US20080172893A1 - Digitizing planimeter - Google Patents
Digitizing planimeter Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20080172893A1 US20080172893A1 US11/625,623 US62562307A US2008172893A1 US 20080172893 A1 US20080172893 A1 US 20080172893A1 US 62562307 A US62562307 A US 62562307A US 2008172893 A1 US2008172893 A1 US 2008172893A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- radiation
- sensor
- planimeter
- housing
- distance
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B17/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of infrasonic, sonic or ultrasonic vibrations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
- G01B7/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques
- G01B7/32—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of electric or magnetic techniques for measuring areas
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
- Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y10S367/00—Communications, electrical: acoustic wave systems and devices
- Y10S367/907—Coordinate determination
Definitions
- the present invention concerns planimeters. It has particular, although not exclusive, application to planimeters based on transmission of ultrasound or other radiation.
- planimeters have been developed to make that task easier. Planimeters usually comprise some kind of wheel that gets rolled along the drawing feature to be measured and infers the feature's length from the number of rotations. Some additionally have provisions for entering the drawing scale, and the output produced by the planimeter is the result of multiplying the measured length by the scale.
- planimeters have pairs of wheels that, due to differences in the wheels' rotations, enable them to infer not only one-dimensional length but also relative directions. Such planimeters often calculate and produce derived quantities such as areas. So planimeters contribute greatly to the ease of determining from drawings quantities such as how much carpet a room requires or how long a fence it would take to enclose a yard.
- This concept can be applied to planimeters by providing the device with the capacity to take such measurements of distances to two or more different reflector positions automatically from each of a sequence of a sequence of drawing positions over which the user positions the device, by storing the sequence of positions this inferred, and by calculating from such sequences quantities such as distances, areas, etc.
- Preferably such quantities are scaled, and the output is preferably provided in a human-readable form on the device itself.
- FIG. 1 is a plan view of one of the present invention's embodiments in use.
- FIG. 2 is a more-detailed plan view of that embodiment.
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of that embodiment.
- FIG. 4 is a perspective view of that embodiment.
- FIG. 5 is a sensor-pattern diagram containing plots of that embodiment's sensor patterns.
- FIG. 6 is a plan view similar to FIG. 2 but with lines depicting geometrical relationships between the handle and sensor angles.
- FIG. 7 is a plan view similar to FIG. 1 but showing the embodiment oriented for left-handed use.
- FIG. 1 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in the form of a movable “puck” 10 disposed on a drawing 12 from which quantities such as areas and peripheries are to be determined.
- the puck 10 works by measuring the delay between its emission of ultrasound pulses and its resultant reception of echoes reflected from a fiducial object such as a reflector assembly 14 placed by the user in a fixed position on the drawing 12 .
- the user depresses the puck's ON/CLEAR key, which is identified in FIG. 2 by reference numeral 16 .
- the user then, as FIG. 1 shows, orients the puck's sensor-mounting faces 18 and 20 parallel to respective mutually orthogonal reflector faces 22 and 24 .
- the user With the puck in that orientation, the user so locates the puck 10 that crosshairs 26 scribed in the puck's transparent or translucent window 28 are superimposed on a drawing point of interest.
- the point of interest typically lies on the outline of a drawing feature whose area, peripheral length, or other quantity is to be determined.
- the user presses the puck's MEASURE button, identified in FIG. 2 by reference numeral 30 .
- the system responds by determining and storing the crosshair-indicated point's location with respect to the reflector faces 22 and 24 .
- the user then moves the puck to a different drawing position and depresses the MEASURE button 30 again. What happens next depends on the feature to be measured and the type of measurement desired.
- the feature of interest is a property line to be fenced and that the measurement is being taken to determine the required fence length.
- the property line is somewhat complex, the user may repeat the above point-locating operations several times, and the microprocessor 36 records in an internal data store the locations of the points thereby determined. Then, when the user has positioned the cross hairs on the end of the property-line portion to be fenced, the user depresses the END button 31 . In response the system treats each pair of successive measured points as end-points of a line segment belonging to the property line, it computes the resultant property-line length from those measurements and a scale factor that the user has previously entered, and it displays the result on the display 32 .
- FIG. 3 is a block diagram of the puck's circuitry.
- FIG. 3 's block 34 represents the puck's buttons, including the above-mentioned MEASURE button.
- a processor 36 responds to depression of the MEASURE button by performing a sequence that starts with its sending a current-drive signal pulse through a transmitter switch 38 to an x-axis power transmitter 40 .
- That transmitter may simply be, say, a transistor such as a MOSFET connected between a power rail and an x-axis transmitter 42 , and that transmitter may be a high-Q piezoelectric transducer in parallel with an inductor coupled to the other power rail.
- the transistor During the current-drive pulse, the transistor allows current flow from the power source through the inductor, whose current rises to a level that is approximately proportional to the drive-signal pulse's duration.
- the processor 36 ends that pulse, the transistor interrupts the current flow from the power source.
- the inductor's resultant back emf starts oscillation in the inductor-transducer combination at the transducer's natural frequency, which is about 50 kHz in the illustrated embodiment.
- the piezoelectric transducer's resultant oscillation transmits an ultrasound pulse directed to one of the reflector assembly's surfaces, from which an echo propagates to the puck's x-axis receiver 44 .
- a high-input-impedance pre-amplifier 46 buffers the resultant pulse-modulated sine-wave voltage, which, during a predetermined time window set by the microprocessor 36 , a receiver switch 48 directs to a receiver amplifier 50 .
- a peak detector 52 determines when the first peak occurs in amplifier 50 's oscillatory output, independently of whether that peak is positive or negative, and an amplitude detector 54 determines the time of occurrence of the first peak within that window that thereafter exceeds a predetermined minimum.
- the microprocessor repeats the operation, this time with a longer current pulse so that the sonic-pulse amplitude is higher, and it continues repeating the operation until the echo's magnitude exceeds the minimum requirement. Also, the system determines what the delay is between the first peak and the one that exceeds the minimum; if the delay is too long—i.e., if the rise time is too great—then an obstruction such as a pencil or a user's finger may be in the way, and the system may attempt to avoid the resultant error by adjusting the window during which it “listens” for the first peak.
- the processor repeatedly drives the transmitters with pulses of that amplitude. For each transmitted pulse, it measures the time that elapses before the resultant echo is received. It considers the echo received when the oscillatory receiver output's first cycle within the decided-upon time window first reaches a positive or negative maximum.
- An approach that I have found to be relatively reliable begins by sending two pulses. If the two resultant elapsed-time measurements result in values that are equal (within the system's time-measurement resolution), the distance determination is based on that value. If they differ, then up to a maximum of three further measurements are made to find two readings in a row that are equal, and the distance determination is based on those two readings' value. If the number of readings reaches five without equality between two successive readings, then the lowest reading that does not differ excessively from the others is used. The distance determination is based on the speed of sound, of course, and the illustrated embodiment uses the output of a temperature sensor 56 to help arrive at an accurate value for that quantity. Some embodiments may additionally or instead use pressure and/or humidity sensors.
- the system repeats the operation for the y direction. If both measurements were made successfully, the processor operates a beeper 57 once to indicate that the measurement was made successfully. Otherwise, it causes two beeps in quick succession to tell the user that the point should be re-measured.
- the x-axis transmitter 42 and receiver 44 are disposed on sensor surface 18 .
- On the other sensor surface 20 is disposed another, y-axis transmitter, as is a y-axis receiver, and, after it has made the x-axis measurement, it similarly makes a y-axis measurement.
- a power amplifier 58 like power amplifier 40 is provided for the y-axis receiver 60 , and the processor 36 uses the transmitter switch 38 to control whether the current pulse goes to the x- or y-axis power transmitter.
- the receiver switch 48 uses the receiver switch 48 to control whether the input to the receiver amplifier 50 comes from the x-axis preamplifier 46 or from a similar preamplifier 62 , which buffers the y-axis receiver's output.
- FIG. 5 is an idealized far-field sensor-pattern diagram for transmitter 42 and receiver 60 .
- trace 66 represents the relative magnitude of transmitter 42 's ultrasound-pressure level as a function of transmission angle
- trace 68 represents the receiver's sensitivity as a function of reception angle
- their (normalized) product, trace 70 is the transmitter-receiver pair's combined pattern.
- the plots are intended only to be suggestive rather than accurate; typical actual 6 db beam widths may be on the order of 50° to 60°, although those values are not critical, and beam shapes outside that range can also be used.
- the transmitter-receiver combination remains sensitive through a significant range about the normal.
- the first receiver-cycle maximum will typically result from a path representing the shortest distance to the reflector surface—and therefore a path perpendicular to it—even if the puck's sensor-bearing faces are not oriented exactly parallel to the reflector faces.
- the patterns in FIG. 5 are themselves idealized, and the overall pattern would not in most embodiments be quite as symmetrical as trace 70 suggests. Nor would the maximum necessarily occur precisely on the normal to the sensor-bearing surface.
- Features such as the sensor-bearing surfaces 18 and 20 themselves and the crosstalk barriers identified in FIG. 2 by reference numeral 72 will tend to skew the pattern to some extent.
- the transmitter and receivers are intentionally mounted with a little tilt toward the cross hairs. The reason for this is to increase sensitivity in the very-near field. Although in the far field each receiver-transmitter pair's individual patterns largely overlap, the spacing between the receiver and transmitter tends to cause the overlap, and thus the transducer pair's sensitivity, to be reduced. Tilting the transducers in such a manner that their patterns are inclined toward each other, as FIG. 5 's plots 66 and 68 suggest in an exaggerated fashion, tends to mitigate this effect.
- the two sensors are aimed at right angles to each other. That is, FIG. 6 's angle a between dashed line 74 , which divides one transmitter-receiver pair's pattern into equal-power portions, and dashed line 76 , which similarly divides the other transmitter-receiver pair's pattern, is 90°. But strict orthogonality is not necessary; indeed, any non-zero angle can theoretically be used to obtain the required two-dimensional information. Still, angles a that differ from 90° by more than 20° will find little if any practical use, and that angle preferably differs from the ideal by less than 10°.
- FIG. 6 illustrates another of the illustrated embodiment's advantageous features, namely, that the handle portion 15 is oriented at an angle to the sensor directions. That is, dashed line 77 , which is the axis about which the handle portion's second moment of area is lowest, is not parallel to either of the directions in which the transmitter-receiver pairs are aimed. It turns out that such an arrangement makes the puck more natural to hold when the puck is in the proper orientation. Although the handle's angle does not have to form the illustrated, 45° angle to provide this benefit to some extent, something near to that angle is desirable both for comfort and for an additional reason, which FIG. 7 illustrates.
- FIG. 7 is similar to FIG. 1 , except that FIG. 7 shows the puck orientation that a left-handed person would use, whereas FIG. 1 's is the one that a right-handed person would use.
- the reflector 14 would be located to the right of the puck 10 rather than to the left, and the receiver-transmitter pair used to determine the x component of the puck's two-dimensional position is the one positioned on face 20 rather than those on face 18 ; user set-up operations would inform the system of whether the user is employing the puck in the right- or left-handed mode, and its calculations would be accordingly adjusted; for one of the sensors, the inferred coordinate would increase with measured distance in the left-handed mode and decrease with it in the right-handed mode.
