeruginosa, C. albicans , and A. niger , at 2-8° C. and 40° C. over a 28 day test period and meet the requirements specified in both the USP and EP.
the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream also statistically significantly (p ⁇ 0.05) releases imiquimod at a faster rate over a 3 hour time period in comparison to the lower dosage strength formulations of the present invention through a synthetic membrane, e.g., Microporous polyethylene film 3M No. 9711 CoTranTM. There is no statistical difference (p ⁇ 0.05) between the imiquimod release rates for any of the 3.75% w/w imiquimod formulations. There is no statistical difference (p ⁇ 0.05) between the imiquimod release rates for any of the 2.5% w/w imiquimod formulations.
the greater the amount of imiquimod in a formulation the faster and greater the total amount of imiquimod that is released from such formulation that the amount and rate of release of imiquimod are concentration dependant and that the rates and amounts of release of imiquimod from the formulations of the present invention are linear and dose proportionate to the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream;
ANOVA statistical analysis at 95% confidence level is used to analyze the stability data generated, including the data generated for the membrane and skin permeation experiments.
the formulations of the present invention including the formulations identified in this Example 23, have Hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB) values between about 12 and 15, and more preferably between about 12.4 and about 13.4.
HLB Hydrophilic-lipophilic balance
HPLC HPLC 9. Waters 265 (Alliance Separations module), Water 996 (Photodiode array detector), CPU (Compaq), Software - Microsoft Windows NT Version 4.00.1381 and Analysis software - Millenium 32 Version 4.00.00.00
Waters 265 Alliance Separations module
Water 996 Photodiode array detector
CPU Computer
Software - Microsoft Windows NT Version 4.00.1381 and Analysis software - Millenium 32 Version 4.00.00.00
octyl sodium sulfate (OSS) is weighed into a large beaker and is mixed with about 990 ml Milli-Q ultrapure water and about 10.0 ml of triethylamine (TEA). The mixture is sonicated and stirred for about 5 min to dissolve the solids. A pH meter is then placed in the mixture and the pH of the OSS/TEA solution is adjusted to about 2.0 with concentrated H 3 PO 4 , stirring continuously during the adjusting procedure. The entire mixture is then filtered through a 0.2 ⁇ m filter. The filtrate is mixed with acetonitrile (HPLC grade) in the ratio of about 72:28 aqueous:acetonitrile by volume.
acetonitrile HPLC grade
Imiquimod standards are prepared, as described under Sample Diluent and Receiver Fluid, for stability test and receiver for membrane release tests. Initially, a stock solution of imiquimod is prepared by dissolving about 25 mg of imiquimod into about 50 ml of solvent (either Sample Diluent or Receiver Fluid) to give a concentration of about 500 ⁇ g/ml in Sample Diluent or Receiver Fluid.
the following combination standard solution is also prepared; whereby, about 500 mg of methylparaben and about 50 mg propylparaben are weighed into a single 250 ml volumetric flask and is diluted to volume with sample diluent above, to form the parabens solution: In addition, about 500 mg of imiquimod and about 200 mg benzyl alcohol are also weighed into a single 100 ml volumetric flask and about 10 ml of the parabens solution is then transferred into the imiquimod/benzyl alcohol volumetric which is made up to volume with diluent and is sonicated to dissolve fully.
Impurity standards are prepared separately at a concentration of about 50 p.g/ml in Sample Diluent and are analyzed in each HPLC run.
the impurity standards that are included in each HPLC run are as follows:
compositions for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream and 1% imiquimod cream formulations are shown. Also shown in the Table 16, are four placebo formulations Pbo1, Pbo2, Pbo3 and formulation Pbo4,
the 30° C. stability samples are removed from the stability cabinet at each time point and placed at about 2-8° C. for future reference, as follows:
the chromatograms for each formulation are compared to those generated for the impurity standards, as described above under Impurity Standards, to identify if there are any degradation peaks present.
the chromatograms are viewed at an absorbance of 318 nm wavelength at which the preservatives do not absorb to confirm the absence of degradation products.
the pH measurement protocol is as follows:
the ‘crossover’ point is an indication of the elastic structure of the formulation and a high cross over point indicates that more force is required to breakdown the formulation thus providing an indication for longer term stability of the cream formulations.
the G 1 value is a measurement of the elastic part of the formulation, whereby a high G 1 value indicates a more rigid formulation which ‘recovers’ more easily from applied shear stress.
the preservative efficacy test is performed on formulations 110, 126, Pbo4 and 182 which are stored at about 2-8° C. and about 40° C. for about 3 months. Preservative efficacy testing is carried out according to the procedure described in line with the methodology described in the USP 2007 and EP 2007.
the time points, at which the inoculated samples are tested are: 0 h, 24 h, 48 h, 7 days, 14 days, 21 days and 28 days.
Method validation is performed using Staphylococcus aureus cultures to confirm the neutralizing effect of D/E broth, for this purpose 110 and 182 are used to confirm neutralization of the preservatives.
the release of imiquimod from 13 formulations are compared using methodology based on the principles of the FDA, SUPAC-SS guidelines.
the protocol for the investigation is as follows:
a synthetic membrane (Microporous polyethylene film 3M No. 9711 CoTranTM) is mounted in a small Franz cell (refer to FIG. 56 ) with a receiver fluid (0.1 N HCl) to ensure sink conditions (is equilibrated for a minimum of 30 min prior to dosing).
Imiquimod stock (14) Specific activity of about 57 mCl/mmol with a radiochemical purity of about 99.2% is supplied as a powder in a borosilicate multi-dose vial with additional screw cap.
Working stock solutions are prepared by addition of 1 ml isostearic acid to the imiquimod powder using a needle and syringe inserted through the septum of the vial. The screw cap is then replaced securely and the vial shaken on a vortex mixer until all the imiquimod dissolves in the isostearic acid. The homogeneity is also confirmed. This results in a stock solution containing about 1000 Ci/ml.
the method for the preparation of about a 100 g radioactive batch is as follows:
the method involves the use of full thickness human skin that is mounted in a Franz cell with about a 0.01 N hydrochloric acid as receiver fluid to ensure sink conditions.
a dose of formulation equivalent to about 10 mg/cm 2 is applied to the membrane and the diffusion of imiquimod is measured over time.
Human skin from cosmetic reduction surgery is used.
Subcutaneous fat is removed mechanically prior to preparation of the skin section for the study.
the formulations (6u) are applied to the surface of the membrane using a positive displacement pipette.
the receptor compartment of the Franz cells is then filled with the receiver fluid and the cells are fixed in a water bath maintained at about 37° C.
the receptor compartment contents are continuously agitated by small magnetic followers.
samples of receiver fluid are taken from the receptor compartment, and are replaced with fresh receiver fluid and are assayed by scintillation counting.
a mass balance experiment is carried out, where the amount of 14 C imiquimod remaining in the donor compartment, surface residue, Stratum corneum (SC), remaining epidermis, dermis and receiver, compartment is quantified.
SC Stratum corneum
This method involves removal of the SC by tape stripping and processing of the remaining epidermal layer and dermis using standard procedures.
the protocol for the mass balance is as follows:
Unabsorbed dose The surface of each Franz cell donor chamber is wiped gently with a cotton bud using 5 clockwise and anti-clockwise movements. This procedure is repeated on 4 occasions using alternate wet (receiver fluid) and dry cotton buds. The cotton buds are added to scintillation cocktail before analysis. Two tape strips are removed from the skin and these are regarded as unabsorbed formulation and included in the total surface activity. The Stratum corneum ) (SC) is removed by carefully tape stripping the membrane ten times using Scotch adhesive tape. Collectively, each tape is placed into a scintillation vial to which 4 ml of scintillation cocktail are added before analysis.
Epidermal layer The remaining section of the epidermis (following tape stripping) is carefully removed from the dermis with a scalpel.
the epidermis is placed into a glass vial containing 2 ml of Soluene 350 and is incubated at about 50° C. for about 72 h before analysis by LSC.
the remaining dermal layer is placed in to a glass vial containing about 2 ml of Soluene 350 and is incubated at about 50° C. for about 72 h before analysis by LSC.
the preservatives benzyl alcohol, methylparaben and propylparaben
the imiquimod formulations can not be detected.
it permits the detection of degradation products, if any, in the presence of preservatives.
no degradation products are identified at about 318 nm for any of the imiquimod formulations tested up to and including the 6 month stability time point at about 25° C. and about 40° C.
Table 17 and FIG. 57 show a summary of the findings, whereby simple microscopic analysis of the imiquimod formulations identify formulations with inconsistent particle size and large aggregation of material. Summary and composition of lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations are listed in Table 13 and Table 14.
formulations 245, 121 and 193 show signs of phase separation. All the other formulations in Table 19 show good homogeneity, and are subsequently sub-aliquoted and placed on stability as described above under Preparation of Stability Samples.
imiquimod in the formulations is stable at both about 25° C. and about 40° C. over an about six month period, although the results for three and six months at both about 25° C. and about 40° C. look consistently higher than previous time points. This could be attributed to a small amount of water evaporation from the containers.
all samples are consistent with the commercially supplied Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream sample. There are no degradation products detected in any of the samples in Table 20 at any of the temperatures and time points when analyzed at about 318 nm.
the specification amount of imiquimod that is recovered from the samples in Table 20 is between about 90%-110% w/w, thereby confirming that the samples fall within their target specification.
the specification amount of imiquimod that is recovered from preferred 2.5% imiquimod formulations of the present invention will fall within between about 2.25% and about 2.75% w/w and the amount of imiquimod that is recovered from preferred 3.7.5% imiquimod formulations of the present invention will fall within between about 3.38% and about 4.12% w/w.
the amount of imiquimod recovery from preferred formulations will fall within about the 100% ⁇ 10% w/w specification of their target concentrations.
Benzyl alcohol content is found to fall over the duration of the stability tests. The greatest loss observed is in the placebo's; Pbo4 (1.08 ⁇ 0.02% w/w), Pbo1 (1.01 ⁇ 0.03% w/w), Pbo2 (1.04 ⁇ 0.08% w/w) and Pbo3 (1.11 ⁇ 0.00% w/w) and the active formulation 257 (1%) (1.37 ⁇ 0.01% w/w) which shows a loss in benzyl alcohol at about 40° C. for about 6 months down from 2.0% w/w.
the specified range for benzyl alcohol in the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream formulations (1.0 to 2.1% w/w), are within specification for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
the decrease in benzyl alcohol content from the formulations is possibly the result of the formation of an ester (benzyl isostearate), whereby there is a reaction between the excipients of benzyl alcohol and isostearic acid.
Brookfield viscosity measurements are notoriously variable and, as such, there are fluctuations in the measurements of the formulations over about a 6 month period when stored at about 25° C. Variations in results are further observed if the spindle or the speed of the spindle rotation is altered. Although the majority of the formulations are measured using the same settings and spindle; the placebo formulations (Pbo1, Pbo2, Pbo3 and Pbo4) result in torque measurements below the threshold required for accurate measurements and subsequently readings are inaccurate. Attempts are made to change the settings and spindles; however, results are vastly different and thus unreliable. See also Tables 24-26.
Table 29 reports final viable counts of organism inoculations that are added to the formulations.
Table 30 shows colony forming unit count (cfu) for Staphylococcus aureus after PET validation is performed on two formulations stored at about 2-8° C.
the preservative efficacy test (“PET”) is a procedure used to demonstrate antimicrobial activity of a formulation with respect to the preservative system used.
PET The preservative efficacy test
Table 31 cell counts that are recovered from the inoculated formulations at various time points are reported. The data shows that sufficient log reductions are present in the formulations at about 2-8° C. and about 40° C. and meet the requirements that are specified in both the USP and EP.
Table 34 The data that is shown in Table 34 is the actual amount of imiquimod that is recovered for each formulation from the various matrices, which is also represented graphically in FIG. 60 .
FIG. 61 represents the total amount of imiquimod that is recovered for each formulation in the epidermis, dermis and receiver fluid combined.
the average data for the 5%, 1%, 3.75% and 2.5% w/w formulations showing the amount of imiquimod that is recovered from the unabsorbed fraction, in the Stratum corneum and in the epidermis, dermis and receiver fluid combined are shown in FIG. 62 .
This data shows that there is a linear dose release between the amount of imiquimod applied and recovery in each of the matrices. See also Table 35 for stability of calibration standards in spent receiver fluid and Tables 36-40 for statistical analysis.
Example 24 four Phase 3 randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, placebo-controlled clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of a 3.75% imiquimod cream of Example 23 and a 2.5% imiquimod cream of Example 23 to placebo in the treatment of typical visible or palpable actinic keratoses of the face or balding scalp.
Subjects, who are determined to be eligible during the screening phase, are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either 2.5% imiquimod cream, 3.75% imiquimod cream or placebo cream once daily during the treatment cycles.
Studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 are duplicative studies that investigate 2-week treatment cycles, wherein the 2-week treatment cycles are separated by a two week rest period (no treatment), and studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 are duplicative studies that investigate 3-week treatment cycles, wherein the 3-week treatment cycles are separated by a three week rest period (no treatment). See flow diagrams depicted in Table 60 herein below.
the study entry criteria and endpoints are identical for all four studies. Each study has the same length of a post treatment follow-up period in which the primary endpoint in all four studies is at 8 weeks following the last treatment application.
Example 25 a pharmacokinetic study conducted under maximal use conditions (Study GW01-0706) is described as indicated above.
All four Phase 3 studies are randomized, double-blinded, multicenter, placebo-controlled studies comparing the efficacy and safety of 3.75% imiquimod cream and 2.5% imiquimod cream to placebo in the treatment of typical visible or palpable actinic keratoses of the face or balding scalp.
Subjects determined to be eligible during the screening phase are randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive either 3.75% imiquimod cream, 2.5% imiquimod cream or placebo cream once daily during the treatment cycles.
Studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 investigate two 2-week treatment cycles that are separated by a two weeks of no treatment, and studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 investigate two 3-week treatment cycles that are separated by three weeks of no treatment.
Eligible subjects for the study are at least 18 years of age, with about 5 to 20 typical visible or palpable actinic keratosis lesions (AKs) in an area that exceeded 25 cm 2 on either the face or the balding scalp.
the treatment area could be either the entire face, excluding the ears, or the balding scalp, but not both.
the subjects are to be in good general health, and free of conditions which might put them at undue risk during study procedures. They must not use imiquimod cream on the face or scalp within 1 year of study entrance, nor use other potentially interfering medications within pre-specified washout intervals prior to study entrance.
the randomized, blinded study product is used in 2 treatment cycles each of 2 weeks duration, separated by a 2-week period without treatment. Once a day during the treatment cycles, subjects apply the study cream in a thin layer to the entire treatment area. A maximum of 2 packets (i.e., up to 500 mg) could be applied for a given dose. The study cream is applied prior to normal sleeping hours and is removed approximately 8 hours later with mild soap and water.
