US20060059900A1 - Exhaust gas purification system - Google Patents

Exhaust gas purification system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20060059900A1
US20060059900A1 US11/178,410 US17841005A US2006059900A1 US 20060059900 A1 US20060059900 A1 US 20060059900A1 US 17841005 A US17841005 A US 17841005A US 2006059900 A1 US2006059900 A1 US 2006059900A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
catalyst
exhaust gas
filter
upstream
downstream
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US11/178,410
Inventor
Koichiro Harada
Yoshinori Tsushio
Akihide Takami
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mazda Motor Corp
Original Assignee
Mazda Motor Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mazda Motor Corp filed Critical Mazda Motor Corp
Assigned to MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION reassignment MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HARADA, KOICHIRO, TAKAMI, AKIHIDE, TSUSHIO, YOSHINORI
Publication of US20060059900A1 publication Critical patent/US20060059900A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/92Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
    • B01D53/94Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
    • B01D53/9445Simultaneously removing carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons or nitrogen oxides making use of three-way catalysts [TWC] or four-way-catalysts [FWC]
    • B01D53/9454Simultaneously removing carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons or nitrogen oxides making use of three-way catalysts [TWC] or four-way-catalysts [FWC] characterised by a specific device
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/92Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
    • B01D53/94Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
    • B01D53/9404Removing only nitrogen compounds
    • B01D53/9409Nitrogen oxides
    • B01D53/9413Processes characterised by a specific catalyst
    • B01D53/9422Processes characterised by a specific catalyst for removing nitrogen oxides by NOx storage or reduction by cyclic switching between lean and rich exhaust gases (LNT, NSC, NSR)
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J23/00Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00
    • B01J23/38Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of noble metals
    • B01J23/54Catalysts comprising metals or metal oxides or hydroxides, not provided for in group B01J21/00 of noble metals combined with metals, oxides or hydroxides provided for in groups B01J23/02 - B01J23/36
    • B01J23/56Platinum group metals
    • B01J23/63Platinum group metals with rare earths or actinides
    • B01J35/19
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/0215Coating
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/024Multiple impregnation or coating
    • B01J37/0242Coating followed by impregnation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J37/00Processes, in general, for preparing catalysts; Processes, in general, for activation of catalysts
    • B01J37/02Impregnation, coating or precipitation
    • B01J37/024Multiple impregnation or coating
    • B01J37/0246Coatings comprising a zeolite
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2251/00Reactants
    • B01D2251/20Reductants
    • B01D2251/208Hydrocarbons
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/10Noble metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/102Platinum group metals
    • B01D2255/1021Platinum
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/204Alkaline earth metals
    • B01D2255/2042Barium
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/20Metals or compounds thereof
    • B01D2255/206Rare earth metals
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/40Mixed oxides
    • B01D2255/407Zr-Ce mixed oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/50Zeolites
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/90Physical characteristics of catalysts
    • B01D2255/908O2-storage component incorporated in the catalyst
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/90Physical characteristics of catalysts
    • B01D2255/91NOx-storage component incorporated in the catalyst
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/90Physical characteristics of catalysts
    • B01D2255/912HC-storage component incorporated in the catalyst
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D2255/00Catalysts
    • B01D2255/90Physical characteristics of catalysts
    • B01D2255/915Catalyst supported on particulate filters
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/92Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases
    • B01D53/94Chemical or biological purification of waste gases of engine exhaust gases by catalytic processes
    • B01D53/9459Removing one or more of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, or hydrocarbons by multiple successive catalytic functions; systems with more than one different function, e.g. zone coated catalysts
    • B01D53/9477Removing one or more of nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, or hydrocarbons by multiple successive catalytic functions; systems with more than one different function, e.g. zone coated catalysts with catalysts positioned on separate bricks, e.g. exhaust systems
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02TCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
    • Y02T10/00Road transport of goods or passengers
    • Y02T10/10Internal combustion engine [ICE] based vehicles
    • Y02T10/12Improving ICE efficiencies

