JP2009265089A - Corrosion resistance evaluation method for surface-treated steel sheet - Google Patents
Corrosion resistance evaluation method for surface-treated steel sheet Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- JP2009265089A JP2009265089A JP2009075486A JP2009075486A JP2009265089A JP 2009265089 A JP2009265089 A JP 2009265089A JP 2009075486 A JP2009075486 A JP 2009075486A JP 2009075486 A JP2009075486 A JP 2009075486A JP 2009265089 A JP2009265089 A JP 2009265089A
- Authority
- JP
- Japan
- Prior art keywords
- steel sheet
- corrosion resistance
- treated steel
- corrosion
- test piece
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
- Sampling And Sample Adjustment (AREA)
Abstract
Description
本発明は、自動車ドアに用いられる表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法に関するものである。 The present invention relates to a method for evaluating corrosion resistance of a surface-treated steel sheet used for an automobile door.
自動車用表面処理鋼板の開発では、実際に自動車用外板として表面処理鋼板を使用した場合を想定して、塩水噴霧試験（以下、SSTと称す）、複合サイクル腐食試験（以下、CCTと称す）、暴露試験などの腐食試験により、表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価が行われている。しかし、SSTやCCTに代表される腐食促進試験の場合は、塩水濃度、温度、湿度、および時間割合などによって材料間の相対的な耐食性が変化するため、腐食試験結果が実際に自動車用外板として鋼板を用いた場合の耐食性能と異なり、実際の自動車の腐食との相関性が課題とされている。そこで、上記課題を解決するために、例えば、実際の環境における腐食を再現するため、暴露試験や自動車に試験片を取り付けて走行するOn Vehicle Test などが行われている。
また、環境条件だけでなく、自動車の形状を模擬して加工した試験片を腐食試験に用いる場合もある。例えば、自動車のプレス成形を模擬して、表面処理鋼板に張出し加工や深絞り加工を付与した試験片が腐食試験に供されている（例えば特許文献１）。
その他、外板向け表面処理鋼板においては、チッピングなどによる塗膜損傷を起点とする外観腐食に対する耐食性が要求されることから、塗装した表面処理鋼板に、人工的に傷を付与した試験片が用いられる。また、鋼板合わせ部の穴あき腐食に対する耐食性は、合わせ内部特有の腐食環境を模擬するために、試験片として、鋼板を重ね合わせた試験片やヘミング形状に加工した試験片が用いられる。
In the development of automotive surface-treated steel sheets, a salt spray test (hereinafter referred to as SST) and a combined cycle corrosion test (hereinafter referred to as CCT) are based on the assumption that surface-treated steel sheets are actually used as automotive exterior panels. Corrosion resistance of surface-treated steel sheets is evaluated by corrosion tests such as exposure tests. However, in the case of corrosion accelerated tests represented by SST and CCT, the relative corrosion resistance between materials varies depending on the salt water concentration, temperature, humidity, and time ratio, etc. Unlike the corrosion resistance performance when using a steel plate, the correlation with actual automobile corrosion is a problem. In order to solve the above problems, for example, in order to reproduce corrosion in an actual environment, an exposure test or an On Vehicle Test in which a test piece is mounted on a vehicle is performed.
Further, not only environmental conditions but also test pieces processed by simulating the shape of an automobile may be used for the corrosion test. For example, a test piece obtained by impressing press forming of an automobile and imparting an extension process or a deep drawing process to a surface-treated steel sheet is used for a corrosion test (for example, Patent Document 1).
In addition, for surface-treated steel sheets for outer panels, corrosion resistance to appearance corrosion starting from coating film damage due to chipping, etc. is required, so test pieces with artificially scratched coated surface-treated steel sheets are used. It is done. Moreover, in order to simulate the corrosion environment peculiar to the inside of the laminated portion, the corrosion resistance against perforated corrosion of the steel plate mating portion is a test piece obtained by superimposing steel plates or a test piece processed into a hemming shape.
現在、自動車用途には多くの種類の亜鉛系めっき鋼板が用いられている。また、摺動性や耐食性の向上を目的として、めっき層上に有機、無機皮膜などの化成処理皮膜を形成した化成処理鋼板も用いられている。
これらの表面処理皮膜（めっき層や化成処理皮膜）は、鋼板の製造時においては、均一に鋼板表面に被覆されているが、加工を付与することで損傷する場合がある。場合によってはパウダリングやフレーキングなどの剥離現象を引き起こす。特に自動車部品の多くは形状が複雑で、難成形な形状のものが多く、加工による変形や摺動が大きいためめっき層や化成処理皮膜は損傷を受け易い。このように表面処理皮膜が損傷を受けた場合、該皮膜が有する防錆効果が損なわれる可能性がある。
Currently, many types of galvanized steel sheets are used for automotive applications. Further, for the purpose of improving slidability and corrosion resistance, a chemically treated steel sheet in which a chemically treated film such as an organic or inorganic film is formed on a plating layer is also used.
These surface treatment films (plating layers and chemical conversion treatment films) are uniformly coated on the steel sheet surface during the production of the steel sheet, but may be damaged by processing. In some cases, it causes peeling phenomena such as powdering and flaking. In particular, many automobile parts are complicated in shape, often in difficult-to-form shapes, and are greatly deformed and slid by processing, so that the plating layer and the chemical conversion coating are easily damaged. Thus, when the surface treatment film is damaged, the rust prevention effect of the film may be impaired.
このような加工による表面処理皮膜への影響をシミュレートする方法として、深絞り加工などの加工を付与した試験片を用いて評価することもできるが、実際の自動車の腐食箇所と加工様式は必ずしも一致していていない。また、同じ目的で実プレス加工した自動車部品が耐食性評価に用いられる場合もあるが、実際の自動車成形部品は寸法が大きく、サンプル調達性の面、腐食試験機のスペースの面からも、一様に評価することは困難であった。このように、現在の耐食性評価方法では、表面処理鋼板を適用する部材の実際の皮膜損傷とそれに伴う耐食性劣化の程度を再現できておらず、従って、適正な耐食性を評価することが困難であった。
本発明は、かかる事情に鑑みなされたもので、実際の自動車ドア材の腐食に対して相関性が高い、表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法を提供することを目的とする。
As a method of simulating the effect of such processing on the surface treatment film, it can also be evaluated using a test piece with processing such as deep drawing, but the actual corrosion location and processing mode of an automobile are not necessarily the same. Does not match. In addition, automotive parts that have been actually pressed for the same purpose may be used for corrosion resistance evaluation, but actual automotive molded parts are large in size, uniform in terms of sample availability and corrosion tester space. It was difficult to evaluate. As described above, the current corrosion resistance evaluation method cannot reproduce the actual film damage of the member to which the surface-treated steel sheet is applied and the degree of the corrosion resistance deterioration associated therewith. Therefore, it is difficult to evaluate the appropriate corrosion resistance. It was.
The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances, and an object of the present invention is to provide a method for evaluating the corrosion resistance of a surface-treated steel sheet having a high correlation with the corrosion of an actual automobile door material.
本発明者らは、上記課題を解決すべく検討を重ねた。その結果、以下の知見を得た。
自動車は部位毎に異なる様式でプレス成形されるため、ひずみの変形分布が異なる。したがって表面処理鋼板が受ける損傷の形態や程度もそれぞれの部位によって異なる。ゆえに、自動車ドアなどの腐食の厳しい部位に用いられる表面処理鋼板の耐食性を評価するにあたっては、各部位の特徴的な成形様式の加工を表面処理鋼板に付与したものを試験片として、前記試験片を腐食環境に供して耐食性を評価することが重要となる。
The present inventors have repeatedly studied to solve the above problems. As a result, the following knowledge was obtained.
Since an automobile is press-molded in a different manner for each part, the strain distribution differs. Therefore, the form and degree of damage that the surface-treated steel sheet undergoes vary depending on each part. Therefore, in evaluating the corrosion resistance of the surface-treated steel sheet used in a corrosive part such as an automobile door, the test piece is obtained by applying a processing of a characteristic forming mode of each part to the surface-treated steel sheet as a test piece. It is important to evaluate the corrosion resistance by subjecting to a corrosive environment.
さらに、自動車において、腐食が激しい代表的な部位としては、フード、ドア、クオーター、ホイールハウス、サイドシルなどの鋼板合わせ部が挙げられることから、合わせ部形状で評価することが必要となる。 Furthermore, typical parts of automobiles that are severely corroded include steel plate mating parts such as hoods, doors, quarters, wheel houses, and side sills. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the shape of the mating parts.
本発明は、以上の知見に基づき、鋭意研究を重ねた結果完成されたもので、その要旨は以下のとおりである。
［１］自動車ドアに用いられる表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法であって、ドロービード加工後に平面摺動加工を付与した異種又は同種の表面処理鋼板を重ね合わせて鋼板合わせ部を形成し、次いで、前記鋼板合わせ部を形成した鋼板を試験片として腐食環境に供して耐食性を評価することを特徴とする表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法。
［２］前記［１］において、鋼板合わせ部は、前記異種又は同種の表面処理鋼板を接合して形成されることを特徴とする表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法。
［３］前記［２］において、前記接合が抵抗溶接による接合であることを特徴とする表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法。
［４］前記［１］〜［３］のいずれかにおいて、前記試験片は、前記鋼板合わせ部を形成したのち、化成処理および電着塗装を施したものであることを特徴とする表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法。
The present invention has been completed as a result of intensive studies based on the above findings, and the gist thereof is as follows.
[1] A method for evaluating the corrosion resistance of a surface-treated steel sheet used for an automobile door, wherein a different or the same kind of surface-treated steel sheet to which a flat sliding process is applied after draw beading is formed to form a steel sheet mating portion, A method for evaluating the corrosion resistance of a surface-treated steel sheet, characterized in that the corrosion resistance is evaluated by subjecting the steel sheet on which the steel sheet mating portion is formed to a corrosive environment as a test piece.
[2] The corrosion resistance evaluation method for a surface-treated steel sheet according to [1], wherein the steel sheet mating portion is formed by joining the different or the same kind of surface-treated steel sheets.
[3] A method for evaluating corrosion resistance of a surface-treated steel sheet according to [2], wherein the joining is joining by resistance welding.
[4] The surface-treated steel sheet according to any one of [1] to [3], wherein the test piece is subjected to chemical conversion treatment and electrodeposition coating after forming the steel plate mating portion. Corrosion resistance evaluation method.
本発明の表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価方法によれば、実際の自動車ドア材の腐食に対して相関性が高い評価を簡便に実施することができる。その結果、材料開発の効率化および腐食試験による材料選定の精度向上が期待される。 According to the corrosion resistance evaluation method for a surface-treated steel sheet according to the present invention, it is possible to easily carry out an evaluation having a high correlation with the corrosion of an actual automobile door material. As a result, it is expected to improve the efficiency of material development and improve the accuracy of material selection through corrosion tests.
本発明は実際の自動車部位に即して自動車用表面処理鋼板の耐食性評価を行う方法であり、本発明では自動車ドアに用いられる表面処理鋼板を対象とする。そして、その特徴は、自動車ドアの成形様式で表面処理鋼板を加工した試験片を腐食が発生しやすい合わせ部形状にし、腐食試験に供する耐食性評価方法である。
本発明の耐食性評価の対象である自動車ドア材（ドア内板と称することもある）の合わせ部は、材料を固定し、金型側へ材料を流入させないようにビードが設けてある。また、ビード通過後のサンプル形状を安定化させるために、さらに平面金型で抑えることが多い。そのため、鋼板はビードを通過した後、さらに摺動を受ける。ゆえに、ドア材合わせ部の耐食性評価試験を行うに際し、実際の自動車ドア材の腐食に対して相関性が高い評価結果を得るためには、自動車ドア材の特徴的な成形様式の加工、すなわちドロービード加工、平面摺動加工を表面処理鋼板に付与したものを試験片とすることが重要となる。ここで、深絞り加工、張り出し加工等は、ドア内板合わせ部の成形様式として用いるのは好ましくない。
そして、このように、自動車ドア材の加工を模擬して、事前に表面処理鋼板を加工しておき、加工後の表面処理鋼板を試験片として腐食試験を行うことにより、実際の自動車ドア材の腐食を高い精度で再現することができる。
具体的には、まず、表面処理鋼板にドロービード加工、平面摺動加工を付与し、前記加工付与後の異種又は同種の表面処理鋼板を重ね合わせて鋼板合わせ部を形成する。次いで、前記鋼板合わせ部を形成した鋼板を試験片として腐食環境に供して耐食性を評価することを特徴とする。鋼板合わせ部においては、重ね合わせる表面処理鋼板と接する側の面が耐食性を評価される。したがって、この面が加工付与される面であり、ドロービード加工の場合は、ビート部に直接接して加工を受ける面とする。
この時、鋼板合わせ部は、前記異種又は同種の表面処理鋼板を接合して形成されることが好ましい。また、特に抵抗溶接により接合されることが好ましい。
また、前記試験片は、鋼板合わせ部を形成したのち、化成処理および電着塗装を施したものであることが好ましい。
以下、詳細に説明する。
The present invention is a method for evaluating the corrosion resistance of a surface-treated steel sheet for automobiles according to an actual automobile part. In the present invention, a surface-treated steel sheet used for an automobile door is an object. And the feature is the corrosion-resistance evaluation method which makes the test piece which processed the surface-treated steel plate with the shaping | molding style of the automobile door into the joint part shape which is easy to generate | occur | produce corrosion, and uses for a corrosion test.
A mating portion of an automobile door material (also referred to as a door inner plate) that is an object of the corrosion resistance evaluation of the present invention is provided with a bead so that the material is fixed and the material does not flow into the mold side. Further, in order to stabilize the sample shape after passing through the bead, it is often suppressed by a flat mold. Therefore, the steel sheet is further slid after passing through the bead. Therefore, when performing the corrosion resistance evaluation test of the door material mating part, in order to obtain an evaluation result highly correlated with the corrosion of the actual automobile door material, the processing of the characteristic molding style of the automobile door material, that is, the draw bead It is important to use a test piece obtained by applying processing and plane sliding processing to a surface-treated steel sheet. Here, it is not preferable to use deep drawing processing, overhanging processing, etc. as the molding mode of the door inner plate mating portion.
And, in this way, by simulating the processing of the automobile door material, processing the surface-treated steel plate in advance, and performing the corrosion test using the processed surface-treated steel plate as a test piece, Corrosion can be reproduced with high accuracy.
Specifically, first, a draw bead process and a plane sliding process are applied to the surface-treated steel sheet, and the different or the same type of surface-treated steel sheet after the process is superimposed to form a steel sheet mating portion. Next, the steel plate on which the steel plate mating portion is formed is used as a test piece in a corrosive environment to evaluate the corrosion resistance. In the steel sheet mating portion, the surface on the side in contact with the surface-treated steel sheet to be superposed is evaluated for corrosion resistance. Therefore, this surface is a surface to which processing is applied, and in the case of draw bead processing, the surface is subjected to processing in direct contact with the beat portion.
At this time, it is preferable that the steel plate mating portion is formed by joining the different or same kind of surface-treated steel plates. Moreover, it is preferable to join especially by resistance welding.
Moreover, it is preferable that the test piece is subjected to chemical conversion treatment and electrodeposition coating after forming a steel plate mating portion.
Details will be described below.
ドア合わせ部耐食性試験のための加工として、表面処理鋼板にドロービード加工後に平面摺動加工を付与する。
加工の方法は、ドロービード試験機および摺動試験機により、材料の変形に加えて摺動を付与することができ、ドアのより厳しい加工条件での耐食性を模擬することができる。そして、上記加工は１回だけでなく、複数種、複数回の加工を付与しても構わない。なおこの時の加工方法、回数等は特に限定されず、実際に用いられる自動車ドア材の加工方式を考慮して選択することが好ましい。
As a process for a door joint part corrosion resistance test, a surface sliding process is given to a surface-treated steel sheet after a draw bead process.
As a processing method, a draw bead tester and a sliding tester can impart sliding in addition to material deformation, and can simulate the corrosion resistance of the door under severer processing conditions. And the said process may give not only one time but multiple types and multiple times of process. In addition, the processing method, the number of times, and the like at this time are not particularly limited, and are preferably selected in consideration of the processing method of the automobile door material actually used.
加工付与後の異種又は同種の表面処理鋼板を重ね合わせて鋼板合わせ部を形成する。
自動車では、完全に塗装された外面よりも、複数の鋼板が重なり合った鋼板合わせ部が腐食し易く、防錆対策の中心となっている。このため、自動車ドアに用いられる表面処理鋼板の耐食性を評価するにあたっては、ドア内外板の合わせ部やパネルと部品とで構成される合わせ部における腐食を再現するため、表面処理鋼板に加工を付与した後、表面処理鋼板を重ね合わせて鋼板合わせ部を形成することとする。この時の鋼板合わせ部を形成する鋼板は同種であっても異種であってもどちらでもよい。
また、鋼板合わせ部は、異種又は同種の表面処理鋼板を接合して形成することができる。例えば、スポット溶接等の抵抗溶接で接合して形成することができる。抵抗溶接は自動車の製造工程で使用されている接合方法であり、実験室においても溶接機を用いることにより簡便に接合することができる方法のため、鋼板合わせ部の形成に際し、好適に使用される。しかし、鋼板合わせ部の接合方法は上記に限定されず、他には、シーム溶接等の抵抗溶接の他に、トックス接合などのかしめ、摩擦攪拌接合等が挙げられる。
さらに、自動車の生産工程に従い、鋼板合わせ部を形成した鋼板に対して、化成処理および電着塗装を施し試験片として、この試験片に対して腐食環境に供して耐食性を評価することが好ましい。このように鋼板合わせ部に対して電着塗装までの一連の処理を施した試験片を用いることで、より実際の自動車構造を模擬することができる。
なお、化成処理および電着塗装の条件は特に限定しないが、以下に化成処理および電着塗装の条件の一例を示す。
日本パーカラインジング（株）製PB-3080りん酸塩化成処理液を用いて、りん酸塩皮膜量が1.8〜2.2ｇ/ｍ2になるように化成処理を行った後、関西ペイント（株）製自動車用電着塗料を用いて、焼付け後の膜厚が18〜24μｍになるように塗装する。その後、170℃の雰囲気で20分間焼付け処理する。また、化成処理前に脱脂処理および/又は表面調整処理を行ってもよい。
なお、試験片には、鋼板合わせ内部だけを腐食させ、外面からの腐食の影響を除くために、合わせ部を形成した鋼板の外表面（合わせ開口部を除く）と端部にシールを施すことが好ましい。
The different or the same kind of surface-treated steel sheets after processing are overlapped to form a steel sheet mating portion.
In automobiles, the steel plate mating portion where a plurality of steel plates overlap is more likely to corrode than the completely painted outer surface, which is the center of rust prevention measures. For this reason, when evaluating the corrosion resistance of surface-treated steel sheets used for automobile doors, the surface-treated steel sheets are processed to reproduce the corrosion at the mated parts of the door inner and outer plates and the mated parts composed of panels and parts. Then, the surface-treated steel plates are overlapped to form a steel plate mating portion. The steel plates forming the steel plate mating portion at this time may be the same type or different types.
Moreover, the steel plate mating portion can be formed by joining different or the same type of surface-treated steel plates. For example, it can be formed by joining by resistance welding such as spot welding. Resistance welding is a joining method used in the manufacturing process of automobiles, and it is a method that can be easily joined by using a welding machine even in a laboratory, so it is preferably used when forming a steel sheet mating part. . However, the joining method of the steel sheet mating portion is not limited to the above, and other than the resistance welding such as seam welding, caulking such as Tox joining, friction stir welding and the like can be mentioned.
Furthermore, it is preferable to perform chemical conversion treatment and electrodeposition coating on the steel sheet on which the steel sheet mating portion is formed in accordance with the production process of the automobile, and use the test specimen in a corrosive environment to evaluate the corrosion resistance. Thus, the actual vehicle structure can be simulated more by using the test piece that has been subjected to a series of processes up to electrodeposition coating on the steel sheet mating portion.
In addition, although the conditions of chemical conversion treatment and electrodeposition coating are not specifically limited, an example of the conditions of chemical conversion treatment and electrodeposition coating is shown below.
After performing chemical conversion treatment using PB-3080 phosphate chemical treatment solution manufactured by Nippon Parker Lines Co., Ltd. so that the amount of phosphate film is 1.8-2.2 g / m 2 , Kansai Paint Co., Ltd. Using an electrodeposition paint for automobiles, coating is performed so that the film thickness after baking is 18 to 24 μm. Thereafter, baking is performed for 20 minutes in an atmosphere of 170 ° C. Moreover, you may perform a degreasing process and / or a surface adjustment process before chemical conversion treatment.
In addition, in order to corrode only the inside of the steel plate, and to remove the influence of corrosion from the outer surface, the test piece shall be sealed on the outer surface (excluding the mating opening) and the end of the steel plate on which the joint is formed. Is preferred.
このようにして作製した鋼板合わせ部を形成させた表面処理鋼板を試験片として腐食環境に供して耐食性を評価する。
例えば、複合サイクル試験などの腐食環境に試験片を供し、所定期間後の腐食の状態を観察する、若しくは塗膜の膨れ幅、赤錆の発生頻度などを定量的に測定することによって耐食性を評価する。
耐食性を評価する方法は特に限定しない。自動車用外観腐食試験法として国内外で規格化されている試験法、例えば、国内では、JASO M 609-91で規格された試験法、米国では、米国自動車技術者協会で定めたSAE J2334などの複合サイクル試験法を用いることができる。
The surface-treated steel sheet formed with the steel sheet mating portion thus produced is used as a test piece in a corrosive environment to evaluate the corrosion resistance.
For example, the corrosion resistance is evaluated by subjecting the test piece to a corrosive environment such as a combined cycle test and observing the state of corrosion after a predetermined period of time, or by quantitatively measuring the swollen width of the coating film, the occurrence frequency of red rust, etc. .
The method for evaluating the corrosion resistance is not particularly limited. Test methods standardized at home and abroad as exterior corrosion test methods for automobiles, such as the test methods specified in JASO M 609-91 in Japan, SAE J2334 established by the American Automobile Engineers Association in the United States, etc. A combined cycle test method can be used.
なお、本発明で用いる表面処理鋼板とは、特に限定されず、使用される目的に応じて適宜選択することができる。中でも、電気亜鉛めっき鋼板、溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板および合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板は好適に使用される。 The surface-treated steel sheet used in the present invention is not particularly limited and can be appropriately selected depending on the purpose of use. Among these, an electrogalvanized steel sheet, a hot dip galvanized steel sheet, and an alloyed hot dip galvanized steel sheet are preferably used.
＜本発明試験片の作製＞
板厚0.75mmでめっき付着量45g／m2、及び60g／m2の合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板（GA45およびGA60）2種と、板厚0.75mmでめっき付着量50g／m2の電気亜鉛めっき鋼板（EG50）ならびに冷延鋼板の計4種に対して、図１に示すようにドロービード加工と平面摺動加工を施した。なお、ここで、めっき付着量は片面あたりの付着量であり、全て両面めっきとした。次いで、同種の鋼板の上記サンプルをスポット溶接で接合して合わせ部を形成し、試験片（本発明例１；ｎ＝３）を作製した。次いで、作製した試験片の評価面の腐食に影響を及ぼす部位にポリエステル製粘着テープ（日東電工（株）製リビック（登録商標））でシールした。なお、上記ドロービード加工は、押しつけ荷重3923N（400kgf）、引き抜き速度1m/minの条件にて行い、上記平面摺動加工は、押しつけ荷重3923N（400kgf）、引き抜き速度1m/minの条件にて行った。図に示す合わせ部の内部（両面）を評価面とした。
<Preparation of the test piece of the present invention>
Two types of alloyed hot-dip galvanized steel sheets (GA45 and GA60) with a coating thickness of 45 g / m 2 and 60 g / m 2 at a plate thickness of 0.75 mm, and electrogalvanizing with a plating thickness of 50 g / m 2 at a plate thickness of 0.75 mm A total of four types of steel plate (EG50) and cold-rolled steel plate were subjected to draw bead processing and plane sliding processing as shown in FIG. Here, the amount of plating adhesion is the amount of adhesion per one side, and all are double-sided plating. Next, the above-mentioned samples of the same type of steel plate were joined by spot welding to form a mating portion, and a test piece (Invention Example 1; n = 3) was produced. Subsequently, the part which affects the corrosion of the evaluation surface of the produced test piece was sealed with a polyester adhesive tape (Ribik (registered trademark) manufactured by Nitto Denko Corporation). The draw bead processing was performed under the conditions of pressing load 3923N (400kgf) and pulling
また、接合後、シール前の図１に示す試験片に、アルカリ脱脂を行い、以下に示すように化成処理および電着塗装を施した後、さらに、本発明例１と同様に、評価面の腐食に影響を及ぼす部位にシールした。
リン酸塩化成処理液（日本パーカライジング（株）製ＰＢ−３０８０）を用いて、りん酸塩皮膜量が１．８〜２．２g/m2となるように化成処理を行った後、関西ペイント（株）製自動車用電着塗料を用いて電着塗装した。その後、１７０℃の雰囲気で20分間焼付け処理し、膜厚が１８〜２４μmの電着塗膜を形成した。
In addition, after joining, the test piece shown in FIG. 1 before sealing is subjected to alkali degreasing and subjected to chemical conversion treatment and electrodeposition coating as shown below. Sealed in areas that affect corrosion.
After performing chemical conversion treatment using a phosphate chemical treatment solution (PB-3080 manufactured by Nihon Parkerizing Co., Ltd.) so that the amount of phosphate film is 1.8 to 2.2 g / m 2 , Kansai Paint Electrodeposition coating was performed using an electrodeposition paint for automobiles. Then, it baked for 20 minutes in 170 degreeC atmosphere, and formed the electrodeposition coating film with a film thickness of 18-24 micrometers.
上記のようにして、ドロービード加工および平面摺動加工後、化成処理、電着塗装した試験片（本発明例２；ｎ＝３）を作製した。 As described above, a test piece (invention example 2; n = 3) subjected to chemical conversion treatment and electrodeposition coating after draw bead processing and plane sliding processing was prepared.
＜比較試験片の作製＞
比較サンプルとして、上記本発明と同様に4種の鋼板を用いて、加工を行わず、それ以外は上記本発明２と同じ方法で作製した試験片(比較例１；ｎ＝３)を準備した。また、上記本発明の加工方法（ドロービード加工および平面摺動加工）の代わりに図２に示す張り出し加工を行い試験片とした以外は上記本発明２と同じ方法で作製した試験片(比較例２；ｎ＝３)を準備した。なお、上記張り出し加工は、ブランク110mm角、ポンチ径50mmφ、しわ押さえ圧147100Ｎ（15tf）、速度1m/minの条件にて深さ20mmまで加工を行った。
以上により得られた、本発明試験片と比較試験片をSAE J2334腐食試験に供した。
また、本試験の評価のために、北米を8〜10年走行した車両のドア（シーラー、ワックス等の副資材は使用されていない）の実車データ（各めっき材についてｎ＝３）を用いた。
腐食試験は、全ての試験片について、上記の冷延鋼板と実車データの最大腐食深さの比が約１になるサイクルで終了とした。試験後、鋼板合わせ部の溶接部に穴をあけて分解し、内部の腐食生成物を除錆剤により溶解除去した後、ポイントマイクロメーターを用いて板厚を測定し、各試験片の健全部に対する板厚減少値（腐食深さ）の最大値を求めた。また、各試験片の最大腐食深さ（ｎ＝３）は、同種のめっき材を使用した実車ドア材の最大腐食深さ（ｎ＝３）それぞれを1とした場合の比を求めて評価した（全評価値としてｎ＝９となる）。
以上の方法により得られた結果を図３に示す。なお、図３には、冷延鋼板２枚を用いて鋼板合わせ部を形成した試験片の評価結果も示すが、これは参考例である。
<Production of comparative specimen>
As a comparative sample, a test piece (Comparative Example 1; n = 3) prepared by the same method as that of the present invention 2 was prepared using the four types of steel plates in the same manner as in the present invention, without processing. . Further, a test piece (Comparative Example 2) prepared by the same method as that of the present invention 2 except that the overhanging process shown in FIG. 2 was performed instead of the processing method of the present invention (draw bead processing and flat sliding process) to obtain a test piece. N = 3) was prepared. The overhanging process was performed to a depth of 20 mm under the conditions of a blank 110 mm square, a punch diameter of 50 mmφ, a wrinkle holding pressure of 147100 N (15 tf), and a speed of 1 m / min.
The test piece of the present invention and the comparative test piece obtained as described above were subjected to the SAE J2334 corrosion test.
For the evaluation of this test, actual vehicle data (n = 3 for each plating material) of the door of a vehicle that traveled in North America for 8 to 10 years (secondary materials such as sealers and waxes are not used) were used. .
The corrosion test was completed for all the test pieces in a cycle in which the ratio of the maximum corrosion depth of the cold-rolled steel sheet and the actual vehicle data was about 1. After the test, a hole was made in the welded part of the steel plate mating part to disassemble and the internal corrosion products were dissolved and removed with a rust remover, then the plate thickness was measured using a point micrometer, and the healthy part of each test piece The maximum value of the thickness reduction value (corrosion depth) with respect to was obtained. In addition, the maximum corrosion depth (n = 3) of each test piece was evaluated by obtaining a ratio when the maximum corrosion depth (n = 3) of an actual vehicle door material using the same kind of plating material was set to 1. (The total evaluation value is n = 9).
The results obtained by the above method are shown in FIG. In addition, although the evaluation result of the test piece which formed the steel plate matching part using two cold-rolled steel plates is also shown in FIG. 3, this is a reference example.
図３より、加工せずに鋼板合わせ部を形成した試験片（比較例１）、および張り出し加工して鋼板合わせ部を形成した試験片（比較例２）では、冷延鋼板が実際の自動車と同じ程度の腐食深さに達しても、めっき鋼板（GA45、EG50、GA60）では、実際の自動車の腐食深さと大きく異なり傾向が一致していないことがわかる。
これに対して、本発明のドロービード加工および平面摺動加工を付与し鋼板合わせ部を形成した試験片（本発明例１および２）におけるめっき鋼板では、全てのめっき鋼板（GA45、EG50、GA60）について冷延鋼板と同様に実際の自動車の最大腐食深さとの比が0.5〜1.5の範囲であり、実際の自動車におけるドア材の耐食性を高い精度で再現した。
From FIG. 3, in the test piece (Comparative Example 1) in which the steel sheet mating part was formed without processing, and the test piece (Comparative Example 2) in which the steel sheet mating part was formed by overworking, Even when the same corrosion depth is reached, it can be seen that in the plated steel sheets (GA45, EG50, GA60), the tendency differs greatly from the actual automobile corrosion depth.
On the other hand, in the plated steel sheets in the test pieces (Invention Examples 1 and 2) in which the draw bead processing and the plane sliding processing of the present invention were applied to form the steel sheet mating portion, all the plated steel sheets (GA45, EG50, GA60) As with the cold rolled steel sheet, the ratio of the maximum corrosion depth of the actual automobile is in the range of 0.5 to 1.5, and the corrosion resistance of the door material in the actual automobile is reproduced with high accuracy.
Claims (4)
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2009075486A JP2009265089A (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2009-03-26 | Corrosion resistance evaluation method for surface-treated steel sheet |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2008089653 | 2008-03-31 | ||
| JP2009075486A JP2009265089A (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2009-03-26 | Corrosion resistance evaluation method for surface-treated steel sheet |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| JP2009265089A true JP2009265089A (en) | 2009-11-12 |
Family
ID=41391093
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2009075486A Withdrawn JP2009265089A (en) | 2008-03-31 | 2009-03-26 | Corrosion resistance evaluation method for surface-treated steel sheet |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| JP (1) | JP2009265089A (en) |
Cited By (3)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102590069A (en) * | 2011-01-12 | 2012-07-18 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Test sample used in stainless steel corrosion test and fabrication method thereof |
| KR101272914B1 (en) | 2011-04-12 | 2013-06-11 | 현대자동차주식회사 | Method of testing contact corrosion between different kinds of metal and test piece module thereof |
| JP2016501724A (en) * | 2012-10-24 | 2016-01-21 | マグナ インターナショナル インコーポレイテッド | Laser metal deposition welding of automotive parts |
-
2009
- 2009-03-26 JP JP2009075486A patent/JP2009265089A/en not_active Withdrawn
Cited By (4)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102590069A (en) * | 2011-01-12 | 2012-07-18 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Test sample used in stainless steel corrosion test and fabrication method thereof |
| CN102590069B (en) * | 2011-01-12 | 2014-01-22 | 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 | Test sample used in stainless steel corrosion test and fabrication method thereof |
| KR101272914B1 (en) | 2011-04-12 | 2013-06-11 | 현대자동차주식회사 | Method of testing contact corrosion between different kinds of metal and test piece module thereof |
| JP2016501724A (en) * | 2012-10-24 | 2016-01-21 | マグナ インターナショナル インコーポレイテッド | Laser metal deposition welding of automotive parts |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Lin | Green chemistry in situ phosphatizing coatings | |
| JP5304122B2 (en) | Method for evaluating corrosion resistance of surface-treated steel sheets | |
| JP2009265089A (en) | Corrosion resistance evaluation method for surface-treated steel sheet | |
| JP2009069029A (en) | Corrosion resistance evaluation method of surface treated metal | |
| JP5321481B2 (en) | Perforated corrosion evaluation method for surface-treated steel sheets | |
| JP5217637B2 (en) | Method for evaluating corrosion resistance of surface-treated steel sheets | |
| JP2010122203A (en) | Corrosion resistance evaluation method of surface treated steel sheet | |
| JP5286883B2 (en) | Method for evaluating corrosion resistance of surface-treated steel sheets for automobile side sills | |
| JP4946821B2 (en) | Method for determining structure structure | |
| Bretz et al. | Adhesive bonding and corrosion protection of a die cast magnesium automotive door | |
| CN112410768A (en) | Galvanized steel sheet surface treatment agent, preparation method of surface treatment agent, self-lubricating galvanized steel sheet and preparation method of steel sheet | |
| JP4788606B2 (en) | Method for evaluating corrosion resistance of surface-treated metals | |
| JPH03193443A (en) | Manufacture of high corrosion resistant damping steel sheet | |
| Van Schaik et al. | MagiZinc-the new high performance coating for steel in the BIW and closures | |
| JP5125783B2 (en) | Test piece preparation method and corrosion resistance evaluation method | |
| US5795661A (en) | Zinc coated steel sheet and strip having improved formability and surface quality and method thereof | |
| KR20210069457A (en) | Bonded steel sheet having excellent corrosion resistance and method for manufacturing thereof | |
| JP2009075061A (en) | Corrosion resistance evaluation method of surface treated steel plate | |
| Townsend et al. | Round-Robin Evaluation of a New Standard Laboratory Test for Cosmetic Corrosion | |
| Angeli et al. | The new family of European ZM coatings–a promising option for the automotive industry | |
| CN104630757A (en) | Low temperature black phosphatization liquid with characteristics of high friction resistance and corrosion resistance | |
| Roudabush et al. | A review of perforation corrosion testing-1980 to 1990 | |
| JPH08166338A (en) | Method for testing corrosion resistance of surface-treated steel plate | |
| Riener et al. | Zinc-Magnesium-Aluminium (ZM)-HDG-Coated Steel Sheet for Structural Parts to Outer Panels | |
| CN104633043B (en) | A kind of automobile glass lifter sector rack |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| RD03 | Notification of appointment of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7423 Effective date: 20120321 |
|
| RD04 | Notification of resignation of power of attorney |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A7424 Effective date: 20120327 |
|
| A300 | Withdrawal of application because of no request for examination |
Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A300 Effective date: 20120605 |