GB2035842A - Food casing and method of preparing same - Google Patents

Abstract

This invention relates to a cellulosic food casing, a method of preparing same and a processed food product prepared using such a cellulosic food casing. The cellulosic food casing including art internal coating comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin or a water soluble protein. The cellulosic food casing of the present invention overcome or substantially reduce the problems of known food casings with respect to achieving a good release of the casing from the food product on peeling and with respect to surface grease.

Description

SPECIFICATION Food casing and method of preparing same The present invention relates to a food casing and particularly to a cellulosic food casing suitable for use for encasing and processing a food product and thereafter being removed from the food product, and to a method of manufacturing such a casing.

More particularly, the invention relates to a cellulosic food casing suitable for use with a small diameter dry sausage product generally identified in the industry as "snack foods". These snack foods are presently processed in edible collagen casings.

Generally, food casings used in the processed food industry are thin-walled tubings of different diameters prepared from regenerated cellulose, cellulose derivatives, alginates, collagen and the like. Some types of food casings include a fibrous web embedded in the wall of the casing and such casings are commonly termed in the art as "fibrous casings".

The applicants have discovered that the snack food type products can be processed in cellulosic food casings instead of collagen casings and thereby result in a reduced cost while enabling increased productivity through the use of high speed automatic equipment.

The use of cellulosic food casings for processing snack foods presents several problems not encountered in connection with edible collagen casings. Generally, an edible collagen casing is not removed from a snack food prior to human consumption whereas a cellulosic food casing must be removed.

The removal or peeling of the cellulosic casing is preferably carried out with a high speed automatic peeling machine in order to minimize the costs.

When the cellulosic casing is removed from the meat mass or sausage, there is an occasional tendency for some of the meat to adhere to the casing and thereby be torn from the sausage along with the casing. This results in the surface marring of the sausage and reduced consumer appeal.

Typical peeling machines are described in the U.S. patents no. 2,424,346 to Wilcoxon, no.

2,514,660 to McClure et. al., no. 2,686,972 to Greg, and no. 2,757,409 to Parkers et al.

Peeling machines require a low resistance to the separation of a food casing from the meat mass to avoid the product moving through the machine unpeeled or causing a jam. An unpeeled product must be processed by hand and therefore increases the cost of operation.

The U.S. patents no. 3,898,348 to Chiu et. al., no. 2,901,358 to Underwood et. al., no.

3,106,471 and no. 3,158,492 to Firth, no. 3,307,956 to Chiu et. al., no. 3,442,663 to Turbak, and no. 3,558,331 to Tarika are concerned with solutions to the problem of providing an easy release characteristic to food casing.

Another problem realized in connection with the use of conventional cellulosic casings for snack foods is the tendency for the casing to separate from the encased meat mass during processing so that grease can accumulate between the meat mass and the casing. The appearance of surface grease can reduce consumer appeal.

The U.S. patents no. 3,378,379 to Shiner et. al. and no. 3,743,521 to Rasmussen are concerned with solutions to the problem of fat-out or surface grease for cellulosic casings.

Generally, it would appear that the problems of achieving a good release and avoiding surface grease for cellulosic casings in connection with snack foods cannot be resolved because the respective remedies have conflicting effects. A good release agent would be expected to cause a weak adhesion between the casing and the meat mass so that excessive surface grease would have a tendency to result. A remedy for surface grease would be expected to cause a strong adhesion between the casing and the meat mass so that poor peeling would result.

Applicants have conducted experiments which confirmed these expectations.

In accordance with the present invention, a cellulosic food casing is provided which will adhere to a food mass encased and processed therein and which can thereafter be easily removed from the surface of the processed food mass.

By practice of the present invention there may be provided a cellulosic food casing suitable for use in connection with a snack food.

By practice of the present invention there may be also provided a cellulosic food casing in a shirred form.

One embodiment of the invention is a cellulosic food casing including an internal coating comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin.

Generally, the food casing is tubular and cellulosic food casings include, but are not limited to, regenerated cellulose casing with or without a fibrous web fabricated in accordance with known methods.

Typically, the water soluble cellulose ethers suitable for the invention include non-ionic water soluble alkyl and hydroxyalkyl cellulose ethers such as methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, ethyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose, and ethylhydroxyethyl cellulose, and the anionic water soluble cellulose ethers such as carboxymethyl cellulose, and carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose. Methyl cellulose is particularly preferred.

Commercially, carboxymethyl cellulose and carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose are usually sold as the sodium salt and it is an established trade practice not to refer to the commercial product as the sodium salt. For purposes of this application references to these materials shall include the sodium salts and other alkali metal salts thereof.

Other suitable cellulose ethers include alkali soluble cellulose ethers such as alkali soluble methyl cellulose and hydroxyethyl cellulose. For purposes of this application, the definition of water soluble is intended to include alkali soluble cellulose ethers.

The cationic thermosetting resins suitable for the invention are preferably water soluble or water dispersible resins which can be cured to the insoluble state. The resins include the reaction products of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide, a modified melamine and formaldehyde, and a modified urea and formaldehyde. In addition, polyalkylenepolyamines and/or their salts, which include polyamines such as diethylenetriamine, triethylenetetramine, tetraethylenepentamine and the corresponding polypropylenepolyamines, as well as 4,4'-iminobisbutylamine, and 3,3'3"-nitrilotrispropylamine, are suitable. In general, an aldehyde-reactive polyalkylene-polyamine may be used provided the ratio of carbon atoms to nitrogen atoms therein is not greater than about 4: 1.

The higher polyalkylene-polyamines can also be used including polyethylenimine (formed by homopolymerization of ethyleneimine), and the long chain polyalkylene-polyamines formed by reacting a simple alkylenediamine or a simple polyalkylene-polyamine with from about 0.6 to about 1.5 mols of an alkylene dichloride, an alkylene dichlorohydrin or epichlorohydrin.

A method for preparing the epichlorohydrin-polyamine compositions is described in U.S.

patent no. 2,926,154. A method of preparing the cationic melamine-formaldehyde thermosetting resin compositions is described in U.S. patent no. 2,796,362. A method of preparing ureaformaldehyde thermosetting resin is described in U.S. patent no. 2,616,874.

Coating compositions suitable for use in accordance with the present invention are homogeneous aqueous solutions or suspensions typically containing at least about 0.286% by weight of a water soluble cellulose ether and at least about 0.029% by weight of a cationic thermosetting resin when the coating composition is applied by internal spraying during shirring. The concentrations could be lower for slugging. The preferred ratio of the water soluble cellulose ether to the cationic thermosetting resin in the coating composition depends on the specific chemicals and can be determined by straight forward experimentation. For methyl cellulose and Kymene (also called resin 4190), a product sold by Hercules, Inc.; the preferred weight ratio is about 10:1.

Suitable coating compositions may also contain other ingredients such as mineral oils, polyols such as propylene glycol, glycerol, triethylene glycol and sorbitol and water soluble alkylene oxide adducts of partial fatty acid esters as, for example, ethoxylated fatty acid partial esters of such polyols as anhydrosorbitols, glycerol, polyglycerol, pentaerythritol and glucosides. Typical water soluble adducts of this class are materials commercially available under the trademark "Tween" (Atlas Chemical Industries, inc.). These ingredients serve as processing aids.

A number of factors are known to affect the preparation of shirred casing sticks and the suitability of the shirred casing sticks for use in the processing of various types of food products, particularly when high speed automatic equipment is employed in the shirring and stuffing operations. It is well known in the art, for example, that if the moisture content of the tubular casing is too great, difficulty is experienced in formation of proper pleats and shirring patterns, and "bowing and snaking" of the resulting shirred casing stick will occur, thereby making stuffing operations more difficult. Further, it has been found that when water is applied to the casing during the shirring process, application of excessive amounts of water can cause the casing to seize on the shirring mandrel thereby making further processing very difficult, if not impossible.

Accordingly, when it is desired to apply the coating compositions described herein, as, for example, while the tubular casing is passing over a shirring mandrel during the shirring operation, it has been found that the amount of coating composition applied must be controlled to add the desired amount of water to the casing. It is also advantageous to avoid application of more coating composition than can be retained by the casing in order to prevent excess coating composition from being lost and wasted or from accumulating in localized areas of the shirred sticks with resulting detrimental effects thereto. Generally, the level of application of the coating compositions of this invention to the casing is about 3.5 milligrams per square inch (0.54 mg/cm2) of internal casing surface (1 in2 is equivalent to 6.45 cm2).

The amount of water and other ingredients applied to the surface of the casing may be controlled by varying the amount of coating composition applied and/or the concentration of the ingredients in the coating composition.

Application of the coating composition to the internal casing surface can be accomplished by using any one of a number of well-known methods. Thus, for example, the coating composition can be introduced into the casing in the form of a slug of liquid and advancing the casing past the liquid slug coats the inner surface thereof. A typical slugging operation is shown and described in the U.S. patent no. 3,378,379. Alternatively, the aqueous coating composition can be applied onto the casing internal surface through a hollow mandrel over which the casing is advancing as, for example, the mandrel of a casing shirring machine in a manner similar to that described in the U.S. patent no. 3,451,827. This method is generally referred to as "internal spray shirring".

The casing prepared in accordance with the preferred embodiment of this invention includes at least about 0.010 milligrams of methyl cellulose and at least about 0.001 milligrams of Kymene, a polyamide epichlorohydrin resin, per square inch of internal casing surface.

Casing produced in accordance with the invention can be used not only in the preparation of snack food products, but also in the preparation of food products from a wide range of formulations and processing conditions because the casings can be readily removed from the processed food product using high speed automatic peeling machines with high peeling efficiency. The food products processed within the instant casing do not exhibit an undesirable level of surface grease.

As used herein, surface grease rating is a subjective measure of the amount of accumulated fat and/or grease on the meat mass surface after peeling wherein "1" represents a substantially grease free surface, "5" represents an acceptable (but slightly greasy) surface, and "10" represents heavy fat deposits.

As used herein, peelability is defined by dividing the number of sausage links successfully peeled by a high speed automatic peeler by the total number of sausage links fed into the peeler. A peelability of at least about 95% is considered to be a commercially acceptable level.

Illustrative, non-limiting examples of the practice of the invention are set out below.

Numerous other examples can readily be evolved in the light of the guiding principles and teachings contained herein. The examples herein are intended merely to illustrate the invention and not in any sense to limit the manner in which the invention can be practiced. The parts and percentages recited therein and throughout this specification, unless otherwise stated, refer to parts by weight and percentages by weight.

EXAMPLE I Cellulosic casing samples including the respective coating compositions having the proportions of ingredients shown in Table 1 were prepared. The internal surface of the treated casing contained a uniform coating of an admixture of methyl cellulose and Kymene.

The casing samples used in this example were prepared from commercially produced cellulosic casing samples 55 feet long and having a flatwidth of about 0.75 inches. The casings were shirred on an apparatus such as that disclosed in U.S. patent no. 3,110,058 to Marbach.

As each 55 foot length of casing was being shirred, the particular coating composition was applied in the amount of about 3.5 milligrams of coating composition per square inch of internal casing surface by metering through the shirring mandrel along with the stream of inflation air. TABLE 1 COATING COMPOSITIONS Kymene Methyl Casing Solutions (12.5% Cellulose (100% Propylene Mineral Sample No.Solids) (g) Solids) (g) Tween 80 (g) H2O (g) Glycol (g) Oil (g) 1 22.8 11.4 12.1 426.9 465.4 48.6 2 22.8 12.8 12.1 436.9 465.4 48.6 3 22.8 14.25 12.1 436.9 465.4 48.6 4 22.8 17.1 12.1 434.1 465.4 48.6 5 22.8 19.95 12.1 431.2 465.4 48.6 6 22.8 22.8 12.1 428.4 465.4 48.6 7 22.8 28.5 12.1 422.7 465.4 48.6 8 22.8 57 12.1 394.1 465.4 48.6 9 11.4 28.5 12.1 434.0 434.0 48.6 10 38.9 28.5 12.1 406.15 465.4 48.6 11 228.0 28.5 12.1 217.4 465.4 48.6 12 44.0 8.25 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 13 33.0 8.25 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 14 26.4 8.25 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 15 22.0 8.25 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 16 18.86 8.25 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 17 20.0 25.0 12.1 428.9 465.4 48.6 18 16.0 20.0 12.1 437.9 465.4 48.6 19 12.0 15.0 12.1 446.9 465.4 48.6 20 8.0 10.0 12.1 455.9 465.4 48.6 21 4.0 5.0 12.1 464.9 465.4 48.6 EXAMPLE II This example shows the effect of the ratio of methyl cellulose to Kymene in the treating solution on the peelability and surface grease rating of the treated casings. The casing samples no. 1 to 1 6 as prepared in Example I were stuffed with a snack food emulsion prepared from an all beef formulation and linked into sausage products by conventional linking apparatus.

A typical snack food emulsion has a comparatively high fat content and includes a starter culture such as Lactacel. The snack food emulsion used was selected to be similar to typical snack food emulsions.

A typical smokehouse or product processing schedule was carried out. The sausage products were subjected to a twelve minute smoke period. For the first hour, the dry bulb setting was about 110"F and the wet bulb temperature was at ambient. After about one hour, the wet bulb temperature was adjusted to be about 104to and the relative humidity was about 81%. These conditions were maintained for about 6 to 7 hours in order to develop the starter culture.

Thereafter, the dry bulb temperature was adjusted to about 140"F and the wet bulb temperature was adjusted to about 112"F. The relative humidity was from about 40% to about 41 % and these conditions were maintained for an additional 40 hours. After a total processing time of about 48 hours, the sausage products were subjected to a cold shower for about 10 minutes and then stored in a cooler at a temperature of about 40"F prior to peeling.

The processed encased food products were sprayed with water to moisten the casings and then the casings were removed by passing through a commercially available high speed automatic peeler. A Ranger Apollo high-speed peeling machine was used.

The peeled snack food products were evaluated for the presence of surface grease. The results are shown in Table 2. The peelability of the casings from the encased food products was determined by dividing the number of sausage links successfully peeled on the Ranger Apollo Peeler by the total number of sausage links tested.

TABLE 2 Methyl Cellulose Kymene MC: Kymene Surface Casing Treatment Level Treatment Level Treatment Grease Peelability Sample No. (mg/100in2) (mg/100in2) Ratio Rating % 1 4.0 1.0 4/1 3 86.5 2 4.5 1.0 4.5/1 3 86.0 3 5.0 1.0 5/1 2 94.9 4 6.0 1.0 6/1 2 95.8 5 7.0 1.0 7/1 3 93.9 6 8.0 1.0 8/1 3 97.6 7 10.0 1.0 10/1 3 96.3 8 20.0 1.0 20/1 3 98.1 9 10.0 0.5 20/1 2 97.0 10 10.0 1.7 6/1 1 86.0 11 10.0 10.0 1/1 1 0 12 2.9 1.9 1.5/1 3 40.3 13 2.9 1.4 2.0/1 3 57.6 14 2.9 1.2 2.5/1 4 72.8 15 2.9 1.0 3.0/1 2 73.6 16 2.9 0.8 3.5/1 2 85.6 Untreated Sample # - - - 6 89.0 Untreated Sample # - - - 8 100.00 Untreated Sample # - - - 7 86.0 MC: Methyl Cellulose All the snack food products processed in the treated casing samples of this example exhibited acceptable levels of surface grease.

The casing samples no. 3 to 9 exhibited acceptable peelability, but the casing samples no. 1, 2, and 10 to 1 6 exhibited commercially unacceptable degree of peelability.

Table 2 shows that as the treatment ratio increases, the degree of peelability increases. This shows how the preferred ratio of cellulose ether to resin can be determined. The Untreated Samples 1 to 3 show the uncontrolled variation in performance. The Untreated Sample 2 shows that the product is prone to rendering or fat-out as indicated by the high grease rating. The peelability of untreated sample 2 was high, as expected, because of the ease of casing release associated with the presence of the product surface grease.

EXAMPLE 111 This example shows the effect of total treatment levels upon product performance. The casing samples no. 7, and 1 7 to 21 as prepared in Example 1 were used in this example. Additional samples 36 and 37 were prepared in the same manner to provide lower treatment levels. These casing samples contained various levels of coating composition wherein the ratio of methyl cellulose to Kymene was kept substantially constant. The casing samples were stuffed, processed and peeled in accordance with the procedure described in the Example II. The degree of peelability of the casings, as well as the surface grease rating were evaluated. The results are shown in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Total Methyl Cellulose Kymene MC: Kymene Treatment Surface Casing Treatment Level Treatment Level Treatment Level Grease % Sample No. (mg/100in2) (mg/100in2) Ratio (mg/100in2) Rating Peelability 7 10.00 1.00 10:1 11.00 3 96.3 17 8.75 0.88 10:1 9.63 2 97.4 18 7.00 0.70 10:1 7.70 2 98.7 19 5.25 0.53 10:1 5.78 2 98.7 20 3.50 0.35 10:1 3.85 2 99.0 21 1.75 0.18 10:1 1.93 1 98.0 36 1.38 0.14 10:1 1.52 2 98.0 37 1.0 0.1 10:1 1.10 1 96.0 MC: Methyl Cellulose All the casings used in this example exhibited good peelability and good fat-out resistance (acceptable surface grease rating). This indicates that at a treatment ratio of about 1 0:1 of methyl cellulose to Kymene, the treatment is effective over a wide range of treatment levels.

Table 3 shows that when the treatment ratio is about 10:1 a very low level of methyl cellulose and Kymene is effective.

EXAMPLE IV In this example, several different cellulose ethers and water soluble cationic thermosetting resins were evaluated. Coating compositions No. 22 to 27, having the proportions of ingredients shown in Table 4, were prepared. The casing samples No. 22 to 27 were treated respectively with coating compositions No. 22 to 27. The coating compositions were applied by internal spray shirring. The shirred casings were stuffed with a standard snack food emulsion and processed under typical smokehouse processing conditions as described in the Example II.

The processed food products were sprayed with water to moisten the casings and then the casings were removed by passing through a Ranger Apollo Peeler machine. Peelability of the casings and surface grease ratings of the product are shown in Table 4a. The treatment levels and the ratios of the respective cellulose ethers to cationic thermosetting resins are also shown in Table 4a.

TABLE 4 Casing Cellulose Propylene Mineral Sample No. Resin (g) Ether (g) Tween 80 (g) H2O (g) Glycol (g) Oil (g) 22 22.8 g. Kymene 28.5 g. Methyl 12.1 434.1 465.4 48.6 (12.5% Solids) Cellulose (100% Solids) 23 22.8 g. Kymene 8.25 g. Methyl 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 (12.5% Solids) Cellulose (100% Solids) 24 45.6 g. Kymene 8.25 g. CMC 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 (12.5% Solids) (100% Solids) 25 22.8 g. Kymene 8.25 g. CMHEC 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 (12.5% Solids) (100% Solids) 26 2.86 g. PEI 8.25 g. CMC 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 (33% Solids) (100% Solids) 27 2.86 g. Urea 8.25 g.CMC 12.1 431.5 465.4 48.6 Formaldehyde (100% Solids) (35% Solids) CMC-Carboxymethyl cellulose CMHEC-Carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose PEI-Polyethyleneimine TABLE 4a Cellulose Ether Resin Cellulose Treatment Treatment Ether to Surface Casing Cellulose Level Level Resin Grease Peelability Sample No.Ether mg/100in2 Resin mg/100in2 Ratio Rating % 22 Methyl Cellulose 10.00 Kymene 1.0 10/1 3 96.3 23 Methyl Cellulose 2.90 Kymene 1.0 2.9/1 2 73.6 24 Carboxy Methyl 2.85 Kymene 2.0 1.42/1 4 98.5 Cellulose 25 Carboxy Methyl 2.85 Kymene 1.0 2.85/1 4 99.5 Hydroxyethyl Cellulose 26 Carboxy Methyl 2.85 Polyethyleneimine 0.33 8.64/1 5 97.6 Callulose 27 Carboxy Methyl 2.85 Urea 0.35 8.14/1 3 98.6 Cellulose Formaldehyde Untreated Sample # 2 - - - - 8 100.00 EXAMPLE V In this example, casing samples No. 28 to 32 were stuffed with a typical snack food emulsion and processed under the same smokehouse processing conditions as described in the Example II. The processed stuffed casing samples No. 28 and 29 were untreated. The casing sample No.

30 was treated with carboxymethyl cellulose alone and the casing sample No. 31 was treated with Kymene alone. The casing sample No. 32 was treated with an admixture of carboxymethyl cellulose and Kymene.

The peelability and surface grease ratings of the casings in this example are shown in Table 5. TABLE 5 Treatment Levels (mg/100in2 Casing) Surface Casing Grease Peelability Sample No. Treatment Type CMC Kymene Rating % 28 Untreated Sample #1 - - 6 89 29 Untreated Sample #2 - - 8 100 30 CMC 2.85 - 8 96 31 Kymene - 1.0 2 34 32 CMC and Kymene 2.85 1.0 4 98.5 CMC: Carboxymethyl Cellulose The Table 5 shows the surprising results of the invention. The casing sample no. 30 shows a typical result for the use of a release agent. Similarly, the casing sample no. 31 is a typical result for the use of a cationic thermosetting resin.

In view of this mechanism it is surprising that the combination of the cellulose ether and the cationic theremosetting resin provides both an acceptable surface grease rating and an acceptable peelability. It would be anticipated that the expected irreversible bonding of the resin to both the In view of this mechanism it is surprising that the combination of the cellulose ether and the cationic theremosetting resin provides both an acceptable surface grease rating an acceptable peelability. It would be anticipated that the expected irreversible bonding of the resin to both the meat mass and the casing would interfere with the release required for acceptable peelability.

For the present invention, it is believed that a new mechanism occurs. There is crosslinking between the cellulose ether and the cationic thermosetting resin so that no bonding occurs between the resin and the casing. In the dry state, the cationic thermosetting resin bonds the meat mass to the cellulose ether and the cellulose ether retains a bond to the casing. Upon wetting, the cellulose ether provides an easy release from the casing so that good peelability results.

EXAMPLE Vl This example demonstrates that the proposed mechanism appears to be correct.

Casing sample No. 33 was first slugged with methyl cellulose alone and then spray shirred with Kymene alone. Casing sample No 34, was slugged with Kymene alone, then spray shirred with methyl cellulose alone. Casing sample No. 35 was slugged with a coating composition of the invention comprising methyl cellulose and Kymene.

The casing sample No 33 exhibited both acceptable grease rating and peelability. Apparently, the methyl cellulose prevented the Kymene from bonding to the casing.

The casing sample No. 34 exhibited an acceptable grease rating, but the adhesion between casing, resin, and meat mass was so strong that surface marring occurred during the peeling, resulting in poor peelability. This shows that the Kymene forms an irreversible bond to the casing and the subsequent treatment with methyl cellulose cannot achieve good peelability.

The casing sample No 35 shows the typical results of the invention for comparison.

It is of interest that the treatment of the casing sample No. 34 gave unacceptable results for snack foods.

The results are shown in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Surface Casing Grease Peelability Sample No. Treatment Type Rating 33 First, Methyl Cellulose Then, Kymene 1 95% 34 First, Kymene Then, Methyl Cellulose 2 0 35 Methyl Cellulose and Kymene 2 96% ADDITIONAL EMBODIMENTS It is known from U.S. patent no. 3,427,169 to Rose et al that a cellulosic casing can be made to adhere to a dry sausage emulsion and follow the shrinkage of the sausage during curing through the use of a soluble protein having a molecular weight above about 10,000 and an isoelectric point in the range of from about pH 2 to pH 6. These soluble proteins include glutelins, prolamines, prolines, hydroxy prolines, histones, elastins, and protamines. Typical examples are egg albumin, edestin, glutenin, procollagen, gelatin, and gliadin.

The following are further examples of additional embodiments of the invention.

EXAMPLE VII A cellulosic food casing as in the Example I is internally slugged with the following coating composition: 2.85 g. gelatin 28.5 g. methyl cellulose 442.7 g. water Thereafter, the casing was dried prior to shirring. The following coating composition was then sprayed into the casing during shirring: a 442.7 g. water 465.5 g. propylene glycol 12.1 g. Tween 80 48.6 g. mineral oil The treatment level is about .30 milligrams per square inch.

The casing was stuffed and processed as in the Example II.

The peelability is about 96% and the grease rating about 2.

EXAMPLE VIII The Example VI is repeated except that 2.85 g. of egg albumin replaces the gelatin.

The peelability is about 95% and the grease rating is about 3.

EXAMPLE IX The Example VI is repeated except that 2.85 g. of glutenin replaces the gelatin.

The peelability is about 95% and the grease rating is about 3.

We wish it to be understood that we do not desire to be limited to the exact details shown and described, for modifications will occur to a person skilled in the art.

Claims (59)

1. A cellulosic food casing including an internal coating comprising a water cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin or a water soluble protein.

2. A cellulosic food casing including an internal coating comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin.

3. A food casing as claimed in claim 2, further comprising a fibrous web embedded in said casing.

4. A food casing as claimed in claim 2 or claim 3 in a shirred form.

5. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein said resin is water soluble or water dispersible.

6. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 5, wherein said resin is curable from being water soluble to being water insoluble.

7. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 6, wherein said coating further comprises one or more components selected from mineral oils, polyols, and water soluble alkylene oxide adducts of partial fatty acid esters.

8. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 7, wherein said cellulose ether is selected from non-ionic water soluble alkyl and hydroxyalkyl cellulose ethers, and anionic water soluble cellulose ethers.

9. A food casing as claimed in claim 8 wherein said cellulose ether is selected from methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, ethyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose and ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose.

1 0. A food casing as claimed in claim 8 wherein said cellulose ether is selected from carboxymethyl cellulose, and carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose.

11. A food casing as claimed in claim 9, wherein said cellulose ether is methyl cellulose.

1 2. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 11, wherein said resin is selected from the group consisting of reaction products of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide, a modified melamine and formaldehyde, and a modified urea and formaldehyde.

1 3. A food casing as claimed in claim 12, wherein said resin is the reaction product of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide.

14. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 11, wherein said resin is a polyalkylenepolyamine or a salt thereof.

1 5. A food casing as claimed in claim 14, wherein said resin is selected from diethylenetriamine, triethylene-tetramine, tetraethylene-pentamine, 4,4'-iminobisbutylamine, and 3,3',3"nitrilotrispropylamine.

1 6. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 11, wherein said resin is an aldehyde-reactive polyalkylene-polyamine having a ratio of carbon atoms to nitrogen atoms therein not greater than about 4:1.

1 7. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 11, wherein said resin is a higher polyalkylene-polyamine selected from polyethyleneimine formed by homopolymerization of ethyleneimine, and long chain polyalkylene-polyamines formed by reacting a simple polyalkylene-polyamine with from 0.6 to 1.5 mols of an alkylene dichloride, alkylene dichlorohydrin, or epichlorohydrin.

18. A food casing as claimed in any one of claims 2 to 4, wherein said cellulose ether is methyl cellulose and said resin is the reaction product of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide.

1 9. A food casing as claimed in claim 1 8 wherein the weight ratio of said methyl cellulose to said reaction product is about 10:1.

20. A food casing as claimed in claim 18, wherein said coating comprises at least 1.0 milligram of said methyl cellulose per 100 square inches (0.1 6 mg/100 cm2) of internal casing surface and at least 0.1 milligram of said reaction product per 100 square inches (0.016 mg/100 cm2) of internal casing surface.

21. A method of preparing a cellulosic food casing which comprises coating the internal surface of said food casing with a coating composition comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin or a water soluble protein.

22. A method of preparing a cellulosic food casing which comprises coating the internal surface of said food casing with a coating composition comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin.

23. A method as claimed in claim 22 wherein said resin is water soluble or water dispersible.

24. A method as claimed in claim 22 or claim 23 wherein said coating composition is an aqueous solution or suspension comprising at least 0.286% by weight of said water soluble cellulose ether and at least 0.029% by weight of said resin.

25. A method as claimed in any one of claims 22 to 24, wherein said coating is about 3.5 milligrams per square inch (0.54 mg/cm2) of internal casing surface.

26. A method as claimed in any one of claims 22 to 25, wherein said resin is curable from being water soluble to being water insoluble.

27. A method as claimed in any one of claims 22 to 26, wherein said cellulose ether is selected from non-ionic water soluble alkyl and hydroxyalkyl cellulose ethers, and anionic water soluble cellulose ethers.

28. A method as claimed in claim 27, wherein said cellulose ether is selected from methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, ethyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose and ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose.

29. A method as claimed in claim 27, wherein said cellulose ether is selected from carboxymethyl cellulose, and carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose.

30. A method as claimed in claim 28, wherein said cellulose ether is methyl cellulose.

31. A method as claimed in any one of claims 22 to 30, wherein said resin is selected from reaction products of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide, a modified melamine and formaldehyde, and a modified urea and formaldehyde.

32. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said resin is the reaction product of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide.

33. A method as claimed in claim 22, wherein said cellulose ether is methyl cellulose and said resin is the reaction product of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide.

34. A method as claimed in claim 33, wherein the weight ratio of said methyl cellulose to said reaction product is about 1 0:1.

35. A method as claimed in claim 33, wherein said coating comprises at least 1.0 milligram of said methyl cellulose per 100 square inches (0.16 mg/100 cm2) of internal casing surface and at least 0.1 milligram of said reaction product per 100 square inches (0.016 mg/100 cm2) of internal casing surface.

36. A method as claimed in any one of claims 22 to 35, wherein said coating composition is applied by slugging the casing.

37. A method as claimed in any one of claims 22 to 35, wherein said coating composition is applied by spray shirring the casing.

38. A method of preparing a processed food product which comprises processing the food product in a food casing, the food casing being a cellulosic food casing including an internal coating comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin or a water soluble protein, and peeling said food casing from said food product subsequent to said processing.

39. A method of preparing a processed food product which comprises processing the food product in a food casing, the food casing being a cellulosic food casing including an internal coating comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a cationic thermosetting resin, and peeling said food casing from said food product subsequent to said processing.

40. A method as claimed in claim 39, wherein said resin is water soluble or water dispersible.

41. A method as claimed in claim 38 or claim 39 wherein said coating is an aqueous solution or suspension comprising at least 0.286% by weight of said water soluble cellulose ether and at least 0.029% by weight of said resin.

42. A method as claimed in any one of claims 39 to 41, wherein said coating is about 3.5 milligrams per square inch (0.54 mg/cm2) of internal casing surface.

43. A method as claimed in any one, of claims 39 to 42, wherein said resin is curable from being water soluble to being water insoluble.

44. A method as claimed in any one of claims 39 to 43, wherein said cellulose ether is selected from non-ionic water soluble alkyl and hydroxyalkyl cellulose ethers, and anionic water soluble cellulose ethers.

45. A method as claimed in claim 44, wherein said cellulose ether is selected from methyl cellulose, hydroxy methyl cellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, ethyl methyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl cellulose and ethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose.

46. A method as claimed in claim 44, wherein said cellulose ether is selected from carboxymethyl cellulose and carboxymethyl hydroxyethyl cellulose.

47. A method as claimed in claim 45, wherein said cellulose ether is methyl cellulose.

48. A method as claimed in any one of claims 39 to 47, wherein said resin is selected from reaction products of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide, a modified melamine and formaldehyde, and a modified urea and formaldehyde.

49. A method as claimed in claim 48, wherein said resin is the reaction product of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide.

50. A method as claimed in claim 39, wherein said cellulose ether is methyl cellulose and said resin is the reaction product of an epichlorohydrin and a polyamide.

51. A method as claimed in claim 50, wherein the weight ratio of said methyl cellulose to said reaction product is about 10:1.

52. A method as claimed in claim 50, wherein said coating comprises at least 1.0 milligram of said methyl cellulose per 100 square inches (0.16 mg/100 cm2) of internal casing surface and at least 0.1 milligram of said reaction product per 100 square inches (0.016 mg/100 cm2) of internal casing surface.

53. A cellulosic food casing including an internal coating comprising a water soluble cellulose ether and a water soluble protein.

54. A food casing as claimed in claim 53, wherein said protein is selected from gelatin, egg albumin, and glutenin.

55. A cellulosic food casing substantially as hereinbefore described and with reference to any one of the Examples.

56. A method of preparing a cellulosic food casing substantially as hereinbefore described and with reference to any one of the Examples.

57. A cellulosic food casing whenever prepared by a method as claimed in any one of claims 21 to 37 or 56.

58. A method of preparing a processed food product substantially as hereinbefore described and with reference to any one of the Examples.

59. A processed food product whenever prepared by a method as claimed in any one of claims 38 to 52 or 58.