EP3854747A1 - Device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation - Google Patents

Device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3854747A1
EP3854747A1 EP20153116.7A EP20153116A EP3854747A1 EP 3854747 A1 EP3854747 A1 EP 3854747A1 EP 20153116 A EP20153116 A EP 20153116A EP 3854747 A1 EP3854747 A1 EP 3854747A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
acceleration data
instant
data point
previous
output
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP20153116.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Wojciech Pomierski
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nat Oilwell Varco Poland Sp Z O O
National Oilwell Varco Poland Sp zoo
Original Assignee
Nat Oilwell Varco Poland Sp Z O O
National Oilwell Varco Poland Sp zoo
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nat Oilwell Varco Poland Sp Z O O, National Oilwell Varco Poland Sp zoo filed Critical Nat Oilwell Varco Poland Sp Z O O
Priority to EP20153116.7A priority Critical patent/EP3854747A1/en
Publication of EP3854747A1 publication Critical patent/EP3854747A1/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B27/00Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for cargo or passengers
    • B63B27/10Arrangement of ship-based loading or unloading equipment for cargo or passengers of cranes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66CCRANES; LOAD-ENGAGING ELEMENTS OR DEVICES FOR CRANES, CAPSTANS, WINCHES, OR TACKLES
    • B66C13/00Other constructional features or details
    • B66C13/02Devices for facilitating retrieval of floating objects, e.g. for recovering crafts from water
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66DCAPSTANS; WINCHES; TACKLES, e.g. PULLEY BLOCKS; HOISTS
    • B66D1/00Rope, cable, or chain winding mechanisms; Capstans
    • B66D1/28Other constructional details
    • B66D1/40Control devices
    • B66D1/48Control devices automatic
    • B66D1/52Control devices automatic for varying rope or cable tension, e.g. when recovering craft from water
    • B66D1/525Control devices automatic for varying rope or cable tension, e.g. when recovering craft from water electrical
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B63SHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; RELATED EQUIPMENT
    • B63BSHIPS OR OTHER WATERBORNE VESSELS; EQUIPMENT FOR SHIPPING 
    • B63B17/00Vessels parts, details, or accessories, not otherwise provided for
    • B63B2017/0072Seaway compensators

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation. More particularly, the invention relates to a method, device and system where input data to a Kalman filter is pre-filtered and forecasted to improve positioning in active heave compensation. The invention also relates to a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by a control unit, cause the control unit to execute the method.
  • Wave-generated motion of floating vessels is usually measured by a so-called motion reference unit (MRU).
  • MRUs measure vessel motion from typically 6 sensors: 3 accelerometers and 3 gyros.
  • the accelerometers pick up accelerations along 3 perpendicular axes while the gyros measure the angular acceleration around the same axes.
  • the sensors cover a range of frequencies spanning typically from 0 to 100 Hz.
  • a MRU is able to estimate linear and angular accelerations, velocities and positions in any direction and at any predetermined measurement point of the vessel.
  • the details on how sensor signals are combined to determine the heave acceleration at the vessel center of gravity, are known to the person skilled in the art but are outside the scope of this description.
  • a Kalman filter is an algorithm that uses a series of measurements observed over time, containing statistical noise and other inaccuracies, and produces estimates of unknown variables that tend to be more accurate than those based on a single measurement alone, by estimating a joint probability distribution over the variables for each timeframe.
  • velocity equals the time integral of acceleration and position equals the time integral of velocity.
  • the accelerometers are not perfect but possess some small but finite noise, it is not possible to derive true velocity or positions from the accelerometer signals by pure integration. Even a tiny offset error or false low frequency component will grow to very high values during some extended integration time interval with some type of filter.
  • a standard Kalman or extended Kalman filter will provide satisfactory results under certain conditions, but often this is not sufficient.
  • No physical wave model is available for Kalman filters, so in case of input acceleration data noise or even void data points, predictions need to be made based on previous input acceleration data points, which causes signal delays.
  • the invention has for its object to remedy or to reduce at least one of the drawbacks of the prior art, or at least provide a useful alternative to prior art.
  • the invention relates to an apparatus for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from an MRU as set forth in claim 1.
  • the invention in a second aspect, relates to a system for controlling the position of a load on a rig or vessel as set forth in claim 3.
  • the invention relates to a rig or vessel including the system according to the second aspect.
  • the invention relates to a method for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from an MRU as set forth in claim 7.
  • the invention relates to a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by a control unit, cause the control unit to execute the method according to the fourth aspect.
  • the reference numeral 1 will be used to denote an apparatus according the first aspect of the invention, whereas the reference numeral 10 will be used to denote a system according to the second aspect of the invention.
  • the drawings, graphs and flow diagrams are shown schematically and simplified, and various features in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
  • Figure 1 shows, very schematically, a system 10 for controlling the position of a load on a rig or vessel.
  • the system includes an apparatus 1, denoted “Filter & Integrator” in the figure, for filtering a forecasting of acceleration data from a motion reference unit (MRU) 2.
  • MRU motion reference unit
  • the MRU 2 samples the acceleration, from the influence of waves and wind, of a not shown rig or vessel.
  • the sampling frequency (1/ ⁇ t, where ⁇ t is used in Figs. 3-5 to denote the time between two samples) may vary in different situations, but in exemplary embodiments the sampling frequency may be in the order to 100Hz or higher. In certain embodiment the sampling frequency may be in the order or 500 Hz or higher.
  • the apparatus 1 receives the acceleration data from the MRU 2 and integrates, pre-filters and forecasts it before it is transmitted to a controller 4 provided with a Kalman filter for further processing of velocity data and ultimately for calculating the position of the rig or vessel.
  • the apparatus is also adapted to build a string of values based on deviation between instant and previous acceleration data points for forecasting of acceleration data in case of noise or void data points as will be explained below with reference to Figs. 3-5 .
  • the controller 4 is adapted to calculate a change in position of the rig or vessel, and to operate a heave compensator 6, see Fig.
  • FIG. 2 An exemplary hydraulic heave compensator 6 is shown in Fig. 2 , wherein hydraulic pistons 12 are operated to counteract the movement/heave of the rig or vessel due to waves and wind.
  • An exemplary, schematically shown load-handling device 14, is here represented by two sheaves over which a wire rope is running.
  • the controller 4 is adapted to control the hydraulic pistons 12 to lower and raise the platform 16 to which the sheaves 14 are connected in response to the calculated change of position.
  • Fig. 3 shows a flow diagram exemplifying the steps taken by the apparatus according to the present invention as well as in the method according to the present invention to provide an instant output acceleration data point.
  • a series of acceleration data points are sampled by the MRU 2 and transmitted to the apparatus 1.
  • the latest/current acceleration data point will herein be referred to as an instant acceleration data point.
  • Acceleration data points sampled at previous points in time, i.e. before the instant acceleration data point will be referred to as previous acceleration data points.
  • step 3A an instant, measured acceleration data point a n for point n in time is sampled and transmitted to the apparatus 1 for any n larger than n k , where n k is a number of samples needed to start the calculations.
  • n k will vary in different embodiments and will also be dependent on the sampling time, but in certain embodiments n k may be in the order of 5 or 10.
  • step 3B an instant change in acceleration at n between the instant measured acceleration data point a n and the immediate previous output acceleration data point af n-1 over the sampling period ⁇ t is calculated.
  • the derivate of acceleration with respect to time is sometimes also referred to as "jerk", whereby at n may be regarded as the instant jerk.
  • An average change in acceleration as n over n k samples is calculated in step 3C.
  • step 3D the difference between the average change in acceleration and the immediate, previous average change in acceleration k n is calculated.
  • step 3E The average k n over n s samples, denoted ks n, , is then then eventually calculated in step 3E.
  • ks n can be regarded as an arithmetic string of values that are used for forecasting acceleration values in case of void or noisy acceleration data points as will now be explained.
  • step 3F the absolute value of at n , i.e the instant change in acceleration over ⁇ t as calculated in step 3B, is checked towards a predetermined maximum value at max .
  • This predetermined value may be set differently in different embodiments, for different MRUs and in different weather conditions, but for any absolute value of at n larger than at max the instant, measured acceleration data point a n in step 3A will assumed to be noise and therefore disregarded.
  • a n from step 3A will also be disregarded. If a n is disregarded, then the process continues to the right in the flow diagram of Fig. 3 , where the immediate previous calculated value ks n-1 in the arithmetic string from step 3E is used to forecast an instant output, acceleration data point.
  • the previous calculated value ks n-1 in the arithmetic string from step 3E is set as the instant value ks n in the arithmetic string.
  • step 3X an updated average change in acceleration as n is calculated based on ks n from step 3W and the immediate previous average change in acceleration as n-1 .
  • step 3Y the instant, output acceleration data point af n is calculated based on the immediate, previous output acceleration data point af n-1 , the updated average change in acceleration as n from step 3X and the sampling time ⁇ t.
  • step 3Z the calculated as n from step 3X is set at at n for use as future at n-1 in step 3C.
  • the forecasted acceleration data point af n from step 3Y is thereby taken as output acceleration data point from the apparatus.
  • step 3F if the absolute value of at n does not exceed at max and if neither of a n or a n-1 is void, then the instant, measured/sampled acceleration data point a n from step 3A is accepted as the instant output acceleration data point a f n as shown in 3G.
  • the acceleration forecast model as calculated in steps 3A-E, is also then also accepted, and ks n is accepted as an updated data point in the arithmetic string and may be used in a future ks n-1 in step 3W in a situation where at n is disregarded.
  • step 3H the measured or forecasted af n is taken as output from the acceleration flow diagram.
  • the pre-filtration and forecasting of acceleration data points as exemplified in Fig. 3 will significantly improve the quality of input velocity data points to a Kalman filter in the controller 4, as will be explained with reference to the following figures.
  • Fig. 4 an exemplary flow diagram shows how the acceleration output data points from Fig. 3 are used to calculate both measured and modelled velocity data points to the Kalman Filter in the controller 4.
  • output acceleration data points af n are taken from the algorithm in Fig. 3 for n larger than n c , where n c is a number over which the change in output velocity will later be averaged.
  • n c may vary between different embodiments and in different weather conditions, and it will also depend on the time between samples ⁇ t, but in certain embodiments n c may be in the range of 5 or 10.
  • step 4B an instant velocity data point vm n , without offset, is found from the immediate, previous velocity data point and the integration of input acceleration from step 4A over ⁇ t.
  • step 4C instant position data point s1 n , without offset, is found from the immediate, previous position data point s1 n-1 and integration of the velocity from step 4B.
  • step 4D it is checked if n is smaller than or equal to n i , where n i is a number/gate set to ensure a sufficient number of samples after start-up when calculating the velocity offset v0 n .
  • n i may in certain embodiments be a number that is large enough for the passing of one or more heave periods, which are typically around 12 seconds each.
  • n i may be set to ensure the inclusion of around 5 heave periods, whereby n i may be in the order of 6000 (1 minute of 100 Hz sampling frequency) or 30 000 (1 minute of 500 Hz sampling frequency).
  • the method goes to the right in the flow diagram to step 4X, where the offset is estimated as sum of position data points from start-up at t 0 to the present time t n over the time lapsed. If a sufficient number of data points have been sampled, i.e. if n > n i , then in step 4E the same calculation is done based on position data points from time t n-ni .
  • step 4F An actual measured instant, output velocity data point v n , including offset v0 n , is then calculated in step 4F, and used as measurement input to the Kalman filter in step 4M.
  • a velocity model is built as a further input to the Kalman filter based on previous output velocity data points from the Kalman filter, as will be now be explained.
  • step 4G an instant change in output velocity vt n is calculated based on the immediate two previous output velocity data points from the Kalman filter vf n-1 and vf n-2 .
  • An average change in output velocity vs n over n c samples is calculated in step 4H, where n c in exemplary embodiments may be in the order of 5 or 10, depending i.a.
  • step 41 The difference in change in average output velocity dvs n between the present value vs n and the previous value vs n-1 is calculated in step 41.
  • step 4J it is checked if the absolute value of dvs n exceeds a pre-determined value dvs max . If the absolute value of dvs n exceeds dvs max , then the instant calculated value of dvs n will be disregarded, and the previous value dvs n-1 will be used instead as indicated in step 4K. Normally, since the acceleration data has already been filtered (as shown in Fig. 3 ), the absolute value of dvs n will not be exceeding dvs max .
  • the new (or optionally previous) dvs n from step 4J (or optionally 4K), will then be used to calculate an instant modelled velocity data point ve n in step 4L as input to the Kalman filter in step 4M.
  • the immediate previous output velocity data point from the Kalman filter vf n-1 is used together with vs n from step 4H and dvs n from step 4J (or optionally 4K) and ⁇ t.
  • the instant modelled velocity data point ve n is then used as input to the Kalman filter together with the measured velocity v n in step 4M. What happens "behind the curtains" of the Kalman filter is beyond the scope of the present disclosure, but will be known to a person skilled in the art.
  • the Kalman filter produces an instant output velocity data point vf n in step 4N.
  • Fig. 5 the instant output velocity data point vf n from Fig. 4 is used by the controller in step 5A.
  • vf n is then used, together an immediate previous position data point sm n-1 to find the immediate, instant position data point without offset sm n in step 5B.
  • an instant offset variable st n is calculated based on an immediate previous offset variable st n-1 and sm n from step 5B.
  • step 5D a check is made to verify if n is smaller than n d where n d is a number/gate set to ensure a sufficient number of samples after start-up when calculating the position offset.
  • n d will typically be in the range 5 times n i in step 4E.
  • step 5X the position offset is estimated as the sum of position data points st n from start-up at t 0 to the present time t n over the time lapsed. If a sufficient number of data points have been sampled, i.e. if n>n d , then in step 5E the same calculation is done based on position data points from time t n-nd . A resulting instant calculated output sf n from the controller is finally found in step 5F based on the integrated position from step 5B and the calculated offset.
  • the output sf n represents the measure and calculated instant, output position of the rig or vessel on which the system 10 and apparatus 1 are placed, and is used by the controller to counteract the change in position by operating the heave compensator.
  • Fig. 6 shows MRU-sampled values a n (some of which have been manually spoiled to test the algorithm) together with the output acceleration data values after filtering and forecasting.
  • a n many of which have been manually spoiled to test the algorithm
  • Fig. 7 the measured velocity v n is shown together with the forecasted velocity ve n and the output from the Kalman filter vf n .
  • Velocity data output from the Kalman filter without the pre-filtering and forecasting of acceleration data has also been shown, and as can be seen from the figure, the pre-filtering and forecasting algorithm according to the present invention, significantly improves the accuracy of the results.
  • Fig. 8 is an enlarged view of a portion of the graph from Fig. 7 . As can be seen from Figs. 7 and 8 , there is a very good match between measurement and model inputs to the Kalman filter and the output from the filter when the acceleration data has been pre-filtered and forecasted.
  • Fig. 9 shows a comparison between the input, sampled acceleration data a n , acceleration data with filtration and forecasting af n compared to real acceleration data as found by means of Jonswap wave model, as will be understood by a person skilled in the art and not disussed in further detail herein. As can be seen, there is a remarkably good fit between the forecasted acceleration data and the real model, despite noise in the input samples.
  • Fig. 10 shows load position error in active heave compensation based on input to the heave compensator from the system 10 according to the present invention. As can be seen from the figure, it is possible to keep a 100mT load fixed within an error margin of approximately ⁇ 10 cm.
  • aspects of invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer.
  • the device claim enumerating several means several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Ocean & Marine Engineering (AREA)
  • Feedback Control In General (AREA)

Abstract

There is disclosed an apparatus for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from a motion reference unit, the apparatus being adapted to provide an instant output acceleration data point by:- receiving a plurality of measured acceleration data points from a motion reference unit;- based on the received, measured acceleration data points, calculate a deviation in acceleration between an instant, measured acceleration data point and a previous output acceleration data point;(a) if the absolute value of the calculated deviation exceeds a predetermined value or if the instant or previous, measured acceleration data point is void, then calculate an instant, modelled acceleration data point based on average deviation between previous acceleration data points and use modelled acceleration data point as instant acceleration data point output;(b) if the absolute value of the calculated deviation does not exceed a pre-determined value and the instant or previous acceleration data points are not void, then accept instant measured acceleration data point as acceleration data point output and use the accepted instant acceleration data point to calculate an updated average deviation between acceleration data points for forecasting of future acceleration data points under (a); and- use the instant acceleration data point output from (a) and/or (b) to calculate an instant, measured velocity data point as input to Kalman filter.There is also disclosed a system including the apparatus, a method for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data as well as a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with instructions for executing the method.

Description

  • The present invention relates to a device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation. More particularly, the invention relates to a method, device and system where input data to a Kalman filter is pre-filtered and forecasted to improve positioning in active heave compensation. The invention also relates to a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by a control unit, cause the control unit to execute the method.
  • Wave-generated motion of floating vessels is usually measured by a so-called motion reference unit (MRU). MRUs measure vessel motion from typically 6 sensors: 3 accelerometers and 3 gyros. The accelerometers pick up accelerations along 3 perpendicular axes while the gyros measure the angular acceleration around the same axes. The sensors cover a range of frequencies spanning typically from 0 to 100 Hz. By advanced signal processing a MRU is able to estimate linear and angular accelerations, velocities and positions in any direction and at any predetermined measurement point of the vessel. The details on how sensor signals are combined to determine the heave acceleration at the vessel center of gravity, are known to the person skilled in the art but are outside the scope of this description. Instead the present disclosure will concentrate on the basic processes of pre-filtering and forecasting acceleration data for the calculation of velocity data as input to a Kalman filter. A Kalman filter is an algorithm that uses a series of measurements observed over time, containing statistical noise and other inaccuracies, and produces estimates of unknown variables that tend to be more accurate than those based on a single measurement alone, by estimating a joint probability distribution over the variables for each timeframe.
  • Mathematically, velocity equals the time integral of acceleration and position equals the time integral of velocity. However, because the accelerometers are not perfect but possess some small but finite noise, it is not possible to derive true velocity or positions from the accelerometer signals by pure integration. Even a tiny offset error or false low frequency component will grow to very high values during some extended integration time interval with some type of filter. A standard Kalman or extended Kalman filter will provide satisfactory results under certain conditions, but often this is not sufficient. No physical wave model is available for Kalman filters, so in case of input acceleration data noise or even void data points, predictions need to be made based on previous input acceleration data points, which causes signal delays.
  • The invention has for its object to remedy or to reduce at least one of the drawbacks of the prior art, or at least provide a useful alternative to prior art.
  • The object is achieved through features, which are specified in the description below and in the claims that follow.
  • In a first aspect, the invention relates to an apparatus for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from an MRU as set forth in claim 1.
  • In a second aspect, the invention relates to a system for controlling the position of a load on a rig or vessel as set forth in claim 3.
  • In a third aspect, the invention relates to a rig or vessel including the system according to the second aspect.
  • In a fourth aspect, the invention relates to a method for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from an MRU as set forth in claim 7.
  • In a fifth aspect, the invention relates to a non-transitory computer readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by a control unit, cause the control unit to execute the method according to the fourth aspect.
  • In the following is described an example of a preferred embodiment illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein:
  • Fig. 1
    shows schematically a system according to the second aspect of the invention;
    Fig. 2
    shows an active heave compensation module as being controlled by the system in Fig. 1;
    Fig. 3
    shows a block diagram for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from a motion reference unit;
    Fig. 4
    shows a block diagram for filtering and forecasting of velocity data based on filtered and forecasted acceleration data from Fig. 3;
    Fig. 5
    shows a block diagram for calculation of position based on the output from Fig. 4;
    Fig. 6
    shows input and forecasted acceleration data;
    Fig. 7
    shows input, forecasted and filtered velocity compared with unfiltered calculated velocity;
    Fig. 8
    shows a detailed view of the graph from Fig. 7;
    Fig. 9
    shows input and forecasted acceleration data compared with actual (real) acceleration data; and
    Fig. 10
    shows the simulated load position error when the load is compensated by means of an active heave compensation module according to the invention.
  • In the following, the reference numeral 1 will be used to denote an apparatus according the first aspect of the invention, whereas the reference numeral 10 will be used to denote a system according to the second aspect of the invention. The drawings, graphs and flow diagrams are shown schematically and simplified, and various features in the drawings are not necessarily drawn to scale.
  • Figure 1 shows, very schematically, a system 10 for controlling the position of a load on a rig or vessel. The system includes an apparatus 1, denoted "Filter & Integrator" in the figure, for filtering a forecasting of acceleration data from a motion reference unit (MRU) 2. The MRU 2 samples the acceleration, from the influence of waves and wind, of a not shown rig or vessel. The sampling frequency (1/Δt, where Δt is used in Figs. 3-5 to denote the time between two samples) may vary in different situations, but in exemplary embodiments the sampling frequency may be in the order to 100Hz or higher. In certain embodiment the sampling frequency may be in the order or 500 Hz or higher. The apparatus 1 receives the acceleration data from the MRU 2 and integrates, pre-filters and forecasts it before it is transmitted to a controller 4 provided with a Kalman filter for further processing of velocity data and ultimately for calculating the position of the rig or vessel. In addition to the filtering of acceleration data from the MRU 1, the apparatus is also adapted to build a string of values based on deviation between instant and previous acceleration data points for forecasting of acceleration data in case of noise or void data points as will be explained below with reference to Figs. 3-5. Based on the input from the apparatus 1, the controller 4 is adapted to calculate a change in position of the rig or vessel, and to operate a heave compensator 6, see Fig. 2, by regulating a pump or valve 8 of the heave compensator 6 to counteract the movements of the vessel in order to keep a not shown load fixed relative to the seabed or another reference point. In certain situations, instead of keeping the load still, it may be desirable to move the load with a fixed speed relative to the seabed, where the relative movement between load and rig or vessel may also be measured and supplied to the controller 4. The relative movement may e.g. be measured by controlling hoisting speed of a wire rope in a not shown crane or top drive, as will be understood by a person skilled in the art.
  • An exemplary hydraulic heave compensator 6 is shown in Fig. 2, wherein hydraulic pistons 12 are operated to counteract the movement/heave of the rig or vessel due to waves and wind. An exemplary, schematically shown load-handling device 14, is here represented by two sheaves over which a wire rope is running. The controller 4 is adapted to control the hydraulic pistons 12 to lower and raise the platform 16 to which the sheaves 14 are connected in response to the calculated change of position.
  • Fig. 3 shows a flow diagram exemplifying the steps taken by the apparatus according to the present invention as well as in the method according to the present invention to provide an instant output acceleration data point. A series of acceleration data points are sampled by the MRU 2 and transmitted to the apparatus 1. The latest/current acceleration data point will herein be referred to as an instant acceleration data point. Acceleration data points sampled at previous points in time, i.e. before the instant acceleration data point, will be referred to as previous acceleration data points. In step 3A an instant, measured acceleration data point an for point n in time is sampled and transmitted to the apparatus 1 for any n larger than nk, where nk is a number of samples needed to start the calculations. nk will vary in different embodiments and will also be dependent on the sampling time, but in certain embodiments nk may be in the order of 5 or 10. In step 3B an instant change in acceleration atn between the instant measured acceleration data point an and the immediate previous output acceleration data point afn-1 over the sampling period Δt is calculated. The derivate of acceleration with respect to time is sometimes also referred to as "jerk", whereby atn may be regarded as the instant jerk. An average change in acceleration asn over nk samples is calculated in step 3C. In step 3D the difference between the average change in acceleration and the immediate, previous average change in acceleration kn is calculated. The average kn over ns samples, denoted ksn,, is then then eventually calculated in step 3E. ksn can be regarded as an arithmetic string of values that are used for forecasting acceleration values in case of void or noisy acceleration data points as will now be explained. In step 3F, the absolute value of atn, i.e the instant change in acceleration over Δt as calculated in step 3B, is checked towards a predetermined maximum value atmax. This predetermined value may be set differently in different embodiments, for different MRUs and in different weather conditions, but for any absolute value of atn larger than atmax the instant, measured acceleration data point an in step 3A will assumed to be noise and therefore disregarded. Similarly, if the instant measured/sampled acceleration data point an from step 3A or the immediate, previous sampled acceleration data point an-1 is void (zero), an from step 3A will also be disregarded. If an is disregarded, then the process continues to the right in the flow diagram of Fig. 3, where the immediate previous calculated value ksn-1 in the arithmetic string from step 3E is used to forecast an instant output, acceleration data point. In step 3W, since the instant, sampled acceleration data point an had to be disregarded, the previous calculated value ksn-1 in the arithmetic string from step 3E is set as the instant value ksn in the arithmetic string. Then, in step 3X an updated average change in acceleration asn is calculated based on ksn from step 3W and the immediate previous average change in acceleration asn-1. In step 3Y the instant, output acceleration data point afn is calculated based on the immediate, previous output acceleration data point afn-1, the updated average change in acceleration asn from step 3X and the sampling time Δt. Finally, in step 3Z the calculated asn from step 3X is set at atn for use as future atn-1 in step 3C. The forecasted acceleration data point afn from step 3Y is thereby taken as output acceleration data point from the apparatus. Alternatively, in step 3F, if the absolute value of atn does not exceed atmax and if neither of an or an-1 is void, then the instant, measured/sampled acceleration data point an from step 3A is accepted as the instant output acceleration data point afn as shown in 3G. The acceleration forecast model, as calculated in steps 3A-E, is also then also accepted, and ksn is accepted as an updated data point in the arithmetic string and may be used in a future ksn-1 in step 3W in a situation where atn is disregarded. In step 3H the measured or forecasted afn is taken as output from the acceleration flow diagram. The pre-filtration and forecasting of acceleration data points as exemplified in Fig. 3 will significantly improve the quality of input velocity data points to a Kalman filter in the controller 4, as will be explained with reference to the following figures.
  • In Fig. 4 an exemplary flow diagram shows how the acceleration output data points from Fig. 3 are used to calculate both measured and modelled velocity data points to the Kalman Filter in the controller 4. In step 4A, output acceleration data points afn are taken from the algorithm in Fig. 3 for n larger than nc, where nc is a number over which the change in output velocity will later be averaged. nc may vary between different embodiments and in different weather conditions, and it will also depend on the time between samples Δt, but in certain embodiments nc may be in the range of 5 or 10. In step 4B an instant velocity data point vmn, without offset, is found from the immediate, previous velocity data point and the integration of input acceleration from step 4A over Δt. Similarly, in step 4C, instant position data point s1n, without offset, is found from the immediate, previous position data point s1n-1 and integration of the velocity from step 4B. In step 4D it is checked if n is smaller than or equal to ni , where ni is a number/gate set to ensure a sufficient number of samples after start-up when calculating the velocity offset v0n. ni may in certain embodiments be a number that is large enough for the passing of one or more heave periods, which are typically around 12 seconds each. In one specific embodiment, ni may be set to ensure the inclusion of around 5 heave periods, whereby ni may be in the order of 6000 (1 minute of 100 Hz sampling frequency) or 30 000 (1 minute of 500 Hz sampling frequency). For nni, then the method goes to the right in the flow diagram to step 4X, where the offset is estimated as sum of position data points from start-up at t0 to the present time tn over the time lapsed. If a sufficient number of data points have been sampled, i.e. if n>ni, then in step 4E the same calculation is done based on position data points from time tn-ni. An actual measured instant, output velocity data point vn, including offset v0n, is then calculated in step 4F, and used as measurement input to the Kalman filter in step 4M. In addition, a velocity model is built as a further input to the Kalman filter based on previous output velocity data points from the Kalman filter, as will be now be explained. In step 4G an instant change in output velocity vtn is calculated based on the immediate two previous output velocity data points from the Kalman filter vfn-1 and vfn-2. An average change in output velocity vsn over nc samples is calculated in step 4H, where nc in exemplary embodiments may be in the order of 5 or 10, depending i.a. on Δt and the required accuracy. The difference in change in average output velocity dvsn between the present value vsn and the previous value vsn-1 is calculated in step 41. In step 4J it is checked if the absolute value of dvsn exceeds a pre-determined value dvsmax. If the absolute value of dvsn exceeds dvsmax, then the instant calculated value of dvsn will be disregarded, and the previous value dvsn-1 will be used instead as indicated in step 4K. Normally, since the acceleration data has already been filtered (as shown in Fig. 3), the absolute value of dvsn will not be exceeding dvsmax. The new (or optionally previous) dvsn from step 4J (or optionally 4K), will then be used to calculate an instant modelled velocity data point ven in step 4L as input to the Kalman filter in step 4M. For calculating the instant modelled velocity data point ven in step 4L the immediate previous output velocity data point from the Kalman filter vfn-1 is used together with vsn from step 4H and dvsn from step 4J (or optionally 4K) and Δt. The instant modelled velocity data point ven is then used as input to the Kalman filter together with the measured velocity vn in step 4M. What happens "behind the curtains" of the Kalman filter is beyond the scope of the present disclosure, but will be known to a person skilled in the art. The Kalman filter produces an instant output velocity data point vfn in step 4N.
  • In Fig. 5, the instant output velocity data point vfn from Fig. 4 is used by the controller in step 5A. vfn is then used, together an immediate previous position data point smn-1 to find the immediate, instant position data point without offset smn in step 5B. In step 5C an instant offset variable stn is calculated based on an immediate previous offset variable stn-1 and smn from step 5B. In step 5D, a check is made to verify if n is smaller than nd where nd is a number/gate set to ensure a sufficient number of samples after start-up when calculating the position offset. nd will typically be in the range 5 times ni in step 4E. If nnd, then the method goes to the right in the flow diagram to step 5X, where the position offset is estimated as the sum of position data points stn from start-up at t0 to the present time tn over the time lapsed. If a sufficient number of data points have been sampled, i.e. if n>nd, then in step 5E the same calculation is done based on position data points from time tn-nd. A resulting instant calculated output sfn from the controller is finally found in step 5F based on the integrated position from step 5B and the calculated offset. The output sfn represents the measure and calculated instant, output position of the rig or vessel on which the system 10 and apparatus 1 are placed, and is used by the controller to counteract the change in position by operating the heave compensator.
  • Fig. 6 shows MRU-sampled values an (some of which have been manually spoiled to test the algorithm) together with the output acceleration data values after filtering and forecasting. As can be seen in the figure, "noisy" samples have been filtered out, and the algorithm of Fig. 3 still produces a smooth acceleration output data curve.
  • In Fig. 7, the measured velocity vn is shown together with the forecasted velocity ven and the output from the Kalman filter vfn. Velocity data output from the Kalman filter without the pre-filtering and forecasting of acceleration data has also been shown, and as can be seen from the figure, the pre-filtering and forecasting algorithm according to the present invention, significantly improves the accuracy of the results. Fig. 8 is an enlarged view of a portion of the graph from Fig. 7. As can be seen from Figs. 7 and 8, there is a very good match between measurement and model inputs to the Kalman filter and the output from the filter when the acceleration data has been pre-filtered and forecasted.
  • Fig. 9 shows a comparison between the input, sampled acceleration data an, acceleration data with filtration and forecasting afn compared to real acceleration data as found by means of Jonswap wave model, as will be understood by a person skilled in the art and not disussed in further detail herein. As can be seen, there is a remarkably good fit between the forecasted acceleration data and the real model, despite noise in the input samples.
  • Fig. 10 shows load position error in active heave compensation based on input to the heave compensator from the system 10 according to the present invention. As can be seen from the figure, it is possible to keep a 100mT load fixed within an error margin of approximately ± 10 cm.
  • It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim. Use of the verb "comprise" and its conjugations does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those stated in a claim. The article "a" or "an" preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements.
  • The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
  • Aspects of invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In the device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware.

Claims (12)

  1. Apparatus for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from a motion reference unit, the apparatus being adapted to provide an instant output acceleration data point by:
    - receiving a plurality of measured acceleration data points from a motion reference unit;
    - based on the received, measured acceleration data points, calculate a deviation in acceleration between an instant, measured acceleration data point and a previous output acceleration data point;
    (a) if the absolute value of the calculated deviation exceeds a predetermined value or if the instant or previous, measured acceleration data point is void, then calculate an instant, modelled acceleration data point based on average deviation between previous acceleration data points and use modelled acceleration data point as instant acceleration data point output; or
    (b) if the absolute value of the calculated deviation does not exceed a predetermined value and the instant or previous acceleration data points are not void, then accept instant measured acceleration data point as acceleration data point output and use the accepted instant acceleration data point to calculate an updated average deviation between acceleration data points for forecasting of future acceleration data points under (a); and
    - use the instant acceleration data point output from (a) and/or (b) to calculate an instant, measured velocity data point as input to Kalman filter.
  2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the apparatus is further adapted to calculate an instant, modelled velocity data point based on average deviation between previous output velocity data points from the Kalman filter, and to use the instant, modelled velocity data point as a further input to the Kalman filter.
  3. System for controlling the position of a load on a rig or vessel, the system comprising:
    - an apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims;
    - a motion reference unit adapted to provide acceleration data points to the apparatus; and
    - a controller including a Kalman filter, the Kalman filter being adapted to calculate an instant output velocity data point based on the instant velocity data point from the apparatus;
    - the controller further being adapted to:
    - calculate, based on the instant output velocity data point from the Kalman filter, a position of the rig or vessel; and
    - based on the calculated position of the rig or vessel, to compensate for the change in position by sending a control signal to a heave compensator.
  4. System according to the previous claim, wherein the system further is adapted to receive information about relative movement between the load and the rig or vessel, and to include this relative movement in the calculation of the position of the rig or vessel.
  5. Vessel or rig including a system according to any one of the claims 3 or 4, where in the rig or vessel further comprises:
    - a load handling apparatus, such as a crane or a top drive; and
    - an active heave compensator.
  6. Vessel or rig according to the previous claim, wherein the active heave compensator is a hydraulic heave compensator and wherein the controller is adapted to operate a pump or a valve of the heave compensator to adjust the position of the load handling apparatus.
  7. Method for filtering and forecasting of acceleration data from a motion reference unit, the method including the step of providing an instant output acceleration data point by:
    - measuring a plurality of acceleration data points;
    - based on the measured acceleration data points; calculating a deviation in acceleration between an instant, measured acceleration data point and a previous output acceleration data point;
    - (a) if the absolute value of the calculated deviation exceeds a predetermined value or if the instant or previous, measured acceleration data point is void, then calculating an instant, modelled acceleration data point based on average deviation between previous acceleration data points and use modelled acceleration data point as instant acceleration data point output; or
    - (b) if the absolute value of the calculated deviation does not exceed a predetermined value and the instant or previous acceleration data points are not void, then accepting the instant measured acceleration data point as output instant acceleration data point and use the accepted output instant acceleration data point to calculate an updated average deviation between acceleration data points for forecasting of future acceleration data points under (a); and
    - using the instant acceleration data point output from (a) and/or (b) to calculate an instant, measured velocity data point as input to a Kalman filter.
  8. The method according to the previous claim, wherein the method further includes the step of:
    - calculating an instant, modelled velocity data point based on average deviation between previous output velocity data points from the Kalman filter, and to use the instant, modelled velocity data point as a further input to the Kalman filter.
  9. Method for active heave compensation of a load on a rig or vessel, the method including the steps of any one of the claims 7 or 8, and further the steps of:
    - calculating an instant position of a load on a rig or vessel based on an instant output velocity data point from the Kalman filter;
    - operating a heave compensator to compensate for change in position between the instant, calculated position and a previous calculated position.
  10. Method according to the previous claim, wherein the step of operating a heave compensator includes the step of operating a hydraulic pump or valve.
  11. Method according to the previous claim, wherein the method further includes the steps of:
    - measuring the relative movement between the load and the rig or vessel, and
    - including this relative movement in the calculation of instant position of the load.
  12. Non-transitory computer-readable medium encoded with instructions that, when executed by a control unit, cause the control unit to execute the method according to any one of claim 7-11.
EP20153116.7A 2020-01-22 2020-01-22 Device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation Withdrawn EP3854747A1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20153116.7A EP3854747A1 (en) 2020-01-22 2020-01-22 Device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20153116.7A EP3854747A1 (en) 2020-01-22 2020-01-22 Device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3854747A1 true EP3854747A1 (en) 2021-07-28

Family

ID=69187656

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20153116.7A Withdrawn EP3854747A1 (en) 2020-01-22 2020-01-22 Device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3854747A1 (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2123588A1 (en) * 2008-05-21 2009-11-25 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH Crane control with active swell sequence
WO2011034435A1 (en) * 2009-09-16 2011-03-24 Kongsberg Seatex As Method and system for modelling rotary accelerations of a vessel
WO2012161584A1 (en) * 2011-05-20 2012-11-29 Optilift As System, device and method for tracking position and orientation of vehicle, loading device and cargo in loading device operations

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2123588A1 (en) * 2008-05-21 2009-11-25 Liebherr-Werk Nenzing GmbH Crane control with active swell sequence
WO2011034435A1 (en) * 2009-09-16 2011-03-24 Kongsberg Seatex As Method and system for modelling rotary accelerations of a vessel
WO2012161584A1 (en) * 2011-05-20 2012-11-29 Optilift As System, device and method for tracking position and orientation of vehicle, loading device and cargo in loading device operations

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN1328146C (en) Anti-sway control of a crane under operator's command
US5443566A (en) Electronic antisway control
Richter et al. Real-time heave motion estimation using adaptive filtering techniques
JP3228342B2 (en) Elevator speed control
RU2285902C1 (en) Method for determining and compensating for deviation of gyro-stabilized platform and device for realization of said method
JP4426440B2 (en) Method and system for determining vertical floating speed and vertical floating speed of a ship
CN113823409B (en) Method and system for evaluating risk of hypotension event in dialysis
EP3984936A1 (en) Monitoring system for conveyance system
EP2477883A1 (en) Method and system for modelling rotary accelerations of a vessel
EP3854747A1 (en) Device, system and method for position signal filtering in active heave compensation
CN106982043A (en) For the method for the operation for controlling moving average filter
JP6118988B2 (en) Motor drive device
RU2646954C2 (en) Correction method of strap down inertial navigation system
US11085801B2 (en) Physical quantity measuring apparatus
CN103914628B (en) A kind of Space teleoperation system output state Forecasting Methodology
KR850007788A (en) Crane automatic driving method and device
CN109788200B (en) Camera stability control method based on predictive analysis
US20180283912A1 (en) Signal processing device, detection device, physical quantity measurement device, electronic apparatus, and vehicle
CN107664499B (en) On-line noise reduction method for accelerometer of ship strapdown inertial navigation system
JPH1045379A (en) Hung cargo swing condition sensing device
EP3250888B1 (en) Multiple sensor integration
FI111932B (en) Method of adjusting the speed of the lift and the lift system
CN114314350B (en) Automatic calibration method for positioning swing angle of automatic crane lifting appliance
CN114852860B (en) Bridge crane anti-shaking method and system based on signal difference
US20230324431A1 (en) Real-time speed estimation method of moving object

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20210129