EP3524493B1 - Procédé de direction pour véhicule - Google Patents

Procédé de direction pour véhicule Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3524493B1
EP3524493B1 EP18155991.5A EP18155991A EP3524493B1 EP 3524493 B1 EP3524493 B1 EP 3524493B1 EP 18155991 A EP18155991 A EP 18155991A EP 3524493 B1 EP3524493 B1 EP 3524493B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
steering
vehicle
angle
control system
moment
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP18155991.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3524493A1 (fr
Inventor
Peter Marx
Christopher Kreis
Stefan Blumberg
Malte ROTHHÄMEL
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Volkswagen AG
Scania CV AB
Original Assignee
Volkswagen AG
Scania CV AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Volkswagen AG, Scania CV AB filed Critical Volkswagen AG
Priority to EP18155991.5A priority Critical patent/EP3524493B1/fr
Publication of EP3524493A1 publication Critical patent/EP3524493A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3524493B1 publication Critical patent/EP3524493B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B62—LAND VEHICLES FOR TRAVELLING OTHERWISE THAN ON RAILS
    • B62D—MOTOR VEHICLES; TRAILERS
    • B62D9/00—Steering deflectable wheels not otherwise provided for
    • B62D9/005—Emergency systems using brakes for steering

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of supporting a steering process of a vehicle according to the main body of claim 1, a control system for a vehicle according to the main body of claim 12 and a vehicle suitable to be used in the method according to the main body of claim 13.
  • a steering support system such as a hydraulic steering support system.
  • EPS electric power steering
  • ESC/ESP electronic stability control
  • the steering support system normally is a primary steering support system due to the requirement of providing backup systems. In case of a malfunction, a secondary backup system is required to assure safe steering behavior of the vehicle.
  • DE 10 2008 046 007 A1 is considered the closest prior-art-document and illustrates such a secondary steering support system, wherein a brake moment is selectively applied to the wheels in order to achieve a desired steering behavior in turn.
  • DE 10 2015 014 882 A1 and DE 603 15 766 T2 disclose similar systems.
  • US 2008/011539 A1 discloses a steering column that is linked to a steering gear comprising a rack and a pinion.
  • additional technical assemblies shall be avoided by using technical components, already existing in a state-of-the-art vehicle.
  • a first aspect of the invention relates to a method of supporting a steering process of a vehicle that is steerable by manipulating the orientation of at least two wheels via a steering wheel, a steering kinematics that comprises a steering column and a steering gear, with the steering column comprising an upper end portion facing the steering wheel, wherein an angle sensor is located at the upper end portion and/or an entrance of the steering gear and a lower end portion facing the steering gear, with the vehicle being equipped with at least one primary steering support system, wherein the method comprises at least the following steps:
  • the control system derives the steering moment from an upper steering angle of the upper end portion or the entrance of the steering gear delivered by the at least one angle sensor and from mechanical data of the steering kinematics being stored in the control system and further from a lower steering angle of the steering kinematics being measured or simulated.
  • At least one angle sensor may be located at the upper end portion of the steering gear and the mechanical data may comprise mechanical data of the steering column and the lower steering angle may be defined at the lower end portion of the steering column.
  • the mechanical data may comprise mechanical data of a torsion bar of the steering gear and the lower steering angle may be defined as a torsion angle of the torsion bar measured at a steering gear output shaft.
  • both methods of measuring the lower steering angle may be combined.
  • the method of the invention may be executed by enhancing the functionality of a controllable braking system, that may be any system known to a person skilled in the art that allows for selectively braking down certain wheels of the vehicle, such as an ESP system for example, featured by a state-of-the-art vehicle. Enhancing the functionality of the controllable braking system is preferably based on a respective software component.
  • the control system may be a central or distributed control system that sends and receives the signals required for the method and executes the calculations to determine the steering moment.
  • the steering moment is a value being most suitable to determine the driver's steering intention.
  • Correlation between the steering moment and the driver's steering intention may be embodied by a mathematical function (and its derivations), for instance, wherein the driver's steering intention may be expressed by certain levels of the steering moment and the current direction of the steering moment. For example, a certain level of the steering moment at a current upper steering angle may deliver the information that the vehicle is moving in the desired direction. A higher level of the steering moment may express that the driver intends to steer the vehicle in a certain direction, additionally.
  • the mathematical function may therefore take the steering moment and the upper steering angle as an input to make a decision, whether additional or less support by the brake system is required and in which direction.
  • the respective data is preferably stored in the control device.
  • the stiffness of the steering column and the torsion bar are part of the known mechanical data of the vehicle.
  • ⁇ upper is preferably measured by the existing angle sensor of the vehicle, normally provided by an ESP system.
  • ⁇ lower1 is determined by direct or indirect measurement or simulated, which is further described below.
  • attention is also paid to a slackness that occurs in the steering column, and its influence is paid respect to in the calculation of ⁇ . Accordingly, accuracy of the method is enhanced.
  • ⁇ lower2 is directly measured at the steering gear output shaft, preferably by another angle sensor, based on the fact, that the correlation of the torsion moment occurring in the torsion bar and its torsion angle are very well known.
  • the torsion angle at the output of the steering gear directly delivers the torsion moment induced to the torsion bar, which is almost equal to the steering moment.
  • the other angle sensor can be placed at the steering gear output shaft and still another angle sensor can be placed at the steering gear input shaft to measure the upper steering angle at the steering gear input shaft, which is the most direct method of determining the torsion of the torsion bar.
  • the method of the invention provides a very simple way of supporting the steering process in the vehicle, if the primary steering support system is not working properly.
  • basically no additional hardware is required, as standard modules of the vehicle may be used, for example those of an ESP system.
  • no additional torque sensor is required to determine the steering moment.
  • detection of the malfunction of the primary steering support system is done while the vehicle is moving.
  • induction of the brake moment to the at least one wheel is done to the vehicle while it is moving, so as to achieve the desired steering behavior.
  • the lower steering angle is measured by another angle sensor, located at the lower end portion of the steering column for direct measurement or located at the steering gear for indirect measurement.
  • Indirect measurement of the lower steering angle refers to the other angle sensor not being directly mounted to the lower end portion of the steering column, but at a part mechanically linked to it.
  • this allows for very accurate identification of the lower steering angle, wherein an additional angle sensor can be implemented much easier than a torque sensor.
  • the other angle sensor is located at a steering gear input shaft. This way, torsion of the steering column between the upper and lower end portions of the steering column can be easily measured by comparing ⁇ upper at the steering wheel and ⁇ lower at the steering gear input shaft.
  • the lower steering angle is simulated.
  • Simulation means a calculation starting at a given system condition and further being based on a known behavior of the system.
  • a last value of the steering moment delivered by the primary steering support system before malfunction is taken as an input value to the control system.
  • a brake moment correlating with the input value is applied to the brake system, an initial value of the lower steering angle is calculated and then, the control system further simulates a change of the steering moment according to a measured change of at least the upper steering angle and a simulated change of the lower steering angle, based on respective correlation data, being stored in the control system.
  • this allows for determining the steering moment at a sufficient accuracy without any additional sensor.
  • This embodiment is based on the assumption, that, in the first moment after failure of the primary steering support system, the steering direction of the wheels and the lower and upper steering angle are constant.
  • the last known values of the steering moment and the current steering direction of the wheels, delivered by the primary steering support system, are then taken as an input for the method of the invention.
  • a brake moment is applied to the wheels, according to the last known steering moment, in order to maintain the current steering situation after failure of the primary steering support system. If the driver now intends to change the steering direction, he applies a changing steering moment via the steering wheel, which is rotating accordingly thereby changing the upper steering angle.
  • the steering moment is now unknown.
  • To determine the steering moment again a mathematical function based on empirical knowledge can be provided, delivering change of the lower steering angle and the steering moment, accordingly.
  • the vehicle comprises a yaw sensor measuring a yaw rate of the vehicle and a velocity sensor measuring a velocity of the vehicle and that the measured values are used to derive the orientation of the at least two wheels from respective correlation data, being stored in the control system, to achieve the lower steering angle.
  • the lower steering angle can be easily gained from the difference between the upper steering angle and the orientation of the at least two wheels via the steering gear.
  • yaw sensors are commonly used in state-of-the-art-vehicles, so that no additional sensor is required.
  • the vehicle comprises a velocity sensor measuring a rotational speed of the at least two wheels of the vehicle that are used for steering and that the measured values are used to derive the orientation of the respective wheels from respective correlation data, being stored in the control system, to achieve the lower steering angle.
  • the orientation of the wheels can be gained from their rotational speeds. Based on that, the lower steering angle can be easily gained from the difference between the upper steering angle and the orientation of the at least two wheels via the steering gear.
  • no additional sensor is required for this embodiment, either.
  • the vehicle comprises at least one near field sensor acquiring environmental data and that a current direction of movement of the vehicle relatively to the environment is derived from the data and that the orientation of the at least two wheels is then derived from respective correlation data, being stored in the control system, to achieve the lower steering angle.
  • the vehicle comprises a yaw sensor measuring a yaw rate of the vehicle which is compared to the driver's steering intention and the brake moment applied to the at least one wheel is adapted if a derivation of the current direction of movement of the vehicle and the driver's steering intention is detected.
  • the steering wheel, steering column and a steering gear are connected via cardan joints and that calibration of the mechanical data stored in the control device is accomplished at the beginning of each trip of the vehicle.
  • control system may continuously analyze control- and measurement signals from the primary steering support system and the steering behavior of the vehicle. Based on this, the control system may simulate the method of supporting the steering process of the invention. The control system may compare the results of the simulation with the actual steering behavior of the vehicle and for example eliminate inaccuracies in the control system's software component regarding the mechanical data of the steering column. Reasons for these inaccuracies are for example non-linearities in the cardan joints or abrasive effects.
  • the method is executed by an ESP system of the vehicle, which is equipped with a respective software component.
  • a second aspect of the invention relates to a control system for a vehicle, equipped with a software component adapted to execute an inventive control method according to this description.
  • a third aspect of the invention relates to a vehicle, steerable by manipulating the orientation of at least two wheels via a steering wheel, a steering kinematics that comprises a steering column and a steering gear, with the steering column comprising an upper end portion facing the steering wheel, wherein an angle sensor is located at the upper end portion and/or an entrance of the steering gear, and a lower end portion facing the steering gear, with the vehicle being equipped with at least one primary steering support system, further comprising at least the following features:
  • control system is equipped with a software component that allows for deriving the steering moment from an upper steering angle of the upper end portion or the entrance of the steering gear delivered by the at least one angle sensor and from mechanical data of the steering kinematics being stored in the control system and further from a lower steering angle of the steering kinematics being measured or simulated by the software component.
  • At least one angle sensor is located at the upper end portion and the mechanical data comprise mechanical data of the steering column and the lower steering angle is defined at the lower end portion of the steering column or the mechanical data comprise mechanical data of a torsion bar of the steering gear and the lower steering angle is defined as a torsion angle of the torsion bar measured at a steering gear output shaft.
  • At least the control system, the angle sensor, the brake system and the operational connection belong to an ESP system of the vehicle, which is equipped with the software component.
  • control system is an inventive control system according to this description.
  • the backup steering method uses a brake system of the ESP to brake down selected wheels to support steering.
  • the driver's steering intention is derived from a steering moment in the steering kinematics, which is a result of the forces attacking the wheels and the driver holding the steering wheel in position or moving the same.
  • the steering moment is not measured, if a primary hydraulic or electric steering support system is malfunctioned. Instead, it is gained from the rotational position of the steering wheel compared to a rotational position a reference point along the the steering kinematics with respect to the mechanical stiffness of a referenced section of the steering kinematics.
  • There are certain possibilities of determining the rotational position of the reference point based on known vehicle data.
  • the invention also relates to a control system of the vehicle and to the vehicle, both being adapted for the described method.
  • Figure 1 shows a block diagram of a method of supporting a steering process of a vehicle according to the invention.
  • a vehicle 10 is provided in step 1 of the method.
  • the vehicle 10, as can be seen in Figure 3 is a motorized utility vehicle, such as a truck 12. It is steerable by manipulating the orientation of two wheels 14 located at the front of the vehicle 10. Steering is done manually via a steering wheel 16, as shown in Figure 2 , which is linked to a steering column 18 and a steering gear 20, all part of a steering kinematics 17 of the vehicle 10.
  • the steering column 18 comprises an upper end portion 22 and a lower end portion 24.
  • the upper end portion 22 is equipped with an angle sensor 26 and located at an interface to the steering wheel 16.
  • the lower end portion 24 is located at an interface to the steering gear 20, preferably being a steering gear input shaft.
  • the steering gear 20 transmits the rotational steering movement of the steering column 18 into a steering movement of the wheels 14 via a torsion bar 21 and a steering lever 34.
  • the vehicle 10 is equipped with an ESP system and with a primary steering support system, wherein the primary steering support system in this embodiment is a hydraulic power steering, even though electric power steering just as an example is also possible.
  • the vehicle 10 has a control system 28, that belongs to the ESP system ( Figure 3 ) or may belong to an alternative system known to a person skilled in the art that allows for selectively braking down certain wheels 14 of the vehicle 10. Just for the purpose of simple explanation it is referred to an ESP system in the following.
  • the control system 28 detects a malfunction of the primary steering support system of the vehicle 10.
  • the malfunction may be a loss of hydraulic pressure in the primary steering support system or another error case.
  • the method of the invention makes use of the ESP to apply a certain brake moment to selected wheels 14 in order to create a steering moment and thereby support the manual steering process of the driver.
  • the control system 28 of the vehicle 10 needs to figure out the driver's steering intention.
  • the steering moment in the steering kinematics 17, for example the steering column 18, is analyzed to conclude the driver's steering intention.
  • the available data is limited.
  • the ESP provides an angle sensor 26.
  • the angle sensor 26 detects an upper steering angle ⁇ upper .
  • the respective measurement value is detected by the control system 28.
  • the control system 28 further has a data basis including the stiffness of the steering column 18, c steering column or the torsion bar 21, c torsion bar .
  • the value of ⁇ lower1, 2 is required.
  • the value of ⁇ lower1, 2 is measured by another angle sensor 30 which is located at the lower end portion 24 of the steering column 18 or the steering gear output shaft 25, respectively, and directly measures the value of ⁇ lower1, 2 .
  • ⁇ lower2 if the stiffness of the steering columns 18 is much higher than that of the torsion bar 21, either the difference between the upper steering angle ⁇ upper at the upper end portion 22 or at the entrance of the steering gear 45 may be directly used for the calculation of the steering moment M steer in combination with ⁇ lower2 . If the stiffness of the steering columns 18 and that of the torsion bar 21 are similar, it is preferred to measure ⁇ upper at the entrance of the steering gear 45. A person skilled in the art independently decides which variant fits the accuracy requirements of the calculation. Among other possibilities of determining value of ⁇ lower1, 2 direct measurement with an angle sensor 26, 30 is the most accurate one and the effort is low at the same time. Based on the steering moment M steer and the upper steering angle ⁇ upper as an input, the control system 28 decides the level of brake moment required on each of the wheels 14.
  • control system 28 induces the required brake moment to the respective wheels 14 via a brake system 32 of the vehicle 10, so as to achieve the desired steering behavior.
  • the vehicle 10 further comprises a yaw sensor 36, continuously measuring a yaw rate of the vehicle 10. In a fifth step, this yaw rate is compared to the driver's steering intention and the current brake moment applied to the respective wheels 14. If the vehicle is moving in the desired direction, which may for example be detected when the steering moment M steer in the referenced section of the steering kinematics 17 is zero and the upper steering angle does not change, the current brake moment is maintained.
  • a different value of the steering moment M steer or a changing upper steering angle ⁇ upper may express that the driver intends to steer the vehicle 10 in a certain direction more or less intensely.
  • the brake moment is adapted according to the derivation of the current direction of movement of the vehicle 10 and the driver's steering intention.
  • determination of ( ⁇ lower1 may be done differently in step three of the method.
  • the other angle sensor 30 can be implemented in the steering gear 20.
  • the other angle sensor 30 indirectly measures the value of ⁇ lower1 which can be calculated by the control system 28 taking into account the transmission of the steering gear 20.
  • the yaw sensor 36 in combination with a velocity sensor 38 can be used.
  • a measured yaw rate and velocity of the vehicle 10 are used to derive the orientation of the at least two wheels 14 from respective correlation data, being stored in the control system 28, to achieve the lower steering angle ⁇ lower1 .
  • Yaw rate and velocity of the vehicle 10 are describing a path the vehicle 10 is moving along.
  • the correlation data may comprise certain moving paths that belong to certain orientations of the wheels 14 and velocities.
  • the velocity sensor 38 measures a rotational speed of the wheels 14. As two wheels 14 on the same axis feature a specific difference in their rotational speed during a curve, the orientation of the respective wheels 14 can be gained.
  • one or more near field sensors 40 can be used to acquire environmental data to determine a current direction of movement of the vehicle 10 relatively to the environment. Again, from a moving path of the vehicle 10, orientation of the wheels 14 can be derived.
  • the near field sensors 40 can be a camera 42 or a GPS sensor 44, for example.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Transportation (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Steering Control In Accordance With Driving Conditions (AREA)

Claims (16)

  1. Procédé de support d'un processus de direction d'un véhicule (10) orientable par manipulation de l'orientation d'au moins deux roues (14) par le biais d'un volant de direction (16), d'une cinématique de direction (17) comprenant une colonne de direction (18) et un boîtier de direction (20), la colonne de direction (18) comprenant une partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) orientée vers le volant de direction (16), un capteur d'angle (26) étant situé au niveau de la partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) et/ou d'une entrée du boîtier de direction (45), et une partie d'extrémité inférieure (24) orientée vers le boîtier de direction (20), le véhicule (10) étant muni d'au moins un système de support de direction primaire, le procédé comprenant au moins les étapes suivantes :
    - détection d'un dysfonctionnement du système de support de direction primaire ;
    - utilisation d'un système de commande (28) du véhicule (10) pour déduire une intention de direction d'un conducteur à partir d'un moment de direction (Msteer) appliqué au volant de direction (16) par le conducteur ;
    - détermination d'un moment de freinage requis dans un système de freinage (32) du véhicule (10) pour obtenir un comportement de direction qui correspond à l'intention de direction du conducteur ;
    - application du moment de freinage à au moins une roue (14) du véhicule (10), de manière à obtenir le comportement de direction souhaité ;
    caractérisé en ce que
    le système de commande (28) déduit le moment de direction (Msteer) à partir d'un angle de braquage supérieur (ϕupper) de la partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) ou de l'entrée du boîtier de direction (45) fourni par l'au moins un capteur d'angle (26) et à partir de données mécaniques de la cinématique de direction (17) qui sont stockées dans le système de commande (28) et en outre à partir d'un angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1, 2) de la cinématique de direction (17) qui est mesuré ou simulé.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins un capteur d'angle (26) est situé au niveau de la partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) et les données mécaniques comprennent des données mécaniques de la colonne de direction (18) et l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1) est défini au niveau de la partie d'extrémité inférieure (24) de la colonne de direction (18).
  3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1) est mesuré par un autre capteur d'angle (30), situé au niveau de la partie d'extrémité inférieure (24) de la colonne de direction (18) pour une mesure directe ou situé au niveau du boîtier de direction (20) pour une mesure indirecte.
  4. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que, une fois le dysfonctionnement du système de support de direction primaire détecté, une dernière valeur du moment de direction (Msteer) fournie par le système de support de direction primaire avant le dysfonctionnement est prise comme valeur d'entrée pour le système de commande (28), puis un moment de freinage en corrélation avec la valeur d'entrée est appliqué au système de freinage (32) et une valeur initiale de l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1) est calculée et ensuite, le système de commande (28) simule en outre, un changement du moment de direction (Mdirection) en fonction d'un changement mesuré d'au moins l'angle de braquage supérieur (ϕupper) et d'un changement simulé de l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1), sur la base de données de corrélation respectives stockées dans le système de commande (28).
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que le véhicule (10) comprend un capteur de lacet (36) mesurant une vitesse de lacet du véhicule (10) et un capteur de vitesse (38) mesurant une vitesse du véhicule (10) et en ce que les valeurs mesurées sont utilisées pour déduire l'orientation des au moins deux roues (14) à partir de données de corrélation respectives, stockées dans le système de commande (28), pour obtenir l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1).
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que le véhicule (10) comprend un capteur de vitesse (38) mesurant une vitesse de rotation des au moins deux roues (14) du véhicule (10) utilisées pour la direction et en ce que les valeurs mesurées sont utilisées pour déduire l'orientation des roues respectives à partir de données de corrélation respectives, stockées dans le système de commande (28), pour obtenir l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1).
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que le véhicule (10) comprend au moins un capteur de champ proche (40) qui acquiert des données environnementales et en ce qu'une direction de déplacement actuelle du véhicule (10) par rapport à l'environnement est déduite à partir des données et en ce que l'orientation des au moins deux roues (14) est ensuite déduite à partir de données de corrélation respectives, stockées dans le système de commande (28), pour obtenir l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1).
  8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 7, caractérisé en ce que le véhicule (10) comprend un capteur de lacet (36) mesurant une vitesse de lacet du véhicule (10), qui est comparée à l'intention de direction du conducteur et le moment de freinage appliqué à l'au moins une roue (14) est adapté si un écart entre la direction de déplacement actuelle du véhicule (10) et l'intention de direction du conducteur est détecté.
  9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 8, caractérisé en ce que le volant de direction (16), la colonne de direction (18) et un boîtier de direction (20) sont reliés par l'intermédiaire de joints de cardan et en ce que l'étalonnage des données mécaniques stockées dans le dispositif de commande s'effectue au début de chaque parcours du véhicule (10).
  10. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 9, caractérisé en ce que le procédé est exécuté par un système ESP du véhicule (10), qui est équipé d'un composant logiciel respectif.
  11. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les données mécaniques comprennent des données mécaniques d'une barre de torsion (21) du boîtier de direction (20) et l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower2) est défini comme un angle de torsion de la barre de torsion (21) mesuré au niveau d'un arbre de sortie du boîtier de direction (25).
  12. Système de commande (28) pour un véhicule, équipé d'un composant logiciel adapté pour exécuter un procédé de commande selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes.
  13. Véhicule (10), orientable en manipulant l'orientation d'au moins deux roues (14) par le biais d'un volant de direction (16), d'une cinématique de direction (17) comprenant une colonne de direction (18) et un boîtier de direction (20), la colonne de direction (18) comprenant une partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) orientée vers le volant de direction (16), un capteur d'angle (26) étant situé au niveau de la partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) et/ou d'une entrée du boîtier de direction (45), et une partie d'extrémité inférieure (24) orientée vers le boîtier de direction (20), le véhicule (10) étant muni d'au moins un système de support de direction primaire, comprenant en outre au moins les éléments suivants :
    - un système de commande (28), capable de détecter un dysfonctionnement du système de support de direction primaire et de déduire une intention de direction d'un conducteur à partir d'un moment de direction (Msteer) appliqué au volant de direction (16) par le conducteur et de déterminer en outre un moment de freinage requis pour obtenir un comportement de direction qui correspond à l'intention de direction du conducteur ;
    - un système de freinage (32) ;
    - une connexion opérationnelle entre le système de commande (28) et le système de freinage (32), de sorte que le moment de freinage soit applicable à au moins une roue (14) du véhicule (10) en réponse à un signal provenant du système de commande (28), de manière à obtenir le comportement de direction souhaité ;
    caractérisé en ce que
    le système de commande (28) est équipé d'un composant logiciel permettant de déduire le moment de direction (Msteer) à partir d'un angle de braquage supérieur (ϕupper) de la partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) ou de l'entrée du boîtier de direction (45) fourni par l'au moins un capteur d'angle (26) et à partir de données mécaniques de la cinématique de direction (17) qui sont stockées dans le système de commande (28) et en outre à partir d'un angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1, 2) de la cinématique de direction (17) qui est mesuré ou simulé par le composant logiciel.
  14. Véhicule (10) selon la revendication 13, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins un capteur d'angle (26) est situé au niveau de la partie d'extrémité supérieure (22) et les données mécaniques comprennent des données mécaniques de la colonne de direction (18) et l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower1) est défini au niveau de la partie d'extrémité inférieure (24) de la colonne de direction (18) ou en ce que les données mécaniques comprennent des données mécaniques d'une barre de torsion (21) du boîtier de direction (20) et l'angle de braquage inférieur (ϕlower2) est défini comme un angle de torsion de la barre de torsion (21) mesuré au niveau d'un arbre de sortie du boîtier de direction (25).
  15. Véhicule (10) selon la revendication 13 ou 14, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins le système de commande (28), le capteur d'angle (26), le système de freinage (32) et la connexion opérationnelle appartiennent à un système ESP du véhicule (10) qui est équipé du composant logiciel.
  16. Véhicule (10) selon l'une quelconque des revendications 13 à 15, caractérisé en ce que le système de commande (28) est un système de commande selon la revendication 12.
EP18155991.5A 2018-02-09 2018-02-09 Procédé de direction pour véhicule Active EP3524493B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP18155991.5A EP3524493B1 (fr) 2018-02-09 2018-02-09 Procédé de direction pour véhicule

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP18155991.5A EP3524493B1 (fr) 2018-02-09 2018-02-09 Procédé de direction pour véhicule

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3524493A1 EP3524493A1 (fr) 2019-08-14
EP3524493B1 true EP3524493B1 (fr) 2021-07-07

Family

ID=61189295

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP18155991.5A Active EP3524493B1 (fr) 2018-02-09 2018-02-09 Procédé de direction pour véhicule

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3524493B1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102019109234A1 (de) * 2019-04-09 2020-10-15 Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Nutzfahrzeuge GmbH Verfahren und Steuergerät zum Bestimmen eines auf eine Lenksäule eines Lenksystems für ein Fahrzeug ausgeübten Lenkmoments und Sensorvorrichtung für ein Lenksystem für ein Fahrzeug

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19858297A1 (de) * 1998-12-17 2000-06-29 Daimler Chrysler Ag Verfahren zur Korrektur eines Signals wenigstens eines Sensors, aufgrund dessen eine Bahnkurve ermittelbar ist, auf der sich das Fahrzeug bewegt
DE10003564A1 (de) * 2000-01-27 2001-08-02 Mercedes Benz Lenkungen Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung eines Lenkwinkels eines Kraftfahrzeugs ohne separaten Lenkwinkelsensor
US6808041B2 (en) 2000-02-11 2004-10-26 Delphi Technologies, Inc. Method and system for providing secondary vehicle directional control through braking
DE10244068A1 (de) * 2002-09-06 2004-03-11 Volkswagen Ag Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Drehmomentmessung für eine elektromechanische Lenkung
DE102007027039B4 (de) * 2006-07-13 2013-02-28 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Bestimmung der absoluten Position eines Lenksystems durch einen Linearsensor an der Zahnstange
DE102008046007B4 (de) 2008-09-05 2021-05-20 Man Truck & Bus Se Vorrichtung zur Lenkkraftunterstützung eines Kraftfahrzeuges
GB201118619D0 (en) * 2011-10-27 2011-12-07 Jaguar Cars Improvements in electric power assisted steering (EPAS) systems
DE102011087670A1 (de) * 2011-12-02 2013-06-06 Zf Friedrichshafen Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bestimmen eines Fahrparameters und Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern eines Antriebsstrangs eines Fahrzeugs
SE539681C2 (sv) 2014-11-28 2017-10-31 Scania Cv Ab Förfarande och system för tillhandahållande av servostyrningsassistans vid styrservobortfall

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3524493A1 (fr) 2019-08-14

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107458466B (zh) 用于确定在车辆的方向盘处的驾驶员手力矩的方法和装置
CN107380254B (zh) 使用***状态预测的电动助力转向控制
US9522696B2 (en) Method and apparatus for controlling electric power steering
US20180154936A1 (en) Vehicle Steering Apparatus Having Automatic Steering Function
CN107891909B (zh) 具有抓握感测的转向补偿
KR102286847B1 (ko) 조향토크 추정 장치 및 방법
US8634986B2 (en) Friction-based state of health indicator for an electric power steering system
US6678596B2 (en) Generating steering feel for steer-by-wire systems
US6614343B1 (en) Method for determining vehicle status variables
KR100851120B1 (ko) 이에스피 통합형 차선 유지 지원장치 및 그 제어 방법
US9511794B2 (en) Electric power steering system and method for processing fail-safe of electronic control unit
CN106004994A (zh) 基于eps和车辆模型的表面摩擦系数的连续估算
CN104149850A (zh) 提高车辆方向稳定性的方法及相关的转向***和配备该***的车辆
US11225284B2 (en) Method and device for estimating a steering torque
US10293852B2 (en) Understeer and oversteer detector for a motor vehicle
EP2873590B1 (fr) Angle de volant à partir de capteurs dynamiques de véhicule ou vitesses de roues
KR20170016083A (ko) 차량의 전동식 조향장치 및 그 제어 방법
EP3524493B1 (fr) Procédé de direction pour véhicule
US20170072996A1 (en) Apparatus and method for controlling electric power steering system
JP4568996B2 (ja) 操舵装置と操舵装置の抗力算出装置
KR100971284B1 (ko) 전류직접측정법을 이용한 스티어 바이 와이어 조향제어장치
KR20190071616A (ko) 래크 힘을 결정하기 위한 방법과 시스템, 작업 장치를 위한 작동 보조 방법, 작동 보조 장치 및 작업 장치
CN113928415A (zh) 机动车辆的线控转向转向***、机动车辆及辅助行驶机动车辆直行行驶的方法
CN111824249A (zh) 在没有扭矩传感器的转向***操作中提供辅助扭矩
EP3056409B1 (fr) Atténuation de direction du couple pour direction assistée électrique

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN PUBLISHED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20200129

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20210312

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: VOLKSWAGEN AG

Owner name: SCANIA CV AB

RAP3 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: VOLKSWAGEN AG

Owner name: SCANIA CV AB

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1408328

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210715

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602018019538

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG9D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20211014 AND 20211020

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1408328

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20210707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211007

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211108

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211007

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20211008

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602018019538

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20220408

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20220228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220209

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220228

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220209

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220228

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20210707

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240226

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20240222

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20180209

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20240221

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240222

Year of fee payment: 7