EP2055140B1 - Method of adjusting a hearing instrument - Google Patents
Method of adjusting a hearing instrument Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2055140B1 EP2055140B1 EP06792685A EP06792685A EP2055140B1 EP 2055140 B1 EP2055140 B1 EP 2055140B1 EP 06792685 A EP06792685 A EP 06792685A EP 06792685 A EP06792685 A EP 06792685A EP 2055140 B1 EP2055140 B1 EP 2055140B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- microphones
- microphone
- hearing instrument
- stability
- better
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/43—Electronic input selection or mixing based on input signal analysis, e.g. mixing or selection between microphone and telecoil or between microphones with different directivity characteristics
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/45—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
- H04R25/453—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback electronically
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/45—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback
- H04R25/456—Prevention of acoustic reaction, i.e. acoustic oscillatory feedback mechanically
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets, i.e. electro-acoustic or electro-mechanical hearing aids; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/40—Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic
- H04R25/405—Arrangements for obtaining a desired directivity characteristic by combining a plurality of transducers
Definitions
- This invention relates generally to a method of adjusting a hearing instrument.
- Hearing instruments such as hearing devices or hearing aids, are often equipped with a multi-microphone system in order to provide directional information of the sound.
- two microphones are located at the hearing instrument in a predefined distance from each other.
- ITE in-the-ear
- CIC completely-in-the-canal
- the feedback stability and maximum stable gain are depending on the actual microphone location in relation to the venting of the hearing instrument housing, the pinna or other environmental influences caused by the physics of the user of the hearing instrument. Therefore, even if the distance between two technically identical microphones is very small, the feedback stability and maximum stable gain are different for those two microphones.
- EP 1 221 276 a method for adapting a hearing device and a hearing device with two microphones for directional-use is described.
- the use of a switching unit to switch the connecting outputs of the microphones to the digital signal processing unit is proposed.
- the forward and backward location of the microphones within the hearing device in relation to the front of the head of the user may be adapted and thus the hearing device may be used either for the left or the right ear of the user, providing correct directional information.
- this document teaches a predefined operational connection of multiple microphones to a digital signal processing unit.
- EP 1 309 225 a method for determining the feedback threshold of a microphone in a given location or position respectively within a hearing device and therefore the determination of the maximum gain for this microphone in a given acoustical setup is provided.
- This method may be used for limiting the maximum gain for a specific microphone or to determine the value of the maximum gain for a specific microphone for providing feedback stability of the hearing instrument concerned.
- the present invention provides a method of adjusting a hearing instrument, the hearing instrument comprising at least two microphones and an amplifying processing unit, the method comprising the steps of:
- the microphone determined to have the better feedback stability will be used, i.e. will be operationally connected to the amplifier or amplifying processing unit of the hearing instrument. Thus, a better performance rather than switching to a predetermined microphone will be achieved.
- the method further comprises the steps of:
- This embodiment takes into account the acoustical stability of each of the microphones in order to optimally combine the microphones to achieve an optimal omni-directional performance if desired by the user of the hearing instrument.
- the known current solutions only propose the selection of one predetermined specific microphone, i.e. the microphone in the forward position of the shell of the hearing instrument, not taking into account the specific, individual acoustical stability of the microphones of a specific hearing instrument.
- the determination of the proportion and phase of the signals of the microphones will be made as a function of frequency and the proportion and phase of the signals of the microphone will be set and modified accordingly. This takes into account that the microphones may have different acoustic performance for different frequencies. To provide excellent omni-directional performance, both microphones will remain active, but the proportion and phase of the signals of the different microphones will be used dependent of the actual frequencies of the sound.
- the microphone location effect is estimated by taking into account the different contributions of reflected sound by the pinna.
- the "microphone location effect” describes the amplification from free field sound to the microphone e.g. by reflections on the pinna. This effect may be measured directly for a certain range of frequencies for a specific hearing instrument inserted within the ear of the individual user of this hearing instrument. This may be performed either during the fitting process based on the real situation or based on stored geometrical data of the microphone location and the geometry of the pinna and the ear canal of the user retrieved during a customized shell molding process. This step is especially useful for hearing instruments of the type of ITE and CIC.
- the feedback stability for each of the microphones is estimated by performing measurement on the ear of an individual user during the fitting process. Such a process is known and described for instance in EP 1 309 225 .
- the feedback stability for the microphones is estimated based on geometrical data of the location of the microphone and vent of the hearing instrument.
- the feedback stability will be calculated based on stored geometrical data of the hearing instrument and the geometry of the ear canal that may be recorded and stored during the molding process of the shell of a hearing instrument to be inserted into the ear canal.
- the best microphone is determined and its location is selected as the only microphone to be used in an omni-directional mode.
- the omni-directional mode only one of the at least two microphones of the hearing instrument will be operationally connected to the amplifier or amplifying processing unit of the hearing instrument. This only one microphone is not a predefined microphone but the microphone with the better acoustic performance.
- the best microphone is determined by weighting maximum stable overall amplifications as a function of frequency and selecting the most stable amplification.
- the maximum stable overall amplification is calculated as a function of frequency by adding the above described "microphone location effect" and the feedback threshold.
- the feedback threshold describes the maximum stable amplification of the hearing instrument from the microphone to the eardrum of the individual user of the hearing instrument.
- the weighting is done by a predefined rule that is independent of individual hearing loss.
- the rule only takes into account the data retrieved by the hearing instrument itself and its position and influence by the geometry of the ear canal and the pinna.
- the weighting is done by a predefined rule that is dependent of individual hearing loss.
- the individual hearing loss of the user will be taken into account by the rule. This might be done for instance by estimating the feedback stability only for a specific range or multiple ranges of frequencies specified by he individual hearing loss of the user of the hearing instrument.
- the selection of the better microphone position is done by switching the operative connection of the microphones to the previously determined better microphone, i.e. the microphone with the higher maximum stable overall amplification. This switching may be performed by using a switching unit within the hearing device to automatically connect only the better microphone to the amplifier or to the signal processing unit and/or to disconnect the other microphones respectively.
- the inventive method above will be applied to a hearing instrument that is at least partially insertable into an ear canal.
- Fig. 1 schematically shows a partial cross-section of the external ear with a hearing instrument partially inserted into the ear canal.
- FIG 1 the schematic drawing of an ITE hearing aid 1 at least partially inserted into the ear canal 2 is shown.
- the hearing aid comprises two microphones 3 and 4, located on the front side of the shell of the hearing aid 1. Both microphones 3 and 4 are connected to an amplifying processing unit 5, arranged within the shell of the hearing aid 1.
- This amplifying processing unit 5 drives a receiver 6 which is acoustically coupled to the ear canal 2 via a conduct 7.
- the hearing aid 1 further comprises a venting canal 8 that connects the ear canal 2 with the environment.
- the better of the two microphones 3 and 4 remains connected to the amplifying processing unit 5 and the other microphone will be disconnected from the amplifying processing unit 5.
- This switching is performed i.e. by using a switching unit as described in EP 1 221 276 .
- both microphones 3 and 4 remain connected to the amplifying processing unit 5.
- the amplifying processing unit 5 will set only one of those microphones active for determined ranges of frequencies, i.e. by applying respectively set filters. As an example it thus may be the case that the first microphone 3 is activated for low frequencies and the second microphone 4 is activated for high frequencies, providing an even better acoustic performance than using only one microphone for the whole range of frequencies.
- the present solution advantageously takes the acoustical stability into account when combining the two microphones or selecting one of the two microphones for omni-directional use. Therefore the better microphone will be selected and thus a higher stable gain and less feedback related problems will be achieved for hearing devices with at least two microphones for the omni-directional mode.
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Neurosurgery (AREA)
- Otolaryngology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Circuit For Audible Band Transducer (AREA)
- Fittings On The Vehicle Exterior For Carrying Loads, And Devices For Holding Or Mounting Articles (AREA)
- Electrophonic Musical Instruments (AREA)
- Measuring Pulse, Heart Rate, Blood Pressure Or Blood Flow (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- This invention relates generally to a method of adjusting a hearing instrument.
- Hearing instruments, such as hearing devices or hearing aids, are often equipped with a multi-microphone system in order to provide directional information of the sound.
- In such a directional mode of the hearing instrument, usually two microphones are located at the hearing instrument in a predefined distance from each other.
- Especially for hearing devices of the type of in-the-ear (ITE) or completely-in-the-canal (CIC), there is only little space available for arranging the microphones. Even though, the two microphones, usually two electrically identical microphones, have a different acoustical behavior.
- Especially the feedback stability and maximum stable gain are depending on the actual microphone location in relation to the venting of the hearing instrument housing, the pinna or other environmental influences caused by the physics of the user of the hearing instrument. Therefore, even if the distance between two technically identical microphones is very small, the feedback stability and maximum stable gain are different for those two microphones.
- In
EP 1 221 276 - Thus, this document teaches a predefined operational connection of multiple microphones to a digital signal processing unit.
- In
EP 1 309 225 - This method may be used for limiting the maximum gain for a specific microphone or to determine the value of the maximum gain for a specific microphone for providing feedback stability of the hearing instrument concerned.
- It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of adjusting a hearing instrument with at least two microphones for the omni-directional mode.
- The present invention provides a method of adjusting a hearing instrument, the hearing instrument comprising at least two microphones and an amplifying processing unit, the method comprising the steps of:
- estimating the microphone location effect for each of the microphones;
- estimating the feedback stability for each of the microphones;
- determining the microphone with the better feedback stability to be used in an omni-directional mode.
- For using the hearing instrument in an omni-directional mode, only the microphone determined to have the better feedback stability will be used, i.e. will be operationally connected to the amplifier or amplifying processing unit of the hearing instrument. Thus, a better performance rather than switching to a predetermined microphone will be achieved.
- In a further embodiment of the present invention, the method further comprises the steps of:
- determining the proportion and phase of the signals of the at leat two microphones to be used in an omnidirectional mode; and
- setting the proportion and phase of the signals of the microphones.
- This embodiment takes into account the acoustical stability of each of the microphones in order to optimally combine the microphones to achieve an optimal omni-directional performance if desired by the user of the hearing instrument. The known current solutions only propose the selection of one predetermined specific microphone, i.e. the microphone in the forward position of the shell of the hearing instrument, not taking into account the specific, individual acoustical stability of the microphones of a specific hearing instrument.
- In a further embodiment, the determination of the proportion and phase of the signals of the microphones will be made as a function of frequency and the proportion and phase of the signals of the microphone will be set and modified accordingly. This takes into account that the microphones may have different acoustic performance for different frequencies. To provide excellent omni-directional performance, both microphones will remain active, but the proportion and phase of the signals of the different microphones will be used dependent of the actual frequencies of the sound.
- In a further embodiment, the microphone location effect is estimated by taking into account the different contributions of reflected sound by the pinna. The "microphone location effect" describes the amplification from free field sound to the microphone e.g. by reflections on the pinna. This effect may be measured directly for a certain range of frequencies for a specific hearing instrument inserted within the ear of the individual user of this hearing instrument. This may be performed either during the fitting process based on the real situation or based on stored geometrical data of the microphone location and the geometry of the pinna and the ear canal of the user retrieved during a customized shell molding process. This step is especially useful for hearing instruments of the type of ITE and CIC.
- In a further embodiment, the feedback stability for each of the microphones is estimated by performing measurement on the ear of an individual user during the fitting process. Such a process is known and described for instance in
EP 1 309 225 - In a further embodiment, the feedback stability for the microphones is estimated based on geometrical data of the location of the microphone and vent of the hearing instrument. Thus, the feedback stability will be calculated based on stored geometrical data of the hearing instrument and the geometry of the ear canal that may be recorded and stored during the molding process of the shell of a hearing instrument to be inserted into the ear canal.
- In a further embodiment, the best microphone is determined and its location is selected as the only microphone to be used in an omni-directional mode. For the omni-directional mode, only one of the at least two microphones of the hearing instrument will be operationally connected to the amplifier or amplifying processing unit of the hearing instrument. This only one microphone is not a predefined microphone but the microphone with the better acoustic performance.
- In a further embodiment, the best microphone is determined by weighting maximum stable overall amplifications as a function of frequency and selecting the most stable amplification. The maximum stable overall amplification is calculated as a function of frequency by adding the above described "microphone location effect" and the feedback threshold. The feedback threshold describes the maximum stable amplification of the hearing instrument from the microphone to the eardrum of the individual user of the hearing instrument.
- In a further embodiment, the weighting is done by a predefined rule that is independent of individual hearing loss. Thus, the rule only takes into account the data retrieved by the hearing instrument itself and its position and influence by the geometry of the ear canal and the pinna.
- In a further embodiment, the weighting is done by a predefined rule that is dependent of individual hearing loss. In addition to the data retrieved from the hearing instrument in its position within the ear of the user, the individual hearing loss of the user will be taken into account by the rule. This might be done for instance by estimating the feedback stability only for a specific range or multiple ranges of frequencies specified by he individual hearing loss of the user of the hearing instrument.
- In a further embodiment, the selection of the better microphone position is done by switching the operative connection of the microphones to the previously determined better microphone, i.e. the microphone with the higher maximum stable overall amplification. This switching may be performed by using a switching unit within the hearing device to automatically connect only the better microphone to the amplifier or to the signal processing unit and/or to disconnect the other microphones respectively.
- In a further embodiment of the present invention, the inventive method above will be applied to a hearing instrument that is at least partially insertable into an ear canal.
- For purpose of facilitating and understanding of the invention, a preferred embodiment thereof is illustrated in the accompanying drawing to be considered in connection with the following description. Thus the invention may be readily understood and appreciated.
-
Fig. 1 schematically shows a partial cross-section of the external ear with a hearing instrument partially inserted into the ear canal. - Referring to
figure 1 , the schematic drawing of anITE hearing aid 1 at least partially inserted into theear canal 2 is shown. The hearing aid comprises twomicrophones 3 and 4, located on the front side of the shell of thehearing aid 1. Bothmicrophones 3 and 4 are connected to an amplifyingprocessing unit 5, arranged within the shell of thehearing aid 1. This amplifyingprocessing unit 5 drives areceiver 6 which is acoustically coupled to theear canal 2 via aconduct 7. - The
hearing aid 1 further comprises aventing canal 8 that connects theear canal 2 with the environment. - The influence of the
pinna 9, surrounding the front side of the shell of thehearing aid 1, to themicrophones 3 and 4 are shown by arrows symbolizing the path of the environmental sound S. This sound will arrive at the microphones both directly as well as reflected by thepinna 9. - If the user of the
hearing aid 1 wants to switch from the regular directional use to the omni-directional use, in one embodiment, the better of the twomicrophones 3 and 4 remains connected to the amplifyingprocessing unit 5 and the other microphone will be disconnected from the amplifyingprocessing unit 5. - This switching is performed i.e. by using a switching unit as described in
EP 1 221 276 - In another embodiment of the present invention, both
microphones 3 and 4 remain connected to the amplifyingprocessing unit 5. The amplifyingprocessing unit 5 will set only one of those microphones active for determined ranges of frequencies, i.e. by applying respectively set filters. As an example it thus may be the case that thefirst microphone 3 is activated for low frequencies and the second microphone 4 is activated for high frequencies, providing an even better acoustic performance than using only one microphone for the whole range of frequencies. - The present solution advantageously takes the acoustical stability into account when combining the two microphones or selecting one of the two microphones for omni-directional use. Therefore the better microphone will be selected and thus a higher stable gain and less feedback related problems will be achieved for hearing devices with at least two microphones for the omni-directional mode.
Claims (9)
- Method of adjusting a hearing instrument (1), the hearing instrument (1) comprising at least two microphones (3;4) and an amplifying processing unit (5), the method characterized in comprising the steps of:- estimating the microphone location effect describing the amplification from free field sound to the microphone for each of the microphones (3;4);- estimating the feedback stability for each of the microphones (3;4);- determining the microphone (3; 4) with the better feedback stability to be used in an omni-directional mode.
- The method of claim 1, comprising further the steps of:- determining the proportion and phase of the signals of the at least two microphones (3;4) to be used in an omni-directional mode; and- setting the proportion and phase of the signals of the microphones (3;4).
- The method of claim 2, wherein the determination of the proportion and phase of the signals of the at least two microphones (3;4) will be made as a function of frequency and the proportion and phase of the signals of the microphone will be set and modified accordingly.
- The method of claim 1, wherein the microphone location effect describing the amplification from free field sound to the microphoneis estimated by taking into account the different contributions of reflected sound by the pinna (9).
- The method of claim 1, wherein the feedback stability for the microphones (3;4) is estimated by performing measurements on the ear of an individual user during the fitting process of the hearing instrument (1).
- The method of claim 1, wherein the feedback stability for the microphones (3;4) is estimated based on geometrical data of the location of the microphones (3;4) and vent (8) of the hearing instrument (1).
- The method of claim 1, wherein the microphone with the better feedback stability (3;4) is determined and is selected as the only microphone (3;4) to be used in an omni-directional mode,
wherein the microphone with the better feedback stability (3;4) is determined by weighting maximum stable overall amplifications as a function of frequency and selecting the most stable amplification. - The method of claim 7, wherein the selection of the microphone with the better feeback stability is done by switching the operative connection of the microphones (3,4) with the amplifying processing unit (5) to the previously determined microphone with the better feeback stability (3;4).
- Applying the method of any of claims 1 to 8 to a hearing instrument that is at least partially insertable into an ear canal.
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2006/065051 WO2006136615A2 (en) | 2006-08-03 | 2006-08-03 | Method of adjusting a hearing instrument |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP2055140A2 EP2055140A2 (en) | 2009-05-06 |
EP2055140B1 true EP2055140B1 (en) | 2010-11-03 |
Family
ID=37570796
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06792685A Not-in-force EP2055140B1 (en) | 2006-08-03 | 2006-08-03 | Method of adjusting a hearing instrument |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP2055140B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE487338T1 (en) |
DE (1) | DE602006018080D1 (en) |
DK (1) | DK2055140T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2006136615A2 (en) |
Families Citing this family (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP2189006B1 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2011-06-29 | Phonak AG | Method for determining of feedback threshold in a hearing device |
US20110026746A1 (en) * | 2007-09-20 | 2011-02-03 | Phonak Ag | Method for determining of feedback threshold in a hearing device and a hearing device |
DK2088802T3 (en) | 2008-02-07 | 2013-10-14 | Oticon As | Method for estimating the weighting function of audio signals in a hearing aid |
EP2268063A1 (en) * | 2009-06-26 | 2010-12-29 | Siemens Medical Instruments Pte. Ltd. | System and method for customizing a hearing aid device |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5757933A (en) * | 1996-12-11 | 1998-05-26 | Micro Ear Technology, Inc. | In-the-ear hearing aid with directional microphone system |
CN1398501A (en) * | 1999-10-14 | 2003-02-19 | 福纳克有限公司 | Method for adapting hearing device and hearing device |
DK1309225T3 (en) * | 2002-10-02 | 2014-05-26 | Phonak Ag | Method for determining the feedback threshold in a hearing aid |
-
2006
- 2006-08-03 AT AT06792685T patent/ATE487338T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2006-08-03 DE DE602006018080T patent/DE602006018080D1/de active Active
- 2006-08-03 DK DK06792685.7T patent/DK2055140T3/en active
- 2006-08-03 EP EP06792685A patent/EP2055140B1/en not_active Not-in-force
- 2006-08-03 WO PCT/EP2006/065051 patent/WO2006136615A2/en active Application Filing
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DK2055140T3 (en) | 2011-02-21 |
DE602006018080D1 (en) | 2010-12-16 |
ATE487338T1 (en) | 2010-11-15 |
WO2006136615A2 (en) | 2006-12-28 |
WO2006136615A3 (en) | 2007-08-02 |
EP2055140A2 (en) | 2009-05-06 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US7826632B2 (en) | Method of adjusting a hearing instrument | |
US9749754B2 (en) | Hearing aids with adaptive beamformer responsive to off-axis speech | |
US9473858B2 (en) | Hearing device | |
US9807522B2 (en) | Hearing device adapted for estimating a current real ear to coupler difference | |
US8295519B2 (en) | Codebook based feedback path estimation | |
EP1981310B1 (en) | Hearing instrument with linearized output stage | |
US9226082B2 (en) | Hearing aid with means for estimating the ear plug fitting | |
US20160323676A1 (en) | Customization of adaptive directionality for hearing aids using a portable device | |
EP2375787B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for improved noise reduction for hearing assistance devices | |
US20180070185A1 (en) | Hearing device | |
US9843873B2 (en) | Hearing device | |
EP2055140B1 (en) | Method of adjusting a hearing instrument | |
US9301058B2 (en) | Method for selecting a preferred direction of a directional microphone and corresponding hearing device | |
US20100046775A1 (en) | Method for operating a hearing apparatus with directional effect and an associated hearing apparatus | |
US8811622B2 (en) | Dual setting method for a hearing system | |
CN110611870B (en) | Method for identifying receiver, hearing system and earphone | |
US8929576B2 (en) | Method for tuning a hearing device using a percentile analysis, and tuning device | |
US10979827B2 (en) | Method of estimating a feedback path of a hearing aid and a hearing aid | |
US8737656B2 (en) | Hearing device with feedback-reduction filters operated in parallel, and method | |
EP4005241A1 (en) | Ear-worn electronic device incorporating microphone fault reduction system and method | |
US8477971B2 (en) | Hearing device with supporting hook recognition | |
US20230080855A1 (en) | Method for operating a hearing device, and hearing device | |
US20230109140A1 (en) | Method for determining a head related transfer function and hearing device | |
CN117177160A (en) | Self-voice detection on hearing devices and binaural hearing device systems and methods therefor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20081202 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20090512 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: TROESCH SCHEIDEGGER WERNER AG Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602006018080 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20101216 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20101103 |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110303 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110203 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110303 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110204 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110214 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20110804 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602006018080 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110804 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110803 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110803 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20101103 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20140827 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20140825 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20150827 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20150817 Year of fee payment: 10 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20150831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150831 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150831 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20160803 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20170428 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160803 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160831 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R084 Ref document number: 602006018080 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20210827 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602006018080 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20230301 |