US20070000611A1 - Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing - Google Patents
Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20070000611A1 US20070000611A1 US11/530,670 US53067006A US2007000611A1 US 20070000611 A1 US20070000611 A1 US 20070000611A1 US 53067006 A US53067006 A US 53067006A US 2007000611 A1 US2007000611 A1 US 2007000611A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- plasma
- signals
- electrode
- signal
- chamber
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01L—SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES NOT COVERED BY CLASS H10
- H01L21/00—Processes or apparatus adapted for the manufacture or treatment of semiconductor or solid state devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/02—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof
- H01L21/04—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer
- H01L21/18—Manufacture or treatment of semiconductor devices or of parts thereof the devices having at least one potential-jump barrier or surface barrier, e.g. PN junction, depletion layer or carrier concentration layer the devices having semiconductor bodies comprising elements of Group IV of the Periodic System or AIIIBV compounds with or without impurities, e.g. doping materials
- H01L21/30—Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26
- H01L21/302—Treatment of semiconductor bodies using processes or apparatus not provided for in groups H01L21/20 - H01L21/26 to change their surface-physical characteristics or shape, e.g. etching, polishing, cutting
- H01L21/306—Chemical or electrical treatment, e.g. electrolytic etching
- H01L21/3065—Plasma etching; Reactive-ion etching
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32009—Arrangements for generation of plasma specially adapted for examination or treatment of objects, e.g. plasma sources
- H01J37/32082—Radio frequency generated discharge
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01J—ELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
- H01J37/00—Discharge tubes with provision for introducing objects or material to be exposed to the discharge, e.g. for the purpose of examination or processing thereof
- H01J37/32—Gas-filled discharge tubes
- H01J37/32009—Arrangements for generation of plasma specially adapted for examination or treatment of objects, e.g. plasma sources
- H01J37/32082—Radio frequency generated discharge
- H01J37/32137—Radio frequency generated discharge controlling of the discharge by modulation of energy
- H01J37/32155—Frequency modulation
- H01J37/32165—Plural frequencies
Definitions
- the present invention generally relates to plasma control in a semiconductor substrate processing system and, more particularly, to plasma control using a dual cathode frequency mixing technique.
- the increase in size of plasma enhanced semiconductor processing chambers contributes to a spatially variant effect over the surface of the substrate being processed. That is, as the size of the substrate being processed approaches the wavelength of the frequency that is used to bias the substrate, a spatial variation in the RF power distribution forms over the surface of the substrate (e.g., proximate the cathode that forms an electrode). This spatial variation can be frequency dependent in the regime of higher frequencies (shorter wavelengths), larger substrates, or combinations of the two.
- This spatially variant effect has a negative impact on process uniformity. For example, in an etch reactor, the standing wave effect can cause non-uniformity in the etched substrate surface.
- the present invention is a method and apparatus for controlling characteristics of a plasma in a plasma enhanced semiconductor substrate processing chamber.
- the method comprises supplying a first RF signal to a first electrode disposed in a processing chamber, and supplying a second RF signal to the first electrode, wherein an interaction between the first and second RF signals is used to control at least one characteristic of a plasma formed in the processing chamber.
- FIG. 1 is a partial schematic, cross-sectional view of a plasma enhanced processing chamber useful for practicing the present invention
- FIG. 2 is a graph of known ion energy distributions as a function of drive frequency
- FIG. 3 is a series of graphs depicting ion energy distribution at various RF current ratios
- FIG. 4 is an illustrative schematic graph depicting the effect of multi-frequency mixing.
- FIG. 5 is a graph depicting improvement in uniformity realized using the frequency mixing principles of the present invention.
- the present invention generally relates to semiconductor substrate processing in plasma enhanced processing chambers. More specifically, the present invention is a method and apparatus for controlling the characteristics of a plasma formed in a plasma enhanced processing chamber. Characteristics of the plasma which may be controlled include, but are not limited to, the power distribution within the plasma, and the ion energy distribution within the plasma and incident on the workpiece. These plasma characteristics may be controlled via a dual frequency cathode with ratio control in a plasma enhanced processing chamber.
- Examples of plasma enhanced semiconductor processing chambers that may be adapted to benefit from the present invention include the eMaXTM, MXP®, and ENABLERTM processing chambers, all available from Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif.
- the eMaXTM processing chamber is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,113,731, issued Sep. 5, 2000 to Shan et al.
- the MXP® processing chamber is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,534,108, issued Jul. 9, 1996 to Qian et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,321, issued Oct. 7, 1997 to Pu et al.
- the ENABLERTM processing chamber is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/192,271, filed on Jul. 9, 2002. Each of these above-mentioned patents are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
- FIG. 1 depicts a partial schematic, cross-section view of a plasma enhanced processing chamber 100 useful for practicing the present invention.
- a process chamber 100 includes a grounded chamber body 102 and at least one coil segment 106 disposed proximate to the exterior of the chamber body 102 .
- the process chamber 100 also includes a wafer support pedestal 116 disposed within the chamber body 102 and spaced apart from a gas inlet 132 .
- the wafer support pedestal 116 comprises a cathode 127 and an electrostatic chuck 126 for retaining a substrate 114 beneath the gas inlet 132 .
- the electrostatic chuck 126 is driven by a DC power supply 120 to develop an electrostatic force that holds the substrate on the chuck surface.
- the cathode 127 is coupled to a pair of RF bias sources 122 , 123 through a matching network 124 .
- the bias sources 122 , 123 are generally capable of producing an RF signal having a frequency of from about 50 kHz to about 100 MHz and a power of between about 0 and about 10,000 Watts.
- the matching network 124 matches the impedance of the sources 122 , 123 to the plasma impedance.
- a single feed couples energy from both sources 122 , 123 to the support pedestal 116 .
- each source 122 , 123 can be coupled to the cathode 127 via a separate feed.
- the gas inlet 132 may comprise one or more nozzles or a showerhead.
- the gas inlet 132 may comprise a plurality of gas distribution zones such that various gases provided from a gas source 108 —which, when ignited, form a plasma 110 —can be supplied to the chamber body 102 using a specific gas distribution gradient.
- the gas inlet 132 may form an upper electrode 128 that opposes the support pedestal 116 .
- the upper electrode 128 can be coupled to an RF source 118 through a matching network 119 , terminated to a specific impedance, or grounded.
- the source 118 is generally capable of producing an RF signal having a frequency in the about 10 Mhz to about 3 GHz range and a power between about 0 and 10,000 Watts. In one embodiment, the source 118 is capable of producing an RF signal having a frequency of about 60 MHz.
- the RF energy supplied by the source is generally used to facilitate dissociation and ionization of gases in the plasma.
- a substrate 114 is disposed in the processing chamber 100 and held to the support pedestal 116 by the electrostatic chuck 126 .
- a process gas is introduced into the chamber body 102 through the gas inlet 132 by the gas source 108 .
- a vacuum pump not shown, maintains the pressure inside the chamber body 102 at operating pressures—typically between about 10 mTorr to about 20 Torr.
- the RF source 118 provides about 1000 Watts of RF voltage at 13.56 MHz to the upper electrode 128 , thereby exciting the gas inside the chamber body 102 and forming a plasma 110 .
- the RF source 122 is selected to generate power at a frequency of about 2 MHz and the RF source 123 is selected to generate power at a frequency of about 13.56 MHz.
- the RF sources 122 , 123 provide up to about 10,000 Watts of total RF power in a predetermined power ratio from the source 122 to the source 123 of between 1:0 and 0:1. These RF sources 122 , 123 provide bias power that both self-biases the substrate and modulates the plasma sheath.
- Adjusting the ratio between the source 122 and 123 controls the characteristics of the plasma as defined below.
- the plasma having a characteristic defined by the power ratio of the bias sources, facilitates etching one or more materials on the surface of the substrate. After a period of time, or the detection of a specific endpoint, the plasma is extinguished.
- FIG. 2 taken from IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., Vol. 19, No. 2, page 242, depicts a series of graphs 200 1-7 of histograms (along the Y axes) of known ion energy distributions (along the X axes) as a function of drive frequencies (along the Z axis).
- the ion energy distribution associated with lower frequencies has a broader energy bandwidth (e.g., distribution 210 1 in graph 200 1 ), while higher frequencies have a progressively much more concentrated energy bandwidth (e.g., distribution 210 7 in graph 200 7 ).
- the relationship is generally continuous along the spectrum moving from the low frequency ion energy distribution to the high frequency ion energy distribution (e.g., compare distributions 210 1-7 from graphs 200 1-7 ).
- the invention comprises a dual frequency electrode (cathode 127 ) for use in a plasma enhanced processing chamber 100 as described above.
- the two frequencies on the cathode 127 are generally selected for the purpose of sheath modulation and are selected such that they are of a low enough frequency so as to provide a strong self-biasing sheath in the plasma discharge above the powered surface.
- the first frequency provides a broad ion energy distribution (i.e., lower frequency).
- the second frequency provides a peaked, well defined ion energy distribution (i.e., higher frequency).
- the first frequency is selected such that it's cycle time is much larger than the transit time of an ion in the sheath, while the second frequency is selected such that it's period approaches or surpasses the transit time of the ion in the sheath.
- These frequencies are also selected such that when used in conjunction with a third power source provided by an independently driven electrode (e.g., the electrode 128 referred to in FIG. 1 ), they are not the primary power contributor for plasma ionization and dissociation.
- the combined applied voltage of the two frequency sources is used to control the peak-to-peak sheath voltage as well as the self-biased DC potential that is used for anisotropic etching.
- the mixing of the two frequencies is used to tune the energy distribution about this average acceleration generated by this DC potential.
- s ( t ) s ⁇ s 0 xMHz sin( ⁇ x t ) ⁇ s 0 yMHz sin( ⁇ y t ) (2) where the subscripts x and y refer to the first and second RF sources respectively.
- V sheath ⁇ ( t ) - en 2 ⁇ ⁇ 0 ⁇ s ⁇ ( t ) 2 ( 6 ) where ⁇ 0 is the permittivity of free space.
- M ion and m e are the masses of an ion and an electron, respectively, and with boundary conditions stating that the net charge on the electrode surface over an RF cycle is zero and that the initial velocity of the ion before it enters the sheath is equal to the Bohm velocity of the ion.
- the expected ion energy distribution in a plasma formed under a range of operating conditions was modeled and experimentally verified.
- the ion energy distribution was estimated by studying the on-wafer voltage on a wafer under various process conditions in an eMaxTM processing chamber outfitted with a dual frequency cathode as described above with reference to FIG. 1 .
- the two fundamental components of the plasma relative to it's interaction with the powered electrode were held constant and the ratios of applied currents (i.e., proportional to the applied power) of the two RF bias sources were varied while feeding a constant total power to the cathode.
- the first RF source 122 was tuned to 13.56 MHz and the second RF source 123 was tuned to 2 MHz.
- FIG. 3 is a series of graphs 300 1-5 of this analysis, illustrating the results of varying the ratio of the applied currents of the two RF sources.
- the graphs show a distribution (axis 302 ) of the energy (axis 304 ) measured on the wafer.
- axis 302 the energy measured on the wafer.
- the graph 3005 labeled 0% 13 MHz, 100% 2 MHz, if the cathode is only driven with the low frequency RF source, an ion energy distribution 310 5 which is very broad is obtained. This result is similar to the low frequency ion energy distributions depicted in FIG. 2 (see, e.g., distribution 210 1 in graph 200 1 ).
- the graph 300 1 labeled 100% 13 MHz, 0% 2 MHz, on the other hand, shows a narrow energy distribution 310 1 similar to the high frequency ion energy distributions depicted in FIG. 2 (see, e.g., distributions 210 5 and 210 6 in graphs 200 5-6 ) when only the high frequency RF source is used.
- the power distribution within the plasma can be controlled utilizing a plasma enhanced processing chamber with a dual frequency cathode as described above with reference to FIG. 1 .
- two frequencies that provide similar plasma excitation properties but with different spatial uniformity profiles are combined to tune the uniformity of a process.
- the cathode 127 forms a radial transmission line which is terminated along an outer perimeter 112 of the electrostatic chuck 126 .
- This contributes to the creation of a spatially variant power distribution, illustratively shown as a dashed line 130 (it should be noted that the standing wave could be the inverse of the one shown as well).
- the spatially variant power distribution affects the power distribution in the plasma 110 , resulting in greater power near the peak of the wave (near the center of the substrate 114 for the wave 130 depicted in FIG. 1 ) and lesser power in the trough (near the edge of the substrate 114 in FIG. 1 ).
- This power differential in the plasma affects the uniformity of the process being performed on the substrate. As such, in an etch reaction, the uniformity of an etched wafer would be negatively impacted.
- FIG. 4 shows two opposing power distribution profiles 410 , 420 centered over a substrate yielding a flat combined effect 430 .
- any other final power distribution profile that may prove beneficial to a certain process can also be formed using this method.
- an edge high power deposition profile is preferred to minimize the impact of non-azimuthally symmetric deposition in high-aspect ratio features on a processed workpiece).
- This frequency mixing phenomenon may be used to control the power distribution in the plasma and thereby control uniformity of a desired process, such as etching.
- a desired process such as etching.
- an oxide layer and a photoresist layer on multiple wafers were etched using different cathode frequency ratios in an eMaXTM processing chamber outfitted with a dual frequency cathode as described above with reference to FIG. 1 .
- the first RF source was tuned to 13.56 MHz and the second RF source was tuned to 2 MHz.
- the ratios of applied currents of the two RF drives were varied while keeping the total power to the cathode constant at 2,500 Watts.
- the oxide and photoresist etch rates were measured as well as the uniformity of each layer.
- FIG. 5 depicts a combined bar graph and line graph 500 depicting the etch rates and wafer uniformity for the processes described above.
- the x-axis 502 of the graph depicts the ratio of the power supplied by the 13.56 Mhz source to the power supplied by the 2 Mhz source.
- 0:2500 means 0 W of the 13.56 MHz source and 2,500 W of the 2 MHz source.
- the etch rate axis 504
- the etch rate remains relatively constant regardless of the mix of power levels at the different frequencies.
- the wafer uniformity (axis 506 ) for both the oxide and the photoresist varied substantially over the power ratio mix.
- the uniformity ranged somewhat linearly from about 60% (indicating center-fast etching) at OW 13.56 MHz and 2500 W 2 MHz, to about ⁇ 50% (indicating edge-fast etching) at 2500 W 13.56 MHz and 0 W 2 MHz, and near 0% with a fairly even ratio of the power of two frequencies.
- the principles discussed herein apply to dissociation or ionization of bulk plasma, as well as modulation of the sheath properties of the plasma.
- the chosen frequencies of 2 MHz and 13.56 MHz are illustrative only and not intended to define limitations of the invention. Both higher and lower frequencies may be utilized in the current invention.
- drive frequencies may be grouped by their effect on the plasma, then selected as necessary to control the desired property.
- high frequencies effect ionization and dissociation
- lower frequencies effect sheath modulation.
- the principles disclosed herein are not limited to control of standing waves. Additional reasons for frequency dependent propagation exist. For example, providing a frequency dependent termination to the transmission line, or a frequency dependent return path to ground in the chamber that can direct the RF waveform dependent upon its frequency.
- a method and apparatus for controlling characteristics of a plasma in a plasma enhanced processing chamber using a dual frequency cathode drive has been provided.
- the mixing of the two frequencies driving the cathode controls the ion energy and power distributions of a plasma.
Abstract
A method and apparatus for controlling characteristics of a plasma in a semiconductor substrate processing chamber using a dual frequency RF source is provided. The method comprises supplying a first RF signal to a first electrode disposed in a processing chamber, and supplying a second RF signal to the first electrode, wherein an interaction between the first and second RF signals is used to control at least one characteristic of a plasma formed in the processing chamber.
Description
- This application is a divisional of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/823,364, filed Apr. 12, 2004, which claims benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/514,993 filed Oct. 28, 2003. Each of the aforementioned related patent applications is herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention generally relates to plasma control in a semiconductor substrate processing system and, more particularly, to plasma control using a dual cathode frequency mixing technique.
- 2. Description of the Related Art
- The increase in size of plasma enhanced semiconductor processing chambers contributes to a spatially variant effect over the surface of the substrate being processed. That is, as the size of the substrate being processed approaches the wavelength of the frequency that is used to bias the substrate, a spatial variation in the RF power distribution forms over the surface of the substrate (e.g., proximate the cathode that forms an electrode). This spatial variation can be frequency dependent in the regime of higher frequencies (shorter wavelengths), larger substrates, or combinations of the two. This spatially variant effect has a negative impact on process uniformity. For example, in an etch reactor, the standing wave effect can cause non-uniformity in the etched substrate surface.
- Therefore, there is a need for an improved method and apparatus for semiconductor substrate processing that combats this spatially variant effect.
- The present invention is a method and apparatus for controlling characteristics of a plasma in a plasma enhanced semiconductor substrate processing chamber. The method comprises supplying a first RF signal to a first electrode disposed in a processing chamber, and supplying a second RF signal to the first electrode, wherein an interaction between the first and second RF signals is used to control at least one characteristic of a plasma formed in the processing chamber.
- So that the manner in which the above recited features, advantages and objects of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments.
-
FIG. 1 is a partial schematic, cross-sectional view of a plasma enhanced processing chamber useful for practicing the present invention; -
FIG. 2 is a graph of known ion energy distributions as a function of drive frequency; -
FIG. 3 is a series of graphs depicting ion energy distribution at various RF current ratios; -
FIG. 4 is an illustrative schematic graph depicting the effect of multi-frequency mixing; and -
FIG. 5 is a graph depicting improvement in uniformity realized using the frequency mixing principles of the present invention. - To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.
- The present invention generally relates to semiconductor substrate processing in plasma enhanced processing chambers. More specifically, the present invention is a method and apparatus for controlling the characteristics of a plasma formed in a plasma enhanced processing chamber. Characteristics of the plasma which may be controlled include, but are not limited to, the power distribution within the plasma, and the ion energy distribution within the plasma and incident on the workpiece. These plasma characteristics may be controlled via a dual frequency cathode with ratio control in a plasma enhanced processing chamber.
- Examples of plasma enhanced semiconductor processing chambers that may be adapted to benefit from the present invention include the eMaX™, MXP®, and ENABLER™ processing chambers, all available from Applied Materials, Inc. of Santa Clara, Calif. The eMaX™ processing chamber is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,113,731, issued Sep. 5, 2000 to Shan et al. The MXP® processing chamber is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,534,108, issued Jul. 9, 1996 to Qian et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,674,321, issued Oct. 7, 1997 to Pu et al. The ENABLER™ processing chamber is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/192,271, filed on Jul. 9, 2002. Each of these above-mentioned patents are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
-
FIG. 1 depicts a partial schematic, cross-section view of a plasma enhancedprocessing chamber 100 useful for practicing the present invention. In one embodiment, aprocess chamber 100 includes agrounded chamber body 102 and at least onecoil segment 106 disposed proximate to the exterior of thechamber body 102. Theprocess chamber 100 also includes awafer support pedestal 116 disposed within thechamber body 102 and spaced apart from agas inlet 132. Thewafer support pedestal 116 comprises acathode 127 and anelectrostatic chuck 126 for retaining asubstrate 114 beneath thegas inlet 132. - The
electrostatic chuck 126 is driven by aDC power supply 120 to develop an electrostatic force that holds the substrate on the chuck surface. Thecathode 127 is coupled to a pair ofRF bias sources matching network 124. Thebias sources matching network 124 matches the impedance of thesources sources support pedestal 116. Alternatively, eachsource cathode 127 via a separate feed. - The
gas inlet 132 may comprise one or more nozzles or a showerhead. Thegas inlet 132 may comprise a plurality of gas distribution zones such that various gases provided from agas source 108—which, when ignited, form aplasma 110—can be supplied to thechamber body 102 using a specific gas distribution gradient. Thegas inlet 132 may form anupper electrode 128 that opposes thesupport pedestal 116. Theupper electrode 128 can be coupled to anRF source 118 through amatching network 119, terminated to a specific impedance, or grounded. Thesource 118 is generally capable of producing an RF signal having a frequency in the about 10 Mhz to about 3 GHz range and a power between about 0 and 10,000 Watts. In one embodiment, thesource 118 is capable of producing an RF signal having a frequency of about 60 MHz. The RF energy supplied by the source is generally used to facilitate dissociation and ionization of gases in the plasma. - In operation, a
substrate 114 is disposed in theprocessing chamber 100 and held to thesupport pedestal 116 by theelectrostatic chuck 126. A process gas is introduced into thechamber body 102 through thegas inlet 132 by thegas source 108. A vacuum pump, not shown, maintains the pressure inside thechamber body 102 at operating pressures—typically between about 10 mTorr to about 20 Torr. - In one embodiment, the
RF source 118 provides about 1000 Watts of RF voltage at 13.56 MHz to theupper electrode 128, thereby exciting the gas inside thechamber body 102 and forming aplasma 110. TheRF source 122 is selected to generate power at a frequency of about 2 MHz and theRF source 123 is selected to generate power at a frequency of about 13.56 MHz. TheRF sources source 122 to thesource 123 of between 1:0 and 0:1. TheseRF sources source - Control of Ion Energy Distribution Within the Plasma
- The frequency dependence of ion energy distribution within a plasma chamber is well known.
FIG. 2 , taken from IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., Vol. 19, No. 2, page 242, depicts a series ofgraphs 2001-7 of histograms (along the Y axes) of known ion energy distributions (along the X axes) as a function of drive frequencies (along the Z axis). As can be seen in thegraphs 2001-7, the ion energy distribution associated with lower frequencies has a broader energy bandwidth (e.g., distribution 210 1 in graph 200 1), while higher frequencies have a progressively much more concentrated energy bandwidth (e.g., distribution 210 7 in graph 200 7). The relationship is generally continuous along the spectrum moving from the low frequency ion energy distribution to the high frequency ion energy distribution (e.g., compare distributions 210 1-7 from graphs 200 1-7). - Referring back to
FIG. 1 , in one embodiment, the invention comprises a dual frequency electrode (cathode 127) for use in a plasma enhancedprocessing chamber 100 as described above. The two frequencies on thecathode 127 are generally selected for the purpose of sheath modulation and are selected such that they are of a low enough frequency so as to provide a strong self-biasing sheath in the plasma discharge above the powered surface. - The first frequency provides a broad ion energy distribution (i.e., lower frequency). The second frequency provides a peaked, well defined ion energy distribution (i.e., higher frequency). Typically, the first frequency is selected such that it's cycle time is much larger than the transit time of an ion in the sheath, while the second frequency is selected such that it's period approaches or surpasses the transit time of the ion in the sheath. These frequencies are also selected such that when used in conjunction with a third power source provided by an independently driven electrode (e.g., the
electrode 128 referred to inFIG. 1 ), they are not the primary power contributor for plasma ionization and dissociation. - The combined applied voltage of the two frequency sources is used to control the peak-to-peak sheath voltage as well as the self-biased DC potential that is used for anisotropic etching. The mixing of the two frequencies is used to tune the energy distribution about this average acceleration generated by this DC potential. Thus, utilizing a plasma enhanced processing chamber with a dual frequency cathode as described above, the ion energy distribution within the plasma can be controlled.
- To understand how this ion energy distribution tuning works, consider a simple sheath model based on the RF current driven through a cylindrical plasma discharge. The thickness of the plasma sheath generated will oscillate linearly with the applied current:
s(t)=s −s 0 sin(ωt) (1)
where s is the thickness of the sheath,s is the average thickness over time, and s0 is the amplitude of modulation generated by the RF power delivery at frequency ω/2π. - If multiple frequencies are applied, the effect on the sheath thickness is additive, yielding:
s(t)=s −s 0xMHz sin(ωx t)−s0yMHz sin(ωy t) (2)
where the subscripts x and y refer to the first and second RF sources respectively. - Assuming a symmetric discharge Oust for simplicity of discussion; a similar case will hold true for asymmetric discharges as well), the sheath modulation can be related to applied RF current by the relationship:
where I is the current amplitude at the stated frequency; e is the electron charge; n is the electron density of the bulk plasma; and A is the area of the powered surface (electrode). - The voltage across the sheath is related to this sheath modulation by the equation:
where ε0 is the permittivity of free space. - The acceleration of the ions and electrons can then be solved using a system of differential equations based on charged particle motion in an electromagnetic field:
where Mion and me are the masses of an ion and an electron, respectively, and with boundary conditions stating that the net charge on the electrode surface over an RF cycle is zero and that the initial velocity of the ion before it enters the sheath is equal to the Bohm velocity of the ion. Solving for this system of equations for ion velocity at the electrode surface provides a measure of ion energy distribution. - In order to physically assess the ability to control the ion energy distribution of the plasma in operation, the expected ion energy distribution in a plasma formed under a range of operating conditions was modeled and experimentally verified. The ion energy distribution was estimated by studying the on-wafer voltage on a wafer under various process conditions in an eMax™ processing chamber outfitted with a dual frequency cathode as described above with reference to
FIG. 1 . During this analysis, the two fundamental components of the plasma relative to it's interaction with the powered electrode (sheath peak-to-peak voltage and bulk electron density) were held constant and the ratios of applied currents (i.e., proportional to the applied power) of the two RF bias sources were varied while feeding a constant total power to the cathode. Thefirst RF source 122 was tuned to 13.56 MHz and thesecond RF source 123 was tuned to 2 MHz. -
FIG. 3 is a series of graphs 300 1-5 of this analysis, illustrating the results of varying the ratio of the applied currents of the two RF sources. The graphs show a distribution (axis 302) of the energy (axis 304) measured on the wafer. As can be seen from thegraph 3005, labeled 0% 13 MHz, 100% 2 MHz, if the cathode is only driven with the low frequency RF source, an ion energy distribution 310 5 which is very broad is obtained. This result is similar to the low frequency ion energy distributions depicted inFIG. 2 (see, e.g., distribution 210 1 in graph 200 1). The graph 300 1, labeled 100% 13 MHz, 0% 2 MHz, on the other hand, shows a narrow energy distribution 310 1 similar to the high frequency ion energy distributions depicted inFIG. 2 (see, e.g., distributions 210 5 and 210 6 in graphs 200 5-6) when only the high frequency RF source is used. - However, the remaining graphs depicting other ratios where both the high and the low RF frequencies were mixed together reveal an important result. These graphs show the exact same trend as if individual intermediate frequencies were selected, as can be seen by comparison of the graphs 300 1-5 to the histograms depicted in the
graphs 200 1-7 ofFIG. 2 . This shows how a desired distribution along a continuum of individual low to high frequency RF sources may be obtained by utilizing only two sources, rather than many sources. This result increases the capability to perform more processes in one chamber, i.e., increases the “process window” of the chamber. - Although the foregoing discussion focused only on modulating sheath properties with the dual frequency cathode drive, the principles discussed herein could be applied for dissociation as well. This would eliminate the need for the upper RF source for dissociation (
RF source 118 inFIG. 1 ). - Furthermore, the chosen frequencies of 2 MHz and 13.56 MHz are illustrative only and not intended to define limitations of the invention. Both higher and lower frequencies can be utilized in the current invention.
- Control of Power Distribution Within the Plasma
- In another embodiment, the power distribution within the plasma can be controlled utilizing a plasma enhanced processing chamber with a dual frequency cathode as described above with reference to
FIG. 1 . In this embodiment, two frequencies that provide similar plasma excitation properties but with different spatial uniformity profiles are combined to tune the uniformity of a process. For example, in theprocess chamber 100 depicted inFIG. 1 , thecathode 127 forms a radial transmission line which is terminated along anouter perimeter 112 of theelectrostatic chuck 126. This contributes to the creation of a spatially variant power distribution, illustratively shown as a dashed line 130 (it should be noted that the standing wave could be the inverse of the one shown as well). The spatially variant power distribution affects the power distribution in theplasma 110, resulting in greater power near the peak of the wave (near the center of thesubstrate 114 for thewave 130 depicted inFIG. 1 ) and lesser power in the trough (near the edge of thesubstrate 114 inFIG. 1 ). This power differential in the plasma affects the uniformity of the process being performed on the substrate. As such, in an etch reaction, the uniformity of an etched wafer would be negatively impacted. - However, since the spatially variant power effect described above varies at different frequencies, two RF sources with different frequencies may be mixed together to drive the
cathode 127 such that their respective standing waves substantially cancel each other. This is illustratively depicted inFIG. 4 , which shows two opposing power distribution profiles 410, 420 centered over a substrate yielding a flatcombined effect 430. It should also be noted that any other final power distribution profile that may prove beneficial to a certain process can also be formed using this method. (For example, in some CVD processes, an edge high power deposition profile is preferred to minimize the impact of non-azimuthally symmetric deposition in high-aspect ratio features on a processed workpiece). - This frequency mixing phenomenon may be used to control the power distribution in the plasma and thereby control uniformity of a desired process, such as etching. For example, to measure the effect of dual frequency tuning on process uniformity, an oxide layer and a photoresist layer on multiple wafers were etched using different cathode frequency ratios in an eMaX™ processing chamber outfitted with a dual frequency cathode as described above with reference to
FIG. 1 . The first RF source was tuned to 13.56 MHz and the second RF source was tuned to 2 MHz. In each of these etch processes, the ratios of applied currents of the two RF drives were varied while keeping the total power to the cathode constant at 2,500 Watts. The oxide and photoresist etch rates were measured as well as the uniformity of each layer. -
FIG. 5 depicts a combined bar graph andline graph 500 depicting the etch rates and wafer uniformity for the processes described above. Thex-axis 502 of the graph depicts the ratio of the power supplied by the 13.56 Mhz source to the power supplied by the 2 Mhz source. (For example 0:2500 means 0 W of the 13.56 MHz source and 2,500 W of the 2 MHz source.) As can be seen from thebars 510 labeled 0 X ER (oxide etch rate) and thebars 512 labeled PR ER (photoresist etch rate), the etch rate (axis 504) remains relatively constant regardless of the mix of power levels at the different frequencies. - However, the wafer uniformity (axis 506) for both the oxide and the photoresist (respectively shown as
line 520, labeled “OX unif,” andline 522, labeled PR unif,” inFIG. 5 ) varied substantially over the power ratio mix. The uniformity ranged somewhat linearly from about 60% (indicating center-fast etching) at OW 13.56 MHz and 2500W 2 MHz, to about −50% (indicating edge-fast etching) at 2500 W 13.56 MHz and 0W 2 MHz, and near 0% with a fairly even ratio of the power of two frequencies. These results show that uniformity on an etched surface can be controlled fairly independently of the etch rate by controlling the power ratio of each frequency applied to a dual frequency cathode. - As mentioned above, the principles discussed herein apply to dissociation or ionization of bulk plasma, as well as modulation of the sheath properties of the plasma. Also, the chosen frequencies of 2 MHz and 13.56 MHz are illustrative only and not intended to define limitations of the invention. Both higher and lower frequencies may be utilized in the current invention. For example, drive frequencies may be grouped by their effect on the plasma, then selected as necessary to control the desired property. For example, high frequencies effect ionization and dissociation, while lower frequencies effect sheath modulation. Furthermore, the principles disclosed herein are not limited to control of standing waves. Additional reasons for frequency dependent propagation exist. For example, providing a frequency dependent termination to the transmission line, or a frequency dependent return path to ground in the chamber that can direct the RF waveform dependent upon its frequency.
- Thus, a method and apparatus for controlling characteristics of a plasma in a plasma enhanced processing chamber using a dual frequency cathode drive has been provided. The mixing of the two frequencies driving the cathode controls the ion energy and power distributions of a plasma.
- While the foregoing is directed to the illustrative embodiment of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.
Claims (23)
1. Apparatus for controlling characteristics of a plasma in a semiconductor substrate processing system, comprising:
a first electrode disposed within a chamber;
a first RF source for providing a first RF signal coupled to the first electrode through a match network;
a second RF source for providing a second RF signal coupled to the first electrode through the match network, wherein the match network has a single feed to the first electrode; and
a controller for controlling the application of the first and second RF signals such that a manipulable interaction between the first and second RF signals controls at least one plasma characteristic.
2. The apparatus of claim 1 , further comprising:
a third RF source for providing a third RF signal coupled to a second electrode disposed in the chamber.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the first electrode is disposed in a substrate support pedestal contained in the chamber and the second electrode is disposed proximate a roof of the chamber above the support pedestal.
4. The apparatus of claim 2 , wherein the third RF signal coupled to the second electrode is adapted to form a plasma in the chamber during operation thereof.
5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first electrode is disposed in a substrate support pedestal contained in the chamber.
6. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the chamber an etch reactor.
7. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the plasma characteristic is at least sheath modulation.
8. The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein the first and second RF sources are adapted to provide respective first and second RF signals of a low enough frequency to provide a strong self-biasing sheath in the plasma.
9. The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein the frequency of the first RF signal is selected to provide a broad ion energy distribution and the frequency of the second RF signal is selected to provide a peaked, well defined ion energy distribution during operation of the chamber.
10. The apparatus of claim 9 , wherein the first RF signal has a cycle time that is larger than the transit time of an ion in the sheath, and wherein the second RF signal has a period that is nearly equal to or greater than the transit time of an ion in the sheath.
11. The apparatus of claim 7 , wherein the combined applied voltage of the first and second RF signal is used to control a peak-to-peak sheath voltage and a self-biased DC potential.
12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein the controller further controls a desired ratio of the applied power of the first and second RF signals.
13. The apparatus of claim 12 , wherein the ratio is used to tune the energy distribution about an average acceleration generated by the DC potential.
14. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the plasma characteristic is at least a power distribution within the plasma.
15. The apparatus of claim 14 , wherein the first and second RF signals provide similar plasma excitation properties and different spatial uniformity profiles.
16. The apparatus of claim 15 , wherein the manipulable interaction between the first and second RF signals is a varying effect on the power distribution in the plasma.
17. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the first and the second RF signals are selected such that a combined effect of the first and second RF signals produces a substantially flat power distribution.
18. The apparatus of claim 16 , wherein the manipulable interaction between the first and second RF signals is used to control the uniformity of a plasma enhanced etch process.
19. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to control the application of the first and second RF signals to provide a desired plasma energy distribution along a continuum of plasma energy distributions obtainable using individual low to high frequency RF sources.
20. The apparatus of claim 19 , wherein the controller is further configured to provide the desired plasma energy distribution by controlling a ratio of the power of the first and second RF signals.
21. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the controller is further configured to control the application of the first and second RF signals to provide a desired power distribution within the plasma.
22. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the first power supply is adapted to provide a first power distribution in the plasma and wherein the second
23. Apparatus for controlling characteristics of a plasma in a semiconductor substrate processing system, comprising:
a first electrode disposed beneath a substrate support pedestal in a chamber;
a first RF bias source for providing a first RF bias signal and a second RF bias source for providing a second RF bias signal, the first and second RF bias signals coupled to the first electrode through a match network having a single feed to the first electrode;
an RF source for providing an RF signal to a second electrode disposed above the substrate support pedestal, the RF signal adapted to form a plasma during operation;
a controller for controlling the application of the first and second RF bias signals such that a manipulable interaction between the first and second RF signals controls at least one plasma characteristic.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US11/530,670 US20070000611A1 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2006-09-11 | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US51499303P | 2003-10-28 | 2003-10-28 | |
US10/823,364 US7838430B2 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2004-04-12 | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing |
US11/530,670 US20070000611A1 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2006-09-11 | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing |
Related Parent Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/823,364 Division US7838430B2 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2004-04-12 | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20070000611A1 true US20070000611A1 (en) | 2007-01-04 |
Family
ID=38992494
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/823,364 Active 2027-09-23 US7838430B2 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2004-04-12 | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing |
US11/530,670 Abandoned US20070000611A1 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2006-09-11 | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/823,364 Active 2027-09-23 US7838430B2 (en) | 2003-10-28 | 2004-04-12 | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7838430B2 (en) |
KR (1) | KR101115439B1 (en) |
CN (2) | CN101094557A (en) |
TW (1) | TWI356452B (en) |
Cited By (14)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060179412A1 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2006-08-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and computer program product for displaying calendar-based SLO results and breach values |
US20070006971A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2007-01-11 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma generation and control using a dual frequency rf source |
US20100099266A1 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2010-04-22 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Etch reactor suitable for etching high aspect ratio features |
US20100243605A1 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2010-09-30 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Etching method, etching apparatus, computer program and storage medium |
US20100326602A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | Intevac, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US8334657B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2012-12-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | RF matching network of a vacuum processing chamber and corresponding configuration methods |
US20130059448A1 (en) * | 2011-09-07 | 2013-03-07 | Lam Research Corporation | Pulsed Plasma Chamber in Dual Chamber Configuration |
US9039911B2 (en) | 2012-08-27 | 2015-05-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Plasma-enhanced etching in an augmented plasma processing system |
US9147581B2 (en) | 2013-07-11 | 2015-09-29 | Lam Research Corporation | Dual chamber plasma etcher with ion accelerator |
US20150325413A1 (en) * | 2014-05-12 | 2015-11-12 | Moojin Kim | Plasma apparatus and method of fabricating semiconductor device using the same |
US9230819B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2016-01-05 | Lam Research Corporation | Internal plasma grid applications for semiconductor fabrication in context of ion-ion plasma processing |
US9245761B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2016-01-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Internal plasma grid for semiconductor fabrication |
US9257295B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2016-02-09 | Lam Research Corporation | Ion beam etching system |
US9793126B2 (en) | 2010-08-04 | 2017-10-17 | Lam Research Corporation | Ion to neutral control for wafer processing with dual plasma source reactor |
Families Citing this family (70)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7510665B2 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2009-03-31 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma generation and control using dual frequency RF signals |
US20050106873A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2005-05-19 | Hoffman Daniel J. | Plasma chamber having multiple RF source frequencies |
US7615164B2 (en) * | 2004-06-23 | 2009-11-10 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Plasma etching methods and contact opening forming methods |
US20060027329A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-09 | Sinha Ashok K | Multi-frequency plasma enhanced process chamber having a torroidal plasma source |
US20070031609A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-08 | Ajay Kumar | Chemical vapor deposition chamber with dual frequency bias and method for manufacturing a photomask using the same |
US7829471B2 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2010-11-09 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Cluster tool and method for process integration in manufacturing of a photomask |
US7375038B2 (en) * | 2005-09-28 | 2008-05-20 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for plasma etching a chromium layer through a carbon hard mask suitable for photomask fabrication |
US7695633B2 (en) * | 2005-10-18 | 2010-04-13 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Independent control of ion density, ion energy distribution and ion dissociation in a plasma reactor |
KR100777151B1 (en) * | 2006-03-21 | 2007-11-16 | 주식회사 디엠에스 | Hybrid coupled plasma reactor with icp and ccp functions |
US8187415B2 (en) * | 2006-04-21 | 2012-05-29 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma etch reactor with distribution of etch gases across a wafer surface and a polymer oxidizing gas in an independently fed center gas zone |
US20070254483A1 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2007-11-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma etch process using polymerizing etch gases and an inert diluent gas in independent gas injection zones to improve etch profile or etch rate uniformity |
US7541292B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2009-06-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma etch process with separately fed carbon-lean and carbon-rich polymerizing etch gases in independent inner and outer gas injection zones |
US8231799B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2012-07-31 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma reactor apparatus with multiple gas injection zones having time-changing separate configurable gas compositions for each zone |
US7540971B2 (en) * | 2006-04-28 | 2009-06-02 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma etch process using polymerizing etch gases across a wafer surface and additional polymer managing or controlling gases in independently fed gas zones with time and spatial modulation of gas content |
US7758763B2 (en) * | 2006-10-31 | 2010-07-20 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma for resist removal and facet control of underlying features |
US20080119055A1 (en) * | 2006-11-21 | 2008-05-22 | Lam Research Corporation | Reducing twisting in ultra-high aspect ratio dielectric etch |
US7968469B2 (en) * | 2007-01-30 | 2011-06-28 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method of processing a workpiece in a plasma reactor with variable height ground return path to control plasma ion density uniformity |
US8080479B2 (en) * | 2007-01-30 | 2011-12-20 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma process uniformity across a wafer by controlling a variable frequency coupled to a harmonic resonator |
US7879731B2 (en) * | 2007-01-30 | 2011-02-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Improving plasma process uniformity across a wafer by apportioning power among plural VHF sources |
US20080178803A1 (en) * | 2007-01-30 | 2008-07-31 | Collins Kenneth S | Plasma reactor with ion distribution uniformity controller employing plural vhf sources |
KR101262904B1 (en) * | 2007-02-06 | 2013-05-09 | 참엔지니어링(주) | Plasma etching apparatus |
US20080230008A1 (en) * | 2007-03-21 | 2008-09-25 | Alexander Paterson | Plasma species and uniformity control through pulsed vhf operation |
JP5213496B2 (en) * | 2008-03-31 | 2013-06-19 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Plasma etching method and computer-readable storage medium |
US11615941B2 (en) | 2009-05-01 | 2023-03-28 | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | System, method, and apparatus for controlling ion energy distribution in plasma processing systems |
US9767988B2 (en) | 2010-08-29 | 2017-09-19 | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | Method of controlling the switched mode ion energy distribution system |
TWI556309B (en) * | 2009-06-19 | 2016-11-01 | 半導體能源研究所股份有限公司 | Plasma treatment apparatus, method for forming film, and method for manufacturing thin film transistor |
US8501631B2 (en) | 2009-11-19 | 2013-08-06 | Lam Research Corporation | Plasma processing system control based on RF voltage |
JP5916056B2 (en) * | 2010-08-23 | 2016-05-11 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Plasma processing method and plasma processing apparatus |
JP5935116B2 (en) * | 2011-12-16 | 2016-06-15 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Plasma processing equipment |
US9295148B2 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2016-03-22 | Lam Research Corporation | Computation of statistics for statistical data decimation |
US9462672B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2016-10-04 | Lam Research Corporation | Adjustment of power and frequency based on three or more states |
US10325759B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2019-06-18 | Lam Research Corporation | Multiple control modes |
US10157729B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2018-12-18 | Lam Research Corporation | Soft pulsing |
US9320126B2 (en) | 2012-12-17 | 2016-04-19 | Lam Research Corporation | Determining a value of a variable on an RF transmission model |
US9368329B2 (en) * | 2012-02-22 | 2016-06-14 | Lam Research Corporation | Methods and apparatus for synchronizing RF pulses in a plasma processing system |
US9114666B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2015-08-25 | Lam Research Corporation | Methods and apparatus for controlling plasma in a plasma processing system |
US9197196B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2015-11-24 | Lam Research Corporation | State-based adjustment of power and frequency |
US9390893B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2016-07-12 | Lam Research Corporation | Sub-pulsing during a state |
US9530620B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2016-12-27 | Lam Research Corporation | Dual control modes |
US10128090B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2018-11-13 | Lam Research Corporation | RF impedance model based fault detection |
US9502216B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2016-11-22 | Lam Research Corporation | Using modeling to determine wafer bias associated with a plasma system |
US9171699B2 (en) | 2012-02-22 | 2015-10-27 | Lam Research Corporation | Impedance-based adjustment of power and frequency |
US9842725B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-12-12 | Lam Research Corporation | Using modeling to determine ion energy associated with a plasma system |
JP6329543B2 (en) * | 2012-08-28 | 2018-05-23 | アドバンスト・エナジー・インダストリーズ・インコーポレイテッドAdvanced Energy Industries, Inc. | Method for controlling a switched-mode ion energy distribution system |
US9685297B2 (en) | 2012-08-28 | 2017-06-20 | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | Systems and methods for monitoring faults, anomalies, and other characteristics of a switched mode ion energy distribution system |
US9408288B2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2016-08-02 | Lam Research Corporation | Edge ramping |
US9043525B2 (en) | 2012-12-14 | 2015-05-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Optimizing a rate of transfer of data between an RF generator and a host system within a plasma tool |
US9155182B2 (en) | 2013-01-11 | 2015-10-06 | Lam Research Corporation | Tuning a parameter associated with plasma impedance |
US9620337B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-04-11 | Lam Research Corporation | Determining a malfunctioning device in a plasma system |
US9779196B2 (en) | 2013-01-31 | 2017-10-03 | Lam Research Corporation | Segmenting a model within a plasma system |
US9107284B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2015-08-11 | Lam Research Corporation | Chamber matching using voltage control mode |
US9119283B2 (en) | 2013-03-14 | 2015-08-25 | Lam Research Corporation | Chamber matching for power control mode |
US9502221B2 (en) | 2013-07-26 | 2016-11-22 | Lam Research Corporation | Etch rate modeling and use thereof with multiple parameters for in-chamber and chamber-to-chamber matching |
CN104733278B (en) * | 2013-12-23 | 2017-03-15 | 中微半导体设备(上海)有限公司 | Plasma processing apparatus and method of plasma processing |
US9594105B2 (en) | 2014-01-10 | 2017-03-14 | Lam Research Corporation | Cable power loss determination for virtual metrology |
US10950421B2 (en) | 2014-04-21 | 2021-03-16 | Lam Research Corporation | Using modeling for identifying a location of a fault in an RF transmission system for a plasma system |
US9536749B2 (en) | 2014-12-15 | 2017-01-03 | Lam Research Corporation | Ion energy control by RF pulse shape |
JP6424120B2 (en) * | 2015-03-23 | 2018-11-14 | 東京エレクトロン株式会社 | Power supply system, plasma processing apparatus, and power supply control method |
US9716005B1 (en) | 2016-03-18 | 2017-07-25 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma poisoning to enable selective deposition |
GB201608926D0 (en) | 2016-05-20 | 2016-07-06 | Spts Technologies Ltd | Method for plasma etching a workpiece |
US10395896B2 (en) | 2017-03-03 | 2019-08-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method and apparatus for ion energy distribution manipulation for plasma processing chambers that allows ion energy boosting through amplitude modulation |
US10424467B2 (en) * | 2017-03-13 | 2019-09-24 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Smart RF pulsing tuning using variable frequency generators |
TWI767088B (en) | 2017-11-17 | 2022-06-11 | 新加坡商Aes全球公司 | Plasma processing system, control method for modulating supplies therein and related plasma processing control system |
CN111868873B (en) | 2017-11-17 | 2023-06-16 | 先进工程解决方案全球控股私人有限公司 | Synchronized pulsing of plasma processing source and substrate bias |
CN111788655B (en) | 2017-11-17 | 2024-04-05 | 先进工程解决方案全球控股私人有限公司 | Spatial and temporal control of ion bias voltage for plasma processing |
CN111092008A (en) * | 2018-10-24 | 2020-05-01 | 江苏鲁汶仪器有限公司 | Inductively coupled plasma etching equipment and etching method |
KR20220031713A (en) | 2019-07-12 | 2022-03-11 | 에이이에스 글로벌 홀딩스 피티이 리미티드 | Bias supply with single controlled switch |
KR20210136481A (en) | 2020-05-07 | 2021-11-17 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Plasma processing system, and plasma control method in the system, and method for fabricating semiconductor device comprising the control method |
US11942309B2 (en) | 2022-01-26 | 2024-03-26 | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | Bias supply with resonant switching |
US11670487B1 (en) | 2022-01-26 | 2023-06-06 | Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. | Bias supply control and data processing |
Citations (36)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4579618A (en) * | 1984-01-06 | 1986-04-01 | Tegal Corporation | Plasma reactor apparatus |
US4585516A (en) * | 1985-03-04 | 1986-04-29 | Tegal Corporation | Variable duty cycle, multiple frequency, plasma reactor |
US4863549A (en) * | 1987-10-01 | 1989-09-05 | Leybold Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for coating or etching by means of a plasma |
US5065118A (en) * | 1990-07-26 | 1991-11-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electronically tuned VHF/UHF matching network |
US5077499A (en) * | 1990-04-18 | 1991-12-31 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | High-frequency feeding method for use in plasma apparatus and device for carrying out the method |
US5512130A (en) * | 1994-03-09 | 1996-04-30 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and apparatus of etching a clean trench in a semiconductor material |
US5534751A (en) * | 1995-07-10 | 1996-07-09 | Lam Research Corporation | Plasma etching apparatus utilizing plasma confinement |
US5556501A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1996-09-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Silicon scavenger in an inductively coupled RF plasma reactor |
US5570031A (en) * | 1993-11-11 | 1996-10-29 | Frontec Incorporated | Substrate surface potential measuring apparatus and plasma equipment |
US5643364A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1997-07-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma chamber with fixed RF matching |
US5698062A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1997-12-16 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma treatment apparatus and method |
US5817534A (en) * | 1995-12-04 | 1998-10-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | RF plasma reactor with cleaning electrode for cleaning during processing of semiconductor wafers |
US5985375A (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 1999-11-16 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method for pulsed-plasma enhanced vapor deposition |
US6089181A (en) * | 1996-07-23 | 2000-07-18 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma processing apparatus |
US6110287A (en) * | 1993-03-31 | 2000-08-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma processing method and plasma processing apparatus |
US6113731A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-09-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Magnetically-enhanced plasma chamber with non-uniform magnetic field |
US6126778A (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2000-10-03 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Beat frequency modulation for plasma generation |
US6190496B1 (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 2001-02-20 | Tegal Corporation | Plasma etch reactor and method for emerging films |
US6193855B1 (en) * | 1999-10-19 | 2001-02-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Use of modulated inductive power and bias power to reduce overhang and improve bottom coverage |
US6354240B1 (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 2002-03-12 | Tegal Corporation | Plasma etch reactor having a plurality of magnets |
US20020039626A1 (en) * | 1995-09-13 | 2002-04-04 | Nissin Electric Co., Ltd. | Plasma CVD method and apparatus |
US20020041160A1 (en) * | 2000-04-06 | 2002-04-11 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for controlling etch uniformity |
US6411490B2 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2002-06-25 | Lam Research Corporation | Integrated power modules for plasma processing systems |
US6433297B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2002-08-13 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Plasma processing method and plasma processing apparatus |
US20030127319A1 (en) * | 2000-08-07 | 2003-07-10 | Demaray Richard E. | Planar optical devices and methods for their manufacture |
US20030148611A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-08-07 | Lam Research Corporation, A Delaware Corporation | Etch rate uniformity |
US6642149B2 (en) * | 1998-09-16 | 2003-11-04 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma processing method |
US20040025791A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Etch chamber with dual frequency biasing sources and a single frequency plasma generating source |
US20040054669A1 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2004-03-18 | Claude Seyrat | Method for dividing structured documents into several parts |
US20040221958A1 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2004-11-11 | Lam Research Corporation | RF pulsing of a narrow gap capacitively coupled reactor |
US20040255863A1 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2004-12-23 | Tsutomu Higashiura | Plasma process apparatus |
US6841943B2 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2005-01-11 | Lam Research Corp. | Plasma processor with electrode simultaneously responsive to plural frequencies |
US20050022933A1 (en) * | 2003-08-01 | 2005-02-03 | Howard Bradley J. | Multi-frequency plasma reactor and method of etching |
US6872281B1 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2005-03-29 | Lam Research Corporation | Chamber configuration for confining a plasma |
US20050241762A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Alternating asymmetrical plasma generation in a process chamber |
US20070031609A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-08 | Ajay Kumar | Chemical vapor deposition chamber with dual frequency bias and method for manufacturing a photomask using the same |
Family Cites Families (18)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US9285A (en) * | 1852-09-28 | Improvement in brick-kilns | ||
US3598A (en) * | 1844-05-25 | Improvement in water-proof gewsentssgc | ||
US203096A (en) * | 1878-04-30 | Improvement in thill-couplings | ||
US87001A (en) * | 1869-02-16 | conover | ||
US5996A (en) * | 1849-01-02 | Jottrjstal and box | ||
US161930A (en) * | 1875-04-13 | Improvement in horse-collars | ||
US219523A (en) * | 1879-09-09 | Improvement in portable-engine boilers | ||
US3962464A (en) * | 1969-07-21 | 1976-06-08 | Societe D'assistance Technique Pour Produits Nestle S.A. | Process for preparing a butter-like dairy product |
EP0076548B1 (en) * | 1981-10-07 | 1985-03-27 | Unilever N.V. | Process for producing a spread starting from a bimodal dispersed phase |
US4772487A (en) * | 1986-10-01 | 1988-09-20 | Olympus Optical Company Limited | Method and apparatus of forming solid phase reagent in micro-module |
US5280154A (en) | 1992-01-30 | 1994-01-18 | International Business Machines Corporation | Radio frequency induction plasma processing system utilizing a uniform field coil |
US5308637A (en) * | 1992-07-02 | 1994-05-03 | Kraft General Foods, Inc. | Method for processing fat-containing food sauce |
JP3339597B2 (en) * | 1993-09-03 | 2002-10-28 | アネルバ株式会社 | Plasma processing method and plasma processing apparatus |
US6124778A (en) * | 1997-10-14 | 2000-09-26 | Sun Microsystems, Inc. | Magnetic component assembly |
US6586033B1 (en) * | 1999-05-21 | 2003-07-01 | Lipton, Division Of Conopco, Inc. | Ionic stable emulsion sauce |
DE10015825C2 (en) * | 2000-03-30 | 2002-11-21 | Framatome Anp Gmbh | Method for eliminating the play of a pipe in a support member and pipe with a support member |
JP2002299322A (en) * | 2001-03-30 | 2002-10-11 | Toshiba Corp | Plasma processing apparatus and plasma processing method |
JP2003073836A (en) | 2001-08-28 | 2003-03-12 | Canon Inc | Method and apparatus for vacuum treatment |
-
2004
- 2004-04-12 US US10/823,364 patent/US7838430B2/en active Active
- 2004-09-20 TW TW093128382A patent/TWI356452B/en active
- 2004-10-14 KR KR1020040082295A patent/KR101115439B1/en active IP Right Review Request
- 2004-10-21 CN CNA2007101406332A patent/CN101094557A/en active Pending
- 2004-10-21 CN CNB2004100865243A patent/CN100337314C/en active Active
-
2006
- 2006-09-11 US US11/530,670 patent/US20070000611A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (38)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4579618A (en) * | 1984-01-06 | 1986-04-01 | Tegal Corporation | Plasma reactor apparatus |
US4585516A (en) * | 1985-03-04 | 1986-04-29 | Tegal Corporation | Variable duty cycle, multiple frequency, plasma reactor |
US4863549A (en) * | 1987-10-01 | 1989-09-05 | Leybold Aktiengesellschaft | Apparatus for coating or etching by means of a plasma |
US5556501A (en) * | 1989-10-03 | 1996-09-17 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Silicon scavenger in an inductively coupled RF plasma reactor |
US5077499A (en) * | 1990-04-18 | 1991-12-31 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | High-frequency feeding method for use in plasma apparatus and device for carrying out the method |
US5065118A (en) * | 1990-07-26 | 1991-11-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Electronically tuned VHF/UHF matching network |
US6110287A (en) * | 1993-03-31 | 2000-08-29 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma processing method and plasma processing apparatus |
US5698062A (en) * | 1993-11-05 | 1997-12-16 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma treatment apparatus and method |
US5570031A (en) * | 1993-11-11 | 1996-10-29 | Frontec Incorporated | Substrate surface potential measuring apparatus and plasma equipment |
US5512130A (en) * | 1994-03-09 | 1996-04-30 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Method and apparatus of etching a clean trench in a semiconductor material |
US5643364A (en) * | 1994-11-30 | 1997-07-01 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma chamber with fixed RF matching |
US5534751A (en) * | 1995-07-10 | 1996-07-09 | Lam Research Corporation | Plasma etching apparatus utilizing plasma confinement |
US20020039626A1 (en) * | 1995-09-13 | 2002-04-04 | Nissin Electric Co., Ltd. | Plasma CVD method and apparatus |
US5817534A (en) * | 1995-12-04 | 1998-10-06 | Applied Materials, Inc. | RF plasma reactor with cleaning electrode for cleaning during processing of semiconductor wafers |
US6190496B1 (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 2001-02-20 | Tegal Corporation | Plasma etch reactor and method for emerging films |
US6354240B1 (en) * | 1996-07-03 | 2002-03-12 | Tegal Corporation | Plasma etch reactor having a plurality of magnets |
US6089181A (en) * | 1996-07-23 | 2000-07-18 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma processing apparatus |
US6113731A (en) * | 1997-01-02 | 2000-09-05 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Magnetically-enhanced plasma chamber with non-uniform magnetic field |
US6309978B1 (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2001-10-30 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Beat frequency modulation for plasma generation |
US6312556B1 (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2001-11-06 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Beat frequency modulation for plasma generation |
US6126778A (en) * | 1998-07-22 | 2000-10-03 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Beat frequency modulation for plasma generation |
US5985375A (en) * | 1998-09-03 | 1999-11-16 | Micron Technology, Inc. | Method for pulsed-plasma enhanced vapor deposition |
US6642149B2 (en) * | 1998-09-16 | 2003-11-04 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Plasma processing method |
US6411490B2 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2002-06-25 | Lam Research Corporation | Integrated power modules for plasma processing systems |
US6433297B1 (en) * | 1999-03-19 | 2002-08-13 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Plasma processing method and plasma processing apparatus |
US6193855B1 (en) * | 1999-10-19 | 2001-02-27 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Use of modulated inductive power and bias power to reduce overhang and improve bottom coverage |
US20020041160A1 (en) * | 2000-04-06 | 2002-04-11 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Method for controlling etch uniformity |
US20030127319A1 (en) * | 2000-08-07 | 2003-07-10 | Demaray Richard E. | Planar optical devices and methods for their manufacture |
US6872281B1 (en) * | 2000-09-28 | 2005-03-29 | Lam Research Corporation | Chamber configuration for confining a plasma |
US20040054669A1 (en) * | 2000-12-18 | 2004-03-18 | Claude Seyrat | Method for dividing structured documents into several parts |
US20030148611A1 (en) * | 2001-11-13 | 2003-08-07 | Lam Research Corporation, A Delaware Corporation | Etch rate uniformity |
US20040255863A1 (en) * | 2001-12-13 | 2004-12-23 | Tsutomu Higashiura | Plasma process apparatus |
US6841943B2 (en) * | 2002-06-27 | 2005-01-11 | Lam Research Corp. | Plasma processor with electrode simultaneously responsive to plural frequencies |
US20040025791A1 (en) * | 2002-08-09 | 2004-02-12 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Etch chamber with dual frequency biasing sources and a single frequency plasma generating source |
US20040221958A1 (en) * | 2003-05-06 | 2004-11-11 | Lam Research Corporation | RF pulsing of a narrow gap capacitively coupled reactor |
US20050022933A1 (en) * | 2003-08-01 | 2005-02-03 | Howard Bradley J. | Multi-frequency plasma reactor and method of etching |
US20050241762A1 (en) * | 2004-04-30 | 2005-11-03 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Alternating asymmetrical plasma generation in a process chamber |
US20070031609A1 (en) * | 2005-07-29 | 2007-02-08 | Ajay Kumar | Chemical vapor deposition chamber with dual frequency bias and method for manufacturing a photomask using the same |
Cited By (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20070006971A1 (en) * | 2003-08-15 | 2007-01-11 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Plasma generation and control using a dual frequency rf source |
US20060179412A1 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2006-08-10 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and computer program product for displaying calendar-based SLO results and breach values |
US7471293B2 (en) * | 2005-02-09 | 2008-12-30 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, system, and computer program product for displaying calendar-based SLO results and breach values |
US8334657B2 (en) | 2005-08-05 | 2012-12-18 | Applied Materials, Inc. | RF matching network of a vacuum processing chamber and corresponding configuration methods |
US20100243605A1 (en) * | 2006-08-25 | 2010-09-30 | Tokyo Electron Limited | Etching method, etching apparatus, computer program and storage medium |
US20100099266A1 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2010-04-22 | Applied Materials, Inc. | Etch reactor suitable for etching high aspect ratio features |
KR101522251B1 (en) * | 2008-09-22 | 2015-05-21 | 어플라이드 머티어리얼스, 인코포레이티드 | Etch reactor suitable for etching high aspect ratio features |
US20100326602A1 (en) * | 2009-06-30 | 2010-12-30 | Intevac, Inc. | Electrostatic chuck |
US9793126B2 (en) | 2010-08-04 | 2017-10-17 | Lam Research Corporation | Ion to neutral control for wafer processing with dual plasma source reactor |
US20130059448A1 (en) * | 2011-09-07 | 2013-03-07 | Lam Research Corporation | Pulsed Plasma Chamber in Dual Chamber Configuration |
US9418859B2 (en) | 2012-08-27 | 2016-08-16 | Lam Research Corporation | Plasma-enhanced etching in an augmented plasma processing system |
US9039911B2 (en) | 2012-08-27 | 2015-05-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Plasma-enhanced etching in an augmented plasma processing system |
US9230819B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2016-01-05 | Lam Research Corporation | Internal plasma grid applications for semiconductor fabrication in context of ion-ion plasma processing |
US9245761B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2016-01-26 | Lam Research Corporation | Internal plasma grid for semiconductor fabrication |
US9633846B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2017-04-25 | Lam Research Corporation | Internal plasma grid applications for semiconductor fabrication |
US10224221B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2019-03-05 | Lam Research Corporation | Internal plasma grid for semiconductor fabrication |
US11171021B2 (en) | 2013-04-05 | 2021-11-09 | Lam Research Corporation | Internal plasma grid for semiconductor fabrication |
US9257295B2 (en) | 2013-07-08 | 2016-02-09 | Lam Research Corporation | Ion beam etching system |
US9147581B2 (en) | 2013-07-11 | 2015-09-29 | Lam Research Corporation | Dual chamber plasma etcher with ion accelerator |
US9431269B2 (en) | 2013-07-11 | 2016-08-30 | Lam Research Corporation | Dual chamber plasma etcher with ion accelerator |
US10134605B2 (en) | 2013-07-11 | 2018-11-20 | Lam Research Corporation | Dual chamber plasma etcher with ion accelerator |
US20150325413A1 (en) * | 2014-05-12 | 2015-11-12 | Moojin Kim | Plasma apparatus and method of fabricating semiconductor device using the same |
US9490107B2 (en) * | 2014-05-12 | 2016-11-08 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Plasma apparatus and method of fabricating semiconductor device using the same |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20050090118A1 (en) | 2005-04-28 |
CN100337314C (en) | 2007-09-12 |
TWI356452B (en) | 2012-01-11 |
CN1655328A (en) | 2005-08-17 |
CN101094557A (en) | 2007-12-26 |
US7838430B2 (en) | 2010-11-23 |
KR101115439B1 (en) | 2012-04-18 |
KR20050040709A (en) | 2005-05-03 |
TW200515507A (en) | 2005-05-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7838430B2 (en) | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing | |
US6200651B1 (en) | Method of chemical vapor deposition in a vacuum plasma processor responsive to a pulsed microwave source | |
US8962488B2 (en) | Synchronized radio frequency pulsing for plasma etching | |
KR101689916B1 (en) | Plasma generation controlled by gravity induced gas-diffusion separation(gigds) techniques | |
US7736914B2 (en) | Plasma control using dual cathode frequency mixing and controlling the level of polymer formation | |
US6562190B1 (en) | System, apparatus, and method for processing wafer using single frequency RF power in plasma processing chamber | |
US6642149B2 (en) | Plasma processing method | |
US7029594B2 (en) | Plasma processing method | |
US5300460A (en) | UHF/VHF plasma for use in forming integrated circuit structures on semiconductor wafers | |
US8877080B2 (en) | Using vacuum ultra-violet (VUV) data in microwave sources | |
US6875366B2 (en) | Plasma processing apparatus and method with controlled biasing functions | |
US20050034813A1 (en) | Plasma processing apparatus using active matching | |
TW202017043A (en) | Plasma processing method and plasma processing device | |
CN101366101B (en) | Methods and apparatus for igniting a low pressure plasma | |
JP3748230B2 (en) | Plasma etching apparatus and shower plate | |
JPH11297679A (en) | Method and equipment for surface processing of sample | |
CN111937114A (en) | Apparatus and method for controlling ion energy distribution while processing plasma | |
JPH1167493A (en) | Plasma processing device and plasma processing method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., CALIFORNIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:SHANNON, STEVEN C.;GRIMARD, DENNIS S.;HOFFMAN, DANIEL J.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:018228/0816;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040402 TO 20040408 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- AFTER EXAMINER'S ANSWER OR BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION |