US20050067064A1 - Steel surface hardness using laser deposition and active gas shielding - Google Patents
Steel surface hardness using laser deposition and active gas shielding Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- US20050067064A1 US20050067064A1 US10/674,213 US67421303A US2005067064A1 US 20050067064 A1 US20050067064 A1 US 20050067064A1 US 67421303 A US67421303 A US 67421303A US 2005067064 A1 US2005067064 A1 US 2005067064A1
- Authority
- US
- United States
- Prior art keywords
- steel
- laser
- hardness
- nitrogen
- steel surface
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Abandoned
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K35/00—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting
- B23K35/22—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by the composition or nature of the material
- B23K35/24—Selection of soldering or welding materials proper
- B23K35/30—Selection of soldering or welding materials proper with the principal constituent melting at less than 1550 degrees C
- B23K35/3053—Fe as the principal constituent
- B23K35/308—Fe as the principal constituent with Cr as next major constituent
- B23K35/3086—Fe as the principal constituent with Cr as next major constituent containing Ni or Mn
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/20—Bonding
- B23K26/32—Bonding taking account of the properties of the material involved
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K26/00—Working by laser beam, e.g. welding, cutting or boring
- B23K26/34—Laser welding for purposes other than joining
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K35/00—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting
- B23K35/02—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by mechanical features, e.g. shape
- B23K35/0222—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by mechanical features, e.g. shape for use in soldering, brazing
- B23K35/0244—Powders, particles or spheres; Preforms made therefrom
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K35/00—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting
- B23K35/02—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by mechanical features, e.g. shape
- B23K35/0255—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by mechanical features, e.g. shape for use in welding
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K35/00—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting
- B23K35/22—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by the composition or nature of the material
- B23K35/24—Selection of soldering or welding materials proper
- B23K35/30—Selection of soldering or welding materials proper with the principal constituent melting at less than 1550 degrees C
- B23K35/3053—Fe as the principal constituent
- B23K35/308—Fe as the principal constituent with Cr as next major constituent
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K35/00—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting
- B23K35/22—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by the composition or nature of the material
- B23K35/24—Selection of soldering or welding materials proper
- B23K35/32—Selection of soldering or welding materials proper with the principal constituent melting at more than 1550 degrees C
- B23K35/327—Selection of soldering or welding materials proper with the principal constituent melting at more than 1550 degrees C comprising refractory compounds, e.g. carbides
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K35/00—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting
- B23K35/22—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by the composition or nature of the material
- B23K35/38—Selection of media, e.g. special atmospheres for surrounding the working area
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C23—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
- C23C—COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
- C23C24/00—Coating starting from inorganic powder
- C23C24/08—Coating starting from inorganic powder by application of heat or pressure and heat
- C23C24/10—Coating starting from inorganic powder by application of heat or pressure and heat with intermediate formation of a liquid phase in the layer
- C23C24/103—Coating with metallic material, i.e. metals or metal alloys, optionally comprising hard particles, e.g. oxides, carbides or nitrides
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K2103/00—Materials to be soldered, welded or cut
- B23K2103/50—Inorganic material, e.g. metals, not provided for in B23K2103/02 – B23K2103/26
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B23—MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B23K—SOLDERING OR UNSOLDERING; WELDING; CLADDING OR PLATING BY SOLDERING OR WELDING; CUTTING BY APPLYING HEAT LOCALLY, e.g. FLAME CUTTING; WORKING BY LASER BEAM
- B23K35/00—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting
- B23K35/22—Rods, electrodes, materials, or media, for use in soldering, welding, or cutting characterised by the composition or nature of the material
- B23K35/38—Selection of media, e.g. special atmospheres for surrounding the working area
- B23K35/383—Selection of media, e.g. special atmospheres for surrounding the working area mainly containing noble gases or nitrogen
Definitions
- the present invention relates generally to laser metal deposition methodology for making hard surface steel alloys. More particularly, it relates to making high-hardness steel surfaces and improved control of bead contours by the use of active nitrogen shielding together with laser surface alloying of premixed steel powders and carbide powders on a steel surface.
- Laser surface alloying is a versatile process through which one can modify the surface properties of metals and ceramics to obtain required properties.
- the properties of the surface are modified by localized melting and solidification.
- the LSA process alters the solidified microstructure by alloy-induced transformations, composite strengthening through the production of a coating comprised of a matrix material and second-phase particles, or a combination of both.
- the most common uses are for improving resistance to corrosion, abrasion, erosion, oxidation, and wear (1).
- LSA processing of steel surfaces relies on choosing the laser power and modifying the material characteristics to produce harder surfaces.
- the addition of alloying elements to the molten pool modifies the liquid pool composition.
- the alloying elements are added by pre-placing powders on the substrate, pre-blending the matrix powder and hard particles and feeding directly into the laser beam and material interaction region, or by injecting the hard particles into the trailing edge of the molten pool.
- Some processes have also combined the various methods for providing the powder additions, as well as the use of solid wire for the matrix material.
- LSA processing of steel has been performed with inert gas shielding using argon or helium to avoid contamination by oxygen and nitrogen.
- shielding gas composition we have carefully modified the shielding gas composition, hard particle powder composition, laser surface alloying process parameters, and matrix powder composition in order to achieve harder steel alloy surfaces and better bead formation on steel surfaces.
- the invention is a method of controlling bead shape in a steel alloy laser deposition process comprising laser melting an addition of titanium carbide powder and steel powder mixture to a steel surface using a shielding gas comprising 1% to 100% nitrogen.
- the shielding gas can further comprise an inert gas and/or air.
- the invention is a method of controlling bead shape in a steel alloy laser deposition process comprising laser melting an addition of material comprised of titanium carbide and steel on a steel surface in air.
- the invention is a method for producing a high-hardness steel surface comprising the steps of: introducing an addition of a powder mixture containing 10 to 60 weight percent titanium carbide powder and the balance steel onto a steel surface by preplacing the mixture on the surface, feeding the mixture into the interaction area, or combining the preplacing and feeding of the addition components; laser melting the powder additions and a relatively small amount of the steel surface using 1% to 100% nitrogen as shielding gas; and cooling at a rate such that a steel surface with fine titanium carbonitride particles is formed.
- FIG. 1 a is a photomicrograph of laser bead made on a 431 martensitic steel powder with argon shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 1 b is a photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with argon shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 1 c is a photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with mixture of 18 cfh of argon and 2 cfh of nitrogen as shielding gas.
- FIG. 1 d is a photomicrograph of laser bead shape made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders in air.
- FIG. 1 e is a photomicrograph of laser bead shape made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with nitrogen shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 1 f is a comparison of bead outline showing the effect of gradually increasing nitrogen content on the bead shape.
- FIG. 2 a is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on 431 martensitic steel powders with argon shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 2 b is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with argon shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 2 c. is a is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on a premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with shielding made with mixture of 18 cfh of argon and 2 cfh of nitrogen.
- FIG. 2 d is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on a premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with shielding made in air with no intentional shielding.
- FIG. 2 e is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with nitrogen shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 3 a is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on 431 martensitic steel powders with argon shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 3 b is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with argon shielding of 20.
- FIG. 3 c is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with shielding made with mixture of 18 cfh of argon and 2 cfh of nitrogen.
- FIG. 3 d is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with shielding made in air with no intentional shielding.
- FIG. 3 e is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with nitrogen shielding of 20 cfh.
- FIG. 4 is the comparison of hardness distributions in the laser deposits made with different conditions.
- FIG. 5 is the comparison of average hardness of the laser deposits for various conditions.
- harder surface coatings are produced in a laser metal deposition process carried out using active nitrogen shielding and by adding titanium carbide (TiC) particles in a steel matrix.
- TiC titanium carbide
- the harder surface compounds are formed by reaction of the dissolved titanium, carbon and nitrogen which forms harder particles in a steel matrix. Inert gas shielding can be eliminated while yielding better hardness and providing control over the bead shape.
- a mild steel of 1020 type was chosen as the substrate for the experimentation.
- the matrix was designed to be of type 431 martensitic steel composition.
- the specifications are given in Table 1.
- the types of hard particle powders used in the experimentation include titanium carbide (TiC), titanium nitride (TiN) and standard tungsten carbide (WC) powders.
- the specifications of TiC and TiN powders are given Table 1. TABLE 1 Specifications of 431 steel and TiC and TiN powders 431 Powder Sulzer Metco 42C powder, commercial 431 alloy purity, size ⁇ 325 + 80 size, and lot number W53351 TiC Powder AEE Corporation, 99.9% purity, size estimated at ⁇ 325 + 150, and lot number CAS-7440-33-7. TiN Powder Alfa Products Corporation, 99% purity, size estimated at ⁇ 325 + 150, and lot number 031986.
- the laser deposition was made in a Hobart Model HLP 3000 3.0 kW Nd:YAG laser with fiber optic beam delivery and f16 focus optics. A laser power of 2430 W was used in all experiments. The energy absorption for this experimental setup at 2 mm powder thickness was approximately 70%. In all the experiments the powder material to be melted by laser process was premixed and preplaced on the substrate surface. The width of the powder layer was 0.20 inches. The thickness of the powder layer was 0.08 inch.
- the details of the experimental conditions used in the experiments are given in Table 2.
- the laser bead shape and microstructure in the coatings were characterized using optical microscopy after standard etching.
- the hardness distributions in the coatings were measured with an automated hardness tester with 300 and 500 g loads and are given in terms of Vickers Hardness Number (HV). See FIGS. 4 and 5 .
- the laser bead shape shows extensive melting of the substrate compared to other conditions.
- FIG. 1 f shows the effect of gradually increasing the nitrogen content in the shielding gas. With the increase in nitrogen content, the weld pool shape became smaller and smaller. The results show that one can modify the bead shape by controlling the nitrogen content in the shielding gas.
- the microstructures obtained in conditions 1, 7, 8, 9, and 14 are shown in FIG. 2 .
- the microstructure from condition 1 did not contain any carbide and showed only martensite matrix (see FIG. 2 a ).
- the microstructures from conditions 7 (see FIG. 2 b ), 8 (see FIG. 2 c ), 9 (see FIG. 2 d ), and 14 (see FIG. 2 e ) showed the presence of fine carbides in the form of particles and also dendritic form.
- the microstructure from condition 8 shows some coarse TiC particles which have not melted completely.
- the hardness distribution in conditions 1 are compared in FIG. 3 .
- the hardness distributions were measured one one-half of the cross sections shown in FIG. 1 a - 1 e.
- the hardness values were measured at a spatial resolution of 200 micro-meters ( ⁇ m).
- the distributions are shown in a gray scale image format. The darker contrast indicates higher hardness and lighter contrast shows low hardness. Qualitative overview of the images showed that the condition 14 attained highest hardness.
- the hardness distributions are compared in FIG. 4 .
- the results show that the coating made with (condition 14) 431 steel powders with 20% TiC under 20 cfh nitrogen shielding produced the maximum hardness. This result shows that by increasing the nitrogen content in the shielding the hardness of the coating can be increased. TABLE 3 Measured Hardness Data in the substrate and the coatings produced in different conditions.
- the average hardness of the deposits made in conditions 1, 7, 8, 9, and 14 were calculated by assuming a Gaussian distribution. The values are compared in FIG. 5 and in Table 3. The maximum hardness in the coating was occasionally above 1000 HV (see Table 3). This is attributed to sampling of coarse carbides present in the coating by the hardness indenter. Therefore, for true representation of coating performance, the average hardness is evaluated further.
- a maximum hardness of 280 to 300 HV in the substrate is related to the formation of martensite in the regions close to the laser bead due to rapid cooling from the single-phase austenite region.
- the average hardness of the coating in condition 1 was 437.76 HV.
- On adding 20% TiC (condition 7) lead to an increase in average hardness to 573.69 HV. This 31% increase in hardness is attributed to the addition of TiC to the deposit.
- the average hardness of condition 8 was 621.07 HV. This 8% increase in hardness was attributed to increasing levels of dissolved nitrogen, as well as the hard Ti(CN) compound formed by reaction with the dissolved titanium and carbon.
- condition 9 The average hardness of condition 9 was 637.08 HV. This shows only a 2% increase in hardness over condition 8. Although one would expect higher levels of nitrogen dissolution in condition 9, the hardness increase was only 2%. This is attributed to deleterious effects of possible oxygen contamination.
- condition 14 was 724.39 HV. This shows that 13% increase in hardness compared to condition 9 can be achieved by 100% nitrogen shielding.
- Condition 8 gave a 31% increase in the hardness compared to condition 7.
- condition 14 gave a 65% increase in the hardness compared to condition 7.
- the hardness data conclusively show that use of laser metal deposition, 431 steel powders, the addition of TiC powders and 100% nitrogen shielding increases the surface hardness of the laser deposits.
Abstract
The addition of a steel and titanium carbide mixture is laser melted on a steel surface in air or in a shielding gas having a significant nitrogen content. The resulting steel surface has improved hardness and bead shape.
Description
- The United States Government has rights in this invention pursuant to contract no. DE-AC05-00OR22725 between the United States Department of Energy and UT-Battelle, LLC.
- The present invention relates generally to laser metal deposition methodology for making hard surface steel alloys. More particularly, it relates to making high-hardness steel surfaces and improved control of bead contours by the use of active nitrogen shielding together with laser surface alloying of premixed steel powders and carbide powders on a steel surface.
- Laser surface alloying (LSA) is a versatile process through which one can modify the surface properties of metals and ceramics to obtain required properties. The properties of the surface are modified by localized melting and solidification. The LSA process alters the solidified microstructure by alloy-induced transformations, composite strengthening through the production of a coating comprised of a matrix material and second-phase particles, or a combination of both. The most common uses are for improving resistance to corrosion, abrasion, erosion, oxidation, and wear (1).
- Current LSA processing of steel surfaces relies on choosing the laser power and modifying the material characteristics to produce harder surfaces. The addition of alloying elements to the molten pool modifies the liquid pool composition. The alloying elements are added by pre-placing powders on the substrate, pre-blending the matrix powder and hard particles and feeding directly into the laser beam and material interaction region, or by injecting the hard particles into the trailing edge of the molten pool. Some processes have also combined the various methods for providing the powder additions, as well as the use of solid wire for the matrix material. In all cases, LSA processing of steel has been performed with inert gas shielding using argon or helium to avoid contamination by oxygen and nitrogen.
- Recently, 100% nitrogen shielding was used in laser surface alloying of titanium alloys to produce harder titanium surfaces (2) Such a nitrogen shield process cannot be extended to steels, however, since it is well known that excess amounts of nitrogen dissolution into liquid steel will lead to gas porosity (3). No use of nitrogen shielding for laser surface alloying of steels is known prior to this invention.
- We have carefully modified the shielding gas composition, hard particle powder composition, laser surface alloying process parameters, and matrix powder composition in order to achieve harder steel alloy surfaces and better bead formation on steel surfaces.
- 1. S. S. Babu et. al., “Toward Prediction of Microstructural Evolution during Laser Surface Alloying”, Metallurgical and Materials transactions A, Vol. 33A, pp. 1189-1200, (2002).
- 2. I. Garcia, et. al., “(Ti,Al)/(Ti,Al)N Coatings Produced by Laser Surface Alloying”, Materials Letters, Vol. 53, pp. 44-51, (2002).
- 3. S. Kou, “Welding Metallurgy”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 64, (1987).
- It is an object of this invention to modify the gas shielding used with steel alloy laser surface alloying processes to allow excess nitrogen to enter the liquid steel.
- It is another object of this invention to utilize alloying elements in a steel alloy laser surface alloying process such that the alloying elements will dissolve in the liquid steel and react with dissolved nitrogen to form fine hard particles before the onset of solidification of the steel matrix.
- It is another object of this invention to select laser surfacing process parameters in a steel alloy laser surface alloying process that will allow for dissolution of particles, dissolution of nitrogen from a shielding gas and also provide the proper cooling rate to allow for re-precipitation of fine hard particles.
- It is a further object of this invention to select a matrix composition in a steel alloy laser surface alloying process that does not adversely influence the dissolution and re-precipitation of hard particles.
- Further and other objectives of the present invention will become apparent from the description contained herein.
- In one embodiment, the invention is a method of controlling bead shape in a steel alloy laser deposition process comprising laser melting an addition of titanium carbide powder and steel powder mixture to a steel surface using a shielding gas comprising 1% to 100% nitrogen. The shielding gas can further comprise an inert gas and/or air.
- In another embodiment, the invention is a method of controlling bead shape in a steel alloy laser deposition process comprising laser melting an addition of material comprised of titanium carbide and steel on a steel surface in air.
- In a further embodiment, the invention is a method for producing a high-hardness steel surface comprising the steps of: introducing an addition of a powder mixture containing 10 to 60 weight percent titanium carbide powder and the balance steel onto a steel surface by preplacing the mixture on the surface, feeding the mixture into the interaction area, or combining the preplacing and feeding of the addition components; laser melting the powder additions and a relatively small amount of the steel surface using 1% to 100% nitrogen as shielding gas; and cooling at a rate such that a steel surface with fine titanium carbonitride particles is formed.
-
FIG. 1 a is a photomicrograph of laser bead made on a 431 martensitic steel powder with argon shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 1 b is a photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with argon shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 1 c is a photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with mixture of 18 cfh of argon and 2 cfh of nitrogen as shielding gas. -
FIG. 1 d is a photomicrograph of laser bead shape made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders in air. -
FIG. 1 e is a photomicrograph of laser bead shape made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with nitrogen shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 1 f is a comparison of bead outline showing the effect of gradually increasing nitrogen content on the bead shape. -
FIG. 2 a. is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on 431 martensitic steel powders with argon shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 2 b. is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with argon shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 2 c. is a is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on a premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with shielding made with mixture of 18 cfh of argon and 2 cfh of nitrogen. -
FIG. 2 d. is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on a premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with shielding made in air with no intentional shielding. -
FIG. 2 e. is a high magnification optical photomicrograph of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powder with nitrogen shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 3 a is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on 431 martensitic steel powders with argon shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 3 b is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with argon shielding of 20. -
FIG. 3 c is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with shielding made with mixture of 18 cfh of argon and 2 cfh of nitrogen. -
FIG. 3 d is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with shielding made in air with no intentional shielding. -
FIG. 3 e is the measured hardness distribution image of laser bead made on premixed 431 martensitic steel and 20% TiC powders with nitrogen shielding of 20 cfh. -
FIG. 4 is the comparison of hardness distributions in the laser deposits made with different conditions. -
FIG. 5 is the comparison of average hardness of the laser deposits for various conditions. - In this laser surface alloying process, harder surface coatings are produced in a laser metal deposition process carried out using active nitrogen shielding and by adding titanium carbide (TiC) particles in a steel matrix. In particular, the harder surface compounds are formed by reaction of the dissolved titanium, carbon and nitrogen which forms harder particles in a steel matrix. Inert gas shielding can be eliminated while yielding better hardness and providing control over the bead shape.
- A mild steel of 1020 type was chosen as the substrate for the experimentation. The matrix was designed to be of
type 431 martensitic steel composition. The specifications are given in Table 1. The types of hard particle powders used in the experimentation include titanium carbide (TiC), titanium nitride (TiN) and standard tungsten carbide (WC) powders. The specifications of TiC and TiN powders are given Table 1.TABLE 1 Specifications of 431 steel and TiC and TiN powders 431 Powder Sulzer Metco 42C powder, commercial 431 alloy purity, size −325 + 80 size, and lot number W53351 TiC Powder AEE Corporation, 99.9% purity, size estimated at −325 + 150, and lot number CAS-7440-33-7. TiN Powder Alfa Products Corporation, 99% purity, size estimated at −325 + 150, and lot number 031986. - The laser deposition was made in a
Hobart Model HLP 3000 3.0 kW Nd:YAG laser with fiber optic beam delivery and f16 focus optics. A laser power of 2430 W was used in all experiments. The energy absorption for this experimental setup at 2 mm powder thickness was approximately 70%. In all the experiments the powder material to be melted by laser process was premixed and preplaced on the substrate surface. The width of the powder layer was 0.20 inches. The thickness of the powder layer was 0.08 inch. - The details of the experimental conditions used in the experiments are given in Table 2. The laser bead shape and microstructure in the coatings were characterized using optical microscopy after standard etching. The hardness distributions in the coatings were measured with an automated hardness tester with 300 and 500 g loads and are given in terms of Vickers Hardness Number (HV). See
FIGS. 4 and 5 . - A laser bead with 431 steel powders alone and with argon shielding at 20 cubic feet per hour (cfh) was made first. The laser bead shape (see
FIG. 1 a) shows extensive melting of the substrate compared to other conditions. - Mixing 20% by weight of TiC powders to the 431 steel powders (see
FIG. 1 b) and with argon shielding at 20 cfh led to reduction in the size of the bead. In addition, the liquid metal flow over the substrate sides was reduced compared to the bead with no TiC additions. - In the next run, a small amount of nitrogen was mixed with argon shielding. This was done by mixing 2 cfh of nitrogen with 18 cfh argon. This led to smoother and smaller bead shape (see
FIG. 1 c) compared to the previous conditions. - To evaluate the effect of increasing nitrogen, the shielding was completely removed and the effect of ambient air present during laser bead deposition was tested. The bead shape (see
FIG. 1 d) was again smaller than previous conditions. However, the surface was rougher compared to previous conditions. This may have been due to oxygen contamination from the air.TABLE 2 Experimental matrix used in the investigation to evaluate the effect of nitrogen, air and argon shielding with carbide and nitride particles Base Metal 1020 Mild Steel Beam Diameter 5 mm Nd: YAG Power 2430 W Optics F16 - Fiber Optic Delivery Laser Orientation 15° rear angle (Run # 1-22) 15° forward angle (Run # 22-30) Gas Supply 0.375″ I.D. copper tube @ 30° Powder Thickness 0.080″ t × 2.5″ L (Run # 1-22) (thoroughly mixed) 2.5″ L (Run # 22-30) Matrix/Particle Material Shielding Run (% by wt) Speed (cfh) Powder # 431 TiN TiC WC (IPM) Ar N2 Delivery Notes 1 100% — — — 5 20 — preplaced 2 100% — — — 5 18 2 preplaced 3 100% — — — 5 — — preplaced 4 80% 20% — — 5 20 — preplaced 5 80% 20% — — 5 18 2 preplaced 6 80% 20% — — 5 — — preplaced 7 80% — 20% — 5 20 — preplaced 8 80% — 20% — 5 18 2 preplaced 9 80% — 20% — 5 — — preplaced 10 80% — 20% — 15 20 — preplaced 11 80% — 20% — 15 18 2 preplaced 12 80% — 20% — 15 — — preplaced 13 80% — 20% — 15 — 20 preplaced 14 80% — 20% — 5 — 20 preplaced 15 80% — 20% — 15 20 — preplaced 3 passes & 3 mm overlap 16 80% — 20% — 15 — 20 preplaced 3 passes & 3 mm overlap 17 100% — — — 15 — 20 preplaced 18 100% — — — 5 — 20 preplaced 19 80% — — 20% 5 20 — preplaced 20 80% — — 20% 5 — 20 preplaced 21 80% — — 20% 15 — 20 preplaced 22 80% — — 20% 15 20 — preplaced 23 80% — — 30% 5 20 — tube-fed reverse direction 24 80% — — 30% 15 20 — tube-fed reverse direction 25 80% — — 30% 5 — 20 tube-fed reverse direction 26 80% — — 30% 15 — 20 tube-fed reverse direction 27 80% — 30% — 5 20 — tube-fed reverse direction 28 80% — 30% — 15 20 — tube-fed reverse direction 29 80% — 30% — 5 — 20 tube-fed reverse direction 30 80% — 30% — 15 — 20 tube-fed reverse direction 31 50% — 50% — 5 20 — tube-fed reverse direction - In the next run, 100% nitrogen was used as a shielding gas by making the laser beads with 20 cfh flow of nitrogen around the bead region. The bead shape attained with this condition is shown in
FIG. 1 e. Since there was no oxygen contamination in this experiment, the bead was much smoother. Interestingly, the bead was smaller than in previous runs. - A comparison of the outlines from all the laser beads is shown in
FIG. 1 f.FIG. 1 f shows the effect of gradually increasing the nitrogen content in the shielding gas. With the increase in nitrogen content, the weld pool shape became smaller and smaller. The results show that one can modify the bead shape by controlling the nitrogen content in the shielding gas. - The microstructures obtained in
conditions FIG. 2 . The microstructure fromcondition 1 did not contain any carbide and showed only martensite matrix (seeFIG. 2 a). The microstructures from conditions 7 (seeFIG. 2 b), 8 (seeFIG. 2 c), 9 (seeFIG. 2 d), and 14 (seeFIG. 2 e) showed the presence of fine carbides in the form of particles and also dendritic form. The microstructure from condition 8 (seeFIG. 2 c) shows some coarse TiC particles which have not melted completely. - The presence of fine particles smaller than original particle size indicates that most of the original TiC powders dissolve in the liquid steel. On dissolution, the super saturation of titanium and carbon increases as well as the nitrogen due to dissolution from the shielding environment. Then, during cooling from high temperature, the dissolved titanium, carbon and nitrogen react to precipitate as titanium carbonitride, Ti(CN). The presence of dendritic shaped Ti(CN) particles indicates these precipitates are forming much before the primary solidification of the steel matrix. The carbides obtained in
condition 14 were much finer. This is attributed to the higher supersaturation of nitrogen, and is also partly due to faster cooling in the deposit due to the smaller bead shape. - The hardness distribution in conditions 1 (see
FIG. 3 a), 7 (seeFIG. 3 b), 8 (seeFIG. 3 c), 9 (seeFIG. 3 d), and 14 (seeFIG. 3 e) are compared inFIG. 3 . The hardness distributions were measured one one-half of the cross sections shown inFIG. 1 a-1 e. The hardness values were measured at a spatial resolution of 200 micro-meters (μm). The distributions are shown in a gray scale image format. The darker contrast indicates higher hardness and lighter contrast shows low hardness. Qualitative overview of the images showed that thecondition 14 attained highest hardness. - The hardness distributions are compared in
FIG. 4 . The results show that the coating made with (condition 14) 431 steel powders with 20% TiC under 20 cfh nitrogen shielding produced the maximum hardness. This result shows that by increasing the nitrogen content in the shielding the hardness of the coating can be increased.TABLE 3 Measured Hardness Data in the substrate and the coatings produced in different conditions. Minimum Maximum Minimum Maximum Average Substrate Substrate Coating Coating Coating Hardness, Hardness, Hardness, Hardness, Hardness, Run HV HV HV HV HV 1 140.7 285.43 393.97 461.918 437.76 7 136.18 249.25 529.65 1834.78 573.69 8 172.36 244.72 579.4 1378.12 621.07 9 154.27 258.29 602.01 1007.26 637.08 14 167.84 298.99 651.76 1103.95 724.39 - The average hardness of the deposits made in
conditions FIG. 5 and in Table 3. The maximum hardness in the coating was occasionally above 1000 HV (see Table 3). This is attributed to sampling of coarse carbides present in the coating by the hardness indenter. Therefore, for true representation of coating performance, the average hardness is evaluated further. - The average substrate hardness close to the coating did not change much in all conditions tested. A maximum hardness of 280 to 300 HV in the substrate is related to the formation of martensite in the regions close to the laser bead due to rapid cooling from the single-phase austenite region.
- The average hardness of the coating in
condition 1 was 437.76 HV. On adding 20% TiC (condition 7) lead to an increase in average hardness to 573.69 HV. This 31% increase in hardness is attributed to the addition of TiC to the deposit. - The average hardness of
condition 8 was 621.07 HV. This 8% increase in hardness was attributed to increasing levels of dissolved nitrogen, as well as the hard Ti(CN) compound formed by reaction with the dissolved titanium and carbon. - The average hardness of
condition 9 was 637.08 HV. This shows only a 2% increase in hardness overcondition 8. Although one would expect higher levels of nitrogen dissolution incondition 9, the hardness increase was only 2%. This is attributed to deleterious effects of possible oxygen contamination. - The average hardness of
condition 14 was 724.39 HV. This shows that 13% increase in hardness compared tocondition 9 can be achieved by 100% nitrogen shielding.Condition 8 gave a 31% increase in the hardness compared tocondition 7. However,condition 14 gave a 65% increase in the hardness compared tocondition 7. - The hardness data conclusively show that use of laser metal deposition, 431 steel powders, the addition of TiC powders and 100% nitrogen shielding increases the surface hardness of the laser deposits.
- While there has been shown and described what are at present considered the preferred embodiments of the invention, it will be obvious to those skilled in the art that various changes and modifications can be prepared therein without departing from the scope of the invention defined by the appended claims.
Claims (6)
1. A method of controlling bead shape in a steel alloy laser deposition process comprising laser melting a premixed titanium carbide powder and steel powder mixture on a steel surface using a shielding gas comprising 1% to 100% nitrogen.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein said shielding gas further comprises an inert gas.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein said shielding gas further comprises air.
4. A method of controlling bead shape in a steel alloy laser deposition process comprising laser melting an addition of material comprised of titanium carbide and steel on a steel surface in air.
5. A method for producing a high-hardness steel surface comprising the steps of:
a) introducing an addition of a powder mixture containing 10 to 60 weight percent titanium carbide powder and the balance steel onto a steel surface by preplacing said mixture on the surface, feeding said mixture into the interaction area, or combining the preplacing and feeding of the addition components;
b) laser melting said powder additions and a relatively small amount of the steel surface using 1% to 100% nitrogen as shielding gas; and
c) cooling at a rate such that a steel surface with fine titanium carbonitride particles is formed.
6. A high hardness martensitic steel surface with distributed carbide particles produced according to the method of claim 5.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/674,213 US20050067064A1 (en) | 2003-09-29 | 2003-09-29 | Steel surface hardness using laser deposition and active gas shielding |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/674,213 US20050067064A1 (en) | 2003-09-29 | 2003-09-29 | Steel surface hardness using laser deposition and active gas shielding |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
US20050067064A1 true US20050067064A1 (en) | 2005-03-31 |
Family
ID=34376830
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
US10/674,213 Abandoned US20050067064A1 (en) | 2003-09-29 | 2003-09-29 | Steel surface hardness using laser deposition and active gas shielding |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20050067064A1 (en) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102010026084A1 (en) | 2010-07-05 | 2012-01-05 | Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh | Applying material layer on workpiece made of material containing titanium aluminide, comprises heating workpiece by induction at preheating temperature and applying powdery additive on heated surface of workpiece by deposition welding |
EP3254783A1 (en) * | 2016-06-07 | 2017-12-13 | EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems | Powder mixture for use in the manufacture of a three-dimensional object by means of an additive manufacturing method |
WO2017211602A1 (en) * | 2016-06-07 | 2017-12-14 | Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems | Powder mixture for use in the manufacture of a three-dimensional object by means of an additive manufacturing method |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3779720A (en) * | 1971-11-17 | 1973-12-18 | Chromalloy American Corp | Plasma sprayed titanium carbide tool steel coating |
US3977837A (en) * | 1973-11-06 | 1976-08-31 | Chromalloy American Corporation | Titanium carbide tool steel having improved properties |
US4318739A (en) * | 1979-06-05 | 1982-03-09 | A. Finkl & Sons Co. | Steel having improved surface and reduction of area transverse properties, and method of manufacture thereof |
US5720830A (en) * | 1992-11-19 | 1998-02-24 | Sheffield Forgemasters Limited | Engineering ferrous metals and method of making thereof |
US5858463A (en) * | 1995-10-17 | 1999-01-12 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Method of regenerating extrusion die for ceramic honeycomb structural bodies |
US5900077A (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 1999-05-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Hardness, strength, and fracture toughness steel |
US6899773B2 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2005-05-31 | Advanced Steel Technology, Llc | Fine-grained martensitic stainless steel and method thereof |
-
2003
- 2003-09-29 US US10/674,213 patent/US20050067064A1/en not_active Abandoned
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3779720A (en) * | 1971-11-17 | 1973-12-18 | Chromalloy American Corp | Plasma sprayed titanium carbide tool steel coating |
US3977837A (en) * | 1973-11-06 | 1976-08-31 | Chromalloy American Corporation | Titanium carbide tool steel having improved properties |
US4318739A (en) * | 1979-06-05 | 1982-03-09 | A. Finkl & Sons Co. | Steel having improved surface and reduction of area transverse properties, and method of manufacture thereof |
US5720830A (en) * | 1992-11-19 | 1998-02-24 | Sheffield Forgemasters Limited | Engineering ferrous metals and method of making thereof |
US5858463A (en) * | 1995-10-17 | 1999-01-12 | Ngk Insulators, Ltd. | Method of regenerating extrusion die for ceramic honeycomb structural bodies |
US5900077A (en) * | 1997-12-15 | 1999-05-04 | Caterpillar Inc. | Hardness, strength, and fracture toughness steel |
US6899773B2 (en) * | 2003-02-07 | 2005-05-31 | Advanced Steel Technology, Llc | Fine-grained martensitic stainless steel and method thereof |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102010026084A1 (en) | 2010-07-05 | 2012-01-05 | Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh | Applying material layer on workpiece made of material containing titanium aluminide, comprises heating workpiece by induction at preheating temperature and applying powdery additive on heated surface of workpiece by deposition welding |
WO2012069029A2 (en) | 2010-07-05 | 2012-05-31 | Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh | Process and apparatus for applying layers of material to a workpiece made of tial |
US9550255B2 (en) | 2010-07-05 | 2017-01-24 | Mtu Aero Engines Gmbh | Process and apparatus for applying layers of material to a workpiece made of tiAl |
EP3254783A1 (en) * | 2016-06-07 | 2017-12-13 | EOS GmbH Electro Optical Systems | Powder mixture for use in the manufacture of a three-dimensional object by means of an additive manufacturing method |
WO2017211602A1 (en) * | 2016-06-07 | 2017-12-14 | Eos Gmbh Electro Optical Systems | Powder mixture for use in the manufacture of a three-dimensional object by means of an additive manufacturing method |
CN109311088A (en) * | 2016-06-07 | 2019-02-05 | 德国易欧司光电技术有限公司 | For manufacturing the mixture of powders of three-dimension object by increasing material manufacturing method |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Bartkowski et al. | Microstructure, microhardness and corrosion resistance of Stellite-6 coatings reinforced with WC particles using laser cladding | |
De Damborenea | Surface modification of metals by high power lasers | |
US4015100A (en) | Surface modification | |
Kathuria | Some aspects of laser surface cladding in the turbine industry | |
Xu et al. | Comparison between diode laser and TIG cladding of Co-based alloys on the SUS403 stainless steel | |
Deuis et al. | Metal-matrix composite coatings by PTA surfacing | |
EP0919638B1 (en) | Laser clad pot roll sleeves and bushing for galvanizing baths | |
Montealegre et al. | Surface treatments by laser technology | |
JPH0525655A (en) | Method for hardening surface of aluminum base metal and surface hardened aluminum base member | |
US20130045334A1 (en) | Hardface coating systems and methods for metal alloys and other materials for wear and corrosion resistant applications | |
Dobrzański et al. | Manufacturing technologies thick-layer coatings on various substrates and manufacturing gradient materials using powders of metals, their alloys and ceramics | |
EP3371337B1 (en) | Method of layer-by-layer construction of a metallic part | |
Yamaguchi et al. | Porosity reduction in WC-12Co laser cladding by aluminum addition | |
Kim et al. | Chromium carbide laser-beam surface-alloying treatment on stainless steel | |
Fatoba et al. | Laser metal deposition influence on the mechanical properties of steels and stainless steel composites: a review | |
Babu et al. | Reactive gas shielding during laser surface alloying for production of hard coatings | |
US20050067064A1 (en) | Steel surface hardness using laser deposition and active gas shielding | |
US20120261459A1 (en) | Laser metalworking using reactive gas | |
Babinets et al. | Influence of modification and microalloying on deposited metal structure and properties | |
Valente et al. | LASER cladding—a post processing technique for coating, repair and re-manufacturing | |
Lisiecki et al. | Robotized fiber laser cladding of steel substrate by metal matrix composite powder at cryogenic conditions | |
CN112004961A (en) | Article having a protective layer of nitrogen alloy and method of producing the same | |
Nowotny et al. | Microstructure and wear properties of laser clad carbide coatings | |
Gassmann et al. | Laser cladding of hard particles rich alloys | |
Do Vale et al. | Effect of laser parameters on the characteristics of a laser clad AISI 431 stainless steel coating on carbon steel substrate |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
AS | Assignment |
Owner name: PENN STATE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, PENNSYLVANIA Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:MARTUKANITZ, RICHARD P.;TRESSLER, JAY F.;REEL/FRAME:014558/0263 Effective date: 20030926 Owner name: UT-BATTELLE, LLC, TENNESSEE Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:BABU, SUDARSANAM S.;REEL/FRAME:014558/0269 Effective date: 20030919 |
|
STCB | Information on status: application discontinuation |
Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION |