EP2251849B1 - Procédé de détection améliorée d'objets de type conduite - Google Patents
Procédé de détection améliorée d'objets de type conduite Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2251849B1 EP2251849B1 EP10002260.7A EP10002260A EP2251849B1 EP 2251849 B1 EP2251849 B1 EP 2251849B1 EP 10002260 A EP10002260 A EP 10002260A EP 2251849 B1 EP2251849 B1 EP 2251849B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- measurement points
- straight line
- profiles
- matrix
- line
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 38
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 28
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 24
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 238000010183 spectrum analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000003384 imaging method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000003672 processing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000008694 Humulus lupulus Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000007476 Maximum Likelihood Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000004522 Pentaglottis sempervirens Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012790 confirmation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010006 flight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229940050561 matrix product Drugs 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003595 spectral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08G—TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
- G08G5/00—Traffic control systems for aircraft, e.g. air-traffic control [ATC]
- G08G5/0073—Surveillance aids
- G08G5/0086—Surveillance aids for monitoring terrain
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for improved detection of line-type objects according to the features of patent claim 1.
- the present method is suitable for low-flying aircraft to avoid collisions with power lines and other line-type objects such as e.g. Guy wires of masts, cable cars, etc.
- a method for obstacle warning for low-flying aircraft In this case, distance images of the environment in front of the aircraft are generated by means of a sensor. Obstacle contours are extracted from the distance images by searching for discontinuities ("hops") between adjacent image pixels by means of high-pass filters. With a navigation system, the location of the Hindemisk correction can be superimposed graphically on the natural external view. A recognition of the obstacle in the true sense does not take place.
- DE 10 2005 047 273 B4 Another method for supporting low-level flights is described, which is based on the examination of jumps in the recorded distance images. In this method, wire-like obstacles are detected in strong environmental conditions, such as clutter or when looking at the sky.
- US 2008 / 0007708A1 also describes a method for line detection in which a Hough transformation is used.
- a Hough transformation By means of a rangefinder distance images are taken during the flight and potential images in which lines could occur selected. Subsequently, a projection of the potential line measuring points in a horizontal Level. In a subsequent Hough transformation and subsequent shape transformation, the identification of straight line pieces takes place.
- the object of the invention is to provide a method for improved line detection, with which lines are detected reliably and in real time.
- a set of three-dimensional measurement points in a geodesic coordinate system are generated from the distance values of a distance image generated by a distance sensor of this environment, taking into account the position and location of the aircraft. From this set of measurement points, potential line measurement points are extracted using known filter methods.
- the potential line measurement points are projected into a horizontal plane and identified by means of a polynomial phase transformation and a subsequent spectral analysis of line progressions.
- the potential line measurement pixels are projected on and at a predeterminable distance from a straight line found in the first step into a vertical plane to the horizontal plane and the respective straight line from the first step, and catenoid or parabolic courses are identified by means of a quadratic shape transformation.
- a mathematical analogy is established between a line fit and the determination of the spectral parameters of a signal having a plurality of components.
- an assignment of suitable measuring points i. which are within a defined corridor, i. having a predetermined distance to the estimated in the first step straight line, instead.
- the evaluation in the second method step according to the invention is generalized to the identification of catenoids.
- the identification can also be done on parabolas.
- the result of an evaluation of a distance image (data set) can be compared with the results of the temporally advanced images in addition to the confirmation.
- the position of the lines relative to one another can be investigated on the basis of the parameterization found by the polynomial phase transformation, and implausible line courses can be eliminated.
- the attitude relative to the extrapolated flight trajectory of the missile can be examined to generate a warning in critical cases.
- the pilot can be informed, for example, about the distance, height and direction relative to the helicopter axis or flight vector.
- the line can be drawn as a symbol, cloud of measurement point or katenoid based on the found parameterization as a video or FLIR overlay or in a digital map.
- the sensor selected is an imaging front-end which actively scans the scene and whose image information consists of distance values. Distance images are advantageous for the subsequent automatic image evaluation for line detection.
- the sensors used are a laser scanner, which preferably operates in the infrared range, or an imaging radar in the mm-wave range. Although the radar has certain advantages in terms of bad weather conditions (fog), according to the current state of the art, only one laser scanner has the desired vertical and lateral image resolution. Both sensors are equally suitable as active systems for day and night operation.
- a suitable laser scanner is designed for long ranges (> 1km) and high image resolution (eg 0.5 horizontal * 0.1 degrees vertical). For each distance image, the spatial direction into which the laser measurement pulse was emitted must be clearly determinable in the sensor-oriented coordinate system, by the design of the scanner and possibly by additional measurements during the scanning process.
- the navigation system is used to determine the position and position of the aircraft.
- Each distance value is converted into a scene point using the coordinates of the associated spatial scanning direction and the current position and attitude parameters of the aircraft.
- a scene point (measuring point) is defined by its three spatial coordinates in a terrestrial coordinate system. From each distance image, a so-called earth-fixed measuring point cloud is formed in this way, from which possibly existing lines can be extracted.
- Data processing is handled by a mid-power processor. On this, the above-mentioned transformation of distance measurement values into measurement points is first carried out.
- the resulting data serves as input for an evaluation unit.
- the evaluation unit determines whether the individual lines are in dangerous proximity to the current position of the aircraft or the intended trajectory.
- the result of this evaluation is communicated visually and / or acoustically to the pilot.
- an imaging front-end can be used, which actively scans the surroundings of the aircraft and whose image information consists of distance values. The resulting distance images are used in the subsequent process steps for line detection.
- Suitable sensors are a laser scanner or an imaging radar in the mm-wave range. In contrast to the radar, which has certain advantages with regard to bad weather operation (fog), a laser scanner has a comparatively better vertical and lateral image resolution. Both sensors are equally suitable as active systems for day and night operation.
- a suitable laser scanner is designed for long ranges (> 1km) and high image resolution (eg 0.5 horizontal * 0.1 degrees vertical). For each distance image is determined by the design of the scanner and by any additional measurements during the scan, the spatial direction in which the laser measuring pulse was emitted clearly in the sensor-oriented coordinate system.
- the navigation system is used to determine the position and position of the aircraft.
- Each distance value is converted to a measuring point using the coordinates of the associated spatial scanning direction and the current position and attitude parameters of the aircraft.
- a measuring point is defined by its three spatial coordinates in a geodetic coordinate system. From each distance image arises in this way a so-called earth-proof measuring point cloud from which existing lines can be extracted.
- Data processing is handled by a mid-power processor. On this a transformation of the distance measurement values into measuring points is carried out. The resulting data serves as input for an evaluation unit. The evaluation unit determines whether the individual lines are in dangerous proximity to the current position of the aircraft or the intended trajectory The result of this evaluation is communicated visually and / or acoustically to the pilot.
- the starting point for the PPT used in the invention is a reduced amount of three-dimensional measuring points.
- the reduced quantity is due to the fact that only such measured values are subjected to a PPT which has not been eliminated by clutter or interference filters.
- a first method step of the invention only the horizontal (x, y) component of the measured values is evaluated in order to identify the straight line courses in this point set. Horizontal lines are potential directions of passage of lines.
- all vertical planes belonging to the straight lines found here are examined for catenoid pieces or parabolic pieces [Katenoide: cosh (x)]. That is, all measurement points lying in or near such a plane are projected into that plane, and the resulting set of two-dimensional measurement points is examined for catenoids using quadratic shape transformation (QFT).
- QFT quadratic shape transformation
- Polynomial phase transformation (polynomial phase transform - PPT)
- the invention is based on the so-called polynomial phase transform.
- the problem of the line detection according to the invention is converted into a problem of the frequency determination of a sinusoidal signal or the spectral analysis of a frequency mixture in the case of multiple lines.
- known signal processing methods are available (Fourier Transformation, Matrix Pencil, FFT, Wavelets, Esprit, Pisarenco, MUSIC etc.) where the matrix Pencil has proven to be particularly efficient and will be explained in detail below.
- the frequencies ⁇ j are determined according to the invention.
- these include the Fourier transform (FT), the Maximum Likelihood Method (MLM), the least squares method (LSM) and the Matrix Pencil Method (MPM).
- FT Fourier transform
- MLM Maximum Likelihood Method
- LSM least squares method
- MPM Matrix Pencil Method
- the matrix pencil method is used.
- the other methods for frequency determination can be used.
- T means transposed and L is a chosen parameter, the so-called pencil parameter, with d ⁇ L ⁇ N - d.
- the continuity of each element of the truncated pseudoinverse is Y 0 + also at the point where the noise equals 0, and thus also the continuity of the z r 's.
- Y 0 + is identical to X 0 + if and only if the noise is zero.
- Y 0 + Y 1 If LM has singular values equal to zero that do not contain information about the z r 's, one can reduce the size of the matrix before calculating the singular values.
- the singular values z r are the M eigenvalues of Z E * which are the same as the M non-zero singular values of Y 0 + Y 1 ,
- Quadratic Form Transform (QFT)
- the pixels of the line are transformed into the front view. In other words, you no longer look at the pixels of the straight line from a bird's eye view. Instead, one uses the first found pixel of the straight as the zero point of a new coordinate system, which uses the found straight line as one of the new axes, and the z axis as the second new axis. Thus, one obtains a graph in which the found straight should have catenoid shape if it corresponds to a high voltage line.
- the transformation PPT is based on a polynomial of degree 1.
- ⁇ # 0 expediently ⁇ is set to 1.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
- Remote Sensing (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Length Measuring Devices By Optical Means (AREA)
- Image Processing (AREA)
Claims (4)
- Procédé destiné à la reconnaissance améliorée d'objets de type canalisations dans un environnement situé à l'avant d'un engin volant, à partir des valeurs de distance d'une image de distance dudit environnement, créée à l'aide d'un capteur de distance, en tenant compte de la position et de la situation de l'engin volant, une quantité de points de mesure tridimensionnels étant créée dans un système de coordonnées géodésique, à partir de laquelle en utilisant des méthodes de filtrage connues pour l'identification de points de mesure qui sont éliminés comme des encombrements ou des pannes, on extrait des points de mesure potentiels des canalisations,
dans une première étape, les points de mesure potentiels des canalisations étant projetés dans un plan horizontal, des tracés de droites étant identifiés et dans une deuxième étape, les points de mesure potentiels des canalisations étant projetés à et dans un écart prédéfinissable par rapport à une droite trouvée lors de la première étape, dans un plan vertical par rapport au plan horizontal et à la droite concernée issue de la première étape et à l'aide d'une transformation de forme quadratique, des tracés caténoïdes ou paraboliques étant identifiés, dans la première étape, la projection horizontale des points de mesure potentiels des canalisations s'effectuant sur une matrice NxM selonj : variable entre 1 et dd : nombre de la droiteµ1 : paramètre constant compris entre 0,01 et 1xj : tronçon d'axe de la jème droiteϕj : angle de la jème droiteet lors de l'analyse spectrale, les fréquences fj = µ1*tanϕj étant déterminées. - Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que pour aboutir à un faible taux de fausses alertes, on compare des tracés caténoïdes ou paraboliques trouvés avec des identifications antérieures dans le temps.
- Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce qu'on analyse une image de distance accumulée à partir de plusieurs images de distance successives dans le temps.
- Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que si plusieurs canalisations ont été trouvées dans une image de distance, on élimine les tracés de canalisations non plausibles.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102009020636.1A DE102009020636B4 (de) | 2009-05-09 | 2009-05-09 | Verfahren zur verbesserten Erkennung von leitungsartigen Objekten |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2251849A2 EP2251849A2 (fr) | 2010-11-17 |
EP2251849A3 EP2251849A3 (fr) | 2012-08-08 |
EP2251849B1 true EP2251849B1 (fr) | 2016-10-12 |
Family
ID=42289768
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP10002260.7A Not-in-force EP2251849B1 (fr) | 2009-05-09 | 2010-03-05 | Procédé de détection améliorée d'objets de type conduite |
Country Status (2)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2251849B1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE102009020636B4 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN104849708B (zh) * | 2015-05-18 | 2017-03-08 | 中国民航大学 | 基于频域多项式相位变换的高速机动目标参数估计方法 |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE19605218C1 (de) | 1996-02-13 | 1997-04-17 | Dornier Gmbh | Hinderniswarnsystem für tieffliegende Fluggeräte |
DE19828318C2 (de) | 1998-06-25 | 2001-02-22 | Eurocopter Deutschland | Drahthervorhebung |
DE10055572C1 (de) | 2000-11-09 | 2002-01-24 | Astrium Gmbh | Verfahren zur Leitungserkennung für tieffliegende Fluggeräte |
FR2888944B1 (fr) * | 2005-07-20 | 2007-10-12 | Eurocopter France | Procede de detection par telemetrie d'objets filaires suspendus |
DE102005047273B4 (de) | 2005-10-01 | 2008-01-03 | Eads Deutschland Gmbh | Verfahren zur Unterstützung von Tiefflügen |
-
2009
- 2009-05-09 DE DE102009020636.1A patent/DE102009020636B4/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2010
- 2010-03-05 EP EP10002260.7A patent/EP2251849B1/fr not_active Not-in-force
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
ABED-MERAIM K ET AL: "Multi-line fitting using polynomial phase transforms and downsampling", 2001 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING. PROCEEDINGS. (ICASSP). SALT LAKE CITY, UT, MAY 7 - 11, 2001; [IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (ICASSP)], NEW YORK, NY : IEEE, US, vol. 3, 7 May 2001 (2001-05-07), pages 1701 - 1704, XP010802866, ISBN: 978-0-7803-7041-8, DOI: 10.1109/ICASSP.2001.941266 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE102009020636B4 (de) | 2017-09-28 |
DE102009020636A1 (de) | 2010-11-18 |
EP2251849A3 (fr) | 2012-08-08 |
EP2251849A2 (fr) | 2010-11-17 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE102015100134B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Detektieren und Verfolgen von Objekten unter Verwendung mehrerer Radarsensoren | |
EP2418510B1 (fr) | Procédé d'évaluation d'une surface au sol concernant son caractère approprié en tant que zone d'atterrissage ou surface de roulement pour aéronefs | |
DE102018102884A1 (de) | Lidar-radar-relative pose-kalibrierung | |
EP1531343B1 (fr) | Procédé de suivi d'objets | |
DE10307580B3 (de) | Verfahren zum Bestimmen und Verfolgen von Position und Orientierung eines Magnetfeldsensors | |
EP2417476B1 (fr) | Détecteur radar à onde entretenue modulée en fréquence, et procédé d'accord de fréquences | |
EP2927844A1 (fr) | Estimation de position et de pose des objects 3d | |
EP1770595B1 (fr) | Procédé d'assistance d'avions volant à basse altitude pour la détection d'obstacles | |
DE102015107388A1 (de) | Kollisionsvermeidung mit statischen Zielobjekten in engen Räumen | |
DE102015115786B4 (de) | An einem computer realisiertes verfahren und system zur verarbeitung einer sequenz von bildern | |
DE102017128194A1 (de) | Genaue Selbstortung unter Verwendung eines Automobilradars mit synthetischer Apertur | |
DE102018132805A1 (de) | Verfahren für eine verbesserte Objekterfassung | |
EP1205765B1 (fr) | Méthode de reconnaissance des fils conducteurs pour aéronefs volants à basse altitude | |
EP1634241B1 (fr) | Procede et dispositif de determination d'objet dans des systemes d'assistance au conducteur pour vehicules automobiles | |
DE102019114723A1 (de) | Abschwächen von schwingungen in einem radarsystem auf einer beweglichen plattform | |
DE102021100351A1 (de) | Adaptive untersuchung für lidar-basiertes gruppieren | |
DE102006039104A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Entfernungsmessung von Objekten auf von Bilddaten eines Monokamerasystems | |
EP3663881B1 (fr) | Procédé de commande d'un véhicule autonome en fonction des vecteurs de mouvement estimés | |
EP2251849B1 (fr) | Procédé de détection améliorée d'objets de type conduite | |
DE102018001533B4 (de) | Echtzeitverfahren zur dynamischen Koordinaten- und Parameterschätzung mit gitterbasierten nicht-linearen probabilistischen Filtern | |
DE102019126631A1 (de) | Verbesserte Trajektorienschätzung basierend auf Ground Truth | |
DE102018121158A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Erfassen von Bodenabtastpunkten und Fahrerunterstützungssystem, das dafür konfiguriert ist, ein derartiges Verfahren auszuführen | |
WO2022129266A1 (fr) | Procédé de détection d'au moins un objet d'un environnement au moyen de signaux de réflexion d'un système capteur radar | |
DE102019215440B4 (de) | Erkennung von Verkehrsschildern | |
EP2699933B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de détermination de paramètres d'une cible |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA ME RS |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA ME RS |
|
RIC1 | Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant |
Ipc: G08G 5/00 20060101AFI20120629BHEP |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20130201 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: AIRBUS DEFENCE AND SPACE GMBH |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20151130 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20160718 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 837129 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20161015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502010012526 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20161012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170113 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170112 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170212 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170213 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502010012526 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R081 Ref document number: 502010012526 Country of ref document: DE Owner name: HENSOLDT SENSORS GMBH, DE Free format text: FORMER OWNER: AIRBUS DS ELECTRONICS AND BORDER SECURITY GMBH, 82024 TAUFKIRCHEN, DE |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20170112 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20170713 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170331 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170305 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20170331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 837129 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20170305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20100305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20161012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20161012 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20220324 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20220322 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20220323 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20220331 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502010012526 Country of ref document: DE |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20230305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230305 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230305 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230331 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20231003 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230305 |