US11065600B2 - Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules - Google Patents

Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US11065600B2
US11065600B2 US16/303,232 US201716303232A US11065600B2 US 11065600 B2 US11065600 B2 US 11065600B2 US 201716303232 A US201716303232 A US 201716303232A US 11065600 B2 US11065600 B2 US 11065600B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
polymer
poly
gram
polymer system
toxins
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
US16/303,232
Other versions
US20190201867A1 (en
Inventor
Tamaz Guliashvili
Thomas Golobish
Maryann Gruda
Pamela O'SULLIVAN
Andrew SCHEIRER
Vincent Capponi
Phillip Chan
Wei-Tai Young
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Cytosorbents Corp
Original Assignee
Cytosorbents Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Cytosorbents Corp filed Critical Cytosorbents Corp
Priority to US16/303,232 priority Critical patent/US11065600B2/en
Assigned to CYTOSORBENTS CORPORATION reassignment CYTOSORBENTS CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CYTOSORBENTS, INC.
Assigned to CYTOSORBENTS, INC. reassignment CYTOSORBENTS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CHAN, PHILLIP, GOLOBISH, THOMAS, SCHEIRER, Andrew, YOUNG, WEI-TAI, CAPPONI, VINCENT, GRUDA, MARYANN, GULIASHVILI, TAMAZ, O'SULLIVAN, Pamela
Publication of US20190201867A1 publication Critical patent/US20190201867A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US11065600B2 publication Critical patent/US11065600B2/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/22Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising organic material
    • B01J20/26Synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • B01J20/261Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained by reactions only involving carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/74Synthetic polymeric materials
    • A61K31/745Polymers of hydrocarbons
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0031Rectum, anus
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K9/00Medicinal preparations characterised by special physical form
    • A61K9/0012Galenical forms characterised by the site of application
    • A61K9/0053Mouth and digestive tract, i.e. intraoral and peroral administration
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61MDEVICES FOR INTRODUCING MEDIA INTO, OR ONTO, THE BODY; DEVICES FOR TRANSDUCING BODY MEDIA OR FOR TAKING MEDIA FROM THE BODY; DEVICES FOR PRODUCING OR ENDING SLEEP OR STUPOR
    • A61M1/00Suction or pumping devices for medical purposes; Devices for carrying-off, for treatment of, or for carrying-over, body-liquids; Drainage systems
    • A61M1/36Other treatment of blood in a by-pass of the natural circulatory system, e.g. temperature adaptation, irradiation ; Extra-corporeal blood circuits
    • A61M1/3679Other treatment of blood in a by-pass of the natural circulatory system, e.g. temperature adaptation, irradiation ; Extra-corporeal blood circuits by absorption
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D15/00Separating processes involving the treatment of liquids with solid sorbents; Apparatus therefor
    • B01D15/08Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography
    • B01D15/26Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by the separation mechanism
    • B01D15/34Size selective separation, e.g. size exclusion chromatography, gel filtration, permeation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/22Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising organic material
    • B01J20/26Synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • B01J20/262Synthetic macromolecular compounds obtained otherwise than by reactions only involving carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds, e.g. obtained by polycondensation
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/22Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof comprising organic material
    • B01J20/26Synthetic macromolecular compounds
    • B01J20/265Synthetic macromolecular compounds modified or post-treated polymers
    • B01J20/267Cross-linked polymers
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/28Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J20/28054Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J20/28069Pore volume, e.g. total pore volume, mesopore volume, micropore volume
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/28Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J20/28054Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J20/28078Pore diameter
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/28Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J20/28054Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J20/28078Pore diameter
    • B01J20/2808Pore diameter being less than 2 nm, i.e. micropores or nanopores
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/28Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J20/28054Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J20/28078Pore diameter
    • B01J20/28083Pore diameter being in the range 2-50 nm, i.e. mesopores
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/28Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties
    • B01J20/28054Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof characterised by their form or physical properties characterised by their surface properties or porosity
    • B01J20/28078Pore diameter
    • B01J20/28085Pore diameter being more than 50 nm, i.e. macropores
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/32Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
    • B01J20/3202Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the carrier, support or substrate used for impregnation or coating
    • B01J20/3206Organic carriers, supports or substrates
    • B01J20/3208Polymeric carriers, supports or substrates
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/32Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
    • B01J20/3231Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the coating or impregnating layer
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/32Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
    • B01J20/3231Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the coating or impregnating layer
    • B01J20/3242Layers with a functional group, e.g. an affinity material, a ligand, a reactant or a complexing group
    • B01J20/3268Macromolecular compounds
    • B01J20/327Polymers obtained by reactions involving only carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/32Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
    • B01J20/3231Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the coating or impregnating layer
    • B01J20/3242Layers with a functional group, e.g. an affinity material, a ligand, a reactant or a complexing group
    • B01J20/3268Macromolecular compounds
    • B01J20/3272Polymers obtained by reactions otherwise than involving only carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/32Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
    • B01J20/3231Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the coating or impregnating layer
    • B01J20/3242Layers with a functional group, e.g. an affinity material, a ligand, a reactant or a complexing group
    • B01J20/3268Macromolecular compounds
    • B01J20/3272Polymers obtained by reactions otherwise than involving only carbon to carbon unsaturated bonds
    • B01J20/3274Proteins, nucleic acids, polysaccharides, antibodies or antigens
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J20/00Solid sorbent compositions or filter aid compositions; Sorbents for chromatography; Processes for preparing, regenerating or reactivating thereof
    • B01J20/30Processes for preparing, regenerating, or reactivating
    • B01J20/32Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating
    • B01J20/3231Impregnating or coating ; Solid sorbent compositions obtained from processes involving impregnating or coating characterised by the coating or impregnating layer
    • B01J20/3289Coatings involving more than one layer of same or different nature
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D15/00Separating processes involving the treatment of liquids with solid sorbents; Apparatus therefor
    • B01D15/08Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography
    • B01D15/10Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features
    • B01D15/12Selective adsorption, e.g. chromatography characterised by constructional or operational features relating to the preparation of the feed
    • B01D15/125Pre-filtration

Definitions

  • the disclosed inventions are in the field of porous polymeric sorbents.
  • the disclosed inventions are also in the field of broadly reducing endotoxins in blood and blood products that can cause endotoxemia. Additionally, the disclosed inventions are in the field of broadly removing endotoxins by perfusion or hemoperfusion.
  • LPS lipopolysaccharides
  • O-antigen is a repetitive glycan polymer comprising the hydrophilic outermost domain of the molecule, and the composition is different for each strain of LPS.
  • the core attaches the O-antigen to Lipid A, which is a biologically active phosphorylated glucosamine disaccharide containing multiple hydrophobic fatty acid tails. These fatty acid tails are responsible for anchoring the LPS into the bacterial cell wall. Both the core and Lipid A are highly conserved across different strains of LPS, and Lipid A is the primary toxic component.
  • LPS lipopolysaccharide binding protein
  • Endotoxins have also been associated with countless syndromes and diseases. These include complications from trauma, burns, and invasive surgery, and also organ-specific illnesses like liver disease, kidney dialysis complications, and autoimmune diseases.
  • Toraymyxin is a PMB-based extracorporeal device designed for selective blood purification of endotoxins via direct hemoperfusion and is approved as a therapeutic device by the health insurance system in Japan.
  • Polymyxin B is characterized by a heptapeptide ring, a tripeptide group, and a fatty acid tail, and is an antibiotic primarily used for resistant Gram-negative infections.
  • Positively charged diaminobutyric acid groups of PMB interact with negatively charged phosphate groups of LPS, leading to interaction between the N-terminal fatty acyl chain of PMB and lipid A fatty acyl tails, forming a very stable PMB-LPS complex.
  • anion exchange resins can also be used for LPS removal.
  • Diethylaminoethyl-cellulose (DEAE-cellulose) resin is positively charged as a result of tertiary amine functional groups, and Bengsch et. al. have reported binding of LPS in plasmas with high affinity and capacity at physiological pH by the DEAE-cellulose adsorber.
  • Bengsch et. al. have reported binding of LPS in plasmas with high affinity and capacity at physiological pH by the DEAE-cellulose adsorber.
  • the reduction in endotoxin levels was accompanied by a transient, hut reversible, increase of prothrombin time.
  • Boengsch S, Boos K S, Nagel D, Seidel D, Inthom D Extracorporeal plasma treatment for the removal of endotoxin in patients with sepsis: clinical results of a pilot study.
  • the Alteco LPS adsorber (Alteco Medical AB) consists of polyethylene slabs with an immobilized special cationic peptide, HAE 27, which selectively hinds and adsorbs LI'S. Additionally, EndoTrap (Profos AG) adsorbers consist of a bacteriophage protein immobilized on Sepharose beads, where the bacteriophage protein has a high affinity for LPS molecules.
  • Adsorption capacities of numerous commercial endotoxin adsorbers were assessed in a study by Harm et. al.
  • Adsorbents tested include Toraymyxin PMX-20R, Alteco LPS Adsorber, Diethylaminoethyl-sepharose (DEAE-Sepharose), Polymyxin B-Agarose, and EndoTrap red, and mobile phases used in the study include buffer solution, protein solution, serum, heparinized plasma, and whole blood.
  • Only the Alteco LPS Adsorber and the Toraymyxin PMX-20R are hemocompatible, so only these adsorbents were tested in whole blood. These two adsorbers are also the only two of the aforementioned products that are designed for hemoperfusion applications.
  • DEAE-Sepharose was most efficient for LPS removal from serum, decreasing the value to 28 ⁇ 0.8% of the control; however, it was unable to be tested in heparinized plasma due to heparin binding capabilities of DEAE-Sepharose leading to plasma clotting.
  • PMB-Agarose was the second most efficient, reducing LPS levels to 36 ⁇ 3.6% and 64 ⁇ 6.8% of the control in serum and heparinized plasma, respectively.
  • Toraymyxin was the only other adsorber able to reduce levels below 75% of the control, decreasing LAL activity to 41 ⁇ 3.5% and 65 ⁇ 4.5% of the control for serum and heparinized plasma, respectively.
  • endotoxins are components of the cell walls of gram-negative bacteria.
  • Gram-negative bacteria are commonly used in the production of recombinant proteins, and many of the techniques utilized to extract the desired recombinant proteins from the bacteria cells also release lipopolysaccharides.
  • Purification of the recombinant proteins using ion-exchange columns are not always completely successful because LPS tend to form a complex with the proteins via specific or non-specific interactions, and the entire complex becomes immobilized on the exchange column.
  • Ropp et. al. have developed a technique using alkanediols to separate LPS from the protein-LPS complex, leaving the protein immobilized on an ion-exchange column (PCT Int. Appl. (2005), WO 2005003152 A1 20050113). Alkanediols were selected because of the reduced toxicity and flammability, compared with other reagents that accomplish similar separations.
  • alkanediols exhibit broad antimicrobial activities and have been used in cosmetics as moisturizing antimicrobial agents.
  • dimers and trimers of 1,2-hexanediol and ( ⁇ S)-3-(hexyloxy)propane-1,2-diol in water when two hydroxyl groups become closer and the aliphatic chain becomes longer, the amphipathicity of the alkanediol is increased and thus, it is likely to penetrate more easily into membrane bilayers of the microbial cell (Yoo I K, J I I Kim, Y K Kang. “Conformational preferences and antimicrobial activities of alkanediols.” Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2015 vol 1064, 15-24.)
  • Lipoteichoic acid is a primary component of gram-positive bacteria cell walls, and has many of the same pathogenic properties as LPS. LTA is anchored into the cell wall via a glycolipid, which plays an analogous role to lipid A in LPS (Morath S, et. al. “Structure/function relationships of lipoteichoic acids. J Endotoxin Res. 2005; 11(6):348-56.) If released from the cell wall, it can bind non-specifically to membrane phospholipids, or specifically to toll-like receptors, of target cells and activate the complement cascade or trigger the release of reactive species and cytokines, which may act to amplify cell damage.
  • LTA Lipoteichoic acid
  • LTA plays an important role in infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, and in animal studies has been shown to trigger cascades resulting in multiple organ failure and septic shock in addition to meningeal inflammation, encephalomyelitis, and arthritis (Ginsburg I. “Role of lipoteichoic acid in infection and inflammation.” Lancet Infect Dis. 2002 March; 2(3):171-9.)
  • a novel sorbent material offers an advantage over existing technologies in that endotoxin levels in biological fluids are decreased without the potential leaching of harmful substances, resulting in a safe and effective method.
  • This sorbent material differs from other existing technologies due to the net neutral charge of the functional groups covalently attached to the polymeric matrix.
  • LPS may be retained by the novel sorbent material through tortuous path, sorption, and pore capture.
  • Several pathways can be utilized to synthesize the said resin, comprised of either a polyol group or a zwitterionic group covalently bound to a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) backbone.
  • the polymer is hemocompatible.
  • the polymers described herein exhibit minimal activation, indicating plasma-like interactions. Additionally, the sorbents are able to remove cytokines and inflammatory protein moieties simultaneously while removing endotoxins, and have the potential to exhibit antimicrobial activity. Removing either endotoxins or cytokines from an endotoxemic patient may be an insufficient treatment, as remaining endotoxin will trigger more cytokine production and remaining cytokines could still result in sepsis. By removing both the root cause of the infection and the subsequent excessive inflammatory response, this novel sorbent offers an advantage over existing technologies designed specifically for endotoxin removal.
  • the invention concerns a biocompatible polymer system comprising at least one polymer, said polymer comprising polyol or zwitterionic functionality; the polymer system capable of adsorbing endotoxins.
  • Preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing a broad range of toxins and inflammatory mediators having a molecular weight of from less than about 0.5 kDa to about 1,000 kDa (or about 1 kDa to about 1,000 kDa in some embodiments).
  • Some preferred polymers are hemocompatible.
  • Certain preferred polymer systems have geometry of a spherical bead.
  • Some preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing one or more of gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, and gram-negative bacterial components.
  • Gram-negative bacterial components include, but are not limited to, lipopolysaccharide (LPS).
  • Other preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing one or more of gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components.
  • Gram-positive bacterial components include, but are not limited to, lipoteichoic acid (LTA).
  • toxins and inflammatory mediators comprise one or more of cytokines, pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), superantigens, monokines, chemokines, interferons, proteases, enzymes, peptides including bradykinin, soluble CD40 ligand, bioactive lipids, oxidized lipids, cell-free hemoglobin, cell-free myoglobin, growth factors, glycoproteins, prions, toxins, bacterial and viral toxins, drugs, vasoactive substances, foreign antigens, and antibodies.
  • the polymers can be made by any means known in the art to produce a suitable porous polymer.
  • the polymer is made using suspension polymerization.
  • the polymer is made via emulsion polymerization, bulk polymerization, or precipitation polymerization.
  • the polymers are in the form of solid supports.
  • the solid support is a bead.
  • the solid support is a fiber, monolithic column, or film.
  • Some polymer systems have a polymer pore structure that has a total volume of pore sizes in the range of from 10 ⁇ to 40,000 ⁇ greater than 0.1 cc/g and less than 5.0 cc/g dry polymer, while other polymer systems are nonporous.
  • Other embodiments have a polymer pore structure that has a total volume of pore sizes in the range of from 10 ⁇ to 40,000 ⁇ greater than 0.1 cc/g and less than 3.0 cc/g dry polymer, while other polymer systems are nonporous.
  • the polymer is in the form of hypercrosslinked or macroreticular porous polymer beads containing polyol groups. In certain other embodiments, the polymer is in the form of hypercrosslinked or macroreticular porous polymer beads containing zwitterionic groups. In preferred embodiments, the polymer is in the form of a hypercrosslinked or macroreticular porous polymer beads containing diol groups.
  • the polymer is in the form of nonporous polymer beads containing polyol groups. In certain other embodiments, the polymer is in the form of nonporous polymer beads containing zwitterionic groups. In preferred embodiments, the polymer is in the form of nonporous polymer beads containing diol groups.
  • the polymer beads comprise polyol groups.
  • the polymer beads comprising polyol groups can be produced by ring-opening reactions of premade polymer that contains epoxide groups.
  • the polyol groups are diol groups.
  • the polymer beads comprising polyol groups can be produced by ester hydrolysis reactions of premade polymer that contains residual acetate groups.
  • the polyol groups are diol groups.
  • the polymer beads comprise zwitterionic functionality.
  • the polymer beads comprising zwitterionic functionality can be produced by free-radical reactions in the presence zwitterionic monomers that contain double bonds readily available for polymerization.
  • Some polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing epoxide groups which are copolymerized in the presence of cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, monomer, and suitable porogen to yield porous polymeric polymer containing epoxide functionality. These epoxides are then converted into polyols via a ring-opening reaction in the presence of a base. In preferred systems the epoxides are converted into diols.
  • Still other polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing acetate groups which are copolymerized in the presence of a cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, monomer, and suitable porogen to yield porous polymer containing acetate groups. These acetate groups are converted into polyols via ester hydrolysis in the presence of a base. In preferred embodiments, the polyol groups are diol groups.
  • Some polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing epoxide groups which are copolymerized in the presence of cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, and monomer to yield nonporous polymeric polymer containing epoxide functionality. These epoxides are then converted into polyols via a ring-opening reaction in the presence of a base. In preferred systems the epoxides are converted into diols.
  • polystyrene resin polystyrene resin
  • Other polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing acetate groups which are copolymerized in the presence of cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, and monomer to yield nonporous polymeric polymer containing acetate. These acetate groups are converted into polyols via ester hydrolysis in the presence of a base. In preferred embodiments, the polyol groups are diol groups.
  • Certain polymers are formed and subsequently modified to be biocompatible. Some modifications comprise forming a biocompatible surface coating or layer. Yet another aspect concerns devices for removing endotoxins from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein. Another aspect concerns devices for also removing a broad range of protein based toxins from less than 0.5 kDa to 1,000 kDa from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
  • aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, and gram-negative bacterial components from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein. Additional aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
  • Yet another aspect concerns devices for removing endotoxins from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
  • Another aspect concerns devices for also removing a broad range of protein based toxins from less than 0.5 kDa to 1,000 kDa from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
  • aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, and gram-negative bacterial components from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein. Additional aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
  • Other aspects include methods of perfusion comprising passing a physiologic fluid once through or multiple times by way of a suitable extracorporeal circuit through a device comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
  • Still other aspects concern applications wherein the polymer described herein is enterally or rectally administered.
  • the invention concerns a non-biocompatible polymer system comprising at least one polymer, said polymer comprising polyol or zwitterionic functionality; the polymer system capable of adsorbing endotoxins from physiologic fluids, laboratory or manufacturing fluids, or water systems in one or more of healthcare facilities, in-home healthcare applications, pharmaceutical facilities, biotechnology facilities, biological manufacturing processes, cell culture manufacturing processes, and laboratories.
  • Preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing one or more of a broad range of toxins, bacteria, bacteria fragments, and bacterial components.
  • FIGS. 1, 2, 3, and 4 show log differential pore volume plots for modified polymers.
  • FIG. 5 presents endotoxin removal data from a dynamic model, in human plasma, expressed as a percentage determined by the amount of endotoxin remaining after 120 minutes compared to the pre-circulation concentration for modified polymers CY15129, CY15154, CY16000 and CY16029.
  • FIG. 6 shows endotoxin removal data from a dynamic model, in human plasma, expressed as a percentage determined by the amount of endotoxin remaining after 120 minutes compared to the pre-circulation concentration for polymer CY15154 and its non-modified precursor CY15077.
  • FIG. 7 displays cytokine removal data from a dynamic model, in whole blood, expressed as a percentage determined by the amount of cytokines remaining at specified time points compared to the pre-circulation concentration.
  • biocompatible is defined to mean the sorbent is capable of coming in contact with physiologic fluids, living tissues, or organisms, without producing unacceptable clinical changes during the time that the sorbent is in contact with the physiologic fluids, living tissues, or organisms.
  • hemocompatible is defined as a condition whereby a biocompatible material when placed in contact with whole blood or blood plasma results in clinically acceptable physiologic changes.
  • physiologic fluids are liquids that originate from the body and can include, but are not limited to, nasopharyngeal, oral, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, hepatic, pleural, pericardial, peritoneal, intestinal, prostatic, seminal, vaginal secretions, as well as tears, saliva, lung, or bronchial secretions, mucus, bile, blood, lymph, plasma, serum, synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and interstitial, intracellular, and extracellular fluid, such as fluid that exudes from burns or wounds.
  • laboratory or manufacturing fluids are defined as liquids that are used in life sciences applications that include, but are not limited to, tissue and cell culture media and additives, chemical or biologic assay media, sample preparation buffers, biologic manufacturing media, growth media, and bioreactor media.
  • sorbent includes adsorbents and absorbents.
  • sorb is defined as “taking up and binding by absorption and adsorption”.
  • the term “perfusion” is defined as passing a physiologic fluid, once through or by way of a suitable extracorporeal circuit, through a device containing the porous polymeric adsorbent to remove toxic molecules from the fluid.
  • hemoperfusion is a special case of perfusion where the physiologic fluid is blood.
  • dispenser or “dispersing agent” is defined as a substance that imparts a stabilizing effect upon a finely divided array of immiscible liquid droplets suspended in a fluidizing medium.
  • heparin mimicking polymer refers to any polymer that possesses the same anticoagulant and/or antithrombogenic properties as heparin.
  • microreticular synthesis is defined as a polymerization of monomers into polymer in the presence of an inert precipitant which forces the growing polymer molecules out of the monomer liquid at a certain molecular size dictated by the phase equilibria to give solid nanosized microgel particles of spherical or almost spherical symmetry packed together to give a bead with physical pores of an open cell structure [U.S. Pat. No. 4,297,220, Meitzner and Oline, Oct. 27, 1981; R. L. Albright, Reactive Polymers Reactive Polymers, 4, 155-174 (1986)].
  • hypercrosslinked describes a polymer in which the single repeating unit has a connectivity of more than two.
  • Hypercrosslinked polymers are prepared by crosslinking swollen, or dissolved, polymer chains with a large number of rigid bridging spacers, rather than copolymerization of monomers.
  • Crosslinking agents may include bis(chloromethyl) derivatives of aromatic hydrocarbons, methylal, monochlorodimethyl ether, and other bifunctional compounds that react with the polymer in the presence of Friedel-Crafts catalysts [Tsyurupa, M. P., Z. K. Blinnikova, N. A. Proskurina, A. V. Pastukhov, L. A. Pavlova, and V. A. Davankov. “Hypercrosslinked Polystyrene: The First Nanoporous Polymeric Material.” Nanotechnologies in Russia 4 (2009): 665-75.]
  • Some preferred polymers comprise residues from one or more monomers, or containing monomers, or mixtures thereof, selected from acrylonitrile, allyl glycidyl ether, butyl acrylate, butyl methacrylate, cetyl acrylate, cetyl methacrylate, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, dipentaerythritol diacrylate, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, dipentaerythritol triacrylate, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylate, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, 3,4-epoxy-1-butene, 1,2-epoxy-9-decene, 1,2-epoxy-5-hexene, ethyl acrylate, e
  • Some embodiments of the invention use an organic solvent and/or polymeric porogen as the porogen or pore-former, and the resulting phase separation induced during polymerization yield porous polymers.
  • Some preferred porogens are selected from, or mixtures comprised of any combination of, benzyl alcohol, cyclohexane, cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone, decane, dibutyl phthalate, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, di-2-ethylhexylphosphoric acid, ethylacetate, 2-ethyl-1-hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, n-heptane, n-hexane, isoamyl acetate, isoamyl alcohol, n-octane, pentanol, poly(propylene glycol), polystyrene, poly(styrene-co-methyl methacrylate), t
  • the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, poly(diethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof.
  • Preferred sorbents are biocompatible.
  • the polymer is biocompatible.
  • the polymer is hemocompatible.
  • the biocompatible polymer is hemocompatible.
  • the geometry of the polymer is a spherical bead.
  • the biocompatible polymer comprises poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone).
  • the biocompatible polymer comprises 1,2-diols. In another embodiment, the biocompatible polymer comprises 1,3-diols
  • the biocompatible polymer comprises heparin mimicking polymers.
  • the coating/dispersant on the poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin will imbue the material with improved biocompatibility.
  • a group of cross-linkers consisting of dipentaerythritol diacrylates, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylates, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylates, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylates, dipentaerythritol triacrylates, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylates, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, pentaerythritol diacrylates, pentaerythritol dimethacrylates, pentaerythritol tetraacrylates, pentaerythritol tetramethacrylates, pentaerythritol triacrylates, pentaerythritol trimethacrylates, trimethylolpropane diacrylate, trimethylolpropane dimethacrylate, trimethylol
  • the polymer is a polymer comprising at least one crosslinking agent and at least one dispersing agent.
  • the dispersing agent may be biocompatible.
  • the dispersing agents can be selected from chemicals, compounds or materials such as hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, poly(diethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof; the crosslinking agent selected from a group consisting of dipentaerythritol diacrylates, dipentaerythritol dimethacryl
  • the biocompatible polymer coating is selected from a group consisting of poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof.
  • the biocompatible oligomer coating is selected from a group consisting of poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof.
  • Some present biocompatible sorbent compositions are comprised of a plurality of pores.
  • the biocompatible sorbents are designed to adsorb a broad range of toxins from less than 0.5 kDa to 1,000 kDa. While not intending to be bound by theory, it is believed the sorbent acts by sequestering molecules of a predetermined molecular weight within the pores. The size of a molecule that can be sorbed by the polymer will increase as the pore size of the polymer increases. Conversely, as the pore size is increased beyond the optimum pore size for adsorption of a given molecule, adsorption of said protein may or will decrease.
  • the solid form is porous.
  • Some solid forms are characterized as having a pore structure having a total volume of pore sizes in the range of from 10 ⁇ to 40,000 ⁇ greater than 0.1 cc/g and less than 5.0 cc/g dry polymer.
  • the solid form is nonporous.
  • the polymers can be made in bead form having a diameter in the range of 0.1 micrometers to 2 centimeters. Certain polymers are in the form of powder, beads or other regular or irregularly shaped particulates.
  • the plurality of solid forms comprises particles having a diameter in the range for 0.1 micrometers to 2 centimeters.
  • the undesirable molecules include endotoxins, gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, gram-negative bacterial components, gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components, and inflammatory mediators and stimulators comprised of cytokines, pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), superantigens, monokines, chemokines, interferons, proteases, enzymes, peptides including bradykinin, soluble CD40 ligand, bioactive lipids, oxidized lipids, cell-free hemoglobin, cell-free myoglobin, growth factors, glycoproteins, prions, toxins, bacterial and viral toxins, drugs, vasoactive substances, foreign antigens, and antibodies.
  • cytokines pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), superantigens, monokines, chemokines, interfer
  • sorbents include cross-linked polymeric material derived from the reaction of a cross-linker with one or more of the following polymerizable monomers, then subsequently epoxidized and ring-opened to form a polyol: acrylonitrile, allyl glycidyl ether, butyl acrylate, butyl methacrylate, cetyl acrylate, cetyl methacrylate, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, dipentaerythritol diacrylate, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, dipentaerythritol triacrylate, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylate, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, 3,4-epoxy-1-butene,
  • polymeric sorbents are prepared from the reaction of a cross-linker with vinyl acetate and subsequently modified to form a bead containing polyol groups.
  • the reaction may be a copolymerization, or a one-pot reaction in which vinyl acetate is added once initial polymerization has nearly completed, utilizing unused initiator to begin a second free-radical polymerization to add vinyl acetate groups to the surface of the polymer beads.
  • the subsequent modification of the vinyl acetate containing polymer includes, in order: hydrolysis to convert acetate groups into hydroxyl groups, reaction with epichlorohydrin to form polymer beads containing epoxide groups, and ring-opening to convert epoxide groups into polyol groups.
  • polyols are diols.
  • Some embodiments of the invention involve direct synthesis of polymeric beads containing epoxide groups, followed by ring-opening of epoxide groups to form polyols.
  • One or more of the following polymerizable vinyl monomer containing epoxide groups can be polymerized in the presence of cross-linker and monomer to yield polymeric beads containing above mentioned functionalities: allyl glycidyl ether, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, 3,4-epoxy-1-butene, 1,2-epoxy-9-decene, 1,2-epoxy-5-hexene, glycidyl methacrylate, 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene 1,2-epoxide, and 2-vinyloxirane.
  • Vinyl monomers containing epoxide groups can also be copolymerized with hemocompatible monomer (NVP. 2-HEMA, etc.) to yield hemocompatible beads containing epoxide groups.
  • the polyols are diols.
  • Still other embodiments consist of hypercrosslinked polymeric sorbents containing polyol groups on the beads' surfaces. This can be accomplished via free-radical or S N 2 type chemistries.
  • the chemical modification of the surface of sorbent beads which is the case in the above modification, is facilitated by the remarkable peculiarity of the hypercrosslinked polystyrene; namely, that the reactive functional groups of the polymer are predominantly located on its surface.
  • the hypercrosslinked polystyrene is generally prepared by crosslinking polystyrene chains with large amounts of bifunctional compounds, in particular, those bearing two reactive chloromethyl groups.
  • the latter alkylate, in a two-step reaction, two phenyl groups of neighboring polystyrene chains according to Friedel-Crafts reaction, with evolution of two molecules of HCl and formation of a cross bridge.
  • the three-dimensional network formed acquires rigidity. This property gradually reduces the rate of the second step of the crosslinking reaction, since the reduced mobility of the second pendant functional group of the initial crosslinking reagent makes it more and more difficult to add an appropriate second partner for the alkylation reaction. This is especially characteristic of the second functional groups that happen to be exposed to the surface of the bead.
  • This circumstance makes it possible to predominantly modify the surface of the polymer beads by involving the above chloromethyl groups into various chemical reactions that allow attachment of biocompatible and hemocompatible monomers, and/or cross-linkers or low molecular weight oligomers.
  • the polyols are diols.
  • hypercrosslinked polystyrene containing pendant unreacted chloromethyl groups is directly modified in the presence of one or more of the following reagents to form sorbent polymer beads containing polyols on the beads' surfaces (or on the surface of pores): ( ⁇ )-3-amino-1,2-propanediol, glycerol, and other polyols.
  • the polyols are diols.
  • the surface coating biocompatibility and hemocompatibility agent also acts as the polyol functional group.
  • sorbents include cross-linked polymeric material derived from the reaction of a cross-linker with one or more of the following polymerizable monomers, then subsequently reacted with a polymerizable zwitterionic monomer in the presence of a free radical intiator: acrylonitrile, allyl glycidyl ether, butyl acrylate, butyl methacrylate, cetyl acrylate, cetyl methacrylate, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, dipentaerythritol diacrylate, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, dipentaerythritol triacrylate, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylate, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone
  • Polymerizable zwitterionic monomers include one, or more, of the following: 2-Acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt, [3-(Acryloylamino)propyl]-trimethylammonium chloride, 3-[[2-(Acryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethylammonio]-propionate, [2-(Acryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl)-ammonium hydroxide, 2-Acryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine, [3-(Methacryloylamino)propyl]-trimethylammonium chloride, 3-[[2-(Methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethylammonio]-propionate, [2-(Methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl)-ammonium hydroxide
  • the polymers of this invention are made by suspension polymerization in a formulated aqueous phase with free radical initiation in the presence of aqueous phase dispersants that are selected to provide a biocompatible and a hemocompatible exterior surface to the formed polymer beads.
  • the beads are made porous by the macroreticular synthesis with an appropriately selected porogen (pore forming agent) and an appropriate time-temperature profile for the polymerization in order to develop the proper pore structure.
  • polymers made by suspension polymerization can be made biocompatible and hemocompatible by further grafting of biocompatible and hemocompatible monomers or low molecular weight oligomers. It has been shown that the radical polymerization procedure does not consume all the vinyl groups of DVB introduced into copolymerization. On average, about 30% of DVB species fail to serve as crosslinking bridges and remain involved in the network by only one of two vinyl groups. The presence of a relatively high amount of pendant vinyl groups is therefore a characteristic feature of the adsorbents. It can be expected that these pendant vinyl groups are preferably exposed to the surface of the polymer beads and their macropores, if present, should be readily available to chemical modification.
  • the chemical modification of the surface of DVB-copolymers relies on chemical reactions of the surface-exposed pendant vinyl groups and aims at converting these groups into more hydrophilic functional groups.
  • This conversion via free radical grafting of monomers and/or cross-linkers or low molecular weight oligomers provides the initial hydrophobic adsorbing material with the property of hemocompatibility.
  • the radical polymerization initiator is initially added to the dispersed organic phase, not the aqueous dispersion medium as is typical in suspension polymerization.
  • the radical initiator like benzoyl peroxide, generates radicals relatively slowly. This initiator is only partially consumed during the formation of beads even after several hours of polymerization. This initiator easily moves toward the surface of the bead and activates the surface exposed pendant vinyl groups of the divinylbenzene moiety of the bead, thus initiating the graft polymerization of other monomers added after the reaction has proceeded for a period of time.
  • free-radical grafting can occur during the transformation of the monomer droplets into polymer beads thereby incorporating monomers and/or cross-linkers or low molecular weight oligomers that impart biocompatibility or hemocompatibility as a surface coating.
  • the hemoperfusion and perfusion devices consist of a packed bead bed of the polymer beads in a flow-through container fitted with either a retainer screen at both the exit end and the entrance end to maintain the bead bed inside the container, or with a subsequent retainer screen to collect the beads after mixing.
  • the hemoperfusion and perfusion operations are performed by passing the whole blood, blood plasma or physiologic fluid through the packed bead bed. During the perfusion through the bead bed, the toxic molecules are retained by sorption, torturous path, and/or pore capture, while the remainder of the fluid and intact cell components pass through essentially unchanged in concentration.
  • an in-line filter is comprised of a packed bead bed of the polymer beads in a flow-through container, fitted with a retainer screen at both the exit end and the entrance end to maintain the bead bed inside the container.
  • Biological fluids are passed from a storage bag once-through the packed bead bed via gravity, during which the toxic molecules are retained by sorption, torturous path, and/or pore capture, while the remainder of the fluid and intact cell components pass through essentially unchanged in concentration.
  • Certain polymers useful in the invention are macroporous polymers prepared from the polymerizable monomers of styrene, divinylbenzene, ethylvinylbenzene, and the acrylate and methacrylate monomers such as those listed below by manufacturer.
  • Rohm and Haas Company (now part of Dow Chemical Company): macroporous polymeric sorbents such as AmberliteTM XAD-1, AmberliteTM XAD-2, AmberliteTM XAD-4, AmberliteTM XAD-7, AmberliteTM XAD-7HP, AmberliteTM XAD-8, AmberliteTM XAD-16, AmberliteTM XAD-16 HP, AmberliteTM XAD-18, AmberliteTM XAD-200, AmberliteTM XAD-1180, AmberliteTM XAD-2000, AmberliteTM XAD-2005, AmberliteTM XAD-2010, AmberliteTM XAD-761, and AmberliteTM XE-305, and chromatographic grade sorbents such as AmberchromTM CG 71,s,m,c, AmberchromTM CG 161,s,m,c, AmberchromTM CG 300,s,m,c, and AmberchromTM CG 1000,s,m,c.
  • macroporous polymeric sorbents such as AmberliteTM X
  • DiaionTM HP 10 Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation: DiaionTM HP 10, DiaionTM HP 20, DiaionTM HP 21, DiaionTM HP 30, DiaionTM HP 40, DiaionTM HP 50, DiaionTM SP70, DiaionTM SP 205, DiaionTM SP 206, DiaionTM SP 207, DiaionTM SP 700, DiaionTM SP 800, DiaionTM SP 825, DiaionTM SP 850, DiaionTM SP 875, DiaionTM HP 1MG, DiaionTM HP 2MG, DiaionTM CHP 55 ⁇ , DiaionTM CHP 55Y, DiaionTM CHP 20 ⁇ , DiaionTM CHP 20Y, DiaionTM CHP 2MGY, DiaionTM CHP 20P, DiaionTM HP 20SS, DiaionTM SP 20SS, DiaionTM SP 207SS.
  • Purolite Company PurosorbTM AP 250 and PurosorbTM AP 400, and Kaneka Corp. Lixelle beads.
  • cellulosic porous materials are cellulosic porous materials. Such modifications could include the addition of lipophilic substrates that comprise aryl or alkyl groups, along with polyol or zwitterionic substrates, added via free-radical or S N 2 type chemistries.
  • proteins may be adsorbed by the composition of the instant disclosure. Some of these proteins and their molecular weights are shown in the table below.
  • a 4-neck glass lid was affixed to a 3 L jacketed cylindrical glass reaction vessel using a stainless steel flange clamp and PFTE gasket.
  • the lid was fitted with a PFTE stirrer bearing, RTD adapter, and water-cooled reflux condenser.
  • a stainless steel stirring shaft having five 60° agitators was fit through the stirrer bearing and inserted into a digital overhead stirrer.
  • An RTD was fit through the corresponding adapter, and connected to a PolyStat circulating heating and chilling unit. Compatible tubing was used to connect the inlet and outlet of the reaction vessel jacket to the appropriate ports on the PolyStat. The unused port in the lid was used for charging the reactor and was plugged at all other times.
  • Aqueous phase and organic phase compositions are shown below, in Table I and Table II, respectively.
  • Ultrapure water was split into approximately equal parts in two separate Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing a PFTE coated magnetic stir bar.
  • Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) having a degree of hydrolysis of 85.0 to 89.0 mol percent and a viscosity of 23.0 to 27.0 cP in a 4% aqueous solution at 20° C., was dispersed into the water in the first flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation.
  • Salts (see Table 1, MSP, DSP, TSP and Sodium nitrite) were dispersed into the water in the second flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Circulation of heat transfer fluid from the PolyStat through the reaction vessel jacket was started, and fluid temperature heated to 60° C. Once PVA and salts dissolved, both solutions were charged to the reactor, one at a time, using a glass funnel. The digital overhead stirrer was powered on and the rpm set to a value to form appropriate droplet sizes upon organic phase addition. Temperature of the aqueous phase in the kettle was set to 70° C.
  • the organic phase was prepared by adding benzoyl peroxide (BPO) to the divinylbenzene (DVB) in a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask and swirling until completely dissolved. 2,2,4-trimethylpentane and toluene were added to the flask, which was swirled to mix well. Once the temperature of the aqueous phase in the reactor reached 70° C., the organic phase was charged into the reactor using a narrow-necked glass funnel. Temperature of the reaction volume dropped upon the organic addition. A temperature program for the PolyStat was started, heating the reaction volume from 60 to 77° C. over 30 minutes, 77 to 80° C. over 30 minutes, holding the temperature at 80° C. for 960 minutes, and cooling to 20° C. over 60 minutes.
  • BPO benzoyl peroxide
  • DVD divinylbenzene
  • reaction volume level in the reactor was marked. Overhead stirrer agitation was stopped, residual liquid siphoned out of the reactor, and the reactor filled to the mark with ultrapure water at room temperature. Overhead stirrer agitation was restarted and the slurry heated to 70° C. as quickly as possible. After 30 minutes, agitation was stopped and residual liquid siphoned out. Polymer beads were washed five times in this manner. During the final wash, the slurry temperature was cooled to room temperature. After the final water wash, polymer beads were washed with 99% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in the same manner. 99% IPA was siphoned out and replaced with 70% IPA before transferring the slurry into a clean 4 L glass container.
  • IPA isopropyl alcohol
  • the polymer was steam stripped in a stainless steel tube for 8 hours, rewet in 70% IPA, transferred into DI water, sieved to obtain only the portion of beads having diameters between 300 and 600 m, and dried at 100° C. until no further weight loss on drying was observed.
  • Epoxidation 50.8 g dried base polymer CY14175 was added to a 1 L jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. 300 mL acetic anhydride (99%) was added to the reactor containing dried base polymer. The mixture was cooled to 5° C. with constant agitation at 100 RPM. 30 mL hydrogen peroxide solution (30% in water) was added over a 30 minute period. Reaction temperature was maintained between 10 and 15° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
  • reaction mixture was washed with acetic acid, and then with DI water until the pH of the reaction supernatant was neutral. Polymer was then dried at 80° C. until no further loss on drying was observed. Dry polymer yield was 61.6 g.
  • Ring opening 20.0 g dried epoxide functionalized polymer was added to a 500 mL jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. 70 mL 70% isopropanol (IPA) was charged to the reactor and the mixture was agitated at 100 RPM. 70 mL 1M NaOH (aq) was added slowly. Reaction temperature was increased to 70° C. and held at 70° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
  • IPA 70% isopropanol
  • reaction was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral.
  • the result of the procedure was a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin functionalized with 1,2-diol groups.
  • Thrombogenicity was measured by the uPTT assay in which materials were compared to the negative control (plasma alone), positive control (glass beads) and reference beads to determine the degree of contact activation activity.
  • the % change in clot formation over time as compared to the reference materials was determined, then grouped according to: ⁇ 25% activators, 25-49% moderate activators, 50-74% mild activators, 75-100% minimal and >100% non-activators of the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Polymer CY15129, 97%, was a minimal activator.
  • reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral.
  • the result of the procedure was a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin with sulfobetaine functionality.
  • Thrombogenicity was measured by the uPTT assay in which materials were compared to the negative control (plasma alone), positive control (glass beads) and reference beads to determine the degree of contact activation activity.
  • the % change in clot formation over time as compared to the reference materials was determined, then grouped according to: ⁇ 25% activators, 25-49% moderate activators, 50-74% mild activators, 75-100% minimal and >100% non-activators of the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Polymer CY15154, 89%, was a minimal activator.
  • reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral.
  • the result of the procedure was a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin with diol functionality.
  • a 4-neck glass lid was affixed to a 1 L jacketed cylindrical glass reaction vessel using a stainless steel flange clamp and PFTE gasket.
  • the lid was fitted with a PFTE stirrer bearing, RTD adapter, and water-cooled reflux condenser.
  • a stainless steel stirring shaft having four 60° agitators was fit through the stirrer bearing and inserted into a digital overhead stirrer.
  • An RTD was fit through the corresponding adapter, and connected to a PolyStat circulating heating and chilling unit. Compatible tubing was used to connect the inlet and outlet of the reaction vessel jacket to the appropriate ports on the PolyStat. The unused port in the lid was used for charging the reactor and was plugged at all other times.
  • Aqueous phase and organic phase compositions are shown below, in Table IX and Table X, respectively.
  • Ultrapure water was added to an Erlenmeyer flask containing a PFTE coated magnetic stir bar.
  • Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) having a degree of hydrolysis of 85.0 to 89.0 mol percent and a viscosity of 23.0 to 27.0 cP in a 4% aqueous solution at 20° C., was dispersed into the water in the flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Circulation of heat transfer fluid from the PolyStat through the reaction vessel jacket was started, and fluid temperature heated to 60° C.
  • the solution was charged to the reactor using a glass funnel.
  • the digital overhead stirrer was powered on and the rpm set to a value to form appropriate droplet sizes upon organic phase addition.
  • Temperature of the aqueous phase in the kettle was set to 70° C.
  • the organic phase was prepared by adding benzoyl peroxide (BPO) to the divinylbenzene (DVB) and allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) in a 1 L Erlenmeyer flask and swirling until completely dissolved. 2,2,4-trimethylpentane and toluene were added to the flask, which was swirled to mix well.
  • BPO benzoyl peroxide
  • DVD divinylbenzene
  • AGE allyl glycidyl ether
  • the organic phase was charged into the reactor using a narrow-necked glass funnel. Temperature of the reaction volume dropped upon the organic addition. A temperature program for the PolyStat was started, heating the reaction volume from 60 to 77° C. over 30 minutes, 77 to 80° C. over 30 minutes, holding the temperature at 80° C. for 960 minutes, and cooling to 20° C. over 60 minutes.
  • reaction volume level in the reactor was marked. Overhead stirrer agitation was stopped, residual liquid siphoned out of the reactor, and the reactor filled to the mark with ultrapure water at room temperature. Overhead stirrer agitation was restarted and the slurry heated to 70° C. as quickly as possible. After 30 minutes, agitation was stopped and residual liquid siphoned out. Polymer beads were washed five times in this manner. During the final wash, the slurry temperature was cooled to room temperature. After the final water wash, polymer beads were washed with 99% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in the same manner. 99% IPA was siphoned out and replaced with 70% IPA before transferring the slurry into a clean 2 L glass container.
  • IPA isopropyl alcohol
  • the polymer was steam stripped in a stainless steel tube for 8 hours, rewet in 70% IPA, transferred into DI water, sieved to obtain only the portion of beads having diameters between 300 and 600 m, and dried at 100° C. until no further weight loss on drying was observed.
  • Ring Opening 100 mL polymer CY15186, wetted in 70% IPA, was added to a 1 L jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. 300 mL 1M NaOH (aq) was added slowly. Reaction temperature was increased to 80° C. and held at 80° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
  • reaction was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral.
  • the result of the procedure was a poly(allyl glycidyl ether-co-divinylbenzene) resin functionalized with 1,2-diol groups.
  • Thrombogenicity was measured by the uPTT assay in which materials were compared to the negative control (plasma alone), positive control (glass beads) and reference beads to determine the degree of contact activation activity.
  • the % change in clot formation over time as compared to the reference materials was determined, then grouped according to: ⁇ 25% activators, 25-49% moderate activators, 50-74% mild activators, 75-100% minimal and >100% non-activators of the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Polymer CY16000, 84%, was a minimal activator.
  • a 4-neck glass lid was affixed to a 3 L jacketed cylindrical glass reaction vessel using a stainless steel flange clamp and PFTE gasket.
  • the lid was fitted with a PFTE stirrer bearing, RTD adapter, and water-cooled reflux condenser.
  • a stainless steel stirring shaft having five 60° agitators was fit through the stirrer bearing and inserted into a digital overhead stirrer.
  • An RTD was fit through the corresponding adapter, and connected to a PolyStat circulating heating and chilling unit. Compatible tubing was used to connect the inlet and outlet of the reaction vessel jacket to the appropriate ports on the PolyStat. The unused port in the lid was used for charging the reactor and was plugged at all other times.
  • Aqueous phase and organic phase compositions are shown below, in Table XIV and Table XV, respectively.
  • Ultrapure water was split into approximately equal parts in two separate Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing a PFTE coated magnetic stir bar.
  • Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) having a degree of hydrolysis of 85.0 to 89.0 mol percent and a viscosity of 23.0 to 27.0 cP in a 4% aqueous solution at 20° C., was dispersed into the water in the first flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation.
  • Salts (see Table 1, MSP, DSP, TSP and Sodium nitrite) were dispersed into the water in the second flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Circulation of heat transfer fluid from the PolyStat through the reaction vessel jacket was started, and fluid temperature heated to 60° C. Once PVA and salts dissolved, both solutions were charged to the reactor, one at a time, using a glass funnel. The digital overhead stirrer was powered on and the rpm set to a value to form appropriate droplet sizes upon organic phase addition. Temperature of the aqueous phase in the kettle was set to 60° C.
  • the organic phase was prepared by adding benzoyl peroxide (BPO) to the divinylbenzene (DVB) and vinyl acetate (VA) in a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask and swirling until completely dissolved. 2,2,4-trimethylpentane and toluene were added to the flask, which was swirled to mix well. Once the temperature of the aqueous phase in the reactor reached 60° C., the organic phase was charged into the reactor using a narrow-necked glass funnel. Temperature of the reaction volume dropped upon the organic addition. A temperature program for the PolyStat was started, heating the reaction volume from 50 to 67° C. over 30 minutes, 67 to 70° C. over 30 minutes, holding the temperature at 70° C. for 960 minutes, and cooling to 20° C. over 60 minutes.
  • BPO benzoyl peroxide
  • VVB divinylbenzene
  • VA vinyl acetate
  • reaction volume level in the reactor was marked. Overhead stirrer agitation was stopped, residual liquid siphoned out of the reactor, and the reactor filled to the mark with ultrapure water at room temperature. Overhead stirrer agitation was restarted and the slurry heated to 70° C. as quickly as possible. After 30 minutes, agitation was stopped and residual liquid siphoned out. Polymer beads were washed five times in this manner. During the final wash, the slurry temperature was cooled to room temperature. After the final water wash, polymer beads were washed with 99% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in the same manner. 99% IPA was siphoned out and replaced with 70% IPA before transferring the slurry into a clean 4 L glass container.
  • IPA isopropyl alcohol
  • the polymer was steam stripped in a stainless steel tube for 8 hours, rewet in 70% IPA, transferred into DI water, sieved to obtain only the portion of beads having diameters between 300 and 600 m, then stored in 70% IPA.
  • Example 8 Polymer Modification CY16083
  • Ring Opening 100 mL polymer CY16207, wetted in 70% IPA, was added to a 1 L jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a TeflonTM coated agitator and RTD probe. 300 mL 1M NaOH (aq) was added slowly. Reaction temperature was increased to 50° C. and held at 50° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
  • reaction was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral.
  • the result of the procedure was a poly(vinyl acetate-co-divinylbenzene) resin functionalized with diol groups.
  • Pore structure including pore size, pore size distribution, and surface properties, is very important to the adsorption characteristics of porous material.
  • IUPAC has classified pores into micropores, mesopores, and macropores; terms which are widely used in adsorption, catalysis, and other areas.
  • Micropores have widths smaller than 2 nm ( ⁇ 20 ⁇ ).
  • Mesopores have widths between 2 and 50 nm (20 ⁇ ⁇ 500 ⁇ ).
  • Macropores have widths larger than 50 nm (>500 ⁇ ).
  • pore size is the distance between two opposite walls of the pore and therefore refer to the diameter of cylindrical pores, or the width of slit-shaped pores.
  • transport pores (with pore diameter greater than 250 ⁇ ) has been used in the area of activated carbon adsorption.
  • the term “large transport pores” refers to pores with a diameter greater than 2,000 ⁇ , as a subgroup of macropores; the term “capacity pores” refers to pores with diameter greater than 100 ⁇ , and are capable of adsorbing small and midsize biomolecules and proteins (to 50 kDa); and the term “effective pores” refers to pores with a diameter within the range of 100 ⁇ 250 ⁇ . which is a subgroup of mesopores and has shown to be the most effective pores for small and midsize protein adsorption.
  • the macropores provide a transfer path for adsorbate to reach the inner adsorption sites.
  • the large transport pores provide a much more effective transfer path that is particularly important for large molecules, such as large proteins, endotoxins, and other large toxin molecules.
  • This invention discloses the technique of producing a wide pore size distribution, including large transport pores, conventional macropores, mesopores, and micropores, to complement special needs in adsorption applications.
  • Table XVII summarizes the pore size distribution of polymer examples disclosed in this application, including IUPAC classifications and size fractions important to protein and biomolecule adsorption.
  • FIG. 5 Data for endotoxin removal from plasma in dynamic recirculation model, using modified polymers CY15129, CY15154, CY16000, and CY16029 is shown below, in FIG. 5 .
  • FIG. 6 presents endotoxin removal data for polymer CY15154 and its non-modified precursor polymer CY15077.
  • Purified proteins were added to 300 mL 3.8% citrated whole bovine blood (Lampire Biologicals) at expected clinical concentrations and recirculated through a 20 mL polymer-filled device at a flow rate of 140 mL/min for five hours. Proteins and initial concentrations were: IL-6 3000 pg/mL and TNF- ⁇ at 800 pg/mL. Plasma was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following manufacturer instructions (R&D Systems). Data for cytokine removal from whole blood using polymer CY15129 in a dynamic recirculation model is shown below, in FIG. 7 .

Abstract

The invention concerns biocompatible polymer systems comprising at least one polymer with a plurality of pores, said polymer comprising either polyol or zwitterionic groups designed to adsorb endotoxins and other inflammatory mediator molecules. The inventions are in the field of porous polymeric sorbents, also in the field of broadly reducing endotoxins in blood and blood products that can cause endotoxemia, additionally, in the field of broadly removing endotoxins by perfusion or hemoperfusion.

Description

RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is a National Stage Application filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/US2017/033220, filed May 18, 2017, which claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application No. 62/341,676, filed May 26, 2016, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein in their entireties.
TECHNICAL FIELD
The disclosed inventions are in the field of porous polymeric sorbents. The disclosed inventions are also in the field of broadly reducing endotoxins in blood and blood products that can cause endotoxemia. Additionally, the disclosed inventions are in the field of broadly removing endotoxins by perfusion or hemoperfusion.
BACKGROUND
Gram-negative bacterial cell walls contain bound toxic substances known as endotoxins, or lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Structurally, LPS are composed of three distinct regions; O-antigen, core, and Lipid A. The O-antigen is a repetitive glycan polymer comprising the hydrophilic outermost domain of the molecule, and the composition is different for each strain of LPS. The core attaches the O-antigen to Lipid A, which is a biologically active phosphorylated glucosamine disaccharide containing multiple hydrophobic fatty acid tails. These fatty acid tails are responsible for anchoring the LPS into the bacterial cell wall. Both the core and Lipid A are highly conserved across different strains of LPS, and Lipid A is the primary toxic component.
There are two major pathways by which endotoxin can enter the bloodstream, where intravenous doses as low as 1 ng per kg body weight per hour can trigger inflammatory responses in humans. The first is through local or systemic infection by exogenous gram-negative bacteria, and the second by translocation of endogenous gram-negative bacteria, or fragments thereof, across the intestinal membrane. Once in circulation, LPS can induce an inflammatory response by binding to lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LPB) to form the LPS-LPB complex, subsequently triggering immune system and tissue cell reactions. Prolonged and upregulated inflammatory responses may lead to sepsis or systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), both of which can progress to potentially fatal septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS).
Endotoxins have also been associated with countless syndromes and diseases. These include complications from trauma, burns, and invasive surgery, and also organ-specific illnesses like liver disease, kidney dialysis complications, and autoimmune diseases.
Currently, there are a number of commercial endotoxin adsorbers. Several products are available based on Polymyxin B (PMB) immobilized on agarose gel, including Detoxi-Gel Endotoxin Removing Gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific), AffiPrep Polymyxin Matrix (BioRad), Polymyxin B agarose (Sigma-Aldrich), and Endotoxin Affisorbent (bioWORLD). Toraymyxin (Toray Medical Co.) is a PMB-based extracorporeal device designed for selective blood purification of endotoxins via direct hemoperfusion and is approved as a therapeutic device by the health insurance system in Japan. Polymyxin B is characterized by a heptapeptide ring, a tripeptide group, and a fatty acid tail, and is an antibiotic primarily used for resistant Gram-negative infections. Positively charged diaminobutyric acid groups of PMB interact with negatively charged phosphate groups of LPS, leading to interaction between the N-terminal fatty acyl chain of PMB and lipid A fatty acyl tails, forming a very stable PMB-LPS complex. (Harm, Stephan, Dieter Falkenhagen, and Jens Hartmann. “Endotoxin Adsorbents in Extracorporeal Blood Purification: Do They Fulfill Expectations?” Int J Artif Organs 37.3 (2014): 222-32.).
Exploiting negatively charged groups of LI'S, anion exchange resins can also be used for LPS removal. Diethylaminoethyl-cellulose (DEAE-cellulose) resin is positively charged as a result of tertiary amine functional groups, and Bengsch et. al. have reported binding of LPS in plasmas with high affinity and capacity at physiological pH by the DEAE-cellulose adsorber. However, the reduction in endotoxin levels was accompanied by a transient, hut reversible, increase of prothrombin time. (Bengsch S, Boos K S, Nagel D, Seidel D, Inthom D. Extracorporeal plasma treatment for the removal of endotoxin in patients with sepsis: clinical results of a pilot study. Shock. 2005; 23(6):494-500.) The Alteco LPS adsorber (Alteco Medical AB) consists of polyethylene slabs with an immobilized special cationic peptide, HAE 27, which selectively hinds and adsorbs LI'S. Additionally, EndoTrap (Profos AG) adsorbers consist of a bacteriophage protein immobilized on Sepharose beads, where the bacteriophage protein has a high affinity for LPS molecules.
Adsorption capacities of numerous commercial endotoxin adsorbers were assessed in a study by Harm et. al. Adsorbents tested include Toraymyxin PMX-20R, Alteco LPS Adsorber, Diethylaminoethyl-sepharose (DEAE-Sepharose), Polymyxin B-Agarose, and EndoTrap red, and mobile phases used in the study include buffer solution, protein solution, serum, heparinized plasma, and whole blood. Only the Alteco LPS Adsorber and the Toraymyxin PMX-20R are hemocompatible, so only these adsorbents were tested in whole blood. These two adsorbers are also the only two of the aforementioned products that are designed for hemoperfusion applications. In batch adsorption tests using 10% adsorber in 100 ng FITC-LPS per mL solution, the adsorbing ability of DEAE-Sepharose was the best compared against other tested materials, decreasing LPS levels to 18±8.5% of the control in 10 mM PBS buffer solution and to 37±4% of the control in 4% (w/v) Human Serum Albumin (HSA) solution. Toraymyxin was the only other adsorber able to reduce activity below 70% and 95% in PBS and HSA solution, respectively, resulting in a reduction to 21±2% in PBS and 87±6% in HSA solution. Batch tests in serum and heparinized plasma were performed using 10% adsorber in 5 ng LPS per mL of spiked serum or plasma. DEAE-Sepharose was most efficient for LPS removal from serum, decreasing the value to 28±0.8% of the control; however, it was unable to be tested in heparinized plasma due to heparin binding capabilities of DEAE-Sepharose leading to plasma clotting. PMB-Agarose was the second most efficient, reducing LPS levels to 36±3.6% and 64±6.8% of the control in serum and heparinized plasma, respectively. Toraymyxin was the only other adsorber able to reduce levels below 75% of the control, decreasing LAL activity to 41±3.5% and 65±4.5% of the control for serum and heparinized plasma, respectively. In batch tests using 5% (w/v) adsorber and LPS concentration of 3 ng/mL in whole blood, Toraymyxin reduced activity to 60±14% of the control while the Alteco LPS Adsorber was unable to reduce activity below 90% (Harm, Stephan, Dieter Falkenhagen, and Jens Hartmann. “Endotoxin Adsorbents in Extracorporeal Blood Purification: Do They Fulfill Expectations?” Int J Artif Organs 37.3 (2014): 222-32.).
For hemoperfusion applications, a concern with the use of immobilized PMB on a polymeric support is the potential for non-covalently bound PMB to leach from the support into the recirculating blood. Polymyxin B has been shown to induce neurotoxicity in some patients undergoing intravenous treatment (Weinstein, L, T L Doan, and M A Smith. “Neurotoxicity in patients treated with intravenous polymyxin B: Two case reports.” Am J Health Syst Pharm 2009 Feb. 15; 66(4):345-7.). Furthermore, PMB has been shown to induce nephrotoxicity in some patients undergoing intravenous treatment (Sobieszczyk, M E, et. al. “Combination therapy with polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative respiratory tract infections.” J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004 August; 54(2):566-9). In the study by Harm et. al., referenced above, non-covalently bound PMB from Toray fibers and PMB-Agarose beads was removed through a series of washing steps and quantified using HPLC. Fibers or beads were incubated ten times in normal saline solution, followed by five times in 0.1N HCl solution. After the fifth 0.1N HCl washing step, 42±12 ng PMB/mL was found from the Toray fibers. After the fourth 0.1N HCl washing step, 27±6 ng PMB/mL was found from the PMB-Agarose beads.
As mentioned previously, endotoxins are components of the cell walls of gram-negative bacteria. Gram-negative bacteria are commonly used in the production of recombinant proteins, and many of the techniques utilized to extract the desired recombinant proteins from the bacteria cells also release lipopolysaccharides. Purification of the recombinant proteins using ion-exchange columns are not always completely successful because LPS tend to form a complex with the proteins via specific or non-specific interactions, and the entire complex becomes immobilized on the exchange column. Ropp et. al. have developed a technique using alkanediols to separate LPS from the protein-LPS complex, leaving the protein immobilized on an ion-exchange column (PCT Int. Appl. (2005), WO 2005003152 A1 20050113). Alkanediols were selected because of the reduced toxicity and flammability, compared with other reagents that accomplish similar separations.
Furthermore, alkanediols exhibit broad antimicrobial activities and have been used in cosmetics as moisturizing antimicrobial agents. In the optimized structures of dimers and trimers of 1,2-hexanediol and (<S)-3-(hexyloxy)propane-1,2-diol in water, when two hydroxyl groups become closer and the aliphatic chain becomes longer, the amphipathicity of the alkanediol is increased and thus, it is likely to penetrate more easily into membrane bilayers of the microbial cell (Yoo I K, J I I Kim, Y K Kang. “Conformational preferences and antimicrobial activities of alkanediols.” Computational and Theoretical Chemistry 2015 vol 1064, 15-24.)
Lipoteichoic acid (LTA) is a primary component of gram-positive bacteria cell walls, and has many of the same pathogenic properties as LPS. LTA is anchored into the cell wall via a glycolipid, which plays an analogous role to lipid A in LPS (Morath S, et. al. “Structure/function relationships of lipoteichoic acids. J Endotoxin Res. 2005; 11(6):348-56.) If released from the cell wall, it can bind non-specifically to membrane phospholipids, or specifically to toll-like receptors, of target cells and activate the complement cascade or trigger the release of reactive species and cytokines, which may act to amplify cell damage. LTA plays an important role in infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, and in animal studies has been shown to trigger cascades resulting in multiple organ failure and septic shock in addition to meningeal inflammation, encephalomyelitis, and arthritis (Ginsburg I. “Role of lipoteichoic acid in infection and inflammation.” Lancet Infect Dis. 2002 March; 2(3):171-9.)
SUMMARY
A novel sorbent material, described herein, offers an advantage over existing technologies in that endotoxin levels in biological fluids are decreased without the potential leaching of harmful substances, resulting in a safe and effective method. This sorbent material differs from other existing technologies due to the net neutral charge of the functional groups covalently attached to the polymeric matrix. LPS may be retained by the novel sorbent material through tortuous path, sorption, and pore capture. Several pathways can be utilized to synthesize the said resin, comprised of either a polyol group or a zwitterionic group covalently bound to a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) backbone. For hemoperfusion applications, it is a requirement that the polymer is hemocompatible. Using the unactivated partial thromboplastin time (uPTT) assay as a measure of thrombogenicity, the polymers described herein exhibit minimal activation, indicating plasma-like interactions. Additionally, the sorbents are able to remove cytokines and inflammatory protein moieties simultaneously while removing endotoxins, and have the potential to exhibit antimicrobial activity. Removing either endotoxins or cytokines from an endotoxemic patient may be an insufficient treatment, as remaining endotoxin will trigger more cytokine production and remaining cytokines could still result in sepsis. By removing both the root cause of the infection and the subsequent excessive inflammatory response, this novel sorbent offers an advantage over existing technologies designed specifically for endotoxin removal.
In some aspects, the invention concerns a biocompatible polymer system comprising at least one polymer, said polymer comprising polyol or zwitterionic functionality; the polymer system capable of adsorbing endotoxins. Preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing a broad range of toxins and inflammatory mediators having a molecular weight of from less than about 0.5 kDa to about 1,000 kDa (or about 1 kDa to about 1,000 kDa in some embodiments). Some preferred polymers are hemocompatible. Certain preferred polymer systems have geometry of a spherical bead.
Some preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing one or more of gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, and gram-negative bacterial components. Gram-negative bacterial components include, but are not limited to, lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Other preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing one or more of gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components. Gram-positive bacterial components include, but are not limited to, lipoteichoic acid (LTA). In some embodiments, toxins and inflammatory mediators comprise one or more of cytokines, pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), superantigens, monokines, chemokines, interferons, proteases, enzymes, peptides including bradykinin, soluble CD40 ligand, bioactive lipids, oxidized lipids, cell-free hemoglobin, cell-free myoglobin, growth factors, glycoproteins, prions, toxins, bacterial and viral toxins, drugs, vasoactive substances, foreign antigens, and antibodies.
The polymers can be made by any means known in the art to produce a suitable porous polymer. In some preferred embodiments, the polymer is made using suspension polymerization. In other embodiments, the polymer is made via emulsion polymerization, bulk polymerization, or precipitation polymerization.
The polymers are in the form of solid supports. In some preferred embodiments, the solid support is a bead. In other embodiments, the solid support is a fiber, monolithic column, or film.
Some polymer systems have a polymer pore structure that has a total volume of pore sizes in the range of from 10 Å to 40,000 Å greater than 0.1 cc/g and less than 5.0 cc/g dry polymer, while other polymer systems are nonporous. Other embodiments, have a polymer pore structure that has a total volume of pore sizes in the range of from 10 Å to 40,000 Å greater than 0.1 cc/g and less than 3.0 cc/g dry polymer, while other polymer systems are nonporous.
In certain embodiments, the polymer is in the form of hypercrosslinked or macroreticular porous polymer beads containing polyol groups. In certain other embodiments, the polymer is in the form of hypercrosslinked or macroreticular porous polymer beads containing zwitterionic groups. In preferred embodiments, the polymer is in the form of a hypercrosslinked or macroreticular porous polymer beads containing diol groups.
In certain embodiments, the polymer is in the form of nonporous polymer beads containing polyol groups. In certain other embodiments, the polymer is in the form of nonporous polymer beads containing zwitterionic groups. In preferred embodiments, the polymer is in the form of nonporous polymer beads containing diol groups.
In some embodiments, the polymer beads comprise polyol groups. The polymer beads comprising polyol groups can be produced by ring-opening reactions of premade polymer that contains epoxide groups. In preferred embodiments, the polyol groups are diol groups.
In other embodiments, the polymer beads comprising polyol groups can be produced by ester hydrolysis reactions of premade polymer that contains residual acetate groups. In preferred embodiments, the polyol groups are diol groups.
In some other embodiments, the polymer beads comprise zwitterionic functionality. The polymer beads comprising zwitterionic functionality can be produced by free-radical reactions in the presence zwitterionic monomers that contain double bonds readily available for polymerization.
Some polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing epoxide groups which are copolymerized in the presence of cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, monomer, and suitable porogen to yield porous polymeric polymer containing epoxide functionality. These epoxides are then converted into polyols via a ring-opening reaction in the presence of a base. In preferred systems the epoxides are converted into diols.
Still other polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing acetate groups which are copolymerized in the presence of a cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, monomer, and suitable porogen to yield porous polymer containing acetate groups. These acetate groups are converted into polyols via ester hydrolysis in the presence of a base. In preferred embodiments, the polyol groups are diol groups.
Some polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing epoxide groups which are copolymerized in the presence of cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, and monomer to yield nonporous polymeric polymer containing epoxide functionality. These epoxides are then converted into polyols via a ring-opening reaction in the presence of a base. In preferred systems the epoxides are converted into diols.
Other polymer systems are constructed from polymerizable vinyl monomers containing acetate groups which are copolymerized in the presence of cross-linker, hemocompatible monomer, and monomer to yield nonporous polymeric polymer containing acetate. These acetate groups are converted into polyols via ester hydrolysis in the presence of a base. In preferred embodiments, the polyol groups are diol groups.
Certain polymers are formed and subsequently modified to be biocompatible. Some modifications comprise forming a biocompatible surface coating or layer. Yet another aspect concerns devices for removing endotoxins from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein. Another aspect concerns devices for also removing a broad range of protein based toxins from less than 0.5 kDa to 1,000 kDa from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
Other aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, and gram-negative bacterial components from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein. Additional aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components from physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
Yet another aspect concerns devices for removing endotoxins from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein. Another aspect concerns devices for also removing a broad range of protein based toxins from less than 0.5 kDa to 1,000 kDa from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
Other aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, and gram-negative bacterial components from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein. Additional aspects concern devices for also removing one or more of gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components from non-physiologic fluid comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
Other aspects include methods of perfusion comprising passing a physiologic fluid once through or multiple times by way of a suitable extracorporeal circuit through a device comprising the biocompatible polymer system described herein.
Still other aspects concern applications wherein the polymer described herein is enterally or rectally administered.
In some aspects, the invention concerns a non-biocompatible polymer system comprising at least one polymer, said polymer comprising polyol or zwitterionic functionality; the polymer system capable of adsorbing endotoxins from physiologic fluids, laboratory or manufacturing fluids, or water systems in one or more of healthcare facilities, in-home healthcare applications, pharmaceutical facilities, biotechnology facilities, biological manufacturing processes, cell culture manufacturing processes, and laboratories. Preferred polymers are also capable of adsorbing one or more of a broad range of toxins, bacteria, bacteria fragments, and bacterial components.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the disclosure, are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate aspects of the disclosure and together with the detailed description serve to explain the principles of the disclosure. No attempt is made to show structural details of the disclosure in more detail than may be necessary for a fundamental understanding of the disclosure and the various ways in which it may be practiced. In the drawings:
FIGS. 1, 2, 3, and 4 show log differential pore volume plots for modified polymers.
FIG. 5 presents endotoxin removal data from a dynamic model, in human plasma, expressed as a percentage determined by the amount of endotoxin remaining after 120 minutes compared to the pre-circulation concentration for modified polymers CY15129, CY15154, CY16000 and CY16029.
FIG. 6 shows endotoxin removal data from a dynamic model, in human plasma, expressed as a percentage determined by the amount of endotoxin remaining after 120 minutes compared to the pre-circulation concentration for polymer CY15154 and its non-modified precursor CY15077.
FIG. 7 displays cytokine removal data from a dynamic model, in whole blood, expressed as a percentage determined by the amount of cytokines remaining at specified time points compared to the pre-circulation concentration.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS
As required, detailed embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein; it is to be understood that the disclosed embodiments are merely exemplary of the invention that may be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as limits, but merely as a basis for teaching one skilled in the art to employ the present invention. The specific examples below will enable the invention to be better understood. However, they are given merely by way of guidance and do not imply any limitation.
The present invention may be understood more readily by reference to the following detailed description taken in connection with the accompanying figures and examples, which form a part of this disclosure. It is to be understood that this invention is not limited to the specific materials, devices, methods, applications, conditions or parameters described and/or shown herein, and that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments by way of example only and is not intended to be limiting of the claimed invention. The term “plurality”, as used herein, means more than one. When a range of values is expressed, another embodiment includes from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. All ranges are inclusive and combinable.
It is to be appreciated that certain features of the invention, which are, for clarity, described herein in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the invention that are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any subcombination. Further reference to values stated in ranges includes each and every value and combination of values within that range.
The following definitions are intended to assist in understanding the present invention:
The term “biocompatible” is defined to mean the sorbent is capable of coming in contact with physiologic fluids, living tissues, or organisms, without producing unacceptable clinical changes during the time that the sorbent is in contact with the physiologic fluids, living tissues, or organisms.
The term “hemocompatible” is defined as a condition whereby a biocompatible material when placed in contact with whole blood or blood plasma results in clinically acceptable physiologic changes.
As used herein, the term “physiologic fluids” are liquids that originate from the body and can include, but are not limited to, nasopharyngeal, oral, esophageal, gastric, pancreatic, hepatic, pleural, pericardial, peritoneal, intestinal, prostatic, seminal, vaginal secretions, as well as tears, saliva, lung, or bronchial secretions, mucus, bile, blood, lymph, plasma, serum, synovial fluid, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and interstitial, intracellular, and extracellular fluid, such as fluid that exudes from burns or wounds.
As used herein, the term “laboratory or manufacturing fluids” are defined as liquids that are used in life sciences applications that include, but are not limited to, tissue and cell culture media and additives, chemical or biologic assay media, sample preparation buffers, biologic manufacturing media, growth media, and bioreactor media.
As used herein, the term “sorbent” includes adsorbents and absorbents.
For purposes of this invention, the term “sorb” is defined as “taking up and binding by absorption and adsorption”.
For the purposes of this invention, the term “perfusion” is defined as passing a physiologic fluid, once through or by way of a suitable extracorporeal circuit, through a device containing the porous polymeric adsorbent to remove toxic molecules from the fluid.
The term “hemoperfusion” is a special case of perfusion where the physiologic fluid is blood.
The term “dispersant” or “dispersing agent” is defined as a substance that imparts a stabilizing effect upon a finely divided array of immiscible liquid droplets suspended in a fluidizing medium.
The term “heparin mimicking polymer” refers to any polymer that possesses the same anticoagulant and/or antithrombogenic properties as heparin.
The term “macroreticular synthesis” is defined as a polymerization of monomers into polymer in the presence of an inert precipitant which forces the growing polymer molecules out of the monomer liquid at a certain molecular size dictated by the phase equilibria to give solid nanosized microgel particles of spherical or almost spherical symmetry packed together to give a bead with physical pores of an open cell structure [U.S. Pat. No. 4,297,220, Meitzner and Oline, Oct. 27, 1981; R. L. Albright, Reactive Polymers Reactive Polymers, 4, 155-174 (1986)].
The term “hypercrosslinked” describes a polymer in which the single repeating unit has a connectivity of more than two. Hypercrosslinked polymers are prepared by crosslinking swollen, or dissolved, polymer chains with a large number of rigid bridging spacers, rather than copolymerization of monomers. Crosslinking agents may include bis(chloromethyl) derivatives of aromatic hydrocarbons, methylal, monochlorodimethyl ether, and other bifunctional compounds that react with the polymer in the presence of Friedel-Crafts catalysts [Tsyurupa, M. P., Z. K. Blinnikova, N. A. Proskurina, A. V. Pastukhov, L. A. Pavlova, and V. A. Davankov. “Hypercrosslinked Polystyrene: The First Nanoporous Polymeric Material.” Nanotechnologies in Russia 4 (2009): 665-75.]
Some preferred polymers comprise residues from one or more monomers, or containing monomers, or mixtures thereof, selected from acrylonitrile, allyl glycidyl ether, butyl acrylate, butyl methacrylate, cetyl acrylate, cetyl methacrylate, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, dipentaerythritol diacrylate, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, dipentaerythritol triacrylate, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylate, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, 3,4-epoxy-1-butene, 1,2-epoxy-9-decene, 1,2-epoxy-5-hexene, ethyl acrylate, ethyl methacrylate, ethylstyrene, ethylvinylbezene, glycidyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, octyl acrylate, octyl methacrylate, pentaerythritol diacrylate, pentaerythritol dimethacrylate, pentaerythritol tetraacrylate, pentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, pentaerythritol triacrylate, pentaerythritol trimethacrylate, styrene, trimethylolpropane diacrylate, trimethylolpropane dimethacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, trivinylbenzene, trivinylcyclohexane, vinyl acetate, vinylbenzyl alcohol, 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene 1,2-epoxide, vinylformamide, vinylnaphthalene, 2-vinyloxirane, and vinyltoluene.
Some embodiments of the invention use an organic solvent and/or polymeric porogen as the porogen or pore-former, and the resulting phase separation induced during polymerization yield porous polymers. Some preferred porogens are selected from, or mixtures comprised of any combination of, benzyl alcohol, cyclohexane, cyclohexanol, cyclohexanone, decane, dibutyl phthalate, di-2-ethylhexyl phthalate, di-2-ethylhexylphosphoric acid, ethylacetate, 2-ethyl-1-hexanoic acid, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, n-heptane, n-hexane, isoamyl acetate, isoamyl alcohol, n-octane, pentanol, poly(propylene glycol), polystyrene, poly(styrene-co-methyl methacrylate), tetraline, toluene, tri-n-butylphosphate, 1,2,3-trichloropropane, 2,2,4-trimethylpentane, and xylene.
In yet another embodiment, the dispersing agent is selected from a group consisting of hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, poly(diethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof.
Preferred sorbents are biocompatible. In another further embodiment, the polymer is biocompatible. In yet another embodiment, the polymer is hemocompatible. In still a further embodiment, the biocompatible polymer is hemocompatible. In still a further embodiment, the geometry of the polymer is a spherical bead.
In another embodiment, the biocompatible polymer comprises poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone).
In another embodiment, the biocompatible polymer comprises 1,2-diols. In another embodiment, the biocompatible polymer comprises 1,3-diols
In another further embodiment, the biocompatible polymer comprises heparin mimicking polymers.
The coating/dispersant on the poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin will imbue the material with improved biocompatibility.
In still yet another embodiment, a group of cross-linkers consisting of dipentaerythritol diacrylates, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylates, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylates, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylates, dipentaerythritol triacrylates, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylates, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, pentaerythritol diacrylates, pentaerythritol dimethacrylates, pentaerythritol tetraacrylates, pentaerythritol tetramethacrylates, pentaerythritol triacrylates, pentaerythritol trimethacrylates, trimethylolpropane diacrylate, trimethylolpropane dimethacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, trivinylbenzene, trivinylcyclohexane and mixtures thereof can be used in formation of a hemocompatible hydrogel coating.
In some embodiments, the polymer is a polymer comprising at least one crosslinking agent and at least one dispersing agent. The dispersing agent may be biocompatible. The dispersing agents can be selected from chemicals, compounds or materials such as hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, poly(diethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl acrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof; the crosslinking agent selected from a group consisting of dipentaerythritol diacrylates, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylates, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylates, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylates, dipentaerythritol triacrylates, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylates, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, pentaerythritol diacrylates, pentaerythritol dimethacrylates, pentaerythritol tetraacrylates, pentaerythritol tetramethacrylates, pentaerythritol triacrylates, pentaerythritol trimethacrylates, trimethylolpropane diacrylate, trimethylolpropane dimethacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, trivinylbenzene, trivinylcyclohexane and mixtures thereof. Preferably, the polymer is developed simultaneously with the formation of the coating, wherein the dispersing agent is chemically bound or entangled on the surface of the polymer.
In still another embodiment, the biocompatible polymer coating is selected from a group consisting of poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof.
In still another embodiment, the biocompatible oligomer coating is selected from a group consisting of poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic acid) and mixtures thereof.
Some present biocompatible sorbent compositions are comprised of a plurality of pores. The biocompatible sorbents are designed to adsorb a broad range of toxins from less than 0.5 kDa to 1,000 kDa. While not intending to be bound by theory, it is believed the sorbent acts by sequestering molecules of a predetermined molecular weight within the pores. The size of a molecule that can be sorbed by the polymer will increase as the pore size of the polymer increases. Conversely, as the pore size is increased beyond the optimum pore size for adsorption of a given molecule, adsorption of said protein may or will decrease.
In certain methods, the solid form is porous. Some solid forms are characterized as having a pore structure having a total volume of pore sizes in the range of from 10 Å to 40,000 Å greater than 0.1 cc/g and less than 5.0 cc/g dry polymer.
In certain other methods, the solid form is nonporous.
In certain embodiments, the polymers can be made in bead form having a diameter in the range of 0.1 micrometers to 2 centimeters. Certain polymers are in the form of powder, beads or other regular or irregularly shaped particulates.
In some embodiments, the plurality of solid forms comprises particles having a diameter in the range for 0.1 micrometers to 2 centimeters.
In some methods, the undesirable molecules include endotoxins, gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, gram-negative bacterial components, gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components, and inflammatory mediators and stimulators comprised of cytokines, pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), superantigens, monokines, chemokines, interferons, proteases, enzymes, peptides including bradykinin, soluble CD40 ligand, bioactive lipids, oxidized lipids, cell-free hemoglobin, cell-free myoglobin, growth factors, glycoproteins, prions, toxins, bacterial and viral toxins, drugs, vasoactive substances, foreign antigens, and antibodies.
In some embodiments, sorbents include cross-linked polymeric material derived from the reaction of a cross-linker with one or more of the following polymerizable monomers, then subsequently epoxidized and ring-opened to form a polyol: acrylonitrile, allyl glycidyl ether, butyl acrylate, butyl methacrylate, cetyl acrylate, cetyl methacrylate, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, dipentaerythritol diacrylate, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, dipentaerythritol triacrylate, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylate, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, 3,4-epoxy-1-butene, 1,2-epoxy-9-decene, 1,2-epoxy-5-hexene, ethyl acrylate, ethyl methacrylate, ethylstyrene, ethylvinylbezene, glycidyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, octyl acrylate, octyl methacrylate, pentaerythritol diacrylate, pentaerythritol dimethacrylate, pentaerythritol tetraacrylate, pentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, pentaerythritol triacrylate, pentaerythritol trimethacrylate, styrene, trimethylolpropane diacrylate, trimethylolpropane dimethacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, trivinylbenzene, trivinylcyclohexane, vinyl acetate, vinylbenzyl alcohol, 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene 1,2-epoxide, vinylformamide, vinylnaphthalene, 2-vinyloxirane, and vinyltoluene. In preferred sorbents, the formed polyol is a diol.
In one other embodiment, polymeric sorbents are prepared from the reaction of a cross-linker with vinyl acetate and subsequently modified to form a bead containing polyol groups. The reaction may be a copolymerization, or a one-pot reaction in which vinyl acetate is added once initial polymerization has nearly completed, utilizing unused initiator to begin a second free-radical polymerization to add vinyl acetate groups to the surface of the polymer beads. The subsequent modification of the vinyl acetate containing polymer includes, in order: hydrolysis to convert acetate groups into hydroxyl groups, reaction with epichlorohydrin to form polymer beads containing epoxide groups, and ring-opening to convert epoxide groups into polyol groups. In preferred embodiments, polyols are diols.
Some embodiments of the invention involve direct synthesis of polymeric beads containing epoxide groups, followed by ring-opening of epoxide groups to form polyols. One or more of the following polymerizable vinyl monomer containing epoxide groups can be polymerized in the presence of cross-linker and monomer to yield polymeric beads containing above mentioned functionalities: allyl glycidyl ether, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, 3,4-epoxy-1-butene, 1,2-epoxy-9-decene, 1,2-epoxy-5-hexene, glycidyl methacrylate, 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene 1,2-epoxide, and 2-vinyloxirane. Vinyl monomers containing epoxide groups can also be copolymerized with hemocompatible monomer (NVP. 2-HEMA, etc.) to yield hemocompatible beads containing epoxide groups. In preferred embodiments, the polyols are diols.
Still other embodiments consist of hypercrosslinked polymeric sorbents containing polyol groups on the beads' surfaces. This can be accomplished via free-radical or S N2 type chemistries. The chemical modification of the surface of sorbent beads, which is the case in the above modification, is facilitated by the remarkable peculiarity of the hypercrosslinked polystyrene; namely, that the reactive functional groups of the polymer are predominantly located on its surface. The hypercrosslinked polystyrene is generally prepared by crosslinking polystyrene chains with large amounts of bifunctional compounds, in particular, those bearing two reactive chloromethyl groups. The latter alkylate, in a two-step reaction, two phenyl groups of neighboring polystyrene chains according to Friedel-Crafts reaction, with evolution of two molecules of HCl and formation of a cross bridge. During the crosslinking reaction, the three-dimensional network formed acquires rigidity. This property gradually reduces the rate of the second step of the crosslinking reaction, since the reduced mobility of the second pendant functional group of the initial crosslinking reagent makes it more and more difficult to add an appropriate second partner for the alkylation reaction. This is especially characteristic of the second functional groups that happen to be exposed to the surface of the bead. Therefore, of the pendant unreacted chloromethyl groups in the final hypercrosslinked polymer, the largest portion, if not the majority of the groups, are located on the surface of the bead (or on the surface of pores). This circumstance makes it possible to predominantly modify the surface of the polymer beads by involving the above chloromethyl groups into various chemical reactions that allow attachment of biocompatible and hemocompatible monomers, and/or cross-linkers or low molecular weight oligomers. The subsequent introduction of hydroxyl groups, followed by reaction with epichlorohydrin, results in the polymer sorbent containing epoxide groups on the beads' surfaces. These epoxide groups can then be ring-opened to form polyol groups. In some preferred embodiments, the polyols are diols.
In other embodiments, hypercrosslinked polystyrene containing pendant unreacted chloromethyl groups is directly modified in the presence of one or more of the following reagents to form sorbent polymer beads containing polyols on the beads' surfaces (or on the surface of pores): (±)-3-amino-1,2-propanediol, glycerol, and other polyols. In preferred embodiments, the polyols are diols.
Still in other embodiments, the surface coating biocompatibility and hemocompatibility agent, poly(vinyl alcohol), also acts as the polyol functional group.
In some other embodiments, sorbents include cross-linked polymeric material derived from the reaction of a cross-linker with one or more of the following polymerizable monomers, then subsequently reacted with a polymerizable zwitterionic monomer in the presence of a free radical intiator: acrylonitrile, allyl glycidyl ether, butyl acrylate, butyl methacrylate, cetyl acrylate, cetyl methacrylate, 3,4-dihydroxy-1-butene, dipentaerythritol diacrylate, dipentaerythritol dimethacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetraacrylate, dipentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, dipentaerythritol triacrylate, dipentaerythritol trimethacrylate, divinylbenzene, divinylformamide, divinylnaphthalene, divinylsulfone, 3,4-epoxy-1-butene, 1,2-epoxy-9-decene, 1,2-epoxy-5-hexene, ethyl acrylate, ethyl methacrylate, ethylstyrene, ethylvinylbezene, glycidyl methacrylate, methyl acrylate, methyl methacrylate, octyl acrylate, octyl methacrylate, pentaerythritol diacrylate, pentaerythritol dimethacrylate, pentaerythritol tetraacrylate, pentaerythritol tetramethacrylate, pentaerythritol triacrylate, pentaerythritol trimethacrylate, styrene, trimethylolpropane diacrylate, trimethylolpropane dimethacrylate, trimethylolpropane triacrylate, trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate, trivinylbenzene, trivinylcyclohexane, vinyl acetate, vinylbenzyl alcohol, 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene 1,2-epoxide, vinylformamide, vinylnaphthalene, 2-vinyloxirane, and vinyltoluene. Polymerizable zwitterionic monomers include one, or more, of the following: 2-Acrylamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulfonic acid sodium salt, [3-(Acryloylamino)propyl]-trimethylammonium chloride, 3-[[2-(Acryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethylammonio]-propionate, [2-(Acryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl)-ammonium hydroxide, 2-Acryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine, [3-(Methacryloylamino)propyl]-trimethylammonium chloride, 3-[[2-(Methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethylammonio]-propionate, [2-(Methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethyl-(3-sulfopropyl)-ammonium hydroxide, and 2-Methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine.
In one embodiment, the polymers of this invention are made by suspension polymerization in a formulated aqueous phase with free radical initiation in the presence of aqueous phase dispersants that are selected to provide a biocompatible and a hemocompatible exterior surface to the formed polymer beads. In some embodiments, the beads are made porous by the macroreticular synthesis with an appropriately selected porogen (pore forming agent) and an appropriate time-temperature profile for the polymerization in order to develop the proper pore structure.
In another embodiment, polymers made by suspension polymerization can be made biocompatible and hemocompatible by further grafting of biocompatible and hemocompatible monomers or low molecular weight oligomers. It has been shown that the radical polymerization procedure does not consume all the vinyl groups of DVB introduced into copolymerization. On average, about 30% of DVB species fail to serve as crosslinking bridges and remain involved in the network by only one of two vinyl groups. The presence of a relatively high amount of pendant vinyl groups is therefore a characteristic feature of the adsorbents. It can be expected that these pendant vinyl groups are preferably exposed to the surface of the polymer beads and their macropores, if present, should be readily available to chemical modification. The chemical modification of the surface of DVB-copolymers relies on chemical reactions of the surface-exposed pendant vinyl groups and aims at converting these groups into more hydrophilic functional groups. This conversion via free radical grafting of monomers and/or cross-linkers or low molecular weight oligomers provides the initial hydrophobic adsorbing material with the property of hemocompatibility.
In yet another embodiment, the radical polymerization initiator is initially added to the dispersed organic phase, not the aqueous dispersion medium as is typical in suspension polymerization. During polymerization, many growing polymer chains with their chain-end radicals show up at the phase interface and can initiate the polymerization in the dispersion medium. Moreover, the radical initiator, like benzoyl peroxide, generates radicals relatively slowly. This initiator is only partially consumed during the formation of beads even after several hours of polymerization. This initiator easily moves toward the surface of the bead and activates the surface exposed pendant vinyl groups of the divinylbenzene moiety of the bead, thus initiating the graft polymerization of other monomers added after the reaction has proceeded for a period of time. Therefore, free-radical grafting can occur during the transformation of the monomer droplets into polymer beads thereby incorporating monomers and/or cross-linkers or low molecular weight oligomers that impart biocompatibility or hemocompatibility as a surface coating.
The hemoperfusion and perfusion devices consist of a packed bead bed of the polymer beads in a flow-through container fitted with either a retainer screen at both the exit end and the entrance end to maintain the bead bed inside the container, or with a subsequent retainer screen to collect the beads after mixing. The hemoperfusion and perfusion operations are performed by passing the whole blood, blood plasma or physiologic fluid through the packed bead bed. During the perfusion through the bead bed, the toxic molecules are retained by sorption, torturous path, and/or pore capture, while the remainder of the fluid and intact cell components pass through essentially unchanged in concentration.
In some other embodiments, an in-line filter is comprised of a packed bead bed of the polymer beads in a flow-through container, fitted with a retainer screen at both the exit end and the entrance end to maintain the bead bed inside the container. Biological fluids are passed from a storage bag once-through the packed bead bed via gravity, during which the toxic molecules are retained by sorption, torturous path, and/or pore capture, while the remainder of the fluid and intact cell components pass through essentially unchanged in concentration.
Certain polymers useful in the invention (as is or after further modification) are macroporous polymers prepared from the polymerizable monomers of styrene, divinylbenzene, ethylvinylbenzene, and the acrylate and methacrylate monomers such as those listed below by manufacturer. Rohm and Haas Company, (now part of Dow Chemical Company): macroporous polymeric sorbents such as Amberlite™ XAD-1, Amberlite™ XAD-2, Amberlite™ XAD-4, Amberlite™ XAD-7, Amberlite™ XAD-7HP, Amberlite™ XAD-8, Amberlite™ XAD-16, Amberlite™ XAD-16 HP, Amberlite™ XAD-18, Amberlite™ XAD-200, Amberlite™ XAD-1180, Amberlite™ XAD-2000, Amberlite™ XAD-2005, Amberlite™ XAD-2010, Amberlite™ XAD-761, and Amberlite™ XE-305, and chromatographic grade sorbents such as Amberchrom™ CG 71,s,m,c, Amberchrom™ CG 161,s,m,c, Amberchrom™ CG 300,s,m,c, and Amberchrom™ CG 1000,s,m,c. Dow Chemical Company: Dowex™ Optipore™ L-493, Dowex™ Optipore™ V-493, Dowex™ Optipore™ V-502, Dowex™ Optipore™ L-285, Dowex™ Optipore™ L-323, and Dowex™ Optipore™ V-503. Lanxess (formerly Bayer and Sybron): Lewatit™ VPOC 1064 MD PH, Lewatit™ VPOC 1163, Lewatit™ OC EP 63, Lewatit™ S 6328 Å, Lewatit™ OC 1066, and Lewatit™ 60/150 MIBK. Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation: Diaion™ HP 10, Diaion™ HP 20, Diaion™ HP 21, Diaion™ HP 30, Diaion™ HP 40, Diaion™ HP 50, Diaion™ SP70, Diaion™ SP 205, Diaion™ SP 206, Diaion™ SP 207, Diaion™ SP 700, Diaion™ SP 800, Diaion™ SP 825, Diaion™ SP 850, Diaion™ SP 875, Diaion™ HP 1MG, Diaion™ HP 2MG, Diaion™ CHP 55 Å, Diaion™ CHP 55Y, Diaion™ CHP 20 Å, Diaion™ CHP 20Y, Diaion™ CHP 2MGY, Diaion™ CHP 20P, Diaion™ HP 20SS, Diaion™ SP 20SS, Diaion™ SP 207SS. Purolite Company: Purosorb™ AP 250 and Purosorb™ AP 400, and Kaneka Corp. Lixelle beads.
Other certain polymers useful in the invention (as is or after further modification) are cellulosic porous materials. Such modifications could include the addition of lipophilic substrates that comprise aryl or alkyl groups, along with polyol or zwitterionic substrates, added via free-radical or S N2 type chemistries.
Various proteins may be adsorbed by the composition of the instant disclosure. Some of these proteins and their molecular weights are shown in the table below.
Molecular
Protein Weight (Da)
PAF (Platelet Activating Factor) 524
bilirubin 548.6
heme b 616.5
MIP-1alpha 8,000
Complement C5a 8,200
Complement C3a 9,089
IL-8 9,000
S100B (dimerizes) 10,000
β-2 microglobulin 11,800
Procalcitonin 13,000
Phospholipase A2, secretory PLA2 type I pancreatic 14,000
PLA2G2A 16,083
IL-7 17,400
Myoglobin 17,699
Trypsin-human pancreas 23,300
IL-6 23,718
Toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1 24,000
Enterotoxin B, S aureus 24,500
HMGB1 24,894
Interferon gamma 25,000
Chymotrypsin 25,000
Elastase (neutrophil) 25,000
Trypsin 26,488
PF4 27,100
Enterotoxin A, S. aureus 27,800
alpha toxin A&B, S. aureus 28,000
PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen 29,000
Arginse I 35,000
Carboxypeptidase A 35,000
Thrombin 36,700
alpha-1 antitrypsin 44,324
TNF-alpha 52,000
Activated Protein C 56,200
Amylase 57,000
hemopexin 57,000
alpha-1 antichymotrypsin 55,000-68,000
Diptheria toxoid 62,000
hemoglobin, oxy 64,000
Pseudomonas Exotoxin A 66,000
ShigaToxin (A 32 kDa, 5 × B 7.7 kDa) 69,000
Calpain-1 (human erythrocytes) 112,00
C reactive Protein (5 × 25 kDa) 115,000
Myeloperoxidase (neutrophils) 150,000
Immunoglobulin G IgG 150,000
NOS synthase 150,000
Immunoglobulin A IgA 162,000
Immunoglobulin E (IgE) 190,000
Immunoglobulin M IgM 950,000
The following examples are intended to be exemplary and non-limiting.
Example 1: Base Sorbent Synthesis CY14175 & CY15077
Reactor Setup: a 4-neck glass lid was affixed to a 3 L jacketed cylindrical glass reaction vessel using a stainless steel flange clamp and PFTE gasket. The lid was fitted with a PFTE stirrer bearing, RTD adapter, and water-cooled reflux condenser. A stainless steel stirring shaft having five 60° agitators was fit through the stirrer bearing and inserted into a digital overhead stirrer. An RTD was fit through the corresponding adapter, and connected to a PolyStat circulating heating and chilling unit. Compatible tubing was used to connect the inlet and outlet of the reaction vessel jacket to the appropriate ports on the PolyStat. The unused port in the lid was used for charging the reactor and was plugged at all other times.
Polymerization: Aqueous phase and organic phase compositions are shown below, in Table I and Table II, respectively. Ultrapure water was split into approximately equal parts in two separate Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing a PFTE coated magnetic stir bar. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), having a degree of hydrolysis of 85.0 to 89.0 mol percent and a viscosity of 23.0 to 27.0 cP in a 4% aqueous solution at 20° C., was dispersed into the water in the first flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Salts (see Table 1, MSP, DSP, TSP and Sodium nitrite) were dispersed into the water in the second flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Circulation of heat transfer fluid from the PolyStat through the reaction vessel jacket was started, and fluid temperature heated to 60° C. Once PVA and salts dissolved, both solutions were charged to the reactor, one at a time, using a glass funnel. The digital overhead stirrer was powered on and the rpm set to a value to form appropriate droplet sizes upon organic phase addition. Temperature of the aqueous phase in the kettle was set to 70° C. The organic phase was prepared by adding benzoyl peroxide (BPO) to the divinylbenzene (DVB) in a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask and swirling until completely dissolved. 2,2,4-trimethylpentane and toluene were added to the flask, which was swirled to mix well. Once the temperature of the aqueous phase in the reactor reached 70° C., the organic phase was charged into the reactor using a narrow-necked glass funnel. Temperature of the reaction volume dropped upon the organic addition. A temperature program for the PolyStat was started, heating the reaction volume from 60 to 77° C. over 30 minutes, 77 to 80° C. over 30 minutes, holding the temperature at 80° C. for 960 minutes, and cooling to 20° C. over 60 minutes.
TABLE I
Aqueous Phase Composition
Reagent Mass (g)
Ultrapure water 1500.000
Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) 4.448
Monosodium phosphate (MSP) 4.602
Disodium phosphate (DSP) 15.339
Trisodium phosphate (TSP) 9.510
Sodium nitrite 0.046
Total 1533.899
TABLE II
Organic Phase Compositions
CY14175 CY15077
Reagent Mass (g) Mass (g)
Divinylbenzene, 63% (DVB) 508.751 498.383
2,2,4-trimethylpentane (Isooctane) 384.815 482.745
Toluene 335.004 222.404
Benzoyl peroxide, 98% (BPO) 3.816 3.738
Total (excluding BPO) 1228.571 1203.532
Work-up: reaction volume level in the reactor was marked. Overhead stirrer agitation was stopped, residual liquid siphoned out of the reactor, and the reactor filled to the mark with ultrapure water at room temperature. Overhead stirrer agitation was restarted and the slurry heated to 70° C. as quickly as possible. After 30 minutes, agitation was stopped and residual liquid siphoned out. Polymer beads were washed five times in this manner. During the final wash, the slurry temperature was cooled to room temperature. After the final water wash, polymer beads were washed with 99% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in the same manner. 99% IPA was siphoned out and replaced with 70% IPA before transferring the slurry into a clean 4 L glass container. Unless noted otherwise, on an as-needed basis the polymer was steam stripped in a stainless steel tube for 8 hours, rewet in 70% IPA, transferred into DI water, sieved to obtain only the portion of beads having diameters between 300 and 600 m, and dried at 100° C. until no further weight loss on drying was observed.
Cumulative pore volume data for polymers CY14175 and CY15077, measured by nitrogen desorption isotherm and mercury intrusion porosimetry, respectively, are shown below in Tables III and IV, respectively.
TABLE III
Nitrogen Desorption Isotherm Data for CY14175
Pore Diameter Pore size Cumulative Pore
Range (Å) Diameter (Å) Volume (cm3/g)
1411.9-1126.5 1236.809577 0.018062878
1126.5-981.7  1043.979923 0.038442381
981.7-752.9 836.7828769 0.141559621
752.9-659.9 700.1024343 0.24336622
659.9-572.0 609.4657394 0.416511969
572.0-483.1 519.8089977 0.646318614
483.1-449.8 465.2234212 0.730406771
449.8-401.4 422.7246485 0.849167577
401.4-354.1 374.6289335 0.956165766
354.1-337.9 345.6019761 0.997336398
337.9-313.5 324.758962 1.0547802
313.5-290.8 301.2432086 1.09667858
290.8-262.8 275.299967 1.164042391
262.8-247.2 254.510376 1.199751164
247.2-233.6 240.0176376 1.228796957
233.6-220.1 226.435352 1.256631669
220.1-208.6 213.9982044 1.283063762
208.6-130.5 151.2300725 1.464027373
130.5-105.7 115.2567614 1.527062065
105.7-82.8  91.14860242 1.592486039
82.8-67.6 73.42901881 1.641003444
67.6-57.5 61.59836256 1.6763711
57.5-51.6 54.15491457 1.699539142
51.6-45.0 47.72291376 1.728282889
45.0-39.8 42.01726183 1.752728216
39.8-35.8 37.55877213 1.779016164
35.8-31.8 33.51596841 1.8086605
31.8-28.7 30.02327371 1.82963357
28.7-26.0 27.18773181 1.850084632
26.0-23.3 24.46989555 1.87529426
23.3-20.9 21.92055755 1.902736527
20.9-18.5 19.52461159 1.935789448
18.5-16.2 17.16324429 1.97779901
TABLE IV
Mercury Intrusion Data for CY15077
Pore size Cumulative
Diameter (Å) Intrusion (mL/g)
226299.0625 3.40136E−30
213166.0781 0.001678752
201295.1563 0.002518128
172635.8125 0.004364755
139538.0625 0.007554384
113120.7813 0.011919139
90542.36719 0.01645177
78733.25781 0.0203129
72446.375 0.022327403
60340.40234 0.027867284
48343.83984 0.035327822
39009.13672 0.040918175
32136.4082 0.04899035
25330.65625 0.063195683
20981.51563 0.079529688
16219.86426 0.108860672
13252.41211 0.141730919
10501.53613 0.193969816
8359.911133 0.262399256
6786.30127 0.345866203
5538.122559 0.438174427
4337.931152 0.563276172
3501.674805 0.681870878
2838.742188 0.804727197
2593.016846 0.865813017
2266.688965 0.938610673
1831.041748 1.056586146
1509.850708 1.163395643
1394.006104 1.21002543
1294.780151 1.257248282
1207.692627 1.293158531
1131.860962 1.326992273
1065.099976 1.35812819
953.1816406 1.405935764
884.0358887 1.445426106
823.5491333 1.478719592
770.9108276 1.510579824
722.4724731 1.537048101
684.6119995 1.564400196
672.187561 1.581117511
636.7885742 1.60271585
604.7248535 1.621845484
558.1287231 1.651492
518.2624512 1.678913713
483.5536499 1.708594561
453.5110779 1.735918999
426.9998474 1.755934
403.1251526 1.783603072
382.7776794 1.793849826
362.7162476 1.817784309
342.3734436 1.838774562
330.1105042 1.851493955
315.5238037 1.869742155
302.2973938 1.885128617
290.2946777 1.895119786
279.1246643 1.912378907
268.7442627 1.924305081
259.1106873 1.936048627
241.8737793 1.955100656
226.7678223 1.972970247
213.3626251 1.988123298
201.4908142 2.007521152
194.9888611 2.022114754
188.9506989 2.033871174
180.582901 2.035052776
172.8530121 2.050720692
164.9621735 2.062945843
157.8110657 2.071056128
151.1540375 2.082133055
143.9185333 2.096480608
138.4670563 2.106938839
132.8492737 2.119287968
129.5760345 2.126605988
126.5438614 2.126605988
124.2635574 2.132267475
120.8976135 2.141504765
117.3792267 2.150759459
114.791893 2.154810667
111.9475937 2.162935257
108.8830032 2.167646885
106.6480179 2.174062729
104.5217743 2.179908991
102.4295197 2.179908991
100.1580353 2.182951927
98.29322052 2.184018135
96.44822693 2.191127539
94.42159271 2.198545218
91.52587891 2.209161043
89.25807953 2.209312439
87.0777359 2.215425491
85.42358398 2.221472025
83.62612915 2.232139587
82.11174011 2.237514496
79.91614532 2.239231586
78.01462555 2.239560127
76.19993591 2.239560127
75.09249115 2.239560127
73.41201019 2.239560127
72.23709869 2.240245819
71.09960175 2.242422104
69.86301422 2.243849993
68.40761566 2.257676363
67.13697815 2.259181261
66.03359222 2.266284466
65.08189392 2.270181179
64.04368591 2.272682428
62.38490295 2.280714512
61.32764053 2.280714512
60.30379868 2.287917852
59.41370392 2.287917852
58.54679489 2.293802738
57.79866409 2.297607183
56.88977814 2.299046278
55.9213295 2.302111387
54.98665237 2.303381443
Example 2: Polymer Modification CY15129
Epoxidation: 50.8 g dried base polymer CY14175 was added to a 1 L jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. 300 mL acetic anhydride (99%) was added to the reactor containing dried base polymer. The mixture was cooled to 5° C. with constant agitation at 100 RPM. 30 mL hydrogen peroxide solution (30% in water) was added over a 30 minute period. Reaction temperature was maintained between 10 and 15° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
Work-up: reaction mixture was washed with acetic acid, and then with DI water until the pH of the reaction supernatant was neutral. Polymer was then dried at 80° C. until no further loss on drying was observed. Dry polymer yield was 61.6 g.
The epoxidation procedure described above should never be scaled to reaction volumes greater than 1 L. Formation of diacetyl peroxide can occur if peracetic acid, the desired intermediate compound, combines with excess acetic anhydride. Diacetyl peroxide is known to be a shock-sensitive explosive. It is therefore emphasized that an alternative epoxidation procedure be used whenever possible.
Ring opening: 20.0 g dried epoxide functionalized polymer was added to a 500 mL jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. 70 mL 70% isopropanol (IPA) was charged to the reactor and the mixture was agitated at 100 RPM. 70 mL 1M NaOH(aq) was added slowly. Reaction temperature was increased to 70° C. and held at 70° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
Work-up: reaction was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral. The result of the procedure was a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin functionalized with 1,2-diol groups.
Cumulative pore volume data for polymer CY15129, measured by nitrogen desorption isotherm, is shown below in Table V. Table VI displays atomic concentrations for polymer CY15129, as measured by XPS. A log differential pore volume plot for polymer CY15129 is presented in FIG. 1, below.
Thrombogenicity was measured by the uPTT assay in which materials were compared to the negative control (plasma alone), positive control (glass beads) and reference beads to determine the degree of contact activation activity. In the uPTT assay, the % change in clot formation over time as compared to the reference materials was determined, then grouped according to: <25% activators, 25-49% moderate activators, 50-74% mild activators, 75-100% minimal and >100% non-activators of the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Polymer CY15129, 97%, was a minimal activator.
TABLE V
Nitrogen Desorption Isotherm Data for CY15129
Pore Diameter Average Cumulative Pore
Range (Å) Diameter (Å) Volume (cm3/g)
2034.9-1317.1 1526.474454 0.002514444
1317.1-935.6  1062.084035 0.007514721
935.6-803.2 859.0838936 0.012804653
803.2-724.3 759.5729583 0.022385884
724.3-618.7 663.0038051 0.11069146
618.7-528.4 566.229207 0.293450368
528.4-477.4 500.2010743 0.422802223
477.4-427.8 449.747968 0.528381351
427.8-385.3 404.2054307 0.635018474
385.3-345.0 362.8353743 0.713148267
345.0-323.2 333.3669226 0.755679912
323.2-298.1 309.5707625 0.801803022
298.1-277.2 286.8210159 0.83919397
277.2-257.8 266.7224264 0.873960046
257.8-239.1 247.7159777 0.904840173
239.1-233.9 236.4822841 0.916370883
233.9-221.5 227.3553143 0.935307969
221.5-206.1 213.192271 0.959816922
206.1-137.2 157.3515944 1.074317205
137.2-104.8 116.2916904 1.132011868
104.8-83.2  91.22080984 1.176129172
83.2-69.8 75.13316152 1.206969053
69.8-58.7 63.1255608 1.235375227
58.7-51.9 54.78635173 1.254262131
51.9-45.5 48.17647142 1.274408627
45.5-40.2 42.44539909 1.293073999
40.2-36.1 37.876562 1.312338195
36.1-32.2 33.86330891 1.33343912
32.2-29.0 30.37788936 1.349636805
29.0-26.3 27.49677094 1.364920292
26.3-23.6 24.80122448 1.383211762
23.6-21.2 22.24825062 1.403332779
21.2-18.9 19.86056309 1.427226088
18.9-16.5 17.49279507 1.458083699
TABLE VI
Atomic Concentrations (in %) for CY15129
Polymer Condition C N O Na S
CY15129 Ground 96.2 0.1 3.7 0.0 0.0
Example 3: Polymer Modification CY15154
20.05 g dried base polymer CY15077 was added to a 500 mL jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. Dried polymer was rewet into DI water making 100 mL slurry in reactor. 9.00 g zwitterionic neutral methacrylate monomer, [(2-methacryloyloxy)ethyl]-dimethyl-3-(sulfopropyl) ammonium hydroxide, and 1.1 g ammonium persulfate were dissolved in 100 mL DI water and the solution added to the reactor containing base polymer slurry. The mixture was heated to 75° C. and maintained at 75° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
Work-up: reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral. The result of the procedure was a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin with sulfobetaine functionality.
Cumulative pore volume data for polymer CY15154, measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry, is shown below in Table VII. Table VIII displays atomic concentrations for polymer CY15154, as measured by XPS. A log differential pore volume plot for polymer CY15154 presented in FIG. 2, below.
Thrombogenicity was measured by the uPTT assay in which materials were compared to the negative control (plasma alone), positive control (glass beads) and reference beads to determine the degree of contact activation activity. In the uPTT assay, the % change in clot formation over time as compared to the reference materials was determined, then grouped according to: <25% activators, 25-49% moderate activators, 50-74% mild activators, 75-100% minimal and >100% non-activators of the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Polymer CY15154, 89%, was a minimal activator.
TABLE VII
Mercury Intrusion Data for CY15154
Pore size Cumulative
Diameter (Å) Intrusion (mL/g)
226224.3281 3.71747E−30
213111.3594 0.001651293
201224.8906 0.002752155
172655.7656 0.005687786
139499.2344 0.00917385
113385.7891 0.012109481
90518.1875 0.014494682
78735.29688 0.015962498
72420.08594 0.017063361
60385.85547 0.019265084
46424.50391 0.021194145
39101.98438 0.023196908
31984.0625 0.0254653
25215.5918 0.028356753
20767.02734 0.031620611
16262.83203 0.037091091
13245.06152 0.044879291
10517.09473 0.0569603
8352.324219 0.073541678
6780.537109 0.094531983
5534.965332 0.122123614
4339.857422 0.168052331
3501.186768 0.227679923
2838.171631 0.301284552
2595.267822 0.342711538
2267.181396 0.401519477
1830.77832 0.502746403
1510.444214 0.602516055
1394.070435 0.649135411
1294.078247 0.688528717
1207.664307 0.725108385
1132.627563 0.760447145
1065.868652 0.791572869
953.7478638 0.843100905
883.8695679 0.884387076
823.3493652 0.94593215
770.980835 0.970002472
722.2579956 1.001678586
684.7388306 1.018621564
671.9746704 1.028800249
636.4578247 1.046198368
604.7978516 1.051783919
558.0610352 1.10215652
518.3203125 1.134908557
483.8748169 1.16506958
453.6493225 1.193175197
427.0003357 1.22020638
403.2171021 1.244618416
382.7931213 1.267649531
362.960968 1.290832281
342.2845154 1.310541511
330.1563721 1.326383829
315.566925 1.343571901
302.711731 1.357273817
290.2910767 1.371727705
279.088562 1.386254311
268.7399292 1.402165532
259.1445618 1.416057229
241.76651 1.434283853
226.8022308 1.453515768
213.4399872 1.475559831
201.5339813 1.494312882
195.092392 1.507889271
188.9113312 1.517046452
180.6271057 1.527027011
172.8740692 1.538419604
164.948822 1.556914806
157.7954102 1.56731689
151.1784973 1.587052464
143.9606934 1.589773178
138.4709473 1.602503777
132.876236 1.614367723
129.5559845 1.623571157
126.5602341 1.627325177
124.2691345 1.627749205
120.9029312 1.636968136
117.360611 1.64050591
114.767189 1.650183678
111.9378891 1.658891678
108.8768463 1.669423223
106.6498108 1.669423223
104.528862 1.669845104
102.434761 1.670300245
100.163887 1.679309368
98.28566742 1.687124491
96.43279266 1.69373095
94.42179871 1.696792841
91.53875732 1.700315237
89.2629776 1.713412642
87.08113098 1.717851758
85.41996765 1.717851758
83.63195801 1.718092918
82.10193634 1.723257303
79.91257477 1.731604815
78.01113129 1.735616565
76.20046234 1.742268085
75.09152222 1.744680524
73.40940857 1.750109911
72.2360611 1.752892733
71.0995636 1.757597446
69.86175537 1.762209773
68.40699005 1.76675427
67.13555145 1.770863652
66.03234863 1.771475196
65.08116913 1.771476984
64.0411911 1.775840044
62.38346863 1.787451506
61.32735062 1.787451506
60.30354691 1.793258786
59.41280365 1.797853351
58.54663467 1.797853351
57.80006027 1.802747488
56.88902664 1.802747488
55.92008591 1.803194642
54.98501587 1.808090687
TABLE VIII
Atomic Concentrations (in %) for CY15154
Polymer Condition C N O Na S
CY15154 Ground 93.9 0.7 4.8 0.1 0.6
Example 4: Polymer Modification CY16029
200 mL base polymer CY14175, wetted in DI water, was added to a 1000 mL jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. Excess water was removed from the reactor using a vacuum pump and filter tube. 500 mL 1.0M sodium hydroxide was added to the reactor. The mixture was heated to 50° C. and maintained at 50° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
Work-up: reaction mixture was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral. The result of the procedure was a poly(styrene-co-divinylbenzene) resin with diol functionality.
Example 5: Base Sorbent Synthesis CY15186
Reactor Setup: a 4-neck glass lid was affixed to a 1 L jacketed cylindrical glass reaction vessel using a stainless steel flange clamp and PFTE gasket. The lid was fitted with a PFTE stirrer bearing, RTD adapter, and water-cooled reflux condenser. A stainless steel stirring shaft having four 60° agitators was fit through the stirrer bearing and inserted into a digital overhead stirrer. An RTD was fit through the corresponding adapter, and connected to a PolyStat circulating heating and chilling unit. Compatible tubing was used to connect the inlet and outlet of the reaction vessel jacket to the appropriate ports on the PolyStat. The unused port in the lid was used for charging the reactor and was plugged at all other times.
Polymerization: Aqueous phase and organic phase compositions are shown below, in Table IX and Table X, respectively. Ultrapure water was added to an Erlenmeyer flask containing a PFTE coated magnetic stir bar. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), having a degree of hydrolysis of 85.0 to 89.0 mol percent and a viscosity of 23.0 to 27.0 cP in a 4% aqueous solution at 20° C., was dispersed into the water in the flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Circulation of heat transfer fluid from the PolyStat through the reaction vessel jacket was started, and fluid temperature heated to 60° C. Once PVA dissolved, the solution was charged to the reactor using a glass funnel. The digital overhead stirrer was powered on and the rpm set to a value to form appropriate droplet sizes upon organic phase addition. Temperature of the aqueous phase in the kettle was set to 70° C. The organic phase was prepared by adding benzoyl peroxide (BPO) to the divinylbenzene (DVB) and allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) in a 1 L Erlenmeyer flask and swirling until completely dissolved. 2,2,4-trimethylpentane and toluene were added to the flask, which was swirled to mix well. Once the temperature of the aqueous phase in the reactor reached 70° C., the organic phase was charged into the reactor using a narrow-necked glass funnel. Temperature of the reaction volume dropped upon the organic addition. A temperature program for the PolyStat was started, heating the reaction volume from 60 to 77° C. over 30 minutes, 77 to 80° C. over 30 minutes, holding the temperature at 80° C. for 960 minutes, and cooling to 20° C. over 60 minutes.
TABLE IX
Aqueous Phase Composition
Reagent Mass (g)
Ultrapure water 501.505
Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) 1.463
Total 502.968
TABLE X
Organic Phase Composition
Reagent Mass (g)
Divinylbenzene, 63% (DVB) 149.518
Allyl glycidyl ether (AGE) 16.613
2,2,4-trimethylpentane (Isooctane) 160.913
Toluene 74.134
Benzoyl peroxide, 98% (BPO) 1.246
Total (excluding BPO) 401.178
Work-up: reaction volume level in the reactor was marked. Overhead stirrer agitation was stopped, residual liquid siphoned out of the reactor, and the reactor filled to the mark with ultrapure water at room temperature. Overhead stirrer agitation was restarted and the slurry heated to 70° C. as quickly as possible. After 30 minutes, agitation was stopped and residual liquid siphoned out. Polymer beads were washed five times in this manner. During the final wash, the slurry temperature was cooled to room temperature. After the final water wash, polymer beads were washed with 99% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in the same manner. 99% IPA was siphoned out and replaced with 70% IPA before transferring the slurry into a clean 2 L glass container. Unless noted otherwise, on an as-needed basis the polymer was steam stripped in a stainless steel tube for 8 hours, rewet in 70% IPA, transferred into DI water, sieved to obtain only the portion of beads having diameters between 300 and 600 m, and dried at 100° C. until no further weight loss on drying was observed.
Cumulative pore volume data for polymer CY15186, measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry, is shown below in Table XI.
TABLE XI
Mercury Intrusion Data for CY15186
Pore size Cumulative
Diameter (Å) Intrusion (mL/g)
226574.9688 4.16667E−30
213402.0781 0.00143953
201557.2031 0.002673413
172865.7813 0.005552473
139642.9063 0.008842826
113246.3672 0.01213318
90612.32813 0.016246123
78790.625 0.018096946
72482.59375 0.018919535
60373.96094 0.022004243
49330.66406 0.025782049
38828.21094 0.029563239
32281.45898 0.032648358
25408.87305 0.038482815
20836.85352 0.045313008
16161.98633 0.05680377
13229.80762 0.070135541
10529.51172 0.090406768
8364.625977 0.117706239
6782.583496 0.154166013
5537.970215 0.199266374
4336.817871 0.271772623
3498.797607 0.351178646
2839.945801 0.443094909
2594.289795 0.490598917
2268.72168 0.553719223
1830.803467 0.660846353
1510.359009 0.764178634
1394.668335 0.811257899
1294.491577 0.852448702
1208.005005 0.888583481
1131.924561 0.921772897
1066.473633 0.951730609
953.3641968 1.003630996
884.2562866 1.052415848
823.5280151 1.073814034
771.4370728 1.105411649
722.2237549 1.120140433
685.1390381 1.145742297
672.3484497 1.153626442
636.8387451 1.16934073
604.7866211 1.208441377
558.3435059 1.240501285
518.1854858 1.268068552
483.8361511 1.295331836
453.4187012 1.322064877
426.98349 1.346303344
403.1603394 1.367477417
382.764679 1.388786197
362.9465027 1.407936335
342.3362122 1.428686738
329.841217 1.442481041
315.7774048 1.456739783
302.3786621 1.468396068
290.1838379 1.481325388
279.0186768 1.494134068
268.7069092 1.504692793
259.1578064 1.514950275
241.945694 1.532619953
226.7833557 1.550052524
213.419693 1.569337964
201.5121765 1.586070657
195.0518036 1.599830866
188.9384308 1.612305164
180.598114 1.617076278
172.8187256 1.627080917
164.9259338 1.637640119
157.7406464 1.652938724
151.21492 1.657568693
143.9346313 1.674796224
138.4336395 1.684575438
132.8709869 1.689449072
129.5866547 1.702379704
126.4979095 1.706433415
124.2752533 1.71120882
120.9342499 1.714904308
117.3752136 1.714904308
114.7828979 1.724609733
111.9247818 1.729753852
108.8955307 1.730157733
106.6599426 1.744294405
104.532135 1.746785283
102.4387283 1.75013876
100.1778946 1.75013876
98.2558136 1.750320315
96.43884277 1.753109574
94.43161011 1.756025434
91.53116608 1.759399176
89.26831055 1.777230859
87.07096863 1.777230859
85.41964722 1.780620933
83.62415314 1.780620933
82.10125732 1.785255194
79.90966034 1.788483143
78.01230621 1.788483143
76.20275879 1.788483143
75.0914917 1.788589239
73.41194916 1.788589239
72.23661041 1.788589239
71.10020447 1.789496899
69.86201477 1.800735831
68.40441895 1.80268836
67.13528442 1.80268836
66.03346252 1.810508251
65.08029175 1.81166029
64.04324341 1.822634697
62.3841629 1.825838447
61.32678223 1.828645229
60.30419159 1.830532074
59.41298676 1.830532074
58.54736328 1.830532074
57.79838181 1.830532074
56.88856888 1.830532074
55.92162704 1.83255136
54.98494339 1.832824707
Example 6: Polymer Modification CY16000
Ring Opening: 100 mL polymer CY15186, wetted in 70% IPA, was added to a 1 L jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon coated agitator and RTD probe. 300 mL 1M NaOH(aq) was added slowly. Reaction temperature was increased to 80° C. and held at 80° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
Work-up: reaction was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral. The result of the procedure was a poly(allyl glycidyl ether-co-divinylbenzene) resin functionalized with 1,2-diol groups.
Cumulative pore volume data for polymer CY16000, measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry, is shown below in Table XII. Table XIII displays atomic concentrations for polymer CY16000, as measured by XPS. A log differential pore volume plot for polymer CY16000 is presented in FIG. 3, below.
Thrombogenicity was measured by the uPTT assay in which materials were compared to the negative control (plasma alone), positive control (glass beads) and reference beads to determine the degree of contact activation activity. In the uPTT assay, the % change in clot formation over time as compared to the reference materials was determined, then grouped according to: <25% activators, 25-49% moderate activators, 50-74% mild activators, 75-100% minimal and >100% non-activators of the intrinsic coagulation pathway. Polymer CY16000, 84%, was a minimal activator.
TABLE XII
Mercury Intrusion Data for CY16000
Pore size Cumulative
Diameter (Å) Intrusion (mL/g)
226237.4219 3.27869E−30
213116.6875 0.001780028
201256 0.002912772
172597.9375 0.005663724
139531.7344 0.008900138
113393.6016 0.011165627
90536.97656 0.013916579
78745.64844 0.016182069
72432.8125 0.017314814
60388.14063 0.020551227
49564.25391 0.023191452
38797.54688 0.025975971
32041.20898 0.029775988
25302.44141 0.036112998
20921.08984 0.043078985
16231.54297 0.055562966
13231.72168 0.069240041
10497.79492 0.089360692
8343.577148 0.116200015
6776.628418 0.151556209
5542.397949 0.195025146
4340.495117 0.265774131
3498.106201 0.341953665
2839.38623 0.430826575
2594.266846 0.478813648
2267.297852 0.540965915
1830.911011 0.644623816
1509.371948 0.745699465
1393.887939 0.794316649
1294.647949 0.83322984
1207.980835 0.869946182
1132.671631 0.903727651
1066.053711 0.932609558
953.1560059 0.978823841
883.3498535 1.016740084
823.050415 1.050323486
770.6383667 1.083085179
722.1539307 1.128799915
684.3758545 1.146574736
671.9072266 1.158596516
636.8184204 1.175545812
604.8302612 1.191316247
557.7293701 1.218484282
517.8145142 1.246015668
483.4432983 1.273180366
453.1549377 1.299499989
426.4946594 1.323516726
402.9095459 1.345747828
382.497406 1.366356015
362.7590942 1.386311769
342.0608215 1.405492902
329.5023804 1.420231104
315.2943726 1.437522292
302.1650391 1.447153091
290.3215027 1.461028457
279.1251221 1.47798562
268.9230042 1.478424907
259.0871582 1.499376774
241.8872223 1.516182542
226.7401123 1.52628684
213.3443909 1.54687202
201.4691315 1.565247297
194.9713898 1.57622385
188.963913 1.586960673
180.6094666 1.597345948
172.8415527 1.605777144
164.9702148 1.615878105
157.8144836 1.62835598
151.1303864 1.637635469
143.9487305 1.651656628
138.4449463 1.661584258
132.878067 1.671312332
129.5904083 1.677082658
126.49086 1.684068799
124.2613449 1.68521893
120.9155121 1.696256876
117.3831711 1.70307827
114.7640991 1.709652185
111.9642258 1.709652185
108.8973465 1.710108638
106.6852188 1.719043851
104.4803925 1.726407647
102.4626007 1.730650187
100.1529846 1.738801718
98.26617432 1.742565274
96.43665314 1.744427681
94.44145203 1.744753599
91.53864288 1.750175834
89.26194763 1.750728965
87.08582306 1.755701542
85.41732788 1.764526129
83.63022614 1.765552759
82.10185242 1.769952536
79.9105835 1.773370266
78.01232147 1.782885909
76.19724274 1.791909099
75.08769226 1.792658687
73.40957642 1.796038389
72.23654175 1.796038389
71.09810638 1.796038389
69.86147308 1.796038389
68.40509033 1.796038389
67.13497925 1.796038389
66.03092957 1.797552824
65.08396149 1.802418113
64.04406738 1.802683711
62.38559723 1.813122511
61.32781601 1.813122511
60.30435562 1.821751833
59.41186142 1.823982239
58.54719925 1.823982239
57.79738235 1.825609565
56.8899765 1.825609565
55.91999054 1.834336996
54.98700714 1.834405422
TABLE XIII
Atomic Concentrations (in %) for CY16000
Polymer Condition C N O Na S
CY16000 Ground 98.8 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0
Example 7: Base Sorbent Synthesis CY16207
Reactor Setup: a 4-neck glass lid was affixed to a 3 L jacketed cylindrical glass reaction vessel using a stainless steel flange clamp and PFTE gasket. The lid was fitted with a PFTE stirrer bearing, RTD adapter, and water-cooled reflux condenser. A stainless steel stirring shaft having five 60° agitators was fit through the stirrer bearing and inserted into a digital overhead stirrer. An RTD was fit through the corresponding adapter, and connected to a PolyStat circulating heating and chilling unit. Compatible tubing was used to connect the inlet and outlet of the reaction vessel jacket to the appropriate ports on the PolyStat. The unused port in the lid was used for charging the reactor and was plugged at all other times.
Polymerization: Aqueous phase and organic phase compositions are shown below, in Table XIV and Table XV, respectively. Ultrapure water was split into approximately equal parts in two separate Erlenmeyer flasks, each containing a PFTE coated magnetic stir bar. Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), having a degree of hydrolysis of 85.0 to 89.0 mol percent and a viscosity of 23.0 to 27.0 cP in a 4% aqueous solution at 20° C., was dispersed into the water in the first flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Salts (see Table 1, MSP, DSP, TSP and Sodium nitrite) were dispersed into the water in the second flask and heated to 80° C. on a hot plate with agitation. Circulation of heat transfer fluid from the PolyStat through the reaction vessel jacket was started, and fluid temperature heated to 60° C. Once PVA and salts dissolved, both solutions were charged to the reactor, one at a time, using a glass funnel. The digital overhead stirrer was powered on and the rpm set to a value to form appropriate droplet sizes upon organic phase addition. Temperature of the aqueous phase in the kettle was set to 60° C. The organic phase was prepared by adding benzoyl peroxide (BPO) to the divinylbenzene (DVB) and vinyl acetate (VA) in a 2 L Erlenmeyer flask and swirling until completely dissolved. 2,2,4-trimethylpentane and toluene were added to the flask, which was swirled to mix well. Once the temperature of the aqueous phase in the reactor reached 60° C., the organic phase was charged into the reactor using a narrow-necked glass funnel. Temperature of the reaction volume dropped upon the organic addition. A temperature program for the PolyStat was started, heating the reaction volume from 50 to 67° C. over 30 minutes, 67 to 70° C. over 30 minutes, holding the temperature at 70° C. for 960 minutes, and cooling to 20° C. over 60 minutes.
TABLE XIV
Aqueous Phase Composition
Reagent Mass (g)
Ultrapure water 1504.514
Poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) 4.388
Monosodium phosphate (MSP) 4.639
Disodium phosphate (DSP) 15.358
Trisodium phosphate (TSP) 9.529
Sodium nitrite 0.050
Total 1533.899
TABLE XV
Organic Phase Composition
Reagent Mass (g)
Divinylbenzene, 63% (DVB) 184.489
Vinyl acetate (VA) 276.734
2,2,4-trimethylpentane (Isooctane) 519.415
Toluene 217.344
Benzoyl peroxide, 98% (BPO) 7.060
Total (excluding BPO) 1197.981
Work-up: reaction volume level in the reactor was marked. Overhead stirrer agitation was stopped, residual liquid siphoned out of the reactor, and the reactor filled to the mark with ultrapure water at room temperature. Overhead stirrer agitation was restarted and the slurry heated to 70° C. as quickly as possible. After 30 minutes, agitation was stopped and residual liquid siphoned out. Polymer beads were washed five times in this manner. During the final wash, the slurry temperature was cooled to room temperature. After the final water wash, polymer beads were washed with 99% isopropyl alcohol (IPA) in the same manner. 99% IPA was siphoned out and replaced with 70% IPA before transferring the slurry into a clean 4 L glass container. Unless noted otherwise, on an as-needed basis the polymer was steam stripped in a stainless steel tube for 8 hours, rewet in 70% IPA, transferred into DI water, sieved to obtain only the portion of beads having diameters between 300 and 600 m, then stored in 70% IPA.
Example 8: Polymer Modification CY16083
Ring Opening: 100 mL polymer CY16207, wetted in 70% IPA, was added to a 1 L jacketed glass reactor, which was equipped with a Teflon™ coated agitator and RTD probe. 300 mL 1M NaOH(aq) was added slowly. Reaction temperature was increased to 50° C. and held at 50° C. for 24 hours with agitation at 100 RPM.
Work-up: reaction was cooled to room temperature and washed with DI water until the pH of reaction supernatant was neutral. The result of the procedure was a poly(vinyl acetate-co-divinylbenzene) resin functionalized with diol groups.
Cumulative pore volume data for polymer CY16083, measured by mercury intrusion porosimetry, is shown below in Table XVI. A log differential pore volume plot for polymer CY16083 is presented in FIG. 4, below.
TABLE XVI
Mercury Intrusion Data for CY16083
Pore size Cumulative
Diameter (Å) Intrusion (mL/g)
226391.9063 4.78469E−30
213308.9531 0.012976322
201386.2656 0.02406518
172686.375 0.054736488
139546.625 0.109237045
113150.9688 0.18072477
90562.88281 0.269671559
78762.24219 0.337856233
72451.34375 0.385278791
60349.18359 0.496875197
46204.09375 0.697754502
38763.8125 0.836230755
31643.42969 1.000192761
25230.56055 1.205377698
20887.55078 1.38317883
16239.9668 1.625140905
13230.17285 1.826209903
10526.66992 2.024656534
8343.935547 2.255314827
6768.749023 2.437402248
5536.999023 2.610224247
4339.233398 2.809215069
3496.317871 2.979628563
2839.894531 3.132294893
2594.126465 3.201504469
2269.560547 3.289848328
1830.92041 3.426440239
1510.197266 3.543637514
1394.337891 3.59655261
1294.366821 3.639976263
1208.313232 3.682707548
1132.399414 3.715785503
1065.535278 3.749961376
953.255188 3.801620483
883.243103 3.842084646
823.732666 3.878456354
770.7653809 3.914454937
722.7271118 3.989947796
684.5341187 3.999229193
672.2802734 4.007525921
636.6481934 4.021618843
604.5131836 4.041242599
558.1253662 4.064183712
518.5241089 4.095198154
483.8094177 4.125536919
453.6139832 4.149884224
427.0258789 4.17394495
403.3308411 4.201014519
382.3586426 4.224377632
362.4940186 4.242950439
342.3064575 4.266281605
329.9550171 4.28075552
315.6726379 4.299653053
302.4161987 4.306960106
290.1585083 4.327187061
279.201416 4.34189415
268.7153015 4.355234623
259.0892944 4.374240398
241.8599091 4.383106709
226.7653198 4.401435852
213.347641 4.423255444
201.5104675 4.442746162
194.9966431 4.454417229
188.9203796 4.464861393
180.6326904 4.472812653
172.8411407 4.489228249
164.9724884 4.502909184
157.8284607 4.51300478
151.176178 4.524533749
143.9182281 4.549272537
138.4604645 4.55087471
132.8447571 4.55614233
129.5848236 4.571050644
126.493721 4.576627254
124.2370682 4.585023403
120.9169006 4.589932919
117.3489761 4.599758148
114.7642288 4.605149269
111.946228 4.6123209
108.9087601 4.619316101
106.6530533 4.630918026
104.5154953 4.637215614
102.4490051 4.64176178
100.1706924 4.642546177
98.26054382 4.642546177
96.43994141 4.642546177
94.42762756 4.646022797
91.53787994 4.659168243
89.26939392 4.670140743
87.08105469 4.674285412
85.43276978 4.682890892
83.63574219 4.683265686
82.1003418 4.688156128
79.91436768 4.694897175
78.01213074 4.699482918
76.19928741 4.706587791
75.09382629 4.709022045
73.41336823 4.713496685
72.2383728 4.720668793
71.10043335 4.723160267
69.86404419 4.731044769
68.40866852 4.73837328
67.13607788 4.73837328
66.03302765 4.73837328
65.08182526 4.738733292
64.04320526 4.744318962
62.38569641 4.75237608
61.32912827 4.755572319
60.30617142 4.758491516
59.41395187 4.765036583
58.5463829 4.765704632
57.79882813 4.769648552
56.88949585 4.773656368
55.92075729 4.779618263
54.98794556 4.780755997
Example 9: Pore Structure Summary and Classification
Pore structure, including pore size, pore size distribution, and surface properties, is very important to the adsorption characteristics of porous material. IUPAC has classified pores into micropores, mesopores, and macropores; terms which are widely used in adsorption, catalysis, and other areas.
Micropores have widths smaller than 2 nm (<20 Å).
Mesopores have widths between 2 and 50 nm (20 Å ˜500 Å).
Macropores have widths larger than 50 nm (>500 Å).
Under IUPAC's definition, pore size (or pore diameter) is the distance between two opposite walls of the pore and therefore refer to the diameter of cylindrical pores, or the width of slit-shaped pores. In addition to the IUPAC classification, the term transport pores (with pore diameter greater than 250 Å) has been used in the area of activated carbon adsorption. For the purpose of illustration in this application, the term “large transport pores” refers to pores with a diameter greater than 2,000 Å, as a subgroup of macropores; the term “capacity pores” refers to pores with diameter greater than 100 Å, and are capable of adsorbing small and midsize biomolecules and proteins (to 50 kDa); and the term “effective pores” refers to pores with a diameter within the range of 100˜250 Å. which is a subgroup of mesopores and has shown to be the most effective pores for small and midsize protein adsorption.
While mesopores are useful adsorption sites, the macropores provide a transfer path for adsorbate to reach the inner adsorption sites. The large transport pores provide a much more effective transfer path that is particularly important for large molecules, such as large proteins, endotoxins, and other large toxin molecules. This invention discloses the technique of producing a wide pore size distribution, including large transport pores, conventional macropores, mesopores, and micropores, to complement special needs in adsorption applications. Table XVII summarizes the pore size distribution of polymer examples disclosed in this application, including IUPAC classifications and size fractions important to protein and biomolecule adsorption.
TABLE XVII
Pore Data Summary
Polymer ID
CY14175 CY15129 CY15077 CY15154 CY15186 CY16000 CY16083
Porosimetly Method Nitrogen Nitrogen Mercury Mercury Mercury Mercury Mercury
Desorption Desorption Intrusion Intrusion Intrusion Intrusion Intrusion
Total Pore Volume, cc/g; 1.9778 1.4581 2.3034 1.8081 1.8328 1.8344 4.7808
Dp > 16 Å
Capacity Pore Volume, cc/g; 1.5433 1.1418 2.1830 1.6800 1.7502 1.7391 4.6425
Dp > 100 Å
Effective Pore Volume, 0.3500 0.2550 0.2369 0.2543 0.2258 0.2309 0.2683
cc/g; Dp, 100 Å→250 Å
Transport Pore Volume of 1.1933 0.8868 1.9461 1.4256 1.5244 1.5083 4.3742
Dp > 250 Å, cc/g
Large Transport Pore ~0 0 1.0108 0.4635 0.6195 0.6045 3.2898
Volume, cc/g; Dp > 2,000
Macropore Volume, cc/g; 0.6026 0.3655 1.6945 1.1510 1.2825 1.2601 4.0952
Dp > 500 Å
Mesopore Volume, cc/g; 1.3125 1.0503 0.6089 0.6571 0.5503 0.5743 0.6856
Dp: 20→500 Å
Micropore Volume, cc/g; 0.0627 0.0423 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Dp < 20 Å
Capacity Pore Volume, 78% 78% 95% 93% 95% 95% 97%
% of total pore vol
Effective Pore Volume, 18% 17% 10% 14% 12% 13% 6%
% of total pore vol
Transport Pore Volume, 60% 61% 84% 79% 83% 82% 92%
% of total pore vol
Large Transport Pore 0% 0% 44% 26% 34% 33% 69%
Volume, % of total pore vol
Macropore Volume, 30% 25% 74% 64% 70% 69% 86%
% of total pore vol
Mesopore Volume, 66% 92% 28% 39% 31% 33% 14%
% of total pore vol
Micropore Volume, 3.2% 4% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
% of total pore vol
Dp = Pore Diameter
vol = volume
>: greater
<: smaller
~: approximately
→: to (for range)
Example 10: Endotoxin Removal from Plasma in a Recirculation Model
20 mL of heat-inactivated human citrated plasma was spiked with 3 EU/ml endotoxin purchased from Associates of Cape Cod, East Falmouth, Mass., and then spiked into plasma reservoir. Plasma with endotoxin was mixed on stir plate for 15 minutes and recirculated through the 1.5 mL polymer column at a flow rate of 2.5 mL/min. Samples were collected from the reservoir using sterile pipette tips and diluted 1:20 in endotoxin-free water. All diluted samples were tested in the Pierce LAL Endotoxin Assay from Life Technologies, Corp., Grand Island, N.Y. Data for endotoxin removal from plasma in dynamic recirculation model, using modified polymers CY15129, CY15154, CY16000, and CY16029 is shown below, in FIG. 5. FIG. 6 presents endotoxin removal data for polymer CY15154 and its non-modified precursor polymer CY15077.
Example 11: Cytokine Removal from Whole Bovine Blood in a Recirculation Model
Purified proteins were added to 300 mL 3.8% citrated whole bovine blood (Lampire Biologicals) at expected clinical concentrations and recirculated through a 20 mL polymer-filled device at a flow rate of 140 mL/min for five hours. Proteins and initial concentrations were: IL-6 3000 pg/mL and TNF-α at 800 pg/mL. Plasma was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following manufacturer instructions (R&D Systems). Data for cytokine removal from whole blood using polymer CY15129 in a dynamic recirculation model is shown below, in FIG. 7.

Claims (14)

What is claimed:
1. A method of adsorbing endotoxins comprising contacting physiologic fluid with a polymer system comprising either polyol or zwitterionic functionality; said polymer system has the form of a solid support having a polymer coating comprising poly(diethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl acrylate), poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate), poly(hydroxypropyl acrylate), poly (hydroxypropyl methacrylate), poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinyl alcohol), salts of poly(acrylic acid), salts of poly(methacrylic) acid, or mixtures thereof.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the polymer system is also capable of adsorbing a broad range of toxins and inflammatory mediators.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the said toxins and inflammatory mediators have a molecular weight of from less than 0.5 kDa to 1,000 kDa.
4. The method of claim 2 wherein the said toxins and inflammatory mediators have a molecular weight of from less than 0.5 kDa to 60 kDa.
5. The method of claim 2 wherein the toxins and inflammatory mediators comprise one or more of cytokines, pathogen-associated molecular pattern molecules (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular pattern molecules (DAMPs), superantigens, monokines, chemokines, interferons, proteases, enzymes, peptides including bradykinin, soluble CD40 ligand, bioactive lipids, oxidized lipids, cell-free hemoglobin, cell-free myoglobin, growth factors, glycoproteins, prions, toxins, bacterial and viral toxins, drugs, vasoactive substances, foreign antigens, and antibodies.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the polymer system is also capable of adsorbing one or more of gram-negative bacteria, gram-negative bacteria fragments, and gram-negative bacterial components.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the polymer system is also capable of adsorbing one or more of gram-positive bacteria, gram-positive bacteria fragments, and gram-positive bacterial components.
8. The method of claim 1 wherein the solid support is selected from beads, fibers, monolithic columns, film, membranes, or semi-permeable membranes.
9. The method of claim 1 wherein the polymer system comprises a plurality of pores and a total volume of pore sizes in the range of from 10 Å to 40,000 Å greater than 0.1 cc/g and less than 5.0 cc/g dry polymer.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the polymer system is nonporous.
11. The method of claim 1 wherein the polymer system further comprises a hypercrosslinked polymer.
12. The method of claim 1 wherein the polymer system further comprises either (i) heparin or (ii) a heparin mimicking polymer.
13. The method of claim 1, comprising passing the physiologic fluid one or more times through an extracorporeal circuit comprising a device comprising the polymer system.
14. The method of claim 1 wherein the polymer system further comprises a macroreticular porous polymer.
US16/303,232 2016-05-26 2017-05-18 Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules Active US11065600B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US16/303,232 US11065600B2 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-05-18 Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201662341676P 2016-05-26 2016-05-26
US16/303,232 US11065600B2 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-05-18 Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules
PCT/US2017/033220 WO2017205166A1 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-05-18 The use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2017/033220 A-371-Of-International WO2017205166A1 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-05-18 The use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/372,985 Continuation US11826724B2 (en) 2016-05-26 2021-07-12 Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20190201867A1 US20190201867A1 (en) 2019-07-04
US11065600B2 true US11065600B2 (en) 2021-07-20

Family

ID=60411868

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US16/303,232 Active US11065600B2 (en) 2016-05-26 2017-05-18 Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules
US17/372,985 Active 2037-12-04 US11826724B2 (en) 2016-05-26 2021-07-12 Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules
US18/502,809 Pending US20240082817A1 (en) 2016-05-26 2023-11-06 Use Of A Hemocompatible Porous Polymer Bead Sorbent For Removal Of Endotoxemia-Inducing Molecules

Family Applications After (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/372,985 Active 2037-12-04 US11826724B2 (en) 2016-05-26 2021-07-12 Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules
US18/502,809 Pending US20240082817A1 (en) 2016-05-26 2023-11-06 Use Of A Hemocompatible Porous Polymer Bead Sorbent For Removal Of Endotoxemia-Inducing Molecules

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (3) US11065600B2 (en)
EP (1) EP3463646A4 (en)
JP (3) JP7033083B2 (en)
CN (1) CN109562353B (en)
AU (2) AU2017272021B2 (en)
CA (1) CA3025321A1 (en)
RU (1) RU2018146119A (en)
WO (1) WO2017205166A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA3025321A1 (en) * 2016-05-26 2017-11-30 Cytosorbents Corporation The use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules
WO2019222048A1 (en) * 2018-05-15 2019-11-21 Cytosorbents, Inc. Process for functionalizing a biocompatible polymeric bead, the functionalized beads, and the beads produced thereby
JP7312030B2 (en) * 2018-07-02 2023-07-20 旭化成メディカル株式会社 blood treatment beads
CN111686704B (en) * 2020-07-02 2023-08-08 苏州仝康医疗科技有限公司 Blood purification adsorbent and preparation method and application thereof
US20230347037A1 (en) * 2020-10-01 2023-11-02 Alteco Medical Ab Matrices for selective binding of at least one component from a body fluid
JPWO2023008561A1 (en) 2021-07-30 2023-02-02
CN114053406B (en) * 2021-11-23 2022-12-09 华中科技大学 Multifunctional photo-thermal nano sterilization material and preparation and application thereof
CN114452952B (en) * 2021-12-16 2023-12-29 健帆生物科技集团股份有限公司 Ultrahigh crosslinked adsorption resin with bimodal pore structure, and preparation method and application thereof
CN114950383B (en) * 2022-04-08 2024-02-06 淄博康贝医疗器械有限公司 Cytokine adsorbent for blood purification and preparation method thereof

Citations (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4297220A (en) 1958-07-18 1981-10-27 Rohm And Haas Company Macroreticulated copolymer adsorption process
US6087300A (en) 1998-02-06 2000-07-11 Renal Tech International Llc Method of producing material for purification of physiological liquids of organism
US20020197252A1 (en) * 2001-04-10 2002-12-26 Renal Tech International Selective adsorption devices and systems
US20020198487A1 (en) 2001-04-10 2002-12-26 Renal Tech International Devices, systems, and methods for reducing levels of pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory stimulators or mediators in physiologic fluids
JP2003320229A (en) 2002-04-30 2003-11-11 Asahi Kasei Corp Modified hollow fiber membrane
WO2005003152A1 (en) 2003-06-24 2005-01-13 Akzo Nobel N.V. Removal of lipopolysacchrarides from protein- lipopolysaccharide complexes by nonflammable solvents
US20080041791A1 (en) 2003-03-07 2008-02-21 Seldon Technologies, Llc Purification of fluids with nanomaterials
CN102247817A (en) 2011-05-03 2011-11-23 大连理工大学 Endotoxin adsorbent using molecular cluster as functional group and preparation method thereof
RU2439089C1 (en) 2010-05-11 2012-01-10 Учреждение Российской академии наук Институт высокомолекулярных соединений РАН Method of producing cellular polymer sorbent for selective sorption of endotoxin from blood plasma
US20130195792A1 (en) 2010-04-01 2013-08-01 Cytosorbents Corporation Method of treating inflammation
US20140158604A1 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-06-12 Jacques Chammas Platelet Storage Container
US20140294751A1 (en) 2013-04-01 2014-10-02 Cytosorbents Corporation Hemocompatibility Modifiers for Cross-Linked Polymeric Material
RU2013113725A (en) 2010-09-09 2014-10-20 Сайтосорбент, Инк. POLYMER SYSTEM POSSESSING SELECTIVITY OF ADSORPTION BY DIMENSIONS
CN104582751A (en) 2012-06-29 2015-04-29 西托索尔本茨公司 Methods of using polymers
WO2015165198A1 (en) 2014-04-30 2015-11-05 邯郸净化设备研究所 Method and device for purifying tungsten hexafluoride by means of continuous rectification
WO2016138528A1 (en) 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Wayne State University Methods and compositions relating to biocompatible implants
WO2017070415A1 (en) 2015-10-22 2017-04-27 Cytosorbents Corporation Multi-functional hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removing protein based toxins an potassium from biological fluids

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5149425A (en) 1988-11-09 1992-09-22 Chembiomed, Ltd. Affinity supports for hemoperfusion
US6544727B1 (en) 1995-06-07 2003-04-08 Cerus Corporation Methods and devices for the removal of psoralens from blood products
JP2003506111A (en) 1999-01-22 2003-02-18 ザ ダウ ケミカル カンパニー Surface-modified divinylbenzene resin with blood compatible coating
US8038638B2 (en) 2004-02-23 2011-10-18 Hemolife Medical, Inc. Plasma detoxification and volume control system and methods of use
AT507846B1 (en) 2009-01-22 2011-12-15 Fresenius Medical Care De Gmbh SORPTION FOR ENDOTOXINES
US10064406B2 (en) 2011-01-06 2018-09-04 Cytosorbents Corporation Polymeric sorbent for removal of impurities from whole blood and blood products
WO2015164198A1 (en) * 2014-04-24 2015-10-29 Exthera Medical Corporation Method for removing bacteria from blood using high flow rate
CA3025321A1 (en) * 2016-05-26 2017-11-30 Cytosorbents Corporation The use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules

Patent Citations (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4297220A (en) 1958-07-18 1981-10-27 Rohm And Haas Company Macroreticulated copolymer adsorption process
US6087300A (en) 1998-02-06 2000-07-11 Renal Tech International Llc Method of producing material for purification of physiological liquids of organism
US20020197252A1 (en) * 2001-04-10 2002-12-26 Renal Tech International Selective adsorption devices and systems
US20020198487A1 (en) 2001-04-10 2002-12-26 Renal Tech International Devices, systems, and methods for reducing levels of pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory stimulators or mediators in physiologic fluids
JP2003320229A (en) 2002-04-30 2003-11-11 Asahi Kasei Corp Modified hollow fiber membrane
US20080041791A1 (en) 2003-03-07 2008-02-21 Seldon Technologies, Llc Purification of fluids with nanomaterials
WO2005003152A1 (en) 2003-06-24 2005-01-13 Akzo Nobel N.V. Removal of lipopolysacchrarides from protein- lipopolysaccharide complexes by nonflammable solvents
US20130195792A1 (en) 2010-04-01 2013-08-01 Cytosorbents Corporation Method of treating inflammation
RU2439089C1 (en) 2010-05-11 2012-01-10 Учреждение Российской академии наук Институт высокомолекулярных соединений РАН Method of producing cellular polymer sorbent for selective sorption of endotoxin from blood plasma
RU2013113725A (en) 2010-09-09 2014-10-20 Сайтосорбент, Инк. POLYMER SYSTEM POSSESSING SELECTIVITY OF ADSORPTION BY DIMENSIONS
CN102247817A (en) 2011-05-03 2011-11-23 大连理工大学 Endotoxin adsorbent using molecular cluster as functional group and preparation method thereof
CN104582751A (en) 2012-06-29 2015-04-29 西托索尔本茨公司 Methods of using polymers
US20140158604A1 (en) 2012-12-12 2014-06-12 Jacques Chammas Platelet Storage Container
US20140294751A1 (en) 2013-04-01 2014-10-02 Cytosorbents Corporation Hemocompatibility Modifiers for Cross-Linked Polymeric Material
JP2016514568A (en) 2013-04-01 2016-05-23 サイトソーベンツ・コーポレーション Blood compatibility modifier for cross-linked polymeric materials
WO2015165198A1 (en) 2014-04-30 2015-11-05 邯郸净化设备研究所 Method and device for purifying tungsten hexafluoride by means of continuous rectification
WO2016138528A1 (en) 2015-02-27 2016-09-01 Wayne State University Methods and compositions relating to biocompatible implants
WO2017070415A1 (en) 2015-10-22 2017-04-27 Cytosorbents Corporation Multi-functional hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removing protein based toxins an potassium from biological fluids

Non-Patent Citations (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Bengsch et al., Extracorporeal Plasma Treatment for the Removal of Endotoxin Patients With Sepsis: Clinical Results of a Pilot Study, Shock. 2005, 23(6): 494-500.
Cao et al.; "The impact of structure on elasticity, switchability, stability and functionality of an all-in-one carboxybetaine elastomer"; Biomaterials; vol. 34; Oct. 2013; p. 7592-7600 (contains English Abstract).
Ginsburg, Role of Lipoteichoic Acid in Infection and Inflammation, Lancet Inft Dis. Mar. 2002, 2(3):171-179.
Harm_Falkenhagen_Hartmann, Endotoxin Adsorbents in Extracorporeal Blood Purification: Do They Fulfill Expectations? Int J Artif Organs 37.3 (2014): 222-232).
Morath et al., Structure/Function Relationships of Lipoteichoic Acids, j Endotoxin Res. 2005, 11(6):348-356.
R.L. Albright, Porous Polymers as an Anchor for Catalysis, Reactive Polymers, 4, Issue 2, (Apr. 1986), 155-174.
Sobieszcyk, et al., Combination Therapy With Polymyxin B for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Respiratory Tract Infections, J. Antimicrob Chemother. Aug. 5, 2004, 54(2):566-569.
Tsyurupa et al., Hypercrosslinked Polystyrene: The First Nanoporous Polymeric Material, Nanotechnologies in Russia 4 (2009): 665-675.
Weinstein, et al., Neurotoxicity in Patients Treated With Intravenous Polymyxin B: Two Case Reports, Am J Health Syst Pharm, Feb. 15, 2009, 66(4): 345-347.
Yoo et al., Conformational Preferences and Antimicrobial Activities of Alkanediols, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 2015 vol. 1064, 15-24.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2017205166A1 (en) 2017-11-30
US20240082817A1 (en) 2024-03-14
JP2023130402A (en) 2023-09-20
US20190201867A1 (en) 2019-07-04
EP3463646A4 (en) 2020-01-08
JP7033083B2 (en) 2022-03-09
AU2017272021A1 (en) 2018-11-29
CN109562353A (en) 2019-04-02
CN109562353B (en) 2022-07-15
RU2018146119A3 (en) 2020-09-29
AU2017272021B2 (en) 2021-09-02
JP2022071026A (en) 2022-05-13
CA3025321A1 (en) 2017-11-30
US11826724B2 (en) 2023-11-28
JP7305825B2 (en) 2023-07-10
EP3463646A1 (en) 2019-04-10
US20220032267A1 (en) 2022-02-03
JP2019523700A (en) 2019-08-29
AU2021273537A1 (en) 2021-12-16
RU2018146119A (en) 2020-06-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11826724B2 (en) Use of a hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removal of endotoxemia-inducing molecules
US11723916B2 (en) Multi-functional hemocompatible porous polymer bead sorbent for removing protein based toxins and potassium from biological fluids
US20230381391A1 (en) The Use of a Hemocompatible Porous Polymer Bread Sorbent for Removal of Pamps and Damps
JP3901216B2 (en) Tumor necrosis factor-α adsorbent, adsorption removal method, and adsorber using the adsorbent
JPH0518625B2 (en)
JPH01181875A (en) Adsorptive body of immune complex and removing device for immune complex with it
JPS59169532A (en) Adsorbing material of c-reactive protein
JPH0424065B2 (en)
JP5924637B2 (en) PCSK9 adsorber
JPH0771632B2 (en) Adsorbent and removal device using the same
JP3084436B2 (en) Anti-DNA antibody removal device
JPH01158970A (en) Immunoglobulin adsorbing material for direct blood perfusion and adsorbing apparatus
WO2023008561A1 (en) Blood component adsorbent material
JP2726662B2 (en) Adsorbent and removal device using the same
JPH10328565A (en) Immunity complex removing device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: CYTOSORBENTS CORPORATION, NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:CYTOSORBENTS, INC.;REEL/FRAME:047551/0526

Effective date: 20180214

Owner name: CYTOSORBENTS, INC., NEW JERSEY

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:GULIASHVILI, TAMAZ;GOLOBISH, THOMAS;GRUDA, MARYANN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20170316 TO 20170424;REEL/FRAME:047551/0455

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO UNDISCOUNTED (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: BIG.); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

FEPP Fee payment procedure

Free format text: ENTITY STATUS SET TO SMALL (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: SMAL); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: SMALL ENTITY

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE MAILED -- APPLICATION RECEIVED IN OFFICE OF PUBLICATIONS

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: AWAITING TC RESP., ISSUE FEE NOT PAID

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT RECEIVED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: PUBLICATIONS -- ISSUE FEE PAYMENT VERIFIED

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE