EP2085287A1 - Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant - Google Patents
Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2085287A1 EP2085287A1 EP08101186A EP08101186A EP2085287A1 EP 2085287 A1 EP2085287 A1 EP 2085287A1 EP 08101186 A EP08101186 A EP 08101186A EP 08101186 A EP08101186 A EP 08101186A EP 2085287 A1 EP2085287 A1 EP 2085287A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- warning
- rail vehicle
- identification information
- transmitting device
- received
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 28
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 20
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 claims description 41
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 10
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 abstract 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 18
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 9
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 6
- 238000002255 vaccination Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000003137 locomotive effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000036541 health Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008439 repair process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000002604 ultrasonography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003466 welding Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L17/00—Switching systems for classification yards
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L23/00—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains
- B61L23/06—Control, warning or like safety means along the route or between vehicles or trains for warning men working on the route
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B61—RAILWAYS
- B61L—GUIDING RAILWAY TRAFFIC; ENSURING THE SAFETY OF RAILWAY TRAFFIC
- B61L25/00—Recording or indicating positions or identities of vehicles or trains or setting of track apparatus
- B61L25/02—Indicating or recording positions or identities of vehicles or trains
- B61L25/026—Relative localisation, e.g. using odometer
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method and a system for the automated determination and adjustment of warning parameters in rail vehicles.
- the present invention relates to a method and a corresponding system for automated determination and setting of warning parameters in rail vehicles, in which at least one warning device of the rail vehicle is activated based on the warning parameters.
- Safety plays a very important role in rail vehicles. This is particularly true in the areas where people are near rails. For some time now, particularly the level crossings (that is, intersections of rails with roads) have been particularly carefully protected. Also at the stations various measures are taken to ensure the safety of people on the platform. On the other hand, safety also plays an extremely important role in track maintenance, track maintenance or track repair work.
- the so-called track construction trains or track construction compositions are usually used, which contain the necessary equipment for the work (such as cranes, welding equipment, etc.), and which also can transport track workers.
- track construction trains are equipped with warning devices, which the track construction workers by sound or light signals (or a combination thereof) to inform about the danger of an arriving train.
- the so-called alarm or warning centers are used, which have an overview of the construction site, and which emit appropriate warning signals in case of danger. These warning signals are then received by the track construction trains and output via the warning means.
- an alarm center can be responsible for several construction sites or construction site sections. Therefore, it is essential in such systems that alerting the track workers only occurs when the track train is actually in the warning area in which the received warning signals should be effectively effective.
- the so-called vaccination keys with position information are used for this purpose. These vaccination keys are clearly assigned to a certain warning area and must be introduced by a track construction worker when entering the warning area in the designated plug-in device on the track construction train. The information stored on the key is then used by the evaluation unit of the train to select the correct warning signals.
- this conventional solution includes a few important drawbacks and carries a few high risks. So the vaccination must be replaced after each change in position of the track construction. In this case, a track construction worker must remove the old key and bring it back to its storage location, pick up the new key at its storage location and then insert it again into the opening provided for this purpose. In the time in which neither of the two keys is plugged in, the track construction train can evaluate no warning signals correctly. In addition, a track construction worker is always busy with such solutions with the replacement of the vaccination key. No automation can be realized. It is also clear that human error can not be ruled out, so that it is also possible that improper warning signal evaluations take place due to improper action or an operational error, which can have fatal consequences.
- the objects of the invention are achieved in that, in a method for the automated determination and setting of warning parameters in rail vehicles, wherein at least one warning device of the rail vehicle is activated based on the warning parameters, at least one transmission device sends at least one of the transmission device associated identification information, the at least one identification information is received by a receiving device assigned to the rail vehicle and transmitted to an evaluation device, the relative position of the rail vehicle is determined by the evaluation device based on the at least one received identification information, and the warning parameter assigned to the relative position of the rail vehicle is determined and the warning device is activated be set.
- the advantage of this invention lies in the fact that the determination and adjustment of warning parameters in rail vehicles can be done in a completely automated manner, without need for human operators.
- the relative position of the rail vehicle is determined based on data acquired by a tachometer and / or a hodometer.
- This embodiment variant has the particular advantage that in addition to the received identification information also one or more further position data sources are used. As a result, on the one hand, the accuracy of the position values can be substantially increased, and on the other hand, the plausibility of wirelessly received signals can also be checked as required.
- the identification information associated with the at least one transmission device is transmitted periodically by the transmission device.
- This embodiment variant has the particular advantage that the communication channel is occupied only briefly by the transmitting device and multiple assignments of several transmitting devices on the same communication channel are possible.
- by periodically receiving the identification information it is possible to control the functionality of the transmission devices without a great deal of additional effort.
- a transmission request is sent from an activation device assigned to the rail vehicle and received by at least one transmission device, and then the identification information associated with at least one transmission device (B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 ) is transmitted by at least one transmission device.
- the advantage of this embodiment lies in the fact that the transmitting devices are normally inactive or passive. The identification information is sent out in this case only if a request from the side the activation device of the rail vehicle is received by a transmitting device. As a result, the power consumption of the transmitting devices can be substantially reduced, and also overlapping warning sections can be unbundled.
- this can reduce the amount of radiation in the vicinity of the transmitting devices over a certain period of time, which on the one hand can reduce the interference and interference between the signals emitted by different transmitting devices and, on the other hand, the health risk to the people in the vicinity (for example track construction workers) ,
- At least one unique position identification of the transmitting device is transmitted with the identification information assigned to the transmitting device.
- the data stored in a database are used to determine the relative position of the rail vehicle and / or to determine the warning parameters.
- This embodiment variant has the particular advantage that the relative position determination in complex environments with multiple overlapping transmission ranges with different identification information is possible.
- the position determination can also be implemented particularly easily by comparing the received data with the data stored in the database.
- the stored data can also contain map information as needed, which can be used for simple signal evaluation and parameter determination.
- the identification information associated with the transmission device is transmitted by each transmission device via its own communication channel.
- This embodiment variant has the particular advantage that several transmitting devices can be received and evaluated at the same time, without interference or interference occurring as a result of confusion.
- a can Communication channel for example, be uniquely associated with a particular transmitting device, so that the receiving device can be set specifically to this channel to obtain the desired identification information.
- warning information of the alarm center is received by the receiving device, and the at least one warning device of the rail vehicle is activated by the evaluation device based on the received warning parameters.
- the advantage of this embodiment lies in particular in the fact that the warning output always coincides in time and location with the warning information of the alarm center.
- the setting of the warning parameters is carried out completely automatically, so that no additional expense arises.
- received data and / or log data are stored by the evaluation device in the database.
- This embodiment variant has the particular advantage that the entire process of data transmission can be recorded. As a result, in particular all normal and special processes as well as special incidents can be subsequently assigned and evaluated.
- the present invention also relates to a corresponding system for the automated determination and setting of warning parameters in rail vehicles.
- the identification information associated with the at least one transmission device can be sendable and receivable via a wireless radio network.
- the wireless radio network can be, for example, an NFC and / or Bluetooth and / or RFID and / or ZigBee network.
- these other data transmission technologies can also be used to create a secure and functional solution.
- FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a rail vehicle 10, in which the adjustment of the warning parameters in the classical manner of the prior art is made.
- reference numeral 11 refers to a locomotive
- reference numeral 12 refers to a trailer.
- the rail vehicle 10 but also consist of a different number of carriages 11, 12, in particular also from a single car, which then combines both the functionalities of the locomotive 11, as well as the functionalities of the trailer 12 in itself.
- the trailer 12 may include one or more fixed or movable working devices 12 '.
- a crane is represented with a load hook, whereby Of course, many other devices can be used here.
- the rail vehicle 10 according to the invention may, in particular, be a track construction train, although certainly also other types of rail vehicles may be considered.
- the rail vehicle 10 may move on the track 30.
- the rail vehicle 10 in FIG. 1 includes an optical warning device (rotating light) 13 and an acoustic warning device 14 (bell).
- an optical warning device rotating light
- an acoustic warning device 14 bell
- the rail vehicle 10 has a receiving device 15, which in FIG. 1 is shown as an antenna.
- This receiving device 15 receives the warning signals emitted by an alarm center 40 via a warning signal communication channel 41.
- the emitted warning signals can be transmitted via analog or digital radio, with several different transmission variants (modulations, codes, etc.) are conceivable.
- the received warning signals are then evaluated by an evaluation unit (not shown) of the rail vehicle 10 and the warning devices 13, 14 actuated accordingly.
- the position of the rail vehicle 10 plays a decisive role. So it makes no sense to take warning signals and warning means 13, 14 to operate when the warning refer to another site area. Therefore, the position information is an essential element in the evaluation of the received warning signals.
- the position information is transmitted to the rail vehicle 10 via the so-called seed wrenches 21 ', 21 ".
- seed keys 21', 21" are attached to the so-called warning sector limit panels 20 ', 20 ", with special shots for this purpose 22 ', 22 "can be provided.
- the corresponding Impfierel 21' Upon entry of the rail vehicle 10 in the warning sector, which is bounded by the two boundary plates 20 'and 20 ", the corresponding Impf Whateverl 21' must be removed by a track construction worker from the border panel 20 'and plugged into the appropriate insertion opening 16 on the rail vehicle 10.
- the socket 21 ' the position information is stored, due to which the evaluation of the received warning signals can then be carried out correctly.
- the vaccination key 21' After leaving the warning sector, which is located between the warning area boundary panels 20 'and 20 ", the vaccination key 21' must again be removed from the plug-in opening 16 on the rail vehicle 10 and brought back into the receptacle 22 'at the boundary panel 20' new vaccination key (corresponding to the new position) taken back from his board and placed in the plug-in opening 16 so that the evaluation of the received signals can run smoothly.
- the position determination and thus also the corresponding determination and the setting of warning parameters in rail vehicles 10 are carried out automatically, so that in particular the activation of the warning devices 13, 14 can be automated.
- FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a system which can be used to carry out the inventive method.
- a rail vehicle 10 is shown, but this time for simplicity consisting of a single car.
- this is not to be construed restrictive, because the invention relates unchanged to rail vehicles 10 with a different number of cars.
- a plurality of transmitting devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 are shown.
- the number of transmitting devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 is of course not interpreted as limiting, and may be smaller or larger as needed.
- At least one of the transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 transmits the identifier information assigned to it.
- This information may comprise various data, for example an ID number, which is uniquely associated with a particular transmitter B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 .
- position information (for example coordinate point data or the like) can also be transmitted by the transmitting devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 .
- a person skilled in the art will easily conclude further possibilities which can also be used by the transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 as identification information.
- each of the transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 can advantageously use its own communication channel 50 m-1 , 50 m , 50 m + 1 .
- These different communication channels may differ from each other for example by the transmission frequency, coding or another size.
- the different transmitting devices B m-1, B m, B m + 1 one or more communication channels 50 m-1, 50 m, 50 m + share.
- the transmitting devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 are also arranged so that they are located at the boundaries of the warning areas or sectors S n-1 , S n , S n + 1 .
- the transmitting devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 can also be integrated into the above-described warning range limit panels 20 ', 20 ", but clearly other solutions are possible, but which do not deviate from the basic idea of this invention.
- the identification information transmitted by the individual transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 is received by a receiving device 15 assigned to the rail vehicle 10.
- the receiving device 15 can in particular be the same receiving device as that which is used as described above for receiving the warning signals emitted by the alarm center. Of course, it can be a completely different and separate device. Here, for simplicity, a single receiving device 15 is shown, which, however, combines the two functionalities.
- the evaluation device 60 After receiving the identification information from one or more transmitting devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 they are transmitted from the receiving device 15 to an evaluation device 60 of the rail vehicle 10.
- the construction of the evaluation device 60 of the rail vehicle 10 will be described below with reference to FIG FIG. 3 described in more detail.
- the evaluation device 60 determines the relative position of the rail vehicle 10, ie the warning sector S n-1 , S n , S n + 1 , in which the rail vehicle 10 is currently located. Due to this specific relative position of the rail vehicle 10, the warning parameters associated with this relative position of the rail vehicle 10 are then adjusted by an adjustment module of the evaluation unit 60 determined and set to activate the warning device 13, 14.
- this determination runs, for example, so that it is determined by the evaluation device 60 based on the received identification information that the rail vehicle 10 is in the warning sector S n-1 .
- the warning parameters for the warning sector S n-1 ie the frequency of the warning signals, the duration of the warning, etc.
- the number and type of warning parameters depend essentially on the type of transmission of the warning signals, or on the operation of the external alarm center 40 from. However, it will be immediately apparent to one skilled in the art how to determine and adjust these warning parameters in each specific case.
- any type of wireless radio technology can be used for this purpose.
- Some examples of such transmission technologies include NFC, Bluetooth, RFID or even ZigBee.
- other transmission technologies are conceivable, such as the ultrasound, infrared or magnetic field transmission.
- a person skilled in the art will also be able to understand immediately in this case that the choice of a particular transmission technology can not call the basic idea of the invention into question.
- the identification information they can be transmitted uninterruptedly by the transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1, for example.
- the rail vehicle 10 could receive and evaluate this identification information in this case immediately after entering the corresponding warning sector S n-1 , S n , S n + 1 .
- the identification information may be sent by the individual transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 only periodically. In this case, the reception can not be done immediately, but the radiation levels at the site can be significantly reduced.
- an asymmetric transmission pattern can be used by the individual transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 send out their identification information with some time delay. So on the one hand, the frequency spectrum can be much better utilized, and on the other hand, the time information can also improve Positioning quality can be used.
- an activation device associated with the rail vehicle 10 (again shown here for simplicity by the receiving device 15) can be provided, which can send transmission requests to one or more transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 as required. It may then be provided that the identification information associated with the transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 is transmitted only after the reception of such a transmission request. In this way, additionally the power consumption of the transmitting devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 can be reduced.
- reference numeral 61 refers to a database.
- the database 61 may store data for determining the relative position of the rail vehicle 10 and / or the data for determining the warning parameters.
- these data can also contain a list of the identification information associated with each transmission device B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 and / or the warning parameter associated with each warning sector S n-1 , S n , S n + 1 .
- the determination and setting of the warning parameters is such that the received identification information is compared with the identification information stored in the database 61. If there is a match, the corresponding relative position (ie the warning sector) is determined, and then the corresponding warning parameters are read from the database 61 and set.
- identification information of at least two or three different transmission devices B m-1 , B m , B m + 1 must always be received and evaluated.
- geographical maps or similar information can be stored, based on which the plausibility analysis can be performed. It is also conceivable to carry out the motion analysis in order to exploit the fact that rail vehicles 10 are rail-bound (for example, a rail vehicle 10 can not skip warning sectors).
- other devices can be used to optimize the relative position determination.
- the reference number refers 62 to a tachometer, and reference numeral 63 to a hodometer. By means of these instruments further data (eg speed of the rail vehicle 10, or the distance traveled by it) can be detected, based on which the relative position of the rail vehicle 10 can be used in addition to the received identification information.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
Priority Applications (5)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP08101186A EP2085287B1 (fr) | 2008-01-31 | 2008-01-31 | Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant |
DE502008002802T DE502008002802D1 (de) | 2008-01-31 | 2008-01-31 | Verfahren zur automatisierten Bestimmung und Einstellung von Warnparametern bei Schienenfahrzeugen und entsprechendes System |
AT08101186T ATE501013T1 (de) | 2008-01-31 | 2008-01-31 | Verfahren zur automatisierten bestimmung und einstellung von warnparametern bei schienenfahrzeugen und entsprechendes system |
EP09151889A EP2085286B1 (fr) | 2008-01-31 | 2009-02-02 | Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant |
AT09151889T ATE530409T1 (de) | 2008-01-31 | 2009-02-02 | Verfahren zur automatisierten bestimmung und einstellung von warnparametern bei schienenfahrzeugen und entsprechendes system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
EP08101186A EP2085287B1 (fr) | 2008-01-31 | 2008-01-31 | Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2085287A1 true EP2085287A1 (fr) | 2009-08-05 |
EP2085287B1 EP2085287B1 (fr) | 2011-03-09 |
Family
ID=39496136
Family Applications (2)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP08101186A Not-in-force EP2085287B1 (fr) | 2008-01-31 | 2008-01-31 | Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant |
EP09151889A Active EP2085286B1 (fr) | 2008-01-31 | 2009-02-02 | Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant |
Family Applications After (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP09151889A Active EP2085286B1 (fr) | 2008-01-31 | 2009-02-02 | Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (2) | EP2085287B1 (fr) |
AT (2) | ATE501013T1 (fr) |
DE (1) | DE502008002802D1 (fr) |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011076516A1 (fr) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Procédé et dispositif pour sécuriser la trajectoire de circulation de véhicules se déplaçant sur une voie |
WO2014033001A3 (fr) * | 2012-08-28 | 2015-01-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Commande sur site d'un élément de voies ferrées |
US9131349B2 (en) | 2011-10-21 | 2015-09-08 | Hanning & Kahl Gmbh & Co. Kg | Apparatus for transmitting location based messages from vehicles to stationary infrastructure |
EP3406504A1 (fr) * | 2017-05-12 | 2018-11-28 | Zöllner Signal GmbH | Système d'avertissement pour un chantier de travaux et procédé de fonctionnement d'un chantier de travaux |
Families Citing this family (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102008060188A1 (de) * | 2008-11-28 | 2010-06-10 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Abstandsmessung |
FR2967961B1 (fr) * | 2010-11-29 | 2014-04-18 | Europ De Travaux Ferroviaires Etf | Procede de securisation de la circulation d'un train ou engin sur une voie ferree. |
DE102014218671A1 (de) | 2014-09-17 | 2016-03-17 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und System zur Überwachung eines Schienenverkehrs |
BE1022851B1 (fr) * | 2015-03-20 | 2016-09-22 | Ertms Solutions | Vérification de l’état de fonctionnement d’une balise |
DE102015205175A1 (de) * | 2015-03-23 | 2016-09-29 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur fahrzeugseitigen Positionsdatenerfassung bei einem Schienenfahrzeug |
DE102017110418B4 (de) * | 2017-05-12 | 2022-03-03 | Zöllner Signal GmbH | Warnsystem für eine Gleisbaustelle mit die Gleisbaustelle in Warnbereiche unterteilenden Grenzmarkierungen |
DE102017219643A1 (de) * | 2017-11-06 | 2019-05-09 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Schienenfahrzeugortung |
AT17200U1 (de) | 2019-12-16 | 2021-09-15 | Plasser & Theurer Export Von Bahnbaumaschinen Gmbh | Stellwerkgebundenes Rottenwarnsystem |
DE102022206510A1 (de) | 2022-06-28 | 2023-12-28 | Siemens Mobility GmbH | Eisenbahnkomponente und Verfahren zum Ermitteln einer ein Schienenfahrzeug betreffenden, ortsbezogenen Information |
Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050010338A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2005-01-13 | Kraeling Mark Bradshaw | Method and system for controlling locomotives |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB2146864B (en) * | 1983-09-14 | 1987-06-17 | David James Reginald Martin | Vehicle location system |
FR2714239B1 (fr) * | 1993-12-16 | 1996-01-19 | Cgti | Procédé et système de localisation. |
DE10147462A1 (de) * | 2001-09-20 | 2003-04-17 | Bombardier Transp Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ortung von Fahrzeugen |
GB0328202D0 (en) * | 2003-12-05 | 2004-01-07 | Westinghouse Brake & Signal | Railway vehicle detection |
-
2008
- 2008-01-31 EP EP08101186A patent/EP2085287B1/fr not_active Not-in-force
- 2008-01-31 AT AT08101186T patent/ATE501013T1/de active
- 2008-01-31 DE DE502008002802T patent/DE502008002802D1/de active Active
-
2009
- 2009-02-02 AT AT09151889T patent/ATE530409T1/de active
- 2009-02-02 EP EP09151889A patent/EP2085286B1/fr active Active
Patent Citations (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US20050010338A1 (en) | 2003-05-22 | 2005-01-13 | Kraeling Mark Bradshaw | Method and system for controlling locomotives |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
"ETCS - System Requirements Specification (SRS) - Chapter 2 General Description", UIC/ETCS SPECIFICATION, XX, XX, 9 August 1996 (1996-08-09), pages 1 - 3, XP002276769 * |
Cited By (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2011076516A1 (fr) * | 2009-12-21 | 2011-06-30 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Procédé et dispositif pour sécuriser la trajectoire de circulation de véhicules se déplaçant sur une voie |
US9131349B2 (en) | 2011-10-21 | 2015-09-08 | Hanning & Kahl Gmbh & Co. Kg | Apparatus for transmitting location based messages from vehicles to stationary infrastructure |
WO2014033001A3 (fr) * | 2012-08-28 | 2015-01-15 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Commande sur site d'un élément de voies ferrées |
US9434396B2 (en) | 2012-08-28 | 2016-09-06 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Local operation of a component of a railway track system |
EP3406504A1 (fr) * | 2017-05-12 | 2018-11-28 | Zöllner Signal GmbH | Système d'avertissement pour un chantier de travaux et procédé de fonctionnement d'un chantier de travaux |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP2085287B1 (fr) | 2011-03-09 |
EP2085286A3 (fr) | 2010-01-13 |
ATE530409T1 (de) | 2011-11-15 |
EP2085286A2 (fr) | 2009-08-05 |
ATE501013T1 (de) | 2011-03-15 |
DE502008002802D1 (de) | 2011-04-21 |
EP2085286B1 (fr) | 2011-10-26 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP2085287B1 (fr) | Procédé de détermination automatisée et réglage de paramètres d'alerte dans des véhicules sur rails et système correspondant | |
EP2250065B1 (fr) | Procédé de sécurisation de véhicules sur rails par des techniques de signalisation et système de sécurisation de ces véhicules | |
DE69009551T2 (de) | System zur Steuerung des Verlaufs von mehreren Eisenbahnzügen auf einem Netz. | |
DE19509696C2 (de) | Verfahren zur gegenseitigen Kontaktaufnahme zwischen Zügen und Einrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
EP2531391B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de contrôle de l'intégrité d'un train | |
DE102012107918A1 (de) | Schienenfahrzeug-Ortungssystem und Schienenfahrzeug mit einem solchen Ortungssystem | |
WO2011076512A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'intégralité d'un train se déplaçant sur une voie | |
DE69509398T2 (de) | Ein verkehrssteuerungssystem, dessen verwendung und ein bewegungssteuerungsverfahren einer mobilen einheit | |
DE4406720C2 (de) | Zugsicherungssystem | |
EP3608201A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de simulation d'un trajet d'un véhicule moteur | |
EP2870047B1 (fr) | Fonctionnement d'un véhicule ferroviaire | |
EP3795451B1 (fr) | Procédé de localisation d'un véhicule dans une station destinée à un arrêt du véhicule | |
AT413809B (de) | Weichensteuerung | |
EP3406504B1 (fr) | Système d'avertissement pour un chantier de travaux et procédé de fonctionnement d'un chantier de travaux | |
DE102006029845B4 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Absicherung von Streckenabschnitten eines segmentierten Fahrweges für einen schienengebundenen Fahrzeugverband | |
EP3294609B1 (fr) | Dispositif technique ferroviaire côté voie et procédé de détection d'une utilisation d'au moins un composant côté voie d'un système ferroviaire | |
EP2794382B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif permettant de détecter des données de projection d'un dispositif de détection pour surveiller et/ou réguler le trafic ferroviaire | |
DE102014218527A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Erzeugen einer Geschwindigkeitsempfehlung für ein Schienenfahrzeug | |
DE10063979C1 (de) | Zugbeeinflussungseinrichtung | |
EP2674345B1 (fr) | Dispositif de détection d'états sur des tronçons de voie ferrée | |
DE102020206005A1 (de) | Fahrbetriebsanordnung und Verfahren zum Steuern eines Schienenfahrzeugs | |
DE102010047580A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Ermittlung einer Information | |
DE102006061811A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Orten eines Fahrzeugs | |
EP2124358B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procédé de transmission de données sans fil sous forme de points | |
DE102007041718B4 (de) | Anordnung und Verfahren zur Absicherung von Arbeitsstellen im Gleisbereich |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA MK RS |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20100203 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20100301 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SCHWEIZER ELECTRONIC AG |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502008002802 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20110421 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502008002802 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110421 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: BOVARD AG |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20110309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110610 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110620 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110609 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20110309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110609 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110711 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110709 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20111212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502008002802 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20111212 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: SCHWEIZER ELECTRONIC A.G. Effective date: 20120131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110309 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080131 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20150121 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20150113 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20150121 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20150122 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20150122 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502008002802 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 501013 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20160131 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160131 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20160930 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160131 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160802 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160131 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160131 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160201 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160131 |