Definitions

  • This invention relates to an exhaust gas purification system for a diesel engine.
  • Exhaust gas purification systems for diesel engines are generally known in which a filter for trapping particulates in exhaust gas is disposed in an exhaust passage and an oxidation catalyst is disposed upstream of the filter in the exhaust passage.
  • These exhaust gas purification systems use reaction heat in the oxidation catalyst to raise the temperature of the filter up to a temperature at which particulates ignite and burn in order to regenerate the filter.
  • the regeneration of the filter is implemented, for example, by increasing the amount of hydrocarbons (HC) in exhaust gas by the control of fuel injection of the engine (post-injection carried out during the expansion stroke or exhaust stroke after the main injection at or about top dead center of the compression stroke), burning HC in the oxidation catalyst to produce reaction heat and using the produced reaction heat to heat the filter downstream of the oxidation catalyst.
  • HC hydrocarbons
  • Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-162611 discloses a technique in which a plurality of honeycomb monolith supports are employed for a plurality of oxidation catalysts having different numbers of cells per unit area of the supports, respectively, and the plurality of oxidation catalysts are placed in series in the direction of flow of exhaust gas such that the number of cells is increased from upstream to downstream in the direction of flow of exhaust gas.
  • This technique aims at solving a problem that when the fuel injection timing of the engine is retarded to raise the exhaust gas temperature, the engine fuel flammability is deteriorated to produce a large amount of soot and the produced soot is deposited on the oxidation catalysts.
  • the upstream oxidation catalyst has a low cell density to allow exhaust gas to pass at high flow rates so that soot is hard to deposit thereon.
  • the downstream oxidation catalyst has a high cell density to allow exhaust gas to pass at low flow rates so that soot is easy to deposit thereon. Since, however, the flow rate of exhaust gas in the downstream oxidation catalyst is low, increase in HC in the exhaust gas produces a large amount of oxidation reaction heat of HC so that the downstream catalyst becomes likely to reach the necessary temperature for burning off soot. In this manner, the downstream catalyst can effectively work as an oxidation catalyst while preventing the deposition of soot.
  • the cell density of the oxidation catalyst is low as described above, the deposition of soot on the oxidation catalyst is reduced but the amount of HC flowing through the oxidation catalyst into the filter is increased. Since in this case HC flows into the filter without being burned off by the oxidation catalyst, this means the amount of heat of HC combustion supplied from the catalyst to the filter is small, which is disadvantageous in the ignition of particulates deposited on the filter. In turn, this means that the amount of fuel supplied to the oxidation catalyst for the purpose of filter regeneration (i.e., the amount of post-injected fuel) is increased, leading to decreased fuel economy.
  • An object of the present invention is to allow the catalyst upstream of the filter to effectively work for the heating of the filter, i.e., for the burning-off of particulates, based on a different viewpoint from the cell density and thus solve the problem of HC slipping through the catalyst and in turn the problem of decrease in fuel economy.
  • the present invention focused on that the ability of the oxidation catalyst to burn off HC depends on the amount of support material (active alumina and oxygen storage component) on which catalytic metal is supported. Based on this finding, the distribution of support material in the catalyst is adjusted such that exhaust gas flowing into the filter has a high temperature to facilitate the burning-off of particulates.
  • the present invention is directed to an exhaust gas purification system for a diesel engine in which a filter for trapping particulates in exhaust gas from the engine is disposed in an exhaust passage of the engine and a catalyst for oxidizing HC in exhaust gas is disposed upstream of the filter in the exhaust passage.
  • the catalyst comprises a catalytic layer which is formed on the wall surfaces of each cell of a honeycomb support and contains catalytic metal, active alumina and an oxygen storage component both serving as a support material which supports the catalytic metal, and part of the catalyst downstream in the direction of flow of the exhaust gas is larger than part of the catalyst upstream in the direction of flow of the exhaust gas in terms of the amount of the support material per unit area of the wall surfaces of the cells of the honeycomb support.
  • the exhaust gas temperature at the filter entrance is increased as compared to the case where the support material is distributed uniformly over the entire length of the catalyst along the direction of flow of exhaust gas. The reason can be explained as follows.
  • the catalytic activity goes high and in turn the oxidation reactions of HC go up.
  • the exhaust gas is heated by the heat of the oxidation reactions to raise its temperature, so that the exhaust gas temperature at the filter entrance becomes higher than that at the catalyst entrance.
  • upstream part of the catalyst since upstream part of the catalyst has a small amount of support material, it has a small heat capacity and therefore is likely to raise its temperature, which is advantageous to early activation.
  • exhaust gas is promptly raised in temperature by heat of HC combustion at the upstream part of the catalyst.
  • the downstream part rapidly activates the oxidation reactions of HC because of a large amount of support material. Therefore, the rate of increase in exhaust gas temperature rapidly goes up as compared to the above case where the support material is distributed uniformly. Specifically, active oxygen is released from the oxygen storage component which is a support material contained in the catalyst.
  • Heat of combustion is produced in the process of the released active oxygen oxidizing CO in exhaust gas to CO 2 .
  • the oxidation of HC in exhaust gas by the action of the catalytic metal is activated to produce a large amount of heat of HC combustion.
  • downstream part of the catalyst has a larger amount of support material than upstream part thereof, the temperature of exhaust gas flowing into the filter can be raised without the above problem that HC slips through the catalyst.
  • a decrease in the temperature of exhaust gas flowing into the filter can be lessened.
  • the exhaust gas purification system of the present invention is advantageous in quickly regenerating the filter while preventing an increase in fuel consumption.
  • the catalyst may be formed as an integral piece of the upstream part and the downstream part (in which a single catalyst includes the upstream part and downstream part so that the upstream and downstream parts of a single monolith support have different amounts of support material per unit area of the honeycomb support) or may be formed of two separate pieces consisting of upstream and downstream catalysts using separate supports, respectively. Further, the catalyst may consist of three or more parts having different amounts of support material per unit area of the honeycomb support so that the amount of support material increases in proceeding from upstream to downstream. Furthermore, the catalytic metal may be distributed so that downstream part of the catalyst has a larger amount of catalytic metal than upstream part thereof.
  • the catalyst may be an oxidation catalyst for exerting a catalytic action on oxidation reactions of HC or may be a lean-NOx catalyst of a NOx direct decomposition type or of a NOx storage-reduction type.
  • the NOx direct decomposition catalyst removes NOx in exhaust gas by reducing NOx using HC as a reductant under oxygen-rich (fuel-lean) conditions.
  • the NOx storage-reduction catalyst stores NOx in exhaust gas under oxygen-rich conditions and reduces the stored NOx under fuel-rich conditions where the oxygen concentration in exhaust gas goes down.
  • the oxidation catalyst is preferably a catalyst obtained by supporting a catalytic material containing alumina, an oxygen storage component, an HC adsorbent and precious metal as catalytic metal on a support, such as a honeycomb monolith support.
  • the lean-NOx catalyst is preferably a NOx storage-reduction catalyst obtained by supporting a catalytic material containing alumina, an oxygen storage component, a NOx storage component and catalytic metal on a support, such as a honeycomb monolith support.
  • the oxygen storage component may be ceria (CeO 2 ) or a mixed oxide containing cerium (Ce) and another one or more metals including zirconium (Zr), praseodymium (Pr) and neodymium (Nd).
  • the HC adsorbent is preferably zeolite, more preferably ⁇ -zeolite.
  • the precious metal may be platinum (Pt), rhodium (Rh), palladium (Pd) or iridium (Ir).
  • Preferable NOx storage components include alkaline earth metals, such as barium (Ba), and alkaline metals, such as lithium (Li), potassium (K) or sodium (Na).
  • the oxidation catalyst for oxidizing HC in exhaust gas which is disposed upstream of the particulate filter in an exhaust passage, has a structure that part of the catalyst downstream in the direction of flow of exhaust gas has a larger amount of support material than upstream part thereof. Therefore, the exhaust gas temperature at the filter entrance can be increased as compared to the case where the support material is distributed uniformly over the entire length of the catalyst along the direction of flow of exhaust gas. This is advantageous in quickly regenerating the filter while preventing an increase in fuel consumption.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view for illustrating an exhaust gas purification system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exhaust gas purification system 1 for a diesel engine according to the embodiment of the present invention.
  • reference numeral 2 denotes a catalytic converter incorporated in an exhaust passage from the engine.
  • the converter 2 includes a catalyst placed in its upstream side in the direction of flow of exhaust gas to remove HC in the exhaust gas by oxidation, and a filter 5 placed downstream of the catalyst to trap particulates in the exhaust gas.
  • the catalyst for removing HC in the exhaust gas is divided into an upstream catalyst 3 placed toward the upstream end of the converter 2 and a downstream catalyst 4 placed downstream of the upstream catalyst 3 . Therefore, the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 and the filter 5 are arranged in series in the direction of flow of exhaust gas.
  • Each of the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 is made by supporting a catalytic material on the wall surfaces of each cell in a honeycomb monolith support made of ceramic or metal.
  • the downstream catalyst 4 has a larger amount of catalytic material supported thereon, i.e., amount of support material, than the upstream catalyst 3 .
  • the filter 5 is a honeycomb-shaped filter made of ceramic or metal in which exhaust gas inflow cells closed at their downstream ends and exhaust gas outflow cells closed at their upstream ends are alternately arranged. Each pair of adjacent exhaust gas inflow and outflow cells are separated by a thin partition. Exhaust gas having flew into one of the exhaust gas inflow cells flows out through micro pores in the surrounding partitions into the adjacent exhaust gas outflow cells. Particulates in the exhaust gas adheres to the wall surfaces of the exhaust gas passages (including the exhaust gas inflow cells, the exhaust gas outflow cells and micro pores). Each of the wall surfaces of the exhaust gas passages is formed with a catalytic layer for promoting burning-off of particulates during regeneration of the filter 5 .
  • the filter 5 Under engine operating conditions in which the temperature of exhaust gas from the engine is high, the filter 5 is likely to be heated up to the regeneration temperature which allows burning-off of particulates by oxidation reaction heat of HC in the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 . In this case, the filter 5 can be continuously regenerated. NO in exhaust gas is oxidized into NO 2 by the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 and the produced NO 2 is supplied to the filter 5 . Therefore, the produced NO 2 effectively acts as an oxidant for particulates during the filter regeneration.
  • Forced regeneration of the filter 5 is implemented by controlling the fuel injection of the engine to inject fuel into an engine cylinder during the expansion stroke or exhaust stroke after the main injection at or about top dead center of the compression stroke, i.e., carry out “post injection”.
  • a large amount of unburned fuel i.e., HC
  • the catalysts 3 and 4 are heated to reach their active temperatures.
  • Both the upstream catalyst 3 and the downstream catalyst 4 are oxidation catalysts.
  • the catalytic material is made of active alumina, CeO 2 serving as an oxygen storage component, ⁇ -zeolite serving as an HC adsorbent and platinum (Pt) serving as a catalytic metal.
  • Each catalyst was made by mixing active alumina, CeO 2 and ⁇ -zeolite in a mass ratio of 1:1:1 to prepare a support material and supporting Pt on the support material.
  • a support for each of the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 was used a cordierite honeycomb support having 400 cells per square inch (approximately 6.54 cm 2 ), 4 mil (approximately 0.1 mm) inter-cell wall thickness and 12.5 cm 3 volume.
  • the support material obtained by mixing active alumina, CeO 2 and ⁇ -zeolite in a mass ratio of 1:1:1 was supported by 60 g/L on the honeycomb support.
  • the same support material was supported by 180 g/L on the honeycomb support. Therefore, the downstream catalyst 4 contains a larger amount of support material per unit area of wall surfaces of each cell in the honeycomb support than the upstream catalyst 3 .
  • Pt was supported on the support material by impregnation such that the amount of Pt supported was 2 g/L.
  • g/L denotes the amount of substance supported per unit volume L of the support.
  • Example 2 The same support material as in Example 1 was supported by 120 g/L uniformly on the entire cordierite honeycomb support having 400 cells per square inch (approximately 6.54 cm 2 ), 4 mil (approximately 0.1 mm) inter-cell wall thickness and 25 cm 3 volume and Pt was supported on the support material, thereby obtaining a catalyst (oxidation catalyst) of Comparative example 1.
  • the amount of Pt supported in this catalyst is 2 g/L.
  • the total amount of active alumina, oxygen storage component (CeO 2 ), HC adsorbent ( ⁇ -zeolite) and catalytic metal (Pt) in the catalyst of Comparative example 1 is equal to the total amount thereof in the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 of Example 1.
  • Both the upstream catalyst 3 and the downstream catalyst 4 are lean-NOx catalysts.
  • the catalytic material is made of active alumina, CeO 2 , barium (Ba) serving as a NOx storage component and platinum (Pt) serving as a catalytic metal.
  • Each catalyst was made by mixing active alumina and CeO 2 in a mass ratio of 1:1 to prepare a support material and supporting Pt and Ba on the support material.
  • a support for each of the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 was used a cordierite honeycomb support of the same type as in Example 1.
  • the support material obtained by mixing active alumina and CeO 2 in a mass ratio of 1:1 was supported by 60 g/L on the honeycomb support.
  • the same support material was supported by 180 g/L on the honeycomb support. Therefore, the downstream catalyst 4 contains a larger amount of support material per unit area of wall surfaces of each cell in the honeycomb support than the upstream catalyst 3 .
  • Pt and Ba were supported on the support material by impregnation such that the amounts of Pt and Ba supported were 2 g/L and 20 g/L, respectively.
  • Example 2 The same support material as in Example 2 was supported by 120 g/L uniformly on the entire cordierite honeycomb support of the same type as in Comparative example 1 and Pt and Ba were supported on the support material, thereby obtaining a catalyst (lean-NOx catalyst) of Comparative example 2.
  • the amounts of Pt and Ba supported in this catalyst are 2 g/L and 20 g/L, respectively.
  • the total amount of active alumina, oxygen storage component (CeO 2 ), catalytic metal (Pt) and NOx storage component (Ba) in the catalyst of Comparative example 2 is equal to the total amount thereof in the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 of Example 2.
  • Each of the catalysts 3 and 4 in Example 1 was aged, and the aged catalysts 3 and 4 and a filter 5 were then attached to a model gas flow reactor in a layout of a catalytic converter 2 shown in FIG. 1 .
  • the catalytic converter 2 was allowed to pass a model gas and concurrently gradually increased in gas temperature at the entrance of the upstream catalyst 3 from normal temperature and then measured in terms of the gas temperature at the entrance of the filter 5 and the HC slip rate.
  • the HC slip rate is the rate of HC having slipped through the catalysts 3 and 4 without being oxidized by the catalysts to the total flow of HC.
  • the aging was implemented by keeping the catalysts at 800° C. in a normal atmosphere for 6 hours.
  • the space velocity SV was 100000 h ⁇ 1 , and the rate of temperature rise was 30° C./min.
  • Example 2 Each of the catalysts of Example 2 and Comparative examples 1 and 2 was also aged in the same manner as in Example 1, and a catalytic converter consisting of the aged catalysts and a filter was then measured in terms of the gas temperature at the entrance of the filter and the HC slip rate with a model gas flow reactor using a model gas.
  • the measurement results are shown in Table 1.
  • TABLE 1 Catalyst Catalyst entrance HC slip Filter entrance type gas temperature rate gas temperature
  • Example 1 Oxidation 300° C. 24% 333° C. 325° C. 2% 364° C. 350° C. 1.5% 386° C. Comparative Oxidation 300° C. 68% 284° C. ex. 1 325° C. 13% 342° C. 350° C.
  • Example 1 A comparison between Example 1 and Comparative example 1 each using an oxidation catalyst shows that at the same catalyst entrance gas temperature, Example 1 exhibits a lower HC slip rate and a higher filter entrance gas temperature than Comparative example 1.
  • Comparative example 1 At a low catalyst entrance gas temperature (300° C.), Comparative example 1 exhibits a filter entrance gas temperature lower than the catalyst entrance gas temperature while Example 1 exhibits a filter entrance gas temperature 30° C. higher than the catalyst entrance gas temperature.
  • a comparison between Example 2 and Comparative example 2 each using a lean-NOx catalyst shows that at the same catalyst entrance gas temperature, Example 2 exhibits a lower HC slip rate than Comparative example 2, and that at the same high catalyst entrance gas temperatures, Example 2 exhibits a higher filter entrance gas temperature than Comparative example 2.
  • the HC slip rate can be reduced to increase the filter entrance gas temperature, as compared to if the same support material is supported uniformly all over a single honeycomb support as in Comparative examples 1 and 2, even though both the cases do not differ in the total amount of support material from each other. This is advantageous in quickly regenerating the filter while preventing an increase in fuel consumption.
  • Example 2 using a lean-NOx catalyst NO in exhaust gas is oxidized into NO 2 by Pt at lean air-fuel ratios and then stored as barium nitrate in Ba serving as a NOx storage component. Thereafter, when the engine is operated at rich air-fuel ratios, the stored NO 2 is released from the NOx storage component. Therefore, the released NO 2 can be supplied to the filter 5 to burn off particulates.

