US20050167882A1 - Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells - Google Patents
Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050167882A1 US20050167882A1 US10/508,684 US50868404A US2005167882A1 US 20050167882 A1 US20050167882 A1 US 20050167882A1 US 50868404 A US50868404 A US 50868404A US 2005167882 A1 US2005167882 A1 US 2005167882A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- flow field
- conductive flow
- field plate
- resistivity
- temperature
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/02—Details
- H01M8/0202—Collectors; Separators, e.g. bipolar separators; Interconnectors
- H01M8/0204—Non-porous and characterised by the material
- H01M8/0223—Composites
- H01M8/0226—Composites in the form of mixtures
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/02—Details
- H01M8/0202—Collectors; Separators, e.g. bipolar separators; Interconnectors
- H01M8/0204—Non-porous and characterised by the material
- H01M8/0221—Organic resins; Organic polymers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H01—ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
- H01M—PROCESSES OR MEANS, e.g. BATTERIES, FOR THE DIRECT CONVERSION OF CHEMICAL ENERGY INTO ELECTRICAL ENERGY
- H01M8/00—Fuel cells; Manufacture thereof
- H01M8/02—Details
- H01M8/0202—Collectors; Separators, e.g. bipolar separators; Interconnectors
- H01M8/0204—Non-porous and characterised by the material
- H01M8/0213—Gas-impermeable carbon-containing materials
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
- Y02E60/30—Hydrogen technology
- Y02E60/50—Fuel cells
Definitions
- This invention relates to fuel cells and in particular to a process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells.
- Conductive flow field plates comprise the outer layers of a fuel cell and serve a number of functions; they provide structural integrity to the fuel cell; protect the fuel cell from corrosive degradation over the operating life of the fuel cell; and, most importantly conduct electrons and heat from the interior of the fuel cell to the exterior. Conductivity at the interface between the flow field plate and the outermost interior layer, i.e., gas diffusion layer, is critical for minimizing fuel cell resistance.
- Carbon/graphite fillers over plastic polymers have been identified as a promising alternative to graphite in manufacturing conductive flow field plates. Processes for preparing such plates are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,124,747 A1 to Murer and Amadei, U.S. Pat. No. 4,169,816 A1 to Tsien and U.S. Pat. No. 4,686,072 A1 to Fukuda, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- carbon/graphite filler plates provide increased durability and flexibility to the fuel cell
- the composition of carbon/graphite filler plates provides less than superior conductivity and resistivity (both bulk resistivity and through plane resistivity) properties.
- Attempts have been made to reduce the resistivity of a molded plate by machining the surface of the molded plate to eliminate the polymer rich skin layer from the surface of the plate. Such machining processes however are time consuming and expensive.
- a process for decreasing the resistivity of a non-machined conductive flow field plate for use in a fuel cell wherein the conductive flow field plate has a material softening temperature comprising the steps of (a) heating the conductive flow field plate to a temperature greater than 25° C. but less than the material softening temperature; (b) maintaining the conductive flow field plate at the temperature for an effective period of time; and, (c) cooling the conductive flow field plate to room temperature, wherein the conductive flow field plate is annealed.
- the process disclosed by the present invention has many advantages.
- the process can decrease the resistivity of conductive flow field plates by up to 30-50%.
- FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the material softening temperature of a conductive flow field plate comprised of 30% polymer, 20% graphite fiber and 50% graphite powder;
- FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the bulk resistivity of a conductive flow field plate, molded by extrusion transfer pressing (“ETP”), measured as a function of the annealing temperature;
- FIG. 3 is a graph comparing the through plane resistivity of machined and non-machined ETP conductive flow field plates, measured as a function of the annealing temperature
- FIG. 4 is a graph depicting the effect of annealing time on the through plane resistivity of ETP conductive flow field plates heated to a temperature of 185° C.
- the present invention provides a process for decreasing the resistivity of a conductive flow field plate for use in a fuel cell.
- the process includes the step of annealing the conductive flow field plate by heating the conductive flow field plate to a temperature between 25° C. (room temperature) and a temperature less than, and preferably slightly lower than, the material softening temperature of the conductive flow field plate; maintaining the conductive flow field plate at that temperature for an effective period of time; and, cooling the conductive flow field plate to room temperature.
- the conductive flow field plate is heated by either placing the plate in boiling liquid or by dry heating the conductive flow field plate in an oven.
- the conductive flow field plate is heated to a temperature between 25° C. (room temperature) and a temperature less than, and preferably slightly lower than, the material softening temperature of the conductive flow field plate, as determined by an expansion probe in a thermal mechanical analyzer (TMA).
- TMA thermal mechanical analyzer
- the material softening temperature is the temperature above which thermal expansion of the material composition of the conductive flow field plate becomes non-linear and is no longer reversible.
- annealing significantly decreases the resistivity of the surface of the conductive flow field plate (bulk resistivity) and the resistivity through the plane of the conductive flow field plate (through plane resistivity). It is speculated that annealing alters the surface morphology of the composition of the conductive flow field plate and promotes heterogeneous distribution of conductive fillers.
