KR20000037362A - Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results - Google Patents
Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- KR20000037362A KR20000037362A KR1020000020843A KR20000020843A KR20000037362A KR 20000037362 A KR20000037362 A KR 20000037362A KR 1020000020843 A KR1020000020843 A KR 1020000020843A KR 20000020843 A KR20000020843 A KR 20000020843A KR 20000037362 A KR20000037362 A KR 20000037362A
- Authority
- KR
- South Korea
- Prior art keywords
- internet
- site
- evaluation
- result
- sites
- Prior art date
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 abstract description 24
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing; Price estimation or determination; Fundraising
- G06Q30/0201—Market modelling; Market analysis; Collecting market data
- G06Q30/0203—Market surveys; Market polls
Landscapes
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Finance (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Accounting & Taxation (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
Description
본 발명은 인터넷 사이트에 대한 평가 와 그 결과의 공개 그리고 인터넷 사이트 검색시 평가 결과를 반영하는 기술이다. 인터넷 사이트에 대한 체계적인 평가 및 결과의 공개는 아직 실시되지 않고 있으며 인터넷 검색 분야에서는 검색 엔진을 사용하고 있다. 현재 사용중인 대부분의 검색 엔진은 검색단어(키워드)를 이용하여 검색 결과를 나열내거나 내용을 주제별로 분류한 후 주제별 검색을 제공한다. 하지만 다수의 사이트들이 검색 결과로 나열되기 때문에 원하는 자료를 찾기 위해서 검색 결과에 나타는 사이트들을 하나하나 살펴 보아야 하는등 시간의 낭비가 초래된다.The present invention is a technique that reflects the evaluation results of the evaluation of the Internet site and the results and the search of the Internet site. Systematic evaluation and disclosure of the results have not been carried out yet, and search engines are used in the field of Internet search. Most search engines currently in use use search words (keywords) to list search results or categorize content by topic and then provide a topic-specific search. However, since many sites are listed as search results, it is a waste of time to look at each site that appears in the search results to find the desired data.
인터넷 사이트를 객관으로 공정하게 평가하고 사용자들이 효과적으로 평가 결과를 이용하게 하는 것이 본 발명의 과제이다.It is an object of the present invention to evaluate the Internet site fairly and objectively and to allow users to effectively use the evaluation result.
이를 위하여 평가시 각 사이트의 자료의 내용, 운영 상태등의 심사 및 사용자 여론, 해당 사이트 접속 건수 등 보편적 기준이되는 항목을 조사하여 사이트를 평가한다. 평가 결과는 상기 항목별 심사 내용을 종합하여 수치 혹은 등급 등의 형태로 표기되어 인터넷 사이트를 통하여 공개된다. 사용자가 효과적으로 평가 결과를 이용하도록 하기 위하여 분류된 인터넷 사이트 리스트에 평가 결과를 함께 표기하거나 일정 평가 등급 이상의 사이트만을 사용자가 선택하여 나타낼 수 있게 한다. 이 경우에 사용자로부터 평가 등급을 입력받아 입력된 등급 이상의 사이트만을 제공 할 수도 있다. 또한 사용자가 사이트 주소를 입력하면 평가 결과를 보여주거나 인터넷 사이트 검색시 검색어와 평가 결과를 병행하여 검색할 수 있도록 검색 엔진의 구동을 지원하게 된다.To do this, the site is evaluated by examining items that are universal criteria such as the content of each site, the status of operation, user opinion, and the number of site accesses. The evaluation results are displayed in the form of numerical values or grades by combining the contents of the above-mentioned examinations and are disclosed through the Internet site. In order to enable the user to effectively use the evaluation result, the evaluation result may be displayed on the classified Internet site list or the user may select and display only the site of a certain evaluation level or higher. In this case, the user may be provided with only a site having a rating higher than the rating inputted from the user. In addition, when a user inputs a site address, the search engine can be displayed to display the evaluation result or to search the search word and the evaluation result in parallel when searching the Internet site.
본 발명은 사이트의 평가 과정 및 평가 결과의 활용 과정으로 구성된다.The present invention consists of the evaluation process of the site and the utilization process of the evaluation results.
먼저 사이트 평가 과정은 각각의 인터넷 사이트들의 내용을 심사하고 그 결과를 수치 혹은 등급으로 나타내어 인터넷 서비스를 수행하는 웹서버와 연결된 컴퓨더의 데이터 베이스에 저장하는 과정이다. 평가자는 데이터 베이스에 저장하는 프로세스를 구비한 프로그램이 설치된 컴퓨터를 이용하여 자신이 심사하거나 조사한 평가 결과를 데이터 베이스에 저장한다. 데이터 베이스에는 사이트 주소와 항목별 평가 결과 및 종합 결과를 계산 할 수 있는 테이블과 필드로 구성 된다.First of all, the site evaluation process is the process of reviewing the contents of each Internet site and expressing the result in numerical or rating form and storing it in the database of the computer connected to the web server performing the Internet service. The evaluator saves the evaluation result examined or investigated in the database by using a computer on which a program having a process of storing in the database is installed. The database consists of tables and fields from which site addresses, itemized evaluation results, and overall results can be calculated.
평가 결과의 활용 과정은 평가 과정에서 얻어진 평가 결과가 사용자에게 필요한 정보로 가공되어 제공되어지는 과정이며 조회 유형 설정 프로세스, 조회 프로세스, 조회 결과 제공 프로세스등의 세부 프로세드들로 나누어 진다. 먼저 조회 유형 설정 프로세스는 사용자가 인터넷과 연결된 자신의 컴퓨터에서 평가 결과를 어떠한 형태로 나타낼 것인지를 선택하게 하는 화면을 웹 브라우저를 통하여 제공하는 프로세스이다. 예를 들면 찾고자 하는 사이트의 주제, 평가 등급별 여부, 평가 순위별 여부 등이 사용자가 선택할 수 있는 항목이다. 조회 과정은 사용자의 웹 브라우저를 통하여 제공된 조회 내용을 데이터 베이스에서 검색하는 과정이다. 마지막으로 조회 결과 제공 프로세스에서는 상기 조회 프로세스에서 얻어진 결과를 다시 사용자 컴퓨터의 브라우저를 통하여 보여지게 하는 프로세스이다.The process of using the evaluation result is a process in which the evaluation result obtained in the evaluation process is processed and provided as necessary information for the user, and is divided into detailed processes such as inquiry type setting process, inquiry process, and inquiry result providing process. First, the inquiry type setting process is a process of providing a screen through a web browser that allows a user to select a form of evaluation results on his computer connected to the Internet. For example, the user can select the subject of the site to be searched for, whether it is rated or not, or whether it is ranked by the ranking. The retrieval process is a process of retrieving the retrieval contents provided through the user's web browser from the database. Finally, in the inquiry result providing process, the result obtained in the inquiry process is displayed again through the browser of the user's computer.
인터넷을 사이트의 내용을 평가하여 공개하는것 자체가 여러 산업 분야에 발전적인 역할을 기대할수 있으며 인터넷 사용자들에게는 우수한 사이트를 단시간내에 용이하게 접근하도록 도와주고, 사이트 운영자에게는 자신 혹은 경쟁 사이트의 평가 결과를 이용하여 보다 양질의 사이트로 발전 시킬수 있다.Evaluating the content of the Internet and publishing the content itself can be expected to play an evolutionary role in various industries. It helps Internet users to easily access excellent sites in a short time. It can be used to develop a better site.
Claims (2)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020000020843A KR20000037362A (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2000-04-20 | Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020000020843A KR20000037362A (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2000-04-20 | Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
KR20000037362A true KR20000037362A (en) | 2000-07-05 |
Family
ID=19665711
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
KR1020000020843A KR20000037362A (en) | 2000-04-20 | 2000-04-20 | Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
KR (1) | KR20000037362A (en) |
Cited By (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20010034993A (en) * | 2000-07-04 | 2001-05-07 | 허노재 | Method for diagnosing and appraising efficiency of home-page and thereof system |
KR20020003466A (en) * | 2000-07-04 | 2002-01-12 | 현영호 | Trading of Internet Web Site |
KR100411747B1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2003-12-24 | 김시우 | The system for concluding search ranking and the method for concluding search ranking thereof |
KR100509276B1 (en) * | 2001-08-20 | 2005-08-22 | 엔에이치엔(주) | Method for searching web page on popularity of visiting web pages and apparatus thereof |
WO2005116857A1 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2005-12-08 | Nhn Corporation | Community search system through network and method thereof |
KR100695467B1 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2007-03-15 | 재성 안 | Method of estimating web usability and System for the same |
-
2000
- 2000-04-20 KR KR1020000020843A patent/KR20000037362A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
Cited By (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
KR20010034993A (en) * | 2000-07-04 | 2001-05-07 | 허노재 | Method for diagnosing and appraising efficiency of home-page and thereof system |
KR20020003466A (en) * | 2000-07-04 | 2002-01-12 | 현영호 | Trading of Internet Web Site |
KR100411747B1 (en) * | 2000-07-12 | 2003-12-24 | 김시우 | The system for concluding search ranking and the method for concluding search ranking thereof |
KR100509276B1 (en) * | 2001-08-20 | 2005-08-22 | 엔에이치엔(주) | Method for searching web page on popularity of visiting web pages and apparatus thereof |
WO2005116857A1 (en) * | 2004-05-27 | 2005-12-08 | Nhn Corporation | Community search system through network and method thereof |
US7761441B2 (en) | 2004-05-27 | 2010-07-20 | Nhn Corporation | Community search system through network and method thereof |
KR100695467B1 (en) * | 2004-08-10 | 2007-03-15 | 재성 안 | Method of estimating web usability and System for the same |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
KR101063364B1 (en) | System and method for prioritizing websites during the web crawling process | |
Baeza-Yates et al. | Modeling user search behavior | |
US7702671B2 (en) | Systems and methods for discovery of data that needs improving or authored using user search results diagnostics | |
US7152059B2 (en) | System and method for predicting additional search results of a computerized database search user based on an initial search query | |
US7599918B2 (en) | Dynamic search with implicit user intention mining | |
US20080319955A1 (en) | Web browser page rating system | |
US8849818B1 (en) | Searching via user-specified ratings | |
US7813976B2 (en) | Computer-based system and method for searching and screening financial securities and relevant intellectual property | |
US20070271255A1 (en) | Reverse search-engine | |
US20130006958A1 (en) | Automatic Identification of Related Search Keywords | |
US20100228714A1 (en) | Analysing search results in a data retrieval system | |
JP2008097641A (en) | Method and apparatus for searching data of database | |
US6668251B1 (en) | Rendering discriminator members from an initial set of result data | |
Spink | Web search: emerging patterns | |
Liebling et al. | Anticipatory search: using context to initiate search | |
US20090037235A1 (en) | System that automatically identifies a Candidate for hiring by using a composite score comprised of a Spec Score generated by a Candidates answers to questions and an Industry Score based on a database of key words & key texts compiled from source documents, such as job descriptions | |
Tomaszewski | A study of citations to STEM databases: ACM Digital Library, Engineering Village, IEEE Xplore, and MathSciNet | |
JP4912384B2 (en) | Document search device, document search method, and document search program | |
KR20000037362A (en) | Internet site evaluate and practical use of the results | |
US20030004837A1 (en) | Methods and systems for providing supplier information | |
Wakeling et al. | Investigating the potential impact of non-personalized recommendations in the OPAC: Amazon vs. WorldCat. org | |
US20080104510A1 (en) | Graphical Interface for Search Engine | |
Murata | Visualizing the structure of web communities based on data acquired from a search engine | |
Kumar et al. | Search engines evaluation | |
Hurley et al. | DubLet: An Online CBR System for Rental Property Recommendation |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
A201 | Request for examination | ||
E902 | Notification of reason for refusal | ||
E601 | Decision to refuse application |