JPH10265304A - Repellent product and repellency using them same - Google Patents
Repellent product and repellency using them sameInfo
- Publication number
- JPH10265304A JPH10265304A JP9070090A JP7009097A JPH10265304A JP H10265304 A JPH10265304 A JP H10265304A JP 9070090 A JP9070090 A JP 9070090A JP 7009097 A JP7009097 A JP 7009097A JP H10265304 A JPH10265304 A JP H10265304A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- repellent
- container
- vessel
- case
- effect
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Landscapes
- Agricultural Chemicals And Associated Chemicals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【０００１】[0001]
【発明の属する技術分野】本発明は、忌避製品及びそれ
を用いた忌避方法に関し、より詳細には犬や猫等が嫌う
臭い剤すなわち忌避剤による忌避効果をより向上させる
ための忌避製品およびそれを用いた忌避方法に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a repellent product and a repellent method using the same, and more particularly, to a repellent product for improving the repellent effect of an odorant or repellent which dogs and cats dislike, ie, a repellent. The present invention relates to a repelling method using a refuge.
【０００２】[0002]
【従来技術】犬猫が環境に悪影響を及ぼす分野として、
公園の砂場に犬猫が放つ糞尿による悪臭、あるいは糞に
由来するトキソカラ属の虫卵によるトキソカラ属の感染
源などが懸念されている。これらの解決方法として定期
的な砂の入れ替え、あるいは忌避剤を散布する方法がと
られている。2. Description of the Related Art Dogs and cats have a negative impact on the environment.
There are concerns about foul odors emitted by dogs and cats in the park sandbox, or the source of Toxocara spp. Caused by eggs of Toxocara spp. As a solution to these problems, a method of periodically replacing the sand or spraying a repellent has been adopted.
【０００３】忌避剤は主に液状の揮発性物質からなる場
合が多く、一般にはこれをアルコールに溶解してアルコ
ール溶液としたり、噴射剤を配合してエアゾールタイプ
にしたものあるいはゼオライト等の多孔質担体にしみ込
ませたものが多く用いられている。しかしこれら忌避剤
は前記揮発性物質からなり忌避効果の持続性が低いた
め、特開平５−２８６８０３号公報では揮発性物質を樹
脂に溶解させたものをゼオライト等に担持させて忌避効
果の持続性向上を図った忌避剤が、特開平５−７８２１
９号公報では揮発性物質をゼオライト等に担持させ表面
を被覆して忌避効果の持続性向上を図った忌避剤が、さ
らには特開平７−３２７５７５号公報では揮発性物質を
膨潤固化させて持続性向上を図った忌避剤がそれぞれ提
案されている。In many cases, the repellent is mainly composed of a liquid volatile substance. Generally, the repellent is dissolved in alcohol to form an alcohol solution, a propellant is added to form an aerosol type, or a porous material such as zeolite is used. A material impregnated in a carrier is often used. However, since these repellents are composed of the volatile substance and have low persistence of the repellent effect, Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication No. Hei 5-286803 discloses that a volatile substance dissolved in a resin is supported on zeolite or the like to maintain the repellent effect. An improved repellent is disclosed in JP-A-5-7821.
No. 9 discloses a repellent agent in which a volatile substance is supported on a zeolite or the like to coat the surface to improve the persistence of the repellent effect. Repellents with improved properties have been proposed.
【０００４】しかしながら犬猫の忌避を希望する場所は
その殆どが土面や土中である場合が多く、前記したよう
に揮発性物質を樹脂に溶解させたものや揮発性物質をゼ
オライト等に担持させ表面を被覆したものを散布して
も、風雨等の影響で忌避成分が滞留できず、その一方で
犬猫の糞尿臭・マーキング臭は土壌中に染み込んでいて
なかなか抜けないため満足のいく忌避効果が得られない
場合が多い。また、揮発性物質を膨潤固化させた忌避剤
を設置した場合は通常の忌避効果は得られるものの、強
いマーキング臭がしみ込んだ土面においては、前記と同
様に忌避効果が十分でない場合がある。これに対し、前
記忌避剤を土壌中に直接埋め込む方法も考えられるが、
この場合忌避成分の空気中への揮散が妨げられるため十
分な忌避効果が得られにくい。特に雨等により土壌が濡
れている状態においては極度な毛細管現象により揮発性
物質が急激に消費され易く、この場合は忌避効果の有効
期間が短くなってしまう。[0004] However, most of the places where dogs and cats are desired to be repelled are on the soil surface or in the soil, and as described above, volatile substances are dissolved in resin or volatile substances are carried on zeolite or the like. Even after spraying the coated surface, the repellent components cannot be retained due to the effects of the weather, etc. On the other hand, the odor and marking odor of dogs and cats are permeated into the soil and are not easily removed, so they are satisfactory repellent In many cases, no effect can be obtained. When a repellent obtained by swelling and solidifying a volatile substance is provided, a normal repelling effect can be obtained, but the repelling effect may not be sufficient on a soil surface in which a strong marking smell is impregnated. On the other hand, a method of directly embedding the repellent in the soil is also considered,
In this case, volatilization of the repellent components into the air is hindered, so that it is difficult to obtain a sufficient repellent effect. In particular, when the soil is wet due to rain or the like, the volatile substance is apt to be rapidly consumed due to the extreme capillary phenomenon, and in this case, the effective period of the repellent effect is shortened.
【０００５】[0005]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】このように、土面は犬
猫の忌避が得に希望される箇所であるにもかかわらず風
雨の影響を受け易いため、忌避剤を使用しても空気中と
土壌中の双方にその忌避成分を長期間揮散させるといっ
たことが困難であり、十分な忌避効果を得ることができ
ないといった課題があった。As described above, the soil surface is easily affected by the weather even though it is a place where dogs and cats are desired to be repelled. There is a problem that it is difficult to volatilize the repellent component for a long period of time both in soil and in soil, and it is not possible to obtain a sufficient repellent effect.
【０００６】本発明は上記課題に鑑みなされたものであ
り、土面やその近傍において、風雨の影響を受けること
なく忌避剤の忌避効果を十分にまた長期間に渡って発揮
させ得る忌避製品及びそれを用いた忌避方法を提供する
ことを目的としている。The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and provides a repellent product capable of sufficiently exhibiting the repellent effect of a repellent on a soil surface or in the vicinity thereof without being affected by wind and rain for a long period of time. It aims to provide a repellent method using it.
【０００７】[0007]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明者らは、上記課題
を解決すべく鋭意検討した結果、忌避剤と土壌との間に
適当な空間がないと忌避成分の空気中への有効な揮散が
妨げられること、および、忌避剤を一か所にまとめて設
置した方が忌避効果が上がることを見い出し本発明を提
案するに至った。Means for Solving the Problems The present inventors have conducted intensive studies to solve the above-mentioned problems, and as a result, if there is no appropriate space between the repellent and the soil, the effective volatilization of the repellent components into the air. Was found to be prevented, and the repellent effect was improved by installing the repellent in one place, and came to propose the present invention.
【０００８】すなわち本発明に係る忌避製品は、容器内
に忌避剤を収容した忌避製品であって、前記容器の全体
または一部が透水可能となっていることを特徴としてい
る。That is, the repellent product according to the present invention is a repellent product in which a repellent is contained in a container, wherein the whole or a part of the container is permeable to water.
【０００９】忌避剤が液体の場合は徐放性のコントロー
ルが困難であるため、前記忌避剤としては、固体もしく
は固形物質に担持された液体あるいは膨潤固体であるも
のを用いるが好ましい。When the repellent is a liquid, it is difficult to control the sustained release. Therefore, it is preferable to use a solid or a liquid carried on a solid substance or a swollen solid as the repellent.
【００１０】また前記容器底部には、抜水孔が形成され
ているのが好ましい。この抜水孔は雨水等を排水し得る
ため、容器内に雨水が溜まって忌避剤が流出したりその
忌避成分が急激に消費されたりするのを防ぐことができ
る。Preferably, a drain hole is formed at the bottom of the container. Since the drain hole can drain rainwater or the like, it is possible to prevent rainwater from accumulating in the container and prevent the repellent from flowing out and rapidly repelling the repellent components.
【００１１】また、前記容器に雨水の侵入を防止する構
造体が設けられている場合は雨水等による影響をより抑
制することができる。When the container is provided with a structure for preventing rainwater from entering, the influence of rainwater or the like can be further suppressed.
【００１２】容器の全体または一部が多孔質構造となっ
て透水可能となっている場合は、孔の短孔径が１mm以下
であるのが好ましい。前記短孔径が１mmを越えると土や
砂の侵入により忌避成分を徐放することが困難となる。
特に容器の全体または一部が素焼きからなっている場合
は、容易に前記多孔質構造をなすことができるため好ま
しい。When the whole or a part of the container has a porous structure and is permeable to water, the short diameter of the hole is preferably 1 mm or less. When the short hole diameter exceeds 1 mm, it becomes difficult to release the repellent component slowly due to intrusion of soil and sand.
In particular, it is preferable that the whole or a part of the container is made of unglazed because the porous structure can be easily formed.
【００１３】また、本発明に係る忌避方法は、容器内に
忌避剤を収容した忌避製品であって、前記容器の全体ま
たは一部が透水可能となっている忌避製品を対象場所の
地中または砂近似粉粒体中に半埋め状態または埋没状態
に設置し、対象場所周辺空間に前記忌避剤の忌避成分を
飛散させて動物を忌避することを特徴としている。Further, the repelling method according to the present invention is directed to a repellent product containing a repellent in a container, wherein the repellent product in which the whole or a part of the container is permeable to water is placed underground or in a target place. It is characterized by being installed in a semi-buried state or a buried state in a sand-approximate powder, and repelling the animal by scattering the repellent component of the repellent in the space around the target place.
【００１４】[0014]
【発明の実施の形態】以下、本発明に係る忌避製品およ
びそれを用いた忌避方法の実施の形態を図面に基づいて
説明する。図１は実施の形態に係る忌避製品を示した模
式的部分断面斜視図であり、図例の忌避製品１０は、例
えば素焼きの容器１１内に粒状の忌避剤１２を収容して
なる。容器１１の壁面に存在する孔（図示せず）の短孔
径は１mm以下であり、容器１１の上部は開放していてそ
の内径は下方から上方へ向かって拡径している。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Embodiments of a repellent product according to the present invention and a repellent method using the same will be described below with reference to the drawings. FIG. 1 is a schematic partial cross-sectional perspective view showing a repellent product according to an embodiment, and a repellent product 10 in the illustrated example is formed by accommodating a granular repellent agent 12 in, for example, an unglazed container 11. The short hole diameter of a hole (not shown) existing on the wall surface of the container 11 is 1 mm or less, the upper portion of the container 11 is open, and the inner diameter increases from below to above.
【００１５】容器１１の大きさは持ち運びに不便でな
く、配置場所の確保が困難でない程度であれば何ら限定
されることはなく、例えば植木鉢程度の大きさとしても
よい。また例えば積極的に植木鉢を模倣し、その中に植
物を植え込み得る忌避製品としてもよく、この場合、忌
避製品を風景に馴染ませることが可能となる一方、逆
に、忌避製品の所在を人間にとって明確にすることも可
能となる。The size of the container 11 is not limited as long as it is not inconvenient to carry and it is not difficult to secure an arrangement place, and may be, for example, a size of a flowerpot. Also, for example, a repellent product that can positively imitate a flower pot and plant a plant in it may be used. Clarification is also possible.
【００１６】また、容器の形態は何ら図例のものに限定
されることはなく、例えば猫を模倣した置物様としても
よい。この場合、他の猫が居るかの如き錯覚を起こさせ
ることにより猫を忌避する効果が得られる場合がある
他、対人的には和やかな雰囲気作りを行うことができ
る。Further, the form of the container is not limited to the example shown in the drawings, and may be, for example, a figurine imitating a cat. In this case, the effect of repelling the cat may be obtained by causing an illusion as if there is another cat, and a peaceful atmosphere can be created personally.
【００１７】容器壁の厚みは様々考えられるが、前記孔
との関連上、忌避成分の揮散を妨げない程度であって割
れにくい強度を有する厚さが好ましい。There are various thicknesses of the container wall, but in view of the hole, a thickness that does not hinder the volatilization of the repellent components and has a strength that is not easily broken is preferable.
【００１８】このように構成された忌避製品１０を用い
て対象とする動物を忌避するには、忌避製品１０を対象
場所の例えば地中に半埋め状態または埋没状態に設置
し、対象場所周辺空間に忌避剤１２の忌避成分を揮散さ
せる。In order to repel a target animal using the repellent product 10 configured as described above, the repellent product 10 is installed in a target location, for example, in a semi-buried or buried state in the ground, and the space around the target location is set. The volatile component of the repellent 12 is volatilized.
【００１９】これによれば、忌避剤１２の周辺にある程
度の空間が保たれ、また忌避剤１２が広範囲に渡って散
在することがないため対象箇所に集中的に忌避成分を揮
散させることができ、忌避効果を向上させることができ
る。また、容器内に雨水等が侵入したとしても容器１１
自体が透水性を有するため容器内に水が溜まりにくく、
忌避剤の流出や忌避成分の過剰消費を防止することがで
きる。According to this, a certain amount of space is maintained around the repellent 12, and since the repellent 12 is not scattered over a wide area, the repellent components can be volatilized intensively at the target portion. The repelling effect can be improved. Even if rainwater or the like enters the container, the container 11
Water itself is difficult to accumulate in the container because it has water permeability,
Outflow of the repellent and excessive consumption of the repellent components can be prevented.
【００２０】図例の忌避製品にあってはその上部が開放
している場合について示したが、何らこれに限定される
ことはなく、例えば蓋体等の構造体を有するものであっ
てもよい。その場合の蓋体は容器壁と同様、素焼き等の
多孔質構造を有しているのが好ましい。The repellent product shown in the figure has a case where the upper part is open, but the present invention is not limited to this, and may have a structure such as a lid. . The lid in that case preferably has a porous structure such as unglazed like the container wall.
【００２１】図２は別の実施の形態に係る忌避製品を示
した模式的部分断面分解斜視図であり、図例の忌避製品
２０はその容器２１の底部に抜水孔２２が形成されてい
る。この抜水孔２２とは、例えば容器底部の一部が開口
した開口部２１ａに網状物２３が取り付けられた時の、
土や砂が入り込まない程度の網目孔のことであり、この
抜水孔２２の大きさは容器内の忌避剤が抜け出さない程
度である。この場合、忌避剤の忌避成分は抜水孔２２か
ら揮散可能であるため、容器２１自体は必ずしも多孔質
構造を有する必要はなく、例えば通気性のないポリプロ
ピレンやポリエチレン等のプラスチックス製であっても
よいし、その他金属製であってもよい。また、抜水孔２
２の形態としては網状物２３の網目孔によるものの他、
忌避成分を揮散可能であって抜粋機能を有した孔であれ
ばなんら限定されるものではない。FIG. 2 is a schematic partial cross-sectional exploded perspective view showing a repellent product according to another embodiment. The repellent product 20 in the illustrated example has a drain hole 22 formed at the bottom of a container 21. . The drainage hole 22 is, for example, when the net 23 is attached to an opening 21a in which a part of the container bottom is opened.
It is a mesh hole that does not allow soil or sand to enter, and the size of the drain hole 22 is such that the repellent in the container does not escape. In this case, since the repellent component of the repellent can be volatilized from the drain hole 22, the container 21 itself does not necessarily have to have a porous structure. For example, the container 21 is made of non-breathable plastics such as polypropylene or polyethylene. Or other metal. In addition, drain hole 2
As the second embodiment, in addition to the mesh hole of the mesh member 23,
There is no particular limitation as long as it is a hole capable of volatilizing the repellent component and having an extracting function.
【００２２】[0022]
【実施例および比較例】本発明の詳細を具体的な実施例
に基づき説明する。 （実験１）実験１では忌避剤として揮発性物質をゼオラ
イトに担持させた製品（商品名：のら猫にげる、タケダ
園芸製）を用い、これを下記の実施例及び比較例に係る
各種容器等にそれぞれ３０ｇづつ入れた忌避製品を用意
し、所定の砂場に設置して、この砂場に水を散布した後
の犬猫に対する忌避効果を調べた。前記忌避効果は、そ
の後の犬猫の糞尿の有無により判断した。Examples and Comparative Examples The details of the present invention will be described based on specific examples. (Experiment 1) In Experiment 1, a product (trade name: Nora Cat Niger, Takeda Horticulture) having a volatile substance supported on zeolite as a repellent was used for various containers according to the following Examples and Comparative Examples. A repellent product containing 30 g each was prepared, placed in a predetermined sandbox, and the repellent effect on dogs and cats after spraying water on the sandbox was examined. The repellent effect was determined based on the presence or absence of manure in dogs and cats thereafter.
【００２３】各実験条件は下記の通りである。 砂場：１ｍ×１ｍの面積を有し、猫の糞尿臭を有する砂
場。 散布した水量：２０リットル 実施例１：図２に示した忌避製品２０（容器２１：ポリ
プロピレン製バケツ型容器、容量１００ml、開口部２１
ａ径：１０mm、網状物２３：ナイロン製、１００メッシ
ュ） 実施例２：図１に示した忌避製品１０（素焼き、容量１
００ml） 比較例１：砂場に最深５cm程度の窪みを作り、該窪みを
容器代わりとする 比較例２：１０×１０cm程度の不織布を容器代わりとし
て忌避剤を包む 比較例３：ポリプロピレン製バケツ型容器であって孔無
し（容量１００ml）Each experimental condition is as follows. Sandbox: A sandbox having an area of 1m x 1m and having the smell of cat urine. Sprayed water volume: 20 liters Example 1: Repellent product 20 shown in FIG. 2 (container 21: polypropylene bucket container, capacity 100 ml, opening 21
a diameter: 10 mm, mesh material 23: nylon, 100 mesh) Example 2: Repellent product 10 shown in FIG. 1 (unglazed, capacity 1)
Comparative Example 1: A hollow having a depth of about 5 cm is formed in a sandbox, and the hollow is used as a container. Comparative Example 2: A nonwoven fabric of about 10 × 10 cm is used as a container to wrap the repellent. Comparative Example 3: Polypropylene bucket-type container No holes (capacity 100ml)
【００２４】上記各実施例及び比較例に係る忌避製品に
よる忌避効果を下記の表１に示す。表中○はその後糞尿
が観察されなかったことを示し、×はその後も糞尿が観
察されたことを示す。The repellent effects of the repellent products according to the above Examples and Comparative Examples are shown in Table 1 below. In the table, ○ indicates that manure was not observed thereafter, and × indicates that manure was observed thereafter.
【００２５】[0025]
【表１】 [Table 1]
【００２６】上記表１から明らかなように、その後糞尿
が観察されなかったのは比較例１に係る容器の場合は１
日目のみであり、比較例２では２日目までであってその
後は糞尿が観察された。また、比較例３に係る容器の場
合は１日目から糞尿が観察され、忌避効果が得られなか
った。これに対し実施例１、２に係る容器の場合は７日
目においても糞尿が観察されず、忌避効果が存続してい
る状態であった。As is clear from Table 1, no excrement was observed thereafter in the case of the container according to Comparative Example 1.
Only on the day, in Comparative Example 2, it was up to the second day, after which manure was observed. In the case of the container according to Comparative Example 3, excrement was observed from the first day, and no repellent effect was obtained. On the other hand, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, no manure was observed even on the seventh day, and the repellent effect was still present.
【００２７】（実験２）次に、水の散布を行わず、風速
５ｍ／ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた他は実験１の場
合と同様にして上記実施例１、２および比較例１〜３の
場合についてその忌避効果を調べた。実験結果を下記の
表２に示す。(Experiment 2) Next, Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1 were carried out in the same manner as in Experiment 1 except that water was not sprayed and a wind of 5 m / s was applied from one direction. The repellent effect was examined for the cases of ~ 3. The experimental results are shown in Table 2 below.
【００２８】[0028]
【表２】 [Table 2]
【００２９】上記表２から明らかなように、水の散布を
行わず、風速５ｍ／ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた場
合においては比較例１〜３のいずれにおいても実験例１
の場合よりも忌避効果の存続期間が長くなるものの、比
較例１の場合は４日目以降、比較例２の場合は６日目以
降、比較例３の場合は５日目以降に糞尿が観察された。
これに対し、実施例１、２に係る容器の場合は７日目に
おいても糞尿が観察されず、忌避効果が存続している状
態であった。As is clear from Table 2 above, when spraying water was not performed and a wind having a wind speed of 5 m / s was applied from one direction, Experimental Examples 1 to 3 in any of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were performed.
Although the duration of the repellent effect is longer than in the case of the above, excrement is observed after the fourth day in the case of Comparative Example 1, after the sixth day in the case of Comparative Example 2, and after the fifth day in the case of Comparative Example 3. Was done.
On the other hand, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, no excrement was observed even on the seventh day, and the repellent effect was still present.
【００３０】（実験３）次に、風速５ｍ／ｓの風を一方
方向から作用させた他は実験１の場合と同様にして上記
実施例１、２および比較例１〜３の場合についてその忌
避効果を調べた。実験結果を下記の表３に示す。(Experiment 3) Next, in the same manner as in Experiment 1, except that a wind having a wind speed of 5 m / s was applied from one direction, the cases of Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were avoided. The effect was investigated. The experimental results are shown in Table 3 below.
【００３１】[0031]
【表３】 [Table 3]
【００３２】上記表３から明らかなように、風速５ｍ／
ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた場合においては比較例
１〜３のいずれの場合も１日目から糞尿が観察され、忌
避効果が得られなかった。これに対し、実施例１、２に
係る容器の場合は７日目においても糞尿が観察されず、
忌避効果が存続している状態であった。As is apparent from Table 3, the wind speed is 5 m /
In the case where the wind of s acted from one direction, excretion was observed from the first day in any of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, and no repellent effect was obtained. In contrast, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, no manure was observed even on the seventh day,
The repellent effect persisted.
【００３３】（実験４）実験４では忌避剤として揮発性
物質を樹脂に溶解させ、ゼオライトに担持させた製品
（商品名：のらよけビーズ、神東塗料製）を用い、これ
を上記の実施例及び比較例に係る各種容器等にそれぞれ
３０ｇづつ入れ、上記砂場に設置して、この砂場に水を
散布した後の犬猫の忌避効果を調べた。前記忌避効果
は、その後の犬猫の糞尿の有無により判断した。実験結
果を下記の表４に示す。(Experiment 4) In Experiment 4, a product (trade name: Norayoke Beads, manufactured by Shinto Paint) having a volatile substance dissolved in a resin as a repellent and supported on zeolite was used. 30 g of each was placed in each of the containers and the like according to the examples and the comparative examples, placed in the above sandbox, and the repellent effect of dogs and cats after spraying water in the sandbox was examined. The repellent effect was determined based on the presence or absence of manure in dogs and cats thereafter. The experimental results are shown in Table 4 below.
【００３４】[0034]
【表４】 [Table 4]
【００３５】上記表４から明らかなように、その後糞尿
が観察されなかったのは比較例１に係る容器の場合は１
日目のみであり、比較例２では２日目までであってその
後は糞尿が観察された。また、比較例３に係る容器の場
合は１日目から糞尿が観察され、忌避効果が得られなか
った。これに対し実施例１、２に係る容器の場合は７日
目においても糞尿が観察されず、忌避効果が存続してい
る状態であった。As is clear from Table 4 above, no excrement was observed after that in the case of the container according to Comparative Example 1.
Only on the day, in Comparative Example 2, it was up to the second day, after which manure was observed. In the case of the container according to Comparative Example 3, excrement was observed from the first day, and no repellent effect was obtained. On the other hand, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, no manure was observed even on the seventh day, and the repellent effect was still present.
【００３６】（実験５）次に、水の散布を行わず、風速
５ｍ／ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた他は実験４の場
合と同様にして上記実施例１、２および比較例１〜３の
場合についてその忌避効果を調べた。実験結果を下記の
表５に示す。(Experiment 5) Next, Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1 were carried out in the same manner as in Experiment 4 except that water was not sprayed and a wind of 5 m / s was applied from one direction. The repellent effect was examined for the cases of ~ 3. The experimental results are shown in Table 5 below.
【００３７】[0037]
【表５】 [Table 5]
【００３８】上記表５から明らかなように、水の散布を
行わず、風速５ｍ／ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた場
合においては比較例１〜３のいずれにおいても実験例１
の場合よりも忌避効果の存続期間が長くなるものの、比
較例１の場合は４日目以降、比較例２の場合は６日目以
降、比較例３の場合は４日目以降に糞尿が観察された。
これに対し、実施例１、２に係る容器の場合は７日目に
おいても糞尿が観察されず、忌避効果が存続している状
態であった。As is clear from Table 5, when water was not sprayed and a wind having a wind speed of 5 m / s was applied from one direction, all of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 show Experimental Example 1.
Although the duration of the repellent effect is longer than in the case of the above, excretion is observed after the fourth day in the case of Comparative Example 1, after the sixth day in the case of Comparative Example 2, and after the fourth day in the case of Comparative Example 3. Was done.
On the other hand, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, no excrement was observed even on the seventh day, and the repellent effect was still present.
【００３９】（実験６）次に、風速５ｍ／ｓの風を一方
方向から作用させた他は実験４の場合と同様にして上記
実施例１、２および比較例１〜３の場合についてその忌
避効果を調べた。実験結果を下記の表６に示す。(Experiment 6) Next, in the same manner as in Experiment 4, except that a wind having a wind speed of 5 m / s was applied from one direction, the cases of Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were avoided. The effect was investigated. The experimental results are shown in Table 6 below.
【００４０】[0040]
【表６】 [Table 6]
【００４１】上記表６から明らかなように、風速５ｍ／
ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた場合においては比較例
１〜３のいずれの場合も１日目から糞尿が観察され、忌
避効果が得られなかった。これに対し、実施例１、２に
係る容器の場合は７日目においても糞尿が観察されず、
忌避効果が存続している状態であった。As is clear from Table 6, the wind speed is 5 m /
In the case where the wind of s acted from one direction, excretion was observed from the first day in any of Comparative Examples 1 to 3, and no repellent effect was obtained. In contrast, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, no manure was observed even on the seventh day,
The repellent effect persisted.
【００４２】（実験７）実験７では忌避剤担持加工品
（商品名：ビスコパール、レンゴー製）を用い、これを
上記の実施例及び比較例に係る各種容器等にそれぞれ２
５ｇづつ入れ、上記砂場に設置して、この砂場に水を散
布した後の犬猫の忌避効果を調べた。前記水の散布は週
の始めに行い、前記忌避効果は、その後の犬猫の糞尿の
有無により判断した。実験結果を下記の表７に示す。(Experiment 7) In Experiment 7, a repellent-carrying processed product (trade name: Biscopearl, made by Rengo) was used and placed in various containers and the like according to the above-mentioned Examples and Comparative Examples.
5 g each was placed in the sandbox, and the repelling effect of dogs and cats after spraying water on the sandbox was examined. The water was sprayed at the beginning of the week, and the repellent effect was judged by the presence or absence of manure in dogs and cats thereafter. The experimental results are shown in Table 7 below.
【００４３】[0043]
【表７】 [Table 7]
【００４４】上記表７から明らかなように、その後糞尿
が観察されず忌避効果が存続したのは、比較例１に係る
容器の場合は３週目までであり、比較例２では４週目ま
でであり、比較例３では２週目までであって、その後は
糞尿が観察された。これに対し実施例１、２に係る容器
の場合は７週目においても糞尿が観察されず、忌避効果
が存続している状態であった。As is clear from Table 7 above, excretion was not observed after that, and the repellent effect persisted until the third week in the case of the container according to Comparative Example 1, and until the fourth week in Comparative Example 2. In Comparative Example 3, it was up to the second week, and thereafter, manure was observed. On the other hand, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, no excrement was observed even at the 7th week, and the repellent effect was maintained.
【００４５】（実験８）次に、水の散布を行わず、風速
５ｍ／ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた他は実験７の場
合と同様にして上記実施例１、２および比較例１〜３の
場合についてその忌避効果を調べた。実験結果を下記の
表８に示す。(Experiment 8) Next, Example 1 and 2 and Comparative Example 1 were carried out in the same manner as in Experiment 7 except that water was not sprayed and a wind of 5 m / s was applied from one direction. The repellent effect was examined for the cases of ~ 3. The experimental results are shown in Table 8 below.
【００４６】[0046]
【表８】 [Table 8]
【００４７】上記表８から明らかなように、水の散布を
行わず、風速５ｍ／ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた場
合においては比較例１〜３のいずれにおいても実験例１
の場合よりも忌避効果の存続期間が長くなるものの、比
較例１の場合は４週目以降、比較例２の場合は６週目以
降、比較例３の場合は７週目以降に糞尿が観察された。
これに対し、実施例１、２に係る容器の場合は７週目に
おいても糞尿が観察されず、忌避効果が存続している状
態であった。As is apparent from Table 8, when water was not sprayed and a wind having a wind speed of 5 m / s was applied from one direction, Experimental Examples 1 to 3 in any of Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were performed.
Although the duration of the repellent effect is longer than that in the case of, excretion is observed after 4 weeks in the case of Comparative Example 1, after the 6th week in the case of Comparative Example 2, and after the 7th week in the case of Comparative Example 3. Was done.
On the other hand, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, excrement was not observed even at the seventh week, and the repellent effect was still present.
【００４８】（実験９）次に、風速５ｍ／ｓの風を一方
方向から作用させた他は実験７の場合と同様にして上記
実施例１、２および比較例１〜３の場合についてその忌
避効果を調べた。実験結果を下記の表９に示す。(Experiment 9) Next, in the same manner as in Experiment 7, except that a wind having a wind speed of 5 m / s was applied from one direction, the cases of Examples 1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were avoided. The effect was investigated. The experimental results are shown in Table 9 below.
【００４９】[0049]
【表９】 [Table 9]
【００５０】上記表９から明らかなように、風速５ｍ／
ｓの風を一方方向から作用させた場合においては比較例
１、２のいずれの場合も１週目から糞尿が観察され、ま
た比較例３の場合は３週目から糞尿が観察されて忌避効
果が十分でなかった。これに対し、実施例１、２に係る
容器の場合は７週目においても糞尿が観察されず、忌避
効果が存続している状態であった。As apparent from Table 9 above, the wind speed was 5 m /
In the case where the wind of s was applied from one direction, manure was observed from the first week in both cases of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, and in the case of Comparative Example 3, the manure was observed from the third week. Was not enough. On the other hand, in the case of the containers according to Examples 1 and 2, excrement was not observed even at the seventh week, and the repellent effect was still present.
【００５１】以上説明したように、本発明に係る忌避製
品にあっては、種々のタイプの忌避剤を使用した場合も
その忌避効果をより長期間に渡って発揮させることがで
き、風雨等の影響を受けにくくすることができた。As described above, in the repellent product according to the present invention, even when various types of repellents are used, the repellent effect can be exhibited for a longer period of time, and We were able to be less affected.
【００５２】[0052]
【発明の効果】以上のように、本発明の請求項１に係る
忌避製品によれば、忌避剤を収容した容器の全体または
一部が透水可能となっているため、容器内にしみ込んだ
雨水等を排水することが可能であり、前記雨水等による
忌避剤の忌避成分過剰消費を防止することができる。ま
た、忌避剤が直接風雨に晒されることがないため、空気
中と土壌中の双方に揮発性物質を同時に長期間揮散する
ことができる、従来の忌避剤の使用効果と比較してより
長期間の忌避効果を維持することができる。また、コン
クリート等の上にも設置することができ、使用場所が限
定されることもない。As described above, according to the repellent product according to the first aspect of the present invention, since the whole or a part of the container containing the repellent is water permeable, the rainwater soaked in the container is provided. And the like can be drained, thereby preventing excessive consumption of the repellent component of the repellent by the rainwater or the like. In addition, since the repellent is not directly exposed to the weather, volatile substances can be volatilized simultaneously in the air and in the soil for a long period of time. The repellent effect can be maintained. In addition, it can be installed on concrete or the like, and the place of use is not limited.
【００５３】また、請求項２に係る忌避製品によれば、
容器内に収容される忌避剤が固体もしくは固形物質に担
持された液体あるいは膨潤固体であるため、単なる液体
の場合と違って徐放性のコントロールが可能となる。Further, according to the repellent product according to claim 2,
Since the repellent contained in the container is a solid or a liquid carried on a solid substance or a swollen solid, it is possible to control the sustained release unlike the case of a simple liquid.
【００５４】請求項３に係る忌避製品によれば、底部に
抜水孔が形成された容器内に忌避剤が収容されているた
め、前記容器がたとえプラスチック等の非透水性素材か
らなる場合であっても、前記抜水孔から雨水等を排水す
ることができるため、請求項１の場合と同様の効果を得
ることができる。According to the repellent product according to the third aspect, since the repellent is contained in a container having a drain hole formed at the bottom, the container is made of a non-permeable material such as plastic. Even so, rainwater or the like can be drained from the drain hole, so that the same effect as in claim 1 can be obtained.
【００５５】請求項４に係る忌避製品によれば、雨水の
侵入を防止する構造体を有しているため、雨水等による
忌避剤への影響をより低減することができる。According to the fourth aspect of the present invention, since the repellent product has a structure for preventing intrusion of rainwater, the influence of the rainwater on the repellent can be further reduced.
【００５６】請求項５に係る忌避製品によれば、容器が
多孔質構造を有していた場合の短孔径が１mm以下である
ため、孔内に土や砂等が入り込むのを防ぐことができ、
孔が詰まって揮発性物質の揮散が妨げられるといったこ
とを防止することができる。According to the repellent product according to claim 5, since the short hole diameter is 1 mm or less when the container has a porous structure, it is possible to prevent soil and sand from entering the hole. ,
It is possible to prevent the holes from being clogged and hindering the volatilization of the volatile substance.
【００５７】請求項６に係る忌避製品によれば、容器の
全体または一部が素焼きからなっているため、該素焼き
の部分を多孔質構造とすることができ、請求項１の場合
の効果を確実に得ることができる。According to the repellent product of claim 6, since the whole or a part of the container is made of unglazed, the unglazed part can have a porous structure. Can be obtained reliably.
【００５８】また、請求項７に係る忌避方法によれば、
上記したような忌避製品を地中等に半埋め状態または埋
没状態に設置するため、従来のように忌避剤を散在させ
る場合と比較して忌避剤をある程度一箇所にまとめて設
置することができ、忌避剤の有効な飛散を図ることがで
きる。Further, according to the repelling method according to claim 7,
In order to install the repellent product as described above in a semi-buried state or buried state in the ground, etc., it is possible to collectively install the repellent at some place compared to the case where the repellent is scattered as in the past, Effective scattering of the repellent can be achieved.
【図１】実施の形態に係る忌避製品を示した模式的部分
断面斜視図である。FIG. 1 is a schematic partial sectional perspective view showing a repellent product according to an embodiment.
【図２】別の実施の形態に係る忌避製品を示した模式的
部分断面分解斜視図である。FIG. 2 is a schematic partial cross-sectional exploded perspective view showing a repellent product according to another embodiment.
【符号の説明】 １０ 忌避製品 １１、２１ 容器 １２ 忌避剤 ２１ａ 開口部 ２２ 抜水孔 ２３ 網状物[Description of Signs] 10 Repellent products 11, 21 Container 12 Repellent 21a Opening 22 Drainage hole 23 Mesh
Claims (7)
って、前記容器の全体または一部が透水可能となってい
る忌避製品。1. A repellent product containing a repellent in a container, wherein the whole or a part of the container is permeable to water.
れた液体あるいは膨潤固体であることを特徴とする請求
項１記載の忌避製品。2. The repellent product according to claim 1, wherein the repellent is a solid, a liquid carried on a solid substance, or a swollen solid.
求項１記載の忌避製品。3. The repellent product according to claim 1, wherein a drain hole is formed in the bottom of the container.
していることを特徴とする請求項１記載の忌避製品。4. The repellent product according to claim 1, wherein the container has a structure for preventing rainwater from entering.
って透水可能となり、前記多孔質構造における孔の短孔
径が１mm以下であることを特徴とする請求項１記載の忌
避製品。5. The repellent product according to claim 1, wherein the whole or a part of the container is made permeable by the porous structure, and the short diameter of the hole in the porous structure is 1 mm or less.
ている請求項１記載の忌避製品。6. The repellent product according to claim 1, wherein the whole or a part of the container is made of unglazed.
って前記容器の全体または一部が透水可能となっている
忌避製品を対象場所の地中または砂近似粉粒体中に半埋
め状態または埋没状態に設置し、対象場所周辺空間に前
記忌避剤の忌避成分を飛散させて動物を忌避する忌避方
法。7. A repellent product containing a repellent in a container, wherein the repellent product in which the whole or a part of the container is permeable to water is half-buried in the ground of the target place or in the sand-like powder granules. A repelling method for repelling an animal by installing the repelling agent in a state of being buried or in a buried state, and scattering the repellent component of the repellent in the space around the target place.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9070090A JPH10265304A (en) | 1997-03-24 | 1997-03-24 | Repellent product and repellency using them same |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9070090A JPH10265304A (en) | 1997-03-24 | 1997-03-24 | Repellent product and repellency using them same |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH10265304A true JPH10265304A (en) | 1998-10-06 |
Family
ID=13421504
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP9070090A Withdrawn JPH10265304A (en) | 1997-03-24 | 1997-03-24 | Repellent product and repellency using them same |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH10265304A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7801236B2 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2010-09-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Adaptive modulation scheme and data rate control method |
-
1997
- 1997-03-24 JP JP9070090A patent/JPH10265304A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US7801236B2 (en) | 2004-03-05 | 2010-09-21 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Adaptive modulation scheme and data rate control method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| WO2005058016A1 (en) | Root and water management system for potted plants | |
| AU770241B2 (en) | Insect trap and fitting | |
| EP1508271B1 (en) | Lawn stake with canine scent attractant | |
| JPH10265304A (en) | Repellent product and repellency using them same | |
| KR200267161Y1 (en) | Double type pollen | |
| US20020026747A1 (en) | Substance dispensing conserver | |
| JP2004261029A (en) | Greening culture medium | |
| US20130200172A1 (en) | Pest deterrent device | |
| US5344649A (en) | Cat repellant and dispenser | |
| JPH08239305A (en) | Repelling tool for bird and animal | |
| JPH09322611A (en) | Suppression of seed germination | |
| JP2008283911A (en) | Tool for repelling vermins, fence for preventing infiltration of vermins and method of construction for repelling vermins | |
| WO2003079778A1 (en) | Deterrent | |
| JP3070658U (en) | Livestock excrement composting promotion sheet | |
| ES2715383T3 (en) | Sealing device for standing water tanks | |
| JPH07284364A (en) | Animal repelling method and animal repelling article | |
| JPH04106953U (en) | flower pot | |
| CN214784239U (en) | Basement roof waterproof structure | |
| JPH1060989A (en) | Introduction cylinder for soil underground infiltration of surface water | |
| CA2671608A1 (en) | System and method for potting plants | |
| JP3400841B2 (en) | Living floor | |
| JP3195972U (en) | flower pot | |
| KR960008826Y1 (en) | Wall paper | |
| JPH08109111A (en) | Repellent against small animal | |
| JP2021000038A (en) | Harmful animal evasion material |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| A300 | Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300 Effective date: 20040601 |