EP2308987B1 - Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation - Google Patents
Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2308987B1 EP2308987B1 EP10185221.8A EP10185221A EP2308987B1 EP 2308987 B1 EP2308987 B1 EP 2308987B1 EP 10185221 A EP10185221 A EP 10185221A EP 2308987 B1 EP2308987 B1 EP 2308987B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- cells
- electroporation
- mrna
- egfp
- transfected
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 238000004520 electroporation Methods 0.000 title claims description 233
- 238000001890 transfection Methods 0.000 title claims description 95
- 210000003527 eukaryotic cell Anatomy 0.000 title claims description 24
- 108091033319 polynucleotide Proteins 0.000 title claims description 24
- 102000040430 polynucleotide Human genes 0.000 title claims description 24
- 239000002157 polynucleotide Substances 0.000 title claims description 23
- 230000001976 improved effect Effects 0.000 title description 5
- 210000004443 dendritic cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 326
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 296
- 108020004999 messenger RNA Proteins 0.000 claims description 192
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 87
- 230000035800 maturation Effects 0.000 claims description 70
- 210000001616 monocyte Anatomy 0.000 claims description 68
- 239000000427 antigen Substances 0.000 claims description 58
- 108091007433 antigens Proteins 0.000 claims description 58
- 102000036639 antigens Human genes 0.000 claims description 58
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 claims description 56
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens Species 0.000 claims description 51
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 claims description 47
- 210000001821 langerhans cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 40
- 108090000765 processed proteins & peptides Proteins 0.000 claims description 37
- 108060008682 Tumor Necrosis Factor Proteins 0.000 claims description 34
- 206010028980 Neoplasm Diseases 0.000 claims description 30
- 210000003958 hematopoietic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 27
- 102100031573 Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 Human genes 0.000 claims description 23
- 101000777663 Homo sapiens Hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen CD34 Proteins 0.000 claims description 23
- MZOFCQQQCNRIBI-VMXHOPILSA-N (3s)-4-[[(2s)-1-[[(2s)-1-[[(1s)-1-carboxy-2-hydroxyethyl]amino]-4-methyl-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-5-(diaminomethylideneamino)-1-oxopentan-2-yl]amino]-3-[[2-[[(2s)-2,6-diaminohexanoyl]amino]acetyl]amino]-4-oxobutanoic acid Chemical compound OC[C@@H](C(O)=O)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(C)C)NC(=O)[C@H](CCCN=C(N)N)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(O)=O)NC(=O)CNC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCCCN MZOFCQQQCNRIBI-VMXHOPILSA-N 0.000 claims description 22
- 108090001005 Interleukin-6 Proteins 0.000 claims description 21
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims description 20
- 108091036414 Polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid Proteins 0.000 claims description 18
- 229940115272 polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid Drugs 0.000 claims description 18
- 239000002158 endotoxin Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 229920006008 lipopolysaccharide Polymers 0.000 claims description 17
- 102000004196 processed proteins & peptides Human genes 0.000 claims description 16
- 238000005138 cryopreservation Methods 0.000 claims description 15
- XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-ARSRFYASSA-N dinoprostone Chemical compound CCCCC[C@H](O)\C=C\[C@H]1[C@H](O)CC(=O)[C@@H]1C\C=C/CCCC(O)=O XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-ARSRFYASSA-N 0.000 claims description 14
- 210000001671 embryonic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 13
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 230000004069 differentiation Effects 0.000 claims description 10
- 102000000852 Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha Human genes 0.000 claims description 8
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 8
- 210000005087 mononuclear cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 8
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000030741 antigen processing and presentation Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003308 immunostimulating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003612 virological effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 210000004962 mammalian cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 claims description 5
- 210000005260 human cell Anatomy 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000003614 tolerogenic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000002424 anti-apoptotic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 108010029697 CD40 Ligand Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 102100032937 CD40 ligand Human genes 0.000 claims description 2
- 108091028043 Nucleic acid sequence Proteins 0.000 claims description 2
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 claims description 2
- 108010048367 enhanced green fluorescent protein Proteins 0.000 description 148
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 78
- 210000003819 peripheral blood mononuclear cell Anatomy 0.000 description 77
- 108020004414 DNA Proteins 0.000 description 60
- 102100037850 Interferon gamma Human genes 0.000 description 46
- 108010074328 Interferon-gamma Proteins 0.000 description 46
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 45
- 210000001151 cytotoxic T lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 43
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 41
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 40
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 37
- 238000001638 lipofection Methods 0.000 description 32
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 27
- 102100040247 Tumor necrosis factor Human genes 0.000 description 26
- 206010022000 influenza Diseases 0.000 description 26
- 102100035793 CD83 antigen Human genes 0.000 description 25
- 108010017213 Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor Proteins 0.000 description 25
- 102100039620 Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor Human genes 0.000 description 25
- 101000946856 Homo sapiens CD83 antigen Proteins 0.000 description 25
- 238000010257 thawing Methods 0.000 description 25
- 101000946889 Homo sapiens Monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 Proteins 0.000 description 23
- 102100035877 Monocyte differentiation antigen CD14 Human genes 0.000 description 23
- 108700019146 Transgenes Proteins 0.000 description 23
- 238000000338 in vitro Methods 0.000 description 21
- 101000914484 Homo sapiens T-lymphocyte activation antigen CD80 Proteins 0.000 description 20
- 102100027222 T-lymphocyte activation antigen CD80 Human genes 0.000 description 20
- 102000006354 HLA-DR Antigens Human genes 0.000 description 19
- 108010058597 HLA-DR Antigens Proteins 0.000 description 19
- 239000006285 cell suspension Substances 0.000 description 19
- 230000004936 stimulating effect Effects 0.000 description 19
- 210000001744 T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 18
- 108060003393 Granulin Proteins 0.000 description 17
- 102000025850 HLA-A2 Antigen Human genes 0.000 description 16
- 108010074032 HLA-A2 Antigen Proteins 0.000 description 16
- 230000000638 stimulation Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 15
- 238000010186 staining Methods 0.000 description 15
- 108090000978 Interleukin-4 Proteins 0.000 description 14
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 14
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 14
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 14
- 210000002966 serum Anatomy 0.000 description 14
- ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N ethidium bromide Chemical compound [Br-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 ZMMJGEGLRURXTF-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 13
- 229960005542 ethidium bromide Drugs 0.000 description 13
- 230000028327 secretion Effects 0.000 description 13
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 13
- IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Dimethylsulphoxide Chemical compound CS(C)=O IAZDPXIOMUYVGZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 12
- 108010004729 Phycoerythrin Proteins 0.000 description 12
- 238000000684 flow cytometry Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 11
- 241000701806 Human papillomavirus Species 0.000 description 10
- 229960005486 vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 10
- 101001057504 Homo sapiens Interferon-stimulated gene 20 kDa protein Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 101001055144 Homo sapiens Interleukin-2 receptor subunit alpha Proteins 0.000 description 9
- 102100026878 Interleukin-2 receptor subunit alpha Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 230000000735 allogeneic effect Effects 0.000 description 9
- 210000001185 bone marrow Anatomy 0.000 description 9
- 230000003833 cell viability Effects 0.000 description 9
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 9
- -1 CD86 Proteins 0.000 description 8
- 241000725303 Human immunodeficiency virus Species 0.000 description 8
- 230000001464 adherent effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 210000004369 blood Anatomy 0.000 description 8
- 239000008280 blood Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000000872 buffer Substances 0.000 description 8
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 8
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 8
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 8
- 230000003248 secreting effect Effects 0.000 description 8
- 241000699666 Mus <mouse, genus> Species 0.000 description 7
- 239000012124 Opti-MEM Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000001476 gene delivery Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000028993 immune response Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 7
- 238000013518 transcription Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000035897 transcription Effects 0.000 description 7
- 102000004127 Cytokines Human genes 0.000 description 6
- 108090000695 Cytokines Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 238000002965 ELISA Methods 0.000 description 6
- 108700008625 Reporter Genes Proteins 0.000 description 6
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000006698 induction Effects 0.000 description 6
- 210000004698 lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 6
- 201000001441 melanoma Diseases 0.000 description 6
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 6
- 241000700605 Viruses Species 0.000 description 5
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 5
- LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I dipotassium trisodium dihydrogen phosphate hydrogen phosphate dichloride Chemical compound P(=O)(O)(O)[O-].[K+].P(=O)(O)([O-])[O-].[Na+].[Na+].[Cl-].[K+].[Cl-].[Na+] LOKCTEFSRHRXRJ-UHFFFAOYSA-I 0.000 description 5
- 230000003828 downregulation Effects 0.000 description 5
- MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N fluorescein-5-isothiocyanate Chemical compound O1C(=O)C2=CC(N=C=S)=CC=C2C21C1=CC=C(O)C=C1OC1=CC(O)=CC=C21 MHMNJMPURVTYEJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 5
- 208000032839 leukemia Diseases 0.000 description 5
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000002953 phosphate buffered saline Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000003389 potentiating effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000003827 upregulation Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000006146 Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 230000000890 antigenic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000004748 cultured cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000013394 immunophenotyping Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000009169 immunotherapy Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000001939 inductive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 102000039446 nucleic acids Human genes 0.000 description 4
- 108020004707 nucleic acids Proteins 0.000 description 4
- 150000007523 nucleic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 4
- 210000005259 peripheral blood Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 239000011886 peripheral blood Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000004083 survival effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 241000712461 unidentified influenza virus Species 0.000 description 4
- 101150013553 CD40 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000007260 Deoxyribonuclease I Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 108010008532 Deoxyribonuclease I Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 108010002350 Interleukin-2 Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000000588 Interleukin-2 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 239000005089 Luciferase Substances 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108700019961 Neoplasm Genes Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000048850 Neoplasm Genes Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 241000283973 Oryctolagus cuniculus Species 0.000 description 3
- 102100040245 Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 5 Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 201000011510 cancer Diseases 0.000 description 3
- 230000030833 cell death Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007541 cellular toxicity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003795 chemical substances by application Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000005684 electric field Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000001747 exhibiting effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007710 freezing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008014 freezing Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000005090 green fluorescent protein Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000036039 immunity Effects 0.000 description 3
- 150000002632 lipids Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000002243 precursor Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000011534 wash buffer Substances 0.000 description 3
- 102000040650 (ribonucleotides)n+m Human genes 0.000 description 2
- FXYZDFSNBBOHTA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[amino(morpholin-4-ium-4-ylidene)methyl]guanidine;chloride Chemical compound Cl.NC(N)=NC(=N)N1CCOCC1 FXYZDFSNBBOHTA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 102100024222 B-lymphocyte antigen CD19 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 102100027951 Brain and acute leukemia cytoplasmic protein Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 210000001266 CD8-positive T-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000006144 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle's medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- QTANTQQOYSUMLC-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ethidium cation Chemical compound C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 QTANTQQOYSUMLC-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 2
- 238000012413 Fluorescence activated cell sorting analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 108010010803 Gelatin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000011786 HLA-A Antigens Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010075704 HLA-A Antigens Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100027875 Homeobox protein Nkx-2.5 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 101000980825 Homo sapiens B-lymphocyte antigen CD19 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000578784 Homo sapiens Melanoma antigen recognized by T-cells 1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 101000934338 Homo sapiens Myeloid cell surface antigen CD33 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000341655 Human papillomavirus type 16 Species 0.000 description 2
- 101100156155 Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108060003951 Immunoglobulin Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010014726 Interferon Type I Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000002227 Interferon Type I Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010050904 Interferons Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000014150 Interferons Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010002352 Interleukin-1 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010002386 Interleukin-3 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108010063738 Interleukins Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000015696 Interleukins Human genes 0.000 description 2
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N L-glutamine Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-VKHMYHEASA-N 0.000 description 2
- 108060001084 Luciferase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102100025243 Myeloid cell surface antigen CD33 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- NWIBSHFKIJFRCO-WUDYKRTCSA-N Mytomycin Chemical compound C1N2C(C(C(C)=C(N)C3=O)=O)=C3[C@@H](COC(N)=O)[C@@]2(OC)[C@@H]2[C@H]1N2 NWIBSHFKIJFRCO-WUDYKRTCSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 229920002274 Nalgene Polymers 0.000 description 2
- PXIPVTKHYLBLMZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sodium azide Chemical compound [Na+].[N-]=[N+]=[N-] PXIPVTKHYLBLMZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000006044 T cell activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 102000008230 Toll-like receptor 3 Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010060885 Toll-like receptor 3 Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000251539 Vertebrata <Metazoa> Species 0.000 description 2
- 102100022748 Wilms tumor protein Human genes 0.000 description 2
- APKFDSVGJQXUKY-INPOYWNPSA-N amphotericin B Chemical compound O[C@H]1[C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@H]1/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/C=C/[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](C)OC(=O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)C[C@](O)(C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(O)=O)O[C@H]2C1 APKFDSVGJQXUKY-INPOYWNPSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 210000003719 b-lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001413 cellular effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000013599 cloning vector Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000000139 costimulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 125000004122 cyclic group Chemical group 0.000 description 2
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000002950 fibroblast Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000012737 fresh medium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000008273 gelatin Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229920000159 gelatin Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 235000019322 gelatine Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 235000011852 gelatine desserts Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 238000012239 gene modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001415 gene therapy Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000005017 genetic modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000013617 genetically modified food Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- RWSXRVCMGQZWBV-WDSKDSINSA-N glutathione Chemical compound OC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCC(=O)N[C@@H](CS)C(=O)NCC(O)=O RWSXRVCMGQZWBV-WDSKDSINSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 210000004408 hybridoma Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 102000018358 immunoglobulin Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 229940072221 immunoglobulins Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 229940079322 interferon Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012933 kinetic analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000000265 leukocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 239000003446 ligand Substances 0.000 description 2
- KWGKDLIKAYFUFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M lithium chloride Chemical compound [Li+].[Cl-] KWGKDLIKAYFUFQ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108010032806 molgramostim Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000000746 purification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011541 reaction mixture Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000013341 scale-up Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- DAEPDZWVDSPTHF-UHFFFAOYSA-M sodium pyruvate Chemical compound [Na+].CC(=O)C([O-])=O DAEPDZWVDSPTHF-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N streptomycin Chemical compound CN[C@H]1[C@H](O)[C@@H](O)[C@H](CO)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@](C=O)(O)[C@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@@H]1[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](NC(N)=N)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O UCSJYZPVAKXKNQ-HZYVHMACSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000013595 supernatant sample Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002560 therapeutic procedure Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000003151 transfection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001052 transient effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004881 tumor cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 2
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 208000030507 AIDS Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 241000251468 Actinopterygii Species 0.000 description 1
- APKFDSVGJQXUKY-KKGHZKTASA-N Amphotericin-B Natural products O[C@H]1[C@@H](N)[C@H](O)[C@@H](C)O[C@H]1O[C@H]1C=CC=CC=CC=CC=CC=CC=C[C@H](C)[C@@H](O)[C@@H](C)[C@H](C)OC(=O)C[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)CC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)C[C@H](O)C[C@](O)(C[C@H](O)[C@H]2C(O)=O)O[C@H]2C1 APKFDSVGJQXUKY-KKGHZKTASA-N 0.000 description 1
- 101710145634 Antigen 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020005544 Antisense RNA Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000235349 Ascomycota Species 0.000 description 1
- 108091003079 Bovine Serum Albumin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710122598 Brain and acute leukemia cytoplasmic protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229920002307 Dextran Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000206602 Eukaryota Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000282326 Felis catus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000233866 Fungi Species 0.000 description 1
- 101710177291 Gag polyprotein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010024636 Glutathione Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000018565 Hemochromatosis Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010090007 Homeobox Protein Nkx-2.5 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001005719 Homo sapiens Melanoma-associated antigen 3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000738771 Homo sapiens Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase C Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001094545 Homo sapiens Retrotransposon-like protein 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100034353 Integrase Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100022297 Integrin alpha-X Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102000006992 Interferon-alpha Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010047761 Interferon-alpha Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229930182816 L-glutamine Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 101150109178 M1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000043129 MHC class I family Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091054437 MHC class I family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101710125418 Major capsid protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100028389 Melanoma antigen recognized by T-cells 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100025082 Melanoma-associated antigen 3 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101100013973 Mus musculus Gata4 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101150114527 Nkx2-5 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108010057576 Papillomavirus E7 Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 229930182555 Penicillin Natural products 0.000 description 1
- JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N Penicillin G Chemical compound N([C@H]1[C@H]2SC([C@@H](N2C1=O)C(O)=O)(C)C)C(=O)CC1=CC=CC=C1 JGSARLDLIJGVTE-MBNYWOFBSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000004793 Polystyrene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 101710192141 Protein Nef Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100037422 Receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase C Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108700005075 Regulator Genes Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 241000283984 Rodentia Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000011579 SCID mouse model Methods 0.000 description 1
- 240000004808 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000024932 T cell mediated immunity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005867 T cell response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 101710127857 Wilms tumor protein Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108050003627 Wnt Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100460507 Xenopus laevis nkx-2.5 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000037919 acquired disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002671 adjuvant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960003942 amphotericin b Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003242 anti bacterial agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229940088710 antibiotic agent Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 210000000612 antigen-presenting cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000005975 antitumor immune response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001640 apoptogenic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N argon Substances [Ar] XKRFYHLGVUSROY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052786 argon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000015736 beta 2-Microglobulin Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108010081355 beta 2-Microglobulin Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000005208 blood dendritic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000002798 bone marrow cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940022399 cancer vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000009566 cancer vaccine Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003990 capacitor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000747 cardiac effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007675 cardiac surgery Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004113 cell culture Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012578 cell culture reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000011712 cell development Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010261 cell growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006727 cell loss Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003184 complementary RNA Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010668 complexation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012258 culturing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001086 cytosolic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000034994 death Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940029030 dendritic cell vaccine Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960002986 dinoprostone Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000003814 drug Substances 0.000 description 1
- 108010078428 env Gene Products Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 239000012894 fetal calf serum Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000799 fluorescence microscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N formaldehyde Substances O=C WSFSSNUMVMOOMR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000005714 functional activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229960003692 gamma aminobutyric acid Drugs 0.000 description 1
- BTCSSZJGUNDROE-UHFFFAOYSA-N gamma-aminobutyric acid Chemical compound NCCCC(O)=O BTCSSZJGUNDROE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000001502 gel electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007429 general method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N glutamine Natural products OC(=O)C(N)CCC(N)=O ZDXPYRJPNDTMRX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229960003180 glutathione Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003394 haemopoietic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002443 helper t lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000005847 immunogenicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002847 impedance measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002757 inflammatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 208000037797 influenza A Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 108010061181 influenza matrix peptide (58-66) Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002743 insertional mutagenesis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011488 interferon-alpha production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000019697 interleukin-15 production Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000002500 ions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009533 lab test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007885 magnetic separation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001785 maturational effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000003071 memory t lymphocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000011325 microbead Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007758 minimum essential medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229960004857 mitomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- OHDXDNUPVVYWOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N n-methyl-1-(2-naphthalen-1-ylsulfanylphenyl)methanamine Chemical compound CNCC1=CC=CC=C1SC1=CC=CC2=CC=CC=C12 OHDXDNUPVVYWOV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 210000000822 natural killer cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 210000004967 non-hematopoietic stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 description 1
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 238000012803 optimization experiment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229940049954 penicillin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000008194 pharmaceutical composition Substances 0.000 description 1
- 210000005134 plasmacytoid dendritic cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000013492 plasmid preparation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229920002223 polystyrene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000013641 positive control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000034190 positive regulation of NF-kappaB transcription factor activity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001556 precipitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000036278 prepulse Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002062 proliferating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000644 propagated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M propidium iodide Chemical compound [I-].[I-].C12=CC(N)=CC=C2C2=CC=C(N)C=C2[N+](CCC[N+](C)(CC)CC)=C1C1=CC=CC=C1 XJMOSONTPMZWPB-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N prostaglandin E2 Natural products CCCCCC(O)C=CC1C(O)CC(=O)C1CC=CCCCC(O)=O XEYBRNLFEZDVAW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000004224 protection Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035802 rapid maturation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009257 reactivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001172 regenerating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008929 regeneration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011069 regeneration method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000022532 regulation of transcription, DNA-dependent Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010076 replication Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 238000010187 selection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012679 serum free medium Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000019491 signal transduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940054269 sodium pyruvate Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009168 stem cell therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009580 stem-cell therapy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229960005322 streptomycin Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004448 titration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 108700012359 toxins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000010361 transduction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000026683 transduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000844 transformation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000032258 transport Effects 0.000 description 1
- 241000701161 unidentified adenovirus Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000013603 viral vector Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/87—Introduction of foreign genetic material using processes not otherwise provided for, e.g. co-transformation
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/46—Cellular immunotherapy
- A61K39/461—Cellular immunotherapy characterised by the cell type used
- A61K39/4615—Dendritic cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/46—Cellular immunotherapy
- A61K39/462—Cellular immunotherapy characterized by the effect or the function of the cells
- A61K39/4622—Antigen presenting cells
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
- A61K39/00—Medicinal preparations containing antigens or antibodies
- A61K39/46—Cellular immunotherapy
- A61K39/464—Cellular immunotherapy characterised by the antigen targeted or presented
- A61K39/4643—Vertebrate antigens
- A61K39/4644—Cancer antigens
- A61K39/46449—Melanoma antigens
- A61K39/464491—Melan-A/MART
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P35/00—Antineoplastic agents
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P37/00—Drugs for immunological or allergic disorders
- A61P37/02—Immunomodulators
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
- A61P43/00—Drugs for specific purposes, not provided for in groups A61P1/00-A61P41/00
Definitions
- the present invention provides an improved method for gene delivery in hematopoietic cells or stem cells not including human embryonic stem cells, in particular in dendritic cells.
- the method of the invention is superior to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for gene delivery, including tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells.
- DC Dendritic cells
- CTL cytotoxic T lymphocytes
- nonviral gene delivery systems for DC-based vaccines would provide a more attractive approach with clinical perspectives since safety issues and immunogenicity of the vector are reduced to a minimum.
- DC can be transfected to comparable levels as compared to transduction by recombinant viruses, such as poxviruses Kim, C. J. et al., J. Immunother., 20:276-286 (1997 )) or adenoviruses ( Dietz, A. B., Vuk, P.S., Blood, 91:392-398 (1998 )), while circumventing the drawbacks of viral vectors ( Jenne, L. et al., Gene Ther., 7:1575-1583 (2000 ); Jonuleit, H.
- RNA has a short cellular half-life and lacks the potential to integrate into the host genome, thereby obviating safety concerns, e.g. insertional mutagenesis, in the context of clinical gene therapy trials ( Lu, D. et al., Cancer Gene Ther., 1:245-252 (1994 ); Ying, H. et al., Nat. med., 5:823-827 (1999 )).
- this short cellular halflife may be disadvantageous since it may result in a relatively short protein expression.
- Electroporation methods for the integration of cyclic polynucleic acids into "normal" cells are generally use the following reaction conditions ( Van Tendeloo V.F.I et al., Gene Ther. 5:700-707 (1998 ); Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther. 7:1431-1437 (2000 ); Van Bockstaele, D., Berneman, Z.N., Cytometry 41:31-35 (2000 ); Lurquin, P.F., Mol. Biotechnol. 7:5-35 (1997 ); Matthews, K.E. et al., Mol. Biotechnol., vol 48, Chapter 22, Ed.Nickoloff ); Spencer, S.C., Biochem. and Biotechnol. 42:75-82 (1993 )):
- US patent no. 5,766,902 discloses an electroporation method for nucleic acid molecules, wherein the nucleic acid molecules are applied in or together with a ligand which binds to the target cell.
- Said complex may comprise an endosomal disruption agent.
- US patent No. 5,554,528 decribes the use of plasmids (i.e., cyclic DNA constructs) containing a toxin gene under the control of HIV elements for stable transformation of cell lines in order to block HIV replication when cells are infected.
- Said patent mentions DNA transfection by electroporation (column 15, example 2) using electrical settings (250 ⁇ F; 220 to 290 V; 100 ⁇ l volumes, BioRad cuvettes and Gene Pulser ® ) which are not typical for plasmid electroporation, it does, however, not mention RNA transfection, let alone RNA electropration.
- RNA transfection let alone RNA electropration.
- only "normal" mammalian cell lines are electroporated, primary cells are not contemplated.
- the present invention describes a method for high-efficiency non-viral transfection of Mo-DC as well as other types of dendritic cells (including CD34 + derived Langerhans cells and interstitial type DC) by mRNA electroporation correlated with effective loading of tumor antigens into different types of human DC.
- the efficiency of the method of the present invention was compared with other transfection methods, such as lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA as well as cDNA electroporation, and found to be highly superior. Furthermore, the effect of DC maturation on loading efficiency was investigated. An electroporation-based mRNA transfection protocol was developed which is suitable for highly efficient antigen loading in Mo-DC, as well as in 34-DC and 34-LC. This technique proved to be superior to mRNA lipofection or passive mRNA pulsing in terms of loading efficiency and subsequent activation of an antigen-specific CD8 + CTL clone.
- the transfection efficiency in Mo-DC, 34-DC and 34-LC was at least 25, 6 and 3 times, respectively, more efficient as compared to plasmid DNA electroporation described in van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998 ), and also superior to previously described mRNA electroporation. Also, such mRNA electroporation was superior to mRNA lipofection and passive pulsing. This increased transfection efficiency was translated in a superior biological effect in vitro, as confirmed by our CTL activation experiments, and could be used as a tool to investigate as to whether it results in a higher immunopotency in vivo ( Porgador, A.
- mRNA-transfected DC were able to efficiently process the introduced antigen and present antigenic epitopes in an MHC class I-restricted manner to a specific CD8 + TIL clone ( Fig. 4 ).
- antigen loading by mRNA electroporation was preferably performed prior to DC maturation in order to achieve the most optimal antigen presentation ( Fig. 5 ), indicating the importance of the sequence of loading and DC maturation for future DC-based vaccine design ( Morse, M. A. et al., Cancer Res., 58:2965-2968 (1998 )).
- the present invention thus provides a method for transfection of hematopoietic cells or stem cells not including human embryonic stem cells with one or more or a mixture of naked linear RNA, which method comprises electroporation of a suspension containing the hematopoietic cells or stem cells and the naked linear RNA to be transfected with a square wave soft pulse at 300 to 600 V in a 4mm cuvette for 100 ⁇ s to 1 ms, wherein the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 100 to 1x10 9 cells per ml.
- the method of the invention is applicable for loading human dendritic cells (DC) with antigens such as tumor antigens, which is a challenging approach for DC-based tumor vaccines.
- DC dendritic cells
- antigens such as tumor antigens
- the present invention describes a cytoplasmic expression system based on mRNA electroporation to efficiently introduce genetic information into DC.
- mRNA-electroporated DC retained their phenotype and maturational potential.
- DC electroporated with mRNA encoding Melan-A strongly activated a Melan-A-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clone in an HLA-restricted manner and were superior to mRNA-lipofected or -pulsed DC.
- CTL cytotoxic T lymphocyte
- Optimal stimulation of the CTL occurred when Mo-DC underwent maturation following mRNA transfection. Strikingly, a nonspecific stimulation of CTL was observed when DC were transfected with plasmid DNA.
- Our data clearly demonstrate that Mo-DC electroporated with mRNA efficiently present functional antigenic peptides to cytotoxic T cells.
- electroporation of mRNA encoding tumor antigens is a powerful technique to charge human dendritic cells with tumor antigens and could serve applications in future DC-based tumor vaccines.
- Transfection of ready mature DC was less efficient when maturation stimuli such as TNF ⁇ + LPS were used.
- the use of a certain generation methanol for Mo-DC including an optimized maturation stimulus allowed, however, also for efficient transfection such as tumor antigens of mature Mo-DC.
- the invention is hereinafter described in more detail by the appended figures and the examples.
- the so called "soft pulse” electroporation devices are utilized. With such devices the following settings a voltage of 300 to 600 V and a time of 100 ⁇ s to 1 ms are utilized which are believed to correspond to a capacitance of below 300 ⁇ F (although, due to the use of eukaryotic cell suspensions; a correct conversion is not possible).
- the pulse form provided by commercially available soft pulse electroporation devices may be a square wave pulse or an exponential decay pulse.
- Preferred settings for the soft pulse devices are 350 to 450 V for 300 to 600 ⁇ s.
- the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 1x10 3 to 1x10 9 cells per ml, preferably 1x10 5 to 1x10 9 cells per ml. Even more preferred are 1x10 5 to 5x10 7 cells per ml, most preferably 1 to 4x10 7 cells per ml.
- the linear RNA to be transfected is so-called "naked" RNA, i.e. RNA which is not complexed or stabilized by a ligand.
- Linear RNA to be utilized in the present invention includes modified or unmodified, defined or undefined RNA or DNA-RNA hybrids and all kinds of modified variants thereof.
- the most preferred linear polynucleotides are mRNA.
- the above DNA-RNA hybrides are particularly suitable to repair or modify genes ( Stepehnson, J., JAMA 281 (2), 119-122 (1999 )). It is moreover preferred that the concentration of the RNA to be transfected is 1x10 -7 to 1x10 -5 mmol/ml, preferably 4x10 -6 to 6x10 -6 mmol/ml.
- eukaryotic cells can be electroporated with the method of the invention, such as vertebrate cells including mammalian cells (such as human cells, rodent (mouse, rat) cells), non-vertebrate cells (such as cells of fish and worms), lower eukaryotes such as yeasts, filamentous fungi and ascomycetes.
- mammalian cells such as human cells, rodent (mouse, rat) cells
- non-vertebrate cells such as cells of fish and worms
- lower eukaryotes such as yeasts, filamentous fungi and ascomycetes.
- the mammalian/human cells are stem cells and derivatives thereof such as embryonic stem cells but not including human embryonic stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells and derivatives thereof, and hematopoietic cells including mononuclear cells, marrow CD34 + progenitor derived dendritic cells, CD34 + progenitor derived Langerhans cell, monocycle-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DC), and most preferably are Mo-DC including immature Mo-DC and mature Mo-DC, but can also be applied to DC precursors or progenitors such as monocytes or CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and also to embryonic stem cells.
- stem cells and derivatives thereof such as embryonic stem cells but not including human embryonic stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells and derivatives thereof, and hematopoietic cells including mononuclear cells, marrow CD34 + progenitor derived dendritic cells, CD34 + progenitor derived
- the method of the invention is also suitable to transduce primary bone marrow cells by RNA electroporation (it could be shown that mRNA electroporation of total bone marrow mononuclear cells is possible).
- the above mentioned precursor cells are electroporated with mRNA encoding the relevant antigen prior to (rapid) differentiation into dendritic cells. This strategy will be published in Ponsaerts et al. Journal of Immunology 2002 , in press. This approach might also be of value for other types of precursor dendritic cells including CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells or fresh CD11c+ blood dendritic cells that have a relative short halflife in vitro.
- the linear polynucleotides used in the method of the invention may be any functional nucleotide sequence exhibiting a certain effect in the eukaryotic cell, which includes polynucleotides encoding proteins or peptides to be expressed in the eukaryotic cells, polynucleotides being functional or regulatory sequences and the like.
- the proteins or peptides to be expressed in the eukaryotic cells may or may not have a direct function in the eukaryotic cells, i.e. the expessed protein or peptide changes the property of the transfected cell, or is merely expressed in the cell or secreted by the cell (e.g. is a reporter gene or a gene product).
- the above mentioned proteins or peptides encoded by the linear polynucleotides include, but are not limited to, tumor antigens, microbial antigens, viral antigens, immunostimulatory or tolerogenic molecules, anti-apoptotic molecules, adhesion and homing molecules and antigen processing molecules.
- the above mentioned functional or regulatory sequences include, but are not limited to, differentiation-regulating genes, differentiation-associated genes and tissue specific genes.
- Examples of the above proteins or peptides encoded by the linear polynucleotides are Reportergenes such as EGFP (Enhanced green fluorescent protein; SEQ ID NOs:1 and 2) etc.; Tumor/Viral Antigens such as WT1 (Wilms tumor 1 protein; SEQ ID NOs:3 and 4), E6 (Human Papilloma Virus E6 protein; SEQ ID NOs:5 and 6), E7 (Human Papilloma Virus E7 protein; SEQ ID NO:7 and 8), env (Human Immunodefficiency Virus env protein; SEQ ID NO:9), gag (Human Immunodefficiency Virus gag protein SEQ ID NO:10), tat(WT) (Human Immunodefficiency Virus tat(WT) proteins; SEQ ID NO: 11) tat(SLT) (Human Immunodefficiency Virus tat(SLT) protein SEQ ID NO:12), Nef (Human Immunodefficiency Virus Ne
- RNA electroporation For the electroporation, the following parameters were most preferred: a 4 mm cuvette with 200 ⁇ l of cell suspension and we shock the cells using 300 volts and a capacitance of 150 ⁇ F (pulse time 8-10 ms). These are optimal parameters for both leukemic K562 cells and different types of DC, both progenitor- and monocyte-derived DC. In the optimization process, other parameters were also checked, e.g., by ranging the voltage and the capacitance, as well as the volume in the cuvette, resulting in shorter or longer pulse times. In summary the following parameters for efficiency and toxicity of RNA electroporation were found:
- the common denominator for RNA electroporation is the low voltage (range 100 V-450 V), combined with a low capacitance (150 to below 300 ⁇ F) (which is in contrast to DNA settings, for which a high capacitance is required) and a low electroporation volume (200 ⁇ l) to increase cell concentration.
- Electroporation and incubations are all performed at room temperature and cells are resuspended in serumfree buffer (e.g. IMDM, RPMI, a serum reduced buffer (e.g. Opti-MEM ® ) or in optimized electroporation buffer Optimix ® purchased from EquiBio, UK cat n# EKIT-E1).
- serumfree buffer e.g. IMDM, RPMI, a serum reduced buffer (e.g. Opti-MEM ® ) or in optimized electroporation buffer Optimix ® purchased from EquiBio, UK cat n# EKIT-E1).
- the electroporator type is Easyject Plus ® (EquiBio) which only delivers exponential decay pulses.
- Examples 2-4 (“Reference Examples”) a Gene Pulser II ® (Biorad) was used.
- Example 10 which represents a method of the invention, a so-called "soft pulse” electroporators (such as Multiporator of Eppendorf and ECM 830 of Genetronix
- IVT mRNA-based electroporation is a highly efficient and simple nonviral method to gene-modify human Mo-DC, 34-DC and 34-LC with tumor antigens.
- the technique described in this study can serve applications in DC-based tumor vaccine development and in other gene transfer protocols requiring high-level short-term transgene expression in hematopoietic cells.
- EasyjecT PLUS D2000 model SHV (220 V; exponential decay pulses) was purchased from EquiBio Ltd. (cat # EJ-002, Action Court, Ashford Road, Ashford, Middlesex, TW15 1XB, U.K).
- the EasyjecT PLUS is fully microprocessor controlled via a bench top remote control unit, featuring an LCD display, membrane keypad and "Smart Card” reader/recorder. Hard copies of the parameters and initiated pulse values can be taken using the EasyjecT printer (included in the EasysyjecT PLUS). This information is invaluable in confirming your experimental procedure and giving results assured information.
- the EasyjecT PLUS includes a multitude of safety and operating detection features to enable safe operation without compromising the experimental procedure.
- the EasyjecT is designed to deliver single or double exponential decay pulses.
- the EasyjecT PLUS has in addition the unique "double pulse” technology. This has been beneficial in certain cases where single pulse
- Electroporation cuvettes Throughout the experiments with EasyjecT PLUS D2000, sterile 4mm electroporation cuvettes with cap (EquiBio, UK cat # ECU-104) were used. Each cuvette is individually wrapped and gamma-irradiated. Specifically designed sterile pipettes were used to further improve aseptic procedures. Total capacity is 800 ⁇ l. Electroporation medium: Just before electroporation, cells were resuspended in Optimix® medium (EquiBio, UK, cat #EKIT-E1). Optimix is a QC-tested fully optimised medium, designed for the electroporation of eukaryotic cells.
- Optimix improves both transfection efficiencies and survival rates over phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or other standard culture medium.
- PBS phosphate-buffered saline
- the composition of Optimix has been carefully formulated to help protect cells during the electroporation process, also providing additional salts and critical molecules that help in the regeneration process following the destabilisation caused by the electrical discharge through the cell.
- the Optimix kit is ready to use and contains enough material for approx. 24 experiments. The kit is shipped at ambient temperature, however, it is important that some of the components are stored at either 4°C or -20°C on arrival.
- Optimix comprises 1 x 200ml of washing solution, 4 x 2.5ml of Optimix, 4x ATP and 4 x glutathione.
- V is the output voltage of the electroporation apparatus and d is the distance between the electrodes of the cuvette.
- Pulse time ( ⁇ ) is by definition the elapsed time, in seconds, from the beginning of the pulse, when the electric field is maximum ( E o ) until the electric field has decreased to e -1 (0.368) of the initial value E o . Practically, this value is measured by the microprocessor of the electroporation unit.
- the pulse time gives an estimation of the duration of the membrane pore formation process and is inversely correlated by the volume of electroporation medium in the cuvette and the directly correlated with the cell concentration in the cuvette and the resistance of the medium.
- T2 cells T2 cells (TAP-deficient, HLA-A2 + , TxB hybrid), EBV-LG2 (HLA-A2- EBV-transformed B lymphocytes), and SK23-MEL (Melan-A + HLA-A2 + melanoma cell line) were kindly provided by Dr. Pierre Van der Bruggen (Ludwig institute for Cancer Research, Brussels, Belgium).
- K562 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC n° CCL-243, Rockville, MD, USA).
- IMDM Iscove's medium
- L-glutamine 2 mM
- penicillin 100 U/ml
- streptomycin 100 ⁇ g/ml
- amphotericin B 1.25 ⁇ g/mt Fungizone
- FCS 10% fetal calf serum
- the TIL clone was maintained in AIM-V medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 5% pooled human AB serum (Sigma, Bornem, Belgium) and 500 IU/ml interleukin (IL)-2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and used as responder population in DC coculture experiments.
- AIM-V medium Gibco BRL
- human AB serum Sigma, Bornem, Belgium
- 500 IU/ml interleukin (IL)-2 R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- BM samples were aspirated by sternal puncture from hematologically normal patients undergoing cardiac surgery, after informed consent.
- Peripheral blood mononuclear cells PBMC
- the 6 PBMC donors used in this study are designated by letters A to F.
- Mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient separation (LSM, ICN Biomedicals Inc., Costa Mesa, CA, USA). Monocytes were directly isolated and used for DC culture, as described below.
- PBMC for DC/T-cell cocultures were cryopreserved in a solution consisting of 90% FCS and 10% DMSO and stored at -80°C until use.
- CD34 + cell sorting After Ficoll-Hypaque separation, mononuclear BM cells were indirectly stained using supernatant of the 43A1 hybridoma (anti-CD34) kindly donated by Dr. H-J. Buhring, University of Tübingen, Germany ( Buhring, H. J. et al., Leukemia, 5:854-860 (1991 )), followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark).
- anti-CD34 43A1 hybridoma
- the CD34 labeled cells were then sorted on a FACStar PLUS cell sorter (Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium) equipped with an air-cooled argon ion laser ILT model 5500-A (Ion Laser Technology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Sort windows were set to include cells with low side scatter and with positive green fluorescence (CD34 + ). Purities of >95% were routinely obtained.
- CD34 + cells were cultured in 2 ml of complete medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Leucomax, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland), 2.5 ng/ml tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- ⁇ (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and 50 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF; Biosource, Nivelle, Belgium) until day 5; afterwards, SCF was replaced by 1000 U/ml IL-4 (R&D Systems), which was added for the next 5-9 days. After 12 days of culture, a 15-20 fold total cell expansion was observed and cells exhibited typical markers of mature DC including CD1a, CD80, CD86 and HLA-DR ( Fig. 3C ).
- GM-CSF granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor
- TNF tumor necrosis factor
- SCF stem cell factor
- sorted CD34 + cells were first cultured for 8 days in complete medium containing 100 ng/ml IL-3, 100 ng/ml IL-6 and 50 ng/ml SCF (all from Biosource), followed by LC differentiation in GM-CSF (100 ng/ml) and IL-4 (1000 U/ml) for the next 4 weeks.
- Immature monocyte-derived DC (iMo-DC) were generated from PBMC as described by Romani, N. et al., J. Exp. Med., 180:83-93 (1996 ). Briefly, PBMC were allowed to adhere in AIM-V medium for 2 h at 37°C.
- GM-CSF 100 ng/ml
- IL-4 1000 U/ml
- Maturation of iMo-DC was induced by adding 2.5 ng/ml TNF- ⁇ and 100 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Sigma) for 24 h starting from day 6 of the Mo-DC culture.
- monocytes derived from PBMCs were allowed to adhere in AIM-V medium (Gibco BRL, Paisly, UK) for 2 h at 37°C in 6-well culture plates (20x10 6 PBMC/well). After careful removal of the non-adherent fraction, cells were cultured in serum-free AIM-V medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml GM-CSF (Leucomax, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) for 2 days. To obtain mature DC, poly-I:C (Sigma, Cambridge, UK) was added 24 hours after starting the culture at a concentration of 25 ⁇ g/ml. The typical yield and purity of the DC culture was 1-2x10 6 cells/well containing 60-70% of DC.
- monocytes were isolated from PBMC by magnetic isolation using CD14 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Routinely, 4-8x10 6 monocytes were obtained starting from 100x10 6 PBMC with purity levels ⁇ 85%.
- HLA-A typing of DC HLA-A2 subtyping was determined on BM-derived mononuclear cells and PBMC by indirect staining with the supernatant of the BB7-2 hybridoma (anti-HLA-A2; ATCC), followed by FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins (DAKO). HLA-A2 staining was analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACScan analytical flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium).
- Synthetic peptides An influenza virus-specific HLA-A*0201-restricted matrix protein M1 peptide (M1; amino acids (aa) 58-66, GILGFVFTL; SEQ ID NO:32) was used for activation or for detection of matrix protein M1 peptide specific T-cells when pulsed on respectively DC and T2 cells.
- M1 HLA-A*0201-restricted matrix protein M1 peptide
- a human papillomavirus (HPV) HLA-A2-restricted E7 protein-specific peptide E7; amino acids (aa) 11-20, YMLDLQPETT; SEQ ID NO:33
- HPV human papillomavirus
- Melan-A peptide (MA; aa 27-35, AAGIGILTV; SEQ ID NO:34) was also used.
- Peptides (>95% pure) were purchased from Sigma-Genosys (Cambridge, UK). Both peptides were dissolved in 100% DMSO to 10 mg/ml, further diluted to 1 mg/ml in serum-free IMDM and stored in aliquots at -70°C. Peptides were used at a final concentration of 20 mM. The peptides (>95% pure) were purchased from Sigma-Genosys (Cambridge, UK).
- the peptides were dissolved in 100% DMSO to 10 mg/ml, further diluted to 1 mg/ml in serum-free IMDM and stored in aliquots at -80°C. The peptides were used at a final concentration of 20 ⁇ M.
- T2 cells, HLA-A2 + iMo-DC or DC were washed twice with IMDM and subsequently incubated (2x10 6 cells/ml) for 1 to 2 h at room temperature in 5 ml conical polystyrene tubes or 15 ml conical tubes with 20 ⁇ g/ml peptide in serum-free IMDM medium supplemented with 2.5 ⁇ g/ml ⁇ 2-microglobulin (Sigma). Afterwards, the cells were washed and used respectively as stimulators for PBMC or as restimulators in cytokine release assays.
- Plasmids For plasmid cDNA transfection, a pEGFP-N1 plasmid (CLONTECH Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used encoding an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene under the control of a CMV promoter plasmid pGEM4Z/EGFP/A64 (kindly provided by Dr. E. Gilboa, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA) contained the EGFP gene under the control of T7 promoter. Plasmid pcDNA1.1/Melan-A contained the Melan-A/MART-1 gene driven by a CMV promoter was kindly provided by Dr. Pierre Van der Bruggen.
- EGFP enhanced green fluorescent protein
- Plasmid pcDNA1.1/Amp (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as a backbone control vector.
- Plasmid pCMV-Luciferase (CLONTECH Laboratories, Polo Alter, CA, USA) carried a luciferase gene under the control of a CMV promoter and was used as a control plasmid.
- Plasmid pGEM4Z/M1/A64 (kindly provided by Dr. A. Steinkasserer, University of Er Weg, Er Weg, Germany) encoding an influenza M1 gene under the control of a T7 promoter (SEQ ID NO:31). Plasmids were propagated in E.
- Coli strain DH5 ⁇ (Gibco BRL) or supercompetent cells (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) and purified on endotoxin-free QIAGEN ® -tip 500 columns (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA).
- IVT in vitro transcribed mRNA
- plasmids were linearized, purified using a Genieprep kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) or a PCR purification Kit (Qiagen) and used as DNA templates for the in vitro transcription reaction.
- pcDNA1.1/Melan-A was used as such for in vitro transcription under the control of a T7 promoter.
- EGFP cDNA isolated as a 0.8 kb HindIII-NotI fragment from pEGFP-H1
- pcDNA1.1/Amp was first subcloned into pcDNA1.1/Amp and subsequently cloned as a BamHI-XbaI fragment into pSP64 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) that allows in vitro transcription under the control of an SP6 promoter. Transcription was carried out in a final 20-100 ⁇ l reaction mix at 37°C for 3-4 h using the SP6 MessageMachine kit (Ambion) to generate 5' m'GpppG-capped IVT mRNA. Transcription reactions with Spe I (MBI Fermentas, St.
- CD14 microbead-isolated monocytes were washed twice with Optimix Washing Solution (EquiBio, Ashford, Middlesex, UK) and resuspended to a final concentration of 50x10 6 cells/ml in Optimix electroporation buffer (EquiBio). Subsequently 0.2 ml of the cell suspension was mixed with 20 ⁇ g of IVT mRNA and electroporated in a 0.4 cm cuvette at 300 V and 150 ⁇ F using an Easyject Plus device (EquiBio). Plasmid DNA electroporation was performed as previously described ( Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998 )). After electroporation, fresh complete medium (including cytokines for DC) was added to the cell suspension and cells were further incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO 2 .
- Lipofection of mRNA was performed using the cationic lipid DMRIE-C (Gibco BRL) according to manufacturer's instructions with minor modifications ( Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998 )). Briefly, K562 cells were washed twice with serum-free IMDM and resuspended to a final concentration of 1-2.10 6 cells/ml in Opti-MEM. 34-DC, 34-LC and Mo-DC were harvested after respectively 12, 25 and 6 days of culture, washed twice with serum-free IMDM, and resuspended to a final concentration of 1-2.10 6 cells/ml in Opti-MEM.
- IVT mRNA Five ⁇ g of IVT mRNA, diluted in 250 ⁇ l Opti-MEM, was mixed with DMRIE-C, also diluted in 250 ⁇ l Opti-MEM, at a lipid:RNA ratio of 4: 1. After 5-15 min of incubation at room temperature in order to allow RNA-lipid complexation, lipoplexes were added to the cells and allowed to incubate for 2 hours at 37°C. Alternatively, 5-20 ⁇ g of IVT mRNA was pulsed to the cells in the absence of DMRIE-C for 3-4 h at 37°C. Plasmid DNA lipofection was performed as described previously ( Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998 )). After lipofection or passive pulsing, fresh complete medium (including cytokines for DC) was added to each well.
- EGFP analysis EGFP-transfected cells were checked for EGFP expression 24-48 h after transfection by flow cytometric (FCM) analysis. Briefly, cells (1-5 x 10 5 ) were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 1% FCS and resuspended in 0.5 ml of PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide. Ethidium bromide (EB) at a final concentration of 10 ⁇ g/ml was added directly prior to FCM analysis on a FACScan analytical flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) to assess cell viability.
- FCM flow cytometric
- gating was performed on cells exhibiting a large forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) profile, i.e. DC, in order to allow exclusion of contaminating autologous lymphocytes Gated DC were then evaluated for EGFP expression.
- FSC forward scatter
- SSC side scatter
- Immunophenotyping of DC Immunophenotyping was performed as described previously ( Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998 )). The following monoclonal antibodies were used: CD1a-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Beerse, Belgium), CD1a-phycoerythrin (PE) (Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, CA, USA), CD14-PE, HLA-DR-PE, HLA-DR-FITC (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), CD4-PE, CD80-PE (Becton Dickinson), CD80-FITC (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), CD40-FITC (BioSource, Zoersel, Belgium), CD86-PE (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), CD86-FITC (Serotec, Oxford, UK), CD13-FITC (DAKO), CD14-FITC
- Immunophenotyping with CD83 was followed by staining with a secondary rabbit anti-mouse (RAM)-FITC antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark).
- RAM rabbit anti-mouse
- Nonreactive isotype-matched antibodies (Becton Dickinson) were used as controls.
- Ethidium bromide was added prior to FCM analysis on a FACScan analytical flow cytometer (Beckton Dickinson) to assess cell viability and to exclude dead cells from the analysis. Gating was also performed to exclude remaining lymphocytes in the DC cultures.
- EGFP enhanced green fluorescent protein
- PE phycoerythrin
- Interferon (IFN)- ⁇ release assay 34-DC, 34-LC and iMo-DC were used as stimulator cells 24 h after transfection.
- IFN Interferon
- 6-day-cultured iMo-DC were allowed to mature for 24 h in the presence of TNF- ⁇ and LPS prior to transfection and used as stimulators 24 h after transfection.
- iMo-DC were transfected with mRNA on day 6 of culture and, after 12-16 h to allow protein expression, TNF- ⁇ , and LPS were added to induce final DC maturation. After an additional 24 h, mature transfected Mo-DC were used as stimulators.
- iMo-DC pulsed with the Melan-A, an irrelevant influenza M1 peptide or an irrelevant human papilloma virus E7 peptide were used as stimulators.
- Stimulators were either washed twice and resuspended in AIM-V medium supplemented with 10% pooled human AB serum and 40 IU/ml IL-2.
- Responder CTL were washed vigorously 3-4 times and resuspended in AIM-V medium. Then, CTL (1 x 10 5 cells) were coincubated with stimulator cells (1x10 5 cells) in 96-round bottom plates for 24 h at 37°C in a total volume of 200 ⁇ l.
- stimulators and responder PBMC were washed and resuspended in IMDM + 5% hAB serum. Then, responder PBMC (1x10 5 cells) were coincubated with stimulator cells (1x10 4 cells) in 96-well round-bottom plates for 6 hours at 37°C In a total volume of 100 ⁇ l. Triplicate supernatant samples from these cocultures were tested for specific IFN- ⁇ secretion by an IFN- ⁇ ELISA (Biosource, Nivelle, Belgium). To normalize data, the background IFN- ⁇ secretion (defined as IFN- ⁇ released by the CTL exposed to unmodified DC) was subtracted from each of the observed measurements. Measurements are presented as IU/ml released by 10 5 responder cells/24 h.
- IFN- ⁇ secreting cell assay PBMC primed and cultured as described above (1x10 6 ) were restimulated for 3 hours in 24-well plates with T2 cells (1x10 5 ) pulsed with M1 peptide or E7 peptide as control. Next, IFN- ⁇ -secreting cells were analyzed by a flow cytometric IFN- ⁇ Secretion Assay Detection Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Cells were also stained with CD8-FITC (Becton Dickinson) and 5x10 5 cells were analyzed per sample by flow cytometry. Analysis was done by gating on the lymphocyte population.
- Allogeneic mixed leukocyte reaction Immature and mature DC were used for stimulation of allogeneic PBMC. Briefly, immature or mature DC were cocultured with 20x10 6 allogeneic PBMC (ratio 1:10) in 10 ml IMDM supplemented with 5% human (h) AB serum (Sigma) in T25 culture flasks. On day 4 of culture, 5 ml fresh medium (IMDM + 5% hAB serum) was added to the cultures. On day 7 of culture, cells were analyzed for reactivity.
- MLR mixed leukocyte reaction
- stimulated PBMC (1x10 5 cells) were restimulated with PBMC from the DC donor (1x10 4 cells) in 96-well round bottom plates for 6 hours at 37°C in a total volume of 100 ⁇ l.
- Supernatant samples from these cocultures were tested for IFN- ⁇ secretion by IFN- ⁇ ELISA (Biosource, Nivelle, Belgium).
- M1 peptide-pulsed immature, M1 peptide-pulsed mature DC and matrix protein mRNA-electroporated mature DC were used for antigen-specific stimulation of PBMC.
- 2x10 6 antigen-loaded DC were cocultured with 20x10 6 autologous PBMC (ratio 1:10) in 10 ml IMDM supplemented with 5% hAB serum in T25 culture flasks.
- 10 ml IMDM supplemented with 5% hAB serum
- 5 ml fresh medium IMDM + 5% hAB serum
- mRNA electroporation at optimal settings showed a significantly reduced cell mortality rate as compared to cDNA electroporation at optimal settings (15% versus 51%, respectively).
- DMRIE-C-mediated RNA and DNA lipofection showed a somewhat similar outcome in terms of efficiency and viability although optimal lipid:nucleic acid ratio (4:1 versus 3: 1) as well as incubation time (2 h versus 6 h) varied for RNA and DNA lipofection, respectively (Table 1).
- optimal lipid:nucleic acid ratio (4:1 versus 3: 1)
- incubation time (2 h versus 6 h) varied for RNA and DNA lipofection, respectively
- Fig. 1B we also studied kinetics of EGFP expression following mRNA electroporation
- Immature Mo-DC Immature Mo-DC (iMo-DC) were generated from adherent PBMC in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4. At day 5-6 of culture, Mo-DC were electroporated with EGFP mRNA. Optimization experiments revealed optimal settings similar to those of K562 cells (300 V, 150 ⁇ F), leading to maximal transfection efficiency combined with the lowest level of cell death. FCM analysis of EGFP expression showed more than 60% EGFP-expressing iMo-DC ( Fig. 2A & Table 2).
- EGFP mRNA in Mo-DC Lipofection of EGFP mRNA in Mo-DC resulted in a much lower efficiency (7.5 ⁇ 0.5%) and was slightly more toxic (mean cell mortality rate 28 ⁇ 10%) to the cells than mRNA electroporation, as shown in Fig 2A .
- Passive pulsing of DC with mRNA did not result in any detectable EGFP expression.
- Kinetic analysis of mRNA expression in Mo-DC showed a maximum 24 h after electroporation, followed by a slow decline in function of time ( Fig. 2B ). Five days after mRNA electroporation, EGFP was still detectable in a substantial proportion of Mo-DC (31% EGFP + cells), in contrast to transgene expression kinetics in K562 cells (9% EGFP + cells after 5 days).
- mRNA transfection in bone marrow CD34 + progenitor-derived DC (34-DC) and CD34 + progenitor-derived Langerhans cells (34-LC) was also tested. Up to 72% and 53%, respectively, of these DC types were readily transfected by mRNA electroporation ( Fig. 2C ), but not by mRNA lipofection or mRNA pulsing (Table 2). Viability was always higher than 80% for both 34-DC and 34-LC ( Fig. 2C ).
- Table 2 summarizes efficiency of mRNA-based electroporation, lipofection and passive pulsing in the different types of DC. Table 2: Efficiency of mRNA transfection in different types of DC. Transfection efficiency (%) Method of transfection iMo-DC mMo-DC 34-LC 34-DC Electroporation 63 ⁇ 9 33 ⁇ 8 50 ⁇ 3 73 ⁇ 3 Lipofection 7.5 ⁇ 2.5 4 ⁇ 2.3 ⁇ BG ⁇ BG Passive pulsing ⁇ BG ⁇ BG ⁇ BG ⁇ BG ⁇ BG
- EGFP expression was analyzed by FCM to estimate transfection efficiency (% EGFP + DC).
- iMo-DC immature Mo-DC
- mMo-DC mature Mo-DC
- 34-LC CD34 + progenitor-derived Langerhans cells
- 34-DC CD34 + progenitor-derived dendritic cells.
- SD standard deviation
- Phenotype and maturation of mRNA-electroporated DC Since DC have a delicate phenotype which can easily be disturbed by culture or transfection conditions, we assessed by FCM analysis whether electroporated DC retained their respective phenotype as well as their capacity to differentiate into mature DC. Control and EGFP mRNA-transfected Mo-DC were stained using monoclonal antibodies binding to characteristic DC markers including CD1a, HLA-DR, CD80, CD86 and CD83. Electroporation of mRNA showed no effect on the phenotype of Mo-DC, as electroporated Mo-DC co-expressing EGFP retained high levels of CD1a, HLA-DR and CD86 ( Fig. 3A ).
- EGFP + 34-DC co-expressed HLA-DR, CD1a, CD80 and CD86. Similar findings were observed in 34-LC, with the exception that 34-LC exhibited lower levels of CD80 and CD86, compatible with their similarity to immature Langerhans-like DC (data not shown).
- MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation by mRNA-transfected DC Given the high transfection efficiency in Mo-DC, we investigated to what extent mRNA-transfected Mo-DC could process antigen and present MHC class I-restricted antigenic epitopes to an antigen-specific CTL clone. Therefore, we introduced mRNA encoding Melan-A/MAPT-1 into HLA-A2 + Mo-DC using electroporation, lipofection or passive pulsing. Mo-DC electroporated or lipofected with Melan-A mRNA markedly stimulated an HLA-A2 + Melan-A-specific CTL clone, as judged by IFN- ⁇ secretion ( Fig. 4 ).
- Mo-DC passively pulsed with Melan-A mRNA did not result in any CTL stimulation.
- HLA-A2 + Mo-DC electroporated with EGFP mRNA or HLA-A2- Mo-DC electroporated with Melan-A mRNA did not stimulate the CTL clone to produce IFN- ⁇ .
- iMo-DC immature Mo-DC
- mMo-DC mature Mo-DC
- 34-LC CD34 + progenitor-derived Langerhans cells
- 34-DC CD34 + progenitor-derived DC
- ⁇ BG IFN- ⁇ production below background.
- Mo-DC obtained by culturing PBMC in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 for 5-7 days exhibit predominantly an immature phenotype ( Romani, N. et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 196:137-151 (1996 )). These immature Mo-DC are specialized in capturing large amounts of antigens from the environment ( Sallusto, F., Lanzavecchia, A., J. Exp. Med., 179:1109-1118 (1994 )). However, for optimal presentation to CTL, Mo-DC need to undergo a maturation process which can be induced by bacterial products (e.g.
- 34-LC and 34-DC can also be transfected by plasmid DNA electroporation ( Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998 )). Therefore, we evaluated whether plasmid DNA-transfected DC can also induce antigen-specific CTL activation.
- HLA-A2 + 34-LC electoporated with plasmid DNA or IVT mRNA encoding Melan-A were incubated with the Melan-A specific CTL to evaluate IFN- ⁇ secretion ( Fig. 6 ).
- EGFP RNA-transfection of immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (generated from leukapheresis products and matured by a cocktail of IL-1 ⁇ + IL-6 + TNF ⁇ + PEG 2 under GMP conditions for clinical application) by electroporation.
- Monocyte-derived immature Dendritic Cells (DC) were generated from leukapheresis products as described ( Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods 245: 15-29 (2000 )).
- Immature DC (d6) were washed twice in RPMI and once in washing-solution of the Optimix ® -Kit (EQUIBIO, Maidstone Kent, U.K.).
- DC were adjusted to a final cell concentration of 10x10 6 /ml in Optimix ® -Medium. Then 0,2 ml of the cell suspension were mixed with 20 ⁇ g in vitro transcribed EGFP RNA in a 1,5 ml reaction tube. After incubation at room temperature for a maximum of 3 minutes the cell suspension were transferred in a 0,4-cm-gap electroporation-cuvette. Pulse were triggered at a voltage of 300 V and a capacitance of 150 ⁇ F with the Gene Pulser II (BioRad, Kunststoff, Germany) resulting in pulse time of 7-10 msec.
- DC Dendritic Cells
- the Forward and Side Scatter analysis addition reveals that for monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells that are generated from leukapheresis products, RNA-transfected by electroporation, and fully matured by adding a maturation cocktail consisting of of IL-1 ⁇ , IL-6, TNF-a and PGE 2 ( Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 245: 15-29 (2000 )) the use of 260 V is slightly better as the integrity of the cells is somewhat better preserved.
- Immature DC (d6) - see Fig. 9A - were washed twice in RPMI and once in washing-solution of the Optimlx ® -Kit (EQUIBIO, Maidstone Kent, U.K.). DC were adjusted to a final cell concentration of 10x10 6 /ml in Optimix ® -Medium. Then 0,2 ml of the cell suspension were mixed with or without 20 ⁇ g in vitro transcribed EGFP RNA in a 1,5 ml reaction tube. After incubation at room temperature for a maximum of 3 minutes the cell suspension was transferred in a 0,4-cm-gap electroporation-cuvette.
- Pulses were triggered at the indicated voltage and a capacitance of 150 ⁇ F with the Gene Pulser II (BioRad, Kunststoff, Germany) resulting in pulse time of 7-10 msec.
- the cell suspensions were transferred to 6-well-plates (1x10 6 DC/ well/3 ml culture medium). Terminal maturation was induced by addition of IL-1 ⁇ , IL-6, TNF-a and PGE 2 .
- 48 h after electroporation the DC were counterstained with the indicated mouse mAbs and PE-conjugated anti-mouse Ig followed by FACS-analysis. The results are shown in Fig. 9B .
- the phenotypic analysis reveals that for monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells that are generated from leukapheresis products, RNA-transfected by electroporation, and fully matured by adding a maturation cocktail consisting of of IL-1 ⁇ , IL-6, TNF-a and PGE 2 ( Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 245: 15-29 (2000 )) the use of 260 V is slightly better as more cells are in the upper right quadrant, i.e. expressing both EGFP and the maturation markers CD83 and CD25.
- EGFP RNA-transfection of already matured monocyte-derived dendritic cells (generated from leukapheresis cells and matured by a cocktail of IL-1 ⁇ + IL-6 + TNF ⁇ + PEG 2 under GMP conditions for clinical application) by electroporation.
- DC Dendritic Cells
- Immature DC (d6) were induced to undergo terminal maturation by addition of IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF- ⁇ and PGE 2 as described in Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods 245: 15-29 (2000 ).
- Mature DC were transfected with EGFP-RNA by electroporation as described in Example 2.
- DC Mature monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells
- mRNA-electroporated mature dendritic cells retain transgene expression, phenotypical properties and stimulatory capacity after cryopreservation.
- Table 4 Transgene expression in cryopreserved mRNA-electroporated K562 cells % EGFP+ cells MFI EGFP+ cells % dead cells
- K562 cells were electroporated with EGFP mRNA and cryopreserved 3 or 24 hours after transfection.
- K562 cells were resuspended in cryotubes (Nunc CryoTube Vials, Nalgene Nunc International, Denmark) at a concentration of 10 x 10 6 per ml in pure FCS.
- the suspension was mixed on ice with an equal volume of FCS supplemented with 20% DMSO (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).
- Cell suspensions were slowly frozen (-1°C/min) to -80°C by using a cryo freezing container (Nalgene Nunc International). Cells were frozen at -80°C for more than 24 hours before use in further experiments.
- Electroporation mRNA was still functional after cryopreservation. In cultures that had been frozen 3 hours after the electroporation, the MFI of expressed EGFP almost doubled between 3 and 24 hours after thawing (p 0.0009).
- Table 5 Transgene expression in cryopreserved mRNA-electroporated DC % EGFP+ cells MFI EGFP+ cells % dead cells
- Cryopreservation: iMo-DC cells frozen 18 h after mRNA electroporation (n 4) 6 h after thawing 61 ⁇ 2 215 ⁇ 14 26 ⁇ 1 24 after thawing 27 ⁇ 1 251 ⁇ 24 64 ⁇ 2
- Control 2 EGFP expression in mRNA-
- Immature Mo-DC were electroporated with EGFP mRNA.
- Cells were cryopreserved as immature DC 18 hours after transfection or as mature DC 24 hours after transfection. Maturation was induced by adding a maturation cocktail (TNF- ⁇ + PGE 2 + IL-1 + IL-6) directly after transfection.
- FCM maturation cocktail
- a combination of a serum-free culture protocol and a poly-I:C maturation stimulus results in the rapid generation of fully mature and viable CD83+ DC from peripheral blood monocytes.
- This provides for an efficient and clinical applicable antigen loading strategy for these short-term cultured DC, based on mRNA electroporation of monocytes.
- the T-cell activation capacity of these short-term and serum-free cultured Mo-DC was found to be highly stimulatory in an influenza antigen model system using influenza matrix protein M1 peptide-pulsed and matrix protein mRNA-electroporated DC. In the following (including the corresponding Figures) results are expressed as mean ⁇ standard deviation. Comparisons were validated using Student's t-test. A p-value ⁇ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
- mRNA electroporation of monocytes followed by differentiation to DC Using a previously optimized mRNA electroporation protocol, we examined the possibility of genetic modification of the above-described DC. In these experiments, the EGFP reporter gene was used to assess mRNA transfection efficiency. After optimization, the following mRNA electroporation and culture protocol resulted in the generation of antigen-loaded mature DC.
- monocytes were isolated from PBMC by CD14 immunobead magnetic separation. After electroporation, cells were resuspended in serum-free AIM-V medium supplemented with GM-CSF. After 24 hours of culture, poly-I:C was added to the cultures to obtain mature DC.
- the cultured DC were analyzed 48 hours after electroporation of the monocytes. No difference was observed in scatter profile between non-electroporated and EGFP mRNA-electroporated monocytes that were cultured to DC ( Figure 19A ).
- the mean electroporation-related mortality in the DC cultures was 10% (mean of 3 independent experiments, Figure 19B ). This low cell mortality was most probably due to the serum free-culture condition, because addition of autologous plasma following electroporation resulted in lack of electroporation-related mortality (data not shown).
- D. Stimulatory capacity of mRNA-loaded short-term-cultured mature DC We examined in an influenza model system whether mRNA-electroporated monocytes rapidly differentiated in serum-free medium into mature DC could stimulate antigen-specific T-cells upon coculture with PBMC. In these experiments, monocytes were electroporated with mRNA encoding influenza matrix protein M1, and further cultured to mature DC as described above. Next, DC were cocultured with autologous PBMC without the addition of exogenous cytokines.
- primed PBMC were restimulated with T2 cells pulsed with a MHC class I-restricted influenza matrix protein M1 peptide (T2/M1), and IFN- ⁇ secretion was determined after 6 hours by ELISA ( Figure 21 ).
- T2 cells pulsed with a MHC class I-restricted influenza matrix protein M1 peptide (T2/M1)
- IFN- ⁇ secretion was determined after 6 hours by ELISA ( Figure 21 ).
- T2 cells Upon restimulation with peptide-pulsed T2 cells, the activated T cells in the primed PBMC culture produced IFN- ⁇ against the immunodominant M1 matrix protein peptide.
- Proleferation in monocyte-derived dendritic cell cultures is caused by progenitor cells capable of myeloid differentiation. Blood. 92:1598 ).
- the relatively rapid maturation of the presented short-term cultured DC, seen by the upregulation of HLA-DR, CD80, CD86 and CD83, as compared to immature DC is, according to previous reports, due to poly-I:C signaling via Toll-like receptor 3 ( Alexopoulou, L. et al. 2001. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF- ⁇ B by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413:732 ). This signaling pathway induces IFN- ⁇ production by the DC ( Cella, M. et al. 1999.
- type I interferons like IFN- ⁇ , might induce IL-15 production and in this way strongly promote a T-helper 1 response, which is needed for induction of a strong CD8+ T cell response ( Santini, S.M. et al. 2000. Type I interferon as a powerful adjuvant for monocyte-derived dendritic cell development and activity in vitro and in Hu-PBL-SCID mice. J. Exp. Med. 10:1777 ; Saikh, K.U., et al. 2001.
- mRNA-electroporated mature dendritic cells retain transgene expression, phenotypical properties and stimulatory capacity after cryopreservation.
- Leukemia in press
- EGFP protein expression
- Monocytes that were electroporated with EGFP-mRNA and subsequently differentiated to mature DC showed only a small shift of EGFP fluorescence as compared to non-electroporated control DC.
- Leukemia in press ) focused on the stimulatory capacity of influenza matrix protein mRNA-electroporated conventional DC, i.e. DC cultured for 6-7 days in serum-containing medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4, and maturated with a cocktail consisting of TNF- ⁇ , PGE 2 , IL-1 and IL-6. Comparing the final outcome in terms of autologous influenza-specific T-cell activation, antigen mRNA-loaded conventional DC and short-term-cultured DC gave similar results, indicating the validity of this protocol.
- conventional DC i.e. DC cultured for 6-7 days in serum-containing medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4, and maturated with a cocktail consisting of TNF- ⁇ , PGE 2 , IL-1 and IL-6.
- EP parameters 300V, 150 ⁇ F (mRNA settings) or 260V, 1050 ⁇ F (DNA settings) Cells were washed twice in IMDM, once in Electroporation Wash Buffer and resuspended in Optimix medium at 5 million cells/200 ⁇ l. 20 ⁇ g of EGFP mRNA was added to the cells just before electroporation. In case DNA settings were used, 300 ⁇ l of Optimix ® was added to the cells (total volume 500 ⁇ l). After shocking, cells were immediately put into 3 ml of warm culture medium (IMDM, 10% FCS) supplemented with IL-3, IL-6 and stem cell factor. EGFP analysis at 24h-96h and phenotypic analysis at 96h by FACS.
- IMDM warm culture medium
- This experiment shows that the mRNA electroporation technology of the present invention is able to transfect human bone marrow mononuclear cells up to 25-30% efficiency.
- High levels of EGFP expression were observed in the myeloid fraction (CD33+ cells), in particular in the monocyte fraction (CD14+ cells) and the hematopoietic progenitor fraction (CD34+ cells) comprising the hematopoietic stem cells.
- a low but consistent transfection level was observed in the lymphoid fraction (CD7+ and CD19+ cells), concordant with the data obtained in peripheral blood (see Fig. 22A to E ).
- ES cells 5 million ES cells were thawed on 10/6 and put into culture in gelatin-coated 75 cm 2 flask and 3 million mitomycin C-treated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) feeder cells for 48h. Then, ES cells were trypsinized, washed 3 times in DMEM, once in Electroporation Wash Buffer and resuspended in Optimix medium at 7.5 million cells/200 ⁇ l. 20 ⁇ g of EGFP mRNA or 20 ⁇ l RNase-free water (mock) was added to the cells just before electroporation.
- MEF mouse embryonic fibroblasts
- EGFP fluorescence was checked by fluorescence microscopy at 24h post-EP and simultaneous EGFP and phenotypic analysis was performed at 48h post-EP by FACS (results see Fig. 23A and B ).
- the mRNA electroporation technology of the present invention is able to transfect mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells to levels above 90% efficiency, implicating a powerful tool to genetically modify mouse ES cells, and possibly also human ES cells, be it in a transient manner. This could be of value for control of differentiation of ES cells by transgene expression of master regulator genes, skewing or biasing differentiation into distinct lineages for large-scale generation of differentiated cells and tissues in vitro.
- ES mouse embryonic stem
- Fresh PBMC were washed twice in IMDM, once in Electroporation Wash Buffer and resuspended in Optimix medium at 5 million cells/200 ⁇ l. 20 ⁇ g of EGFP mRNA or 20 ⁇ l RNase-free water (mock) was added to the cells just before electroporation. After shocking, cells were immediately put into 3 ml of warm culture medium (IMDM, 10% FCS). Simultaneous EGFP and phenotypic analysis was performed at 24h by FACS (results see Fig. 24A-C ).
- This experiment shows that the mRNA electroporation technology of the present invention is able to transfect human peripheral blood mononuclear cells up to 4% efficiency.
- the low but consistent transfection levels were mainly observed in the monocyte fraction (CD14+ cells) and to a lower extent in the T lymphocytes (CD3+ cells) and the natural killer (NK) cells.
- B cells CD19+ cells could not be transfected using the current electroporation parameters, which warrants further optimization for this type of cells.
- Electroporation of mRNA at ⁇ s-range (soft pulse; general method): Immature (d6) or mature (d7) Mo-DC were washed once with Opti-Mem ® or with washing-solution Optimix ® , respectively.
- Cells were adjusted to a final cell concentration of 1-4x10 7 /ml in electroporation buffer (Opti-Mem ® , Optimix ® or isoosomolar electroporation buffer). Then 0,2-0,8 ml of the cell suspension were mixed with IVT mRNA (up to 20 ⁇ g /2x10 6 cells) in a 1,5 ml reaction tube.
- the cell suspension were transferred in a 0,4-cm-gap electroporation cuvette.
- Cells were triggered at a voltage of 400 and a pulse time of 500 ⁇ s using Multiporator ® (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) or ECM 830 ® (Genetronics BTX, San Diego, CA, USA).
- Multiporator ® Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- ECM 830 ® Geneetronics BTX, San Diego, CA, USA.
- the cell suspension were transferred to 6-well-plates (1x10 6 DC/ well/ 3 ml culture medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4).
- immature DC terminal maturation were induced by addition of IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF- ⁇ and PGE 2 .
- a method for transfection of eukaryotic cells with one or more or a mixture of linear polynucleotides comprises electroporation of a suspension containing the eukaryotic cells and the linear polynucleotides to be transfected at a capacitance of below 300 ⁇ F.
- the pulse is an exponential decay pulse; and/or (ii) the electroporation is performed at a voltage from 100 to 500 V, preferably 200 to 350 V, more preferably 250 to 300 V, and/or (iii) the capacitance is 100 to below 300 ⁇ F, preferably 150 to 250 ⁇ F; and/or (iv) the pulsing time is from 1 to 40 ms, preferably 2.5 to 25 ms, and most preferably 7 to 10 ms.
- a method for transfection of eukaryotic cells with one or more or a mixture of linear polynucleotides preferably a method as defined above, which method comprises electroporation of a suspension containing the eukaryotic cells and the linear polynucleotides to be transfected with a soft pulse at 300 to 600 V for 100 ⁇ s to 1 ms.
- the soft pulse is a square wave pulse or an exponential decay pulse, preferably with 350 to 500 V for 300 to 600 ⁇ s.
- the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 100 to 1x10 9 cells per ml, preferably 1x10 5 to 5x10 7 cells per ml, most preferably 1 to 4x10 7 cells per ml;
- the linear polynucleotides to be transfected are naked polynucleodides including, but not limited to, modified or unmodified, defined or undefined DNA, RNA or DNA-RNA hybrids and preferably are mRNA; and/or (iii) the concentration of the polynucleotides to be transfected is 1x10 -7 to 1x10 -5 mmol/ml, preferably 4x10 -6 to 6x10 -6 mmol/ml.
- the eukaryotic cells preferably (i) are mammalian cells, preferably human cells; and/or (ii) are selected from non-hematopoietic cells including, but being not limited to, fibroblast and tumour cells, stem cells and derivatives thereof such as embryonic stem cells, and hematopoietic cells including, but being not limited to, mononuclear cells, hematopoietic stem cells and derivatives thereof, marrow CD34 + progenitor derived dendritic cells, CD34 + progenitor derived Langerhans cells, monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DC), and most preferably are Mo-DC including, but being not limited to, immature Mo-DC and mature Mo-DC.
- non-hematopoietic cells including, but being not limited to, fibroblast and tumour cells, stem cells and derivatives thereof such as embryonic stem cells, and hematopoietic cells including, but being not limited to, mononuclear cells, hematopoi
- eukaryotic cells are Mo-DC
- the linear polynucleotides are mRNA
- the transfection is performed at a low voltage, low capacitance and a high cell concentration, preferably a voltage of 250 to 300 V, a capacitance of 150 to 250 ⁇ F and a cell concentration of 1x10 7 to 4x10 7 cells/ml, at a pulse time of 7 to 10 ms.
- the linear polynucleotides are (i) proteins or peptides to be expressed in the eukaryotic cells, said proteins or peptides may or may not have a function in the eukaryotic cells, preferably the linear polynucleotides encode tumor antigens, microbial antigens, viral antigens, immunostimulatory or tolerogenic molecules, anti-apoptotic molecules, adhesion and homing molecules and antigen processing molecules; (ii) functional or regulatory sequences including, but not limited to, differentiation-regulating genes, differentiation-associated genes and tissue-specific genes.
- the eukaryotic cells are human mature Mo-DC and/or wherein the linear polynucleotides to be transfected are mRNA, and wherein the method may further comprise further maturation of the transfected MoDC by providing a maturation stimulus, or wherein the eukaryotic cells are human immature Mo-DC and/or wherein the linear polynucleotide to be transfected is mRNA, and wherein the method may further comprise maturation of the transfected cells by providing a maturation structure.
- the maturation structures comprise one or more of the compounds selected from the group IL-1 ⁇ , IL-6, TNF- ⁇ , PGE 2 , lipopolysaccharide, immunostimulatory DNA sequences, CD40 ligand, poly-I:C, etc., and preferably is a mixture comprising IL-1 ⁇ , IL-6, TNF- ⁇ and PGE 2 .
- the method further comprises cryoconservation of the transfected cells.
- transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above.
- a pharmaceutical composition or vaccine comprising transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above.
- transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above (i) for preparing an agent for immunotherapy, including induction of immunity or tolerance, tumor therapy, stem cell therapy, regenerative medicine, or tissue engineering, or (ii) as expression system for gene products encoded by the linear polynucleotides, or as detection system.
- a method for immunotherapy or tumour therapy which comprises administering transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above to the patient.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
- Public Health (AREA)
- Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
- Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
- Immunology (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- Epidemiology (AREA)
- Mycology (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Oncology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
- Medicines That Contain Protein Lipid Enzymes And Other Medicines (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Antibodies Or Antigens For Use As Internal Diagnostic Agents (AREA)
- Measuring Or Testing Involving Enzymes Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
- Materials For Medical Uses (AREA)
- Medicines Containing Material From Animals Or Micro-Organisms (AREA)
Description
- The present invention provides an improved method for gene delivery in hematopoietic cells or stem cells not including human embryonic stem cells, in particular in dendritic cells. The method of the invention is superior to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for gene delivery, including tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells.
- Dendritic cells (DC) are bone-marrow-derived leukocytes that function as professional antigen-capturing and -presenting cells for the initiation of a primary immune response in vitro and in vivo (Banchereau, J., Steinman, R.M., Nature, 392:245-252 (1998)). Given their central role in cell-mediated immunity in vivo, they represent highly attractive targets for molecular immunotherapy of acquired diseases, such as AIDS and cancer. Recent advances in the ex vivo generation of DC and the ability to modulate DC functions provide a rationale to design DC-based tumor vaccines (Avigan, D., Blood Rev., 13:51-64 (1999)). The outcome of such tumor vaccines will highly depend on the efficacy of the applied antigen-loading method for optimal stimulation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL)-mediated antitumor immune responses (Tarte, K., Klein, B., Leukemia, 13:653-663 (1999)). Although several reports have documented viral transfer of cDNA encoding tumor-associated antigens to load DC for induction of TAA-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) (Dietz, A.B., Vuk, P.S., Blood, 91:392-398 (1998); Brossart, P. et al., J. Immunol., 158:3270-3276 (1997); Specht, J.M. et al., J. Exp. Med., 186:1213-1221 (1997)) nonviral gene delivery systems for DC-based vaccines would provide a more attractive approach with clinical perspectives since safety issues and immunogenicity of the vector are reduced to a minimum.
- Furthermore, it is generally known that nonviral DNA transfection methods are inefficient, particularly in nondividing cells, as there is only very limited DNA trafficking to the nucleus where transcription occurs (Luo, D., Saltzman, W.M., Nat. Biotechnol., 18:33-37 (2000)). Therefore, several groups demonstrated the feasibility of mRNA transfection as a valid alternative for nonviral gene delivery, since this strategy avoids the need for entry into the nucleus as well as the complex issues of transcriptional regulation associated with DNA vectors (Lu, D. et al., Cancer Gene Ther., 1:245-252 (1994); Kariko, K. et al., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1369:320-334 (1998); Sawai, K. et al., Mol. Genet. Metab., 64:44-51 (1998)). The RNA approach has several advantages that render it attractive in developing DC-based tumor vaccines. First, DC can be transfected to comparable levels as compared to transduction by recombinant viruses, such as poxviruses Kim, C. J. et al., J. Immunother., 20:276-286 (1997)) or adenoviruses (Dietz, A. B., Vuk, P.S., Blood, 91:392-398 (1998)), while circumventing the drawbacks of viral vectors (Jenne, L. et al., Gene Ther., 7:1575-1583 (2000); Jonuleit, H. et al., Gene Ther., 7:249-254 (2000)). Second, DC can be charged with the full antigenic spectrum using total mRNA instead of IVT mRNA as a source of tumor antigens without prior identification of tumor-associated antigens (Zhang, W. et al., Hum. Gene Ther., 10:1151-1161 (1999)). Moreover, RNA has a short cellular half-life and lacks the potential to integrate into the host genome, thereby obviating safety concerns, e.g. insertional mutagenesis, in the context of clinical gene therapy trials (Lu, D. et al., Cancer Gene Ther., 1:245-252 (1994); Ying, H. et al., Nat. med., 5:823-827 (1999)). On the other hand this short cellular halflife may be disadvantageous since it may result in a relatively short protein expression.
- However, the problem of inefficient gene transfer and low level of expression by nonviral transfection remains (Arthur, J.F. et al., Cancer Gene Ther., 4:17-25 (1997).
- Previously, we reported high-level transgene expression in proliferating CD34+ progenitor-derived DC (34-DC) and Langerhans cells (34-LC) using electroporation-mediated gene delivery (Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998)). In contrast, nondividing monocyte-derived DC (Mo-DC), which represent a highly accessible and widely used source of in vitro cultured DC, were relatively refractory to cDNA transfection techniques, either by electroporation or by lipofection.
- Recently, it was shown that human DC could be transfected with RNA and were capable of inducing primary antigen-specific CTL (Nair, S. K. et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 16:364-369 (1998)). However, there are very few data on efficiency of mRNA transfer in Mo-DC using passive pulsing, lipofection or electroporation, if at all. Furthermore, the feasibility of mRNA transfection in 34-DC or 34-LC has not yet been established, let alone that the method has been adapted to Mo-DC.
- Electroporation methods for the integration of cyclic polynucleic acids into "normal" cells (such as tumor cells) are generally use the following reaction conditions (Van Tendeloo V.F.I et al., Gene Ther. 5:700-707 (1998); Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther. 7:1431-1437 (2000); Van Bockstaele, D., Berneman, Z.N., Cytometry 41:31-35 (2000); Lurquin, P.F., Mol. Biotechnol. 7:5-35 (1997); Matthews, K.E. et al., Mol. Biotechnol., ); Spencer, S.C., Biochem. and Biotechnol. 42:75-82 (1993)):
- a cell concentration in the range of 1 to 10x106 cell/ml
- a voltage in the range of 200-350 V
- a capacitance of greater than 300 µF
- a pulse length in the range of 15 to 40 µs
- However such "conventional" electroporation methods give only very poor RNA transfection yields if applied to primary cells (such as Mo-DC) and/or if linear polynucleotides are electroporated as it was e.g. shown in Strobel, I. et al., Gene Therapy 7:2028-2035 (2000) where we reported on the electroporation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells and tested various "conventional" parameter settings: i) the cell density was tested in the range from 2×106 - 4×107 cells/ml while capacitance and voltage were kept constant at 300 µF and 250V, respectively, showing that an increased cell density resulted in a decreased mortality; ii) the impact of the voltage was investigated in the range from 250-350 V, while capacitance and cell density were kept constant at 300 µF and 4x107cells/ml, respectively, demonstrating that an increasing voltage resulted in a higher mortality; iii) the capacitance was evaluated in the range from 300-1500 µF while cell density and voltage were kept constant at 4x107 cells/ml and 250 V, respectively. Increasing capacitance yielded in an increased mortality. Although pulse times below 22 ms increased the cell viability, only a very low heterologous gene expression was detectable. In contrast pulse times above 28 ms increased transient gene expression but resulted in a high cell loss. In conclusion, the optimal electroporation conditions for immature monocyte-derived DC were found in this previously published work as follows: i.) cell density of 4x107 cells/ml; ii.) voltage of 250 V; iii.) capacitance of 300 - 500 µF and iv.) pulse times between 22-28 ms. Using these optimised electroporation conditions up to 11 % of DC were GFP+ after 48 h, when GFP RNA was transfected. A similar transfection efficacy was obtained using GFP DNA.
- Recently we also reported that effective electroporation of in vitro transcribed mRNA into monocyte-derived dendritic cells is possible, but did not mention how this electroporation can be achieved (Poster at the 6th Symposium on dendritic cells, Port Douglas, Australia, May 26-June 1, 2000 and at the Keystone Symposia, Taos, NM, USA., March 12-18, 2001).
-
US patent no. 5,766,902 discloses an electroporation method for nucleic acid molecules, wherein the nucleic acid molecules are applied in or together with a ligand which binds to the target cell. Said complex may comprise an endosomal disruption agent. -
US patent No. 5,554,528 decribes the use of plasmids (i.e., cyclic DNA constructs) containing a toxin gene under the control of HIV elements for stable transformation of cell lines in order to block HIV replication when cells are infected. Said patent mentions DNA transfection by electroporation (column 15, example 2) using electrical settings (250 µF; 220 to 290 V; 100 µl volumes, BioRad cuvettes and Gene Pulser®) which are not typical for plasmid electroporation, it does, however, not mention RNA transfection, let alone RNA electropration. Furthermore, only "normal" mammalian cell lines are electroporated, primary cells are not contemplated. - It was now surprisingly found that with a particular electroporation setting hematopoietic cells or stem cells not including human embryonic stem cells, such as monocyte derived dendritic cells, can effectively be transfected with DNA and RNA. In particular, it was found out that the mRNA transfection efficiency was improved using an optimized mRNA-based electroporation. Thus, the present invention describes a method for high-efficiency non-viral transfection of Mo-DC as well as other types of dendritic cells (including CD34+ derived Langerhans cells and interstitial type DC) by mRNA electroporation correlated with effective loading of tumor antigens into different types of human DC. The efficiency of the method of the present invention was compared with other transfection methods, such as lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA as well as cDNA electroporation, and found to be highly superior. Furthermore, the effect of DC maturation on loading efficiency was investigated. An electroporation-based mRNA transfection protocol was developed which is suitable for highly efficient antigen loading in Mo-DC, as well as in 34-DC and 34-LC. This technique proved to be superior to mRNA lipofection or passive mRNA pulsing in terms of loading efficiency and subsequent activation of an antigen-specific CD8+ CTL clone. With such mRNA-based electroporation, the transfection efficiency in Mo-DC, 34-DC and 34-LC was at least 25, 6 and 3 times, respectively, more efficient as compared to plasmid DNA electroporation described in van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998), and also superior to previously described mRNA electroporation. Also, such mRNA electroporation was superior to mRNA lipofection and passive pulsing. This increased transfection efficiency was translated in a superior biological effect in vitro, as confirmed by our CTL activation experiments, and could be used as a tool to investigate as to whether it results in a higher immunopotency in vivo (Porgador, A. et al., J. Exp. Med., 188:1075-1082 (1998)). Importantly, mRNA-transfected DC were able to efficiently process the introduced antigen and present antigenic epitopes in an MHC class I-restricted manner to a specific CD8+ TIL clone (
Fig. 4 ). Furthermore, in concordance with previous reports on the effect of maturation on the antigen-presenting capacity of DC (Cella, M. et al., Curr. Opin. Immunol., 9:10-16 (1997)), antigen loading by mRNA electroporation was preferably performed prior to DC maturation in order to achieve the most optimal antigen presentation (Fig. 5 ), indicating the importance of the sequence of loading and DC maturation for future DC-based vaccine design (Morse, M. A. et al., Cancer Res., 58:2965-2968 (1998)). - The present invention thus provides a method for transfection of hematopoietic cells or stem cells not including human embryonic stem cells with one or more or a mixture of naked linear RNA, which method comprises electroporation of a suspension containing the hematopoietic cells or stem cells and the naked linear RNA to be transfected with a square wave soft pulse at 300 to 600 V in a 4mm cuvette for 100 µs to 1 ms, wherein the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 100 to 1x109 cells per ml.
- The method of the invention is applicable for loading human dendritic cells (DC) with antigens such as tumor antigens, which is a challenging approach for DC-based tumor vaccines. (This is quite important, since in preliminary experiments it was found that the plasmid DNA electroporation approach is not applicable for tumor antigen loading of DC, because the T cell stimulation it provokes is indistinguishable from non-specific T cell stimulation mediated by plasmid DNA, either directly or indirectly. This nonspecific stimulation was not observed when using mRNA electroporation, establishing the superiority of that technique for specific DC-based T cell stimulation.) Also, the expression of other proteins (e.g., stimulatory or tolerogenic or apoptotic molecules) in DC by gene transfer might be desired, furthermore the introduction of antisense RNA by electroporation. In other words, the present invention describes a cytoplasmic expression system based on mRNA electroporation to efficiently introduce genetic information into DC. Preliminary experiments in K562 cells using an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) reporter gene revealed that mRNA electroporation as compared to plasmid DNA electroporation showed a markedly improved transfection efficiency (89% versus 40% EGFP+ cells, respectively) and induced a strikingly lower cell toxicity (15% death rate with mRNA versus 51% with plasmid DNA). Applying mRNA electroporation for nonviral transfection of different types of human DC, including monocyte-derived DC (Mo-DC), CD34+ progenitor-derived DC (34-DC) and Langerhans cells (34-LC), high-level transgene expression by mRNA electroporation was obtained in more than 50% of all DC types. mRNA-electroporated DC retained their phenotype and maturational potential. Importantly, DC electroporated with mRNA encoding Melan-A strongly activated a Melan-A-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) clone in an HLA-restricted manner and were superior to mRNA-lipofected or -pulsed DC. Optimal stimulation of the CTL occurred when Mo-DC underwent maturation following mRNA transfection. Strikingly, a nonspecific stimulation of CTL was observed when DC were transfected with plasmid DNA. Our data clearly demonstrate that Mo-DC electroporated with mRNA efficiently present functional antigenic peptides to cytotoxic T cells. Therefore, electroporation of mRNA encoding tumor antigens is a powerful technique to charge human dendritic cells with tumor antigens and could serve applications in future DC-based tumor vaccines. Transfection of ready mature DC was less efficient when maturation stimuli such as TNFα + LPS were used. The use of a certain generation methanol for Mo-DC including an optimized maturation stimulus (see Example 4) allowed, however, also for efficient transfection such as tumor antigens of mature Mo-DC. The invention is hereinafter described in more detail by the appended figures and the examples.
-
-
Figure 1 shows the flow cytometric analysis of transgene expression in K562 cells following EGFP mRNA electroporation.- A: K562 cells were electroporated with EGFP mRNA at 300 V, 150 µF or with EGFP plasmid DNA at 260V, 1050 µF (dashed line) as described in the Examples. Twenty-four hours post-electroporation, flow cytometric (FCM) EGFP analysis was performed to estimate transfection efficiency of mRNA electroporation (bold line) and plasmid DNA electroporation (dashed line). An overlay histogram representative of five independent experiments is shown. Non-electroporated cells (thin line) were used to determine background fluorescence. The M1 region indicates the EGFP-positive cell fraction. The percentage of EGFP+ cells was 85% (bold line) and 50% (dashed line) following mRNA or plasmid DNA electroporation, respectively.
- B: Kinetics of EGFP mRNA expression in K562 cells in function of time (n=3). Note the rapid induction of high-level EGFP expression already 3 hours following electroporation.
-
Figure 2 shows the FCM analysis of transgene expression following EGFP mRNA transfection in different types of DC.- A: Immature Mo-DC were cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 and transfected at
day 6 of culture with control (Melan-A) or EGFP mRNA by lipofection (bottom) or electroporation (top) and analyzed by FCM one day after transfection. The dot plots show EGFP fluorescence on the x-axis and ethidium bromide staining on the y-axis. Gates were drawn based on control mRNA-lipofected or electroporated Mo-DC. Percentage of dead cells (upper left corner) and viable EGFP+ cells (lower right corner) is indicated. Results are representative of 8 independent experiments. - B: Monitoring of EGFP mRNA expression and cell viability in Mo-DC following mRNA electroporation in function of time (n=2).
- C: 34-DC (bottom) and 34-LC (top) were cultured as described in Materials and Methods and transfected at
day
- A: Immature Mo-DC were cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 and transfected at
-
Figure 3 shows the phenotypical analysis and maturation potential of mRNA-electroporated DC.- A: Immature Mo-DC (iMo-CD) were transfected by electroporation with mRNA encoding EGFP and stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled antibodies specific for CD1a, HLA-DR and CD86 one day after electroporation (bottom). Untransfected iMo-DC (top) served as controls and isotype-matched antibodies were used to set quadrants. Results are representative of 3 experiments.
- B: iMo-DC were transfected by electroporation with mRNA encoding Melan-A and directly stained with a PE-labeled CD80 antibody (bottom) or indirectly stained with a CD83 antibody (top). A representative overlay histogram is shown in which the dashed line represents the control non-electroporated iMo-DC, the thin line the electroporated iMo-DC and the bold line represents electroporated iMo-DC that were allowed to mature for an additional 24 h following mRNA electroporation in the presence of TNF-α and LPS.
- C: 12 day-cultured 34-DC were transfected by electroporation with mRNA encoding EGFP and stained with PE-labeled antibodies specific for CD1a, HLA-DR, CD86 and CD80 one day after electroporation (bottom). Untransfected 34-DC (top) served as controls and isotype-matched antibodies were used to set quadrants. Results are representative of 3 experiments.
-
Figure 4 shows the mRNA-based antigen loading of Mo-DC. Immature Mo-DC were cultured with GM-CSF and IL-4 and transfected atday 6 of culture with Melan-A mRNA by electroporation (n= 11), lipofection (n=8) or passive pulsing (n=5) or with EGFP mRNA by electroporation (n=6). The SK23-MEL melanoma cell line, HLA-A2+ Mo-DC pulsed with a Melan-A or irrelevant influenza peptide and HLA-A2-negative Mo-DC electroporated with Melan-A mRNA served as controls. Antigen-presenting cells (indicated on the left of the graph) were coincubated with a Melan-A specific CD8+ CTL clone to determine antigen loading eficiency, as reflected by IFN-γ production of the CTL clone. Results are shown as mean ± SD. * P<0.05; EP= electroporation; lipo= lipofection; puls= passive pulsing. -
Figure 5 shows the effect of DC maturation on tumor antigen presentation of mRNA-transfected Mo-DC. IFN-γ production by the CTL clone was measured after coculture with HLA-A2+ Mo-DC electroporated with Melan-A mRNA. iMo-DC, Mo-DC transfected at the immature stage and used as such; Mo-DCa, Mo-DC transfected at the mature stage after LPS+TNF-α stimulation; Mo-DCb, Mo-DC transfected at the immature stage, matured by LPS+TNF-α and then assayed for Melan-A-specific CTL clone stimulation. Results are shown as mean ± SD (n=4). * P<0.05 -
Figure 6 shows the outcome of plasmid cDNA-based antigen loading of 34-LC. IFN-γ production by the CTL clone was measured after coculture with HLA-A2+ 34-LC electroporated with various plasmid DNA constructs encoding Melan-A (pcDNA1.1/Melan-A; n= 12), EGFP (pEGFP-N1; n=12), luciferase (pCMV-Luc; n= 3) or with a backbone vector (pcDNA1.1/Amp; n=6) lacking a eukaryotic cDNA sequence. Alternatively, 34-LC were electroporated with in vitro transcribed mRNA encoding EGFP or Melan-A (n=3). Results are shown as mean ± SD. * P<0.05. -
Figure 7 shows the result of electroporation of immature monocyte-derived cells, in particular, the phenotype of dendritic cells 48 h after electroporation with GFP-RNA. The numbers in the lower right part of the quadrant indicate the EGFP-positive DC, the numbers in the upper right part show the EGFP+/CD83+ and EGFP+/CD25+ DC, respectively. -
Figure 8 shows the transfection efficiency of and kinetics of EGFP expression in dendritic cells following GFP-RNA-transfection using electroporation. -
Figure 9 shows the results of EGFP RNA-transfection of monocyte-derived dendritic cells by electroporation.- A: Contour plots showing the influence of voltage on cell size and granularity.
- B: shows that the EGFP expression of CD83 and CD25 is influenced by the voltage.
-
Figure 10 : EGFP RNA-transfection of mature monocyte-derived dendritic cells by electroporation- A and H show the transfection efficiency and kinetics of EGFP expression following GFP-RNA transfection of mature dendritic cells using electroporation.
- B to G confirm that the phenotype of dendritic cells is maintained after electroporation with GFP-RNA.
-
Figure 11 : FCM analysis of transgene expression in immature and mature DC after EGFP mRNA electroporation in non-frozen controls and after thawing of cryopreserved samples. The dot plots show EGFP fluorescence on the x-axis and ethidium bromide staining on the y-axis. Analysis was performed on cells exhibiting a large forward scatter and large side scatter profile, in order to allow exclusion of contaminating autologous lymphocytes. Percentage of dead cells (upper left corner), viable EGFP+ cells (lower right corner) and viable EGFP- cells (lower left corner) is indicated based on the number of dots in the quadrant analysis. (A) Dot plots show analysis of non-frozen iMo-DC 24 hours after mRNA electroporation (left), and of mRNA-electroporated iMo-DC 6 hours after thawing (middle) and 24 hours (right) after thawing. (B) Dot plots show analysis of non-frozen mMo-DC 24 hours after mRNA electroporation (left),and of mRNA-electroporated mMo-DC 6 hours after thawing (middle) and 24 hours (right) after thawing. EP= electroporation. -
Figure 12 : Representative example of phenotypical analysis of non-frozen and frozen mRNA-electroporated immature and mature DC. Dot plots show FCM analysis of PE-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against typical DC-markers including CD1a, HLA-DR, CD80 and CD86 (y-axis). As controls to set quadrants, isotype-matched antibodies and a PE-labeled monoclonal CD14 antibody was used. Analysis of DC markers was done on viable EGFP- cells in control samples and on viable EGFP+ cells in mRNA-electroporated DC as shown by the EGFP fluorescence on the x-axis. (A) iMo-DC onday 8 of culture, (B) EGFP+ iMo-DC after mRNA electroporation onday 6, followed by 48 hours of culture. (C) EGFP+ iMo-DC after mRNA electroporation onday 6, culture for 18 hours, cryopreservation, thawing and culture for 24 hours. (D) iMo-DC that have been stimulated for 48 hours with a maturation cocktail afterday 6. (E) EGFP+ iMo-DC after mRNA electroporation onday 6 and stimulation for 48 hours with the maturation cocktail, (F) EGFP+ iMo-DC after mRNA electroporation onday 6 and culture for 24 hours with a maturation cocktail, cryopreservation, thawing and culture for 24 hours in presence of the maturation cocktail. In general, phenotyping was performed after 2 days of culture, with or without a frozen interval (that was not counted), followingday 6 of the Mo-DC culture.
As shown by the dot plot analysis ofFigure 12 , iMo-DC undergo maturation at 48 hours after mRNA electroporation as demonstrated by an upregulation of HLA-DR, CD80 and CD86 (Figure 12 , A & B). Thawed DC have the same upregulation of HLA-DR and CD80, but have lower levels of CD86 (Figure 12, C ). This is probably caused by the fact that the frozen immature DC culture is dying 24 hours after thawing. Immature Mo-DC responded well to the maturation cocktail as seen by the upregulation of HLA-DR, CD80 and CD86 in mMo-DC as compared with the expression levels in iMo-DC (Figure 12 , A & D). However, the combination of mRNA electroporation and a maturation stimulus seems to be very potent in maturing DC, as this combination results in high level of HLA-DR, CD80 and CD86 expression (Figure 12, E ). Frozen mature DC that were electroporated show high level maturation marker expression after thawing (Figure 12, F ). -
Figure 13 : Stimulatory capacity of cryopreserved mRNA-electroporated mature DC. Cryopreserved matrix protein M1 mRNA-electroporated mature DC were used as stimulators for PBMC during a 6 day coculture. Primed PBMC were then stimulated with T2 cells, pulsed with an MHC class I-restricted M1 immunodominant epitope, during a 6 hour coculture. Antigen specific T cells in the primed PBMC culture were detected as shown by positive IFN-γ production. As controls, unpulsed T2 cells were used as stimulators and fresh PBMC as responders. Results are shown as mean ± standard error.
Upon restimulation with peptide-pulsed T2 cells, the activated T cells in the primed PBMC culture produced IFN-γ against the immunodominant matrix protein peptide. The specificity of this activation is shown by only background IFN-γ production of the primed PBMC culture against unpulsed T2 cells. To show that these cultured PBMC were stimulated during the 6 day culture, the same experiment was done with fresh PBMC. After coculture with either T2 cells or T2 cells pulsed with the peptide, no IFN-γ production was detected above background level (Figure 13 ). -
Figure 14 : Representative flow cytometric analysis of scatter profile and viability of short-term serum-free-cultured immature DC and poly-I:C-maturated DC of Example 6.
Left side, immature monocyte-derived DC (iMo-DC) cultured for 2 days in AIM-V medium + GM-CSF. Right side, poly-I:C-maturated monocyte-derived DC (mMo-DC). Upper dot plots show forward and side scatter profiles of all cells. The R1 gate shows the percentage of DC in the cultures. Lower dot plots show mortality by ethidium bromide staining within the cultured DC. (upper numbers, ethidium bromide-positive dead DC ; lower numbers, ethidium bromide-negative living DC). The lower dot plots were gated on R1 (upper panel). The data shown are from PBMC donor A. The results are representative for PBMC from donors A, B, F for immature DC and A, B, C, D, E, F for mature DC. -
Figure 15 : Representative phenotypical analysis of short-term serum-free-cultured immature DC and serum-free-cultured poly-I:C-maturated DC of Example 6.
Flow cytometric analysis of FITC-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against DC and monocyte markers: CD14, HLA-DR, CD86 (left side) and CD1a, CD80, CD83 (right side). After 2 days of culture in AIM-V medium supplemented with GM-CSF, with or without addition of poly-I:C after 1 day of culture, DC were analyzed by outgating remaining lymphocytes. Comparative data are shown in histograms for immature (thin line) and mature (thick line) DC. The data shown are from PBMC donor A. The results are representative for PBMC from donors A, B, F for immature DC and A, B, C, D, E, F for mature DC. -
Figure 16 : Allogeneic stimulatory capacity of short-term serum-free-cultured immature DC versus serum-free-cultured poly-I:C-maturated DC of Example 6.
Immature and mature short-term cultured DC (respectively iMo-DC and mMo-DC) were used as stimulators for allogeneic PBMC during a 7-day coculture. Afterwards, primed PBMC were restimulated with PBMC from the DC donor during a 6-hour coculture. Activated T-cells in the primed PBMC culture were detected as shown by IFN-γ production against the target PBMC. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of two individual experiments for cultures initiated with immature DC (iMo-DC) and mature DC (mMo-DC). The significant difference is indicated with an asterisk. Results were obtained with PBMC from donors B and C. -
Figure 17 : Stimulatory capacity of short-term serum-free-cultured immature DC versus serum-free-cultured poly-I:C-maturated DC (Example 6).
Influenza matrix protein M1 peptide-pulsed immature and mature DC (respectively iMo-DC and mMo-DC) were used as stimulators for autologous PBMC during a 7-day coculture. Afterwards, primed PBMC were restimulated with T2 cells, pulsed with a MHC class I-restricted influenza matrix protein M1 peptide (T2/M1), during a 6-hour coculture. Antigen-specific T cells in the primed PBMC culture were detected as shown by increased IFN-γ production. As a control, irrelevant HPV E7 peptide-pulsed T2 cells (T2/E7) were used as stimulators. Significant differences are indicated with an asterisk. Results were obtained with PBMC from donor B (Figure 17A ,3 experiments) and donor F (Figure 17B ,2 experiments). -
Figure 18 : Stimulatory capacity of serum-free-cultured immature DC versus serum-free cultured poly-I:C-maturated DC. Direct staining of IFN-γ-secreting CD8+ T cells after restimulation with an influenza target (Example 6).
Influenza matrix protein M1 peptide-pulsed immature and mature DC (respectively iMo-DC and mMo-DC) were used as stimulators for PBMC during a 7-day coculture. Primed PBMC were then restimulated for three hours with T2 cells pulsed with a MHC class I-restricted influenza M1 peptide or with an HPV E7 control peptide. Dot plots show IFN-γ-secreting cells within the CD8+ and CD8-lymphocyte population. The numbers of IFN-γ-secreting cells indicated on the dot plots are percentages of total lymphocytes. Results were obtained with PBMC from donor B. -
Figure 19 : Representative flow cytometric analysis of scatter profile, viability and EGFP expression of EGFP mRNA-electroporated monocytes short-term cultured to mature DC (Example 6).
Monocytes, electroporated (EP, lower dot plots), or not (EP, upper dot plots), with EGFP mRNA were cultured for 2 days in AIM-V medium + GM-CSF. Maturation was induced by poly-I:C after 24 hours of culture. (A) Scatter profile of the cultured mature DC. (B) Ethidium bromide staining of the cultured mature DC. The dot plots were gated on R1 (scatter profile). The indicated numbers show the percentage of ethidium bromide-negative living DC. (C) FL-1 EGFP fluorescence histogram overlay of non-electroporated mature DC (thin dotted line) and EGFP mRNA-electroporated mature DC (thick line). The data shown are from PBMC donor D. The results are representative for PBMC from donors C, D, E. -
Figure 20 : Representative phenotypical analysis of monocytes electroporated with mRNA and short-term serum-free cultured to mature DC (Example 6).
Flow cytometric analysis of PE-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against DC and monocyte markers: CD14, CD80, CD86, HLA-DR and CD83. Monocytes, electroporated (EP, lower dot plots), or not (EP, upper dot plots), with EGFP mRNA were cultured for 2 days in AIM-V medium + GM-CSF. Maturation was induced by poly-I:C after 24 hours of culture. Histograms show the level of marker expression (black overlay) against isotype control staining (dotted line). The data shown are from PBMC donor D. The results are representative for PBMC from donors C, D, E. -
Figure 21 : Stimulatory capacity of mRNA-electroporated monocytes short-term serum-free cultured to mature DC (Example 6).
Monocytes, electroporated with influenza matrix protein mRNA, were cultured for 2 days in AIM-V medium + GM-CSF. Maturation was induced by poly-I:C after 24 hours of culture. These mature antigen-loaded DC were used as stimulators for autologous PBMC during a 7-day coculture. Afterwards, primed PBMC were restimulated during a 6-hour coculture with T2 cells, pulsed with a MHC class I-restricted influenza matrix protein M1 peptide (T2/M1). Antigen-specific T-cells in the primed PBMC culture were detected as shown by increased IFN-γ production. As a control, irrelevant HPV E7 peptide-pulsed T2 cells (T2/E7) were used as stimulators. Results are shown as mean ± standard deviation of three individual experiments for PBMC from donor B (indicated as A) and PBMC from donor C (indicated as B). Significant differences are indicated with an asterisk. -
Figure 22 : The results of the EGFP analysis of the transfected cells of Example 7 at 24 and 96 h is shown inFig. 22A and B , respectively. The phenotypic analysis of the transfected cells of Example 7 after 96 h (CD34/gated on CD45+ cells;CD 19/gated on DR+ cells;CD 14/gated on CD33+ cells;CD 4/gated on CD7+ cells) is shown inFigs 22C to F , respectively. -
Figure 23 shows the results of the EGFP analysis and phenotypic analysis of the transfected embryonic stem cells of Example 8, without feeder (A) and with feeder (B). -
Figure 24 shows the results of the EGFP analysis and phenotypic analysis of the PBMC electroporated according to the method of Example 9 -
Figure 25 : mRNA-electroporation of Mo-DC at the µs-range (Example 10B)- A: Influence of voltage on transfection efficiency. Immature Mo-DC were electroporated for 500 µs at the indicated voltage using the machine MULTIPORATOR® (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), which delivers exponential decay pulse. Immediately after that terminal maturation was induced by addition of IL-1β IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2. Transfection efficiency was determined at the indicated time by FCM analysis. The dashed line shows the fluorescence of Mo-DC transfected with EGFP mRNA. The dotted line represents negative control. The numbers in the figure indicate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI).
- B: Influence of voltage on viability. The figure shows the same Mo-DC as described above after staining with propidium-jodide. The numbers in the figure indicate dead cells.
-
Figure 26 : Influence of pulse form on transfection efficiency (Example 10C)
Immature Mo-DC were electroporated for 500 µs at 400 V using the machines MULTIPORATOR® (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) and ECM830® (Genetronics BTX, San Diego, CA, USA) delivering exponential decay or rectangular pulses, respectively. Immediately after that terminal maturation was induced by addition of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2. Mature DC were electroporated at the same settings. Transfection efficiacy was determined by FCM analysis 2d post-electroporation. The dashed line shows the fluorescence of DC transfected with EGFP mRNA. The dotted line represents fluorescence of DC transfected with FluM1 mRNA. The numbers in the figure indicate the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). -
Figure 27 : Phenotypical analysis of Mo-DC 2d after mRNA-electroporation at the µs-range (Example 10C). Immature and mature Mo-DC were electroporated as described inFigure 26 /Example 10C. The dashed line shows the red-fluorescence of Mo-DC stained with the monoclonal antibodies specific for CD83 and CD25, respectively. The dotted line represents the isotype control. The number in the figure indicates the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). -
Figure 28 : Scale-up of the cell number per electroporation cuvette (Example 10D).
Increasing numbers of mature Mo-DC were electroporated with EGFP mRNA in a 0,4 cm-gap-cuvette at 400 V for 500 µs using the machine MULTIPORATOR®. After 24 hrs transfection efficiency was determined by FCM-analysis of the EGFP-fluorescence.- A: The dashed line shows the fluorescence of Mo-DC transfected with EGFP mRNA. The dotted line represents negative control.
- B: Recovery of cells (%) shown immediately post-electroporation (p.e.) and 24 h later.
- In the method of the invention the so called "soft pulse" electroporation devices are utilized. With such devices the following settings a voltage of 300 to 600 V and a time of 100 µs to 1 ms are utilized which are believed to correspond to a capacitance of below 300 µF (although, due to the use of eukaryotic cell suspensions; a correct conversion is not possible). The pulse form provided by commercially available soft pulse electroporation devices may be a square wave pulse or an exponential decay pulse. Preferred settings for the soft pulse devices are 350 to 450 V for 300 to 600 µs.
- In a preferred embodiment of the invention the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 1x103 to 1x109 cells per ml, preferably 1x105 to 1x109 cells per ml. Even more preferred are 1x105 to 5x107 cells per ml, most preferably 1 to 4x107 cells per ml.
- The linear RNA to be transfected is so-called "naked" RNA, i.e. RNA which is not complexed or stabilized by a ligand. Linear RNA to be utilized in the present invention includes modified or unmodified, defined or undefined RNA or DNA-RNA hybrids and all kinds of modified variants thereof. The most preferred linear polynucleotides are mRNA. The above DNA-RNA hybrides are particularly suitable to repair or modify genes (Stepehnson, J., JAMA 281 (2), 119-122 (1999)). It is moreover preferred that the concentration of the RNA to be transfected is 1x10-7 to 1x10-5 mmol/ml, preferably 4x10-6 to 6x10-6 mmol/ml.
- All types of eukaryotic cells can be electroporated with the method of the invention, such as vertebrate cells including mammalian cells (such as human cells, rodent (mouse, rat) cells), non-vertebrate cells (such as cells of fish and worms), lower eukaryotes such as yeasts, filamentous fungi and ascomycetes.
- The mammalian/human cells are stem cells and derivatives thereof such as embryonic stem cells but not including human embryonic stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells and derivatives thereof, and hematopoietic cells including mononuclear cells, marrow CD34+ progenitor derived dendritic cells, CD34+ progenitor derived Langerhans cell, monocycle-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DC), and most preferably are Mo-DC including immature Mo-DC and mature Mo-DC, but can also be applied to DC precursors or progenitors such as monocytes or CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells and also to embryonic stem cells. The method of the invention is also suitable to transduce primary bone marrow cells by RNA electroporation (it could be shown that mRNA electroporation of total bone marrow mononuclear cells is possible). The above mentioned precursor cells are electroporated with mRNA encoding the relevant antigen prior to (rapid) differentiation into dendritic cells. This strategy will be published in Ponsaerts et al. Journal of Immunology 2002, in press. This approach might also be of value for other types of precursor dendritic cells including CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells or fresh CD11c+ blood dendritic cells that have a relative short halflife in vitro.
- The linear polynucleotides used in the method of the invention may be any functional nucleotide sequence exhibiting a certain effect in the eukaryotic cell, which includes polynucleotides encoding proteins or peptides to be expressed in the eukaryotic cells, polynucleotides being functional or regulatory sequences and the like. The proteins or peptides to be expressed in the eukaryotic cells may or may not have a direct function in the eukaryotic cells, i.e. the expessed protein or peptide changes the property of the transfected cell, or is merely expressed in the cell or secreted by the cell (e.g. is a reporter gene or a gene product). The above mentioned proteins or peptides encoded by the linear polynucleotides include, but are not limited to, tumor antigens, microbial antigens, viral antigens, immunostimulatory or tolerogenic molecules, anti-apoptotic molecules, adhesion and homing molecules and antigen processing molecules. The above mentioned functional or regulatory sequences include, but are not limited to, differentiation-regulating genes, differentiation-associated genes and tissue specific genes. Examples of the above proteins or peptides encoded by the linear polynucleotides are Reportergenes such as EGFP (Enhanced green fluorescent protein; SEQ ID NOs:1 and 2) etc.; Tumor/Viral Antigens such as WT1 (Wilms tumor 1 protein; SEQ ID NOs:3 and 4), E6 (Human Papilloma Virus E6 protein; SEQ ID NOs:5 and 6), E7 (Human Papilloma Virus E7 protein; SEQ ID NO:7 and 8), env (Human Immunodefficiency Virus env protein; SEQ ID NO:9), gag (Human Immunodefficiency Virus gag protein SEQ ID NO:10), tat(WT) (Human Immunodefficiency Virus tat(WT) proteins; SEQ ID NO: 11) tat(SLT) (Human Immunodefficiency Virus tat(SLT) protein SEQ ID NO:12), Nef (Human Immunodefficiency Virus Nef protein; SEQ ID NO:13), Ref (Human Immunodefficiency Virus Ref protein; SEQ ID NO:14); Melan-A/MART1 (Melanoma antigen Melan-A; SEQ ID NOs:15 and 16); MAGEA1 (Melanoma antigen 1; SEQ ID NOs:17 and 18); MAGEA3 (Melanoma antigen 3; SEQ ID NOs:19 and 20) etc.; Cytokines such as GM-CSF (Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor; SEQ ID NOs:21 and 22), IL-2 (interleukin 2; SEQ ID NOs:23 and 24) etc; and Genes for Stem Cells such as Nkx2.5 (CSX: cardiac-specific homeo box; SEQ ID NOs:25 and 26), Notch (Notch homolog 1; ; SEQ ID NOs:27 and 28), BAALC (brain and acute leukemia, cytoplasmic Locus; SEQ ID NOs:29 and 30), Wnt genes, GATA-4, GABA, desmine, cardiac troponine, etc.
- For the electroporation, the following parameters were most preferred: a 4 mm cuvette with 200 µl of cell suspension and we shock the cells using 300 volts and a capacitance of 150 µF (pulse time 8-10 ms). These are optimal parameters for both leukemic K562 cells and different types of DC, both progenitor- and monocyte-derived DC. In the optimization process, other parameters were also checked, e.g., by ranging the voltage and the capacitance, as well as the volume in the cuvette, resulting in shorter or longer pulse times. In summary the following parameters for efficiency and toxicity of RNA electroporation were found:
- 300 V - 150 µF - 200 µl - 8 ms
- 450V-150 µF-200 µl-8 ms
- The common denominator for RNA electroporation is the low voltage (range 100 V-450 V), combined with a low capacitance (150 to below 300 µF) (which is in contrast to DNA settings, for which a high capacitance is required) and a low electroporation volume (200 µl) to increase cell concentration.
- Electroporation and incubations are all performed at room temperature and cells are resuspended in serumfree buffer (e.g. IMDM, RPMI, a serum reduced buffer (e.g. Opti-MEM®) or in optimized electroporation buffer Optimix® purchased from EquiBio, UK cat n# EKIT-E1). The electroporator type is Easyject Plus® (EquiBio) which only delivers exponential decay pulses. In Examples 2-4 ("Reference Examples") a Gene Pulser II® (Biorad) was used. Example 10, which represents a method of the invention, a so-called "soft pulse" electroporators (such as Multiporator of Eppendorf and ECM 830 of Genetronix BTX) are used.
- The significant decrease in toxicity observed with mRNA electroporation could in part be explained by the less stringent electrical settings required for introduction of the RNA (Table 1). Nevertheless, mRNA electroporation performed at stringent DNA settings resulted in a lower cell toxicity as well, suggesting that cell toxicity is not solely due to the electroporation procedure itself, but can also be related to the nature of the introduced nucleic acids. Moreover, co-introduction of bacterial contaminants (e.g. LPS) often found in plasmid preparations, could affect cell viability (Gordillo, G. M., Transpl. Immunol., 7:83-94 (1999)).
- In an attempt to compare DNA and mRNA loading of DC, it was unexpectedly observed that a nonspecific stimulation of the TIL clone with plasmid DNA- but not with mRNA-electroporated 34-DC and 34-LC (
Fig. 6 ), which could be abolished by DNase I treatment of the plasmid DNA. Although this stimulatory effect of plasmid DNA confounded data interpretation, the impact of this phenomenon on DC loading with respect to antigen-presenting capacity needs further investigation. Possible involvement of immunostimulatory sequences present in plasmid DNA (i.e. unmethylated CpG motifs) should be considered (Klinman, D. M. et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93:2879-2883 (1996); Klinman, D. M. et al., Vaccine, 17:19-25 (1999)). - Although mRNA lipofection was overall less efficient than mRNA electroporation for loading DC, especially 34-DC and 34-LC, these data were derived from experiments with only one cationic lipid, i.e. DMRIE-C. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that other lipids would accomplish comparable, or even higher, efficiencies of transfection and/or of MHC class I-restricted antigen loading of Mo-DC, 34-LC or 34-DC as compared to mRNA electroporation. Using passive mRNA pulsing, we were not able to detect any EGFP expression nor CTL activation by any type of DC examined. Therefore, these results seem somewhat in contrast to the findings of Nair et al., Nat. Biotechnol., 16:364-369 (1998) who showed in pulsing experiments that immature Mo-DC can take up mRNA without the use of a transfection agent, and subsequently prime tumor-specific CTL in vitro. It is possible that in the Experiment of Nair et al. passive RNA pulsing of DC lead to effective RNA transfection in a substantial portion of DC as protein expression cannot be detected.
- In conclusion, it is shown that IVT mRNA-based electroporation is a highly efficient and simple nonviral method to gene-modify human Mo-DC, 34-DC and 34-LC with tumor antigens. The technique described in this study can serve applications in DC-based tumor vaccine development and in other gene transfer protocols requiring high-level short-term transgene expression in hematopoietic cells.
- Normal pulse: EasyjecT PLUS D2000 model SHV (220 V; exponential decay pulses) was purchased from EquiBio Ltd. (cat # EJ-002, Action Court, Ashford Road, Ashford, Middlesex, TW15 1XB, U.K). The EasyjecT PLUS is fully microprocessor controlled via a bench top remote control unit, featuring an LCD display, membrane keypad and "Smart Card" reader/recorder. Hard copies of the parameters and initiated pulse values can be taken using the EasyjecT printer (included in the EasysyjecT PLUS). This information is invaluable in confirming your experimental procedure and giving results assured information. The EasyjecT PLUS includes a multitude of safety and operating detection features to enable safe operation without compromising the experimental procedure. Features includes: -Pre-Arc detection, open and short circuit detection, pre-pulse impedance measurement linked to a fully enclosed electroporation chamber. The programming gives visual and audible alarms if unsafe or incorrect information is measured or programmed. The EasyjecT is designed to deliver single or double exponential decay pulses. The EasyjecT PLUS has in addition the unique "double pulse" technology. This has been beneficial in certain cases where single pulse
-
Scheme 1 Exponential decay pulse; relation with pulse time experiments have resulted in unsuccessful or disappointing transformations. Detailed specifications of the EasyjecT PLUS: Output Voltage: 100-3500 Volts (50V steps) in high voltage mode or 20-450 Volts (2V steps) in low voltage mode. Shunt resistor: 20 Ohms - Infinite (10 values). Capacitance range: 0.5µF/25µF in high voltage mode or 150-3000µF in low voltage mode. Pulse time: 10µs to 7 seconds. DOUBLE PULSE facility withinter pulse time 0 to 30 s. Program storage: 8 internal or 8 per smart card. Safety detection monitoring by visual and audible alarms for open and short circuit situations also if arcing should occur. Printer is included. Dimensions: Main unit (425 x 220 x 510mm) Key Pad (100 x 270 x 35mm) Chamber ( 260 x 67 x 92mm) Power 190-250Volts or 90-220 Volts Max 250Watts. Wave Form: Decaying exponential waveform with RC time constant dependant upon capacitor, sample and shunt resistor selected. In Examples 2-4 Gene Pulser II (Biorad)was used.
Soft pulse: Multiporator ® (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), exponential decay pulse and ECM830 ® (Genetronics BTX, San Diego, CA, USA), Rectangular pulse.
Electroporation cuvettes: Throughout the experiments with EasyjecT PLUS D2000, sterile 4mm electroporation cuvettes with cap (EquiBio, UK cat # ECU-104) were used. Each cuvette is individually wrapped and gamma-irradiated. Specifically designed sterile pipettes were used to further improve aseptic procedures. Total capacity is 800 µl.
Electroporation medium: Just before electroporation, cells were resuspended in Optimix® medium (EquiBio, UK, cat #EKIT-E1). Optimix is a QC-tested fully optimised medium, designed for the electroporation of eukaryotic cells. Optimix improves both transfection efficiencies and survival rates over phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or other standard culture medium. The composition of Optimix has been carefully formulated to help protect cells during the electroporation process, also providing additional salts and critical molecules that help in the regeneration process following the destabilisation caused by the electrical discharge through the cell. The Optimix kit is ready to use and contains enough material for approx. 24 experiments. The kit is shipped at ambient temperature, however, it is important that some of the components are stored at either 4°C or -20°C on arrival. Optimix comprises 1 x 200ml of washing solution, 4 x 2.5ml of Optimix, 4x ATP and 4 x glutathione. Prior to use use, 5.5 mg ATP and 7.7 mg gltathione is mixed with 2.5 ml Optimix buffer and frozen in aliquots at -20°C.
Electrical parameters: Unless otherwise mentioned, typical mRNA electroporation settings were 300 V, 150 µF and an internal shunt resistance is put at infinity (+∞). Total volume in the cuvette is 200 µl containing 2-5 million cells resuspended in Optimix medium.
Electroporation mathematics: The electric field E is expressed in Volts per centimeter using the following formula: -
-
- Pulse time (τ) is by definition the elapsed time, in seconds, from the beginning of the pulse, when the electric field is maximum (Eo ) until the electric field has decreased to e -1 (0.368) of the initial value Eo . Practically, this value is measured by the microprocessor of the electroporation unit. The pulse time for an ideal system can be calculated as follows:
- Cell lines: T2 cells (TAP-deficient, HLA-A2+, TxB hybrid), EBV-LG2 (HLA-A2- EBV-transformed B lymphocytes), and SK23-MEL (Melan-A+ HLA-A2+ melanoma cell line) were kindly provided by Dr. Pierre Van der Bruggen (Ludwig institute for Cancer Research, Brussels, Belgium). K562 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC n° CCL-243, Rockville, MD, USA). Cell lines were cultured in complete medium consisting of Iscove's medium (IMDM) supplemented with L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), amphotericin B (1.25 µg/mt Fungizone) and 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Sera Lab, Sussex, UK). Cells were maintained in logarithmic phase growth at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2. All cell culture reagents were purchased from Gibco BRL (Paisley, UK).
- Melan-A-specific CTL clone: The CD8+ TIL 1235 clone recognizing the immunodominant HLA-A0201-restricted Melan-A27-35 epitope (AAGIGILTV; SEQ ID NO:34) was a kind gift of Dr. J. Wunderlich (NIH, Bethesda, USA) and was cultured as described earlier with minor modifications (Reeves, M. E. et al., Cancer Res., 56:5672-5677 (1996)). Briefly, the TIL clone was maintained in AIM-V medium (Gibco BRL) supplemented with 5% pooled human AB serum (Sigma, Bornem, Belgium) and 500 IU/ml interleukin (IL)-2 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) and used as responder population in DC coculture experiments.
- Source of primary cells: Bone marrow (BM) samples were aspirated by sternal puncture from hematologically normal patients undergoing cardiac surgery, after informed consent. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were obtained from healthy volunteers or hemochromatosis patients. The 6 PBMC donors used in this study are designated by letters A to F. Mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient separation (LSM, ICN Biomedicals Inc., Costa Mesa, CA, USA). Monocytes were directly isolated and used for DC culture, as described below. PBMC for DC/T-cell cocultures were cryopreserved in a solution consisting of 90% FCS and 10% DMSO and stored at -80°C until use.
- CD34 + cell sorting: After Ficoll-Hypaque separation, mononuclear BM cells were indirectly stained using supernatant of the 43A1 hybridoma (anti-CD34) kindly donated by Dr. H-J. Buhring, University of Tübingen, Germany (Buhring, H. J. et al., Leukemia, 5:854-860 (1991)), followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark). The CD34 labeled cells were then sorted on a FACStarPLUS cell sorter (Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium) equipped with an air-cooled argon ion laser ILT model 5500-A (Ion Laser Technology, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Sort windows were set to include cells with low side scatter and with positive green fluorescence (CD34+). Purities of >95% were routinely obtained.
- In vitro culture of DC: 34-DC cultures were cultured as described previously (Lardon, F. et al., Immunology, 91:553-559 (1997)). Briefly, 1-2.105 CD34+ cells were cultured in 2 ml of complete medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; Leucomax, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland), 2.5 ng/ml tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany) and 50 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF; Biosource, Nivelle, Belgium) until
day 5; afterwards, SCF was replaced by 1000 U/ml IL-4 (R&D Systems), which was added for the next 5-9 days. After 12 days of culture, a 15-20 fold total cell expansion was observed and cells exhibited typical markers of mature DC including CD1a, CD80, CD86 and HLA-DR (Fig. 3C ). - For 34-LC, we used the protocol described by Herbst, B. et al., Blood, 88:2541-2548 (1996). Briefly, sorted CD34+ cells were first cultured for 8 days in complete medium containing 100 ng/ml IL-3, 100 ng/ml IL-6 and 50 ng/ml SCF (all from Biosource), followed by LC differentiation in GM-CSF (100 ng/ml) and IL-4 (1000 U/ml) for the next 4 weeks. After 25 days of culture, a 75-100-fold increase in the total number of nucleated cells was observed and cells expressed high levels of CD1a and CD40, intermediate levels of HLA-DR and low levels of CD80 and CD86 and were able to efficiently take up FITC-dextran at 37°C (data not shown).
Immature monocyte-derived DC (iMo-DC) were generated from PBMC as described by Romani, N. et al., J. Exp. Med., 180:83-93 (1996). Briefly, PBMC were allowed to adhere in AIM-V medium for 2 h at 37°C. The non-adherent fraction was removed, and adherent cells were further cultured for 5-7 days in IMDM supplemented with 2.5% autologous heat-inactivated plasma. GM-CSF (100 ng/ml) and IL-4 (1000 U/ml) were added to the cultures every 2-3 days starting fromday 0. Maturation of iMo-DC was induced by adding 2.5 ng/ml TNF-α and 100 ng/ml lipopolysaccharide (LPS; Sigma) for 24 h starting fromday 6 of the Mo-DC culture.
Alternatively, monocytes derived from PBMCs were allowed to adhere in AIM-V medium (Gibco BRL, Paisly, UK) for 2 h at 37°C in 6-well culture plates (20x106 PBMC/well). After careful removal of the non-adherent fraction, cells were cultured in serum-free AIM-V medium supplemented with 100 ng/ml GM-CSF (Leucomax, Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland) for 2 days. To obtain mature DC, poly-I:C (Sigma, Cambridge, UK) was added 24 hours after starting the culture at a concentration of 25 µg/ml. The typical yield and purity of the DC culture was 1-2x106 cells/well containing 60-70% of DC. For electroporation experiments, monocytes were isolated from PBMC by magnetic isolation using CD14 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Routinely, 4-8x106 monocytes were obtained starting from 100x106 PBMC with purity levels ≥ 85%. - HLA-A typing of DC: HLA-A2 subtyping was determined on BM-derived mononuclear cells and PBMC by indirect staining with the supernatant of the BB7-2 hybridoma (anti-HLA-A2; ATCC), followed by FITC-conjugated rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins (DAKO). HLA-A2 staining was analyzed by flow cytometry using a FACScan analytical flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium).
- Synthetic peptides: An influenza virus-specific HLA-A*0201-restricted matrix protein M1 peptide (M1; amino acids (aa) 58-66, GILGFVFTL; SEQ ID NO:32) was used for activation or for detection of matrix protein M1 peptide specific T-cells when pulsed on respectively DC and T2 cells. A human papillomavirus (HPV) HLA-A2-restricted E7 protein-specific peptide (E7; amino acids (aa) 11-20, YMLDLQPETT; SEQ ID NO:33) was used in control experiments when pulsed on T2 cells. Melan-A peptide (MA; aa 27-35, AAGIGILTV; SEQ ID NO:34) was also used. Peptides (>95% pure) were purchased from Sigma-Genosys (Cambridge, UK). Both peptides were dissolved in 100% DMSO to 10 mg/ml, further diluted to 1 mg/ml in serum-free IMDM and stored in aliquots at -70°C. Peptides were used at a final concentration of 20 mM. The peptides (>95% pure) were purchased from Sigma-Genosys (Cambridge, UK). The peptides were dissolved in 100% DMSO to 10 mg/ml, further diluted to 1 mg/ml in serum-free IMDM and stored in aliquots at -80°C. The peptides were used at a final concentration of 20 µM.
- Peptide-pulsing of DC: T2 cells, HLA-A2+ iMo-DC or DC were washed twice with IMDM and subsequently incubated (2x106 cells/ml) for 1 to 2 h at room temperature in 5 ml conical polystyrene tubes or 15 ml conical tubes with 20 µg/ml peptide in serum-free IMDM medium supplemented with 2.5 µg/ml β2-microglobulin (Sigma). Afterwards, the cells were washed and used respectively as stimulators for PBMC or as restimulators in cytokine release assays.
- Plasmids: For plasmid cDNA transfection, a pEGFP-N1 plasmid (CLONTECH Laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used encoding an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene under the control of a CMV promoter plasmid pGEM4Z/EGFP/A64 (kindly provided by Dr. E. Gilboa, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA) contained the EGFP gene under the control of T7 promoter. Plasmid pcDNA1.1/Melan-A contained the Melan-A/MART-1 gene driven by a CMV promoter was kindly provided by Dr. Pierre Van der Bruggen. pcDNA1.1/Amp (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was used as a backbone control vector. Plasmid pCMV-Luciferase (CLONTECH Laboratories, Polo Alter, CA, USA) carried a luciferase gene under the control of a CMV promoter and was used as a control plasmid. Plasmid pGEM4Z/M1/A64 (kindly provided by Dr. A. Steinkasserer, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany) encoding an influenza M1 gene under the control of a T7 promoter (SEQ ID NO:31). Plasmids were propagated in E. Coli strain DH5α (Gibco BRL) or supercompetent cells (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) and purified on endotoxin-free QIAGEN®-
tip 500 columns (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA, USA). - Production of in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA: For in vitro transcriptions, plasmids were linearized, purified using a Genieprep kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) or a PCR purification Kit (Qiagen) and used as DNA templates for the in vitro transcription reaction. pcDNA1.1/Melan-A was used as such for in vitro transcription under the control of a T7 promoter. EGFP cDNA, isolated as a 0.8 kb HindIII-NotI fragment from pEGFP-H1, was first subcloned into pcDNA1.1/Amp and subsequently cloned as a BamHI-XbaI fragment into pSP64 (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) that allows in vitro transcription under the control of an SP6 promoter. Transcription was carried out in a final 20-100 µl reaction mix at 37°C for 3-4 h using the SP6 MessageMachine kit (Ambion) to generate 5' m'GpppG-capped IVT mRNA. Transcription reactions with Spe I (MBI Fermentas, St. Leon Rot, Germany) linearized plasmids pGEM4Z/EGFP/A64 or pGEM4Z/M1/A64 as templates were carried out in a final 20µl reaction mix at 37°C using the T7 MessageMachine Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) to generate 5' capped in vitro transcribed (IVT) mRNA. Purification of IVT mRNA was performed by DNase I digestion followed by LiCl precipitation and 70% ethanol wash, according to manufacturer's instructions. For each experiment, at least three different batches of mRNA were used. mRNA quality was checked by agarose-formaldehyde gel electrophoresis. RNA concentration was assayed by spectrophotometrical analysis at OD260. RNA was stored at -80°C in small aliquots (1 µg/µl).
- Cell transfections: Prior to electroporation, K562 cells were washed twice with serum-free IMDM and resuspended to a final concentration of 5-10x106 cells/ml in Opti-MEM (Gibco BRL). After phenotypic analysis (performed in order to confirm the presence of CD1a+HLA-DR+ DC in the cultures), 34-DC, 34-LC and Mo-DC were routinely harvested after respectively 12, 25 and 6 days of culture (unless stated otherwise), washed twice with serum-free IMDM, and resuspended to a final concentration of 10-40x106 cells/ml in Opti-MEM. Subsequently, 0.5 ml of the cell suspension was mixed with 20 µg of IVT mRNA, and electroporated in a 0.4 cm cuvette using an Easyject Plus device (EquiBio, Kent, UK). In K562 cells, various voltages, capacitances and electroporation volumes were compared in order to assess their effect on mRNA transfection efficiency (see Results section). Electroporation of mRNA into CD14 microbead-isolated monocytes was done as described in Van Tenderloo, V. P. et al., Blood, 98:49 (2001), with minor modifications. Briefly, prior to electroporation, CD14 microbead-isolated monocytes were washed twice with Optimix Washing Solution (EquiBio, Ashford, Middlesex, UK) and resuspended to a final concentration of 50x106 cells/ml in Optimix electroporation buffer (EquiBio). Subsequently 0.2 ml of the cell suspension was mixed with 20 µg of IVT mRNA and electroporated in a 0.4 cm cuvette at 300 V and 150 µF using an Easyject Plus device (EquiBio). Plasmid DNA electroporation was performed as previously described (Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998)). After electroporation, fresh complete medium (including cytokines for DC) was added to the cell suspension and cells were further incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere supplemented with 5% CO2.
- Lipofection of mRNA was performed using the cationic lipid DMRIE-C (Gibco BRL) according to manufacturer's instructions with minor modifications (Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998)). Briefly, K562 cells were washed twice with serum-free IMDM and resuspended to a final concentration of 1-2.106 cells/ml in Opti-MEM. 34-DC, 34-LC and Mo-DC were harvested after respectively 12, 25 and 6 days of culture, washed twice with serum-free IMDM, and resuspended to a final concentration of 1-2.106 cells/ml in Opti-MEM. Five µg of IVT mRNA, diluted in 250 µl Opti-MEM, was mixed with DMRIE-C, also diluted in 250 µl Opti-MEM, at a lipid:RNA ratio of 4: 1. After 5-15 min of incubation at room temperature in order to allow RNA-lipid complexation, lipoplexes were added to the cells and allowed to incubate for 2 hours at 37°C. Alternatively, 5-20 µg of IVT mRNA was pulsed to the cells in the absence of DMRIE-C for 3-4 h at 37°C. Plasmid DNA lipofection was performed as described previously (Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998)). After lipofection or passive pulsing, fresh complete medium (including cytokines for DC) was added to each well.
- EGFP analysis: EGFP-transfected cells were checked for EGFP expression 24-48 h after transfection by flow cytometric (FCM) analysis. Briefly, cells (1-5 x 105) were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) supplemented with 1% FCS and resuspended in 0.5 ml of PBS supplemented with 1% BSA and 0.1% sodium azide. Ethidium bromide (EB) at a final concentration of 10 µg/ml was added directly prior to FCM analysis on a FACScan analytical flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) to assess cell viability. For EGFP analysis in DC cultures, gating was performed on cells exhibiting a large forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC) profile, i.e. DC, in order to allow exclusion of contaminating autologous lymphocytes Gated DC were then evaluated for EGFP expression.
- Immunophenotyping of DC: Immunophenotyping was performed as described previously (Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998)). The following monoclonal antibodies were used: CD1a-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Beerse, Belgium), CD1a-phycoerythrin (PE) (Caltag Laboratories, San Francisco, CA, USA), CD14-PE, HLA-DR-PE, HLA-DR-FITC (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), CD4-PE, CD80-PE (Becton Dickinson), CD80-FITC (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), CD40-FITC (BioSource, Zoersel, Belgium), CD86-PE (PharMingen, San Diego, CA, USA), CD86-FITC (Serotec, Oxford, UK), CD13-FITC (DAKO), CD14-FITC (Becton Dickinson, Erembodegem, Belgium) and the non-conjugated CD83 (HB-15 clone; Immunotech, Marseille, France). Immunophenotyping with CD83 was followed by staining with a secondary rabbit anti-mouse (RAM)-FITC antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Nonreactive isotype-matched antibodies (Becton Dickinson) were used as controls. Ethidium bromide was added prior to FCM analysis on a FACScan analytical flow cytometer (Beckton Dickinson) to assess cell viability and to exclude dead cells from the analysis. Gating was also performed to exclude remaining lymphocytes in the DC cultures. In particular, for immunophenotyping of enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) mRNA-electroporated DC, the following phycoerythrin (PE)-labeled monoclonal antibodies were used: CD1a-PE, HLA-DR-PE, CD80-PE, CD14-PE, CD86-PE, and the secondary RAM-PE antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for CD83 staining.
- Interferon (IFN)-γ release assay: 34-DC, 34-LC and iMo-DC were used as
stimulator cells 24 h after transfection. To study the effect of maturation, 6-day-cultured iMo-DC were allowed to mature for 24 h in the presence of TNF-α and LPS prior to transfection and used asstimulators 24 h after transfection. Alternatively, iMo-DC were transfected with mRNA onday 6 of culture and, after 12-16 h to allow protein expression, TNF-α, and LPS were added to induce final DC maturation. After an additional 24 h, mature transfected Mo-DC were used as stimulators. In some experiments, iMo-DC pulsed with the Melan-A, an irrelevant influenza M1 peptide or an irrelevant human papilloma virus E7 peptide were used as stimulators. Stimulators were either washed twice and resuspended in AIM-V medium supplemented with 10% pooled human AB serum and 40 IU/ml IL-2. Responder CTL were washed vigorously 3-4 times and resuspended in AIM-V medium. Then, CTL (1 x 105 cells) were coincubated with stimulator cells (1x105 cells) in 96-round bottom plates for 24 h at 37°C in a total volume of 200 µl. Alternatively, stimulators and responder PBMC were washed and resuspended in IMDM + 5% hAB serum. Then, responder PBMC (1x105 cells) were coincubated with stimulator cells (1x104 cells) in 96-well round-bottom plates for 6 hours at 37°C In a total volume of 100 µl. Triplicate supernatant samples from these cocultures were tested for specific IFN-γ secretion by an IFN-γ ELISA (Biosource, Nivelle, Belgium). To normalize data, the background IFN-γ secretion (defined as IFN-γ released by the CTL exposed to unmodified DC) was subtracted from each of the observed measurements. Measurements are presented as IU/ml released by 105 responder cells/24 h. - IFN-γ secreting cell assay: PBMC primed and cultured as described above (1x106) were restimulated for 3 hours in 24-well plates with T2 cells (1x105) pulsed with M1 peptide or E7 peptide as control. Next, IFN-γ-secreting cells were analyzed by a flow cytometric IFN-γ Secretion Assay Detection Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) according to manufacturer's instructions. Cells were also stained with CD8-FITC (Becton Dickinson) and 5x105 cells were analyzed per sample by flow cytometry. Analysis was done by gating on the lymphocyte population.
- Allogeneic mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR): Immature and mature DC were used for stimulation of allogeneic PBMC. Briefly, immature or mature DC were cocultured with 20x106 allogeneic PBMC (ratio 1:10) in 10 ml IMDM supplemented with 5% human (h) AB serum (Sigma) in T25 culture flasks. On
day 4 of culture, 5 ml fresh medium (IMDM + 5% hAB serum) was added to the cultures. Onday 7 of culture, cells were analyzed for reactivity. For this, stimulated PBMC (1x105 cells) were restimulated with PBMC from the DC donor (1x104 cells) in 96-well round bottom plates for 6 hours at 37°C in a total volume of 100 µl. Supernatant samples from these cocultures were tested for IFN-γ secretion by IFN-γ ELISA (Biosource, Nivelle, Belgium). - Induction of MHC class I-restricted influenza-specific T cells: M1 peptide-pulsed immature, M1 peptide-pulsed mature DC and matrix protein mRNA-electroporated mature DC were used for antigen-specific stimulation of PBMC. Briefly, 2x106 antigen-loaded DC were cocultured with 20x106 autologous PBMC (ratio 1:10) in 10 ml IMDM supplemented with 5% hAB serum in T25 culture flasks. On
day 4 of culture, 5 ml fresh medium (IMDM + 5% hAB serum) was added to the cultures. Onday 7 of culture, cells were analyzed for antigen specificity. - A. Optimization of IVT mRNA transfection in K562 cell: In preliminary experiments to optimize mRNA electroporation, we used leukemic K562 cells, as these cells were readily transfectable by plasmid electroporation (Baum, C. et al., Biotechniques, 17:1058-1062 (1994)). The EGFP reporter gene was used to assess mRNA transfection efficiency. Various electroporation settings were tested and transfection efficiency was determined by FCM analysis of EGFP expression (
Fig. 1A ). Of all tested electrical settings, a voltage of 300 V combined with a capacitance of 150 µF in a total cuvette volume of 200 µl resulted in the highest EGFP expression (Table 1).Table 1: Optimization of mRNA electroporation parameters in K562 cells Electroporation voltage (V) capacitance (µF) cell volume (µl) efficiency (%) viability (%) DNA 260 1050 500 40 49 300 150 200 28 85 RNA 300 150 200 89 85 300 300 200 83 59 260 1050 500 81 73 250 1500 500 80 69 Lipofection lipid lipid:DNA ratio incubation time (h) efficiency (%) viability (%) DNA DMRIE-C 3:1 6 26 88 RNA DMRIE-C 4:1 2 22 80 - K562 cell were transfected as described in the Materials and Methods section by electroporation or lipofection. Cells were analyzed 24 h after electroporation by FCM for EGFP expression to estimate transfection efficiency (= % EGFP+ cells) as well as by ethidium bromide exclusion for cell viability. Results are the mean of four independent experiments each with a different IVT mRNA batch (standard error of the mean < 2.5%).
- The vast majority of the viable cell fraction expressed EGFP to a significant extent. The percentage of EGFP-expressing K562 cells was markedly higher following mRNA electroporation than following plasmid cDNA transfection, even when cDNA electroporation was performed at optimal DNA electroporation settings, i.e. 260 V and 1050 µF (
Fig. 1A ). Furthermore, mRNA electroporation at optimal settings showed a significantly reduced cell mortality rate as compared to cDNA electroporation at optimal settings (15% versus 51%, respectively). DMRIE-C-mediated RNA and DNA lipofection showed a somewhat similar outcome in terms of efficiency and viability although optimal lipid:nucleic acid ratio (4:1 versus 3: 1) as well as incubation time (2 h versus 6 h) varied for RNA and DNA lipofection, respectively (Table 1).
As RNA is extremely labile and has a short half-life time compared to DNA, we also studied kinetics of EGFP expression following mRNA electroporation (Fig. 1B ). Transgene expression in K562 cells peaked at 24-48 h and rapidly declined to background levels after 6 days. - B. Efficiency of IVT mRNA transfection in different types of DC: Immature Mo-DC (iMo-DC) were generated from adherent PBMC in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4. At day 5-6 of culture, Mo-DC were electroporated with EGFP mRNA. Optimization experiments revealed optimal settings similar to those of K562 cells (300 V, 150 µF), leading to maximal transfection efficiency combined with the lowest level of cell death. FCM analysis of EGFP expression showed more than 60% EGFP-expressing iMo-DC (
Fig. 2A & Table 2). Mortality in Mo-DC after mRNA electroporation ranged from 15-30% (mean cell mortality rate 22±8%), although untransfected Mo-DC cultures already exhibited some degree of cell death (5-10%). When gating on the viable population, 85% of viable Mo-DC expressed EGFP to some extent. TNFα+LPS-induced maturation of Mo-DC prior to transfection showed a significant decrease in electroporation and lipofection efficiency (Table 2). DC maturation following mRNA transfection had no effect on transgene expression (data not shown). Lipofection of EGFP mRNA in Mo-DC resulted in a much lower efficiency (7.5±0.5%) and was slightly more toxic (mean cell mortality rate 28±10%) to the cells than mRNA electroporation, as shown inFig 2A . Passive pulsing of DC with mRNA did not result in any detectable EGFP expression. Kinetic analysis of mRNA expression in Mo-DC showed a maximum 24 h after electroporation, followed by a slow decline in function of time (Fig. 2B ). Five days after mRNA electroporation, EGFP was still detectable in a substantial proportion of Mo-DC (31% EGFP+ cells), in contrast to transgene expression kinetics in K562 cells (9% EGFP+ cells after 5 days). Monitoring of cell viability after mRNA electroporation revealed a somewhat stable viability in function of time (Fig. 2B ).
mRNA transfection in bone marrow CD34+ progenitor-derived DC (34-DC) and CD34+ progenitor-derived Langerhans cells (34-LC) was also tested. Up to 72% and 53%, respectively, of these DC types were readily transfected by mRNA electroporation (Fig. 2C ), but not by mRNA lipofection or mRNA pulsing (Table 2). Viability was always higher than 80% for both 34-DC and 34-LC (Fig. 2C ). Table 2 summarizes efficiency of mRNA-based electroporation, lipofection and passive pulsing in the different types of DC.Table 2: Efficiency of mRNA transfection in different types of DC. Transfection efficiency (%) Method of transfection iMo-DC mMo-DC 34-LC 34- DC Electroporation 63±9 33±8 50±3 73±3 Lipofection 7.5±2.5 4±2.3 <BG <BG Passive pulsing <BG <BG <BG <BG - Different types of DC were transfected with IVT EGFP mRNA using electroporation, lipofection or passive pulsing. One day after transfection, EGFP expression was analyzed by FCM to estimate transfection efficiency (% EGFP+ DC). iMo-DC, immature Mo-DC; mMo-DC, mature Mo-DC; 34-LC, CD34+ progenitor-derived Langerhans cells; 34-DC, CD34+ progenitor-derived dendritic cells. Results are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three independent experiments for passive pulsing, lipofection or electroporation; < BG, EGFP expression below background fluorescence.
- Phenotype and maturation of mRNA-electroporated DC: Since DC have a delicate phenotype which can easily be disturbed by culture or transfection conditions, we assessed by FCM analysis whether electroporated DC retained their respective phenotype as well as their capacity to differentiate into mature DC. Control and EGFP mRNA-transfected Mo-DC were stained using monoclonal antibodies binding to characteristic DC markers including CD1a, HLA-DR, CD80, CD86 and CD83. Electroporation of mRNA showed no effect on the phenotype of Mo-DC, as electroporated Mo-DC co-expressing EGFP retained high levels of CD1a, HLA-DR and CD86 (
Fig. 3A ). Mock electroporation (electroporation without mRNA) gave similar results (data not shown). The capacity of mRNA-electroporated Mo-DC to differentiate to mature Mo-DC was evaluated by expression of mature DC markers including CD80 and CD83.Fig. 3B shows that mRNA electroporation itself did not induce DC maturation, but that the maturation potential after electroporation was retained since mRNA-transfected immature Mo-DC were able to upregulate CD83 and CD80 in the presence of a maturation cocktail (TNF-α +LPS). - Also, the phenotype of 34-DC was also not affected by mRNA electroporation (
Fig. 3C ). EGFP+ 34-DC co-expressed HLA-DR, CD1a, CD80 and CD86. Similar findings were observed in 34-LC, with the exception that 34-LC exhibited lower levels of CD80 and CD86, compatible with their similarity to immature Langerhans-like DC (data not shown). - C. MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation by mRNA-transfected DC: Given the high transfection efficiency in Mo-DC, we investigated to what extent mRNA-transfected Mo-DC could process antigen and present MHC class I-restricted antigenic epitopes to an antigen-specific CTL clone. Therefore, we introduced mRNA encoding Melan-A/MAPT-1 into HLA-A2+ Mo-DC using electroporation, lipofection or passive pulsing. Mo-DC electroporated or lipofected with Melan-A mRNA markedly stimulated an HLA-A2+ Melan-A-specific CTL clone, as judged by IFN-γ secretion (
Fig. 4 ). Mo-DC passively pulsed with Melan-A mRNA did not result in any CTL stimulation. HLA-A2+ Mo-DC electroporated with EGFP mRNA or HLA-A2- Mo-DC electroporated with Melan-A mRNA did not stimulate the CTL clone to produce IFN-γ. Both HLA-A2+ Melan-A+ SK23-MEL melanoma cells and HLA-A2+ Mo-DC, pulsed with the immunodominant Melan-A27-35 peptide AAGIGILTV, were used as positive controls and induced strong IFN-γ production by the CTL clone. HLA-A2+ Mo-DC pulsed with the M1 influenza peptide did not elicit any specific IFN-γ production. Mo-DC electroporated with Melan-A IVT mRNA stimulated the CTL clone more than twice stronger than mRNA-lipofected Mo-DC (Fig. 4 ), suggesting a correlation with the difference in transfection efficiency between the two gene transfer methods (Table 2). The observation that transfection efficiency and CTL activation were correlated, was also made when comparing efficiency of mRNA electroporation (Table 2) and the capacity to stimulate the CTL clone in the other types of DC (Table 3). Electroporation of HLA-A2+ 34-DC and 34-LC with Melan mRNA, but not EGFP mRNA, led to specific CTL activation. In concordance with the absence of any detectable transfection level (Table 2), lipofection of 34-DC and 34-LC or passive pulsing of all types of DC with Melan-A mRNA did not result in any IFN-γ detectable above background levels (Table 3).Table 3: CTL activation by different types of DC CTL activation (IU IFN-γ/ml/24 h) Method of transfection iMo-DC mMo-DC 34-LC 34-DC Electroporation 11.3±2.2 5.8±1.8 6.9±1.4 7.7±3 Lipofection 3.7±1.1 1.5±0.8 <BG < BG Passive pulsing < BG <BG < BG < BG - Different types of DC were transfected with IVT Melan mRNA using electroporation, lipofection or passive pulsing. One day after transfection, 105 transfected DC were cocultured for 24 h with 105 Melan-A-specific CTL at 37°C. Afterwards, supernatants were collected and IFN-γ secretion was checked by IFN-γ ELISA, as described in the Materials and Methods section. Results are the mean ± SD of at least five independent experiments for electroporation and of 3 independent experiments for passive pulsing and lipofection. iMo-DC, immature Mo-DC; mMo-DC, mature Mo-DC; 34-LC, CD34+ progenitor-derived Langerhans cells; 34-DC, CD34+ progenitor-derived DC; <BG, IFN-γ production below background.
- D. Effect of maturation on mRNA loading in Mo-DC : Mo-DC obtained by culturing PBMC in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4 for 5-7 days exhibit predominantly an immature phenotype (Romani, N. et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 196:137-151 (1996)). These immature Mo-DC are specialized in capturing large amounts of antigens from the environment (Sallusto, F., Lanzavecchia, A., J. Exp. Med., 179:1109-1118 (1994)). However, for optimal presentation to CTL, Mo-DC need to undergo a maturation process which can be induced by bacterial products (e.g. LPS), inflammatory cytokines (e.g. TNF-α) and/or CD40 ligation by T helper cells (Bancherau, J., Steinmann, R. N., Nature, 392:245-252 (1998)). Therefore, in order to test whether maturation and the sequence of loading affected the antigen-presenting capacity of Mo-DC, we evaluated the ability of Mo-DC loaded with Melan-A by mRNA electroporation to stimulate the CTL clone prior to and after maturation with LPS+TNF-α.
Figure 5 clearly indicates that the most potent CTL activation was obtained when mRNA loading by electroporation or lipofection was performed prior to maturation of Mo-DC. When maturation occurred prior to mRNA loading, there was a significant decrease in IFN-γ secretion by TIL cells (Fig. 5 ), likely to be correlated with the lower degree of transfectability of mature Mo-DC which were matured with LPS and TNF-α (Table 2). - E. cDNA loading versus mRNA loading: In contrast to Mo-DC, 34-LC and 34-DC can also be transfected by plasmid DNA electroporation (Van Tendeloo, V.F.I. et al., Gene Ther., 5:700-707 (1998)). Therefore, we evaluated whether plasmid DNA-transfected DC can also induce antigen-specific CTL activation. HLA-A2+ 34-LC electoporated with plasmid DNA or IVT mRNA encoding Melan-A were incubated with the Melan-A specific CTL to evaluate IFN-γ secretion (
Fig. 6 ). Strikingly, we reproducibly obtained similar IFN-γ levels with Melan-A cDNA- as with control vector-transfected 34-LC, indicating nonspecific CTL stimulation. Transfection with two other irrelevant plasmids (pEGFP-N1 and pCMV-Luciferase) resulted in a similar nonspecific CTL stimulation. This phenomenon was never observed in mock-transfected (electroporation without plasmid DNA) 34-LC or when the DNA was digested by DNase I prior to electroporation (Fig. 6 ). Similar observations were made in 34-DC (data not shown). - EGFP RNA-transfection of immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells (generated from leukapheresis products and matured by a cocktail of IL-1β + IL-6 + TNFα + PEG2 under GMP conditions for clinical application) by electroporation. Monocyte-derived immature Dendritic Cells (DC) were generated from leukapheresis products as described (Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods 245: 15-29 (2000)). Immature DC (d6) were washed twice in RPMI and once in washing-solution of the Optimix®-Kit (EQUIBIO, Maidstone Kent, U.K.). DC were adjusted to a final cell concentration of 10x106/ml in Optimix®-Medium. Then 0,2 ml of the cell suspension were mixed with 20 µg in vitro transcribed EGFP RNA in a 1,5 ml reaction tube. After incubation at room temperature for a maximum of 3 minutes the cell suspension were transferred in a 0,4-cm-gap electroporation-cuvette. Pulse were triggered at a voltage of 300 V and a capacitance of 150 µF with the Gene Pulser II (BioRad, Munich, Germany) resulting in pulse time of 7-10 msec. Immediately after that the cell suspensions were transferred to 6-well-plates (1x106 DC/ well/3 ml culture medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4). In the half number of the wells terminal maturation was induced by addition of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2 as described (Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods 245: 15-29 (2000)). 48 h after electroporation the DC were counterstained with the indicated mouse mAbs and PE-conjugated anti-mouse Ig followed by FACS-analysis. The results are summarised in
Fig. 7 . - The addition of a maturation cocktail after transfection leads to a population of Dendritic Cells that is more mature as indicated by expression of CD83 and CD25 by a much higher percentage of DC. This is important as only mature DC induce immunity in vivo while immature ones can induce tolerance (Roncarolo, M.G. et al., Exp. Med. 15;193(2):F5-9. Review. (2001)).
- Monocyte-derived immature Dendritic Cells (DC) were processed as described above, and following addition of the maturation stimulus the longevity of EGFP expression in mature transfected DC was examined. Expression of EGFP is maintained in the majority of cells even after 4 days. The results are summarised in
Fig. 8 . - EGFP RNA-transfection of monocyte-derived dendritic cells by electroporation - Titration of Voltage
- Monocyte-derived immature Dendritic Cells (DC) were generated from leukapheresis products as described (Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods 245: 15-29 (2000)). Immature DC (d6) were washed twice in RPMI and once in washing-solution of the Optimix®-Kit (EQUIBIO, Maidstone Kent, U.K.). DC were adjusted to a final cell concentration of 10x106/ml in Optimix®-Medium. Then 0,2 ml of the cell suspension were mixed with or without 20 µg in vitro transcribed EGFP RNA in a 1,5 ml reaction tube. After incubation at room temperature for a maximum of 3 minutes the cell suspension were transferred in a 0,4-cm-gap electroporation-cuvette. Pulse were triggered at the indicated voltage and a capacitance of 150 µF with the Gene Pulser II (BioRad, Munich, Germany) resulting in pulse time of 7-10 ms. Immediately after that the cell suspensions were transferred to 6-well-plates (1x106 DC/ well/3 ml culture medium). Terminal maturation was induced by addition of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2 as described (Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods 245: 15-29 (2000)). 48 h after electroporation the DC were analyzed. The contour-plots of
Fig. 9A show on the x-axis the forward side scatter and on y-axis the sideward scatter. - The Forward and Side Scatter analysis addition reveals that for monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells that are generated from leukapheresis products, RNA-transfected by electroporation, and fully matured by adding a maturation cocktail consisting of of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-a and PGE2 (Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 245: 15-29 (2000)) the use of 260 V is slightly better as the integrity of the cells is somewhat better preserved.
- Immature DC (d6) - see
Fig. 9A - were washed twice in RPMI and once in washing-solution of the Optimlx®-Kit (EQUIBIO, Maidstone Kent, U.K.). DC were adjusted to a final cell concentration of 10x106/ml in Optimix®-Medium. Then 0,2 ml of the cell suspension were mixed with or without 20 µg in vitro transcribed EGFP RNA in a 1,5 ml reaction tube. After incubation at room temperature for a maximum of 3 minutes the cell suspension was transferred in a 0,4-cm-gap electroporation-cuvette. Pulses were triggered at the indicated voltage and a capacitance of 150 µF with the Gene Pulser II (BioRad, Munich, Germany) resulting in pulse time of 7-10 msec. Immediately after that the cell suspensions were transferred to 6-well-plates (1x106 DC/ well/3 ml culture medium). Terminal maturation was induced by addition of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-a and PGE2. 48 h after electroporation the DC were counterstained with the indicated mouse mAbs and PE-conjugated anti-mouse Ig followed by FACS-analysis. The results are shown inFig. 9B . - The phenotypic analysis reveals that for monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells that are generated from leukapheresis products, RNA-transfected by electroporation, and fully matured by adding a maturation cocktail consisting of of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-a and PGE2 (Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 245: 15-29 (2000)) the use of 260 V is slightly better as more cells are in the upper right quadrant, i.e. expressing both EGFP and the maturation markers CD83 and CD25.
- EGFP RNA-transfection of already matured monocyte-derived dendritic cells (generated from leukapheresis cells and matured by a cocktail of IL-1β + IL-6 + TNFα + PEG2 under GMP conditions for clinical application) by electroporation.
- A: Monocyte-derived immature Dendritic Cells (DC) were generated from leukapheresis products as described (Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods, 245:15-29 (2000)). Immature DC (d6) were induced to undergo terminal maturation by addition of IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2 as described in Feuerstein, B. et al., J. Immunol. Methods 245: 15-29 (2000). Mature DC were transfected with EGFP-RNA by electroporation as described in Example 2.
- While DC matured by TNFα + LPS are transfected only to a mean of 33 %, from the results depicted in
Figs. 10A and H it can be concluded that mature monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells (matured by an optimised maturation cocktail consisting of IL-1β + IL-6 + TNFα + PGE2) are efficiently transfected, and maintain EGFP expression over the 48h time period tested. - B: Mature monocyte-derived Dendritic Cells (DC) are efficiently transfected, and maintain their mature phenotype (high expression of CD83, CD80, CD25, CD40, HLA-DR and MHC class I) over the 48h time period tested as it is confirmed by
Fig. 10B-G . - The addition of a maturation cocktail after transfection leads to a population of Dendritic Cells that is more mature as indicated by expression of CD83 and CD25 by a much higher percentage of DC. This is important as only mature DC induce immunity in vivo while immature ones can induce tolerance (Roncarolo, M.G et al., J. Exp. Med. 15;193(2):F5-9. Review. (2000)).
- mRNA-electroporated mature dendritic cells retain transgene expression, phenotypical properties and stimulatory capacity after cryopreservation.
Table 4: Transgene expression in cryopreserved mRNA-electroporated K562 cells % EGFP+ cells MFI EGFP+ cells % dead cells Control: EGFP expression in mRNA-electroporated K562 cells (n=2) 3 h after EP 66 ± 1 109 ± 15 19 ± 2 24 h after EP 72 ± 1 363 ± 62 17 ± 1 48 h after EP 73±9 319 ± 67 18 ± 8 Protocol 1 : K562 cells frozen 3 hours after mRNA electroporation (n=3) 3 h after thawing 60 ± 2 286 ± 11 31 ± 2 24 h after thawing 73 ± 1 454 ± 19 18 ± 1 48 h after thawing 80 ± 1 207 ± 2 11 ± 1 Protocol 2: K562 cells frozen 24 hours after mRNA electroporation (n=3) 3 h after thawing 72 ± 1 363 ± 62 22 ± 1 24 h after thawing 77 ± 1 178 ± 43 13 ± 2 48 h after thawing 80 ± 1 97 ± 43 7 ± 1 - K562 cells were electroporated with EGFP mRNA and cryopreserved 3 or 24 hours after transfection. For cryopreservation, K562 cells were resuspended in cryotubes (Nunc CryoTube Vials, Nalgene Nunc International, Denmark) at a concentration of 10 x 106 per ml in pure FCS. Next, the suspension was mixed on ice with an equal volume of FCS supplemented with 20% DMSO (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). Cell suspensions were slowly frozen (-1°C/min) to -80°C by using a cryo freezing container (Nalgene Nunc International). Cells were frozen at -80°C for more than 24 hours before use in further experiments. Cells were analyzed at different time points before and after cryopreservation by FCM for EGFP expression to estimate transfection efficiency (= % EGFP+ cells) and the mean fluorescence intensity of EGFP+ cells (= MFI EGFP+ cells). The number of dead cells was determined by ethidium bromide staining (= % dead cells). Results are shown as mean ± standard error.
- There was slightly less cell survival in cultures frozen 3 hours after the electroporation as compared to cultures frozen 24 hours after electroporation (p=0.0025). Cells need to recover for a short time after the electroporation.
- Electroporation mRNA was still functional after cryopreservation. In cultures that had been frozen 3 hours after the electroporation, the MFI of expressed EGFP almost doubled between 3 and 24 hours after thawing (p=0.0009).
Table 5: Transgene expression in cryopreserved mRNA-electroporated DC % EGFP+ cells MFI EGFP+ cells % dead cells Control 1: EGFP expression in mRNA-electroporated iMo-DC (n=3) 24 h after EP 73 ± 5 246 ± 63 12 ± 3 48 h after EP 59 ± 10 218 ± 57 24 ± 9 Cryopreservation: iMo-DC cells frozen 18 h after mRNA electroporation (n=4) 6 h after thawing 61 ± 2 215 ± 14 26 ± 1 24 after thawing 27 ± 1 251 ± 24 64 ± 2 Control 2: EGFP expression in mRNA-electroporated iMo-DC + maturation (n=3) 24 h after EP 71 ± 3 431 ± 60 13 ± 1 48 h after EP 73 ± 3 428 ± 64 11 ± 1 Cryopreservation: mMo-DC cells frozen 24 h after mRNA electroporation (n=4) 6 after thawing 63 ± 1 464 ± 24 20 ± 1 24 h after thawing 60 ± 1 390 ± 19 25 ± 2 - Immature Mo-DC were electroporated with EGFP mRNA. Cells were cryopreserved as
immature DC 18 hours after transfection or asmature DC 24 hours after transfection. Maturation was induced by adding a maturation cocktail (TNF-α + PGE2 + IL-1 + IL-6) directly after transfection. Cells were analyzed by FCM at different time points before and after cryopreservation for EGFP expression, in order to estimate transfection efficiency (= % EGFP+ cells) and the mean fluorescence intensity of EGFP+ cells (= MFI EGFP+ cells). The number of dead cells was determined by ethidium bromide staining (= % dead cells). Results are shown as mean ± standard error. EP, electroporation. - As seen in a non-frozen control of immature and mature DC (Table 5, respectively
control 1 and control 2), viability is not significantly affected by this electroporation in function of time (p-value respectively 0.1849 and 0.1362) and cells express high levels of EGFP (Table 5 ;Figure 11 A&B).
Immature DC that were frozen 18 hours after electroporation seemed to survive the freezing cycle well 6 hours after thawing. There was a small increase in cell mortality (+13%, p=0.0008), but the MFI of EGFP expressing cells was approximately the same as in non-frozen control DC (p=0.5185). However, 24 hours after thawing, there was high level of cell mortality in the frozen cultures as compared to non-frozen control DC that have been cultured for 48 hours after electroporation (64% versus 24%, p=0.0017) (Table 2 ;Figure 11 A) . - For the cryopreservation of mature DC, immature Mo-DC were electroporated, followed by a 2 hour incubation in medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4, in order to allow transgene expression to start. Following this, the DC maturation cocktail was added and the level of EGFP expression and cell survival was determined 24 and 48 hours after transfection. DC were frozen 24 hours after mRNA electroporation and transgene expression and cell survival was determined 6 and 24 hours after thawing (Table 2 ;
Figure 1 B) . Six hours after thawing, DC cultures appeared to survive the freezing and have a similar number of EGFP+ cells and MFI level of EGFP+ cells as compared to non-frozen cultures (p-value respectively 0.0033 and 0.5183). Mature DC survived the thawing procedure better than frozen immature DC (64% cell death for immature DC versus 25% for mature DC after 24 hours of culture, p=0.00004). - A combination of a serum-free culture protocol and a poly-I:C maturation stimulus results in the rapid generation of fully mature and viable CD83+ DC from peripheral blood monocytes. This provides for an efficient and clinical applicable antigen loading strategy for these short-term cultured DC, based on mRNA electroporation of monocytes. The T-cell activation capacity of these short-term and serum-free cultured Mo-DC was found to be highly stimulatory in an influenza antigen model system using influenza matrix protein M1 peptide-pulsed and matrix protein mRNA-electroporated DC. In the following (including the corresponding Figures) results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Comparisons were validated using Student's t-test. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
- A. Characterization of short-term and serum-free in vitro cultured DC, with or without poly-I:C maturation: After monocyte enrichment from PBMC, cells were cultured for 2 days in AIM-V medium supplemented with GM-CSF only. To obtain mature DC, poly-I:C was added after 24 hours of culture. Cultured cells were analyzed after a total culture period of 48 hours by flow cytometry. One observed difference with classical DC cultured for 6-7 days in serum-containing medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4, was a lower forward- and side-scatter profile of the serum-free-cultured cells (
Figure 1 , upper panels). However, this was not due to serum-free- or poly-I:C-induced mortality, since ethidium bromide staining showed cell populations with a mean viability of more than 80% (Figure 14 , lower panels). Immune phenotyping was also performed after 48 hours of culture (Figure 15 ). A majority of the cultured cells showed downregulation of CD14 expression, demonstrating loss of a characteristic monocyte marker. This downregulation is most likely due to serum-free culture of monocytes, since in experimental conditions, where human AB serum (1%) was added to the DC culture medium, no downregulation of CD14 was observed (data not shown). Cells cultured without poly-I:C showed moderate expression of HLA-DR, and only a small fraction showed expression of CD83 and of the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86. This corresponds with a typical immature DC phenotype. In contrast, cells that were exposed to poly-I:C, showed a fast upregulation of HLA-DR, CD83, and the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86, corresponding with the typical phenotype of mature DC. CD1a was present on a small proportion of the cells (Figure 15 ). - B. Poly-I:C maturated serum-free-cultured DC are more potent than their immature counterparts in inducing in vitro T-cell immune responses: In order to determine whether the new cultured cell types also had the functional properties of DC, their stimulatory capacity was first evaluated in a modified allogeneic mixed leucocyte reaction (MLR). For this, immature and mature DC were cultured for 7 days with allogeneic PBMC. Next, the stimulated PBMC were restimulated with PBMC from the DC donor, and IFN-γ secretion in the supernatant was analyzed by ELISA (
Figure 16 ). Based on the level of IFN-γ secretion against the PBMC targets, the results show that mature DC were more potent in inducing an allogeneic MLR response than immature DC (3.1 ± 0.1 IU/ml/6h for immature DC vs. 21.3 ± 0.8 IU/ml/6h for mature DC, p=0.0004). Autologous antigen-specific stimulatory capacity was evaluated in an influenza model system, DC were pulsed with an HLA-A2-restricted influenza matrix protein M1-specific peptide and cocultured with autologous PBMC. After 7 days of coculture, cultured PBMC were restimulated with M1 peptide- or E7 control peptide-pulsed T2 cells. After a 6-hour restimulation, IFN-γ secretion in the supernatant was analyzed by ELISA (Figure 17A and 17B ). Based on the level of IFN-γ secretion against the influenza M1 target, the results show that mature DC were more potent in inducing an autologous immune response than immature DC (Figure 17A : 2.3 ± 0.3 IU/ml/6h for immature DC vs. 22.9 ± 3.1 IU/ml/6h for mature DC, p=0.0006). The specificity of this immune response was shown by a significantly lower amount of IFN-γ production against the control HPV E7 target as compared to the influenza M1 target (Figure 17A : for mature DC p=0.0079, for immature DC p=0.0461;Figure 4B : for mature DC p=0.0064). In order to show that IFN-γ was produced by CD8+ T lymphocytes, we used an IFN-γ-secreting assay in which, after restimulation of cultured PBMC with an influenza (T2/M1) or control (T2/E7) target, IFN-γ-secreting cells are directly stained for detection by flow cytometry (Figure 18 ). Flow cytometric analysis showed detectable M1-specific IFN-γ-secreting T-cells within the CD8+ T-cell population of PBMC cultures initially stimulated with mature DC pulsed with M1 peptide. This immune response was virtually not seen in cultures initially stimulated with immature DC. - C. mRNA electroporation of monocytes followed by differentiation to DC: Using a previously optimized mRNA electroporation protocol, we examined the possibility of genetic modification of the above-described DC. In these experiments, the EGFP reporter gene was used to assess mRNA transfection efficiency. After optimization, the following mRNA electroporation and culture protocol resulted in the generation of antigen-loaded mature DC. First, monocytes were isolated from PBMC by CD14 immunobead magnetic separation. After electroporation, cells were resuspended in serum-free AIM-V medium supplemented with GM-CSF. After 24 hours of culture, poly-I:C was added to the cultures to obtain mature DC. The cultured DC were analyzed 48 hours after electroporation of the monocytes. No difference was observed in scatter profile between non-electroporated and EGFP mRNA-electroporated monocytes that were cultured to DC (
Figure 19A ). The mean electroporation-related mortality in the DC cultures was 10% (mean of 3 independent experiments,Figure 19B ). This low cell mortality was most probably due to the serum free-culture condition, because addition of autologous plasma following electroporation resulted in lack of electroporation-related mortality (data not shown). Comparing the level of EGFP fluorescense in non-electroporated and EGFP mRNA-electroporated short-term cultured DC, the data show low, but detectable, EGFP expression in practically all of the viable mRNA-loaded DC (Figure 19C ). The phenotype of the cultured cells was examined by flow cytometry for the characteristic DC markers (Figure 20 ). We observed no difference in phenotype between non-electroporated and EGFP mRNA-electroporated short-term and serum-free cultured mature DC. Remarkable, as compared to the data shown inFigure 15 , in which DC were cultured from adherent monocytes, less downregulation of CD14 was observed on DC grown from CD14+ positively isolated monocytes (<10% CD14+ DC generated from adherent PBMC versus around 50% CD14+ DC generated from CD14+ monocytes). - D. Stimulatory capacity of mRNA-loaded short-term-cultured mature DC: We examined in an influenza model system whether mRNA-electroporated monocytes rapidly differentiated in serum-free medium into mature DC could stimulate antigen-specific T-cells upon coculture with PBMC. In these experiments, monocytes were electroporated with mRNA encoding influenza matrix protein M1, and further cultured to mature DC as described above. Next, DC were cocultured with autologous PBMC without the addition of exogenous cytokines. After 7 days of culture, primed PBMC were restimulated with T2 cells pulsed with a MHC class I-restricted influenza matrix protein M1 peptide (T2/M1), and IFN-γ secretion was determined after 6 hours by ELISA (
Figure 21 ). Upon restimulation with peptide-pulsed T2 cells, the activated T cells in the primed PBMC culture produced IFN-γ against the immunodominant M1 matrix protein peptide. The specificity of this activation was shown by only background IFN-γ production of the primed PBMC culture against HPV E7 peptide-pulsed T2 cells (T2/M1 vs. T2/E7, forFigure 8A : p=0.0002, forFigure 8B : p<0.0001). - Discussion: In the first part of this study we describe an alternative culture protocol for Mo-DC. The present serum-free culture and poly-I:C maturation protocol resulted in the rapid generation of fully mature, viable, and highly stimulatory CD83+ DC. The observed phenotypical properties (
Figure 15 ) are in accordance with previous reported data by Czerniecki et al. on similar DC culture protocols for short-term and serum-free-cultured DC (Czerniecki, B.J., et al. 2001. Diverse functional activity of CD83+ monocyte-derived dendritic cells and implications for cancer vaccines. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 21:157 ). The observed difference in CD14 downregulation between DC cultured from adherent monocytes (Figure 15 , CD14+ cells less than 10%) and DC cultured from magnetic bead-isolated monocytes (Figure 20 , around 50% CD14+ cells), could likely be ascribed to the CD14 selection procedure, and warrants further investigation, e.g. by comparing positive selections of CD14+ cells and negative selection of CD14+ cells by depletion of B-, T- and NK-cells. A similar observation was already reported by Cavanagh et al. where conventional DC, grown from adherent PBMC, were compared to DC generated from monocytes sorted by CD14 positive selection (Cavanagh, L.L. et al. 1998. Proleferation in monocyte-derived dendritic cell cultures is caused by progenitor cells capable of myeloid differentiation. Blood. 92:1598). The relatively rapid maturation of the presented short-term cultured DC, seen by the upregulation of HLA-DR, CD80, CD86 and CD83, as compared to immature DC is, according to previous reports, due to poly-I:C signaling via Toll-like receptor 3 (Alexopoulou, L. et al. 2001. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-). This signaling pathway induces IFN-α production by the DC (Cella, M. et al. 1999. Maturation, activation, and protection of dendritic cells induced by double-stranded RNA. J. Exp. Med. 189:821), which can act as a strong maturation stimulus. Furthermore, type I interferons, like IFN-α, might induce IL-15 production and in this way strongly promote a T-helper 1 response, which is needed for induction of a strong CD8+ T cell response (Santini, S.M. et al. 2000. Type I interferon as a powerful adjuvant for monocyte-derived dendritic cell development and activity in vitro and in Hu-PBL-SCID mice. J. Exp. Med. 10:1777 ; Saikh, K.U., et al. 2001. IL-15-induced conversion of monocytes to mature dendritic cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 126:447). This might account for the differences we observed when comparing immature and mature short-term cultured DC in both allogeneic and autologous T-cell stimulatory capacity. These data also confirm recent experiments from Bhardwaj and colleagues, describing the need for mature DC to activate influenza-specific memory T-cells (Larsson, M. et al. 2000. Requirement of mature dendritic cells for efficient activation of influenza A-specific memory CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 165: 1182). - The second part of this study focused on the genetic modification of these short-term serum-free cultured DC. Previously, we developed an antigen loading strategy based on electroporation of mRNA into DC cultured in the presence of serum and GM-CSF + IL-4. This transfection technology resulted in high-level transgene expression in Mo-DC using an EGFP reporter gene. More than 70% of the transfected cells showed high level EGFP expression (relative fluorescence between 102 and 103 decade as measured by flow cytometry) and retained their phenotypical properties after transfection (Van Tendeloo, V. et al. 2001. Highly efficient gene delivery by mRNA electroporation in human hematopoietic cells: Superiority to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells. Blood. 98:49 ; Ponsaerts, P. et al. 2002. mRNA-electroporated mature dendritic cells retain transgene expression, phenotypical properties and stimulatory capacity after cryopreservation. Leukemia (in press )). However, the use of this technology for transfection of short-term serum-free cultured DC, as presented in this study, resulted in substantial cell mortality among transfected cells (data not shown). Because a DC vaccine, in order to be effective, should have a high DC viability, we attempted to transfect fresh monocytes followed by rapid differentiation to DC. As shown by the data in
Figure 19 , cell viability was high and antigen was still detectable in the DC two days after the initial electroporation in virtually all cells when using this strategy. Noteworthy, as compared to our previous results (Van Tendeloo, V. et al. 2001. Highly efficient gene delivery by mRNA electroporation in human hematopoietic cells: Superiority to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells. Blood. 98:49 ; Ponsaerts, P. et al. 2002. mRNA-electroporated mature dendritic cells retain transgene expression, phenotypical properties and stimulatory capacity after cryopreservation. Leukemia (in press )), related to the electroporation of DC cultured in serum in the presence of GM-CSF and IL-4, the level of protein expression, e.g. EGFP, was much lower in monocytes after 24 hours (data not shown) and 48 hours (Figure 19c ). Monocytes that were electroporated with EGFP-mRNA and subsequently differentiated to mature DC showed only a small shift of EGFP fluorescence as compared to non-electroporated control DC. This can be explained by the difficulty of obtaining high protein expression levels in primary uncultured mononuclear cells (data not shown). However, there is no consensus yet that a high level of antigen expression in DC is mandatory for induction of a stronger immune response. Here, we provide functional evidence that, despite the lower level of antigen expression in these short-term-cultured DC, a specific immune response in an influenza model system could be initiated very efficiently. Previous experiments in our laboratory (Ponsaerts, P. et al. 2002. mRNA-electroporated mature dendritic cells retain transgene expression, phenotypical properties and stimulatory capacity after cryopreservation. Leukemia (in press )) focused on the stimulatory capacity of influenza matrix protein mRNA-electroporated conventional DC, i.e. DC cultured for 6-7 days in serum-containing medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4, and maturated with a cocktail consisting of TNF-α, PGE2, IL-1 and IL-6. Comparing the final outcome in terms of autologous influenza-specific T-cell activation, antigen mRNA-loaded conventional DC and short-term-cultured DC gave similar results, indicating the validity of this protocol. - In conclusion, this combined serum-free culture and poly-I:C maturation (and optional mRNA electroporation) of peripheral blood monocytes results in the rapid generation of fully mature, viable and highly stimulatory CD83+ DC. This ex vivo protocol results in an important reduction in time and consumables for preparation of mature DC as compared to classical culture protocols. This might be of importance not only for laboratory experiments, but also for clinical immunotherapy protocols.
- EP parameters: 300V, 150µF (mRNA settings) or 260V, 1050µF (DNA settings) Cells were washed twice in IMDM, once in Electroporation Wash Buffer and resuspended in Optimix medium at 5 million cells/200 µl. 20 µg of EGFP mRNA was added to the cells just before electroporation. In case DNA settings were used, 300 µl of Optimix® was added to the cells (
total volume 500 µl). After shocking, cells were immediately put into 3 ml of warm culture medium (IMDM, 10% FCS) supplemented with IL-3, IL-6 and stem cell factor. EGFP analysis at 24h-96h and phenotypic analysis at 96h by FACS. The results are summarized in Table 6Table 6 Time-point Settings Viability Efficiency 24h 300V, 150 µF 98% 25% 260V, 1050 µF 95% 21 % 96h 300V, 150 µF ND 31% 260V, 1050 µF ND 22.6% ND, not done - This experiment shows that the mRNA electroporation technology of the present invention is able to transfect human bone marrow mononuclear cells up to 25-30% efficiency. High levels of EGFP expression were observed in the myeloid fraction (CD33+ cells), in particular in the monocyte fraction (CD14+ cells) and the hematopoietic progenitor fraction (CD34+ cells) comprising the hematopoietic stem cells. A low but consistent transfection level was observed in the lymphoid fraction (CD7+ and CD19+ cells), concordant with the data obtained in peripheral blood (see
Fig. 22A to E ). - mRNA electroporation of mouse embryonic stem cells.
Total cells: 15 million ES cells
EP parameters: 300V, 150µF (mRNA settings) - 5 million ES cells were thawed on 10/6 and put into culture in gelatin-coated 75 cm2 flask and 3 million mitomycin C-treated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) feeder cells for 48h. Then, ES cells were trypsinized, washed 3 times in DMEM, once in Electroporation Wash Buffer and resuspended in Optimix medium at 7.5 million cells/200 µl. 20 µg of EGFP mRNA or 20 µl RNase-free water (mock) was added to the cells just before electroporation. After shocking, cells were immediately put into gelatin-coated 25cm2 flasks with or without 1 million MEF feeder cells into 8 ml ES cell medium (DMEM, 15% FBS, glutamine, sodium pyruvate, NEAA, β-ME and antibiotics). EGFP fluorescence was checked by fluorescence microscopy at 24h post-EP and simultaneous EGFP and phenotypic analysis was performed at 48h post-EP by FACS (results see
Fig. 23A and B ). - By this experiment it is shown that the mRNA electroporation technology of the present invention is able to transfect mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells to levels above 90% efficiency, implicating a powerful tool to genetically modify mouse ES cells, and possibly also human ES cells, be it in a transient manner. This could be of value for control of differentiation of ES cells by transgene expression of master regulator genes, skewing or biasing differentiation into distinct lineages for large-scale generation of differentiated cells and tissues in vitro.
- mRNA electroporation of adult peripheral blood
Total cells: 10 million NC
EP parameters: 300V, 150µF (mRNA settings) - Fresh PBMC were washed twice in IMDM, once in Electroporation Wash Buffer and resuspended in Optimix medium at 5 million cells/200 µl. 20 µg of EGFP mRNA or 20 µl RNase-free water (mock) was added to the cells just before electroporation. After shocking, cells were immediately put into 3 ml of warm culture medium (IMDM, 10% FCS). Simultaneous EGFP and phenotypic analysis was performed at 24h by FACS (results see
Fig. 24A-C ). - This experiment shows that the mRNA electroporation technology of the present invention is able to transfect human peripheral blood mononuclear cells up to 4% efficiency. The low but consistent transfection levels were mainly observed in the monocyte fraction (CD14+ cells) and to a lower extent in the T lymphocytes (CD3+ cells) and the natural killer (NK) cells. B cells (CD19+ cells) could not be transfected using the current electroporation parameters, which warrants further optimization for this type of cells.
- A. Electroporation of mRNA at µs-range (soft pulse; general method): Immature (d6) or mature (d7) Mo-DC were washed once with Opti-Mem® or with washing-solution Optimix®, respectively. Cells were adjusted to a final cell concentration of 1-4x107/ml in electroporation buffer (Opti-Mem®, Optimix® or isoosomolar electroporation buffer). Then 0,2-0,8 ml of the cell suspension were mixed with IVT mRNA (up to 20 µg /2x106 cells) in a 1,5 ml reaction tube. After incubation at room temperature for a maximum of 3 minutes the cell suspension were transferred in a 0,4-cm-gap electroporation cuvette. Cells were triggered at a voltage of 400 and a pulse time of 500 µs using Multiporator® (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) or ECM 830® (Genetronics BTX, San Diego, CA, USA). Immediately after that the cell suspension were transferred to 6-well-plates (1x106 DC/ well/ 3 ml culture medium supplemented with GM-CSF and IL-4). In the case of immature DC terminal maturation were induced by addition of IL-1ß, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2. FCM-analysis were performed in the time range of 24-96 h. The general settings are summarized in Table 7.
Table 7: Machine Multiporator ® (Eppendorf, Hamburq, Germany): Exponential decay pulse ECM830 ® (Genetronics BTX, San Dieqo, CA, USA): Rectangular pulse Volume of cells 2-8x106/ 200 µl, 16x106/ 400 µl, 32x106/ 800 µl, Electroporation medium OPTI-MEM® I (Gibco, Paisley, UK) OPTI-MIX® Kit (EquiBio, Ashford, Middlesex, UK) Isoosomolar electroporation buffer (Eppendorf, Hamburg, DE) Cuvette gap 0,4 cm Amount of RNA 5-20 µg / 2x106 cells Voltage 200 - 600 V Pulse Time up to 500 µs Electroporation temperature Room temperature - B. mRNA-Transfection of Mo-DC by electroporation at the µs-range, Influence of voltage on transfection efficiency and viability: More than 90% of the Mo-DC were EGFP+ using a voltage of 400 V and a pulse time of 500 µs (
Fig. 25A ). Further increasing of the voltage resulted in increasing transgene expression as indicated by increasing mean fluorescence intensity (MFI). Kinetic analysis revealed only a weak decrease of the MFI, even 96 hrs after electroporation. Determination of the cell viability with propidium jodide showed, that the increase of the voltage resulted only in a weak increase of the percentage of dead cells (Fig. 25B ). Using a voltage of 600 V even 96 hrs after electroporation the amount of dead cells are only approximately 16%. - C. Influence of pulse form on transfection efficiency and phenotype: Comparison of two electroporation machines delivering exponential decay or rectangular pulse revealed that the form of the pulse has no influence on transfection efficiency when electroporation of Mo-DC were performed in their immature stage (
Fig. 26 ). In comparison with exponential decay pulses delivery of rectangular pulses resulted in a higher transgene expression when electroporation were performed with mature DC. Phenotypical FCM-analysis showed that electroporation of Mo-DC in their immature stage following by addition of the maturation cocktail IL-1β + IL-6 + TNF-a + PGE2 resulted in a higher transgene expression in comparison with electroporation of mature Mo-DC (Fig.27 ). This effect is shown for a early (CD83) as well as for a late appearing (CD25) surface antigen of mature Mo-DC. - D. Scale-up of the number of cells per electroporation cuvette: In order to determine the maximal cell number per cuvette which can efficiently electroporated, scaling-up experiments were performed. Increasing of the volume of cell suspension resulted in a slightly increase of transgene expression (
Fig. 28A ). Efficient electroporation were possible up to 32x106 Mo-DC using the maximal volume of 0,8 ml of the 0,4 cm-gap-cuvette. Calculation of the cell number immediately after electroporation showed a recovery of more than 60 % (Fig. 28B ). Even after a culture time of 24 hrs less amounts of cells were lost. - A method for transfection of eukaryotic cells with one or more or a mixture of linear polynucleotides, which method comprises electroporation of a suspension containing the eukaryotic cells and the linear polynucleotides to be transfected at a capacitance of below 300 µF.
- The method as defined above, wherein (i) the pulse is an exponential decay pulse; and/or (ii) the electroporation is performed at a voltage from 100 to 500 V, preferably 200 to 350 V, more preferably 250 to 300 V, and/or (iii) the capacitance is 100 to below 300 µF, preferably 150 to 250 µF; and/or (iv) the pulsing time is from 1 to 40 ms, preferably 2.5 to 25 ms, and most preferably 7 to 10 ms.
- A method for transfection of eukaryotic cells with one or more or a mixture of linear polynucleotides, preferably a method as defined above, which method comprises electroporation of a suspension containing the eukaryotic cells and the linear polynucleotides to be transfected with a soft pulse at 300 to 600 V for 100 µs to 1 ms. The method as defined above, wherein the soft pulse is a square wave pulse or an exponential decay pulse, preferably with 350 to 500 V for 300 to 600 µs.
- The method as defined above, wherein (i) the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 100 to 1x109 cells per ml, preferably 1x105 to 5x107 cells per ml, most preferably 1 to 4x107 cells per ml; (ii) the linear polynucleotides to be transfected are naked polynucleodides including, but not limited to, modified or unmodified, defined or undefined DNA, RNA or DNA-RNA hybrids and preferably are mRNA; and/or (iii) the concentration of the polynucleotides to be transfected is 1x10-7 to 1x10-5 mmol/ml, preferably 4x10-6 to 6x10-6 mmol/ml.
- The method as defined above, wherein the eukaryotic cells preferably (i) are mammalian cells, preferably human cells; and/or (ii) are selected from non-hematopoietic cells including, but being not limited to, fibroblast and tumour cells, stem cells and derivatives thereof such as embryonic stem cells, and hematopoietic cells including, but being not limited to, mononuclear cells, hematopoietic stem cells and derivatives thereof, marrow CD34+ progenitor derived dendritic cells, CD34+ progenitor derived Langerhans cells, monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DC), and most preferably are Mo-DC including, but being not limited to, immature Mo-DC and mature Mo-DC.
- The method as defined above, wherein eukaryotic cells are Mo-DC, the linear polynucleotides are mRNA and the transfection is performed at a low voltage, low capacitance and a high cell concentration, preferably a voltage of 250 to 300 V, a capacitance of 150 to 250 µF and a cell concentration of 1x107 to 4x107 cells/ml, at a pulse time of 7 to 10 ms.
- The method as defined above, wherein the linear polynucleotides are (i) proteins or peptides to be expressed in the eukaryotic cells, said proteins or peptides may or may not have a function in the eukaryotic cells, preferably the linear polynucleotides encode tumor antigens, microbial antigens, viral antigens, immunostimulatory or tolerogenic molecules, anti-apoptotic molecules, adhesion and homing molecules and antigen processing molecules; (ii) functional or regulatory sequences including, but not limited to, differentiation-regulating genes, differentiation-associated genes and tissue-specific genes.
- The method as defined above, wherein the eukaryotic cells are human mature Mo-DC and/or wherein the linear polynucleotides to be transfected are mRNA, and wherein the method may further comprise further maturation of the transfected MoDC by providing a maturation stimulus, or wherein the eukaryotic cells are human immature Mo-DC and/or wherein the linear polynucleotide to be transfected is mRNA, and wherein the method may further comprise maturation of the transfected cells by providing a maturation structure.
- The method as defined above, wherein the maturation structures comprise one or more of the compounds selected from the group IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, PGE2, lipopolysaccharide, immunostimulatory DNA sequences, CD40 ligand, poly-I:C, etc., and preferably is a mixture comprising IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2.
- The method as defined above, wherein the method further comprises cryoconservation of the transfected cells.
- The transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above.
- A pharmaceutical composition or vaccine comprising transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above.
- Use of the transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above (i) for preparing an agent for immunotherapy, including induction of immunity or tolerance, tumor therapy, stem cell therapy, regenerative medicine, or tissue engineering, or (ii) as expression system for gene products encoded by the linear polynucleotides, or as detection system. A method for immunotherapy or tumour therapy which comprises administering transfected eukaryotic cells obtainable by the method as defined above to the patient.
-
- <110> Schuler, Gerold N.V. Antwerps Innovatiecentrum
- <120> Improved Transfection of Eucaryotic Cells with Linear Polynucleotides by Electroporation
- <130> 102548ep
- <150>
EP 02748810.5
<151> 2002-06-21 - <150>
EP 01115076.0
<151> 2001-06-21 - <160> 34
- <170> PatentIn Ver. 2.1
- <210> 1
<211> 4733
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence - <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: pEGFP-N1 cloning vector (Clonetech) - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (679)..(1395) - <400> 1
- <210> 2
<211> 239
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence - <223> Description of Artificial Sequence: pEGFP-N1 cloning vector (Clonetech)
- <400> 2
- <210> 3
<211> 3023
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (391)..(1737) - <400> 3
- <210> 4
<211> 449
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 4
- <210> 5
<211> 458
<212> DNA
<213>Human papillomavirus type 16 - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (3)..(455) - <400> 5
- <210> 6
<211> 151
<212> PRT
<213>Human papillomavirus type 16 - <400> 6
- <210> 7
<211> 540
<212> DNA
<213> Artificial Sequence - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (82)..(375) - <220>
<223> Description of Artificial Sequence: fragment of humanpapilloma virus type 16 E7 gene - <400> 7
- <210> 8
<211> 98
<212> PRT
<213> Artificial Sequence - <223> Description of Artificial Sequence: fragment of human
papilloma virus type 16 E7 gene - <400> 8
- <210> 9
<211> 2627
<212> DNA
<213> Human immunodeficiency virus - <400> 9
- <210> 10
<211> 1564
<212> DNA
<213> Human immunodeficiency virus - <400> 10
- <210> 11
<211> 318
<212> DNA
<213> Human immunodeficiency virus - <400> 11
- <210> 12
<211> 318
<212> DNA
<213> Human immunodeficiency virus - <400> 12
- <210> 13
<211> 742
<212> DNA
<213> Human immunodeficiency virus - <400> 13
- <210> 14
<211> 394
<212> DNA
<213> Human immunodeficiency virus - <400> 14
- <210> 15
<211> 1524
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (54)..(407) - <400> 15
- <210> 16
<211> 118
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 16
- <210> 17
<211> 1722
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (188)..(1114) - <400> 17
- <210> 18
<211> 309
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 18
- <210> 19
<211> 1753
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (210)..(1151) - <400> 19
- <210> 20
<211> 314
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 20
- <210> 21
<211> 756
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (87)..(422) - <400> 21
- <210> 22
<211> 112
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 22
- <210> 23
<211> 825
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (48)..(515) - <400> 23
- <210> 24
<211> 156
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 24
- <210> 25
<211> 975
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (1)..(972) - <400> 25
- <210> 26
<211> 324
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 26
- <210> 27
<211> 980
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (221) .. (727) - <400> 27
- <210> 28
<211> 169
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 28
- <210> 29
<211> 2826
<212> DNA
<213> Homo sapiens - <220>
<221> CDS
<222> (184)..(618) - <400> 29
- <210> 30
<211> 145
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 30
- <210> 31
<211> 1027
<212> DNA
<213> Influenza virus - <400> 31
- <210> 32
<211> 9
<212> PRT
<213> Influenza virus - <400> 32
- <210> 33
<211> 10
<212> PRT
<213> Influenza virus - <400> 33
- <210> 34
<211> 9
<212> PRT
<213> Homo sapiens - <400> 34
Claims (13)
- A method for transfection of hematopoietic cells or stem cells not including human embryonic stem cells with one or more or a mixture of naked linear RNA, which method comprises electroporation of a suspension containing the hematopoietic cells or stem cells and the naked linear RNA to be transfected with a square wave soft pulse at 300 to 600 V in a 4mm cuvette for 100 µs to 1 ms, wherein the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 100 to 1x109 cells per ml.
- The method of claim 1 which comprises electroporation with 350 to 500 V for 300 to 600 µs.
- The method of claims 1 or 2, wherein the naked linear RNA is modified or unmodified, defined or undefined RNA.
- The method of claim 3, wherein the naked linear RNA is mRNA.
- The method according to any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 1x105 to 5x107 cells per ml.
- The method of claim 5, wherein the concentration of the cells in the suspension is 1 to 4x107 cells per ml.
- The method according to anyone of claims 1 to 6, wherein the concentration of the naked linear RNA to be transfected is 1x10-7 to 1x10-5 mmol/ml, preferably 4x10-6 to 6x10-6 mmol/ml.
- The method according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein(i) the hematopoietic cells or stem cells are mammalian cells, preferably human cells not including human embryonic stem cells; and/or(ii) the stem cells include derivatives of such stem cells and are preferably embryonic stem cells not including human embryonic stem cells, and the hematopoietic cells include mononuclear cells, hematopoietic stem cells and derivatives thereof, marrow CD34+ progenitor derived dendritic cells, CD34+ progenitor derived Langerhans cells, monocyte-derived dendritic cells (Mo-DC), and most preferably are Mo-DC including immature Mo-DC and mature Mo-DC.
- The method according to claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the naked linear RNA(i) encode proteins or peptides to be expressed in the eukaryotic cells, said proteins or peptides may or may not have a function in the eukaryotic cells, preferably the linear polynucleotides encode tumor antigens, microbial antigens, viral antigens, immunostimulatory or tolerogenic molecules, anti-apoptotic molecules, adhesion and homing molecules and antigen processing molecules;(ii) are functional or regulatory sequences including, but not limited to, differentiation-regulating genes, differentiation-associated genes and tissue-specific genes.
- The method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the hematopoietic cells are human mature Mo-DC and/or wherein the linear polynucleotides to be transfected is mRNA, and wherein the method may further comprise further maturation of the transfected MoDC by providing a maturation stimulus.
- The method according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the hematopoietic cells are human immature Mo-DC and/or wherein the naked linear RNA to be transfected is mRNA, and wherein the method may further comprise maturation of the transfected cells by providing a maturation structure.
- The method according to claim 10 or 11, wherein the maturation structures comprise one or more of the compounds selected from IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, PGE2, lipopolysaccharide, immunostimulatory DNA sequences, CD40 ligand and poly-I:C, and preferably is a mixture comprising IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and PGE2.
- The method of any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein the method further comprises cryoconservation of the transfected cells.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP10185221.8A EP2308987B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP01115076A EP1270732A1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2001-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryontic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
EP10185221.8A EP2308987B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
EP02748810.5A EP1397500B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
Related Parent Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02748810.5A Division-Into EP1397500B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
EP02748810.5A Division EP1397500B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
EP02748810.5 Division | 2002-06-21 |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2308987A2 EP2308987A2 (en) | 2011-04-13 |
EP2308987A3 EP2308987A3 (en) | 2011-04-27 |
EP2308987B1 true EP2308987B1 (en) | 2014-09-10 |
Family
ID=8177780
Family Applications (3)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP01115076A Withdrawn EP1270732A1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2001-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryontic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
EP10185221.8A Expired - Lifetime EP2308987B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
EP02748810.5A Expired - Lifetime EP1397500B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
Family Applications Before (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP01115076A Withdrawn EP1270732A1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2001-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryontic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02748810.5A Expired - Lifetime EP1397500B1 (en) | 2001-06-21 | 2002-06-21 | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (3) | EP1270732A1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP2004536598A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20040025690A (en) |
CN (1) | CN1701121B (en) |
AU (2) | AU2008202507B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BR0210936A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2451389C (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003000907A2 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104830794A (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2015-08-12 | 杨光华 | DC cell based on HPVE7 antigen, targeting immune cell population, preparation method and applications thereof |
Families Citing this family (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20060222656A1 (en) | 2005-04-01 | 2006-10-05 | University Of Maryland, Baltimore | MAGE-A3/HPV 16 peptide vaccines for head and neck cancer |
WO2002094994A2 (en) | 2001-05-18 | 2002-11-28 | Mayo Foundation For Medical Education And Research | Chimeric antigen-specific t cell-activating polypeptides |
US8513008B2 (en) | 2004-10-07 | 2013-08-20 | Argos Therapeutics, Inc. | Mature dendritic cell compositions and methods for culturing same |
DE602005025005D1 (en) | 2004-10-07 | 2011-01-05 | Argos Therapeutics Inc | COMPOSITIONS OF RIDGE OF DENDRITIC CELLS AND METHOD OF CULTURING THEM |
DE102004063265B4 (en) * | 2004-12-29 | 2012-02-02 | Biontech Ag | Method for determining the function of nucleic acid sequences and the expression products encoded thereby |
MX2007012221A (en) | 2005-04-08 | 2008-03-18 | Argos Therapeutics Inc | Dendritic cell compositions and methods. |
US9157066B2 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2015-10-13 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Transcriptome transfer produces cellular phenotype conversion |
ES2433669T3 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2013-12-12 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Methods for phototransfecting nucleic acid in living cells |
US10647960B2 (en) | 2005-12-13 | 2020-05-12 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Transcriptome transfer produces cellular phenotype conversion |
DE102006005827B3 (en) * | 2006-02-08 | 2007-07-26 | Torzewski, Jan, Prof. Dr. med. | Progenitor cells transfected with messenger RNA encoding a protein that promotes homing to target tissue, useful for regenerative treatment e.g. of cardiovascular or hematological diseases |
AU2011227447B2 (en) * | 2010-03-15 | 2016-04-14 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | System and method of preparing and storing activated mature dendritic cells |
AU2012291101B2 (en) | 2011-07-29 | 2016-04-07 | Riken | Cell for use in immunotherapy which contains modified nucleic acid construct encoding Wilms tumor gene product or fragment thereof, method for producing said cell, and said nucleic acid construct |
US10316332B2 (en) | 2011-07-29 | 2019-06-11 | Riken | Cell for immunotherapy, including modified nucleic acid construct encoding Wilms tumor gene product |
DE12858350T1 (en) | 2011-12-16 | 2021-10-07 | Modernatx, Inc. | MODIFIED MRNA COMPOSITIONS |
EP3501550A1 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2019-06-26 | Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. | Modified polynucleotides for the production of proteins associated with human disease |
US9283287B2 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2016-03-15 | Moderna Therapeutics, Inc. | Modified polynucleotides for the production of nuclear proteins |
US10501512B2 (en) | 2012-04-02 | 2019-12-10 | Modernatx, Inc. | Modified polynucleotides |
EP2971010B1 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2020-06-10 | ModernaTX, Inc. | Formulation and delivery of modified nucleoside, nucleotide, and nucleic acid compositions |
US11419925B2 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2022-08-23 | The Trustees Of The University Of Pennsylvania | Cancer vaccines and methods of treatment using the same |
CN104761644A (en) * | 2014-01-03 | 2015-07-08 | 百奇生物科技(苏州)有限公司 | Fusion protein MBP-MART-1 expressed by Escherichia coli, and preparation method and application thereof |
KR101518972B1 (en) | 2014-08-01 | 2015-05-18 | 제이더블유크레아젠 주식회사 | Method of Preparing Dendritic Cell, Dendritic Cell Prepared by the Same and Use Thereof |
CN112899308B (en) * | 2021-02-05 | 2022-03-11 | 北京鼎成肽源生物技术有限公司 | Method for electrotransfection of immortalized dendritic cells |
WO2024008274A1 (en) * | 2022-07-04 | 2024-01-11 | Universiteit Antwerpen | T regulatory cell modification |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5554528A (en) * | 1987-08-21 | 1996-09-10 | Board Of Revents Of University Of Colorado | Compositions and methods for inhibition of HIV production |
US5124259A (en) * | 1989-08-23 | 1992-06-23 | Mitsui Toatsu Chemicals, Inc. | Method for electroporation |
GB9317380D0 (en) * | 1993-08-20 | 1993-10-06 | Therexsys Ltd | Transfection process |
US6368855B1 (en) * | 1996-06-11 | 2002-04-09 | Antigen Express, Inc. | MHC class II antigen presenting cells containing oligonucleotides which inhibit Ii protein expression |
PT1157041E (en) * | 1999-03-01 | 2005-10-31 | Genentech Inc | ANTIBODIES FOR CANCER THERAPY AND DIAGNOSIS |
BR0012069A (en) * | 1999-06-30 | 2002-08-27 | Corixa Corp | Compositions and methods for therapy and diagnosis of lung cancer |
-
2001
- 2001-06-21 EP EP01115076A patent/EP1270732A1/en not_active Withdrawn
-
2002
- 2002-06-21 WO PCT/EP2002/006897 patent/WO2003000907A2/en active Application Filing
- 2002-06-21 KR KR10-2003-7016741A patent/KR20040025690A/en active Search and Examination
- 2002-06-21 CA CA2451389A patent/CA2451389C/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-06-21 BR BR0210936-0A patent/BR0210936A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2002-06-21 EP EP10185221.8A patent/EP2308987B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-06-21 CN CN028163621A patent/CN1701121B/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-06-21 EP EP02748810.5A patent/EP1397500B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-06-21 JP JP2003507290A patent/JP2004536598A/en active Pending
-
2008
- 2008-06-05 AU AU2008202507A patent/AU2008202507B2/en not_active Expired
-
2010
- 2010-11-29 JP JP2010265545A patent/JP2011050395A/en active Pending
-
2011
- 2011-04-12 AU AU2011201652A patent/AU2011201652C1/en not_active Ceased
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104830794A (en) * | 2015-05-05 | 2015-08-12 | 杨光华 | DC cell based on HPVE7 antigen, targeting immune cell population, preparation method and applications thereof |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1270732A1 (en) | 2003-01-02 |
CN1701121B (en) | 2013-12-04 |
KR20040025690A (en) | 2004-03-24 |
WO2003000907A2 (en) | 2003-01-03 |
CA2451389A1 (en) | 2003-01-03 |
CN1701121A (en) | 2005-11-23 |
EP1397500A2 (en) | 2004-03-17 |
AU2011201652A1 (en) | 2011-04-28 |
EP2308987A3 (en) | 2011-04-27 |
BR0210936A (en) | 2004-06-08 |
AU2011201652B2 (en) | 2012-08-16 |
EP2308987A2 (en) | 2011-04-13 |
WO2003000907A3 (en) | 2003-09-25 |
AU2011201652C1 (en) | 2013-03-14 |
AU2008202507A1 (en) | 2008-06-26 |
AU2008202507B2 (en) | 2011-02-17 |
JP2004536598A (en) | 2004-12-09 |
CA2451389C (en) | 2012-12-11 |
EP1397500B1 (en) | 2014-09-17 |
AU2011201652B8 (en) | 2012-09-20 |
JP2011050395A (en) | 2011-03-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7547551B2 (en) | Transfection of eukaryontic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation | |
AU2011201652C1 (en) | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation | |
Van Tendeloo et al. | Highly efficient gene delivery by mRNA electroporation in human hematopoietic cells: superiority to lipofection and passive pulsing of mRNA and to electroporation of plasmid cDNA for tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells | |
Weissman et al. | HIV gag mRNA transfection of dendritic cells (DC) delivers encoded antigen to MHC class I and II molecules, causes DC maturation, and induces a potent human in vitro primary immune response | |
US6149906A (en) | Antigen presenting cells of the adipocyte lineage | |
Chiriva‐Internati et al. | Efficient generation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes against cervical cancer cells by adeno‐associated virus/human papillomavirus type 16 E7 antigen gene transduction into dendritic cells | |
EP3838915A1 (en) | Tumor immunotherapy composition based on antigen-presenting cells activated by attenuated listeria monocytogenes, preparation method therefor and application thereof | |
Batchu et al. | Efficient lysis of epithelial ovarian cancer cells by MAGE-A3-induced cytotoxic T lymphocytes using rAAV-6 capsid mutant vector | |
Philip et al. | Dendritic cells loaded with MART-1 peptide or infected with adenoviral construct are functionally equivalent in the induction of tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in patients with melanoma | |
EP3277800A1 (en) | Method for antigen loading of dendritic cells and vaccine | |
Met et al. | Studies on mRNA electroporation of immature and mature dendritic cells: effects on their immunogenic potential | |
EP4089170A1 (en) | Composition comprising antigen-presenting cell co-expressing mhc and tumor antigen, and cancer treatment using same | |
Artusio et al. | Transfection of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells with native tumor DNA induces antigen-specific T-cell responses in vitro. | |
AU2002319256A1 (en) | Improved transfection of eukaryotic cells with linear polynucleotides by electroporation | |
Berlyn et al. | Developing dendritic cell polynucleotide vaccination for prostate cancer immunotherapy | |
Takahashi et al. | Cytoplasmic expression of EGFP in dendritic cells transfected with in vitro transcribed mRNA or cellular total RNA extracted from EGFP expressing leukemia cells | |
Markowicz et al. | Nonviral transfection of human umbilical cord blood dendritic cells is feasible, but the yield of dendritic cells with transgene expression limits the application of this method in cancer immunotherapy | |
JP2020500553A (en) | Viral vector construct for expression of a gene adjuvant that activates the STING pathway | |
Ponsaerts | Dendritic cell vaccines for immunity and tolerance: mRNA electroporation as a tool for efficient gene transfer | |
WO2008119024A1 (en) | Modified antigen presenting cells and methods of use | |
O-SULLIVAN et al. | Therapeutic properties of DNA-based fibroblast and dendritic cell vaccines in mice with squamous carcinoma | |
Murugaiyan et al. | Dendritic cell-based immunotherapy: a promising approach for treatment of cancer | |
Van Tendeloo et al. | Highly efficient gene delivery by mRNA electroporation in human hematopoietic cells: tumor antigen loading of dendritic cells1 | |
Gholamin et al. | Highly efficient transfection of dendritic cells derived from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patient: optimization with green fluorescent protein and validation with tumor RNA as a tool for immuno-genetherapy | |
Minigene | Induction of Protective Immunity to |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 1397500 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: P |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20111026 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20120618 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20140314 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AC | Divisional application: reference to earlier application |
Ref document number: 1397500 Country of ref document: EP Kind code of ref document: P |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 686721 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20141015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 60246629 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20141023 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: BOHEST AG, CH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20141211 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150112 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 60246629 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20150611 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20150621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20160628 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20160621 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20160621 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20160621 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20160620 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20160621 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20140910 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 686721 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170621 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20170621 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170701 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20180228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170621 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170621 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: FP Effective date: 20141103 Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170630 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170630 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20210702 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 60246629 Country of ref document: DE |