GB2091631A - Base film for magnetic recording tape - Google Patents
Base film for magnetic recording tape Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- GB2091631A GB2091631A GB8100140A GB8100140A GB2091631A GB 2091631 A GB2091631 A GB 2091631A GB 8100140 A GB8100140 A GB 8100140A GB 8100140 A GB8100140 A GB 8100140A GB 2091631 A GB2091631 A GB 2091631A
- Authority
- GB
- United Kingdom
- Prior art keywords
- film
- magnetic recording
- base film
- recording tape
- surface roughness
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G11—INFORMATION STORAGE
- G11B—INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
- G11B5/00—Recording by magnetisation or demagnetisation of a record carrier; Reproducing by magnetic means; Record carriers therefor
- G11B5/62—Record carriers characterised by the selection of the material
- G11B5/73—Base layers, i.e. all non-magnetic layers lying under a lowermost magnetic recording layer, e.g. including any non-magnetic layer in between a first magnetic recording layer and either an underlying substrate or a soft magnetic underlayer
- G11B5/739—Magnetic recording media substrates
- G11B5/73923—Organic polymer substrates
- G11B5/73927—Polyester substrates, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate
- G11B5/73935—Polyester substrates, e.g. polyethylene terephthalate characterised by roughness or surface features, e.g. by added particles
Landscapes
- Shaping By String And By Release Of Stress In Plastics And The Like (AREA)
- Manufacture Of Macromolecular Shaped Articles (AREA)
Abstract
A base film for a magnetic recording tape, has a tensile strength at an elongation of 5% of 9-15 Kg/mm<2> as measured along both the longitudinal and transverse directions, the ratio of the average surface roughness to the particle size of included particles being 2.0 x 10<-3> to 5.1 x 10<-3>. The average surface roughness is preferably 0.005-0.040 micron. The magnetic recording tape made therefrom exhibits an improved running property and an improved abrasion resistance as well as good surface characteristics. The base film may be a polyester and the included particles kaolin or CaCO3.
Description
SPECIFICATION
Base film for magnetic recording tape
This invention relates to an improved base film for a magnetic recording tape, which is wellbalanced in mechanical properties as measured along both the longitudinal and transverse directions.
This base film exhibits a specified F--5 value as measured along both the longitudinal and transverse directions and a specified ratio of the average surface roughness to the average particle size of particles included therein. By the term "F--5 value" used herein is meant a tensile strength at an elongation of 5%.
A film composed mainly of a polyester, especially polyethlene terephthalate (hereinafter, for brevity, referred to as "PET"), which has been biaxially drawn and heat-set, is ordinarily used as the material of a base film for a magnetic recording tape. This film is roughly divided into a balanced type wherein the orientation and mechanical properties in the longitudinal direction are relatively similar to those in the transverse direction and a tensilized type where the orientation and mechanical properties are much higher in the longitudinal direction than in the transverse direction.A film of the balanced type is ordinarily prepared by drawing the film at a similar drawing ratio in both the longitudinal and transverse directions, and in the film of this type, the F--5 value is lower than 1 5 Kg/mm2, more ordinarily lower than 13 Kg/mm2, in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. On the other hand, a tensilized film is prepared by drawing the film at the total drawing ratio in the longitudinal direction at a level much higher than the drawing ratio in the transverse direction, and the F--5 value is ordinarily larger than 1 5 Kg/mm2 and in the range of 1 7 to 20 Kg/mm2 in many cases.
Films of both these types have merits and demerits in the stiffness, dimensional stability, preparation easiness and cost, and one of these two types is appropriately selected according to the intended use.
Properties required for a base film for magnetic recording tape are the fineness and uniformity of protrusions on the film surface which are necessary for ensuring the uniformity and the smoothness of a magnetic material coating layer to be formed thereon, and the running property and abrasion resistance capable of resisting repeated use. These surface protrusions may ordinarily be formed by including protrusion-forming particles of an inorganic substance of a polymerinsoluble substance such as a catalyst residue (hereinafter, for brevity, referred to as "internal particles") into the film. However, the running property and abrasion resistance are properties contrary to the fineness and uniformity of the surface projections (hereinafter referred to as "surface characteristics").In the film of the balanced type, the surface protrusions are ordinarily dependent upon the size and number of the included particles. For example, if a great number of large particles are included in the film, the running property and abrasion resistance can be improved, but the surface protrusions become coarse and fatal defects, such as omission of recording, i.e., increase in dropout, reduction of the output power and increase of the noise, are brought about in the resulting magnetic recording tape. On the other hand, if fine particles are included, fine surface protrusions are formed, and reduction of the output power and occurrence of the dropout phenomenon can be prevented, but the slip characteristic is degraded, resulting in reduction of the running property and abrasion resistance.
It is a primary object of the present invention to provide a base film for a magnetic tape in which the above-mentioned defects of the conventional base films are eliminated and both the running property and abrasion resistance and the surface characteristics are improved.
Other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the following description.
In accordance with the present invention, there is provided a base film for a magnetic recording tape, which possesses an F--5 value of from 9 to 15 Kg/mm2 as measured along both the longitudinal and transverse directions, and in which the ratio of the average surface roughness to the particle size of included particles is from 2.0 x 10-3to 5.1 x 10-3.
The present invention is directed to a so-called balanced type film in which the F--5 value is 9 to
1 5 Kg/mm2 in both the longitudinal and transverse directions. When the F--5 value is smaller than 9
Kg/mm2, undesirable elongation is caused in the magnetic tape by abnormal tension or the like ocurring during running. In contrast, when the F--5 value exceeds 15 Kg/mm2, the dimensional stability is degraded.
In order to obtain a good dimensional stability, it is preferable that the F--5 value be in the range of from 10 to 13 Kg/mm2.
It is preferable that the average surface roughness be in the range of from 0.005 to 0.04 micron. If the average surface roughness exceeds 0.04 micron, the surface characteristics are degraded, and if the average surface roughness is smaller than 0.005 micron, the running property is degraded. Accordingly, too large or too small an average surface roughness is not preferred. Even if the ratio of the average surface roughness to the average particle size of included particles (hereinafter, for brevity, referred to as "roughness parameter") is within the range specified in the present invention, it is not always
possible to greatly improve both the running property and abrasion resistance and the surface characteristics.
For optimum results, the average surface roughness is not larger than 0.030 micron, more
preferably not larger than 0.025 micron. If the average surface roughness is not larger than 0.030
micron, the output characteristics of the tape is further improved and if the average surface roughness is
not larger than 0.025 micron, the effect of preventing the dropout phenomenon is further enhanced.
It is indispensable that the roughness parameter should not be higher than 5.1 x 10-3, preferably
not higher than 4.6 x 10-3 and more preferably not higher than 4.1 x 1 0-3. If the roughness parameter
exceeds 5.1 x 10-3, it is impossible to improve to the desired extent both the running property and
abrasion resistance and the surface characteristics. More specifically, if the roughness parameter is not
higher than 5.1 x 10-3, the resulting tape is excellent in the above-mentioned properties, and if the
roughness parameter is not higher than 4.6 x 10-3, the dropout reduction and the output increase of
the tape can further be improved.
In conventional balanced type films, the roughness parameter is ordinarily in the range of from
5.3 x 10-3 to 5.7 x 10-3 or higher. if the roughness parameter is reduced to a level not higher than
5.1 x 10-3 as in the present invention, this means that the size of included particles is increased when
the surface roughness is the same and the surface roughness is made finer when the particle size of
included particles is the same. If the roughness parameter exceeds the upper limit of 5.1 x 10-3, the
intended improvement in both the running property and abrasion resistance and the surface
characteristics cannot be attained. In general, the lower the roughness parameter, the more enhanced
the above-mentioned, intended effect. However, the roughness parameter should be at least
2.0 x 10-3.If the roughness parameter is lower than 2.0 x 10-3, the running property and abrasion
resistance cannot be improved.
The film of the present invention should preferably be a biaxially drawn polyester film having
properties required for a base film for magnetic recording tapes.
A process for preparing the film of the present invention will now be described.
The base film is prepared by a process wherein polyester having fine particles included therein is
melt-extruded from a slit die to form an undrawn film, and, if necessary to a super-drawn film not
substantially oriented is formed from said film. Then, the undrawn film or the super-drawn film is
biaxially drawn in both the longitudinal and transverse directions at a draw ratio of from 2.0 to 4.5 at a
temperature in the range of from the glass transition temperature of the polymer to 17000, and then,
the drawn film is heat-treated at a temperature of from 1 50 to 23000. In the biaxial drawing process,
the surface protrusions of the film should be pressed down by means of calendering to adjust the
surface conditions of the base film.
As the polyester that is used there can be mentioned, a homopolyester, a copolyester and a mixed
polymer containing at least 70% by weight of such homopolyester or copolyester. Polyethylene
terephthalate and polyethylene-2,6-naphthalate are especially preferred as the polyester type polymer.
As the fine particles to be included into the base film, there may be used external particles
comprised of inorganic particles such as Cacao,,, 53it2, A1203 and calcium phosphate and internal
particles containing metal ccmponents such as Ca, Si and P, and the kinds of particles used in the
present invention are not particularly critical. A combination of external particles and internal particles of
the Ca-Li-P series is preferably used. The particle size is preferably in the range of from 1 to 8 microns
as measured according to the clark-field illumination microscope method, and the amount of the
particles incorporated preferably in the range of from 0.025 to 0.5 0 by weight.
It is preferable that the calender treatment be carried out under conditions of a roll temperature of
from 80 to 1 500C and a linear roll pressure of 300 to 1,000 Kg/cm.
The method of adjusting the surface condition of the film in the present invention is not limited to
the above-mentioned caiender method. A method of adjusting the surface condition of the film by a
combination of special drawing and heat treatments may be employed.
The above-mentioned parameters are determined according to the following methods.
(1) F-S Value:
The F--5 value is determined according to ASTM D-882.
(2) Average Surface Roughness: The average surface roughness is expressed by the average roughness Ra measured at a cut-off length of 0.25 mm by a contact feeler type surface roughness meter (HOMMEL TESTER Model T1 0) specified according to DIN 4768. The diameter of the top end of the contact feeler is 1 0 microns.
(3) Roughness Parameter:
The roughness parameter is expressed by the ratio of the above Ra value to the average particle size of included particles measured according to the following method.
The film is melted and rapidly cooled in a very narrow space between preparing glass sheets, and
particles having a diameter of at least 1 micron are observed by microscope under the dark-field illumination in the transmission state and the average particle size is calculated. The magnifying power
is 128 times, and the average size is expressed by the volume average size. Under the dark-field illumination, the particle size is seen as large as 2.4 times the true particle size observed under the
ordinary light-field illumination. In the present invention, the particle size is expressed by the particle
size measured under the dark-fieid illumination.
The present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the following examples that by no means limit the scope of the invention. Parts and percents are by weight unless otherwise specified.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1
The particle size of kaolin as an inorganic material was adjusted by pulverization and classification to obtain particles having an average particle size of 1.5 microns. Polyethylene terephthalate (hereinafter, for brevity, referred to as "PET") having an intrinsic viscosity [ 71 ] of 0.65 and containing 0.2% of the above particles included therein was prepared by polymerization according to a conventional procedure. The formed PET was extruded, cooled and biaxially drawn according to conventional procedures to obtain a film.The drawing ratio in the longitudinal direction was 3.4 and the drawing ratio in the transverse direction was 3.6; the drawing temperature in the longitudinal direction was 900C and the drawing temperature in the transverse direction was 1 00 C. The heat treatment was conducted at 2000 C. The thickness of the obtained film was 1 5 microns. A video tape was prepared from this film according to customary procedures. Properties of the tape are shown in Table I, below.
From the results shown in Table I, it is seen that the running property and abrasion resistance of the product of Comparative Example 1 were poor, and it was very difficult to obtain a good running property and abrasion resistance simultaneously with a good surface characteristics.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
A film was prepared in the same manner as described in Comparative Example 1 except that the average particle size of the particles was changed to 2.5 microns. Properties of a tape prepared from this film are shown in Table I, below. From the results shown in Table I, it is seen that the surface roughness varied depending upon the size of the included particles and the running property was somewhat improved but the output characteristic and dropout level were not satisfactory, and thus it was difficult to obtain a good running property and abrasion resistance simultaneously with good surface characteristics.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3
A film was prepared in the same manner as described in Comparative Example 1 except that the average particle size of the particles used was changed to 3.5 microns. Properties of a tape prepared from this film are shown in Table I, below. From the results shown in Table I, it is seen that the running property and abrasion resistance were improved but the output characteristic and dropout level were drastically deteriorated and thus it was difficult to obtain a good running property and abrasion resistance simultaneously with good surface characteristics.
EXAMPLE 1
A film was prepared by using the same starting materials in the same manner as described in
Comparative Example 2 except that during the drawing in the longitudinal direction, the film surface was pressed at 1 000C under a linear pressure of 300 Kg/cm to effect a calender treatment. The average surface roughness of the so obtained film was very small. A video tape was prepared from this film according to customary procedures. Properties of the obtained tape are shown in Table I, below.
It was found that in the product of Example 1 , the running property and abrasion resistance were maintained at good levels, though the surface roughness was very small, and the product was very suitable as a magnetic recording material.
EXAMPLE 2
A film was prepared by using the same starting materials in the same manner as described in
Comparative Example 3 except that the surface of the film was pressed at 1 000C under linear pressure of 300 Kg/cm during the drawing in the longitudinal direction to effect a calender treatment. A tape was prepared from this film according to customary procedures. Properties of the obtained tape are shown in Table I, below.
It was found that in the product of Example 2, all of the surface characteristics, running property and abrasion resistance were highly enhanced.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4
An ester exchange reaction of 100 parts of dimethyl terephthalate and 70 parts of ethylene glycol was carried out in the presence of 0.035 part of manganese acetate as a catalyst according to customary procedures. Then, 0.04 part of antimony trioxide, 0.15 part of lithium acetate dissolved in ethylene glycol, 0.09 part of calcium acetate and 0.03 part of calcium carbonate having an average particle size of 2.0 microns, which was uniformly dispersed in ethylene glycol, were added to the reaction product, and 0.13 part of trimethyl phosphate was added and a poly-condensation reaction was carried out to obtain PET having an intrinsic viscosity [ 71 ] of 0.65 and a softening point of 259.70C.
The so obtained PET was melt-extruded at 2900C into a balanced type film by biaxial drawing.
Drawing in the longitudinal direction was carried out at a drawing ratio of 3.4 at a temperature of 900C and drawing in the transverse direction was carried out at a drawing ratio of 3.6 at a temperature of 1 00 C. The heat treatment was carried out at 2000 C.
Properties of the so obtained film and a tape prepared from this film are shown in Table I, below.
It is seen that the roughness parameter of the film was large, and, therefore, the output characteristic of the tape was reduced.
EXAMPLE 3
A film was prepared by using the same materials in the same manner as described in Comparative
Example 4, except that a calender treatment was carried out at 900C under a linear roll pressure of 500
Kg/cm by using nip rollers during the first drawing in the longitudinal direction. Properties of a tape prepared from this film are shown in Table I, below. It is seen that all the properties of the resulting tape were excellent.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5
A film having a thickness of 1 5 microns was prepared by using the same materials in the same manner as described in Comparative Example 4, except that the F--5 value was relatively increased in the longitudinal direction as compared with that in the transverse direction. In this case, the first drawing in the longitudinal direction was carried out at drawing ratio of 3.2 at 900C and the drawing in the transverse direction was carried out at a drawing ratio of 3.6 at 1200 C. The second drawing in the longitudinal direction was carried out at a drawing ratio of 1.2 at 1 300 C. The heat treatment was carried out 2000 C.
Properties of the so obtained film and a tape prepared from this film are shown in Table 1, below.
It is seen that the output characteristic of the tape was reduced, as in the case of the tape of
Comparative Example 4.
EXAMPLE 4
A film was prepared by using the same materials in the same manner as described in Comparative
Example 5, except that during the first drawing in the longitudinal direction, the calender treatment was carried out at 900C under a linear pressure of 500 Kg/cm by using nip rollers. Properties of a tape prepared from this film are shown in Table I, below. It is seen that the tape was excellent in all of the output characteristic, dropout level, running property and abrasion resistance.
TABLE I
Properties of Film Properties of Tape
F-5 Value (Kg/mm) Running Property
Roughness Output Dropout and
MD TD Ra(micron) Parameter (x10-12) Characteristics Level Abrasion Resistance
Comparative
Example 1 11.8 12.0 0.029 5.7 B B D
Comparative
Example 2 12.0 11.9 0.044 6.0 E C B
Comparative
Example 3 11.9 12.2 0.058 5.5 G D A
Example 1 11.9 12.0 0.029 4.5 B A # B A
Example 2 12.1 12.1 0.039 4.5 C B A
Comparative
Example 4 12.0 12.4 0.035 5.6 D B B
Example 3 12.2 12.0 0.024 4.2 B A A
Comparative
Example 5 13.0 11.0 0.034 5.4 D B B
Example 4 13.1 10.9 0.021 3.7 A A A
Note
MD: longitudinal direction
TD: transverse direction In determining the tape properties shown in Table I, a sample tape was cut into a 1/2 inch width and applied to a video tape recorder (VHS manufactured and supplied by Victor) and properties were evaluated according to the following scales.
(1) Output Characteristic:
The tapes were ranked by chroma S/N by using the tape of Comparative Example 2 as the reference tape.
A: above +2 dB
B: +1.Sto+2dB C: +1.Oto+1.SdB D: +0.Sto+1.0dB E: O to +0.5 dB F: -0.5 to O dB
G: below0.5 dB
(2) Dropout Level:
The number of dropouts continuing for more than 15 microseconds was counted.
A: less than 10 dropouts per minute
B: 10 to 20 dropouts per minute
C: 20 to 50dropouts per minute
D: more than 50 dropouts per minutes
(3) Running Property and Abrasion Resistance:
The tape was travelled on a recorder 500 times, and the film was ranked based on the running state and the state of damages on the film after the running test.
A: Excellent
B: Good
C: Moderate
D: Poor
Claims (10)
1. A base film for a magnetic recording tape, which possesses an F--5 value of from 9 to 1 5
Kg/mm2 as measured along both the longitudinal and transverse directions and in which the ratio of the average surface roughness to the average particle size of included particles is from 2.0 x 10-3 to 5.1 x 10-3.
2. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to claim 1, wherein the average surface roughness is from 0.005 to 0.40 micron.
3. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to claim 1, wherein the average surface roughness is from 0.005 to 0.30 micron.
4. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to claim 1, wherein the average surface roughness is from 0.005 to 0.025 micron.
5. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the ratio of the average surface roughness to the average particle size of included particles is from 2.0 x 103to4.6x 10-3.
6. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to claim 5, wherein the ratio of the average surface roughness to the average particle size of included particles is from 2.0 x 10-3 to 4.1 x 10-3.
7. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the F--5 value is from 10 to 13 Kg/mm2.
8. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein the material of the film is a polyester.
9. A base film for a magnetic recording tape according to claim 8, wherein the material of the film is polyethylene terephthalate.
10. A base film for a magnetic recording tape substantially as described in any one of Examples 1 to 4.
Priority Applications (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8100140A GB2091631B (en) | 1981-01-05 | 1981-01-05 | Base film for magnetic recording tape |
DE19813101232 DE3101232A1 (en) | 1981-01-05 | 1981-01-16 | Film support for a tape for magnetic recordings |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB8100140A GB2091631B (en) | 1981-01-05 | 1981-01-05 | Base film for magnetic recording tape |
DE19813101232 DE3101232A1 (en) | 1981-01-05 | 1981-01-16 | Film support for a tape for magnetic recordings |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
GB2091631A true GB2091631A (en) | 1982-08-04 |
GB2091631B GB2091631B (en) | 1984-04-18 |
Family
ID=25790620
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
GB8100140A Expired GB2091631B (en) | 1981-01-05 | 1981-01-05 | Base film for magnetic recording tape |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
DE (1) | DE3101232A1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2091631B (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0229346A1 (en) * | 1985-12-17 | 1987-07-22 | Diafoil Company, Limited | Polyethylene naphthalate film for high-density magnetic recording media |
EP0545371A1 (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 1993-06-09 | Diafoil Hoechst Co., Ltd | Optical tape |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3507729A1 (en) * | 1985-03-05 | 1986-09-11 | Hoechst Ag, 6230 Frankfurt | BIAXIAL-ORIENTED FILM WITH HIGH SCRATCH AND ABRASION RESISTANCE |
JPH0232151A (en) * | 1988-07-21 | 1990-02-01 | Diafoil Co Ltd | Polyester composition |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1591582A (en) * | 1977-03-01 | 1981-06-24 | Teijin Ltd | Polyester film having slipperiness |
JPS5564635A (en) * | 1978-11-08 | 1980-05-15 | Tdk Corp | Base for magnetic recording tape |
GB2052521B (en) * | 1979-05-19 | 1983-03-16 | Diafoil Co Ltd | Polyester film containing fine powder crosslinked polymer |
-
1981
- 1981-01-05 GB GB8100140A patent/GB2091631B/en not_active Expired
- 1981-01-16 DE DE19813101232 patent/DE3101232A1/en active Granted
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0229346A1 (en) * | 1985-12-17 | 1987-07-22 | Diafoil Company, Limited | Polyethylene naphthalate film for high-density magnetic recording media |
US4876137A (en) * | 1985-12-17 | 1989-10-24 | Diafoil Company, Limited | Polyethylene naphthalate film for high-density magnetic recording media of floppy disk |
EP0545371A1 (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 1993-06-09 | Diafoil Hoechst Co., Ltd | Optical tape |
US5527594A (en) * | 1991-12-04 | 1996-06-18 | Diafoil Hoechst Company, Limited | Optical tape |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE3101232C2 (en) | 1988-06-01 |
GB2091631B (en) | 1984-04-18 |
DE3101232A1 (en) | 1982-08-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5609949A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyester film | |
EP0659810B1 (en) | A biaxially oriented film of polyethylene-2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate | |
KR20000070955A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyester film for magnetic recording media | |
US4508782A (en) | Base film for magnetic recording tape with F-5 values of 9-15 Kg/mm2 | |
CA2094948A1 (en) | Laminated film | |
US5284699A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyester film | |
US5677034A (en) | Biaxially oriented, laminated polyester film | |
JPH02214734A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyester film | |
JPS63230741A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyester film | |
GB2091631A (en) | Base film for magnetic recording tape | |
EP0659809B1 (en) | Biaxially oriented film of polyethylene-2,6-naphthalenedicarboxylate | |
EP0562486A1 (en) | Laminated polyester film | |
JPH02214733A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyester film | |
JPH0138661B2 (en) | ||
JPH07223288A (en) | Biaxially oriented laminated film | |
JP2897554B2 (en) | Biaxially oriented film | |
JPH0219525B2 (en) | ||
JP2993280B2 (en) | Laminated polyester film for magnetic recording media | |
JPH0584818A (en) | Biaxially stretched laminated film | |
WO1994013484A1 (en) | Biaxially oriented copolyester film | |
JPH08244110A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyethylene-2,6-naphthalene dicarboxylate film and production thereof | |
JP2001341260A (en) | Biaxially stretched polyester film | |
JPH04278349A (en) | Biaxially oriented laminated polyester film | |
JPH07101025A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyester film | |
JPH0896344A (en) | Biaxially oriented polyethylene terephthalate film |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PE20 | Patent expired after termination of 20 years |
Effective date: 20010104 |