KR20000037362A - Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results - Google Patents

Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results Download PDF

Info

Publication number
KR20000037362A
KR20000037362A KR1020000020843A KR20000020843A KR20000037362A KR 20000037362 A KR20000037362 A KR 20000037362A KR 1020000020843 A KR1020000020843 A KR 1020000020843A KR 20000020843 A KR20000020843 A KR 20000020843A KR 20000037362 A KR20000037362 A KR 20000037362A
Authority
KR
South Korea
Prior art keywords
internet
site
evaluation
result
sites
Prior art date
Application number
KR1020000020843A
Other languages
Korean (ko)
Inventor
강영복
Original Assignee
강영복
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 강영복 filed Critical 강영복
Priority to KR1020000020843A priority Critical patent/KR20000037362A/en
Publication of KR20000037362A publication Critical patent/KR20000037362A/en

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
    • G06Q30/0201Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
    • G06Q30/0203Market surveys; Market polls

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Finance (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

PURPOSE: A method for evaluating internet sites and utilizing the evaluated result is provided to supply good sites to the users in order that the users find good internet sites and administrator of the internet site to improve the quality of web site referring to the evaluation result. CONSTITUTION: Evaluation process of web sites is to evaluate the content of each internet site and to store the valued or graded evaluation result in a database of a computer connected to a web server accomplishing internet service. A valuer stores the evaluation result, investigated or inspected by the valuer, in a database using a computer installing a program with a process storing data to a database. The database is consisted of tables and fields for site addresses, evaluation results, and computing the total result. Utilization process of evaluation result is to provide transformed information of the result, gained in the evaluation process, to users. The utilization process is composed of process for setting reference type, reference process, process for providing reference result, and so on. The process for setting reference type is to provide a display window for making users select with which type evaluation result is displayed on their monitor.

Description

인터넷 사이트 평가 및 평가 결과를 활용하는 인터넷 서비스 {Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results}Internet service evaluates and practical use of the results}

본 발명은 인터넷 사이트에 대한 평가 와 그 결과의 공개 그리고 인터넷 사이트 검색시 평가 결과를 반영하는 기술이다. 인터넷 사이트에 대한 체계적인 평가 및 결과의 공개는 아직 실시되지 않고 있으며 인터넷 검색 분야에서는 검색 엔진을 사용하고 있다. 현재 사용중인 대부분의 검색 엔진은 검색단어(키워드)를 이용하여 검색 결과를 나열내거나 내용을 주제별로 분류한 후 주제별 검색을 제공한다. 하지만 다수의 사이트들이 검색 결과로 나열되기 때문에 원하는 자료를 찾기 위해서 검색 결과에 나타는 사이트들을 하나하나 살펴 보아야 하는등 시간의 낭비가 초래된다.The present invention is a technique that reflects the evaluation results of the evaluation of the Internet site and the results and the search of the Internet site. Systematic evaluation and disclosure of the results have not been carried out yet, and search engines are used in the field of Internet search. Most search engines currently in use use search words (keywords) to list search results or categorize content by topic and then provide a topic-specific search. However, since many sites are listed as search results, it is a waste of time to look at each site that appears in the search results to find the desired data.

인터넷 사이트를 객관으로 공정하게 평가하고 사용자들이 효과적으로 평가 결과를 이용하게 하는 것이 본 발명의 과제이다.It is an object of the present invention to evaluate the Internet site fairly and objectively and to allow users to effectively use the evaluation result.

이를 위하여 평가시 각 사이트의 자료의 내용, 운영 상태등의 심사 및 사용자 여론, 해당 사이트 접속 건수 등 보편적 기준이되는 항목을 조사하여 사이트를 평가한다. 평가 결과는 상기 항목별 심사 내용을 종합하여 수치 혹은 등급 등의 형태로 표기되어 인터넷 사이트를 통하여 공개된다. 사용자가 효과적으로 평가 결과를 이용하도록 하기 위하여 분류된 인터넷 사이트 리스트에 평가 결과를 함께 표기하거나 일정 평가 등급 이상의 사이트만을 사용자가 선택하여 나타낼 수 있게 한다. 이 경우에 사용자로부터 평가 등급을 입력받아 입력된 등급 이상의 사이트만을 제공 할 수도 있다. 또한 사용자가 사이트 주소를 입력하면 평가 결과를 보여주거나 인터넷 사이트 검색시 검색어와 평가 결과를 병행하여 검색할 수 있도록 검색 엔진의 구동을 지원하게 된다.To do this, the site is evaluated by examining items that are universal criteria such as the content of each site, the status of operation, user opinion, and the number of site accesses. The evaluation results are displayed in the form of numerical values or grades by combining the contents of the above-mentioned examinations and are disclosed through the Internet site. In order to enable the user to effectively use the evaluation result, the evaluation result may be displayed on the classified Internet site list or the user may select and display only the site of a certain evaluation level or higher. In this case, the user may be provided with only a site having a rating higher than the rating inputted from the user. In addition, when a user inputs a site address, the search engine can be displayed to display the evaluation result or to search the search word and the evaluation result in parallel when searching the Internet site.

본 발명은 사이트의 평가 과정 및 평가 결과의 활용 과정으로 구성된다.The present invention consists of the evaluation process of the site and the utilization process of the evaluation results.

먼저 사이트 평가 과정은 각각의 인터넷 사이트들의 내용을 심사하고 그 결과를 수치 혹은 등급으로 나타내어 인터넷 서비스를 수행하는 웹서버와 연결된 컴퓨더의 데이터 베이스에 저장하는 과정이다. 평가자는 데이터 베이스에 저장하는 프로세스를 구비한 프로그램이 설치된 컴퓨터를 이용하여 자신이 심사하거나 조사한 평가 결과를 데이터 베이스에 저장한다. 데이터 베이스에는 사이트 주소와 항목별 평가 결과 및 종합 결과를 계산 할 수 있는 테이블과 필드로 구성 된다.First of all, the site evaluation process is the process of reviewing the contents of each Internet site and expressing the result in numerical or rating form and storing it in the database of the computer connected to the web server performing the Internet service. The evaluator saves the evaluation result examined or investigated in the database by using a computer on which a program having a process of storing in the database is installed. The database consists of tables and fields from which site addresses, itemized evaluation results, and overall results can be calculated.

평가 결과의 활용 과정은 평가 과정에서 얻어진 평가 결과가 사용자에게 필요한 정보로 가공되어 제공되어지는 과정이며 조회 유형 설정 프로세스, 조회 프로세스, 조회 결과 제공 프로세스등의 세부 프로세드들로 나누어 진다. 먼저 조회 유형 설정 프로세스는 사용자가 인터넷과 연결된 자신의 컴퓨터에서 평가 결과를 어떠한 형태로 나타낼 것인지를 선택하게 하는 화면을 웹 브라우저를 통하여 제공하는 프로세스이다. 예를 들면 찾고자 하는 사이트의 주제, 평가 등급별 여부, 평가 순위별 여부 등이 사용자가 선택할 수 있는 항목이다. 조회 과정은 사용자의 웹 브라우저를 통하여 제공된 조회 내용을 데이터 베이스에서 검색하는 과정이다. 마지막으로 조회 결과 제공 프로세스에서는 상기 조회 프로세스에서 얻어진 결과를 다시 사용자 컴퓨터의 브라우저를 통하여 보여지게 하는 프로세스이다.The process of using the evaluation result is a process in which the evaluation result obtained in the evaluation process is processed and provided as necessary information for the user, and is divided into detailed processes such as inquiry type setting process, inquiry process, and inquiry result providing process. First, the inquiry type setting process is a process of providing a screen through a web browser that allows a user to select a form of evaluation results on his computer connected to the Internet. For example, the user can select the subject of the site to be searched for, whether it is rated or not, or whether it is ranked by the ranking. The retrieval process is a process of retrieving the retrieval contents provided through the user's web browser from the database. Finally, in the inquiry result providing process, the result obtained in the inquiry process is displayed again through the browser of the user's computer.

인터넷을 사이트의 내용을 평가하여 공개하는것 자체가 여러 산업 분야에 발전적인 역할을 기대할수 있으며 인터넷 사용자들에게는 우수한 사이트를 단시간내에 용이하게 접근하도록 도와주고, 사이트 운영자에게는 자신 혹은 경쟁 사이트의 평가 결과를 이용하여 보다 양질의 사이트로 발전 시킬수 있다.Evaluating the content of the Internet and publishing the content itself can be expected to play an evolutionary role in various industries. It helps Internet users to easily access excellent sites in a short time. It can be used to develop a better site.

Claims (2)

인터넷에 연결된 컴퓨터에 나타난 각 인터넷 사이트를 자료의 양과 질, 운영 상태, 하드웨어 경쟁력등을 심사하여 사이트의 유용성을 나타내는 수치로 평가하고 이 결과를 사이트 주소, 내용등과 함께 데이터 베이스에 저장후 이 내용을 인터넷과 연결된 사용자 컴퓨터의 화면에서 사용자가 조회시 리스트 형태로 사용자 컴퓨터에 나타나게 하거나 각 분야별 우수 사이트를 선정하여 인터넷 및 대중 매체에 발표하는 서비스Evaluate each Internet site displayed on a computer connected to the Internet by evaluating the quantity and quality of data, operating status, hardware competitiveness, etc., and indicating the usefulness of the site, and storing the result along with the site address and contents in the database. Service to display on the user's computer in the form of a list when the user inquires on the screen of the user's computer connected to the Internet, or to select excellent sites for each field and present them on the Internet and mass media 상기 1항의 사용자 조회에 있어서 사용자 컴퓨터 화면에 조회하고자 하는 사이트의 주제 혹은 키워드를 입력 할 수 있는 입력란 및 사이트 갯수 혹은 평가등급을 선택할수 있는 선택 버튼을 제공하고, 사용자의 입력시 웹서버에서 데이터 베이스를 조회하여 사이트 갯수n이 선택되었을 경우 입력 키워드를 포함한 사이트 중 평가 결과가 높은 순으로 n 개의 사이트를 검색 결과로 제공하고, 평가 등급 x가 선택 되었을경우 평가 등급이 x등급 이상의 사이트만을 사용자에게 제공하는 인터넷 서비스.In the above user's inquiry, a field for inputting a subject or keyword of a site to be searched on the user's computer screen and a selection button for selecting the number of sites or evaluation grades are provided. If the site number n is selected, n sites are provided as search results in order of the highest evaluation results among the sites including the input keyword, and if the rating level x is selected, only sites with a rating level of x or higher are provided to the user. Internet service.
KR1020000020843A 2000-04-20 2000-04-20 Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results KR20000037362A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020000020843A KR20000037362A (en) 2000-04-20 2000-04-20 Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
KR1020000020843A KR20000037362A (en) 2000-04-20 2000-04-20 Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
KR20000037362A true KR20000037362A (en) 2000-07-05

Family

ID=19665711

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
KR1020000020843A KR20000037362A (en) 2000-04-20 2000-04-20 Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results

Country Status (1)

Country Link
KR (1) KR20000037362A (en)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20010034993A (en) * 2000-07-04 2001-05-07 허노재 Method for diagnosing and appraising efficiency of home-page and thereof system
KR20020003466A (en) * 2000-07-04 2002-01-12 현영호 Trading of Internet Web Site
KR100411747B1 (en) * 2000-07-12 2003-12-24 김시우 The system for concluding search ranking and the method for concluding search ranking thereof
KR100509276B1 (en) * 2001-08-20 2005-08-22 엔에이치엔(주) Method for searching web page on popularity of visiting web pages and apparatus thereof
WO2005116857A1 (en) * 2004-05-27 2005-12-08 Nhn Corporation Community search system through network and method thereof
KR100695467B1 (en) * 2004-08-10 2007-03-15 재성 안 Method of estimating web usability and System for the same

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR20010034993A (en) * 2000-07-04 2001-05-07 허노재 Method for diagnosing and appraising efficiency of home-page and thereof system
KR20020003466A (en) * 2000-07-04 2002-01-12 현영호 Trading of Internet Web Site
KR100411747B1 (en) * 2000-07-12 2003-12-24 김시우 The system for concluding search ranking and the method for concluding search ranking thereof
KR100509276B1 (en) * 2001-08-20 2005-08-22 엔에이치엔(주) Method for searching web page on popularity of visiting web pages and apparatus thereof
WO2005116857A1 (en) * 2004-05-27 2005-12-08 Nhn Corporation Community search system through network and method thereof
US7761441B2 (en) 2004-05-27 2010-07-20 Nhn Corporation Community search system through network and method thereof
KR100695467B1 (en) * 2004-08-10 2007-03-15 재성 안 Method of estimating web usability and System for the same

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
KR101063364B1 (en) System and method for prioritizing websites during the web crawling process
Baeza-Yates et al. Modeling user search behavior
US7702671B2 (en) Systems and methods for discovery of data that needs improving or authored using user search results diagnostics
US7152059B2 (en) System and method for predicting additional search results of a computerized database search user based on an initial search query
US7599918B2 (en) Dynamic search with implicit user intention mining
US20080319955A1 (en) Web browser page rating system
US8849818B1 (en) Searching via user-specified ratings
US7813976B2 (en) Computer-based system and method for searching and screening financial securities and relevant intellectual property
US20070271255A1 (en) Reverse search-engine
US20130006958A1 (en) Automatic Identification of Related Search Keywords
US20100228714A1 (en) Analysing search results in a data retrieval system
JP2008097641A (en) Method and apparatus for searching data of database
US6668251B1 (en) Rendering discriminator members from an initial set of result data
Spink Web search: emerging patterns
Liebling et al. Anticipatory search: using context to initiate search
US20090037235A1 (en) System that automatically identifies a Candidate for hiring by using a composite score comprised of a Spec Score generated by a Candidates answers to questions and an Industry Score based on a database of key words & key texts compiled from source documents, such as job descriptions
Tomaszewski A study of citations to STEM databases: ACM Digital Library, Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, and MathSciNet
JP4912384B2 (en) Document search device, document search method, and document search program
KR20000037362A (en) Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results
US20030004837A1 (en) Methods and systems for providing supplier information
Wakeling et al. Investigating the potential impact of non-personalized recommendations in the OPAC: Amazon vs. WorldCat. org
US20080104510A1 (en) Graphical Interface for Search Engine
Murata Visualizing the structure of web communities based on data acquired from a search engine
Kumar et al. Search engines evaluation
Hurley et al. DubLet: An Online CBR System for Rental Property Recommendation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A201 Request for examination
E902 Notification of reason for refusal
E601 Decision to refuse application