- the preferred annealing temperature correlates with the linear expansion temperature of the material composition of the conductive flow field plate and should preferably always be less than the material softening temperature.
- Preferred annealing temperatures will accordingly be dependent on the material composition of the plate, but will generally be between 25° C. and the material softening temperature of the conductive flow field plate, where thermal expansion of the polymer in the composition occurs in a linear, reversible fashion.
- the conductive flow field plate is a carbon/graphite filler plate comprised of ground liquid crystalline polymer, graphite fiber and graphite powder.
- the polymer can be any liquid crystalline polymer such as liquid crystalline polyester, an engineering thermoplastic, or a blend thereof.
- the polymer is an aromatic polyester resin such as that available from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company under the trade-mark ZENITETM.
- the graphite fiber is preferably a pitch-based graphite fiber having a fiber length distribution range from 15 to 500 m, a fiber diameter of 8 to 10 m, bulk density of 0.3 to 0.5 g/cm 3 and real density of 2.0-2.2 g/cm 3 .
- the graphite powder is preferably a synthetic graphite powder with a particle size distribution range of 20 to 1500 m, a surface area of 2-3 m 2 /g, bulk density of 0.5-0.7 g/cm 3 and real density of 2.0-2.2 g/cm 3 .
- the conductive flow field plate is preferably comprised of 5-40% by weight polymer, 6-95% by weight graphite powder and 0-50% by weight graphite fiber.
- the conductive flow field plate is comprised of 30% by weight polymer, 50% by weight graphite powder and 20% by weight graphite fiber.
- the material softening temperature of a conductive flow field plate comprised of 30% ZENITE®, 20% graphite fiber and 50% graphite powder is approximately 225° C.
- the polymer expands in a non-linear fashion, increasing the air voids within the plate and the thickness of the plate in the process.
- the bulk resistivity of the conductive flow field plate decreases from 25° C. to 225° C., but increases sharply at temperatures above 225° C.
- the conductive flow field plate is maintained at the selected annealing temperature for an effective period of time. During this time, the morphology of the polymer of the conductive flow field plate is altered affecting the conductive contact between the graphite fillers in the polymer matrix. As shown in FIG. 4 , at 185° C. to achieve maximum decreases in through plane resistivity the effective time for annealing is at least 10 hours. The effective time for annealing may alter depending on the annealing temperature.
- the conductive flow field plate is then cooled to room temperature, fixing the morphology of the components of the plate in its altered, annealed form.
- the resistivity (bulk resistivity or through plane resistivity) can be decreased up to 30% in a conductive flow field plate molded by Extrusion Transfer Pressing (ETP) technique (Examples 1 and 2) with a further decrease in resistivity to at least 50% of a compression molded plate (Example 3).
- ETP Extrusion Transfer Pressing
- a machined conductive flow field plate i.e. a plate with a shaved outer skin on both sides, has lower resistivity to start.
- the resistivity increases with increasing annealing temperatures.
- the conductive flow field plates are graphite filler plates comprised of a dry mixture of ground liquid crystalline polymer, graphite fiber and/or graphite powder.
- the conductive flow field plates were molded by either compression molding or Extrusion Transfer Pressing (ETP) technique.
- ETP Extrusion Transfer Pressing
- the bulk resistivity (p) of the conductive flow field plates is measured using the standard four point method.
- the standard four point method is performed in accordance with the method described in Wieder, HH, Laboratory Notes on Electrical and Galvanomagnetic Measurements, Material Science Monograph, Vol. 2, Elsevier Pub., Amsterdam, 1979, which is herein incorporated by reference.
- a current (1) is injected at the first of four linear equi-spaced point electrode probes and collected at the fourth electrode, while the potential difference ⁇ V between the second and third electrodes is measured.
- Through plane resistivity is measured using the contact resistance method, the conductive flow field plate is placed between two gold plates at 314 psi.
- R resistance
- I the current in amps
- V the potential drop in mV as read from the multimeter.
- Example 1 compares the bulk resistivity of a conductive flow field plate annealed at temperatures between 25° C. and 240° C.
- a 254 mm ⁇ 178 mm ⁇ 2.5 mm ETP molded plate comprising 30% by weight ground Zenite® resin, 20% by weight graphite fiber and 50% by weight graphite powder was annealed at temperatures between 25 and 240° C., by sandwiching the conductive flow field plate between two aluminum shims and placing the shims between the platens of a press at the desired temperature. The conductive flow field plate was heated for 10 minutes and then taken out of the press and allowed to cool to room temperature. The bulk resistivity of each side of the conductive flow field plate was measured at 5 different points using a 4-point probe.
- Example 2 compares the change in through plane resistivity of an ETP molded conductive flow field plate and a surface machined ETP molded conductive flow field plate upon annealing at different temperatures.
- ETP conductive flow field plate comprising 30% by weight ground ZENITE® resin, 20% by weight graphite fiber and 50% by weight graphite powder was cut into 2 conductive flow field plates of the following dimension:
- Plate was machined on both surfaces. Plates A and B were annealed at temperatures between 25° C. and 240° C., by sandwiching the conductive flow field plates between two aluminum shims and placing the shims between the platens of a press at the desired temperature. The conductive flow field plates were heated for 30 minutes and then taken out of the press and allowed to cool to room temperature. The through plane resistance of the conductive flow field plates was measured using the contact resistance method.
- a molded non-machined plate showed a drop of ⁇ 30% in through plane resistivity as the annealing temperature was increased from 25° C.-220° C.
- a machined plate showed a general increase in through plane resistivity with increased annealing temperatures.
- the drop in through plane resistivity of the non-machined conductive flow field plate was most significant at around 220° C. to 223° C., just before reaching the material softening temperature.
- Example 3 illustrates the through plane resistivity of a compression molded conductive flow field plate annealed at 80° C. in a mixture of methanol and water.
- each plate composition 50 g was placed into a mold and pressed at 320° C. under 2-4 tons of pressure for 5-10 minutes. The pressure was increased to 7.5-10 tons for 10 minutes and reduced to 10-20 tons for 2 minutes. The mold was cooled to 90° C. under 10-20 tons of pressure. The plates were 101.6 mm ⁇ 101.6 mm with 2-3 mm thickness. Initial resistance was measured using the contact resistance press method as set out in the second column of Table 4.
- the plates were annealed at 80° C. for 500 hours in a bath of 15% methanol in deionized water using a 4 L kettle and a heating mantle fitted with a Graham condenser. The plates were hung into the bath using Teflon tape. The pH of the bath was adjusted to 4 using sulfuric acid to create a corrosive environment within the bath. At the end of the annealing process, the conductive flow field plate was cooled to room temperature and through plane resistivity was measured using the contact resistance press method.
- the initial through plane resistivity of the conductive flow field plate comprised of 50% fiber was greater than the initial through plane resistivity of the conductive flow field plates (plates A and B—see Table 3) comprising of 0 and 20% by weight fiber.
- the decrease in through plane resistivity of plate C was more significant following annealing, as a result of the higher fiber content of the conductive flow field plate and accordingly higher structural integrity of the conductive flow field plate.
- Example 4 illustrates the effect of annealing time on bulk resistivity of the conductive flow field plate.
- a 254 mm ⁇ 178 mm ⁇ 2.67 mm ETP molded conductive flow field plate comprised of 30% by weight ground Zenite® resin, 20% by weight graphite fiber and 50% by weight graphite powder was cut down into 6 plate pieces of 1.5′′ ⁇ 1.5′′ each.
- the bulk resistivity of each of the plate pieces was measured at room temperature using the four-point method.
- the plate pieces were then heated to 185° C. and maintained at this temperature for either 2, 8, 24, 48, 55.5 or 72 hours.
- the plates were then cooled back down to room temperature to complete the annealing process.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Sustainable Development (AREA)
- Sustainable Energy (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Composite Materials (AREA)
- Fuel Cell (AREA)
- Compositions Of Macromolecular Compounds (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention provides a process for decreasing the resistivity of a non-machined conductive flow field plate for use in a fuel cell. The process includes the step of annealing the conductive flow field plate by heating the conductive flow field plate to a temperature between 25° C. (room temperature) and a temperature slightly lower than the material softening temperature of the material composition of the conductive flow field plate; maintaining the conductive flow field plate at that temperature for an effective period of time; and, cooling the conductive flow field plate to room temperature.
Description
- This invention relates to fuel cells and in particular to a process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells.
- Conductive flow field plates comprise the outer layers of a fuel cell and serve a number of functions; they provide structural integrity to the fuel cell; protect the fuel cell from corrosive degradation over the operating life of the fuel cell; and, most importantly conduct electrons and heat from the interior of the fuel cell to the exterior. Conductivity at the interface between the flow field plate and the outermost interior layer, i.e., gas diffusion layer, is critical for minimizing fuel cell resistance.
- Because of the unique set of performance requirements of conductive flow field plates and the aggressive conditions inside the fuel cell, the material options for constructing conductive flow field plates are limited. In general, graphite has been used for conductive flow field plates because of its high electrical conductivity and resistance to corrosion.
- Carbon/graphite fillers over plastic polymers have been identified as a promising alternative to graphite in manufacturing conductive flow field plates. Processes for preparing such plates are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,124,747 A1 to Murer and Amadei, U.S. Pat. No. 4,169,816 A1 to Tsien and U.S. Pat. No. 4,686,072 A1 to Fukuda, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- While these carbon/graphite filler plates provide increased durability and flexibility to the fuel cell, the composition of carbon/graphite filler plates provides less than superior conductivity and resistivity (both bulk resistivity and through plane resistivity) properties. Attempts have been made to reduce the resistivity of a molded plate by machining the surface of the molded plate to eliminate the polymer rich skin layer from the surface of the plate. Such machining processes however are time consuming and expensive.
- There therefore remains a need for a convenient post-molding process that improves the resistivity of conductive flow field plates.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for decreasing the resistivity of a conductive flow field plate for use in a fuel cell.
- According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for decreasing the resistivity of a non-machined conductive flow field plate for use in a fuel cell wherein the conductive flow field plate has a material softening temperature, the process comprising the steps of (a) heating the conductive flow field plate to a temperature greater than 25° C. but less than the material softening temperature; (b) maintaining the conductive flow field plate at the temperature for an effective period of time; and, (c) cooling the conductive flow field plate to room temperature, wherein the conductive flow field plate is annealed.
- The process disclosed by the present invention has many advantages. In particular, the process can decrease the resistivity of conductive flow field plates by up to 30-50%.
- Numerous other objectives, advantages and features of the process will also become apparent to the person skilled in the art upon reading the detailed description of the preferred embodiments, the examples and the claims.
- In drawings which illustrate by way of example only a preferred embodiment of the invention,
-
FIG. 1 is a graph illustrating the material softening temperature of a conductive flow field plate comprised of 30% polymer, 20% graphite fiber and 50% graphite powder; -
FIG. 2 is a graph illustrating the bulk resistivity of a conductive flow field plate, molded by extrusion transfer pressing (“ETP”), measured as a function of the annealing temperature; -
FIG. 3 is a graph comparing the through plane resistivity of machined and non-machined ETP conductive flow field plates, measured as a function of the annealing temperature; and, -
FIG. 4 is a graph depicting the effect of annealing time on the through plane resistivity of ETP conductive flow field plates heated to a temperature of 185° C. - The present invention provides a process for decreasing the resistivity of a conductive flow field plate for use in a fuel cell. The process includes the step of annealing the conductive flow field plate by heating the conductive flow field plate to a temperature between 25° C. (room temperature) and a temperature less than, and preferably slightly lower than, the material softening temperature of the conductive flow field plate; maintaining the conductive flow field plate at that temperature for an effective period of time; and, cooling the conductive flow field plate to room temperature.
- The conductive flow field plate is heated by either placing the plate in boiling liquid or by dry heating the conductive flow field plate in an oven. The conductive flow field plate is heated to a temperature between 25° C. (room temperature) and a temperature less than, and preferably slightly lower than, the material softening temperature of the conductive flow field plate, as determined by an expansion probe in a thermal mechanical analyzer (TMA). The material softening temperature is the temperature above which thermal expansion of the material composition of the conductive flow field plate becomes non-linear and is no longer reversible.
- It has surprisingly been found that annealing significantly decreases the resistivity of the surface of the conductive flow field plate (bulk resistivity) and the resistivity through the plane of the conductive flow field plate (through plane resistivity). It is speculated that annealing alters the surface morphology of the composition of the conductive flow field plate and promotes heterogeneous distribution of conductive fillers. The preferred annealing temperature correlates with the linear expansion temperature of the material composition of the conductive flow field plate and should preferably always be less than the material softening temperature.
- Preferred annealing temperatures will accordingly be dependent on the material composition of the plate, but will generally be between 25° C. and the material softening temperature of the conductive flow field plate, where thermal expansion of the polymer in the composition occurs in a linear, reversible fashion.
- In a preferred embodiment, the conductive flow field plate is a carbon/graphite filler plate comprised of ground liquid crystalline polymer, graphite fiber and graphite powder. The polymer can be any liquid crystalline polymer such as liquid crystalline polyester, an engineering thermoplastic, or a blend thereof. Preferably the polymer is an aromatic polyester resin such as that available from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company under the trade-mark ZENITE™. The graphite fiber is preferably a pitch-based graphite fiber having a fiber length distribution range from 15 to 500 m, a fiber diameter of 8 to 10 m, bulk density of 0.3 to 0.5 g/cm3 and real density of 2.0-2.2 g/cm3. The graphite powder is preferably a synthetic graphite powder with a particle size distribution range of 20 to 1500 m, a surface area of 2-3 m2/g, bulk density of 0.5-0.7 g/cm3 and real density of 2.0-2.2 g/cm3.
- The conductive flow field plate is preferably comprised of 5-40% by weight polymer, 6-95% by weight graphite powder and 0-50% by weight graphite fiber.
- Most preferably the conductive flow field plate is comprised of 30% by weight polymer, 50% by weight graphite powder and 20% by weight graphite fiber.
- As shown in
FIG. 1 , the material softening temperature of a conductive flow field plate comprised of 30% ZENITE®, 20% graphite fiber and 50% graphite powder is approximately 225° C. At temperatures greater than 225° C., the polymer expands in a non-linear fashion, increasing the air voids within the plate and the thickness of the plate in the process. As shown inFIG. 2 , the bulk resistivity of the conductive flow field plate decreases from 25° C. to 225° C., but increases sharply at temperatures above 225° C. - An increase in the graphite fiber content of the plate will increase the structural integrity of the conductive flow field plate therefore permitting less dimensional change in the conductive flow field plate upon annealing. This corresponds to higher decreases in bulk resistivity as shown in tables 3 and 4.
- The conductive flow field plate is maintained at the selected annealing temperature for an effective period of time. During this time, the morphology of the polymer of the conductive flow field plate is altered affecting the conductive contact between the graphite fillers in the polymer matrix. As shown in
FIG. 4 , at 185° C. to achieve maximum decreases in through plane resistivity the effective time for annealing is at least 10 hours. The effective time for annealing may alter depending on the annealing temperature. - The conductive flow field plate is then cooled to room temperature, fixing the morphology of the components of the plate in its altered, annealed form.
- Annealing the conductive flow field plate results in a decrease in resistivity, which becomes more significant as the material softening temperature is approached. As shown in the examples, the resistivity (bulk resistivity or through plane resistivity) can be decreased up to 30% in a conductive flow field plate molded by Extrusion Transfer Pressing (ETP) technique (Examples 1 and 2) with a further decrease in resistivity to at least 50% of a compression molded plate (Example 3).
- This decrease in resistivity is greater than that obtained from machined conductive flow field plates. As shown in
FIG. 3 , a machined conductive flow field plate, i.e. a plate with a shaved outer skin on both sides, has lower resistivity to start. However, the resistivity increases with increasing annealing temperatures. - The following examples further illustrate the invention.
- In these examples, the conductive flow field plates are graphite filler plates comprised of a dry mixture of ground liquid crystalline polymer, graphite fiber and/or graphite powder.
- The conductive flow field plates were molded by either compression molding or Extrusion Transfer Pressing (ETP) technique. The details of these molding processes are set out in U.S. Pat. No. 5,637,329 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,384, which are hereby incorporated by reference.
- The bulk resistivity (p) of the conductive flow field plates is measured using the standard four point method. The standard four point method is performed in accordance with the method described in Wieder, HH, Laboratory Notes on Electrical and Galvanomagnetic Measurements, Material Science Monograph, Vol. 2, Elsevier Pub., Amsterdam, 1979, which is herein incorporated by reference. A current (1) is injected at the first of four linear equi-spaced point electrode probes and collected at the fourth electrode, while the potential difference ΔV between the second and third electrodes is measured. The resistivity (ρ) is determined using the following equation where T is the thickness of the sample, and R is the measured resistance.
ρ=4.53 RT - Through plane resistivity is measured using the contact resistance method, the conductive flow field plate is placed between two gold plates at 314 psi. A power supply sends a known current through the gold plates and resistance (R) is calculated using Ohm's Law, i.e., the formula I=V/R, where I is the current in amps and V is the potential drop in mV as read from the multimeter. Through plane resistivity can be calculated using the equation: p=R×A/T, where A is the area of the plate and T is the thickness of the plate.
- Example 1 compares the bulk resistivity of a conductive flow field plate annealed at temperatures between 25° C. and 240° C.
- A 254 mm×178 mm×2.5 mm ETP molded plate comprising 30% by weight ground Zenite® resin, 20% by weight graphite fiber and 50% by weight graphite powder was annealed at temperatures between 25 and 240° C., by sandwiching the conductive flow field plate between two aluminum shims and placing the shims between the platens of a press at the desired temperature. The conductive flow field plate was heated for 10 minutes and then taken out of the press and allowed to cool to room temperature. The bulk resistivity of each side of the conductive flow field plate was measured at 5 different points using a 4-point probe. The process was repeated for each of the following
temperatures 25° C., 140° C., 160° C., 180° C., 200° C., 220° C., and 240° C. As shown in Table 1 andFIG. 2 , the bulk resistivity of the conductive flow field plate dropped as a function of annealing temperature by about 18-23% at temperatures between 25 and 220° C.TABLE 1 Bulk resistivity measurements for each side of the conductive flow field plate annealed at temperatures between 25° C. and 240° C. Average Bulk Average Bulk Thickness, Resistivity (ohm · cm) Resistivity (Ohm · Temp, ° C. mm Side 1 cm) Side 225 2.50 0.038 0.038 140 2.52 0.039 0.038 160 2.54 0.037 0.036 180 2.54 0.032 0.032 200 2.56 0.031 0.029 220 2.58 0.027 0.026 240 2.86 0.111 0.094 - Example 2 compares the change in through plane resistivity of an ETP molded conductive flow field plate and a surface machined ETP molded conductive flow field plate upon annealing at different temperatures.
- A 254 mm×178 mm×2.5 mm ETP conductive flow field plate comprising 30% by weight ground ZENITE® resin, 20% by weight graphite fiber and 50% by weight graphite powder was cut into 2 conductive flow field plates of the following dimension:
-
- a. 137 mm×75 mm×2.47 mm; area on one side=102.75 cm2.
- b. 101.6 mmx×101.6 mm×2.06 mm; area on one side=103.23 cm2.
- Plate was machined on both surfaces. Plates A and B were annealed at temperatures between 25° C. and 240° C., by sandwiching the conductive flow field plates between two aluminum shims and placing the shims between the platens of a press at the desired temperature. The conductive flow field plates were heated for 30 minutes and then taken out of the press and allowed to cool to room temperature. The through plane resistance of the conductive flow field plates was measured using the contact resistance method.
- As shown in Table 2 and
FIG. 3 , a molded non-machined plate showed a drop of ˜30% in through plane resistivity as the annealing temperature was increased from 25° C.-220° C. A machined plate, on the other hand, showed a general increase in through plane resistivity with increased annealing temperatures. The drop in through plane resistivity of the non-machined conductive flow field plate was most significant at around 220° C. to 223° C., just before reaching the material softening temperature.TABLE 2 Through Plane Resistivity of Machined and Non-machined Conductive flow field Plates Upon Annealing at Temperatures from 25° C. to 240° C. Average Average Thickness Calculated Thickness Calculated Non- resistivity Non- Machined resistivity Annealing machined machined Plate Plate, Machined Plate Temp, ° C. plate, mm (Ωcm) mm (Ωcm) 25 2.47 0.328 2.06 0.268 160 2.47 0.294 2.15 0.335 180 2.54 0.260 2.12 0.342 200 2.51 0.248 2.12 0.325 220 2.51 0.231 2.14 0.311 240 2.67 0.401 2.19 0.550 - Example 3 illustrates the through plane resistivity of a compression molded conductive flow field plate annealed at 80° C. in a mixture of methanol and water.
- 50 g of each plate composition (see Table 3) was placed into a mold and pressed at 320° C. under 2-4 tons of pressure for 5-10 minutes. The pressure was increased to 7.5-10 tons for 10 minutes and reduced to 10-20 tons for 2 minutes. The mold was cooled to 90° C. under 10-20 tons of pressure. The plates were 101.6 mm×101.6 mm with 2-3 mm thickness. Initial resistance was measured using the contact resistance press method as set out in the second column of Table 4.
- The plates were annealed at 80° C. for 500 hours in a bath of 15% methanol in deionized water using a 4 L kettle and a heating mantle fitted with a Graham condenser. The plates were hung into the bath using Teflon tape. The pH of the bath was adjusted to 4 using sulfuric acid to create a corrosive environment within the bath. At the end of the annealing process, the conductive flow field plate was cooled to room temperature and through plane resistivity was measured using the contact resistance press method.
- As shown in Table 4, through plane resistivity was decreased upon prolonged heating at 80° C. The change in the thickness of the conductive flow field plate was only minor indicating that expansion of the polymer was linear in nature.
- The initial through plane resistivity of the conductive flow field plate comprised of 50% fiber (plate C—see Table 3) was greater than the initial through plane resistivity of the conductive flow field plates (plates A and B—see Table 3) comprising of 0 and 20% by weight fiber. However, the decrease in through plane resistivity of plate C was more significant following annealing, as a result of the higher fiber content of the conductive flow field plate and accordingly higher structural integrity of the conductive flow field plate.
TABLE 3 Composition of Plates in % by weight. Plates Ingredients A B C LCP (Zenite ™ 6000) % 30.0 30.0 30.0 Graphite powder % 70.0 50.0 20.0 Pitch fiber % 0.0 20.0 50.0 -
TABLE 4 The drop in through plane resistivity along with weight loss and thickness increase due to annealing in a liquid bath Initial through Final through plane resistivity plane resistivity Thickness Plate# ohm · cm ohm · cm Weight loss, % increase, % A 0.090 0.055 0.02 2.05 B 0.088 0.055 0.03 1.17 C 0.121 0.065 0.03 0.50 - Example 4 illustrates the effect of annealing time on bulk resistivity of the conductive flow field plate. A 254 mm×178 mm×2.67 mm ETP molded conductive flow field plate comprised of 30% by weight ground Zenite® resin, 20% by weight graphite fiber and 50% by weight graphite powder was cut down into 6 plate pieces of 1.5″×1.5″ each.
- The bulk resistivity of each of the plate pieces was measured at room temperature using the four-point method. The plate pieces were then heated to 185° C. and maintained at this temperature for either 2, 8, 24, 48, 55.5 or 72 hours. The plates were then cooled back down to room temperature to complete the annealing process.
- Bulk resistivity of the conductive flow field plate was measured using a 4-point probe on five different points on both sides of each plate. The bulk resistivity measurements are depicted in Table 5 and
FIG. 4 . - As shown in
FIG. 4 , bulk resistivity dropped by approximately 19% after about 10 hours, after which time no further drop in bulk resistivity was observed. The dimensional change in the conductive flow field plate (not shown) due to annealing was less than 5% in all cases.TABLE 5 Drop in Bulk Resistivity as a Function of Annealing Time Annealing Bulk Resistivity Time, Initial Bulk Resistivity (ohms · cm) % drop in bulk hours (ohms · cm) after annealing resistivity 2 0.066 0.059 10.51 8 0.057 0.048 17.00 24 0.063 0.055 15.64 48 0.082 0.066 19.50 55.5 0.053 0.044 16.89 72 0.097 0.078 19.39 - Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to its preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that other changes, modifications, additions and omissions may be made without departing from the substance and the scope of the present invention as defined by the attached claims.
Claims (13)
1. A process for decreasing the resistivity of a conductive flow field plate for use in a fuel cell wherein the conductive flow field plate has a material softening temperature, the process comprising the steps of:
(a) heating the conductive flow field plate to a temperature greater than 25° C. but less than the material softening temperature;
(b) maintaining the conductive flow field plate at the temperature for an effective period of time; and,
(c) cooling the conductive flow field plate to room temperature,
wherein the conductive flow field plate is thereby annealed.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein the conductive flow field plate is made by molding graphite filled polymer.
3. The process of claims 1 or 2 wherein the conductive flow field plate comprises from about 5 to about 40% by weight polymer, from about 6 to about 95% by weight graphite powder and from 0 to about 50% by weight graphite fiber.
4. The process of claim 3 wherein the conductive flow field plate comprises about 30% by weight polymer, about 50% by weight graphite powder and about 20% by weight graphite fiber.
5. The process of claim 3 , wherein the conductive flow field plate comprises about 30% by weight polymer, about 20% by weight graphite powder and about 50% by weight graphite fiber.
6. The process of claim 3 , wherein the conductive flow field plate comprises about 30% by weight polymer and about 70% by weight graphite powder.
7. The process of any one of claims 2 to 6 , wherein the polymer is liquid crystalline polyester.
8. The process of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the conductive flow field plate is made by compression molding.
9. The process of claim 8 wherein the resistivity is decreased by up to about 50%.
10. The process of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the conductive flow field plate is molded using extrusion transfer pressing technique.
11. The process of claim 10 wherein resistivity is decreased by up to about 30%.
12. The process of any one of claims 1 to 11 wherein the temperature is about 185° C.
13. The process of claim 12 wherein the conductive flow field plate is maintained at the temperature for at least 10 hours.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/508,684 US20050167882A1 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-03-17 | Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US36600702P | 2002-03-20 | 2002-03-20 | |
PCT/CA2003/000379 WO2003079474A2 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-03-17 | Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells |
US10/508,684 US20050167882A1 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-03-17 | Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050167882A1 true US20050167882A1 (en) | 2005-08-04 |
Family
ID=28042050
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/390,122 Expired - Fee Related US7153603B2 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-03-17 | Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells |
US10/508,684 Abandoned US20050167882A1 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-03-17 | Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/390,122 Expired - Fee Related US7153603B2 (en) | 2002-03-20 | 2003-03-17 | Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (2) | US7153603B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1490921A2 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2005527938A (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003209898A1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2479874A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003079474A2 (en) |
Citations (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4124747A (en) * | 1974-06-04 | 1978-11-07 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Conductive polyolefin sheet element |
US4169816A (en) * | 1978-03-06 | 1979-10-02 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Electrically conductive polyolefin compositions |
US4686072A (en) * | 1984-04-04 | 1987-08-11 | Kureha Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Process for preparing a carbonaceous five-layer fuel cell electrode substrate with elongated holes for feeding reactant gases |
US5591384A (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 1997-01-07 | Modern Technologies Corp. | Method for molding parts |
US6242118B1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2001-06-05 | International Fuel Cells Llc | Method and apparatus for removing contaminants from the coolant supply of a fuel cell power plant |
Family Cites Families (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4169818A (en) * | 1978-04-17 | 1979-10-02 | Celanese Corporation | Mixture of hydroxypropylcellulose and poly(maleic anhydride/alkyl vinyl ether) as a hydrocolloid gelling agent |
US4359438A (en) | 1981-09-21 | 1982-11-16 | Ashland Oil, Inc. | Process for molding corrosion resistant fuel cell collecting plates |
NZ210392A (en) * | 1983-12-06 | 1987-06-30 | Cormack Owen | Spatter guard for paint roller |
US5776624A (en) | 1996-12-23 | 1998-07-07 | General Motors Corporation | Brazed bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells |
US6210789B1 (en) | 1997-02-20 | 2001-04-03 | W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc. | Electrically conductive composite article |
US5798188A (en) | 1997-06-25 | 1998-08-25 | E. I. Dupont De Nemours And Company | Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell with bipolar plate having molded polymer projections |
CA2306144A1 (en) | 1997-10-14 | 1999-04-22 | Cytec Technology Corp. | Conductive thermoset molding composition and method for producing same |
US6103413A (en) | 1998-05-21 | 2000-08-15 | The Dow Chemical Company | Bipolar plates for electrochemical cells |
GB9821856D0 (en) | 1998-10-08 | 1998-12-02 | Ici Plc | Bipolar plates for fuel cells |
US6790554B2 (en) | 1998-10-08 | 2004-09-14 | Imperial Chemical Industries Plc | Fuel cells and fuel cell plates |
US6248467B1 (en) | 1998-10-23 | 2001-06-19 | The Regents Of The University Of California | Composite bipolar plate for electrochemical cells |
EP1139470A1 (en) * | 1998-11-16 | 2001-10-04 | Toray Industries, Inc. | Porous conductive sheet and method for producing the same |
US6180275B1 (en) | 1998-11-18 | 2001-01-30 | Energy Partners, L.C. | Fuel cell collector plate and method of fabrication |
US6379795B1 (en) * | 1999-01-19 | 2002-04-30 | E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company | Injection moldable conductive aromatic thermoplastic liquid crystalline polymeric compositions |
US6251308B1 (en) | 1999-03-19 | 2001-06-26 | Premix | Highly conductive molding compounds and fuel cell bipolar plates comprising these compounds |
CA2311196C (en) * | 1999-06-14 | 2005-08-16 | Kawasaki Steel Corporation | A fuel cell separator, a fuel cell using the fuel cell separator, and a method for making the fuel cell separator |
US6322919B1 (en) | 1999-08-16 | 2001-11-27 | Alliedsignal Inc. | Fuel cell and bipolar plate for use with same |
JP2001229936A (en) | 2000-02-16 | 2001-08-24 | Toyota Central Res & Dev Lab Inc | Electrolytic film and its production method |
WO2001080336A2 (en) | 2000-04-18 | 2001-10-25 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Membrane electrode assembly having annealed polymer electrolyte membrane |
JP3948217B2 (en) * | 2000-06-05 | 2007-07-25 | 昭和電工株式会社 | Conductive curable resin composition, cured product thereof, and molded product thereof |
JP3504910B2 (en) * | 2000-06-19 | 2004-03-08 | 日本ピラー工業株式会社 | Manufacturing method of fuel cell separator |
-
2003
- 2003-03-17 CA CA002479874A patent/CA2479874A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-03-17 AU AU2003209898A patent/AU2003209898A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-03-17 US US10/390,122 patent/US7153603B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-03-17 JP JP2003577363A patent/JP2005527938A/en active Pending
- 2003-03-17 WO PCT/CA2003/000379 patent/WO2003079474A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-03-17 EP EP03744290A patent/EP1490921A2/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-03-17 US US10/508,684 patent/US20050167882A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4124747A (en) * | 1974-06-04 | 1978-11-07 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Conductive polyolefin sheet element |
US4169816A (en) * | 1978-03-06 | 1979-10-02 | Exxon Research & Engineering Co. | Electrically conductive polyolefin compositions |
US4686072A (en) * | 1984-04-04 | 1987-08-11 | Kureha Kagaku Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Process for preparing a carbonaceous five-layer fuel cell electrode substrate with elongated holes for feeding reactant gases |
US5591384A (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 1997-01-07 | Modern Technologies Corp. | Method for molding parts |
US5637329A (en) * | 1994-03-31 | 1997-06-10 | Modern Technologies Corp. | Plasticator and system for molding parts |
US6242118B1 (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2001-06-05 | International Fuel Cells Llc | Method and apparatus for removing contaminants from the coolant supply of a fuel cell power plant |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2003079474A3 (en) | 2004-07-22 |
JP2005527938A (en) | 2005-09-15 |
US7153603B2 (en) | 2006-12-26 |
WO2003079474A2 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
AU2003209898A1 (en) | 2003-09-29 |
US20040046282A1 (en) | 2004-03-11 |
EP1490921A2 (en) | 2004-12-29 |
CA2479874A1 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
AU2003209898A8 (en) | 2003-09-29 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Simaafrookhteh et al. | Fabrication of multi-filler thermoset-based composite bipolar plates for PEMFCs applications: Molding defects and properties characterizations | |
US6797424B2 (en) | Separator for fuel cell, production process thereof, and solid polymer fuel cell using the separator | |
US6451471B1 (en) | Conductivity fuel cell collector plate and method of fabrication | |
WO2019095497A1 (en) | Composition for preparing electrically conductive material and preparation method therefor, bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel battery and preparation method therefor, and proton exchange membrane fuel battery | |
EP2982647B1 (en) | Carbon plate, and composite carbon plate | |
CN113372590A (en) | Polyimide graphene composite film and graphite film | |
KR100454370B1 (en) | Separator for fuel cell and method of fabricating thereof | |
Lee | Electro-mechanical properties of the carbon fabric composites with fibers exposed on the surface | |
Kim et al. | Manufacturing of the carbon/phenol composite bipolar plates for PEMFC with continuous hot rolling process | |
US7153603B2 (en) | Process for decreasing the resistivity of conductive flow field plates for use in fuel cells | |
CN113594487A (en) | Bipolar plate and preparation method thereof | |
KR20080074455A (en) | Bipolar plate for fuel cell | |
CN114559579A (en) | High-density flexible graphite bipolar plate and preparation method and application thereof | |
CN1998100A (en) | Low cost gas diffusion media for use in PEM fuel cells | |
Yu et al. | Integrated carbon composite bipolar plate for polymer–electrolyte membrane fuel cells | |
CN113707900B (en) | Preparation method of composite bipolar plate for fuel cell | |
Chen et al. | Nylon 6/CB polymeric conductive plastic bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells | |
CN114976090A (en) | Method for manufacturing integrated bipolar reaction plate | |
CN113524846A (en) | Composite aluminum-plastic film and manufacturing method thereof | |
JP2001068128A (en) | Separator for fuel cell and manufacture thereof | |
CN114105641A (en) | Production process of photovoltaic graphite crucible | |
Kypta et al. | Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube-Filled Polymer Composites for Direct Injection Molding of Bipolar Plates | |
WO2008085320A1 (en) | Carbon-filled polymer composite bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane fuel cells | |
CN117410513B (en) | Flexible composite graphite bipolar plate and preparation method thereof | |
JP2019204601A (en) | Fuel cell separator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: E. I. DUPONT CANADA COMPANY, CANADA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CAI, YUQI;FISHER, JOHN CHARLES;CHOPRA, DIVYA;REEL/FRAME:015221/0279;SIGNING DATES FROM 20040921 TO 20040922 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |