EP2427598B1 - Process for improved leaching of electrostatic precipitator ash from a recovery boiler - Google Patents
Process for improved leaching of electrostatic precipitator ash from a recovery boiler Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2427598B1 EP2427598B1 EP09846901.8A EP09846901A EP2427598B1 EP 2427598 B1 EP2427598 B1 EP 2427598B1 EP 09846901 A EP09846901 A EP 09846901A EP 2427598 B1 EP2427598 B1 EP 2427598B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- leaching
- centrifugal separation
- electrostatic precipitator
- leaching tank
- separation stage
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000002386 leaching Methods 0.000 title claims description 94
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 79
- 239000012717 electrostatic precipitator Substances 0.000 title claims description 46
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 title claims description 18
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 claims description 55
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 44
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 claims description 37
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 21
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 21
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 claims description 21
- 150000001805 chlorine compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 claims description 16
- 239000007790 solid phase Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000002956 ash Substances 0.000 description 43
- PMZURENOXWZQFD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Sulfate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O PMZURENOXWZQFD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 40
- 229910052938 sodium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 26
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 15
- 235000011152 sodium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 14
- 206010001497 Agitation Diseases 0.000 description 13
- 239000007832 Na2SO4 Substances 0.000 description 12
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 10
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 8
- 238000001816 cooling Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 7
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 7
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 238000002425 crystallisation Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008025 crystallization Effects 0.000 description 6
- 238000005119 centrifugation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 5
- CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sodium Carbonate Chemical compound [Na+].[Na+].[O-]C([O-])=O CDBYLPFSWZWCQE-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 4
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001704 evaporation Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008020 evaporation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000001914 filtration Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000007797 corrosion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000005260 corrosion Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfuric acid Chemical compound OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002378 acidificating effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004061 bleaching Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004140 cleaning Methods 0.000 description 2
- OSVXSBDYLRYLIG-UHFFFAOYSA-N dioxidochlorine(.) Chemical compound O=Cl=O OSVXSBDYLRYLIG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000002349 favourable effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003546 flue gas Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007791 liquid phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000012071 phase Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910001414 potassium ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 238000004537 pulping Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 229910000029 sodium carbonate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 2
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Carbonate Chemical compound [O-]C([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 239000004155 Chlorine dioxide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000002918 Fraxinus excelsior Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000007864 aqueous solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007844 bleaching agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000740 bleeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000460 chlorine Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000019398 chlorine dioxide Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000000470 constituent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010924 continuous production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008021 deposition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010790 dilution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012895 dilution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012065 filter cake Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002655 kraft paper Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001172 regenerating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000246 remedial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000008399 tap water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000020679 tap water Nutrition 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21H—PULP COMPOSITIONS; PREPARATION THEREOF NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES D21C OR D21D; IMPREGNATING OR COATING OF PAPER; TREATMENT OF FINISHED PAPER NOT COVERED BY CLASS B31 OR SUBCLASS D21G; PAPER NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- D21H13/00—Pulp or paper, comprising synthetic cellulose or non-cellulose fibres or web-forming material
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D21—PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
- D21C—PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE BY REMOVING NON-CELLULOSE SUBSTANCES FROM CELLULOSE-CONTAINING MATERIALS; REGENERATION OF PULPING LIQUORS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- D21C11/00—Regeneration of pulp liquors or effluent waste waters
- D21C11/06—Treatment of pulp gases; Recovery of the heat content of the gases; Treatment of gases arising from various sources in pulp and paper mills; Regeneration of gaseous SO2, e.g. arising from liquors containing sulfur compounds
Definitions
- the invention relates to a process for leaching electrostatic precipitator ash from a recovery boiler in accordance with the preamble of Patent Claim 1.
- Chlorides are also supplied to the pulp process by way of make-up chemicals and water.
- the wood also has a content of chloride, even if this content is normally low.
- Potassium is another non-process element which is principally supplied by way of the wood. Even low contents of the non-process elements such as potassium and chlorides in the flows entering the pulp process contribute to high contents in the pulp process since the process is becoming increasingly closed.
- Potassium and chlorides contribute to major corrosion problems throughout the pulp mill, and especially to clogging of the recovery boiler and to corrosion of heating surfaces.
- High contents of potassium and chlorides in the dust which is separated off from the flue gases from the recovery boiler have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of electrostatic precipitators.
- the electrostatic precipitator ash which is separated off from the flue gases from the recovery boiler principally contains Na 2 SO 4 , it also contains, due to the process being closed, the highest concentrations of potassium and chlorides within the pulp mill.
- One way of decreasing the content of potassium and chloride in the liquor stock in the pulp mill is to separate off part of the electrostatic precipitator ash from the chemical cycle in the mill.
- the separation can take place by the ash being dumped or by the ash being dissolved in water and then conducted to the water purification in the mill. These types of separation result in the heavy metals which are present in the electrostatic precipitator ash polluting the effluent.
- the loss of sodium sulphate which occurs when electrostatic precipitator ash is separated off from the chemical cycle must be compensated for by supplying make-up chemicals.
- the proposed solutions usually involve filters or constituent steps in which all the dissolved or leached electrostatic precipitator ash, or parts of this ash, is/are cooled.
- Other processes for recovering Na 2 SO 4 also exist, in which processes the electrostatic precipitator ash is firstly dissolved completely and then crystallized by evaporation in a crystallizer, with subsequent separation of solid phase and liquid.
- SE,C, 504374 discloses a process in which the electrostatic precipitator ash is treated in a pressurized filter, in which process filtration and washing of the filter cake, and any possible leaching, take place in one and the same vessel. This process affords a good result as long as the filter can be kept free from clogging. Methods for cleaning the filter, with the cleaning taking place either during operation or in association with occasional interruptions in the filtration process, are required.
- US, A, 3833462 discloses another process in which leaching takes place at pH 3-6 and 40-80°C, followed by filtration in a filter.
- a proposed remedial measure was that of using a larger filter; while such a filter should, per se, extend the period of operation, the filter would have to be cleaned sooner or later. It was stated that it was possible to leach out, from the electrostatic precipitator ash, a good 89% of the sodium chloride that was present in the ash.
- SE, A, 9504281 discloses another method which includes cooling.
- the leaching is to take place at a pH of less than 10 and at a temperature greater than 20 °C, typically at 30°C, after which the total quantity of slurried material undergoes cooling down to a temperature of less than 20°C.
- This process involves a need for cooling, with an attendant consumption of energy.
- SE, A, 9603972 also discloses another method for leaching the electrostatic precipitator ash in which the latter firstly undergoes a leaching at least 32°C, preferably in the vicinity of the boiling point of the aqueous solution, and in which a first substance which has crystallized out is returned, after separation, to the black liquor.
- the leachate which is obtained from the process then also undergoes cooling down to approximately 10-15°C, after which a second substance which has crystallized out is likewise returned to the black liquor. While this system affords good leaching, it demands a high requirement of energy for the cooling even if the cooling is only required for the relatively small quantities constituted by the leachate.
- the object of the invention is to obtain an improved process for recovering the useful chemicals, principally Na 2 SO 4 , in the electrostatic precipitator ash, which process does not suffer from the disadvantages of the prior art. While the improvement is first and foremost aimed at an increased recovery of useful chemicals in the pulping process, it is also aimed at an improved degree of recovery of these useful chemicals without these chemicals being accompanied by a high proportion of chlorides, in particular, but also potassium.
- This objective is met by a process wherein the ashes are leached in a first leaching tank and thereafter sent to centrifugal separation comprising at least two centrifugal separation stages in series, and where at least a part of the first liquid fraction from the first centrifugal separation stage containing chlorides and potassium is bled out from the process.
- the first dry matter substance obtained from the first centrifugal separation stage is further led to a second leaching tank where preferably similar conditions as in the first leaching tank is established as of pH and dry substance level.
- the total dwell time in this second leaching tank is not as important as of further crystallization of sodium sulphate, as most crystallization of sodium sulphate has already been made in first leaching tank.
- a dwell time in the second leaching tank could preferably be in the order of at least 40-80% of the dwell time in the first leaching tank, as further crystallization of sodium sulphate could take place at the larger particles of sodium sulphate already formed.
- the reslurried and leached first dry matter substance from the first centrifugal separation stage is thereafter fed to a second centrifugal separation stage from which a second liquid fraction is obtained that is led back to at least one preceding leaching tank, and a second dry matter substance which thereafter is mixed into black liquor before the black liquor is being sent to the recovery process.
- the difference between a one-stage leaching process and the two-stage leaching process according to the invention is the solubility equilibrium between the first and second leaching tanks.
- Another object is to adapt and optimize the stages for the specific process function of the specific stage, such that the first centrifugal separation stage takes place in a high rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a clean first liquid fraction and a first dry matter substance, and that the second centrifugal separation stage takes place in a low rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a second dry matter substance at o dry matter concentration being at least 15% higher than that of the first dry matter substance.
- the first centrifugal separation stage preferably takes place at a rotational speed above 3500 rpm, and the second centrifugal separation stage takes place at a rotational speed below 3500 rpm. while the difference in rotational speed between first and second centrifugal separation stages is at least 2000 rpm.
- the more aggressive separation in the first stage could thus obtain a cleaner filtrate, while not optimizing the dry matter concentration, as this dry matter concentration is subject to a following leaching stage and anyway needs dilution for that stage.
- the first centrifugal separation stage is taking place in a nozzle bowl separator centrifuge, which has proven its capability of obtaining clean filtrates from these kinds of slurries, but not necessarily as high concentration in the separated dry matter phase.
- the nozzle bowl separator is also less expensive than a decanter centrifuge for the same capacity, which latter decanter centrifuge is more than 2.5 times more expensive than a nozzle bowl separator.
- the second centrifugal separation stage is taking place in a decanter centrifuge, which has proven its capability of obtaining a high concentration in the separated dry matter phase (i.e. the sodium sulphate), with a clean filtrate in the separated liquid phase.
- a decanter centrifuge which has proven its capability of obtaining a high concentration in the separated dry matter phase (i.e. the sodium sulphate), with a clean filtrate in the separated liquid phase.
- the leaching process in at least one leaching tank preferably established at a temperature in the interval 65-105°C, and preferably below boiling temperature below 95°C and most preferred at about 80°C which provides a safe margin towards boiling.
- the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash having a dry substance level in the interval 15-40% by weight being obtained.
- the leaching process in at least one leaching tank is further preferably established such that the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash passing through, and being treated in, the leaching tank in at least two agitation zones, in which agitation zones the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash undergoes repeated gentle agitation in the leaching tank.
- Figure 1 show an apparatus set-up which is used in a prior art one-stage leaching and centrifugal process for leaching electrostatic precipitator ash.
- the electrostatic precipitator ash, from electrostatic precipitator 19, and liquids for leaching are supplied to a first leaching tank 1.
- a part of the liquid for leaching can expediently be fabrication water from the bleaching department or the pulp drying machine, evaporation condensate, scrubber condensate or tap-water.
- H 2 SO 4 or other suitable acidic conditioner for establishment of correct pH can be supplied when the electrostatic precipitator ash contains high contents of Na 2 CO 3 .
- the amount supplied is typically around 0.1 kg per 1.0 kg of electrostatic precipitator ash, i. e. in proportions of approx. 5-15% by weight.
- the electrostatic precipitator ash can typically have a composition corresponding to the following; Component % by weight (w%) Na 2 SO 4 86 Na 2 CO 3 5 NaCl 2 KCl 7
- the ash which is supplied to the leaching tank contains chloride ions and potassium ions.
- the chloride content in the slurry is typically 2.0-7.0 % by weight.
- a pH in the interval pH 8-13 preferably around pH 9, is established in the leaching tank.
- the mixture in the leaching tank should preferably not exceed 1600 kg/m 3 , which thus sets an upper limit to the leaching process. If the consistency becomes too high, something which already begins to become apparent at 1570 kg/m 3 , the mixture then becomes increasingly difficult to pump and agitate with the stirrers. In particular, the initial admixing with the electrostatic precipitator ash using the first stirrer 11 is rendered more difficult at these concentrations.
- a suitable lower concentration level corresponds to a mixture at 1450-1550 kg/m 3 .
- the temperature should preferably be kept within the interval 65-105°C, with a relatively high temperature within the interval 80-105°C being most favorable for the leaching process.
- An optimum temperature both from the point of view of the process and the point of view of the apparatus is around 80°C.
- leaching takes place under these process conditions (pH, concentration and temperature) for a relatively long time, within the interval 1-5 hours, preferably 2 hours, and while agitating gently, favorable process conditions are created for crystal growth of, in particular, a solid phase of Na 2 SO 4 . It has been found that the crystals which are formed are distributed normally around a particle size of about 200 ⁇ m, which is a surprisingly good result which should be compared with what can be obtained using the energy-intensive cooling technique, where a crystal formation with particles normally distributed around 300 ⁇ m can be achieved under optimum conditions.
- the leaching tank is shaped such that repeated gentle agitation is obtained over the whole volume. An initial agitation preferably takes place using a first stirrer 11 in connection with the electrostatic precipitator ash being supplied.
- the mixture passes through at least one additional agitation zone and preferably two agitation zones.
- This can be achieved by installing at least one double bottom 13 in the middle of the leaching tank.
- An intermediate-stage stirrer 12a is arranged in an outlet from this double bottom 13, and a final-stage stirrer 12b is arranged in connection with the outlet from the leaching tank.
- the dwell time in the leaching tank, between agitations, when the mixture is not subjected to direct agitation, should amount to at least 30% of the total dwell time in the leaching tank.
- the intermediate-stage stirrer consequently acts on the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash when the latter has had a dwell time in the region of 30-70% of the total dwell time in the leaching tank, and the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash is subjected to a final-stage stirrer in a lower part of the leaching tank in connection with the outlet from the leaching tank.
- the agitation should preferably be gentle in order to ensure that particles which have already crystallized out are not broken, and a mechanical blade-equipped stirrer of the propeller type can expediently be used, in each respective position, for the intermediate-stage and final-stage stirrers, with both the stirrers being driven by the same shaft, which latter is driven at a moderate rotational speed in the region of 50-200 rpm, preferably around 80 rpm.
- the slurry which is obtained in this way is pumped onwards, via the pump 4, to a centrifugation stage, in this present case a decanter centrifuge 2, where particles which have been formed, i. e. solid phase containing Na 2 SO 4 , are separated out as a dry fraction.
- a decanter centrifuge affords a continuous process which does not require to be interrupted for regenerating the equipment (due to clogging, etc.).
- the decanter centrifuge comprises, in a known manner, a rotating screw body 20, on which a worm 21 has been formed.
- a casing 22, which also rotates, is arranged around the screw body 20.
- the slurry is fed into the decanter centrifuge via the inlet 23 and, due to the rotation of the casing 22, the leached liquid is flung against the inside of the casing, where the heavier solid-particle fraction forms the outer layer 28, due to the centrifugal effect, and the liquid fraction forms the inner layer 29.
- the liquid fraction leaves the decanter centrifuge via the spillway 25, while the screw feeds the solid fraction out towards the outlet 24. Due to the spillway 25 for the liquid fraction being located at a shorter distance from the axis of rotation than the outlet 24, it will be mainly the solid fraction which is transported by the worm 21 towards the outlet 24 via the conformed outlet of the casing.
- the solid fraction which is obtained in this way, and which consists of enriched Na 2 SO 4 , is given, by the decanter centrifuge, a relatively high dry substance content, in the dry substance fraction, which is in the interval 58-97%, and is then fed to a slurrying vessel 3, where it is admixed with black liquor/BL, for example, for forwarding to recovery, either via evaporation (not shown) or directly to the recovery boiler 18.
- the liquid fraction with its content of chloride ions and potassium ions, can in part be returned to the leaching tank 1 or in part, 26, forwarded to the effluent for external purification or further working up.
- a washing zone can optionally be arranged in the decanter centrifuge. This is shown in the figure by means of a distribution ring 27 for washing liquid, which ring opens up radially inwards towards the layer 28 of the solid fraction which is passing by.
- the washing liquid which is preferably pressurized, can expediently be the condensate (cond.) which is otherwise added to the top of the leaching tank in connection with the initial slurrying of the electrostatic precipitator ash.
- the washing liquid is advantageously added at a position in the decanter centrifuge at which a separating effect is exerted on the liquid even after the position at which the washing liquid is added.
- figure 2 is the system set up according to the invention shown.
- the leaching tank and associated leaching process is preferably similar to the one described in figure 1 , and similar components and flows have same reference numbers.
- the slurry which is obtained in this way is pumped onwards, via a pump 4a, to a first centrifugation stage 2a.
- a centrifugation stage In this centrifugation stage is a first liquid fraction LF1 as well as a first dry matter substance DM1 obtained.
- the first liquid fraction LF1 contains high levels of chlorides and potassium and a part of this fraction is bled off from the process via 26. The remaining part of this first liquid fraction could be returned back to the first leaching tank 1 a.
- acidic liquids such as Na 2 SO 4 and/or H 2 SO 4 be added in a dedicated supply conduit connected to the first leaching tank 1 a as shown in figure 2 .
- This pH correction is needed if the carbonate content of the ash is typically higher than 5 weight-%, and thus dependent on the specific overall mill process.
- the first dry matter substance DM1 obtained contains high levels of sodium sulphate, and is sent to a second leaching tank 1 b, where the crystallization of sodium sulphate is taken even further on the particles already formed.
- the crystallization process is improved as large parts of the chlorides and potassium has been bled off in the first centrifugal stage 2a.
- the leaching process in the second leaching tank 1 b is essentially at the similar conditions as in the first leaching tank as of pH and dry substance level, excluding the bled off part of the chlorides and potassium.
- the leached slurry which is obtained in this way is pumped onwards, via a pump 4b, to a second centrifugation stage 2b.
- a second centrifugation stage 2b In this centrifugation stage is a second liquid fraction LF2 as well as a second dry matter substance DM2 obtained.
- the second liquid fraction LF2 contains some residual levels of sodium sulphate and a part of this fraction is returned back to the first leaching tank 1 a while the remaining part of this second liquid fraction could be returned back to the second leaching tank 1 b.
- the final dry matter substance DM2 is similarly to figure 1 led via outlet 24 to any appropriate mixing tank where this dry matter substance DM2 is mixed with black liquor before sending it further to the recovery process via the evaporation train of directly to the recovery boiler.
- the first centrifugal separation stage 2a taking place in a high rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a clean first liquid fraction LF1 and a first dry matter substance DM1
- the second centrifugal separation stage 2b takes place in a low rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a second dry matter substance DM2 with a dry matter concentration being at least 15% higher than that of the first dry matter substance.
- the first centrifugal separation stage takes preferably place at a rotational speed above 3500 rpm
- the second centrifugal separation stage takes place at a rotational speed below 3500 rpm, while the difference in rotational speed between first and second centrifugal separation stages is at least 2000 rpm.
- the first centrifugal separation stage takes place in a nozzle bowl separator centrifuge which is shown in figure 3 .
- the nozzle centrifuge consists basically of a stationary housing 50 and a bowl 51 rotating inside of the housing at high rotational speed.
- the slurry is fed from 1 a via a feed inlet pipe into the inlet chamber 52 at the lower end of the rotating bowl 51, and passes thereafter around a lower edge of a conical wall to a disc stack 53 with conical discs where the main separation takes place. Separation takes place under the influence of high centrifugal force.
- the narrow conical discs establish interspaces which split the total liquid flow into several thin layers.
- the solid particles are flung and settle on the underside of the disc above and slide down into the outer separation chamber 54 for the denser solid particles.
- the separated solid particles i.e. Na 2 SO 4 crystals
- the clarified liquid LF1 is conveyed to the centre of the bowl from where it is pumped by a centripetal pump 56 to the outlet 58.
- This type of centrifuge could also preferably be equipped with a washing stage, where washing liquid (Kond.) may be added via a central pipe 60 to the lowermost part of the inlet chamber 52.
- the second centrifugal separation stage 2b preferably takes place in a decanter centrifuge, also used in the prior art one-stage leaching and centrifugal process as shown in figure 1 .
- This type of centrifuge is impeding somewhat less centrifugal force on the separation, and the dry matter fraction could be given a higher concentration as the out feed of this fraction is assisted by the screw conveyor.
- the disadvantage is that the liquid fraction can have higher content of particles as the separation effect from the centrifugal effect is lower.
- this is an ideal separation process as a second separation stage, as the liquid fraction is circulated back to at least one preceding leaching tank, where said solid particles (i.e. Na 2 SO 4 crystals) is used as growth areas for further deposition of sodium sulphate.
- the leaching process in at least one leaching tank 1a/1b is established at a temperature in the interval 65-105°C, preferably around 80°C with a slurried electrostatic precipitator ash having a dry substance level in the interval 15-40% by weight being obtained.
- the leaching process in at least one leaching tank 1a/1b is preferably also established such that the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash passing through, and being treated in, the leaching tank in at least two agitation zones, in which agitation zones the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash undergoes repeated gentle agitation in the leaching tank.
Landscapes
- Paper (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
Description
- The invention relates to a process for leaching electrostatic precipitator ash from a recovery boiler in accordance with the preamble of
Patent Claim 1. - In the present-day pulp mill, it is desired to minimize the discharges and consumption of chemicals.
Several bleaching processes, in particular those which use chlorine dioxide, form chlorides which are either bound in the pulp or which leave together with used fabrication water. While preference is given to closing the process such that the fabrication water is returned, this leads to the contents of chloride in the process being gradually raised to undesirable levels. - Chlorides are also supplied to the pulp process by way of make-up chemicals and water. The wood also has a content of chloride, even if this content is normally low. Potassium is another non-process element which is principally supplied by way of the wood. Even low contents of the non-process elements such as potassium and chlorides in the flows entering the pulp process contribute to high contents in the pulp process since the process is becoming increasingly closed.
- Potassium and chlorides contribute to major corrosion problems throughout the pulp mill, and especially to clogging of the recovery boiler and to corrosion of heating surfaces.
High contents of potassium and chlorides in the dust which is separated off from the flue gases from the recovery boiler have a detrimental effect on the efficiency of electrostatic precipitators.
While the electrostatic precipitator ash which is separated off from the flue gases from the recovery boiler principally contains Na2SO4, it also contains, due to the process being closed, the highest concentrations of potassium and chlorides within the pulp mill.
One way of decreasing the content of potassium and chloride in the liquor stock in the pulp mill is to separate off part of the electrostatic precipitator ash from the chemical cycle in the mill. The separation can take place by the ash being dumped or by the ash being dissolved in water and then conducted to the water purification in the mill. These types of separation result in the heavy metals which are present in the electrostatic precipitator ash polluting the effluent.
The loss of sodium sulphate which occurs when electrostatic precipitator ash is separated off from the chemical cycle must be compensated for by supplying make-up chemicals. Several different types of leaching process exist for recovering Na2SO4 from the electrostatic precipitator ash which has been separated off by freeing the latter from potassium and chlorides, in particular. The proposed solutions usually involve filters or constituent steps in which all the dissolved or leached electrostatic precipitator ash, or parts of this ash, is/are cooled. Other processes for recovering Na2SO4 also exist, in which processes the electrostatic precipitator ash is firstly dissolved completely and then crystallized by evaporation in a crystallizer, with subsequent separation of solid phase and liquid. -
SE,C, 504374 -
US, A, 3833462 discloses another process in which leaching takes place at pH 3-6 and 40-80°C, followed by filtration in a filter. - In Tappi Proceedings, Chemical Recovery Conference 1992 in Seattle, pages 329-350,"Recycle of Bleach Plant Extraction Stage Effluent to the Kraft Liquor Cycle", B. Blackwell and A. Hitzroth present experiences from leaching processes which have been used. A leaching of the electrostatic precipitator ash in water at a dry substance concentration of around 15% by weight, and at pH 5, which low pH was pointed out to constitute a substantial corrosion problem, was performed in a Harmac system. The leached liquid was filtered in a filter (belt filter) and this filter exhibited substantial clogging problems due to small particles of organic material which clogged the filter mesh. A proposed remedial measure was that of using a larger filter; while such a filter should, per se, extend the period of operation, the filter would have to be cleaned sooner or later. It was stated that it was possible to leach out, from the electrostatic precipitator ash, a good 89% of the sodium chloride that was present in the ash.
-
SE, A, 9504281 -
SE, A, 9603972 - The problem with the known solutions described above is that they suffer from one or more of the following disadvantages;
- are energy-intensive, resulting in high operational costs;
- require expensive and complicated apparatus/systems ;
- involve filters which easily become clogged and render continuous operation more difficult;
- do not afford a sufficiently high degree of bleed-out of chlorides and potassium from the process liquid which is returned, or
- do not afford an equally high degree of recovery of Na2SO4 from the electrostatic precipitator ash.
-
SE, C, 517587 WO03/016616 - The object of the invention is to obtain an improved process for recovering the useful chemicals, principally Na2SO4, in the electrostatic precipitator ash, which process does not suffer from the disadvantages of the prior art. While the improvement is first and foremost aimed at an increased recovery of useful chemicals in the pulping process, it is also aimed at an improved degree of recovery of these useful chemicals without these chemicals being accompanied by a high proportion of chlorides, in particular, but also potassium. This objective is met by a process wherein the ashes are leached in a first leaching tank and thereafter sent to centrifugal separation comprising at least two centrifugal separation stages in series, and where at least a part of the first liquid fraction from the first centrifugal separation stage containing chlorides and potassium is bled out from the process. The first dry matter substance obtained from the first centrifugal separation stage is further led to a second leaching tank where preferably similar conditions as in the first leaching tank is established as of pH and dry substance level. The total dwell time in this second leaching tank is not as important as of further crystallization of sodium sulphate, as most crystallization of sodium sulphate has already been made in first leaching tank. However, a dwell time in the second leaching tank could preferably be in the order of at least 40-80% of the dwell time in the first leaching tank, as further crystallization of sodium sulphate could take place at the larger particles of sodium sulphate already formed. The reslurried and leached first dry matter substance from the first centrifugal separation stage is thereafter fed to a second centrifugal separation stage from which a second liquid fraction is obtained that is led back to at least one preceding leaching tank, and a second dry matter substance which thereafter is mixed into black liquor before the black liquor is being sent to the recovery process. The difference between a one-stage leaching process and the two-stage leaching process according to the invention is the solubility equilibrium between the first and second leaching tanks. By leaching out chlorides and potassium after the first leaching step is crystallization of sodium sulphate favored in the second leach tank, reaching a higher sodium sulphate content of the final dry matter content, as well as high concentrations of chlorides and potassium in the first liquid phase bled out after first leaching stage.
- Another object is to adapt and optimize the stages for the specific process function of the specific stage, such that the first centrifugal separation stage takes place in a high rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a clean first liquid fraction and a first dry matter substance, and that the second centrifugal separation stage takes place in a low rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a second dry matter substance at o dry matter concentration being at least 15% higher than that of the first dry matter substance.
- The first centrifugal separation stage preferably takes place at a rotational speed above 3500 rpm, and the second centrifugal separation stage takes place at a rotational speed below 3500 rpm. while the difference in rotational speed between first and second centrifugal separation stages is at least 2000 rpm. The more aggressive separation in the first stage could thus obtain a cleaner filtrate, while not optimizing the dry matter concentration, as this dry matter concentration is subject to a following leaching stage and anyway needs dilution for that stage.
- In a preferred embodiment of the invention the first centrifugal separation stage is taking place in a nozzle bowl separator centrifuge, which has proven its capability of obtaining clean filtrates from these kinds of slurries, but not necessarily as high concentration in the separated dry matter phase. The nozzle bowl separator is also less expensive than a decanter centrifuge for the same capacity, which latter decanter centrifuge is more than 2.5 times more expensive than a nozzle bowl separator.
- In yet a preferred embodiment of the invention the second centrifugal separation stage is taking place in a decanter centrifuge, which has proven its capability of obtaining a high concentration in the separated dry matter phase (i.e. the sodium sulphate), with a clean filtrate in the separated liquid phase.
- According to the invention is the leaching process in at least one leaching tank preferably established at a temperature in the interval 65-105°C, and preferably below boiling temperature below 95°C and most preferred at about 80°C which provides a safe margin towards boiling. The slurried electrostatic precipitator ash having a dry substance level in the interval 15-40% by weight being obtained. The leaching process in at least one leaching tank is further preferably established such that the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash passing through, and being treated in, the leaching tank in at least two agitation zones, in which agitation zones the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash undergoes repeated gentle agitation in the leaching tank.
- Other features and aspects and advantages of the invention are evident from the subsequent patent claims and from the detailed description of some embodiments of the invention which follows.
-
-
Fig. 1 shows a prior art one-stage leaching and centrifugal process, -
Fig. 2 shows the principal system set up and flow routing in a two-stage leaching and centrifugal process according to the invention, -
Fig. 3 shows a nozzle bowl separator preferably used in the first centrifugal stage of the two-stage process shown infigure 2 . -
Figure 1 show an apparatus set-up which is used in a prior art one-stage leaching and centrifugal process for leaching electrostatic precipitator ash. This system is also disclosed inSE,C,517587 WO 03/016616 electrostatic precipitator 19, and liquids for leaching are supplied to afirst leaching tank 1. - A part of the liquid for leaching (kond.) can expediently be fabrication water from the bleaching department or the pulp drying machine, evaporation condensate, scrubber condensate or tap-water. H2SO4 or other suitable acidic conditioner for establishment of correct pH can be supplied when the electrostatic precipitator ash contains high contents of Na2CO3.
The amount supplied is typically around 0.1 kg per 1.0 kg of electrostatic precipitator ash, i. e. in proportions of approx. 5-15% by weight. - The electrostatic precipitator ash can typically have a composition corresponding to the following;
Component % by weight (w%) Na2SO4 86 Na2CO3 5 NaCl 2 KCl 7 - The ash which is supplied to the leaching tank contains chloride ions and potassium ions. The chloride content in the slurry is typically 2.0-7.0 % by weight.
- In order to achieve an optimal leaching process, a pH in the interval pH 8-13, preferably around pH 9, is established in the leaching tank.
The mixture in the leaching tank should preferably not exceed 1600 kg/m3, which thus sets an upper limit to the leaching process. If the consistency becomes too high, something which already begins to become apparent at 1570 kg/m3, the mixture then becomes increasingly difficult to pump and agitate with the stirrers. In particular, the initial admixing with the electrostatic precipitator ash using thefirst stirrer 11 is rendered more difficult at these concentrations. A suitable lower concentration level corresponds to a mixture at 1450-1550 kg/m3.
The temperature should preferably be kept within the interval 65-105°C, with a relatively high temperature within the interval 80-105°C being most favorable for the leaching process. An optimum temperature both from the point of view of the process and the point of view of the apparatus is around 80°C. - If leaching takes place under these process conditions (pH, concentration and temperature) for a relatively long time, within the interval 1-5 hours, preferably 2 hours, and while agitating gently, favorable process conditions are created for crystal growth of, in particular, a solid phase of Na2SO4. It has been found that the crystals which are formed are distributed normally around a particle size of about 200 µm, which is a surprisingly good result which should be compared with what can be obtained using the energy-intensive cooling technique, where a crystal formation with particles normally distributed around 300 µm can be achieved under optimum conditions. The leaching tank is shaped such that repeated gentle agitation is obtained over the whole volume. An initial agitation preferably takes place using a
first stirrer 11 in connection with the electrostatic precipitator ash being supplied. After that, the mixture passes through at least one additional agitation zone and preferably two agitation zones. This can be achieved by installing at least one double bottom 13 in the middle of the leaching tank. An intermediate-stage stirrer 12a is arranged in an outlet from this double bottom 13, and a final-stage stirrer 12b is arranged in connection with the outlet from the leaching tank. The dwell time in the leaching tank, between agitations, when the mixture is not subjected to direct agitation, should amount to at least 30% of the total dwell time in the leaching tank. The intermediate-stage stirrer consequently acts on the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash when the latter has had a dwell time in the region of 30-70% of the total dwell time in the leaching tank, and the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash is subjected to a final-stage stirrer in a lower part of the leaching tank in connection with the outlet from the leaching tank. The agitation should preferably be gentle in order to ensure that particles which have already crystallized out are not broken, and a mechanical blade-equipped stirrer of the propeller type can expediently be used, in each respective position, for the intermediate-stage and final-stage stirrers, with both the stirrers being driven by the same shaft, which latter is driven at a moderate rotational speed in the region of 50-200 rpm, preferably around 80 rpm. - The slurry which is obtained in this way is pumped onwards, via the pump 4, to a centrifugation stage, in this present case a decanter centrifuge 2, where particles which have been formed, i. e. solid phase containing Na2SO4, are separated out as a dry fraction.
Using a decanter centrifuge affords a continuous process which does not require to be interrupted for regenerating the equipment (due to clogging, etc.). The decanter centrifuge comprises, in a known manner, a rotating screw body 20, on which aworm 21 has been formed. Acasing 22, which also rotates, is arranged around the screw body 20. The screw body is imparted a rotation R1 and the casing a parallel rotation R2, with typical rotational speeds being in the range R1 = 1500-3400 rpm and R2 = 1450-3350 rpm; while R2 is at least 50 rpm below R1, consequently, a somewhat higher rotational speed is imparted to the screw, thereby contributing to theworm 21 of the rotational body slowly feeding the crystallized particles towards theoutlet 24.
The slurry is fed into the decanter centrifuge via theinlet 23 and, due to the rotation of thecasing 22, the leached liquid is flung against the inside of the casing, where the heavier solid-particle fraction forms theouter layer 28, due to the centrifugal effect, and the liquid fraction forms theinner layer 29. The liquid fraction leaves the decanter centrifuge via thespillway 25, while the screw feeds the solid fraction out towards theoutlet 24. Due to thespillway 25 for the liquid fraction being located at a shorter distance from the axis of rotation than theoutlet 24, it will be mainly the solid fraction which is transported by theworm 21 towards theoutlet 24 via the conformed outlet of the casing. The solid fraction which is obtained in this way, and which consists of enriched Na2SO4, is given, by the decanter centrifuge, a relatively high dry substance content, in the dry substance fraction, which is in the interval 58-97%, and is then fed to a slurrying vessel 3, where it is admixed with black liquor/BL, for example, for forwarding to recovery, either via evaporation (not shown) or directly to therecovery boiler 18. - The liquid fraction, with its content of chloride ions and potassium ions, can in part be returned to the
leaching tank 1 or in part, 26, forwarded to the effluent for external purification or further working up. - In order to further leach out chlorides from the solid fraction, a washing zone can optionally be arranged in the decanter centrifuge. This is shown in the figure by means of a
distribution ring 27 for washing liquid, which ring opens up radially inwards towards thelayer 28 of the solid fraction which is passing by. The washing liquid, which is preferably pressurized, can expediently be the condensate (cond.) which is otherwise added to the top of the leaching tank in connection with the initial slurrying of the electrostatic precipitator ash. The washing liquid is advantageously added at a position in the decanter centrifuge at which a separating effect is exerted on the liquid even after the position at which the washing liquid is added. - In
figure 2 is the system set up according to the invention shown. Here is the ash from theelectrostatic precipitator 19 supplied to afirst leaching tank 1 a. The leaching tank and associated leaching process is preferably similar to the one described infigure 1 , and similar components and flows have same reference numbers. - The slurry which is obtained in this way is pumped onwards, via a
pump 4a, to afirst centrifugation stage 2a. In this centrifugation stage is a first liquid fraction LF1 as well as a first dry matter substance DM1 obtained. The first liquid fraction LF1 contains high levels of chlorides and potassium and a part of this fraction is bled off from the process via 26. The remaining part of this first liquid fraction could be returned back to thefirst leaching tank 1 a. - In order to establish the correct pH conditions for the leaching process could acidic liquids, such as Na2SO4 and/or H2SO4 be added in a dedicated supply conduit connected to the
first leaching tank 1 a as shown infigure 2 . This pH correction is needed if the carbonate content of the ash is typically higher than 5 weight-%, and thus dependent on the specific overall mill process. - The first dry matter substance DM1 obtained contains high levels of sodium sulphate, and is sent to a
second leaching tank 1 b, where the crystallization of sodium sulphate is taken even further on the particles already formed. The crystallization process is improved as large parts of the chlorides and potassium has been bled off in the firstcentrifugal stage 2a. - The leaching process in the
second leaching tank 1 b is essentially at the similar conditions as in the first leaching tank as of pH and dry substance level, excluding the bled off part of the chlorides and potassium. - After the leaching process in the
second leaching tank 1 b the leached slurry which is obtained in this way is pumped onwards, via apump 4b, to asecond centrifugation stage 2b. In this centrifugation stage is a second liquid fraction LF2 as well as a second dry matter substance DM2 obtained. The second liquid fraction LF2 contains some residual levels of sodium sulphate and a part of this fraction is returned back to thefirst leaching tank 1 a while the remaining part of this second liquid fraction could be returned back to thesecond leaching tank 1 b. - The final dry matter substance DM2 is similarly to
figure 1 led viaoutlet 24 to any appropriate mixing tank where this dry matter substance DM2 is mixed with black liquor before sending it further to the recovery process via the evaporation train of directly to the recovery boiler. - In a preferred embodiment of the invention is the first
centrifugal separation stage 2a taking place in a high rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a clean first liquid fraction LF1 and a first dry matter substance DM1, and that the secondcentrifugal separation stage 2b takes place in a low rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a second dry matter substance DM2 with a dry matter concentration being at least 15% higher than that of the first dry matter substance. The first centrifugal separation stage takes preferably place at a rotational speed above 3500 rpm, and the second centrifugal separation stage takes place at a rotational speed below 3500 rpm, while the difference in rotational speed between first and second centrifugal separation stages is at least 2000 rpm. - The first centrifugal separation stage takes place in a nozzle bowl separator centrifuge which is shown in
figure 3 . The nozzle centrifuge consists basically of astationary housing 50 and abowl 51 rotating inside of the housing at high rotational speed. The slurry is fed from 1 a via a feed inlet pipe into theinlet chamber 52 at the lower end of therotating bowl 51, and passes thereafter around a lower edge of a conical wall to adisc stack 53 with conical discs where the main separation takes place. Separation takes place under the influence of high centrifugal force. The narrow conical discs establish interspaces which split the total liquid flow into several thin layers. In each layer the solid particles are flung and settle on the underside of the disc above and slide down into theouter separation chamber 54 for the denser solid particles. The separated solid particles (i.e. Na2SO4 crystals) are continuously discharged vianozzles 55 arranged in the radially outer part of theseparation chamber 54. The clarified liquid LF1 is conveyed to the centre of the bowl from where it is pumped by acentripetal pump 56 to the outlet 58.
This type of centrifuge could also preferably be equipped with a washing stage, where washing liquid (Kond.) may be added via a central pipe 60 to the lowermost part of theinlet chamber 52.
This type of centrifuge is impeding a strong centrifugal force on the separation, and the liquid fraction separated has a very low content of solid particles. The disadvantage is that the dry matter fraction has lower concentration as it must be kept at a fluent state as it flows off under gravity trough tight control nozzles in theseparation chamber 54. However, this is an ideal separation process as a first separation stage, as the dry matter fraction still need reslurrying in front of the second leaching stage. - The second
centrifugal separation stage 2b preferably takes place in a decanter centrifuge, also used in the prior art one-stage leaching and centrifugal process as shown infigure 1 . This type of centrifuge is impeding somewhat less centrifugal force on the separation, and the dry matter fraction could be given a higher concentration as the out feed of this fraction is assisted by the screw conveyor. The disadvantage is that the liquid fraction can have higher content of particles as the separation effect from the centrifugal effect is lower. However, this is an ideal separation process as a second separation stage, as the liquid fraction is circulated back to at least one preceding leaching tank, where said solid particles (i.e. Na2SO4 crystals) is used as growth areas for further deposition of sodium sulphate. - The leaching process in at least one
leaching tank 1a/1b, preferably both, is established at a temperature in the interval 65-105°C, preferably around 80°C with a slurried electrostatic precipitator ash having a dry substance level in the interval 15-40% by weight being obtained. The leaching process in at least oneleaching tank 1a/1b is preferably also established such that the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash passing through, and being treated in, the leaching tank in at least two agitation zones, in which agitation zones the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash undergoes repeated gentle agitation in the leaching tank. - By means of the 2 stage process according to the invention, major improvements in recycling useful process chemicals Na and SO4 to the pulping process while bleeding out chloride and potassium from the electrostatic precipitator ash. One case study was based on an electrostatic precipitator ash having the following composition;
Component % by weight Cl 8.1 K 4.0 Na 30.4 SO4 57.0 CO3 0.5
The chlorides and potassium are bled out via the liquid fraction from the first centrifugal separation stage, with at least 0.5-2.0 ton of liquid fraction per ton of electrostatic precipitator ash being forwarded to effluent or further working-up. - By means of the 2-stage process, it was found possible to separate over 85% of its chloride and potassium content from the electrostatic precipitator ash.
Claims (6)
- Process for purifying recovery boiler electrostatic precipitator ash from chlorides and potassium, in particular, by means of leaching and subsequently separating off a solid phase, which solid phase is returned to the pulp process, with the process comprising a first leaching stage, where the electrostatic precipitator ash is firstly slurried and agitated in a first leaching tank at a pH in the interval 8-13 at a dry substance level in the interval 15-40% and at a total dwell time in the first leaching tank in the interval 1-5 hours, after which the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash, which has thus been leached, is fed to a separation stage in which the leached electrostatic precipitator ash undergoes a separation of crystallized substance by means of a centrifugal separation characterized in that the centrifugal separation comprises at least two centrifugal separation stages in series, and that the first centrifugal separation stage takes place in a high rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a clean first liquid fraction and a first dry matter substance, and that the second centrifugal separation stage takes place in a low rotational speed centrifuge optimized for obtaining a second dry matter substance at a dry matter concentration being at least 15% higher than that of the first dry matter substance, and where at least a part of the first liquid fraction from the first centrifugal separation stage containing chlorides and potassium is bled out from the process and the first dry matter substance obtained from the first centrifugal separation stage is led to a second leaching tank where similar conditions as in the first leaching tank is established as of pH and dry substance level, after which the reslurried and leached first dry matter substance from the first centrifugal separation stage is fed to a second centrifugal separation stage from which a second liquid fraction is obtained that is led back to at least one preceding leaching tank, and a second dry matter substance which thereafter is mixed into black liquor before the black liquor is being sent to the recovery process.
- Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the first centrifugal separation stage takes place at a rotational speed above 3500 rpm, and the second centrifugal separation stage takes place at a rotational speed below 3500 rpm., while the difference in rotational speed between first and second centrifugal separation stages is at least 2000 rpm.
- Process according to Claim 2, characterized in that the first centrifugal separation stage takes place in a nozzle bowl separator centrifuge.
- Process according to Claim 3, characterized in that the second centrifugal separation stage takes place in a decanter centrifuge.
- Process according to Claim 1, characterized in that the leaching process in at least one leaching tank is established at a temperature in the interval 65-105°C, preferably around 80°C with a slurried electrostatic precipitator ash having a dry substance level in the interval 15-40% by weight being obtained.
- Process according to Claim 5, characterized in that the leaching process in at least one leaching tank is established such that the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash passing through, and being treated in, the leaching tank in at least two agitation zones, in which agitation zones the slurried electrostatic precipitator ash undergoes repeated gentle agitation in the leaching tank.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2009/050493 WO2011002354A1 (en) | 2009-05-06 | 2009-05-06 | Process for improved leaching of electrostatic precipitator ash from a recovery boiler |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2427598A1 EP2427598A1 (en) | 2012-03-14 |
EP2427598A4 EP2427598A4 (en) | 2014-04-02 |
EP2427598B1 true EP2427598B1 (en) | 2016-01-06 |
Family
ID=43411247
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP09846901.8A Active EP2427598B1 (en) | 2009-05-06 | 2009-05-06 | Process for improved leaching of electrostatic precipitator ash from a recovery boiler |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2427598B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN102421961B (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0924612B1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2011002354A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2018197753A1 (en) * | 2017-04-28 | 2018-11-01 | Andritz Oy | Method of treating fly ash of a recovery boiler |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8721837B2 (en) * | 2012-07-26 | 2014-05-13 | Veolia Water Solutions & Technologies North America, Inc. | Method for recovering pulping chemicals and reducing the concentration of potassium and chloride therein |
US9333468B2 (en) | 2012-09-24 | 2016-05-10 | Abengoa Bioenergy New Technologies, Llc | Soak vessels and methods for impregnating biomass with liquid |
FI126767B (en) * | 2012-11-16 | 2017-05-15 | Andritz Oy | Procedure for leaching ash from collection boiler |
CN104631181B (en) * | 2013-11-12 | 2018-09-25 | 王子控股株式会社 | Recycle processing method and processing unit that boiler collects ash |
SE538684C2 (en) * | 2014-12-10 | 2016-10-18 | Göran Hofstedt Anders | Procedure and plant for washing raw soap |
FI127615B (en) | 2015-11-27 | 2018-10-31 | Andritz Oy | A method for treating recovery boiler ash |
FR3072396B1 (en) * | 2017-10-12 | 2019-11-08 | L'air Liquide Societe Anonyme Pour L'etude Et L'exploitation Des Procedes Georges Claude | METHOD FOR TREATING ELECTROFILTER ASHES FROM THE RECOVERY BOILER IN A KRAFT PROCESS |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
SE504374C2 (en) * | 1994-10-20 | 1997-01-20 | Kvaerner Pulping Tech | Leakage of electric filter ash |
JPH08170288A (en) * | 1994-12-15 | 1996-07-02 | Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd | Removal of sodium salt and potassium salt from caught ash of soda-recovering boiler |
SE517587C2 (en) * | 2001-08-14 | 2002-06-25 | Kvaerner Pulping Tech | Procedure for leaching electric filter ash from a soda boiler |
SE526435C2 (en) * | 2001-09-28 | 2005-09-13 | Skogsind Tekn Foskningsinst | Recovery of pulping chemicals in alkaline sulfite pulping process and production of steam, by combusting hydrogen sulfide-containing gas in steam boiler, absorbing sulfur dioxide in sodium carbonate, and removing carbon dioxide |
JP3683870B2 (en) * | 2002-07-15 | 2005-08-17 | 太平洋セメント株式会社 | Dust water washing system and dust water washing method |
EP1798297A1 (en) * | 2005-12-16 | 2007-06-20 | CTU - Conzepte Technik Umwelt AG | Process for the treatment of heavy-metal bearing dust |
-
2009
- 2009-05-06 BR BRPI0924612-6A patent/BRPI0924612B1/en active IP Right Grant
- 2009-05-06 CN CN200980159135.XA patent/CN102421961B/en active Active
- 2009-05-06 EP EP09846901.8A patent/EP2427598B1/en active Active
- 2009-05-06 WO PCT/SE2009/050493 patent/WO2011002354A1/en active Application Filing
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2018197753A1 (en) * | 2017-04-28 | 2018-11-01 | Andritz Oy | Method of treating fly ash of a recovery boiler |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BRPI0924612A2 (en) | 2016-08-30 |
BRPI0924612B1 (en) | 2018-08-07 |
EP2427598A1 (en) | 2012-03-14 |
WO2011002354A1 (en) | 2011-01-06 |
CN102421961A (en) | 2012-04-18 |
EP2427598A4 (en) | 2014-04-02 |
CN102421961B (en) | 2013-09-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2427598B1 (en) | Process for improved leaching of electrostatic precipitator ash from a recovery boiler | |
EP2580161B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for in-line production of milk of lime into an in-line production process of pcc arranged in connection with a fibrous web machine | |
WO2009017389A2 (en) | Method for extracting crude palm oil | |
JPH02112495A (en) | Method and apparatus for improving the process of manufacturing a liquid or a fiber suspension liquid containing air or a gas | |
EP1444395B1 (en) | Process for leaching electrical filter ash from a recovery boiler | |
US20160040356A1 (en) | Method and assembly for processing cellulose pulp of wood processing industry | |
US4388197A (en) | Procedure for separating finely divided matter from a suspension by filtering | |
CN209790931U (en) | Oil cake extraction system | |
CN101318894B (en) | Separation purification method and apparatus for p-benzene dicarboxylic acid | |
WO2008063123A1 (en) | Leaching of chloride and potassium from electric filter ashes | |
WO2020053944A1 (en) | Washing treatment method for chlorine-containing powder, and washing treatment system for chlorine-containing powder | |
WO1992003611A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for decreasing problems caused by residual or reaction gases or gases harmful to a process | |
US4301000A (en) | Method and apparatus for fractionation and recovery of limestone grits in kraft pulping process | |
CN209790933U (en) | Oil sand extraction system | |
US5788813A (en) | Clarifying and/or filtering of green liquor and an apparatus therefore | |
JP5084990B2 (en) | Distributor cleaning method and apparatus | |
WO2011102761A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for controlling incrustations in multi stage evaporation train for black liquor | |
JP3765479B2 (en) | Method for filtering water to be treated containing suspended solids | |
CN209797825U (en) | System is prepared to soybean protein concentrate | |
CN111517365B (en) | Titanium tetrachloride production method and system | |
CN208395563U (en) | Slurry purification device, pulping device and papermaking-method reconstituted tobaccos system | |
US20230061315A1 (en) | Methods for producing cornstarch | |
JP4664628B2 (en) | Sludge concentration part structure | |
CZ20023492A3 (en) | Method and plant for treatment of process water | |
CA2544315A1 (en) | Apparatus for separating suspensions |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20111202 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20140304 |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: B01D 53/74 20060101ALI20140226BHEP Ipc: B01D 53/80 20060101ALI20140226BHEP Ipc: D21C 11/06 20060101AFI20140226BHEP Ipc: B01D 43/00 20060101ALI20140226BHEP |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: VALMET POWER AB |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: VALMET AKTIEBOLAG |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20150819 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 768973 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160215 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602009035741 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20160106 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160407 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160406 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160531 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160506 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160506 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602009035741 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20161007 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160506 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160506 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160531 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160531 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160406 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160531 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160506 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160506 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20090506 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160531 Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20160106 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: UEP Ref document number: 768973 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160106 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230506 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20230516 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20230512 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240520 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20240521 Year of fee payment: 16 |