EP2171113A1 - High strength, high toughness rotating shaft material - Google Patents
High strength, high toughness rotating shaft materialInfo
- Publication number
- EP2171113A1 EP2171113A1 EP08772048A EP08772048A EP2171113A1 EP 2171113 A1 EP2171113 A1 EP 2171113A1 EP 08772048 A EP08772048 A EP 08772048A EP 08772048 A EP08772048 A EP 08772048A EP 2171113 A1 EP2171113 A1 EP 2171113A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- max
- alloy
- inclusions
- carbon
- cobalt
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C33/00—Making ferrous alloys
- C22C33/04—Making ferrous alloys by melting
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/44—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
- C22C—ALLOYS
- C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
- C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
- C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
- C22C38/52—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with cobalt
Definitions
- This invention relates to a steel alloy that provides high strength and high fracture toughness, and in particular to such an alloy that also provides improved fatigue resistance.
- the known alloys have been made with a process that includes the use of a rare earth treatment to control the size and shape of inclusions such as sulfides, oxides, and oxysulfides that would otherwise adversely affect the strength and toughness of the alloys in the structural applications for which they are designed.
- the present invention relates to an age-hardenable, martensitic steel alloy having a composition and microstructure that is designed to provide a significant improvement in the fatigue life of a finished component, such as a rotating shaft of the type suitable for use in a jet engine or gas turbine.
- a finished component such as a rotating shaft of the type suitable for use in a jet engine or gas turbine.
- the balance of the alloy is iron and usual impurities, including additional elements in amounts which do not detract from the desired combination of properties.
- the alloy according to this invention is further characterized by a dispersion of small inclusions having a size distribution of about 0.4 ⁇ m to about 7 ⁇ m in major dimension in the alloy matrix.
- the median inclusion size is at least about 1.6 ⁇ m.
- the composition of the inclusions contains essentially no rare earth elements such as cerium and lanthanum.
- a method of improving the low cycle fatigue life of a high strength, high toughness, age- hardenable martensitic steel alloy includes the step of melting an age- hardenable martensitic steel alloy having the weight percent composition set forth above.
- the method further includes the step of adding calcium to the molten alloy to combine with available sulfur and oxygen in the molten alloy to form inclusions that are removable from said alloy.
- the method also includes the steps of processing the alloy to remove at least a portion of the inclusions from the alloy and then solidifying the refined alloy, whereby the solidified alloy contains a limited dispersion of such inclusions in the alloy matrix.
- the retained inclusions have a size distribution of about OA. ⁇ m to about 7 ⁇ m in major dimension and a median size of at least about 1.6 ⁇ m.
- the alloy can be mechanically worked and machined to form a useful product such as a shaft for a rotating machine.
- FIGURE 1 presents graphs of the transverse axial-axial fatigue life for a known rare-earth treated alloy and for a calcium treated alloy according to the present invention.
- FIGURE 2 presents histograms of the frequencies of sizes of inclusions in the known rare-earth treated alloy and the calcium treated alloy according to the present invention.
- the alloy according to the prevent invention contains at least about 0.2%, better yet, at least about 0.20%, and preferably at least about 0.21% carbon because it contributes to the good hardness capability and high tensile strength of the alloy primarily by combining with other elements such as chromium and molybdenum to form carbides during heat treatment. Too much carbon adversely affects the fracture toughness of this alloy. Accordingly, carbon is limited to not more than about 0.36%, better yet, to not more than about 0.33%, and preferably to not more than about 0.27%.
- Cobalt contributes to the hardness and strength of this alloy and benefits the ratio of yield strength to tensile strength (Y.S./U.T.S.). Therefore, at least about 8%, better yet at least about 10%, and preferably at least about 11% cobalt is present in this alloy. Above about 22% cobalt the fracture toughness and the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of the alloy are adversely affected. Preferably, not more than about 17%, and better yet not more than about 14% cobalt is present in this alloy.
- Cobalt and carbon are critically balanced in this alloy to provide the unique combination of high strength and high fracture toughness that is characteristic of the alloy.
- carbon and cobalt are preferably balanced in accordance with the following relationship:
- carbon and cobalt are preferably balanced such that:
- Chromium contributes to the good hardenability and hardness capability of this alloy and benefits the desired low ductile-brittle transition temperature of the alloy. Therefore, at least about 1.3%, better yet at least about 2%, and preferably at least about 2.9% chromium is present. Above about 4% chromium the alloy is susceptible to rapid overaging such that the unique combination of high tensile strength and high fracture toughness is not attainable with the preferred age-hardening heat treatment. Preferably, chromium is limited to not more than about 3.5%, and better yet to not more than about 3.3%. When the alloy contains more than about 3% chromium, the amount of carbon present in the alloy is adjusted upwardly in order to ensure that the alloy provides the desired high tensile strength.
- At least about 0.75% and preferably at least about 1.0% molybdenum is present in this alloy because it benefits the desired low ductile-brittle transition temperature of the alloy. Above about 2.7% molybdenum, the fracture toughness of the alloy is adversely affected. Preferably, molybdenum is limited to not more than about 1.75%, and better yet to not more than about 1.5%.
- the % carbon and/or % cobalt must be adjusted downwardly in order to ensure that the alloy provides the desired high fracture toughness. Accordingly, when the alloy contains more than about 1.5% molybdenum, the % carbon is not more than the median % carbon for a given % cobalt as defined by equations a) and b) or a) and c).
- Nickel contributes to the hardenability of this alloy such that the alloy can be hardened with or without rapid quenching techniques. Nickel benefits the fracture toughness and stress corrosion cracking resistance provided by this alloy and contributes to the desired low ductile-to-brittle transition temperature. Accordingly, at least about 10%, better yet, at least about 10.5%, and preferably at least about 11.0% nickel is present. Above about 15% nickel the fracture toughness and impact toughness of the alloy can be adversely affected because the solubility of carbon in the alloy is reduced which may result in carbide precipitation in the grain boundaries when the alloy is cooled at a slow rate, such as when air cooled following forging. Preferably, nickel is limited to not more than about 13.0%, and better yet to not more than about 12,0%.
- manganese can be present in this alloy in amounts which do not detract from the desired properties.
- manganese can be present because manganese adversely affects the fracture toughness of the alloy.
- manganese is restricted to about 0.15% max. and better yet to about 0.10% max.
- the alloy contains not more than about 0.05% manganese.
- Up to about 0.1% silicon, up to about 0.01% aluminum, and up to about 0.02% titanium can be present as residuals from small additions for deoxidizing the alloy.
- a small but effective amount of calcium is present in this alloy to provide sulfide and oxide inclusion shape control which benefits the fracture toughness and the low cycle fatigue life of the alloy. It is believed that the use of calcium in this alloy benefits the low cycle fatigue (LCF) life because it beneficially affects the size and distribution of inclusions that form in the alloy matrix during processing.
- the present invention avoids the use of rare earth treatments. Therefore, the alloy or product made in accordance with the present invention may contain only trace amounts of such elements as cerium, lanthanum, and other rare earths.
- the balance of the alloy according to the present invention is essentially iron except for the usual impurities found in commercial grades of alloys intended for similar service or use.
- the levels of such elements must be controlled so as not to adversely affect the desired properties of this alloy.
- phosphorus is limited to not more than about 0.01%, preferably not more than about 0.008%.
- Sulfur adversely affects the fracture toughness provided by this alloy. Accordingly, sulfur is restricted to about 0.0040% max., better yet to about 0.0025% max., and preferably to about 0.0020% max. Best results are obtained when the alloy contains not more than about 0.001% sulfur.
- Tramp elements such as lead, tin, arsenic and antimony are limited to about 0.003% max. each, better yet to about 0.002% max. each, and preferably to about 0.001% max each.
- Oxygen is limited to not more than about 20 parts per million (ppm) and nitrogen to not more than about 40 ppm.
- the alloy of the present invention is readily melted using conventional vacuum or inert gas melting techniques. For best results, as when additional refining is desired, a multiple melting practice is preferred. The preferred practice is to melt a heat in a vacuum induction furnace (VIM) and cast the heat in the form of an electrode. The alloying addition for sulfide shape control referred to above is preferably made before the molten VIM heat is cast. Preferably, the electrode is then remelted in a vacuum arc furnace (VAR) and recast into one or more ingots. It is expected that the alloy would contain not more than about 0.001% calcium after VAR processing. Prior to VAR the electrode ingot is preferably stress relieved at about 125O 0 F for 4-16 hours and air cooled. After VAR the ingot(s) is(are) preferably homogenized at about 2150-2250 0 F for 6-24 hours. This alloy can also be prepared using powder metallurgy techniques, for example, VIM followed by inert gas atomization.
- the alloy can be hot worked from about 225O 0 F to about 1500 0 F.
- the preferred hot working practice is to forge an ingot from about 2150-2250 0 F to obtain at least a 30% reduction in cross sectional area.
- the ingot is then reheated to about 1800 0 F and further forged to obtain at least another 30% reduction in cross sectional area.
- the alloy can also be hot worked using a single reduction step for some product forms.
- the alloy according to the present invention is austenitized and age hardened as follows. Austenitizing of the alloy is carried out by heating the alloy at about 1550- 1800 0 F for about 1 hour plus about 5 minutes per inch of thickness and then quenching in oil. The hardenability of this alloy is good enough to permit air cooling or vacuum heat treatment with inert gas quenching, both of which have a slower cooling rate than oil quenching. Whatever quenching technique is used, the quench rate is preferably rapid enough to cool the alloy from the austenitizing temperature to about 15O 0 F in not more than about 2 h.
- this alloy When this alloy is to be oil quenched, however, it is preferably austenitized at about 1550-1600°F, whereas when the alloy is to be vacuum treated or air hardened it is preferably austenitized at about 1575-165O 0 F. After austenitizing, the alloy is preferably cold treated as by deep chilling at about -100 to -32O 0 F for 1/2 to 1 hour and then warmed in air. Age hardening of this alloy is preferably conducted by heating the alloy at about 850-950 0 F for about 5 hours followed by cooling in air.
- each composition is iron and the usual impurities.
- Longitudinal and transverse sections of the sample materials were obtained.
- Standard tensile and fracture toughness specimens were prepared from each of the sections.
- the tensile and fracture toughness specimens were heat treated by heating at 1625 0 F for one hour and then cooled in air.
- the test specimens were then deep chilled at -100 0 F for one hour, followed by warming in air.
- the specimens were then age hardened by heating at 900 0 F for five hours and then air cooled.
- Transverse blanks measuring 3 A in. square x 4-1/2 in. long were cut from each of the heats.
- the blanks were heat treated using the same heat treatment used for the tensile and fracture toughness specimens as described above.
- the heat treated blanks were low stress ground to form axial-axial fatigue test specimens.
- Servo-Hydraulic test equipment was used with a 20 Hz sinusoidal waveform to cycle the specimens from zero stress to each of three maximum tensile stress levels of 1400 MPa, 1200 MPa, and 1100 MPa (203 ksi, 174 ksi, and 160 ksi, respectively).
- Tables HIA and HIB are graphed in Figure 1 which displays the data points and shows lines that connect the median values of the fatigue lives measured at the three stress levels.
- Tables IIIA and IHB and shown in Figure 1 graphically illustrate that the calcium treated alloy according to the present invention provides significantly longer fatigue life than the rare earth treated material at each of the three stress levels examined.
- the inclusion size data set forth in Tables IV and V fit a Weibull distribution as shown in Figure 2. It was determined that the median values of the inclusion sizes between the calcium treated material and the rare earth treated material were statistically different at a 95% confidence level. Therefore, there is a statistically significant difference in median inclusion size between the calcium treated material and the rare earth treated material.
- the median inclusion size for the calcium treated alloy was determined to be about 1.6 microns, whereas the median inclusion size for the rare earth treated material is about 1.1 microns. It is believed that the generally larger inclusion size of the calcium treated alloy in combination with the different composition of the inclusions resulting from the calcium desulfurization practice according to the present invention significantly benefits the fatigue life provided by the alloy and process according to the present invention. The improvement in the fatigue life realized by the alloy and process of our invention was not expected in view of the differences in the inclusion size and composition relative to the known rare earth treated alloys.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
- Turbine Rotor Nozzle Sealing (AREA)
- Shafts, Cranks, Connecting Bars, And Related Bearings (AREA)
- Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
- Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)
Abstract
An age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy that provides high strength, high toughness, and good low cycle fatigue life and a method of making same are disclosed. The alloy comprises a matrix having a weight percent composition consisting essentially of about Carbon 0.2-0.36 Manganese 0.20 max. Silicon 0.10 max. Phosphorus 0.01 max. Sulfur 0.004 max. Chromium 1.3-4 Nickel 10-15 Molybdenum 0.75-2.7 Cobalt 8-22 Aluminum 0.01 max. Titanium 0.02 max. Calcium 0.001 max. and the balance being iron and usual impurities. The alloy further contains a plurality of inclusions dispersed in the alloy matrix. The inclusions comprise calcium compounds that are about 0.4μm to about 7.0μm in major dimension, they have a median size of at least about 1.6μm in major dimension, and the inclusions contain essentially no rare earth elements.
Description
HIGH STRENGTH, HIGH TOUGHNESS ROTATING SHAFT MATERIAL
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a steel alloy that provides high strength and high fracture toughness, and in particular to such an alloy that also provides improved fatigue resistance.
DESCRIPTION OF RELATED ART
Steel alloys having a good combination of high strength and high fracture toughness are known. Examples of such alloys are described and claimed in U.S. Patent No. 5,087,415; U.S. Patent No. 5,268,044; U.S. Patent No. 5,866,066; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0113931; the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. The alloys described in those documents were originally designed for structural aerospace uses such as aircraft landing gear components, aircraft structural members, such as braces, beams, and struts. The known alloys have been made with a process that includes the use of a rare earth treatment to control the size and shape of inclusions such as sulfides, oxides, and oxysulfides that would otherwise adversely affect the strength and toughness of the alloys in the structural applications for which they are designed.
Since the original development of the above-mentioned alloys, a new application of the alloys has arisen, namely, in rotating shafts for jet engines. In the course of developing rotating shafts made from these alloys, it has been found that the fatigue life of the rare earth treated alloys, particularly the low cycle fatigue life, leaves something to be desired. However, the combination of high strength and high fracture toughness provided by these alloys is still highly desirable for the rotating shaft application. Therefore, it would be desirable to have a steel alloy that provides the combination of high strength and high fracture toughness provided by the known alloys, together with improved fatigue life for the rotating shaft application.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to an age-hardenable, martensitic steel alloy having a composition and microstructure that is designed to provide a significant improvement in the fatigue life of a finished component, such as a rotating shaft of the type suitable for use in a jet engine or gas turbine. Summarized in the table below are the Broad, Intermediate, and Preferred chemistries of the material according to the present invention. The values set forth in the table are given in weight percent.
Broad Intermediate Preferred
C 0.2-0.36 0.20-0.33 0.21-0.27
Mn 0.20 max. 0.15 max. 0.10 max.
Si 0.1 max. 0.1 max. 0.1 max.
P 0.01 max. 0.008 max. 0.008 max.
S 0.0040 max. 0.0025 max. 0.0020 max.
Cr 1.3-4 2-4 2.9-4.0
Ni 10-15 10.5-15 11.0-13.0
Mo 0.75-2.7 0.75-1.75 1.0-1.5
Co 8-22 8-17 10-14
Ti 0.02 max. 0.02 max. 0.02 max.
Al 0.01 max. 0.01 max. 0.01 max.
The balance of the alloy is iron and usual impurities, including additional elements in amounts which do not detract from the desired combination of properties. The alloy according to this invention is further characterized by a dispersion of small inclusions having a size distribution of about 0.4μm to about 7μm in major dimension in the alloy matrix. Preferably, the median inclusion size is at least about 1.6μm. The composition of the inclusions contains essentially no rare earth elements such as cerium and lanthanum.
In accordance with another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of improving the low cycle fatigue life of a high strength, high toughness, age- hardenable martensitic steel alloy. The method includes the step of melting an age- hardenable martensitic steel alloy having the weight percent composition set forth above. The method further includes the step of adding calcium to the molten alloy to combine with available sulfur and oxygen in the molten alloy to form inclusions that are
removable from said alloy. The method also includes the steps of processing the alloy to remove at least a portion of the inclusions from the alloy and then solidifying the refined alloy, whereby the solidified alloy contains a limited dispersion of such inclusions in the alloy matrix. The retained inclusions have a size distribution of about OA. μm to about 7 μm in major dimension and a median size of at least about 1.6μm. The alloy can be mechanically worked and machined to form a useful product such as a shaft for a rotating machine.
The foregoing tabulation is provided as a convenient summary and is not intended to restrict the lower and upper values of the ranges of the individual elements of the alloy of this invention for use solely in combination with each other, or to restrict the broad, intermediate or preferred ranges of the elements for use solely in combination with each other. Thus, one or more of the broad, intermediate, and preferred ranges can be used with one or more of the other ranges for the remaining elements. In addition, a broad, intermediate, or preferred minimum or maximum for an element can be used with the maximum or minimum for that element from one of the remaining ranges. Here and throughout this application percent (%) means percent by weight unless otherwise indicated.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
The foregoing summary as well as the following detailed description will be better understood when read in conjunction with the drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 presents graphs of the transverse axial-axial fatigue life for a known rare-earth treated alloy and for a calcium treated alloy according to the present invention; and
FIGURE 2 presents histograms of the frequencies of sizes of inclusions in the known rare-earth treated alloy and the calcium treated alloy according to the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
The alloy according to the prevent invention contains at least about 0.2%, better yet, at least about 0.20%, and preferably at least about 0.21% carbon because it contributes to the good hardness capability and high tensile strength of the alloy primarily by combining with other elements such as chromium and molybdenum to form carbides during heat treatment. Too much carbon adversely affects the fracture toughness of this alloy. Accordingly, carbon is limited to not more than about 0.36%, better yet, to not more than about 0.33%, and preferably to not more than about 0.27%.
Cobalt contributes to the hardness and strength of this alloy and benefits the ratio of yield strength to tensile strength (Y.S./U.T.S.). Therefore, at least about 8%, better yet at least about 10%, and preferably at least about 11% cobalt is present in this alloy. Above about 22% cobalt the fracture toughness and the ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of the alloy are adversely affected. Preferably, not more than about 17%, and better yet not more than about 14% cobalt is present in this alloy.
Cobalt and carbon are critically balanced in this alloy to provide the unique combination of high strength and high fracture toughness that is characteristic of the alloy. Thus, to ensure good fracture toughness, carbon and cobalt are preferably balanced in accordance with the following relationship:
a) % Co < 35-81.8(% C).
To ensure that the alloy provides the desired high strength and hardness, carbon and cobalt are preferably balanced such that:
b) % Co > 25.5-70(% C); and, for best results
c) % Co > 26.9-70(% C).
- A -
Chromium contributes to the good hardenability and hardness capability of this alloy and benefits the desired low ductile-brittle transition temperature of the alloy. Therefore, at least about 1.3%, better yet at least about 2%, and preferably at least about 2.9% chromium is present. Above about 4% chromium the alloy is susceptible to rapid overaging such that the unique combination of high tensile strength and high fracture toughness is not attainable with the preferred age-hardening heat treatment. Preferably, chromium is limited to not more than about 3.5%, and better yet to not more than about 3.3%. When the alloy contains more than about 3% chromium, the amount of carbon present in the alloy is adjusted upwardly in order to ensure that the alloy provides the desired high tensile strength.
At least about 0.75% and preferably at least about 1.0% molybdenum is present in this alloy because it benefits the desired low ductile-brittle transition temperature of the alloy. Above about 2.7% molybdenum, the fracture toughness of the alloy is adversely affected. Preferably, molybdenum is limited to not more than about 1.75%, and better yet to not more than about 1.5%. When more than about 1.5% molybdenum is present in this alloy the % carbon and/or % cobalt must be adjusted downwardly in order to ensure that the alloy provides the desired high fracture toughness. Accordingly, when the alloy contains more than about 1.5% molybdenum, the % carbon is not more than the median % carbon for a given % cobalt as defined by equations a) and b) or a) and c).
Nickel contributes to the hardenability of this alloy such that the alloy can be hardened with or without rapid quenching techniques. Nickel benefits the fracture toughness and stress corrosion cracking resistance provided by this alloy and contributes to the desired low ductile-to-brittle transition temperature. Accordingly, at least about 10%, better yet, at least about 10.5%, and preferably at least about 11.0% nickel is present. Above about 15% nickel the fracture toughness and impact toughness of the alloy can be adversely affected because the solubility of carbon in the alloy is reduced which may result in carbide precipitation in the grain boundaries when the alloy is cooled at a slow rate, such as when air cooled following forging. Preferably, nickel is limited to
not more than about 13.0%, and better yet to not more than about 12,0%.
Other elements can be present in this alloy in amounts which do not detract from the desired properties. Not more than about 0.20% manganese can be present because manganese adversely affects the fracture toughness of the alloy. Preferably, manganese is restricted to about 0.15% max. and better yet to about 0.10% max. For best results the alloy contains not more than about 0.05% manganese. Up to about 0.1% silicon, up to about 0.01% aluminum, and up to about 0.02% titanium can be present as residuals from small additions for deoxidizing the alloy.
A small but effective amount of calcium is present in this alloy to provide sulfide and oxide inclusion shape control which benefits the fracture toughness and the low cycle fatigue life of the alloy. It is believed that the use of calcium in this alloy benefits the low cycle fatigue (LCF) life because it beneficially affects the size and distribution of inclusions that form in the alloy matrix during processing. Unlike the alloys described in U.S. Patent No. 5,087,415; U.S. Patent No. 5,268,044; U.S. Patent No. 5,866,066; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2007/0113931, the present invention avoids the use of rare earth treatments. Therefore, the alloy or product made in accordance with the present invention may contain only trace amounts of such elements as cerium, lanthanum, and other rare earths.
The balance of the alloy according to the present invention is essentially iron except for the usual impurities found in commercial grades of alloys intended for similar service or use. The levels of such elements must be controlled so as not to adversely affect the desired properties of this alloy. For example, phosphorus is limited to not more than about 0.01%, preferably not more than about 0.008%. Sulfur adversely affects the fracture toughness provided by this alloy. Accordingly, sulfur is restricted to about 0.0040% max., better yet to about 0.0025% max., and preferably to about 0.0020% max. Best results are obtained when the alloy contains not more than about 0.001% sulfur. Tramp elements such as lead, tin, arsenic and antimony are limited to about 0.003% max. each, better yet to about 0.002% max. each, and preferably to about 0.001% max each.
Oxygen is limited to not more than about 20 parts per million (ppm) and nitrogen to not more than about 40 ppm.
The alloy of the present invention is readily melted using conventional vacuum or inert gas melting techniques. For best results, as when additional refining is desired, a multiple melting practice is preferred. The preferred practice is to melt a heat in a vacuum induction furnace (VIM) and cast the heat in the form of an electrode. The alloying addition for sulfide shape control referred to above is preferably made before the molten VIM heat is cast. Preferably, the electrode is then remelted in a vacuum arc furnace (VAR) and recast into one or more ingots. It is expected that the alloy would contain not more than about 0.001% calcium after VAR processing. Prior to VAR the electrode ingot is preferably stress relieved at about 125O0F for 4-16 hours and air cooled. After VAR the ingot(s) is(are) preferably homogenized at about 2150-22500F for 6-24 hours. This alloy can also be prepared using powder metallurgy techniques, for example, VIM followed by inert gas atomization.
The alloy can be hot worked from about 225O0F to about 15000F. The preferred hot working practice is to forge an ingot from about 2150-22500F to obtain at least a 30% reduction in cross sectional area. The ingot is then reheated to about 18000F and further forged to obtain at least another 30% reduction in cross sectional area. It will be appreciated that the alloy can also be hot worked using a single reduction step for some product forms.
The alloy according to the present invention is austenitized and age hardened as follows. Austenitizing of the alloy is carried out by heating the alloy at about 1550- 18000F for about 1 hour plus about 5 minutes per inch of thickness and then quenching in oil. The hardenability of this alloy is good enough to permit air cooling or vacuum heat treatment with inert gas quenching, both of which have a slower cooling rate than oil quenching. Whatever quenching technique is used, the quench rate is preferably rapid enough to cool the alloy from the austenitizing temperature to about 15O0F in not more than about 2 h. When this alloy is to be oil quenched, however, it is preferably
austenitized at about 1550-1600°F, whereas when the alloy is to be vacuum treated or air hardened it is preferably austenitized at about 1575-165O0F. After austenitizing, the alloy is preferably cold treated as by deep chilling at about -100 to -32O0F for 1/2 to 1 hour and then warmed in air. Age hardening of this alloy is preferably conducted by heating the alloy at about 850-9500F for about 5 hours followed by cooling in air.
WORKING EXAMPLES
In order to demonstrate the improvement in fatigue life provided by the alloy according to the present invention relative to the known alloy, comparative testing was conducted. Samples for testing were obtained from a heat of a known rare-earth treated (RE Treated) material and from a calcium treated (Ca Treated) heat of the alloy according to the present invention. The weigh percent chemistries of the two heats are set forth in Table 1 below.
TABLE l
Element RE Treated Ca Treated
C 0.224 0.223
Mn <0.01 <0.01
Si 0.02 0.01
P 0.0014 0.0016
S 0.0008 <0.0005
Cr 3.01 3.01
Ni 11.14 11.07
Mo 1.18 1.17
Co 13.44 13.45
Al 0.003 0.011
Ti 0.010 0.009
Ce 0.009
La 0.006
N 0.0010 0.0010
O O.OOIO O.OOIO
Ca O.005
The balance of each composition is iron and the usual impurities.
Longitudinal and transverse sections of the sample materials were obtained. Standard tensile and fracture toughness specimens were prepared from each of the sections. The tensile and fracture toughness specimens were heat treated by heating at 16250F for one hour and then cooled in air. The test specimens were then deep chilled at -1000F for one hour, followed by warming in air. The specimens were then age hardened by heating at 9000F for five hours and then air cooled. The results of the tensile and fracture toughness testing are shown in Table 2 below including the 0.2% offset yield strength and the ultimate tensile strength in ksi, the percent elongation, the percent reduction in area, and the Kic fracture toughness in ksWin.
TABLE 2
Y.S. U.T.S. Elong. RA. KIc
Sample Orientation (ksi) (ksi) (%) (%) (ksWin.)
RE
Treated Longitudinal 253.0 286.0 16.0 65.0 136.3
Transverse 251.0 281.0 13.0 46.0 109.9
Ca Treated Longitudinal 246.0 281.0 17.0 70.0 145.4
Transverse 250.0 285.0 17.0 65.0 108.2
The data presented in Table 2 show that the Ca-treated alloy according to the presented provides tensile properties and fracture toughness that is at least as good as the known rare earth treated alloy. There was no adverse effect on the tensile and fracture toughness properties that resulted from the calcium treatment.
Transverse blanks measuring 3A in. square x 4-1/2 in. long were cut from each of the heats. The blanks were heat treated using the same heat treatment used for the tensile and fracture toughness specimens as described above. The heat treated blanks were low stress ground to form axial-axial fatigue test specimens.
Smooth fatigue test specimens (Kt = 1.0) for room temperature axial-axial fatigue testing were prepared in accordance with ASTM E466-96. Servo-Hydraulic test equipment was used with a 20 Hz sinusoidal waveform to cycle the specimens from zero stress to each of three maximum tensile stress levels of 1400 MPa, 1200 MPa, and 1100 MPa (203 ksi, 174 ksi, and 160 ksi, respectively). Six samples of each heat were tested at each stress level. This axial-axial fatigue test was therefore performed under conditions that gave R = O and Kt = 1. For economic reasons, testing of a specimen was discontinued at 1,728,000 cycles (24 hours) if the specimen did not fail by that time.
The results of the fatigue tests for the rare earth treated specimens are shown in Table HIA and the results for the calcium treated specimens are shown in Table MB.
TABLE IIIA
Max Stress
MPa ksi Sample Cycles Average StdDev.
1400 203 1 36,310
1400 203 2 20,495
1400 203 3 34,727
1400 203 4 12,452
1400 203 5 15,521
1400 203 6 31,052 25,093 10,264
1200 174 1 54,333
1200 174 2 17,177
1200 174 3 12,178
1200 174 4 14,621
1200 174 5 39,475
1200 174 6 435,204 95,498 167,243
1100 160 1 26,684
1100 160 2 1,728,000
1100 160 3 1,728,000
1100 160 4 31,239
1100 160 5 44,192
1100 160 6 244,558 633,779 851,512
TABLE IHB
Max Stress
MPa Ksi Sample Cycles Average Std.Dev.
1400 203 1 103,467
1400 203 2 128,634
1400 203 3 338,054
1400 203 4 36,116
1400 203 5 48,048
1400 203 6 55,407 118,288 113,370
1200 174 1 312,529
1200 174 2 1,728,000
1200 174 3 59,719
1200 174 4 558,427
1200 174 5 1,441,076
1200 174 6 1,728,000 971,292 748,506
1100 160 1 1,728,000
1100 160 2 1,699,342
1100 160 3 367,452
1100 160 4 1,728,000
1100 160 5 1,728,000
1100 160 6 1,728,000 1,496,466 553,220
The data presented in Tables HIA and HIB are graphed in Figure 1 which displays the data points and shows lines that connect the median values of the fatigue lives measured at the three stress levels. The data presented in Tables IIIA and IHB and shown in Figure 1 graphically illustrate that the calcium treated alloy according to the present invention provides significantly longer fatigue life than the rare earth treated material at each of the three stress levels examined.
Material from the samples that broke during the fatigue testing were analyzed in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to characterize the inclusions formed in each alloy by size and composition. The SEM examined 191 inclusions in the samples from the calcium treated heat and 156 inclusions in the rare earth treated material. Table IV presents the sizes and compositions of the inclusions observed in the rare earth treated alloy. Table V presents the sizes and compositions of the inclusions observed in the calcium treated material.
TABLEIV
Note: Elements that are enriched compared to matrix values have been highlighted with bold print.
TABLE V
Note: Elements that are enriched compared to matrix values have been highlighted with bold print.
The data in Tables IV and V show that the type of desulfurization treatment greatly affects the composition of the inclusions. Most of the inclusions in the rare earth treated alloy contain the rare earth elements Ce and La. In contrast, most of the inclusions in the calcium treated alloy contain Ca, but essentially no rare earth elements
such as Ce and La. Both the rare earth treatment and the calcium treatment were effective in gettering tramp elements such as P, S, and As.
The inclusion size data set forth in Tables IV and V fit a Weibull distribution as shown in Figure 2. It was determined that the median values of the inclusion sizes between the calcium treated material and the rare earth treated material were statistically different at a 95% confidence level. Therefore, there is a statistically significant difference in median inclusion size between the calcium treated material and the rare earth treated material. The median inclusion size for the calcium treated alloy was determined to be about 1.6 microns, whereas the median inclusion size for the rare earth treated material is about 1.1 microns. It is believed that the generally larger inclusion size of the calcium treated alloy in combination with the different composition of the inclusions resulting from the calcium desulfurization practice according to the present invention significantly benefits the fatigue life provided by the alloy and process according to the present invention. The improvement in the fatigue life realized by the alloy and process of our invention was not expected in view of the differences in the inclusion size and composition relative to the known rare earth treated alloys.
The terms and expressions which have been employed herein are use as terms of description and not of limitation. There is no intention in the use of such terms and expressions to exclude any equivalents of the features described or any portions thereof. It is to be recognized, however, that various modifications are possible within the scope of the invention described and claimed.
Claims
1. An age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy that provides high strength, high toughness, and good low cycle fatigue life, said alloy comprising: a matrix having a weight percent composition consisting essentially of about
Carbon 0.2-0.36
Manganese 0.20 max.
Silicon 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.01 max.
Sulfur 0.004 max.
Chromium 1.3-4
Nickel 10-15
Molybdenum 0.75-2.7
Cobalt 8-22
Aluminum 0.01 max.
Titanium 0.02 max.
Calcium 0.001 max. and the balance being iron and usual impurities; and a plurality of inclusions dispersed in said matrix, said inclusions comprising calcium compounds that are about 0.4μm to about 7.0μm in major dimension and have a median size of at least about 1.6μm in major dimension, and wherein said inclusions contain essentially no rare earth elements.
2. An age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy as set forth in Claim 1 wherein the matrix composition consists essentially of about
Carbon 0.20-0.33
Manganese 0.15 max.
Phosphorus 0.008 max.
Sulfur 0.0025 max.
Chromium 2-4
Nickel 10.5-15
Molybdenum 0.75-1.75, and
Cobalt 8-17.
3. An age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy as set forth in Claim 1 wherein the matrix composition consists essentially of about
Carbon 0.21-0.27
Manganese 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.008 max.
Sulfur 0.0020 max.
Chromium 2.25-3.5
Nickel 11.0-13.0
Molybdenum 1.0-1.5, and
Cobalt 10-15.
4. An age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy as set forth in Claim 1 wherein the matrix composition contains not more than about 0.33% carbon.
5. An age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy as set forth in Claim 1 wherein the matrix composition consists essentially of about
Carbon 0.21-0.34
Phosphorus 0.008 max.
Sulfur 0.003 max.
Chromium 1.5-2.80
Nickel 10-13
Molybdenum 0.9-1.8, and
Cobalt 14-22.
6. An age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy as set forth in Claim 1 wherein the matrix composition consists essentially of about
Carbon 0.30-0.36
Manganese 0.05 max.
Sulfur 0.001 max.
Chromium 1.3-3.2
Nickel 10-13
Molybdenum 1.0-2.7
Cobalt 13.8-17.4, and
Aluminum 0.005 max.
7. A method of improving the low cycle fatigue life of a high strength, high toughness, martensitic steel alloy comprising the steps of : melting a martensitic steel alloy having the following composition in weight percent, about
Carbon 0.2-0.36
Manganese 0.20 max.
Silicon 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.01 max.
Sulfur 0.004 max.
Chromium 1.3-4
Nickel 10-15
Molybdenum 0.75-2.7
Cobalt 8-22 and the balance being iron and usual impurities; adding calcium to the alloy while molten such that the calcium combines with available elements to form inclusions dispersed in said alloy; processing said alloy to remove at least a portion of said inclusions; and then solidifying said alloy; whereby said alloy is provided with a matrix containing a limited dispersion of said inclusions that are about 0.4μm to about 7μm in major dimension and have a median size of at least about l.όμm in major dimension, and wherein said inclusions contain essentially no rare earth elements.
8. The method as set forth in Claim 7 wherein the melting step comprises melting the martensitic steel alloy to have the following composition in weight percent, about
Carbon 0.20-0.33
Manganese 0.15 max.
Silicon 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.008 max.
Sulfur 0.0025 max.
Chromium 2-4
Nickel 10.5-15
Molybdenum 0.75-1.75
Cobalt 8-17
Aluminum 0.01 max.
Titanium 0.02 max. and the balance essentially iron and usual impurities.
9. The method as set forth in Claim 7 wherein the melting step comprises melting the martensitic steel alloy to have the following composition in weight percent, about
Carbon 0.21-0.27
Manganese 0.1 max.
Silicon 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.008 max.
Sulfur 0.002 max.
Chromium 2.25-3.5
Nickel 11.0-13.0
Molybdenum 1.0-1.5
Cobalt 10-15
Aluminum 0.01 max.
Titanium 0.02 max. and the balance essentially iron and usual impurities.
10. A method of making a shaft for a rotating machine comprising the steps of : melting a martensitic steel alloy having the following composition in weight percent, about
Carbon 0.2-0.36
Manganese 0.20 max.
Silicon 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.01 max.
Sulfur 0.004 max
Chromium 1.3-4
Nickel 10-15
Molybdenum 0.75-2.7
Cobalt 8-22
Aluminum 0.01 max.
Titanium 0.02 max. and the balance being iron and usual impurities; adding calcium to the alloy while molten such that the calcium combines with available elements to form inclusions dispersed in said alloy, said inclusions being about 0.4μm to about 7μm in major dimension and having a median size of at least about l.όμm in major dimension, and wherein said inclusions contain essentially no rare earth elements; processing said alloy to remove at least a portion of said inclusions; solidifying said alloy; mechanically working the solidified alloy to provide an elongated intermediate product; and then machining the elongated intermediate form to provide a shaft.
11. A shaft for a rotating machine comprising: an age hardenable, martensitic steel alloy comprising a matrix having a weight percent composition consisting essentially of about
Carbon 0.2-0.36
Manganese 0.20 max.
Silicon 0.10 max.
Phosphorus 0.01 max.
Sulfur 0.004 max.
Chromium 1.3-4
Nickel 10-15
Molybdenum 0.75-2.7
Cobalt 8-22
Aluminum 0.01 max.
Titanium 0.02 max.
Calcium 0.001 max. and the balance being iron and usual impurities; and a plurality of inclusions dispersed in said matrix, said inclusions comprising calcium compounds that are about 0.4μm to about 7.0μm in major dimension and have a median size of at least about 1.6μm in major dimension, and wherein said inclusions contain essentially no rare earth elements.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US94624407P | 2007-06-26 | 2007-06-26 | |
PCT/US2008/068372 WO2009003112A1 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | High strength, high toughness rotating shaft material |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2171113A1 true EP2171113A1 (en) | 2010-04-07 |
Family
ID=39687231
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08772048A Withdrawn EP2171113A1 (en) | 2007-06-26 | 2008-06-26 | High strength, high toughness rotating shaft material |
Country Status (9)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US20090004041A1 (en) |
EP (1) | EP2171113A1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2010531933A (en) |
KR (1) | KR20100029130A (en) |
CN (1) | CN101802239A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2691795A1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX2009014214A (en) |
TW (1) | TW200925296A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2009003112A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US8756429B2 (en) | 2008-10-10 | 2014-06-17 | International Business Machines Corporation | Tunable encryption system |
CN102155802A (en) * | 2011-04-29 | 2011-08-17 | 武汉中圣能源环保工程有限公司 | Non-vacuum solar high temperature tower-type heat collector |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US4461657A (en) * | 1983-05-19 | 1984-07-24 | Union Carbide Corporation | High strength steel and gas storage cylinder manufactured thereof |
US5087415A (en) * | 1989-03-27 | 1992-02-11 | Carpenter Technology Corporation | High strength, high fracture toughness structural alloy |
JP2683599B2 (en) * | 1990-02-06 | 1997-12-03 | シーアールエス ホールディングス,インコーポレイテッド | Martensitic alloy steel and structural members with high strength and high fracture surface toughness with low ductility-brittleness transition temperature |
US5268044A (en) * | 1990-02-06 | 1993-12-07 | Carpenter Technology Corporation | High strength, high fracture toughness alloy |
US5866066A (en) * | 1996-09-09 | 1999-02-02 | Crs Holdings, Inc. | Age hardenable alloy with a unique combination of very high strength and good toughness |
JP2002285290A (en) * | 2001-03-27 | 2002-10-03 | Daido Steel Co Ltd | High strength and highly fatigue resistant steel for structural purpose and production method therefor |
US20070113931A1 (en) * | 2005-11-18 | 2007-05-24 | Novotny Paul M | Ultra-high strength martensitic alloy |
-
2008
- 2008-06-26 WO PCT/US2008/068372 patent/WO2009003112A1/en active Application Filing
- 2008-06-26 JP JP2010515122A patent/JP2010531933A/en active Pending
- 2008-06-26 CA CA002691795A patent/CA2691795A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-06-26 MX MX2009014214A patent/MX2009014214A/en unknown
- 2008-06-26 KR KR1020107001716A patent/KR20100029130A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2008-06-26 US US12/147,055 patent/US20090004041A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2008-06-26 CN CN200880105114A patent/CN101802239A/en active Pending
- 2008-06-26 EP EP08772048A patent/EP2171113A1/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2008-06-26 TW TW097124031A patent/TW200925296A/en unknown
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2009003112A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP2010531933A (en) | 2010-09-30 |
WO2009003112A1 (en) | 2008-12-31 |
MX2009014214A (en) | 2010-03-15 |
CN101802239A (en) | 2010-08-11 |
KR20100029130A (en) | 2010-03-15 |
CA2691795A1 (en) | 2008-12-31 |
TW200925296A (en) | 2009-06-16 |
US20090004041A1 (en) | 2009-01-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US5268044A (en) | High strength, high fracture toughness alloy | |
US5087415A (en) | High strength, high fracture toughness structural alloy | |
EP0925379B1 (en) | Age hardenable alloy with a unique combination of very high strength and good toughness | |
CN115667570B (en) | High fracture toughness, high strength, precipitation hardening stainless steel | |
JP2001221003A (en) | High and low pressure integrated turbine rotor and manufacturing method for it | |
CN105886949A (en) | High-performance heat resistant steel, and preparation method and application thereof | |
EP2668306B1 (en) | High strength, high toughness steel alloy | |
US20090266451A1 (en) | Ultra-High Strength Martensitic Alloy | |
US6576186B1 (en) | Enhanced machinability precipitation-hardenable stainless steel for critical applications | |
WO2009003112A1 (en) | High strength, high toughness rotating shaft material | |
CA2073460C (en) | High strength, high fracture toughness alloy | |
MX2008006428A (en) | Ultra-high strength martensitic alloy |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100107 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100901 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20110112 |