- the system can be used to measure a feature's total length, and some embodiments enable the user to enter a height value to be multiplied by that length.
- the display 32 displays the length of a wall in response to the user's depressing the END key 31 , for example, the user can press center pad 78 's down-indicating edge to display the wall area arrived at by assuming a previously entered wall height.
- settings such as wall height, drawing scale, etc.
- the system not only treats each entered point as defining a line segment with the one before it but also treats the first and last entered points as doing so, too: depressing that key creates a closed figure, which itself have an area that manipulating the center pad 78 enables the user to display in addition to the length of the figure's periphery.
- the closed figure may represent a room whose wall height has been previously entered, in which case that pad also enables the user to cause the room's wall area and volume to be displayed.
- the user can depress the M+ button 82 and then start a new closed figure, this figure being the interior portion to be excluded.
- the interior figure is measured as described above except that, instead of ending the measurement with CLOSE+, the user depresses the CLOSE ⁇ button 84 to indicate that the area has a negative value, and, when that area appears on the display, depresses the SET button 86 and then the M+ button to indicate that the memory contents should be updated by adding the (negative) displayed value to the previously stored results. Depressing the MR button 88 causes that updated value to be displayed.
- the user If the user recognized a shape as an arc, he starts the measurement as before by pressing the ON/CLEAR key 16 twice. Before he uses the MEASURE key 30 to enter the first, though, the user depresses the ARC/CIRC key 92 to indicate that the points about to be entered are not line-segment endpoints but rather an arc's first end point, an intermediate point on the arc, and the arc's other end point. Consequently, entry of the third point results automatically in the system's determining the arc's length, the area defined by the arc and its cord, and, if height has been entered previously, the wall area and “room” volume.
- the procedure starts in the same manner if the user recognizes the shape as a complete circle, with the exception that the user presses the ARC/CIRC key 92 twice instead of once.
- the third point's entry results in the system's determining the circumference and area of the circle that that three entered points define. If the first two points are the ends of the circle's diameter, the user can press the CLOSE+key to signify that fact, and the system will compute the length, area, volume, etc. accordingly.
- the system identifies individual points in two-dimensional space in the course of tracing drawing features. Some embodiments may display these raw data. Or the system may be used as a digitizer input to provide those data, as well as derived data such as those described above, to, say, some personal-computer application. Standard interfaces have been provided for such input, and, as FIG. 3 's blocks 94 and 96 indicate, the data can be supplied over a wired or wireless connection to an application running on a personal computer. For example, the user may depress the PC SEND key identified in FIG. 2 by reference numeral 98 to cause the value displayed on the puck's display 32 to populate a selected cell in a spreadsheet program running on a PC coupled to the system.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Measurement Of Velocity Or Position Using Acoustic Or Ultrasonic Waves (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention concerns planimeters. It has particular, although not exclusive, application to planimeters based on transmission of ultrasound or other radiation.
- 2. Background Information
- Many applications arise in which lengths, areas, and other quantities need to be inferred from scale-model drawings of buildings, plots of land, mechanical devices, etc. Even when the drawing features are single straight lines, determining the length of the real-world feature thereby represented takes time. So planimeters have been developed to make that task easier. Planimeters usually comprise some kind of wheel that gets rolled along the drawing feature to be measured and infers the feature's length from the number of rotations. Some additionally have provisions for entering the drawing scale, and the output produced by the planimeter is the result of multiplying the measured length by the scale.
- Some planimeters have pairs of wheels that, due to differences in the wheels' rotations, enable them to infer not only one-dimensional length but also relative directions. Such planimeters often calculate and produce derived quantities such as areas. So planimeters contribute greatly to the ease of determining from drawings quantities such as how much carpet a room requires or how long a fence it would take to enclose a yard.
- But I have recognized that planimeters for those and similar applications can be provided in a way that extends their usefulness and can be implemented without much expense. What I do is adapt to digitizing an approach that had previously been used only for what are sometimes known as “electronic tape measures.” In accordance with this approach, an ultrasonic or other-radiation transmitter and receiver are positioned in a movable housing, and distances are inferred from the delays between the radiation's transmission and the reception of any resultant echo. This concept can be applied to planimeters by providing the device with the capacity to take such measurements of distances to two or more different reflector positions automatically from each of a sequence of a sequence of drawing positions over which the user positions the device, by storing the sequence of positions this inferred, and by calculating from such sequences quantities such as distances, areas, etc. Preferably such quantities are scaled, and the output is preferably provided in a human-readable form on the device itself.
-
FIG. 1 is a plan view of one of the present invention's embodiments in use. -
FIG. 2 is a more-detailed plan view of that embodiment. -
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of that embodiment. -
FIG. 4 is a perspective view of that embodiment. -
FIG. 5 is a sensor-pattern diagram containing plots of that embodiment's sensor patterns. -
FIG. 6 is a plan view similar toFIG. 2 but with lines depicting geometrical relationships between the handle and sensor angles. -
FIG. 7 is a plan view similar toFIG. 1 but showing the embodiment oriented for left-handed use. -
FIG. 1 depicts an embodiment of the present invention in the form of a movable “puck” 10 disposed on adrawing 12 from which quantities such as areas and peripheries are to be determined. Thepuck 10 works by measuring the delay between its emission of ultrasound pulses and its resultant reception of echoes reflected from a fiducial object such as areflector assembly 14 placed by the user in a fixed position on thedrawing 12. - To begin a new measurement, the user depresses the puck's ON/CLEAR key, which is identified in
FIG. 2 byreference numeral 16. Grasping the puck'shandle portion 17, the user then, asFIG. 1 shows, orients the puck's sensor-mounting faces 18 and 20 parallel to respective mutually orthogonal reflector faces 22 and 24. With the puck in that orientation, the user so locates thepuck 10 thatcrosshairs 26 scribed in the puck's transparent ortranslucent window 28 are superimposed on a drawing point of interest. The point of interest typically lies on the outline of a drawing feature whose area, peripheral length, or other quantity is to be determined. - With the puck thus positioned, the user presses the puck's MEASURE button, identified in
FIG. 2 byreference numeral 30. In a manner to be described in more detail below, the system responds by determining and storing the crosshair-indicated point's location with respect to the reflector faces 22 and 24. Typically, the user then moves the puck to a different drawing position and depresses theMEASURE button 30 again. What happens next depends on the feature to be measured and the type of measurement desired. - Suppose, for example, that the feature of interest is a property line to be fenced and that the measurement is being taken to determine the required fence length. If the property line is somewhat complex, the user may repeat the above point-locating operations several times, and the
microprocessor 36 records in an internal data store the locations of the points thereby determined. Then, when the user has positioned the cross hairs on the end of the property-line portion to be fenced, the user depresses theEND button 31. In response the system treats each pair of successive measured points as end-points of a line segment belonging to the property line, it computes the resultant property-line length from those measurements and a scale factor that the user has previously entered, and it displays the result on thedisplay 32. - The way in which the above-mentioned puck-position determination is made will now be described by reference to
FIG. 3 , which is a block diagram of the puck's circuitry. FIG. 3's block 34 represents the puck's buttons, including the above-mentioned MEASURE button. Aprocessor 36 responds to depression of the MEASURE button by performing a sequence that starts with its sending a current-drive signal pulse through atransmitter switch 38 to anx-axis power transmitter 40. That transmitter may simply be, say, a transistor such as a MOSFET connected between a power rail and anx-axis transmitter 42, and that transmitter may be a high-Q piezoelectric transducer in parallel with an inductor coupled to the other power rail. During the current-drive pulse, the transistor allows current flow from the power source through the inductor, whose current rises to a level that is approximately proportional to the drive-signal pulse's duration. When theprocessor 36 ends that pulse, the transistor interrupts the current flow from the power source. The inductor's resultant back emf starts oscillation in the inductor-transducer combination at the transducer's natural frequency, which is about 50 kHz in the illustrated embodiment. - The piezoelectric transducer's resultant oscillation transmits an ultrasound pulse directed to one of the reflector assembly's surfaces, from which an echo propagates to the puck's
x-axis receiver 44. A high-input-impedance pre-amplifier 46 buffers the resultant pulse-modulated sine-wave voltage, which, during a predetermined time window set by themicroprocessor 36, a receiver switch 48 directs to areceiver amplifier 50. Apeak detector 52 determines when the first peak occurs inamplifier 50's oscillatory output, independently of whether that peak is positive or negative, and anamplitude detector 54 determines the time of occurrence of the first peak within that window that thereafter exceeds a predetermined minimum. - If that minimum is not met, the microprocessor repeats the operation, this time with a longer current pulse so that the sonic-pulse amplitude is higher, and it continues repeating the operation until the echo's magnitude exceeds the minimum requirement. Also, the system determines what the delay is between the first peak and the one that exceeds the minimum; if the delay is too long—i.e., if the rise time is too great—then an obstruction such as a pencil or a user's finger may be in the way, and the system may attempt to avoid the resultant error by adjusting the window during which it “listens” for the first peak.
- With the desired transmitter amplitude thereby determined, the processor repeatedly drives the transmitters with pulses of that amplitude. For each transmitted pulse, it measures the time that elapses before the resultant echo is received. It considers the echo received when the oscillatory receiver output's first cycle within the decided-upon time window first reaches a positive or negative maximum.
- Because of noise and other factors, the elapsed time for a given puck position tends to vary from pulse to pulse, and various approaches can be taken to deal with that inconsistency. An approach that I have found to be relatively reliable begins by sending two pulses. If the two resultant elapsed-time measurements result in values that are equal (within the system's time-measurement resolution), the distance determination is based on that value. If they differ, then up to a maximum of three further measurements are made to find two readings in a row that are equal, and the distance determination is based on those two readings' value. If the number of readings reaches five without equality between two successive readings, then the lowest reading that does not differ excessively from the others is used. The distance determination is based on the speed of sound, of course, and the illustrated embodiment uses the output of a
temperature sensor 56 to help arrive at an accurate value for that quantity. Some embodiments may additionally or instead use pressure and/or humidity sensors. - With the x measurement thus made, the system repeats the operation for the y direction. If both measurements were made successfully, the processor operates a
beeper 57 once to indicate that the measurement was made successfully. Otherwise, it causes two beeps in quick succession to tell the user that the point should be re-measured. - As
FIG. 4 shows, thex-axis transmitter 42 andreceiver 44 are disposed onsensor surface 18. On theother sensor surface 20 is disposed another, y-axis transmitter, as is a y-axis receiver, and, after it has made the x-axis measurement, it similarly makes a y-axis measurement. AsFIG. 3 shows, apower amplifier 58 likepower amplifier 40 is provided for the y-axis receiver 60, and theprocessor 36 uses thetransmitter switch 38 to control whether the current pulse goes to the x- or y-axis power transmitter. Similarly, it uses thereceiver switch 48 to control whether the input to thereceiver amplifier 50 comes from thex-axis preamplifier 46 or from asimilar preamplifier 62, which buffers the y-axis receiver's output. - We digress here to note that the measurement depends on the user's orienting the puck as described above, i.e., with the puck's sensor-bearing surfaces parallel to the reflector faces from which they are to receive echoes. However, the system permits a significant departure from exact parallelism, as can be appreciated by reference to
FIG. 5 , which is an idealized far-field sensor-pattern diagram fortransmitter 42 andreceiver 60. In that diagram, in which the angles are shown as measured from the normal tosensor face 18, trace 66 represents the relative magnitude oftransmitter 42's ultrasound-pressure level as a function of transmission angle, while trace 68 represents the receiver's sensitivity as a function of reception angle, and their (normalized) product, trace 70, is the transmitter-receiver pair's combined pattern. The plots are intended only to be suggestive rather than accurate; typical actual 6 db beam widths may be on the order of 50° to 60°, although those values are not critical, and beam shapes outside that range can also be used. - As trace 70 shows, the transmitter-receiver combination remains sensitive through a significant range about the normal. As a consequence of that fact and the fact that ultrasound power decays exponentially with distance, the first receiver-cycle maximum will typically result from a path representing the shortest distance to the reflector surface—and therefore a path perpendicular to it—even if the puck's sensor-bearing faces are not oriented exactly parallel to the reflector faces.
- Now, that perpendicular distance from one of the transducers to the reflector will itself be affected by departures from perpendicularity. As can be seen in
FIG. 4 , though, the transmitter and receiver transducers are so spaced from the cross-hair intersection point that pivoting about that intersection point through small angles makes the distance to the reflector assembly decrease for one of those transducers if it increases for the other. Ideally the spacing is symmetrical so that the increase in the one distance equals the decrease in the other. Although assembly and other tolerances will typically prevent strict equality, the transducers can almost always be so placed that most of the one distance's variation will canceled out by the other's. - Additionally, of course, the patterns in
FIG. 5 are themselves idealized, and the overall pattern would not in most embodiments be quite as symmetrical as trace 70 suggests. Nor would the maximum necessarily occur precisely on the normal to the sensor-bearing surface. Features such as the sensor-bearingsurfaces FIG. 2 byreference numeral 72 will tend to skew the pattern to some extent. In the illustrated embodiment, moreover, the transmitter and receivers are intentionally mounted with a little tilt toward the cross hairs. The reason for this is to increase sensitivity in the very-near field. Although in the far field each receiver-transmitter pair's individual patterns largely overlap, the spacing between the receiver and transmitter tends to cause the overlap, and thus the transducer pair's sensitivity, to be reduced. Tilting the transducers in such a manner that their patterns are inclined toward each other, as FIG. 5's plots 66 and 68 suggest in an exaggerated fashion, tends to mitigate this effect. - In the illustrated embodiment, the two sensors are aimed at right angles to each other. That is, FIG. 6's angle a between dashed
line 74, which divides one transmitter-receiver pair's pattern into equal-power portions, and dashedline 76, which similarly divides the other transmitter-receiver pair's pattern, is 90°. But strict orthogonality is not necessary; indeed, any non-zero angle can theoretically be used to obtain the required two-dimensional information. Still, angles a that differ from 90° by more than 20° will find little if any practical use, and that angle preferably differs from the ideal by less than 10°. -
FIG. 6 illustrates another of the illustrated embodiment's advantageous features, namely, that the handle portion 15 is oriented at an angle to the sensor directions. That is, dashedline 77, which is the axis about which the handle portion's second moment of area is lowest, is not parallel to either of the directions in which the transmitter-receiver pairs are aimed. It turns out that such an arrangement makes the puck more natural to hold when the puck is in the proper orientation. Although the handle's angle does not have to form the illustrated, 45° angle to provide this benefit to some extent, something near to that angle is desirable both for comfort and for an additional reason, whichFIG. 7 illustrates. -
FIG. 7 is similar toFIG. 1 , except thatFIG. 7 shows the puck orientation that a left-handed person would use, whereas FIG. 1's is the one that a right-handed person would use. As that drawing shows, thereflector 14 would be located to the right of thepuck 10 rather than to the left, and the receiver-transmitter pair used to determine the x component of the puck's two-dimensional position is the one positioned onface 20 rather than those onface 18; user set-up operations would inform the system of whether the user is employing the puck in the right- or left-handed mode, and its calculations would be accordingly adjusted; for one of the sensors, the inferred coordinate would increase with measured distance in the left-handed mode and decrease with it in the right-handed mode. So orienting the puck's handle portion at an angle makes the puck ambidextrous. Of course, an exact 45° angle is not necessary to achieve this result, but the angle of the handle'saxis 77 should be closer to the bisector of the angle between thesensor directions - As was explained above, the system can be used to measure a feature's total length, and some embodiments enable the user to enter a height value to be multiplied by that length. When the
display 32 displays the length of a wall in response to the user's depressing theEND key 31, for example, the user can presscenter pad 78's down-indicating edge to display the wall area arrived at by assuming a previously entered wall height. (In the illustrated embodiment, settings such as wall height, drawing scale, etc. are entered through keys in a normally concealed supplementalkey region 79 that opening a slidablebottom sleeve 80 reveals.) Depressing that edge again may result in the assumed height's being displayed, and depressing the up- and down-indicating edges may cause the display to scroll back and forth through those values. - If instead of depressing the END key 31 after the last position entry the user depresses the
CLOSE+ key 81, the system not only treats each entered point as defining a line segment with the one before it but also treats the first and last entered points as doing so, too: depressing that key creates a closed figure, which itself have an area that manipulating thecenter pad 78 enables the user to display in addition to the length of the figure's periphery. The closed figure may represent a room whose wall height has been previously entered, in which case that pad also enables the user to cause the room's wall area and volume to be displayed. - It sometimes happens that the area is desired of a closed figure from which some interior space has been removed. In that case, the user can depress the
M+ button 82 and then start a new closed figure, this figure being the interior portion to be excluded. The interior figure is measured as described above except that, instead of ending the measurement with CLOSE+, the user depresses the CLOSE−button 84 to indicate that the area has a negative value, and, when that area appears on the display, depresses theSET button 86 and then the M+ button to indicate that the memory contents should be updated by adding the (negative) displayed value to the previously stored results. Depressing theMR button 88 causes that updated value to be displayed. - When the user recognizes that an error has been made in entering a location, he can depress the UNDO
button 90 to remove that location from the sequence being entered. But errors can go unnoticed, and this is particularly true when a great many points are being entered for a curve. Additionally, measurement errors arising simply from unavoidable inexactitude in locating points can tend to accumulate. This effect can be reduced in cases in which the user recognizes all or part of the curve as an arc or complete circle. - If the user recognized a shape as an arc, he starts the measurement as before by pressing the ON/CLEAR key 16 twice. Before he uses the
MEASURE key 30 to enter the first, though, the user depresses the ARC/CIRC key 92 to indicate that the points about to be entered are not line-segment endpoints but rather an arc's first end point, an intermediate point on the arc, and the arc's other end point. Consequently, entry of the third point results automatically in the system's determining the arc's length, the area defined by the arc and its cord, and, if height has been entered previously, the wall area and “room” volume. - The procedure starts in the same manner if the user recognizes the shape as a complete circle, with the exception that the user presses the ARC/CIRC key 92 twice instead of once. The third point's entry results in the system's determining the circumference and area of the circle that that three entered points define. If the first two points are the ends of the circle's diameter, the user can press the CLOSE+key to signify that fact, and the system will compute the length, area, volume, etc. accordingly.
- Of course, the system identifies individual points in two-dimensional space in the course of tracing drawing features. Some embodiments may display these raw data. Or the system may be used as a digitizer input to provide those data, as well as derived data such as those described above, to, say, some personal-computer application. Standard interfaces have been provided for such input, and, as FIG. 3's
blocks FIG. 2 byreference numeral 98 to cause the value displayed on the puck'sdisplay 32 to populate a selected cell in a spreadsheet program running on a PC coupled to the system. - It is apparent from the foregoing description using the present invention's teachings makes possible a flexible yet potentially inexpensive planimeter. The invention thus constitutes a significant advance in the art.
Claims (22)
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/625,623 US7408838B1 (en) | 2007-01-22 | 2007-01-22 | Digitizing planimeter |
PCT/US2007/088637 WO2008091467A1 (en) | 2007-01-22 | 2007-12-21 | Digitizing planimeter |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/625,623 US7408838B1 (en) | 2007-01-22 | 2007-01-22 | Digitizing planimeter |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20080172893A1 true US20080172893A1 (en) | 2008-07-24 |
US7408838B1 US7408838B1 (en) | 2008-08-05 |
Family
ID=39639857
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US11/625,623 Expired - Fee Related US7408838B1 (en) | 2007-01-22 | 2007-01-22 | Digitizing planimeter |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7408838B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2008091467A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2651768B1 (en) * | 2010-12-15 | 2020-05-20 | Packsize LLC | Device for three dimensional measurement of items |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4500977A (en) * | 1980-09-25 | 1985-02-19 | Egon Gelhard | Method and apparatus for measuring a distance using ultrasonic echo signals, particularly for use on a motor vehicle |
US4616419A (en) * | 1983-12-26 | 1986-10-14 | Akio Kubo | Measuring device for a figure |
US5023438A (en) * | 1988-11-26 | 1991-06-11 | Nitto Kohki Co., Ltd. | Portable data input apparatus with different display modes |
US6118118A (en) * | 1997-08-20 | 2000-09-12 | Maasland N.V. | Sensor apparatus and method to scan separate overlapping space volumes to locate object therein |
Family Cites Families (68)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4184261A (en) | 1977-01-07 | 1980-01-22 | Los Angeles Scientific Instrument Co., Inc. | Multipurpose drafting and measuring instrument |
US4206314A (en) | 1978-08-14 | 1980-06-03 | Gtco Corporation | Graphic digitizer |
US4570033A (en) | 1983-09-09 | 1986-02-11 | Numonics Corporation | Polyphase digitizer |
JPS6370326A (en) | 1986-09-12 | 1988-03-30 | Wacom Co Ltd | Position detector |
US4730190A (en) | 1986-10-29 | 1988-03-08 | Winlam Company | Hand-held measuring device |
US4859813A (en) | 1987-09-04 | 1989-08-22 | Calcomp Inc. | Digitizer tablet having electrical interconnect components on the writing substrate |
US4827086A (en) | 1987-11-03 | 1989-05-02 | Calcomp Inc. | Digitizer cursor coil for reducing edge effect |
GB2220077A (en) * | 1988-02-06 | 1989-12-28 | Hugh Tottenham | Digital planimeter |
US4794208A (en) | 1988-02-08 | 1988-12-27 | Calcomp Inc. | Frequency shifting digitizer for reducing AC fields interference |
US4806707A (en) | 1988-02-12 | 1989-02-21 | Calcomp Inc. | 3-Dimensional digitizer pen |
US4835347A (en) | 1988-02-12 | 1989-05-30 | Calcomp, Inc. | Shifting wire sequence digitizer system |
US4853497A (en) | 1988-06-20 | 1989-08-01 | Calcomp Inc. | Shielding techique for digitizers |
US4853499A (en) | 1988-12-12 | 1989-08-01 | Calcomp Inc. | Ground switching technique for silkscreened digitizer grids |
US4873399A (en) | 1988-12-20 | 1989-10-10 | Calcomp Inc. | Ink-on-glass digitizer tablet and method of construction |
US5130500A (en) | 1989-07-18 | 1992-07-14 | Kabushikikaisha Wacom | Digitizer having flat tablet with magnetic shield plate |
US4956526A (en) | 1989-07-18 | 1990-09-11 | Kabushikikaisha Wacom | Digitizer having flat tablet with magnetic shield plate |
ES2085360T3 (en) | 1989-11-06 | 1996-06-01 | Calcomp Inc | DIGIT CONVERSION TABLETS SYSTEM WITH DUAL CURSOR / MOUSE MODE. |
US5270692A (en) | 1989-11-06 | 1993-12-14 | Calcomp Inc. | Digitizer cursor/mouse with unitary switch actuators |
US4939318A (en) | 1989-11-06 | 1990-07-03 | Calcomp Inc. | Digitizer pen tilt correction employing wires near the data point |
US5325398A (en) | 1989-12-13 | 1994-06-28 | Kabushikikaisha Wacom | Pulse count mode communication system |
US5045645A (en) | 1990-05-22 | 1991-09-03 | Calcomp Inc. | Digitizer system with passive pointer |
US5214757A (en) | 1990-08-07 | 1993-05-25 | Georesearch, Inc. | Interactive automated mapping system |
US5095180A (en) | 1990-09-21 | 1992-03-10 | Graphtec Kabushiki Kaisha | Device for determining position coordinates |
US5347295A (en) | 1990-10-31 | 1994-09-13 | Go Corporation | Control of a computer through a position-sensed stylus |
US5124509A (en) | 1991-01-15 | 1992-06-23 | Calcomp, Inc. | Digitizer with capacitive and inductive coupling |
US5107079A (en) | 1991-03-18 | 1992-04-21 | Calcomp Inc. | Position digitizer circuit for a moveable instrument |
US5345044A (en) | 1991-04-29 | 1994-09-06 | Calcomp, Inc. | Cordless digitizer using electromagnetic locating signals |
US5134253A (en) | 1991-06-13 | 1992-07-28 | Calcomp, Inc. | Digitizer employing loopback conductor pattern using rotation sequencing |
US5287105A (en) | 1991-08-12 | 1994-02-15 | Calcomp Inc. | Automatic tracking and scanning cursor for digitizers |
US5235142A (en) | 1991-09-16 | 1993-08-10 | Calcomp, Inc. | Phase reference system for cordless looping digitizer |
US5164585A (en) | 1991-09-24 | 1992-11-17 | Daniel Y. T. Chen | Stylus/digitizer combination with elongate reflectors and linear CCD |
US5381160A (en) | 1991-09-27 | 1995-01-10 | Calcomp Inc. | See-through digitizer with clear conductive grid |
US5160813A (en) | 1991-09-27 | 1992-11-03 | Calcomp Inc. | Cordless digitizer local conductor phase reference system |
US5227909A (en) | 1991-09-30 | 1993-07-13 | Calcomp Inc. | Single coil digitizer-coupled image scanner |
US5247138A (en) | 1991-11-08 | 1993-09-21 | Calcomp Inc. | Cordless digitizer stylus status encoding and transmission scheme |
US5198623A (en) | 1991-11-27 | 1993-03-30 | Calcomp, Inc. | Method for use in a digitizer for determining pen tilt |
US5525981A (en) | 1992-01-30 | 1996-06-11 | Calcomp Inc. | Cordless digitizer transducer/cursor status transmission apparatus and method |
JPH0792722B2 (en) | 1992-02-21 | 1995-10-09 | グラフテック株式会社 | Digitizer |
US5357061A (en) | 1992-04-30 | 1994-10-18 | Calcomp Inc. | Digitizer tablet having high permeability grid shield |
US5326940A (en) | 1992-06-23 | 1994-07-05 | Calcomp Inc. | Dynamically-adjustable scanning rate in digitizers |
US5821916A (en) | 1992-08-13 | 1998-10-13 | Calcomp, Inc. | Digitizer cursor velocity offset error correction system |
US5630168A (en) | 1992-10-27 | 1997-05-13 | Pi Systems Corporation | System for utilizing object oriented approach in a portable pen-based data acquisition system by passing digitized data by data type to hierarchically arranged program objects |
JPH07129305A (en) | 1993-10-29 | 1995-05-19 | Graphtec Corp | Cordless digitizer |
US5428805A (en) | 1992-12-22 | 1995-06-27 | Morgan; Michael W. | Method and apparatus for recognizing and performing handwritten calculations |
WO1994015272A1 (en) | 1992-12-22 | 1994-07-07 | Morgan Michael W | Pen-based electronic teaching system |
US5357062A (en) | 1993-01-28 | 1994-10-18 | Calcomp Inc. | Pressure sensing apparatus for digitizer pen tip |
US5554827A (en) | 1993-02-22 | 1996-09-10 | Wacom Co., Ltd. | Method of and apparatus for determining whether a digitizer coordinate detecting tablet is properly operating and/or writing adjustment data into a memory associated with the tablet |
US5384688A (en) | 1993-03-08 | 1995-01-24 | Calcomp Inc. | Three-dimensional circuits for digitizer and pen-based computer system pen cursors |
US5408055A (en) | 1993-10-25 | 1995-04-18 | Calcomp Inc. | Cordless transducer phase reference and data communication apparatus and method for digitizers |
US5373118A (en) | 1993-10-25 | 1994-12-13 | Calcomp Inc. | Half normal frequency regime phase encoding in cordless digitizers |
US5436598A (en) | 1994-01-21 | 1995-07-25 | Calcomp Inc. | Phase lock loop circuit for signals periodically inverting in phase |
JP3411118B2 (en) | 1994-03-31 | 2003-05-26 | グラフテック株式会社 | Digitizer and digitizer position determination method |
US5737740A (en) | 1994-06-27 | 1998-04-07 | Numonics | Apparatus and method for processing electronic documents |
US5544255A (en) | 1994-08-31 | 1996-08-06 | Peripheral Vision Limited | Method and system for the capture, storage, transport and authentication of handwritten signatures |
US5714720A (en) | 1994-09-15 | 1998-02-03 | Calcomp Inc. | High efficiency passive pointer digitizer system |
US5635683A (en) | 1995-01-04 | 1997-06-03 | Calcomp Technology, Inc. | Dynamic pressure adjustment of a pressure-sensitive pointing device for a digitizer |
JP2730018B2 (en) | 1995-02-28 | 1998-03-25 | 株式会社ワコム | Digitizer and position detection method |
US5736686A (en) | 1995-03-01 | 1998-04-07 | Gtco Corporation | Illumination apparatus for a digitizer tablet with improved light panel |
US5627348A (en) | 1995-04-07 | 1997-05-06 | A.T. Cross Company | Electronic stylus with writing feel |
US5793360A (en) | 1995-05-05 | 1998-08-11 | Wacom Co., Ltd. | Digitizer eraser system and method |
JPH0914902A (en) | 1995-07-03 | 1997-01-17 | Ushikata Shokai:Kk | Graphic measuring apparatus |
JPH09159434A (en) | 1995-12-07 | 1997-06-20 | Ushikata Shokai:Kk | Figure measuring apparatus |
US5760347A (en) | 1996-10-10 | 1998-06-02 | Numonics, Inc. | Digitizer pen apparatus |
DE10104877A1 (en) | 2001-02-03 | 2002-08-14 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Method and device for determining length, area and volume |
DE10149144C1 (en) | 2001-10-05 | 2003-04-03 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Portable distance measuring device has fitting of holder to housing of measuring device detected for providing new reference point for evaluation circuit |
US20050036662A1 (en) | 2003-08-14 | 2005-02-17 | Brosnan Michael J. | Measurement instrument |
US7568289B2 (en) | 2005-03-14 | 2009-08-04 | Robert Bosch Company Limited | Handheld optical distance measurement device |
DE102005000060A1 (en) | 2005-05-12 | 2006-11-16 | Hilti Ag | Manageable surface coordinate measuring device |
-
2007
- 2007-01-22 US US11/625,623 patent/US7408838B1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2007-12-21 WO PCT/US2007/088637 patent/WO2008091467A1/en active Application Filing
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4500977A (en) * | 1980-09-25 | 1985-02-19 | Egon Gelhard | Method and apparatus for measuring a distance using ultrasonic echo signals, particularly for use on a motor vehicle |
US4616419A (en) * | 1983-12-26 | 1986-10-14 | Akio Kubo | Measuring device for a figure |
US5023438A (en) * | 1988-11-26 | 1991-06-11 | Nitto Kohki Co., Ltd. | Portable data input apparatus with different display modes |
US6118118A (en) * | 1997-08-20 | 2000-09-12 | Maasland N.V. | Sensor apparatus and method to scan separate overlapping space volumes to locate object therein |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7408838B1 (en) | 2008-08-05 |
WO2008091467A1 (en) | 2008-07-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US6184873B1 (en) | Pen positioning system | |
US6414673B1 (en) | Transmitter pen location system | |
US6335723B1 (en) | Transmitter pen location system | |
US5521616A (en) | Control interface apparatus | |
CA2024527C (en) | Acoustic digitizing system | |
JP4808637B2 (en) | Portable distance measuring device | |
RU2461849C2 (en) | Detector for detecting and determining position of concealed objects in inspected facility | |
EP1982253B1 (en) | Touch detection | |
US6928029B2 (en) | Combination tape measure and range finder | |
MXPA06007221A (en) | Device and method for measuring the profile of a surface. | |
US20070109527A1 (en) | System and method for generating position information | |
GB2198232A (en) | Speed measuring apparatus | |
JP4614685B2 (en) | Handheld photoelectric rangefinder | |
US5009277A (en) | Method and apparatus for position determination | |
US7408838B1 (en) | Digitizing planimeter | |
JP2003329453A (en) | Dimension measuring device for room | |
GB2097922A (en) | Positional determination | |
JPS623318A (en) | Coordinate detector | |
EP0971308A1 (en) | Three-dimensional input device and method for digitising objects | |
RU2463553C2 (en) | Range finder | |
JPS6083126A (en) | Coordinate detector for input position | |
Tseng et al. | Laser-based internal profile measurement system | |
Coulbourn et al. | Area Measurement | |
KR20060022980A (en) | Mobile phone with function of length measurement | |
JPH02130615A (en) | Coordinate input device |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCALE MASTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, NEBRASKA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:NOVAK, JOEL S.;REEL/FRAME:021041/0708 Effective date: 20080508 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: SCALE MASTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, NEVADA Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE STATE OF THE ASSIGNEE SHOULD BE CHANGED TO CARSON CITY, NEVADA. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 021041 FRAME 0708. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNEE IS LOCATED IN CARSON CITY, NEVADA - NOT CARSON CITY, NEBRASKA..;ASSIGNOR:NOVAK, JOEL S.;REEL/FRAME:021065/0188 Effective date: 20080508 Owner name: SCALE MASTER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, NEVADA Free format text: CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE STATE OF THE ASSIGNEE SHOULD BE CHANGED TO CARSON CITY, NEVADA. PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 021041 FRAME 0708;ASSIGNOR:NOVAK, JOEL S.;REEL/FRAME:021065/0188 Effective date: 20080508 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
STCH | Information on status: patent discontinuation |
Free format text: PATENT EXPIRED DUE TO NONPAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEES UNDER 37 CFR 1.362 |
|
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20120805 |