EP2794448A1 - Elevator system - Google Patents
Elevator systemInfo
- Publication number
- EP2794448A1 EP2794448A1 EP12798675.0A EP12798675A EP2794448A1 EP 2794448 A1 EP2794448 A1 EP 2794448A1 EP 12798675 A EP12798675 A EP 12798675A EP 2794448 A1 EP2794448 A1 EP 2794448A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- test element
- car
- electrical resistance
- test
- determined
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0018—Devices monitoring the operating condition of the elevator system
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B7/00—Other common features of elevators
- B66B7/12—Checking, lubricating, or cleaning means for ropes, cables or guides
- B66B7/1207—Checking means
- B66B7/1215—Checking means specially adapted for ropes or cables
- B66B7/1223—Checking means specially adapted for ropes or cables by analysing electric variables
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
- B66B1/34—Details, e.g. call counting devices, data transmission from car to control system, devices giving information to the control system
- B66B1/3476—Load weighing or car passenger counting devices
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
- B66B5/12—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions in case of rope or cable slack
- B66B5/125—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions in case of rope or cable slack electrical
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/02—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions
- B66B5/14—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions in case of excessive loads
- B66B5/145—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators responsive to abnormal operating conditions in case of excessive loads electrical
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D07—ROPES; CABLES OTHER THAN ELECTRIC
- D07B—ROPES OR CABLES IN GENERAL
- D07B1/00—Constructional features of ropes or cables
- D07B1/14—Ropes or cables with incorporated auxiliary elements, e.g. for marking, extending throughout the length of the rope or cable
- D07B1/145—Ropes or cables with incorporated auxiliary elements, e.g. for marking, extending throughout the length of the rope or cable comprising elements for indicating or detecting the rope or cable status
Definitions
- the invention relates to an elevator installation and a method for checking conditions of an elevator installation.
- safety-critical conditions are, for example, a failure of a support element, an overloading of a car, or a driving of a car without a counterweight moving in the opposite direction.
- Such and other safety critical states are associated with each
- Security systems monitored For example, the load on the cabin is monitored by load measuring sensors.
- the state of a support element is monitored, for example, by optical control systems or by magnetic sensors.
- a disadvantage of these known monitoring systems is that a separate monitoring system must be used for each component of the elevator.
- the device or the method should be simple and reliable, and be used in various elevator systems.
- the support element comprises a jacket and at least one tension member and at least one test element, wherein the test element is designed as a separate element from the tension member and wherein a tensile load is substantially absorbed by the tension member.
- Support element is arranged
- This method has the advantage that with only one monitoring system, namely a test element, which is arranged in the support element, several safety-critical states of an elevator system can be monitored. Since information about the driving state of the car is retrievable by an elevator control at any time, there is no need for any additional monitoring systems. Due to the integration of the test element in the support element also no additional space in the
- At least two or three or four of the following states of the elevator installation can be detected by the method for checking states of an elevator installation:
- a charge of the car is determined by the method for checking conditions of an elevator installation by a electrical resistance is determined in the at least one test element during a standstill of the cabin.
- a single test element can be used, or alternatively several test elements can be provided in several support elements. Because in lift systems with several support elements not all load-bearing elements are normally loaded equally at a certain point in time, it is advantageous to use at least one test element in each support element in order to be able to determine a charge of the car as precisely as possible.
- the electrical resistance of the test element correlates with a load of the support element, it is possible to deduce the load in the cabin from the specific electrical resistance of the test element.
- the determined value of the electrical resistance of the test element is compared with a first threshold value, wherein an overcharge is present when the determined value is greater than the first threshold value.
- a slack support element is determined by determining an electrical resistance in the at least one test element during a standstill or during a drive of the car, and in which the measured value is compared with a second threshold value with a slack support element present when the particular value is less than the second threshold.
