EP3765346A1 - Method for controlling a level crossing and railway control arrangement - Google Patents
Method for controlling a level crossing and railway control arrangementInfo
- Publication number
- EP3765346A1 EP3765346A1 EP19720415.9A EP19720415A EP3765346A1 EP 3765346 A1 EP3765346 A1 EP 3765346A1 EP 19720415 A EP19720415 A EP 19720415A EP 3765346 A1 EP3765346 A1 EP 3765346A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- signals
- period
- level crossing
- caused
- rail
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 30
- 230000004888 barrier function Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005284 excitation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 231100001261 hazardous Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 2
- 101000879673 Streptomyces coelicolor Subtilisin inhibitor-like protein 3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000005352 clarification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001902 propagating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L29/00—Safety means for rail/road crossing traffic
- B61L29/24—Means for warning road traffic that a gate is closed or closing, or that rail traffic is approaching, e.g. for visible or audible warning
- B61L29/28—Means for warning road traffic that a gate is closed or closing, or that rail traffic is approaching, e.g. for visible or audible warning electrically operated
- B61L29/30—Supervision, e.g. monitoring arrangements
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L29/00—Safety means for rail/road crossing traffic
- B61L29/24—Means for warning road traffic that a gate is closed or closing, or that rail traffic is approaching, e.g. for visible or audible warning
- B61L29/28—Means for warning road traffic that a gate is closed or closing, or that rail traffic is approaching, e.g. for visible or audible warning electrically operated
- B61L29/32—Timing, e.g. advance warning of approaching train
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
- B61L23/04—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for monitoring the mechanical state of the route
- B61L23/042—Track changes detection
- B61L23/044—Broken rails
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for controlling a level crossing according to the preamble of claim 1 and a path control arrangement according to the preamble of claim 10. An.
- the problem underlying the invention is therefore to provide a solution that overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art.
- This object is achieved by the method for controlling a railway crossing starting from the preamble of claim 1 by its characterizing features, as well as the rail transition control arrangement according to the preamble of claim 10 by its characterizing features.
- the time and / or duration of a railroad crossing closure are dependent on first signals caused by at least a first rail of first rail passing the first rail and second signals from Ultrasonic wave guided via the railroad crossing second rail caused second signals.
- both rails are monitored, so that a traversing vehicle, which with its wheels successively touches both rails also influences the at least one ultrasonic wave in the first rail and also influences the at least one ultrasonic wave in the second rail, which in each case has an impact on the quality of the first and second signals caused.
- a traversing vehicle which with its wheels successively touches both rails also influences the at least one ultrasonic wave in the first rail and also influences the at least one ultrasonic wave in the second rail, which in each case has an impact on the quality of the first and second signals caused.
- the level crossing control can thus respond to an ac current occupancy and control corresponding barriers and Sig nale and / or influence approaching trains.
- the inventive method can be developed such that the signals in each case in a first period in which the railroad crossing is closed and the rails are free, and in a second period in which the railroad crossing is opened, are detected, the determination due to a first comparison of the signals generated in the first period with those recorded in the second caused signals.
- an independent standardization is achieved because in the first period in which the rail transition is closed, the rails are not touched.
- the qualities of the first and second signals generated during this period should be taken as qualities that correlate with a free hazard space. Compared to these qualities, different qualities of first and second signals are indicators that correlate with a occupied state.
- This standardization according to the invention also has the advantage that it takes into account the local conditions, since the normalization takes place by monitoring the qualities on site and can also be updated repeatedly and is not permanently and unadjusted by calculated or set standard values.
- each rail is a device for Sen and guiding the ultrasound into the rail and a device for receiving the signals caused to be operated.
- the excitation of the rails are provided with ultrasonic waves and the detection of signals caused thereby on both rails independently.
- the inventive method is further developed such that the means for transmitting and A direction for receiving crossing at the transition roadside are operated opposite each other. This completely covers the danger area to be examined, in particular the rails located in the area. If the method according to the invention is further developed in such a way that an active circuit of the level crossing with open barriers cyclically detects values, in particular a change in amplitude, of the signals of the second period, in the first rail and the second rail, then those relevant to the level crossing control become Signals are acquired only when needed or current data is provided, which saves energy during generation and / or capture.
- failures of individual participating devices can also be detected up-to-the-minute, and the opening of the barrier can be prevented and / or other security processes can be triggered or processes initiated to remedy the failure.
- the inven tion proper method can be developed such that when operating a call barrier at the railroad crossing, during the times closed barriers a cyclic detection of the signals caused the first period.
- a constant updating of the standardization can be ensured.
- functional failures can be identified early and processes can be initiated to remedy the situation.
- the method is developed in such a way that for the determination and / or comparisons the amplitudes of the caused signals are detected. Amplitudes correlate very well with changes on the rails and thus are very good as monitored quality of the caused Signa le suitable.
- Figure is a schematic representation of abutsbei game of the inventive method Maschinenmat-generating path control arrangement.
- the figure shows an embodiment of the arrangement according to the invention for controlling a level crossing, which has the Vortei le according to the invention to provide a solution that does not require additional equipment of trains and still offers egg nen reliable self-test.
- a level crossing B which passes a track G, which is formed from a first rail RI and a second rail R2.
- a first barrier S1 is indicated, which prevents the crossing of the track G from one side and a second barrier S2, which prevents the crossing of the track G from the opposite side.
- the barriers S1 ... S2 are closed at a general railroad crossing due to an approaching train, if the result of an examination of the rails R1 ... R2 conclusions on the fact that vehicles and / or other devisbetei ended both rails have passed.
- a first measuring section MSI is installed on the first rail S1 and a second measuring section MS2 is provided on the second rail S2.
- this is to measuring distances, which are based on the design of the Messtre bridges from the field of rail break detection.
- monitoring with guided ultrasound waves is generally carried out.
- an excitation unit for example a piezo-based oscillator
- (ultra) sound modes in the rail S1... S2 typically ⁇ 100 kHz excited, propagating along the rail S1 ... S2.
- the amplitude of the received signal is reduced or the signal is completely lost. Any influences on the rail S1 ... S2 also lead to a reduction of the signal such as attachments on the track, cross-sectional changes or objects that are in contact with the track.
- a solid object such as the wheels of Lokomo tive also leads to a slight signal change depending on the mode.
- This system can also be used according to the invention for the recognition He traversingmple horrauer monocyte Kunststoff- and - objects.
- this signal change compared to the systems for Schienenbrucherken nen can still be improved, so that the detection of (motor vehicle) wheels, pedestrians or other objects ver improved, especially adapted to them can be.
- the invention thus uses this rail break detection in the manner of an "axle counting" or detection of touches in order to use this for the level crossing control.
- a Sen and a receiver are installed per rail R1 ... R2, respectively at the roadside, which is shown schematically by the limitation of the measuring distances MS1 ... MS2 in the figure.
- measurements are carried out cyclically in operation and a current measurement standard is determined without influencing.
- This normalization size may vary depending on ambient conditions, such as humidity, temperature, soiling. If the barriers S1 ... S2 are then closed, the current measurement is compared with the current normal for the hazardous area release message and warned in the event of a significant deviation.
- the invention overcomes the difficulty of filtering out an un-influenced measurement, although road vehicles usually cross.
- the barriers are closed by default and are geöff net only on call and after clarification of possible approaching trains. That There are no vehicles and trains are at least 1km away when opening the barriers.
- the measuring devices MS1 ... MS ... 2 of the two rails R1 ... R2 continuously transmit and receive pulses in an alternative embodiment of the invention, so that each measuring device MS1 ... MS2 itself is a failure itself can recognize. By comparing both systems, even smaller deviations of the system can be determined.
- the two systems monitor each other in accordance with the invention.
- both measuring devices MS1 ... MS2 When the call barrier is then requested, both measuring devices MS1 ... MS2 must first detect "FREI” and can determine the measurement standard, and then, if an object, for example a car, crosses the level crossing, they should cause the same amount of influence on the ultrasound Recognize signals, ie, recognize "OCCUPIED" as often as possible.
- Deviations must be tolerated or recognized, for example, when a pedestrian on one side of the track, but not on the other side. Therefore, in the case of discrepancies before the barrier S1 ... S2 is closed, visual and audible warnings should be issued and the barriers S1 ... S2 should in this case only be closed with a time delay of, for example, 1 minute.
- both sensors MS1 ... MS2 have recognized the danger area GR as "FREE"
- the route can be traveled by trains again Learning be trained so that this alternative control steps are conceivable.
- the advantage is the use of conventional Senso rik.
- the invention is not limited to the illustrated and be described embodiment of the invention Anord tion and the inventive method. Much more should all be encompassed by the claims defined variants, as far as they the essential to the invention core of the use of conventional sensors for the provision of a simple failure disclosure by mutual care and evaluation, including operations at level crossing B, and thus provide alternatives for various reliability and safety requirements so as to provide remote sensing technology for time-optimized securing of level crossings.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102018206300.1A DE102018206300A1 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2018-04-24 | Method for controlling a level crossing and path control arrangement |
PCT/EP2019/059147 WO2019206641A1 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2019-04-10 | Method for controlling a level crossing and railway control arrangement |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP3765346A1 true EP3765346A1 (en) | 2021-01-20 |
EP3765346B1 EP3765346B1 (en) | 2022-02-09 |
Family
ID=66334380
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP19720415.9A Active EP3765346B1 (en) | 2018-04-24 | 2019-04-10 | Method for controlling a level crossing and railway control arrangement |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US11964684B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP3765346B1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE102018206300A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2019206641A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN112678030B (en) * | 2020-12-21 | 2021-08-17 | 北京交通大学 | Method for controlling dynamic signal priority of guided transport vehicle under multi-request response |
Family Cites Families (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6031790A (en) * | 1996-08-20 | 2000-02-29 | The Nippon Signal Co. Ltd. | Information generator using elastic wave |
DE19826421C1 (en) * | 1998-06-16 | 2000-03-09 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for detecting a defect in a guide rail |
-
2018
- 2018-04-24 DE DE102018206300.1A patent/DE102018206300A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2019
- 2019-04-10 US US17/050,400 patent/US11964684B2/en active Active
- 2019-04-10 EP EP19720415.9A patent/EP3765346B1/en active Active
- 2019-04-10 WO PCT/EP2019/059147 patent/WO2019206641A1/en active Search and Examination
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
US20210362760A1 (en) | 2021-11-25 |
DE102018206300A1 (en) | 2019-10-24 |
EP3765346B1 (en) | 2022-02-09 |
US11964684B2 (en) | 2024-04-23 |
WO2019206641A1 (en) | 2019-10-31 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0463127B1 (en) | Arrangement for identifying an object by means of structure-borne noise, and use of said arrangement | |
EP3445635B1 (en) | Method for operating a positioning device, and positioning device | |
EP2334535B1 (en) | Method and device for increasing the stopping accuracy of a moving object | |
EP2394882B1 (en) | Scanner with secured function | |
EP2516305A1 (en) | Method and device for determining the movement and/or the position of an elevator car | |
EP2403745B1 (en) | Devices for detecting the occupied state or free state of a track section and method for operating such devices | |
WO2018224318A1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring a danger zone of a level crossing | |
WO2013050244A1 (en) | Rail fracture detection method and device | |
WO2000029270A1 (en) | Method for detecting damage in railway traffic | |
EP3475142A1 (en) | Transmitter device, sensor device, and method for sensing a magnetic field change | |
EP2868548B1 (en) | Method for monitoring the state of a switch in a train security system, and train securing system | |
DE4116997A1 (en) | METHOD FOR DETECTING UNWANTED CHANGES OR MANIPULATIONS ON LONG-STRETCHED BODY-CONDUCTIVE BODIES | |
WO2020173646A1 (en) | Device and method for ascertaining acoustic events in a track using acoustic sensors | |
EP3765346B1 (en) | Method for controlling a level crossing and railway control arrangement | |
EP3158344B1 (en) | Derailing recognition method and device | |
DE102007006833A1 (en) | Action e.g. switching operation, triggering device for railway system, has sensors detecting acoustic signals, where device detects rail-mounted vehicle located on track system based on signals and triggers action based on vehicle detection | |
WO2019206660A2 (en) | Method for controlling a railway crossing and railway control arrangement | |
WO2019137798A1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring a hazard zone of a level crossing | |
WO2019086206A1 (en) | Vehicle-based device for receiving information from a track-based transmission device | |
DE2401623A1 (en) | SAFETY DEVICE AGAINST COLLISION | |
EP1251055A1 (en) | Trackside platform area monitoring device and method | |
EP3428035A1 (en) | Method for determining an occupancy status of a section of track for railway traffic | |
DE102010012926B4 (en) | Method for the timely, acoustic warning of passengers of a rail-bound vehicle, in particular a train, and a device for its implementation | |
DE1530410A1 (en) | Method for the transmission and evaluation of characteristics generated by the effects of trains in the railway safety system | |
DE19912786A1 (en) | Rail traffic operation/movement emergency cancellation method for track notification section |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: UNKNOWN |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE |
|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20201012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: BA ME |
|
DAV | Request for validation of the european patent (deleted) | ||
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20211129 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1467331 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20220215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502019003411 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG9D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20220209 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220609 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220509 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220509 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220510 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220609 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502019003411 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20220430 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20221110 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220410 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20220410 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20220620 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20230720 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20230410 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230410 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230410 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20220209 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20190410 |