US20110002739A1 - Temporary floating breakwater and causeway with simulated beach and kelp - Google Patents
Temporary floating breakwater and causeway with simulated beach and kelp Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20110002739A1 US20110002739A1 US12/828,631 US82863110A US2011002739A1 US 20110002739 A1 US20110002739 A1 US 20110002739A1 US 82863110 A US82863110 A US 82863110A US 2011002739 A1 US2011002739 A1 US 2011002739A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- floating breakwater
- floating
- temporary
- causeway
- breakwater
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 238000007667 floating Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 80
- 241000512259 Ascophyllum nodosum Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims abstract description 13
- 239000004743 Polypropylene Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 229920001155 polypropylene Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- -1 polypropylenes Polymers 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 150000001336 alkenes Chemical class 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000003305 oil spill Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 10
- 239000004753 textile Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethyl urethane Chemical compound CCOC(N)=O JOYRKODLDBILNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 7
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004677 Nylon Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004873 anchoring Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 229920001778 nylon Polymers 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000004806 packaging method and process Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 23
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000010887 ISOL method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008030 elimination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003379 elimination reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000014653 Carica parviflora Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000243321 Cnidaria Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000296380 Laminaria hyperborea Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000235842 Nereocystis luetkeana Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000011358 absorbing material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010521 absorption reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035508 accumulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002411 adverse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003373 anti-fouling effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009360 aquaculture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000144974 aquaculture Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000309464 bull Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000007123 defense Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000497 foam cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000006261 foam material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012856 packing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009046 primary transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B21/00—Tying-up; Shifting, towing, or pushing equipment; Anchoring
- B63B21/50—Anchoring arrangements or methods for special vessels, e.g. for floating drilling platforms or dredgers
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B22/00—Buoys
- B63B22/02—Buoys specially adapted for mooring a vessel
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B63—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
- B63B—SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING
- B63B35/00—Vessels or similar floating structures specially adapted for specific purposes and not otherwise provided for
- B63B35/44—Floating buildings, stores, drilling platforms, or workshops, e.g. carrying water-oil separating devices
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D15/00—Movable or portable bridges; Floating bridges
- E01D15/14—Floating bridges, e.g. pontoon bridges
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E01—CONSTRUCTION OF ROADS, RAILWAYS, OR BRIDGES
- E01D—CONSTRUCTION OF BRIDGES, ELEVATED ROADWAYS OR VIADUCTS; ASSEMBLY OF BRIDGES
- E01D15/00—Movable or portable bridges; Floating bridges
- E01D15/24—Bridges or similar structures, based on land or on a fixed structure and designed to give access to ships or other floating structures
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02B—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
- E02B3/00—Engineering works in connection with control or use of streams, rivers, coasts, or other marine sites; Sealings or joints for engineering works in general
- E02B3/04—Structures or apparatus for, or methods of, protecting banks, coasts, or harbours
- E02B3/06—Moles; Piers; Quays; Quay walls; Groynes; Breakwaters ; Wave dissipating walls; Quay equipment
- E02B3/062—Constructions floating in operational condition, e.g. breakwaters or wave dissipating walls
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02A10/00—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE at coastal zones; at river basins
- Y02A10/11—Hard structures, e.g. dams, dykes or breakwaters
Definitions
- the invention relates to marine deployable apparatus, and more particularly to temporary floating breakwaters.
- Permanent breakwater structures are offshore concrete or earthen revetments designed to provide coastal defense and mitigate shoreline erosion by absorbing and dissipating sea state intensity and surf conditions. They are often used to extend and enhance protection to harbors and seaports, and may also provide a secondary function as a causeway or travel corridor for land vehicles or foot traffic. The mass, logistics, and labor required to construct a conventional breakwater makes them impractical for remote areas. Temporary, floating breakwater designs have shown some successes. However, such structures typically are intended to attenuate waves with heights not exceeding 4 feet. Practical applications of these temporary structures demand much greater effectiveness in open ocean environments where wave heights up to 12 feet are common during storm conditions.
- FIG. 1 The most basic configuration of a FBW concept is shown in FIG. 1 .
- the unit 100 is moored parallel to the shore 102 and facing the prevailing wind and wave direction 104 .
- This configuration has been well studied, and provides 60-80% reduction of wave energy in flume testing (see MOORING FORCES AND MOTION RESPONSES OF PONTOON-TYPE FLOATING BREAKWATERS, S. A. Sannasiraj, V. Sundar and R. Sundaravadivelu, Ocean Engineering Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras 600 036, India, Received 1 May 1996, herein incorporated by reference).
- This arrangement has the greatest shore system length, and provides the most direct solution for the most important set of shore wind and wave conditions.
- This configuration permits sheltered vessels 106 to operate up-wind and down-wind, and to moor with either bow or stern facing into the weather.
- any along-shore current 108 does not add significantly to the mooring load, as the projection of the FBW of FIG. 1 is favorable in the along-shore direction.
- the configuration of FIG. 4 has twice the system length and will be subject to very large mooring forces if there is significant along-shore current.
- the Army RIBs configuration reflects a large proportion of the wave energy and therefore reduces its mooring load.
- FIG. 2 An important consideration in the design of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 2 , where the shoreline and the wind-wave direction are at 45 degrees. This configuration shows the difficulty of satisfying all the current and wind preferences in a non-orthogonal situation of wind, shore, and current.
- the FBW is in a good alignment to the weather—it will reflect some of the wave energy and absorb the rest to keep the wave action in the anchorage low.
- the wind action on the moored ships is far from optimal.
- FIG. 3 provides for a partial solution in which the wind and anchorage directions are aligned, and some reflection and absorption of wave actions results from the angle of the FBW.
- the current adds to the mooring loads on the FBW.
- FIGS. 2 and 3 have the advantage of permitting the use of a decked FBW to double as a causeway for vehicle transport directly to shore. The potential elimination of a separate causeway requirement may compensate for the other drawbacks of these non-orthogonal case.
- the configuration of FIG. 1 has the most flexibility and the best logistics.
- a reusable, temporary Floating Breakwater includes a plurality of inflated modules enclosed by an encapsulating cover so as to join the inflated modules together, thereby providing redundant buoyancy and in some embodiments also providing support thereupon for a causeway without need of a rigid beam.
- Various embodiments also include a semi-permeable “sloping beach” section that causes waves to break before reaching the FBW.
- Some of these embodiments also include a bed of wave-energy-absorbing material that approximates the natural wave-absorbing activity of kelp.
- the kelp and/or synthetic beach include low surface energy fibers and/or films such as olefins and polypropylenes to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident.
- the claimed FBW can be temporarily sunk when necessary so as to avoid damage due to hazards such as extremely high seas and/or ice.
- Embodiments of the present invention use low-mass inflatable materials.
- the base material is a urethane-coated VectranTM woven with a tensile strength of 2500 lbf/inch.
