EP2116674A2 - External protection of plants against aircraft impact - Google Patents

External protection of plants against aircraft impact Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2116674A2
EP2116674A2 EP08020268A EP08020268A EP2116674A2 EP 2116674 A2 EP2116674 A2 EP 2116674A2 EP 08020268 A EP08020268 A EP 08020268A EP 08020268 A EP08020268 A EP 08020268A EP 2116674 A2 EP2116674 A2 EP 2116674A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
net
barrage
protection
threats
installation
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP08020268A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Petrangeli Gianni
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP2116674A2 publication Critical patent/EP2116674A2/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E04BUILDING
    • E04HBUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
    • E04H9/00Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate
    • E04H9/04Buildings, groups of buildings or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake or extreme climate against air-raid or other war-like actions

Definitions

  • the technical field of the invention is the protection of plants or installations against voluntary or accidental impact of an aircraft (e.g. the New York September 11 th 2001 event).
  • This description refers to a nuclear power plant as a typical application.
  • This protection system is based on the use of a barrage net of cables; this net is [line 5] mobile on the ground and its height can be rapidly adjusted; the net is supported by a number of aerostatic balloons ( Figure 1 ).
  • the barrage net is complemented by a (reinforced concrete) wall closer to the installation to be protected ( Figure 1 ) and having a height and a width of some meters.
  • the protection may have the dimensions shown in Figure 1 and 2 , which are able to protect the plant [line 10] against an aircraft directed against its target with a maximum angle of 30° with the horizontal or sliding on the ground.
  • At least two concentric barrage nets are envisaged at a distance of about 50 m from each other ( Figure 1 ).
  • Each net is anchored to railway cars, mobile on circular rails; other plan paths can be adopted in order to fit to the ground shape. Any linear structure crossing the rails path (high voltage electric [line 15] lines, gas or water pipes) has to be put underground for the small distance necessary to cross the rails.
  • Each net is laterally extended for a limited circular angle (or for a different track extension), indicatively for 300 m and is movable independently from the other.
  • This arrangement can protect the plant against a double strike by two airplanes at some interval of time from each other.
  • the [line 20] net located on the rail farther from the arriving plane should be firstly used; then, in case of a second strike, the other net should be employed. This sequence would avoid that the second net functionality be jeopardized by the fall of the first net impacted. If protection against more than two consecutive strikes is sought, more than two rails can be used.
  • the balloons are 7 for each [line 25] train (14 in total).
  • a wind-turbine indicatively with an output power of 10 kW
  • the electric power generated by the turbine will recharge accumulator banks located on the railway cars below; these accumulators, in turn, can be used for the movement of the train, for the supply of electric power to essential plant auxiliaries, even in case of [line 30] emergencies, or for the production of hydrogen.
  • the complex of the wind turbines (of about 140 kW power in total) makes the whole protection installation permanently useful, even if no aerial threat ever materializes. The considerable height, at which the turbines are located, better insures the presence of a sufficient wind velocity.
  • Some balloons bring the aerials of a radar detection, alarm and [line 35] control system, which is installed in addition and independently from the air space control insured by the competent institutions.
  • the local radar system is also used to position the barrage nets in the most convenient way on the basis of the motion of the incoming aircraft.
  • the height of the balloons from ground can be adjusted, by winches located on the railway cars, from the ground level up to about 650 m elevation.
  • the net proper namely the part of the cable or cable and chain system having also horizontal elements, is here assumed to have an height of about 100 m.
  • a light but strong object (steel or carbon fibre bar) can be secured to each of the knots of the nets in order to help damage and arrest the engines of the impacting aircraft.
  • the system has to be protected against lightening by the usual provisions; it also complies with any [line 45] applicable regulation.
  • the reference balloons have a spherical shape but a different shape (e.g. ellipsoidal with tail pieces) can be used for an higher stability in strong winds.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Emergency Management (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Transplanting Machines (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
  • Tires In General (AREA)

Abstract

The technical field of the invention is the protection of plants or installations (e.g. a nuclear power plant) against voluntary or accidental impact of an aircraft (e.g., New York September 11th 2001 event). This protection system is based on the use of a barrage net of cables; the net is mobile on ground rails and its height can be quickly adjusted; the net is supported by a number of aerostatic balloons. The barrage net is complemented by a wall closer to the installation to be protected. At least two concentric independent barrage nets are envisaged in order to cope with a double (or multiple) strike by two or more consecutive aircrafts. Along the barrage cable of each balloon a wind turbine and radar aerials are located with the purpose, respectively, of usefulness of the system in absence of threats and of automatic detection of threats and of net position control.

Description

  • [line1] The technical field of the invention is the protection of plants or installations against voluntary or accidental impact of an aircraft (e.g. the New York September 11th 2001 event). This description refers to a nuclear power plant as a typical application. This protection system is based on the use of a barrage net of cables; this net is [line 5] mobile on the ground and its height can be rapidly adjusted; the net is supported by a number of aerostatic balloons (Figure 1). The barrage net is complemented by a (reinforced concrete) wall closer to the installation to be protected (Figure 1) and having a height and a width of some meters. For a plant located in open country, the protection may have the dimensions shown in Figure 1 and 2, which are able to protect the plant [line 10] against an aircraft directed against its target with a maximum angle of 30° with the horizontal or sliding on the ground. At least two concentric barrage nets are envisaged at a distance of about 50 m from each other (Figure 1). Each net is anchored to railway cars, mobile on circular rails; other plan paths can be adopted in order to fit to the ground shape. Any linear structure crossing the rails path (high voltage electric [line 15] lines, gas or water pipes) has to be put underground for the small distance necessary to cross the rails. Each net is laterally extended for a limited circular angle (or for a different track extension), indicatively for 300 m and is movable independently from the other. This arrangement can protect the plant against a double strike by two airplanes at some interval of time from each other. To this end, in case of an attack, the [line 20] net located on the rail farther from the arriving plane should be firstly used; then, in case of a second strike, the other net should be employed. This sequence would avoid that the second net functionality be jeopardized by the fall of the first net impacted. If protection against more than two consecutive strikes is sought, more than two rails can be used. In the indicative scheme described, the balloons are 7 for each [line 25] train (14 in total). Along the anchorage cable of each balloon a wind-turbine, indicatively with an output power of 10 kW, is secured by a stabilizing rigid bar; the electric power generated by the turbine will recharge accumulator banks located on the railway cars below; these accumulators, in turn, can be used for the movement of the train, for the supply of electric power to essential plant auxiliaries, even in case of [line 30] emergencies, or for the production of hydrogen. The complex of the wind turbines (of about 140 kW power in total) makes the whole protection installation permanently useful, even if no aerial threat ever materializes. The considerable height, at which the turbines are located, better insures the presence of a sufficient wind velocity. Some balloons, in addition, bring the aerials of a radar detection, alarm and [line 35] control system, which is installed in addition and independently from the air space control insured by the competent institutions. The local radar system is also used to position the barrage nets in the most convenient way on the basis of the motion of the incoming aircraft. The height of the balloons from ground can be adjusted, by winches located on the railway cars, from the ground level up to about 650 m elevation. [line 40] The net proper, namely the part of the cable or cable and chain system having also horizontal elements, is here assumed to have an height of about 100 m. A light but strong object (steel or carbon fibre bar) can be secured to each of the knots of the nets in order to help damage and arrest the engines of the impacting aircraft. The system has to be protected against lightening by the usual provisions; it also complies with any [line 45] applicable regulation. The reference balloons have a spherical shape but a different shape (e.g. ellipsoidal with tail pieces) can be used for an higher stability in strong winds.
  • Some indicative data of the system components are listed in the following:
    • Equivalent diameter of each balloon, about 22 m
    • [line 50] helium (if this gas is used) loss from one of the balloons, less than 300 m3 per month
    • lift of each balloon, at least 4.8 t
    • steel or synthetic fibre mooring cables with a diameter of at least 22 mm,
    • weighting about 2.5 kg/m and with a failure load of at least 45 t (doubled)
    • [line 55] dimension of the principal net mesh, 50 m
    • wind turbines weighting about 500 kg, with a power of about 10 kW each
    • instead of a single balloon per cable, more than one balloon can be installed, even on the same vertical line
  • It is estimated that the inertia of each net plus its failure strength are sufficient to assure [line 60] the fall of a large airliner within 1000 m from the impact; a 767 airliner as the ones which were used against the World Trade Center in N.Y on September 11 2001 has been considered in calculations; possibly the impact against the net would immediately destroy or detach form the plane body wings and engines [1] [2]. A larger aircraft can also be stopped.
  • [line 65] References (both containing a large number of other references):
    1. [1] Gianni Petrangeli, Nuclear Safety, Elsevier, Oxford 2006, pages 189 and following
    2. [2] Gianni Petrangeli, Large Aircraft impact on a Nuclear Plant, ICAPP 2007, Nice, France, paper 7081

Claims (8)

  1. the system is essentially passive, mobile and flexible (possibility of automatic horizontal and vertical adjustment to a threat)
  2. the system can also be installed around an already built installation
  3. The system is effective even against large airliners
  4. the system offers protection against a double or multiple strike too
  5. the system is sufficiently visible to represent a dissuasion factor for a planned attack and, at the same time, sufficiently not intrusive for the normal plant operation
  6. the system is useful in normal conditions also because it incorporates a small (order of 140 kW) wind farm for the generation and storage of electric energy
  7. the system can also replace or help the elevated plant stack for the discharge of gaseous waste
  8. the system can be adjusted for an offshore installation (LNG terminal etc.) by the replacement of railway cars with barges.
EP08020268A 2008-05-05 2008-11-21 External protection of plants against aircraft impact Withdrawn EP2116674A2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IT000235A ITRM20080235A1 (en) 2008-05-05 2008-05-05 SYSTEM FOR THE EXTERNAL PROTECTION OF PLANTS FROM THE FALL OF PLANES

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2116674A2 true EP2116674A2 (en) 2009-11-11

Family

ID=40302994

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08020268A Withdrawn EP2116674A2 (en) 2008-05-05 2008-11-21 External protection of plants against aircraft impact

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2116674A2 (en)
IT (1) ITRM20080235A1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014125480A1 (en) * 2013-02-13 2014-08-21 Israel Military Industries Ltd. Shielding of structures
WO2019027665A1 (en) * 2017-08-01 2019-02-07 Redmond Robert F Jr Modular man-portable drone barrier
US12007206B2 (en) 2018-03-22 2024-06-11 Robert F. Redmond, Jr. Modular man-portable drone barrier

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
GIANNI PETRANGELI: "Large Aircraft Impact on a Nuclear Plant", ICAPP, 2007, pages 7081
GIANNI PETRANGELI: "Nuclear Safety", 2006, ELSEVIER, pages: 189

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2014125480A1 (en) * 2013-02-13 2014-08-21 Israel Military Industries Ltd. Shielding of structures
WO2019027665A1 (en) * 2017-08-01 2019-02-07 Redmond Robert F Jr Modular man-portable drone barrier
US12007206B2 (en) 2018-03-22 2024-06-11 Robert F. Redmond, Jr. Modular man-portable drone barrier

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ITRM20080235A1 (en) 2009-11-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9719219B2 (en) Helicopter landing deck
US20140152017A1 (en) System of floating platforms for generating electricity by wind turbines
JP5807319B1 (en) Floating offshore wind power generation facility
CN102758732B (en) Power generating and monitoring integrated aerial wind power generation system
EP1586771B1 (en) Windpark protecting a building situated within the windpark
EP2116674A2 (en) External protection of plants against aircraft impact
KR101321090B1 (en) Lightning protection and method for a firing body
CN105337236A (en) Windproof line drawing device for high-voltage transmission line
Sørensen Wind energy
JP5622013B1 (en) Collective tidal current power generation facility
CN214939862U (en) Marine wind power foundation anti-collision system for blocking ship from approaching
Petrangeli Barrage balloons against aircraft threat: A well proven concept revisited
CN109725255A (en) A kind of wind power generating set sea low voltage crossing detection method
Ekergard et al. Axial Force Damper in a Linear Wave Energy Convertor
CN112874716A (en) Floating type photovoltaic power station protection device
WO2012117135A1 (en) Floating structure and installation for using the energy of the surge of the waves, using a floating catamaran with several oscillating water column chambers
EP2796708B1 (en) Semi-submerged device for absorbing the energy of the waves
CN208057305U (en) A kind of cylindrical linear generator and wave energy generating set
Tahir et al. Offshore wind energy in ice prone cold regions-An overview of technological gaps and needs
WO2016020709A1 (en) Improvements in or relating to wind turbines
CN210047606U (en) Offshore platform framework
JP2003320996A (en) Floatation apparatus floating in jet stream
Derevianko et al. Peculiarities of lightning protector of ground solar power plants in Ukraine
DE102007006011A1 (en) Offshore pontoon i.e. floating system, for floating wind power plant, is installed independent of water depth to produce power from wind energy, where pontoon uses half-diver principle to provide stable platform for usage of wind power
CN105610152B (en) Ocean power Transmission equipment and its implementation

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20110601