201137653 六、發明說明： 【發明所屬之技術領域】 [0001] 本發明涉及一種零件降額設計系統及方法。 [先前技術] [0002] 為了使電子零件的失效率降低，所以在電路設計時要進 行降額設計，以便在將功耗降至最低時優化性能。傳統 的降額設計由人工完成，需要設計者根據自身經驗進行 設計，並無自動化和流程化設計的觀念，如此一來，可 能會因設計者的疏忽而遺漏了其中的某一個階段，導致 0 設計出現錯誤。 【發明内容】 [0003] 鑒於以上内容，本發明提供一種零件降額設計系統及方 法，規範了產品各零件降額設計的流程，並自動對得到 的降額參數值進行評估。 [0004] 一種零件降額設計系統，該系統運行於電躅中，該系統 包括：獲取模組，用於從電腦的儲存裝置中獲取產品的 Q 規格和零件檢驗規範列表，獲取產品包括的所有零件， 並將所獲取的零件進行分類，以得到不同類型的零件， 及從儲存裝置中獲取各類零件的實際工作參數值和額定 參數值；分析模組，用於將所述各類零件的每一個實際 工作參數值和對應的額定參數值進行比較，判斷所述零 件是否有降額空間，當所述零件有降額空間時，對零件 的實際工作參數值進行分析，以得到分析結果，及根據 所述零件檢驗規範列表判斷所述分析得到的結果是否有 效；設置模組，用於當所述分析得到的結果有效時，根 099113643 表單編號A0101 第3頁/共16頁 0992024045-0 201137653 據各零件的實際工作參數值和額定參數值設置對應的降 額參數值，其中，所述各零件的降額參數值應大於該零 件的實際工作參數值並小於該零件的額定參數值；評估 模組，用於根據所述產品的規格評估所設置的降額參數 值是否有效；及更新模組，用於當所設置的降額參數值 有效時，將所述設置的各零件的降額參數值更新至儲存 裝置所述產品的物料清單列表中。 [0005] 一種零件降額設計方法，該方法應用於電腦中，該方法 包括步驟：從電腦的儲存裝置中獲取產品的規格和零件 檢驗規範列表；從儲存裝置中獲取產品包括的所有零件 ，並將所獲取的零件進行分類，以得到不同類型的零件 ;從儲存裝置中獲取各類零件的實際工作參數值和額定 參數值；將所述各類零件的每一個實際工作參數值和對 應的額定參數值進行比較，判斷所述零件是否有降額空 間；當所述零件有降額空間時，對零件的實際工作參數 值進行分析，以得到分析結果；根據所述零件檢驗規範 列表判斷所述分析得到的結果是否有效；當所述分析得 到的結果有效時，根據實際工作參數值和額定參數值設 置降額參數值，其中，所述降額參數值應大於實際工作 參數值並小於額定參數值；根據所述產品的規格評估所 設置的降額參數值是否有效；及當所設置的降額參數值 有效時，將所述設置的各零件的降額參數值更新至儲存 裝置所述產品的物料清單列表中。 [0006] 相較於習知技術，所述零件降額設計系統及方法，規範 了產品各零件降額設計的流程，並自動對得到的降額參 099113643 表單編號A0101 第4頁/共16頁 0992024045-0 201137653 [0007] Ο [0008] Ο [0009] [0010] 099113643 數值進行評估，提高了零件降額設計的工作效率和產品 的可靠性。【實施方式】 如圖1所示，係本發明零件降額設計系統較佳實施例的應 用環境圖。在本較佳實施例中，所述零件降額設計系統 10運行於電腦1中，所述電腦1還包括儲存裝置2 ^所述儲 存襄置2用於儲存產品的規格及該產品所包括零件的資訊 ’例如：零件的名稱，零件的額定參數值，零件檢驗規 辜已列表。所述零件降額設計系統10包括獲取模組1〇〇、分析模組101、設置锔組102、評估模組103及更新模組1〇4； . ： ： ：.' °本發明所稱的模組是完成一特定功能的電腦程式段， 比程式更適合於描述軟體在電腦中的執行過程，因此在 本發明以下對軟體描述中都以模組描述。 所述獲取模組100用於從儲存裝置2中獲取產品的規格和 零件檢驗規範列表。所述產品的規格包括產品功能的有 效範圍和產品可靠性的有效範圍。所述零件檢驗規範列 表包括根據各零件的實際工作參數進行優化仿真分析所 得結果的標準值範園。 所述獲取模組1G0還用於從儲存裝置2中獲取該產品包括 的所有零件’並將所獲取的零件進行分類，以得到不同 類型的零件’例如：電容類零件、電隨零件及電感類 零件。 所述獲取餘丨_驗從料|置2巾獲取各類零件的 實際工作參數值和額定參數值。所述實際工作參數值是 用=透過量測得_零件在實際卫作中的參數值，用戶 表單編號A0101 第5頁/共16頁 0992024045-0 201137653 將所述量測得到的實際工作參數值儲存至儲_置2中。 職料作的電流值 、實際工作的電壓值、實際工作的功率值、實際工作的 頻率值及實際工作溫度值。所述額定參數值包括，曰 限於，額定電流值、額定電Μ值、額定功額= 率值及額定溫度值。 [0011] [0012] [0013] 所述分析模組UH用於將所述各_件的每—個實際工作 參數值和對應的額定參數值進行比較，判是 否有降額空間。當有零件的實際工作參數值小於對應的 額定參數值時，所述分析模組1G1_所料件有降額介 間；當零件的每—個實際I作參數值等於對應的額定/ 數值時，所述分析模組101騎_零件沒有降額空間。 所述分析減ΗΠ還黯當料零件有降額⑼時，對零 件的實際卫作參數值進行分析，以得到分析結果。所述 分析包括’但錢於，優化㈣、風險性分析、敏感度 分析及蒙特卡洛法分析。 所述分析模組m還用於根據儲存裝置2中的零件檢驗規 範列表判斷所述分析得到的結果是否有效。 、^ ==述分析得到的結果和物置二：= 規犯列表中的料值進行比較，當所述分析得到的結果 在零件檢驗規範列表中的標準值範κ之㈣，所述 == 述分析得到的結果有效，當所述分:得到 的、、。果不在令件檢驗規範列表中的標準值範圍之内時， 所述分析模組1G1判斷所述分析得到㈣果無效。 099113643 表單編號A0101 第6頁/共16頁 0992024045-0 201137653 [0014] [0015] Ο [0016] ❹ [0017] [0018] 所述設置模組102用於當所述分析得到的結果有效時，根 據各零件的實際工作參數值和額定參數值設置對應的降 額參數值。其中，所述設置模組102設置的降額參數值應 滿足以下條件：額定參數值>降額參數值>實際工作參 數值。 所述評估模組103用於評估所設置的降額參數值是否有效 。所述評估模組103根據所述降額參數值對產品進行功能 測試和可靠性測試，以判斷根據所述降額參數值得到的 產品的功能和可靠性疋否在..產品的規_格範圍之内。當根 . .... 據所述降額參數值得到的產品的功能和可靠性在產品的 規格範圍之内時，所述評估模組103評估所設置的降額參 數值有效；當根據所述降額參數值得到的產品的功能和 可靠性不在產品的規格範圍之内時，所述評估模組103評 估所設置的降額參數值無效。 所述更新模組104用於當所設置的降额參數值有效時，將 所設置的各零件的降額參數值更新至儲存裝置2的該產品 的物料清單列表中。 如圖2所示，係本發明一種零件將額設計方法較佳實施例 的方法流程圓。首先，步驟S10，獲取模組100從儲存裝 置2中獲取產品的規袼和零件檢驗規範列表 。所述產品的 規格包括產品功能的有效範圍和產品可靠性的有效範圍 。所述零件檢驗規範列表包括根據各零件的實際工作參 數進行優化仿真分析所得結果的標準值範圍。 步驟SU ’獲取模組100從儲存裝置2中護取該產品包括的 099113643 表單編號A0101 第7頁/共16頁 0992024045-0 201137653 有零件’並將所獲取的零件進行分_，以得到不同類 零件例如.電容類零件、電卩J·類零件及電感類零 件。 [0019] 'I〗獲取模組100從儲存裝裏2中獲取各類零件的實 際工作參數值和額定參數值。所述實際工作參數包括’ 不限於，實際工作的電流值、實瞭工作的電壓值、實 際工作的功率值、實際工作的頻率值及實際工作溫度值 所述額定參數值包括，但不限於，額定電流值、額定 電壓值額疋功率值' 额定頻.率.值及額疋溫度值。 [0020] v驟S13，分析模組1〇1將所述各類零件的每一個實際工 作參數值和對應的額定參數值進行比較，判斷所述零件 疋否有降額空間。當有零件的實際;c·作參數值小於對應 的額定參數值時，所述分析模組1〇1判斷所述零件有降額 空間；當零件的每一個實際工作參數值等於對應的額定 參數值時，所述分析模組101判斷所述^件沒有降額空間 〇 ：： ....201137653 VI. Description of the Invention: [Technical Field of the Invention] [0001] The present invention relates to a system and method for derating parts. [Prior Art] [0002] In order to reduce the failure rate of electronic components, derating design is required in circuit design to optimize performance when power consumption is minimized. The traditional derating design is done manually, and the designer needs to design according to his own experience. There is no concept of automation and process design. As a result, one of the stages may be missed due to the designer's negligence, resulting in 0. There was an error in the design. SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [0003] In view of the above, the present invention provides a part derating design system and method, which standardizes the derating design process of each part of the product, and automatically evaluates the derating parameter values obtained. [0004] A part derating design system, the system running in an electric cymbal, the system comprising: an acquisition module, configured to obtain a Q specification of a product and a part inspection specification list from a storage device of the computer, and obtain all the products included in the product Parts, and sorting the acquired parts to obtain different types of parts, and obtaining actual working parameter values and rated parameter values of various parts from the storage device; an analysis module for using the various types of parts Each actual working parameter value is compared with a corresponding rated parameter value to determine whether the part has a derating space. When the part has a derating space, the actual working parameter value of the part is analyzed to obtain an analysis result. And determining, according to the part inspection specification list, whether the result obtained by the analysis is valid; setting a module, when the result obtained by the analysis is valid, root 099113643 Form No. A0101 Page 3 / Total 16 Page 0992024045-0 201137653 According to the actual working parameter value and the rated parameter value of each part, the corresponding derating parameter value is set, wherein the parts are lowered The parameter value should be greater than the actual working parameter value of the part and less than the rated parameter value of the part; the evaluation module is configured to evaluate whether the set derating parameter value is valid according to the specification of the product; and update the module for When the set derating parameter value is valid, the set derating parameter value of each part is updated to the material list list of the product of the storage device. [0005] A part derating design method, the method is applied to a computer, the method comprising the steps of: obtaining a product specification and a part inspection specification list from a storage device of the computer; obtaining all parts included in the product from the storage device, and Sorting the acquired parts to obtain different types of parts; obtaining actual working parameter values and rated parameter values of various parts from the storage device; and each actual working parameter value and corresponding rating of the various types of parts Comparing the parameter values to determine whether the part has a derating space; when the part has a derating space, analyzing the actual working parameter values of the parts to obtain an analysis result; determining according to the part inspection specification list Whether the result obtained by the analysis is valid; when the result of the analysis is valid, the derating parameter value is set according to the actual working parameter value and the rated parameter value, wherein the derating parameter value should be greater than the actual working parameter value and less than the rated parameter Value; evaluate whether the set derating parameter value is valid according to the specification of the product; Derating parameter value is valid, each of the components of the setting value is updated derating parameter storage means to said material inventory list in the product. [0006] Compared with the prior art, the part derating design system and method standardizes the process of design derating of each part of the product, and automatically obtains the deducted parameter 099113643 Form No. A0101 Page 4 of 16 0992024045-0 201137653 [0007] 0008 [0008] 0009 [0009] [0010] 099113643 The numerical evaluation evaluates the work efficiency and product reliability of the part derating design. [Embodiment] As shown in Fig. 1, it is an application environment diagram of a preferred embodiment of the component derating design system of the present invention. In the preferred embodiment, the part derating design system 10 is operated in a computer 1. The computer 1 further includes a storage device 2. The storage device 2 is configured to store product specifications and parts included in the product. Information 'for example: the name of the part, the nominal value of the part, the part inspection specification is listed. The part derating design system 10 includes an acquisition module 1〇〇, an analysis module 101, a setup group 102, an evaluation module 103, and an update module 1〇4; . : : :. ° ° A module is a computer program segment that performs a specific function. The program is more suitable for describing the execution process of the software in the computer than the program. Therefore, the following description of the software is described in the module. The acquisition module 100 is configured to obtain a specification of a product and a list of part inspection specifications from the storage device 2. The specifications of the product include the effective range of product functions and the effective range of product reliability. The list of parts inspection specifications includes a standard value range for the results of the optimized simulation analysis based on the actual operating parameters of the parts. The acquisition module 1G0 is further configured to acquire all the parts included in the product from the storage device 2 and classify the acquired parts to obtain different types of parts, for example: capacitor parts, electric parts and inductances. Components. The acquisition of the remaining 丨 _ inspection material | set 2 towel to obtain the actual working parameter values and rated parameter values of various parts. The actual working parameter value is the parameter value measured by the amount of transmission _ part in the actual servant, user form number A0101 page 5 / total 16 page 0992024045-0 201137653 the measured actual working parameter value Save to Storage_Set 2. The current value of the material, the actual working voltage value, the actual working power value, the actual working frequency value and the actual working temperature value. The rated parameter values include, 限于 limited to, rated current value, rated power Μ value, rated power = rate value and rated temperature value. [0013] [0013] The analysis module UH is configured to compare each of the actual operating parameter values of the respective pieces with the corresponding rated parameter values to determine whether there is a derating space. When the actual working parameter value of the part is less than the corresponding rated parameter value, the analysis module 1G1_ has a derating interval; when each actual I parameter value of the part is equal to the corresponding rated value/value The analysis module 101 rides the part without derating space. The analysis reduces the actual working parameter values of the parts to obtain the analysis results when the parts are derated (9). The analysis includes 'but money, optimization (4), risk analysis, sensitivity analysis, and Monte Carlo analysis. The analysis module m is further configured to determine whether the result of the analysis is valid according to the part inspection specification list in the storage device 2. , ^ = = the results of the analysis and the object set two: = the value of the list of the rules of the comparison, when the results of the analysis in the list of parts of the standard specification of the standard value κ (four), the == The results obtained by the analysis are valid, when the points are: obtained, . If the analysis module 1G1 determines that the analysis is not valid within the range of the standard value in the list of the specification of the component inspection specification, the analysis module 1G1 determines that the analysis is invalid. 099113643 Form No. A0101 Page 6 / Total 16 Page 0992024045-0 201137653 [0015] [0016] [0018] The setting module 102 is configured to use when the result of the analysis is valid, Set the corresponding derating parameter value according to the actual working parameter value and rated parameter value of each part. The derating parameter value set by the setting module 102 should meet the following conditions: rated parameter value > derating parameter value > actual working parameter value. The evaluation module 103 is configured to evaluate whether the set derating parameter value is valid. The evaluation module 103 performs functional testing and reliability testing on the product according to the derating parameter value to determine whether the function and reliability of the product obtained according to the derating parameter value are in the product specification. Within the scope. When the function and reliability of the product obtained according to the derating parameter value are within the specification range of the product, the evaluation module 103 evaluates that the set derating parameter value is valid; When the function and reliability of the product obtained by derating the parameter value are not within the specification range of the product, the evaluation module 103 evaluates that the set derating parameter value is invalid. The update module 104 is configured to update the set derating parameter values of the parts to the bill of materials list of the product of the storage device 2 when the set derating parameter value is valid. As shown in Fig. 2, it is a method flow of a preferred embodiment of a part designing method of the present invention. First, in step S10, the acquisition module 100 obtains a list of specifications and part inspection specifications of the product from the storage device 2. The specifications of the product include the effective range of product functions and the effective range of product reliability. The list of part inspection specifications includes a range of standard values for the results of the optimized simulation analysis based on the actual operating parameters of the parts. The step SU 'acquisition module 100 protects the product from the storage device 2 to include the 099113643 form number A0101 page 7/16 pages 0992024045-0 201137653 has the parts 'and divides the obtained parts into _ to get different classes Parts such as capacitor parts, electric J. parts and inductance parts. [0019] The 'I' acquisition module 100 obtains actual working parameter values and rated parameter values of various types of parts from the storage unit 2. The actual working parameters include, but are not limited to, the actual working current value, the actual working voltage value, the actual working power value, the actual working frequency value, and the actual working temperature value. The rated parameter values include, but are not limited to, Rated current value, rated voltage value 疋 power value 'rated frequency rate value and value 疋 temperature value. [0020] In step S13, the analysis module 1〇1 compares each actual working parameter value of the various types of parts with a corresponding rated parameter value, and determines whether the part has a derating space. When there is an actual part; c. The parameter value is less than the corresponding rated parameter value, the analysis module 101 determines that the part has a derating space; when each actual working parameter value of the part is equal to the corresponding rated parameter When the value is, the analysis module 101 determines that the piece has no derating space 〇:: ....
[0021] 步驟S14 ’當所述零件有降..額空間.時，.分析模組1 〇 1對零 件的實際工作參數值進行分析，以得到分析結果。所述 分析包括，但不限於，優化分析、風險性分析 '敏感度 分析及蒙特卡洛法分析。 [0022] 步驟S15，分析模組101根據儲存裝置2中的零件檢驗規範 列表判斷所述分析得到的結果是否有纟。所述分析模組 101將所述分析得到的結果和儲存數置2中的零件檢驗規 範列表中的標準值進行比較，當所述分析得到的結果在 099113643 表單編號A0101 第8頁/共16頁 0992024045-0 201137653 [0023] Ο [0024] Ο [0025] 零件檢驗規範列表中的標準值範圍之内時’所述分析模 組1 〇 1判斷所述分析得到的結果有效，當所述分析得到的 結果不在零件檢驗規範列表中的標準值範園之内時’所 述分析模組1〇1判斷所述分析得到的結果難效° 步驟S16，當所述分析得到的結果有效時，設置模組102 根據各零件的實際工作參數值和額定參數值設置對應的 降額參數值。其中，所述設置模組102設置的降額參數值 應滿足以下條件：額定參數值>降額參數值>實際工作 參數值。 步驟S17，評估模组103用於評估所設置的降額參數值是 否有效。所述評估模組103根據所述降額參數值對產品進 行功能測試和可靠性測試，以判斷拫據所述降額參數值 得到的產品的功能和可靠性是否在產品的規格範圍之内 °當根據所述降額參數值得到的產品的功能和可靠性在 產品的規格範圍之内時’ ％述評姑模組1〇3評估所設置的 降額參數值有效；當根據所述降額參數值得到的產品的 ： . 功能和可靠性不在產品的規格範圍之内時，所述評估模 組103評估所設置的降額參數值無效。 步驟S18，所述更新模組104用於當所設置的降額參數值 有效時，將所設置的各零件的降額參數值更新至儲存裝 置2的所述產品的物料清單列表中。 综上所述，本發明符合發明專利要件，爰依法提出專利 申凊。惟，以上所述者僅為本發明之較佳實施例，本發 明之範圍並不以上述實施例為限，舉凡熟悉本案技藝之 099113643 表單編號Α0101 0992024045-0 [0026] 201137653 人士援依本發明之精神所作之等效修飾或變化，皆應涵 蓋於以下申請專利範圍内。 【圖式簡單說明】 [0027] 圖1係本發明零件降額設計系統較佳實施例的應用環境圖 〇 [0028] 圖2係本發明零件降額設計方法較佳實施例的實施流程圖 【主要元件符號說明】 [0029] 電腦：1 [0030] 儲存裝置 ：2 [0031] 零件降額設計系統：10 [0032] 獲取模組 ：100 [0033] 分析模組 ：101 [0034] 設置模組 ：102 [0035] 評估模組 ：103 [0036] 更新模組 ：104 0992024045-0 099113643 表單編號A0101 第10頁/共16頁[0021] Step S14' When the part has a drop amount of space, the analysis module 1 〇 1 analyzes the actual working parameter value of the part to obtain an analysis result. The analysis includes, but is not limited to, optimization analysis, risk analysis 'sensitivity analysis and Monte Carlo analysis. [0022] In step S15, the analysis module 101 determines, according to the part inspection specification list in the storage device 2, whether the result of the analysis is flawed. The analysis module 101 compares the result of the analysis with the standard value in the part inspection specification list in the storage number set 2, and the result obtained by the analysis is 099113643 Form No. A0101 Page 8 of 16 0992024045-0 201137653 [0023] Ο [0025] When the part of the standard value range in the part inspection specification list is 'the analysis module 1 判断 1 judges that the result of the analysis is valid, when the analysis is obtained If the result is not within the standard value range in the part inspection specification list, the analysis module 1〇1 judges that the result of the analysis is ineffective. Step S16, when the result of the analysis is valid, the mode is set. Group 102 sets the corresponding derating parameter value according to the actual working parameter value and rated parameter value of each part. The derating parameter value set by the setting module 102 should meet the following conditions: rated parameter value > derating parameter value > actual working parameter value. In step S17, the evaluation module 103 is configured to evaluate whether the set derating parameter value is valid. The evaluation module 103 performs functional testing and reliability testing on the product according to the derating parameter value to determine whether the function and reliability of the product obtained according to the derating parameter value are within the specification range of the product. When the function and reliability of the product obtained according to the derating parameter value are within the specification range of the product, the value of the derating parameter set by the evaluation module is valid; when derating according to the derating parameter The evaluation module 103 evaluates that the set derating parameter value is invalid when the function and reliability of the product are not within the specification of the product. In step S18, the update module 104 is configured to update the set derating parameter values of the parts to the bill of materials list of the product of the storage device 2 when the set derating parameter value is valid. In summary, the present invention complies with the requirements of the invention patent, and patents are filed according to law. However, the above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention, and the scope of the present invention is not limited to the above embodiment, and is not familiar with the art of the present invention. 099113643 Form No. 1010101 0992024045-0 [0026] 201137653 Equivalent modifications or variations made by the spirit of the spirit are to be included in the scope of the following claims. BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS [0027] FIG. 1 is an application environment diagram of a preferred embodiment of a part derating design system of the present invention. [0028] FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a preferred embodiment of a method for derating a part of the present invention. Main component symbol description] [0029] Computer: 1 [0030] Storage device: 2 [0031] Part derating design system: 10 [0032] Acquisition module: 100 [0033] Analysis module: 101 [0034] Setting module :102 [0035] Evaluation Module: 103 [0036] Update Module: 104 0992024045-0 099113643 Form Number A0101 Page 10 of 16