- One general aspect of the present invention is a temporary floating breakwater which includes a plurality of inflatable modules and an encapsulating fabric cover configured for surrounding the inflatable modules when they are inflated, and thereby maintaining the inflatable modules in close proximity to one another.
- the floating breakwater when deployed is of sufficient size and has suitable characteristics for protecting shorelines and watercraft from waves having heights of more than 10 feet.
- Some embodiments further include a semi-permeable sloping beach section which is extendable from the encapsulating fabric cover so as to cause approaching waves to break before reaching the encapsulating fabric cover.
- the sloping beach section includes at least one of low surface energy fibers and films such as olefins and polypropylenes configured to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident.
- Other of these embodiments further include a bed of simulated floating kelp material attached to the sloping beach and configured for absorbing energy from waves approaching the encapsulating fabric cover.
- the bed of simulated floating kelp material includes at least one of low surface energy fibers and films such as olefins and polypropylenes configured to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident.
- Various embodiments further include a rigid top deck of textile cells integral with the encapsulating cover and supportable by the plurality of inflatable modules so as to serve as a causeway.
- the plurality of inflatable modules can be deflated so as to temporarily sink the floating breakwater and thereby avoid damage due to surface hazards.
- each inflatable module includes a plurality of air-enclosing flotation bladders.
- the inflatable floating modules are configured for filling with urethane foam.
- the inflatable modules are one of square and rectangular in cross section.
- various embodiments further include a floating causeway formed by a plurality of floating modules and a causeway top surface supported thereby.
- Certain embodiments further include mooring points suitable for attachment of mooring lines thereto.
- the mooring points are each able to sustain 25 k lbf applied by a mooring line.
- the mooring points include abrasion-resistant sacrificial nylon layers.
- the plurality of anchors includes at least one vacuum pile anchoring system.
- FIG. 1 Another general aspect of the present invention is a temporary floating breakwater system which includes a plurality of inflatable floating breakwater support modules, an encapsulating fabric cover configured for surrounding the inflatable floating breakwater support modules when they are inflated, and thereby maintaining the inflatable floating breakwater modules in close proximity to one another, a floating causeway formed by a plurality of floating causeway modules and a causeway top surface which is supportable thereby, and a plurality of mooring lines and anchors configured for stabilizing a location of the floating breakwater and floating causeway when the floating breakwater and floating causeway are deployed on a body of water.
- the floating breakwater system when deployed is of sufficient size and has suitable characteristics for protecting shorelines and watercraft from waves having heights of more than 10 feet.
- the floating breakwater system is configured for packaging in a plurality of containers suitable for simultaneous transport on the deck of vessel having a size and general characteristics comparable to an LCU 1610 class vessel. And in some of these embodiments the temporary floating breakwater system is configured for deployment from the deck of the vessel with the assistance of a utility vessel.
- FIG. 1 is a simplified top view illustrating a typical configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is perpendicular to the shore;
- FIG. 2 is a simplified top view illustrating a typical configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is oblique to the shore;
- FIG. 3 is a simplified top view illustrating a typical configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is parallel to the shore;
- FIG. 4 is a simplified top view illustrating an alternate configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is perpendicular to the shore;
- FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention which includes a sloping beach section with artificial kelp;
- FIG. 6 is a simplified top view of a layout of a preferred embodiment including a 300 foot breakwater and a 600 foot causeway;
- FIG. 7 is a simplified, close-up top, front, and side view of an embodiment with a causeway supported by separated round floats;
- FIG. 8 is a simplified, close-up top, front, and side view of an embodiment supported by adjacent round floats having a causeway supported by top deck beams;
- FIG. 9A is a simplified, close-up top and side view of an embodiment supported by adjacent round floats having a causeway which does not require top deck beams;
- FIG. 9B is a close-up cross-sectional view of the floats of FIG. 9A ;
- FIG. 10 is a simplified top view illustrating transportation of a preferred embodiment on an LCU vessel
- FIG. 11 is a simplified top view illustrating the first step in deployment of the embodiment of FIG. 10 from the LCU vessel;
- FIG. 12 is a simplified top view illustrating the second step in deployment of the embodiment of FIG. 10 from the LCU vessel;
- FIG. 13 is a simplified top view illustrating the third step in deployment of the embodiment of FIG. 10 from the LCU vessel;
- FIG. 14 is a simplified top view illustrating the fourth step in deployment of the embodiment of FIG. 10 from the LCU vessel.
- FIG. 15 is a simplified top view illustrating the fifth step in deployment of the embodiment of FIG. 10 from the LCU vessel;
- FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the present invention in which an inflatable floating breakwater (“FBW”) 500 is deployed at 300 feet.
- FBW inflatable floating breakwater
- the total packed volume of the inflatable portion of this 300′ system as shown in the cross section of FIG. 5 can be packed in a single 20′ ISO container.
- the elimination of mechanical joints between inflated sections is a major feature of this approach, since hinges with solid pivot points are large, heavy, and prone to failure from wave action on a FBW.
- the embodiment of FIG. 5 also provides redundant flotation chambers 502 by enclosing a plurality of standard 10 ⁇ 25 ft floats 502 within a continuous cover layer 504 .
- the cover layer 504 protects the inflated floats 502 and forms a textile flex point in the structure.
- this arrangement permits buckling of the assembly under extreme loads without damage.
- a second tube assembly 504 i.e. the continuous cover layer
- Antifouling coatings can be applied to the topcoat of the embodiment of FIG. 5 , if required for example to prevent large accumulations of marine growth.
- the FBW floats of the present invention include at least one internal bladder for air holding.
- each 25 foot float section is fitted with redundant bladders that permit the FBW 500 to be repaired while deployed.
- the use of heavy Urethane extruded topcoat layers as part of a two-layer system limits the risk of pack ice damage. Mounting for wear panels can be included at the water line if the system is at risk from large ice flows.
- the FWB 500 of the present invention can be sunk if necessary in extreme weather. Both very large ice flows and extreme Sea State 7 conditions would suggest that the safest place for the FBW 500 would be on the bottom. Inflation hoses supported on shore-anchored lines may permit re-floating of the system without divers.
- mooring points 508 are separated at 25 foot intervals, and can support a minimum of 25K lbf as the estimated mooring load per 25 foot section when subjected to a 12 foot wave. In preferred embodiments, a design factor of 5 is applied for this type of structure. This requires a load connection to the FBW assembly 500 that is capable of spreading a mooring point load into a 4-5 foot section of FBW cover material 504 . As in sail making practice, this is accomplished with doublers and webbing, which are all heat-seal bonded to the base materials. The loads can be addressed with these methods and materials. However, chafing that results from excessive FBW motion in higher sea states 510 is a concern.
- the first step to address this chafe issue is to limit motion by the pre-tensioning of the mooring lines 512 .
- the second step in various embodiments is the use of synthetic beach 514 and kelp 516 assemblies as stabilizers to reduce motion.
- the mooring connections include low-friction sliders, combined with abrasion-resistant sacrificial nylon layers.
- the moorings 512 for the breakwater 500 , the causeway 600 and the ships 106 can all be separate, thereby providing good redundancy in the design.
- larger vessels (3000 ton) 106 will need to move off shore and get clear. This will free up these large moorings for use as a safety on the FBW 500 and causeway 600 .
- Lighterage and small craft will have to stay behind the protection of the FBW 500 and will also need added mooring capacity to prevent dragging.
- FBW 500 Reduction of Mooring loads on the FBW 500 will make the system more reliable, lower cost, improve the mean time between repairs (“MTBR”), and system availability.
- the literature includes the use of a low angle of incidence FBW such as the RIBs system (see FIG. 4 ). Based on the problems associated with along-shore currents 108 and the very large system length of the RIBs design, embodiments of the present invention include a FBW 500 that is moored parallel to the wave line 104 . Wave reflection in this configuration is limited.
- Preferred embodiments of the present invention include a mesh skirt that forms a simulated beach 514 in front of the FBW assembly 500 .
- the beach 504 is between 30 and 40 ft long, and extends at a slope from the main tubes 502 .
- the slope angle is controlled by mooring lines 512 and out-hauls 602 on the beach seaward edge.
- a Bascom analysis of wave energy distribution puts the majority of the energy at a depth equal to 2/9'ths of the wave length. Realistic sea state design criteria therefore puts the wave length at approximately 90-100 ft. This results in a synthetic beach design depth of approximately 20 ft.
- the temporary synthetic beach 514 is intended to limit wave height. However, this approach can tend to force the waves to break. While wave breaking is a very effective energy reduction technique, it can have adverse affects on the FBW 500 main structure.
- wave breaking is mitigated by the addition of an artificial kelp bed 516 made of polypropylene textile strips with inherent buoyancy.
- the strips are long with respect to their mounted depth (see FLOW AND FLEXIBILITY, THE ROLES OF SIZE AND SHAPE IN DETERMINING WAVE FORCES ON THE BULL KELP NEREOCYSTIS LUETKEANA MARK W. DENNY,*, BRIAN P. GAYLORD1 AND EDWIN A. COWEN2, Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Department of Biological Sciences, Pacific Grove, Calif. 93950, USA and 2Civil Engineering Department, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, Calif.
- the artificial kelp 516 is designed to reduce wave height in the run up the synthetic beach 514 and reduce the violence of the breaking wave.
- the synthetic beach 514 By making the synthetic beach 514 from open mesh material and adjusting its deployed slope, wave behavior can be further controlled.
- the use of the kelp 516 permits additional adjustment of the incoming wave height.
- the kelp and/or synthetic beach include low surface energy fibers and/or films such as olefins and polypropylenes to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident
- Various embodiments include a rigid top deck 506 of textile cells.
- This deck assembly 506 is integral with the outer cover 504 of the main tubes 502 .
- the top deck cells 506 can be simply inflated and/or can be foam filled. Embodiments that use only inflation are very simple to retrieve, and these embodiments can be sunk and refloated for storm and ice protection. However, embodiments in which the top deck cells are filled with urethane provide greater durability.
- the textiles are coated with urethane. Foam materials soften textile urethane coatings and form a high strength bond to the textile. This 2-part foam is simple to mix and inject into a manifold panel assembly. These foam-cell textile assemblies are very tough, and need only a thin hard surface skin to permit vehicle transport.
- the ground tackle required for the claimed FBW system is not low in mass.
- the total soft goods mass is between 1 ⁇ 3 and 1 ⁇ 2 of the expected anchor mass required for the system. In the event that a deployment in coral is required, the use of low mass cordage would not be acceptable, and chain would be required, adding significant additional mass to the mooring budget.
- An M1A tank 700 at 61 long tons has been used as the criteria for causeway flotation and structural design.
- This load can be supported by embodiments of the present invention having a 5 foot minimum freeboard, and some embodiments include up to 8.5 ft of freeboard with alternative float designs to improve compatibility with INLS units.
- the top deck and floats of the causeway 600 represents a trade space for selection of various embodiments.
- FIGS. 6-7 embodiments are illustrated with a common 10′ ⁇ 25′ round float 702 shown at 20 foot centers. These embodiments minimize the number of floats 702 but maximize demands on the structural performance of the top deck. As illustrated in FIG. 8 , the common round floats 702 can be moved together to provide greater support and stability, at the expense of requiring more floats 702 . The same tradeoffs for inflation and foam filling systems apply in this case as for the breakwater.
- other embodiments include floats with a square or rectangular form.
- the square design provides full support to the upper deck and allows a simple belt design for the Deck layer without any inflated beams.
- the contact pressures for the treads are approximately 12 psi.
- the full vehicle area distributed load is as low as 3 psi.
- an LCU 1610 class vessel 1000 can be used as the primary transport and deployment vessel.
- a 40′ ISO container 1002 can be used to contain the breakwater cover 514 and beach kelp 516 assemblies.
- the breakwater main float tubes 502 which are in a 20′ ISO container 1004 , can be transported in a second position on the deck of the LCU 1000 , and the causeway floats 702 and top deck 600 can be contained in a 30′ ISO and transported in a third position 1006 on the LCU deck.
- a large fairlead assembly 1008 on the bow of the LCU 1000 can feed the soft goods components 1002 , 1004 , 1006 .
- the mooring system components 1010 are also on the LCU deck.
- Three ship anchors 1012 and their rods can be loaded as deck cargo on a RORO rail assembly 1014 .
- the 24 anchors and mooring lines for the breakwater can be transported in two 40′ ISO containers 1016 with integrated RORO rails 1018 that run straight through.
- Container layout on the LCU deck can thereby be designed to permit full deployment of the claimed invention without re-positioning of container units.
- the LCU 1000 is large enough to deliver the system containers.
- a second vessel such as a LCM-8 or MPF 1020 utility boat is required in support of a deployment mission to manage the static ends during deployment and to support the inflation process.
- Deployment of preferred embodiments includes 5 primary steps.
- first the ship 1000 and causeway anchors 1012 and mooring lines 512 are set from the roll-off rails on the LCU 1000 .
- the seaward breakwater anchors 1016 and the cover/beach/kelp assembly 516 are then set along the outer mooring line with the aid of the second vessel 1020 .
- the second vessel 1020 also provides the inflation air to float the system.
- the baseline process has the tube floats 502 , 702 drawn through a messenger tube in the forward container 1002 . This permits packing of the cover 504 and the main floats 502 in separate containers positioned in line on the deck.
- the seaward anchors 1012 are placed as the FBW 500 is deployed.
- step 3 is backhaul of the breakwater to leeward.
- Step 4 consists of setting the leeside moorings for the FBW 500 from the LCU 1000 , using the utility boat 1020 to ferry the mooring lines 512 to personnel on the breakwater top deck 600 .
- Step 5 is deployment of the causeway unit from the third soft goods container 1006 on the LCU deck. The utility boat 1020 will draw out the uninflated units and inflate the system as it proceeds to shore.
Abstract
A durable, quickly deployable temporary floating breakwater (FBW) can protect areas in austere locations. A plurality of inflatable modules is encapsulated within a common cover, which holds the modules together and in some embodiments supports a causeway thereupon. A separate floating causeway can be included. Embodiments include a semi-permeable “sloping beach” section which causes waves to break before reaching the FBW. A bed of wave-energy-absorbing synthetic kelp can be attached to the sloping beach. The beach and/or kelp can include low-surface-energy fibers and films, such as olefins and polypropylenes, to remove oil from the water in case of an oil spill or accident. In embodiments, the FBW can be temporarily sunk to avoid extremely high seas, ice, and/or other surface hazards. The FBW is lightweight, can be quickly and compactly stowed, and in some embodiments can be transported and deployed from the deck of an LCU 1610.
Description
- This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/222,230, filed Jul. 1, 2009, which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
- The invention relates to marine deployable apparatus, and more particularly to temporary floating breakwaters.
- Permanent breakwater structures are offshore concrete or earthen revetments designed to provide coastal defense and mitigate shoreline erosion by absorbing and dissipating sea state intensity and surf conditions. They are often used to extend and enhance protection to harbors and seaports, and may also provide a secondary function as a causeway or travel corridor for land vehicles or foot traffic. The mass, logistics, and labor required to construct a conventional breakwater makes them impractical for remote areas. Temporary, floating breakwater designs have shown some successes. However, such structures typically are intended to attenuate waves with heights not exceeding 4 feet. Practical applications of these temporary structures demand much greater effectiveness in open ocean environments where wave heights up to 12 feet are common during storm conditions. To effectively attenuate sea state conditions of this magnitude, temporary floating structures according to previously disclosed designs would need to be massive, requiring the transport of large volumes of physical structures, mooring lines and anchors to the site being sheltered. This approach is simply not feasible when the quick establishment of a protected area is required.
- The US Navy manual for mooring equipment (Mooring Design Physical & Empirical Data Vessel & Ship Characteristics, Mooring Lines & Chain Buoys, Anchors & Riser Type Mooring Systems DESIGN MANUAL 26.6 APRIL 1986, herein incorporated by reference) sets out the basic considerations for keeping a Floating Breakwater (FBW) in place. Any floating structure is dependent on its mooring system to maintain position. A FBW by design is moored to a lee shore, which is an undesirable configuration for a floating object. Under storm conditions, if mooring lines chafe or anchors drag, there is no space or time to respond. A floating breakwater that is driven into the surf zone and pounded between the bottom and breakers will be a total loss.
- In general, the design of a robust mooring system is the most important single issue in the design of a breakwater. For a FBW system, mooring loads are generated not just from wave action, but also from wind and current. According to published studies on floating breakwaters and realistic sea state requirements, a rough order of magnitude estimate is that each 25 feet of FBW exposure will require 20,000 lbs of mooring capacity. According to navy ratings for anchors, the mooring capacity of an anchor is approximately 15 times the anchor mass. Further design considerations indicate an anchor specification of 2 tons per 25 ft of breakwater length. Coast Guard data for buoy moorings suggest that these values may not be conservative.
- Each shoreline has a unique set of conditions for wind wave and current action, and Floating Breakwater Systems can be designed and configured to address various combinations. The most basic configuration of a FBW concept is shown in
FIG. 1 . Theunit 100 is moored parallel to theshore 102 and facing the prevailing wind andwave direction 104. This configuration has been well studied, and provides 60-80% reduction of wave energy in flume testing (see MOORING FORCES AND MOTION RESPONSES OF PONTOON-TYPE FLOATING BREAKWATERS, S. A. Sannasiraj, V. Sundar and R. Sundaravadivelu, Ocean Engineering Centre, Indian Institute of Technology, Madras 600 036, India, Received 1 May 1996, herein incorporated by reference). - This arrangement has the greatest shore system length, and provides the most direct solution for the most important set of shore wind and wave conditions. This configuration permits sheltered
vessels 106 to operate up-wind and down-wind, and to moor with either bow or stern facing into the weather. In addition, any along-shore current 108 does not add significantly to the mooring load, as the projection of the FBW ofFIG. 1 is favorable in the along-shore direction. In contrast, the configuration ofFIG. 4 has twice the system length and will be subject to very large mooring forces if there is significant along-shore current. However the Army RIBs configuration reflects a large proportion of the wave energy and therefore reduces its mooring load. - An important consideration in the design of the present invention is illustrated in
FIG. 2 , where the shoreline and the wind-wave direction are at 45 degrees. This configuration shows the difficulty of satisfying all the current and wind preferences in a non-orthogonal situation of wind, shore, and current. In the design shown, the FBW is in a good alignment to the weather—it will reflect some of the wave energy and absorb the rest to keep the wave action in the anchorage low. However the wind action on the moored ships is far from optimal. - The configuration of
FIG. 3 provides for a partial solution in which the wind and anchorage directions are aligned, and some reflection and absorption of wave actions results from the angle of the FBW. However, the current adds to the mooring loads on the FBW. It should be pointed out that the configurations ofFIGS. 2 and 3 have the advantage of permitting the use of a decked FBW to double as a causeway for vehicle transport directly to shore. The potential elimination of a separate causeway requirement may compensate for the other drawbacks of these non-orthogonal case. The configuration ofFIG. 1 has the most flexibility and the best logistics. - What is needed, therefore, is an apparatus and method for providing a portable, re-usable, floating breakwater that can be deployed in various configurations as needed, and can withstand realistic sea conditions with waves up to 12 feet in height.
- A reusable, temporary Floating Breakwater (FBW) is claimed that includes a plurality of inflated modules enclosed by an encapsulating cover so as to join the inflated modules together, thereby providing redundant buoyancy and in some embodiments also providing support thereupon for a causeway without need of a rigid beam. Various embodiments also include a semi-permeable “sloping beach” section that causes waves to break before reaching the FBW. Some of these embodiments also include a bed of wave-energy-absorbing material that approximates the natural wave-absorbing activity of kelp. And in some embodiments, the kelp and/or synthetic beach include low surface energy fibers and/or films such as olefins and polypropylenes to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident.
- In certain embodiments, the claimed FBW can be temporarily sunk when necessary so as to avoid damage due to hazards such as extremely high seas and/or ice.
- Embodiments of the present invention use low-mass inflatable materials. In some embodiments, the base material is a urethane-coated Vectran™ woven with a tensile strength of 2500 lbf/inch.
