JP4328687B2 - Sorting of taro - Google Patents

Sorting of taro Download PDF

Info

Publication number
JP4328687B2
JP4328687B2 JP2004214314A JP2004214314A JP4328687B2 JP 4328687 B2 JP4328687 B2 JP 4328687B2 JP 2004214314 A JP2004214314 A JP 2004214314A JP 2004214314 A JP2004214314 A JP 2004214314A JP 4328687 B2 JP4328687 B2 JP 4328687B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
taro
sorting
specific gravity
taros
liquid
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2004214314A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JP2006034107A (en
Inventor
竜郎 前田
一貴 抜井
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nisshin Seifun Group Inc
Original Assignee
Nisshin Seifun Group Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nisshin Seifun Group Inc filed Critical Nisshin Seifun Group Inc
Priority to JP2004214314A priority Critical patent/JP4328687B2/en
Publication of JP2006034107A publication Critical patent/JP2006034107A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP4328687B2 publication Critical patent/JP4328687B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Preparation Of Fruits And Vegetables (AREA)
  • Apparatuses For Bulk Treatment Of Fruits And Vegetables And Apparatuses For Preparing Feeds (AREA)

Description

本発明は、食感が硬く、喫食に適さないサトイモ(以下、がりと称する)を選別、除去する、サトイモの選別方法に関する。   The present invention relates to a method for sorting taro, which sorts and removes taro (hereinafter referred to as “gari”) that has a hard texture and is not suitable for eating.

サトイモは、塊茎を食用とするサトイモ科の根菜であり、土垂、石川早生、豊後などの品種が知られている。サトイモをだしや調味液などとともに煮た総菜を小芋煮といい、総菜市場における主要なアイテムとなっている。本来、小芋煮はだしと調味液がサトイモに程よく煮含まれており、噛んだ時にほくほくと軟らかく、粘りもあり、とろけるような食感を持っているものである。しかし、形状、色調はまったく同じながら、食感が硬く、喫食に適さず、小芋煮に混入すると極端な場合「石」のように硬い食感となるがりが、数百個から数千個に数個の割合で存在している。   The taro is a root vegetable of the taro family that uses the tuber as an edible, and varieties such as Sado, Hayashi Ishikawa and Bungo are known. A side dish prepared with taro and soy sauce and seasoning is called Kobuchi-ni. It is a major item in the side dish market. Originally, Kobuchi-ni is stocked in taro with moderately simmered dashi and seasoning liquid, and when chewed it is soft and sticky and has a melting texture. However, although the shape and color are exactly the same, the texture is hard, not suitable for eating, and when mixed in Kobuchi-ni, it becomes a hard texture like `` stone '' in extreme cases, from hundreds to thousands It exists at a rate of several.

がりは、外観では良品質のサトイモと区別がつかないため、良品質のサトイモとともに調理されて小芋煮として市場に出回り、クレームの原因となることが避けられなかった。したがって、小芋煮に調理する前のサトイモからがりのみを選別、除去することが強く望まれているが、有効な方法はいまだ存在しないのが現状である。   Since gari is indistinguishable from high-quality taro, it is unavoidable that it is cooked with good-quality taro and goes on the market as a small-boiled potato, causing complaints. Therefore, it is strongly desired to select and remove only taro from the taro before cooking in small-boiled but there is no effective method yet.

本発明の目的は、簡単かつ迅速に、調理前のサトイモの品質に影響を与えず、がりを選別、除去することができるサトイモの選別方法を提供することにある。
本発明者らは、調理前のサトイモからがりを選別、除去する方法について検討を重ねた結果、サトイモを比重差によって選別することによって、本発明の目的が達成されることを見出し、本発明を完成するに至った。
An object of the present invention is to provide a taro selection method that can easily and quickly select and remove a bite without affecting the quality of taro before cooking.
As a result of repeated studies on a method for selecting and removing taro from the taro before cooking, the present inventors have found that the object of the present invention can be achieved by selecting taro according to the specific gravity difference. It came to be completed.

すなわち、本発明は、サトイモの比重を選別基準として、がりと呼ばれる喫食に適さないサトイモを選別し、除去するサトイモの選別方法であって、サトイモの選別基準とする比重値を1.055〜1.075の範囲内に設定することを特徴とする、サトイモの選別方法を提供するものである。
また本発明は、サトイモの比重を選別基準として、がりと呼ばれる喫食に適さないサトイモを選別し、除去するサトイモの選別方法であって、サトイモを比重1.055〜1.075の選別用液に投入し、浮上したサトイモを除去することを特徴とする、サトイモの選別方法を提供するものである。
That is, the present invention is a method for sorting taros that are not suitable for eating, which is called “ gari”, with the specific gravity of taro as a selection standard, and a taro selection method for selecting a taro, which has a specific gravity value of 1.055 to 1. The present invention provides a method for selecting taro, which is characterized by being set within a range of 0.075 .
The present invention also relates to a taro selection method for selecting and removing taros that are not suitable for eating, using the specific gravity of taro as a selection criterion. The taro is selected as a liquid for selection having a specific gravity of 1.055 to 1.075. The present invention provides a method for sorting taro, which is characterized by removing the taro that has been introduced and floated.

本発明のサトイモの選別方法によれば、サトイモを比重によって選別するため、簡単かつ迅速に、調理前のサトイモの品質に影響を与えず、がりを選別、除去することができる。   According to the method for sorting taros of the present invention, taros are sorted by specific gravity, so that it is possible to sort and remove potatoes easily and quickly without affecting the quality of taro before cooking.

以下、本発明のサトイモの選別方法について詳述する。
本発明はサトイモを比重によって選別するが、がりを有効に選別するためには、選別基準とする比重値を、1.055〜1.075の範囲内に設定することが好ましい。
選別する方法としては、特に限定されず、例えば、比重選別機(グラビティセパレータ)を用いる方法、近赤外線を用いる方法、比重選別用液を用いる方法を挙げることができる。その中でも、比重を1.055〜1.075の範囲に調整した選別用液を用いる方法が、選別基準とする比重値を正確かつ容易に設定できる点で好ましい。以下、選別用液を用いる方法について詳述する。
Hereinafter, the selection method of the taro of this invention is explained in full detail.
In the present invention, taros are sorted by specific gravity. However, in order to effectively sort garlic, it is preferable to set a specific gravity value as a sorting standard within a range of 1.055 to 1.075.
The method for sorting is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include a method using a specific gravity sorter (gravity separator), a method using near infrared rays, and a method using a specific gravity sorting liquid. Among these, a method using a sorting liquid whose specific gravity is adjusted to a range of 1.055 to 1.075 is preferable in that a specific gravity value as a sorting standard can be set accurately and easily. Hereinafter, the method using the sorting liquid will be described in detail.

選別用液は特に限定されないが、食塩水が、コスト、比重調整の容易さ、安全性、サトイモの品質への影響のなさ等の点から好ましく用いられる。
選別用液としての食塩水を作る場合には、水100質量部に対して8.5〜11.8質量部の食塩を溶解することによって、前記比重の範囲(1.055〜1.075)に調整することができる。
The sorting solution is not particularly limited, but saline is preferably used from the viewpoints of cost, ease of specific gravity adjustment, safety, and no influence on taro quality.
In the case of preparing a saline solution as a sorting solution, the specific gravity range (1.055 to 1.075) is obtained by dissolving 8.5 to 11.8 parts by mass of salt with respect to 100 parts by mass of water. Can be adjusted.

サトイモの比重は、食感がより硬い、重度のがりであるほど小さくなる。したがって、選別用液の比重を小さくすると、重度のがりだけが浮上する。一方、選別用液の比重を大きくすると、軽度のがりまでも浮上し、非常に優れた食感のサトイモのみが沈降する。
また、2種類以上の比重の異なる選別用液を用意すれば、多段階の選別をし、それぞれの選別に応じた用途で用いることも可能である。例えば、比重1.06の選別用液でまず重度のがりを選別した後、比重1.07の選別用液で軽度のがりを選別した場合、選別された重度のがりは飼料などに、軽度のがりはマッシュしてポテトサラダの混合用などに転用される。一方、沈降したサトイモは非常に良品質であり、小芋煮などの食感は、非常に優れたものとなる。
The specific gravity of taro becomes smaller as the texture becomes harder and more severe. Therefore, when the specific gravity of the sorting liquid is reduced, only severe burrs emerge. On the other hand, when the specific gravity of the sorting liquid is increased, even a slight bite emerges and only taro with a very excellent texture is settled.
Further, if two or more kinds of sorting liquids having different specific gravities are prepared, it is possible to carry out multi-stage sorting and use it for applications according to each sorting. For example, after first sorting heavy agar with a sorting liquid with a specific gravity of 1.06 and then sorting out a mild gab with a sorting liquid with a specific gravity of 1.07, Garlic is mashed and used for mixing potato salad. On the other hand, the settled taro has a very good quality, and the texture of the small-boiled potato is very excellent.

選別対象のサトイモは、調理前のどの段階のものでも良く、例えば収穫して水洗いした皮付きのものでも、皮をむいたものでも良い。なお、皮をむいたものに、成形・型抜き処理、チルド・冷凍処理、成形後あるいは冷凍後沸騰水中で短時間煮る処理(以下,プレボイル処理という)を施したものでもよいが、何れの場合も、これらの処理によってサトイモの比重が変化しないように注意する必要がある。   The taro to be selected may be at any stage before cooking. For example, it may be peeled and washed with water, or peeled. In addition, the peeled product may be subjected to a molding / die cutting process, a chilled / freezing process, or a process of boiling in boiling water after molding or after freezing (hereinafter referred to as a preboil process). However, care must be taken not to change the specific gravity of taro by these treatments.

本発明の選別方法を実施するための選別装置としては、選別用液とサトイモの投入手段が設けられ、浮上したがりと沈降した良品質のサトイモが選別できるものであれば特に限定はなく、選別用液が入れられた容器と一定量のサトイモを供給する装置(例えばホッパー)からなり、サトイモを投入して一定時間放置した後、浮上したがりを人手あるいはその他の装置を用いて除去するバッチ式装置でも、選別用液の水流があるところにベルトコンベアなどから連続してサトイモを投入し、浮上したがりが水流とともに排出される連続式装置でもよい。   The sorting apparatus for carrying out the sorting method of the present invention is not particularly limited as long as it is equipped with a sorting liquid and taro feeding means, and can sort out high quality taros that want to float and sink. A batch system that consists of a container containing a working solution and a device that supplies a certain amount of taro (for example, a hopper). After the taro has been introduced and left for a certain period of time, it will be removed manually or by other devices. The apparatus may also be a continuous apparatus in which taro is continuously introduced from a belt conveyor or the like in a place where there is a water flow of the sorting liquid, and the floating surface is discharged together with the water flow.

次に本発明を具体的に説明するために実施例を挙げるが、本発明は、以下の実施例に限定されるものではない。   EXAMPLES Next, examples are given to specifically describe the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the following examples.

〔実施例1〕
水道水100質量部に9.4質量部の食塩を溶解し、比重1.06の選別用液を調製した。
サトイモ(土垂)を水洗いし、皮をむき、円柱状にくりぬいて1個の質量が13gから18gになるように成形したものを1000個用意した。成形した1000個のサトイモを、前記選別用液を満たした80リットルの水槽に投入して軽く攪拌した後、5分間放置した。浮上しているサトイモと沈降したサトイモを両方採取し、それぞれの個数を測定した。
浮上したサトイモおよび沈降したサトイモをそれぞれ真水で洗浄し、下記の製造工程に従い小芋煮を調理した。得られた小芋煮を6名のパネラーによって表1に示す評価基準によって評価した。その結果は表2に示すとおりである。
[Example 1]
9.4 parts by mass of sodium chloride was dissolved in 100 parts by mass of tap water to prepare a sorting liquid having a specific gravity of 1.06.
Thousands of taro (soil) were washed with water, peeled and hollowed into a cylindrical shape so that the mass of one piece was 13 to 18 g. 1000 shaped taros were put into an 80 liter water tank filled with the sorting solution, stirred gently, and allowed to stand for 5 minutes. Both floating and falling taros were collected and the number of each was measured.
The surfaced taro and the settled taro were each washed with fresh water and cooked in small bowl according to the following manufacturing process. The obtained small-boiled stew was evaluated according to the evaluation criteria shown in Table 1 by six panelists. The results are shown in Table 2.

(小芋煮の製造工程)
(1) 60リットル用二重釜に、調味液(砂糖6質量部、味醂3質量部、醤油5質量部を混合した液)を30リットル入れて煮立たせる。
(2) 調味液が煮立ったら、サトイモを12kg投入する。
(3) サトイモ投入後、二重釜中で20分煮る。
(4) 片栗粉懸濁液(片栗粉1質量部を水10質量部に懸濁した液)を10リットル投入して攪拌し、とろみをつける。
(Manufacturing process of Kobuchi-ni)
(1) Add 30 liters of seasoning liquid (liquid mixed with 6 parts by weight of sugar, 3 parts by weight of miso and 5 parts by weight of soy sauce) to a 60 liter double pot and boil.
(2) When the seasoning liquid is boiled, add 12 kg of taro.
(3) After adding taro, boil for 20 minutes in a double pot.
(4) Add 10 liters of potato starch suspension (a solution obtained by suspending 1 part by weight of potato starch in 10 parts by weight of water), stir and thicken.

Figure 0004328687
Figure 0004328687

Figure 0004328687
Figure 0004328687

以上の結果より、成形したサトイモを比重1.06の選別用液で選別すると、浮上したサトイモと沈降したサトイモとで小芋煮の食感に明確な差が生じ、浮上したサトイモが「がり」としてほぼ完全に除去されていることがわかった。   From the above results, when the molded taro was sorted with a sorting liquid with a specific gravity of 1.06, there was a clear difference in the texture of the dried taro and the settled taro. It was found that it was almost completely removed.

〔実施例2〜4〕
水道水100質量部に8.5質量部の食塩を溶解し、比重1.055の選別用液を調製した。
サトイモ(石川早生)を水洗いし、皮をむき、円柱状にくりぬいて1個の質量が13gから18gになるように成形したものを1000個用意し、沸騰水中で5分間プレボイルした後、−50℃のショックフリーザ内で1時間急速凍結させ、−20℃の冷凍庫内にて表3に示した期間それぞれ保存を行った。
それぞれのサトイモを、沸騰水中に投入し、8分間プレボイルした。プレボイル後のサトイモを、前記選別用液を満たした80リットルの水槽に投入して軽く攪拌した後、5分間放置した。浮上しているサトイモと沈降したサトイモを両方採取し、それぞれの個数を測定した。
浮上したサトイモおよび沈降したサトイモをそれぞれ真水で洗浄し、実施例1と同様の製造工程に従い小芋煮を調理した。得られた小芋煮を6名のパネラーによって表1に示す評価基準によって評価した。その結果は表4に示すとおりである。
[Examples 2 to 4]
In 100 parts by mass of tap water, 8.5 parts by mass of sodium chloride was dissolved to prepare a sorting liquid having a specific gravity of 1.055.
Thousands of taros (Ishikawa Hayao) were washed with water, peeled, hollowed out into a cylindrical shape, and 1000 pieces were prepared so that the mass of each piece was 13g to 18g. After preboiling in boiling water for 5 minutes, -50 The sample was rapidly frozen in a shock freezer at 0 ° C. for 1 hour and stored in a freezer at −20 ° C. for the periods shown in Table 3.
Each taro was put into boiling water and preboiled for 8 minutes. The pre-boiled taro was put into an 80 liter water tank filled with the above-mentioned sorting solution, stirred gently, and allowed to stand for 5 minutes. Both floating and falling taros were collected and the number of each was measured.
The surfaced taro and the settled taro were each washed with fresh water and cooked in small bowl according to the same production process as in Example 1. The obtained small-boiled stew was evaluated according to the evaluation criteria shown in Table 1 by six panelists. The results are shown in Table 4.

Figure 0004328687
Figure 0004328687

Figure 0004328687
Figure 0004328687

以上の結果より、成形・冷凍後、プレボイルしたサトイモを比重1.055の選別用液で選別すると、浮上したサトイモと沈降したサトイモとで小芋煮の食感に明確な差が生じ、浮上したサトイモが「がり」としてほぼ完全に除去されていることがわかった。
Based on the above results, after molding and freezing, when pre-boiled taros were selected with a sorting liquid with a specific gravity of 1.055, a clear difference in the texture of the small potato boiled between the taros that floated and the taros that settled, Was found to be almost completely removed as “burr”.

Claims (2)

サトイモの比重を選別基準として、がりと呼ばれる喫食に適さないサトイモを選別し、除去するサトイモの選別方法であって、サトイモの選別基準とする比重値を1.055〜1.075の範囲内に設定することを特徴とする、サトイモの選別方法。 The specific gravity of taro as screening criteria, were selected taro unsuitable for eating called rising, a selection method of taro of removing, the specific gravity value of the selection criteria of taro in the range of 1.055 to 1.075 A method for sorting taros, characterized by setting . サトイモの比重を選別基準として、がりと呼ばれる喫食に適さないサトイモを選別し、除去するサトイモの選別方法であって、サトイモを比重1.055〜1.075の選別用液に投入し、浮上したサトイモを除去することを特徴とする、サトイモの選別方法。 A selection method of taro, which selects and removes taros that are not suitable for eating, using the specific gravity of taro as a selection standard. The taro is introduced into a sorting liquid having a specific gravity of 1.055 to 1.075 and surfaced. A method for sorting taro, which comprises removing taro.
JP2004214314A 2004-07-22 2004-07-22 Sorting of taro Expired - Fee Related JP4328687B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004214314A JP4328687B2 (en) 2004-07-22 2004-07-22 Sorting of taro

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004214314A JP4328687B2 (en) 2004-07-22 2004-07-22 Sorting of taro

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JP2006034107A JP2006034107A (en) 2006-02-09
JP4328687B2 true JP4328687B2 (en) 2009-09-09

Family

ID=35899761

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2004214314A Expired - Fee Related JP4328687B2 (en) 2004-07-22 2004-07-22 Sorting of taro

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4328687B2 (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8643679B2 (en) 2008-04-04 2014-02-04 Nintendo Co., Ltd. Storage medium storing image conversion program and image conversion apparatus

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5019559B2 (en) * 2006-03-29 2012-09-05 カゴメ株式会社 Tomato sorting equipment
JP5224018B2 (en) * 2006-05-29 2013-07-03 志戸本 宗徳 Silage and preparation method thereof

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8643679B2 (en) 2008-04-04 2014-02-04 Nintendo Co., Ltd. Storage medium storing image conversion program and image conversion apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006034107A (en) 2006-02-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090068332A1 (en) Appliance for shucking seed coverings from their kernals
KR100810911B1 (en) The sea cabbage salted dry fish which and is manufactured with a method with manufacturing method
JP4328687B2 (en) Sorting of taro
CN107232563A (en) Multi-flavor boils big certain herbaceous plants with big flowers melon seeds and preparation method thereof
US20090291191A1 (en) Processed Potato Product
CN1105531A (en) Millet flour for making instant porridge and preparation method thereof
CN106579490B (en) A kind of opening salt stir-fries the processing method of Chinese torreya
Nathan et al. Comparative analysis of type 3 and type 4 cassava peeling machines
CN109225939B (en) Color sorting process for shelled melon seeds for preventing pumpkin seeds from being mixed with peels
CN108740708A (en) A kind of preparation method of sweet potato flour
KR100785712B1 (en) Method of manufacturing ketchup in red, green or yellow color using liquid Kimchi
WO2020067314A1 (en) Batter liquid, batter mix, method for manufacturing food for deep frying, and deep-fried food manufacturing method
CN112189794A (en) Fruity red bean stuffing and preparation method thereof
Ayodeji et al. Development and performance evaluation of a sieving machine for poundo yam process plant
JPH05227917A (en) Pasty curry roux
JP3105726B2 (en) Tomato ketchup and method for producing the same
Akosua et al. Loss assessment in the production of gari from cassava (Manihot esculenta)
Ortega-Rivas et al. Common preliminary operations: cleaning, sorting, grading
CN109730298A (en) A kind of production method of thick chilli sauce
Bolaji et al. Optimization of some processing conditions of fortified maize snack (Kokoro) using response surface modeling
ATE466489T1 (en) BAKED POTATO CHIPS AND METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF
SU1333288A1 (en) Method of producing press-like potato mass
Choudhary et al. Importance of Potato Processing & Products
SU995727A1 (en) Method of preparing quick-frozen potato balls
JP2021154058A (en) Additional batter pouring tool and production method of fried food using additional batter pouring tool

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A621 Written request for application examination

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A621

Effective date: 20061212

A977 Report on retrieval

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A971007

Effective date: 20080811

A131 Notification of reasons for refusal

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A131

Effective date: 20080909

A521 Written amendment

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A523

Effective date: 20081104

TRDD Decision of grant or rejection written
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 20090602

A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

A61 First payment of annual fees (during grant procedure)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A61

Effective date: 20090615

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120619

Year of fee payment: 3

R150 Certificate of patent or registration of utility model

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R150

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120619

Year of fee payment: 3

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130619

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130619

Year of fee payment: 4

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140619

Year of fee payment: 5

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

R250 Receipt of annual fees

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: R250

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees