GB2222420A - Bacteria and its use in a microbial profile modification process - Google Patents

Bacteria and its use in a microbial profile modification process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB2222420A
GB2222420A GB8820916A GB8820916A GB2222420A GB 2222420 A GB2222420 A GB 2222420A GB 8820916 A GB8820916 A GB 8820916A GB 8820916 A GB8820916 A GB 8820916A GB 2222420 A GB2222420 A GB 2222420A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
spores
cells
injected
zones
nutrient solution
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
GB8820916A
Other versions
GB8820916D0 (en
GB2222420B (en
Inventor
Richard S Silver
Pamela A Bunting
William G Moon
Willard P Acheson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chevron USA Inc
Original Assignee
Chevron Research and Technology Co
Chevron Research Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Chevron Research and Technology Co, Chevron Research Co filed Critical Chevron Research and Technology Co
Publication of GB8820916D0 publication Critical patent/GB8820916D0/en
Publication of GB2222420A publication Critical patent/GB2222420A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of GB2222420B publication Critical patent/GB2222420B/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/58Compositions for enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons, i.e. for improving the mobility of the oil, e.g. displacing fluids
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/50Compositions for plastering borehole walls, i.e. compositions for temporary consolidation of borehole walls
    • C09K8/504Compositions based on water or polar solvents
    • C09K8/506Compositions based on water or polar solvents containing organic compounds
    • C09K8/508Compositions based on water or polar solvents containing organic compounds macromolecular compounds
    • C09K8/514Compositions based on water or polar solvents containing organic compounds macromolecular compounds of natural origin, e.g. polysaccharides, cellulose
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09KMATERIALS FOR MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATIONS, NOT PROVIDED FOR ELSEWHERE
    • C09K8/00Compositions for drilling of boreholes or wells; Compositions for treating boreholes or wells, e.g. for completion or for remedial operations
    • C09K8/58Compositions for enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons, i.e. for improving the mobility of the oil, e.g. displacing fluids
    • C09K8/582Compositions for enhanced recovery methods for obtaining hydrocarbons, i.e. for improving the mobility of the oil, e.g. displacing fluids characterised by the use of bacteria

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)

Abstract

Bacteria, particularly of two newly isolated strains of bacteria described herein, are injected downhole in a petroleum reservoir to modify its profile by producing an exopolymer. The bacteria have the capability to plug the zones of higher permeability within the reservoir so that a subsequent waterflood may selectively enter the oil bearing less permeable zones. The injected water is used to drive this oil to an area where it may then be recovered.

Description

BACTERIA AND ITS USE IN A MICROBIAL PROFILE MODIFICATION PROCESS This invention generally relates to the use of microorganisms to enhance oil recovery from petroleum reservoirs. Here, a suitable strain of bacteria is used to plug high permeability zones and increase waterflood efficiency by redirecting the flood to lower permeability, oil-bearing zones.
Petroleum that is in underground reservoirs is brought to the surface in a variety of ways. One of the more notable publicly held ideas of oil recovery is the "gusher," however, due to the changing nature of oil reserves, and economic and environmental policies, the gusher is the thing of the past. Surface pumps, which are a common highway sight, oftentimes provide the lift force necessary to bring oil to the surface in those reservoirs where the reservoir pressure is insufficient.
Additionally, subsurface pumps can be coupled with the surface pumps to assist in the lifting duty. However, there comes a time in the life of many reservoir formations in which the reservoir pressure and the pumping devices are not enough to-overcome the oil viscosity and the capillary forces of the formation. At this point, enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques are useful to recover additional oil that refuses to come to the surface by the means described above.
The term "EOR" spans a panoply of techniques and devices that are used to recover the last bit of oil reserves. There are devices and methods for: steam injection, water injection, gas drive, emulsification, injecting plugging agents, etc. One "device" that may perform many of these feats is a microorganism, most notably, a bacterium.
The idea of using bacteria to increase or enhance oil recovery is not new. Many laboratory investigations and a number of field tests have been performed both in the U.S. and elsewhere [see generally, J. Davis, Petroleum Microbiology (1967) and works collected in J. E. Zajic et al., Microbes and Oil Recovery, Bioresource Publications, El Paso (1985)]. Several technical meetings devoted exclusively to microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) have been held. Some of the previous literature consists of anecdotal accounts or inadequately controlled studies, resulting in a skeptical appraisal of the technology. (See also D. Hitzman, Petroleum Microbiology and the History of its Role in Enhanced Oil Recovery, Proc. Int'l. Conf. on Micro. Enh.Oil Rec., p 162, (May 16-21, 1982), and E. Donaldsonet al., There are Bugs in My Oil Well, Chemtech, p. 602 (Oct. 1985).] The principle behind MEOR is based on the fact that microbes can produce most of the agents now employed in chemical EOR; i.e., water-soluble polymers, surfactants, co-surfactants and solvents such as ethanol and acetone, and acids. (See M. Singer, Microbial Biosurfactants in Zajic, Microbes and Oil Recovery, U.S. Patent No. 4,552,261 to McInerney et al., U.S. Patent No. 2,807,570 to Updegraff and U.S. Patent No. 2,660,550 to Updegraff et al.) Some microbial-produced products, e.g., xanthan biopolymer, are now commercially used for EOR.Such use is dependent on the cost-effectiveness of the microbial product compared to competing non-microbial products, e.g., xanthan as compared to polyacrylamide. In this application, the definition of MEOR applies to processes involving the in-situ application of microbial processes and usually excludes EOR processes which merely involve the use of chemical products which are produced in a fermentation plant.
The specific application of microorganisms for EOR in this invention is their use for the selective plugging of zones of high permeability (i.e., thief zones) in petroleum reservoirs. When water injection is used to recover oil, it is injected downhole in an injection well to move any oil out of the formation to be recovered at a producing well. The water pushes the oil out of the small interstices and pores of the rocks, but it pushes the oil out of wider spaces and larger pores (i.e., zones of higher permeability) first, leaving the smaller areas still filled with oil. Since petroleum is formed in stratified sedimentary deposits, several distinct layers of oil-bearing sands are usually present over the vertical profile of an oil well. Different layers can vary widely in permeability and porosity, as well as other properties.
Since a waterflood will naturally seek the zone of least resistance (or highest permeability), low permeability zones may be bypassed. After a time, recoverable oil is "watered out" of the high permeability zones, but the low permeability streaks still contain considerable recoverable oil.
"Profile modification" provides a way that the residual oil may be recovered from these lower permeability zones.
Current technology involves the injection of water-soluble polymers, which selectively enter the high permeability zones. Cationic cross-linking agents, i.e., Cr+3, Ti+4, or A1+31 held in solution by a complexing agent (e.g., citrate) or by oxidation state, are co-injected with the polymer or are swept after the polymer. (See U.S. Patent No.
4,552,217 to Wu et al.) As the polymer gradually crosslinks and gels into a water-insoluble 3-D matrix in the high permeability zones, the water flood is channeled into zones of lower permeability, thus increasing oil production. There are problems associated with the techniques of profile modification with cross-linking polymers. Such polymers are relatively expensive, they may shear-degrade upon injection at the wellhead and may not penetrate sufficiently before gelling. For this reason, the use of microorganisms is promising in profile modification because it eliminates some of these problems.
As with other techniques, using microbes to plug high permeability zones is not exactly new. Some early researchers are listed in J. Davis, "Petroleum Microbiology" (1967) and more recently there is U.S. Patent No. 4,558,739 to McInerney et al.; and D. Revus, A Study of Reservoir Selective Plugging Utilizing In Situ Growth of Bacteria to Improve Volumetric Sweep Efficiency, Masters Thesis, Univ. of Oklahoma (1982), P. Kalish et al., The Effect of Bacteria on Sandstone Permeability, 16 Jour. Pet. Tech. 805 (July 1964). C. Brierly et al., Investigation of Microbially Induced Permeability Loss During In-Situ Leaching, Bureau of Mines (NTIS Publication) (April 1982).
They use microbes in a variety of ways to enhance oil recovery. Some researchers have used the bacteria that naturally exists in the formation and have simply injected nutrients downhole to stimulate their growth and plug the formation [see U.S. Patent No. 4,475,590 to Brown and L.
Allison, Effect of Micoorganisms on Permeability of Soil Under Prolonged Submergence, 63 Soil Science 439 (1947)].
Others have injected bacteria downhole followed by a nutrient solution. Some researchers depend on the biomass of the bacteria for plugging purposes, while others show that exopolymers produced by the bacteria are effective in closing off areas of high permeability.
Another factor in this plugging technique is the size of the organism being injected. Smaller bacteria may penetrate the formation a bit easier than larger bacteria.
To that end, the spores of different bacteria may be used for injection to penetrate even deeper. Spores penetrate a reservoir formation easier and become lodged in these permeable zones, so that when they are stimulated to grow by a nutrient solution, they will plug more pores more effectively.
Other problems exist with the nutrient solutions used in the prior art. For example, downhole in a petroleum reservoir, there are conditions that put further constraints on microorganisms. More specifically, connate water, in many formations, has both high concentrations of salt (NaCI), alkaline earth ions (Ca+2, Mg+2, Ba+2), and heavy metal ions. Such ions can form insoluble precipitates with many of the standard components of bacterial nutrient media.
These precipitates can plug the wellbore and prevent injection of cells or nutrients. Furthermore, some of these ions are inhibitory or toxic to microbial cells and some (e.g., Ca+2) are inhibitory to production of microbial biopolymer. Bacteria and the nutrient source that are injected downhole must be tolerant to these if they are to survive.
The downhole environment is usually anoxic, unlike the highly oxygenated condition above. To be able to survive and live in both environments, bacteria must either be shielded from oxygen (which may be difficult and expensive) or must be tolerant to it (e.g., a facultative anaerobe).
[Bacteria can be broadly divided into 3 categories based on their ability to utilize and tolerate oxygen: (1) obligately aerobic bacteria, which require molecular oxygen for growth; (2) obligately anaerobic bacteria, to which molecular oxygen is toxic; and (3) facultative anaerobes, which can grow either in the presence or absence of atmospheric oxygen.
Of the three, facultative anaerobes appear to be the most suitable MEOR candidates, since they can survive exposure to air during storage and injection while retaining the ability to grow well anaerobically.] The most important ingredient, i.e., the bacteria, sometimes must be selected for these exact conditions that exist in a reservoir. Also, the nutrient's solution has to be tailored to both the bacteria and the reservoir in which it will be injected. All these considerations must be merged together to provide the desired result in plugging the formation thief zones.
It is an object of this invention to inject a bacterium, in the spore form, into a petroleum reservoir to selectively plug highly permeable thief zones, so that enhanced oil recovery techniques, such as water injection, and other enhanced oil recovery methods will be more effective. It is a further objective of this invention to develop novel techniques for spore preparation and injection that do not cause well-face plugging.
Mature petroleum reservoirs are frequently waterflooded to increase oil production. When a heterogeneous permeability profile exists, the flood poorly sweeps the less permeable zones. "Profile modification" is the enhancement of waterflood efficiency, generally accomplished by the injection of soluble, cross-linkable polymers and a cross-linking agent. The injected polymer selectively enters the highly permeable, watered-out "thief zones" where it sets into an insoluble crosslinked gel, thus channelling the waterflood into the tighter, oil-bearing zones.
According to one aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for enhancing oil recovery by improving the sweep efficiency of a water flood through an oil producing reservoir which has zones of relatively high permeability and saline connate water, comprising the steps of: isolating a bacterium that has the following characteristics: it is motile; it is a facultative anaerobe; it is at least halotolerant; it is at least thermotolerant; it produces an exopolymer; and it sporulates; preparing a suspension of spores of said bacterium or of cells or mixtures thereof; and injecting said suspension into an oil producing reservoir for said spores or cells to become lodged in zones of relatively high permeability and plug said zones.
The present microbial process should improve sweep efficiency more effectively than is currently possible with injected polymer, and at a significantly lower cost.
We have isolated strains of bacteria from saline sediments which are halotolerant (able to live in a moderately salty environment), spore forming, thermotolerant (able to live within a wide temperature range), biopolymer-producing facultative anaerobes; that is, they can grow and produce a viscous biopolymer within a petroleum reservoir. When spores of these bacteria, pretreated in accordance with our techniques, are injected along with the specially designed nutrient solution of this disclosure, they selectively penetrate higher permeability zones. After germination and growth, their biomass, and the exopolymer (the polymer that is secreted outside of the cell) that is produced in-situ, gives the desired profile modification. The effectiveness is superior to injected polymers since the non-viscous spore suspension penetrates further, and the chemicals cost one-tenth that of polymers.Since the polymer is formed in-situ, there is no degradation from injection shear or storage. The novel techniques we have developed for spore preparation, injection, medium and cross-linker formulation and cross-linker delivery overcome problems of injectability, precipitation and control prevalent in the prior art and render the technique operable and practical.
It is also within the scope of this invention to reduce the permeability of underground formations to restrict the spread of contaminant materials. For example, to prevent the flow of hazardous wastes into background aquifers.
The present invention will now be described in greater detail. Reference will be made to the accompanying drawings, wherein: FIG. 1 is an example of a MEOR continuous testing unit.
FIG. 2 shows the pressure response of cumulative nutrient addition on growing cells in a core.
MEOR requires the use of halotolerant, facultative anaerobes since most oil field connate waters are salty and oxygen tension is nil. The cells must be thermophilic (able to grow above 550C) or "thermotolerant" (able to grow over a wide temperature range including 40-45 C and survive exposure to above 550C) since petroleum reservoirs are most frequently within this temperature range. The cells (or spores from the cells) must be small-sized and mobile (or motile) so they can penetrate far into the porous rock. They must have non-fastidious nutrient requirements since laboratory culture media would be prohibitively expensive for field application where huge volumes are injected.
The cells must be able to grow and produce the desired product under in-situ conditions of pH, temperature, heavy metal ion concentration, etc. Although some oil-bearing formations are too hot, impermeable or otherwise inhospitable to microbial presence, many are within a temperature range of 20-800C and can support microbial presence and growth. Microbes used for MEOR must also be non-pathogenic and must not produce any animal or plant toxins, since they may be injected near water supply aquifers.
Although many microbes can utilize hydrocarbons as the sole carbon and energy source, all known species that do this are aerobes which require molecular oxygen for the initial attack on hydrocarbons. If facultative anaerobes are used for MEOR, non-petroleum carbon sources should be supplied. Unless hydrocarbon-utilizing anaerobes can be created through recombinant DNA techniques, sufficient nonhydrocarbon metabolizable components must be present in the petroleum. Suitable carbon substrates are cheap carbohydrates such as molasses and whey and possibly inexpensive synthetic substrates such as methanol. Nitrogen, phosphorus and other nutrients must also be supplied if these are not present in the carbon substrate or in the rock. Nutrients must be supplied at the correct time that microbial activity is desired; loss or absorption of nutrients would be an economic debit.
Facultative anaerobic halophilic, or halotolerant, thermotolerant bacteria are used to achieve profile modification through the production of exopolymer and/or the growth of cells within highly permeable rock, thereby decreasing the permeability of this rock. The exopolymer forms an insoluble matrix within the rock pores which is resistant to bio-, shear, and thermal degradation. Ionic or other cross-linking agents are preferably used to enhance polymer stability in-situ. However, since the polymer is produced in-situ and not injected from the surface (where water solubility is essential), such cross-linking agents are an optional feature of our invention.
The spores which are injected are small enough to penetrate high permeability zones, but not the oil-bearing low permeability zones. The spores are prepared by growing cells on a sporulation medium to give a spore concentrate (109 spores/ml). This spore suspension is stable for long periods of time and is pretreated (by aging, lysozyme or other enzyme treatment) and filtered to remove cellular debris and improve injectivity. The spore suspension may be diluted 1:1000 with nutrient or brine prior to injection, i.e., the injected spore concentration is approximately 106/ml.
The Bacteria The preferred bacteria of choice are two strains of Bacillus licheniformis dubbed (SLS-1 NRRL No. B-18179 and Salton-l), - both deposited on 23rd February 1987 in the Agricultural Research Service Culture Collection at 1815 North University Street, Peoria, Illinois 61604, U.S.A. under the respective accession numbers NRRL No.B-18179 and NRRL No.B-18178, which bacteria possess the following characteristics: motility; facultative anaerobiasis; exopolymer production; sporulation, thermotolerance, and halotolerance. They will alter the profile of a petroleum reservoir by their own mass and their exopolymer when they are lodged in zones of high permeability. Since they are motile the bacteria may reach further into the permeable zone.
Thus according to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for modifying the profile of a petroleum reservoir to enhance oil recovery from relatively high permeability zones1 comprising: preparing a biologically pure form of Bacillus licheniformis, NRRL No.B-18178 or B-18179; forming spores of B-18178 or B-18179; separating the spores from cell debris and proteins; flowing the spores into a relatively high permeability zone in a petroleum reservoir; and contacting the spores with a nutrient solution to facilitate growth and exopolymer production.
The biopolymer may be produced in larger quantities if one or a mixture of the following ingredients is added directly to the culture medium: phosphate in the form tripolyphosphate, citric acid, A1+3 (as aluminum citrate), or ammonium nitrate.
Polyphosphate is an essential component of the preferred medium, in a salt form such as sodium, potassium or ammonium tri-polyphosphate.
Natural Isolates from Enrichment Cultures To isolate bacteria which could survive high salt concentrations, environmental samples of oil reser voir waters and sediments were obtained from saline lakes including the Great Salt Lake in Utah, the Salton Sea and Soda Lake in California. These samples were collected and shipped in a manner to preserve strictly anaerobic bacteria.
Enrichment cultures of each of the source sam ples were set up in several different culture media con taining 5, 10 and 15% salt. Nutrient broth glucose and the brain heart infusion enrichment culture media were used as culture media under sterile and anaerobic conditions (unless otherwise specified, all nutrient media are common formulations which are readily available from bacterial nutrient supply companies, such as Difco or BBL).
For strict anaerobic bacteria, thioglycollate broth, which contains its own reducing agent, was used. All enrichments cultures were incubated at 400C.
After subculturing each enrichment medium at least once, the most recent subculture was streaked in duplicate to a variety of agar plates including nutrient agar, nutrient agar glucose, veal agar, and brain heart infusion agar containing salt in varying concentrations (i.e., 5, 10 and 15%). One set of plates was incubated aerobically at 400C; the other set was incubated in an anaerobic jar using a BBL GasPac anaerobic system to create and maintain an anaerobic environment.
After incubation, the plates were examined and generally showed at least three morphologically distinct colony types. These colonies were picked from the agar surface and re-streaked in duplicate to plates of the same agar for both aerobic and anaerobic incubation. On the basis of these plates, strict aerobes and strict anaerobes were discarded.
The enrichment culture isolates were further screened for their ability to grow in a simple liquid medium. Bushnell-Haas medium, widely used for the cultivation of hydrocarbon-degrading microbes (when supplemented with oil) is among the most simple media which provide the essential elements required by non-fastidious microorganisms. Its composition, per liter, is 0.2 g magnesium sulfate, 0.02 g calcium chloride, 1.0 g monopotassium phosphate, 1.0 g dipotassium phosphate, 1.0 g ammonium nitrate, and 0.05 g ferric chloride.
None of the enrichment culture isolates would grow anaerobically on the very simple Bushnell-Haas mineral salts medium containing 10% salt and molasses.
When this medium was supplemented with small amounts of yeast extract or tryptone, a very few cultures showed moderate growth. These cultures included: SLS-1, which was isolated from sediment from the Great Salt Lake, Utah; and Salton-l, which was isolated from the Salton Sea.
Continued culture in even this supplemented liquid medium resulted in less vigorous growth. For culture maintenance, Brain Heart Infusion was added at 1/20 its usual concentration to facilitate continued good growth. This culture maintenance medium was called Inoculum Growth Medium (IGM) and had the following composition: Inoculum Growth Medium (IGM) Per liter distilled water 0.2 g Magnesium Sulfate 0.02 g Calcium Chloride 1.0 g Monopotassium Phosphate Medium pH was adjusted 1.0 g Dipotassium Phosphate to 7.0 (8.0 in later 1.0 g Ammonium Nitrate experiments) prior to 0.05 g Ferric Chloride autoclaving.
100 g Sodium Chloride 1.0 g Yeast Extract (Difco) 1.85 g Brain Heart Infusion (BBL) 2.5 g Molasses (as solids) or Sucrose While IGM has been extensively used for culture maintenance, it contains a precipitate which makes it unsuitable for injection into consolidated sandstone.
Molasses is low-cost and would be the preferred substrate for commercial field operation, but raw molasses contains insolubles, is variable in quality, and contains both sucrose and reducing sugars which complicates laboratory analyses for substrate consumption. For these reasons, most of the laboratory studies have been conducted using sucrose, or other simple sugars, as the growth substrates.
Characterization and Identification of MEOR Isolates Only two genera of bacillus-shaped, gram positive, single endospore forming bacteria are recognized in Bergey's Manual for Determinative Bacteriology, the authoritative source for the classification of bacteria -there are: Clostridium and Bacillus. The two bacteria are differentiated by the ability of the Bacillus species to survive and grow in the presence of molecular oxygen (they are facultative anaerobes); whereas Clostridia cannot (they are obligate anaerobes).
The two bacterial isolates showing the most promise for permeability modification were species of Bacillus. SLS-1 and Salton-l (while isolated from saline sediments hundreds of miles apart) show many similarities and a few differences. Biochemical and morphological tests showed that the two isolates are indeed closely related and most closely resemble the species, Bacillus licheniformis, described in Bergey's Manual.
TABLE 1 Characterization of MEOR-Salton and MEOR-SLS-1 MEOR-Salton MEOR-SLS Morphology Rod shapel, flexible Rod shapel, flexible Gram Reaction Positive Positive give negative staining in old give negative staining culture in old culture size (wide x length)m) 0.5 - 0.55 x 1.2 - 2.2 0.4 - 0.6 x 1.5 - 2.8 Electron micrograph cell wall gram positive cell wall-like same structure spore former yes yes motility yes yes (negative staining) (Peritrichous or polar flagella) (same) Double time (td) 1 hr 15 min 2 hr 30 min (condition IGM + 10% NaCl) Final O.D. 0.68 0.42 Final pH 6.2 - 6.5 6.2 - 6.3 NaCl Requirement 6% - 12% 8% - 12% optimal NaCl range 8% - 10% 8% - 10% (condition IGM + 10% NaCl Moderate halophile Moderate halophile or 8% NaCl, pH 8, 37 C) End Products Acetoin 1.18 mM 3.3 mM (condition IGM + 10% NaCl, Acetate 12.84 mM 17.47 mM 37 C) (Triplicate experiment;Ethanol 0.53 mM 0.62 mM Resuluts reperesent the CO2 113.80) mole 121.56) mole average value) H2 1.3) mole Biochemical Test VP positive positive MR negative negative Growth in IGM + 0.2% Tri poly PO4 No poly PO4 Final O.D. 0.6 0.48 Final O.D. 0.3 0.25 Presence of poly PO4 TABLE 2 Comparison of the Characteristics of Salton-1 and SLS-1 with Bacillus licheniformis Characteristic Salton-1 SLS-1 B. licheniformis Gram Reaction Gram + Gram + Gram + Cell Morphology short rod short rod short rod Width 0.2 0.5 0.6 - 0.8 Length 0.5 - 1.0 1.5 - 3.0 1.5 - 3.0 Motility + Flagella + Flagella + Flagella Catalase + + + Respiration Facultative Anaerobe Facultative Anaerobe Facultative Anaerobe Growth in Anaerobe Agar + + + Nitrate -- > Nitrates + + + Hydrolysis of Starch + + + Amylase - - Max temp. for growth degrees C 55 ND 50-55 Carbon Assimilation Sucrose + + + Glucose + + + Sorbitol + + * Fructose + + * Starch + + * Maltose + + * Galactose - - * Lactose - - * Sodium Citrate - - * Fermentation Glucose, sucrose Glucose, sucrose Gas formation and fructose and fructose erratic weakly weakly G+C Content of DNA** 48 mole % 45 mole % 43-47 mole % *Reaction not listed in Bergey's 8th Edition **Determined at U. of Wisconsin Bergey's Manual suggests that Bacillus licheniformis is a halotolerant (growth in 7% NaCl) bacterium which produces an extracellular glutamyl polypeptide and a carbohydrate-based polymer of levan (repeating units of fructofuranose). The present isolates both produce an extracellular polymer (which has been characterized as polyglutamic acid for Salton-l), and both were isolated in medium containing 5-10% salt.There seems little doubt that these isolates are strains of Bacillus licheniformis though the cells of Salton-l are somewhat smaller than the dimensions given in Bergey's.
SPORULATION Advantages of Spores over Vegetative Cells as Inoculum Vegetative cells of Salton-l have the following disadvantages as an inoculum for core or field experiments: 1. They tend to clump together in short chains or small masses, plugging injection line filters during cell injection and leading to inoculum losses when the cell suspension is pre-filtered. Adding commercially available surfactants such as magnesium lignosulfonate, Marasperse C-21 or N-22 (trademark of Marathon Co.), Reax 888 (trademark of West Virginia Pulp and Paper Co.), or Tween 80 (trademark of Atlas Powder Co.) to either the cell suspensions prior to filtering or to the growth medium during cell growth does not effectively remedy the problem. When the surfactants were added to the growth medium, lower medium viscosities were recorded after cell growth.
2. Vegetative cells tend to rapidly lyse when they are stored. Polymer Medium-2 (PM-2) medium containing sucrose but no nitrogen proved to the best medium for maintaining viability of the cell suspension. (PM-2 medium contains [per liter of waters: 200 g NaCl; .5 g MgS04; 1.33 g NH3N04; 2.0 g NaNO4; 1 g yeast extract; and 2.6 g citric acid, which is then adjusted to pH 8.0.) In PM-2 medium containing nitrogen but not sucrose, the viable cell count dropped from 108 to 104 per ml during the 72-hour storage. The availability of a carbon substrate is apparently very important in maintaining vegetative cell viability. Spores, on the other hand, are stable and resistant to adverse environmental factors such as nutrient imbalances, desiccation, and high temperatures.Spores have been shown to survive for decades in soils, and our lab studies have shown no loss in germination capacity when stored for over one month in brine at room temperature or at 40C.
3. Vegetative cells are considerably larger than the endospores that they produce, limiting their passage through narrow pore throats in rock formations. It also would seem logical that vegetative cells, coated with polymeric material, would tend to adsorb more readily to rock surfaces.
Inducing Sporulation in Salton-l Species classification studies had shown that both Salton-l and SLS-1 are spore-forming Bacilli. Yet in PM-2, spores are formed in low numbers, generally less than 0.1t of the cells are present as spores, even in older cultures. (Spore percentages were determined by comparing plate counts on cell suspensions before and after heating the suspension to 800C for 20 minutes.) The sporulation literature indicates that Bacillus species vary widely in their propensity to sporulate and that sporulation is influenced by dissolved oxyqen, nutrition, and other factors. Examination of existing cultures showed that in IGM medium a greater proportion of cells produced spores than had been observed in PM-2 medium, which was interpreted as being due to the richer composition of the IGM medium.Experiments on sporulation included incubating PM-2 medium with and without supplementation with rich components aerobically and anaerobically, varying the salt concentration, and preparing and monitoring growth and sporulation in several media formulation taken from the literature.
In all of the above experiments, the only combination of medium formulation and incubation conditions that provided 100% sporulation of Salton-l cultures was aerobic incubation in chemically defined sporulation medium (CDSM) of the composition similar to Hageman et al. (Hageman, J. H., Shankweiler, G. W., Wall, P. R., Franich, K., McCowan, G. W., Cauble, S. M., Grajeda, J., Quinones, C., 160, J. Bacteriol. 438 (1984), "Single chemically defined sporulation medium for Bacillus subtilis growth, sporulation and extracellular protease production" which is hereby incorporated by reference).
CDSM was prepared as follows: TABLE 3 10 x Macro Stock Solution 50 x Trace Element Solution 20.9 g MOPS buffer (40 mM) 10.17 g Magnesium chloride 1.36 g KH2PO4 (40 mM) 1.94 g Calcium chloride 3.14 g Ammonium sulfate 0.25 g Manganese chloride (95 mM) 9.01 g glucose (200 mM) 0.0004 g Zinc chloride 1.13 g l-Lactic acid 0.0203 g Ferric chloride (50 mM) 0.37 g l-Glutamic acid 0.0169 g Thiamine HC1 (10 mM) pH to 7.0 with KOH 0.5 ml of 1.0 N HC1 Volume to 250 ml with Volume to 250 ml with distilled water distilled waster Filter-sterilize Filter-sterilize CDSM Medium 50 ml Macro Stock Solutions 10 ml Trace Element Solution 0.050 g l-Tryptophan 0.050 g l-Isoleucine Volume to 500 ml with distilled water Filter-sterilize and dispense into sterile test tubes Interestingly, growth of Salton-l is slow in this medium whether or not salt is added. But the final cell density is higher than was observed with any other medium formulation, and after 3-4 weeks incubation, only small bright circular spores are observed under phase contrast microscopy; vegetative cell forms have essentially totally disappeared. Spore density in CDSM is around 109 spores per ml.
Growth and spore production in aerobic CDSM cultures is comparable whether or not salt is incorporated into the salt-free medium formulation. It is interesting to note, however, that spores transferred from salt-free CDSM medium to PM-2 medium produced significantly more polymer than those transferred from salt-containing CDSM, possibly indicating that a "cell shock" phenomenon is a factor in turning on polymer production.
Growth and sporulation are inhihited when CDSM is incubated anaerobically or when 10% salt is added.
During sporulation the medium changes from a light yellow to a dark brown color. After spores are formed, the vegetative cells lyse and slowly disintegrate.
Microscopic examination of freshly sporulated cells reveals that the optically refractile spores are surrounded with considerable cell debris and analysis shows that viscous cell proteins have been released into the medium. We have found that such fresh spore suspensions have poor injectibility and tend to plug at the face of cores when injected. Conversely, we have found that a short (e.g., 2 hrs.) treatment of fresh spores with the proteolytic enzyme lysozyme removes the adherent cell debris and solubilizes proteins suspended in the liquid, such that the lysozyme-treated spores can be easily injected without face plugging. Further, it is known (e.g., ref.Hagemann et al) that sporulating cultures produce autogenous proteases, and we have observed that upon long-term aging (e.g., 1-2 mo.) of a fresh spore suspension, the adherent debris and suspended proteins are likewise solubilized as achieved by the brief lysozyme treatment. Assuming sufficient time is available, the aging procedure would be more economical, i.e., the spores could be prepared several months prior to injection, since no added chemicals are required.
Germination of Sal ton-i Spores Some species of Bacillus produce spores which do not readily germinate even when environmental conditions and nutrients would favor the growth of vegetative cells.
These spores must be induced to break their dormant state by heat shocking or exposure to amino acids.
THE BIOPOLYMER Polymer Recovery and Properties Salton-l produces a viscous, extra cellular, water-soluble polymer during the early stationary phase of its growth cycle. Many biopolymers, such as xanthan, can be precipitated from culture medium using alcohol, and it appears that the biopolymers produced by both bacteria (Salton-l and SLS-1) were no exception. Briefly, the method that was used to precipitate the biopolymer consisted of the following two steps: centrifugation of the culture medium containing the biopolymer at 7000 rpm for 20 minutes to remove the bacterial cells; and mixing the supernatant with an equal volume of 95E ethanol to precipitate the polymer into slimy strands which can be quantitatively recovered by filtration or low-speed centrifugation (1500 rpm, 5 minutes).
Many microbes produce viscous polysaccharides and halophilic Bacilli are known to produce levans or polyfructoses. However, the identity of the polymer from both strands of bacteria was determined by spectroscopic tests to be primarily polyglutamic acid. Elemental analysis of the polymer give the following results: Element Weight Percent Percent of Total Carbon 32.8 40.8 Hydrogen 5.1 6.1 Nitrogen 7.5 9.5 Phosphorus 0.7 Considering that the polymer was analyzed with contained moisture and impurities, and also that it had some phosphorus content, the results agree with polyglutamic acid.
The role of phosphorus is yet unclear; it may be merely ionically bound residual phosphate from nutrient medium ormay play some biochemical or structural role.
Unlike polysaccharides, such as Xanthan Gum which are produced by some bacteria, polyglutamate is resistant to proteolytic enzymes and biological attack and is stable once formed [see Troy, F., 248, J. Biol. Chem., 316 (1973) "Chemistry and biosynthesis of the poly(gamma D-glutamyl) capsule in Bacillus licheniformis".
The use of bacteria such as SLS-1 and Salton-l in MEOR techniques will now be described in detail.
BENCH-SCALE CONTINUOUS CORE TESTS Automated Core Test Apparatus An automated bench-scale laboratory unit was operated continuously for performing core 2 and packed column testing to demonstrate the feasibility of this MEOR approach. A simplified flow schematic of the unit is shown in FIG. 1. Six core experiments can be run simultaneously and independently. Oil 4 and brine 6, bacteria and nutrients 8 were fed through separate feed pumping systems (oil was pumped through pump 10 and brine, bacteria, and nutrients through pump 12). Sterile brine 6, bacterial cells (or spores) and nutrients 8 were pumped through 0.125" (0.32 cm) OD tubing using a Milton Roy or a peristaltic pump 12. To maintain anaerobic conditions, a small purge of nitrogen was bled into each vessel 6 and 8.Feed rates, depending on predetermined experimental conditions normally ranged from 0.03-1.0 ml/min.
This has a field correlation feed rate of 0.3-11 linear ft/day (9.1-335 cm/day). For temperature control, all cores 2 were placed in a constant temperature incubator 14. All experiments were conducted at 400C (1040F). Differential pressure was recorded using transducers 16 with appropriate diaphragms.
In most experiments, pressure taps 18 were located at intervals along the length ot the core 2. This was accomplished by drilling a 0.125"1(0.32 cm) OD hole into and through the resin and epoxy (on the surface of the core 2) and into the sandstone of'the core 2 such that fluid transmitted through the core 2 flowed out the hole. The holes in the resin were tapped and threaded and fitted with gyrolock connectors.
Nylon tubing was connected from these fittings to a pressure transducer. Pressure signals were processed and converted to a digital signal by a signal demodulator 20. Calibration of the transducers 16 were performed using a preset nitrogen calibratioz pressure setup. A computer 22 continuously monitored (a:id every 30 minutes printed and logged to hard copy or floppy disk) the cores' pressure and other readings.
The printout gave a time-pressure log so as to follow the pressure differential for the entire length of each core 2.
This enabled an accurate compilation of pressure measurements for the entire duration of each core experiment independently. Flow rates were measured both from timepump feed rates and from effluent product collection rates; these rates were continuously taken. The effluent samples were collected continuously using a fraction collector 24.
CORE PREPARATION Berea standstone cores, obtained from Cleveland Quarries (Amherst, Ohio) were of 2" (5.1 cm) diameter and received as cylinders of specified lengths and permeabilities. A specified core is coated with epoxy and cast in a resin mold. After cutting the core to a designated length and facing the ends, it was placed in a core holder to be attached to the continuous flow apparatus and then vacuum saturated with brine for an accurate pore volume determination. An oil-brine saturated core was prepared by pumping several pore volumes of brine followed by adding several pore volumes of crude oil to a irreducible water saturation.
Brine was then pumped through the core until no more oil was observed in the effluent. At this time, initial brine permeability was determined. For most experimental runs, the flow tubing, fittings, and valvings were disinfected and then completely flushed with sterile brine before each startup. Calculations for % porosity and % pore volume of oil saturation were also determined before starting each core experiment.
INJECTION OF CELLS AND NUTRIENT Depending on the purpose of a designated experimental run, a core may or may not be oil saturated. The sequence of additions for an experiment are as follows: 1. Brine injection to determine permeability.
2. Add 0.3-1.0 pore volumes of cell or spore suspension at a concentration of approximately 106 cells/ml.
3. Add 0.3-1.0 pore volumes of specifically formulated nutrient solution; this could be added with the cells (as has been demonstrated).
4. A cross-linker (Al+3 or Cr+3) could also be added either with a water flush or in combination with cells and/or nutrient material. The concentration of cross-linker would be about 1000 ppm. Such cross-linker is preferably held in solubilized form by polyphosphate salt.
5. Incubation ("lock in") for 5-10 days.
6. Commence brine addition or add a second nutrient and/or cross-linker batch. At this time a check is also made for permeability reduction and effluent samples are analyzed for biopolymer concentration.
7. Incubation (repeated).
8. Steps 6 and 7 can be repeated.
9. Final brine addition to check for lasting permeability reduction.
MONITORING PERFORMANCE DURING CORE RUNS Cell growth along with biopolymer production for the enhancement of lasting permeability reduction is the ultimate goal of our MEOR process. Monitoring the extent of this growth and production during an on-going core experiment can be accurately accomplished by recording gas pressure buildup as cells grow, calculating and evaluating pressure gradients and overall permeability calculations (while pumping) during sequential additions, and by performing analyses on effluent samples taken; i.e., cell plate count, biopolymer concentration, and residual sucrose (the most frequently used carbon source) concentration, etc. Several demonstration experiments were completed using this basic apparatus.
EXAMPLE 1 (Nutrient Utilization) FIG. 2 shows the pressure response of cumulative nutrient addition on growing cells in the core. Previously added cells (to the core) were fed 4 separate batches of nutrient with approximately five days' incubation between each addition. Separate curves are shown for the pressure response at: 1) the core's inlet, 2) 30% length from the inlet, and, 3) 70% length from the inlet. As shown, pressure response increases as a function of time as a result of step-wise nutrient addition to the core's previously added cells. The increase in static pressure during incubation is due to cell gas production (CO2) while the increase in dynamic (pumping) pressure with each injection is due to the accumulation of cell mass/biopolymer throughout the length of the core. It has been repeatedly demonstrated that when core effluent cell count and nutrient sucrose utilization increase, a desired reduction in core permeability results (as is shown here; i.e., 367 millidarcy or md to 58 md).
EXAMPLE 2 (Lonq Distance Transport) To verify the presence of in situ produced biopolymer at extended distances from the injection site, a 40 ft. (12.2 m) packed Berea "slim tube" (crushed sandstone) was constructed with pressure transducers and sampling ports at 10 ft. (3.1 m) intervals. The initial brine permeability of the slim tube (76 cc pore volumes) was 6.7 d (6700 md) and after feeding 2.3 pore volumes (abbreviated PV) of 6 x 107 cells/ml at a rate of O.11 ml/min (80 ft/day) for 17 hours, the sample port at the end (40 ft. (12.2 m) length) of the tube showed 104 cells/ml of cells identical to those fed and 113 ppm biopolymer that these cells produced. As time and subsequent additions proceeded, the overall permeability was reduced to 0.4 d (400 md), and the biopolymer concentration at the end of the slim tube in the effluent was measured at 1222 ppm.
This experiment enabled measurement of polymer production-penetration and adsorption over a long distance corresponding to a "thief zohe in the field. The results show that the cells and subsequently produced biopolymer completely penetrated to the end of the tube, demonstrating the effectiveness of the MEOR technique. Total "plugging".
of the slim tube is further evidenced by the following points: 1. Throughout the course of the experiment, the feed pump rate had to be reduced. The progressively slower rate was needed to stay below the pressure limitations on the equipment. The pressure buildup and slower feed rate demonstrates the effectiveness of biopolymer buildup in the total length of the slim tube.
2. Permeability reduction for the overall length of the slim tube is 94%.
3. Significant increases in the rate of change of pressure differentials occurred during the duration of the run.
In the "Slim Tube" experiment product samples were taken at specified times and locations along the packed core during the course of the experiment. The 40 f t. (12.2 m) Berea-pack olumn had both transducers and sampling ports at the inlet and each subsequent 10 fit. (3.1 m) interval.
These results show that overall permeability reduction continues to increase due to the increase of in situ produced biopolymer throughout the length of the 40 ft. (12.2 m) slim tube. By continually monitoring pressure response and the concentration of biopolymer at the sample ports, a good representation of experimental progress (for permeability reduction) was continually available.
This experiment also demonstrated that the Salton bacteria cells will transport through high permeability Berea core at a reasonable concentration for process effectiveness.
CELL AND SPORE PENETRATION EXPERIMENTS EXAMPLE 3 (Cell Injection Phase) A cell penetration experiment using a moderately permeable Berea sandstone core (146 md, 9 cm in length) and a highly permeable core (1361 md, 9 cm long) was conducted to measure the flow properties of the cell suspension.
Three pore volumes of 4 x 105 cells/ml were added to each core. High retention of the cells on the sandstone with each core resulted; i.e., essentially 100% of the cells injected were retained on the respective cores.
A second cell migration experiment was run using a 9 cm long x 5 cm diameter Berea core to obtain more information on Salton cell penetration. Again, the majority of the cells were retained within the core. The following material balance was calculated: Total Liquid recovery = 99.4% Total vegetative cell count feed = 1.06 x 108 cells/ml Total recovered cell count = 3.06 x 105 cells/ml This showed that greater than 99% of the feed cells were retained on the core. From these two tests it became apparent that spores, not cells, should be the penetrating/ migrating species through the sandstone. The cells appear either too large and/or adhesive to the core material and cannot travel through the network of rock pores for any appreciable distance.
EXAMPLE 4 (Spore Pretreatment) When cells of Bacillus bacteria are induced to sporulate, microscopic observation of fresh spores reveals small, optically refractile spores plus considerable adhering cell debris. When such "fresh" spores were diluted to approximately 106 spores/ml and injected into a Berea core of 1000 md permeability, poor injectability was obtained with almost immediate face plugging. Visual observation revealed a film of sticky proteinaceous matter on the face of the core. The concentrated spore suspension was then treated by adding 1 mg/ml lysozyme at 400C for 2 hours.
The spores were then filtered through Whatman No. 1 paper.
Microscopic observation revealed that the previous adherent material was no longer present. Subsequent injection of these treated spores into a core gave good injectability with no buildup of any face-plugging layer.
It was later observed that aging of a fresh spore suspension for a period in excess of two months has a beneficial effect similar to that which can be obtained with lysozyme in a few hours.
EXAMPLE 5 (Spore Injection) Spore transport and spore adsorption/desorption characteristics were studied in a high and low permeability core. A 107/ml concentration of pretreated spores was injected into each core for 23.33 hours. The low permea bility core received 18.1 pore volumes (PV) of spores followed by the same amount of brine; the high permeability core received 8.5 PV spores followed by the same amount of" brine.
TABLE 1 Low Permeability High Permeability Core Core 9.2 cm -Length- 16.3 cm 5.1 cm -Diameter- 5.0 cm 35.0 ml -Pore Volume- 74.4 ml PERMEABILITY (feed rate - 5.2 ft/d i.e. 1.58 m/d (field)) 123 md -Brine- 800 md 105 md -50E Spores Added- 800 md 82 md -100% Spores Added- 686 md The pressure drop data for the high permeability core indicate that the spores penetrated farther than in the low permeability core. After completing the material balance for the high permeability core, the following conclusions have been made: 1. Breakthrough of injected spores in the core effluent occurred at 0.5 PV which is a measure of the "inaccessible pore volume" for spore transport.
2. Over the course of the experiment, spore concentration in the effluent increased from 4 x 102 to 1.8 x 106 spores/ml.
3. 95% of the injected spores were retained by the high permeability core even after extensive brine flushing. A negligible concentration of spores was detected in the effluent during the injection and subsequent brine flushing from the low permeability core.
Significant overall permeability reduction was observed in both cores but the pressure drop data suggest some spore accumulation at the front of each core.
EXAMPLE 6 (Spore Inflection) In proposed field application, large volumes of fluids will pass through the well bore surface where any face plugging mechanism is a concern. A Salton spore suspension (conc. = 1.3 x 106 spores/ml) was injected intos a small cross section, low permeability (141 md) Berea core at a rate of 1 PV/hr in two operational modes, i.e., continuous recycle and straight-through single pass.
TABLE 2 PERMEABILITIES (recycle) 1. Brine 141 md 2. After 138 pv 140 md Spores Added 3. After 33i pv 132 md Spores Added PERMEABILITIES (single pass) 1. After 91 pv 124 md Spores Added (428 pv cum.) 2. After 151 pv 115 md Spores Added (488 pv cum.) 3. After 184 pv 110 md Spores Added (521 pv cum.) Core Parameters: L = 8.5 cm D = 1.4 cm PV = 6.5 ml The results of Table 2 show the permeability calculations for the single pass and recycle experiments.
Further it was observed that no feed spores were detected in the effluent sent back to recycle. It can thus be safety assumed that for the 365 hours of recycling 337 PV of spores, essentially 100% of the spores remained on the core. Also, by carefully reviewing the pressure drop data along the length of the core, the predominant weight fraction of the feed was in the very front (face) of the core. This almost certainly accounts for the 6% permeability reduction after 337 PV were recycled.
The same core was then used for straight-through; single pass operation and was continuously injected with 184 PV of a 1.35 x 106/ml spore feed. Again, no spores were detected in the effluent. After 184 PV were added in the single-pass mode and 337 PV in the recycle mode (521 total PV added) a 22% permeability reduction was measured.
After feeding over 500 PV of the spore suspension, no indication of any face plugging was evident; i.e., only +0.3 psig pressure change at the face of the core.
EXAMPLE 7 (Spore Retention) Spores are injected in a single pass to a Berea core of relatively high starting brine permeability (approximately 2100 md). The essential core parameters are listed below: Core length = 10.85 cm Diameter = 5.04 cm Pore volume = 49.7 ml Only two pressure transducers, inlet and outlet, were attached to the core; 145 PV of spores were injected (average conc. = 1.9 x 10/6ml) into the core over 339 hours at an average feed rate of 0.36 ml/min. The results show that spore breakthrough (2.5 x 102 spores/ml) occurred after 20.7 ml (0.42 PV) and the concentration of spores continued to increase during pumping to an effluent concentration of 5.6 x 105 spores/ml at the conclusion of the experiment.
An accurate material balance was completed for this run as follows: Total spores fed (145 PV) = 1.43 x 1010 Total spores recovered (effluent) = 5.73 x 108 Spores recovered = 4% Spores remaining on core = 96% This result indicates that the majority of the spores are retained by the core after feeding 145 PV. Permeability has continued to decrease throughout the duration of the run from approximately 2100 md at the beginning to 60 md at the end of the experiment. No plugging was observed at the core face; injection rate decreased only 13%; and the injection pressure increased less than 1 psig.
It has been experimentally shown that under conditions of our invention, cells and spores can easily penetrate Berea core material. These conditions are: 1) Use of selected bacteria such as our SLS and SALTON-1 strains which form small, compact spores and motile cells.
2) Pretreatment of spores with a proteolytic enzyme such as lysozyme (or with autogenous proteases generated by long-term aging of spores) so as to remove adhering cell debris and sticky proteins.
3) Use of polyphosphate ion in the nutrient solution which chelates and prevents precipitation with ions present in the connate brine such as calcium and magnesium.
In the Examples, cells and viscous biopolymer were evident the total length of the core. Since the experiment used a high permeability core, it is safe to say that field "thief zones" can be altered successfully by this microbial profile modification process. In no experiments where our preferred procedures have been used has there been any significant face plugging. Cells and spores have easily gone into the respective cores of low or high permeability. If continuous flow measurements are taken in low permeability cores using cells or spores, little or no penetration is observed by pressure drop data, but no face plugging is evident after many pore volumes of nutrient or recycle solution has been added.In contrast to this, continuous injection experiments of spores into high permeability cores, develop a gradient of spore concentration (by observing pressure drop data) with some fraction (e.g., 5%) of feed spores collected at the effluent after a suitable period.
Our proposed MEOR process will give the germinated cells time to grow, multiply, and produce biopolymer. This "incubation" time is, if all components have-been properly" selected, less than a week in duration. We have observed substantial incubation gas production over the total length of core, cell growth followed by biopolymer production and lasting permeability reduction to continual brine flushing.
The magnitude of profile modification with our process can easily be as low as 65% permeability reduction and as high as 95%. The level of reduction depends on several factors; i.e., beginning permeability, amount of bacteria added, incubation time, and obviously, proper nutrient. The ease of reducing permeability seems to increase when using cores that are in excess of 600 md, which is desirable since the "thief zones" we wish to plug are high permeability. Also, a certain level (concentration) of cells may be necessary before substantial amounts of biopolymer are formed and permeability is reduced.
The first amount of injected cells may act as a "conditioner" for the sandstone, enabling further spore/cell addition to perform their required tasks, i.e., germination, reproduction, and bipolymer production. Incubation times of 5-10 days allows processing steps to be completed.
Nutrient composition and the quantity added are "critical" process requirements. All nutrient formulations must be optimized to maximize biopolymer production. Also, when more than one addition of nutrient is made, more than one cell/spore addition may be required to achieve maximum permeability reduction. Alternatively, profile modification can be accomplished by injecting the nutrient solution into an injection well and the spores or cells or mixtures thereof into an adjacent production well, or vice versa.
If all steps have been achieved to ensure significant profile modification, permeability reduction will be more resistant to erosion due to continual water flooding and elapsed time.

Claims (25)

Claims:
1. A process for enhancing oil recovery by improving the sweep efficiency of a water flood through an oil producing reservoir which has zones of relatively high permeability and saline connate water, comprising the steps of: isolating a bacterium that has the following characteristics: it is motile; it is a facultative anaerobe; it is at least halotolerant; it is at least thermotolerant; it produces an exopolymer; and it sporulates; preparing a suspension of spores of said bacterium or of cells or mixtures thereof; and injecting said suspension into an oil producing reservoir for said spores or cells to become lodged in zones of relatively high permeability and plug said zones.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the isolated bacterium is a biologically pure strain of Bacillus licheninformis, NKKL No.B-18179 or its spores or mixtures thereof.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1, wherein the isolated bacterium is a biologically pure strain of Bacillus licheniformis, NKKL No.B-18178 or its spores or mixtures thereof.
4. The process of claims 1, 2 or 3, wherein the spores have been pretreated with proteolytic enzymes.
5. The process according to any preceding claim wherein the spores have been aged in suspension for a period of at least one month.
6. The process according to any preceding claim wherein the relatively highly permeable zones are selectively plugged by the growth of the bacteria and by the production of a bacterial exopolymer.
7. The process according to any preceding claim further comprising injecting a nutrient solution into the relatively highly permeable zones.
8. A process according to claim 7, wherein the nutrient solution comprises a polyphosphate nutrient.
9. A process as claimed in claim 8, wherein the nutrient solution additionally contains a polyvalent cross-linker.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the polyphosphate is also used as a chelating agent.
11. A process according to claim 9 or 10, wherein the polyvalent cross-linker is an ion selected from the group consisting of aluminum, titanium or chromium.
12. A process of any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein said nutrient solution is injected prior to the injection of said bacterial spores or cells or mixtures thereof.
13. The process of any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein said nutrient solution is injected simultaneously with said bacterial spores or cells or mixtures thereof.
14. The process of any one of claims 7 to 11, wherein said nutrient solution is injected after said bacterial spores or cells or mixtures thereof.
15. The process of any one of claims 7 to 14 where said nutrient solution is injected into a production well and said bacterial spores or cells or mixtures thereof are injected into an adjacent injection well.
16. The process of any one of claims 7 to 14 where said nutrient solution is injected into an injection well and said bacterial spores or cells or mixtures thereof are injected into an adjacent production well.
17. A process according to any one of claims 7 to 16 comprising flowing water into the relatively highly permeable zones after the introduction of the nutrient medium.
18. A process according to any preceding claim, further comprising flowing water into the relatively highly permeable zones before the introduction of the bacterial spores or cells.
19. A process according to any one of the preceding claims comprising flowing a flooding agent into the petroleum reservoir after the relatively highly permeable zones have been plugged.
20. A process for enhancing oil recovery from an oil producing reservoir, substantially as described in the foregoing Examples.
21. A process for modifying the profile of a petroleum reservoir to enhance oil recovery from relatively high permeability zones, comprising: preparing a biologically pure form of Bacillus licheniformis, NsKL No.B-18178 or B-18179; forming spores of B-18178 or B-18179; separating the spores from cell debris and proteins; flowing the spores into a relatively high permeability zone in a petroleum reservoir; and contacting the spores with a nutrient solution to facilitate growth and exopolymer production.
22. A process as claimed in claim 19, wherein said nutrient solution is as defined in any one of claims 8 to 11.
23. A process as claimed in claim 19 or 20, wherein the spores have been treated with proteolytic enzyme.
24. A process as claimed in claim 19, 20 or 21, wherein the spores have been aged in suspension for a period of at least one month.
25. A process for modifying the profile of a petroleum reservoir, substantially as described herein.
GB8820916A 1987-03-06 1988-09-06 Process for enhancing oil recovery Expired - Fee Related GB2222420B (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US2285787A 1987-03-06 1987-03-06

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB8820916D0 GB8820916D0 (en) 1988-10-05
GB2222420A true GB2222420A (en) 1990-03-07
GB2222420B GB2222420B (en) 1992-09-09

Family

ID=21811801

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB8820916A Expired - Fee Related GB2222420B (en) 1987-03-06 1988-09-06 Process for enhancing oil recovery

Country Status (1)

Country Link
GB (1) GB2222420B (en)

Cited By (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2005124099A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2005-12-29 Statoil Asa Well treatment
WO2005124100A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2005-12-29 Statoil Asa Well treatment
EP1854860A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-14 Stichting Geodelft Biosealing
WO2011025984A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 Geo Fossil Fuels, Llc Microbial enhanced oil recovery methods
WO2011098770A1 (en) * 2010-02-12 2011-08-18 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Method and system for predicting the effect of microbes injected into an oil-bearing reservoir
US8210261B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2012-07-03 Statoil Asa Method of well treatment and construction
WO2012164285A1 (en) * 2011-05-31 2012-12-06 Goe-Ip As Method for microbial control of injection liquid flow in a hydrocarbon reservoir
CN102822311A (en) * 2010-04-02 2012-12-12 纳幕尔杜邦公司 Mechanical device for dispersing biomass populations
US8863855B2 (en) 2007-06-26 2014-10-21 Statoil Asa Method of enhancing oil recovery
AU2018236858A1 (en) * 2018-05-04 2019-11-21 Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology Reinforcement method for water leaking of water facilities using soil microbes biostimulation and microparticles injection

Cited By (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2005124099A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2005-12-29 Statoil Asa Well treatment
US7964539B2 (en) 2004-06-17 2011-06-21 Statoil Asa Well treatment
US8596358B2 (en) 2004-06-17 2013-12-03 Statoil Asa Well treatment
EA012088B1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2009-08-28 Статойлгидро Аса Well treatment
EA012242B1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2009-08-28 Статойл Аса Well treatment
WO2005124100A1 (en) * 2004-06-17 2005-12-29 Statoil Asa Well treatment
US8210261B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2012-07-03 Statoil Asa Method of well treatment and construction
EP1854860A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-14 Stichting Geodelft Biosealing
WO2007129889A1 (en) * 2006-05-09 2007-11-15 Stichting Deltares Biosealing
US8256994B2 (en) 2006-05-09 2012-09-04 Stichting Deltares Biosealing
US8863855B2 (en) 2007-06-26 2014-10-21 Statoil Asa Method of enhancing oil recovery
WO2011025984A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2011-03-03 Geo Fossil Fuels, Llc Microbial enhanced oil recovery methods
US8316933B2 (en) 2009-08-28 2012-11-27 Geo Fossil Fuels Llc Microbial enhanced oil recovery methods
EP3150698A1 (en) * 2009-08-28 2017-04-05 Geo Fossil Fuels, LLC Microbial enhanced oil recovery methods
US10378009B2 (en) 2009-08-28 2019-08-13 Geo Fossil Fuels, Llc Microbial enhanced oil recovery methods utilizing a microorganism that is deficient in its ability to degrade short chain hydrocarbons
US8868392B2 (en) 2010-02-12 2014-10-21 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Method and system for predicting the effect of microbes injected into an oil-bearing reservoir
WO2011098770A1 (en) * 2010-02-12 2011-08-18 Bp Exploration Operating Company Limited Method and system for predicting the effect of microbes injected into an oil-bearing reservoir
CN102822311A (en) * 2010-04-02 2012-12-12 纳幕尔杜邦公司 Mechanical device for dispersing biomass populations
WO2012164285A1 (en) * 2011-05-31 2012-12-06 Goe-Ip As Method for microbial control of injection liquid flow in a hydrocarbon reservoir
AU2012264431B2 (en) * 2011-05-31 2017-02-02 Goe-Ip As Method for microbial control of injection liquid flow in a hydrocarbon reservoir
US9683162B2 (en) 2011-05-31 2017-06-20 Goe-Ip As Method for microbial control of injection liquid flow in a hydrocarbon reservoir
EA030279B1 (en) * 2011-05-31 2018-07-31 ГОЕ-АйПи АС Method for microbial control of injection liquid flow in a hydrocarbon reservoir
US10138409B2 (en) 2011-05-31 2018-11-27 Goe-Ip As Method for microbial control of injection liquid flow in a hydrocarbon reservoir
CN103562340A (en) * 2011-05-31 2014-02-05 全球有机能源股份有限公司 Method for microbial control of injection liquid flow in hydrocarbon reservoir
AU2018236858A1 (en) * 2018-05-04 2019-11-21 Korea Advanced Institute Of Science And Technology Reinforcement method for water leaking of water facilities using soil microbes biostimulation and microparticles injection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
GB8820916D0 (en) 1988-10-05
GB2222420B (en) 1992-09-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4799545A (en) Bacteria and its use in a microbial profile modification process
CA2531963C (en) A process for enhanced recovery of crude oil from oil wells using novel microbial consortium
CA1317540C (en) Oil recovery process using microbial combinations
Yakimov et al. The potential of Bacillus licheniformis strains for in situ enhanced oil recovery
Lazar Ch. A-1 MEOR field trials carried out over the world during the last 35 years
CA1329564C (en) Recovery of oil from oil reservoirs
Bryant Potential uses of microorganisms in petroleum recovery technology
US5083611A (en) Nutrient injection method for subterranean microbial processes
US8720546B2 (en) Prevention of biomass aggregation at injection wells
US4558739A (en) Situ microbial plugging process for subterranean formations
US11555142B2 (en) Two-step process for microbial enhanced oil recovery
CA1196303A (en) Method of enhancing oil recovery by use of exopolymer- producing microorganisms
US4800959A (en) Microbial process for selectively plugging a subterranean formation
Sarkar et al. A critical evaluation of MEOR processes
GB2222420A (en) Bacteria and its use in a microbial profile modification process
Bhupathiraju et al. Pretest studies for a microbially enhanced oil recovery field pilot in a hypersaline oil reservoir
Behlülgil et al. Bacteria for improvement of oil recovery: A laboratory study
CN108219765A (en) A kind of reservoir endogenous micro-organisms activator and its flooding method based on inorganic salts
Bhupathiraju et al. Ch. R-7 isolation and characterization of novel halophilic anaerobic bacteria from oil field brines
CA1309366C (en) Bacteria and its use in a microbial profile modification process
Bryant et al. Microbial enhanced oil recovery
Parli et al. Transport and stability of polymer-producing bacteria in porous media
Nazina et al. Microbiological investigation of the stratal waters
Devi et al. Development of biochemically enhanced oil recovery technology for oil fields–a review
Springham Microbiological methods for the enhancement of oil recovery

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
732E Amendments to the register in respect of changes of name or changes affecting rights (sect. 32/1977)
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19990906