- One general aspect of the present invention is a temporary floating breakwater which includes a plurality of inflatable modules and an encapsulating fabric cover configured for surrounding the inflatable modules when they are inflated, and thereby maintaining the inflatable modules in close proximity to one another. The floating breakwater when deployed is of sufficient size and has suitable characteristics for protecting shorelines and watercraft from waves having heights of more than 10 feet.
- Some embodiments further include a semi-permeable sloping beach section which is extendable from the encapsulating fabric cover so as to cause approaching waves to break before reaching the encapsulating fabric cover. In some of these embodiments the sloping beach section includes at least one of low surface energy fibers and films such as olefins and polypropylenes configured to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident. Other of these embodiments further include a bed of simulated floating kelp material attached to the sloping beach and configured for absorbing energy from waves approaching the encapsulating fabric cover. And in some of these embodiments the bed of simulated floating kelp material includes at least one of low surface energy fibers and films such as olefins and polypropylenes configured to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident.
- Various embodiments further include a rigid top deck of textile cells integral with the encapsulating cover and supportable by the plurality of inflatable modules so as to serve as a causeway. In some embodiments the plurality of inflatable modules can be deflated so as to temporarily sink the floating breakwater and thereby avoid damage due to surface hazards. And in certain embodiments each inflatable module includes a plurality of air-enclosing flotation bladders.
- In some embodiments the inflatable floating modules are configured for filling with urethane foam. In certain embodiments the inflatable modules are one of square and rectangular in cross section. And various embodiments further include a floating causeway formed by a plurality of floating modules and a causeway top surface supported thereby.
- Certain embodiments further include mooring points suitable for attachment of mooring lines thereto. In some of these embodiments the mooring points are each able to sustain 25 k lbf applied by a mooring line. In other of these embodiments the mooring points include abrasion-resistant sacrificial nylon layers. And still other of these embodiments further include a plurality of mooring lines and a plurality of anchors configured for stabilizing a location of the floating breakwater when deployed on a body of water. In some of these embodiments the plurality of anchors includes at least one vacuum pile anchoring system.
- Another general aspect of the present invention is a temporary floating breakwater system which includes a plurality of inflatable floating breakwater support modules, an encapsulating fabric cover configured for surrounding the inflatable floating breakwater support modules when they are inflated, and thereby maintaining the inflatable floating breakwater modules in close proximity to one another, a floating causeway formed by a plurality of floating causeway modules and a causeway top surface which is supportable thereby, and a plurality of mooring lines and anchors configured for stabilizing a location of the floating breakwater and floating causeway when the floating breakwater and floating causeway are deployed on a body of water. The floating breakwater system when deployed is of sufficient size and has suitable characteristics for protecting shorelines and watercraft from waves having heights of more than 10 feet.
- In various embodiments the floating breakwater system is configured for packaging in a plurality of containers suitable for simultaneous transport on the deck of vessel having a size and general characteristics comparable to an
LCU 1610 class vessel. And in some of these embodiments the temporary floating breakwater system is configured for deployment from the deck of the vessel with the assistance of a utility vessel. - The features and advantages described herein are not all-inclusive and, in particular, many additional features and advantages will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the drawings, specification, and claims. Moreover, it should be noted that the language used in the specification has been principally selected for readability and instructional purposes, and not to limit the scope of the inventive subject matter.
-
FIG. 1 is a simplified top view illustrating a typical configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is perpendicular to the shore; -
FIG. 2 is a simplified top view illustrating a typical configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is oblique to the shore; -
FIG. 3 is a simplified top view illustrating a typical configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is parallel to the shore; -
FIG. 4 is a simplified top view illustrating an alternate configuration of a FBW where the direction of the prevailing waves and wind is perpendicular to the shore; -
FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view of a preferred embodiment of the present invention which includes a sloping beach section with artificial kelp; -
FIG. 6 is a simplified top view of a layout of a preferred embodiment including a 300 foot breakwater and a 600 foot causeway; -
FIG. 7 is a simplified, close-up top, front, and side view of an embodiment with a causeway supported by separated round floats; -
FIG. 8 is a simplified, close-up top, front, and side view of an embodiment supported by adjacent round floats having a causeway supported by top deck beams; -
FIG. 9A is a simplified, close-up top and side view of an embodiment supported by adjacent round floats having a causeway which does not require top deck beams; -
FIG. 9B is a close-up cross-sectional view of the floats ofFIG. 9A ; -
FIG. 10 is a simplified top view illustrating transportation of a preferred embodiment on an LCU vessel; -
FIG. 11 is a simplified top view illustrating the first step in deployment of the embodiment ofFIG. 10 from the LCU vessel; -
FIG. 12 is a simplified top view illustrating the second step in deployment of the embodiment ofFIG. 10 from the LCU vessel; -
FIG. 13 is a simplified top view illustrating the third step in deployment of the embodiment ofFIG. 10 from the LCU vessel; -
FIG. 14 is a simplified top view illustrating the fourth step in deployment of the embodiment ofFIG. 10 from the LCU vessel; and -
FIG. 15 is a simplified top view illustrating the fifth step in deployment of the embodiment ofFIG. 10 from the LCU vessel; -
FIG. 5 is a cross sectional view of an embodiment of the present invention in which an inflatable floating breakwater (“FBW”) 500 is deployed at 300 feet. The total packed volume of the inflatable portion of this 300′ system as shown in the cross section ofFIG. 5 can be packed in a single 20′ ISO container. The elimination of mechanical joints between inflated sections is a major feature of this approach, since hinges with solid pivot points are large, heavy, and prone to failure from wave action on a FBW. The embodiment ofFIG. 5 also providesredundant flotation chambers 502 by enclosing a plurality of standard 10×25 ft floats 502 within acontinuous cover layer 504. Thecover layer 504 protects the inflated floats 502 and forms a textile flex point in the structure. This arrangement permits buckling of the assembly under extreme loads without damage. By staggering thefloat elements 502 in a second tube assembly 504 (i.e. the continuous cover layer), this double-tube system provides for a stable platform for service, and operation as a causeway if required. Antifouling coatings can be applied to the topcoat of the embodiment ofFIG. 5 , if required for example to prevent large accumulations of marine growth. - In preferred embodiments, the FBW floats of the present invention include at least one internal bladder for air holding. In some embodiments, each 25 foot float section is fitted with redundant bladders that permit the
FBW 500 to be repaired while deployed. In various embodiments, the use of heavy Urethane extruded topcoat layers as part of a two-layer system limits the risk of pack ice damage. Mounting for wear panels can be included at the water line if the system is at risk from large ice flows. - For embodiments that include only inflated elements in the
main floats 502 and theupper deck 506, theFWB 500 of the present invention can be sunk if necessary in extreme weather. Both very large ice flows and extreme Sea State 7 conditions would suggest that the safest place for theFBW 500 would be on the bottom. Inflation hoses supported on shore-anchored lines may permit re-floating of the system without divers. - In preferred embodiments, mooring points 508 are separated at 25 foot intervals, and can support a minimum of 25K lbf as the estimated mooring load per 25 foot section when subjected to a 12 foot wave. In preferred embodiments, a design factor of 5 is applied for this type of structure. This requires a load connection to the
FBW assembly 500 that is capable of spreading a mooring point load into a 4-5 foot section ofFBW cover material 504. As in sail making practice, this is accomplished with doublers and webbing, which are all heat-seal bonded to the base materials. The loads can be addressed with these methods and materials. However, chafing that results from excessive FBW motion in higher sea states 510 is a concern. The first step to address this chafe issue is to limit motion by the pre-tensioning of the mooring lines 512. The second step in various embodiments is the use ofsynthetic beach 514 andkelp 516 assemblies as stabilizers to reduce motion. Finally in some embodiments the mooring connections include low-friction sliders, combined with abrasion-resistant sacrificial nylon layers. - As can be seen from the full layout of the embodiment of
FIG. 6 , themoorings 512 for thebreakwater 500, thecauseway 600 and theships 106 can all be separate, thereby providing good redundancy in the design. As wave and wind storm loads increase, larger vessels (3000 ton) 106 will need to move off shore and get clear. This will free up these large moorings for use as a safety on theFBW 500 andcauseway 600. Lighterage and small craft will have to stay behind the protection of theFBW 500 and will also need added mooring capacity to prevent dragging. - Reduction of Mooring loads on the
FBW 500 will make the system more reliable, lower cost, improve the mean time between repairs (“MTBR”), and system availability. The literature includes the use of a low angle of incidence FBW such as the RIBs system (seeFIG. 4 ). Based on the problems associated with along-shore currents 108 and the very large system length of the RIBs design, embodiments of the present invention include aFBW 500 that is moored parallel to thewave line 104. Wave reflection in this configuration is limited. - Preferred embodiments of the present invention include a mesh skirt that forms a
simulated beach 514 in front of theFBW assembly 500. In some preferred embodiments thebeach 504 is between 30 and 40 ft long, and extends at a slope from themain tubes 502. The slope angle is controlled bymooring lines 512 and out-hauls 602 on the beach seaward edge. A Bascom analysis of wave energy distribution puts the majority of the energy at a depth equal to 2/9'ths of the wave length. Realistic sea state design criteria therefore puts the wave length at approximately 90-100 ft. This results in a synthetic beach design depth of approximately 20 ft. The temporarysynthetic beach 514 is intended to limit wave height. However, this approach can tend to force the waves to break. While wave breaking is a very effective energy reduction technique, it can have adverse affects on theFBW 500 main structure. - In some embodiments, wave breaking is mitigated by the addition of an
artificial kelp bed 516 made of polypropylene textile strips with inherent buoyancy. The strips are long with respect to their mounted depth (see FLOW AND FLEXIBILITY, THE ROLES OF SIZE AND SHAPE IN DETERMINING WAVE FORCES ON THE BULL KELP NEREOCYSTIS LUETKEANA MARK W. DENNY,*, BRIAN P. GAYLORD1 AND EDWIN A. COWEN2, Hopkins Marine Station of Stanford University, Department of Biological Sciences, Pacific Grove, Calif. 93950, USA and 2Civil Engineering Department, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, Calif. 93950, USA Accepted October 1997, herein incorporated by reference) (see also Effect of the kelp Laminaria hyperborea upon sand dune erosion and water particle velocities, Stig Magnar Løvås and Alf Tørum, Department of Coastal and Ocean Engineering, Civil and Environmental Engineering, SINTEF Fisheries and Aquaculture, Klobuveien 153, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway, herein incorporated by reference). - The
artificial kelp 516 is designed to reduce wave height in the run up thesynthetic beach 514 and reduce the violence of the breaking wave. There are a number of design tools which thebeach 514 andkelp 516 assemblies offer. By making thesynthetic beach 514 from open mesh material and adjusting its deployed slope, wave behavior can be further controlled. In addition, the use of thekelp 516 permits additional adjustment of the incoming wave height. And in some embodiments, the kelp and/or synthetic beach include low surface energy fibers and/or films such as olefins and polypropylenes to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident - Various embodiments include a rigid
top deck 506 of textile cells. Thisdeck assembly 506 is integral with theouter cover 504 of themain tubes 502. Thetop deck cells 506 can be simply inflated and/or can be foam filled. Embodiments that use only inflation are very simple to retrieve, and these embodiments can be sunk and refloated for storm and ice protection. However, embodiments in which the top deck cells are filled with urethane provide greater durability. In some of these embodiments, the textiles are coated with urethane. Foam materials soften textile urethane coatings and form a high strength bond to the textile. This 2-part foam is simple to mix and inject into a manifold panel assembly. These foam-cell textile assemblies are very tough, and need only a thin hard surface skin to permit vehicle transport. - The ground tackle required for the claimed FBW system is not low in mass. The total soft goods mass is between ⅓ and ½ of the expected anchor mass required for the system. In the event that a deployment in coral is required, the use of low mass cordage would not be acceptable, and chain would be required, adding significant additional mass to the mooring budget.
- The design of self-embedding anchors is not a new area of engineering. For the breakwater alone, the expected requirement is 25-30 long tons of anchor capacity. Novel anchor systems such as jetted or screw type anchors may be able to reduce the required anchor mass. Some embodiments employ vacuum pile anchoring systems for high strength lightweight mooring. Existing Side Load Warping Tug (SLWT) units and other equipment have winch and A-frame gear which may provide a capability to rapidly set such non-traditional anchors.
- An
M1A tank 700 at 61 long tons has been used as the criteria for causeway flotation and structural design. This load can be supported by embodiments of the present invention having a 5 foot minimum freeboard, and some embodiments include up to 8.5 ft of freeboard with alternative float designs to improve compatibility with INLS units. The top deck and floats of thecauseway 600 represents a trade space for selection of various embodiments. - In
FIGS. 6-7 , embodiments are illustrated with a common 10′×25′round float 702 shown at 20 foot centers. These embodiments minimize the number offloats 702 but maximize demands on the structural performance of the top deck. As illustrated inFIG. 8 , the common round floats 702 can be moved together to provide greater support and stability, at the expense of requiring more floats 702. The same tradeoffs for inflation and foam filling systems apply in this case as for the breakwater. - With reference to
FIGS. 9A and 9B , other embodiments include floats with a square or rectangular form. The square design provides full support to the upper deck and allows a simple belt design for the Deck layer without any inflated beams. Even though theM1A 700 has a high mass, the contact pressures for the treads are approximately 12 psi. Of theM1A 700, the full vehicle area distributed load is as low as 3 psi. These are modest design loads for the Causeway hard surface and can be supported with a single thin hard surface panel that bears directly on square main floats. - As illustrated in
FIG. 10 , in preferred embodiments anLCU 1610class vessel 1000 can be used as the primary transport and deployment vessel. For example, forward on the LCU deck, a 40′ISO container 1002 can be used to contain thebreakwater cover 514 andbeach kelp 516 assemblies. The breakwatermain float tubes 502, which are in a 20′ISO container 1004, can be transported in a second position on the deck of theLCU 1000, and the causeway floats 702 andtop deck 600 can be contained in a 30′ ISO and transported in athird position 1006 on the LCU deck. - A
large fairlead assembly 1008 on the bow of theLCU 1000 can feed thesoft goods components soft goods containers mooring system components 1010 are also on the LCU deck. Three ship anchors 1012 and their rods can be loaded as deck cargo on aRORO rail assembly 1014. The 24 anchors and mooring lines for the breakwater can be transported in two 40′ISO containers 1016 withintegrated RORO rails 1018 that run straight through. Container layout on the LCU deck can thereby be designed to permit full deployment of the claimed invention without re-positioning of container units. TheLCU 1000 is large enough to deliver the system containers. In addition, a second vessel such as a LCM-8 orMPF 1020 utility boat is required in support of a deployment mission to manage the static ends during deployment and to support the inflation process. - Deployment of preferred embodiments includes 5 primary steps. With reference to
FIG. 11 , first theship 1000 andcauseway anchors 1012 andmooring lines 512 are set from the roll-off rails on theLCU 1000. As illustrated inFIG. 12 , the seaward breakwater anchors 1016 and the cover/beach/kelp assembly 516 are then set along the outer mooring line with the aid of thesecond vessel 1020. Thesecond vessel 1020 also provides the inflation air to float the system. The baseline process has the tube floats 502, 702 drawn through a messenger tube in theforward container 1002. This permits packing of thecover 504 and themain floats 502 in separate containers positioned in line on the deck. The seaward anchors 1012 are placed as theFBW 500 is deployed. - As illustrated in
FIG. 13 , step 3 is backhaul of the breakwater to leeward. - Step 4, as shown in
FIG. 14 , consists of setting the leeside moorings for theFBW 500 from theLCU 1000, using theutility boat 1020 to ferry themooring lines 512 to personnel on thebreakwater top deck 600. Step 5, as shown inFIG. 15 , is deployment of the causeway unit from the thirdsoft goods container 1006 on the LCU deck. Theutility boat 1020 will draw out the uninflated units and inflate the system as it proceeds to shore. - The foregoing description of the embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure. It is intended that the scope of the invention include, but not be limited by this detailed description, nor limited by the claims appended hereto.
Claims (19)
1. A temporary floating breakwater comprising:
a plurality of inflatable modules; and
an encapsulating fabric cover configured for surrounding the inflatable modules when they are inflated, and thereby maintaining the inflatable modules in close proximity to one another;
the floating breakwater when deployed being of sufficient size and having suitable characteristics for protecting shorelines and watercraft from waves having heights of more than 10 feet.
2. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , further comprising a semi-permeable sloping beach section which is extendable from the encapsulating fabric cover so as to cause approaching waves to break before reaching the encapsulating fabric cover.
3. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 2 , wherein the sloping beach section includes at least one of low surface energy fibers and films such as olefins and polypropylenes configured to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident.
4. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 2 , further comprising a bed of simulated floating kelp material attached to the sloping beach and configured for absorbing energy from waves approaching the encapsulating fabric cover.
5. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 4 , wherein the bed of simulated floating kelp material includes at least one of low surface energy fibers and films such as olefins and polypropylenes configured to remove oil from both surface and water columns and the surface zone in the event of an oil spill or accident.
6. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , further comprising a rigid top deck of textile cells integral with the encapsulating cover and supportable by the plurality of inflatable modules so as to serve as a causeway.
7. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of inflatable modules can be deflated so as to temporarily sink the floating breakwater and thereby avoid damage due to surface hazards.
8. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , wherein each inflatable module includes a plurality of air-enclosing flotation bladders.
9. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , wherein the inflatable floating modules are configured for filling with urethane foam.
10. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , wherein the inflatable modules are one of square and rectangular in cross section.
11. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , further comprising a floating causeway formed by a plurality of floating modules and a causeway top surface supported thereby.
12. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 1 , further comprising mooring points suitable for attachment of mooring lines thereto.
13. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 12 , wherein the mooring points are each able to sustain 25 k lbf applied by a mooring line.
14. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 12 , wherein the mooring points include abrasion-resistant sacrificial nylon layers.
15. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 12 , further comprising a plurality of mooring lines and a plurality of anchors configured for stabilizing a location of the floating breakwater when deployed on a body of water.
16. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 15 , wherein the plurality of anchors includes at least one vacuum pile anchoring system.
17. A temporary floating breakwater system, comprising:
a plurality of inflatable floating breakwater support modules;
an encapsulating fabric cover configured for surrounding the inflatable floating breakwater support modules when they are inflated, and thereby maintaining the inflatable floating breakwater modules in close proximity to one another; a floating causeway formed by a plurality of floating causeway modules and a causeway top surface which is supportable thereby; and
a plurality of mooring lines and anchors configured for stabilizing a location of the floating breakwater and floating causeway when the floating breakwater and floating causeway are deployed on a body of water;
the floating breakwater system when deployed being of sufficient size and having suitable characteristics for protecting shorelines and watercraft from waves having heights of more than 10 feet.
18. The temporary floating breakwater system of claim 17 , wherein the floating breakwater system is configured for packaging in a plurality of containers suitable for simultaneous transport on the deck of vessel having a size and general characteristics comparable to an LCU 1610 class vessel.
19. The temporary floating breakwater of claim 18 , wherein the temporary floating breakwater system is configured for deployment from the deck of the vessel with the assistance of a utility vessel.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US12/828,631 US20110002739A1 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2010-07-01 | Temporary floating breakwater and causeway with simulated beach and kelp |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US22223009P | 2009-07-01 | 2009-07-01 | |
US12/828,631 US20110002739A1 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2010-07-01 | Temporary floating breakwater and causeway with simulated beach and kelp |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20110002739A1 true US20110002739A1 (en) | 2011-01-06 |
Family
ID=43412754
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/828,631 Abandoned US20110002739A1 (en) | 2009-07-01 | 2010-07-01 | Temporary floating breakwater and causeway with simulated beach and kelp |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20110002739A1 (en) |
Cited By (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120051845A1 (en) * | 2009-01-15 | 2012-03-01 | Ocean Brick System (O.B.S.) Ltd. | Deep water port |
US8807869B1 (en) * | 2011-04-12 | 2014-08-19 | Li Lee | Floating barriers |
US20150259869A1 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2015-09-17 | Innovation And Development Llc | Modular submergible breakwater for lowering water wave kinetic energy especially during storms or rough waters |
US9556573B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2017-01-31 | Christopher Fred Betcher | Wave attenuation system and method |
CN106400734A (en) * | 2016-05-27 | 2017-02-15 | 中交第航务工程局有限公司 | Movable temporary breakwater structure |
US9683346B2 (en) | 2009-01-15 | 2017-06-20 | Ocean Brick Systems (O.B.S.) Ltd. | Perforated structure mountable onto a seabed |
US10207773B2 (en) | 2014-05-01 | 2019-02-19 | Christopher Betcher | Corrosion-and-chafing-resistant, buoy system and method |
US10334846B2 (en) | 2014-02-07 | 2019-07-02 | Gojo Industries, Inc. | Compositions and methods with efficacy against spores and other organisms |
US20220242528A1 (en) * | 2019-06-11 | 2022-08-04 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Floating breakwater structure |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2185458A (en) * | 1939-07-14 | 1940-01-02 | Texas Co | Floating breakwater |
US3595192A (en) * | 1969-07-30 | 1971-07-27 | Virgilio P Vega | Floating cargo carrier |
US3999879A (en) * | 1975-06-16 | 1976-12-28 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Inflatable roadway |
US4487151A (en) * | 1982-05-14 | 1984-12-11 | Salvatore Deiana | Floating highway |
US4822309A (en) * | 1986-02-21 | 1989-04-18 | Vandenberg John A | Combined life preserver cushion and tote bag |
US5961251A (en) * | 1997-12-29 | 1999-10-05 | Prendergast; Francis G. | Artificial seaweed device |
US20020067958A1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2002-06-06 | Bruno Seguin | Methods of installing offshore platforms |
US6514010B2 (en) * | 2000-05-04 | 2003-02-04 | Gunderboom, Inc. | Containment/exclusion boom with bird deterrent |
US7481176B2 (en) * | 2006-06-05 | 2009-01-27 | United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Transportable flotation system |
US8007202B2 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2011-08-30 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Protective marine barrier system |
-
2010
- 2010-07-01 US US12/828,631 patent/US20110002739A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2185458A (en) * | 1939-07-14 | 1940-01-02 | Texas Co | Floating breakwater |
US3595192A (en) * | 1969-07-30 | 1971-07-27 | Virgilio P Vega | Floating cargo carrier |
US3999879A (en) * | 1975-06-16 | 1976-12-28 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Inflatable roadway |
US4487151A (en) * | 1982-05-14 | 1984-12-11 | Salvatore Deiana | Floating highway |
US4822309A (en) * | 1986-02-21 | 1989-04-18 | Vandenberg John A | Combined life preserver cushion and tote bag |
US5961251A (en) * | 1997-12-29 | 1999-10-05 | Prendergast; Francis G. | Artificial seaweed device |
US6514010B2 (en) * | 2000-05-04 | 2003-02-04 | Gunderboom, Inc. | Containment/exclusion boom with bird deterrent |
US20020067958A1 (en) * | 2000-06-30 | 2002-06-06 | Bruno Seguin | Methods of installing offshore platforms |
US7481176B2 (en) * | 2006-06-05 | 2009-01-27 | United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army | Transportable flotation system |
US8007202B2 (en) * | 2006-08-02 | 2011-08-30 | Honeywell International, Inc. | Protective marine barrier system |
Cited By (11)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120051845A1 (en) * | 2009-01-15 | 2012-03-01 | Ocean Brick System (O.B.S.) Ltd. | Deep water port |
US9683346B2 (en) | 2009-01-15 | 2017-06-20 | Ocean Brick Systems (O.B.S.) Ltd. | Perforated structure mountable onto a seabed |
US8807869B1 (en) * | 2011-04-12 | 2014-08-19 | Li Lee | Floating barriers |
US10334846B2 (en) | 2014-02-07 | 2019-07-02 | Gojo Industries, Inc. | Compositions and methods with efficacy against spores and other organisms |
US20150259869A1 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2015-09-17 | Innovation And Development Llc | Modular submergible breakwater for lowering water wave kinetic energy especially during storms or rough waters |
US9410300B2 (en) * | 2014-03-14 | 2016-08-09 | Innovation And Development Llc | Modular submergible breakwater for lowering water wave kinetic energy especially during storms or rough waters |
US10207773B2 (en) | 2014-05-01 | 2019-02-19 | Christopher Betcher | Corrosion-and-chafing-resistant, buoy system and method |
US9556573B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2017-01-31 | Christopher Fred Betcher | Wave attenuation system and method |
US9963847B2 (en) | 2014-05-19 | 2018-05-08 | Christopher Fred Betcher | Wave attenuation system and method |
CN106400734A (en) * | 2016-05-27 | 2017-02-15 | 中交第航务工程局有限公司 | Movable temporary breakwater structure |
US20220242528A1 (en) * | 2019-06-11 | 2022-08-04 | Elta Systems Ltd. | Floating breakwater structure |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20110002739A1 (en) | Temporary floating breakwater and causeway with simulated beach and kelp | |
US7603959B1 (en) | Use of prefabricated components in floating structures | |
KR101583494B1 (en) | Mooring system for floating arctic vessel | |
US6877456B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for protecting ships and harbors from attack by vessels | |
KR100615566B1 (en) | Floating structures and Method for Providing a Floating Runway and a Floating Bridge | |
CN100393576C (en) | Berthing method and system | |
US3818708A (en) | Floating barrier | |
US7182034B2 (en) | Offshore floating dock | |
US20220242528A1 (en) | Floating breakwater structure | |
CA2708933C (en) | Modular offshore platforms and associated methods of use and manufacture | |
US20050058509A1 (en) | Floating modular breakwater | |
NZ534886A (en) | Swing mooring pontoon | |
ES2952084T3 (en) | Port plant for storage, loading and unloading of hydrocarbon products at sea and procedure for this | |
GB2443697A (en) | Floating water wheel with buoyant blades | |
KR20150046054A (en) | Semi-submersible integrated port | |
US7056059B1 (en) | Boom with ramped or horizontal skirt structure for slowing the flow speed of buoyant fluids on moving water for fluid, containment, fluid containment system and method | |
US7431622B2 (en) | Floating berth system and method | |
WO2015136086A1 (en) | A quay structure, a quay arrangement and a method of installing such structure | |
US20060078385A1 (en) | Apparatus for creating a local reduction in wave height | |
GB2490009A (en) | Soft-Docking Pontoon | |
CN109440722A (en) | A kind of tension leg anchor system can descend submerged floating shielding and breakwater | |
KR101074923B1 (en) | Ship mooring without pier | |
KR20170036268A (en) | A offshore floating structure having outstanding quay anchorage ability against extreme environment | |
RU2551827C2 (en) | Basic element of water transport, floating tow of such elements and floating raft of such tows | |
Loveday | Critical wharf infrastructure in challenging conditions |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: WARWICK MILLS, INC., NEW HAMPSHIRE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HOWLAND, CHARLES A.;REEL/FRAME:024632/0892 Effective date: 20100701 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |