US20100095757A1 - Measurements of rock parameters - Google Patents
Measurements of rock parameters Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20100095757A1 US20100095757A1 US12/524,504 US52450408A US2010095757A1 US 20100095757 A1 US20100095757 A1 US 20100095757A1 US 52450408 A US52450408 A US 52450408A US 2010095757 A1 US2010095757 A1 US 2010095757A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- borehole tool
- transducer array
- rock matrix
- transducer
- borehole
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 72
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 title claims description 46
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 62
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 43
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 38
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 23
- 238000003491 array Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 12
- 239000003381 stabilizer Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 33
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L Calcium carbonate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]C([O-])=O VTYYLEPIZMXCLO-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910000019 calcium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000000919 ceramic Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 25
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 14
- 230000002285 radioactive effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000035515 penetration Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000010363 phase shift Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000011800 void material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000005299 abrasion Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009530 blood pressure measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013213 extrapolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007480 spreading Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003892 spreading Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000004215 Carbon black (E152) Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000282887 Suidae Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000000712 assembly Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000429 assembly Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002238 attenuated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000015278 beef Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000009529 body temperature measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003111 delayed effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010433 feldspar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005294 ferromagnetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003302 ferromagnetic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005251 gamma ray Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008187 granular material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000206 health hazard Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 229930195733 hydrocarbon Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 150000002430 hydrocarbons Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002139 neutron reflectometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008685 targeting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000844 transformation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001131 transforming effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E21—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; MINING
- E21B—EARTH OR ROCK DRILLING; OBTAINING OIL, GAS, WATER, SOLUBLE OR MELTABLE MATERIALS OR A SLURRY OF MINERALS FROM WELLS
- E21B49/00—Testing the nature of borehole walls; Formation testing; Methods or apparatus for obtaining samples of soil or well fluids, specially adapted to earth drilling or wells
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/04—Analysing solids
- G01N29/043—Analysing solids in the interior, e.g. by shear waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N29/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves; Visualisation of the interior of objects by transmitting ultrasonic or sonic waves through the object
- G01N29/34—Generating the ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor
- G01N29/348—Generating the ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves, e.g. electronic circuits specially adapted therefor with frequency characteristics, e.g. single frequency signals, chirp signals
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/40—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS; TAGS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/40—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging
- G01V1/44—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting specially adapted for well-logging using generators and receivers in the same well
- G01V1/48—Processing data
- G01V1/50—Analysing data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/023—Solids
- G01N2291/0232—Glass, ceramics, concrete or stone
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/028—Material parameters
- G01N2291/02818—Density, viscosity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/02—Indexing codes associated with the analysed material
- G01N2291/028—Material parameters
- G01N2291/02854—Length, thickness
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N2291/00—Indexing codes associated with group G01N29/00
- G01N2291/26—Scanned objects
- G01N2291/263—Surfaces
- G01N2291/2636—Surfaces cylindrical from inside
Definitions
- the present invention relates to methods and apparatus to measure physical parameters such as density and porosity of the rock matrix in a near wellbore area as well as the type(s) of fluid present in the near wellbore area.
- MWD measurements-while-drilling
- LWD Logging-while-drilling
- Measurements-while-drilling in general covers the collection of directional data enabling well trajectory description in three-dimensional space while extending the wellbore, and also includes pressure and temperature measurements within the wellbore.
- Logging-while-drilling in general covers the evaluation of physical properties in the matrix surrounding the tools. MWD and LWD are standard practice in offshore directional wells, where the well cost is offset by rig time and wellbore stability considerations.
- the downhole measured data values are usually stored in solid-state memory, while a low resolution data stream is sent through pressure pulses inside the drill string to surface for real-time measurement readouts.
- Some MWD/LWD tools have the ability to retrieve the stored data by deploying a wireline tool that engages with the MWD/LWD tools if the data transmission link fails.
- the latest technology for data transfer further allows for high speed transfer of data from downhole to surface enabling the transfer of large data streams.
- Logging-while-drilling covers the measurement of formation properties (e.g. density, resistivity, porosity, sonic velocity, gamma ray) during the excavation of the hole, or shortly thereafter, through the use of tools integrated into the bottomhole assembly.
- LWD while sometimes risky and expensive, has the advantage of measuring properties of a formation before drilling fluids invade deeply. Further, many wellbores prove to be difficult or even impossible to measure with conventional wireline tools, especially highly deviated wells where hole stability issues may be time critical. In these situations, the LWD measurement ensures that some measurement of the subsurface is captured in the event that wireline operations are not possible.
- LWD tools use similar data storage and transmission systems as MWD tools, with some having more solid-state memory to provide higher resolution logs after the tool is tripped out.
- Measurement/Logging-after-drilling covers measurements made by measurements-while-drilling (MWD) tools and logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools subsequent to the initial bit run. MWD logs are recorded while drilling the well. However, these tools can also record logs at later times when the drillstring is in the hole. This may be while pulling out after drilling, or on a subsequent bit run or circulating trip. The latter is also known as re-logging or logging while tripping.
- MWD measurements-while-drilling
- LWD logging-while-drilling
- Electrical wireline is related to any aspect of logging that employs an electrical cable to lower tools into the borehole and to transmit data.
- a wireline log is hence a continuous measurement of formation properties with electrically powered instruments to infer properties and make decisions about drilling and production related operations. Measurements may include electrical properties (resistivity and conductivity at various frequencies), sonic properties, active and passive nuclear measurements, dimensional measurements of the wellbore, formation fluid sampling, formation pressure measurement, wireline-conveyed sidewall coring tools, and others.
- the logging tool or sonde
- the measurements are preferably and in most cases taken on the way out of the wellbore in order to maintain the tension on the cable as constant as possible for depth correlation purposes.
- Down log measurements may also be conducted on the way into the well for instance in certain hostile environments where the tool electronics might not survive, and repeated on the way out if possible.
- Most wireline measurements are recorded continuously while the sonde is moving, however certain fluid sampling and pressure-measuring tools used for formation sampling require that the sonde be stopped, increasing the risk that the sonde or the cable might become stuck.
- Measurements taken by wireline-logging tools are taken in much the same way as by LWD tools, except that the measurements by the latter are taken by a selfcontained tool near the bottom of the bottomhole assembly and are recorded downward (as the well is deepened) rather than upward from the bottom of the hole (as wireline logs are recorded).
- Two important parameters in defining the type of formation surrounding the borehole are the density and the porosity of the near wellbore rock. These parameters are also applied in combination with resistivity data to detect the fluid type present in the rock matrix, more particularly if hydrocarbon resources (reservoir data) are present. A change of fluid type within the porous volume, i.e. from water to oil or gas results in a dramatic change in the neutron reflection and an increase in the resistivity measurement.
- the conventional measurement technique used in formation evaluation for density and porosity is based on the use of radioactive sources. Live Gamma and Neutron sources are continuously radiating the formation and sensors detect the response (reflection) from the formation. Based on the reflected radiation (and additional data) it is possible to make estimates on the two parameters, density and porosity.
- the procedure developed and used to load and un-load radioactive sources in Measurement-while-drilling (MWD) Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) subs are based on three simple rules; “Distance, Shielding and Time of Exposure”.
- MWD Measurement-while-drilling
- BHA Bottom Hole Assembly
- To enable the distance long handling rods are used to mount the radioactive source and install/un-install in BHA sub and protective casket (pig).
- To enable shielding the different sources are stored in “pigs”, small containers that are permanently stored in heavy-duty containers.
- the pig for Gammasources contains substantial mass of lead that prevents the gamma rays from escaping.
- the pig for Neutron-sources contains water gel, as water is a most suitable reflector for Neutron particles. To enable shortest time of exposure the personnel involved are trained to perform the installation quickly.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,206,108 discloses a bottom hole assembly comprising a number of sensors adapted to measure different parameters in a wellbore.
- Different types of sensors are mentioned which utilize different technologies including acoustic, ultra sonic, radioactive devices and many others. Acoustic devices are mentioned in connection with parameters such as porosity and acoustic velocity; however the sensors are also referred to as state of the art sensors.
- the publication gives no indication that would make a person skilled in the art consider replacing the radioactive based sensors or that it would be desirable to do so.
- the present invention relates to a borehole tool for performing measurements in a wellbore comprising a number of transducer elements in at least one transducer array placed at an outermost surface of the borehole tool for emitting at least one focused beam of high frequency ultrasound into the rock matrix in the near wellbore area when in use.
- a borehole tool capable of measuring different physical properties of the rock matrix in the near wellbore area, such as for instance densities and porosities.
- focused beams of high frequency ultrasound information of the rock matrix of very high resolution is obtainable. These parameters can thus be determined with a far better accuracy and precision than with traditional measuring techniques resulting in better information for finding, evaluating, and exploiting oil and gas fields.
- the use of ultrasound is also advantageous in making the use of the highly dangerous and polluting radioactive sources superfluous, ultrasound on the other hand posing no risks to the personnel handling or manufacturing the borehole tool or to the environment when in use.
- the at least one transducer array is arranged for close contact with the formation. This is advantageously in that the transducer array is then most of the time in close contact with the wellbore wall and the rock matrix of which the measurements are to be made. The number of boundaries from which the ultrasound beam is reflected is in this way minimized and more precise result obtainable. In one embodiment this can be obtained by placing the at least one transducer array on the ribs or stabilizers of the borehole tool, or in a specifically designed logging tool.
- the transducer array(s) is placed approximately along the axis of length of the wellbore and/or approximately along the periphery of the tool.
- the focal point position of the beam can be controlled and directed to different positions along the length of the wellbore and in a broad range of radial directions from the wellbore, respectively.
- the transducer array(s) is placed on a sleeve of the borehole tool with a lower rotational speed compared to the drill string. This is advantageously in that measurements can then be made on a stationary or near stationary environment, minimizing dynamic effects, regardless of the motion of the rest of the borehole tool.
- the transducer array(s) comprises a fronting material at least partly with similar acoustic impedance as the rock matrix.
- the transducer array(s) comprises a fronting material at least partly of a ceramic and/or at least partly of a crystalline structure based on CaCO 3 .
- a ceramic is advantageous as a fronting material because of its good properties to resist wear and abrasion in this case arising from the friction between the transducer array and the rock matrix as close contact between the two are desirable for the most accurate measurements.
- a fronting material of a crystalline structure based on CaCO 3 similar acoustic impedance between the fronting material and the rock matrix is obtained.
- the invention further relates to a borehole tool according to the above further comprising memory and one or more processors for processing data measured by said transducer array(s).
- a borehole tool where the data from the ultrasound measurements can be stored for as long as needed and possibly transmitted to the surface.
- the borehole tool according to the further comprises a processor for influencing the functional parameters of the transducer array(s) such as frequency, amplitude and/or focal point position of the emitted focused beam.
- a processor for influencing the functional parameters of the transducer array(s) such as frequency, amplitude and/or focal point position of the emitted focused beam.
- the present invention relates to a method for measuring physical parameters of the rock matrix in a near wellbore area comprising the steps of
- the method according to the above further comprises determining the density of the rock matrix using the laws of reflection.
- the method further comprises generating 2D and/or 3D pictures of the formation in the near wellbore area.
- pictures of the rock formation in the near wellbore area can be obtained, from which many data can be extracted important for the directioning of the wellbore and possible finding of oil or gas.
- the above method comprises determining the porosity of the rock matrix in the near wellbore area from said pictures.
- the method further comprises emitting series of beams of different focal point positions and/or of different frequencies.
- the method comprises applying one or more correction filters to generate near perfect focus of the emitted beam. This step also acts to improve the precision of the measured data
- a further embodiment is a method according to the above further comprising applying Fourier analysis on harmonic frequencies to determine the type of fluid in a porous volume in the near wellbore area. This is an advantageous method to determine for instance if the pores in a rock matrix are gas filled or filled with oil as these materials have different elastic properties. The type of formation and eventually its commercial value is in this way better determined.
- high frequency ultrasound refers to ultra sound with a frequency in the range of 1-100 MHz, more desirable 1-20 MHz and preferably 1-10 MHz.
- the selection of a suitable frequency range will as explained herein depend on the desired resolution and the level of acceptable damping.
- FIG. 1 illustrates some basic principles of ultrasound emission used in the invention
- FIG. 2 illustrates the principle of a time delayed focused beam
- FIG. 3 illustrates an array of transducer elements emitting an interference wave with adjustable lateral focus and focus depth
- FIG. 4 illustrates a method of determining the density and porosity of a material according to one embodiment of the invention
- FIG. 5 shows a borehole assembly with ultrasound transducers mounted on the ribs
- FIG. 6 shows in a cross-sectional view one embodiment of a number of peripherical transducer arrays mounted on a borehole assembly according to one embodiment of the present invention
- FIGS. 7 and 8 show two different embodiments of systems for determining the formation parameters according to the invention.
- the present invention is based on the principle idea of the application of ultrasound to evaluate formation parameters in the near wellbore rock.
- ultrasonic measurements have—apart from technology development projects to measure flow by use of ultrasound Doppler frequency shift—traditionally only been applied in instruments of the simple pulse-echo type where an acoustic pulse reflected from the front and the back of the borehole casing is measured and analyzed to obtain a value of the thickness and the quality of the borehole wall itself.
- This technique is for example used in borehole televiewers and in various cased-hole devices to determine the casing corrosion and cement-bond quality.
- the acoustic signals are here in the hundreds of kilohertz to the low-megahertz range, i.e. of very low frequencies compared to the ultrasound methods according to the present invention as will be apparent below.
- FIG. 1 The basic physical behavior of an acoustic wave being sent out through a heterogeneous medium or an object is illustrated in FIG. 1 .
- An acoustic pulse is emitted from a transducer probe 102 transforming an electrical signal into mechanical vibrations and vice versa.
- the transducer can be made of piezoelectric crystals or a ferromagnetic material. In general, the same transducer can be used both to send and receive sound waves.
- a transducer probe also has a sound absorbing substance to eliminate back-reflections from the probe itself. Special embodiments of transducers for use in the present invention are discussed later.
- ultrasound measuring is performed by emitting a pulse 104 , which will be partly reflected 105 from any boundaries 103 between different structures or phases in the medium 100 , and partially transmitted 106 .
- the reflection 105 and transmission 106 depend on the difference in the acoustic impedance of the two structures.
- the sound wave to some extend is dampened or attenuated on its way through the different matters.
- the signal dampening is a function of the traveled wavelength, wherefore high frequency reduces the depth of investigation. The application of ultrasound is thus a trade-off between the benefits of high frequencies and depth of penetration.
- the relationship between the reflected energy and the transmitted energy from any matter boundary between two materials with the impedances Z 1 and Z 2 is well known and defined through the following equations:
- R is the fraction of reflected amplitude
- T is the fraction of the transmitted amplitude, with reference to the original amplitude.
- the reflected pulse 105 from some boundary gives information of two measurements: The amplitude of the reflected signal, which is dependent on the amplitude of the transmitted signal and the attenuation of the matrix (the matrix being the material or combination of material from a transducer and into the measuring point/point of focus), and the time it takes returning, which is dependent on the distance from the transducer and the speed of sound in the matrix.
- Transducer probes for the present invention can be of many shapes and sizes.
- the shape of the probe determines its field of view, and the frequency of emitted sound waves determines how deep the sound waves penetrate and the resolution of the image.
- Transducer probes may contain one or more piezo-crystal or ferromagnetic elements in one or more phased arrays. In multiple-element probes, each element generally has its own circuit.
- the transducers may for example be placed in a ring form or as a stack of similarly shapes transducer elements.
- FIG. 2 a number of transducer elements 102 are stacked in a transducer array 201 . If all the transducer elements 102 are ‘pinged’ or stimulated at the same time the result would be an unfocused beam with acoustic energy spreading out along several focus lines. By stimulating the transducer elements 102 in a rapid sequence, the ultrasound is sent out in an interference pattern 120 . According to Huygens principle, the wavefront will behave as a single beam, thus the beam is formed by all transducers in the array, and the direction is determined by the time sequence.
- phase steering can be applied to make a concave wavefront, resulting in focusing of the beam with its narrowest part (the focal depth point) a distance (focal depth) 121 from the probe.
- the time delay of the element pulses By regulating the time delay of the element pulses both the focus depth and optionally the lateral position of the focus can be changed as illustrated in FIG. 3 .
- the time-delayed pulses are emitted from a transducer array penetrating into a medium 100 .
- the acoustic focus 202 of the resulting interference wave 205 is changed in lateral position 203 (to the left in the figure) and in depth 204 (to the right) by controlling the time sequences and time delay by which the pulses are emitted.
- an acoustic focus can also be obtained by the geometrically shape and design of the array of transducer elements for instance by a curved transducer array.
- the main energy (biggest amplitude) in the reflected wave has the same frequency as the original wave, in addition to the harmonic oscillations (typically 3 ⁇ f 1 , 5 ⁇ f 1 ) that are present in an acoustically unlinear matrix.
- the harmonic oscillations typically 3 ⁇ f 1 , 5 ⁇ f 1
- the reflected signal will contain a fraction of the output energy at different significant frequencies—f Hz, f 1 , 3 ⁇ f 1 Hz, 5 ⁇ f 1 Hz, etc.
- Images generated from the harmonic frequencies will have less aberration in signal, as the signal has only traveled one way in the matrix compared to two ways for the transmitted frequency. Images created from harmonic frequencies will generally have less amplitude, but more importantly the images will be less disturbed from changes in velocity in the traveled matrix.
- FIG. 4 illustrates a method of determining the density of a rock matrix according to one embodiment of the invention.
- Pulses of ultrasound frequencies (>1 MHz) are sent from an array of transducer elements in a transducer array thereby emitting an interference wave with a given focus in a chosen position (lateral position and depth) relative to the transducer, with a known amplitude A and at a known frequency f 1 , 301 .
- the transducer array is placed as close as possible to the rock wall and the rock matrix in the near wellbore area is scanned, 302 for instance by swiping along the z-axis of the wellbore (along the wellbore) or in different radial directions for the same or similar depths in the borehole.
- the optimal scanning or swipe pattern would depend on the actual configuration of the transducer array(s) on the borehole tool. Assuming a homogeneous rock matrix on a microscale, one would only need a small swipe to define the density and the porosity.
- the amplitude of the reflected signal R relative to the emitted amplitude along with the time of the largest amplitude in the reflected signal is then measured, 303 .
- the impedance Z 1 is known (known ⁇ 1 and v i )
- the laws of reflection (equation (1) and (2)) yield the impedance of the rock matrix Z 2 .
- the velocity of sound in the rock v 2 , 304 is determined. Combining these, gives the density of the rock matrix ⁇ 2 as a mean value of density over the distance into the focal point.
- the measurements can then be repeated for a number of different focal point positions and over a range of different frequencies f 1 , 306 , whereby more accurate results can be obtained and a depth based log may be established.
- the focal point will to some extend be smeared out or blurred.
- the best measurements and most accurate results with the above described method are hence obtained when the transducer array is in close contact with the rock wall with no mud or fluid in between.
- the matrix in between the probe and the rock wall some mud and fluid with moving particles
- the acoustic impedance value of the matrix between the sensor and the rock matrix is known.
- the calculation can be based on estimated values for the physical parameters of the mud.
- the high frequency ultrasound is furthermore capable of generating high resolution images employing known techniques and methods from e.g. medical ultrasound scanning.
- the 2D images 307 are obtained e.g. by plotting the relative amplitude of reflected signals at the points from where they are reflected.
- Stacking 2D images 307 from approximately stationary objects together, 3D images of very high resolution revealing some or all internal boundaries can be extracted from the scanning data of a matter e.g. by application of known image processing techniques.
- the same or similar techniques can be used on the ultrasound scanning data from the near wellbore rock to get 2D and/or 3D pictures of the formation of the rock. From these the porosity of the rock matrix can then be determined, 305 , using standard mathematical expressions.
- Equation (3) gives the relationship between frequency f, wave length ⁇ and speed of sound v:
- acoustic images may be created by increasing the transmitting frequency, for example corresponding to a wave length that is 1/10 of the grain size. This would impose a frequency of 46 MHz.
- the ultrasound measurements are used to determine the types of fluid present in the porous volumes of the rock matrix in the near wellbore area. This is done by scanning the rock matrix with a range of different ultrasound frequencies and analyzing the reflected harmonic frequencies applying Fourier transformations. As different fluids such as oil, gas or water have different elastic properties they also have different resonance frequencies influencing the reflected signal differently. Being un-linear matter, water and oil or gas will be reflecting harmonic frequencies that are reflected with a phase shift compared to the reflected signal from the rock material itself (assumed to be unlinear). Thus, applying Fourier analysis on the measured reflected harmonic frequencies from a series of different emitted frequencies yields a picture of the elasticity of the fluid within a certain pore which in turn reveals information on the type of fluid.
- Another aspect of the ultrasound measurements is how the focused beam is disturbed when the acoustic energy passes through the heterogeneous rock matrix.
- different filters may be applied to generate near perfect focus, such as for instance iterative aberration correction filters.
- the principle is here to use harmonic frequency signals (returning signal) and compare this with the returning signals at the transmitting frequency.
- the harmonic frequency signals have traveled one direction.
- the transmitting frequency signal has traveled back and forth (two directions).
- Investigating phase shifts enables a description of the velocity change in the matrix from the transducer to the focus depth. By adding an inverted phase shift to the transmitted signal, it is possible to cancel out the time delay given by the heterogeneous matrix (different speed of sound in one matrix). By performing this iteratively a close to perfect focus is achievable.
- the acoustic energy hitting a matter boundary is divided into reflected and transmitted energy.
- the acoustic impedance in two materials is similar, very little energy is reflected.
- gel based on water is commonly used between the probe face and the body during medical exterior examination, as water and beef reveal similar impedances (our body consists of 50-70% of water).
- a fronting material of similar acoustic impedance as the rock matrix is applied in the ultrasound transducers.
- a fronting material with a crystalline structure (based on CaCO 3 ) may be designed with matching acoustic impedance as sandstone.
- a piece of sandstone is porous wherefore the acoustic impedance for a porous matrix is not really valid/possible to define, since the main volume would be sandstone and the remaining void would be filled with fluid/gas with different (lower) acoustic impedance. Therefore an exact match between the acoustic impedance of the fronting material of the transducer array and the rock matrix is probably not possible except by a mere chance, however, similar properties should be aimed towards in order to obtain the most accurate results.
- the transducer elements 201 are mounted on stabilizers or the ribs 401 of a rotary steerable assembly 400 , as sketched in FIG. 5 .
- Examples of such assemblies are the PowerDrive from Schlumberger or AutoTrak from Baker Hughes Inteq.
- the ribs 401 apply force against the borehole wall 403 and are in direct contact with the rock matrix 100 .
- An advantage of placing the transducer arrays close to the drill bit 402 is that the measurements will then be performed on the rock formation before the drilling fluids invade deeply and thus the measurements will only be inflicted by mudcake or mud particles in the rock formation to a very limited extent.
- transducer elements 201 may be mounted on the front of probes of formation testers.
- the transducer elements 201 may be applied in the probe of tools an example of which is the Schlumberger's MDT.
- the transducer arrays may also according to a further embodiment of the invention be placed in their own borehole tool together with all relevant electronics.
- one or more arrays of transducer elements are mounted on the outermost parts of the borehole equipment in order to minimize the distance to the rock matrix 100 into which the transducer emits the ultrasound as sketched by the wave and the arrow 407 in FIG. 5 . Therefore the transducer arrays are advantageously equipped with a fronting material with very good wear and abrasion resisting properties.
- the fronting material is made of a ceramic.
- a number of ultrasound transducers may be used in accordance with the design of the specific drilling or wireline tool, such as for instance one on each rib approximately along the axis of length of the wellbore or one or a number of curved arrays of transducer elements extending around the periphery of the tool. The latter is illustrated in FIG. 6 .
- This configuration is advantageous in that measurements are obtainable at a broad range of radial directions from the wellbore, almost regardless of the rotational speed of the equipment 500 .
- the transducer array(s) may further be mounted on a sleeve on the borehole assembly rotating slower than the rest of the assembly, say 2-3 rotations per hour.
- the measurements can be made on a near static environment where dynamic effects can be disregarded and more accurate results obtained.
- FIG. 7 a system for measuring the formation parameters of a near wellbore area by the use of ultrasound and according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the system comprises a local system 601 which is placed in the borehole logging or drilling tool.
- This local system comprises firstly one or more transducer arrays 201 for emitting ultrasound into the rock matrix 100 .
- the transducer arrays 201 are via a local processor 620 connected to a local memory 602 for storing the measured data from the ultrasound measurements.
- the local system further comprises one or more sensors 603 for registering parameters such as for instance the time, the position, temperature, and/or the velocity of the tool etc.
- a more complete and accurate log 608 of the borehole is obtainable.
- the local system comprises a local processor 620 for processing some of the measured data which is then used e.g. to adjust some parameters in the following measurements. For example for use in an iterative adjustment of the frequency range applied in the ultrasound measurements for better correlation with the rock matrix.
- the obtained data may at some times (but not necessarily at all times) be transmitted 609 to a main processor (CPU) 604 and a main memory 605 on the surface in a high speed telemetry system and processed on the surface.
- CPU main processor
- main memory 605 main memory
- a high speed telemetry system is preferable, since detailed acoustic processing requires large amounts of data to be transferred from/to the transducers.
- the transmission may also take place more or less continuously by wireline and/or when tripping the tool.
- the CPU performs the calculations involved in processing the data,—for instance determining the densities and porosity according to the methods described earlier,—and presents the measurements, images and results 606 , 608 on e.g. a monitor, a printer or the like.
- the CPU can also store the processed data and/or image on disk or on the main memory 605 .
- the local system here 701 also comprises an ultrasound transducer 201 , a local processor 620 , a local memory 602 and advantageously one or more sensors 603 .
- a local processor 704 in the local system 701 is capable of extracting at least some of the formation parameters based on pre-loaded data and the measured data from the transducer and the sensor(s). In this embodiment these processed data are used directly in controlling and/or regulating the behavior of the borehole tool.
- the local system 701 is coupled to a further processor 604 and a main memory 605 outside the borehole.
- the data transmission link 609 may also transmit data the other way from the main processor 604 down to the local system so that a person may influence and control the different units in the logging and/or drilling tool.
- Autopilot system as this where the automatic steering to some extend or completely is based on certain sensor values is used today in some Rotary Steerable Drilling systems.
- Formation is a general term for the rock around the borehole. In the context of formation evaluation, the term refers to the volume of rock seen by a measurement made in the borehole, as in a log or a well test. These measurements indicate the physical properties of this volume. Extrapolation of the properties beyond the measurement volume requires a geological model.
- Porosity is the percentage of pore volume or void space, or that volume within rock that can contain fluids. Porosity can be a relic of deposition (primary porosity, such as space between grains that were not compacted together completely) or can develop through alteration of the rock (secondary porosity, such as when feldspar grains or fossils are preferentially dissolved from sandstones). Effective porosity is the interconnected pore volume in a rock that contributes to fluid flow in a reservoir. It excludes isolated pores. Total porosity is the total void space in the rock whether or not it contributes to fluid flow. Thus, effective porosity is typically less than total porosity.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Geology (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Geophysics (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
- Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
- Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analyzing Materials By The Use Of Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
- Geophysics And Detection Of Objects (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to methods and apparatus to measure physical parameters such as density and porosity of the rock matrix in a near wellbore area as well as the type(s) of fluid present in the near wellbore area.
- In geological exploration and development, formation evaluation indicating the physical properties of a volume of rock next to the borehole is used to determine e.g. whether a potential oil or gas field is commercially viable. Extrapolation of the properties beyond the measurement volume further requires a geological model.
- Physical properties of the near wellbore rock are generally evaluated by measurements-while-drilling (MWD), Logging-while-drilling (LWD), by different wireline tools or combinations hereof.
- Measurements-while-drilling (MWD) in general covers the collection of directional data enabling well trajectory description in three-dimensional space while extending the wellbore, and also includes pressure and temperature measurements within the wellbore. Logging-while-drilling (LWD) in general covers the evaluation of physical properties in the matrix surrounding the tools. MWD and LWD are standard practice in offshore directional wells, where the well cost is offset by rig time and wellbore stability considerations. The downhole measured data values are usually stored in solid-state memory, while a low resolution data stream is sent through pressure pulses inside the drill string to surface for real-time measurement readouts. Some MWD/LWD tools have the ability to retrieve the stored data by deploying a wireline tool that engages with the MWD/LWD tools if the data transmission link fails. The latest technology for data transfer further allows for high speed transfer of data from downhole to surface enabling the transfer of large data streams.
- Logging-while-drilling (LWD) covers the measurement of formation properties (e.g. density, resistivity, porosity, sonic velocity, gamma ray) during the excavation of the hole, or shortly thereafter, through the use of tools integrated into the bottomhole assembly. LWD, while sometimes risky and expensive, has the advantage of measuring properties of a formation before drilling fluids invade deeply. Further, many wellbores prove to be difficult or even impossible to measure with conventional wireline tools, especially highly deviated wells where hole stability issues may be time critical. In these situations, the LWD measurement ensures that some measurement of the subsurface is captured in the event that wireline operations are not possible. LWD tools use similar data storage and transmission systems as MWD tools, with some having more solid-state memory to provide higher resolution logs after the tool is tripped out.
- Measurement/Logging-after-drilling covers measurements made by measurements-while-drilling (MWD) tools and logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools subsequent to the initial bit run. MWD logs are recorded while drilling the well. However, these tools can also record logs at later times when the drillstring is in the hole. This may be while pulling out after drilling, or on a subsequent bit run or circulating trip. The latter is also known as re-logging or logging while tripping.
- Electrical wireline is related to any aspect of logging that employs an electrical cable to lower tools into the borehole and to transmit data. A wireline log is hence a continuous measurement of formation properties with electrically powered instruments to infer properties and make decisions about drilling and production related operations. Measurements may include electrical properties (resistivity and conductivity at various frequencies), sonic properties, active and passive nuclear measurements, dimensional measurements of the wellbore, formation fluid sampling, formation pressure measurement, wireline-conveyed sidewall coring tools, and others. In wireline measurements, the logging tool (or sonde) is lowered into the open wellbore and the measurements are preferably and in most cases taken on the way out of the wellbore in order to maintain the tension on the cable as constant as possible for depth correlation purposes. Down log measurements may also be conducted on the way into the well for instance in certain hostile environments where the tool electronics might not survive, and repeated on the way out if possible. Most wireline measurements are recorded continuously while the sonde is moving, however certain fluid sampling and pressure-measuring tools used for formation sampling require that the sonde be stopped, increasing the risk that the sonde or the cable might become stuck. Measurements taken by wireline-logging tools are taken in much the same way as by LWD tools, except that the measurements by the latter are taken by a selfcontained tool near the bottom of the bottomhole assembly and are recorded downward (as the well is deepened) rather than upward from the bottom of the hole (as wireline logs are recorded).
- Two important parameters in defining the type of formation surrounding the borehole are the density and the porosity of the near wellbore rock. These parameters are also applied in combination with resistivity data to detect the fluid type present in the rock matrix, more particularly if hydrocarbon resources (reservoir data) are present. A change of fluid type within the porous volume, i.e. from water to oil or gas results in a dramatic change in the neutron reflection and an increase in the resistivity measurement.
- The conventional measurement technique used in formation evaluation for density and porosity is based on the use of radioactive sources. Live Gamma and Neutron sources are continuously radiating the formation and sensors detect the response (reflection) from the formation. Based on the reflected radiation (and additional data) it is possible to make estimates on the two parameters, density and porosity.
- According to established knowledge all radiation represents a health hazard. The procedure developed and used to load and un-load radioactive sources in Measurement-while-drilling (MWD) Bottom Hole Assembly (BHA) subs are based on three simple rules; “Distance, Shielding and Time of Exposure”. To enable the distance long handling rods are used to mount the radioactive source and install/un-install in BHA sub and protective casket (pig). To enable shielding the different sources are stored in “pigs”, small containers that are permanently stored in heavy-duty containers. The pig for Gammasources contains substantial mass of lead that prevents the gamma rays from escaping. The pig for Neutron-sources contains water gel, as water is a most suitable reflector for Neutron particles. To enable shortest time of exposure the personnel involved are trained to perform the installation quickly.
- Despite all security efforts performed when applying the method described above employing radioactive sources, the potential health risks as well as the environmental disadvantages of the method provide powerful incentives to develop alternative methods to measure indirectly or directly the rock density and porosity excluding the use of radioactive sources.
- U.S. Pat. No. 6,206,108 discloses a bottom hole assembly comprising a number of sensors adapted to measure different parameters in a wellbore. Different types of sensors are mentioned which utilize different technologies including acoustic, ultra sonic, radioactive devices and many others. Acoustic devices are mentioned in connection with parameters such as porosity and acoustic velocity; however the sensors are also referred to as state of the art sensors. The publication gives no indication that would make a person skilled in the art consider replacing the radioactive based sensors or that it would be desirable to do so.
- It is therefore an object of the present invention to present alternative methods and apparatus to measure the density and the porosity of a rock matrix.
- According to one aspect the present invention relates to a borehole tool for performing measurements in a wellbore comprising a number of transducer elements in at least one transducer array placed at an outermost surface of the borehole tool for emitting at least one focused beam of high frequency ultrasound into the rock matrix in the near wellbore area when in use. Hereby is obtained a borehole tool capable of measuring different physical properties of the rock matrix in the near wellbore area, such as for instance densities and porosities. By the use of focused beams of high frequency ultrasound information of the rock matrix of very high resolution is obtainable. These parameters can thus be determined with a far better accuracy and precision than with traditional measuring techniques resulting in better information for finding, evaluating, and exploiting oil and gas fields. The use of ultrasound is also advantageous in making the use of the highly dangerous and polluting radioactive sources superfluous, ultrasound on the other hand posing no risks to the personnel handling or manufacturing the borehole tool or to the environment when in use.
- In one embodiment the at least one transducer array is arranged for close contact with the formation. This is advantageously in that the transducer array is then most of the time in close contact with the wellbore wall and the rock matrix of which the measurements are to be made. The number of boundaries from which the ultrasound beam is reflected is in this way minimized and more precise result obtainable. In one embodiment this can be obtained by placing the at least one transducer array on the ribs or stabilizers of the borehole tool, or in a specifically designed logging tool.
- In further embodiments of the invention the transducer array(s) is placed approximately along the axis of length of the wellbore and/or approximately along the periphery of the tool. Hereby the focal point position of the beam can be controlled and directed to different positions along the length of the wellbore and in a broad range of radial directions from the wellbore, respectively.
- In a further embodiment the transducer array(s) is placed on a sleeve of the borehole tool with a lower rotational speed compared to the drill string. This is advantageously in that measurements can then be made on a stationary or near stationary environment, minimizing dynamic effects, regardless of the motion of the rest of the borehole tool.
- According to an embodiment of the invention the transducer array(s) comprises a fronting material at least partly with similar acoustic impedance as the rock matrix. Hereby is obtained that the reflected energy form hitting the boundary between the fronting material and the rock matrix itself is minimized, and thus, as much energy as possible is transmitted further into the rock.
- In further embodiments the transducer array(s) comprises a fronting material at least partly of a ceramic and/or at least partly of a crystalline structure based on CaCO3. A ceramic is advantageous as a fronting material because of its good properties to resist wear and abrasion in this case arising from the friction between the transducer array and the rock matrix as close contact between the two are desirable for the most accurate measurements. By using a fronting material of a crystalline structure based on CaCO3 similar acoustic impedance between the fronting material and the rock matrix is obtained.
- The invention further relates to a borehole tool according to the above further comprising memory and one or more processors for processing data measured by said transducer array(s). Hereby is obtained a borehole tool where the data from the ultrasound measurements can be stored for as long as needed and possibly transmitted to the surface.
- Also, in one embodiment the borehole tool according to the further comprises a processor for influencing the functional parameters of the transducer array(s) such as frequency, amplitude and/or focal point position of the emitted focused beam. Hereby is obtained a borehole tool where the measuring parameters can be optimized continuously whereby better, more reliable and more precise results can be obtained.
- According to another aspect, the present invention relates to a method for measuring physical parameters of the rock matrix in a near wellbore area comprising the steps of
-
- from one or more transducer arrays comprising a number of transducer elements and placed on a borehole tool, emitting at least one focused beam of high frequency ultrasound into the rock matrix in the near wellbore area, the beam given a focal point position, frequency and amplitude,
- measuring the amplitude of the reflected signal,
- measuring the time of the largest amplitude in the reflected signal.
- The advantages of this method are as mentioned above for the borehole tool.
- In an embodiment the method according to the above further comprises determining the density of the rock matrix using the laws of reflection. These steps represent a rather simple and fast, yet reliable method capable of determining the rock density with very good precision.
- In an embodiment the method further comprises generating 2D and/or 3D pictures of the formation in the near wellbore area. Hereby pictures of the rock formation in the near wellbore area can be obtained, from which many data can be extracted important for the directioning of the wellbore and possible finding of oil or gas.
- According to another embodiment, the above method comprises determining the porosity of the rock matrix in the near wellbore area from said pictures.
- In a further embodiment the method further comprises emitting series of beams of different focal point positions and/or of different frequencies. By controlling the focal point positions and frequencies, more precise measurements can be obtained and depth based logs can be established.
- In yet a further embodiment the method comprises applying one or more correction filters to generate near perfect focus of the emitted beam. This step also acts to improve the precision of the measured data
- Finally, a further embodiment is a method according to the above further comprising applying Fourier analysis on harmonic frequencies to determine the type of fluid in a porous volume in the near wellbore area. This is an advantageous method to determine for instance if the pores in a rock matrix are gas filled or filled with oil as these materials have different elastic properties. The type of formation and eventually its commercial value is in this way better determined.
- The term “high frequency ultrasound” as use in connection with the present invention refers to ultra sound with a frequency in the range of 1-100 MHz, more desirable 1-20 MHz and preferably 1-10 MHz. The selection of a suitable frequency range will as explained herein depend on the desired resolution and the level of acceptable damping.
- In the following, preferred embodiments of the invention will be described referring to the figures, where
-
FIG. 1 illustrates some basic principles of ultrasound emission used in the invention, -
FIG. 2 illustrates the principle of a time delayed focused beam, -
FIG. 3 illustrates an array of transducer elements emitting an interference wave with adjustable lateral focus and focus depth, -
FIG. 4 illustrates a method of determining the density and porosity of a material according to one embodiment of the invention, -
FIG. 5 shows a borehole assembly with ultrasound transducers mounted on the ribs, -
FIG. 6 shows in a cross-sectional view one embodiment of a number of peripherical transducer arrays mounted on a borehole assembly according to one embodiment of the present invention, and -
FIGS. 7 and 8 show two different embodiments of systems for determining the formation parameters according to the invention. - The present invention is based on the principle idea of the application of ultrasound to evaluate formation parameters in the near wellbore rock.
- In the context of borehole logging, ultrasonic measurements have—apart from technology development projects to measure flow by use of ultrasound Doppler frequency shift—traditionally only been applied in instruments of the simple pulse-echo type where an acoustic pulse reflected from the front and the back of the borehole casing is measured and analyzed to obtain a value of the thickness and the quality of the borehole wall itself. This technique is for example used in borehole televiewers and in various cased-hole devices to determine the casing corrosion and cement-bond quality. The acoustic signals are here in the hundreds of kilohertz to the low-megahertz range, i.e. of very low frequencies compared to the ultrasound methods according to the present invention as will be apparent below.
- Specifically, the application of ultrasound for formation evaluation purposes, utilizing the benefits of high frequency ultrasound has not been investigated in prior art.
- The basic physical behavior of an acoustic wave being sent out through a heterogeneous medium or an object is illustrated in
FIG. 1 . An acoustic pulse is emitted from atransducer probe 102 transforming an electrical signal into mechanical vibrations and vice versa. The transducer can be made of piezoelectric crystals or a ferromagnetic material. In general, the same transducer can be used both to send and receive sound waves. Generally, a transducer probe also has a sound absorbing substance to eliminate back-reflections from the probe itself. Special embodiments of transducers for use in the present invention are discussed later. - When a
wave front 101 is traveling through a medium 100, dampening (attenuation), reflection, and transmission will take place governed by acoustic laws. Basically, ultrasound measuring is performed by emitting apulse 104, which will be partly reflected 105 from anyboundaries 103 between different structures or phases in the medium 100, and partially transmitted 106. Thereflection 105 andtransmission 106 depend on the difference in the acoustic impedance of the two structures. Further, the sound wave to some extend is dampened or attenuated on its way through the different matters. The signal dampening is a function of the traveled wavelength, wherefore high frequency reduces the depth of investigation. The application of ultrasound is thus a trade-off between the benefits of high frequencies and depth of penetration. - The acoustic impedance Z is the product of the density ρ and the acoustic velocity v (speed of sound in the material) and is a physical property of all defined masses, Z=ρ v. The relationship between the reflected energy and the transmitted energy from any matter boundary between two materials with the impedances Z1 and Z2 is well known and defined through the following equations:
-
- Here R is the fraction of reflected amplitude and T is the fraction of the transmitted amplitude, with reference to the original amplitude.
- When the pulse returns to the
transducer 102, the reflectedpulse 105 from some boundary gives information of two measurements: The amplitude of the reflected signal, which is dependent on the amplitude of the transmitted signal and the attenuation of the matrix (the matrix being the material or combination of material from a transducer and into the measuring point/point of focus), and the time it takes returning, which is dependent on the distance from the transducer and the speed of sound in the matrix. - Advantageous transducer probes for the present invention can be of many shapes and sizes. The shape of the probe determines its field of view, and the frequency of emitted sound waves determines how deep the sound waves penetrate and the resolution of the image. Transducer probes may contain one or more piezo-crystal or ferromagnetic elements in one or more phased arrays. In multiple-element probes, each element generally has its own circuit. The transducers may for example be placed in a ring form or as a stack of similarly shapes transducer elements.
- Multiple-element probes have the great advantage that the ultrasonic beam can be “steered” by changing the timing in which each element gets pulsed. This is illustrated in
FIG. 2 . Here a number oftransducer elements 102 are stacked in atransducer array 201. If all thetransducer elements 102 are ‘pinged’ or stimulated at the same time the result would be an unfocused beam with acoustic energy spreading out along several focus lines. By stimulating thetransducer elements 102 in a rapid sequence, the ultrasound is sent out in aninterference pattern 120. According to Huygens principle, the wavefront will behave as a single beam, thus the beam is formed by all transducers in the array, and the direction is determined by the time sequence. The same principle of phase steering can be applied to make a concave wavefront, resulting in focusing of the beam with its narrowest part (the focal depth point) a distance (focal depth) 121 from the probe. By regulating the time delay of the element pulses both the focus depth and optionally the lateral position of the focus can be changed as illustrated inFIG. 3 . The time-delayed pulses are emitted from a transducer array penetrating into a medium 100. Theacoustic focus 202 of the resultinginterference wave 205 is changed in lateral position 203 (to the left in the figure) and in depth 204 (to the right) by controlling the time sequences and time delay by which the pulses are emitted. - Alternatively, an acoustic focus can also be obtained by the geometrically shape and design of the array of transducer elements for instance by a curved transducer array.
- The main energy (biggest amplitude) in the reflected wave has the same frequency as the original wave, in addition to the harmonic oscillations (typically 3×f1, 5×f1) that are present in an acoustically unlinear matrix. This means that when an acoustic wave with f1 Hz is sent through a media striking an object, the reflected signal will contain a fraction of the output energy at different significant frequencies—f Hz, f1, 3×f1 Hz, 5×f1 Hz, etc. This physical phenomenon is used when scanning with a focused beam as described above in the heterogeneous rock matrix (solids, fluids), where mathematical analysis on f, f1, n×f1 is then applied to determine the heterogeneous media (n=3, 5, 7 etc). In traditional use of ultrasound a single frequency is used for the transmitting and receiving signal in order to generate an adequate acoustic image. However, if the matrix has acoustically unlinear properties Fourier transformation of the amplitude vs. time signal may be applied to filter out the harmonic frequencies. This enables different acoustic images generated from the transmitted frequency and the harmonic frequencies. Images generated from the harmonic frequencies will have less aberration in signal, as the signal has only traveled one way in the matrix compared to two ways for the transmitted frequency. Images created from harmonic frequencies will generally have less amplitude, but more importantly the images will be less disturbed from changes in velocity in the traveled matrix.
-
FIG. 4 illustrates a method of determining the density of a rock matrix according to one embodiment of the invention. Pulses of ultrasound frequencies (>1 MHz) are sent from an array of transducer elements in a transducer array thereby emitting an interference wave with a given focus in a chosen position (lateral position and depth) relative to the transducer, with a known amplitude A and at a known frequency f1, 301. The transducer array is placed as close as possible to the rock wall and the rock matrix in the near wellbore area is scanned, 302 for instance by swiping along the z-axis of the wellbore (along the wellbore) or in different radial directions for the same or similar depths in the borehole. The optimal scanning or swipe pattern would depend on the actual configuration of the transducer array(s) on the borehole tool. Assuming a homogeneous rock matrix on a microscale, one would only need a small swipe to define the density and the porosity. - The amplitude of the reflected signal R relative to the emitted amplitude along with the time of the largest amplitude in the reflected signal is then measured, 303. As the impedance Z1 is known (known ρ1 and vi), the laws of reflection (equation (1) and (2)) yield the impedance of the rock matrix Z2. Furthermore, by assuming that the highest amplitude returns from the depth of focus (with a known position), the velocity of sound in the rock v2, 304 is determined. Combining these, gives the density of the rock matrix ρ2 as a mean value of density over the distance into the focal point. The measurements can then be repeated for a number of different focal point positions and over a range of different frequencies f1, 306, whereby more accurate results can be obtained and a depth based log may be established.
- As all boundaries or interfaces cause some reflections of the ultrasound and thus a spreading of the energy, the focal point will to some extend be smeared out or blurred. The best measurements and most accurate results with the above described method are hence obtained when the transducer array is in close contact with the rock wall with no mud or fluid in between. On the other hand, if this is not the case, the matrix in between the probe and the rock wall (some mud and fluid with moving particles) would then have to be taken into consideration in the above method. In some cases the acoustic impedance value of the matrix between the sensor and the rock matrix is known. Alternatively, the calculation can be based on estimated values for the physical parameters of the mud.
- The high frequency ultrasound is furthermore capable of generating high resolution images employing known techniques and methods from e.g. medical ultrasound scanning. Here, the
2D images 307 are obtained e.g. by plotting the relative amplitude of reflected signals at the points from where they are reflected. Stacking2D images 307 from approximately stationary objects together, 3D images of very high resolution revealing some or all internal boundaries can be extracted from the scanning data of a matter e.g. by application of known image processing techniques. According to the present invention the same or similar techniques can be used on the ultrasound scanning data from the near wellbore rock to get 2D and/or 3D pictures of the formation of the rock. From these the porosity of the rock matrix can then be determined, 305, using standard mathematical expressions. - The higher the frequencies of the transmitted pulses are, the more information can be extracted about the inhomogenities of the rock matrix, i.e. grain particles, pores etc. The following definitions of grain sizes are commonly used within drilling (source: Drilling Data Handbook, Institut Francais du Petrole Publications):
-
- Clay/Mudstone: <4 micrometer
- Silt: 4 micrometer—62.5 micrometer
- Sandstone: 62.5 micrometer—2 mm (ranging from very fine to coarse sandstone)
- Conglometares (granules, gravel, pebbles): >2 mm
- Targeting sandstone as the primary rock matrix of interest, the smallest grain size is 6.25*10−4 m. Equation (3) gives the relationship between frequency f, wave length λ and speed of sound v:
-
- Assuming a speed of sound, v, in sandstone of 2900 m/s and assuming that wave length must be at the same length as the grain size in order to achieve absolute porosity measurements, the following calculation can be made:
-
f=v/λ=2900 m/s/6.25*10−4=4.6 MHz - Better acoustic images may be created by increasing the transmitting frequency, for example corresponding to a wave length that is 1/10 of the grain size. This would impose a frequency of 46 MHz.
- In a further embodiment of the invention the ultrasound measurements are used to determine the types of fluid present in the porous volumes of the rock matrix in the near wellbore area. This is done by scanning the rock matrix with a range of different ultrasound frequencies and analyzing the reflected harmonic frequencies applying Fourier transformations. As different fluids such as oil, gas or water have different elastic properties they also have different resonance frequencies influencing the reflected signal differently. Being un-linear matter, water and oil or gas will be reflecting harmonic frequencies that are reflected with a phase shift compared to the reflected signal from the rock material itself (assumed to be unlinear). Thus, applying Fourier analysis on the measured reflected harmonic frequencies from a series of different emitted frequencies yields a picture of the elasticity of the fluid within a certain pore which in turn reveals information on the type of fluid.
- The challenge with increasing the frequency is, as also mentioned earlier, that signal dampening is a function of traveled wavelength, meaning that high frequency reduces the depth of investigation. Frequencies used in conventional medical ultrasound range typically from 1-8 MHz, but transducer probes emitting ultrasound in the GHz-range have been developed. The optimal frequency to use downhole in the investigation of the near wellbore matrix is hence a question of trade-off between obtainable resolution (precision of results) and possible penetration depth. Different types of transducers of different frequencies should thus be chosen according to the present situation, the task at hand, the necessity of highly accurate data or just indicative, the memory or processor capacity etc.
- Another aspect of the ultrasound measurements is how the focused beam is disturbed when the acoustic energy passes through the heterogeneous rock matrix. In order to account for this, different filters may be applied to generate near perfect focus, such as for instance iterative aberration correction filters. The principle is here to use harmonic frequency signals (returning signal) and compare this with the returning signals at the transmitting frequency. The harmonic frequency signals have traveled one direction. The transmitting frequency signal has traveled back and forth (two directions). Investigating phase shifts enables a description of the velocity change in the matrix from the transducer to the focus depth. By adding an inverted phase shift to the transmitted signal, it is possible to cancel out the time delay given by the heterogeneous matrix (different speed of sound in one matrix). By performing this iteratively a close to perfect focus is achievable.
- As mentioned, the acoustic energy hitting a matter boundary is divided into reflected and transmitted energy. As can be read from the equations (1) and (2) above, if the acoustic impedance in two materials is similar, very little energy is reflected. This is why gel based on water, is commonly used between the probe face and the body during medical exterior examination, as water and beef reveal similar impedances (our body consists of 50-70% of water). Hence, according to one aspect of the present invention, a fronting material of similar acoustic impedance as the rock matrix is applied in the ultrasound transducers. As an example a sandstone with v=2900 m/s and density of 2200 kg/m3 would have an acoustic impedance of 6.38*106 kg/m2s. For measurements on a rock matrix with a lot of sandstone a fronting material with a crystalline structure (based on CaCO3) may be designed with matching acoustic impedance as sandstone. One should notice that a piece of sandstone is porous wherefore the acoustic impedance for a porous matrix is not really valid/possible to define, since the main volume would be sandstone and the remaining void would be filled with fluid/gas with different (lower) acoustic impedance. Therefore an exact match between the acoustic impedance of the fronting material of the transducer array and the rock matrix is probably not possible except by a mere chance, however, similar properties should be aimed towards in order to obtain the most accurate results.
- As high frequency ultrasound is subject to amplitude dampening it is important to have minimal or preferably direct contact between the transducer elements and the formation. Therefore according to one embodiment of the invention, the transducer elements 201 (enlarged for clarity) are mounted on stabilizers or the
ribs 401 of a rotarysteerable assembly 400, as sketched inFIG. 5 . Examples of such assemblies are the PowerDrive from Schlumberger or AutoTrak from Baker Hughes Inteq. Theribs 401 apply force against theborehole wall 403 and are in direct contact with therock matrix 100. An advantage of placing the transducer arrays close to thedrill bit 402 is that the measurements will then be performed on the rock formation before the drilling fluids invade deeply and thus the measurements will only be inflicted by mudcake or mud particles in the rock formation to a very limited extent. - For single
measurements transducer elements 201 may be mounted on the front of probes of formation testers. For wireline applications thetransducer elements 201 may be applied in the probe of tools an example of which is the Schlumberger's MDT. Of course, the transducer arrays may also according to a further embodiment of the invention be placed in their own borehole tool together with all relevant electronics. In all cases, one or more arrays of transducer elements are mounted on the outermost parts of the borehole equipment in order to minimize the distance to therock matrix 100 into which the transducer emits the ultrasound as sketched by the wave and thearrow 407 inFIG. 5 . Therefore the transducer arrays are advantageously equipped with a fronting material with very good wear and abrasion resisting properties. In one embodiment the fronting material is made of a ceramic. A number of ultrasound transducers may be used in accordance with the design of the specific drilling or wireline tool, such as for instance one on each rib approximately along the axis of length of the wellbore or one or a number of curved arrays of transducer elements extending around the periphery of the tool. The latter is illustrated inFIG. 6 . This configuration is advantageous in that measurements are obtainable at a broad range of radial directions from the wellbore, almost regardless of the rotational speed of theequipment 500. The transducer array(s) may further be mounted on a sleeve on the borehole assembly rotating slower than the rest of the assembly, say 2-3 rotations per hour. Hereby is obtained that the measurements can be made on a near static environment where dynamic effects can be disregarded and more accurate results obtained. - In
FIG. 7 is shown a system for measuring the formation parameters of a near wellbore area by the use of ultrasound and according to one embodiment of the invention. The system comprises alocal system 601 which is placed in the borehole logging or drilling tool. This local system comprises firstly one ormore transducer arrays 201 for emitting ultrasound into therock matrix 100. Thetransducer arrays 201 are via alocal processor 620 connected to alocal memory 602 for storing the measured data from the ultrasound measurements. If the tool is purely a logging tool only registering and measuring formation parameters and with no feed-back or control mechanisms, no more system parts need be present in the downhole tool. In one embodiment the local system, however further comprises one ormore sensors 603 for registering parameters such as for instance the time, the position, temperature, and/or the velocity of the tool etc. Hereby a more complete and accurate log 608 of the borehole is obtainable. - In a further embodiment, the local system comprises a
local processor 620 for processing some of the measured data which is then used e.g. to adjust some parameters in the following measurements. For example for use in an iterative adjustment of the frequency range applied in the ultrasound measurements for better correlation with the rock matrix. Alternatively the obtained data may at some times (but not necessarily at all times) be transmitted 609 to a main processor (CPU) 604 and amain memory 605 on the surface in a high speed telemetry system and processed on the surface. A high speed telemetry system is preferable, since detailed acoustic processing requires large amounts of data to be transferred from/to the transducers. Alternatively the transmission may also take place more or less continuously by wireline and/or when tripping the tool. The CPU performs the calculations involved in processing the data,—for instance determining the densities and porosity according to the methods described earlier,—and presents the measurements, images andresults 606, 608 on e.g. a monitor, a printer or the like. The CPU can also store the processed data and/or image on disk or on themain memory 605. - A more enhanced closed loop system for formation evaluation and exploitation is sketched in
FIG. 8 . Here, in comparison with the system described inFIG. 7 , the system further gives the possibility of using the measured and calculated formation parameters directly to control or influence the drilling or general behavior of the tool. As in the previous embodiment, the local system here 701 also comprises anultrasound transducer 201, alocal processor 620, alocal memory 602 and advantageously one ormore sensors 603. In addition hereto a local processor 704 in thelocal system 701 is capable of extracting at least some of the formation parameters based on pre-loaded data and the measured data from the transducer and the sensor(s). In this embodiment these processed data are used directly in controlling and/or regulating the behavior of the borehole tool. This could for instance be by regulating the rate of penetration (ROP) 702 or by regulating the direction of drilling (as illustrated by theforce unit 703. As in the previous embodiment, thelocal system 701 is coupled to afurther processor 604 and amain memory 605 outside the borehole. Thedata transmission link 609 may also transmit data the other way from themain processor 604 down to the local system so that a person may influence and control the different units in the logging and/or drilling tool. Autopilot system as this where the automatic steering to some extend or completely is based on certain sensor values is used today in some Rotary Steerable Drilling systems. One drawback of such a closed loop systems is the risk of a sensor which might set off the drilling in a wrong direction with the result of several days of non-productive time spent on sidetracking. On the other hand, given that all relevant sensors and processors work as planned, the system is advantageous in giving the possibility to correct and direct the drilling of the borehole tool faster and more accurately based on the just measured and calculated rock parameters thereby increasing the chances of a more profitably drilling. - Definitions:
- Formation:
- “Formation” is a general term for the rock around the borehole. In the context of formation evaluation, the term refers to the volume of rock seen by a measurement made in the borehole, as in a log or a well test. These measurements indicate the physical properties of this volume. Extrapolation of the properties beyond the measurement volume requires a geological model.
- Porosity:
- “Porosity” is the percentage of pore volume or void space, or that volume within rock that can contain fluids. Porosity can be a relic of deposition (primary porosity, such as space between grains that were not compacted together completely) or can develop through alteration of the rock (secondary porosity, such as when feldspar grains or fossils are preferentially dissolved from sandstones). Effective porosity is the interconnected pore volume in a rock that contributes to fluid flow in a reservoir. It excludes isolated pores. Total porosity is the total void space in the rock whether or not it contributes to fluid flow. Thus, effective porosity is typically less than total porosity.
- It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. The word ‘comprising’ does not exclude the presence of other elements or steps than those listed in a claim.
Claims (19)
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
NO20070628 | 2007-02-02 | ||
NO20070628A NO20070628L (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2007-02-02 | Measurement of rock parameters |
PCT/NO2008/000036 WO2008094050A2 (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2008-02-04 | Measurements of rock parameters |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20100095757A1 true US20100095757A1 (en) | 2010-04-22 |
Family
ID=39590461
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US12/524,504 Abandoned US20100095757A1 (en) | 2007-02-02 | 2008-02-04 | Measurements of rock parameters |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20100095757A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2458618B (en) |
NO (1) | NO20070628L (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008094050A2 (en) |
Cited By (16)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120179377A1 (en) * | 2009-06-24 | 2012-07-12 | Terje Lenart Lie | Transducer assembly |
US20120304763A1 (en) * | 2011-06-06 | 2012-12-06 | Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc. | Optical method and apparatus for determining a characteristic such as volume and density of an excavated void in a construction material |
US8481920B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2013-07-09 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for determining formation density from nuclear density measurements made using sensors at more than one location |
US20150019133A1 (en) * | 2012-02-28 | 2015-01-15 | Cidra Corporate Services Inc. | Acoustic monitoring of block caving |
WO2015050456A1 (en) * | 2013-10-02 | 2015-04-09 | Bergen Technology Center As | Petroleum well downhole logging tool with high speed data bus |
WO2015069731A1 (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-14 | Piezotech, Llc | Time of flight through mud |
US20150198030A1 (en) * | 2014-01-13 | 2015-07-16 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Ultrasonic Logging Methods and Apparatus for Measuring Cement and Casing Properties Using Acoustic Echoes |
CN104903748A (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2015-09-09 | 哈里伯顿能源服务公司 | Sourceless density determination apparatus, methods, and systems |
CN106091852A (en) * | 2016-06-17 | 2016-11-09 | 中国葛洲坝集团易普力股份有限公司 | On-site mixed explosive and rock mass Impedance matching method of testing and system thereof |
US20160348500A1 (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2016-12-01 | Pile Dynamics, Inc. | Borehole testing device |
WO2018089869A1 (en) * | 2016-11-11 | 2018-05-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole tool for measuring fluid flow |
US10054713B2 (en) | 2015-12-02 | 2018-08-21 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Acousto-electromagnetic measurement through use of Doppler spectrum for casing corrosion evaluation |
US10107094B2 (en) | 2014-07-18 | 2018-10-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Formation density or acoustic impedance logging tool |
US10422912B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2019-09-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Drilling noise categorization and analysis |
US10690805B2 (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2020-06-23 | Pile Dynamics, Inc. | Borehold testing device |
US10760401B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2020-09-01 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Downhole system for determining a rate of penetration of a downhole tool and related methods |
Families Citing this family (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8559269B2 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2013-10-15 | Chevron U.S.A., Inc. | Device and method for generating a beam of acoustic energy from a borehole, and applications thereof |
US8547791B2 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2013-10-01 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Device and method for generating a beam of acoustic energy from a borehole, and applications thereof |
US8547790B2 (en) | 2008-07-02 | 2013-10-01 | Chevron U.S.A. Inc. | Device and method for generating a beam of acoustic energy from a borehole, and applications thereof |
WO2010112042A1 (en) * | 2009-04-02 | 2010-10-07 | Statoil Asa | Apparatus and method for evaluating a wellbore, in particular a casing thereof |
US8289808B2 (en) | 2009-04-16 | 2012-10-16 | Chevron U.S.A., Inc. | System and method to estimate compressional to shear velocity (VP/VS) ratio in a region remote from a borehole |
US8942063B2 (en) | 2010-11-12 | 2015-01-27 | Chevron U.S.A Inc. | Data acquisition and processing system and method for investigating sub-surface features of a rock formation |
US9103944B2 (en) | 2012-08-21 | 2015-08-11 | Los Alamos National Security, Llc | System and method for sonic wave measurements using an acoustic beam source |
RU2523782C1 (en) * | 2013-04-02 | 2014-07-20 | Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение науки Институт физики Земли им. О.Ю. Шмидта Российской академии наук (ИФЗ РАН) | Control over local rock specimen density variation at straining |
RU2548406C1 (en) * | 2013-12-25 | 2015-04-20 | Шлюмберже Текнолоджи Б.В. | Method of determining change in properties of borehole area of reservoir-bed under influence of drilling solution |
CN109470769B (en) * | 2018-09-30 | 2021-07-02 | 中国建筑科学研究院有限公司 | Method and system for detecting grouting fullness of sleeve by ultrasonic reflection method |
US11215047B2 (en) | 2019-05-14 | 2022-01-04 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Iterative borehole shape estimation of CAST tool |
CN113504307B (en) * | 2021-09-10 | 2021-12-21 | 西南石油大学 | Multi-frequency core sound velocity measuring device |
Citations (47)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2931455A (en) * | 1956-03-29 | 1960-04-05 | Texaco Inc | Acoustic logging of wells |
US3175639A (en) * | 1960-10-19 | 1965-03-30 | Liben William | Method for measuring formation porosity, permeability and mud cake thickness in oil well bore holes by sonic pulses |
US3564914A (en) * | 1968-08-12 | 1971-02-23 | Sinclair Research Inc | Sequential acoustic and electrical resistivity well-logging device |
US3775739A (en) * | 1965-12-13 | 1973-11-27 | Shell Oil Co | Method and apparatus for detecting fractures |
US3900826A (en) * | 1973-10-31 | 1975-08-19 | Texaco Inc | Acoustic permeability log utilizing differential travel time measurements |
US4283953A (en) * | 1978-10-30 | 1981-08-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining a granularity property of a subsurface formation around a borehole |
US4562556A (en) * | 1981-10-09 | 1985-12-31 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Compressional and shear velocity logging method apparatus |
US4601024A (en) * | 1981-03-10 | 1986-07-15 | Amoco Corporation | Borehole televiewer system using multiple transducer subsystems |
US4641520A (en) * | 1984-08-23 | 1987-02-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Shear wave transducer for stress measurements in boreholes |
US4641724A (en) * | 1982-07-30 | 1987-02-10 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Fracture detection using circumferential offset acoustic paths |
US4646565A (en) * | 1985-07-05 | 1987-03-03 | Atlantic Richfield Co. | Ultrasonic surface texture measurement apparatus and method |
US4733380A (en) * | 1984-12-26 | 1988-03-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for acoustically investigating a casing set in a borehole |
US4867264A (en) * | 1986-09-17 | 1989-09-19 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Apparatus and method for investigating wellbores and the like |
US4876672A (en) * | 1988-03-01 | 1989-10-24 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Ultrasonic logging tool with rotating exposed transducer |
US4979151A (en) * | 1982-03-24 | 1990-12-18 | Ekstrom Michael P | Method and apparatus for investigating stand-off in a borehole |
US5050128A (en) * | 1986-04-02 | 1991-09-17 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Ultrasonic probe having an ultrasonic propagation medium |
US5164548A (en) * | 1988-02-08 | 1992-11-17 | Chevron Research And Technology Company | Method and apparatus for ultrasonic scanning of a borehole having improved sensor array and timing circuit |
US5198770A (en) * | 1990-11-23 | 1993-03-30 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Logging apparatus having a wall engaging pad with longitudinally aligned detecting devices |
US5250806A (en) * | 1991-03-18 | 1993-10-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stand-off compensated formation measurements apparatus and method |
US5427106A (en) * | 1993-07-26 | 1995-06-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Ultrasound transducer device with a one-dimensional or two-dimensional array of transducer elements |
US5541889A (en) * | 1995-01-31 | 1996-07-30 | Western Atlas International | Borehole fluid replacement means and method |
US5924499A (en) * | 1997-04-21 | 1999-07-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Acoustic data link and formation property sensor for downhole MWD system |
US6084826A (en) * | 1995-01-12 | 2000-07-04 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Measurement-while-drilling acoustic system employing multiple, segmented transmitters and receivers |
US6206108B1 (en) * | 1995-01-12 | 2001-03-27 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drilling system with integrated bottom hole assembly |
US6230799B1 (en) * | 1998-12-09 | 2001-05-15 | Etrema Products, Inc. | Ultrasonic downhole radiator and method for using same |
US6230557B1 (en) * | 1998-08-04 | 2001-05-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Formation pressure measurement while drilling utilizing a non-rotating sleeve |
US6466513B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2002-10-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Acoustic sensor assembly |
US20030058739A1 (en) * | 2001-09-21 | 2003-03-27 | Chaur-Jian Hsu | Quadrupole acoustic shear wave logging while drilling |
US20040200274A1 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2004-10-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method having radiation intensity measurements with standoff correction |
US20050000279A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-06 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Acoustic sensor for downhole measurement tool |
US20050132794A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-06-23 | Spross Ronald L. | System, method and apparatus for petrophysical and geophysical measurements at the drilling bit |
US20060076161A1 (en) * | 2004-10-07 | 2006-04-13 | Gary Weaver | Apparatus and method of identifying rock properties while drilling |
US20060084859A1 (en) * | 1995-06-22 | 2006-04-20 | Techniscan, Inc. | Apparatus and method for imaging objects with wavefields |
US20060083108A1 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2006-04-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for sonic log processing |
US20060120217A1 (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2006-06-08 | Wu Peter T | Methods and systems for acoustic waveform processing |
US20060185430A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2006-08-24 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Piezocomposite transducer for a downhole measurement tool |
US20060233048A1 (en) * | 2003-08-08 | 2006-10-19 | Benoit Froelich | Multimode acoustic imaging in cased wells |
US7136510B2 (en) * | 2000-05-02 | 2006-11-14 | Shell Oil Company | Borehole imaging |
US20060254767A1 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2006-11-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Enclosures for Containing Transducers and Electronics on a Downhole Tool |
US20070084277A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2007-04-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for detecting fluid entering a wellbore |
US20080128166A1 (en) * | 2006-12-05 | 2008-06-05 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method to Improve Downhole Instruments |
US20080170466A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-17 | Precision Energy Services, Inc. | Reduction of tool eccentricity effects on acoustic measurements |
US20090101337A1 (en) * | 2007-10-18 | 2009-04-23 | Neidhardt Deitmar J | Method and apparatus for detecting defects in oilfield tubulars |
US7697375B2 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2010-04-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Combined electro-magnetic acoustic transducer |
US20110141847A1 (en) * | 2009-02-19 | 2011-06-16 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and Apparatus for Measuring Pore Pressure Beyond the Casing |
US20110226531A1 (en) * | 2010-03-16 | 2011-09-22 | Tool Joint Products, Llc | System and method for measuring borehole conditions, in particular, verification of a final borehole diameter |
US20120192640A1 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2012-08-02 | Chanh Cao Minh | Borehole Imaging and Formation Evaluation While Drilling |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0224350A3 (en) * | 1985-11-22 | 1988-11-17 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Borehole logging tool |
US5130950A (en) * | 1990-05-16 | 1992-07-14 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Ultrasonic measurement apparatus |
EP1348954A1 (en) * | 2002-03-28 | 2003-10-01 | Services Petroliers Schlumberger | Apparatus and method for acoustically investigating a borehole by using a phased array sensor |
-
2007
- 2007-02-02 NO NO20070628A patent/NO20070628L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
-
2008
- 2008-02-04 GB GB0913740A patent/GB2458618B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-02-04 WO PCT/NO2008/000036 patent/WO2008094050A2/en active Application Filing
- 2008-02-04 US US12/524,504 patent/US20100095757A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (50)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2931455A (en) * | 1956-03-29 | 1960-04-05 | Texaco Inc | Acoustic logging of wells |
US3175639A (en) * | 1960-10-19 | 1965-03-30 | Liben William | Method for measuring formation porosity, permeability and mud cake thickness in oil well bore holes by sonic pulses |
US3775739A (en) * | 1965-12-13 | 1973-11-27 | Shell Oil Co | Method and apparatus for detecting fractures |
US3564914A (en) * | 1968-08-12 | 1971-02-23 | Sinclair Research Inc | Sequential acoustic and electrical resistivity well-logging device |
US3900826A (en) * | 1973-10-31 | 1975-08-19 | Texaco Inc | Acoustic permeability log utilizing differential travel time measurements |
US4283953A (en) * | 1978-10-30 | 1981-08-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining a granularity property of a subsurface formation around a borehole |
US4601024A (en) * | 1981-03-10 | 1986-07-15 | Amoco Corporation | Borehole televiewer system using multiple transducer subsystems |
US4562556A (en) * | 1981-10-09 | 1985-12-31 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Compressional and shear velocity logging method apparatus |
US4979151A (en) * | 1982-03-24 | 1990-12-18 | Ekstrom Michael P | Method and apparatus for investigating stand-off in a borehole |
US4641724A (en) * | 1982-07-30 | 1987-02-10 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Fracture detection using circumferential offset acoustic paths |
US4641520A (en) * | 1984-08-23 | 1987-02-10 | The United States Of America As Represented By The United States Department Of Energy | Shear wave transducer for stress measurements in boreholes |
US4733380A (en) * | 1984-12-26 | 1988-03-22 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Apparatus and method for acoustically investigating a casing set in a borehole |
US4646565A (en) * | 1985-07-05 | 1987-03-03 | Atlantic Richfield Co. | Ultrasonic surface texture measurement apparatus and method |
US5050128A (en) * | 1986-04-02 | 1991-09-17 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Ultrasonic probe having an ultrasonic propagation medium |
US4867264A (en) * | 1986-09-17 | 1989-09-19 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Apparatus and method for investigating wellbores and the like |
US5164548A (en) * | 1988-02-08 | 1992-11-17 | Chevron Research And Technology Company | Method and apparatus for ultrasonic scanning of a borehole having improved sensor array and timing circuit |
US4876672A (en) * | 1988-03-01 | 1989-10-24 | Atlantic Richfield Company | Ultrasonic logging tool with rotating exposed transducer |
US5198770A (en) * | 1990-11-23 | 1993-03-30 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Logging apparatus having a wall engaging pad with longitudinally aligned detecting devices |
US5250806A (en) * | 1991-03-18 | 1993-10-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Stand-off compensated formation measurements apparatus and method |
US5427106A (en) * | 1993-07-26 | 1995-06-27 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Ultrasound transducer device with a one-dimensional or two-dimensional array of transducer elements |
US6084826A (en) * | 1995-01-12 | 2000-07-04 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Measurement-while-drilling acoustic system employing multiple, segmented transmitters and receivers |
US6206108B1 (en) * | 1995-01-12 | 2001-03-27 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Drilling system with integrated bottom hole assembly |
US5541889A (en) * | 1995-01-31 | 1996-07-30 | Western Atlas International | Borehole fluid replacement means and method |
US20060084859A1 (en) * | 1995-06-22 | 2006-04-20 | Techniscan, Inc. | Apparatus and method for imaging objects with wavefields |
US5924499A (en) * | 1997-04-21 | 1999-07-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Acoustic data link and formation property sensor for downhole MWD system |
US6230557B1 (en) * | 1998-08-04 | 2001-05-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Formation pressure measurement while drilling utilizing a non-rotating sleeve |
US6230799B1 (en) * | 1998-12-09 | 2001-05-15 | Etrema Products, Inc. | Ultrasonic downhole radiator and method for using same |
US6466513B1 (en) * | 1999-10-21 | 2002-10-15 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Acoustic sensor assembly |
US7136510B2 (en) * | 2000-05-02 | 2006-11-14 | Shell Oil Company | Borehole imaging |
US20030058739A1 (en) * | 2001-09-21 | 2003-03-27 | Chaur-Jian Hsu | Quadrupole acoustic shear wave logging while drilling |
US20040200274A1 (en) * | 2003-04-09 | 2004-10-14 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | System and method having radiation intensity measurements with standoff correction |
US20060185430A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2006-08-24 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Piezocomposite transducer for a downhole measurement tool |
US20050000279A1 (en) * | 2003-07-03 | 2005-01-06 | Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc. | Acoustic sensor for downhole measurement tool |
US20060233048A1 (en) * | 2003-08-08 | 2006-10-19 | Benoit Froelich | Multimode acoustic imaging in cased wells |
US20050132794A1 (en) * | 2003-12-22 | 2005-06-23 | Spross Ronald L. | System, method and apparatus for petrophysical and geophysical measurements at the drilling bit |
US7697375B2 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2010-04-13 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Combined electro-magnetic acoustic transducer |
US20060076161A1 (en) * | 2004-10-07 | 2006-04-13 | Gary Weaver | Apparatus and method of identifying rock properties while drilling |
US20060083108A1 (en) * | 2004-10-20 | 2006-04-20 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Methods and systems for sonic log processing |
US20060120217A1 (en) * | 2004-12-08 | 2006-06-08 | Wu Peter T | Methods and systems for acoustic waveform processing |
US20060254767A1 (en) * | 2005-05-10 | 2006-11-16 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Enclosures for Containing Transducers and Electronics on a Downhole Tool |
US20070084277A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2007-04-19 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for detecting fluid entering a wellbore |
US20090165547A1 (en) * | 2005-10-14 | 2009-07-02 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and Method for Detecting Fluid Entering a Wellbore |
US20120192640A1 (en) * | 2006-06-02 | 2012-08-02 | Chanh Cao Minh | Borehole Imaging and Formation Evaluation While Drilling |
US20080128166A1 (en) * | 2006-12-05 | 2008-06-05 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method to Improve Downhole Instruments |
US20080170466A1 (en) * | 2007-01-16 | 2008-07-17 | Precision Energy Services, Inc. | Reduction of tool eccentricity effects on acoustic measurements |
US20090101337A1 (en) * | 2007-10-18 | 2009-04-23 | Neidhardt Deitmar J | Method and apparatus for detecting defects in oilfield tubulars |
US7698937B2 (en) * | 2007-10-18 | 2010-04-20 | Neidhardt Deitmar J | Method and apparatus for detecting defects in oilfield tubulars |
US20110141847A1 (en) * | 2009-02-19 | 2011-06-16 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and Apparatus for Measuring Pore Pressure Beyond the Casing |
US8522611B2 (en) * | 2009-02-19 | 2013-09-03 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Method and apparatus for measuring pore pressure beyond the casing |
US20110226531A1 (en) * | 2010-03-16 | 2011-09-22 | Tool Joint Products, Llc | System and method for measuring borehole conditions, in particular, verification of a final borehole diameter |
Cited By (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20120179377A1 (en) * | 2009-06-24 | 2012-07-12 | Terje Lenart Lie | Transducer assembly |
US9273951B2 (en) * | 2011-06-06 | 2016-03-01 | Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc. | Optical method and apparatus for determining a characteristic such as volume and density of an excavated void in a construction material |
US20120304763A1 (en) * | 2011-06-06 | 2012-12-06 | Troxler Electronic Laboratories, Inc. | Optical method and apparatus for determining a characteristic such as volume and density of an excavated void in a construction material |
US8481920B2 (en) | 2011-07-19 | 2013-07-09 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Apparatus and method for determining formation density from nuclear density measurements made using sensors at more than one location |
US20150019133A1 (en) * | 2012-02-28 | 2015-01-15 | Cidra Corporate Services Inc. | Acoustic monitoring of block caving |
WO2013130745A3 (en) * | 2012-02-28 | 2015-06-25 | Cidra Corporate Services Inc. | Acoustic monitoring of block caving |
US10502727B2 (en) * | 2012-02-28 | 2019-12-10 | CiDRA Corporate Services LLP | Acoustic monitoring of block caving |
CN104903748A (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2015-09-09 | 哈里伯顿能源服务公司 | Sourceless density determination apparatus, methods, and systems |
EP2932309A4 (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2016-08-24 | Halliburton Energy Services Inc | Sourceless density determination apparatus, methods, and systems |
US9753170B2 (en) | 2012-12-31 | 2017-09-05 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Sourceless density determination apparatus, methods, and systems |
WO2015050456A1 (en) * | 2013-10-02 | 2015-04-09 | Bergen Technology Center As | Petroleum well downhole logging tool with high speed data bus |
US9810058B2 (en) | 2013-10-02 | 2017-11-07 | Bergen Technology Center As | Petroleum well downhole logging tool with high speed data bus |
WO2015069731A1 (en) * | 2013-11-05 | 2015-05-14 | Piezotech, Llc | Time of flight through mud |
US20160348500A1 (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2016-12-01 | Pile Dynamics, Inc. | Borehole testing device |
US10330823B2 (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2019-06-25 | Pile Dynamics, Inc. | Borehole testing device |
US10690805B2 (en) * | 2013-12-05 | 2020-06-23 | Pile Dynamics, Inc. | Borehold testing device |
US11340379B2 (en) | 2013-12-05 | 2022-05-24 | Pile Dynamics, Inc. | Borehole inspecting and testing device and method of using the same |
US10358905B2 (en) * | 2014-01-13 | 2019-07-23 | Weatherford Technology Holdings, Llc | Ultrasonic logging methods and apparatus for measuring cement and casing properties using acoustic echoes |
US20150198030A1 (en) * | 2014-01-13 | 2015-07-16 | Weatherford/Lamb, Inc. | Ultrasonic Logging Methods and Apparatus for Measuring Cement and Casing Properties Using Acoustic Echoes |
US10107094B2 (en) | 2014-07-18 | 2018-10-23 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Formation density or acoustic impedance logging tool |
US10422912B2 (en) | 2014-09-16 | 2019-09-24 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Drilling noise categorization and analysis |
US10054713B2 (en) | 2015-12-02 | 2018-08-21 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Acousto-electromagnetic measurement through use of Doppler spectrum for casing corrosion evaluation |
CN106091852A (en) * | 2016-06-17 | 2016-11-09 | 中国葛洲坝集团易普力股份有限公司 | On-site mixed explosive and rock mass Impedance matching method of testing and system thereof |
WO2018089869A1 (en) * | 2016-11-11 | 2018-05-17 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole tool for measuring fluid flow |
US10890563B2 (en) | 2016-11-11 | 2021-01-12 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Downhole tool with an ultrasonic probe for measuring fluid flow properties |
US10760401B2 (en) | 2017-09-29 | 2020-09-01 | Baker Hughes, A Ge Company, Llc | Downhole system for determining a rate of penetration of a downhole tool and related methods |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
NO20070628L (en) | 2008-08-04 |
GB0913740D0 (en) | 2009-09-16 |
WO2008094050A2 (en) | 2008-08-07 |
GB2458618A (en) | 2009-09-30 |
WO2008094050A3 (en) | 2008-09-25 |
GB2458618B (en) | 2011-08-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20100095757A1 (en) | Measurements of rock parameters | |
US10465509B2 (en) | Collocated multitone acoustic beam and electromagnetic flux leakage evaluation downhole | |
CA2727542C (en) | Multi-resolution borehole profiling | |
CA2583865C (en) | Enhancing the quality and resolution of an image generated from single or multiple sources | |
US20200033494A1 (en) | Through tubing cement evaluation using seismic methods | |
US20040095847A1 (en) | Acoustic devices to measure ultrasound velocity in drilling mud | |
US20070005251A1 (en) | Density log without a nuclear source | |
CA2953328C (en) | Formation density or acoustic impedance logging tool | |
EP3172399B1 (en) | Reflection-only sensor at multiple angles for near real-time determination of acoustic properties of a fluid downhole | |
US10605944B2 (en) | Formation acoustic property measurement with beam-angled transducer array | |
US10408053B2 (en) | Encapsulated phased array segment for downhole applications | |
US10041343B2 (en) | Micro-sonic density imaging while drilling systems and methods | |
US20220325622A1 (en) | Self-calibrated method of determining borehole fluid acoustic properties | |
WO2012039707A1 (en) | Micro-sonic density imaging while drilling systems and methods | |
US20210140305A1 (en) | Detection and evaluation of ultrasonic subsurface backscatter | |
Sinha et al. | Applications of sonics and ultrasonics in geophysical prospecting | |
Mrozewski et al. | Gulf of Mexico Gas Hydrate Joint Industry Project Leg II |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: STATOILHYDRO ASA,NORWAY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:HANSEN, BRIKT RATHOUR;REEL/FRAME:023004/0401 Effective date: 20090723 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: STATOIL ASA, NORWAY Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:STATOILHYDRO ASA;REEL/FRAME:031528/0807 Effective date: 20091102 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: STATOIL PETROLEUM AS, NORWAY Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:STATOIL ASA;REEL/FRAME:031627/0265 Effective date: 20130502 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |