EP2791496B1 - Device and method for fault detection in a fuel supply system of a motor vehicle - Google Patents
Device and method for fault detection in a fuel supply system of a motor vehicle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2791496B1 EP2791496B1 EP12856964.7A EP12856964A EP2791496B1 EP 2791496 B1 EP2791496 B1 EP 2791496B1 EP 12856964 A EP12856964 A EP 12856964A EP 2791496 B1 EP2791496 B1 EP 2791496B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- fuel
- rail
- operating status
- engine
- valve device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/22—Safety or indicating devices for abnormal conditions
- F02D41/221—Safety or indicating devices for abnormal conditions relating to the failure of actuators or electrically driven elements
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/30—Controlling fuel injection
- F02D41/38—Controlling fuel injection of the high pressure type
- F02D41/3809—Common rail control systems
- F02D41/3836—Controlling the fuel pressure
- F02D41/3845—Controlling the fuel pressure by controlling the flow into the common rail, e.g. the amount of fuel pumped
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02M—SUPPLYING COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL WITH COMBUSTIBLE MIXTURES OR CONSTITUENTS THEREOF
- F02M37/00—Apparatus or systems for feeding liquid fuel from storage containers to carburettors or fuel-injection apparatus; Arrangements for purifying liquid fuel specially adapted for, or arranged on, internal-combustion engines
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02M—SUPPLYING COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL WITH COMBUSTIBLE MIXTURES OR CONSTITUENTS THEREOF
- F02M55/00—Fuel-injection apparatus characterised by their fuel conduits or their venting means; Arrangements of conduits between fuel tank and pump F02M37/00
- F02M55/02—Conduits between injection pumps and injectors, e.g. conduits between pump and common-rail or conduits between common-rail and injectors
- F02M55/025—Common rails
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02M—SUPPLYING COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL WITH COMBUSTIBLE MIXTURES OR CONSTITUENTS THEREOF
- F02M63/00—Other fuel-injection apparatus having pertinent characteristics not provided for in groups F02M39/00 - F02M57/00 or F02M67/00; Details, component parts, or accessories of fuel-injection apparatus, not provided for in, or of interest apart from, the apparatus of groups F02M39/00 - F02M61/00 or F02M67/00; Combination of fuel pump with other devices, e.g. lubricating oil pump
- F02M63/02—Fuel-injection apparatus having several injectors fed by a common pumping element, or having several pumping elements feeding a common injector; Fuel-injection apparatus having provisions for cutting-out pumps, pumping elements, or injectors; Fuel-injection apparatus having provisions for variably interconnecting pumping elements and injectors alternatively
- F02M63/0225—Fuel-injection apparatus having a common rail feeding several injectors ; Means for varying pressure in common rails; Pumps feeding common rails
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02M—SUPPLYING COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL WITH COMBUSTIBLE MIXTURES OR CONSTITUENTS THEREOF
- F02M63/00—Other fuel-injection apparatus having pertinent characteristics not provided for in groups F02M39/00 - F02M57/00 or F02M67/00; Details, component parts, or accessories of fuel-injection apparatus, not provided for in, or of interest apart from, the apparatus of groups F02M39/00 - F02M61/00 or F02M67/00; Combination of fuel pump with other devices, e.g. lubricating oil pump
- F02M63/02—Fuel-injection apparatus having several injectors fed by a common pumping element, or having several pumping elements feeding a common injector; Fuel-injection apparatus having provisions for cutting-out pumps, pumping elements, or injectors; Fuel-injection apparatus having provisions for variably interconnecting pumping elements and injectors alternatively
- F02M63/0225—Fuel-injection apparatus having a common rail feeding several injectors ; Means for varying pressure in common rails; Pumps feeding common rails
- F02M63/0265—Pumps feeding common rails
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02M—SUPPLYING COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL WITH COMBUSTIBLE MIXTURES OR CONSTITUENTS THEREOF
- F02M65/00—Testing fuel-injection apparatus, e.g. testing injection timing ; Cleaning of fuel-injection apparatus
- F02M65/003—Measuring variation of fuel pressure in high pressure line
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D41/00—Electrical control of supply of combustible mixture or its constituents
- F02D41/22—Safety or indicating devices for abnormal conditions
- F02D2041/224—Diagnosis of the fuel system
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02D—CONTROLLING COMBUSTION ENGINES
- F02D2200/00—Input parameters for engine control
- F02D2200/02—Input parameters for engine control the parameters being related to the engine
- F02D2200/06—Fuel or fuel supply system parameters
- F02D2200/0602—Fuel pressure
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine.
- the invention relates also to a computer programme product comprising programme code for a computer for implementing a method according to the invention.
- the invention relates also to a device for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle and a motor vehicle equipped with the device.
- Modern motor vehicles may be equipped with a fuel system which has what is known as a common-rail.
- a low-pressure pump is adapted to suck up fuel from a fuel tank and feed the fuel through an IMV valve (Inlet metering valve) to a high-pressure pump.
- the high-pressure pump is adapted to pressurise the fuel by feeding the fuel to said common-rail for dispensing to a number of cylinders in the motor vehicle's engine.
- An MDV valve Mechanical Dump Valve
- is arranged on a return side of the fuel system which, when the fuel pressure in said common-rail is too high, functions as a pressure-relief valve allowing in this event a fuel flow back to the fuel tank.
- a control unit in the fuel system is arranged to control said IMV valve by continuously detecting a prevailing pressure of the fuel in said common-rail and comparing this against a preferred reference value for the pressure of the fuel.
- This can typically be effected by means of a regulator intended for this purpose and a PWM signal. It is of the utmost importance that the IMV valve can be quickly regulated. It is also important that transient progressions relating to the quantity of dispensed fuel in the engine's cylinders do not cause a fuel pressure in said common-rail to fall or rise. This imposes strict requirements that the IMV valve will react almost immediately to control information in the PWM signal.
- a known problem associated with said IMV valve is what is known as "slip-stick". This means that the valve is not able to alter a continuous fuel flow in the preferred manner.
- one of the feed pumps may fail.
- an unexpected leakage may occur, for example in fuel pipes or in said common-rail.
- it is difficult to diagnose a source of error in the fuel system and troubleshooting is time-consuming.
- a correctly functioning unit may be needlessly replaced, which is both time-consuming and costly, especially if this fails to address the actual error.
- error code is generated in the event the fuel system does not function as intended. This error code is, however, rather general, which is why isolated fuel-system components may not be clearly identified as the likely source of the error. The error code generated at present is therefore not always helpful to a mechanic at a service station.
- the IMV valve is a relatively cheap fuel-system component. It would therefore be advantageous to be able to isolate this particular component as the source of error in the event it fails to function as intended. With today's more general error codes, this may not always be possible.
- DE102008044360 describes a fuel-injection system in an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle.
- the fuel-injection system comprises a fuel tank, fuel pump, control valve, common-rail and a control unit.
- the control unit is adapted to control the control valve and regulate the fuel flow to said common-rail.
- DE102006000483 describes a fuel-injection system in an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle.
- the fuel-injection system comprises a fuel tank, a first fuel pump, control valve, a second fuel pump, common-rail and a control unit.
- the control unit is adapted to control the control valve and regulate the fuel flow to said second pump.
- US20030084871 describes a fuel dispensing system which is relevant when describing an excess supply of fuel to a common-rail from a high-pressure pump. Said excess supply of fuel is caused in this case by a faulty IMV valve. In the event of said excess supply of fuel, a setting for the engine's target idling speed is modified.
- US 2006/243244 A1 describes a method for detection of a defective volume flow control valve in a fuel injection system in an internal combustion engine. The method is performed only when the fuel injection is switched off and detects leaking valves.
- the IMV valve can be controlled, for example, by a PWM signal.
- An open IMV valve means that fuel is released to the high-pressure pump which it turn means that the pressure in said common-rail increases.
