EP2612103A1 - Vorrichtung und verfahren zur erkennung und abwehr einer gefahr auf see - Google Patents

Vorrichtung und verfahren zur erkennung und abwehr einer gefahr auf see

Info

Publication number
EP2612103A1
EP2612103A1 EP11761715.9A EP11761715A EP2612103A1 EP 2612103 A1 EP2612103 A1 EP 2612103A1 EP 11761715 A EP11761715 A EP 11761715A EP 2612103 A1 EP2612103 A1 EP 2612103A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
intrusion
sequences
threat
reaction
danger
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP11761715.9A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Bernard Alhadef
Pierre Bock
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sofresud
Original Assignee
Sofresud
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sofresud filed Critical Sofresud
Publication of EP2612103A1 publication Critical patent/EP2612103A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41HARMOUR; ARMOURED TURRETS; ARMOURED OR ARMED VEHICLES; MEANS OF ATTACK OR DEFENCE, e.g. CAMOUFLAGE, IN GENERAL
    • F41H11/00Defence installations; Defence devices
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a device and a method for detecting and neutralizing a naval threat.
  • the invention relates more particularly to the field of the close protection of maritime platforms against malicious intrusions or acts of piracy. It represents a global process of alerting and generating a graduated response to criminal or criminal intrusions that can be conducted from skiffs or small, fast and agile naval craft against a floating installation.
  • the overall process characterizing the invention is able to efficiently collaborate various sensors as well as various reaction means performing elementary functions of limited scope.
  • One of the privileged fields of application of the invention is the close protection of off-shore oil rigs, by allowing, after determining the dangerousness of the detected intrusion, to prevent in real time the ground level authorities of the level. criticality of this intrusion, and also to trigger the securing of personnel and equipment of the platform.
  • VTS Vessel Traffic Services
  • SPATIONAV a naval surveillance system for maritime areas and areas under national jurisdiction.
  • SPATIONAV a naval surveillance system for maritime areas and areas under national jurisdiction.
  • SPATIONAV it is firstly a question of creating an image of maritime traffic of the maritime approaches of France, which is as exhaustive as possible and updated in real time. It is then a matter of sharing this information and facilitating coordination between the actors of the State Action at Sea. So, does SPATIONAV have two components: a "sensors and surveillance" component to ensure coverage spaces considered, and an "information system” component for processing, situational assessment and coordination.
  • SPATIONAV have two components: a "sensors and surveillance" component to ensure coverage spaces considered, and an "information system” component for processing, situational assessment and coordination.
  • We know the neighboring projects of SPATIONAV which are gradually set up in countries such as Spain, Saudi Arabia, etc.
  • MWPS Maritime Warning and Protection System
  • TAU Ergency Self Defense
  • Maritime safety-related industrial systems such as Honeywell's "Marine Security: Meeting Threats to the Offshore Oil and Gas Industry” or L3 Communications (Klein Associates, Inc.), which offers the HarborGuard® system, are well known. as a system capable of allowing an offshore installation to detect threats in hostile areas.
  • Alarmed alarm generation systems are also known from the detection of regular maritime traffic and the analysis of global and long-term behaviors, the purpose of which is to detect spatio-temporal sequences of behavior anomalies. .
  • the object of the invention is to solve the technical problems of the prior art satisfactorily.
  • said detection and location means comprise a high resolution frequency modulated continuous wave Doppler radar for detecting small objects in sea clutter
  • said identification means comprise an optronic detection instrument. close-up for day and night use to determine the typology of the target.
  • said threat evaluation means comprise software that characterizes the level of danger of said threat based on the typology and the position, speed and road parameters of the target.
  • said means for determining the reaction comprise software for calculating and planning the level of response by comparison with situations previously recorded in a memory and according to the legal situation of the platform.
  • said means of management of the warning and protection measures include telecommunications equipment and software developing the sequences of implementation of a graduated response ranging from deterrence to the neutralization of the threat.
  • said synchronization means are capable of acting on the management means to execute or suspend one or more sequences of the response after validation by an operator.
  • Another object of the invention is a method of detection and neutralization consisting in performing, jointly and automatically, on the one hand, the localization and the progressive identification of the typology of at least one target likely to constitute the threat and, on the other hand, the continuous analysis of the behavior of said target in order to plan sequences of response scaled according to the typology of the target and the legal situation of the platform and, after validation of a operator and triggering an alert, to execute said sequences.
  • the response sequences are planned by self-learning of previous threats or by comparison with modeled and previously recorded situations.
  • the response sequences are planned for multiple targets by determining a level of danger for each identified target.
  • the innovative approach proposed by the invention lies in a coupling process of a very high resolution radar sensor, to an innovative logic of progressive enrichment of the nature of the detected object and of continuous analysis of the behavior of said object. (kinematic attributes and fine characterization attributes), in view:
  • FIG. 1 A mode of decomposition into functional blocks of the process of the invention is shown in FIG. 1 and is structured as follows:
  • the Detection 1 function is provided by ultra-high resolution radar-type sensors that detect small marine targets despite the sea clutter;
  • the Threat Assessment 2 function processes the information from the Detection function to define the danger of the threat
  • the function Determination of the reaction 3 carries out reversible planning calculations of the responses according to the level of knowledge acquired on the various detected threats;
  • the function of determination of the reaction is improved by a logic of progressive enrichment of the nature of the detected object and of continuous analysis of the behavior of the object 8;
  • the Means Management function 4 develops the implementation sequences of the external reaction means 5 taking into account the internal instructions 6;
  • the detection function 1 is provided by the radar 10. This radar must be able to detect small marine targets in a zone of radius less than or equal to 5 km; the fine echo analysis must make it possible to determine the nature of the target (fast naval object, agile craft, large or small craft) and to classify it.
  • Such a radar is, for example, a frequency modulated (FM) continuous wave (CW) radar whose technology is intrinsically well suited to such detection.
  • FM frequency modulated
  • CW continuous wave
  • the above FMCW radar can be replaced by a high-speed, multi-frequency scanning radar specifically designed for both emission diagrams and associated signal processing to allow the detection of small targets in clutter. of sea
  • the radar provides the localization features of the detected echo, the classification of this echo, the tracking of the detection and the calculation of the kinematics of the track, the transmission of the different characterization attributes of the tracks (classification attributes , position, speed) to the elements connected to the radar (radar technical console, operator station 8);
  • the Threat Assessment 2 function is provided by a module that processes the information provided by the radar to define the degree of danger of the target. This function ensures the acquisition and the association of the information necessary to establish the close surface behavior around the platform, the processing of information making it possible to determine the identity class of the detected echo (unknown, friend or hostile), the determination of the threat according to the following three steps: the evaluation of the danger, by analyzing the identity class of the detected surface moving target, and completing this analysis by a position test of the detected intrusion in relation to the defined safety perimeter around the offshore platform, the calculation of the rank of the threat, using the detected distance, speed and road parameters, and the analysis of the threat characterization parameters , in order to assess the need to trigger or not, a dangerous intrusion alert;
  • the function Determination of reactions 3 is activated following the dangerous intrusion alert generated by the previous evaluation function.
  • the determination function performs counterpoint planning calculations based on the level of knowledge acquired on the various detected threats (behavior criteria, identity classes, and comparison of the known situation in real time with the situations encountered and memorized by the system) taking into account any restrictions caused by the geographical location of the off-shore platform or by the legal status of this platform.
  • the process of developing reaction plans adapted to the nature of the detected intrusion, to the modes of operation of the infrastructure and to the regulatory and legal context is based on the coupling of the Bayesian inference approaches and the reasoning based on case.
  • the role of the servant is to decide on the relevance or irrelevance of sending a response execution instruction to module 4 resources management; the activation of an alert diffusion process internally to the off-shore 5 and 11 platform; activating an outbound alerting process by triggering a standard message logic to inform shore authorities about the nature of the intrusion and the degree of nuisance detected 6 and 12;
  • the management function means 4 protection and alert develops the implementation sequences; non-lethal detonation effectors 6 and 12, disabling means (paralyzing acoustic or other system) 6 and 12, external telecommunication means (VHF, satellite links) 6 and 12 for transmitting warnings on the proven threats and on their nature, and ensures the activation of a process of diffusion of the alert internally on the off-shore platform 5 and 1 1.
  • the very high resolution radar sensor may be completed for surveillance or identification purposes, by an optronic turret equipped with a daylight camera or an infrared camera (element 13 of FIG. 2).
  • An intrusion detection pre-alert can be performed by a wide-area navigation radar (item 13 of Figure 2).
  • the classification of the detected echo can be improved by Doppler analysis of the radar echo.
  • the detection and classification of the intrusion is facilitated by an Automatic Identification System (AIS) receiving element (element 13 of FIG. 2).
  • AIS Automatic Identification System
  • the treatment system can also optimize its ability to plan responses by self-learning from previous cases.
  • Response planning takes into account a multiple target context with threat rank determination for each detected mobile.
  • the reaction determination function takes into account the crisis context data in order to optimize the reaction planning (element 14 of Figure 2).

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar Systems Or Details Thereof (AREA)
EP11761715.9A 2010-09-03 2011-08-31 Vorrichtung und verfahren zur erkennung und abwehr einer gefahr auf see Withdrawn EP2612103A1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1056995A FR2964467B1 (fr) 2010-09-03 2010-09-03 Procede et dispositif pour le declenchement automatique d'une alerte d'intrusion navale
PCT/IB2011/053820 WO2012029040A1 (fr) 2010-09-03 2011-08-31 Dispositif et procédé pour la détection et la neutralisation d'une menace navale

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2612103A1 true EP2612103A1 (de) 2013-07-10

Family

ID=43629141

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11761715.9A Withdrawn EP2612103A1 (de) 2010-09-03 2011-08-31 Vorrichtung und verfahren zur erkennung und abwehr einer gefahr auf see

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2612103A1 (de)
FR (1) FR2964467B1 (de)
WO (1) WO2012029040A1 (de)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016050869A1 (fr) 2014-09-30 2016-04-07 Sofresud Dispositif embarqué et procédé de lutte contre l'abordage par jet d'eau sous pression

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102014017943A1 (de) * 2014-12-05 2016-06-09 Thyssenkrupp Ag System und ein Verfahren zur Identifizierung und Bekämpfung von Bedrohungen insbesondere in asymmetrischen Bedrohungslagen
CN105632115A (zh) * 2015-12-31 2016-06-01 中海石油(中国)有限公司天津分公司 一种海洋油田安防***
CN106934971A (zh) * 2017-03-30 2017-07-07 安徽森度科技有限公司 一种电网异常入侵预警方法

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090015460A1 (en) * 2006-06-08 2009-01-15 Fox Philip A Radar visibility model
DE102008013291A1 (de) * 2008-03-07 2009-09-10 FÜRUS, Sven Marines Sicherheitssystem

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6903676B1 (en) * 2004-09-10 2005-06-07 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Integrated radar, optical surveillance, and sighting system
US7769502B2 (en) * 2005-05-26 2010-08-03 Lockheed Martin Corporation Survivability/attack planning system
US7757595B2 (en) * 2006-04-14 2010-07-20 Raytheon Company Methods and apparatus for optimal resource allocation
ATE531019T1 (de) * 2008-01-21 2011-11-15 Thales Nederland Bv Sicherheits- und sicherungssystem gegen mehrfachbedrohung und bestimmungsverfahren dafür

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090015460A1 (en) * 2006-06-08 2009-01-15 Fox Philip A Radar visibility model
DE102008013291A1 (de) * 2008-03-07 2009-09-10 FÜRUS, Sven Marines Sicherheitssystem

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO2012029040A1 *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2016050869A1 (fr) 2014-09-30 2016-04-07 Sofresud Dispositif embarqué et procédé de lutte contre l'abordage par jet d'eau sous pression

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR2964467A1 (fr) 2012-03-09
FR2964467B1 (fr) 2014-12-26
WO2012029040A1 (fr) 2012-03-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2610636A1 (de) Bereitstellung einer nahezu Echtzeit-Meeresüberwachung anhand von Satellitenbildmaterial und externen Daten
US20160025850A1 (en) Autonomous Robotic Mobile Threat Security System
WO2012029040A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé pour la détection et la neutralisation d'une menace navale
Kastek et al. Multisensor system for the protection of critical infrastructure of a seaport
Kessel et al. Underwater intruder detection sonar for harbour protection: State of the art review and implications
Fillinger et al. Towards a passive acoustic underwater system for protecting harbours against intruders
Ray et al. Methodology for real-time detection of AIS falsification
Patterson et al. Unmanned systems: an emerging threat to waterside security: bad robots are coming
Bonnier et al. On the safe use of long-range laser active imager in the near-infrared for homeland security
Garnier et al. Exploiting the potential of the future “maritime big data”
Leggat et al. Study on persistent monitoring of maritime, Great Lakes and St. Lawrence seaway border regions
Wathen et al. Real-time 3D change detection of IEDs
Real-Arce et al. A new integrated border security approach: the FP7 PERSEUS project
Kastek et al. Multisensor system for the protection of a critical harbour infrastructure
Lovik et al. Underwater protection system
Singh et al. Development of microwave radar based periphery surveillance system in a selected mining area
Morel et al. ScanMaris: automatic detection of abnormal vessel behaviours
Oddone et al. Harbour Protection Exercise TALON 13
Dobias et al. Use of agent—based models in support of coastal surveillance planning and assessment
Summey et al. Fused airborne sensor technology
Lavers et al. Space-based assets, applications, user importance, and maritime vulnerabilities
Görkem et al. Dark Activity Detection in AIS-Based Maritime Networks
Ulmke et al. Persistent maritime traffic monitoring for the Canadian Arctic
Trzaskawka et al. System for critical infrastructure security based on multispectral observation-detection module
Vasilev et al. Impacts of integrated monitoring system upon control at sea

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20130327

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20171006

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20180417