US20060138323A1 - Method of Applying Micro-Protection in Defect Analysis - Google Patents
Method of Applying Micro-Protection in Defect Analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20060138323A1 US20060138323A1 US10/908,953 US90895305A US2006138323A1 US 20060138323 A1 US20060138323 A1 US 20060138323A1 US 90895305 A US90895305 A US 90895305A US 2006138323 A1 US2006138323 A1 US 2006138323A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- defect
- specimen
- microscope
- reference mark
- protection
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 183
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 53
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 35
- 238000010884 ion-beam technique Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 27
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000012780 transparent material Substances 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000003292 glue Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011347 resin Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 229920005989 resin Polymers 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000010410 layer Substances 0.000 description 32
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 18
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 14
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 10
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 239000011241 protective layer Substances 0.000 description 6
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 5
- GYHNNYVSQQEPJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N Gallium Chemical compound [Ga] GYHNNYVSQQEPJS-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 4
- 229910052733 gallium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910001338 liquidmetal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000903 blocking effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010894 electron beam technology Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001803 electron scattering Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003064 anti-oxidating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005553 drilling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 1
- CKHJYUSOUQDYEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N gallium(3+) Chemical compound [Ga+3] CKHJYUSOUQDYEN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002309 gasification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008018 melting Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002844 melting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002894 organic compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000001020 plasma etching Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011163 secondary particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007711 solidification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008023 solidification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008016 vaporization Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/28—Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
- G01N1/36—Embedding or analogous mounting of samples
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N1/00—Sampling; Preparing specimens for investigation
- G01N1/28—Preparing specimens for investigation including physical details of (bio-)chemical methods covered elsewhere, e.g. G01N33/50, C12Q
- G01N1/36—Embedding or analogous mounting of samples
- G01N2001/364—Embedding or analogous mounting of samples using resins, epoxy
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a defect analysis method, and more particularly, to a defect analysis method of utilizing at least one nondestructive micro-protection for semiconductor dies or other substrates.
- FIB focused ion beam
- LMIS liquid metal ion source
- electro-lens electro-lens
- scanning electrodes secondary particle detector
- specimen base capable of axial movements, vacuum system, and anti-vibration and anti-magnetic field devices.
- liquid metal ion source such as liquid gallium (Ga)
- the liquid gallium is transformed into a shape with a tiny pointy tip, and by utilizing a negative electric field, the gallium ion can be extracted from the pointy tip.
- the size of the ion source is confirmed, and after passing the ion beam to the surface of the specimen via a second focusing, the ion beam is able to perform operations including incision and drilling.
- gallium has been a popular liquid metal ion source in various commercial systems.
- semiconductor industries are able to fabricate precise scanning electron microscope (SEM) cross-sectional specimens or transmission electron microscope (TEM) cross-sectional specimens to perform micro-area analyses.
- the FIB microscopes provide an alternative specimen fabrication tool for the users, in that the FIB microscopes are capable of achieving a success rate of greater than 90% within a working hour between 2-6 hours, and by utilizing the specimens fabricated by the FIB microscopes, the transmission electron microscopes are able to obtain satisfactory resolution and contrast results.
- the ions collide with the specimens phenomena such as gasification and ionization will occur on the surface of the specimen, neutral atoms, ions, and electrons will be produced, and a small quantity of the ions will be implanted into the specimen.
- the implanted ions are all destructive in nature and when these focused ion beams are utilized to fabricate cross-sectional specimens from a defect located on the surface of a wafer, the defect or the surface of the wafer will be damaged. In mild cases, an amorphous layer containing the ion source element (gallium in general) will form over the surface of the specimen, whereas in severe cases, precipitate containing the ion source element will be generated. At any rate, either case will damage the specimen and influence the result of the observation. When the defect is not located on the surface layer of the specimen, a layer disposed on the defect will be first removed to expose the defect. Next, a scanning electron microscope or an optical microscope is used to perform a top-view observation on the defect and a focused ion beam is used to fabricate a cross-sectional specimen. In either condition, the chance of damaging the defect remains the same.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective diagram showing the method of fabricating a TEM cross-section specimen 10 by using a FIB microscope of a dual beam system according to the prior art. (As shown in FIG.
- the TEM cross-section specimen 10 comprises a plurality of trenches 12 thereon and when the trenches 12 are not filled with stuffing materials, the platinum layer formed by evaporation process will not only cover a defect 14 , but also will fill the trenches 12 (both not shown in the figure). Since the high atomic number and electron scattering of the platinum layer is much stronger, the electrons are not likely to penetrate the layer and black areas will be produced as a result of contrast difference, thereby blocking the defect 14 and increasing the difficulty of observation.
- a method of defect analysis by applying at least one micro-protection comprises: providing a substrate, in which the substrate includes at least a defect thereon; forming a micro-protection on the surface of the defect; confirming the site of the defect; and utilizing a focused ion beam (FIB) microscope for forming a specimen of the defect.
- FIB focused ion beam
- the present invention provides a defect analysis method by creating at least a reference mark in proximity to the defect, performing a layer removing process for exposing the layer where the defect is located or performing the layer removing process before the reference mark is created, and forming a non-destructive micro-protection on the defect.
- the reference mark can be created after the formation of the non-destructive micro-protection.
- a scanning electron microscope can be utilized to observe the top-view structure of the defect, and after the transmission electron microscope specimen of the defect is fabricated by the FIB microscope, a transmission electron microscope can be utilized to analyze the cross-sectional structure of the defect while performing the defect analysis.
- FIG. 1 is a perspective diagram showing the method of fabricating a transmission electron microscope cross-section specimen by using a focused ion beam microscope of a dual beam system according to the prior art.
- FIG. 2 through FIG. 6 are perspective diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection according to the present invention.
- FIG. 7 through FIG. 8 are flowchart diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection according to the present invention.
- FIG. 9 is a perspective diagram showing the top-view of the defect of the contact hole observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention.
- FIG. 10 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of the defect of the contact hole observed by a transmission electron microscope along line 10 - 10 ′ of FIG. 9 according to the present invention.
- FIG. 11 is a perspective diagram showing the top-view of a word line defect observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention.
- FIG. 12 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of the word line defect observed by a transmission electron microscope along line 12 - 12 ′ of FIG. 11 according to the present invention.
- FIG. 2 through FIG. 6 are perspective diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection according to the present invention
- FIG. 7 through FIG. 8 are flowchart diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection.
- a substrate 100 is first provided according to step 202 , in which the substrate 100 can be a wafer or a glass substrate.
- the substrate 100 includes a defect 102 thereon, in which the defect 102 can be a surface defect or a bottom layer defect.
- step 204 determines whether the defect is a surface defect. If the defect 102 is a surface defect (as shown in FIG.
- an observation is performed to observe the substrate 100 by utilizing a microscope, and at least a reference mark 104 is created (step 206 ) in proximity to the defect 102 .
- the reference mark can be a feature of a surface structure or a laser mark, and the microscope can be an optical microscope or a scanning electron microscope.
- the defect 102 can also be a bottom layer defect, such as the defect 102 shown in FIG. 3 .
- a layer removing process (step 208 ) is performed to remove the material layer formed on the substrate 100 layer after layer, in which the layer removing process can be carried out physically (via plasma etching) or chemically (via solution reactions).
- the layer removing process can be carried out physically (via plasma etching) or chemically (via solution reactions).
- an optical microscope or a scanning electron microscope is utilized to observe the surface of the substrate 100 to ensure that the defect is not damaged and at least a reference mark 104 is created in proximity to the defect according to step 212 .
- another layer removing process is performed to expose the layer containing the defect, according to step 214 .
- the reference mark 104 includes a feature located on a bottom layer structure, a focused ion beam mark, or a laser mark. Since the depth of the reference mark 104 fabricated by the laser or focused ion beam is usually much deeper, the reference mark 104 has to be created before the layers are removed, thereby preventing damage to the defect 102 and ensuring that the reference mark 104 is clearly visible.
- the location of the defect can be determined by partially removing the layer on top of the defect.
- reference marks can then be created according to step 212 .
- the layer on top of the defect may have to be removed completely to determine the location of the defect before creating any reference mark (step 216 ). Since the defect is already exposed, the reference mark 104 is usually created by utilizing a specific feature on the layer structure or by a laser under an optical microscope to prevent damage to the defect 102 .
- the method of fabricating a micro-protection 106 first includes placing a small quantity of transparent material 114 on the surface of the defect 102 by utilizing a probe 112 , which is controlled by a micromanipulator 108 under an optical microscope 105 .
- a solidifying process (step 222 ) is performed to solidify the transparent material 114 for forming a micro-protection 106 on the surface of the defect 102 , as shown in FIG. 5 and FIG. 8 .
- the transparent material 114 is comprised of transparent resin or glue, and the solidifying process can be heating or at room temperature.
- a focused ion beam microscope is then utilized to find any other unexposed reference marks around the defect (step 224 ).
- the substrate 100 is placed under a focused ion beam microscope to locate any visible reference mark 104 and the reference marks 104 are then used to determine the location of the defect 102 .
- the micro-protection 106 is able to serve as a protective layer to the defect 102 for preventing damage and electron charging when the focused ion beam continuously scans the substrate 100 .
- transparent materials are usually organic compounds and composed of low atomic number elements (ex. C, H, and O).
- the micro-protection 106 is comprised of non-destructive materials including transparent resin or glue.
- a specimen is fabricated by using the focused ion beam microscope (step 226 ), as shown in FIG. 6 and FIG. 8 .
- a specimen 116 of the defect 102 is produced by utilizing the focused ion beam of the FIB microscope to cut a cross-section from the substrate 100 , in which the specimen 116 can be a scanning electron microscope specimen or further cut to a transmission electron microscope specimen.
- the micro-protection 106 is able to serve as a protective layer to the defect 102 for preventing damage and electron charging when the focused ion beam is utilized for cutting the substrate 100 .
- a defect analysis is performed to examine the specimen 116 fabricated from step 226 by inserting the specimen 116 into a scanning electron microscope.
- the scanning electron microscope can be utilized for examining the cross-sectional structure of the defect 102 or the structure of the defect at an angle (one of the functions of the scanning electron microscope being to tilt a specimen at an observable angle).
- a scanning electron microscope can be utilized selectively for observing the top-view structure of the defect 102 after step 206 , 214 , and 216 and before step 218 .
- a transmission electron microscope specimen can be produced when a specimen of the defect is fabricated by the FIB microscope (step 226 ), and a transmission electron microscope can be utilized to perform the defect analysis (step 228 ) for analyzing the cross-sectional structure of the defect 102 . Since the micro-protection 106 is not yet fabricated when the top-view structure of the defect 102 is observed by the scanning electron microscope, problems such as electron charging are not likely to occur and at the same time, the same specimen 116 can be utilized for both top-view analysis and cross-sectional analysis without using additional specimens.
- the present invention is able to observe the defect on the specimen 116 by utilizing both the top-view analysis and the cross-sectional analysis, thereby acquiring much more information regarding to the defect, increasing the accuracy for determining the cause of the defect, and reducing the risk of sampling error.
- the present invention is able to provide better results when the defect cause of each specimen is different.
- FIG. 9 is a perspective diagram showing the top view of a defect 232 of the contact hole 230 observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention
- FIG. 10 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of the defect 232 of the contact hole 230 observed by a transmission electron microscope along line 10 - 10 ′ of FIG. 9 .
- the defect 232 is included within the central contact hole 230 (please refer to the normal contact hole on the right).
- steps including formation of at least one micro-protection (step 218 ), solidifying process (step 222 ), and utilizing an FIB microscope to search for uncovered reference marks in proximity to the defect for determining the site of the defect (step 226 ) are performed over the surface of the defect.
- a transmission electron microscope specimen along a sectional line 10 - 10 ′ of FIG. 9 is fabricated when an FIB microscope is utilized for creating a specimen (step 226 ).
- a defect analysis is performed (step 228 ) by utilizing a transmission electron microscope to observe the defect 232 of the contact hole 230 for producing the result as shown in FIG. 10 .
- the specimen has been cut accurately and the defect 232 has remained undamaged due to the protection of the micro-protection 234 .
- FIG. 11 is a perspective diagram showing the top-view structure of the defect 262 of a word line 260 observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention
- FIG. 12 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of the defect 262 of the word line 260 observed by a transmission electron microscope along a sectional line 12 - 12 ′ of FIG. 11 .
- the defect 262 is included on the word line 260 (please refer to other normal word lines).
- steps including formation of at least one micro-protection (step 218 ), a solidification process (step 222 ), and utilizing an FIB microscope to search for uncovered reference marks in proximity to the defect for determining the site of the defect (step 226 ) are performed over the surface of the defect.
- a transmission electron microscope specimen along a sectional line 12 - 12 ′ of FIG. 11 is fabricated when an FIB microscope is utilized for creating a specimen (step 226 ).
- a defect analysis is performed (step 228 ) by utilizing a transmission electron microscope to observe the defect 262 of the word line 260 for producing the result as shown in FIG. 12 .
- the specimen has been cut accurately and the defect 262 has remained undamaged due to the protection of the micro-protection 264 .
- a reference mark is created in proximity to the defect and a layer removing process is performed for exposing the layer where the defect is situated.
- a layer removing process can be performed before the reference mark is created on the same layer as the defect and finally, a non-destructive micro-protection is then formed on top of the defect.
- the location of the defect can be accurately confirmed and by utilizing the partial coverage of the micro-protection, the defect can be well protected from any damage caused by the focused ion beam.
- problems caused during observations or the electron charging can also be greatly reduced. Consequently, when the present method is applied to an actual production line, various specimens containing defects can be created successfully and information regarding each defect can be easily extracted.
- different analyses can be applied to a same defect, thereby increasing the accuracy of determining the cause of the defect and reducing the amount of determination time.
- the present invention provides a defect analysis method by creating at least a reference mark in proximity to the defect, performing a layer removing process for exposing the layer where the defect is located or performing the layer removing process before the reference mark is created, and forming a non-destructive micro-protection on the defect.
- the reference mark can be created after the formation of the non-destructive micro-protection when the size of the defect is greater than a critical size (the critical size will be based on the specification of the product, the experience level, and the limit of the fabrication process).
- the method is not only able to confirm the location of the defect by utilizing the FIB microscope to search the reference mark in proximity to the defect, but is also able to utilize the partial coverage of the micro-protection to protect the defect from any damage when the focused ion beam is continuously fired on the substrate. Since the micro-protection only partially covers the defect, problems such as the electron charging can be effectively prevented. Additionally, a scanning electron microscope can be utilized to observe the top-view structure of the defect, and after the transmission electron microscope specimen of the defect is fabricated by the FIB microscope, a transmission electron microscope can be utilized to analyze the cross-sectional structure of the defect while performing the defect analysis. By utilizing this method, the same defect can be analyzed simultaneously by both top-view analysis and cross-sectional analysis without additional sampling, thereby increasing the accuracy of determining the root cause of the defect and at the same time reducing the amount of analytical time and sampling risk.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Pathology (AREA)
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- 1. Field of the Invention
- The present invention relates to a defect analysis method, and more particularly, to a defect analysis method of utilizing at least one nondestructive micro-protection for semiconductor dies or other substrates.
- 2. Description of the Prior Art
- In the semiconductor fabricating process, some small particles and defects are unavoidable. As the size of devices shrinks and the integration of circuits increases gradually, those small particles or defects affect the property of the integrated circuits more seriously. In order to improve the reliability of semiconductor devices, a plurality of tests and monitors is performed continuously to find the root cause of the defects or particles. Then, process parameters can be tuned correspondingly to reduce a presence of defects or particles so as to improve the yield and reliability of the semiconductor fabricating process.
- In recent years, the development and usage of focused ion beam (FIB) microscopes have become increasingly popular. By utilizing an ion beam as the emitting source, the FIB microscope is able to perform various analyses or circuit edits on different materials. The structure of a standard FIB microscope is nevertheless complex, including components such as liquid metal ion source (LMIS), electro-lens, scanning electrodes, secondary particle detector, specimen base capable of axial movements, vacuum system, and anti-vibration and anti-magnetic field devices. In general, when an electric field is applied to a liquid metal ion source such as liquid gallium (Ga), the liquid gallium is transformed into a shape with a tiny pointy tip, and by utilizing a negative electric field, the gallium ion can be extracted from the pointy tip.
- After being focused by the electro-lens and a series of aperture size alterations, the size of the ion source is confirmed, and after passing the ion beam to the surface of the specimen via a second focusing, the ion beam is able to perform operations including incision and drilling. Having numerous advantages including a low melting point, a low vaporizing pressure, and strong anti-oxidizing capability, gallium has been a popular liquid metal ion source in various commercial systems. Moreover, due to the development of FIB microscopes, semiconductor industries are able to fabricate precise scanning electron microscope (SEM) cross-sectional specimens or transmission electron microscope (TEM) cross-sectional specimens to perform micro-area analyses.
- In addition to the fabrication of cross-section specimens provided by transmission electron microscopes, the FIB microscopes provide an alternative specimen fabrication tool for the users, in that the FIB microscopes are capable of achieving a success rate of greater than 90% within a working hour between 2-6 hours, and by utilizing the specimens fabricated by the FIB microscopes, the transmission electron microscopes are able to obtain satisfactory resolution and contrast results. However, when the ions collide with the specimens, phenomena such as gasification and ionization will occur on the surface of the specimen, neutral atoms, ions, and electrons will be produced, and a small quantity of the ions will be implanted into the specimen. The implanted ions are all destructive in nature and when these focused ion beams are utilized to fabricate cross-sectional specimens from a defect located on the surface of a wafer, the defect or the surface of the wafer will be damaged. In mild cases, an amorphous layer containing the ion source element (gallium in general) will form over the surface of the specimen, whereas in severe cases, precipitate containing the ion source element will be generated. At any rate, either case will damage the specimen and influence the result of the observation. When the defect is not located on the surface layer of the specimen, a layer disposed on the defect will be first removed to expose the defect. Next, a scanning electron microscope or an optical microscope is used to perform a top-view observation on the defect and a focused ion beam is used to fabricate a cross-sectional specimen. In either condition, the chance of damaging the defect remains the same.
- Recently, a new type of FIB microscope referred to as the dual beam system has been introduced. Capable of providing two particle beams (ion beam plus electron beam) simultaneously, the electron beam of the dual beam system can be utilized to form a platinum (Pt) protective layer over the surface of the defect. Despite having several advantages, the dual beam system still remains unpopular as a result of an overly high cost and other problems caused during fabrication of cross-section specimens. Please refer to
FIG. 1 .FIG. 1 is a perspective diagram showing the method of fabricating aTEM cross-section specimen 10 by using a FIB microscope of a dual beam system according to the prior art. (As shown inFIG. 1 , theTEM cross-section specimen 10 comprises a plurality oftrenches 12 thereon and when thetrenches 12 are not filled with stuffing materials, the platinum layer formed by evaporation process will not only cover adefect 14, but also will fill the trenches 12 (both not shown in the figure). Since the high atomic number and electron scattering of the platinum layer is much stronger, the electrons are not likely to penetrate the layer and black areas will be produced as a result of contrast difference, thereby blocking thedefect 14 and increasing the difficulty of observation. - Additionally, a conventional method of utilizing transparent resin or glue to cover the specimen entirely has also been introduced. Despite the fact that this method is effective for increasing the contrast between the protective layer and the surface layer structure, it is unfortunately ineffective for searching and confirming the exact location of the defect by utilizing the FIB microscope. Because the electrical conductivity of the protective layer produced by the method is poor, thereby resulting in electron charging. As the electron charging occurs, the precise location of the defect will be difficult to determine.
- Hence it remains a challenge to provide a default analysis method that is not only able to provide a protective layer for the defect while the focused ion beam is utilized for fabricating a specimen, but that can also accurately determine the location of the defect and perform necessary observations by preventing the blocking of the defect and the electron charging.
- It is therefore an objective of the present invention to provide a method of defect analysis by applying a nondestructive micro-protection for solving the above-mentioned problems.
- According to the present invention, a method of defect analysis by applying at least one micro-protection comprises: providing a substrate, in which the substrate includes at least a defect thereon; forming a micro-protection on the surface of the defect; confirming the site of the defect; and utilizing a focused ion beam (FIB) microscope for forming a specimen of the defect.
- In contrast to the conventional method, the present invention provides a defect analysis method by creating at least a reference mark in proximity to the defect, performing a layer removing process for exposing the layer where the defect is located or performing the layer removing process before the reference mark is created, and forming a non-destructive micro-protection on the defect. Alternatively, the reference mark can be created after the formation of the non-destructive micro-protection. Hence, the method is not only able to confirm the location of the defect by utilizing the FIB microscope to search the reference mark in proximity to the defect, but also to utilize the partial coverage of the micro-protection to protect the defect from any damage when the focused ion beam continuously scans the substrate. Since the micro-protection only partially covers the defect, problems such electron charging can be effectively prevented. Additionally, a scanning electron microscope can be utilized to observe the top-view structure of the defect, and after the transmission electron microscope specimen of the defect is fabricated by the FIB microscope, a transmission electron microscope can be utilized to analyze the cross-sectional structure of the defect while performing the defect analysis. By utilizing this method, the same defect can be analyzed simultaneously by both top-view analysis and cross-sectional analysis without additional sampling, thereby increasing the accuracy of determining the root cause of the defect and reducing the amount of analytical time and sampling risk.
- These and other objectives of the present invention will no doubt become obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment that is illustrated in the various figures and drawings.
-
FIG. 1 is a perspective diagram showing the method of fabricating a transmission electron microscope cross-section specimen by using a focused ion beam microscope of a dual beam system according to the prior art. -
FIG. 2 throughFIG. 6 are perspective diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection according to the present invention. -
FIG. 7 throughFIG. 8 are flowchart diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection according to the present invention. -
FIG. 9 is a perspective diagram showing the top-view of the defect of the contact hole observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention. -
FIG. 10 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of the defect of the contact hole observed by a transmission electron microscope along line 10-10′ ofFIG. 9 according to the present invention. -
FIG. 11 is a perspective diagram showing the top-view of a word line defect observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention. -
FIG. 12 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of the word line defect observed by a transmission electron microscope along line 12-12′ ofFIG. 11 according to the present invention. - Please refer to
FIG. 2 throughFIG. 8 .FIG. 2 throughFIG. 6 are perspective diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection according to the present invention, andFIG. 7 throughFIG. 8 are flowchart diagrams showing the defect analysis by applying the micro-protection. As shown inFIG. 2 andFIG. 7 , asubstrate 100 is first provided according tostep 202, in which thesubstrate 100 can be a wafer or a glass substrate. Thesubstrate 100 includes adefect 102 thereon, in which thedefect 102 can be a surface defect or a bottom layer defect. Next, whether the defect is a surface defect is determined according tostep 204. If thedefect 102 is a surface defect (as shown inFIG. 2 ), an observation is performed to observe thesubstrate 100 by utilizing a microscope, and at least areference mark 104 is created (step 206) in proximity to thedefect 102. The reference mark can be a feature of a surface structure or a laser mark, and the microscope can be an optical microscope or a scanning electron microscope. - Alternatively, the
defect 102 can also be a bottom layer defect, such as thedefect 102 shown inFIG. 3 . When thedefect 102 is a bottom layer defect, as shown inFIG. 3 andFIG. 7 , a layer removing process (step 208) is performed to remove the material layer formed on thesubstrate 100 layer after layer, in which the layer removing process can be carried out physically (via plasma etching) or chemically (via solution reactions). When the layers are being removed, an optical microscope or a scanning electron microscope is utilized to observe the surface of thesubstrate 100 to ensure that the defect is not damaged and at least areference mark 104 is created in proximity to the defect according tostep 212. Next, another layer removing process is performed to expose the layer containing the defect, according tostep 214. Similarly, thereference mark 104 includes a feature located on a bottom layer structure, a focused ion beam mark, or a laser mark. Since the depth of thereference mark 104 fabricated by the laser or focused ion beam is usually much deeper, thereference mark 104 has to be created before the layers are removed, thereby preventing damage to thedefect 102 and ensuring that thereference mark 104 is clearly visible. - When the
defect 102 is a bottom layer defect, sometimes the location of the defect can be determined by partially removing the layer on top of the defect. After the location of the defect is confirmed, reference marks can then be created according tostep 212. Under different situations, the layer on top of the defect may have to be removed completely to determine the location of the defect before creating any reference mark (step 216). Since the defect is already exposed, thereference mark 104 is usually created by utilizing a specific feature on the layer structure or by a laser under an optical microscope to prevent damage to thedefect 102. - Next, at least a micro-protection is formed on the surface of the defect according to
step 218. As shown inFIG. 4 andFIG. 7 , the method of fabricating a micro-protection 106 first includes placing a small quantity oftransparent material 114 on the surface of thedefect 102 by utilizing aprobe 112, which is controlled by amicromanipulator 108 under anoptical microscope 105. Next, a solidifying process (step 222) is performed to solidify thetransparent material 114 for forming a micro-protection 106 on the surface of thedefect 102, as shown inFIG. 5 andFIG. 8 . Preferably, thetransparent material 114 is comprised of transparent resin or glue, and the solidifying process can be heating or at room temperature. - As shown in
FIG. 8 , a focused ion beam microscope is then utilized to find any other unexposed reference marks around the defect (step 224). In order to search for the unexposed reference marks, thesubstrate 100 is placed under a focused ion beam microscope to locate anyvisible reference mark 104 and the reference marks 104 are then used to determine the location of thedefect 102. By covering thedefect 102 partially, themicro-protection 106 is able to serve as a protective layer to thedefect 102 for preventing damage and electron charging when the focused ion beam continuously scans thesubstrate 100. Furthermore, transparent materials are usually organic compounds and composed of low atomic number elements (ex. C, H, and O). Since the electron scattering of low atomic number elements is weak, the electrons can easily pass through them without scattering. The transparent materials will not block the defect when using TEM to observe. Preferably, themicro-protection 106 is comprised of non-destructive materials including transparent resin or glue. - Next, a specimen is fabricated by using the focused ion beam microscope (step 226), as shown in
FIG. 6 andFIG. 8 . According to step 226, aspecimen 116 of thedefect 102 is produced by utilizing the focused ion beam of the FIB microscope to cut a cross-section from thesubstrate 100, in which thespecimen 116 can be a scanning electron microscope specimen or further cut to a transmission electron microscope specimen. Similarly, by covering thedefect 102 partially, themicro-protection 106 is able to serve as a protective layer to thedefect 102 for preventing damage and electron charging when the focused ion beam is utilized for cutting thesubstrate 100. Next, a defect analysis (step 228) is performed to examine thespecimen 116 fabricated fromstep 226 by inserting thespecimen 116 into a scanning electron microscope. Preferably, the scanning electron microscope can be utilized for examining the cross-sectional structure of thedefect 102 or the structure of the defect at an angle (one of the functions of the scanning electron microscope being to tilt a specimen at an observable angle). - Additionally, a scanning electron microscope can be utilized selectively for observing the top-view structure of the
defect 102 afterstep step 218. Next, a transmission electron microscope specimen can be produced when a specimen of the defect is fabricated by the FIB microscope (step 226), and a transmission electron microscope can be utilized to perform the defect analysis (step 228) for analyzing the cross-sectional structure of thedefect 102. Since themicro-protection 106 is not yet fabricated when the top-view structure of thedefect 102 is observed by the scanning electron microscope, problems such as electron charging are not likely to occur and at the same time, thesame specimen 116 can be utilized for both top-view analysis and cross-sectional analysis without using additional specimens. In other words, the present invention is able to observe the defect on thespecimen 116 by utilizing both the top-view analysis and the cross-sectional analysis, thereby acquiring much more information regarding to the defect, increasing the accuracy for determining the cause of the defect, and reducing the risk of sampling error. By utilizing the same specimen for both analyses instead of utilizing one specimen for the top-view analysis and another specimen for the cross-sectional analysis, the present invention is able to provide better results when the defect cause of each specimen is different. - Please refer to
FIG. 9 andFIG. 10 .FIG. 9 is a perspective diagram showing the top view of adefect 232 of thecontact hole 230 observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention whereasFIG. 10 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of thedefect 232 of thecontact hole 230 observed by a transmission electron microscope along line 10-10′ ofFIG. 9 . As shown inFIG. 9 , thedefect 232 is included within the central contact hole 230 (please refer to the normal contact hole on the right). After the top-view structure information regarding to thedefect 232 is collected by the scanning electron microscope, steps including formation of at least one micro-protection (step 218), solidifying process (step 222), and utilizing an FIB microscope to search for uncovered reference marks in proximity to the defect for determining the site of the defect (step 226) are performed over the surface of the defect. Next, a transmission electron microscope specimen along a sectional line 10-10′ ofFIG. 9 is fabricated when an FIB microscope is utilized for creating a specimen (step 226). After the transmission electron microscope specimen is obtained, a defect analysis is performed (step 228) by utilizing a transmission electron microscope to observe thedefect 232 of thecontact hole 230 for producing the result as shown inFIG. 10 . As shown inFIG. 10 , the specimen has been cut accurately and thedefect 232 has remained undamaged due to the protection of themicro-protection 234. - Please refer to
FIG. 11 andFIG. 12 .FIG. 11 is a perspective diagram showing the top-view structure of thedefect 262 of aword line 260 observed by a scanning electron microscope according to the present invention whereasFIG. 12 is a perspective diagram showing the cross-section of thedefect 262 of theword line 260 observed by a transmission electron microscope along a sectional line 12-12′ ofFIG. 11 . As shown inFIG. 11 , thedefect 262 is included on the word line 260 (please refer to other normal word lines). After the top-view structure information regarding to thedefect 262 is collected by the scanning electron microscope, steps including formation of at least one micro-protection (step 218), a solidification process (step 222), and utilizing an FIB microscope to search for uncovered reference marks in proximity to the defect for determining the site of the defect (step 226) are performed over the surface of the defect. Next, a transmission electron microscope specimen along a sectional line 12-12′ ofFIG. 11 is fabricated when an FIB microscope is utilized for creating a specimen (step 226). After the transmission electron microscope specimen is obtained, a defect analysis is performed (step 228) by utilizing a transmission electron microscope to observe thedefect 262 of theword line 260 for producing the result as shown inFIG. 12 . As shown inFIG. 12 , the specimen has been cut accurately and thedefect 262 has remained undamaged due to the protection of themicro-protection 264. - According to the method disclosed by the present invention, at least a reference mark is created in proximity to the defect and a layer removing process is performed for exposing the layer where the defect is situated. Alternatively, a layer removing process can be performed before the reference mark is created on the same layer as the defect and finally, a non-destructive micro-protection is then formed on top of the defect. Hence, the location of the defect can be accurately confirmed and by utilizing the partial coverage of the micro-protection, the defect can be well protected from any damage caused by the focused ion beam. At the same time, problems caused during observations or the electron charging can also be greatly reduced. Consequently, when the present method is applied to an actual production line, various specimens containing defects can be created successfully and information regarding each defect can be easily extracted. Moreover, different analyses can be applied to a same defect, thereby increasing the accuracy of determining the cause of the defect and reducing the amount of determination time.
- In contrast to the conventional method, the present invention provides a defect analysis method by creating at least a reference mark in proximity to the defect, performing a layer removing process for exposing the layer where the defect is located or performing the layer removing process before the reference mark is created, and forming a non-destructive micro-protection on the defect. Alternatively, the reference mark can be created after the formation of the non-destructive micro-protection when the size of the defect is greater than a critical size (the critical size will be based on the specification of the product, the experience level, and the limit of the fabrication process). By doing so, the method is not only able to confirm the location of the defect by utilizing the FIB microscope to search the reference mark in proximity to the defect, but is also able to utilize the partial coverage of the micro-protection to protect the defect from any damage when the focused ion beam is continuously fired on the substrate. Since the micro-protection only partially covers the defect, problems such as the electron charging can be effectively prevented. Additionally, a scanning electron microscope can be utilized to observe the top-view structure of the defect, and after the transmission electron microscope specimen of the defect is fabricated by the FIB microscope, a transmission electron microscope can be utilized to analyze the cross-sectional structure of the defect while performing the defect analysis. By utilizing this method, the same defect can be analyzed simultaneously by both top-view analysis and cross-sectional analysis without additional sampling, thereby increasing the accuracy of determining the root cause of the defect and at the same time reducing the amount of analytical time and sampling risk.
- Those skilled in the art will readily observe that numerous modifications and alterations of the device and method may be made while retaining the teachings of the invention. Accordingly, the above disclosure should be construed as limited only by the metes and bounds of the appended claims.
Claims (20)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
TW093140357A TWI255339B (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2004-12-23 | Method of applying micro-protection in defect analysis |
TW093140357 | 2004-12-23 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20060138323A1 true US20060138323A1 (en) | 2006-06-29 |
US7115865B2 US7115865B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 |
Family
ID=36610306
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/908,953 Active - Reinstated US7115865B2 (en) | 2004-12-23 | 2005-06-01 | Method of applying micro-protection in defect analysis |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7115865B2 (en) |
TW (1) | TWI255339B (en) |
Cited By (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060264005A1 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2006-11-23 | Takuya Naoe | Silicon substrate processing method for observing defects in semiconductor devices and defect-detecting method |
US20100052697A1 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2010-03-04 | Carl Zeiss Smt Inc. | Repairing defects |
US20110309245A1 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2011-12-22 | Yuichi Madokoro | Specimen preparation device, and control method in specimen preparation device |
US20130134308A1 (en) * | 2011-11-28 | 2013-05-30 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation | Sample observation apparatus and method of marking |
JP2019035650A (en) * | 2017-08-15 | 2019-03-07 | 一般財団法人電力中央研究所 | Specimen creation method |
US10329191B2 (en) * | 2015-04-21 | 2019-06-25 | Schott Ag | Glass roll, product having a glass roll, device and method for the manufacture thereof |
CN110416129A (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2019-11-05 | 上海华力微电子有限公司 | A kind of wafer defect labelling apparatus and wafer defect labeling method |
CN110504181A (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2019-11-26 | 上海华力集成电路制造有限公司 | The analysis method of orthogonal via chain test structure open failure |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
TWI236080B (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2005-07-11 | Powerchip Semiconductor Corp | An analysis method |
DE102016205941B4 (en) | 2016-04-08 | 2020-11-05 | Carl Zeiss Smt Gmbh | Apparatus and method for analyzing a defect in a photolithographic mask or a wafer |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6723650B1 (en) * | 2003-04-03 | 2004-04-20 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | TEM sample preparation using transparent defect protective coating |
-
2004
- 2004-12-23 TW TW093140357A patent/TWI255339B/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2005
- 2005-06-01 US US10/908,953 patent/US7115865B2/en active Active - Reinstated
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6723650B1 (en) * | 2003-04-03 | 2004-04-20 | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. | TEM sample preparation using transparent defect protective coating |
Cited By (12)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060264005A1 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2006-11-23 | Takuya Naoe | Silicon substrate processing method for observing defects in semiconductor devices and defect-detecting method |
US7682844B2 (en) * | 2005-05-11 | 2010-03-23 | Ricoh Company, Ltd. | Silicon substrate processing method for observing defects in semiconductor devices and defect-detecting method |
US20100052697A1 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2010-03-04 | Carl Zeiss Smt Inc. | Repairing defects |
US8334701B2 (en) * | 2008-08-29 | 2012-12-18 | Carl Zeiss Nts, Llc | Repairing defects |
US20110309245A1 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2011-12-22 | Yuichi Madokoro | Specimen preparation device, and control method in specimen preparation device |
US8710464B2 (en) * | 2009-03-30 | 2014-04-29 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation | Specimen preparation device, and control method in specimen preparation device |
US20130134308A1 (en) * | 2011-11-28 | 2013-05-30 | Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation | Sample observation apparatus and method of marking |
US10329191B2 (en) * | 2015-04-21 | 2019-06-25 | Schott Ag | Glass roll, product having a glass roll, device and method for the manufacture thereof |
JP2019035650A (en) * | 2017-08-15 | 2019-03-07 | 一般財団法人電力中央研究所 | Specimen creation method |
CN110416129A (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2019-11-05 | 上海华力微电子有限公司 | A kind of wafer defect labelling apparatus and wafer defect labeling method |
CN110416129B (en) * | 2019-07-31 | 2021-07-09 | 上海华力微电子有限公司 | Wafer defect marking device and wafer defect marking method |
CN110504181A (en) * | 2019-08-26 | 2019-11-26 | 上海华力集成电路制造有限公司 | The analysis method of orthogonal via chain test structure open failure |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US7115865B2 (en) | 2006-10-03 |
TW200622235A (en) | 2006-07-01 |
TWI255339B (en) | 2006-05-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7115865B2 (en) | Method of applying micro-protection in defect analysis | |
US6420722B2 (en) | Method for sample separation and lift-out with one cut | |
JP6598684B2 (en) | Reference mark design for tilt or glancing angle milling operations using charged particle beams | |
EP2904633B1 (en) | Multidimensional structural access | |
US10101246B2 (en) | Method of preparing a plan-view transmission electron microscope sample used in an integrated circuit analysis | |
JP4520926B2 (en) | Sample analysis method | |
JP2012073069A (en) | Preparation method of specimen for observing defective part of semiconductor device substrate | |
CN103808540A (en) | Transmission electron microscope sample preparation method | |
US6162735A (en) | In-situ method for preparing and highlighting of defects for failure analysis | |
US6884362B2 (en) | Mass production of cross-section TEM samples by focused ion beam deposition and anisotropic etching | |
CN1854714A (en) | Defect analyzing method by microarea coating | |
KR100889921B1 (en) | Method for Manufacturing Specimen for Analyzing by Transmission Electron Microscope | |
US6616784B2 (en) | Method for fabricating transmission electron microscope | |
US6826971B2 (en) | Fabrication method for sample to be analyzed | |
CN111679100A (en) | Nano probe testing method | |
CN106290544A (en) | A kind of SIMS analysis method | |
Bender et al. | Surface contamination and electrical damage by focused ion beam: conditions applicable to the extraction of TEM lamellae from nanoelectronic devices | |
CN112903736A (en) | Method for testing nanoprobe on sample slope | |
US20060031068A1 (en) | Analysis method | |
KR100655581B1 (en) | Device for Coating Specimen for Analyzing by Transmission Electron Microscope and Method for Coating it using the same | |
CN105699410B (en) | A kind of lossless localization method of GOI failpoints and GOI failure analysis methods | |
KR100620728B1 (en) | Method for Manufacturing Specimen for Analyzing by Transmission Electron Microscope | |
CN112146953B (en) | Test sample and preparation method thereof | |
CN108398302B (en) | Microstructure sample preparation method | |
KR100664855B1 (en) | Method for Preparing Samples for Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: POWERCHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., TAIWAN Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CHANG, CHING-PIN;SHIH, CHING-CHING;CHEN, TING-WEI;REEL/FRAME:016084/0480 Effective date: 20050216 |
|
REMI | Maintenance fee reminder mailed | ||
LAPS | Lapse for failure to pay maintenance fees | ||
REIN | Reinstatement after maintenance fee payment confirmed | ||
FP | Lapsed due to failure to pay maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20101003 |
|
FEPP | Fee payment procedure |
Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES GRANTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFG); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY Free format text: PETITION RELATED TO MAINTENANCE FEES FILED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: PMFP); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY |
|
PRDP | Patent reinstated due to the acceptance of a late maintenance fee |
Effective date: 20120403 |
|
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 4 |
|
STCF | Information on status: patent grant |
Free format text: PATENTED CASE |
|
SULP | Surcharge for late payment | ||
FPAY | Fee payment |
Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
MAFP | Maintenance fee payment |
Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553) Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: POWERCHIP TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, TAIWAN Free format text: CHANGE OF NAME;ASSIGNOR:POWERCHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP.;REEL/FRAME:049629/0267 Effective date: 20100809 |
|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: POWERCHIP SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CORPORATION, Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:POWERCHIP TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION;REEL/FRAME:049747/0017 Effective date: 20190628 |