GB2392543A - Teaching assessment based on comparing students work with database of exemplars. - Google Patents

Teaching assessment based on comparing students work with database of exemplars. Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2392543A
GB2392543A GB0220230A GB0220230A GB2392543A GB 2392543 A GB2392543 A GB 2392543A GB 0220230 A GB0220230 A GB 0220230A GB 0220230 A GB0220230 A GB 0220230A GB 2392543 A GB2392543 A GB 2392543A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
objectives
student
exemplar
students
display
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
GB0220230A
Other versions
GB0220230D0 (en
Inventor
Lyndon Arthur Fitzgerald
James Michael Owers
Myfanwy Powell
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Research Machines PLC
Original Assignee
Research Machines PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Research Machines PLC filed Critical Research Machines PLC
Priority to GB0220230A priority Critical patent/GB2392543A/en
Publication of GB0220230D0 publication Critical patent/GB0220230D0/en
Publication of GB2392543A publication Critical patent/GB2392543A/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10Office automation; Time management
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09BEDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B5/00Electrically-operated educational appliances
    • GPHYSICS
    • G09EDUCATION; CRYPTOGRAPHY; DISPLAY; ADVERTISING; SEALS
    • G09BEDUCATIONAL OR DEMONSTRATION APPLIANCES; APPLIANCES FOR TEACHING, OR COMMUNICATING WITH, THE BLIND, DEAF OR MUTE; MODELS; PLANETARIA; GLOBES; MAPS; DIAGRAMS
    • G09B7/00Electrically-operated teaching apparatus or devices working with questions and answers

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Educational Technology (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

A system for facilitating the input and storage of assessment data indicating whether one or more teaching objectives has been obtained by a student comprises an exemplar processor 18 arranged to retrieve 16 one or more exemplars of work 14 and a selector 24 by which a teacher may select an exemplar which best represents a student's work. Each exemplar is related to a set of teaching objectives and the exemplar processor is arranged to store 22, based on the exemplar selected, a record that the respective set of teaching objectives have been attained by the student.

Description

- 1 - TEACHING ASSESSMENT SYSTEM
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a teaching assessment system of the type operable on a computer or computer network, particularly to assist teachers in a classroom environment. BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
An integral part of teaching, particularly but not exclusively in a school environment, is assessing students. Most educational delivery follows a prescribed curriculum which is designed to deliver learning outcomes/objectives. It is usual after delivery to "test" if a student has achieved/mastered those objectives. This process is known as assessment. A learning outcome/ objective is the concept which is being taught by explanation using different expressions of that concept.
There are two types of assessment: Formative Assessment - this is done continuously as delivery happens and is used to fine-tune what a student sees next. i.e. It is used to inform the planning of the next piece of delivery.
Summative Assessment - this is done periodically e.g. at the end of a term/year and is an overall statement of what
level a student is working at.
- 2 For some subjects like Maths, simple normalised multiple choice tests can be used to provide good data automatically for both formative and summative assessment.
However, for some subjects it is impossible to create a deterministic test of this type and assessment must be based on a qualitative analysis such as: Examining a piece of work produced by a student and marking it against a marking guide.
Observing a student while he does something and monitor how he makes a certain decision and/or what techniques/though processes he uses.
It is this type of "qualitative" assessment for which the present invention is particularly useful.
We have appreciated the need to assist teachers in the input, storage and manipulation of data relating to assessment of student learning achievement. We have particularly appreciated the need for a simple interface by which teachers may enter data relating to students attainment of multiple objectives.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is defined in the claims to which reference is now directed. Preferred features are set out in the dependent claims.
A system embodying the invention provides advantages of speed and simplicity of data entry thereby increasing the speed of processing assessment data.
- 3 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
An embodiment of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, and with reference to the figures, in which: Figure 1: shows a textual example of how learning outcomes are linked to evidence of achievement of that outcome; Figure 2: shows a textual example of how learning outcomes are logically linked to teaching units; Figure 3: shows a textual example of how learning outcomes are logically linked to exemplars; Figure 4: shows further detail of one exemplar; and Figure 5: shows the main functional components of a system embodying the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The system embodying the invention may be a dedicated arrangement of terminals and storage, or a general purpose computer network or standalone computer running software.
The details of implementation are not important, but the substance of the input, manipulation and extraction of data is, as will be described first with reference to Figure 5.
The system embodying the invention shown is a general purpose computer network comprising a central server and a plurality of client terminals. For simplicity, only one
4 - display and processor are shown, though it will be appreciated that a variety of logical arrangements are possible. The system as a whole provides an efficient interface for teachers to instruct assessment data to be stored in an assessment store 22 as a database showing, for each student, the objectives that they have attained as a result of a lesson or series of lessons. As previously mentioned, an objective is the abstract concept that is taught and can be expressed by one or more examples. Such concepts include skills, techniques, knowledge etc. that can be taught and tested. The term teaching or learning "objective" is well understood in the field of teaching and is used interchangeably herein with
the term leaching or learning "outcome". The "attainment" of an objective/outcome by a student means that they have understood and reached a sufficient level of competence in relation to that objective.
A teacher first uses the system to teach a subject. This is achieved by retrieving teaching material from a teaching unit store 12 to demonstrate objectives held in an objective repository 10 and showing these on a display.
A course is a years worth of a subject curriculum. The curriculum consists of a series of progressive learning objectives arranged into several strands/themes. The delivery of the learning objectives is in delivery units, with each unit comprising a plurality of lessons. Note, therefore, that the objectives in the objective repository 10 and the units of teaching material and unit store 12 are logically linked such that presentation of units teaches the underlying objectives.
Each unit has been designed to cover a series of learning objectives, starting with simpler skills (such as "can cut and paste text") and culminating with the application of those skills within an "open ended" integrated task that addresses higher order learning objectives (e.g. can format a document to match its intended audience). An example of how learning objectives/outcomes relate to units of activity is shown in Figure 2.
At the end of each unit a student will be assigned an integrated tasks' which has been designed to cover a different set of objectives which may also be covering different levels of achievement. Three levels of task have been designed, low, medium and high and each student is assigned one only. The student now does this task and the teacher may also observe etc. The teacher now needs to assess how well the student got on with his task.
The input of assessment data is achieved using data in an exemplar store 14 extracted by an extractor 16 and processed by an exemplar processor 18 for display on the display 20. A teacher first selects one of the activities that they have taught (shown logically in Figure 2). The extractor 16 then interrogates the exemplar store 14 and retrieves ''exemplars"' that match the integrated activities that the teacher has taught. Each exemplar comprises one or more "evidence of achievement" data items, as shown in Figure 1, each of which match each learning objective.
These data items contain some text, possibly a fragment of some work (e.g. a screen shot) and are designed to put the learning objective into a context that the teacher can recognize. They are designed in such a way that we can
- 6 say to the teacher.... "If your student produced something like this/did something like this then they have probably attained this objective".
The exemplar data items, shown in Figure 3, match each of the integrated activities (low, medium, high). Exemplars can include: One or more screen shots of actual work Text based explanations of what to look for.
Exemplars include data from each of the evidence of achievement data items that are covered by this activity.
The exemplar data items are thus example representations of the type of work that a student would produce if they have attained the objectives which each of the evidence of achievement data items represent. The teacher now browses these exemplars on the display 20 and double checks that the student achieved the things that the activity was testing. The teacher can choose the appropriate exemplar which best matches the work of the student being assessed and selects this using selector 24. Once selected, the student gets marked as '"assessed for this unit" and each of the learning objectives represented by the exemplar is automatically marked as achieved in the assessment store 22. Note, the database thus constructed holds a "set" of objectives for each student for each course arranged both by strand and by unit of delivery. These data entries get marked as achieved/unmarked as appropriate.
The teacher can now optionally switch to a "detailed view" and work at individual objective level to fine tune the individual "ticks" showing whether each objective is achieved thereby amending the data in the assessment store denoting whether each objective has been attained.
The advantage provided is that the teacher starts with the exemplar that is most like/closest to the level of the student's actual work. This then does some broad assessment after which the teacher can for certain students drill in and fine-tune by indicating at individual learning objective level whether each objective has been achieved.
One of the prime drivers for this design was speed of use for a busy teacher, i.e. with a few clicks the whole class can be assessed at the end of a unit (with suitable fine tuning where needed) and all this can be done by a non expert low confidence teacher/classroom assistant.
The teacher can also add text to each indication that an objective has been attained in relation to one student or a group of students to provide an alert. When the objective is next selected, by teaching a unit containing that objective for example, the alert is provided to the teacher. As ticks are built up along each strand, we automatically calculate "levels". Each strand has some ''marker posts" where, for example, you achieve level-1, level-2. An algorithm is used to decide what and how many ticks constitute attainment of that level (for example, if there
- 8 are seven objectives between the level-1 and level-2 posts, we may say that level-2 is achieved if you get the two key-objectives and at least three of the remaining five). Algorithms will be tuned differently for different strands. When we have a level calculated for each strand, we now create an overall level as an "average" of the level across the individual strands. The teacher can optionally override this automatically calculated overall level.
Note the "overall level" viewing/setting screen has been designed to visually remind the teacher what has been delivered as well as what has been achieved, using a double "thermometertt/'field gauge" type design metaphor.
In the example embodiment, the selector may be any appropriate input device, e.g. mouse, keyboard or touchscreen, and appropriate software drivers to instruct the exemplar processor.

Claims (1)

  1. 9 - CLAIMS
    1. A system for facilitating the input and storage of assessment data indicating whether a set of one or more teaching objectives have been attained by students, comprising: - an exemplar processor arranged to retrieve one or more exemplars of work each relating to a respective set of teaching objectives for presentation on a display; - a selector by which a teacher may select an exemplar shown on the display which best represents examples of student work; and - wherein the exemplar processor is arranged to store, for the exemplar selected, an indication that the respective set of teaching objectives has been attained by a given student or students.
    2. A system according to claim 1, further comprising: - a store of data items, each data item being logically linked to one or more related teaching objectives; - an extractor arranged to retrieve the data items logically linked to the respective set of teaching objectives for the one or more exemplars; - wherein the exemplar processor is configured to receive the retrieved data items and to format the data items for presentation with the one or more respective exemplars.
    - 10 3. A system according to claim 1, wherein the exemplar processor is further arranged to retrieve the indications that the set of objectives have been obtained for a student or students for presentation on a display, and the selector is further arranged such that a teacher may select individual objectives to modify the indication that each individual objective within the set has been obtained for each student or students.
    4. A system according to any preceding claim, wherein the exemplar processor is further arranged to store text data input by a teacher associated with a given objective in relation to a student or students, and to provide an alert for display when that given objective is next selected. 5. A method of operating a computer interface for facilitating the input and storage of assessment data indicating whether a set of one or more teaching objectives have been attained by students, comprising: retrieving one or more exemplars of work each relating to a respective set of teaching objectives for presentation on a display; - displaying the one or more exemplars on a display; - receiving a selection input denoting one of the one or more exemplars in response to a user input selecting an exemplar shown on the display which best represents examples of student work; and - storing, for the exemplar selected, an indication that the respective set of teaching
    - 11 objectives has been attained by a given student or students. 6. A method according to claim 5, wherein the retrieving step further comprises retrieving one or more data items logically linked to the respective set of teaching objectives for the one or more exemplars; and the displaying step comprises displaying the data items for that are logically linked to the respective set of teaching objectives with the respective exemplar.
    7. A method according to claim 5 or 6, further comprising: - retrieving the stored indications that the set of objectives have been obtained for a student or students for presentation on a display, - presenting the stored indications on a display; and - modifying the stored indications of individual objectives to thereby modify the indication that each individual objective within the set has been obtained for each student or students in response to a further user input. 8. A method according to any of claims 5, 6 or 7, further comprising storing text data associated with a given objective input by a teacher in relation to a student or students, and providing an alert for display when that given objective is next selected.
    9. A computer program which when executed on a computer undertakes the method of any of claims 5 to 8.
GB0220230A 2002-08-30 2002-08-30 Teaching assessment based on comparing students work with database of exemplars. Withdrawn GB2392543A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0220230A GB2392543A (en) 2002-08-30 2002-08-30 Teaching assessment based on comparing students work with database of exemplars.

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0220230A GB2392543A (en) 2002-08-30 2002-08-30 Teaching assessment based on comparing students work with database of exemplars.

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB0220230D0 GB0220230D0 (en) 2002-10-09
GB2392543A true GB2392543A (en) 2004-03-03

Family

ID=9943258

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB0220230A Withdrawn GB2392543A (en) 2002-08-30 2002-08-30 Teaching assessment based on comparing students work with database of exemplars.

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2392543A (en)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5978648A (en) * 1997-03-06 1999-11-02 Forte Systems, Inc. Interactive multimedia performance assessment system and process for use by students, educators and administrators
GB2371139A (en) * 2001-01-05 2002-07-17 Research Machines Plc Metadata based teaching system.

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5978648A (en) * 1997-03-06 1999-11-02 Forte Systems, Inc. Interactive multimedia performance assessment system and process for use by students, educators and administrators
GB2371139A (en) * 2001-01-05 2002-07-17 Research Machines Plc Metadata based teaching system.

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB0220230D0 (en) 2002-10-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6267601B1 (en) Computerized system and method for teaching and assessing the holistic scoring of open-ended questions
EP0838798A1 (en) Interactive learning systems
KR970701887A (en) User interface for fulltext document retrieval
WO2003009257A2 (en) System and method for providing an online tutorial
O Olumorin et al. Computer-based tests: a system of assessing academic performance in university of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria
Capel Secondary students' development as teachers over the course of a PGCE year
Andersen et al. Assessing the skills of sport psychology supervisors
JP4447411B2 (en) Learner acquisition characteristic analysis system, method and program thereof
JP6416425B1 (en) Problem analysis system, method, and program
Sardi et al. Book Review: Language Curriculum Design (Monitoring, Assesment and Evaluation)
Luchoomun et al. A knowledge based system for automated assessment of short structured questions
KR20170113619A (en) Semi-automated systems and methods for evaluating responses
Nur’Aini et al. Mathematics teacher performance based on student’s perception and learning achievement by applying structural equation modeling approach
Kuzu et al. The Subjects That the Pre-Service Classroom Teachers Perceive as Difficult in Elementary Mathematics Curriculum.
GB2392543A (en) Teaching assessment based on comparing students work with database of exemplars.
US8060819B2 (en) Method for automated permutation of computerized lists of text data objects with selected columns of imaged parametric data excluded from sorting
Wiediger et al. The significance of accurate student self-assessment in understanding of chemical concepts
Zanthy et al. The use of ASSURE learning design to improve mathematical problem solving ability and self-determination of junior high school students
Nuryanto et al. The validity analysis of reading test items on national standard School Final Examination for 12th Grade of MAN 1 Semarang
Dikmenli et al. High school students’ images of “biology teacher”
Bennett et al. Problem solving in technology-rich environments
Brito et al. Mvgen: Multi version question generation for math courses
Bogamuwa Learning style preferences of English as second language learners in the Open University English for general academic purpose (EGAP) programme
Fairbank Jr et al. Measures of thirty cognitive tasks: Analysis of reliabilities, intercorrelations, and correlations with aptitude battery scores
JP6940675B1 (en) Joint application school selection support device, joint application school selection support method, computer program

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WAP Application withdrawn, taken to be withdrawn or refused ** after publication under section 16(1)