KR20130024608A - Using assessment to purchase how to calculate rankings - Google Patents
Using assessment to purchase how to calculate rankings Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20130024608A KR20130024608A KR1020110088161A KR20110088161A KR20130024608A KR 20130024608 A KR20130024608 A KR 20130024608A KR 1020110088161 A KR1020110088161 A KR 1020110088161A KR 20110088161 A KR20110088161 A KR 20110088161A KR 20130024608 A KR20130024608 A KR 20130024608A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- evaluation
- purchase
- seller
- ranking
- services
- Prior art date
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0278—Product appraisal
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0282—Rating or review of business operators or products
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The present invention relates to a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation used in various commercial activities related to the sale and purchase of goods and services online and offline, and more specifically, divides individual evaluation items for products and services sold by a seller. Subdivide the sub-categories related to the individual valuation items. When the buyer selects the detailed evaluation items that he considers important and evaluates the purchase, the total score index is calculated by adding up the purchaser's preferences and evaluation index and the evaluation index of the individual evaluation items, and the seller It is to provide a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation that allows a ranking to be posted.
That is, the present invention registers the seller's sales information in the management server of the member system and contracts the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation, and the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation to be linked to the seller's products and services. And notifying the buyer, subscribing to the manager's management server, where the buyer can post the purchase evaluation to use the seller's products and services and use the ranking method using the purchase evaluation, and the buyer Rank evaluation of the products and services of the seller in various forms by integrating the purchase evaluation data by item, classifying, statisticing, and processing the collected purchase evaluation data using the purchase evaluation data above, and processing the purchased evaluation data. Posting through the manager's management server to the manager, the above classification, statistics, processed purchase evaluation data It almost certainly is able to be made by the steps of providing the seller and the buyer.
Description
The present invention relates to a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation used in various commercial activities related to the sale and purchase of goods and services online and offline, and more specifically, divides individual evaluation items for products and services sold by a seller. Subdivide the sub-categories related to the individual valuation items. When the buyer selects the detailed evaluation items that he considers important and evaluates the purchase, the total score index is calculated by adding up the purchaser's preferences and evaluation index and the evaluation index of the individual evaluation items, and the seller It is to provide a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation that allows a ranking to be posted.
The purchase evaluation of goods and services being traded in modern business activities can be used to identify buyers' information and purchase tendencies, and to determine the intention of purchasing goods and services as well as to improve the quality of goods and services provided in the future. It is being used as a resource, and it is quite active.
Prior art is a method of determining the ranking of search engine directories in Korean Patent Application Laid-Open No. 10-2001-0088771 (September 28, 2001), which orders a site searched by a search engine and is popular with netizens. To provide a way to determine the directory mark that can be shown. Listed website database with stock information of listed websites and netizens 'valuation of the website, voting status information of the listed pros and cons for the website under evaluation and netizens' valuation of the website The website database and the virtual stocks of the websites listed by the netizens are traded, the results are reflected in the listed website database, and the listing votes for the websites being evaluated by the netizens. A web with a website stock trading web server that lists the website, which reflects the results in the evaluation website database, and obtains a predetermined number of votes from the listing vote; and a web with search information about the website on the Internet. Site database and directory clicked by user Search the website database and send the results to the user, displaying the results in the order in which the websites in the listed website database are listed, from highest to lowest, and then in the valuation website database. To list the websites under evaluation, and finally to list the listed websites database and unlisted and critic websites not in the evaluation website database.
As another prior art, “Review site operation method and server and program recording medium” of the Republic of Korea Patent Publication (A) 10-2009-0066642 (2009.07.22) is a review site operation method and server and program recording medium therefor In the case of a method of providing review information that is generally serviced, the review information is based on the evaluation score of one or more reviewers (that is, review evaluators) who have reviewed the condition or the review information for the expert registering the review information. In general, the user who actually uses the review information is provided in order to solve a problem in which the actual review information is not provided due to a difference in condition from the above expert or reviewer. Review review evaluator conditions for review information based on conditions (e.g. age, gender, taste, etc.) Then, the priority is derived based on the total evaluation score according to the checked review evaluator's condition to provide review information according to the review providing condition for the user.
In the case of the conventional purchase evaluation as described above, it is difficult to expect a correct purchase evaluation when the wrong information is introduced because it focuses on the collecting action or the device rather than the itemized and systematic collection of purchase information.
However, the general purchase evaluation is a rough and inaccurate purchase evaluation, or the purchase evaluation through some personal blogs or sites is a seller-centered purchase evaluation, which is often performed as a promotional purchase evaluation. It was difficult to obtain a purchase evaluation, and the value of the purchase evaluation could not be objectively determined because the purchase evaluation itself was not shown as a ranking.
Figure 3 shows an exemplary view of the subjective evaluation appearing in the background technology of the present invention.
Accordingly, the present inventors have researched and developed to solve the above-described conventional problems, and the present invention relates to a ranking calculation method using purchase evaluation used in various commercial activities related to the sale and purchase of goods and services online and offline. Seller divides individual items for the goods and services sold by the seller, and subdivides the detailed items related to the individual items. When a buyer selects a sub-assessment that he considers important and evaluates a purchase, the buyer calculates the total score index by adding the sub-category's preference, valuation index, and valuation index of the individual valuation item. The present invention has been completed with a technical problem in providing a ranking measurement method using a purchase evaluation that allows posting of a ranking.
Registering the seller's sales information in the management server of the member system operated by the membership system as a solution to the problem, contracting the rank calculation method using the purchase evaluation, and the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation to be linked to the seller's products and services. And notifying the buyer, subscribing to the manager's management server, where the buyer can post the purchase evaluation to use the seller's products and services and use the ranking method using the purchase evaluation, and the buyer Rank evaluation of the products and services of the seller in various forms by integrating the purchase evaluation data by item, classifying, statisticing, and processing the collected purchase evaluation data using the purchase evaluation data above, and processing the purchased evaluation data. Posting through the admin's management server to the admin, the admin sorted above, statistics, processed purchases It almost certainly is able to exit Gaza made by the steps of providing the seller and the buyer.
In the case of using the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation provided by the present invention, the seller can be provided with the detailed evaluation contents of the goods and services provided by the buyer, and the buyer can purchase the goods and services based on the purchase evaluation. By selecting various preferred items and knowing the purchase evaluations of other buyers of selected products and services in detail, it is possible to provide information of products and services that are most suitable for the buyer.
1 is a conceptual diagram of a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation provided by the present invention
Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the flow of the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation provided by the present invention
Figure 3 is an illustration of the subjective evaluation that appears in the technology that is the background of the present invention
4, 5, and 6 are exemplary diagrams of detailed evaluation items and evaluation ratings associated with individual evaluation items and individual item evaluations in the purchase evaluation sheet used in the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation of the present invention.
7 and 8 are exemplary views for inputting the purchase evaluation sheet of the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation of the present invention in accordance with the purchase evaluation form in the management server of the manager;
9 is an exemplary diagram of calculating the preference index and the evaluation index of the evaluation data classified by the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation of the present invention using a publicly known statistical program.
10 is an exemplary diagram of a method for searching a ranking calculated by a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation of the present invention.
11, 12, 13, and 14 are examples of graphs and schematics provided to buyers and sellers of purchase evaluation data processed by classification statistics in a ranking calculation method using purchase evaluation of the present invention.
Hereinafter, an embodiment of a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation provided by the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
1 is a conceptual diagram of a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation provided in the present invention, Figure 2 is a block diagram showing the flow of the ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation provided in the present invention.
The ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation provided by the present invention is performed by a seller providing a product and a service, a buyer using the product and a service, and a management server operated by an administrator who can access the seller and the buyer through the Internet and mobile. It is configured to be.
Goods and services that can be used in the present invention can be provided for all commercial activities that are sold and purchased online and offline.
The present invention relates to a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation used in various commercial activities related to the sale and purchase of goods and services online and offline, and more specifically, divides individual evaluation items for products and services sold by a seller. Subdivide the sub-categories related to the individual valuation items. When a buyer selects a sub-assessment that he considers important and evaluates a purchase, the buyer calculates the total score index by adding the sub-category's preference, valuation index, and valuation index of the individual valuation item. It is configured to provide a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation that enables posting of a ranking.
The method of providing goods and services in the present invention is a method that is widely used in online and offline in general, and since it is a known technology, only a brief description thereof will be provided.
1) Registering the seller's sales information in the management server of the member system and contracting using the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation, 2) Making the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation linked to the seller's products and services. Informing the buyer, 3) the purchaser joining the manager's management server where the purchaser can post the purchase evaluation in order to use the seller's products and services, and to use the ranking method using the purchase evaluation; 5) sorting, statistic, and processing the collected purchase evaluation data using the above-mentioned purchase evaluation, 6) integrating the processed purchase evaluation data to purchase the seller's products and services Posting the evaluation index through the management server of the manager in various forms of ranking, 7) the administrator to the above classification, statistics, processed purchase evaluation data It characterized in that the able to be made by the steps of: providing to the buyer and the purchaser.
The management server of the manager provided by the present invention is operated on a membership system, the member is divided into seller and buyer to be managed by the manager's management server. The personal information of these members is managed through a security program that is already publicly known and used in the Internet shopping malls, etc., which will be described in more detail below for each step.
1) Registering the seller's sales information in the management server of the administrator operated by the membership system as a means of solving the task, and using the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation
The seller is divided into online and offline, and the seller requests the seller's information and the seller's product and service information to the administrator's management server. The administrator contracts the use of the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation together with the registration certification.
2) Integrate the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation to the seller's products and services and notify the buyer
As described above, when a contract for using a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation is established, an online seller moves to a site having a manager's purchase evaluation form on a portion of an online screen showing information on goods and services sold by the online seller. Configure
The program consists of a link program such as a logo, a site name, a site address, and a QR code. In the case of offline sellers, POPs, etc., indicating that they are businesses that can use the ranking calculation method using purchase evaluation are attached to the inside of the offline stores. The POP and the like display the site address, QR code, application information, etc., which are moved to the site where the purchase purchase evaluation form of the administrator is notified so as to be connected to a mobile or computer terminal.
The online seller's product and service evaluation can be purchased by enclosing the purchase evaluation sheet at the time of delivery.The offline seller's product and service evaluation can be evaluated in the store by evaluating the product's product and service. Access to the management server of the so that the purchase evaluation based on the content of the purchase evaluation sheet.
3) signing up to the manager's management server, where the buyer can post the purchase evaluation in order to use the seller's products and services and to use the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation;
Click on the above mobile program to go to the management server of the administrator to purchase evaluation using the purchase evaluation form. At this time, the purchaser proceeds with a simple registration procedure to subscribe to the management server of the manager so that the manager's management server can be used without additional approval.
4) Buyer evaluates goods and services by item
The evaluation items of goods and services proposed by sellers are presented in separate evaluation items and detailed evaluation items related to individual evaluation items.
4, 5, and 6 illustrate an example of detailed evaluation items and evaluation grades associated with individual evaluation items and individual item evaluations, which are used in the ranking evaluation method using the purchase evaluation of the present invention.
In an embodiment, the individual evaluation item may be food, and the detailed evaluation item may be composed of food quantity, freshness, origin, taste, decoration, and cleanliness. The buyer selects the various detailed evaluation items suggested by the seller and evaluates the purchase.
The purchase evaluation is configured in such a way that the rating of the stars, levels, etc. displayed in the detailed evaluation items can be displayed.
In the above purchase evaluation, the purchaser can insert the buyer information such as age, gender, etc., which can be referred to the purchase evaluation information and the purchase evaluation separately, and pictures, videos, testimonials, etc., to increase the reliability of the purchase evaluation. have.
7 and 8 illustrate examples of inputting a purchase evaluation sheet of a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation of the present invention in accordance with a purchase evaluation form in a manager's management server.
5) classifying, statistics, and processing the collected purchase evaluation data using the above purchase evaluation
The purchase evaluation data are classified by the types of goods and services, and the classified purchase evaluation data are calculated using the publicly-known statistical program to calculate the preference index and the evaluation index of the detailed evaluation items. The valuation index of individual valuation items is calculated and the total score index is calculated by summing the valuation indexes of the individual valuation items.
The calculated data is processed into a graph and a diagram of a publicly known public.
9 is a diagram illustrating an example of calculating a preference index and an evaluation index of evaluation data classified by a ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation of the present invention using a publicly known statistical program.
6) Integrate the processed purchase evaluation data and post the purchase evaluation index of seller's products and services through the manager's management server in various forms of ranking.
The purchase evaluation indexes of the seller's products and services are posted through the manager's management server in various forms of ranking.
The goods and services may be classified into conventional product groups, and may be composed of various product groups such as electronics, clothing, and food.
The ranking is posted as a total score index of goods and services classified into a product group, and may also be posted in a price comparison form of a typical price comparison site.
In the above price comparison format, when a buyer selects a product or service, the total score index, detailed item preference index, and detailed item evaluation index of the product and service can be viewed together.
In the case of the above-mentioned total score index, if a product group is selected from the product group, the products and services are listed in the highest total score index. The evaluation index of the detailed evaluation item is displayed along with the list of items.
For example, if food is selected as a product group, the products and services A, B, C… When Z is listed and the buyer selects the goods and services A, the taste of the food, the decoration of the food, the cleanliness of the business, the service status of the employees, the cooking time of the food, etc., in the order of the preference of the detailed evaluation items evaluated by the buyer. The evaluation index of the detailed evaluation items is displayed along with the list of the detailed evaluation items.
In the above ranking, when the buyer uses the products and services and inputs the purchase evaluation data into the manager's management server, the purchase evaluation data is collected in real time, and the data is accumulated and posted hourly, daily, monthly and yearly.
When the manager posts the seller's products and services in various formats through the manager's management server, the buyer can purchase individual items such as the total score index, individual evaluation item evaluation index, detailed evaluation item evaluation index and preference index, and age and gender. The information can be used to search for published rankings in a variety of ways.
For example, if you select hiking shoes for the clothing product group and specify a male as a search condition, A to Z hiking shoes are listed in order of the highest scores only by purchasing evaluation of buyers in the same group. If selected, the evaluation index of the detailed evaluation item is displayed along with the detailed evaluation items such as appearance, fixability, shock absorption, and fatigue degree in order of the detailed evaluation items with the high priority index for the A hiking boots.
In addition, buyers and prospective buyers can search for products and services of the product group by selecting the personal information such as total score index, evaluation index of individual evaluation items, preference index and evaluation index of detailed evaluation items, and age and gender as search conditions. .
For example, when a buyer and a prospective buyer search for a product group of shoes, they select 30's and a men's personal information, and select a total score of 5 or more. Is searched.
Figure 10 shows an example of a method for searching the ranking calculated by the ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation of the present invention.
7) The step of providing the seller and the buyer with the above classification, statistics and processed purchase evaluation data.
The above-mentioned classification and statistically processed purchase evaluation includes data on buyers such as gender, age group, region, purchase pattern, and purchase taste, total score index through purchase evaluation, evaluation index of individual evaluation items, preference index and evaluation of detailed evaluation items. It is provided to sellers and buyers with various graphs and diagrams.
The purchase evaluation data provided at this time may be provided through posting on the management server of the administrator in addition to the direct document.
11, 12, 13, and 14 illustrate graphs and schematics provided to buyers and sellers of purchase evaluation data processed by classification statistics in a ranking calculation method using purchase evaluation of the present invention.
Claims (8)
The ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation is linked to the seller's products and services, and notified to the buyer,
Signing up to a manager's management server where a buyer can post a purchase evaluation in order to use the seller's products and services and to use a ranking method using the purchase evaluation;
Where buyers evaluate items and services by item,
Classifying, statistic, and processing the collected purchase valuation data using the purchase valuation,
Integrate the processed purchase evaluation data and publish the purchase evaluation index of the seller's products and services through the manager's management server in various forms of ranking,
The ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation, characterized in that the manager can be made by providing the above classification, statistics, processed purchase evaluation data to the seller and the buyer
Purchase evaluation is a ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation, characterized in that the online seller showing the product and service information that the online seller sells a program that moves to a site with a manager's purchase evaluation form on a certain portion
Rank calculation method using the purchase evaluation, characterized in that the program consists of a link program such as logo, site name, site address, QR code
In the case of offline sellers, in case of an offline seller, a POP, etc., indicating that a business that can use the ranking calculation method using a purchase evaluation is attached to the offline store, and the site address that moves to the site where the administrator has a purchase evaluation form, QR, etc. Ranking calculation method using purchase evaluation, characterized in that to display the code, application information, etc. to be connected to a mobile or computer terminal
If the ranking is published in order of total score, products and services are listed in the order of highest preference score in the product group, and if the products and services listed are selected, the detailed evaluation is in order of preference index. Ranking calculation method using purchase evaluation, characterized in that the evaluation index of the detailed evaluation item is displayed along with the list of items
The ranking is a purchase that collects the purchase evaluation data in real time whenever the buyer uses goods and services and inputs the purchase evaluation data into the manager's management server, and accumulates and publishes data hourly, daily, monthly, and yearly. Ranking Method Using Evaluation
In the price comparison form of a typical price comparison site, the ranking can be used when the buyer selects a product and a service, such as a total score index, a detailed item preference index, and a detailed item evaluation index. Rank calculation method
When the manager posts the seller's products and services in various formats through the manager's management server, the buyer can purchase individual items such as the total score index, individual evaluation item evaluation index, detailed evaluation item evaluation index and preference index, and age and gender. Ranking calculation method using the purchase evaluation, characterized in that to search the posted rankings in various ways using the information
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020110088161A KR20130024608A (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2011-08-31 | Using assessment to purchase how to calculate rankings |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020110088161A KR20130024608A (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2011-08-31 | Using assessment to purchase how to calculate rankings |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| KR20130024608A true KR20130024608A (en) | 2013-03-08 |
Family
ID=48176651
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| KR1020110088161A KR20130024608A (en) | 2011-08-31 | 2011-08-31 | Using assessment to purchase how to calculate rankings |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| KR (1) | KR20130024608A (en) |
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20150044035A (en) | 2013-10-11 | 2015-04-24 | 에스케이플래닛 주식회사 | Contents recommendation system and contents recommendation method |
| WO2015105270A1 (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2015-07-16 | 에스케이플래닛 주식회사 | User device, method for controlling same, and sensibility evaluation system comprising same |
| KR20150142082A (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2015-12-22 | 한성대학교 산학협력단 | Customer service measuring kit and customer service measuring method |
| KR102117534B1 (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2020-06-01 | 아주대학교산학협력단 | Apparatus and method for predicting credibility of online data |
| KR102138017B1 (en) * | 2019-05-16 | 2020-07-27 | 이원석 | Method providing food material ordering service |
-
2011
- 2011-08-31 KR KR1020110088161A patent/KR20130024608A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (5)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KR20150044035A (en) | 2013-10-11 | 2015-04-24 | 에스케이플래닛 주식회사 | Contents recommendation system and contents recommendation method |
| WO2015105270A1 (en) * | 2014-01-10 | 2015-07-16 | 에스케이플래닛 주식회사 | User device, method for controlling same, and sensibility evaluation system comprising same |
| KR20150142082A (en) * | 2014-06-09 | 2015-12-22 | 한성대학교 산학협력단 | Customer service measuring kit and customer service measuring method |
| KR102117534B1 (en) * | 2018-12-28 | 2020-06-01 | 아주대학교산학협력단 | Apparatus and method for predicting credibility of online data |
| KR102138017B1 (en) * | 2019-05-16 | 2020-07-27 | 이원석 | Method providing food material ordering service |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Wilis et al. | The effect of E-Service Quality, E-Trust, Price and Brand Image Towards E-Satisfaction and Its Impact on E-Loyalty of Traveloka's Customer | |
| Sudhir et al. | Do slotting allowances enhance efficiency or hinder competition? | |
| Farris et al. | Why advertising and promotional costs vary: Some cross-sectional analyses | |
| Fang et al. | Direct and indirect effects of buyers and sellers on search advertising revenues in business-to-business electronic platforms | |
| Davidavičienė et al. | Measuring quality of e-commerce web sites: Case of Lithuania | |
| US10475100B1 (en) | Online marketing service system | |
| Goswami et al. | Impact of consumer decision-making styles on online apparel consumption in India | |
| US20120010939A1 (en) | Social network based online advertising | |
| Ebrahimi et al. | Investigating the effect of perceived service quality, perceived value, brand image, trust, customer satisfaction on repurchase intention and recommendation to other case study: LG company | |
| Mujianto et al. | The unraveling loyalty model of traditional retail to suppliers for business sustainability in the digital transformation era: Insight from MSMEs in Indonesia | |
| Preibusch et al. | The privacy landscape: product differentiation on data collection | |
| KR20130024608A (en) | Using assessment to purchase how to calculate rankings | |
| Zhang et al. | Do different reputation systems provide consistent signals of seller quality: a canonical correlation investigation of Chinese C2C marketplaces | |
| Amblee et al. | The impact of electronic-word-of-mouth on digital microproducts: an empirical investigation of Amazon shorts | |
| Chowdhury et al. | Using the Dirichlet model to predict how fashion brands compete and grow on eBay | |
| Natarajan et al. | Does pickup service quality explain BOPIS users' store relationship performance? The moderating role of users' service experience consciousness | |
| Kato et al. | Selection versus scale: Loyalty indices for brand management | |
| Rafiana et al. | Effect of social media usage and entrepreneurial marketing on the success of organic processed food MSMEs | |
| Nusifera et al. | Factor affecting user satisfaction in agricultural e-commerce applications: Facing the new normal | |
| Bildea et al. | Towards capturing ancillary revenue via unbundling and cross-selling | |
| Barutçu | E-customer satisfaction in the e-tailing industry: An empirical survey for Turkish e-customers | |
| Hafidz et al. | The Effect of Perceived Value on Customer Satisfaction and Customer Loyalty in the Fast-Food Industry in Indonesia | |
| Chen et al. | What constitutes excellent user experience in online consumers' return services? | |
| Durmuş et al. | Are private shopping sites really satisfied customers? | |
| Shadrina et al. | Quality improvement of the e-commerce website using integration of kano model-IPA with QFD approach |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| WITN | Withdrawal due to no request for examination |