- a slack support member is determined by repeatedly determining an electrical resistance in the at least one test element during a standstill or while driving the cabin, and by detecting a change in the measured values per unit time, wherein a slack support element is present when the detected change in the determined values per unit time exceeds a predetermined amount.
- a voltage difference between at least two support elements is determined, in which electrical resistances in at least two
- Inspection elements of two different support elements during a standstill or during a ride of the cabin can be determined.
- the determined values are then compared with each other with a voltage difference when the determined values are farther apart than a predefined difference.
- Such a method can already be used during assembly of an elevator installation in order to uniformly set a tension between a plurality of support elements.
- Uniformly tensioned support elements have the advantage that both a driving behavior of the elevator installation as well as a lifetime of the support elements are optimized.
- a method for checking conditions of an elevator installation damage to the support element is determined in which an electrical resistance is determined in the at least one test element during a standstill or while driving the cabin, and in which the particular value with a third threshold value is compared with damage of the support element is present when the determined value is greater than the third
- Threshold Such a procedure for monitoring damage to the
- Tragieris has the advantage that thereby also supporting elements, which have sheathed tension members can be checked in a simple manner. Depending on the arrangement of the test element in the support element can be monitored by such a method, either a tension member or a sheath of the support element.
- Such a method has the advantage that not only a safety-critical state can be detected, but that the necessary steps for overcoming the safety-critical state are initiated.
- an elevator system which comprises a car, a counterweight, a drive and at least one support element, wherein the car and the counterweight are supported by the support element and wherein the support element is driven by the drive to the car and the
- the support element comprises a casing and at least one tension member and at least one test element, wherein the test element is designed as a separate element from the tension member and wherein a tensile load is substantially absorbed by the tension member, and wherein the
- Test element is connected by at least one contacting device with a measuring device, so that an electrical resistance of the test element of the
- Measuring device can be determined.
- the electrical resistance of the test element is changed by an elongation of the test element, so that by measuring the electrical resistance of the test element at least one of the following states
- Elevator system is detectable:
- the test element extends substantially over an entire length of the support element. This has the advantage that changes in the support element, which lead to a safety-critical state, can be monitored over the entire length of the support element.
- a plurality of test elements are arranged parallel to one another in a support element.
- the parallel test elements may be connected in parallel or in series, depending on whether individual tension members or the entire Support element to be monitored.
- Contacting device can be used when free ends of the series-connected test elements are located at the same end of the support element. This has the advantage that a contacting of the test elements can take place at only one end of the support element, resulting in a simple assembly result.
- Connection of the individual test elements are adapted to the respective monitoring needs.
- the test element is arranged in a jacket of the support element.
- a wear of the casing can be monitored, or a load of the casing at a specific location.
- Such an arrangement also has the advantage that the test element is electrically insulated by the sheath.
- the test element is arranged in a tension member of the support element. This has the advantage that this allows direct monitoring of the respective tension member.
- the test element can be integrated directly into the tension member.
- electrically conductive tension members such as tension members made of steel wires, the test element is advantageously in an electrical
- test element is electrically isolated from its environment.
- test element is arranged in a neutral fiber of the support element. This has the advantage that the test element does not wear too much due to excessive bending stress.
- test element comprises at least one of the following elements:
- test element Copper, nickel, manganese, iron, platinum, tungsten, silicon, boron, or phosphorus.
- Such and other elements may be used singly or in combination with one another to give the test element the desired electrical resistance properties as a function of the load on the test element.
- a combination of some of the above elements is, for example, Konstantan.
- the test element comprises carbon fibers or coated fiber materials.
- the coating is preferably electrically conductive, and the fiber material is substantially electrically non-conductive.
- test element is designed as a separate element from the tension member and does not absorb any significant tensile loads. The forces acting on the support element
- the test element is formed as a separate element in addition to the tension members. Since it is arranged in the suspension means, it experiences the same bends and strains as the suspension element as a whole, but without fulfilling a supporting function.
- test element can be formed independently of other functionalities, i.
- the test element can be formed, for example, from materials which would not be suitable for the formation of tension members.
- a test element can be formed, which is optimally suitable for its function, namely a predictable as possible change in the electrical resistance at different D ehnungszupartyn.
- Figure 1 An exemplary embodiment of an elevator installation
- Figures 2a to 2d Exemplary embodiments of support elements for use in an elevator installation
- Figure 3 An exemplary embodiment of a safety-critical
- FIG. 1 shows an exemplary elevator installation 40.
- the elevator installation 40 has an elevator cage 41, a counterweight 42 and a support element 1 as well as a drive 43.
- the drive 43 drives the support element 1 and thus moves the elevator cage 41 and the counterweight 42 in opposite directions.
- the cabin 41 is designed to receive people and / or goods and to transport between floors of a building. Cabin 41 and counterweight 42 are guided along guides (not shown). In the example shown, the cabin 41 and the counterweight 42 are each suspended from carrying rollers 46.
- the support element 1 is at a first
- Tragschb efest modifies the support roller 46 of the counterweight 42. Then the support element 1 is placed over a traction sheave of the drive 43 to the support roller 46 of the cab 41 out and finally efest Whilesvomchtung 47 connected by a second Tragstoffb with a fixed point.
- the support element 1 runs with a higher speed via the drive 43 in accordance with a transfer factor.
- the wrap factor is 2: 1.
- the support element 1 comprises a test element (not shown).
- a loose end 1.1 of the support element 1 is provided with a contacting device 2 for contacting the test element.
- a contacting device 2 is arranged at both ends of the support element 1.
- only one contacting device 2 is arranged on one of the support means ends 1.1.
- the test element is guided in a loop through the support means, so that the beginning and end of the one end of the support element 1.1. are arranged and can be contacted by the contacting device 2 accordingly.
- the support element ends 1.1. are no longer burdened by the tensile force in the support element 1, since this tensile force is already passed through the support means fasteners 47 into the building.
- the contacting devices 2 are thus arranged in a non-overrolled region of the support element 1.
- the two contacting devices 2 are connected to each other by a measuring device 50.
- the measuring device 50 thus closes an electrical circuit which comprises the test element.
- the measuring device 50 is designed to measure the electrical current and the electrical voltage, or to change their size. After both the electrical voltage and the electric current in this electrical circuit are known, an electrical resistance of the test element can be determined. From the so determined electrical resistance of the
- Test element can then be closed to a state of the elevator system 40. In the event of exceeding or falling below certain threshold values, it is possible, depending on a driving state of the car 41, to determine whether a particular one of them
- the elevator installation 40 shown in FIG. 1 is exemplary. Other capping factors and other arrangements are possible.
- test element 8 in different ways in
- Support element 1 can be arranged. Depending on the intended use of the measurement results, the test element 8 can be arranged at a different location in the support element 1.
- FIG. 2a is a support member 1 consisting of a tension member 5 and a
- test element 8 is arranged outside the center of the tension member 5. In order to electrically isolate the test element 8 from the immediate environment, the test element 8 is embedded in an electrically insulating material 9.
- FIG. 2b is a support member 1 consisting of two tension members 5 and a
- test element 8 is arranged in one of the two tension members 5, the second tension member 5 without
- Test element is formed. Depending on the purpose of verification, it may be sufficient only to monitor a part of the tension members 5.
- the test element 8 is arranged in the neutral fiber of the tension member 5. This has the advantage that the test element 8 is not excessively stressed during bending changes of the support element 1.
- FIG. 2c is a support member 1 consisting of five tension members 5, which are arranged in a common casing 6, shown.
- the support element 1 has a traction side with longitudinal ribs and a rear side, which is formed substantially straight.
- Sheath 6 of the support element 1 is arranged. Due to the arrangement of the test elements 8 in the casing 6, the test elements 8 are electrically isolated from the tension members 5.
- FIG. 2d shows a further exemplary embodiment of a support element 1.
- the support element 1 comprises four tension members 5 in a common casing 6 and a centrally arranged test element 8.
- test element 8 and the test elements 8 in many other embodiments of support elements 1 are possible.
- Elevators can be different arrangements of the test element 8 in
- Be supporting element 1 advantageous.
- Elevator installation require a specific arrangement of the test element 8.
- FIG. 3 shows an exemplary elevator installation 40 in a safety-critical state. As in FIG. 1, both the cabin 41 and the latter are also here
- the counterweight 42 has accumulated on a buffer 10 belonging to the counterweight 42. If now the drive 43, the support element. 1 further transported to one side of the counterweight 42, the elevator car 41 can be further raised without the counterweight 42 can continue to lower. However, this is only possible if the traction of the support element 1 on the traction sheave of the drive 43 is sufficiently large. If, therefore, the car 41 is still raised, the support element 1 slackens on the side of the counterweight 42. It may happen that the traction of the support element 1 on the traction sheave 43 is no longer sufficient to keep the car 41 in its too high position. In such a loss of traction, the cabin 41 falls back at least as far as the entire
- Support element 1 is stretched again. Such a fallback is dangerous for any passengers and must be avoided at all costs.
- Devices for checking conditions of an elevator installation such a safety-critical state can be detected in good time.
- a slack support element 1 forms on one side of the traction sheave, the load on the support element 1 decreases, and as a result the test element in the support element 1 is stretched less.
- the particular electrical resistance of the test element in this situation is then smaller than it should be in a non-critical state. As a result, it can be said that a safety-critical condition prevails.
Landscapes
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Lift-Guide Devices, And Elevator Ropes And Cables (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Cage And Drive Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP12798675.0A EP2794448B1 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2012-11-29 | Elevator system |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP11194604 | 2011-12-20 | ||
PCT/EP2012/073990 WO2013092163A1 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2012-11-29 | Elevator system |
EP12798675.0A EP2794448B1 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2012-11-29 | Elevator system |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2794448A1 true EP2794448A1 (en) | 2014-10-29 |
EP2794448B1 EP2794448B1 (en) | 2018-06-13 |
Family
ID=47326109
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12798675.0A Not-in-force EP2794448B1 (en) | 2011-12-20 | 2012-11-29 | Elevator system |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US9327941B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2794448B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN104024136B (en) |
BR (1) | BR112014014363A2 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2855873C (en) |
CO (1) | CO7051017A2 (en) |
IN (1) | IN2014CN04507A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2013092163A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (17)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102471025B (en) * | 2009-07-06 | 2014-06-25 | 因温特奥股份公司 | Contacting device |
MX2013006934A (en) * | 2010-12-17 | 2013-07-22 | Inventio Ag | Lift installation comprising car and counterweight. |
CN104114762B (en) * | 2012-02-07 | 2018-06-05 | 奥的斯电梯公司 | For the Abrasion detecting of coated lift band or rope |
IN2014DN10732A (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2015-09-04 | Otis Elevator Co | |
EP2909124B1 (en) * | 2012-10-22 | 2016-12-14 | Inventio AG | Load-bearing medium for a lift system |
MX361117B (en) * | 2012-12-18 | 2018-11-28 | Inventio Ag | Lift system with monitoring device and method for monitoring a lift system. |
BR112015029409A2 (en) * | 2013-05-28 | 2017-07-25 | Inventio Ag | elevator system |
EP3060510B1 (en) * | 2013-10-22 | 2019-02-27 | KONE Corporation | Method and device for checking the integrity of load bearing members of an elevator system |
FI126182B (en) * | 2014-06-17 | 2016-07-29 | Kone Corp | Method and arrangement for monitoring the condition of an elevator rope |
AU2015321059B2 (en) * | 2014-09-26 | 2018-11-15 | Inventio Ag | Elevator system |
AU2015352498B2 (en) | 2014-11-28 | 2018-12-13 | Inventio Ag | Elevator system |
WO2018019665A1 (en) | 2016-07-28 | 2018-02-01 | Inventio Ag | Elevator suspension member slack detection arrangement |
CN109641720A (en) * | 2016-08-24 | 2019-04-16 | 因温特奥股份公司 | For determining the method and test device of the state of the suspension traction device of elevator system |
EP3336036B1 (en) | 2016-12-16 | 2021-02-03 | KONE Corporation | Method and arrangement for condition monitoring of a hoisting rope of a hoisting apparatus |
WO2019052909A1 (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2019-03-21 | Inventio Ag | Method for electrical attachment of a connecting element to a belt for a lift system and corresponding belt assembly |
CN110002304B (en) | 2017-12-06 | 2022-03-01 | 奥的斯电梯公司 | Wear detection for elevator system belt |
US20200122973A1 (en) * | 2018-10-18 | 2020-04-23 | Otis Elevator Company | Resistance-based inspection of elevator system support members |
Family Cites Families (19)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS6017754B2 (en) * | 1976-07-21 | 1985-05-07 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Wire rope abnormality detection device |
JP3188833B2 (en) * | 1995-11-17 | 2001-07-16 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator rope tension measuring device |
JP4371515B2 (en) * | 1999-01-22 | 2009-11-25 | インベンテイオ・アクテイエンゲゼルシヤフト | Detection of damage to a rope sheath of a synthetic fiber rope |
JPWO2002046082A1 (en) * | 2000-12-07 | 2004-04-08 | 三菱電機株式会社 | Elevator main rope stretch detection device |
US20020194935A1 (en) * | 2001-06-26 | 2002-12-26 | Arthur Clarke | Tensile load sensing belt |
US20030121729A1 (en) * | 2002-01-02 | 2003-07-03 | Guenther Heinz | Lift belt and system |
JP4129153B2 (en) * | 2002-08-08 | 2008-08-06 | 株式会社日立製作所 | elevator |
JP4202950B2 (en) * | 2004-03-08 | 2008-12-24 | 株式会社日立製作所 | Wire rope and lifting device using the same |
US7409870B2 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2008-08-12 | Otis Elevator Company | Elevator load bearing member wear and failure detection |
DE602004032477D1 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2011-06-09 | Otis Elevator Co | RAGGLIEDS |
ES2360527T3 (en) * | 2004-03-16 | 2011-06-06 | Otis Elevator Company | ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR DEVICE FOR USE WITH ELEVATOR LOAD SUPPORT MEMBERS. |
EP2125594A2 (en) * | 2007-03-12 | 2009-12-02 | Inventio Ag | Elevator system, carrying means for an elevator system, and method for the production of a carrying means |
US20110192683A1 (en) * | 2007-08-17 | 2011-08-11 | Karl Weinberger | Elevator system with support means state detecting device and method for detecting a state of a support means |
EP2367747B1 (en) * | 2008-12-22 | 2013-07-03 | Inventio AG | Method for monitoring a lift puller, a lift puller monitoring device and a lift assembly with such a monitoring device |
JP2010254394A (en) * | 2009-04-22 | 2010-11-11 | Mitsubishi Electric Building Techno Service Co Ltd | Wire rope and method for inspecting life of the wire rope |
CN102933482B (en) * | 2009-12-21 | 2016-04-20 | 因温特奥股份公司 | The suspention of monitoring elevator system and draw gear |
US20130270042A1 (en) * | 2012-04-12 | 2013-10-17 | Inventio Ag | Determining states of elevator components |
IN2014DN10732A (en) * | 2012-07-03 | 2015-09-04 | Otis Elevator Co | |
FI124542B (en) * | 2012-12-30 | 2014-10-15 | Kone Corp | Method and arrangement of the condition of the lift rope |
-
2012
- 2012-11-29 WO PCT/EP2012/073990 patent/WO2013092163A1/en active Application Filing
- 2012-11-29 CN CN201280063516.XA patent/CN104024136B/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2012-11-29 BR BR112014014363A patent/BR112014014363A2/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2012-11-29 CA CA2855873A patent/CA2855873C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2012-11-29 EP EP12798675.0A patent/EP2794448B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2012-12-20 US US13/721,774 patent/US9327941B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2014
- 2014-06-13 CO CO14128547A patent/CO7051017A2/en unknown
- 2014-06-17 IN IN4507CHN2014 patent/IN2014CN04507A/en unknown
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CA2855873A1 (en) | 2013-06-27 |
CN104024136B (en) | 2016-05-25 |
CA2855873C (en) | 2020-06-16 |
US20130153340A1 (en) | 2013-06-20 |
BR112014014363A2 (en) | 2017-06-13 |
US9327941B2 (en) | 2016-05-03 |
EP2794448B1 (en) | 2018-06-13 |
CN104024136A (en) | 2014-09-03 |
CO7051017A2 (en) | 2014-09-10 |
WO2013092163A1 (en) | 2013-06-27 |
IN2014CN04507A (en) | 2015-09-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2794448B1 (en) | Elevator system | |
EP2935071B1 (en) | Lift assembly with monitoring device and method for monitoring a lift assembly | |
EP2702387B1 (en) | Rope test stand | |
EP1847501B1 (en) | Lift installation with a surveillance device of the load carrier for monitoring the status of the load carrier and method for testing the load carrier | |
EP2367747A1 (en) | Method for monitoring an elevator support means, an elevator support means monitoring device, and an elevator system having such a monitoring device | |
WO2009153353A1 (en) | Elevator system with bottom tensioning means | |
WO2012100938A1 (en) | Device for detecting the state of wear of a high-strength fiber rope during use on lifting gear | |
WO2017153250A1 (en) | Supporting means for an elevator installation, with multiple sensors arranged along the supporting means | |
EP2791040B1 (en) | System for making electrical contact with tension members in load-bearing means | |
EP4065499B1 (en) | Method for determining a wear state of components of a suspension means arrangement of an elevator system | |
WO2016046052A1 (en) | Elevator system | |
DE112016003550T5 (en) | BREAK DETECTION DEVICE | |
WO2013153016A1 (en) | Elevator system | |
WO2016062454A1 (en) | Elevator system | |
DE112016007403T5 (en) | Elevator device and calibration method for a weighing device | |
EP2867151A1 (en) | Lift system | |
EP3502013B1 (en) | Device and method for determining discard criteria for a carrying strap with embedded, electrically conductive cord ropes | |
EP3224181B1 (en) | Elevator system | |
WO2019057352A1 (en) | Drive system for an elevator system, and elevator system | |
EP3628631B1 (en) | Method for detecting state of carriers | |
EP3042874B1 (en) | Lift belt monitoring | |
EP2808285B1 (en) | Lift assembly | |
WO2014191374A1 (en) | Elevator system | |
EP3391018A1 (en) | Method for determining the replacement state of wear of a rope made of textile fibre material | |
WO2018103922A1 (en) | Method for detecting the state of support belts |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140513 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20160126 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R079 Ref document number: 502012012893 Country of ref document: DE Free format text: PREVIOUS MAIN CLASS: B66B0001340000 Ipc: B66B0007120000 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: D07B 1/14 20060101ALI20170829BHEP Ipc: B66B 7/12 20060101AFI20170829BHEP Ipc: B66B 1/34 20060101ALI20170829BHEP Ipc: B66B 5/14 20060101ALI20170829BHEP Ipc: B66B 5/12 20060101ALI20170829BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20180117 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 1008296 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180615 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502012012893 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: FP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180913 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180913 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180914 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20181013 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502012012893 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20190314 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181129 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181129 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 1008296 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20181129 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181129 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20191121 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20191121 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20191120 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20191128 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20191120 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20191121 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20191122 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20191120 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180613 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20121129 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180613 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502012012893 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20201201 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20201129 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201201 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201130 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201129 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210601 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201129 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20201129 |