the objective of the studies is to compare the safety and efficacy of 2.5% imiquimod cream and 3.75% imiquimod cream vs. placebo in the treatment of actinic keratosis when the cream is applied once daily for two 2-week treatment cycles separated by a 2-week no-treatment period.
the two additional Phase 3 studies, GW01-0703 and GW01-0705, are conducted concurrently according to identical protocols. These studies are also randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trials identical to the pivotal studies in all respects except for the duration of the treatment regimens and corresponding differences in visit schedules. The planned number of subjects, randomization methodology, entrance criteria, and study drug formulations are the same as in the two Phase 3 GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 studies trials.
the randomized, blinded study products are used in two 2-week treatment cycles, but in GW01-0703 and GW01-0705, the treatment cycles are of three weeks duration, separated by a 3-week period without treatment.
the FDA approved treatment regimen for treating actinic keratosis with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream is two times per week for 16 weeks and end point is determined at end of week 24.
the key entry criteria for these four studies are: (1) 18 years of age or greater; (2) 5-20 AKs in treatment area; (3) the treatment area exceeds 25 cm 2 ; and (4) the treatment area is either full face or balding scalp, but not both.
the FDA approved treatment area for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream is 25 cm 2 and the number of AK lesions treated in the treatment area is generally between 4 and 8.
the protocol for the two pairs of identical phase three studies (4 Studies) includes: (1) voluntary rest periods of any length during treatment cycles are permitted; (2) the subjects keep to original study schedule irrespective of rest periods or missed doses; and (3) the subjects apply the imiquimod formulation in Cycle 2 irrespective of clearance in Cycle 1.
LSRs local skin reactions
AUCsum area under the curve
erythema erythema
the LSR AUC sum is defined as follows:
the primary population to be analyzed for efficacy and safety is the Intent-To-Treat (“ITT”) population, including all randomized subjects.
the Per Protocol (“PP”) population includes subjects who complete the study without any protocol violations. Subjects are excluded from the PP population if any of the following criteria are met.
the investigators determine the treatment area for the studies at baseline (either the entire face or the balding scalp, but not both). Subjects are instructed to apply a thin layer of study medication to the treatment area, up to two packets (up to 500 mg) of product, avoiding the periocular areas, lips and nares. Subjects return for clinic visits over the course of the study for efficacy and safety measurements.
Actinic keratosis lesions arise on a background of UV-damaged skin, and therefore, usually occur over an extensive area or field of sun-exposed skin.
the creams are applied to the entire face or balding scalp, and not just the 5-20 individual lesions required for study entry.
Application to the full face of balding scalp provides clear direction to subjects regarding the area to be treated without reference to the exact location of lesions; additionally application to the full face or balding scalp has the potential to treat sub-clinical or incipient lesions.
Two concentrations of imiquimod cream (2.5% and 3.75%) are used and compared to placebo for each study regimen, allowing a direct comparison of the concentrations for study outcomes.
treatment cycles of two or three weeks are chosen for these Phase three studies. It is observed that sizable numbers of subjects receiving the 5% imiquimod cream two or three times a week take rest periods typically at the 4-6 week point in therapy. The need for rest periods is usually preceded by an increase at ⁇ 2-3 weeks in signs and symptoms of local skin reactions. Cycle treatment (two cycles of three times a week for four consecutive weeks) appears to reduce but not eradicate the need for rest periods among subjects.
the current Phase three studies investigate daily dosing (for two or three weeks) followed by an interval of two or three weeks of no treatment before repeating another two- or three-week treatment cycle. This ‘no treatment period’ is expected to occur after the initial onset of signs and symptoms which herald the onset of pharmacodynamic effects of imiquimod treatment.
Subjects were instructed to apply the cream for a second treatment cycle irrespective of the degree of lesion clearance with the initial treatment cycle. This is consistent with the current Aldara® package insert, which mandates a full 16 weeks of treatment irrespective of interim treatment response.
the use of two treatment cycles allows for a uniform assessment point for all subjects at 8 weeks following the termination of the second treatment cycle, irrespective of initial treatment response.
the two-cycle treatment course is anticipated to have a beneficial effect on ‘sub-clinical’ lesions. Previous studies suggest that these lesions may become visible approximately two weeks into a treatment course.
a second treatment cycle has the potential to treat both residual clinically evident AK lesions as well as any sub-clinical lesions.
AK lesions are counted at study visits to derive the one primary (Complete Clearance) and two secondary (Partial Clearance, Percent AK reduction) efficacy endpoints.
Complete Clearance primary efficacy endpoint subjects needed to be clear of all lesions in the treatment area, irrespective of whether those lesions were identified at baseline or later.
the primary efficacy variable is subject status with respect to complete clearance of AK lesions at the end of study (EOS; 8 weeks following the last scheduled dose).
EOS visits occurred at Week 14 for the GW01-0702/GW01-0704 studies, and at Week 17 for the GW01-0703/GW01-0705 studies.
Complete clearance was defined as the absence of clinically visible or palpable AK lesions in the treatment area.
the secondary efficacy variables are:
Efficacy analyses are conducted on the ITT population and on the PP population.
imputations are made for missing data points using last observation carried forward (LOCF, primary analysis), taking all missed observations as failure (sensitivity analysis), and using observed cases only (supportive analysis).
the PP population analysis uses only cases that are observed.
LOCF last observation carried forward
sensitivity analysis sensitivity analysis
supportive analysis supportive analysis
the PP population analysis uses only cases that are observed.
the LOCF method is used for the ITT population, and only cases that are observed for the PP population. All data from interim visits (before EOS/Early Termination) are analyzed at their nominal time points.
the allowed visit window at EOS is any time more than 42 days after the date of last dose (or last rest). Subjects with no EOS visit are excluded from the PP population. In the ITT population, subjects without an in-window EOS visit are analyzed using the LOCF.
CSH Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
the secondary efficacy variable of partial clearance is compared between each of the active arms and placebo using Hochberg's modified Bonferroni procedure. If the secondary efficacy variable of partial clearance is found to be superior to placebo in either of the active treatment groups, then the secondary efficacy variable of percent reduction is tested. Tertiary efficacy variables are tested without adjustment for multiplicity at the nominal 5% level.
investigational centers yielding fewer than 18 subjects are combined together in order of geographical proximity.
the exact composition of these “analysis centers” is determined and documented prior to breaking the study blind.
the stratification for CMH analyses is based on the analysis centers, not on the actual investigational centers.
the primary efficacy variable is summarized without statistical testing by success frequency by investigator center, by analysis center, by gender, by age subgroup, by skin type subgroup, by baseline lesion count subgroup, and by treatment area (face or balding scalp).
Subjects who show a greater number of AK lesions at any time post-baseline compared to the baseline lesion count are of particular interest since the new lesions may represent sub-clinical lesions which are present but unobserved at the baseline visit.
the proportion of subjects who show new lesions while on treatment are presented by treatment group, and the primary efficacy variable is summarized in this subject subgroup.
Adverse events are coded using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology.
Treatment-emergent AEs are summarized for each treatment group by the overall incidence of at least one event, incidence by system organ class, and incidence by system organ class and preferred term.
Treatment-emergent AEs are also summarized by severity, and by relationship to study product.
the AE incidence is summarized by gender, by age subgroup, by skin type subgroup, by baseline lesion count subgroup, and by location of treatment area (face or balding scalp). Serious AEs and discontinuations due to AEs are listed by subject.
LSR local skin reaction
post-baseline The intensity of each local skin reaction (LSR) type (erythema, edema, weeping/exudate, flaking/scaling/dryness, scabbing/crusting, and erosion/ulceration) and the most intense reaction (post-baseline) for each type are summarized by frequency counts and mean scores by treatment group and study visit.
An LSR sum score is computed at each study visit, and 3 areas under the curve (AUC, in days) are calculated; from Baseline to beginning of Treatment Cycle 2, from beginning of Treatment Cycle 2 to End of Study (EOS), and from Baseline to EOS.
the number and percentage by treatment group of subjects who require a rest period (1 or more, by treatment cycle and overall) are analyzed using CMH statistics.
a similar analysis summarized the number and percentage of subjects by treatment group (1) who require a rest period in both treatment cycles, (2) who require a rest period in Cycle 1 only, and (3) who require a rest period in Cycle 2 only.
the number of dosing days missed due to rest periods and the number of dosing days prior to the beginning of the first rest period are analyzed using nonparametric CMH methods for each treatment cycle and overall.
Subjects in studies GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 are compliant with the administration of study medication; greater than 91% of the subjects are compliant with the dosing regimen. Compliance is defined as applying more than 75% of the prescribed doses; ‘rest’ days are considered as application days.
the primary efficacy variable is the rate of complete clearance at EOS (Week 14).
the secondary efficacy variables are the rate of partial clearance (at least 75% reduction in AKs from baseline) at EOS, and the percent change from Baseline to EOS in investigator counts of AK lesions. Both active treatment arms demonstrate greater efficacy than placebo, which is statistically significant for all primary and secondary endpoints.
ITT Median Percent Change from Baseline in AK Lesion Count at EOS for Individual Two- Week Treatment Cycle Regimen Studies Study 3.75% IMIQ 2.5% IMIQ Placebo GW01-0702 ⁇ 72.7% ⁇ 60.0% ⁇ 21.1% GW01-0704 ⁇ 90.9% ⁇ 76.5% ⁇ 30.0% Combined ⁇ 81.8% ⁇ 71.8% ⁇ 25.0%
LSRs appear to be dose-dependent.
the combined AUC of LSR sum Scores are 272, 242 and 140 for the 3.75% imiquimod, 2.5% imiquimod, and placebo treatment groups, respectively.
Erythema is the most intense LSR during the treatment cycles, and on average all LSRs return to baseline at the first observation post-treatment cycle (within either two or four weeks, following cycles 1 and 2, respectively).
the combined incidence of severe erythema is 26.3%, 14.4%, and 0% for the 3.75% imiquimod, 2.5% imiquimod, and placebo treatment groups, respectively.
both 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod creams demonstrate substantial efficacy for the treatment of AKs that is consistently significantly greater than that of placebo cream, with a trend toward greater efficacy in the 3.75% group.
Both products are well-tolerated as evidence by measures of adverse events, ability of subjects to remain in the study, incidence of rest periods, and compliance with study regimen.
Both active products result in increases in local skin reactions versus the placebo cream.
the LSRs rapidly reduces with the completion of each treatment cycle and these LSRs are associated with relatively few reported application site reactions.
Subjects in studies GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 are compliant with the administration of study medication; greater than 92% of the subjects are compliant with the dosing regimen. Compliance is defined as applying more than 75% of the prescribed doses; ‘rest’ days are considered as application days.
the primary efficacy variable is the rate of complete clearance at EOS (Week 17).
the secondary efficacy variables are the rate of partial clearance (at least 75% reduction in AKs from baseline) at EOS, and the percent change from Baseline to EOS in investigator counts of AK lesions. Both active treatment arms demonstrate greater efficacy than placebo, which is statistically significant for all primary and secondary endpoints.
ITT (LOCF) Median Percent Change from Baseline in AK Lesion Count at EOS for Individual Three- Week Treatment Cycle Regimen Studies Study 3.75% IMIQ 2.5% IMIQ Placebo GW01-0703 ⁇ 82.3% ⁇ 66.7% ⁇ 23.6% GW01-0705 ⁇ 78.9% ⁇ 66.7% ⁇ 22.5% Combined ⁇ 80.0% ⁇ 66.7% ⁇ 23.6%
LSRs appear to be dose-dependent.
the combined AUC of LSR sum Scores are 413, 372 and 189 for the 3.75% imiquimod, 2.5% imiquimod, and placebo treatment groups, respectively.
Erythema is the most intense LSR during the treatment cycles, and on average all LSRs return to baseline at the first observation post-treatment cycle.
the combined incidence of severe erythema is 44.7%, 28.2%, and 0% for the 3.75% imiquimod, 2.5% imiquimod, and placebo treatment groups, respectively.
both 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod creams demonstrate substantial efficacy for the treatment of AKs that is consistently significantly greater than that of placebo cream, with a trend toward greater efficacy with the higher concentration cream. Discontinuation rates for any cause, as well as for safety reasons are low in all treatment groups, and as such, both imiquimod creams can be considered ‘well-tolerated’.
a larger number of subjects that are treated with either the 2.5% or 3.75% imiquimod creams require rest periods from the intended two 3-week treatment cycles. Rest periods and other measures of treatment tolerability (related adverse events, application site reactions, LSRs) demonstrate a dose dependent effect, with the highest incidences in the 3.75% 3-week cycle treatment group.
the four imiquimod treatment groups (2.5% and 3.75%, 2-week and 3-week regimens) can be combined by concentration, irrespective of treatment regimen.
Data for 2.5% imiquimod (both 2 and 3-Week Treatment Cycle Groups) versus that of 3.75% imiquimod (both 2 and 3-Week Treatment Cycle Groups) are evaluated for efficacy effects of concentration (refer to Table 84 below).
Preliminary evaluation suggests an effect of drug concentration in favor of the 3.75% concentration for all three efficacy endpoints: Complete Clearance, Partial Clearance, and Percent Reduction from Baseline of AK lesions.
Preliminary evaluation suggests that the two regimens (2-week and 3-week treatment cycles) are comparable in terms of the efficacy endpoints.
all four dosing regimens that are used show statistically and clinically significant effectiveness in the reduction of AK lesions in the target population.
the efficacy results for the two 2-cycle treatment regimens i.e., the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks and 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks treatment cycles
This finding is consistent with the rank order performance of the 3.75% product for all efficacy endpoints in all four individual Phase 3 studies. Therefore, from an efficacy standpoint, the 3.75% imiquimod cream, when applied daily in two 2-week treatment cycles, is believed to be the preferred dose and regimen combination to treat actinic keratosis.
LSRs which are investigator assessed ‘signs’
these measures address symptoms that are experienced by the subject or investigator actions that are related to subject safety (i.e., discontinuations, rest periods, adverse events including LSRs requiring medical intervention).
the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod creams show similar tolerability.
the overall incidences of treatment-related adverse events for the 2-week Treatment Cycle Regimens show a dose-related trend (see above 85)
the most common treatment-related AEs are application site reactions (see Tables 75 and 83). Inspection of the individual treatment-related AEs reveals low rates for all the individual terms, irrespective of dose group. AEs that may reflect systemic pharmacologic effects of imiquimod's activation of cytokines (e.g., fatigue) are reported; however, systemic AEs occur at a low rate.
LSRs local skin reactions
the 3-week Treatment Cycle Regimens irrespective of product concentration, demonstrates a less favorable safety profile versus the 2-week Treatment Cycle Regimens with no offsetting efficacy benefit.
the 2.5% imiquimod formulation appear to have a slightly improved safety profile to the 3.75% product, though both products are well-tolerated.
the 3.75% product shows a consistent incremental efficacy benefit to the 2.5% product.
the demographic and background characteristics of the efficacy study populations by treatment group in all 4 Phase 3 studies are combined by identical study design in pairs (i.e., GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 will be combined in one pair and GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 will be combined in a second pair).
the number and percentage by treatment group and overall are presented for subjects randomized, subjects included in the ITT population, subjects completing the study, and subjects discontinuing the study, overall and by reason for discontinuation.
Subject age, height, weight, and Baseline lesion count is summarized by mean, standard deviation, median, and range by treatment group.
Sex, race, ethnicity, Fitzpatrick skin type, location of treatment area (face or balding scalp), and prior AK treatment history is characterized by frequency distribution by treatment group.
Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, and range) is used to summarize product usage and exposure for the ITT populations by treatment group. Measures of study medication exposure, for each treatment cycle and overall, includes the total duration of treatment (date of last dose minus date of first dose plus 1, excluding the no-treatment period), the total number of applications, the total number of packets used, the total amount of active drug applied, and the average number of packets used per application. The number and percentage of subjects by treatment group who make fewer than 75% of the required applications (fewer than 21 applications and/or rest days in the 2-week treatment cycle regimen, and fewer than 32 applications and/or rest days in the 3-week treatment cycle regimen) is reported.
the primary efficacy variable prospectively defined for all studies is subject status with respect to complete clearance of AK lesions at End of Study. This is defined as the absence of clinically visible or palpable AK lesions in the treatment area.
the comparative and integrated analysis of efficacy focuses on the primary and two secondary efficacy variables. Integrated and comparative summaries is presented at the primary time point of End of Study. The studies are reviewed separately as well as with the identical studies combined in pairs: GW01-0702 and GW01-0704 for the 2-week treatment cycle regimen, and GW01-0703 and GW01-0705 for the 3-week treatment cycle regimen.
CSH Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
the data from the two pivotal studies is combined and analyzed by age, sex, Fitzpatrick skin type, treatment area, and baseline lesion count.
the ITT population is divided into two subpopulations based on the specific covariate of interest.
the subpopulations are selected as less than, or greater than or equal to, 65 years old.
the subpopulations are selected as above or below the approximate median value of the covariate (combining I with II, and combining III, IV, V, and VI) for skin type; taking less than or equal to 10 vs greater than 10 for baseline lesion count).
PROC GLM analysis of variance
the LSR intensities are summarized in each study by frequency counts and mean score by treatment group and study visit for each LSR type:
the most intense reaction (post-baseline) for each type is also presented by frequency distribution and mean score by treatment group.
An LSR sum score is computed at each study visit (addition of six scores).
Three areas under the curve (AUC, in days, using the trapezoidal approximation) are calculated for each subject: from Baseline to beginning of Treatment Cycle 2, from beginning of Treatment Cycle 2 to End of Study, and from Baseline to End of Study. These values are compared pair wise between treatment groups using Fisher's least significant differences in the one-way analysis of variance (treatment group). Discontinued subjects are included in this analysis using LOCF. Details of the calculation of AUC are provided in the clinical study reports.
a pooled analysis of is also provided, with P values derived from the analysis of variance (PROC GLM) including effects of concentration, regimen, and interaction.
PROC GLM analysis of variance
the number and percentage of subjects by treatment group combining GW01-0702 with GW01-0704 and GW01-0703 with GW01-0705 is presented for each of the following safety indicators.
AEs Adverse events
MedDRA MedDRA
the incidence of adverse events is summarized by gender, by age subgroup, by skin type, by baseline lesion count, and by location of treatment area (face or balding scalp).
age the subpopulations is selected as less than or greater than or equal to, 65 years old.
skin type and baseline lesion count the subpopulations is selected as above or below the approximate median value of the covariate (combining I with II, and combining III, IV, V, and VI for skin type; taking less than or equal to 10 vs greater than 10 for baseline lesion count).
PK pharmacokinetic
AK actinic keratosis
This PK study is designed to quantify the pharmacokinetic profile of imiquimod and its metabolites following 3 weeks (21 days) of daily applications of a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example in adult subjects diagnosed with actinic keratosis (AK).
the study is conducted under maximal use conditions (dose, duration, disease severity, and application areas) in a population that had at least 10 AK lesions in the application area.
the application area is the entire face (exclusive of nares, vermilion, periocular areas and ears) and/or the entire balding scalp; areas estimated as approximately 200 cm 2 . If the area of the entire balding scalp is less, than 200 cm 2 , the forehead area is included in order for the entire treatment area to be approximately 200 cm 2 .
the daily dose is 2 packets of 3.75% imiquimod cream for three continuous weeks.
this PK study is conducted under maximal use conditions: (1) at least 10 clinically typical visible or palpable AK lesions within the treatment area (balding scalp or face); (2) application of 2 full packets (250 mg of formulation per packet) of 3.75% imiquimod formulation once daily for 21 days (maximal dosing regimen); and (3) a skin area of approximately 200 cm 2 of the entire face or balding scalp (maximal treatment area).
Trough serum concentrations are obtained on Days 7, 14, 21, and 22.
the trough concentrations on Days 7 and 14 are obtained during outpatient treatment while the trough concentrations on Days 21 and 22 are obtained while the subjects are dosed in the clinical research facility.
Trough imiquimod concentrations are summarized in Table 87.
Serum concentrations of imiquimod are relatively low in subjects treated with daily applications of an imiquimod 3.75% cream of Example 23 for up to 21 days. While serum concentrations of two imiquimod metabolites (S 26704 and S 27700 combined) are measured throughout the study, very few samples had concentrations above the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ). Therefore, these data are too sparse to assess.
the ratio of trough concentrations is examined to determine whether steady-state conditions are achieved during 21 days of topical treatment with 3.75% imiquimod cream. Under steady-state treatment conditions, the trough concentrations, aside from variability, demonstrate a stable plateau value (i.e., not significantly increasing over time, as indicated by a ratio significantly >1). Considering the variability in imiquimod trough concentrations (observed CV % ranged from 47.6-58.0%), a ratio ⁇ 1.43 (following log transformation) is pre-selected to indicate the achievement of steady state; all three ratios meet that criterion.
Peak exposure (C max ) and total exposure (AUC 0 24 ) for imiquimod are higher on Day 21 than Day 1 when analyzing all subjects in the pharmacokinetic population.
the mean accumulation ratios, RC max and R AUC , for all subjects in the pharmacokinetic population are about 2.810 and about 3.873, respectively.
the serum concentration profile on Day 21 is relatively flat across the dosage interval, and mean C max (0.323 ⁇ 0.159 ng/mL) is less than twice the level of mean C min (0.199 ⁇ 0.109 ng/mL).
the mean effective half life for accumulation is about 55.3 hours and the mean observed elimination half life is about 29.3 hours on Day 21.
the mean (SD) peak imiquimod serum concentrations are about 0.323 (0.159) ng/mL, and the median time to peak concentration is about 9 hours.
Comparison of the mean C max concentrations and the mean trough concentrations indicates a relatively flat concentration-time profile throughout the dosing interval. The observed elimination half-life averaged about 29.26 hours (range 9.72-84.06 hours).
Steady state is believed to be achieved in this study by day 14 or the second week of daily dosing.
Subjects in this study apply 2 packets (500 mg of cream-250 mg/packet; 18.75 mg of imiquimod) daily for 3 weeks to the entire face or balding scalp, and the mean peak serum imiquimod concentration (C max ) is about 0.323 ng/mL.
the mean peak serum imiquimod concentration (C max ) is 0.2 ng/mL.
Subjects who receive six packets (1500 mg cream; 75 mg of imiquimod) 3 times per week for 16 weeks to the hand and forearms) have a C max of 3.5 ng/ml.
Pharmacokinetic data are available from three studies of patients with AK, one using the 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 (Study GW01-0706), and two studies using the marketed Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream formulation (Study 1520-IMIQ and Study 1402-IMIQ).
the dosage, treatment duration, application site and application area in these studies is summarized in Table 91.
Studies 1402-IMIQ and GW01-0706 are primarily pharmacokinetic studies
the data from Study 1520-IMIQ is a large long-term safety trial (551 subjects enrolled), and the pharmacokinetic data comes from subset of subjects representing a cohort receiving maximal exposure to imiquimod (6 packets of 5% cream applied twice weekly to >25% of their body surface area). Subjects in this study could participate in up to three 16-week treatment cycles during the 18-month study.
Study 1520-IMIQ 71.9% of subjects (396 of 551) in the safety population have completed the trial.
Subjects in the safety population average 466.9 days in the study and apply an estimated average of 214.6 packets of study drug (2682.5 mg of imiquimod).
the median prescribed dose is about 3.3 packets twice weekly, and 380 of 551 subjects (69%) have received a dose of 3 or more packets twice weekly, and 182 subjects have received the maximal exposure of 6 packets twice weekly.
the weekly dose of the an 3.75% imiquimod lower dosage strength formulation of Example 23 and the novel two week 2-cycle dosage regimen (2 packets daily or 131.25 mg imiquimod weekly) is similar to the weekly dose that was used in the 1520-IMIQ study, and falls between the two higher doses used in Study 1402-IMIQ.
the novel two week 2-cycle dosage regimen treats a larger surface area (about 200 cm 2 ) than the previously approved regimens for AK on the face and balding scalp (25 cm 2 ). Systemic exposure at steady-state is summarized in Table 92.
Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained following single-dose and repeat-dose administration of 3.75% imiquimod cream in Study GW01-0706 (see Table 89 above).
the mean (SD) accumulation ratios that are calculated from C max and AUC 0-24 are about 2.810 (1.514) and about 3.873 (2.153), respectively.
the mean effective half-life for accumulation is about 55.3 hours and the mean observed elimination half-life is about 29.3 hours on Day 21. Analysis of trough concentrations over time indicate that steady-state conditions are achieved between Day 7 and Day 14.
the amount of imiquimod that is absorbed into systemic circulation after topical application of an imiquimod 3.75% cream of Example 23 to the face and/or scalp once daily for up to 21 days is low; peak and total serum imiquimod concentrations are increased by about 3 to 4 fold between Day 1 and Day 21. Steady state is achieved by Day 14.
C max and AUC 0 24 on Day 21 appear to be similar in female and male subjects and lower in male subjects who apply an imiquimod 3.75% cream of Example 23 to balding scalp rather the face.
the mean peak serum imiquimod concentration that is observed with the daily application of the 3.75% imiquimod product (about 0.323 ng/mL) is within the mean peak serum imiquimod concentrations previously observed with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
Example 24 A meta analysis is conducted across the four clinical studies described in Example 24. Data for Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream is displayed for comparative purposes. See, e.g., FIGS. 25-30 . Of course, the Aldara® data concerned much smaller size treatment areas and a smaller number of AK lesions per treatment than the clinical studies that are described in Example 24.
FIGS. 25 and 25A show the pooled actinic keratosis lesion clearance rates, i.e., complete and partial clearance rates for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 that are used in the short duration therapies (2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks and 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks), are about as equally effective as the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment, even though Aldara® was applied twice a week for 16 weeks on treatment areas no greater than about 25 cm 2 and to no more than between about 4 and 8 AK lesions.
FIG. 26 it shows the complete clearance rates for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that are used in the short duration therapies, i.e., 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks and 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks, are about as equally effective as the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment, even though Aldara® was applied twice a week for 16 weeks on treatment areas no greater than about 25 cm 2 and to no more than between about 4 and 8 AK lesions.
FIG. 27 it shows the partial clearance rates for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that are used in the short duration therapies, i.e., 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks and 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks, are about as equally effective as the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment even though Aldara® was applied twice a week for 16 weeks on treatment areas no greater than about 25 cm 2 and to no more than between about 4 and 8 AK lesions.
FIGS. 28 and 28 A-B an adverse events comparison is shown between the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 that are used in the short duration therapies, i.e., 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 and 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks, and the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment that are used twice a week for 16 weeks on treatment areas no greater than about 25 cm 2 and no more than between about 4 and 8 AK lesions, to treat actinic keratosis. As depicted in FIGS.
FIG. 29 it shows the incidence of severe local skin reactions erythema for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 that are used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week short duration therapy are comparable to the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment, but higher for the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week therapy.
FIG. 30 it shows the incidence of rest periods for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 that are used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week short duration therapy are lower than the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream treatment, but higher for the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week therapy.
Example 24 A comparative analysis is conducted across the four clinical studies described in Example 24 and Aldara®. See, e.g., FIGS. 28 , 28 A-B and 36-42. As previously indicated, treatment with Aldara® concerns much smaller size treatment areas and a smaller number of AK lesions per treatment than the clinical studies that are described in Example 24.
FIGS. 36 and 36A the pooled percent of complete clearance rates for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that are used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks studies, and the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks studies of Example 24, are displayed. Results across treatment regimens (2 week or 3 week treatment cycles) are comparable. A dose response between 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 is evident irrespective of regimen (2 week or 3 week treatment cycles).
FIGS. 37 and 37A the pooled percent of partial complete clearance rates for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that are used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks studies, and the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks studies of Example 24, are displayed. Results across treatment regimens (2 week or 3 week treatment cycles) are comparable. A dose response between 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 is evident irrespective of regimen (2 week or 3 week treatment cycles).
FIGS. 38 and 38A the pooled percent of AK lesion median % reduction for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that are used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks studies, and the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks studies of Example 24, are displayed. Results across treatment regimens (2 week or 3 week treatment cycles) are comparable. A dose response between 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23 is evident irrespective of regimen (2 week or 3 week treatment cycles).
FIG. 39 they show that the percent of subjects who took at least one rest period during treatment for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that are used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks studies of Example 24, are less than those taken with Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
the selected safety parameters for the combined 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 or 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 studies show that the safety events are less favorable in the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 studies than the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 studies.
FIG. 40 shows the percent of local skin reactions (LSRs) of subjects with severe LSRs for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that is used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week studies of Example 24.
LSRs local skin reactions
FIG. 41 shows the incidence of adverse events of subjects for the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that is used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week studies of Example 24.
the most common adverse event is application site reactions which occurs at a lower rate than Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream.
FIG. 41A shows the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of subjects for the combined 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 or 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 studies. This shows that the incidence of adverse events are less favorable in the 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 studies than the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 studies.
FIG. 42 shows the benefit/risk analysis for both (1) the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations of Example 23, that are used in the 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week studies of Example 24, and (2) the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream, to treat actinic keratosis.
the 3.75% imiquimod formulation provides incremental efficacy benefit to the 2.5% imiquimod formulation as defined by results for complete clearance, partial clearance and median percent reductions.
the 3.75% imiquimod formulation provides comparable efficacy to Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream as defined by partial clearance and median percent reductions not withstanding the differences in treatment area size and baseline numbers of AK lesions in the studies of the 3.75% and 5% imiquimod formulations.
the incidences of severe erythema and the incidences of rest periods among the 2.5%, 3.75% and 5% (Aldara®) imiquimod formulations are generally similar (that is within approximately 10% of each other). As noted with the assessment of benefits, these results are not withstanding the differences in treatment area size and baseline numbers of AK lesions in the studies of the 2.5%, 3.75% and 5% imiquimod formulations.
the third measure of risk that is incidence of application site reactions, shows low incidence rates for both the 2.5% and 3.75% imiquimod formulations and a minimum 3-fold higher incidence rate with the Aldara® 5% imiquimod cream formulation.
Example 28 is directed to eight clinical cases wherein subjects diagnosed with actinic keratosis are treated with either 2.5% or 3.75% low dosage strength imiquimod formulations of Example 23 in accordance with either a two-cycle, 2 week on ⁇ 2 week off ⁇ 2 week on treatment regimen or a two-cycle, 3 week on ⁇ 3 week off ⁇ 3 week on treatment regimen, as described herein. See, e.g., FIGS. 43-50 for a summary of results.
a 39 year old white male has an AK lesion count of 11 on his balding scalp at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the full balding scalp is treated daily with a single dose of a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 39 year old white male for each individual daily dose is 1.25 packets.
this 39 year old white male neither misses a dose nor takes a rest period.
the 39 year old white male is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (1.25 packets on average) of the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is applied to his full balding scalp once per day for 14 days; during the next 14 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 39 year old white male is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 39 year old white male is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 2, (c) week 6, (d) week 10, and (e) week 14.
AK lesion count 11 and a local skin reaction (erythema) score of 0.
AK lesion count is IND, but there is a local skin reaction erythema score of 2.
the AK lesion count remains IND, but the local skin reaction erythema score is reduced to 1.
the AK lesion count remains 0 (total clearance) and the local skin reaction erythema score returns to normal or baseline score. Lymphadenopathy is reported as a related adverse event.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 43 , demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that total or complete clearance is achieved with a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full balding scalp of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, treatment period.
This Example 28 as described in FIG. 43 , also demonstrates the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, treatment regimen, which is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
a 74 year old white male with Fitzpatrick skin type III has an AK lesion count of 8 on his balding scalp at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the entire balding scalp is treated daily with a single dose of a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 74 year old white male for each individual daily dose is 2.0 packets.
this 74 year old white male neither misses a dose nor takes a rest period.
the 74 year old white male is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (2.0 packets on average) of the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is applied to his full balding scalp once per day for 14 days; during the next 14 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 74 year old white male is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 74 year old white male is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 2, (c) week 4, (d) week 6, (e) week 10, and (f) week 14.
AK lesion count 8 and a local skin reaction (erythema) score of 0, a baseline score of 0.
the AK lesion count is 19, but there is a local skin reaction erythema score of 2.
the AK lesion count is reduced to 12, and the local skin reaction erythema score is reduced to 1.
the AK lesion count is increased to 33 and the local skin reaction erythema score is increased to 3.
the AK lesion count is reduced to 1 and the local skin reaction erythema score is now 0.
the AK lesion count is up to 2 (partial clearance) and the local skin reaction erythema score remains 0 or the same as the baseline score. No adverse events are reported.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 44 , demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that a reduction in AK lesions (partial clearance) of about 75% from baseline is achieved with a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full balding scalp of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, treatment period.
This Example 28 as described in FIG. 44 is another example of the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 week, treatment regimen, that is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
a 66 year old white female with Fitzpatrick skin type II has an AK lesion count of 9 on her face at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the full face is treated daily with a single dose of a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 66 year old white female for each individual daily dose is 1.26 packets.
this 66 year old white female neither missed a dose on day 29 and took rest periods on days 11, 12, 13 and 14.
the 66 year old white female is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (1.26 packets on average) of the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is applied to her full face once per day for 14 days; during the next 14 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 66 year old white female is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 66 year old white female is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 2, (c) week 6 and (d) week 14.
AK lesion count 9 and a local skin reaction (erythema) score of 0.
AK lesion count is IND, but there is a local skin reaction erythema score of 2.
the AK lesion count remains IND, but the local skin reaction erythema score is reduced to 1.
the AK lesion count is 0 (total clearance) and the local skin reaction erythema score remains at 1. Dizziness, facial stinging, sunburn (mild) are reported as related adverse events.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 45 , demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that total clearance is achieved with a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full face of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, treatment period.
This Example 28 as described in FIG. 45 also demonstrates the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, treatment regimen, which is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
a 73 year old white male with Fitzpatrick skin type II has an AK lesion count of 9 on his face at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the full face is treated daily with a single dose of a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 73 year old white male for each individual daily dose is 1.18 packets.
this 73 year old white male neither misses a dose nor takes a rest period.
the 73 year old white male is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (1.18 packets on average) of the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is applied to his full face once per day for 14 days; during the next 14 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 73 year old white male is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 73 year old white male is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 2, (c) week 4, (d) week 6, (e) week 10, and (f) week 14.
AK lesion count 9 and a local skin reaction (erythema) score of 0.
the AK lesion count is 22, but there is a local skin reaction erythema score of 3.
the AK lesion count is reduced to 3 and the local skin reaction erythema score is reduced to 0.
the AK lesion count is increased to and the local skin reaction erythema score is increased to 2.
the AK lesion count is reduced to 2 and the local skin reaction erythema score is now 0.
the AK lesion count remains at 2 (partial clearance) and the local skin reaction erythema score remains at 0 or the same as the baseline score. No adverse events are reported.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 46 further demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that a reduction in AK lesions (partial clearance) of greater than about 75% from baseline is achieved with a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full face of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, treatment regimen.
This Example 28, as described in FIG. 46 is another example of the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 2 ⁇ 2 ⁇ 2 weeks, treatment regimen, which is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
a 70 year old white male has an AK lesion count of 10 on his face at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the full face is treated daily with a single dose of a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 70 year old white male for each individual daily dose is 2.0 packets.
this 70 year old white male neither misses a dose nor takes a rest period.
the 70 year old white male is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (2.0 packets on average) of the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is applied to his full face once per day for 21 days; during the next 21 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 70 year old white male is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 70 year old white male is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 3, (c) week 9, and (d) week 17.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 47 , demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that partial clearance is achieved with a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full face of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week, treatment regimen.
This Example 28 as described in FIG. 47 , also demonstrates the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks, treatment regimen, which is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
a 65 year old white female has an AK lesion count of 7 on her face at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the full face is treated daily with a single dose of a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 65 year old white female for each individual daily dose is 1.69 packets.
this 65 year old white female neither misses a dose nor takes a rest period.
the 65 year old white female is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (1.69 packets on average) of the 2.5% imiquimod formulation is applied to her full face once per day for 21 days; during the next 21 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 65 year old white female is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 65 year old white female is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 3, (c) week 9, and (d) week 17.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 48 , demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that complete clearance is achieved with a 2.5% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full face of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks, treatment regimen.
This Example 28 as described in FIG. 48 , also demonstrates the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week, treatment regimen, which is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
a 79 year old white male has an AK lesion count of 14 on his face at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the full face is treated daily with a single dose of a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 79 year old white male for each individual daily dose is 1.14 packets.
this 79 year old white male neither misses a dose nor takes a rest period.
the 79 year old white male is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (1.14 packets on average) of the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is applied to his full face once per day for 21 days; during the next 21 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 79 year old white male is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 79 year old white male is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 3, (c) week 9 and (d) week 17.
AK lesion count 14 and a local skin reaction (erythema) score of 1.
erythema 14 and a local skin reaction (erythema) score of 1.
the AK lesion count is up to 16, and the local skin reaction erythema score is increased to 3.
the AK lesion count falls to 6 and local skin reaction erythema score is reduced to 2.
the AK lesion count is 0 (total or complete clearance) and the local skin reaction erythema score falls to 0, below normal or baseline. No adverse events are reported.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 49 , demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that total or complete clearance is achieved with a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full face of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 week, treatment regimen.
This Example 28 as described in FIG. 49 also demonstrates the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks, treatment regimen, which is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
a 78 year old white male has an AK lesion count of 8 on his balding scalp at treatment initiation. Consistent with the present invention, the entire balding scalp is treated daily with a single dose of a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23.
the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is packaged in individual packets in an amount of 250 mg/packet.
the number of average packets that are used by this 78 year old white male for each individual daily dose is 2.0 packets.
this 78 year old white male neither misses a dose nor takes a rest period.
the 78 year old white male is treated as follows: during the first cycle of treatment, one dose (2.0 packets on average) of the 3.75% imiquimod formulation is applied to his full balding scalp once per day for 21 days; during the next 21 days, treatment is suspended; during the second cycle of treatment, treatment is carried out identical to the treatment that is used during the first cycle.
the 78 year old white male is monitored for an additional 8 weeks.
the 78 year old white male is monitored for total or partial clearance, local skin reactions, including erythema, and adverse events at (a) baseline, (b) week 3, (c) week 9, and (d) week 17.
this clinical case as summarized in FIG. 50 further demonstrates efficacy without treatment limiting local skin reactions or adverse events and further demonstrates that complete clearance is achieved with a 3.75% imiquimod formulation of Example 23 when applied to the full balding scalp of a subject diagnosed with actinic keratosis following a 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3 weeks, treatment regimen.
This Example 28, as described in FIG. 50 is another example of the unique bimodal or camelback pattern as to the local skin reaction score for erythema during the 2 cycle, 3 ⁇ 3 ⁇ 3, treatment regimen, which is generated when following the short durations of therapy in accordance with the present invention.
formulations 126 and 182 wherein the fatty acid is a, are the formulations that are used in Examples 24-28 and in FIGS. 1-54 discussed and described herein above.
a formulations 126 and 182 pass the PET tests when stored at about 40° C. for about 3 months.

Landscapes

Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
Public Health (AREA)
Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
Epidemiology (AREA)
Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
Dermatology (AREA)
Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
Organic Chemistry (AREA)
Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)
Medicinal Preparation (AREA)
Nitrogen Condensed Heterocyclic Rings (AREA)
Steroid Compounds (AREA)

US12/636,613 2008-12-19 2009-12-11 Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and shorter dosing regimens for treating actinic keratoses Abandoned US20110021555A1 (en)

Priority Applications (13)

Application Number	Priority Date	Filing Date	Title
US12/636,613 US20110021555A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2009-12-11	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and shorter dosing regimens for treating actinic keratoses
US13/179,336 US20110263633A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Up to six weeks treatment regimen for treating actinic keratoses with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,402 US20110263634A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,315 US8222270B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	2×2×2 week treatment regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,363 US20110257217A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK TREATMENT REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 2.5% IMIQUIMOD
US13/181,507 US20110257219A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions forumlated with 3.75% imiquimod
US13/181,499 US8236816B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75 % imiquimod
US13/182,433 US8299109B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-13	Method of treating actinic keratosis with 3.75% imiquimod cream
US13/184,556 US20110263636A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-17	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK DOSING REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 3.75 % IMIQUIMOD
US13/184,579 US20110263637A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-18	Up to six weeks dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US13/568,003 US9370509B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2012-08-06	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75 % imiquimod
US15/187,751 US10238644B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2016-06-20	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating acting keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US16/268,230 US11318130B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2019-02-05	2x2x2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number	Priority Date	Filing Date	Title
US13953608P	2008-12-19	2008-12-19
US14473109P	2009-01-14	2009-01-14
US20514509P	2009-01-15	2009-01-15
US12/636,613 US20110021555A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2009-12-11	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and shorter dosing regimens for treating actinic keratoses

Related Child Applications (9)

Application Number	Title	Priority Date	Filing Date
US13/179,402 Continuation US20110263634A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,315 Continuation US8222270B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	2×2×2 week treatment regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,363 Continuation US20110257217A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK TREATMENT REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 2.5% IMIQUIMOD
US13/179,336 Continuation US20110263633A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Up to six weeks treatment regimen for treating actinic keratoses with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/181,507 Continuation US20110257219A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions forumlated with 3.75% imiquimod
US13/181,499 Continuation US8236816B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75 % imiquimod
US13/182,433 Continuation US8299109B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-13	Method of treating actinic keratosis with 3.75% imiquimod cream
US13/184,556 Continuation US20110263636A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-17	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK DOSING REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 3.75 % IMIQUIMOD
US13/184,579 Continuation US20110263637A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-18	Up to six weeks dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod

Publications (1)

Publication Number	Publication Date
US20110021555A1 true US20110021555A1 (en)	2011-01-27

Family

ID=42316709

Family Applications (13)

Application Number	Title	Priority Date	Filing Date
US12/636,613 Abandoned US20110021555A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2009-12-11	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and shorter dosing regimens for treating actinic keratoses
US13/179,336 Abandoned US20110263633A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Up to six weeks treatment regimen for treating actinic keratoses with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,363 Abandoned US20110257217A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK TREATMENT REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 2.5% IMIQUIMOD
US13/179,315 Active US8222270B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	2×2×2 week treatment regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,402 Abandoned US20110263634A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/181,507 Abandoned US20110257219A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions forumlated with 3.75% imiquimod
US13/181,499 Active US8236816B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75 % imiquimod
US13/182,433 Active US8299109B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-13	Method of treating actinic keratosis with 3.75% imiquimod cream
US13/184,556 Abandoned US20110263636A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-17	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK DOSING REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 3.75 % IMIQUIMOD
US13/184,579 Abandoned US20110263637A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-18	Up to six weeks dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US13/568,003 Active 2031-01-16 US9370509B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2012-08-06	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75 % imiquimod
US15/187,751 Active 2030-05-19 US10238644B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2016-06-20	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating acting keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US16/268,230 Active US11318130B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2019-02-05	2x2x2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod

Family Applications After (12)

Application Number	Title	Priority Date	Filing Date
US13/179,336 Abandoned US20110263633A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Up to six weeks treatment regimen for treating actinic keratoses with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,363 Abandoned US20110257217A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK TREATMENT REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 2.5% IMIQUIMOD
US13/179,315 Active US8222270B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	2×2×2 week treatment regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/179,402 Abandoned US20110263634A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-08	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 2.5% imiquimod
US13/181,507 Abandoned US20110257219A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	Lower dosage strength pharmaceutical compositions forumlated with 3.75% imiquimod
US13/181,499 Active US8236816B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-12	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75 % imiquimod
US13/182,433 Active US8299109B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-13	Method of treating actinic keratosis with 3.75% imiquimod cream
US13/184,556 Abandoned US20110263636A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-17	3 x 3 x 3 WEEK DOSING REGIMEN FOR TREATING ACTINIC KERATOSIS WITH PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS FORMULATED WITH 3.75 % IMIQUIMOD
US13/184,579 Abandoned US20110263637A1 (en)	2008-12-19	2011-07-18	Up to six weeks dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US13/568,003 Active 2031-01-16 US9370509B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2012-08-06	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75 % imiquimod
US15/187,751 Active 2030-05-19 US10238644B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2016-06-20	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating acting keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US16/268,230 Active US11318130B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2019-02-05	2x2x2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod

Country Status (27)

Country	Link
US (13)	US20110021555A1 (sr)
EP (1)	EP2378876B1 (sr)
AR (1)	AR074802A1 (sr)
AU (1)	AU2009335943A1 (sr)
BR (1)	BRPI0923164A2 (sr)
CL (1)	CL2009002183A1 (sr)
CO (1)	CO6400171A2 (sr)
CR (1)	CR20110338A (sr)
CY (1)	CY1121485T1 (sr)
DK (1)	DK2378876T3 (sr)
DO (1)	DOP2011000195A (sr)
EA (1)	EA201100984A1 (sr)
ES (1)	ES2720149T3 (sr)
GE (1)	GEP20146198B (sr)
HR (1)	HRP20190306T1 (sr)
HU (1)	HUE041944T2 (sr)
IL (2)	IL213628A (sr)
LT (1)	LT2378876T (sr)
MX (2)	MX346455B (sr)
PA (1)	PA8855101A1 (sr)
PE (2)	PE20100469A1 (sr)
PL (1)	PL2378876T3 (sr)
PT (1)	PT2378876T (sr)
RS (1)	RS58566B1 (sr)
SI (1)	SI2378876T1 (sr)
TW (1)	TWI442923B (sr)
WO (1)	WO2010080345A1 (sr)

Cited By (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
US20100160368A1 (en) *	2008-08-18	2010-06-24	Gregory Jefferson J	Methods of Treating Dermatological Disorders and Inducing Interferon Biosynthesis With Shorter Durations of Imiquimod Therapy
US20110207766A1 (en) *	2009-07-13	2011-08-25	Graceway Pharmaceuticals, Llc.	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
WO2011163617A1 (en)	2010-06-25	2011-12-29	Graceway Pharmaceuticals, Llc	Combination therapy with cryosurgery and low dosage strength imiquimod to treat actinic keratosis
US20120035556A1 (en) *	2010-08-05	2012-02-09	Graceway Parmaceuticals, LLC	Pump systems and methods for storing and dispensing a plurality of precisely measured unit-doses of imiquimod cream
WO2015054400A3 (en) *	2013-10-08	2015-06-25	Immunogen, Inc.	Anti-folr1 immunoconjugate dosing regimens
US9434956B2 (en)	2008-08-29	2016-09-06	Los Alamos National Security, Llc	Transgenic plants with enhanced growth characteristics
US9492682B2 (en)	2011-09-14	2016-11-15	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Combination therapy with low dosage strength imiquimod and photodynamic therapy to treat actinic keratosis
US9637547B2 (en)	2013-08-30	2017-05-02	Immunogen, Inc.	Monoclonal antibodies for detection of folate receptor 1
US10119127B2 (en)	2008-08-29	2018-11-06	Los Alamos National Security, Llc	Nucleic acids encoding plant glutamine phenylpyruvate transaminase (GPT) and uses thereof
US10172875B2 (en)	2015-09-17	2019-01-08	Immunogen, Inc.	Therapeutic combinations comprising anti-FOLR1 immunoconjugates
US10238644B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2019-03-26	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating acting keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
CN110891575A (zh) *	2017-03-10	2020-03-17	雅培克公司	治疗和/或预防光化性角化病的方法
US11216742B2 (en)	2019-03-04	2022-01-04	Iocurrents, Inc.	Data compression and communication using machine learning

Families Citing this family (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
MX2014006051A (es) *	2011-11-30	2014-11-25	Merz Pharma Gmbh & Co Kgaa	Uso de alcoholes pegilados para el tratamiento de queratosis actinica.
US10076535B2 (en)	2012-04-27	2018-09-18	The United States Of America, As Represented By The Secretary, Department Of Health And Human Services	Use of CPG oligonucleotides co-formulated with an antibiotic to accelerate wound healing
US9619980B2 (en)	2013-09-06	2017-04-11	Immersion Corporation	Systems and methods for generating haptic effects associated with audio signals
US9576445B2 (en)	2013-09-06	2017-02-21	Immersion Corp.	Systems and methods for generating haptic effects associated with an envelope in audio signals
US9711014B2 (en)	2013-09-06	2017-07-18	Immersion Corporation	Systems and methods for generating haptic effects associated with transitions in audio signals
WO2016040638A2 (en)	2014-09-10	2016-03-17	Washington University	Compositions and methods for treatment of pre-cancerous skin lesions

Citations (42)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
US4411893A (en) *	1981-08-14	1983-10-25	Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company	Topical medicament preparations
US4689338A (en) *	1983-11-18	1987-08-25	Riker Laboratories, Inc.	1H-Imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amines and antiviral use
US4722941A (en) *	1978-06-07	1988-02-02	Kali-Chemie Pharma Gmbh	Readily absorbable pharmaceutical compositions of per se poorly absorbable pharmacologically active agents and preparation thereof
US4746515A (en) *	1987-02-26	1988-05-24	Alza Corporation	Skin permeation enhancer compositions using glycerol monolaurate
US4751087A (en) *	1985-04-19	1988-06-14	Riker Laboratories, Inc.	Transdermal nitroglycerin delivery system
US5238944A (en) *	1988-12-15	1993-08-24	Riker Laboratories, Inc.	Topical formulations and transdermal delivery systems containing 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine
US20020147210A1 (en) *	2000-09-15	2002-10-10	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods for delaying recurrence of herpes virus symptoms
US20030007939A1 (en) *	1998-07-31	2003-01-09	Howard Murad	Pharmaceutical compositions and methods for managing dermatological conditions
US20030072814A1 (en) *	1999-12-16	2003-04-17	Maibach Howard I.	Topical pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of warts
US20030199538A1 (en) *	2001-11-29	2003-10-23	3M Innovative Properties Company	Pharmaceutical formulation comprising an immune response modifier
US6693113B2 (en) *	1997-12-11	2004-02-17	3M Innovative Properties Company	2-methyl-1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c][1,5]napthyridin-4 amine
US6706728B2 (en) *	1999-01-08	2004-03-16	3M Innovative Properties Company	Systems and methods for treating a mucosal surface
US20040087614A1 (en) *	2003-07-28	2004-05-06	Leslie Baumann	Method for treating damaged skin
US20040181130A1 (en) *	2003-03-13	2004-09-16	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods for diagnosing skin lesions
US20040180919A1 (en) *	2003-03-13	2004-09-16	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods of improving skin quality
US6894060B2 (en) *	2000-03-30	2005-05-17	3M Innovative Properties Company	Method for the treatment of dermal lesions caused by envenomation
US20050232869A1 (en) *	2002-10-25	2005-10-20	Foamix Ltd.	Nonsteroidal immunomodulating kit and composition and uses thereof
US20060105028A1 (en) *	2004-11-12	2006-05-18	Jie Zhang	Systems and methods for treating warts
US20070049518A1 (en) *	2005-08-31	2007-03-01	Chandler Stephen R	Novel method of treatment of inflammatory skin conditions
US20070123558A1 (en) *	2004-12-17	2007-05-31	Statham Alexis S	Immune response modifier formulations containing oleic acid and methods
US20070134273A1 (en) *	2004-02-10	2007-06-14	Francois Romagne	Composition and method for the treatment of carcinoma
US20070166384A1 (en) *	2004-04-09	2007-07-19	Zarraga Isidro Angelo E	Methods , composition and preparations for delivery of immune response modifiers
US20070264317A1 (en) *	2006-05-15	2007-11-15	Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd.	Imiquimod cream formulation
US20080015271A1 (en) *	2006-07-14	2008-01-17	Stiefel Research Austrialia Pty Ltd	Fatty acid pharmaceutical foam
US20080125485A1 (en) *	2004-02-17	2008-05-29	Action Medicines	Use of 2,5-Dihydroxybenzene Derivatives for Treating Actinic Keratosis
US20080161328A1 (en) *	2006-09-26	2008-07-03	Muller George W	5-Substituted quinazolinone derivatives and compositions comprising and methods of using the same
US20080193487A1 (en) *	2004-10-08	2008-08-14	Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz	Preparation for Vaccination, Vaccination Method and Use of a Vaccination Preparation
US20080214615A1 (en) *	2006-09-15	2008-09-04	Muller George W	N-methylaminomethyl isoindole compounds and compositions comprising and methods of using the same
US20080280943A1 (en) *	2007-03-23	2008-11-13	Slade Herbert B	Methods and packages to enhance safety when using imiquimod to treat children diagnosed with skin disorders
US20090041680A1 (en) *	2007-08-07	2009-02-12	Foamix Ltd.	Wax Foamable Vehicle and Pharmaceutical Compositions Thereof
US7507703B2 (en) *	2004-09-21	2009-03-24	John R. Woodward	Method of cancer screening; method of cancer treatment; and method of diabetes treatment
US20090130029A1 (en) *	2007-11-21	2009-05-21	Foamix Ltd.	Glycerol ethers vehicle and pharmaceutical compositions thereof
US20090182004A1 (en) *	2008-01-15	2009-07-16	Gareth Winckle	Imiquimod formulation
US20090232755A1 (en) *	2003-07-28	2009-09-17	Leslie Baumann	Combination therapies for treating photodamaged skin
US20090246156A1 (en) *	2008-03-31	2009-10-01	Audrey Kunin	Anti-acne sunscreen composition
US20090281047A1 (en) *	2008-04-03	2009-11-12	Brown Joe Ernest	Compositions And Methods For Immunotherapy
US20090304812A1 (en) *	2005-12-07	2009-12-10	John Staniforth	Topical Pharmaceutical Compositions
US20100021394A1 (en) *	2007-01-31	2010-01-28	Chongxi Yu	High penetration prodrug compositions of 1h-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amines and 1h-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine-related compounds
US20100129439A1 (en) *	2008-10-12	2010-05-27	Frank Alexis	Adjuvant Incorporation in Immunonanotherapeutics
US20100150869A1 (en) *	2005-09-15	2010-06-17	Biomas Ltd.	Use of tellurium compounds for treatment of basal cell carcinoma and/or actinic keratosis
US7893083B2 (en) *	2003-01-06	2011-02-22	Eugene Mandrea	Method of treating genital herpes
US20110045037A1 (en) *	2007-11-30	2011-02-24	Foamix Ltd.	Foam containing benzoyl peroxide

Family Cites Families (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
IT610737A (sr)	1955-11-18	1900-01-01
SE9601528D0 (sv) *	1996-04-23	1996-04-23	Pharmacia Ab	Transdermally administered dextromethorphan as antitissue agent
KR20010101420A (ko)	1999-01-08	2001-11-14	캐롤린 에이. 베이츠	면역반응 조절제로 점막 관련 질환을 치료하기 위한조성물 및 방법
EP1401437A1 (en)	2001-06-15	2004-03-31	3M Innovative Properties Company	Immune response modifiers for the treatment of periodontal disease
US20040192585A1 (en)	2003-03-25	2004-09-30	3M Innovative Properties Company	Treatment for basal cell carcinoma
US20040265351A1 (en) *	2003-04-10	2004-12-30	Miller Richard L.	Methods and compositions for enhancing immune response
WO2005020995A1 (en)	2003-09-02	2005-03-10	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods related to the treatment of mucosal associated conditions
CA2550515A1 (en)	2003-12-31	2005-07-21	Taigen Biotechnology	Protease inhibitors
US20070196452A1 (en)	2004-06-07	2007-08-23	Jie Zhang	Flux-enabling compositions and methods for dermal delivery of drugs
CN1286529C (zh)	2004-06-11	2006-11-29	华中科技大学	具有皮肤靶向性的药物组合物及其制备方法和用途
JP2008530022A (ja)	2005-02-04	2008-08-07	コーリーファーマシューティカルグループ，インコーポレイテッド	免疫反応調節物質を含む水性ゲル処方物
US8889154B2 (en)	2005-09-15	2014-11-18	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Packaging for 1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c] quinolin-4-amine-containing formulation
US20070081962A1 (en)	2005-10-06	2007-04-12	Amit Munshi	Novel delivery of immune response modifiers for removal of chronic tattoos
US20100092401A1 (en)	2006-07-18	2010-04-15	Graceway Pharmaceuticals, Llc	Immune response modifier formulations
US8124096B2 (en)	2006-07-31	2012-02-28	3M Innovative Properties Company	Immune response modifier compositions and methods
US20090018155A1 (en) *	2007-02-08	2009-01-15	Gregory Jefferson J	Methods of treating dermatological disorders and inducing interferon biosynthesis with shorter durations of imiquimod therapy
WO2008118765A1 (en)	2007-03-23	2008-10-02	Graceway Pharmaceuticals, Llc	Methods and packages to enhance safety when using imiquimod to treat children diagnosed with skin disorders
WO2008140713A1 (en)	2007-05-08	2008-11-20	The Brigham And Women's Hospital, Inc	Methods and products for treating proliferative disorders
GB0715428D0 (en)	2007-08-08	2007-09-19	Imp Innovations Ltd	Compositions and uses thereof
KR101483715B1 (ko)	2008-01-31	2015-01-19	큐어백 게엠바하	면역증강제／애주번트인 화학식（ＮｕＧｌＸｍＧｎＮｖ）ａ를 포함하는 핵산 및 이의 유도체
WO2009134769A1 (en)	2008-04-28	2009-11-05	Novartis Ag	Nanoparticles for use in pharmaceutical compositions
WO2009155070A2 (en)	2008-05-30	2009-12-23	Novelix Pharmaceuticals, Inc.	Compositions and methods for treatment of inflammation and hyperkeratotic lesions
US20110212157A1 (en)	2008-06-26	2011-09-01	Anterios, Inc.	Dermal delivery
US20100160368A1 (en)	2008-08-18	2010-06-24	Gregory Jefferson J	Methods of Treating Dermatological Disorders and Inducing Interferon Biosynthesis With Shorter Durations of Imiquimod Therapy
RU2011111206A (ru)	2008-10-31	2012-12-10	Моберг Дерма Аб	Композиции для местного применения, содержащие комбинацию по меньшей мере двух агентов, усиливающих проникновение
HUE041944T2 (hu)	2008-12-19	2019-06-28	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp	Alacsony dózisú imiquimod készítmények és rövid adagolási módszer aktinikus keratózis kezelésére
WO2010088924A1 (en)	2009-02-06	2010-08-12	Telormedix Sa	Pharmaceutical compositions comprising imidazoquinolin(amines) and derivatives thereof suitable for local administration
PL2453747T3 (pl)	2009-07-13	2018-02-28	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Preparaty imikwimodu o niższej mocy dawki i krótkie schematy dawkowania do leczenia brodawek narządów płciowych i okolic odbytu
US8476225B2 (en)	2009-12-04	2013-07-02	Gilead Sciences, Inc.	Antiviral compounds
US9072876B2 (en) *	2010-08-05	2015-07-07	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Pump systems and methods for storing and dispensing a plurality of precisely measured unit-doses of imiquimod cream
US9492682B2 (en) *	2011-09-14	2016-11-15	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Combination therapy with low dosage strength imiquimod and photodynamic therapy to treat actinic keratosis

2009
- 2009-12-11 HU HUE09837849A patent/HUE041944T2/hu unknown
- 2009-12-11 PL PL09837849T patent/PL2378876T3/pl unknown
- 2009-12-11 PT PT09837849T patent/PT2378876T/pt unknown
- 2009-12-11 SI SI200931933T patent/SI2378876T1/sl unknown
- 2009-12-11 MX MX2015008994A patent/MX346455B/es unknown
- 2009-12-11 US US12/636,613 patent/US20110021555A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-12-11 EA EA201100984A patent/EA201100984A1/ru unknown
- 2009-12-11 DK DK09837849.0T patent/DK2378876T3/en active
- 2009-12-11 ES ES09837849T patent/ES2720149T3/es active Active
- 2009-12-11 AU AU2009335943A patent/AU2009335943A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2009-12-11 MX MX2011001555A patent/MX2011001555A/es active IP Right Grant
- 2009-12-11 LT LTEP09837849.0T patent/LT2378876T/lt unknown
- 2009-12-11 RS RS20190210A patent/RS58566B1/sr unknown
- 2009-12-11 WO PCT/US2009/067759 patent/WO2010080345A1/en active Application Filing
- 2009-12-11 EP EP09837849.0A patent/EP2378876B1/en active Active
- 2009-12-11 GE GEAP200912310A patent/GEP20146198B/en unknown
- 2009-12-11 BR BRPI0923164A patent/BRPI0923164A2/pt not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2009-12-17 TW TW098143460A patent/TWI442923B/zh active
- 2009-12-17 CL CL2009002183A patent/CL2009002183A1/es unknown
- 2009-12-18 PA PA20098855101A patent/PA8855101A1/es unknown
- 2009-12-18 PE PE2009001323A patent/PE20100469A1/es not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2009-12-18 AR ARP090104978A patent/AR074802A1/es unknown
- 2009-12-18 PE PE2014000347A patent/PE20142367A1/es not_active Application Discontinuation
2011
- 2011-06-16 IL IL213628A patent/IL213628A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2011-06-17 CR CR20110338A patent/CR20110338A/es unknown
- 2011-06-17 DO DO2011000195A patent/DOP2011000195A/es unknown
- 2011-07-08 US US13/179,336 patent/US20110263633A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-07-08 US US13/179,363 patent/US20110257217A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-07-08 US US13/179,315 patent/US8222270B2/en active Active
- 2011-07-08 US US13/179,402 patent/US20110263634A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-07-12 US US13/181,507 patent/US20110257219A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-07-12 US US13/181,499 patent/US8236816B2/en active Active
- 2011-07-13 CO CO11087690A patent/CO6400171A2/es not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2011-07-13 US US13/182,433 patent/US8299109B2/en active Active
- 2011-07-17 US US13/184,556 patent/US20110263636A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-07-18 US US13/184,579 patent/US20110263637A1/en not_active Abandoned
2012
- 2012-08-06 US US13/568,003 patent/US9370509B2/en active Active
2016
- 2016-06-20 US US15/187,751 patent/US10238644B2/en active Active
2017
- 2017-10-22 IL IL255163A patent/IL255163B/en active IP Right Grant
2019
- 2019-02-05 US US16/268,230 patent/US11318130B2/en active Active
- 2019-02-14 HR HRP20190306TT patent/HRP20190306T1/hr unknown
- 2019-02-14 CY CY20191100200T patent/CY1121485T1/el unknown

Patent Citations (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
US4722941A (en) *	1978-06-07	1988-02-02	Kali-Chemie Pharma Gmbh	Readily absorbable pharmaceutical compositions of per se poorly absorbable pharmacologically active agents and preparation thereof
US4411893A (en) *	1981-08-14	1983-10-25	Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company	Topical medicament preparations
US4689338A (en) *	1983-11-18	1987-08-25	Riker Laboratories, Inc.	1H-Imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amines and antiviral use
US4751087A (en) *	1985-04-19	1988-06-14	Riker Laboratories, Inc.	Transdermal nitroglycerin delivery system
US4751087B1 (sr) *	1985-04-19	1993-03-02	Riker Laboratories Inc
US4746515A (en) *	1987-02-26	1988-05-24	Alza Corporation	Skin permeation enhancer compositions using glycerol monolaurate
US5238944A (en) *	1988-12-15	1993-08-24	Riker Laboratories, Inc.	Topical formulations and transdermal delivery systems containing 1-isobutyl-1H-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine
US6693113B2 (en) *	1997-12-11	2004-02-17	3M Innovative Properties Company	2-methyl-1-(2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazo[4,5-c][1,5]napthyridin-4 amine
US7038051B2 (en) *	1997-12-11	2006-05-02	3M Innovative Properties Company	Imidazonaphthyridines
US20030007939A1 (en) *	1998-07-31	2003-01-09	Howard Murad	Pharmaceutical compositions and methods for managing dermatological conditions
US6706728B2 (en) *	1999-01-08	2004-03-16	3M Innovative Properties Company	Systems and methods for treating a mucosal surface
US20030072814A1 (en) *	1999-12-16	2003-04-17	Maibach Howard I.	Topical pharmaceutical composition for the treatment of warts
US6894060B2 (en) *	2000-03-30	2005-05-17	3M Innovative Properties Company	Method for the treatment of dermal lesions caused by envenomation
US20020147210A1 (en) *	2000-09-15	2002-10-10	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods for delaying recurrence of herpes virus symptoms
US20030199538A1 (en) *	2001-11-29	2003-10-23	3M Innovative Properties Company	Pharmaceutical formulation comprising an immune response modifier
US20050232869A1 (en) *	2002-10-25	2005-10-20	Foamix Ltd.	Nonsteroidal immunomodulating kit and composition and uses thereof
US7893083B2 (en) *	2003-01-06	2011-02-22	Eugene Mandrea	Method of treating genital herpes
US20040180919A1 (en) *	2003-03-13	2004-09-16	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods of improving skin quality
US20040181130A1 (en) *	2003-03-13	2004-09-16	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods for diagnosing skin lesions
US20090202443A1 (en) *	2003-03-13	2009-08-13	3M Innovative Properties Company	Methods of improving skin quality
US20040087614A1 (en) *	2003-07-28	2004-05-06	Leslie Baumann	Method for treating damaged skin
US20090232755A1 (en) *	2003-07-28	2009-09-17	Leslie Baumann	Combination therapies for treating photodamaged skin
US20070134273A1 (en) *	2004-02-10	2007-06-14	Francois Romagne	Composition and method for the treatment of carcinoma
US20080125485A1 (en) *	2004-02-17	2008-05-29	Action Medicines	Use of 2,5-Dihydroxybenzene Derivatives for Treating Actinic Keratosis
US20070166384A1 (en) *	2004-04-09	2007-07-19	Zarraga Isidro Angelo E	Methods , composition and preparations for delivery of immune response modifiers
US7507703B2 (en) *	2004-09-21	2009-03-24	John R. Woodward	Method of cancer screening; method of cancer treatment; and method of diabetes treatment
US20080193487A1 (en) *	2004-10-08	2008-08-14	Johannes-Gutenberg-Universitaet Mainz	Preparation for Vaccination, Vaccination Method and Use of a Vaccination Preparation
US20060105028A1 (en) *	2004-11-12	2006-05-18	Jie Zhang	Systems and methods for treating warts
US20090093514A1 (en) *	2004-12-17	2009-04-09	3M Innovative Properties Company	Immune response modifier formulations containing oleic acid and methods
US20070123558A1 (en) *	2004-12-17	2007-05-31	Statham Alexis S	Immune response modifier formulations containing oleic acid and methods
US20070049518A1 (en) *	2005-08-31	2007-03-01	Chandler Stephen R	Novel method of treatment of inflammatory skin conditions
US20100150869A1 (en) *	2005-09-15	2010-06-17	Biomas Ltd.	Use of tellurium compounds for treatment of basal cell carcinoma and/or actinic keratosis
US20090304812A1 (en) *	2005-12-07	2009-12-10	John Staniforth	Topical Pharmaceutical Compositions
US20070264317A1 (en) *	2006-05-15	2007-11-15	Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd.	Imiquimod cream formulation
US20080015271A1 (en) *	2006-07-14	2008-01-17	Stiefel Research Austrialia Pty Ltd	Fatty acid pharmaceutical foam
US20080214615A1 (en) *	2006-09-15	2008-09-04	Muller George W	N-methylaminomethyl isoindole compounds and compositions comprising and methods of using the same
US20080161328A1 (en) *	2006-09-26	2008-07-03	Muller George W	5-Substituted quinazolinone derivatives and compositions comprising and methods of using the same
US20100021394A1 (en) *	2007-01-31	2010-01-28	Chongxi Yu	High penetration prodrug compositions of 1h-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amines and 1h-imidazo[4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine-related compounds
US20080280943A1 (en) *	2007-03-23	2008-11-13	Slade Herbert B	Methods and packages to enhance safety when using imiquimod to treat children diagnosed with skin disorders
US20090041680A1 (en) *	2007-08-07	2009-02-12	Foamix Ltd.	Wax Foamable Vehicle and Pharmaceutical Compositions Thereof
US20090130029A1 (en) *	2007-11-21	2009-05-21	Foamix Ltd.	Glycerol ethers vehicle and pharmaceutical compositions thereof
US20110045037A1 (en) *	2007-11-30	2011-02-24	Foamix Ltd.	Foam containing benzoyl peroxide
US20090182004A1 (en) *	2008-01-15	2009-07-16	Gareth Winckle	Imiquimod formulation
US20090246156A1 (en) *	2008-03-31	2009-10-01	Audrey Kunin	Anti-acne sunscreen composition
US20090281047A1 (en) *	2008-04-03	2009-11-12	Brown Joe Ernest	Compositions And Methods For Immunotherapy
US20100129439A1 (en) *	2008-10-12	2010-05-27	Frank Alexis	Adjuvant Incorporation in Immunonanotherapeutics

Cited By (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number	Priority date	Publication date	Assignee	Title
US20100160368A1 (en) *	2008-08-18	2010-06-24	Gregory Jefferson J	Methods of Treating Dermatological Disorders and Inducing Interferon Biosynthesis With Shorter Durations of Imiquimod Therapy
US8598196B2 (en)	2008-08-18	2013-12-03	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Methods of treating dermatological disorders and inducing interferon biosynthesis with shorter durations of imiquimod therapy
US9271973B2 (en)	2008-08-18	2016-03-01	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Methods of treating dermatological disorders and inducing interferon biosynthesis with shorter durations of imiquimod therapy
US9862964B2 (en)	2008-08-29	2018-01-09	Los Alamos National Security, Llc	Transgenic plants with enhanced growth characteristics
US10119127B2 (en)	2008-08-29	2018-11-06	Los Alamos National Security, Llc	Nucleic acids encoding plant glutamine phenylpyruvate transaminase (GPT) and uses thereof
US9434956B2 (en)	2008-08-29	2016-09-06	Los Alamos National Security, Llc	Transgenic plants with enhanced growth characteristics
US10238644B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2019-03-26	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	2×2×2 week dosing regimen for treating acting keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US11318130B2 (en)	2008-12-19	2022-05-03	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	2x2x2 week dosing regimen for treating actinic keratosis with pharmaceutical compositions formulated with 3.75% imiquimod
US9078889B2 (en)	2009-07-13	2015-07-14	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
US8642616B2 (en)	2009-07-13	2014-02-04	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
US11850245B2 (en)	2009-07-13	2023-12-26	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
US10918635B2 (en)	2009-07-13	2021-02-16	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
US10238645B2 (en)	2009-07-13	2019-03-26	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
US20110207766A1 (en) *	2009-07-13	2011-08-25	Graceway Pharmaceuticals, Llc.	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
US9980955B2 (en)	2009-07-13	2018-05-29	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Lower dosage strength imiquimod formulations and short dosing regimens for treating genital and perianal warts
WO2011163617A1 (en)	2010-06-25	2011-12-29	Graceway Pharmaceuticals, Llc	Combination therapy with cryosurgery and low dosage strength imiquimod to treat actinic keratosis
US9072876B2 (en) *	2010-08-05	2015-07-07	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Pump systems and methods for storing and dispensing a plurality of precisely measured unit-doses of imiquimod cream
US20120035556A1 (en) *	2010-08-05	2012-02-09	Graceway Parmaceuticals, LLC	Pump systems and methods for storing and dispensing a plurality of precisely measured unit-doses of imiquimod cream
US9642998B2 (en)	2010-08-05	2017-05-09	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Pump systems and methods for storing and dispensing a plurality of precisely measured unit-doses of imiquimod cream
US9492682B2 (en)	2011-09-14	2016-11-15	Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation	Combination therapy with low dosage strength imiquimod and photodynamic therapy to treat actinic keratosis
US9637547B2 (en)	2013-08-30	2017-05-02	Immunogen, Inc.	Monoclonal antibodies for detection of folate receptor 1
US10544230B2 (en)	2013-08-30	2020-01-28	Immunogen, Inc.	Methods of using antibodies to detect folate receptor 1 (FOLR1)
US10017578B2 (en)	2013-08-30	2018-07-10	Immunogen, Inc.	Methods of treating cancer in a patient by administering anti-folate-receptor-1 (FOLR1) antibodies
US11198736B2 (en)	2013-08-30	2021-12-14	Immunogen, Inc.	Method for identifying an ovarian cancer in a subject likely to respond to anti-folate receptor 1 (FOLR1) antibody
US11932701B2 (en)	2013-08-30	2024-03-19	Immunogen, Inc.	Method for increasing the efficacy of cancer therapy by administering an anti-FOLR1 immunoconjugate
WO2015054400A3 (en) *	2013-10-08	2015-06-25	Immunogen, Inc.	Anti-folr1 immunoconjugate dosing regimens
US11033564B2 (en)	2015-09-17	2021-06-15	Immunogen, Inc.	Therapeutic combinations comprising anti-FOLR1 immunoconjugates
US10172875B2 (en)	2015-09-17	2019-01-08	Immunogen, Inc.	Therapeutic combinations comprising anti-FOLR1 immunoconjugates
CN110891575A (zh) *	2017-03-10	2020-03-17	雅培克公司	治疗和/或预防光化性角化病的方法
US11216742B2 (en)	2019-03-04	2022-01-04	Iocurrents, Inc.	Data compression and communication using machine learning
US11468355B2 (en)	2019-03-04	2022-10-11	Iocurrents, Inc.	Data compression and communication using machine learning

Also Published As

Publication number	Publication date
CY1121485T1 (el)	2020-05-29
HRP20190306T1 (hr)	2019-05-03
AU2009335943A1 (en)	2013-10-24
IL255163A0 (en)	2017-12-31
US20110257219A1 (en)	2011-10-20
US20110263636A1 (en)	2011-10-27
US20110257216A1 (en)	2011-10-20
EP2378876A1 (en)	2011-10-26
GEP20146198B (en)	2014-11-25
US20110257218A1 (en)	2011-10-20
US20160303111A1 (en)	2016-10-20
CO6400171A2 (es)	2012-03-15
RS58566B1 (sr)	2019-05-31
WO2010080345A1 (en)	2010-07-15
US20110257217A1 (en)	2011-10-20
US8236816B2 (en)	2012-08-07
PE20142367A1 (es)	2015-01-10
EP2378876A4 (en)	2012-12-05
US8222270B2 (en)	2012-07-17
LT2378876T (lt)	2019-04-25
US20110263637A1 (en)	2011-10-27
DOP2011000195A (es)	2011-12-15
AR074802A1 (es)	2011-02-16
TWI442923B (zh)	2014-07-01
PE20100469A1 (es)	2010-07-31
IL213628A0 (en)	2011-07-31
PT2378876T (pt)	2019-03-01
US9370509B2 (en)	2016-06-21
US20200276182A1 (en)	2020-09-03
BRPI0923164A2 (pt)	2016-01-26
HUE041944T2 (hu)	2019-06-28
MX2011001555A (es)	2011-04-14
EP2378876B1 (en)	2018-11-14
US10238644B2 (en)	2019-03-26
US20110263635A1 (en)	2011-10-27
EA201100984A1 (ru)	2012-01-30
TW201040173A (en)	2010-11-16
PA8855101A1 (es)	2010-07-27
MX346455B (es)	2017-03-21
CR20110338A (es)	2011-11-10
US20110263633A1 (en)	2011-10-27
CL2009002183A1 (es)	2011-01-07
DK2378876T3 (en)	2019-03-11
US8299109B2 (en)	2012-10-30
IL213628A (en)	2017-11-30
PL2378876T3 (pl)	2019-06-28
IL255163B (en)	2019-01-31
SI2378876T1 (sl)	2019-05-31
US20130210855A1 (en)	2013-08-15
US11318130B2 (en)	2022-05-03
ES2720149T3 (es)	2019-07-18
US20110263634A1 (en)	2011-10-27

Legal Events

Date

Code

Title

Description

2009-12-17

AS

Assignment

Owner name: GRACEWAY PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, TENNESSEE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:NORDSIEK, MICHAEL T.;LEVY, SHARON F.;LEE, JAMES H.;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20091210 TO 20091214;REEL/FRAME:023678/0694

2011-12-13

AS