US20080243457A1 - Process for determining a remaining life for a part - Google Patents

Process for determining a remaining life for a part Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20080243457A1
US20080243457A1 US12/135,482 US13548208A US2008243457A1 US 20080243457 A1 US20080243457 A1 US 20080243457A1 US 13548208 A US13548208 A US 13548208A US 2008243457 A1 US2008243457 A1 US 2008243457A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
crack
airfoil
determining
establishing
remaining life
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US12/135,482
Inventor
Robert E. deLaneuville
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Florida Turbine Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Florida Turbine Technologies Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Florida Turbine Technologies Inc filed Critical Florida Turbine Technologies Inc
Priority to US12/135,482 priority Critical patent/US20080243457A1/en
Publication of US20080243457A1 publication Critical patent/US20080243457A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M13/00Testing of machine parts
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01MTESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING OF STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M5/00Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings
    • G01M5/0033Investigating the elasticity of structures, e.g. deflection of bridges or air-craft wings by determining damage, crack or wear

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a process of determining a remaining life for a part, and more specifically to determining a remaining life for an airfoil used in the gas turbine engine.
  • Industrial gas turbine engines and even aero gas turbine engines use several stages of blades and vanes in the turbine section of the engine that are under high temperature loads as well as mechanical loads.
  • the airfoils include cooling air holes opening onto the outer surface of the airfoils for passing cooling air through and over the airfoil for cooling purposes.
  • IGT industrial gas turbine engine
  • the engine operates for a long period of time, or cycle, typically of around 40,000 hours before the engine is shut down for inspection and maintenance. Any premature shut down due to a problem like a damaged airfoil can be very costly due to the engine not performing its intended function like power generation. Because of the temperature, pressure and mechanical loads applied to the airfoil during operation, stresses occur.
  • residual stresses develop on the airfoil as the airfoil cools down to ambient temperature after shut-down of the engine.
  • the residual stresses cause cracks to develop on the surface, typically starting at the cooling hole and extending outward thereof, when the airfoil cools down from its normal operating temperature. If the residual stresses on the airfoil extend into the wall of the airfoil fare enough, the cause can propagate through the wall of the airfoil, resulting in the airfoil to be non-useful.
  • a typical IGT industrial gas turbine
  • a typical IGT can have 50-100 blades or vanes in each stage, and have four stages, making the number of blades and vanes in the turbine in the order to 800 airfoils.
  • the cost of a set of airfoils in the first stage can exceed one million dollars.
  • an inspector would remove an airfoil that shows cracks to prevent a possible catastrophic event from occurring when the IGT is in operation. It is very costly to shut down an IGT prematurely. Therefore, an inspector may remove many airfoils that are still useful, even though many cracks appear on the surface. Thus, many used airfoils can accumulate that are not beyond the useful life in a gas turbine engine.
  • the present invention is a process of determining if a used airfoil of a gas turbine engine has any remaining life, or if the airfoil is at or near its end of life period.
  • the process involves determining the shape and material properties of an airfoil, modeling the airfoil and determining the residual stresses that would occur around the airfoil based upon proper operating conditions on the airfoil such as temperature loads, pressure loads, and other operating loads, observing the locations of cracks on the real airfoil, and then determining if a residual stress level would occur far enough into the wall of the airfoil to cause the crack to propagate enough weaken the structural strength of the airfoil such that the airfoil cannot be reused in the gas turbine engine.
  • the airfoil is considered to still have useful life and can be reused.
  • the present invention is described for use in determining the useful life for an airfoil. However, the process could be used for any part in which cracks would cause problems in the useful life of the part.
  • FIG. 1 shows a cross section view of an airfoil in a gas turbine engine.
  • FIG. 2 shows a side view of a region on the airfoil having cooling holes and cracks propagating therefrom.
  • FIG. 3 shows a section of the airfoil in which the cracks occur, and the residual stress levels.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the process used in the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 An airfoil cross section 12 , such as a blade of a vane, used in a gas turbine engine is shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the airfoil includes a wall extending around the airfoil to define an outer airfoil surface, and a plurality of cooling holes 14 to discharge cooling air onto the airfoil surface for cooling purposes.
  • the airfoil 12 includes ribs 16 located along the trailing edge and midway along the airfoil for structural purposes.
  • FIG. 2 shows a side view of a portion of the airfoil on the pressure side in which a plurality of the cooling holes 14 are shown with cracks 20 propagating out from the holes 14 . One or more cracks can occur at the cooling holes or away from the cooling holes.
  • the crack results from residual stresses that are formed on the airfoil wall from thermal material fatigue as the airfoil goes from operating temperature and conditions to an inoperative state at an ambient temperature.
  • the crack or cracks are most likely to form along a region on the pressure side of the airfoil identified by the arc in FIG. 1 . This is the region of highest temperature load, and also the region in which the cooling holes are located. Cooling holes are located on other regions of the airfoil as well, such as on the leading edge suction side as shown in FIG. 1 .
  • FIG. 3 shows a cross section view of the airfoil 12 in the region on the pressure side of the airfoil where the cracks are most likely to occur.
  • the arc representing the crack forming region identified in FIG. 1 is also shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the wall of the airfoil has a certain thickness as identified in the figure.
  • Two cooling holes 14 are shown in FIG. 3 , and represent two of the cooling holes shown in FIG. 2 in which a crack occurs from the hole on the right side of the figure. Residual stresses develop in the wall of the airfoil when the airfoil cools down to ambient temperature.
  • Two residual stress contours are shown in FIG. 3 . The residual stress will start at the outer wall of the airfoil and progress into the wall toward the inner side of the airfoil.
  • FIG. 3 shows the residual stress region to occupy about 20% of the cross sectional area of the airfoil wall in the crack region.
  • Boundary conditions such as the temperature loads under operating conditions, the pressure loads, and other loads such as centrifugal force loads are part of the boundary conditions as shown in step 10 of FIG. 4 .
  • the inspector would also determine the material properties of the airfoil and the dimensions of the airfoil.
  • a 3D finite element model of the airfoil is then created (step 12 ) in order to apply the boundary conditions and determine the residual stresses that occur in the airfoil (step 14 ). Residual stresses occur in the walls of the airfoil when the airfoil cools down to ambient condition after the engine has been shut down.
  • each crack will occur on the airfoil where a residual stress will occur.
  • the inspector will compare the location of each crack (is the part has more than one crack) with the resulting residual stress levels that the computer modeling has produced. As shown in FIG. 3 , if the residual stress at the region where the crack is observed does not pass through the wall of the airfoil, then the crack will not pass through the wall of the airfoil if the airfoil is placed again in operation under the conditions modeled. It is known that the crack will propagate into the airfoil wall as far as the residual stresses go.
  • the residual stress region does not occupy a significant area of the airfoil wall (such as the 20% region in FIG. 3 )
  • an inspector can reason that the crack will not pass far enough into the airfoil wall such that the structural strength of the airfoil is weakened to the point of being unsafe if used again.
  • the usefulness of an airfoil can be determined by observing the length of the crack growth into the wall versus the time period under which the airfoil was used in the modeled conditions. An airfoil with 40,000 hours of use having a crack passing 50% into the wall could be considered to still have many hours of useful life remaining, since the crack will probably not grow any further as the crack has reached a stable size.
  • Each crack found on the airfoil is compared with the resulting residual stress profile calculated in the computer modeling. If any crack is found to be located where the residual stress would promote crack growth to an unacceptable level, then the airfoil is determined to be beyond or near its useful life in a gas turbine engine.
  • the process of the present invention can also be used to determine if airfoils that are still located in a gas turbine engine can be reused or must be replaced when the engine is not operating.
  • An inspector can use any known process of observing airfoils that are still mounted in the gas turbine engine in order to locate the cracks. Once the cracks are located, the process of determining the residual stress levels at the regions in which cracks are found can be used to determine if the particular airfoil can still be used or must be replaced.
  • the process of the present invention could be used for parts other than airfoils. Any part that could suffer damage from residual stress crack growth could make use of the process of the present invention. A rotary shaft for a critical component in which part failure would be catastrophic would apply. Any part in which the replacement by a new part would be costly could be used to determine if the old part is still usable.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)

Abstract

A process for determining a remaining life of a part, such as an airfoil in a gas turbine engine, comprising the steps of establishing the boundary conditions that act on the part, determining the material properties of the part, creating a 3D finite element model of the part and determining the residual stresses on the part, observing the actual part for at least one crack, and comparing the location of the crack to the residual stresses determined on the model at the crack location. If the residual stress at the crack location passes into the wall of the part beyond a predetermined length, then the part is rejected for further use.

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/437,521 filed on May 20, 2006 and issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,387,030 on Jun. 17, 2008 that claims the benefit to an earlier filed U.S. Provisional application Ser. No. 60/783,651 filed on Mar. 17, 2006 and entitled PROCESS FOR DETERMINING A REMAINING LIFE FOR A GAS TURBINE AIRFOIL.
  • STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
  • None.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • 1. Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to a process of determining a remaining life for a part, and more specifically to determining a remaining life for an airfoil used in the gas turbine engine.
  • 2. Description of the Related Art Including Information Disclosed Under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98
  • Industrial gas turbine engines (and even aero gas turbine engines) use several stages of blades and vanes in the turbine section of the engine that are under high temperature loads as well as mechanical loads. The airfoils include cooling air holes opening onto the outer surface of the airfoils for passing cooling air through and over the airfoil for cooling purposes. In an industrial gas turbine engine (IGT), the engine operates for a long period of time, or cycle, typically of around 40,000 hours before the engine is shut down for inspection and maintenance. Any premature shut down due to a problem like a damaged airfoil can be very costly due to the engine not performing its intended function like power generation. Because of the temperature, pressure and mechanical loads applied to the airfoil during operation, stresses occur. Also, residual stresses develop on the airfoil as the airfoil cools down to ambient temperature after shut-down of the engine. The residual stresses cause cracks to develop on the surface, typically starting at the cooling hole and extending outward thereof, when the airfoil cools down from its normal operating temperature. If the residual stresses on the airfoil extend into the wall of the airfoil fare enough, the cause can propagate through the wall of the airfoil, resulting in the airfoil to be non-useful.
  • The blades and vanes used in the turbine section of an industrial gas turbine engine are numerous and also very expensive. A typical IGT (industrial gas turbine) can have 50-100 blades or vanes in each stage, and have four stages, making the number of blades and vanes in the turbine in the order to 800 airfoils. The cost of a set of airfoils in the first stage can exceed one million dollars. Many times, an inspector would remove an airfoil that shows cracks to prevent a possible catastrophic event from occurring when the IGT is in operation. It is very costly to shut down an IGT prematurely. Therefore, an inspector may remove many airfoils that are still useful, even though many cracks appear on the surface. Thus, many used airfoils can accumulate that are not beyond the useful life in a gas turbine engine.
  • There is a need in the art of gas turbine engines to determine from cracks that appear in an airfoil if that airfoil is still capable of withstanding the operating conditions in the gas turbine engine for another engine operating cycle, or if the airfoil is at or near its useful lifetime.
  • BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention is a process of determining if a used airfoil of a gas turbine engine has any remaining life, or if the airfoil is at or near its end of life period. The process involves determining the shape and material properties of an airfoil, modeling the airfoil and determining the residual stresses that would occur around the airfoil based upon proper operating conditions on the airfoil such as temperature loads, pressure loads, and other operating loads, observing the locations of cracks on the real airfoil, and then determining if a residual stress level would occur far enough into the wall of the airfoil to cause the crack to propagate enough weaken the structural strength of the airfoil such that the airfoil cannot be reused in the gas turbine engine. If the residual stresses that occur at the cracks observed on the surface of the airfoil do not pass into the wall of the airfoil enough to cause the cracks to propagate far, then the airfoil is considered to still have useful life and can be reused. The present invention is described for use in determining the useful life for an airfoil. However, the process could be used for any part in which cracks would cause problems in the useful life of the part.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 shows a cross section view of an airfoil in a gas turbine engine.
  • FIG. 2 shows a side view of a region on the airfoil having cooling holes and cracks propagating therefrom.
  • FIG. 3 shows a section of the airfoil in which the cracks occur, and the residual stress levels.
  • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of the process used in the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • An airfoil cross section 12, such as a blade of a vane, used in a gas turbine engine is shown in FIG. 1. The airfoil includes a wall extending around the airfoil to define an outer airfoil surface, and a plurality of cooling holes 14 to discharge cooling air onto the airfoil surface for cooling purposes. The airfoil 12 includes ribs 16 located along the trailing edge and midway along the airfoil for structural purposes. FIG. 2 shows a side view of a portion of the airfoil on the pressure side in which a plurality of the cooling holes 14 are shown with cracks 20 propagating out from the holes 14. One or more cracks can occur at the cooling holes or away from the cooling holes. The crack results from residual stresses that are formed on the airfoil wall from thermal material fatigue as the airfoil goes from operating temperature and conditions to an inoperative state at an ambient temperature. The crack or cracks are most likely to form along a region on the pressure side of the airfoil identified by the arc in FIG. 1. This is the region of highest temperature load, and also the region in which the cooling holes are located. Cooling holes are located on other regions of the airfoil as well, such as on the leading edge suction side as shown in FIG. 1.
  • FIG. 3 shows a cross section view of the airfoil 12 in the region on the pressure side of the airfoil where the cracks are most likely to occur. The arc representing the crack forming region identified in FIG. 1 is also shown in FIG. 3. The wall of the airfoil has a certain thickness as identified in the figure. Two cooling holes 14 are shown in FIG. 3, and represent two of the cooling holes shown in FIG. 2 in which a crack occurs from the hole on the right side of the figure. Residual stresses develop in the wall of the airfoil when the airfoil cools down to ambient temperature. Two residual stress contours are shown in FIG. 3. The residual stress will start at the outer wall of the airfoil and progress into the wall toward the inner side of the airfoil. FIG. 3 shows the residual stress region to occupy about 20% of the cross sectional area of the airfoil wall in the crack region.
  • In order to determine if a particular used airfoil is still usable in a gas turbine engine, an inspector will first have to establish the boundary conditions that occur on the airfoil. Boundary conditions such as the temperature loads under operating conditions, the pressure loads, and other loads such as centrifugal force loads are part of the boundary conditions as shown in step 10 of FIG. 4. The inspector would also determine the material properties of the airfoil and the dimensions of the airfoil.
  • A 3D finite element model of the airfoil is then created (step 12) in order to apply the boundary conditions and determine the residual stresses that occur in the airfoil (step 14). Residual stresses occur in the walls of the airfoil when the airfoil cools down to ambient condition after the engine has been shut down.
  • The inspector will then observe the actual used airfoil and locate all the cracks on that airfoil (step 16). Each crack will occur on the airfoil where a residual stress will occur. The inspector will compare the location of each crack (is the part has more than one crack) with the resulting residual stress levels that the computer modeling has produced. As shown in FIG. 3, if the residual stress at the region where the crack is observed does not pass through the wall of the airfoil, then the crack will not pass through the wall of the airfoil if the airfoil is placed again in operation under the conditions modeled. It is known that the crack will propagate into the airfoil wall as far as the residual stresses go. Thus, if the residual stress region does not occupy a significant area of the airfoil wall (such as the 20% region in FIG. 3), then an inspector can reason that the crack will not pass far enough into the airfoil wall such that the structural strength of the airfoil is weakened to the point of being unsafe if used again. The usefulness of an airfoil can be determined by observing the length of the crack growth into the wall versus the time period under which the airfoil was used in the modeled conditions. An airfoil with 40,000 hours of use having a crack passing 50% into the wall could be considered to still have many hours of useful life remaining, since the crack will probably not grow any further as the crack has reached a stable size. However, an airfoil with a crack passing 50% into the wall but having only 1000 hours of use could be considered unusable, since the crack will probably continue to grow with a few hundred hours of use. Another factor that would affect useful life based upon the distance that a crack passes into the wall will be if the airfoil would be structurally weakened, since the crack may be at a critical location on the airfoil.
  • However, if one crack is located at a region in which the computer modeling shows the residual stress to pass through the airfoil or shows the residual stress region to occupy a significantly large area of the cross sectional surface of the airfoil wall (as shown in FIG. 3), then the inspector can determine that the crack will pass through the airfoil wall if the airfoil is reused in a gas turbine engine.
  • Each crack found on the airfoil is compared with the resulting residual stress profile calculated in the computer modeling. If any crack is found to be located where the residual stress would promote crack growth to an unacceptable level, then the airfoil is determined to be beyond or near its useful life in a gas turbine engine.
  • Thus, using the process of identifying residual stress levels in regions where cracks occur, an inspector can identify which used airfoils can still be used in a gas turbine engine. Therefore, the operating expense of a gas turbine engine can be significantly reduced by not needing to purchase new airfoils.
  • The process of the present invention can also be used to determine if airfoils that are still located in a gas turbine engine can be reused or must be replaced when the engine is not operating. An inspector can use any known process of observing airfoils that are still mounted in the gas turbine engine in order to locate the cracks. Once the cracks are located, the process of determining the residual stress levels at the regions in which cracks are found can be used to determine if the particular airfoil can still be used or must be replaced.
  • The process of the present invention could be used for parts other than airfoils. Any part that could suffer damage from residual stress crack growth could make use of the process of the present invention. A rotary shaft for a critical component in which part failure would be catastrophic would apply. Any part in which the replacement by a new part would be costly could be used to determine if the old part is still usable.

Claims (7)

1. A process for determining a remaining life of a part, the process comprising the steps of:
Establishing one or more boundary conditions for the part;
Determining the material properties of the part;
Determining residual stresses in the part;
Observing the actual part for at least one crack;
Comparing the location of at least one observed crack with the residual stresses at the crack;
Establishing a maximum level of crack propagation at the crack; and,
Rejecting the part if the residual stress at the crack is beyond the maximum level of crack propagation.
2. The process for determining a remaining life of a part of claim I, and further comprising the step of:
The step of establishing one or more boundary conditions for the part comprising establishing the temperature acting on the part, or establishing the pressure acting on the part, or establishing the loads that act on the part.
3. The process for determining a remaining life of a part of claim 1, and further comprising the step of:
The step of determining residual stresses in the part comprises creating a 3D finite element model of the part and applying the established boundary conditions on the part.
4. The process for determining a remaining life of a part of claim 1, and further comprising the step of:
The step of establishing a maximum level of crack propagation at the crack comprises determining if the crack has reached a stable size.
5. The process for determining a remaining life of a part of claim 1, and further comprising the step of:
The step of establishing a maximum level of crack propagation at the crack comprises determining if the crack passes through a wall of the part.
6. The process for determining a remaining life of a part of claim 1, and further comprising the step of:
The part is an airfoil for use in a gas turbine engine.
7. The process for determining a remaining life of a part of claim 1, and further comprising the step of:
Comparing the locations of a plurality of observed cracks with the residual stresses at the plurality of cracks; and,
Rejecting the part is the residual stress at a particular crack is beyond the maximum level of crack propagation.
US12/135,482 2006-03-17 2008-06-09 Process for determining a remaining life for a part Abandoned US20080243457A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/135,482 US20080243457A1 (en) 2006-03-17 2008-06-09 Process for determining a remaining life for a part

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US78365106P 2006-03-17 2006-03-17
US11/437,521 US7387030B1 (en) 2006-03-17 2006-05-20 Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil
US12/135,482 US20080243457A1 (en) 2006-03-17 2008-06-09 Process for determining a remaining life for a part

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/437,521 Continuation US7387030B1 (en) 2006-03-17 2006-05-20 Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20080243457A1 true US20080243457A1 (en) 2008-10-02

Family

ID=39510311

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/437,521 Expired - Fee Related US7387030B1 (en) 2006-03-17 2006-05-20 Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil
US12/135,482 Abandoned US20080243457A1 (en) 2006-03-17 2008-06-09 Process for determining a remaining life for a part

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/437,521 Expired - Fee Related US7387030B1 (en) 2006-03-17 2006-05-20 Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (2) US7387030B1 (en)

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN105426660A (en) * 2015-10-30 2016-03-23 华中科技大学 Method for predicting residual stress field of surface plane of mechanical part
US9513200B1 (en) 2015-11-04 2016-12-06 Rolls-Royce Corporation Determination of a threshold crack length
US9892219B2 (en) 2014-01-28 2018-02-13 Rolls-Royce Corporation Using fracture mechanism maps to predict time-dependent crack growth behavior under dwell conditions
CN113297772A (en) * 2021-06-07 2021-08-24 南昌航空大学 Method for simulating residual stress distribution of composite material by using finite element software

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7730790B2 (en) * 2004-08-10 2010-06-08 Nordson Corporation Shear test device
US7387030B1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2008-06-17 Florida Turbine Technologies, Inc. Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil
US8209839B1 (en) * 2006-11-28 2012-07-03 Florida Turbine Technologies, Inc. Process for re-designing a distressed component used under thermal and structural loading
US9103741B2 (en) 2010-08-27 2015-08-11 General Electric Company Methods and systems for assessing residual life of turbomachine airfoils
US20120067054A1 (en) 2010-09-21 2012-03-22 Palmer Labs, Llc High efficiency power production methods, assemblies, and systems
US8818078B2 (en) * 2012-02-03 2014-08-26 Solar Turbines Inc. Apparatus and method for optically measuring creep
US20140365940A1 (en) * 2013-06-07 2014-12-11 Solar Turbines Incorporated Systems and methods for manipulating boundary conditions
US10678969B2 (en) 2017-04-21 2020-06-09 General Electric Company Usage based lifing
CN109738141B (en) * 2018-12-29 2021-06-08 北京航天飞腾装备技术有限责任公司 Device and method for measuring static stiffness of high-aspect-ratio airfoil

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4709383A (en) * 1986-04-21 1987-11-24 Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method for evaluating residual fatigue life of mechanical parts
US4953973A (en) * 1989-05-16 1990-09-04 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Detection of compressive residual stresses using the method of caustics
US6532825B1 (en) * 1998-09-28 2003-03-18 Bmc Co., Ltd Fatigue damage detection sensor for structural materials and mounting method thereof
US6964202B2 (en) * 2001-10-17 2005-11-15 Aea Technology Plc Detection of rolling contact fatigue
US7387030B1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2008-06-17 Florida Turbine Technologies, Inc. Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5654500A (en) * 1996-04-17 1997-08-05 General Electric Co. Method for determining cyclic service life for rotational parts of a rotary machine
US7117574B2 (en) * 2002-03-15 2006-10-10 Purdue Research Foundation Determining expected fatigue life of hard machined components

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4709383A (en) * 1986-04-21 1987-11-24 Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Method for evaluating residual fatigue life of mechanical parts
US4953973A (en) * 1989-05-16 1990-09-04 Grumman Aerospace Corporation Detection of compressive residual stresses using the method of caustics
US6532825B1 (en) * 1998-09-28 2003-03-18 Bmc Co., Ltd Fatigue damage detection sensor for structural materials and mounting method thereof
US6964202B2 (en) * 2001-10-17 2005-11-15 Aea Technology Plc Detection of rolling contact fatigue
US7387030B1 (en) * 2006-03-17 2008-06-17 Florida Turbine Technologies, Inc. Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil

Cited By (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9892219B2 (en) 2014-01-28 2018-02-13 Rolls-Royce Corporation Using fracture mechanism maps to predict time-dependent crack growth behavior under dwell conditions
CN105426660A (en) * 2015-10-30 2016-03-23 华中科技大学 Method for predicting residual stress field of surface plane of mechanical part
US9513200B1 (en) 2015-11-04 2016-12-06 Rolls-Royce Corporation Determination of a threshold crack length
CN113297772A (en) * 2021-06-07 2021-08-24 南昌航空大学 Method for simulating residual stress distribution of composite material by using finite element software

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7387030B1 (en) 2008-06-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US7387030B1 (en) Process for determining a remaining life for a gas turbine airfoil
US7925454B1 (en) Process for determining a remaining life of a deteriorated turbine component
US7810385B1 (en) Process for determining a remaining creep life for a turbine component
Maktouf et al. An investigation of premature fatigue failures of gas turbine blade
US6339878B1 (en) Method of repairing an airfoil
RU2430239C2 (en) Procedure for manufacture of coated blades
EP2679778B1 (en) A method for measuring geometry deformations of a turbine component
US20070269316A1 (en) Turbine blade with trailing edge cutback and method of making same
US10526912B2 (en) Method of measuring turbine blade tip erosion
US9102014B2 (en) Method of servicing an airfoil assembly for use in a gas turbine engine
CN106903478A (en) For the system and method for deep tip crack forming mechanism
KR102275609B1 (en) Extending the life of power turbine disks exposed to corrosion damage during operation
EP2159371B1 (en) Gas turbine airfoil assemblies and methods of repair
CA2881943C (en) Turbine blade for a gas turbine engine
Pridemore Stress-rupture characterization in nickel-based superalloy gas turbine engine components
Lam et al. A study of droplet erosion on two L-0 turbine stages
Kubiak et al. Failure of last-stage turbine blades in a geothermal power plant
Gowreesan et al. Resolving Issues and Failures of Diaphragms in Turbines
Szczepanik Investigation of the dynamic properties of engine fan titanium rotor blades in a high manoeuvrability aircraft in FOD aspect
Lowden et al. The role of metallurgical analysis in gas turbine maintenance
Ghorbani et al. Fracture analysis of a first stage turbine blade
JP2004044497A (en) Method for maintaining turbine moving blade
Kubiak et al. Evaluation of the Last Stage Blades of 37.5 and 110 MW Geothermal Turbines
JP2006161567A (en) Wear management method and inspection tool for moving blade/stationary blade of gas turbine
JP2006183529A (en) Reuse method of turbine moving blade, and reused turbine moving blade

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION