JPH10201409A - Animal intrusion preventing step tread - Google Patents
Animal intrusion preventing step treadInfo
- Publication number
- JPH10201409A JPH10201409A JP2426197A JP2426197A JPH10201409A JP H10201409 A JPH10201409 A JP H10201409A JP 2426197 A JP2426197 A JP 2426197A JP 2426197 A JP2426197 A JP 2426197A JP H10201409 A JPH10201409 A JP H10201409A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- animal
- tread
- animals
- step tread
- present
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Landscapes
- Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
Abstract
Description
【０００１】[0001]
【産業の属する技術分野】本発明は踏み板、特に動物侵
入防止の作用を有する踏み板に関する。本発明は人間の
通路として使用できる動物侵入防止踏み板に関する。BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a tread, and more particularly to a tread having an effect of preventing animal invasion. The present invention relates to an animal intrusion prevention tread plate that can be used as a human passage.
【０００２】[0002]
【従来の技術】猪や鹿などの野生動物の侵入を防ぐため
の設備として従来から柵や鉄条網を用いるのが一般的で
ある。柵や鉄条網でも動物の侵入を防ぐことは可能であ
る。従来から農地を囲うなどの方法としては簡単であり
また効果もある。しかしこれらの方法では対処できない
ケースがある。2. Description of the Related Art As equipment for preventing the invasion of wild animals such as wild boars and deer, it has been general to use a fence or a wire net. It is possible to prevent animals from invading with fences and wire fences. Conventionally, the method of surrounding farmland is simple and effective. However, there are cases where these methods cannot be used.
【０００３】たとえば列車に鹿などの動物が衝突して運
行に支障を与える事故がよく起きるが、これを防止する
ために鉄道の線路にこれらの器材を設置するのは難し
い。鉄条網は危険である。また柵によって害獣の侵入を
防止しようとすれば線路の沿線全体を柵で囲まなければ
ならない。これでは踏み切りを塞いでしまうし、また動
物たちの移動を妨げ、生態系に影響を及ぼしかねない。[0003] For example, an accident such as a deer or the like collides with a train and hinders the operation of the train often occurs. However, it is difficult to install such equipment on a railway line in order to prevent the accident. Barbed wire is dangerous. If fences are to be prevented by fences, fences must be enclosed along the entire track. This can block railroad crossings, hinder the movement of animals, and affect ecosystems.
【０００４】[0004]
【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は動物侵入防止
の作用を有する踏み板を提供することを目的としてい
る。すなわち、本発明の踏み板は動物の侵入を防止する
ことを目的とする。本発明の踏み板は特定の場所に動物
が立ち入ること、あるいは立ち止まることを防止するの
が目的である。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION An object of the present invention is to provide a tread having an action of preventing animal invasion. That is, the step board of the present invention aims to prevent invasion of animals. The purpose of the tread of the present invention is to prevent an animal from entering or stopping at a specific place.
【０００５】[0005]
【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は猪やカモシカな
どの動物の足の大きさに近い寸法の隙間を複数個開けて
なる踏み板を要旨とする。本発明の踏み板は猪やカモシ
カなどの動物の足の大きさに近い寸法の貫通孔を複数個
有することを特徴とする動物侵入防止作用を有するもの
である。本発明の動物侵入防止作用を有する踏み板は、
鹿や猪などの野生の動物に限らず、一般に動物は足元が
拘束されるのをいやがる習性を利用するものである。ま
た、本発明は猪やカモシカなどの動物の足の大きさに近
い寸法の貫通孔を複数個有することを特徴とする動物侵
入防止踏み板を鉄道線路に敷設したものであることを要
旨とする。SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The gist of the present invention is a tread plate having a plurality of gaps each having a size close to the size of a foot of an animal such as a boar or an antelope. The tread plate of the present invention has an animal invasion preventing action characterized by having a plurality of through holes having dimensions close to the size of the feet of animals such as boars and antelopes. The tread having the action of preventing animal invasion of the present invention,
In general, not only wild animals such as deer and wild boars, but also animals use a habit of reluctant to restrain their feet. Further, the gist of the present invention is that an animal intrusion prevention tread plate having a plurality of through-holes having dimensions close to the size of an animal such as a wild boar or an antelope is laid on a railway line.
【０００６】[0006]
【発明の実施の形態】図１は本発明の一例であるが、動
物はこの様に足がすっぽりと入るような穴に足を入れる
ことを嫌う。従って、このような板を敷設すれば動物は
この板の上を避ける。またこの穴よりも動物の足の方が
大きい場合でも、これらの動物はただでさえ狭い足の裏
の面積に大きな体重を懸けているのに、踏み板の格子の
点や線のような極端に狭い面積の上に立つと足の裏の一
カ所に体重が懸かりすぎて苦痛になる。DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Although FIG. 1 shows an example of the present invention, animals do not like to put their feet in holes where their feet can fit perfectly. Therefore, if such a board is laid, the animal will avoid it. Also, even if the animal's feet are larger than this hole, these animals still carry a large amount of weight in the area of the soles of the feet, but they have extreme If you stand on a small area, your weight will be too high on one area of the sole and you will be in pain.
【０００７】この様に動物の足の大きさに近い寸法の
穴、貫通孔であれば、若干足より大きくても、また、小
さくても、動物の侵入を防ぐことができるのである。こ
の穴の大きさというのはおよそ７センチ乃至１０センチ
もあれば十分であるが、この程度の穴であれば靴を履い
た人間の足にとっては歩行に差し支えないし、自動車や
自転車、耕運機などの通行にも支障を与えることはな
い。[0007] In the case of a hole or through hole having a size close to the size of the animal's feet, entry of the animal can be prevented even if it is slightly larger or smaller than the feet. The size of this hole is sufficient if it is about 7 cm to 10 cm, but such a hole does not interfere with walking for human feet wearing shoes, and it is difficult to use such a car, bicycle, cultivator, etc. There is no hindrance to traffic.
【０００８】この様に本発明では敷設した場所が害獣の
侵入を防ぐので全体を囲む必要はなく、敷設した場所は
人間にとっては良好な通路になるという利便性を備えて
いる。万一子供の足が入っても、体重が軽いので深くめ
り込むことはなく、子供の力でその足を簡単に取り出す
ことができる。As described above, according to the present invention, the laid place prevents the invasion of pests, so that it is not necessary to surround the whole place, and the laid place has the convenience of being a good passage for humans. Even if a child's foot gets in, the weight is light, so they do not dig deep, and the child's power makes it easy to remove the foot.
【０００９】踏み板の材質はプラスチック、金属、木な
ど、なんでもよい。線路の動物侵入防止のように長期間
機能を保つためには金属、プラスチックなどが適してい
る。植林の苗木を短期間保護するのが目的であれば木の
踏み板を用い、十分に木が成長するころには朽ちて土に
帰るようにすれば回収の手間が不要である。The material of the tread may be any material such as plastic, metal, wood, and the like. Metals, plastics, etc. are suitable for keeping the function for a long period of time, such as preventing animal invasion on the track. If the purpose is to protect planted seedlings for a short period of time, use wooden treads, and when the trees grow sufficiently, they will decay and return to the soil, eliminating the need for recovery.
【００１０】[0010]
【実施例】本願発明の詳細を実施例で説明する。本願発
明はこれら実施例によって何ら限定されるものではな
い。DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS The present invention will be described in detail with reference to embodiments. The present invention is not limited by these examples.
【００１１】実施例１ 本発明は害獣防止の目的によって様々な実施方法があ
る。図２は鉄道線路への動物の侵入を防ぐための例であ
る。鉄道線路への動物の侵入を防ぐのは、列車が動物を
はねる事故が多いからである。事故によって列車のダイ
ヤが遅れるという問題だけではなく、野生動物の犠牲も
また問題である。図２のように線路の内側と外側に穴開
きの踏み板を敷設すれば、動物は線路内に侵入すること
を嫌がる。また線路の内側にだけ敷設しても動物の事故
を防ぐには有効である。またこの場合は動物の足を踏み
入れない場所が線路内だけであるから、幅が狭く、動物
は飛び越えることができる。また踏み板の上は人間にと
っては平板な歩きやすい場所になるので、保線の見回り
作業を行う人には快適な環境になる。Embodiment 1 The present invention has various implementation methods depending on the purpose of preventing pests. FIG. 2 is an example for preventing an animal from entering a railway track. The reason why animals are prevented from entering railway tracks is that trains often hit animals. Not only is the accident delaying train schedules, but also the loss of wildlife. If perforated treads are laid on the inside and outside of the track as shown in FIG. 2, animals do not want to enter the track. Also, laying only inside the track is effective to prevent animal accidents. Also, in this case, since the place where the animal can not step on is only inside the track, the width is narrow and the animal can jump. In addition, since the top of the tread is a flat place that is easy for humans to walk, a comfortable environment is provided for those who perform track maintenance work.
【００１２】図３は踏み板の穴の形状の異なる例であ
る。この様にスリットの形状であっても、動物は足が捉
えられることを嫌って踏み板の上には入ってこない。踏
み板の穴の形状と大きさについては目的とする使用方
法、および場所によって使い分けることが可能である。
なお、誤って侵入した動物の足が抜けなくなっては動物
にとって危険である。穴の大きさは足がすっぽり入るよ
う、大きめの方がよい。FIG. 3 shows an example in which the shape of the hole of the tread is different. Even with such a slit shape, the animal does not enter the tread, disliked to catch the foot. The shape and size of the hole in the tread plate can be properly used depending on the intended use method and location.
In addition, it is dangerous for the animal if the foot of the animal that has accidentally entered cannot be removed. The size of the hole should be larger so that the foot can fit easily.
【００１３】[0013]
【発明の効果】本発明は特定の場所に動物が立ち入るこ
と、あるいは立ち止まることを防止するのができる。本
発明の動物侵入防止踏み板はそのまま人間の通路として
使用できるのでスペースが無駄にならない。According to the present invention, it is possible to prevent an animal from entering or stopping at a specific place. Since the animal invasion prevention tread of the present invention can be used as a human passage as it is, no space is wasted.
【図１】踏み板の一実施例である。FIG. 1 is an embodiment of a step board.
【図２】線路に敷設した例である。FIG. 2 is an example of laying on a track.
【図３】踏み板の穴の形状の異なる例である。FIG. 3 is an example in which the shape of the hole of the tread is different.
１ 踏み板 ２ レール ３ 枕木 1 step board 2 rail 3 sleeper
Claims (2)
近い寸法の隙間を複数個開けてなる踏み板。1. A tread plate having a plurality of gaps each having a size close to the size of a foot of an animal such as a wild boar or an antelope.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2426197A JPH10201409A (en) | 1997-01-23 | 1997-01-23 | Animal intrusion preventing step tread |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2426197A JPH10201409A (en) | 1997-01-23 | 1997-01-23 | Animal intrusion preventing step tread |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JPH10201409A true JPH10201409A (en) | 1998-08-04 |
Family
ID=12133301
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2426197A Pending JPH10201409A (en) | 1997-01-23 | 1997-01-23 | Animal intrusion preventing step tread |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JPH10201409A (en) |
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011160732A (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-25 | Daikure Co Ltd | Animal invasion-preventing device |
| JP2011160731A (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-25 | Daikure Co Ltd | Animal invasion-preventing device |
| JP2011160733A (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-25 | Daikure Co Ltd | Animal invasion-preventing device |
| KR101067734B1 (en) | 2011-04-20 | 2011-09-28 | 주식회사 진화기술공사 | Environment-friendly road structure for animal cut off |
| JP2016061022A (en) * | 2014-09-16 | 2016-04-25 | 株式会社ダイクレ | Structure for preventing urination by animals at root of column |
| KR20180116488A (en) * | 2017-04-14 | 2018-10-25 | 나대석 | A Scaffold for blocking wild animals from entering |
-
1997
- 1997-01-23 JP JP2426197A patent/JPH10201409A/en active Pending
Cited By (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2011160732A (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-25 | Daikure Co Ltd | Animal invasion-preventing device |
| JP2011160731A (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-25 | Daikure Co Ltd | Animal invasion-preventing device |
| JP2011160733A (en) * | 2010-02-10 | 2011-08-25 | Daikure Co Ltd | Animal invasion-preventing device |
| KR101067734B1 (en) | 2011-04-20 | 2011-09-28 | 주식회사 진화기술공사 | Environment-friendly road structure for animal cut off |
| JP2016061022A (en) * | 2014-09-16 | 2016-04-25 | 株式会社ダイクレ | Structure for preventing urination by animals at root of column |
| KR20180116488A (en) * | 2017-04-14 | 2018-10-25 | 나대석 | A Scaffold for blocking wild animals from entering |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Andreassen et al. | The effect of scent‐marking, forest clearing, and supplemental feeding on moose‐train collisions | |
| Wright et al. | Fauna of the National Parks of the United States: a preliminary survey of faunal relations in National Parks | |
| Davidson-Nelson et al. | Testing fladry as a nonlethal management tool for wolves and coyotes in Michigan | |
| KR101569720B1 (en) | the guard fence to prevent wild animals roadkill | |
| Carvalho et al. | Methods to monitor and mitigate wildlife mortality in railways | |
| JPH10201409A (en) | Animal intrusion preventing step tread | |
| JP5291019B2 (en) | Animal intrusion prevention device | |
| Honda et al. | Ungulates-exclusion grates as an adjoining facility to crop damage prevention fences | |
| JP2011160731A (en) | Animal invasion-preventing device | |
| KR20120096623A (en) | Fence for animal protection | |
| Hanophy | Fencing with wildlife in mind | |
| JP6078758B1 (en) | Wild animal intrusion prevention device | |
| JP3626231B2 (en) | Structure to prevent animals from entering the motorway | |
| US6827042B1 (en) | Elephant incursion prevention apparatus | |
| JP3179148U (en) | Animal escape facility | |
| Day et al. | Unintentional farm injury | |
| Huijser et al. | Best Practices Manual to Reduce Animal-Vehicle Collisions and Provide Habitat Connectivity for Wildlife | |
| JP6132524B2 (en) | Greening protection device and slope with greening protection device | |
| Wyckoff et al. | Protecting small livestock and predators alike: Early successes | |
| JP6054155B2 (en) | Herbivore intrusion prevention fence | |
| US20080308046A1 (en) | Deer deterring apparatus | |
| Huijser et al. | Modified jump-outs for white-tailed deer and mule deer | |
| Kockelman | Management concepts | |
| Olexa et al. | Handbook of Florida Fence and Property Law: Duty to Fence | |
| Seamans | A review of deer control devices intended for use on airports |