Abstract

An upstream catalyst (3) and a downstream catalyst (4) are disposed upstream of a particulate filter (5) in an exhaust passage of a diesel engine. The downstream catalyst (4) has a larger amount of support material for supporting catalytic metal than the upstream catalyst (3). This enhances the efficiency of oxidation reactions of HC in the catalysts to raise the temperature of exhaust gas flowing into the filter (5).

Description

    CROSS-REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application claims priority under 35 USC 119 to Japanese Patent Application No. 2004-275480, filed on Sep. 22, 2004, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • (a) Field of the Invention
  • This invention relates to an exhaust gas purification system for a diesel engine.
  • (b) Description of the Related Art
  • Exhaust gas purification systems for diesel engines are generally known in which a filter for trapping particulates in exhaust gas is disposed in an exhaust passage and an oxidation catalyst is disposed upstream of the filter in the exhaust passage. These exhaust gas purification systems use reaction heat in the oxidation catalyst to raise the temperature of the filter up to a temperature at which particulates ignite and burn in order to regenerate the filter. The regeneration of the filter is implemented, for example, by increasing the amount of hydrocarbons (HC) in exhaust gas by the control of fuel injection of the engine (post-injection carried out during the expansion stroke or exhaust stroke after the main injection at or about top dead center of the compression stroke), burning HC in the oxidation catalyst to produce reaction heat and using the produced reaction heat to heat the filter downstream of the oxidation catalyst.
  • As an example of exhaust gas purification systems of such kind, Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. 2004-162611 discloses a technique in which a plurality of honeycomb monolith supports are employed for a plurality of oxidation catalysts having different numbers of cells per unit area of the supports, respectively, and the plurality of oxidation catalysts are placed in series in the direction of flow of exhaust gas such that the number of cells is increased from upstream to downstream in the direction of flow of exhaust gas. This technique aims at solving a problem that when the fuel injection timing of the engine is retarded to raise the exhaust gas temperature, the engine fuel flammability is deteriorated to produce a large amount of soot and the produced soot is deposited on the oxidation catalysts.
  • To be specific, the above publication states as follows: The upstream oxidation catalyst has a low cell density to allow exhaust gas to pass at high flow rates so that soot is hard to deposit thereon. On the other hand, the downstream oxidation catalyst has a high cell density to allow exhaust gas to pass at low flow rates so that soot is easy to deposit thereon. Since, however, the flow rate of exhaust gas in the downstream oxidation catalyst is low, increase in HC in the exhaust gas produces a large amount of oxidation reaction heat of HC so that the downstream catalyst becomes likely to reach the necessary temperature for burning off soot. In this manner, the downstream catalyst can effectively work as an oxidation catalyst while preventing the deposition of soot.
  • If the cell density of the oxidation catalyst is low as described above, the deposition of soot on the oxidation catalyst is reduced but the amount of HC flowing through the oxidation catalyst into the filter is increased. Since in this case HC flows into the filter without being burned off by the oxidation catalyst, this means the amount of heat of HC combustion supplied from the catalyst to the filter is small, which is disadvantageous in the ignition of particulates deposited on the filter. In turn, this means that the amount of fuel supplied to the oxidation catalyst for the purpose of filter regeneration (i.e., the amount of post-injected fuel) is increased, leading to decreased fuel economy. Further, if unburned HC slipping through the oxidation catalyst is stored in the filter, it ignites to cause excessive temperature rise of the filter due to abnormal burning during burning-off of particulates, which is causes of deterioration of the catalytic metal supported on the filter and melting loss and cracks of the filter body.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • An object of the present invention is to allow the catalyst upstream of the filter to effectively work for the heating of the filter, i.e., for the burning-off of particulates, based on a different viewpoint from the cell density and thus solve the problem of HC slipping through the catalyst and in turn the problem of decrease in fuel economy.
  • In order to attain the above object, the present invention focused on that the ability of the oxidation catalyst to burn off HC depends on the amount of support material (active alumina and oxygen storage component) on which catalytic metal is supported. Based on this finding, the distribution of support material in the catalyst is adjusted such that exhaust gas flowing into the filter has a high temperature to facilitate the burning-off of particulates.
  • More specifically, the present invention is directed to an exhaust gas purification system for a diesel engine in which a filter for trapping particulates in exhaust gas from the engine is disposed in an exhaust passage of the engine and a catalyst for oxidizing HC in exhaust gas is disposed upstream of the filter in the exhaust passage. Further, in the exhaust gas purification system, the catalyst comprises a catalytic layer which is formed on the wall surfaces of each cell of a honeycomb support and contains catalytic metal, active alumina and an oxygen storage component both serving as a support material which supports the catalytic metal, and part of the catalyst downstream in the direction of flow of the exhaust gas is larger than part of the catalyst upstream in the direction of flow of the exhaust gas in terms of the amount of the support material per unit area of the wall surfaces of the cells of the honeycomb support.
  • With this structure, as becomes evident in the later-described example of this invention, the exhaust gas temperature at the filter entrance is increased as compared to the case where the support material is distributed uniformly over the entire length of the catalyst along the direction of flow of exhaust gas. The reason can be explained as follows.
  • Considering the temperatures of various parts of the catalyst when the catalyst oxidizes HC, since HC oxidation reaction heat produced at upstream part of the catalyst is transferred to downstream part thereof with the flow of exhaust gas, the downstream part of the catalyst has a higher temperature than the upstream part thereof if the amount of heat dissipated from the catalyst to the outside is small. Plainly speaking, if the exhaust gas having a temperature T flows into the catalyst, it is heated by HC oxidation reaction heat produced in the upstream part of the catalyst to raise its temperature up to T+a and the downstream part of the catalyst is in turn heated by the exhaust gas raised in temperature to have a higher temperature than the upstream part thereof. Therefore, as the downstream end of the catalyst is approached, the catalytic activity goes high and in turn the oxidation reactions of HC go up. As a result, the exhaust gas is heated by the heat of the oxidation reactions to raise its temperature, so that the exhaust gas temperature at the filter entrance becomes higher than that at the catalyst entrance.
  • If the support material is distributed uniformly over the entire length of the catalyst, rise in HC oxidation reactions at downstream part of the catalyst depends only on the heat transfer effect offered by the exhaust gas flow from upstream. Therefore, it cannot be expected to significantly raise the temperature of exhaust gas flowing into the filter. In the case where a large amount of heat is dissipated from the catalyst to the outside and the case where heat is dissipated from between the catalyst and the filter to the outside, it may happen that the exhaust gas temperature at the filter entrance becomes lower than that at the catalyst entrance.
  • In contrast, in the present invention, since upstream part of the catalyst has a small amount of support material, it has a small heat capacity and therefore is likely to raise its temperature, which is advantageous to early activation. Through the early activation of the catalyst, exhaust gas is promptly raised in temperature by heat of HC combustion at the upstream part of the catalyst. When the exhaust gas raised in temperature reaches downstream part of the catalyst, the downstream part rapidly activates the oxidation reactions of HC because of a large amount of support material. Therefore, the rate of increase in exhaust gas temperature rapidly goes up as compared to the above case where the support material is distributed uniformly. Specifically, active oxygen is released from the oxygen storage component which is a support material contained in the catalyst. Heat of combustion is produced in the process of the released active oxygen oxidizing CO in exhaust gas to CO2. Under the influence of the heat of combustion, the oxidation of HC in exhaust gas by the action of the catalytic metal is activated to produce a large amount of heat of HC combustion. In this manner, since downstream part of the catalyst has a larger amount of support material than upstream part thereof, the temperature of exhaust gas flowing into the filter can be raised without the above problem that HC slips through the catalyst. Further, even if a large amount of heat is dissipated to the outside in the course of passage of exhaust gas through the catalyst or in the course of movement of exhaust gas from the catalyst to the filter, a decrease in the temperature of exhaust gas flowing into the filter can be lessened.
  • Accordingly, even when post injection is carried out, the amount of fuel injected can be reduced. Further, even when thermal energy is additionally applied to the catalyst for the purpose of promoting its activity, the amount of energy added can be reduced. In these respects, the exhaust gas purification system of the present invention is advantageous in quickly regenerating the filter while preventing an increase in fuel consumption.
  • The catalyst may be formed as an integral piece of the upstream part and the downstream part (in which a single catalyst includes the upstream part and downstream part so that the upstream and downstream parts of a single monolith support have different amounts of support material per unit area of the honeycomb support) or may be formed of two separate pieces consisting of upstream and downstream catalysts using separate supports, respectively. Further, the catalyst may consist of three or more parts having different amounts of support material per unit area of the honeycomb support so that the amount of support material increases in proceeding from upstream to downstream. Furthermore, the catalytic metal may be distributed so that downstream part of the catalyst has a larger amount of catalytic metal than upstream part thereof.
  • The catalyst may be an oxidation catalyst for exerting a catalytic action on oxidation reactions of HC or may be a lean-NOx catalyst of a NOx direct decomposition type or of a NOx storage-reduction type. The NOx direct decomposition catalyst removes NOx in exhaust gas by reducing NOx using HC as a reductant under oxygen-rich (fuel-lean) conditions. The NOx storage-reduction catalyst stores NOx in exhaust gas under oxygen-rich conditions and reduces the stored NOx under fuel-rich conditions where the oxygen concentration in exhaust gas goes down.
  • The oxidation catalyst is preferably a catalyst obtained by supporting a catalytic material containing alumina, an oxygen storage component, an HC adsorbent and precious metal as catalytic metal on a support, such as a honeycomb monolith support.
  • The lean-NOx catalyst is preferably a NOx storage-reduction catalyst obtained by supporting a catalytic material containing alumina, an oxygen storage component, a NOx storage component and catalytic metal on a support, such as a honeycomb monolith support.
  • The oxygen storage component may be ceria (CeO2) or a mixed oxide containing cerium (Ce) and another one or more metals including zirconium (Zr), praseodymium (Pr) and neodymium (Nd). The HC adsorbent is preferably zeolite, more preferably β-zeolite. The precious metal may be platinum (Pt), rhodium (Rh), palladium (Pd) or iridium (Ir). Preferable NOx storage components include alkaline earth metals, such as barium (Ba), and alkaline metals, such as lithium (Li), potassium (K) or sodium (Na).
  • As described above, in the exhaust gas purification system of the present invention, the oxidation catalyst for oxidizing HC in exhaust gas, which is disposed upstream of the particulate filter in an exhaust passage, has a structure that part of the catalyst downstream in the direction of flow of exhaust gas has a larger amount of support material than upstream part thereof. Therefore, the exhaust gas temperature at the filter entrance can be increased as compared to the case where the support material is distributed uniformly over the entire length of the catalyst along the direction of flow of exhaust gas. This is advantageous in quickly regenerating the filter while preventing an increase in fuel consumption.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic view for illustrating an exhaust gas purification system according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • An embodiment of the present invention will be described below in detail with reference to the drawing.
  • FIG. 1 shows an exhaust gas purification system 1 for a diesel engine according to the embodiment of the present invention. In the figure, reference numeral 2 denotes a catalytic converter incorporated in an exhaust passage from the engine. The converter 2 includes a catalyst placed in its upstream side in the direction of flow of exhaust gas to remove HC in the exhaust gas by oxidation, and a filter 5 placed downstream of the catalyst to trap particulates in the exhaust gas. The catalyst for removing HC in the exhaust gas is divided into an upstream catalyst 3 placed toward the upstream end of the converter 2 and a downstream catalyst 4 placed downstream of the upstream catalyst 3. Therefore, the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 and the filter 5 are arranged in series in the direction of flow of exhaust gas.
  • Each of the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 is made by supporting a catalytic material on the wall surfaces of each cell in a honeycomb monolith support made of ceramic or metal. The downstream catalyst 4 has a larger amount of catalytic material supported thereon, i.e., amount of support material, than the upstream catalyst 3.
  • The filter 5 is a honeycomb-shaped filter made of ceramic or metal in which exhaust gas inflow cells closed at their downstream ends and exhaust gas outflow cells closed at their upstream ends are alternately arranged. Each pair of adjacent exhaust gas inflow and outflow cells are separated by a thin partition. Exhaust gas having flew into one of the exhaust gas inflow cells flows out through micro pores in the surrounding partitions into the adjacent exhaust gas outflow cells. Particulates in the exhaust gas adheres to the wall surfaces of the exhaust gas passages (including the exhaust gas inflow cells, the exhaust gas outflow cells and micro pores). Each of the wall surfaces of the exhaust gas passages is formed with a catalytic layer for promoting burning-off of particulates during regeneration of the filter 5.
  • Under engine operating conditions in which the temperature of exhaust gas from the engine is high, the filter 5 is likely to be heated up to the regeneration temperature which allows burning-off of particulates by oxidation reaction heat of HC in the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4. In this case, the filter 5 can be continuously regenerated. NO in exhaust gas is oxidized into NO2 by the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 and the produced NO2 is supplied to the filter 5. Therefore, the produced NO2 effectively acts as an oxidant for particulates during the filter regeneration.
  • Forced regeneration of the filter 5 is implemented by controlling the fuel injection of the engine to inject fuel into an engine cylinder during the expansion stroke or exhaust stroke after the main injection at or about top dead center of the compression stroke, i.e., carry out “post injection”. In this manner, a large amount of unburned fuel, i.e., HC, is supplied to the catalysts 3 and 4 to increase the amount of HC oxidation reaction heat generated in the catalysts 3 and 4 and thereby heat the filter 5 up to the regeneration temperature. Further, when the temperature of the catalysts 3 and 4 is low, the fuel injection timing of the engine is previously retarded to raise the exhaust gas temperature. Thus, the catalysts 3 and 4 are heated to reach their active temperatures.
  • The usefulness of the present invention will be described below with reference to examples of the present invention and comparative examples.
  • CATALYSTS OF EXAMPLES AND COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES Example 1
  • Both the upstream catalyst 3 and the downstream catalyst 4 are oxidation catalysts. The catalytic material is made of active alumina, CeO2 serving as an oxygen storage component, β-zeolite serving as an HC adsorbent and platinum (Pt) serving as a catalytic metal. Each catalyst was made by mixing active alumina, CeO2 and β-zeolite in a mass ratio of 1:1:1 to prepare a support material and supporting Pt on the support material. As a support for each of the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 was used a cordierite honeycomb support having 400 cells per square inch (approximately 6.54 cm2), 4 mil (approximately 0.1 mm) inter-cell wall thickness and 12.5 cm3 volume.
  • Further, for the upstream catalyst 3, the support material obtained by mixing active alumina, CeO2 and β-zeolite in a mass ratio of 1:1:1 was supported by 60 g/L on the honeycomb support. For the downstream catalyst 4, the same support material was supported by 180 g/L on the honeycomb support. Therefore, the downstream catalyst 4 contains a larger amount of support material per unit area of wall surfaces of each cell in the honeycomb support than the upstream catalyst 3. In both the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4, Pt was supported on the support material by impregnation such that the amount of Pt supported was 2 g/L. Hereinafter, “g/L” denotes the amount of substance supported per unit volume L of the support.
  • Comparative Example 1
  • The same support material as in Example 1 was supported by 120 g/L uniformly on the entire cordierite honeycomb support having 400 cells per square inch (approximately 6.54 cm2), 4 mil (approximately 0.1 mm) inter-cell wall thickness and 25 cm3 volume and Pt was supported on the support material, thereby obtaining a catalyst (oxidation catalyst) of Comparative example 1. The amount of Pt supported in this catalyst is 2 g/L.
  • Therefore, the total amount of active alumina, oxygen storage component (CeO2), HC adsorbent (β-zeolite) and catalytic metal (Pt) in the catalyst of Comparative example 1 is equal to the total amount thereof in the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 of Example 1.
  • Example 2
  • Both the upstream catalyst 3 and the downstream catalyst 4 are lean-NOx catalysts. The catalytic material is made of active alumina, CeO2, barium (Ba) serving as a NOx storage component and platinum (Pt) serving as a catalytic metal. Each catalyst was made by mixing active alumina and CeO2 in a mass ratio of 1:1 to prepare a support material and supporting Pt and Ba on the support material. As a support for each of the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 was used a cordierite honeycomb support of the same type as in Example 1.
  • Further, for the upstream catalyst 3, the support material obtained by mixing active alumina and CeO2 in a mass ratio of 1:1 was supported by 60 g/L on the honeycomb support. For the downstream catalyst 4, the same support material was supported by 180 g/L on the honeycomb support. Therefore, the downstream catalyst 4 contains a larger amount of support material per unit area of wall surfaces of each cell in the honeycomb support than the upstream catalyst 3. In both the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4, Pt and Ba were supported on the support material by impregnation such that the amounts of Pt and Ba supported were 2 g/L and 20 g/L, respectively.
  • Comparative Example 2
  • The same support material as in Example 2 was supported by 120 g/L uniformly on the entire cordierite honeycomb support of the same type as in Comparative example 1 and Pt and Ba were supported on the support material, thereby obtaining a catalyst (lean-NOx catalyst) of Comparative example 2. The amounts of Pt and Ba supported in this catalyst are 2 g/L and 20 g/L, respectively.
  • Therefore, the total amount of active alumina, oxygen storage component (CeO2), catalytic metal (Pt) and NOx storage component (Ba) in the catalyst of Comparative example 2 is equal to the total amount thereof in the upstream and downstream catalysts 3 and 4 of Example 2.
  • Evaluation
  • Each of the catalysts 3 and 4 in Example 1 was aged, and the aged catalysts 3 and 4 and a filter 5 were then attached to a model gas flow reactor in a layout of a catalytic converter 2 shown in FIG. 1. The catalytic converter 2 was allowed to pass a model gas and concurrently gradually increased in gas temperature at the entrance of the upstream catalyst 3 from normal temperature and then measured in terms of the gas temperature at the entrance of the filter 5 and the HC slip rate. The HC slip rate is the rate of HC having slipped through the catalysts 3 and 4 without being oxidized by the catalysts to the total flow of HC.
  • The aging was implemented by keeping the catalysts at 800° C. in a normal atmosphere for 6 hours. The space velocity SV was 100000 h−1, and the rate of temperature rise was 30° C./min. The composition of the model gas was as follows: HC=4000 ppmC, CO=800 ppmC, NO=1000 ppmC, O2=10 volume %, CO2=4.5 volume %, H2O=10 volume % and N2 the remainder.
  • Each of the catalysts of Example 2 and Comparative examples 1 and 2 was also aged in the same manner as in Example 1, and a catalytic converter consisting of the aged catalysts and a filter was then measured in terms of the gas temperature at the entrance of the filter and the HC slip rate with a model gas flow reactor using a model gas. The measurement results are shown in Table 1.
    TABLE 1
    Catalyst Catalyst entrance HC slip Filter entrance
    type gas temperature rate gas temperature
    Example 1 Oxidation 300° C.  24% 333° C.
    325° C.   2% 364° C.
    350° C. 1.5% 386° C.
    Comparative Oxidation 300° C.  68% 284° C.
    ex. 1 325° C.  13% 342° C.
    350° C. 2.3% 368° C.
    Example 2 Lean-NOx 300° C.  83% 282° C.
    325° C.  25% 333° C.
    350° C.   3% 363° C.
    Comparative Lean-NOx 300° C.  95% 281° C.
    ex. 2 325° C.  60% 303° C.
    350° C.  11% 345° C.
  • A comparison between Example 1 and Comparative example 1 each using an oxidation catalyst shows that at the same catalyst entrance gas temperature, Example 1 exhibits a lower HC slip rate and a higher filter entrance gas temperature than Comparative example 1. In particular, at a low catalyst entrance gas temperature (300° C.), Comparative example 1 exhibits a filter entrance gas temperature lower than the catalyst entrance gas temperature while Example 1 exhibits a filter entrance gas temperature 30° C. higher than the catalyst entrance gas temperature. On the other hand, a comparison between Example 2 and Comparative example 2 each using a lean-NOx catalyst shows that at the same catalyst entrance gas temperature, Example 2 exhibits a lower HC slip rate than Comparative example 2, and that at the same high catalyst entrance gas temperatures, Example 2 exhibits a higher filter entrance gas temperature than Comparative example 2.
  • Therefore, if the downstream catalyst 4 has a larger amount of support material than the upstream catalyst 3, the HC slip rate can be reduced to increase the filter entrance gas temperature, as compared to if the same support material is supported uniformly all over a single honeycomb support as in Comparative examples 1 and 2, even though both the cases do not differ in the total amount of support material from each other. This is advantageous in quickly regenerating the filter while preventing an increase in fuel consumption.
  • In Example 2 using a lean-NOx catalyst, NO in exhaust gas is oxidized into NO2 by Pt at lean air-fuel ratios and then stored as barium nitrate in Ba serving as a NOx storage component. Thereafter, when the engine is operated at rich air-fuel ratios, the stored NO2 is released from the NOx storage component. Therefore, the released NO2 can be supplied to the filter 5 to burn off particulates.

Claims (3)

1. An exhaust gas purification system for a diesel engine in which a filter for trapping particulates in exhaust gas from the engine is disposed in an exhaust passage of the engine and a catalyst for oxidizing HC in exhaust gas is disposed upstream of the filter in the exhaust passage, wherein
the catalyst comprises a catalytic layer which is formed on the wall surfaces of each cell of a honeycomb support and contains catalytic metal, active alumina and an oxygen storage component both serving as a support material which supports the catalytic metal, and
part of the catalyst downstream in the direction of flow of the exhaust gas is larger than part of the catalyst upstream in the direction of flow of the exhaust gas in terms of the amount of the support material per unit area of the wall surfaces of the cells of the honeycomb support.
2. The exhaust gas purification system of claim 1, wherein the catalyst is an oxidation catalyst.
3. The exhaust gas purification system of claim 1, wherein the catalyst is a lean-NOx catalyst.
US11/178,410 2004-09-22 2005-07-12 Exhaust gas purification system Abandoned US20060059900A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004-275480 2004-09-22
JP2004275480A JP4556587B2 (en) 2004-09-22 2004-09-22 Exhaust gas purification device

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20060059900A1 true US20060059900A1 (en) 2006-03-23

Family

ID=35428102

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US11/178,410 Abandoned US20060059900A1 (en) 2004-09-22 2005-07-12 Exhaust gas purification system

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US20060059900A1 (en)
EP (1) EP1640056A3 (en)
JP (1) JP4556587B2 (en)

Cited By (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070117716A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Toda Kogyo Corporation Exhaust gas purification catalyst
US20070117715A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Mazda Motor Corporation Exhaust gas purification catalyst and method of fabricating the same
US20070167320A1 (en) * 2006-01-13 2007-07-19 Toda Kogyo Corporation Exhaust gas purifying catalyst
US20070227129A1 (en) * 2004-06-02 2007-10-04 Hino Motors Ltd. Particulate Filter
US20070298504A1 (en) * 2006-06-27 2007-12-27 Torsten Wolfgang Mueller Diesel exhaust treatment system catalyst monitoring
US20080190099A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-08-14 Aleksey Yezerets System and method for inhibiting uncontrolled regeneration of a particulate filter for an internal combustion engine
US20090145117A1 (en) * 2007-04-25 2009-06-11 Man Nutzfahrzeuge Ag Exhaust gas aftertreatment system
EP2129883A1 (en) 2007-02-21 2009-12-09 Umicore AG & Co. KG Catalyst system and use thereof
US20100005787A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2010-01-14 Hino Motors, Ltd. Exhaust gas purification apparatus for engine
US20100100304A1 (en) * 2007-04-27 2010-04-22 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Electronic control unit for controlling fuel injection in expansion and/or exhaust strokes
CN102877916A (en) * 2011-07-13 2013-01-16 现代自动车株式会社 System for purifying exhaust gas and method for controlling the same
US8640446B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2014-02-04 Hyundai Motor Company System for purifying exhaust gas and method for controlling the same

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4835193B2 (en) 2006-02-20 2011-12-14 マツダ株式会社 Diesel particulate filter
JP5582671B2 (en) * 2006-04-21 2014-09-03 株式会社キャタラー Exhaust gas purification catalyst, exhaust gas purification catalyst recovery method, and exhaust gas purification catalyst system
JP5003042B2 (en) * 2006-07-14 2012-08-15 いすゞ自動車株式会社 Exhaust gas purification system
JP4910814B2 (en) * 2007-03-23 2012-04-04 パナソニック株式会社 Exhaust gas purification device
DE102007029418A1 (en) * 2007-06-26 2009-01-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Catalyst element, catalyst for exhaust aftertreatment of an internal combustion engine and method for producing a catalyst element according to the invention
JP5018325B2 (en) * 2007-08-08 2012-09-05 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Exhaust gas purification device for internal combustion engine
JP2009057922A (en) * 2007-08-31 2009-03-19 Honda Motor Co Ltd Exhaust emission control system
JP4916981B2 (en) * 2007-09-10 2012-04-18 本田技研工業株式会社 Exhaust gas purification device
JP5521290B2 (en) * 2008-08-05 2014-06-11 日産自動車株式会社 Diesel engine exhaust purification system
JP5277891B2 (en) * 2008-11-17 2013-08-28 三菱自動車工業株式会社 Exhaust purification device
JP2010184183A (en) * 2009-02-11 2010-08-26 Nippon Soken Inc Exhaust emission control system
GB201121468D0 (en) 2011-12-14 2012-01-25 Johnson Matthey Plc Improvements in automotive catalytic aftertreatment
SE539523C2 (en) * 2016-01-27 2017-10-10 Scania Cv Ab Exhaust gas treatment system

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4118199A (en) * 1975-09-23 1978-10-03 Deutsche Gold- Und Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals Roessler Monolithic carrier catalyst and arrangements of such a catalyst for the purification of exhaust gases from an internal combustion engine
US20020053202A1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2002-05-09 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd Exhaust gas purifying system and method
US20030108465A1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2003-06-12 Engelhard Corporation Diesel oxidation catalyst
US20040001781A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Engelhard Corporation Multi-zone catalytic converter
US20040011026A1 (en) * 2002-07-17 2004-01-22 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Exhaust emission control apparatus of internal combustion engine and method thereof

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH05293376A (en) * 1992-04-15 1993-11-09 Nissan Motor Co Ltd Catalyst for purifying exhaust gas and method therefor
JP2001073742A (en) * 1999-06-29 2001-03-21 Sumitomo Electric Ind Ltd Particulate trap for diesel engine
JP4413366B2 (en) * 2000-03-22 2010-02-10 株式会社キャタラー Exhaust gas purification catalyst
JP3855266B2 (en) * 2001-11-01 2006-12-06 日産自動車株式会社 Exhaust gas purification catalyst
JP2004162611A (en) * 2002-11-13 2004-06-10 Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp Exhaust emission control device for internal combustion engine
JP2004183506A (en) * 2002-11-29 2004-07-02 Mitsubishi Fuso Truck & Bus Corp Exhaust emission control device of vehicle
JP2004239197A (en) * 2003-02-07 2004-08-26 Mazda Motor Corp Engine exhaust fine particulate reduction device
JP4333160B2 (en) * 2003-02-24 2009-09-16 トヨタ自動車株式会社 Exhaust gas purification system for internal combustion engine

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4118199A (en) * 1975-09-23 1978-10-03 Deutsche Gold- Und Silber-Scheideanstalt Vormals Roessler Monolithic carrier catalyst and arrangements of such a catalyst for the purification of exhaust gases from an internal combustion engine
US20030108465A1 (en) * 1999-07-02 2003-06-12 Engelhard Corporation Diesel oxidation catalyst
US20020053202A1 (en) * 2000-09-08 2002-05-09 Nissan Motor Co., Ltd Exhaust gas purifying system and method
US20040001781A1 (en) * 2002-06-27 2004-01-01 Engelhard Corporation Multi-zone catalytic converter
US20040011026A1 (en) * 2002-07-17 2004-01-22 Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha Exhaust emission control apparatus of internal combustion engine and method thereof

Cited By (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070227129A1 (en) * 2004-06-02 2007-10-04 Hino Motors Ltd. Particulate Filter
US7691778B2 (en) * 2005-11-22 2010-04-06 Toda Kogyo Corporation Exhaust gas purification catalyst
US20070117715A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Mazda Motor Corporation Exhaust gas purification catalyst and method of fabricating the same
US20070117716A1 (en) * 2005-11-22 2007-05-24 Toda Kogyo Corporation Exhaust gas purification catalyst
US20070167320A1 (en) * 2006-01-13 2007-07-19 Toda Kogyo Corporation Exhaust gas purifying catalyst
US7696127B2 (en) * 2006-01-13 2010-04-13 Toda Kogyo Corporation Exhaust gas purifying catalyst
US20070298504A1 (en) * 2006-06-27 2007-12-27 Torsten Wolfgang Mueller Diesel exhaust treatment system catalyst monitoring
US8148290B2 (en) * 2006-06-27 2012-04-03 Basf Corporation Diesel exhaust treatment system catalyst monitoring
US20090313971A1 (en) * 2006-06-27 2009-12-24 Basf Catalysts Llc Diesel Exhaust Treatment System Catalyst Monitoring
US20100005787A1 (en) * 2006-09-21 2010-01-14 Hino Motors, Ltd. Exhaust gas purification apparatus for engine
US20080190099A1 (en) * 2006-12-20 2008-08-14 Aleksey Yezerets System and method for inhibiting uncontrolled regeneration of a particulate filter for an internal combustion engine
EP2129883A1 (en) 2007-02-21 2009-12-09 Umicore AG & Co. KG Catalyst system and use thereof
US20090145117A1 (en) * 2007-04-25 2009-06-11 Man Nutzfahrzeuge Ag Exhaust gas aftertreatment system
US8176731B2 (en) * 2007-04-25 2012-05-15 Man Truck & Bus Ag Exhaust gas aftertreatment system
US20100100304A1 (en) * 2007-04-27 2010-04-22 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Electronic control unit for controlling fuel injection in expansion and/or exhaust strokes
US8229650B2 (en) * 2007-04-27 2012-07-24 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Electronic control unit for controlling fuel injection in expansion and/or exhaust strokes
CN102877916A (en) * 2011-07-13 2013-01-16 现代自动车株式会社 System for purifying exhaust gas and method for controlling the same
US20130014493A1 (en) * 2011-07-13 2013-01-17 Hyundai Motor Company System for purifying exhaust gas and method for controlling the same
US8763373B2 (en) * 2011-07-13 2014-07-01 Hyundai Motor Company System for purifying exhaust gas and method for controlling the same
US8640446B2 (en) 2011-09-09 2014-02-04 Hyundai Motor Company System for purifying exhaust gas and method for controlling the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1640056A3 (en) 2006-11-02
JP2006090185A (en) 2006-04-06
EP1640056A2 (en) 2006-03-29
JP4556587B2 (en) 2010-10-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20060059900A1 (en) Exhaust gas purification system
US7735313B2 (en) Method of raising temperature in exhaust-gas purifier and exhaust-gas purification system
KR101110649B1 (en) Diesel engine and a catalysed filter therefor
KR101838558B1 (en) NOx TRAP
RU2597090C2 (en) Dual function catalytic filter
JP3885813B2 (en) Method for raising temperature of exhaust gas purification device and exhaust gas purification system
US7980065B2 (en) Regeneration method for ceramic honeycomb structures
EP2790814B1 (en) Automotive catalytic aftertreatment system
JP5266865B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification system and control method thereof
JP5337930B2 (en) Exhaust purification method
KR20080085871A (en) Exhaust gas-purifying apparatus and exhaust gas-purifying method
US20050282698A1 (en) Particulate filter device and exhaust treatment system, and methods of regenerating the same
US20080254973A1 (en) Catalyst-carried particulate filter
JP4251764B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification device and exhaust gas purification method using the same
JP3885814B2 (en) Method for raising temperature of exhaust gas purification device and exhaust gas purification system
JP2008151100A (en) Exhaust emission control device
JP4561467B2 (en) Exhaust gas purification method and exhaust gas purification system
JP3876905B2 (en) Desulfurization control method for exhaust gas purification system and exhaust gas purification system
JP3724415B2 (en) Nitrogen oxide storage reduction catalyst, exhaust gas purification system including the same, and exhaust gas purification method
MXPA06014886A (en) Methods of regenerating a nox.
US9789442B2 (en) Automotive catalytic aftertreatment system
RU2021124520A (en) NOx TRAP CATALYST FOR LEAN BLOCK CONDITIONS
JP2005282447A (en) Exhaust emission control device
WO2014178632A1 (en) Catalyst system for purifying exhaust gas from gasoline engine
JP2010149014A (en) Exhaust cleaning catalyst, and exhaust cleaning device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MAZDA MOTOR CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HARADA, KOICHIRO;TSUSHIO, YOSHINORI;TAKAMI, AKIHIDE;REEL/FRAME:016773/0400

Effective date: 20050630

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION