GB1594055A - Method of removing pollutants from flue gases - Google Patents

Method of removing pollutants from flue gases Download PDF

Info

Publication number
GB1594055A
GB1594055A GB10343/78A GB1034378A GB1594055A GB 1594055 A GB1594055 A GB 1594055A GB 10343/78 A GB10343/78 A GB 10343/78A GB 1034378 A GB1034378 A GB 1034378A GB 1594055 A GB1594055 A GB 1594055A
Authority
GB
United Kingdom
Prior art keywords
catalyst
cracking
sulfur
regenerator
alumina
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
GB10343/78A
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Chevron USA Inc
Original Assignee
Chevron Research and Technology Co
Chevron Research Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US05/786,723 external-priority patent/US4115250A/en
Application filed by Chevron Research and Technology Co, Chevron Research Co filed Critical Chevron Research and Technology Co
Publication of GB1594055A publication Critical patent/GB1594055A/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/8603Removing sulfur compounds
    • B01D53/8609Sulfur oxides
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01DSEPARATION
    • B01D53/00Separation of gases or vapours; Recovering vapours of volatile solvents from gases; Chemical or biological purification of waste gases, e.g. engine exhaust gases, smoke, fumes, flue gases, aerosols
    • B01D53/34Chemical or biological purification of waste gases
    • B01D53/74General processes for purification of waste gases; Apparatus or devices specially adapted therefor
    • B01D53/86Catalytic processes
    • B01D53/864Removing carbon monoxide or hydrocarbons
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G11/00Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils
    • C10G11/02Catalytic cracking, in the absence of hydrogen, of hydrocarbon oils characterised by the catalyst used

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Catalysts (AREA)
  • Treating Waste Gases (AREA)
  • Exhaust Gas Treatment By Means Of Catalyst (AREA)

Description

(54) METHOD OF REMOVING POLLUTANTS FROM FLUE GASES (71) We, CHEVRON RESEARCH COMPANY, a corporation duly organised under the laws of the State of Delaware, United States of America, of 525 Market Street, San Francisco, California, United States of America, do hereby declare the invention, for which we pray that a patent may be granted to us, and the method by which it is to be performed, to be particularly described in and by the following statement: This invention relates to a method for reducing the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in the flue gas produced in a catalyst regenerator in a fluid catalytic cracking system.
Modern hydrocarbon catalytic cracking systems use a moving bed or fluidized bed of a particulate catalyst. The cracking catalyst is subjected to a continuous cyclic cracking reaction and catalyst regeneration procedure. In a fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) system, a stream of hydrocarbon feed is contacted with fluidized catalyst particles in a hydrocarbon cracking zone, or reactor, usually at a temperature of about 800-1100"F. The reactions of hydrocarbons in the hydrocarbon stream at this temperature result in deposition of carbonaceous coke on the catalyst particles. The resulting fluid products are thereafter separated from the coked catalyst and are withdrawn from the cracking zone.
The coked catalystis then stripped of volatiles and is passed to a catalyst regeneration zone.
In the catalyst regenerator, the coked catalyst regeneration zone. In the catalyst regenerator, the coked catalyst is contacted with a gas containing a controlled amount of molecular oxygen to burn off a desired portion of the coke from the catalyst and simultaneously to heat the catalyst to a high temperature desired when the catalyst is again contacted with the hydrocarbon stream in the cracking zone. After regeneration, the catalyst is returned to the cracking zone, where it is used to vaporize the hydrocarbons and to catalyze hydrocarbon cracking. The flue gas formed by combustion of coke in the catalyst regenerator is separately removed from the regenerator. This flue gas, which may be treated to remove particulates and carbon monoxide from it, is normally passed into the atmosphere. Concern with control of pollutants in flue gas has resulted in a search for improved methods for controlling such pollutants, particularly sulfur oxides and carbon monoxide.
The amount of conversion obtained in an FCC cracking operation is the volume percent of fresh hydrocarbon feed changed to gasoline and lighter products during the conversion step. The end boiling point of gasoline for the purpose of determining conversion is conventionally defined as 430 F. Conversion is often used as a measure of the severity of a commercial FCC operation. At a given set of operating conditions, a more active catalyst gives a greater conversion than does a less active catalyst. The ability to provide higher conversion in a given FCC unit is desirable in that it allows the FCC unit to be operated in a more flexible manner. Feed throughput in the unit can be increased, or alternatively a higher degree of conversion can be maintained with a constant feed throughput rate.
The hydrocarbon feeds processed in commercial FCC units normally contain sulfur, usually termed "feed sulfur". It has been found that about 2-10% or more of the feed sulfur in a hydrocarbon feedstream processed in an FCC system is invariably transferred from the feed to the catalyst particles as a part of the coke formed on the catalyst particles during cracking. The sulfur deposited on the catalyst. herein termed "coke sulfur", is eventually cycled from the conversion zone along with the coked catalyst into the catalyst regenerator.
Thus, about 2-10% or more of the sulfur in the hydrocarbon feed is continuously passed from the cracking zone into the catalyst regeneration zone in the coked catalyst. In an FCC catalyst regenerator, sulfur contained in the coke is burned along with the coke carbon, forming gaseous sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide, which are conventionally removed from the regenerator in the flue gas.
Most of the feed sulfur does not become coke sulfur in the cracking reactor. Instead, it is converted either to normally gaseous sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide and carbon oxysulfide, or to normally liquid organic sulfur compounds. These sulfur compounds are carried along with the vapor products recovered from the cracking reactor.
About 90% or more of the feed sulfur is thus continuously removed from the cracking reactor in the stream of processed, cracked hydrocarbons, with about 40-60% of this sulfur being in the form of hydrogen sulfide. Provisions are conventionally made to recover hydrogen sulfide from the effluent from the cracking reactor. Typically, a very-lowmolecular-weight off-gas vapor stream is separated from the C+ liquid hydrocarbons in a gas recovery unit, and the off-gas is treated, as by scrubbing it with an amine solution, to remove the hydrogen sulfide. Removal of sulfur compounds such as hydrogen sulfide from the fluid effluent from an FCC cracking reactor is relatively simple and inexpensive compared to removal of sulfur oxides from an FCC regenerator flue gas by conventional methods. Moreover, if all the sulfur which must be recovered from an FCC operation could be recovered in a single recovery operation performed on the reactor off-gas, the use of two separate sulfur recovery operations in an FCC unit could be obviated.
It has been suggested to diminish the amount of sulfur oxides in FCC regenerator flue gas by desulfurizing a hydrocarbon feed in a separate desulfurization unit prior to cracking or to desulfurize the regenerator flue gas itself, by a conventional flue gas desulfurization procedure, after removal from the FCC regenerator. Clearly, both of the foregoing alternatives require elaborate, extraneous processing operations and entail large capital and utilities expenses.
If sulfur normally removed from the FCC unit in the regenerator flue gas as sulfur oxides is instead removed from the cracking reactor as hydrogen sulfide along with the processed cracked hydrocarbons. the sulfur thus shifted to the reactor effluent is then simply a a small addition to the hydrogen sulfide and organic sulfur already invariably present in the reactor effluent. The small added expense. if any. of removing even as much as 5-15% more hydrogen sulfide from an FCC reactor off-gas by available means is substantially less than the expense of separate feed desulfurization or flue gas desulfurization to reduce the level of sulfur oxides in the regenerator flue gas. Hydrogen sulfide recovery systems used in present commercial FCC units normally have the capacity to remove additional hydrogen sulfide from the reactor off-gas.Present commercial FCC units normally have the capacity to remove additional hydrogen sulfide from the reactor off-gas. Present off-gas hydrogen sulfide recovery facilities could normally handle any additional hydrogen sulfide which would be added to the off-gas if the sulfur normally in the regenerator flue gas were substantially all converted to hydrogen sulfide in the FCC reactor off-gas. It is accordingly desirable to direct substantially all feed sulfur into the fluid cracked products removel pathway from the cracking reactor and reduce the amount of sulfur oxides in the regenerator flue gas.
It has been suggested. e.g.. in U.S. Patent 3.699,037, to reduce the amount of sulfur oxides in FCC regenerator flue gas by adding particles of Group IIA metal oxides and/or carbonates, such as dolomite, MgO, or CaCO3, to the circulating catalyst in an FCC unit.
The Group IIA metals react with sulfur oxides in the flue gas to form solid sulfur-containing compounds. The Group IIA metal oxides lack physical strength, and regardless of the size of the particles introduced, they are rapidly reduced to fines by attrition and rapidly pass out of the FCC unit with the catalyst fines. Thus, addition of dolomite and the like Group IIA materials must be continuous, and large amounts of material must be employed, in order to reduce the level of flue gas sulfur oxides for any significant period of time.
It has also been suggested, e.g., in U.S. Patent 3.835.031, to reduce the amount of sulfur oxides in an FCC regenerator flue gas by impregnating a Group IIA metal oxide onto a conventional silica-alumina cracking catalyst. The attrition problem encountered when using unsupported Group IIA metals is thereby reduced. However, it has been found that Group IIA metal oxides, such as magnesia, when used as a component of cracking catalysts, have an undesirable effect on the activity and selectivity of the cracking catalysts. The addition of a Group IIA metal to a cracking catalyst results in two particularly noticeable adverse consequences relative to the results obtained in cracking without the presence of the Group IIA metals: (1) the yield of the liquid hydrocarbon fraction is substantially reduced, typically by greater than 1 volume percent of the feed volume; and (2) the octane rating of the gasoline or naphtha fraction (75 -430 F boiling range) is substantially reduced.
Both of the above-noted adverse consequences are seriously detrimental to the economic viability of an FCC cracking operation and even complete removal of sulfur oxides from regenerator flue gas would not compensate for the losses in yield and octane which result from adding Group IIA metals to an FCC catalyst.
Alumina has been a component of many FCC and other cracking catalysts, but primarily in intimate chemical combination with silica. Alumina itself has low acidity and is generally considered to be undesirable for use as a cracking catalyst. The art has taught that alumina is not selective, i.e., the cracked hydrocarbon products recovered from an FCC or other cracking unit using an alumina catalyst would not be desired valuable products, but would include, for example, relatively large amounts of C2 and ligher hydrocarbon gases.
The conventional type of FCC catalyst regeneration currently used in most systems is an incomplete combustion mode. In such systems, referred to herein as "standard regeneration" systems, a substantial amount of coke carbon is left on regenerated catalyst passed from the FCC regeneration zone to the cracking zone. Typically, regenerated catalyst contains a substantial amount of coke carbon, i.e., more than 0.2 weight percent carbon, usually about 0.25 to 0.45 weight percent carbon. The flue gas removed from an FCC regenerator operating in a standard regeneration mode is chracterized by a relatively high carbon monoxide/carbon dioxide concentration ratio. The atmosphere in much or all of the regeneration zone is, over-all, a reducing atmosphere because of the presence of substantial amounts of unburned coke carbon and carbon monoxide.
In general, reducing the level of carbon on regenerated catalyst below about 0.2 weight percent has been difficult. Until recently, there has been little incentive to attempt to remove substantially all coke carbon from the catalyst, since even a fairly high carbon content has had little adverse effect on the activity and selectivity of amorphous silica-alumina catalysts. Most of the FCC cracking catalysts now used, however, contain zeolites, or molecular sieves. Zeolite-containing catalysts have usually been found to have relatively higher activity and selectivity when their coke carbon content after regeneration is relatively low. An incentive has thus arisen for attempting to reduce the coke content of regenerated FCC catalyst to a very low level, e.g., below 0.2 weight percent.
Several methods have been suggested for burning substantially all carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide during regeneration, to avoid air pollution, recover heat and prevent afterburning. Among the procedures suggested for use in obtaining complete carbon monoxide combustion in an FCC regenerator have been: (1) increasing the amount of oxygen introduced into the regenerator relative to standard regeneration; and either (2) increasing the average operating temperature in the regenerator or (3) including various carbon monoxide oxidation promoters in the cracking catalyst to promote carbon monoxide burning. Various solutions have also been suggested for the problem of afterburning of carbon monoxide, such as addition of extraneous combustibles or use of water or heat-accepting solids to absorb the heat of combustion of carbon monoxide.
When using carbon monoxide combustion promoters heretofore commercially available, such as Group VIII noble metals in FCC catalysts, to provide complete carbon monoxide combustion, it has been found quite difficult to maintain the amount of coke on regenerated catalyst at an acceptably low level. Promoter materials when added to the catalyst have been found to provide adequate CO combustion in many cases, but have not been well accepted commercially because of the resulting high level of coke on regenerated catalyst, which has lowered conversion.
Complete combustion systems using an unusually high temperature in the catalyst regenerator to accomplish complete carbon monoxide combustion are also not altogether satisfactory. Some of the heat generated by carbon monoxide combustion is lost in the flue gas, because CO combustion takes place essentially in a dilute catalyst phase in an after-burning mode, and high temperatures can permanently adversely affect the activity and selectivity of the FCC catalyst.
Several types of addition of Group VIII noble metals and other carbon monoxide combustion promoters to FCC systems have been suggested in the art. In U.S. Patent 2,647,860 it is proposed to add 0.1-1 weight percent chromic oxide to an FCC catalyst to promote combustion of carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide and to prevent afterburning.
U.S. Patent 3,364,136 proposes to employ particles containing a small pore (3-5 A.) molecular sieve with which is associated a transition metal from Groups IB, IIB, VIB, VIIB and VIII of the Periodic Table, or compounds thereof, such as a sulfide or oxide.
Representative metals disclosed include chromium, nickel, iron, molybdenum, cobalt, platinum, palladium, copper and zinc. The metal-loaded, small-pore zeolite may be used in an FCC system in physical mixture with cracking catalysts containing larger-pore zeolites active for cracking, or the small-pore zeolite may be included in the same matrix with zeolites active for cracking. The small-pore, metal-loaded zeolites are supplied for the purpose of increasing the CO2/CO ratio in the flue gas produced in the FCC regenerator. In U.S. Patent 3,788,977, it is proposed to add uranium or platinum impregnated on an inorganic oxide such as alumina to an FCC system, either in physical mixture with FCC catalyst or incorporated into the same amorphous matrix as a zeolite used for cracking.
Uranium or platinum is added for the purpose of producing gasoline fractions having high aromatics contents, and no effect on carbon monoxide combustion when using the additive is discussed in the patent. In U.S. Patent 3,808,121 it is proposed to supply large-size particles of a carbon monoxide combustion promoter in an FCC regenerator. The smaller-size catalyst particles are cycled between the FCC cracking reactor and the catalyst regenerator, while, because of their size, the larger promoter particles remain in the regenerator. Carbon monoxide oxidation promoters such as cobalt, copper, nickel, manganese, or copper chromite impregnated on an inorganic oxide such as alumina are disclosed for use. Belgian patent publication 820,181 suggests using catalyst particles containing platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium or rhenium or mixtures or compounds thereof to promote carbon monoxide oxidation in an FCC catalyst regenerator. An amount between a trace and 100 ppm of the active metal is added to FCC catalyst particles by incorporation during catalyst manufacture or by addition of a compound of the metal to the hydrocarbon feed to an FCC unit using the catalyst. The publication notes that addition of the promoter metal increases coke and hydrogen formation during cracking. The catalyst containing the promoter metal can be used as such or can be added in physical mixture with unpromoted FCC cracking catalyst.
We purchased quantities of particulate additives from catalyst manufacturers. The additives were sold by the manufacturers for the purpose of introducing the additives into circulation in admixture with FCC catalyst in FCC units to promote combustion of carbon monoxide during catalyst regeneration in the units. We used the additives in our commercial FCC operations. One such additive was understood to contain a mixture of platinum-alumina particles and silica-alumina particles.
Our British Patent No. 1,540,205 describes and claims a method of removing a sulfur oxide from a gaseous mixture containing it, which comprises reacting in a desulfurization zone at a temperature in the range from 1000 to 1500"F the sulfur oxide-containing gaseous mixture with a particulate reactive alumina material (as hereinafter defined) to form in the alumina material at least one solid compound containing both sulfur atoms and aluminium atoms, separating the resulting sulfur oxide-depleted gaseous mixture from the alumina material, and thereafter reacting the solid compound-containing particulate material with a hydrocarbon at a temperature in the range from 800 to 1300"F so as to convert the sulfur in the said solid compound into hydrogen sulfide. This method is applicable to the treatment of flue gases generated during regeneration of catalysts used in the cracking of a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon stream.
According to the present invention. there is provided in a catalytic hydrocarbon cracking process wherein a cracking catalyst is cycled between the cracking zone and a catalyst regeneration zone, a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon stream is cracked in contact with the catalyst in the cracking zone, and a carbon monoxide-containing and sulfur-containing flue gas is formed in the regeneration zone by burning sulfur-containing coke off the catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas, a method of reducing the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in the flue gas, which comprises: (a) reacting carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon dioxide in the regeneration zone in contact with a carbon monoxide oxidation promoter comprising a metal, or compound of a metal, selected from platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium, copper and chromium, in association with a particulate solid, the promoter being physically admixed with the cracking catalyst; (b) introducing sufficient molecular oxygen into the regeneration zone to provide an atmosphere therein having a molecular oxygen concentration of at least 0.5 volume percent; (c) removing sufficint coke from the catalyst in the regeneration zone to provide an average carbon content of less than 0.2 weight percent in regenerated catalyst passed from the regeneration zone to the cracking zone; (d) including in said catalyst an alumina phase containing 50 to 5000 parts per million of reactive alumina (as hereinafter defined), said catalyst being substantially free from said metal or compound of said metal comprising said promoter; (e) forming a sulfur-'. and aluminium-containing solid in the catalyst in the regeneration zone by reacting sulfur trioxide, or sulfur dioxide and molecular oxygen, with alumina present in said alumina phase in said catalyst: and (f) removing sulfur from the catalyst and forming hydrogen sulfide in the cracking zone by contacting the sulfur- and aluminium-containing solid with the hydrocarbon stream.
We have found that the use of a particulate carbon monoxide combustion promoter containing a metal or metal compound very active for CO combustion promotion, in conjunction with the use of a catalyst containing a discrete, silica-free alumina phase for reaction with sulfur oxides in regenerator flue gas, provides a synergistic method for removing both carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides from the regenerator flue gas.
The present invention is used in connection with a fluid catalyst cracking process for cracking hydrocarbon feeds. The same sulfur-containing hydrocarbon feed normally processed in commercial FCC systems may be processed in a cracking system employing the present invention. Suitable feedstocks include, for example, gas oils, light cycle oils, heavy cycle oils, etc., which usually contain 0.1-10 weight percent sulfur. Sulfur may be present in the feed as a thophene, disulfide or thioether. Suitable feedstocks normally boil in the range from 400 -1100 F or higher. A suitable feed may include recycled hydrocarbons which have already been cracked.
Cracking conditions employed in the cracking or conversion step in an FCC system are frequently provided in part by pre-heating or heat-exchanging hydrocarbon feeds to bring them to a temperature of 600-750"F before introducing them into the cracking zone; however, pre-heating of the feed is not essential. Cracking conditions include a catalyst/hydrocarbon weight ratio of 2-10:1. A hydrocarbon weight space velocity in the cracking zone of 5-S per hour is preferably used. The average amount of coke contained in the catalyst after contact with the hydrocarbons in the cracking zone, when the catalyst is passed to the regenerator, is preferably between 0.5 weight percent and 25 weight percent, depending in part on the carbon content of regenerated catalyst in the particular system, as well as the heat balance of the particular system.
The catalyst regeneration zone used in an FCC system employing an embodiment of the present invention may be of conventional design. The gaseous atmosphere inside the regeneration zone is normally comprised of a mixture of gases in concentrations which vary according to the locus within the regenerator. The concentrations of gases also vary according to the coke concentration on catalyst particles entering the regenerator and according to the amount of molecular oxygen and steam passed into the regenerator.
Generally, the gaseous atmosphere in a regenerator contains 5-25% steam, varying amounts of oxygen, carbon monoxide, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and sulfur trioxide. In order to facilitate removal of sulfur contents from the regenerator flue gas within the regenerator according to the invention, it is preferred that relatively coke-free particles containing active alumina must contact the gaseous regenerator atmosphere at a locus at which the atmosphere contains sulfur trioxide or molecular oxygen and sulfur dioxide. In regenerators of conventional design, the flue gas includes the desired components and catalyst normally contacts the flue gas at this point, after having been freed of a substantial amount of coke. When regenerators of this type are employed, contact between relatively coke-free alumina-containing particles and the oxygen and sulfur dioxide or sulfur trioxide is facilitated.
The carbon monoxide combustion promoters which are suitable for use in the invention are the metals platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium, copper and chromium, or compounds thereof, such as their oxides, sulfides or sulfates. At least one of the foregoing metals or metal compounds is used, and mixtures of two or more of the metals are also suitable. For example, mixtures of platinum and palladium or copper and chromium are suitable. The effect of the above-mentioned carbon monoxide combustion promoter metals may be enhanced, in some cases, by combining them with small amounts of other metals or metalloids, particularly rhenium, tin, germanium or lead.
The carbon monoxide combustion promoter is employed in the FCC system as follows: the promoter is present in the system in association with a relatively small amount of particulate solid other than the catalyst, such as particles of alumina or silica, suitable for circulation in an FCC system, with the promoter metal thus being present in physical mixture with the FCC catalyst. The promoter metal is preferably present in a particulate solid in a relatively high concentration. The total amount of promoter metal added to the system is preferably sufficient to promote combustion of most or substantially all of the carbon monoxide produced in an FCC regenerator.
Platinum is a particularly preferred promoter for use in the present method. The platinum is present on only a small fraction of particles in the system, i.e. the platinum is located on the particulate solid physically admixed with the FCC catalyst. lt is preferred that the total amount of platinum added to an FCC system be between 0.01 and 100 parts per million, by weight, with an amount between 0.1 and 10 parts per million being particularly preferred, with respect to the total amount of catalyst in the system. It will be apparent that the amount of platinum present in a given discrete particle added to an FCC system will be greater when fewer particles containing the promoter are added. The concentration of platinum can range up to 2 weight percent, or higher, if desired, in cases where a very small amount of particulate, platinum- containing material is added to an FCC system. Preferably, however, the amount of platinum added to a particulate solid is kept at less than 1 weight percent of the total weight of the solid. An amount of platinum added to discrete solids of 0.01 to 1 weight percent of the total weight of the discrete solids is a preferred range for use.
The amount of Group VIII noble metals other than platinum is generally from 2 times to 10 times higher total concentration in the system with respect to the total amount of catalyst, than is used for a platinum promoter. Thus, the amount of the Group VIII metal such as palladium or iridium can be calcuated from the foregoing description of the concentration of a platinum promoter, at least twice as much and preferably 5 times as much of other Group VIII noble metals being used. The concentration of the other Group VIII noble metals on any discrete particle in the FCC system is usually kept below 2 weight percent, and preferably below 1 weight perccent.
The amount of copper used in an FCC system as a promoter is generally 100 to 5000 times higher total concentration in the system, with respect to the total amount of catalyst used, than the amount of platinum which would be used in the same system. The concentration of copper promoter on any discrete particle is usually kept below 20 weight percent, and preferably below 10 weight percent.
The amount of chromium used in an FCC system as a promoter is generally between 500 and 25,000 times higher total concentration in the system, with respect to the total amount of catalyst, than the amount of platinum which would be employed in the same system. The concentration of chromium in chromium compound added by, e.g., impregnation, on any discrete particle in the FCC system is usually kept below 20 weight percent of the total particle weight, and preferably below 10 weight percent.
The promoter metal, or metal compound, can be added to a discrete particulate solid, which is physically admixed with the FCC catalyst in circulation in the system. The particulate solid to be mixed with the catalyst can be any material which is suitable for circulation in an FCC system in particulate form in admixture with the catalyst. Particularly suitable materials are the porous inorganic oxides, such as alumina and silica, or mixtures of two or more inorganic oxides, such as silica-alumina, natural and synthetic clays and crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites. Gamma alumina is particularly good. The promoter metal can be added to a particulate solid in any suitable manner, as by impregnation or ion exchange, or can be added to a precursor of a particulate solid, as by coprecipitation from an aqueous solution with an inorganic oxide precursor sol. The particulate solid can be formed into particles of a size suitable for use in an FCC system by conventional means, such as spray-drying or crushing of larger particles to the desired size.
A particulate solid which contains at least one promoter metal or metal compound of the type mentioned above can be admixed with the bulk of FCC catalyst prior to charging the catalyst to an FCC unit. Likewise, the particulate solid containing a promoter can be added to an FCC unit separately from the catalyst in the desired amount.
When the promoter metal is employed in the system, and particularly when the promoter metal is present in a relatively high concentration in a particulate solid physically admixed with the cracking catalyst, it is preferred to perform at least a major portion of the combustion of all carbon monoxide in the catalyst regenerator in a dense catalyst phase region within the regenerator. By a dense catalyst phase region, is meant that the catalyst density in the region is at least 10 pounds per cubic foot.
When using a separate particulate promoter physically mixed with the cracking catalyst, sufficient oxyge substantially constant, the weight of the particle at this time being designated "Wa"; and (3) passing a stream of a gas mixture containing, by weight, 0.05% sulfur dioxide, and, in addition, the same gases in the same proportions as used in step (2), over the solid particle resulting from step (2) at a temperature of 1200"F and atmospheric pressure until the weight of the solid particle is substantially constant, the weight of the solid particle at this time being designated "Ws".
The weight fraction of reactive alumina in the solid particle, designated "Xa", is determined by the formula Xa = Ws-Wa x Wa
Molecular Wt. Alumina Molecular wt. Sulfur Trioxide x3 Various known and commercially used FCC catalysts include at least a small amount of a discrete alumina phase containing reactive alumina, particularly those catalysts which include a preponderance of alumina in their overall composition. On the other hand, many alumina-containing catalysts contain substantially no reactive alumina. Most, if not all, conventional catalysts include both silica and alumina, and it is felt that the absence of reactive alumina, we have noted, in many alumina-containing catalysts is the result of intimate combination of silica and alumina in the catalysts. Thus, the alumina phase must be substantially silica-free in order to include alumia suitable for reaction with sulfur trioxide in the regenerator flue gas.
Most cracking catalysts contain 50 weight percent or more silica, which tends to combine intimately with alumina in a manner that renders the alumina relatively inactive for reaction with sulfur oxides.
Catalysts containing a relatively large amount of alumina present as a discrete phase (free alumina) can be prepared by employing starting materials containing 50%-60% or more of alumina or an alumina precursor, as well as by forming catalyst from materials such as clays known to contain at least some discrete, free alumina. A discrete alumina phase, or reactive alumina, can be added to a previously made catalyst by impregnation, but we have found that alumina cannot be successfully added to a silica-containing catalyst by impregnation unless the catalyst has first been heated to a temperature between 800"F and 1500"F, preferably 1000"-1400"F.
Aside from the requirement that the catalyst include a discrete, substantially silica-free alumina phase, the method of the present invention places no particular limitations on the type of cracking catalyst which can be used. Preferred catalysts are those containing 1-50 weight percent of a zeolitic crystalline aluminosilicate, such as Zeolite X or Zeolite Y, associated with a porous refractory matrix, such as one or more inorganic oxides. The sodium cations in the zeolite component of the catalyst are preferably ion exchanged for rare earths or hydrogen cations to enhance the activity and stability of the catalyst.
Alumina in the catalyst particles reacts with sulfur trioxide or sulfur dioxide and oxygen in the FCC catalyst regenerator to form at least one solid compound including sulfur and aluminium, such as a sulfate of aluminium. In this way, sulfur oxides are removed from the regenerator atmosphere and are not released from the regenerator in the flue gas.
Catalyst containing the solid aluminium- and sulfur-containing material is passed to the cracking zone in the FCC system. In the cracking zone, alumina is regenerated in the catalyst and hydrogen sulfide is formed by contacting the sulfur-containing catalyst with the stream of hydrocarbon being treated in the cracking zone. In addition to forming hydrogen sulfide, the reaction between the sulfur- and aluminium-containing solid and the hydrocarbon feed may produce some other fluid sulfur compounds such as carbonoxysulfide or organic sulfides. The resulting fluid sulfur compounds exit the cracking zone as a part of the stream of cracked hydrocarbons, along with the fluid sulfur compounds formed directly from sulfur in the hydrocarbon feed. Off-gas subsequently separated from the cracked hydrocarbon stream thus includes hydrogen sulfide formed directly from the feed sulfur and hydrogen sulfide formed by reaction of the sulfur- and aluminium-containing solid with the hydrocabron stream in the cracking zone.
It is essential to operation of the present invention that the catalyst which contains a discrete alumina phase with alumina to be reacted with sulfur trioxide in the regenerator must be substantially free from any of the promoter metals or metal compounds described above for use in carbon monoxide combustion promotion, that is, platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium, copper and chromium. It has been found that the presence of these metals or compounds thereof in catalyst particles containing an alumina phase with alumina to be used for reaction with sulfur oxides is actually detrimental to the capacity of the alumina to form solid sulfur-containing materials in an FCC regenerator in the presence of even small amounts of carbon monoxide. Thus, when these metals are present on catalyst particles containing alumina to be reacted with sulfur trioxide, the desired reaction of the sulfur trioxide to form a solid is impaired, and larger amounts of sulfur oxides exit the FCC regenerator in the regenerator flue gas, contrary to the object of the invention. Thus, the metal promoters disclosed, although essential to operation of the invention, must be used in a particulate solid in physical mixture with the catalyst containing a discrete alumina phase which is reacted with sulfur oxides. The promoter metals must, thus, be on separate particles physically mixed with the FCC catalyst.
The following illustrative embodiment describes a preferred embodiment of the operation of the present invention.
ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT A conventional FCC system and equilibrium, zeolite-containing, cracking catalyst of a commercially available type containing an average of 180 ppm (wt.) of reactive alumina in a discrete alumina phase are employed for cracking about 19,000 barrels per day of a hydrocarbon feed having a boiling range of about 580"F to about 1100 F. The hydrocarbon feed contains about 0.8 weight percent feed sulfur. The cracking zone used contains a combination of riser cracking and dense-bed cracking modes. Cracking conditions employed include a reactor temperature of about 920"F, a hydrocarbon weight hourly space velocity of about 5 per hour and a conversion rate (defined as percent of feed converted to 430"F, a hydrocarbon weight hourly space velocity of about 5 per hour and a conversion rate (defined as percent of feed converted to 430"F and lighter components) of about 85%.
The average amount of coke on spent catalyst is about 1.5 weight percent. The coke on spent catalyst includes about 0.7 weight percent sulfur. The amount of carbon on regenerated catalyst is about 0.5 weight percent. The flue gas exiting the catalyst regenerator includes about 650 parts per million (volume) sulfur oxides (calculated as sulfur dioxide), about 0.3 volume percent oxygen, and has a CO/CO2 ratio of about 0.6. Catalyst regeneration conditions used in the regeneration zone include a temperature of about 1200"F. Catalyst is circulated continuously between the cracking zone and regeneration zone at the rate of about 16 tons per minute, with a total catalyst inventory in the system of about 180 tons.
In accordance with the invention, 6() pounds of particles containing 0.6 weight percent platinum impregnated on an alumina carrier are introduced into circulation in the FCC unit along with the catalyst. Introduction of the platinum-alumina particles is then continued at the rate of about 7 pounds per day. The amount of platinum added to the system is thereby maintained at an equilbrium level of about 5 parts per million, by weight, with respect to the total amount of catalyst in the system. Most of the carbon monoxide is burned in a dense catalyst phase region in the regenerator. A sufficient amount of oxygen is added to the regenerator to provide at least 1.0 volume percent oxygen in the regenerator atmosphere. A sufficient amount of coke is burned off the cracking catalyst in the regenerator so that regenerated catalyst cycled to the cracking reactor from the regenerator contains an average of not more than 0.2 weight percent carbon. After addition of the platinum-alumina carbon-monoxide-combustion promoter particles, the CO/C02 ratio and sulfur oxides level in the flue gas exiting the regeneration zone are measured. The CO concentration is found to be substantially reduced to 500-1500 ppm (volume), while the sulfur oxides level. calculated as SO2 is found to have decreased to below 200 parts per million (volume).
As can be seen from the foregoing illustrative embodiment, the method of the present invention provides a simple and economical method for controlling both the amount of carbon monoxide and the amount of sulfur oxides present in flue gas removed from an FCC catalyst regenerator.
WHAT WE CLAIM IS: 1. In a catalytic hydrocarbon cracking process in which cracking catalyst is cycled between a cracking zone and a catalyst regeneration zone, a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon stream is cracked in contact with said cracking catalyst in said cracking zone, and a flue gas containing carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides is formed in said catalyst regeneration zone by burning sulfur-containing coke off said catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas, a method of reducing the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in said flue gas which comprises: (a reacting in said regeneration zone carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon dioxide whilst in contact with a carbon monoxide oxidation promoter comprising a metal, or compound or a metal. selected from platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium, copper and chromium, in association with a particulate solid, the promoter being in physical admixture with said cracking catalyst; (b) introducing sufficient molecular oxygen into the regeneration zone to provide an atmosphere therein having a molecular oxygen concentration of at least 0.5 volume percent; (c) removing sufficient coke from said cracking catalyst in the regeneration zone to
**WARNING** end of DESC field may overlap start of CLMS **.

Claims (4)

**WARNING** start of CLMS field may overlap end of DESC **. sulfur oxides exit the FCC regenerator in the regenerator flue gas, contrary to the object of the invention. Thus, the metal promoters disclosed, although essential to operation of the invention, must be used in a particulate solid in physical mixture with the catalyst containing a discrete alumina phase which is reacted with sulfur oxides. The promoter metals must, thus, be on separate particles physically mixed with the FCC catalyst. The following illustrative embodiment describes a preferred embodiment of the operation of the present invention. ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENT A conventional FCC system and equilibrium, zeolite-containing, cracking catalyst of a commercially available type containing an average of 180 ppm (wt.) of reactive alumina in a discrete alumina phase are employed for cracking about 19,000 barrels per day of a hydrocarbon feed having a boiling range of about 580"F to about 1100 F. The hydrocarbon feed contains about 0.8 weight percent feed sulfur. The cracking zone used contains a combination of riser cracking and dense-bed cracking modes. Cracking conditions employed include a reactor temperature of about 920"F, a hydrocarbon weight hourly space velocity of about 5 per hour and a conversion rate (defined as percent of feed converted to 430"F, a hydrocarbon weight hourly space velocity of about 5 per hour and a conversion rate (defined as percent of feed converted to 430"F and lighter components) of about 85%. The average amount of coke on spent catalyst is about 1.5 weight percent. The coke on spent catalyst includes about 0.7 weight percent sulfur. The amount of carbon on regenerated catalyst is about 0.5 weight percent. The flue gas exiting the catalyst regenerator includes about 650 parts per million (volume) sulfur oxides (calculated as sulfur dioxide), about 0.3 volume percent oxygen, and has a CO/CO2 ratio of about 0.6. Catalyst regeneration conditions used in the regeneration zone include a temperature of about 1200"F. Catalyst is circulated continuously between the cracking zone and regeneration zone at the rate of about 16 tons per minute, with a total catalyst inventory in the system of about 180 tons. In accordance with the invention, 6() pounds of particles containing 0.6 weight percent platinum impregnated on an alumina carrier are introduced into circulation in the FCC unit along with the catalyst. Introduction of the platinum-alumina particles is then continued at the rate of about 7 pounds per day. The amount of platinum added to the system is thereby maintained at an equilbrium level of about 5 parts per million, by weight, with respect to the total amount of catalyst in the system. Most of the carbon monoxide is burned in a dense catalyst phase region in the regenerator. A sufficient amount of oxygen is added to the regenerator to provide at least 1.0 volume percent oxygen in the regenerator atmosphere. A sufficient amount of coke is burned off the cracking catalyst in the regenerator so that regenerated catalyst cycled to the cracking reactor from the regenerator contains an average of not more than 0.2 weight percent carbon. After addition of the platinum-alumina carbon-monoxide-combustion promoter particles, the CO/C02 ratio and sulfur oxides level in the flue gas exiting the regeneration zone are measured. The CO concentration is found to be substantially reduced to 500-1500 ppm (volume), while the sulfur oxides level. calculated as SO2 is found to have decreased to below 200 parts per million (volume). As can be seen from the foregoing illustrative embodiment, the method of the present invention provides a simple and economical method for controlling both the amount of carbon monoxide and the amount of sulfur oxides present in flue gas removed from an FCC catalyst regenerator. WHAT WE CLAIM IS:
1. In a catalytic hydrocarbon cracking process in which cracking catalyst is cycled between a cracking zone and a catalyst regeneration zone, a sulfur-containing hydrocarbon stream is cracked in contact with said cracking catalyst in said cracking zone, and a flue gas containing carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides is formed in said catalyst regeneration zone by burning sulfur-containing coke off said catalyst with an oxygen-containing gas, a method of reducing the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in said flue gas which comprises: (a reacting in said regeneration zone carbon monoxide and oxygen to form carbon dioxide whilst in contact with a carbon monoxide oxidation promoter comprising a metal, or compound or a metal. selected from platinum, palladium, iridium, rhodium, osmium, ruthenium, copper and chromium, in association with a particulate solid, the promoter being in physical admixture with said cracking catalyst; (b) introducing sufficient molecular oxygen into the regeneration zone to provide an atmosphere therein having a molecular oxygen concentration of at least 0.5 volume percent; (c) removing sufficient coke from said cracking catalyst in the regeneration zone to
provide an average carbon content of less than 0.2 weight percent in regenerated catalyst passed from the regeneration zone to the cracking zone; (d) including in the cracking catalyst an alumina phase containing 50 to 5000 parts per million of reactive alumina (as hereinbefore defined), said catalyst being substantially free from the metal or compound thereof comprising said promoter; (e) forming a sulfur- and aluminium-containing solid in said catalyst in the regeneration zone by reacting sulfur trioxide, or sulfur dioxide and molecular oxygen, in said zone with alumina present in said alumina phase of the catalyst; and (f) removing sulfur from said catalyst and forming hydrogen sulfide in said cracking zone by contacting said sulfur- and aluminium-containing solid with said hydrocarbon stream.
2. A method according to claim 1, wherein sufficient of said promoter is admixed with said cracking catalyst to provide between 0.1 and 100 parts per million, by weight, of said metal, calculated as the elemental metal, with respect to the total amount of catalyst.
3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein sufficient molecular oxygen is introduced into the regeneration zone to provide the atmosphere therein with a molecular oxygen concentration of at least 1.0 volume percent.
4. A method in accordance with claim 1 of reducing the amount of carbon monoxide and sulfur oxides in a flue gas, substantially as hereinbefore described in the illustrative embodiment.
GB10343/78A 1977-04-11 1978-03-15 Method of removing pollutants from flue gases Expired GB1594055A (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US05/786,723 US4115250A (en) 1976-03-11 1977-04-11 Method for removing pollutants from catalyst regenerator flue gas

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
GB1594055A true GB1594055A (en) 1981-07-30

Family

ID=25139414

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
GB10343/78A Expired GB1594055A (en) 1977-04-11 1978-03-15 Method of removing pollutants from flue gases

Country Status (8)

Country Link
JP (1) JPS53128569A (en)
BE (1) BE865822A (en)
CA (1) CA1122912A (en)
DE (1) DE2815233A1 (en)
FR (1) FR2387281A1 (en)
GB (1) GB1594055A (en)
IT (1) IT1096172B (en)
NL (1) NL7803829A (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB1585507A (en) * 1976-04-29 1981-03-04 Atlantic Richfield Co Catalyst and process for conversion of hydrocarbons
US4166787A (en) * 1977-12-16 1979-09-04 Chevron Research Company Sulfur oxides control in catalytic cracking

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3304254A (en) * 1965-01-21 1967-02-14 Mobil Oil Corp Catalytic hydrocracking with a physical mixture of a crystalline aluminosilicate and a porous support containing a hydrogenation component
US3312615A (en) * 1965-04-09 1967-04-04 Mobil Oil Corp Catalyst composition containing a crystalline alumino-silicate, a siliceous matrix and inerts for the conversion of hydrocarbons
US3699037A (en) * 1970-10-28 1972-10-17 Chevron Res Catalytic cracking
US3835031A (en) * 1973-05-23 1974-09-10 Standard Oil Co Catalytic cracking with reduced emission of sulfur oxides
US3949684A (en) * 1973-08-29 1976-04-13 Copeland Systems, Inc. Method for oxidation of sulfur-containing substances
DE2444511C3 (en) * 1974-09-18 1981-07-30 Volkswagenwerk Ag, 3180 Wolfsburg Thermal flow meter for gaseous media
CA1046484A (en) * 1976-04-12 1979-01-16 Elroy M. Gladrow Hydrocarbon conversion catalyst containing a co oxidation promoter
GB1585507A (en) * 1976-04-29 1981-03-04 Atlantic Richfield Co Catalyst and process for conversion of hydrocarbons

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE2815233C2 (en) 1988-01-21
BE865822A (en) 1978-07-31
IT7822197A0 (en) 1978-04-11
IT1096172B (en) 1985-08-17
FR2387281B1 (en) 1981-02-13
NL7803829A (en) 1978-10-13
FR2387281A1 (en) 1978-11-10
CA1122912A (en) 1982-05-04
JPS6252787B2 (en) 1987-11-06
DE2815233A1 (en) 1978-10-19
JPS53128569A (en) 1978-11-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4115250A (en) Method for removing pollutants from catalyst regenerator flue gas
US4233276A (en) Process for the desulfurization of waste gases
US4199435A (en) NOx Control in cracking catalyst regeneration
US4497902A (en) Composition for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4369108A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4423019A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4369130A (en) Composition for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4381991A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4836993A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4243556A (en) Sulfur oxides control in cracking catalyst
US4405443A (en) Process for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4542116A (en) Catalyst for removing sulfur oxides from a gas
US4252635A (en) Sulfur oxides control in cracking catalyst regeneration
US4589978A (en) Catalyst for reduction of SOx emissions from FCC units
US4166787A (en) Sulfur oxides control in catalytic cracking
US4204945A (en) Removing pollutants from flue gas in nonzeolitic catalytic cracking
US4240899A (en) Sulfur transfer process in catalytic cracking
US4259176A (en) Restricting silica content of catalyst inventory to prevent alumina poisoning for SOx control
US4332672A (en) Process for controlling sulfur oxides using an alumina-impregnated catalyst
US4165275A (en) Lowering sulfur oxide output from catalyst regeneration
US4204944A (en) Process for removing pollutants from nonzeolitic catalyst regenerator flue gas
US4243557A (en) Sulfur transfer cracking catalyst
GB1591594A (en) Method of removing pollutants from flue gases
GB1594055A (en) Method of removing pollutants from flue gases
CA1145700A (en) Sulfur oxides control in cracking catalyst regeneration

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PS Patent sealed [section 19, patents act 1949]
PCNP Patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19940315