- the fuel flow to the high-pressure pump may be choked off combined with the fuel leaving said common-rail as it is dispensed to the engine's cylinders. It is of the utmost importance that the preferred fuel pressure can be quickly regulated and that the pressure does not fall or rise in the event of sudden changes to the dispensed quantity of fuel. This imposes strict requirements that the IMV valve will react quickly to changes in the generated PWM signal.
- Slip-stick means that, in the event of a change in the PWM signal, the IMV valve's position is not immediately changed unless the change in the PWM signal is of major significance.
- the inventors of the present invention have found that when the IMV valve finally moves, the control error in the regulation system has been integrated, causing the IMV valve's position to move too far. The inventors of the present invention have found that this can cause major fluctuations in the fuel pressure. If the pressure is too high, this may cause the pressure-relief valve to open, generating an error code and restricting the engine's performance. An error code may also be generated if the pressure is too low and should the pressure become too low, this may cause the engine to stop.
- Said error codes for high and low pressure respectively do not however necessarily indicate that the IMV valve is seizing up (slip-stick).
- a number of different sources of errors in the fuel system are possible.
- the present invention proposes a diagnosis which clearly indicates that the IMV valve is faulty if such is the case.
- One object of the present invention is to propose a novel and advantageous method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle.
- Another object of the invention is to propose a novel and advantageous device and a novel and advantageous computer programme for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle.
- a further object of the invention is to propose a method, a device and a computer programme for precisely isolating a source of errors in a fuel system in a motor vehicle.
- a further object of the invention is to propose a cost-effective method, device and computer programme for error detection in a fuel supply system in a motor vehicle.
- Another object of the invention is to propose an alternative method, a novel and advantageous device and a novel and advantageous computer programme for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle.
- a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system comprising a feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, comprising the steps of:
- the operating status can be determined on the basis of an engine speed and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for a preferred pressure in a common-rail in the fuel supply system.
- That said operating status is to be regarded as stationary means that said operating status is stationary or at least essentially stationary.
- That said operating status is to be regarded as stationary means that said operating status is determined to be stationary or at least essentially stationary.
- Said operating status may be considered stationary when the engine speed (n) and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine (280) is negligibly changed.
- the fuel-supply system may be a common-rail-type system.
- Said reference value may be determined on the basis of said predetermined operating status.
- Said period may fall within a range of [10, 50] seconds.
- Said predetermined deviation value may be 20 bar or more.
- the number of occasions may be a value within the range of [5, 25] occasions.
- an IMW valve with slip-stick can be identified if the determined fuel-supply pressure manifests relatively powerful and relatively slow vibrations/oscillations. This is dependent on the initial negligible PWM changes not causing the IMV valve to move and also on the generated PWM increasing as the regulating error worsens. Ultimately the IMV valve "loosens" and as the control signal is integrated, this leads to fluctuations in the fuel-supply pressure.
- the method may further comprise the step of:
- the method may further comprise the step of:
- the method is simple to implement in existing motor vehicles.
- Software for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine according to the invention, can be installed in a control unit in the vehicle during the manufacture thereof.
- a purchaser of the vehicle may thus have the possibility of selecting the function of the method as an option.
- software which comprises programme code for executing the innovative method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a vehicle may be installed in a control unit of the vehicle on the occasion of upgrading at a service station.
- the software may be loaded into a memory of the control unit.
- Implementation of the innovative method is thus cost-effective, particularly as, according to one aspect of the invention, no further components need to be installed in the vehicle. Necessary hardware is currently already provided in the vehicle. The invention therefore proposes a cost-effective solution to the problems stated above.
- Software comprising programme code for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle can be easily updated or replaced. Other components of the software can also be replaced independently of one another. This modular configuration is advantageous from a maintenance perspective.
- a device for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising a feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, comprising:
- the device may further comprise means for determining the operating status on the basis of an engine speed and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for a preferred pressure in a common-rail in the fuel supply system.
- the device may comprise a common-rail unit.
- the device may comprise means for determining said reference value on the basis of said predetermined operating status.
- the device may further comprise:
- the device may further comprise:
- the device may further comprise a further valve device which can be used independently of said valve device.
- Said further valve device already be arranged in the immediate vicinity of said valve device.
- Said further valve device may be identical to said valve device.
- Said further valve device may a backup valve device.
- a control unit in the fuel-supply system may be adapted to deactivate said valve device and activate said further valve device in the event that said valve device is not functioning as intended. In this case, said fuel may be conducted via said further valve device to the feed device from said container, instead of via said valve device.
- the device may further comprise:
- the foregoing object is also achieved with a motor vehicle comprising the characteristic device for error detection in a fuel-supply system.
- the motor vehicle may be a truck, bus or passenger car.
- a computer programme for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle, which computer programme comprises programme code stored on a computer-readable medium in order to cause an electronic control unit or another computer connected to the electronic control unit to perform the steps according to any one of claims 1-10.
- a computer programme for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle, which computer programme comprises programme code for causing an electronic control unit or another computer connected to the electronic control unit to perform the steps according to any one of claims 1-10.
- a computer programme product comprising a programme code stored on a computer-readable medium for performing the method steps according to any one of claims 1-10, which computer programme is run on an electronic control unit or another computer connected to the electronic control unit.
- Figure 1 depicts a side view of a vehicle 100.
- the exemplified vehicle 100 comprises a tractor unit 110 with a trailer 112.
- the vehicle may be a heavy vehicle, such as a truck or a bus.
- the vehicle may alternatively be a passenger car.
- link refers herein to a communication link which may be a physical connection such as an opto-electronic communication line, or a non-physical connection such as a wireless connection, e.g. a radio link or microwave link.
- Figure 2 depicts a subsystem 299 of the vehicle 100.
- the subsystem 299 is arranged in a tractor unit 110.
- the subsystem 299 comprises a fuel tank 230 for holding, for example, diesel, ethanol or petrol.
- the tank 230 may be adapted to hold any appropriate volume, for example 1500 litres.
- a low-pressure pump 240 is adapted to suck up fuel from the tank 230 via a first line 231.
- the low-pressure pump 240 is adapted to pressurise the fuel to approx. 8-12 bar.
- the low-pressure pump 240 is adapted to supply fuel to a valve device 250 via a second line 241.
- the valve device 250 may comprise an IMV valve.
- the valve device 250 may be an electromechanical valve which can be controlled by a first control unit 200.
- the first control unit 200 is adapted to communicate with the valve device 250 via a link L285.
- the first control unit 200 is adapted to control the valve device 250 such that a fuel flow can thus be regulated.
- the valve device 250 may manifest what is known as slip-stick under certain circumstances, such as after a certain amount of wear, ageing or if undesirable particles are present in the fuel.
- the valve device 250 is adapted to communicate flow to a high-pressure pump 260 via a third line 251.
- the high-pressure pump 260 is adapted to further pressurise the fuel and in this case feed the fuel to what is known as a common-rail unit 270 via a fourth line 261.
- Said common-rail unit 270 is adapted to hold said pressurised fuel.
- a pressure P_rail in the fuel present in said common-rail unit 270 may fall within a range of [500, 3000] bar.
- the fuel-supply system may comprise a further valve device (not depicted) which can be used independently of said valve device 250.
- Said further valve device may already be arranged in the immediate vicinity of said valve device 250.
- Said further valve device may be identical to said valve device 250.
- Said further valve device may a backup valve device.
- a control unit in the fuel-supply system may be adapted to deactivate said valve device 250 and activate said further valve device in the event that said valve device 250 is not functioning as intended. In this case, said fuel is conducted via said further valve device to the feed device from said container instead of via said valve device 250.
- the common-rail unit 270 communicates flow to a pressure-relief valve 290 via a fifth line 271.
- the pressure-relief valve 290 may be what is known as an MDV valve.
- the pressure-relief valve 290 may be a mechanical valve which is adapted to be opened at least partially in the event of an abnormal or inadvertent high pressure in the fuel in said common-rail unit 270.
- the pressure-relief valve 290 is adapted to communicate flow to the fuel tank 230 via a sixth line 291.
- Said common-rail unit 270 is adapted to supply fuel to cylinders in an engine 280 in the vehicle.
- the engine 280 has five cylinders, a, b, c, d, e.
- the first control unit 200 is adapted to communicate with the engine 280 via a link L281.
- the first control unit 200 is adapted to control the engine 280 by means of stored control routines.
- a speed sensor 282 is already arranged in the engine 280.
- the speed sensor 282 is adapted to continuously determine a prevailing speed in the engine 280.
- the speed sensor 282 is adapted to communicate with the first control unit 200 via a link L283.
- the speed sensor 282 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on a prevailing speed in the engine 280 to the first control unit 200 via the link L283.
- a pressure sensor 287 is already arranged in the common-rail unit 270.
- the pressure sensor 287 is adapted to continuously determine a prevailing pressure P_rail in the fuel in said common-rail unit 270.
- the pressure sensor 287 is adapted to communicate with the first control unit 200 via a link L288.
- the pressure sensor 287 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on a prevailing pressure P_rail to the first control unit 200 via the link L288.
- the first control unit 200 is adapted to continuously determine a quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine 280. This means continuously determining a prevailing fuel quantity dispensed to the engine 280. This may be effected on the basis of an acceleration demanded by means of an accelerator pedal 292.
- the accelerator pedal 292 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on acceleration demanded by a driver to the first control unit 200 via a link L283.
- the first control unit 200 may be further adapted to control, after said indication, the oscillating motion of said valve device to avoid slip-stick.
- a display screen 294 may be arranged in a cab in the vehicle 100.
- the first control unit 200 is adapted to communicate with the display screen 294 via a link L295.
- the display screen is adapted to indicate to a driver, where appropriate, that the valve device 250 is not functioning as intended.
- the first control unit 200 is adapted to determine a reference value P_rail_ref for said prevailing pressure P_rail. This may be effected on the basis of an acceleration demanded by means of the accelerator pedal 292.
- the accelerator pedal 292 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on acceleration demanded by a driver to the first control unit 200 via the link L293.
- the first control unit is adapted to:
- a second control unit 210 is adapted to communicate with the first control unit 200 via a link L211.
- the second control unit 210 may be detachably connected to the first control unit 200.
- the second control unit 210 may be a control unit external to the vehicle 100.
- the second control unit 210 may be adapted to perform the innovative method steps according to the invention.
- the second control unit 210 may be used to transfer software to the first control unit 200, particularly software for implementing the innovative method.
- the second control unit 210 may alternatively be adapted to communicate with the first control unit 200 via an internal network in the vehicle.
- the second control unit 210 may be adapted to perform essentially the same functions as the first control unit 200, for example determining the number of occasions within a specified period a progression in the fuel-supply pressure in the common-rail unit alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value which to a specified extent deviates from a predetermined reference value and, if said number of occasions exceeds a specified value, taking this as an indication that an IMV valve in the fuel supply system is not functioning as intended.
- Figure 3 illustrates schematically a diagram which describes a progression in the detected pressure P_rail in the fuel in the common-rail unit 270. According to this progression, the valve device 250 is manifesting what is known as slip-stick.
- the diagram shows a reference level P_rail_ref for the pressure in the fuel in the common-rail unit 270.
- This reference level can be determined by means of the first control unit 200.
- This reference level corresponds to a preferred reference value for the pressure in the fuel in the common-rail unit 270.
- a number of occasions N on which the maximum values and minimum values of the curve representing the pressure P_rail exceed or fall below said threshold values P_TH1 and P_TH2 respectively during a predetermined period of time DT is determined.
- the number of occasions N is determined for the value 6, namely for the determined minimum and maximum values max1, max2, max3, min1, min2 and min3. These values exceed or fall below said threshold values P_TH1 and P_TH2.
- the determined number of occasions N can then be compared to a predetermined value TH.
- TH may be 3.
- the determined number of occasions N exceeds TH, it can be determined that the valve device 250 is not functioning as intended (due to slip-stick).
- Figure 4a illustrates schematically a flowchart of a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the method comprises a first method step s401.
- the step s401 comprises the step of
- Figure 4b illustrates schematically a flowchart of a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, according to one embodiment of the invention.
- the method comprises a first method step s410.
- Method step s410 comprises the step of determining a prevailing operating status in said engine: The operating status may, for example, be determined on the basis of an engine speed and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for a preferred pressure in a common-rail 270 in the fuel supply system.
- a subsequent method step s415 is performed.
- the method step s415 comprises the step of determining whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary; the operating status may be regarded as stationary when the engine speed in the engine and/or the fuel supply to the engine is negligibly changed.
- the engine speed in the engine may be regarded as negligibly changed when this is not changed by more than +/-50 rpm during a predetermined period of time.
- the engine speed in the engine may be regarded as negligibly changed when this is not changed by more than +/-20 rpm during a predetermined period of time.
- the fuel supply to the engine may be regarded as negligibly changed when this is not changed by more than +/-20 rpm during a predetermined period of time.
- the method step s420 comprises the step of continuously determining a progression in said fuel-supply pressure P_rail during said determined operating status.
- the pressure sensor 287 may continuously detect a prevailing pressure in the fuel in said common-rail 270.
- the method step s430 comprises the step of determining the number of occasions N within a specified period DT said fuel-supply pressure P_rail alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value (e.g. max1, min1, max2, min2, max3, min3) that deviates from a predetermined reference value P_rail_ref by more than a predetermined deviation value.
- Said period DT may, for example, be 30 seconds.
- Said period DT may be shorter than 30 seconds.
- Said period DT may be longer than 30 seconds.
- Said maximum or minimum values are defined herein as the maximum values or minimum values of periodic oscillations in said continuously determined progression in said fuel-supply pressure P_rail.
- the method step s440 comprises the step of comparing the number of determined deviations according to step s430 with a predetermined value.
- Said predetermined value may be any appropriate value TH, for example 3 or 10, depending on the determined progression's frequency F and said specified period DT.
- the method step s450 comprises the step of determining whether the valve device 240 is functioning as intended. If said determined number of occasions exceeds said appropriate value TH, it may be determined that the valve device 240 is not functioning as intended. If said determined number of occasions falls below said appropriate value TH, it may be determined that the valve device 240 is functioning as intended. If it is determined that the valve device 240 is not functioning as intended, i.e. no, a subsequent method step s460 is performed. If it is determined that the valve device 240 is functioning as intended, i.e. yes, the method ends.
- the method step s460 comprises the step of indicating that said valve device 240 is not functioning as intended. This can be effected visually by means of a display screen arranged in the driver's cab. According to one embodiment, an error code is generated in the first control unit 200, which code indicates that the valve device 250 is not functioning as intended. After the method step s460, a subsequent method step s470 is performed.
- the method step s470 comprises the step of performing an action. This method step is optional. Said action may be any appropriate action. Said action may comprise changing a prevailing operating mode in the first control unit 200 to a different appropriate operating mode, for example a limp-home operating mode. The method ends after the method step s470.
- FIG. 5 depicts a diagram of an embodiment of a device 500.
- the control units 200 and 210 described with reference to Figure 2 may comprise the device 500.
- the device 500 comprises a non-volatile memory 520, a data processing unit 510 and a read/write memory 550.
- the non-volatile memory 520 has a first memory element 530 in which a computer programme, e.g. an operating system, is stored for controlling the function of the device 500.
- the device 500 further comprises a bus controller, a serial communication port, I/O means, an A/D converter, a time and date input and transmission unit, an event counter and an interruption controller (not depicted).
- the non-volatile memory 520 has also a second memory element 540.
- the programme P comprises routines for determining the operating status on the basis of an engine speed in the engine 230 and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for the preferred pressure in a common-rail in the fuel supply system.
- the programme P comprises routines for generating a predetermined error code at said indication.
- the programme P comprises routines for activating a further valve device and deactivating the valve device 250 at said indication.
- an incorrectly functioning valve device may be replaced by a backup valve device.
- the programme P comprises routines for controlling, after said indication, the oscillating motion of said valve device 250 to avoid slip-stick.
- the programme P may be stored in an executable form or compressed form in a memory of 560 and/or in a read/write memory 550.
- the data processing unit 510 performs a certain function, it means that the data processing unit 510 effects a certain part of the programme which is stored in the memory 560 or a certain part of the programme which is stored in the read/write memory 550.
- the data processing device 510 may communicate with a data port 599 via a data bus 515.
- the non-volatile memory 520 is intended for communication with the data processing unit 510 via a data bus 512.
- the separate memory 560 is intended to communicate with the data processing unit 510 via a data bus 511.
- the read/write memory 550 is adapted to communicate with the data processing unit 510 via a data bus 514.
- the links for example L211, L281, L283, L288, L293 and L295, may be connected to the data port 599 (see Figure 2 ).
- signals received on the data port 599 contain information on a prevailing fuel pressure P_rail in the common-rail unit 270.
- signals received on the data port 599 contain information on a prevailing speed in the vehicle's engine.
- the data processing device 500 comprises routines for continuously determining a prevailing quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine from the common-rail unit 270.
- the data processing device 500 comprises routines for continuously determining a demand for the preferred pressure P-rail in said common-rail 270 in the fuel-supply system.
- Parts of the methods herein described may be effected by the device 500 by means of the data processing unit 510 which runs the programme stored in the memory 560 or the read/write memory 550. When the device 500 runs the programme, methods herein described are executed.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Fuel-Injection Apparatus (AREA)
- Combined Controls Of Internal Combustion Engines (AREA)
- Electrical Control Of Air Or Fuel Supplied To Internal-Combustion Engine (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine. The invention relates also to a computer programme product comprising programme code for a computer for implementing a method according to the invention. The invention relates also to a device for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle and a motor vehicle equipped with the device.
- Modern motor vehicles may be equipped with a fuel system which has what is known as a common-rail. In this case, a low-pressure pump is adapted to suck up fuel from a fuel tank and feed the fuel through an IMV valve (Inlet metering valve) to a high-pressure pump. The high-pressure pump is adapted to pressurise the fuel by feeding the fuel to said common-rail for dispensing to a number of cylinders in the motor vehicle's engine. An MDV valve (Mechanical Dump Valve) is arranged on a return side of the fuel system which, when the fuel pressure in said common-rail is too high, functions as a pressure-relief valve allowing in this event a fuel flow back to the fuel tank.
- A control unit in the fuel system is arranged to control said IMV valve by continuously detecting a prevailing pressure of the fuel in said common-rail and comparing this against a preferred reference value for the pressure of the fuel. This can typically be effected by means of a regulator intended for this purpose and a PWM signal. It is of the utmost importance that the IMV valve can be quickly regulated.
It is also important that transient progressions relating to the quantity of dispensed fuel in the engine's cylinders do not cause a fuel pressure in said common-rail to fall or rise.
This imposes strict requirements that the IMV valve will react almost immediately to control information in the PWM signal. A known problem associated with said IMV valve is what is known as "slip-stick". This means that the valve is not able to alter a continuous fuel flow in the preferred manner. - There are a number of different possible sources for errors in the fuel system. For example, one of the feed pumps may fail. Alternatively, an unexpected leakage may occur, for example in fuel pipes or in said common-rail. At present, it is difficult to diagnose a source of error in the fuel system and troubleshooting is time-consuming. In some cases a correctly functioning unit may be needlessly replaced, which is both time-consuming and costly, especially if this fails to address the actual error.
- At present, error code is generated in the event the fuel system does not function as intended. This error code is, however, rather general, which is why isolated fuel-system components may not be clearly identified as the likely source of the error. The error code generated at present is therefore not always helpful to a mechanic at a service station.
- In this context, it should be noted that the IMV valve is a relatively cheap fuel-system component. It would therefore be advantageous to be able to isolate this particular component as the source of error in the event it fails to function as intended. With today's more general error codes, this may not always be possible.
-
DE102008044360 describes a fuel-injection system in an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle. The fuel-injection system comprises a fuel tank, fuel pump, control valve, common-rail and a control unit. The control unit is adapted to control the control valve and regulate the fuel flow to said common-rail. -
DE102006000483 describes a fuel-injection system in an internal combustion engine of a motor vehicle. The fuel-injection system comprises a fuel tank, a first fuel pump, control valve, a second fuel pump, common-rail and a control unit. The control unit is adapted to control the control valve and regulate the fuel flow to said second pump. -
US20030084871 describes a fuel dispensing system which is relevant when describing an excess supply of fuel to a common-rail from a high-pressure pump. Said excess supply of fuel is caused in this case by a faulty IMV valve. In the event of said excess supply of fuel, a setting for the engine's target idling speed is modified.US 2006/243244 A1 describes a method for detection of a defective volume flow control valve in a fuel injection system in an internal combustion engine. The method is performed only when the fuel injection is switched off and detects leaking valves. - There is a need to be able to reliably identify a source of error in the fuel-supply system. It is particularly desirable to be able to isolate the IMV valve as the likely source of the error in the event that it does not satisfy the appropriate performance requirements, for example in a case where it begins to manifest excessive slip-stick.
- The IMV valve can be controlled, for example, by a PWM signal. An open IMV valve means that fuel is released to the high-pressure pump which it turn means that the pressure in said common-rail increases. To lower the pressure, the fuel flow to the high-pressure pump may be choked off combined with the fuel leaving said common-rail as it is dispensed to the engine's cylinders. It is of the utmost importance that the preferred fuel pressure can be quickly regulated and that the pressure does not fall or rise in the event of sudden changes to the dispensed quantity of fuel. This imposes strict requirements that the IMV valve will react quickly to changes in the generated PWM signal. Slip-stick means that, in the event of a change in the PWM signal, the IMV valve's position is not immediately changed unless the change in the PWM signal is of major significance. The inventors of the present invention have found that when the IMV valve finally moves, the control error in the regulation system has been integrated, causing the IMV valve's position to move too far. The inventors of the present invention have found that this can cause major fluctuations in the fuel pressure. If the pressure is too high, this may cause the pressure-relief valve to open, generating an error code and restricting the engine's performance. An error code may also be generated if the pressure is too low and should the pressure become too low, this may cause the engine to stop. Said error codes for high and low pressure respectively do not however necessarily indicate that the IMV valve is seizing up (slip-stick). A number of different sources of errors in the fuel system are possible. To facilitate troubleshooting, the present invention proposes a diagnosis which clearly indicates that the IMV valve is faulty if such is the case.
- One object of the present invention is to propose a novel and advantageous method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle.
- Another object of the invention is to propose a novel and advantageous device and a novel and advantageous computer programme for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle.
- A further object of the invention is to propose a method, a device and a computer programme for precisely isolating a source of errors in a fuel system in a motor vehicle.
- A further object of the invention is to propose a cost-effective method, device and computer programme for error detection in a fuel supply system in a motor vehicle.
- Another object of the invention is to propose an alternative method, a novel and advantageous device and a novel and advantageous computer programme for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle.
- These objects are achieved through a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising a feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine according to
claim 1. - According to one aspect of the invention, a method is proposed for error detection in a fuel-supply system comprising a feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, comprising the steps of:
- determining a prevailing operating status in said engine:
- determining whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary;
- continuously determining a progression in said fuel-supply pressure during said predetermined operating status. The method also comprises the steps of:
- determining the number of occasions within a specified period said fuel-supply pressure alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value that deviates from a predetermined reference value by more than a predetermined deviation value;
- if said number of occasions exceeds a specified value, taking this as an indication that said valve device is not functioning as intended.
- The operating status can be determined on the basis of an engine speed and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for a preferred pressure in a common-rail in the fuel supply system.
- That said operating status is to be regarded as stationary means that said operating status is stationary or at least essentially stationary.
- That said operating status is to be regarded as stationary means that said operating status is determined to be stationary or at least essentially stationary.
- Said operating status may be considered stationary when the engine speed (n) and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine (280) is negligibly changed.
- The fuel-supply system may be a common-rail-type system.
- Said reference value may be determined on the basis of said predetermined operating status.
- Said period may fall within a range of [10, 50] seconds.
- Said predetermined deviation value may be 20 bar or more.
- The number of occasions may be a value within the range of [5, 25] occasions.
- When a prevailing operating status in said engine corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary, only very small changes in the generated PWM need to be made to maintain the preferred fuel-supply pressure. Under these conditions, according to the method according to the invention, an IMW valve with slip-stick can be identified if the determined fuel-supply pressure manifests relatively powerful and relatively slow vibrations/oscillations. This is dependent on the initial negligible PWM changes not causing the IMV valve to move and also on the generated PWM increasing as the regulating error worsens. Ultimately the IMV valve "loosens" and as the control signal is integrated, this leads to fluctuations in the fuel-supply pressure. When the fuel-supply pressure is then regulated in the other direction, the corresponding phenomenon appears again. This causes the measured fuel pressure to have a relatively "sinus-shaped" appearance, i.e. an oscillating progression. Other types of error/sources of error, such as an excessively worn high-pressure pump, do not cause corresponding oscillations.
- The method may further comprise the step of:
- generating a predetermined error code at said indication.
- The method may further comprise the step of:
- controlling, after said indication, the oscillating motion of said valve device to avoid slip-stick. In this case, a control unit may be adapted to continuously control said valve device by means of a control signal to achieve a relatively high-frequency oscillating motion of the valve device. In the case, a valve in the valve device will not be in a constant position but rather oscillate around a predetermined position.
- The method is simple to implement in existing motor vehicles. Software for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine according to the invention, can be installed in a control unit in the vehicle during the manufacture thereof. A purchaser of the vehicle may thus have the possibility of selecting the function of the method as an option. Alternatively, software which comprises programme code for executing the innovative method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a vehicle may be installed in a control unit of the vehicle on the occasion of upgrading at a service station. in which case the software may be loaded into a memory of the control unit. Implementation of the innovative method is thus cost-effective, particularly as, according to one aspect of the invention, no further components need to be installed in the vehicle. Necessary hardware is currently already provided in the vehicle. The invention therefore proposes a cost-effective solution to the problems stated above.
- Software comprising programme code for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle can be easily updated or replaced. Other components of the software can also be replaced independently of one another. This modular configuration is advantageous from a maintenance perspective.
- According to one aspect of the invention, a device is proposed for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising a feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, comprising:
- means for determining a prevailing operating status in said engine:
- means for determining whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary;
- means for continuously determining a progression in said fuel-supply pressure during said predetermined operating status.
- means for determining the number of occasions within a specified period said fuel-supply pressure alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value that deviates from a predetermined reference value by more than a predetermined deviation value; and
- means, if the number of occasions exceeds a specified value, for taking this as an indication that said valve device is not functioning as intended.
- The device may further comprise means for determining the operating status on the basis of an engine speed and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for a preferred pressure in a common-rail in the fuel supply system.
- The device may comprise a common-rail unit.
- The device may comprise means for determining said reference value on the basis of said predetermined operating status.
- The device may further comprise:
- means for generating a predetermined error code at said indication.
- The device may further comprise:
- a further feed device which is arranged between said container and said valve device.
- The device may further comprise a further valve device which can be used independently of said valve device. Said further valve device already be arranged in the immediate vicinity of said valve device. Said further valve device may be identical to said valve device. Said further valve device may a backup valve device. A control unit in the fuel-supply system may be adapted to deactivate said valve device and activate said further valve device in the event that said valve device is not functioning as intended. In this case, said fuel may be conducted via said further valve device to the feed device from said container, instead of via said valve device.
- The device may further comprise:
- means for controlling, after said indication, the oscillating motion of said valve device to avoid slip-stick.
- The foregoing object is also achieved with a motor vehicle comprising the characteristic device for error detection in a fuel-supply system. The motor vehicle may be a truck, bus or passenger car.
- According to one aspect of the invention, a computer programme is proposed for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle, which computer programme comprises programme code stored on a computer-readable medium in order to cause an electronic control unit or another computer connected to the electronic control unit to perform the steps according to any one of claims 1-10.
- According to an aspect of the invention, a computer programme is proposed for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle, which computer programme comprises programme code for causing an electronic control unit or another computer connected to the electronic control unit to perform the steps according to any one of claims 1-10.
- According to one aspect of the invention, a computer programme product is proposed comprising a programme code stored on a computer-readable medium for performing the method steps according to any one of claims 1-10, which computer programme is run on an electronic control unit or another computer connected to the electronic control unit.
- Further objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent to one skilled in the art from the following details, and also by putting the invention into practice. Whereas the invention is described below, it should be noted that it is not limited to the specific details described. Specialists who have access to the teachings herein will recognise further applications, modifications and incorporations within other fields, which are within the scope of the invention.
- For a more complete understanding of the present invention and further objects and advantages thereof, the detailed description set out below should be read together with the accompanying drawings, in which the same reference notations denote similar items in the various drawings, and in which:
-
Figure 1 illustrates schematically a vehicle; -
Figure 2 illustrates schematically a subsystem for the vehicle depicted inFigure 1 , -
Figure 3 illustrates schematically a diagram of a progression according to one aspect of the present invention; -
Figure 4a illustrates schematically a flowchart of a method according to one embodiment of the invention; -
Figure 4b illustrates schematically in more detail a flowchart of a method according to one embodiment of the invention; and -
Figure 5 illustrates schematically a computer according to one embodiment of the invention. -
Figure 1 depicts a side view of avehicle 100. The exemplifiedvehicle 100 comprises atractor unit 110 with atrailer 112. The vehicle may be a heavy vehicle, such as a truck or a bus. The vehicle may alternatively be a passenger car. - The term "link" refers herein to a communication link which may be a physical connection such as an opto-electronic communication line, or a non-physical connection such as a wireless connection, e.g. a radio link or microwave link.
-
Figure 2 depicts asubsystem 299 of thevehicle 100. Thesubsystem 299 is arranged in atractor unit 110. Thesubsystem 299 comprises afuel tank 230 for holding, for example, diesel, ethanol or petrol. Thetank 230 may be adapted to hold any appropriate volume, for example 1500 litres. - A low-
pressure pump 240 is adapted to suck up fuel from thetank 230 via afirst line 231. The low-pressure pump 240 is adapted to pressurise the fuel to approx. 8-12 bar. The low-pressure pump 240 is adapted to supply fuel to avalve device 250 via asecond line 241. - The
valve device 250 may comprise an IMV valve. Thevalve device 250 may be an electromechanical valve which can be controlled by afirst control unit 200. Thefirst control unit 200 is adapted to communicate with thevalve device 250 via a link L285. Thefirst control unit 200 is adapted to control thevalve device 250 such that a fuel flow can thus be regulated. Thevalve device 250 may manifest what is known as slip-stick under certain circumstances, such as after a certain amount of wear, ageing or if undesirable particles are present in the fuel. - The
valve device 250 is adapted to communicate flow to a high-pressure pump 260 via athird line 251. The high-pressure pump 260 is adapted to further pressurise the fuel and in this case feed the fuel to what is known as a common-rail unit 270 via afourth line 261. Said common-rail unit 270 is adapted to hold said pressurised fuel. A pressure P_rail in the fuel present in said common-rail unit 270 may fall within a range of [500, 3000] bar. - The fuel-supply system may comprise a further valve device (not depicted) which can be used independently of said
valve device 250. Said further valve device may already be arranged in the immediate vicinity of saidvalve device 250. Said further valve device may be identical to saidvalve device 250. Said further valve device may a backup valve device. A control unit in the fuel-supply system may be adapted to deactivate saidvalve device 250 and activate said further valve device in the event that saidvalve device 250 is not functioning as intended. In this case, said fuel is conducted via said further valve device to the feed device from said container instead of via saidvalve device 250. - The common-
rail unit 270 communicates flow to a pressure-relief valve 290 via afifth line 271. The pressure-relief valve 290 may be what is known as an MDV valve. The pressure-relief valve 290 may be a mechanical valve which is adapted to be opened at least partially in the event of an abnormal or inadvertent high pressure in the fuel in said common-rail unit 270. The pressure-relief valve 290 is adapted to communicate flow to thefuel tank 230 via asixth line 291. - Said common-
rail unit 270 is adapted to supply fuel to cylinders in anengine 280 in the vehicle. According to one example, theengine 280 has five cylinders, a, b, c, d, e. - The
first control unit 200 is adapted to communicate with theengine 280 via a link L281. Thefirst control unit 200 is adapted to control theengine 280 by means of stored control routines. - A
speed sensor 282 is already arranged in theengine 280. Thespeed sensor 282 is adapted to continuously determine a prevailing speed in theengine 280. Thespeed sensor 282 is adapted to communicate with thefirst control unit 200 via a link L283. Thespeed sensor 282 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on a prevailing speed in theengine 280 to thefirst control unit 200 via the link L283. - A
pressure sensor 287 is already arranged in the common-rail unit 270. Thepressure sensor 287 is adapted to continuously determine a prevailing pressure P_rail in the fuel in said common-rail unit 270. Thepressure sensor 287 is adapted to communicate with thefirst control unit 200 via a link L288. Thepressure sensor 287 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on a prevailing pressure P_rail to thefirst control unit 200 via the link L288. - The
first control unit 200 is adapted to continuously determine a quantity of fuel dispensed to theengine 280. This means continuously determining a prevailing fuel quantity dispensed to theengine 280. This may be effected on the basis of an acceleration demanded by means of anaccelerator pedal 292. Theaccelerator pedal 292 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on acceleration demanded by a driver to thefirst control unit 200 via a link L283. - The
first control unit 200 may be further adapted to control, after said indication, the oscillating motion of said valve device to avoid slip-stick. - A
display screen 294 may be arranged in a cab in thevehicle 100. Thefirst control unit 200 is adapted to communicate with thedisplay screen 294 via a link L295. The display screen is adapted to indicate to a driver, where appropriate, that thevalve device 250 is not functioning as intended. - According to one embodiment, the
first control unit 200 is adapted to determine a reference value P_rail_ref for said prevailing pressure P_rail. This may be effected on the basis of an acceleration demanded by means of theaccelerator pedal 292. Theaccelerator pedal 292 is adapted to continuously send signals containing information on acceleration demanded by a driver to thefirst control unit 200 via the link L293. - According to one embodiment, the first control unit is adapted to:
- determine a prevailing operating status in said engine 280:
- determine whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary;
- continuously determine a progression in said fuel-supply pressure P_rail during said predetermined operating status;
- determine the number of occasions N within a specified period DT said fuel-supply pressure P_rail alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value that deviates from a predetermined reference value P_rail_ref by more than a predetermined deviation value;
- if the number of occasions N exceeds a specified value TH, take this as an indication that said
valve device 250 is not functioning as intended. - A
second control unit 210 is adapted to communicate with thefirst control unit 200 via a link L211. Thesecond control unit 210 may be detachably connected to thefirst control unit 200. Thesecond control unit 210 may be a control unit external to thevehicle 100. Thesecond control unit 210 may be adapted to perform the innovative method steps according to the invention. Thesecond control unit 210 may be used to transfer software to thefirst control unit 200, particularly software for implementing the innovative method. Thesecond control unit 210 may alternatively be adapted to communicate with thefirst control unit 200 via an internal network in the vehicle. Thesecond control unit 210 may be adapted to perform essentially the same functions as thefirst control unit 200, for example determining the number of occasions within a specified period a progression in the fuel-supply pressure in the common-rail unit alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value which to a specified extent deviates from a predetermined reference value and, if said number of occasions exceeds a specified value, taking this as an indication that an IMV valve in the fuel supply system is not functioning as intended. -
Figure 3 illustrates schematically a diagram which describes a progression in the detected pressure P_rail in the fuel in the common-rail unit 270. According to this progression, thevalve device 250 is manifesting what is known as slip-stick. - The diagram shows a reference level P_rail_ref for the pressure in the fuel in the common-
rail unit 270. This reference level can be determined by means of thefirst control unit 200. This reference level corresponds to a preferred reference value for the pressure in the fuel in the common-rail unit 270. - This illustrates how the pressure P_rail varies with the time T. In cases where the
valve device 250 manifests slip-stick, the pressure P_rail will assume an essentially sinus-shaped curve, as illustrated inFigure 3 . - According to one aspect of the invention, the threshold values P_TH1 and P_TH2 are provided. Said threshold values may be determined to correspond to a pressure P_TH1 = P_rail-20 bar and P_TH2 = P_rail+20 bar respectively. According one alternative, said threshold values P_TH1 and P_TH2 are defined in any appropriate way.
- According to one aspect of the invention, a number of occasions N on which the maximum values and minimum values of the curve representing the pressure P_rail exceed or fall below said threshold values P_TH1 and P_TH2 respectively during a predetermined period of time DT is determined.
- According to this example, the number of occasions N is determined for the value 6, namely for the determined minimum and maximum values max1, max2, max3, min1, min2 and min3. These values exceed or fall below said threshold values P_TH1 and P_TH2.
- The determined number of occasions N can then be compared to a predetermined value TH. According to this example, TH may be 3. As the determined number of occasions N exceeds TH, it can be determined that the
valve device 250 is not functioning as intended (due to slip-stick). -
Figure 4a illustrates schematically a flowchart of a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, according to one embodiment of the invention. The method comprises a first method step s401. The step s401 comprises the step of - determining whether a determined operating status prevails in said engine, which operating status is regarded as stationary;
- continuously determining a progression in said fuel-supply pressure during said determined operating status.
- determining the number of occasions within a specified period the progression in said fuel-supply pressure alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value which to a specified extent deviates from a predetermined reference value;
- if the number of occasions exceeds a specified value, taking this as an indication that said valve device is not functioning as intended. The method ends after step s401.
-
Figure 4b illustrates schematically a flowchart of a method for error detection in a fuel-supply system in a motor vehicle comprising at least one feed device for achieving a fuel-supply pressure in an engine and a valve device via which fuel is supplied to the feed device from a container, in addition to devices for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine, according to one embodiment of the invention. - The method comprises a first method step s410. Method step s410 comprises the step of determining a prevailing operating status in said engine: The operating status may, for example, be determined on the basis of an engine speed and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for a preferred pressure in a common-
rail 270 in the fuel supply system. After the method step s410, a subsequent method step s415 is performed. - The method step s415 comprises the step of determining whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary; the operating status may be regarded as stationary when the engine speed in the engine and/or the fuel supply to the engine is negligibly changed. According to one example, the engine speed in the engine may be regarded as negligibly changed when this is not changed by more than +/-50 rpm during a predetermined period of time. According to one example, the engine speed in the engine may be regarded as negligibly changed when this is not changed by more than +/-20 rpm during a predetermined period of time. According to one example, the fuel supply to the engine may be regarded as negligibly changed when this is not changed by more than +/-20 rpm during a predetermined period of time. After the method step s415, a subsequent method step s420 is performed.
- The method step s420 comprises the step of continuously determining a progression in said fuel-supply pressure P_rail during said determined operating status. In this case, the
pressure sensor 287 may continuously detect a prevailing pressure in the fuel in said common-rail 270. After the method step s420, a subsequent method step s430 is performed. - The method step s430 comprises the step of determining the number of occasions N within a specified period DT said fuel-supply pressure P_rail alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value (e.g. max1, min1, max2, min2, max3, min3) that deviates from a predetermined reference value P_rail_ref by more than a predetermined deviation value. Said period DT may, for example, be 30 seconds. Said period DT may be shorter than 30 seconds. Said period DT may be longer than 30 seconds. Said maximum or minimum values are defined herein as the maximum values or minimum values of periodic oscillations in said continuously determined progression in said fuel-supply pressure P_rail. Each occasion a maximum or minimum value exceeds or falls below P_TH2 and P_TH1 described above, this is registered for an accumulated calculation of the number of occasions during said specified period DT. After the method step s430, a subsequent method step s440 is carried out.
- The method step s440 comprises the step of comparing the number of determined deviations according to step s430 with a predetermined value. Said predetermined value may be any appropriate value TH, for example 3 or 10, depending on the determined progression's frequency F and said specified period DT. After the method step s440, a subsequent method step s450 is performed.
- The method step s450 comprises the step of determining whether the
valve device 240 is functioning as intended. If said determined number of occasions exceeds said appropriate value TH, it may be determined that thevalve device 240 is not functioning as intended. If said determined number of occasions falls below said appropriate value TH, it may be determined that thevalve device 240 is functioning as intended. If it is determined that thevalve device 240 is not functioning as intended, i.e. no, a subsequent method step s460 is performed. If it is determined that thevalve device 240 is functioning as intended, i.e. yes, the method ends. - The method step s460 comprises the step of indicating that said
valve device 240 is not functioning as intended. This can be effected visually by means of a display screen arranged in the driver's cab. According to one embodiment, an error code is generated in thefirst control unit 200, which code indicates that thevalve device 250 is not functioning as intended. After the method step s460, a subsequent method step s470 is performed. - The method step s470 comprises the step of performing an action. This method step is optional. Said action may be any appropriate action. Said action may comprise changing a prevailing operating mode in the
first control unit 200 to a different appropriate operating mode, for example a limp-home operating mode. The method ends after the method step s470. -
Figure 5 depicts a diagram of an embodiment of adevice 500. In one embodiment, thecontrol units Figure 2 may comprise thedevice 500. Thedevice 500 comprises anon-volatile memory 520, adata processing unit 510 and a read/write memory 550. Thenon-volatile memory 520 has afirst memory element 530 in which a computer programme, e.g. an operating system, is stored for controlling the function of thedevice 500. Thedevice 500 further comprises a bus controller, a serial communication port, I/O means, an A/D converter, a time and date input and transmission unit, an event counter and an interruption controller (not depicted). Thenon-volatile memory 520 has also asecond memory element 540. - In this case, a computer programme P is proposed comprising routines for:
- determining a prevailing operating status in said engine:
- determining whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as be stationary;
- continuously determining a progression in said fuel-supply pressure during said predetermined operating status.
- determining the number of occasions within a specified period said fuel-supply pressure alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value that deviates from a predetermined reference value by more than a predetermined deviation value;
- if the number of occasions exceeds a specified value, taking this as an indication that said valve device is not functioning as intended.
- According to one embodiment, the programme P comprises routines for determining the operating status on the basis of an engine speed in the
engine 230 and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine and/or the demand for the preferred pressure in a common-rail in the fuel supply system. - According to one embodiment, the programme P comprises routines for generating a predetermined error code at said indication.
- According to one embodiment, the programme P comprises routines for activating a further valve device and deactivating the
valve device 250 at said indication. In this case, an incorrectly functioning valve device may be replaced by a backup valve device. - According to one embodiment, the programme P comprises routines for controlling, after said indication, the oscillating motion of said
valve device 250 to avoid slip-stick. - The programme P may be stored in an executable form or compressed form in a memory of 560 and/or in a read/
write memory 550. - Where it is stated that the
data processing unit 510 performs a certain function, it means that thedata processing unit 510 effects a certain part of the programme which is stored in thememory 560 or a certain part of the programme which is stored in the read/write memory 550. - The
data processing device 510 may communicate with adata port 599 via adata bus 515. Thenon-volatile memory 520 is intended for communication with thedata processing unit 510 via adata bus 512. Theseparate memory 560 is intended to communicate with thedata processing unit 510 via adata bus 511. The read/write memory 550 is adapted to communicate with thedata processing unit 510 via adata bus 514. The links, for example L211, L281, L283, L288, L293 and L295, may be connected to the data port 599 (seeFigure 2 ). - When data are received on the
data port 599, they are stored temporarily in thesecond memory element 540. When input data received have been temporarily stored, thedata processing unit 510 will be ready to effect code execution in a manner described above. According to one embodiment, signals received on thedata port 599 contain information on a prevailing fuel pressure P_rail in the common-rail unit 270. According to one embodiment, signals received on thedata port 599 contain information on a prevailing speed in the vehicle's engine. According to one embodiment, thedata processing device 500 comprises routines for continuously determining a prevailing quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine from the common-rail unit 270. According to one embodiment, thedata processing device 500 comprises routines for continuously determining a demand for the preferred pressure P-rail in said common-rail 270 in the fuel-supply system. - Parts of the methods herein described may be effected by the
device 500 by means of thedata processing unit 510 which runs the programme stored in thememory 560 or the read/write memory 550. When thedevice 500 runs the programme, methods herein described are executed. - The foregoing description of the preferred embodiments of the present invention is provided for illustrative and descriptive purposes. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the variants described. Many modifications and variants will obviously be apparent to one skilled in the art, the scope of protection being defined by the appended claims. The embodiments have been chosen and described in order best to make clear the principles of the invention and its practical applications and hence to make it possible for one skilled in the art to understand the invention for various embodiments and with the various modifications appropriate to the intended use.
Claims (25)
- Method for error detection in a fuel-supply system comprising a feed device (260) for achieving a fuel-supply pressure (P-rail) in an engine (280) and a valve device (250) via which fuel is supplied to the feed device (260) from a container (230) in addition to devices (287) for identifying said fuel-supply pressure (P_rail) in said engine (280), comprising the steps of:- determining (s410) a prevailing operating status in said engine (280):- determining (s415) whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary;- continuously determining (s420) a progression in said fuel-supply pressure (P_rail) during said predetermined operating status;characterised by the steps of:determining (s430) the number of occasions (N) within a specified period (DT) said fuel-supply pressure (P_rail) alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value (max1, min1, max2, min2, max3, min3) that deviates from a predetermined reference value (P_rail_ref) by more than a predetermined deviation value;- if said number of occasions (N) exceeds a specified value (TH), taking this as an indication that said valve device (250) is not functioning as intended.
- Method according to claim 1, where the operating status is determined on the basis of an engine speed (n) and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine (280) and/or the demand for the predetermined reference value (P_rail_ref) in a common-rail in the fuel supply system.
- Method according to claims 1 or 2, where said operating status is regarded as stationary when the engine speed (n) and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine (280) is negligibly changed.
- Method according to any one of the foregoing claims where the fuel-supply system is a common-rail-type system.
- Method according to any one of the foregoing claims, whereby said reference value (P _rail_ref) is determined on the basis of said predetermined operating status.
- Method according any one of the foregoing claims, where said period (DT) falls within a range of [10, 50] seconds.
- Method according to any one of the foregoing claims, whereby said predetermined deviation value is 20 bar or more.
- Method according any one of the foregoing claims, whereby the number of occasions (N) falls within the range of [5, 25] occasions.
- Method according to any one of the foregoing claims, further comprising the step of:- generating (s460) a predetermined error code at said indication.
- Method according to any one of the foregoing claims, further comprising the step of:- controlling (s470), after said indication, the oscillating motion of said valve device.
- Device for error detection in a fuel-supply system comprising a feed device (260) for achieving a fuel-supply pressure (P-rail) in an engine (280) and a valve device (250) via which fuel is supplied to the feed device (260) from a container (230), in addition to devices (287) for identifying said fuel-supply pressure in said engine (280), comprising:- means (200; 210; 500) for determining a prevailing operating status in said engine:- means (200; 210; 500) for determining whether said determined operating status corresponds to a predetermined operating status, which operating status is regarded as stationary;- means (200; 210; 500) for continuously determining a progression in said fuel-supply pressure (P_rail) during said predetermined operating status. characterised by:- means (200; 210; 500) for determining the number of occasions (N) within a specified period (DT) said fuel-supply pressure (P_rail) alternately reaches a maximum or minimum value (max1, min1, max2, min2, max3, min3) that deviates from a predetermined reference value (P_rail_ref) by more than a predetermined deviation value; and- means (200; 210; 500), if said number of occasions (N) exceeds a specified value (TH), for taking this as an indication that said valve device (250) is not functioning as intended.
- Device according to claim 11, further comprising means (200; 210; 500) for determining the operating status on the basis of an engine speed (n) and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine (280) and/or the demand for the predetermined reference value (P_rail_ref) in a common-rail in the fuel supply system.
- Device according to claims 11 or 12, where said operating status is regarded as stationary when the engine speed (n) and/or the quantity of fuel dispensed to the engine (280) is negligibly changed.
- Device according to any one claims 11-13, where the fuel-supply system is a common-rail-type system.
- Device according to any one of claims 11-14, comprising means (200; 210; 500) for determining said reference value (P_rail-ref) on the basis of said predetermined operating status.
- Device according to anyone of claims 11-15, where said period (DT) falls within a range of [10, 50] seconds.
- Device according to any one of claims 11-16, whereby said predetermined deviation value is 20 bar or more.
- Device according to any one of claims 11-17, whereby the number of occasions (N) falls within the range of [5, 25] occasions.
- Device according to any one of claims 11-18, further comprising:- means (200; 210; 500) for generating a predetermined error code at said indication.
- Device according to any one of claims 11-19, further comprising:- a further feed device (240) which is arranged between said container (230) and said valve device (250).
- Device according to any one of claims 11-20, further comprising:- a further valve device which can be used independently of said valve device (250).
- Device according to any one of claims 11-21, further comprising:- means (200; 210; 500) for controlling, after said indication, the oscillating motion of said valve device (250).
- A motor vehicle (100; 110) comprising a device according to any one of claims 11-22.
- Motor vehicle (100; 110) according to claim 23, which motor vehicle is any one from among a truck, bus or passenger car.
- Computer programme product comprising a programme code stored on a computer-readable medium for performing the method steps according to any one of claims 1-10, which computer programme code, when executed on an electronic control unit (200; 500) or another computer (210; 500) connected to the electronic control unit (200; 500), cause the computer to perform the method steps according to any one of claims 1-10.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
SE1151190 | 2011-12-13 | ||
PCT/SE2012/051367 WO2013089621A1 (en) | 2011-12-13 | 2012-12-10 | Device and method for fault detection in a fuel supply system of a motor vehicle |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2791496A1 EP2791496A1 (en) | 2014-10-22 |
EP2791496A4 EP2791496A4 (en) | 2015-12-02 |
EP2791496B1 true EP2791496B1 (en) | 2017-09-20 |
Family
ID=51538752
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP12856964.7A Not-in-force EP2791496B1 (en) | 2011-12-13 | 2012-12-10 | Device and method for fault detection in a fuel supply system of a motor vehicle |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2791496B1 (en) |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
IT1261575B (en) * | 1993-09-03 | 1996-05-23 | Fiat Ricerche | METHOD OF DIAGNOSIS OF MALFUNCTIONS OF THE HIGH PRESSURE CIRCUIT OF HIGH PRESSURE INJECTION SYSTEMS FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES |
DE19757594C2 (en) * | 1997-12-23 | 2002-11-28 | Siemens Ag | Method and device for monitoring the function of a pressure regulator |
US6053147A (en) * | 1998-03-02 | 2000-04-25 | Cummins Engine Company, Inc. | Apparatus and method for diagnosing erratic pressure sensor operation in a fuel system of an internal combustion engine |
DE19950222A1 (en) * | 1999-10-19 | 2001-04-26 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Procedure for diagnosis of fuel supply system of IC engine has recording of variation of fuel pressure in system, formation of frequency spectrum of fuel pressure variation and analysis thereof |
DE10329331B3 (en) * | 2003-06-30 | 2005-05-25 | Siemens Ag | Method for diagnosing a volume flow control valve in an internal combustion engine with high-pressure accumulator injection system |
US7286945B2 (en) * | 2003-11-19 | 2007-10-23 | Honeywell International Inc. | Apparatus and method for identifying possible defect indicators for a valve |
DE102005004423B3 (en) * | 2005-01-31 | 2006-06-14 | Siemens Ag | Fuel injection system`s operability monitoring method for use in internal combustion engine, involves identifying source of defect based on difference of measured temporal behavior of pressure and desired value characteristic |
-
2012
- 2012-12-10 EP EP12856964.7A patent/EP2791496B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
None * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2791496A4 (en) | 2015-12-02 |
EP2791496A1 (en) | 2014-10-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US20140352416A1 (en) | Device and method for fault detection in a fuel supply system of a motor vehicle | |
US10526994B2 (en) | Methods and system for diagnosing a high-pressure fuel pump in a fuel system | |
EP1832737B1 (en) | Abnormality-determining device and method for fuel supply system | |
US7444993B2 (en) | Method for monitoring the operability of a fuel injection system | |
US9567937B2 (en) | Method and device for operating a fuel injection device, especially of a motor vehicle | |
US20130019670A1 (en) | Method for detecting a malfunction in an electronically regulated fuel injection system of an internal combustion engine | |
JPH10299557A (en) | Fuel injection device for internal combustion engine | |
JP2009257277A (en) | High pressure fuel control device | |
US11668262B2 (en) | Methods and system for diagnosing a high-pressure fuel pump in a fuel system | |
KR101858785B1 (en) | Method for controlling the rail pressure of an internal combustion engine | |
EP1790844A1 (en) | Method for identifying anomalous behaviour of a dynamic system | |
US10309335B2 (en) | Fuel-supply system for an internal combustion engine | |
US9638377B2 (en) | Method for determining a value of a current | |
EP2999878B1 (en) | Method and device for functional control of a high pressure fuel pump | |
CN113405746A (en) | Leakage fault diagnosis method and device for oil rail pressure release valve | |
EP2791496B1 (en) | Device and method for fault detection in a fuel supply system of a motor vehicle | |
US20130024092A1 (en) | Device for preventing the engine from stalling in a vehicle equipped with a diesel injection system | |
US8108124B2 (en) | Method for determining an uncontrolled acceleration of an internal combustion engine | |
EP3047137A1 (en) | Hybrid fuel injection equipment | |
JP5959060B2 (en) | Pressure limit valve opening detection method and common rail fuel injection control device | |
CN101466934B (en) | Method of testing the functioning of a component of a fuel injection system | |
JP6837940B2 (en) | Internal combustion engine drive control method and internal combustion engine drive control device | |
WO2020088793A1 (en) | Fuel control system | |
CN116335841B (en) | Control method and system for electric oil delivery pump of diesel engine based on fault self-diagnosis | |
US10711726B2 (en) | Fuel delivery system |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20140714 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: RUNDQVIST, ERIK Inventor name: DYRSCH, RIKARD |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RA4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected) |
Effective date: 20151103 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: F02D 41/38 20060101ALI20151028BHEP Ipc: F02M 63/02 20060101ALI20151028BHEP Ipc: F02M 65/00 20060101AFI20151028BHEP Ipc: F02M 37/00 20060101ALI20151028BHEP Ipc: F02M 55/02 20060101ALI20151028BHEP |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170428 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 930356 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20171015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602012037661 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171220 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 930356 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171220 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20171221 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180120 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602012037661 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20180621 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20171220 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171210 Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171210 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20171231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171210 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171231 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171231 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171231 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20171220 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20121210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20191126 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170920 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602012037661 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210701 |