JP2981290B2 - Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet - Google Patents

Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet

Info

Publication number
JP2981290B2
JP2981290B2 JP2403803A JP40380390A JP2981290B2 JP 2981290 B2 JP2981290 B2 JP 2981290B2 JP 2403803 A JP2403803 A JP 2403803A JP 40380390 A JP40380390 A JP 40380390A JP 2981290 B2 JP2981290 B2 JP 2981290B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
sheet
alloying
thermometer
furnace
average
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
JP2403803A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH04218654A (en
Inventor
信 新井
振一郎 武藤
邦昭 佐藤
寧男 戸村
勝則 秋吉
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
JFE Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kawasaki Steel Corp filed Critical Kawasaki Steel Corp
Priority to JP2403803A priority Critical patent/JP2981290B2/en
Publication of JPH04218654A publication Critical patent/JPH04218654A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2981290B2 publication Critical patent/JP2981290B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Coating With Molten Metal (AREA)
  • Vertical, Hearth, Or Arc Furnaces (AREA)

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき
鋼板の製造方法に関する。
The present invention relates to a method for producing a galvannealed steel sheet.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】従来、溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板としては、そ
のめっき層の一部あるいは全体をFe−Zn合金層とす
るように合金化処理を施した溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板が知ら
れている。このような合金化処理は、図2に示すように
溶融亜鉛めっき槽4の真上に合金化炉2を配置し、めっ
き槽4より引き上げた鋼板1の表面の亜鉛を絞り装置3
により絞って亜鉛付着量の調整を行い、その後直ちに合
金化炉2において鋼板を加熱して亜鉛層へ鉄を拡散させ
ることによりなされ、ここで行われる合金化処理が適正
でない場合、つまり過合金や合金化不足となるとその品
質特性が損なわれるため、合金化処理条件を高精度で制
御する必要がある。
2. Description of the Related Art Heretofore, as a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, there has been known a hot-dip galvanized steel sheet which has been subjected to an alloying treatment so that a part or the whole of a coating layer is formed of an Fe—Zn alloy layer. As shown in FIG. 2, the alloying treatment is performed by arranging the alloying furnace 2 right above the hot-dip galvanizing tank 4 and drawing zinc from the surface of the steel sheet 1 pulled up from the galvanizing tank 4 into a drawing device 3.
The amount of zinc is adjusted by squeezing, and immediately thereafter, the steel sheet is heated in the alloying furnace 2 to diffuse iron into the zinc layer. If the alloying treatment performed here is not appropriate, that is, If the alloying is insufficient, the quality characteristics are impaired. Therefore, it is necessary to control the alloying conditions with high precision.

【0003】従来、このような合金化処理には次のよう
な困難性があった。 (1) 合金化処理に影響を及ぼす因子としては板温、
亜鉛付着量、めっき槽内アルミ濃度等多くのものがあ
り、合金化炉内での適正熱処理条件を予め明らかにする
のが困難である。 (2) 図3に示すように亜鉛めっき鋼板表面の放射率
は板温により変化し合金化が進行する過程で急変する。
したがって通常、使用されている放射率設定タイプの板
温計(放射温度計)で真の板温を測定することは困難で
ある。 (3) 合金化炉においては鋼板は火炎からの輻射の影
響を強く受けるために炉温制御により熱処理条件を一定
に保つことが困難であった。
Conventionally, such an alloying treatment has the following difficulties. (1) Factors affecting the alloying process include sheet temperature and
There are many things such as the amount of zinc attached and the aluminum concentration in the plating tank, and it is difficult to clarify the appropriate heat treatment conditions in the alloying furnace in advance. (2) As shown in FIG. 3, the emissivity of the surface of the galvanized steel sheet changes according to the sheet temperature, and changes rapidly during the progress of alloying.
Therefore, it is usually difficult to measure the true sheet temperature with an emissivity setting type sheet thermometer (radiation thermometer) that is used. (3) In the alloying furnace, since the steel sheet is strongly affected by the radiation from the flame, it is difficult to keep the heat treatment conditions constant by controlling the furnace temperature.

【0004】従来技術としては、図3に示した亜鉛めっ
き面の放射率急変時に合金化が進行することを利用して
鋼板の輻射エネルギーを測定し、演算器により放射率を
計算し、この放射率より合金化度を推定し、炉温制御に
より合金化度を制御する方法(特開昭50−6773
0)がある。また、輻射エネルギーを測定しその絶対値
を制御することにより合金化度をコントロールする方法
(特開昭57−185966)がある。
As a conventional technique, the radiant energy of a steel sheet is measured by utilizing the fact that alloying proceeds when the emissivity of the galvanized surface suddenly changes as shown in FIG. 3, and the emissivity is calculated by an arithmetic unit. Method for estimating the degree of alloying from the rate of alloying and controlling the degree of alloying by furnace temperature control (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 50-6773)
0). There is also a method of controlling the degree of alloying by measuring the radiant energy and controlling the absolute value (Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 57-185966).

【0005】しかし、これらの技術は、 (a) 輻射エネルギー値から精度よく放射率を計算す
るのが困難である。 (b) 鋼板の輻射エネルギーは合金化度以外の要因、
例えば浴中Al濃度や亜鉛付着量等の影響を受けるた
め、輻射エネルギーのみの制御では、合金化度を精度よ
くコントロールすることが難しい。等の欠点があった。
However, these techniques are: (a) It is difficult to accurately calculate the emissivity from the radiant energy value. (B) The radiation energy of the steel sheet is a factor other than the degree of alloying,
For example, it is difficult to control the degree of alloying with high accuracy by controlling only the radiant energy because it is affected by the Al concentration in the bath, the amount of zinc attached, and the like. And the like.

【0006】[0006]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】本発明は上記従来技術
の欠点を解消し、精度よく合金化度をコントロールし、
合金化処理後の鋼板の適正な合金化度を保証する方法を
提供しようとするものである。
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention solves the above-mentioned disadvantages of the prior art, controls the degree of alloying with high accuracy ,
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for ensuring an appropriate degree of alloying of a steel sheet after an alloying treatment .

【0007】[0007]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、合金化処理後
の鋼板の適正な合金化度を保証するために、次の手段を
講じたものである。 合金化炉内に3個以上炉高方向
に順次配置した放射型温度計の指示値が、めっき鋼板の
合金化により放射率が変化することを利用して、隣接す
る温度計の指示値平均の差の減少により、めっきの合
金化完了位置を正確に求める。 めっき層合金化完了
位置に対応する板温計指示値平均に、炉内最上方に位置
する制御板温計の指示値平均が合致するように合金化炉
の燃料流量を制御する。
The present invention employs the following means in order to guarantee a proper degree of alloying of the steel sheet after the alloying treatment. By taking advantage of the fact that emissivity changes by emissivity due to alloying of plated steel sheet, the indicated value of three or more radiation type thermometers arranged sequentially in the furnace height direction in the alloying furnace is The alloying completion position of the plating layer is accurately obtained by reducing the difference. The fuel flow rate of the alloying furnace is controlled such that the average of the indicated values of the plate thermometer located at the uppermost position in the furnace matches the average of the indicated values of the plate thermometer corresponding to the plating layer alloying completion position.

【0008】[0008]

【作用】以下に本発明の原理を示す。合金化炉に入った
鋼板表面の亜鉛は再溶融し、鋼板との境界面で鋼板中の
鉄分と合金を作りこの合金層が成長し、やがて表面全体
が合金層(固相)で覆われる。このため図3に示したよ
うに放射率εの急激な変化が起る。
The principle of the present invention will be described below. The zinc on the surface of the steel sheet that has entered the alloying furnace is remelted to form an alloy with the iron in the steel sheet at the interface with the steel sheet, and this alloy layer grows, and the entire surface is eventually covered with the alloy layer (solid phase). This causes a rapid change in the emissivity ε as shown in FIG.

【0009】図4に板温計の設定放射率εが0.5の場
合の真の板温と板温計指示値の関係を示す。図3に示す
ように、合金化が進行する過程では鋼板表面の放射率が
急変するために、放射率を予め設定する型式の板温計で
は、真の放射率と板温計への設定放射率とのずれが大き
くなるため、図4に示すAの部分のように真の板温と板
温計指示値は大きくずれる。図4のAの部分では真の放
射率と設定放射率の差が大きく、したがって真の板温と
板温計指示値の差は大きい。このAの部分で真の板温が
10℃振れると、板温指示値は100℃程度振れる。ま
た合金化処理が完了すると鋼板の放射率は安定するため
例えば図4のBの部分のようになる。図4のBの部分で
は真の板温が10℃振れたとき、板温計指示値は10℃
程度の振れとなる。
FIG. 4 shows the relationship between the true sheet temperature and the indicated value of the sheet thermometer when the set emissivity ε of the sheet thermometer is 0.5. As shown in FIG. 3, the emissivity of the steel sheet surface changes rapidly during the alloying process. Therefore, in a sheet thermometer of a type in which the emissivity is set in advance, the true emissivity and the set radiation to the sheet thermometer are set. Since the deviation from the rate becomes large, the true sheet temperature and the indicated value of the sheet thermometer are largely shifted as indicated by the portion A in FIG. In part A of FIG. 4, the difference between the true emissivity and the set emissivity is large, and therefore, the difference between the true sheet temperature and the indicated value of the sheet thermometer is large. If the true sheet temperature fluctuates by 10 ° C. in the portion A, the indicated sheet temperature fluctuates by about 100 ° C. When the alloying process is completed, the emissivity of the steel sheet is stabilized, and thus, for example, becomes as shown in part B of FIG. In the part B of FIG. 4, when the true sheet temperature fluctuates by 10 ° C., the indicated value of the sheet thermometer is 10 ° C.
It will be a little swing.

【0010】本発明はこの現象を利用して、ある一定振
れ幅をもった板温計指示値より板温計指示値平均をもと
める操作を炉高方向に3か所以上行なうことにより合金
化完了位置を求めるものである。図5には、以上の原理
を証明するために、板温指示平均値と指示値振れ幅及び
めっき層中のFe濃度の関係を示す。図5の場合板温指
示平均値が545℃〜555℃の範囲で指示値振れ幅が
小(約5℃)となり、その時にめっき層中Fe濃度は1
2〜13%となり、ほぼ最適合金化度となる。つまり、
指示値の振れ幅が小となった時の板温指示平均値は合金
化度(めっき層中Fe濃度)に対応しており、板温指示
平均値を制御することにより合金化度制御が可能とな
る。
The present invention utilizes this phenomenon to complete the alloying by performing an operation of obtaining the average of the indicated values of the thermometer from the indicated values of the thermometer having a certain fluctuation width in three or more places in the furnace height direction. The position is obtained. FIG. 5 shows the relationship between the indicated plate temperature average value, the indicated value fluctuation width, and the Fe concentration in the plating layer in order to prove the above principle. In the case of FIG. 5, the indicated value fluctuation width becomes small (about 5 ° C.) when the indicated sheet temperature average value is in the range of 545 ° C. to 555 ° C., and at that time, the Fe concentration in the plating layer becomes 1
2 to 13%, which is almost the optimum degree of alloying. That is,
The indicated average value of the sheet temperature when the fluctuation of the indicated value is small corresponds to the degree of alloying (Fe concentration in the plating layer), and the degree of alloying can be controlled by controlling the indicated average value of the sheet temperature. Becomes

【0011】以下に各板温計の指示値平均より合金化完
了位置を把握する方法を示す。図6に概要を示すよう
に、合金化炉2に5個の板温計11,12,13,1
4,15を炉高方向に順次設置し、制御用板温計21を
設置した場合を例にして合金化完了位置を見出す例を説
明する。 各板温計の板温平均基準値Ts(℃):鋼
種毎に板温指示値平均値とめっき層の鉄濃度(合金化
度)を求めておき目標の合金化度によって設定する。
接板温計の平均値の差の基準値ΔTs(℃):鋼種毎に
板温指示値平均値と指示値振れ幅およびめっき層の鉄濃
度(合金化度)を求めておき、指示値振れ幅が小となる
領域を基準として設定する。 各板温計の指示値平均
と板温平均基準値Ts(℃)との比較、及び各隣接板温
計の平均値の差と平均値の差の基準値ΔTs(℃)との
比較を行なう。
A method for grasping the alloying completion position from the average of the indicated values of the respective sheet thermometers will be described below. As shown in FIG. 6, five sheet thermometers 11 , 12 , 13, 1
An example of finding the alloying completion position will be described by taking as an example a case where the control plate thermometer 21 is installed and the control plate thermometer 21 is installed sequentially in the furnace height direction. Average temperature T s (° C) of each sheet thermometer : steel
Average sheet temperature reading and iron concentration of plating layer (alloy
Degree), and set according to the target degree of alloying. Reference value ΔT s (° C) of difference between average values of adjacent sheet thermometers : For each steel type
Sheet temperature indicated value average and indicated value fluctuation range and iron concentration of plating layer
Degree (alloying degree) is obtained, and the indicated value fluctuation width becomes small
Set based on the area . Comparison with comparison of the readings of each plate thermometers mean and sheet temperature average reference value T s (℃), and the reference value [Delta] T s of the difference between the average value and the difference between the average values of each adjacent plate thermometers (℃) Perform

【0012】板温計11,12,13,14,15のそ
れぞれの指示値平均をT1 ,T2 ,T3 ,T4 ,T5
する。また隣接板温計の指示値平均の差を次のように定
める。 ΔTA =T2 −T1 , ΔTB =T3 −T2 , ΔTC =T4 −T3 , ΔTD =T5 −T4 , 以下、次の各ケースについて判断する。
The averages of the indicated values of the sheet thermometers 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 are defined as T 1 , T 2 , T 3 , T 4 , and T 5 . The difference between the averages of the indicated values of the adjacent sheet thermometers is determined as follows. ΔT A = T 2 −T 1 , ΔT B = T 3 −T 2 , ΔT C = T 4 −T 3 , ΔT D = T 5 −T 4 , and the following cases are determined.

【0013】ケース1:(図7a) T1 〜T5 が全てTs より高く、かつ隣接板温計の指示
値平均の差が全てΔT s より低いとき:過合金(パウダ
リング不良)と判断し制御用板温計21に対する設定値
をΔT1 (℃)下げる。ここでΔT1 は実操業で得られ
る経験値より定めた設定値である。
Case 1: (FIG. 7a) T1 ~ TFive Is all Ts Higher and adjacent plate thermometer indication
The difference between the value averages is ΔT s When lower: overalloy (powder
Set value for control plate thermometer 21
To ΔT1 (° C) Where ΔT1 Is obtained in actual operation
This is a set value determined from experience values.

【0014】ケース2:(図7b) T1 〜T5 が全てTs より低く、かつ隣接板温計の平均
値の差が全てΔTs より低いとき:合金化不足(焼けむ
ら)と判断し制御用板温計21に対する設定値をΔT2
(℃)を上げる。ここでΔT2 は実操業で得られる経験
値を基にして定めた設定値である。
Case 2: (FIG. 7b) When T 1 to T 5 are all lower than T s and the difference between the average values of the adjacent sheet thermometers is all lower than ΔT s : it is judged that alloying is insufficient (burn unevenness). The set value for the control plate thermometer 21 is ΔT 2
(° C). Here, ΔT 2 is a set value determined based on the experience value obtained in the actual operation.

【0015】ケース3: 板温平均値を連ねる線に屈曲点が認められる場合は、隣
接板温計の平均値の差とその基準値との比較により合金
化完了位置を判定する。具体的には次の手順による。 o ΔTA =T2 −T1 ≦ΔTs であれば板温計11の
位置で合金化完了と判断し、制御用板温計21に対する
設定値を板温計11の指示値平均とする。
Case 3: When a bending point is found in the line connecting the average sheet temperature values, the alloying completion position is determined by comparing the difference between the average values of adjacent sheet thermometers and its reference value. Specifically, the following procedure is used. o If ΔT A = T 2 −T 1 ≦ ΔT s , it is determined that alloying is completed at the position of the sheet thermometer 11, and the set value for the control sheet thermometer 21 is set as the average of the indicated values of the sheet thermometer 11.

【0016】o ΔTB =T3 −T2 ≦ΔTs であれ
ば、板温計12の位置で合金化完了と判断し、制御用板
温計21に対する設定値を板温計12の指示値平均とす
る。 o ΔTC =T4 −T3 ≦ΔTs であれば(図7C)、
板温計13の位置で合金化完了と判断し、制御用板温計
21に対する設定値を板温計13の指示値平均とする。
If o ΔT B = T 3 −T 2 ≦ ΔT s , it is determined that alloying is completed at the position of the sheet thermometer 12 and the set value for the control sheet thermometer 21 is indicated by the indicated value of the sheet thermometer 12. Average. o If ΔT C = T 4 −T 3 ≦ ΔT s (FIG. 7C),
It is determined that alloying is completed at the position of the sheet thermometer 13, and the set value for the control sheet thermometer 21 is set as the average of the indicated values of the sheet thermometer 13.

【0017】o ΔTD =T5 −T4 ≦ΔTs であれば
板温計14の位置で合金化完了と判断し、制御用板温計
21に対する設定値を板温計14の指示値平均とする。 ケース4: 以上の何れでもないとき(図7d):合金化不足(焼け
むら)と判断し、制御用板温計21に対する設定値をΔ
T(℃)上げる。
If o ΔT D = T 5 −T 4 ≦ ΔT s , it is determined that alloying is completed at the position of the sheet thermometer 14, and the set value for the control sheet thermometer 21 is averaged by the indicated value of the sheet thermometer 14. And Case 4: None of the above (FIG. 7d): It is determined that alloying is insufficient (uneven burning), and the set value for the control plate thermometer 21 is Δ
Increase T (° C).

【0018】板温計は3個あれば指示値平均間の差が2
個得られ本発明の目的を達することができるが、4個以
上配置すれば、炉内の合金化の状態をさらに精密に把握
することができる。
If there are three sheet thermometers, the difference between the indicated value averages is 2
Although the object of the present invention can be attained by arranging it, if four or more are arranged, the state of alloying in the furnace can be grasped more precisely.

【0019】[0019]

【実施例】〔実施例1〕図1に実施例に用いた装置の概
要を示す。合金化炉2の全長は40mであり、通板速度
範囲は、目標目付量、板厚によって変化し60〜120
m/minである。
[Embodiment 1] FIG. 1 shows an outline of an apparatus used in the embodiment. The total length of the alloying furnace 2 is 40 m, and the range of the sheet passing speed varies depending on the target basis weight and the sheet thickness.
m / min.

【0020】合金化炉2の出側より5m、10m及び1
5mの位置にそれぞれ放射温度計である板温計8,7及
び6を配置し、鋼板の板幅方向中心位置にて、めっき鋼
板1の板温指示値平均を求めた。当初、板温計6に合金
化目標温度を設定し、合金化炉の燃料ガス流量を制御し
た。その後、各板温計6,7,8の指示値平均の差を差
の基準値と比較し変化率より合金化完了位置を求め、板
温計8を制御用板温計として合金化完了位置に相当する
板温計の指示値平均に合わせ、その合金化目標温度にな
るように合金化炉の燃料ガス流量を制御した。なお、本
実施例では板温計のいずれか一つと制御用板温計を兼用
するようにしたが、前述したように制御用板温計を別途
設けてもよい。この場合は、炉内の最上方にとりつける
ことが好ましい。
5 m, 10 m and 1 m from the exit side of the alloying furnace 2
The sheet temperature gauge 8,7 and 6 are each radiation thermometer disposed at a position of 5 m, at the plate width direction center position of the steel sheet was determined sheet temperature indication Netaira Hitoshi plated steel sheet 1. Initially, the alloying target temperature was set in the sheet thermometer 6, and the fuel gas flow rate of the alloying furnace was controlled. After that, the difference between the average of the indicated values of the sheet thermometers 6, 7, and 8 is compared with the reference value of the difference, and the alloying completion position is obtained from the rate of change. And the fuel gas flow rate of the alloying furnace was controlled so as to reach the alloying target temperature. The book
In the embodiment, one of the plate thermometers is used as the control plate thermometer.
However, as described above, a separate control plate thermometer was
It may be provided. In this case, attach to the top of the furnace
Is preferred.

【0021】このようにして製造した50コイルのサン
プル200個について評価をしたところ、表1の結果と
なった。
Evaluation was made on 200 samples of the 50 coils manufactured in this manner, and the results are shown in Table 1.

【0022】[0022]

【表1】 ─────────────────────────────────── 焼けむら発生率 パウダリング不良率 (目視による) (180°曲げ試験による) 従来法 6/200(3%) 41/200(20.5%) 本発明法 2/200(1%) 3/200(1.5%) ─────────────────────────────────── 焼けむらについては、従来も操業者が合金化炉出側にて
板面を観察し操業していたために発生率が低かったが本
発明によりさらに低くなった。パウダリングについて
は、従来はチェックする手段がないために全く管理され
ていなかったが本発明により激減した。
[Table 1] 発 生 Burning unevenness rate Powdering defect rate (visually (Based on 180 ° bending test) Conventional method 6/200 (3%) 41/200 (20.5%) Method of the present invention 2/200 (1%) 3/200 (1.5%) ─────む Regarding uneven burns, operators have conventionally cleaned the plate surface on the exit side of the alloying furnace. The incidence was low due to observation and operation, but was further reduced by the present invention. Powdering has not been controlled at all because there is no means for checking in the past, but has been drastically reduced by the present invention.

【0023】〔実施例2〕実施例1に用いた装置を用
い、ラインスピード120m/minで正常な操業をし
ていたラインが、操業上の事情によりラインスピード9
0m/minにダウンした場合の過度期間における本発
明による操業の実施例について、表2を参照して説明す
る。
[Embodiment 2] Using the apparatus used in Embodiment 1, a line which had been operating normally at a line speed of 120 m / min was changed to a line speed of 9 due to operational circumstances.
An example of the operation according to the present invention in an excessive period when the speed is reduced to 0 m / min will be described with reference to Table 2.

【0024】[0024]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0025】表2は状態1から状態5に至る経時変化の
データである。状態1では、ラインスピード120m/
min、炉の設定温度485℃で定常状態で操業してい
た。この炉の基準値は、過去の操業データから、 各板温計指示値平均基準値Ts :482℃ 隣接板温計の平均値の差の基準値ΔTs :10℃ としていた。この時板温計6,7,8の指示値平均は各
々470℃,481℃,485℃であった。平均値の差
は11℃,4℃であり、板温計8の位置で鋼板の合金化
が完了していた。
Table 2 shows data on changes with time from state 1 to state 5. In state 1, the line speed is 120 m /
min, the furnace was operated in a steady state at a set temperature of 485 ° C. The reference value of this furnace was set to the reference value ΔT s : 10 ° C. of the difference between the average values of the adjacent sheet thermometers, based on the past operation data, and the average reference value T s of each sheet thermometer: 482 ° C. At this time, the indicated values of the plate thermometers 6, 7, and 8 were 470 ° C., 481 ° C., and 485 ° C., respectively. The difference between the average values was 11 ° C. and 4 ° C., and the alloying of the steel sheet was completed at the position of the sheet thermometer 8.

【0026】ラインスピードが120m/minから9
0m/minにダウンしたとき合金化炉出側板温がアッ
プし、板温計6,7,8の指示値平均はそれぞれ486
℃,492℃,496℃となった(状態2)。各板温計
指示値平均は指示値平均基準値Ts (482℃)よりい
ずれも大であり、隣接板温計の平均の差の基準値ΔT s
(10℃)より小であるため、炉の設定温度を経験に基
づきΔT(3℃)下げ482℃にした。従って、燃料ガ
ス(コークス炉ガス)量も自動的に400Nm 3 /hr
に下げた。燃料ガス量を下げ、炉況が安定するのをおよ
そ10秒間待った。
Line speed from 120 m / min to 9
When the speed of the alloying furnace is reduced to 0 m / min,
The average readings of the plate thermometers 6, 7, and 8 were 486 each.
° C, 492 ° C, and 496 ° C (state 2). Each plate thermometer
The indicated value average is the indicated value average reference value Ts (482 ° C)
The deviation is also large, and the reference value ΔT of the average difference between adjacent plate thermometers is used. s 
(10 ° C), so the furnace temperature can be set based on experience.
Then, the temperature was lowered by TT (3 ° C) to 482 ° C. Therefore, the fuel gas
(Coke oven gas) amount is automatically 400Nm Three / Hr
Lowered to Reduce the amount of fuel gas and allow the reactor conditions to stabilize.
I waited 10 seconds.

【0027】炉況が安定しつつある時、各板温計6,
7,8の指示値平均は475℃,480℃,485℃、
隣接する板温計の平均の差は5℃,5℃となった(状態
3)。各板温計の指示値平均が平均基準値Ts (482
℃)より小となり隣接する板温計の平均の差が急激に小
さくなっている板温計7に着目して、合金化完了位置を
板温度計7の位置と判定した。この時板温計7の指示値
平均は480℃であったの炉での設定温度を480℃に
するのが妥当と判断した。
When the furnace condition is stable, each plate thermometer 6,
The average readings of 7, 8 are 475 ° C, 480 ° C, 485 ° C,
The average difference between adjacent thermometers was 5 ° C. and 5 ° C. (state 3). The average of the indicated values of each sheet thermometer is the average reference value T s (482
C), the alloying completion position was determined to be the position of the sheet thermometer 7 by focusing on the sheet thermometer 7 in which the average difference between the adjacent sheet thermometers was sharply reduced. At this time, the average of the indicated values of the sheet thermometer 7 was 480 ° C., but it was judged appropriate to set the temperature set in the furnace to 480 ° C.

【0028】このため、炉の設定温度をさらにΔT(2
℃)下げて480℃とし、燃料ガス量を自動的に320
Nm3 /hrに下げ、炉況が安定するのを待った。板温
計6,7,8の指示値平均はそれぞれ470℃,475
℃,480℃となり、各板温計の指示値平均が指示値平
均基準値Ts (480℃)より小となり、隣接する板温
計指示値平均の差(5℃,5℃)が平均値の差の基準値
ΔTs (10℃)より小となる板温計8の位置で鋼板の
合金化が完了していると判断した(状態4)。
For this reason, the set temperature of the furnace is further increased by ΔT (2
℃) to 480 ℃, and the amount of fuel gas is automatically reduced to 320 ℃.
Nm 3 / hr, and waited for the furnace conditions to stabilize. The average readings of the plate thermometers 6, 7, and 8 are 470 ° C and 475, respectively.
° C, 480 ° C, the average of the indicated values of each sheet thermometer becomes smaller than the indicated value average reference value T s (480 ° C), and the difference (5 ° C, 5 ° C) between the adjacent sheet thermometer indicated value averages is the average value. It is determined that the alloying of the steel sheet has been completed at the position of the sheet thermometer 8 which is smaller than the reference value ΔT s (10 ° C.) of the difference (state 4).

【0029】更に数分経過後、炉況が完全に安定し、ラ
インスピード90m/minで炉の操業を継続すること
ができた。合金化完了位置も板温計8の位置でラインス
ピード120m/minの時と変わらなかった。以上の
ようにラインスピードが変わっても、即応して炉の温度
をコントロールすることが可能となり、表2の状態1か
ら状態5になるまでに要した時間はほぼ2分であった。
この間、鋼板は90×2=180m進んだが、パウダリ
ングやや不良箇所は1.5mのみであった。
After several minutes, the furnace condition was completely stabilized, and the furnace operation could be continued at a line speed of 90 m / min. The alloying completion position was the same as the position of the sheet thermometer 8 at the line speed of 120 m / min. As described above, even if the line speed changes, the temperature of the furnace can be controlled immediately, and the time required from the state 1 to the state 5 in Table 2 was about 2 minutes.
During this time, the steel sheet advanced by 90 × 2 = 180 m, but the powdering was slightly defective at only 1.5 m.

【0030】[0030]

【発明の効果】本発明によれば、合金化炉内の合金化完
了位置の把握及び制御を行うことにより、従来法に比べ
てはるかに低い焼けむら及びパウダリング発生率とな
り、鋼板の合金化度を適正に保つことができる。なお、
本発明に用いる板温計としては、一般に市販されている
プロフィール型板温計も使用可能である。
According to the present invention, by grasping and controlling the alloying completion position in the alloying furnace, the rate of occurrence of burn unevenness and powdering becomes much lower than in the conventional method, and The degree can be kept properly. In addition,
As the sheet thermometer used in the present invention, a profile-type sheet thermometer that is generally commercially available can also be used.

【図面の簡単な説明】[Brief description of the drawings]

【図1】本発明の実施例に用いた合金化炉の説明図であ
る。
FIG. 1 is an explanatory view of an alloying furnace used in an example of the present invention.

【図2】従来の合金化炉の説明図である。FIG. 2 is an explanatory view of a conventional alloying furnace.

【図3】溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板の板温と放射率の関係を示
すグラフである。
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the relationship between the sheet temperature and the emissivity of a galvanized steel sheet.

【図4】真の板温と板温計指示値の関係を示すグラフで
ある。
FIG. 4 is a graph showing a relationship between a true sheet temperature and an indicated value of a sheet thermometer.

【図5】板温指示平均値と指示値振れ幅及びめっき層中
のFe濃度の関係を示すグラフである。
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the relationship between the indicated sheet temperature average value, the indicated value fluctuation width, and the Fe concentration in the plating layer.

【図6】本発明に用いられる合金化炉の一例における板
温計の配列を示す説明図である。
FIG. 6 is an explanatory view showing an arrangement of sheet thermometers in an example of the alloying furnace used in the present invention.

【図7】合金化完了位置を見出す各種ケースの説明図で
ある。
FIG. 7 is an explanatory view of various cases for finding an alloying completion position.

【符号の説明】[Explanation of symbols]

1 めっき鋼板 2 合金化炉 3 絞り装置 4 めっき槽 5 シンクロール 6 板温計 7 板温計 8 板温計 11 板温計 12 板温計 13 板温計 14 板温計 15 板温計 21 制御用板温計 DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 Plating steel plate 2 Alloying furnace 3 Drawing device 4 Plating tank 5 Sink roll 6 Sheet thermometer 7 Sheet thermometer 8 Sheet thermometer 11 Sheet thermometer 12 Sheet thermometer 13 Sheet thermometer 14 Sheet thermometer 15 Sheet thermometer 21 Control Plate thermometer

───────────────────────────────────────────────────── フロントページの続き (72)発明者 戸村 寧男 千葉市川崎町1番地 川崎製鉄株式会社 千葉製鉄所内 (72)発明者 秋吉 勝則 千葉市川崎町1番地 川崎製鉄株式会社 千葉製鉄所内 (58)調査した分野(Int.Cl.6,DB名) C23C 2/00 - 2/40 ──────────────────────────────────────────────────続 き Continuing on the front page (72) Inventor Norio Tomura 1 Kawasaki-cho, Chiba-shi Kawasaki Steel Corporation Chiba Works (72) Inventor Katsunori Akiyoshi 1 Kawasaki-cho Chiba City Kawasaki Steel Corporation Chiba Works (58 ) Surveyed field (Int.Cl. 6 , DB name) C23C 2/00-2/40

Claims (1)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 鋼板を溶融亜鉛めっき槽に浸漬し、該め
っき鋼板を前記溶融亜鉛めっき槽の直上に鋼板の入口を
下にして配された溶融亜鉛めっき用合金化炉内を通過さ
せて合金化するに際し、合金化炉内に放射型温度計から
なる板温計を3個以上炉高方向に順次配置し、隣接する
板温計の指示値平均間の差を炉の下方より逐次求め、該
差が予め定めた基準値以下に初めてなる隣接する板温計
のうちの下方の板温計の位置を合金化完了位置として把
握し、制御用板温計の指示値平均が、該合金化完了位置
にある板温計の指示平均値に合致するように合金化炉の
燃料流量を制御することを特徴とする合金化溶融亜鉛め
っき鋼板の製造方法。
1. A steel sheet is immersed in a hot-dip galvanizing tank, and the steel sheet is placed immediately above the hot-dip galvanizing tank with an inlet of the steel sheet.
Passed through the hot-dip galvanizing alloying furnace
At the time of alloying, three or more plate thermometers composed of radiation thermometers are sequentially arranged in the alloying furnace in the furnace height direction, and the difference between the indicated value averages of adjacent plate thermometers is determined from the bottom of the furnace. Sequentially obtained, grasp the position of the lower sheet thermometer among the adjacent sheet thermometers whose difference is less than or equal to a predetermined reference value as the alloying completion position, and the indicated value average of the control sheet thermometer is, A method for producing an alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheet, comprising controlling a fuel flow rate of an alloying furnace so as to match an indicated average value of a sheet thermometer at the alloying completion position.
JP2403803A 1990-12-19 1990-12-19 Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet Expired - Fee Related JP2981290B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2403803A JP2981290B2 (en) 1990-12-19 1990-12-19 Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2403803A JP2981290B2 (en) 1990-12-19 1990-12-19 Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH04218654A JPH04218654A (en) 1992-08-10
JP2981290B2 true JP2981290B2 (en) 1999-11-22

Family

ID=18513530

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP2403803A Expired - Fee Related JP2981290B2 (en) 1990-12-19 1990-12-19 Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2981290B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103764867B (en) 2011-08-26 2016-05-25 新日铁住金株式会社 Alloying location determining method, alloying position determining means
JP5673586B2 (en) * 2012-03-23 2015-02-18 Jfeスチール株式会社 Method for calculating degree of alloying of hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and method for controlling alloying

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH04218654A (en) 1992-08-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2981290B2 (en) Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet
EP0921709A2 (en) Alloying system and heating control device for high grade galvanized steel sheet
JP2807156B2 (en) Method for controlling the degree of alloying of galvanized steel sheet
JP3173354B2 (en) Alloying treatment method for hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and its alloying control device
JP3261714B2 (en) Method for controlling alloying of galvanized steel sheet
JP2895357B2 (en) Method of controlling phase structure of galvannealed layer
JP2809774B2 (en) Manufacturing method of hot dip galvanized alloyed steel sheet
JP2960285B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling degree of alloying by emissivity
JPH0144782B2 (en)
JP3175802B2 (en) Method for controlling alloying of hot-dip galvanized steel sheet
JP2795569B2 (en) Operating method of hot dip galvanizing alloying furnace
JP5673586B2 (en) Method for calculating degree of alloying of hot-dip galvanized steel sheet and method for controlling alloying
JP2966652B2 (en) Operating method of hot dip galvanizing alloying furnace
JPH0499854A (en) Production of galvannealed steel sheet
JPH05231945A (en) Measuring method of surface temperature and emissivity of hot-dipped zinc-plated steel plate
JPH11269627A (en) Alloying furnace for galvanized steel sheet, and method for controlling alloying degree of galvanized steel sheet
JPH03146649A (en) Production of alloying galvanized steel strip
JPH0637702B2 (en) Fuel control method for hot dip galvanizing alloy furnace
JP3787320B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling alloying in hot dip galvanizing line
JP2545653B2 (en) Heat input control method for alloying furnace of hot-dip galvanized steel strip
CA1189427A (en) Method for postweld heat treatment
JPH08269669A (en) Method for controlling alloying degree of galvanized steel sheet
JP2019173166A (en) Method of producing hot dip galvanized steel sheet
JPH06207296A (en) Method and equipment for plating strip material with zinc
JP2789946B2 (en) Manufacturing method of galvannealed steel sheet

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20070917

Year of fee payment: 8

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080917

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080917

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090917

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090917

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100917

Year of fee payment: 11

LAPS Cancellation because of no payment of annual fees