EP2032182A2 - Implant containing a source of oxygen - Google Patents

Implant containing a source of oxygen

Info

Publication number
EP2032182A2
EP2032182A2 EP07788720A EP07788720A EP2032182A2 EP 2032182 A2 EP2032182 A2 EP 2032182A2 EP 07788720 A EP07788720 A EP 07788720A EP 07788720 A EP07788720 A EP 07788720A EP 2032182 A2 EP2032182 A2 EP 2032182A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
oxygen
implant
source
bioactive
glass
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP07788720A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Inventor
Ilkka Kangasniemi
Timo Peltola
Jukka Salonen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
BonAlive Biomaterials Oy
Original Assignee
Vivoxid Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from EP06116209A external-priority patent/EP1872806A1/en
Application filed by Vivoxid Oy filed Critical Vivoxid Oy
Priority to EP07788720A priority Critical patent/EP2032182A2/en
Publication of EP2032182A2 publication Critical patent/EP2032182A2/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/40Composite materials, i.e. containing one material dispersed in a matrix of the same or different material
    • A61L27/44Composite materials, i.e. containing one material dispersed in a matrix of the same or different material having a macromolecular matrix
    • A61L27/446Composite materials, i.e. containing one material dispersed in a matrix of the same or different material having a macromolecular matrix with other specific inorganic fillers other than those covered by A61L27/443 or A61L27/46
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/02Inorganic materials
    • A61L27/10Ceramics or glasses
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L27/00Materials for grafts or prostheses or for coating grafts or prostheses
    • A61L27/50Materials characterised by their function or physical properties, e.g. injectable or lubricating compositions, shape-memory materials, surface modified materials
    • A61L27/54Biologically active materials, e.g. therapeutic substances
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03CCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C3/00Glass compositions
    • C03C3/04Glass compositions containing silica
    • C03C3/076Glass compositions containing silica with 40% to 90% silica, by weight
    • C03C3/097Glass compositions containing silica with 40% to 90% silica, by weight containing phosphorus, niobium or tantalum
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03CCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C4/00Compositions for glass with special properties
    • C03C4/0007Compositions for glass with special properties for biologically-compatible glass
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/40Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices characterised by a specific therapeutic activity or mode of action
    • A61L2300/404Biocides, antimicrobial agents, antiseptic agents
    • A61L2300/406Antibiotics
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/40Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices characterised by a specific therapeutic activity or mode of action
    • A61L2300/412Tissue-regenerating or healing or proliferative agents
    • A61L2300/414Growth factors
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61LMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L2300/00Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices
    • A61L2300/60Biologically active materials used in bandages, wound dressings, absorbent pads or medical devices characterised by a special physical form
    • A61L2300/602Type of release, e.g. controlled, sustained, slow
    • A61L2300/604Biodegradation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an implant useful in the prevention and/or treatment of infections and in promotion of tissue healing and/or regeneration.
  • the invention relates also to uses of the said implant and to methods of making it.
  • Oxygen is a known antibacterial agent. It can be made use of in wound dressings, as has been disclosed in e.g. WO 2004/091675 presenting an oxygen releasing bandage based on a complex between polyvinyl acetate and hydrogen peroxide.
  • Document WO 2004/075944 presents a medical device having a porous coating comprising hydrogen peroxide. The body of the medical device is made of a polymer and the porous coating is made of a polymer.
  • Bioactive glass is a known bioactive material. Unlike most other bioactive materials, it is easy to control the manufacturing properties of bioactive glass, the rate of its chemical reactions and the biological response caused by it by changing the chemical composition of bioactive glass itself. Bioactive glass has been used in different types of implants, such as bone fillers/substitutes, bone growth promoting materials, middle ear prostheses etc. Some compositions of bioactive glasses are known to have antimicrobial effects e.g. US 6,190,643 B1 and US 6,342,207.
  • Hydrogen peroxide has also been used in the literature to foam a slurry of glass particles that are then sintered. In this case, the hydrogen peroxide is however also not present in the final implant, neither is any calcium peroxide present in the final implant, as these compounds are destroyed during the sintering.
  • This use of hydrogen peroxide is described for example in Navarro et al, "New macroporous calcium phosphate glass ceramic for guided bone regeneration", Biomaterials, VoI 25, no. 18, pages 4233-4241 and Huipin et al, "Bone induction by porous glass ceramic made from Bioglass® (45S5), J. of Biomedical Materials Research, VoI 58, no. 3, pages 270-276.
  • the object of the invention is to minimise or even eliminate the problems existing in the prior art.
  • One object of the present invention is an implant useful in preventing and/or managing/eradicating microbial infections.
  • Another object of the present invention is to manufacture an implant useful in treating or replacing diseased tissue.
  • Another object of the present invention is to manufacture an implant useful in enhancing the healing or regeneration of tissue, compromised due to delayed access to oxygen physiologically provided by the forming capillary network.
  • Typical implant according to the present invention comprises a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof.
  • the implant according to the present invention is for use in the treatment and/or prevention of infections, such as infected dental root canals, infected chronic cutaneous wounds and ostitis, such as osteomyelitis.
  • infections such as infected dental root canals, infected chronic cutaneous wounds and ostitis, such as osteomyelitis.
  • the implant according to the present invention is typically also for use in traumatology, dentistry, otorhinolaryngology, orthopedics, surgery and internal medicine.
  • the implant according to the present invention is also for use in the promotion of tissue healing and/or regeneration.
  • composition according to the present invention comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof, is for use as a medicament or as a therapeutic device.
  • Typical use according to the invention of a composition comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof, is for the manufacture of an implant for treating and/or preventing infections, such as chronic infections.
  • One typical method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen comprises according to the invention the following steps:
  • Another typical method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species comprises according to the invention the following steps: - mixing granulous material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica or their mixture with a source of oxygen, and
  • Still another typical method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species comprises according to the invention the following steps: - mixing a source of oxygen to the matrix of a material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass or sol-gel produced silica during the preparation process, and
  • bioactive material a material that has been designed to elicit or modulate biological activity.
  • biodegradable in this context means that it is degradable upon prolonged implantation when inserted into mammalian body.
  • biomaterial is meant a material intended to interface with biological systems to evaluate, treat, augment or replace any tissue, organ or function of the body.
  • biocompatibility is meant the ability of a material used in a medical device to perform safely and adequately by causing an appropriate host response in a specific location.
  • resorption is meant reduction/disintegration of biomaterial because of cellular activity or simple dissolution.
  • composite is meant a material comprising at least two different constituents, for example an organic polymer and a ceramic material.
  • Implants in this context are meant to comprise any kind of implant used within the body, such as artificial organs and parts thereof, joint implants, internal/external fixation devices, devices used for reconstruction or replacement of bones and tissues, devices used for supporting and /or stimulation of tissue healing or regeneration, devices used for filling defects in bones and materials used as sealant or posts in the root canal of a tooth.
  • implant materials Depending on the application and purpose of the implant materials, they are expected and designed to be biocompatible and exhibit either longevity or controlled degradability in the body.
  • the optimal degradation rate is directly proportional to the renewal rate of the tissue. In the case of bone tissue, a considerable proportion of the implant is preferably degraded by 6 weeks in the tissue. In cases where physical support to the healing tissues is desirable the degradation rate might be several months or even several years. In some embodiments of the invention the degradation rate may even be nonexistent.
  • the invention can be made use of in medical devices such as canules, catheters and stents.
  • Infection in this context comprises various infections within the body of a mammal, for example human. Infections may occur inside the body, subcutaneously or on the surface of the body. Infection may also occur in a wound or in a corresponding defect or lesion.
  • a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species in this application relates to materials that are capable of releasing for example gaseous oxygen (O2) or ozone (O3), or hydroxyl ions, hydroxyl radicals or oxygen radicals. Such material can naturally also release oxygen in a mixture of these forms.
  • a source of oxygen is sometimes used for sake of shortness and clarity, while it is always meant a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species.
  • the present invention relates to an implant comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species.and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof.
  • the bioactive and/or biodegradable glass can be prepared either conventionally or by a sol-gel process. Conventionally prepared bioactive glass is produced by melting process.
  • a source of oxygen i.e. a chemical agent capable of releasing oxygen
  • the implant according to the present invention has an improved effect in treatment and/or prevention of infections.
  • the oxygen released from the implant effectively reduces, removes or even eliminates bacteria, especially anaerobic bacteria at the implantation site.
  • the implant is capable of producing Ca(OH) 2 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are detrimental for microbes. Simultaneously, these reactions achieve a raise in pH at the area surrounding the implant surface. This pH raise has an impact on the solubility of the material.
  • the amount of ions released from the material can be thus controlled and optimised. As these ions show also antimicrobial effects, a synergetic effect is obtained.
  • the implant according to the present invention improves the growth and regeneration of the tissues in which it is situated.
  • Oxygen released from the implant may produce marked increase in the amount of O 2 dissolved in tissue fluid, which is believed to promote cell and tissue growth at the implant surface and its immediate vicinity, thus adding to the known osteoconductive and osteopromotive as well as soft tissue growth promoting effect of bioactive material.
  • Dissolved oxygen promotes and/or advances the growth of the tissue cells near the implant, even if the capillary formation in the tissue would not be complete or totally effective near the implant.
  • the ions, which are released from the material enhance and stimulate the capillary formation.
  • the dissolved oxygen source raises the pH and changes the solubility of the implant, and thus also the positive effect of the ions to the capillary formation becomes evident.
  • the release of oxygen from the implant is preferably slow enough for not to irritate the cells and tissues in contact with the implant or to interfere with the normal inflammatory cell response, e.g. macrophages, at the implantation site.
  • the tissues typically remove about 4.6 ml O 2 from each 100 ml blood passing through them.
  • Different sources of oxygen release oxygen at different rates. The release rate depends, among other things, on the molecular stability of the source of oxygen, i.e. the chemical agent used, in a given biological environment. For example, calcium peroxide releases oxygen as a function of pH. As the pH drops, the calcium peroxide becomes more soluble and generates progressively higher ratios of molecular oxygen and reactive oxygen species (ROS).
  • ROS reactive oxygen species
  • the metabolic activity of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes is known to reduce the pH of the environment where they grow and proliferate.
  • the concentration of reactive oxygen species formed by the implant is thereby increased.
  • Reactive oxygen species are byproduct of normal cellular respiration and specifically synthesized by phagocyte cells like neutrophils and macrophages.
  • the implant may thus be considered as "intelligent" material: in the beginning when the number and/or metabolic activity of eukaryotes and prokaryotes is high and pH low, the implant is releasing more oxygen species.
  • the pH is correspondingly raised and the release of molecular oxygen and oxygen species decreases.
  • Possible reactive oxygen species include e.g. hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl ions, hydroxyl radicals and oxygen radicals.
  • Other factors that influence the oxygen release rate include e.g. the chemical composition, temperature and physical form of the implant.
  • the present invention enables, for example, to select a bioactive and/or biodegradable glass composition that elicits an appropriate pH, which makes it possible to make adjustments of the release rate of the source of oxygen according to the relevant needs.
  • Bioactive and/or biodegradable glass and/or silica can function as a carrier material of said oxygen source.
  • Said oxygen source can also be contained in another material, as will be discussed more in detail below.
  • the carrier material can also be selected such that is slows down the release rate or diffusion of oxygen.
  • the composition of the active material selected from the group comprising conventionally produced bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, bioactive glass and silica produced by the sol-gel process, or their mixtures can be selected so that the active material is in itself an antimicrobial material.
  • the implant is typically bacteriocidic but it can also be bacteriostatic.
  • the implant may also comprise different additives, such as antibiotics, growth factors, etc. in order to enhance the results of the treatment.
  • the implant comprising sol-gel produced silica comprises peptide growth factors.
  • silver containing sol-gel produced silicas may be suited for the use in the present invention.
  • Possible additives can be incorporated either during the manufacture of the material or they can be added in suitable form to granulated or powdered material or they can be impregnated to the surface of the ready-made implant.
  • the material comprising a source of oxygen may also kill viruses, fungi or other infectious organisms. It has also by definition a destructive impact on growth of anaerobic bacteria. It may be concluded that the source of oxygen strengthens the antimicrobial/antimicrobial biofilm properties of the material in a synergetic manner.
  • the release of oxygen preferably begins immediately after implantation of the implant and continues for a prolonged period of time, typically for 1 week up to 8 months, more typically for at least 2 weeks and up to 6 months, with a slow release rate, which can be for example, ⁇ 1 ⁇ l O 2 /h in dental root canal with corresponding contact area to the implant surface and ⁇ 1ml 02/h in healing tissues.
  • the oxygen releasing implants are designed so that they are compatible with their intended object, purpose and location of use in the body.
  • the primary aim is to eradicate any bacterial infection in the complicated anatomical system including the eventual side canals and the dentinal tubules.
  • the implant is not normally exposed to excessive amounts of body fluids and the clearance of O 2 from the root canal is restricted and slow. Therefore, the release rate of O 2 from the implant is also preferably slow.
  • implants used in locations where they are exposed to a lot of fluctuating fluid in healing and living tissues the release rate must be adapted to meet the requirements defined by the needs of cells and tissues. In these cases the release rate is still slow but higher than in the root canal case.
  • the implant according to the present invention typically prevents or at least reduces, because of its bacteriocidity, the formation of a bacterial biofilm on its surface.
  • the implant allows the dissolving of O 2 in the surrounding body fluid, which is paramount for the growth of cells and tissues. It is important that the time span during which the implant releases O 2 can be adjusted to serve different preventive and/or therapeutic purposes extending from simple disinfecting to long-term replacement of organs or tissues.
  • the source of oxygen is selected from the group consisting of urea peroxide, calcium peroxide, magnesium peroxide, sodium percarbonate, potassium monopersufate and mixtures thereof.
  • the amount of the oxygen releasing material in the implant is typically 0.1 - 30 weight-%, more typically 0.2 - 20 weight-%, most typically 0.5 - 15 weight-% of the total weight of the ready-to-use implant.
  • the amount of the oxygen releasing material can be chosen according to the end use of the implant or according to the used source of oxygen.
  • an implant intended for treatment of root canal comprises, for example, preferably 5 weight-% of calcium peroxide.
  • the disintegration of calcium peroxide is relatively slow process in conditions at issue, and release of oxygen is occurring at slow rate.
  • calcium peroxide is situated inside the silica network of the implant, i.e. distributed relatively evenly within the implant, where it slowly disintegrates and simultaneously releases oxygen.
  • bioactive material such as bioactive glass
  • body fluids reacts in body fluids, and forms calcium phosphate as reaction product.
  • the calcium phosphate molecules are present on the material surface, within the silica network of the material as well as in the nearby tissue.
  • this calcium phosphate can be partly replaced by calcium peroxide, which is capable of slow and adjustable release of oxygen from the material into its nearby vicinity.
  • said source of oxygen is obtained by subjecting a source precursor included in the material, such as calcium oxide, to a hydrogen peroxide treatment.
  • a source precursor included in the material such as calcium oxide
  • a hydrogen peroxide treatment it has been found out that if bioactive glass having calcium oxide (CaO) as a network modifier is treated with diluted hydrogen peroxide, at least part of said calcium oxide transforms into calcium peroxide. A part of said calcium oxide also transforms into calcium hydroxide.
  • the implant according to one embodiment of the present invention can be bioactive and/or biodegradable glass that has been treated so as to comprise calcium peroxide in its network. Calcium peroxide can then release oxygen ions when coming into contact with body fluids and/or tissue.
  • Another possible control variable is the used hydrogen peroxide concentration and the reaction temperature.
  • the modified implant product obtained is highly stable.
  • the hydrogen peroxide used is typically quite weak, having a concentration below 10 vol-%, usually from 4 to 7 vol-%.
  • Said treatment can be made for example by simply mixing a suitable bioactive and/or biodegradable glass or sol-gel produced and CaO doped silica with hydrogen peroxide, allowing it to react for a determined period of time, such as from 2 days to one week, washing and drying the obtained product.
  • the reaction temperature is in the range of 2 - 1O 0 C, preferably about 4 0 C.
  • granulates of bioactive glass and hydrogen peroxide were mixed together in proportion 3:1 and allowed to react for a week at the temperature ranging from 4 to 8 0 C.
  • the peroxide concentration was 4 vol-%.
  • said implant further comprises a biocompatible polymer.
  • Said biocompatible polymer may also be biodegradable.
  • the polymeric material may be selected from the group consisting of biocompatible polymers, such as derivatives of methacrylic acid, acrylic acid and vinylpyrrolidone, polyolefins, polyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycols, polyvinylalcohol, polylactones, polycarbonates, polyanhydrides, aliphatic polyesters, polyorthoesters, copolymers of the above mentioned, polymers and copolymers based on units derived from hydroxyacids and natural polymers, such as sugars, starch, cellulose and cellulose derivatives, polysaccharides, polypeptides and proteins.
  • the polymeric material may thus be either a biostable or a biodegradable material.
  • the material can be porous or it can become porous during the use and/or when in contact with the tissue.
  • Biostable polymers do not dissolve or react in contact with body fluids or tissue.
  • Some suitable biostable polymers are derivatives of acrylic acid or methacrylic acid, such as methyl(methacrylate).
  • Some suitable biodegradable polymers are homo- and copolymers of lactones and polycarbonates.
  • the polymer may be a biodegradable and/or bioresorpable polymer and/or a biopolymer, preferably derived from hydroxyacid units, the most preferred polymeric material being poly( ⁇ -caprolactone-dl-lactide) copolymer. Mixtures of any of the above-mentioned polymers and their various forms may also be used. For embodiments intended for root canal also gutta-percha may be used.
  • the polymeric material is selected from the group consisting of polymers derived from hydroxy acid units, such as hydroxy acid, hydroxy acid derivative such as cyclic ester of a hydroxy acid (lactone), a cyclic carbonate, such as trimethyl carbonate, L-, D- and
  • the polymeric material is poly( ⁇ -caprolactone-dl-lactide) copolymer. Also polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) or polylactide can be used.
  • PLGA polylactide-co-glycolide
  • the oxygen source can be incorporated in said implant in any known manner. It can be for example homogenously dispersed throughout the material of the implant, it can in itself make the implant or it can be in the form of a coating on the surface of the implant.
  • the source of oxygen can be also encapsulated in silica gel or biodegradable polymer.
  • the implant can moreover be manufactured for example by mixing a powder of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass with a powder of oxygen releasing material.
  • the sol-gel produced silica may be in the form of gel, xerogel, ceramic or the like.
  • the sol-gel produced silica can be pure silica or it may typically comprise CaO and/or P 2 O 5 .
  • Sol-gel produced silica may comprise 0.1 - 100 mol-% Si ⁇ 2 .
  • the sol-gel produced silica comprises 40 - 60 mol % Si ⁇ 2 , 5 - 10 mol % P 2 O 5 , and 35 - 50 mol % CaO.
  • hydroxyapatite As an additional component of the implants, it is also possible to use pure calcium phosphate CaP or tricalcium phosphate. Hydroxyl apatite, hydroxyapatite, hydroxycarbonated apatite are another possible material. Moreover, other bioactive ceramic materials or bioactive or biodegradable polymers may be used. Also hydrogels can be used as a carrier matrix for the oxygen source.
  • said bioactive glass has the following composition: Si ⁇ 2 in an amount of 45 wt-%, Na2 ⁇ in an amount of 24.5 wt-%,
  • said bioactive and/or biodegradable glass has the following composition: Si ⁇ 2 in an amount of 40 - 70 wt-%,
  • MgO in an amount of 0 - 30 wt-%
  • CaO in an amount of 0 - 30 wt-%
  • B2O3 in an amount of 0 - 4 wt-%
  • P2O5 in an amount of 0 - 10 wt-%.
  • said bioactive glass has the following composition:
  • MgO in an amount of 0 - 5 wt-%
  • CaO in an amount of 5 - 25 wt-%
  • B2O3 in an amount of 0 - 4 wt-%
  • MgO + CaO 10 - 25 wt-%.
  • the bioactive glass has the composition of
  • Si ⁇ 2 is 53 wt-%
  • Na2 ⁇ is 23 wt-%
  • CaO is 20 wt-%
  • P2O5 is 4 wt-%.
  • Si ⁇ 2 is 51-56 wt-%
  • Na2 ⁇ is 7-9 wt-%
  • CaO is 21-23 wt-%
  • K2O is 10-12 wt-%
  • MgO is 1-4 wt-%
  • P2O5 is 0,5-1 ,5 wt-% and B2O3 is 0-1 wt-%, provided that the total amount of Na2 ⁇ and K2O is 17-20 wt-% of the starting oxides.
  • This composition has been disclosed in WO 2004/031086, the content of which is herein incorporated by reference.
  • the implant according to the present invention is intended for use in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic infections, preferably infections associated with necrosis and osteomyelitis.
  • the treatment is problematic since the lesion is characteristically ischaemic and after treatment/resection there are no more blood vessels to bring oxygen to the lesion site.
  • the implant according to the present invention can thus be used to sustain the remaining cells until neovasculation is completed (re-growth of blood vessels).
  • the reaction products released from the oxygen source are acting as an antimicrobial agent at the surface of the implant, killing infectious cells synergically with the ions released from the material.
  • the present implant thus solves the problem encountered with the prior art implants.
  • the implant according to the present invention is intended for use in traumatology, dentistry, otorhinolaryngology, orthopedics, surgery and internal medicine.
  • the implant can be used for example in endodontics, i.e. root canal treatments, periodontics and cariology.
  • the implant material may be used for example in revision surgery for implanted hip prostheses.
  • the implant may be used in form of a dressing to prevent infection after surgery.
  • said implant can be designed for example to serve as a transtympanic membrane-tube.
  • said implant can be used in nasal septum and frontal sinus to treat or prevent infection, as well as in any kind of catheters of long use span, stents and tubes, such as trachea tube.
  • the implant may also be used to treat bone infections.
  • said non-specific and specific chronic infection is selected from the group consisting of microbial infections, including actinomycosis, infections associated with tissue necrosis and osteomyelitis.
  • Bacterial test suspension was prepared by thawing the bacteria and pipeting 10 ⁇ l of the suspension into a test tube with 5ml TSB, Tryptic Soy Broth from BactoTM. The tube was kept at 37 0 C overnight. Next day the suspension was washed with 10 ml of physiological NaCI and centrifuged for 10 min/10 000 rpm. The supernatant was removed and 5 ml physiological NaCI was added. The mixture was vortexed. The concentration of bacterial suspension was adjusted by making use of spectrophotometer to density of 0.2 (A660). The suspension was diluted to 1 :5 with physiological NaCI solution. 50 ⁇ l of this suspension was used for each experiment.
  • test sample contained 50 mg of the Test Composition in the form of powder and 25 ⁇ l physiological NaCI solution.
  • the bacteria and the test sample were mixed and then incubated under agitation for 30 minutes at 37 0 C.
  • the reaction was stopped with 925 ⁇ l of physiological NaCI and the sample (1 :1 ) was diluted with physiological NaCI (1 :10, 1 :100, and 1 :1000).
  • 10 ⁇ l of each of the samples was cultured on Tryptic Soy Agar from DifcoTM. The cultures were incubated overnight at 37 0 C and the number of bacterial colonies, CFU-count, was counted from the plates on the following day.
  • Table 1 defined as Test Example 1a.
  • Example 1 was repeated except that in step 1.2, 30 mg of CaO2 powder was used.
  • the results of three parallel experiments, Test Examples 2a, 2b and 2c, are given in Table 1.
  • Example 1 was repeated except that in step 1.2, 50 mg of Ca ⁇ 2 powder was used.
  • the results of three parallel experiments, Test Examples 3a, 3b and 3c, are given in Table 1.
  • Positive Control Samples 50 mg of sterilised E-glass having particle size ⁇ 25 ⁇ m and manufactured by Ahlstr ⁇ m Oy, Finland, was mixed with 25 ⁇ l of physiological NaCI and 50 ⁇ l of bacterial suspension and incubated over night at 37 °C. The bacterial samples were diluted to 1 :100 with physiological NaCI. The results of three parallel experiments, Positive controls I, II, III, are given in Table 1.
  • the amount of bacterial colonies was calculated to non-diluted samples.
  • E-glass was used, resulting in at most 11700 bacterial colonies.
  • the number of bacterial colonies was at most 460, in Test Example 2 at most 170 and in Test Example 3, at most 50.
  • Calcium peroxide thus has an effect of increasing the antibacterial effect of the composition and an increase in the amount of calcium peroxide increases said antibacterial effect.
  • Comparative sample 1 comprised a mixture of 50 mg E-glass having particle size
  • Comparative sample 2 comprised a mixture of 50 mg E-glass having particle size
  • Comparative sample 3 comprised 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size ⁇ 45 ⁇ m in the mixture of 25 ⁇ l physiological NaCI and 50 ⁇ l bacterial suspension. The sample was diluted to 1 :100 with physiological NaCI and incubated over night at 37 °C.
  • Comparative sample 3 comprised 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size ⁇ 45 ⁇ m in the mixture of 25 ⁇ l physiological NaCI and 50 ⁇ l bacterial suspension. The sample was diluted to 1 :100 with physiological NaCI and incubated over night at 37 °C.
  • Test example 1 comprised a mixture of 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size
  • Test example 2 comprised a mixture of 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size
  • Dentin Blocks Test blocks height 4 - 5 mm, diameter 5 +/- 1 mm, were prepared from the bovine teeth, lower incisors, with a diamond bur. The root canals of the blocks were widened with ISO 023 round bur. The smear layer was removed from the blocks with an ultrasonic bath treatment comprising 15 min in 17% EDTA, 4 min in 5% NaOCI, and 60 min in distilled water. The blocks were treated in tryptic soy broth, TSB, in ultrasonic bath for 10 min and sterilized by autoclaving 121 0 C, 20 min in TSB. The sterilized blocks were incubated in TSB at 37 0 C over night to control the sterilization being successful, in which case TSB solution should remain clear.
  • the blocks were then infected with Enterococcus faecalis A197A (clinical) by adding a few colonies in TSB-solution with a sterile loop.
  • the blocks were kept in infected broth for 7 days at 37 0 C.
  • Negative controls were kept in sterile broth for 7 days at 37 0 C.
  • the monoinfection purity of the infected broth was checked by colony morphology and gram-staining.
  • bioactive glass mixtures were studied as a paste-like consistency, 2 g/ml of 0.9% NaCI.
  • BAG stands for bioactive glass.
  • Comparative paste 1 comprised a mixture of bioactive glass having particle size ⁇ 25 ⁇ m; Test paste 1 comprised a mixture of bioactive glass having particle size ⁇ 25 ⁇ m and 5 weight-% of CaO 2 ; Comparative paste 2 comprised bioactive glass having particle size ⁇ 45 ⁇ m; Test paste 2 comprised a mixture of bioactive glass having particle size ⁇ 45 ⁇ m and 5 weight-% of CaO 2 ; Test paste 3 comprised a mixture of 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size ⁇ 45 ⁇ m and 10 weight-% of CaO 2 .
  • Ultracal XS which is a known Ca(OH) 2 containing agent for killing bacteria found in infected root canals including Enterococcus faecalis, produced by Ultracal Products Inc. was used as comparative example. It was a ready paste-like material.
  • the bacterial samples were taken at time points 3 and/or 7 days. Three parallel samples were used for each time point and each paste. Also three parallel positive and negative controls, comprising only 0.9% NaCI, were included for each time point. The test was made on cell culture plates having 24 wells.
  • test pastes were used immediately after preparation. The test paste was applied first at the bottom of the well, on which the tooth block was then placed.
  • the root canal of the block was filled carefully with the aid of a probe and finally the whole block was covered with the paste.
  • the control blocks were prepared in a similar way using 0.9% NaCI instead of the paste.
  • the empty wells of the plate were filled with 0.9% NaCI to ensure the humidity of air being sufficiently high. Plates were sealed with paraffin and incubated at 37 0 C for the chosen time periods.
  • test materials were removed from the blocks by rinsing with 0.9% NaCI and cleaning with a round bur ISO 023.
  • the dentin samples were taken with burs ISO 025, 029 and 031.
  • the burs and the material adhered to them were collected into test tubes containing 2 ml TSB. The samples were vortexed for
  • Enterococcus faecalis cultures was checked by gram-staining.
  • Comparative sample shows that an increasing bacterial growth is present in the dentin tubules the deeper the sample is taken from.
  • Bioactive glass alone and combined with CaO 2 appear to be an efficient antibacterial agent.
  • the results from the enriched samples show that the test pastes 1 , 2 and 3 give slightly better antibacterial results over pure bioactive glass especially deeper in the dentin structure
  • the used raw materials for sol preparation are 24.0 g HCI, 40.0 g H 2 O, 52.1 g tetra ethylene orthosilicate (TEOS).
  • 2.32 g CaO 2 powder is mixed with the ready made sol whereby a homogenous mixture is obtained. The mixture is spray dried and CaO 2 comprising SiO 2 microspheres are obtained as end product.

Abstract

The present invention relates to an implant comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of biodegradable and/or bioactive glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof. The invention also relates to the uses of the implant as well as to methods of making it.

Description

IMPLANT, ITS USES AND METHODS FOR MAKING IT
The present invention relates to an implant useful in the prevention and/or treatment of infections and in promotion of tissue healing and/or regeneration. The invention relates also to uses of the said implant and to methods of making it.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Following publications, references and materials are used herein to illuminate the background of the invention, and they are incorporated by reference. In particular, the cases providing additional details respecting the practice are incorporated by reference.
Oxygen is a known antibacterial agent. It can be made use of in wound dressings, as has been disclosed in e.g. WO 2004/091675 presenting an oxygen releasing bandage based on a complex between polyvinyl acetate and hydrogen peroxide. Document WO 2004/075944 presents a medical device having a porous coating comprising hydrogen peroxide. The body of the medical device is made of a polymer and the porous coating is made of a polymer.
Bioactive glass is a known bioactive material. Unlike most other bioactive materials, it is easy to control the manufacturing properties of bioactive glass, the rate of its chemical reactions and the biological response caused by it by changing the chemical composition of bioactive glass itself. Bioactive glass has been used in different types of implants, such as bone fillers/substitutes, bone growth promoting materials, middle ear prostheses etc. Some compositions of bioactive glasses are known to have antimicrobial effects e.g. US 6,190,643 B1 and US 6,342,207.
Other documents disclosing various bioactive compositions including bioactive glass are for example WO 99/02107, WO 00/35509, WO 01/10556, WO 03/074009, WO 99/02201 , WO 96/21628 and WO 2004/031086. Although these compositions comprise various oxides, these oxides are not capable of releasing oxygen as such. Document EP 409 810 presents a method of preparing an implant body for implantation, where the surface of the implant made of titanium or coated with titanium is treated with hydrogen peroxide in order to increase the porosity of the surface and thereby to enhance the binding of the implant to the surrounding tissue. The hydrogen peroxide is however washed away from the surface before its implantation to patients. Hydrogen peroxide has also been used in the literature to foam a slurry of glass particles that are then sintered. In this case, the hydrogen peroxide is however also not present in the final implant, neither is any calcium peroxide present in the final implant, as these compounds are destroyed during the sintering. This use of hydrogen peroxide is described for example in Navarro et al, "New macroporous calcium phosphate glass ceramic for guided bone regeneration", Biomaterials, VoI 25, no. 18, pages 4233-4241 and Huipin et al, "Bone induction by porous glass ceramic made from Bioglass® (45S5), J. of Biomedical Materials Research, VoI 58, no. 3, pages 270-276.
The problem of many conventional implants is that they are prone to infections because they allow microbial growth on their surface at the implantation site. There are many medical conditions that require the removal of tissue, such as neoplastic tissue, infected or traumatized tissue, which needs to be replaced with a permanent or temporary therapeutic material until the defect is healed or the tissue regenerated. In severe cases, compromised neovascularization, i.e. the slow formation of a new capillary network, may be a problem. If the defect is large a significant shortage of oxygen, anoxia, restricting cell proliferation and tissue organization and, perhaps, causing death of additional cells may emerge in the center of the defect. Oxygen depletion may occur also at the tissue/implant interface, slowing down the initial processes of tissue healing.
OBJECT AND GENERAL SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The object of the invention is to minimise or even eliminate the problems existing in the prior art. One object of the present invention is an implant useful in preventing and/or managing/eradicating microbial infections.
Another object of the present invention is to manufacture an implant useful in treating or replacing diseased tissue.
Another object of the present invention is to manufacture an implant useful in enhancing the healing or regeneration of tissue, compromised due to delayed access to oxygen physiologically provided by the forming capillary network.
In order to achieve the above-mentioned objects the present invention is characterised in what is defined in the characterising parts of the independent claims presented hereafter.
Typical implant according to the present invention comprises a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof.
Typically the implant according to the present invention is for use in the treatment and/or prevention of infections, such as infected dental root canals, infected chronic cutaneous wounds and ostitis, such as osteomyelitis.
Furthermore, the implant according to the present invention is typically also for use in traumatology, dentistry, otorhinolaryngology, orthopedics, surgery and internal medicine.
Typically the implant according to the present invention is also for use in the promotion of tissue healing and/or regeneration.
Typically composition according to the present invention comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof, is for use as a medicament or as a therapeutic device.
Typical use according to the invention of a composition comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof, is for the manufacture of an implant for treating and/or preventing infections, such as chronic infections.
One typical method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen comprises according to the invention the following steps:
- mixing a material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica or their mixture, the material comprising a source precursor with a chemical agent,
- allowing the source precursor in the material and the chemical agent to react for a determined period under appropriate chemical and physical conditions whereby at least part of the source precursor is transformed into source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, - washing and drying the obtained product and forming it to an implant.
Another typical method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, comprises according to the invention the following steps: - mixing granulous material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica or their mixture with a source of oxygen, and
- forming the obtained product to an implant.
Still another typical method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, comprises according to the invention the following steps: - mixing a source of oxygen to the matrix of a material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass or sol-gel produced silica during the preparation process, and
- forming the obtained product to an implant.
DEFINITIONS AND DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The terms used in this application, if not otherwise defined, are those agreed on at the consensus conference on biomaterials in 1987 and 1992, see Williams, DF (ed.): Definitions in biomaterials: Proceedings of a consensus conference of the European Society for Biomaterials, Chester, England. March 3-5, 1986. Elsevier, Amsterdam 1987, and Williams DF1 Black J, Doherty PJ. Second consensus conference on definitions in biomaterials. In: Doherty PJ, Williams RL, Williams DF, Lee AJ (eds). Biomaterial-Tissue Interfaces. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992.
In this application, by bioactive material is meant a material that has been designed to elicit or modulate biological activity. The term biodegradable in this context means that it is degradable upon prolonged implantation when inserted into mammalian body. By biomaterial is meant a material intended to interface with biological systems to evaluate, treat, augment or replace any tissue, organ or function of the body. By biocompatibility is meant the ability of a material used in a medical device to perform safely and adequately by causing an appropriate host response in a specific location. By resorption is meant reduction/disintegration of biomaterial because of cellular activity or simple dissolution. By composite is meant a material comprising at least two different constituents, for example an organic polymer and a ceramic material.
Implants in this context are meant to comprise any kind of implant used within the body, such as artificial organs and parts thereof, joint implants, internal/external fixation devices, devices used for reconstruction or replacement of bones and tissues, devices used for supporting and /or stimulation of tissue healing or regeneration, devices used for filling defects in bones and materials used as sealant or posts in the root canal of a tooth. Depending on the application and purpose of the implant materials, they are expected and designed to be biocompatible and exhibit either longevity or controlled degradability in the body. The optimal degradation rate is directly proportional to the renewal rate of the tissue. In the case of bone tissue, a considerable proportion of the implant is preferably degraded by 6 weeks in the tissue. In cases where physical support to the healing tissues is desirable the degradation rate might be several months or even several years. In some embodiments of the invention the degradation rate may even be nonexistent. Furthermore, the invention can be made use of in medical devices such as canules, catheters and stents.
Infection in this context comprises various infections within the body of a mammal, for example human. Infections may occur inside the body, subcutaneously or on the surface of the body. Infection may also occur in a wound or in a corresponding defect or lesion.
A source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species in this application relates to materials that are capable of releasing for example gaseous oxygen (O2) or ozone (O3), or hydroxyl ions, hydroxyl radicals or oxygen radicals. Such material can naturally also release oxygen in a mixture of these forms. In the following, a source of oxygen is sometimes used for sake of shortness and clarity, while it is always meant a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to an implant comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species.and a material selected from the group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof. The bioactive and/or biodegradable glass can be prepared either conventionally or by a sol-gel process. Conventionally prepared bioactive glass is produced by melting process. Surprisingly, it has been found out that by incorporating or combining a source of oxygen, i.e. a chemical agent capable of releasing oxygen, to bioactive material comprising bioactive and/or biodegradable glasses it is possible to obtain an implant with an improved anti-microbial and tissue growth promoting effect. This beneficial effect is better than can be expected by evaluating the individual implant components separately, i.e. it appears that the ions released from the bioactive material and the active oxygen components released from the source of oxygen produce a synergetic effect, resulting in enhanced prevention of infections and/or rehabilitation of tissues. Furthermore, it is assumed that the silica network of the material provides a useful matrix to embrace and contain the chemical source of oxygen while it also allows the release of oxygen and associated reaction products through the matrix.
The implant according to the present invention has an improved effect in treatment and/or prevention of infections. The oxygen released from the implant effectively reduces, removes or even eliminates bacteria, especially anaerobic bacteria at the implantation site. Furthermore, the implant is capable of producing Ca(OH)2 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are detrimental for microbes. Simultaneously, these reactions achieve a raise in pH at the area surrounding the implant surface. This pH raise has an impact on the solubility of the material. The amount of ions released from the material can be thus controlled and optimised. As these ions show also antimicrobial effects, a synergetic effect is obtained.
Furthermore, the implant according to the present invention improves the growth and regeneration of the tissues in which it is situated. Oxygen released from the implant may produce marked increase in the amount of O2 dissolved in tissue fluid, which is believed to promote cell and tissue growth at the implant surface and its immediate vicinity, thus adding to the known osteoconductive and osteopromotive as well as soft tissue growth promoting effect of bioactive material. Dissolved oxygen promotes and/or advances the growth of the tissue cells near the implant, even if the capillary formation in the tissue would not be complete or totally effective near the implant. Also the ions, which are released from the material enhance and stimulate the capillary formation. As explained above, the dissolved oxygen source raises the pH and changes the solubility of the implant, and thus also the positive effect of the ions to the capillary formation becomes evident.
The release of oxygen from the implant is preferably slow enough for not to irritate the cells and tissues in contact with the implant or to interfere with the normal inflammatory cell response, e.g. macrophages, at the implantation site. In a physiological situation, the tissues typically remove about 4.6 ml O2 from each 100 ml blood passing through them. Different sources of oxygen release oxygen at different rates. The release rate depends, among other things, on the molecular stability of the source of oxygen, i.e. the chemical agent used, in a given biological environment. For example, calcium peroxide releases oxygen as a function of pH. As the pH drops, the calcium peroxide becomes more soluble and generates progressively higher ratios of molecular oxygen and reactive oxygen species (ROS).
The metabolic activity of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes is known to reduce the pH of the environment where they grow and proliferate. The concentration of reactive oxygen species formed by the implant is thereby increased. Reactive oxygen species are byproduct of normal cellular respiration and specifically synthesized by phagocyte cells like neutrophils and macrophages. The implant may thus be considered as "intelligent" material: in the beginning when the number and/or metabolic activity of eukaryotes and prokaryotes is high and pH low, the implant is releasing more oxygen species. When the number of eukaryotes and prokaryotes decreases, the pH is correspondingly raised and the release of molecular oxygen and oxygen species decreases.
Possible reactive oxygen species include e.g. hydrogen peroxide, hydroxyl ions, hydroxyl radicals and oxygen radicals. In addition to the pH of the environment other factors that influence the oxygen release rate include e.g. the chemical composition, temperature and physical form of the implant. The present invention enables, for example, to select a bioactive and/or biodegradable glass composition that elicits an appropriate pH, which makes it possible to make adjustments of the release rate of the source of oxygen according to the relevant needs. Bioactive and/or biodegradable glass and/or silica can function as a carrier material of said oxygen source. Said oxygen source can also be contained in another material, as will be discussed more in detail below. The carrier material can also be selected such that is slows down the release rate or diffusion of oxygen.
According to one embodiment of the invention the composition of the active material selected from the group comprising conventionally produced bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, bioactive glass and silica produced by the sol-gel process, or their mixtures, can be selected so that the active material is in itself an antimicrobial material. The implant is typically bacteriocidic but it can also be bacteriostatic.
Generally, no additives are needed. However, according to one embodiment the implant may also comprise different additives, such as antibiotics, growth factors, etc. in order to enhance the results of the treatment. According to one specific embodiment of the invention the implant comprising sol-gel produced silica comprises peptide growth factors. Also silver containing sol-gel produced silicas may be suited for the use in the present invention. Possible additives can be incorporated either during the manufacture of the material or they can be added in suitable form to granulated or powdered material or they can be impregnated to the surface of the ready-made implant.
According to one embodiment of the invention the material comprising a source of oxygen may also kill viruses, fungi or other infectious organisms. It has also by definition a destructive impact on growth of anaerobic bacteria. It may be concluded that the source of oxygen strengthens the antimicrobial/antimicrobial biofilm properties of the material in a synergetic manner.
The release of oxygen preferably begins immediately after implantation of the implant and continues for a prolonged period of time, typically for 1 week up to 8 months, more typically for at least 2 weeks and up to 6 months, with a slow release rate, which can be for example, <1μl O2/h in dental root canal with corresponding contact area to the implant surface and <1ml 02/h in healing tissues.
Typically, the oxygen releasing implants are designed so that they are compatible with their intended object, purpose and location of use in the body. For example, in the dental root canal the primary aim is to eradicate any bacterial infection in the complicated anatomical system including the eventual side canals and the dentinal tubules. In this case the implant is not normally exposed to excessive amounts of body fluids and the clearance of O2 from the root canal is restricted and slow. Therefore, the release rate of O2 from the implant is also preferably slow. On the other hand, implants used in locations where they are exposed to a lot of fluctuating fluid in healing and living tissues the release rate must be adapted to meet the requirements defined by the needs of cells and tissues. In these cases the release rate is still slow but higher than in the root canal case. It can be observed that the implant according to the present invention typically prevents or at least reduces, because of its bacteriocidity, the formation of a bacterial biofilm on its surface. The implant, however, allows the dissolving of O2 in the surrounding body fluid, which is paramount for the growth of cells and tissues. It is important that the time span during which the implant releases O2 can be adjusted to serve different preventive and/or therapeutic purposes extending from simple disinfecting to long-term replacement of organs or tissues.
According to one embodiment of the invention the source of oxygen is selected from the group consisting of urea peroxide, calcium peroxide, magnesium peroxide, sodium percarbonate, potassium monopersufate and mixtures thereof. The amount of the oxygen releasing material in the implant is typically 0.1 - 30 weight-%, more typically 0.2 - 20 weight-%, most typically 0.5 - 15 weight-% of the total weight of the ready-to-use implant. The amount of the oxygen releasing material can be chosen according to the end use of the implant or according to the used source of oxygen. In some embodiments the amount of the oxygen releasing material in the implant is low, in the range of 0.5 - 10 weight-%, more typically 1 - 7 weight-%, most typically 3 - 6 weight-% of the total weight of the ready-to-use implant. According to one embodiment of the invention an implant intended for treatment of root canal comprises, for example, preferably 5 weight-% of calcium peroxide. Generally speaking the disintegration of calcium peroxide is relatively slow process in conditions at issue, and release of oxygen is occurring at slow rate. Preferably calcium peroxide is situated inside the silica network of the implant, i.e. distributed relatively evenly within the implant, where it slowly disintegrates and simultaneously releases oxygen.
It is known that bioactive material, such as bioactive glass, reacts in body fluids, and forms calcium phosphate as reaction product. The calcium phosphate molecules are present on the material surface, within the silica network of the material as well as in the nearby tissue. With the present invention, this calcium phosphate can be partly replaced by calcium peroxide, which is capable of slow and adjustable release of oxygen from the material into its nearby vicinity.
According to an embodiment of the invention, said source of oxygen is obtained by subjecting a source precursor included in the material, such as calcium oxide, to a hydrogen peroxide treatment. It has been found out that if bioactive glass having calcium oxide (CaO) as a network modifier is treated with diluted hydrogen peroxide, at least part of said calcium oxide transforms into calcium peroxide. A part of said calcium oxide also transforms into calcium hydroxide. A similar transformation can be made in sol-gel produced CaO doped silica. In other words, the implant according to one embodiment of the present invention can be bioactive and/or biodegradable glass that has been treated so as to comprise calcium peroxide in its network. Calcium peroxide can then release oxygen ions when coming into contact with body fluids and/or tissue. The longer the reaction time, the deeper into the implant the formation of calcium peroxide advances. For example, when the reaction is allowed to proceed for 5 days, typically a layer of 100 - 150 μm is achieved. Another possible control variable is the used hydrogen peroxide concentration and the reaction temperature. The modified implant product obtained is highly stable. The hydrogen peroxide used is typically quite weak, having a concentration below 10 vol-%, usually from 4 to 7 vol-%. Said treatment can be made for example by simply mixing a suitable bioactive and/or biodegradable glass or sol-gel produced and CaO doped silica with hydrogen peroxide, allowing it to react for a determined period of time, such as from 2 days to one week, washing and drying the obtained product. The reaction temperature is in the range of 2 - 1O0C, preferably about 40C. By adjusting the reaction time it is possible to control the amount of formed calcium peroxide and its distribution within the silica network.
According to one specific embodiment granulates of bioactive glass and hydrogen peroxide were mixed together in proportion 3:1 and allowed to react for a week at the temperature ranging from 4 to 8 0C. The peroxide concentration was 4 vol-%.
According to another embodiment of the invention, said implant further comprises a biocompatible polymer. Said biocompatible polymer may also be biodegradable. The polymeric material may be selected from the group consisting of biocompatible polymers, such as derivatives of methacrylic acid, acrylic acid and vinylpyrrolidone, polyolefins, polyethylene oxide, polyethylene glycols, polyvinylalcohol, polylactones, polycarbonates, polyanhydrides, aliphatic polyesters, polyorthoesters, copolymers of the above mentioned, polymers and copolymers based on units derived from hydroxyacids and natural polymers, such as sugars, starch, cellulose and cellulose derivatives, polysaccharides, polypeptides and proteins.
The polymeric material may thus be either a biostable or a biodegradable material. The material can be porous or it can become porous during the use and/or when in contact with the tissue. Biostable polymers do not dissolve or react in contact with body fluids or tissue. Some suitable biostable polymers are derivatives of acrylic acid or methacrylic acid, such as methyl(methacrylate). Some suitable biodegradable polymers are homo- and copolymers of lactones and polycarbonates. The polymer may be a biodegradable and/or bioresorpable polymer and/or a biopolymer, preferably derived from hydroxyacid units, the most preferred polymeric material being poly(ε-caprolactone-dl-lactide) copolymer. Mixtures of any of the above-mentioned polymers and their various forms may also be used. For embodiments intended for root canal also gutta-percha may be used.
According to one preferable embodiment of the present invention, the polymeric material is selected from the group consisting of polymers derived from hydroxy acid units, such as hydroxy acid, hydroxy acid derivative such as cyclic ester of a hydroxy acid (lactone), a cyclic carbonate, such as trimethyl carbonate, L-, D- and
DL-lactic acids, L-, D- and DL-lactides and ε-caprolactone. According to yet another embodiment, the polymeric material is poly(ε-caprolactone-dl-lactide) copolymer. Also polylactide-co-glycolide (PLGA) or polylactide can be used.
The oxygen source can be incorporated in said implant in any known manner. It can be for example homogenously dispersed throughout the material of the implant, it can in itself make the implant or it can be in the form of a coating on the surface of the implant. The source of oxygen can be also encapsulated in silica gel or biodegradable polymer. The implant can moreover be manufactured for example by mixing a powder of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass with a powder of oxygen releasing material.
The sol-gel produced silica may be in the form of gel, xerogel, ceramic or the like. The sol-gel produced silica can be pure silica or it may typically comprise CaO and/or P2O5. Sol-gel produced silica may comprise 0.1 - 100 mol-% Siθ2. Typically the sol-gel produced silica comprises 40 - 60 mol % Siθ2, 5 - 10 mol % P2O5, and 35 - 50 mol % CaO.
As an additional component of the implants, it is also possible to use pure calcium phosphate CaP or tricalcium phosphate. Hydroxyl apatite, hydroxyapatite, hydroxycarbonated apatite are another possible material. Moreover, other bioactive ceramic materials or bioactive or biodegradable polymers may be used. Also hydrogels can be used as a carrier matrix for the oxygen source.
According to one embodiment of the invention, said bioactive glass has the following composition: Siθ2 in an amount of 45 wt-%, Na2θ in an amount of 24.5 wt-%,
CaO in an amount of 24.5 wt-%, P2O5 in an amount of 6 wt-%.
According to one embodiment of the invention, said bioactive and/or biodegradable glass has the following composition: Siθ2 in an amount of 40 - 70 wt-%,
Na2θ in an amount of 0 - 34 wt-%, K2O in an amount of 0 - 20 wt-%,
MgO in an amount of 0 - 30 wt-%, CaO in an amount of 0 - 30 wt-%, B2O3 in an amount of 0 - 4 wt-%,
P2O5 in an amount of 0 - 10 wt-%.
According to one embodiment of the invention, said bioactive glass has the following composition:
Siθ2 in an amount of 53 - 60 wt-%,
Na2θ in an amount of 0 - 34 wt-%, K2O in an amount of 1 - 20 wt-%,
MgO in an amount of 0 - 5 wt-%, CaO in an amount of 5 - 25 wt-%, B2O3 in an amount of 0 - 4 wt-%,
P2O5 in an amount of 0,5 - 6 wt-%, provided that
Na2θ + K2θ = 16 - 35 wt-% K2O + MgO = 5 - 20 wt-%, and
MgO + CaO = 10 - 25 wt-%.
This composition has been disclosed in WO 96/21628, the content of which is herein incorporated by reference. According to another embodiment of the invention, the bioactive glass has the composition of
Siθ2 is 53 wt-%,
Na2θ is 23 wt-%, CaO is 20 wt-% and
P2O5 is 4 wt-%.
According to yet another embodiment of the invention the bioactive glass has the composition of
Siθ2 is 51-56 wt-%, Na2θ is 7-9 wt-%,
CaO is 21-23 wt-%, K2O is 10-12 wt-%,
MgO is 1-4 wt-%,
P2O5 is 0,5-1 ,5 wt-% and B2O3 is 0-1 wt-%, provided that the total amount of Na2θ and K2O is 17-20 wt-% of the starting oxides. This composition has been disclosed in WO 2004/031086, the content of which is herein incorporated by reference.
According to one embodiment of the invention, the implant according to the present invention is intended for use in the treatment and/or prevention of chronic infections, preferably infections associated with necrosis and osteomyelitis.
In the case of osteomyelitis for example, the treatment is problematic since the lesion is characteristically ischaemic and after treatment/resection there are no more blood vessels to bring oxygen to the lesion site. The implant according to the present invention can thus be used to sustain the remaining cells until neovasculation is completed (re-growth of blood vessels). At the same time, the reaction products released from the oxygen source are acting as an antimicrobial agent at the surface of the implant, killing infectious cells synergically with the ions released from the material. The present implant thus solves the problem encountered with the prior art implants. According to another embodiment of the invention, the implant according to the present invention is intended for use in traumatology, dentistry, otorhinolaryngology, orthopedics, surgery and internal medicine.
In dental applications, the implant can be used for example in endodontics, i.e. root canal treatments, periodontics and cariology. In orthopedics, the implant material may be used for example in revision surgery for implanted hip prostheses. In general surgery, the implant may be used in form of a dressing to prevent infection after surgery. In otorhinolaryngology, said implant can be designed for example to serve as a transtympanic membrane-tube. Furthermore, said implant can be used in nasal septum and frontal sinus to treat or prevent infection, as well as in any kind of catheters of long use span, stents and tubes, such as trachea tube. The implant may also be used to treat bone infections.
According to one embodiment of the invention, said non-specific and specific chronic infection is selected from the group consisting of microbial infections, including actinomycosis, infections associated with tissue necrosis and osteomyelitis.
The details and embodiments given above in connection with the implant also apply to the use according to the invention.
In this specification, except where the context requires otherwise, the words "comprise", "comprises" and "comprising" means "include", "includes" and "including", respectively. That is, when the invention is described or defined as comprising specified features, various embodiments of the same invention may also include additional features.
EXPERIMENTAL PART
Experiments were made in order to determine the effect of adding calcium peroxide to bioactive glass. Experiment A
Example 1 1.1 Preparation of calcium peroxide
CaO + H2O2 → CaO2 8 H2O
568 mg of CaO was reacted with 70 ml of 30 % H2O2 in 430 ml of water. The ingredients were mixed, covered and kept occasionally agitated at 4 °C for seven days. The precipitate was collected by filtration, washed with distilled water and dried at room temperature. 1160 mg of slightly yellowish CaO2 powder was obtained.
1.2 Preparation of the Test Composition
10 mg of Caθ2 powder obtained in step 1.1 was mixed with bioactive glass S53P4 having the composition of Siθ2 is 53 wt-% of the final total weight, Na2θ is 23 wt- % of the final total weight, CaO is 20 wt-% of the final total weight and P2O5 is 4 wt-% of the final total weight, and a particle size of less than 25 μm, to add up to 1 g of final Test Composition.
1.3 Procedure of Testing
The Effect of the Test Composition was evaluated in a suspension of bacteria
Enterococcus faecalis A197A (clinical). Bacterial test suspension was prepared by thawing the bacteria and pipeting 10 μl of the suspension into a test tube with 5ml TSB, Tryptic Soy Broth from Bacto™. The tube was kept at 37 0C overnight. Next day the suspension was washed with 10 ml of physiological NaCI and centrifuged for 10 min/10 000 rpm. The supernatant was removed and 5 ml physiological NaCI was added. The mixture was vortexed. The concentration of bacterial suspension was adjusted by making use of spectrophotometer to density of 0.2 (A660). The suspension was diluted to 1 :5 with physiological NaCI solution. 50 μl of this suspension was used for each experiment. The test sample contained 50 mg of the Test Composition in the form of powder and 25 μl physiological NaCI solution. The bacteria and the test sample were mixed and then incubated under agitation for 30 minutes at 37 0C. The reaction was stopped with 925 μl of physiological NaCI and the sample (1 :1 ) was diluted with physiological NaCI (1 :10, 1 :100, and 1 :1000). 10 μl of each of the samples was cultured on Tryptic Soy Agar from Difco™. The cultures were incubated overnight at 37 0C and the number of bacterial colonies, CFU-count, was counted from the plates on the following day. The results are given in Table 1 , defined as Test Example 1a.
The same procedure was repeated with two parallel samples, defined asTest Examples 1 b and 1c.
Example 2
Example 1 was repeated except that in step 1.2, 30 mg of CaO2 powder was used. The results of three parallel experiments, Test Examples 2a, 2b and 2c, are given in Table 1.
Example 3
Example 1 was repeated except that in step 1.2, 50 mg of Caθ2 powder was used. The results of three parallel experiments, Test Examples 3a, 3b and 3c, are given in Table 1.
Negative Control Samples
75 μl of physiological NaCI was incubated over night at 37 0C. The results of three parallel experiments, Negative controls I, II, III, are given in Table 1.
Positive Control Samples 50 mg of sterilised E-glass having particle size < 25 μm and manufactured by Ahlstrδm Oy, Finland, was mixed with 25 μl of physiological NaCI and 50 μl of bacterial suspension and incubated over night at 37 °C. The bacterial samples were diluted to 1 :100 with physiological NaCI. The results of three parallel experiments, Positive controls I, II, III, are given in Table 1.
Positive control sample procedure was repeated. The results of three parallel experiments, Positive controls Ia, Ha, IHa, are given in Table 1.
Comparative example 2
50 mg of bioactive glass of composition S53P4, which was also used in Example 1 , manufactured by Vivoxid Oy, Turku, Finland and having particle size of < 25 μm, was mixed with 25 μl of physiological NaCI and 50 μl of bacterial suspension. The samples were diluted to 1 :10 with physiological NaCI and incubated over night at 37 0C. The results of three parallel experiments, Comparative examples 2a, 2b and 2c, are given in Table 1.
Table 1 Results of the experiments, CFU stands for colony forming unit.
As can be seen from table 1 , Negative control gave no bacterial growth as there was no source of bacteria used.
The amount of bacterial colonies was calculated to non-diluted samples.
In Positive controls, E-glass was used, resulting in at most 11700 bacterial colonies. In Test Example 1 , the number of bacterial colonies was at most 460, in Test Example 2 at most 170 and in Test Example 3, at most 50. Calcium peroxide thus has an effect of increasing the antibacterial effect of the composition and an increase in the amount of calcium peroxide increases said antibacterial effect.
Experiment B
Following materials were used in the experiment:
Bioactive glass of composition S53P4 manufactured by Vivoxid Oy, Turku, Finland; E-glass manufactured by Ahlstrom Oy; Finland; Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) from Bacto™; Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) from Scharlau Chemie S.A.; Fysiological NaCI from Baxter, 75 % CaO2 from Sigma-Aldrich.
Samples were tested in a suspension of bacteria Enterococcus faecalis A197A (clinical). The bacterial test suspension was prepared as described above in point 1.3.
50 mg E-glass in the mixture of 25 μl physiological NaCI and 50 μl bacterial suspension was used as positive control sample without incubation; 75 μl physiological NaCI was used as negative control sample.
Comparative sample 1 comprised a mixture of 50 mg E-glass having particle size
< 45 μm and 1 weight-% of CaO2 in the mixture of 25 μl physiological NaCI and 50 μl bacterial suspension. The sample was diluted to 1 :1000 with physiological NaCI and incubated over night at 37 °C.
Comparative sample 2 comprised a mixture of 50 mg E-glass having particle size
< 45 μm and 5 weight-% of CaO2 in the mixture of 25 μl physiological NaCI and 50 μl bacterial suspension. The sample was diluted to 1 :100 with physiological NaCI and incubated over night at 37 °C. Comparative sample 3 comprised 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size < 45 μm in the mixture of 25 μl physiological NaCI and 50 μl bacterial suspension. The sample was diluted to 1 :100 with physiological NaCI and incubated over night at 37 °C.
Test example 1 comprised a mixture of 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size
< 45 μm and 1 weight-% of CaO2 in the mixture of 25 μl physiological NaCI and 50 μl bacterial suspension. The sample was diluted to 1 :100 with physiological NaCI and incubated over night at 37 0C.
Test example 2 comprised a mixture of 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size
< 45 μm and 5 weight-% of CaO2 in the mixture of 25 μl physiological NaCI and 50 μl bacterial suspension. The sample was undiluted and incubated over night at 37 °C.
All the samples were prepared and examined in triplicate.
Results of the Experiment B are shown in Table 2.
Table 2 Results of the experiments, CFU stands for colony forming unit.
From the results it can be concluded that the bioactive glass itself shows a minor antibacterial effect, see comparative example 3. Also the addition of CaO2 to a "normal" E-glass gives a minor antibacterial effect, see comparative examples 1 , 2. However, the combination of bioactive glass and CaO2 gives an antibacterial effect much better than the direct sum effect of the components. Experiment C
Dentin Block Examples
Preparation of the Dentin Blocks Test blocks, height 4 - 5 mm, diameter 5 +/- 1 mm, were prepared from the bovine teeth, lower incisors, with a diamond bur. The root canals of the blocks were widened with ISO 023 round bur. The smear layer was removed from the blocks with an ultrasonic bath treatment comprising 15 min in 17% EDTA, 4 min in 5% NaOCI, and 60 min in distilled water. The blocks were treated in tryptic soy broth, TSB, in ultrasonic bath for 10 min and sterilized by autoclaving 121 0C, 20 min in TSB. The sterilized blocks were incubated in TSB at 37 0C over night to control the sterilization being successful, in which case TSB solution should remain clear.
The blocks were then infected with Enterococcus faecalis A197A (clinical) by adding a few colonies in TSB-solution with a sterile loop. The blocks were kept in infected broth for 7 days at 37 0C. Negative controls were kept in sterile broth for 7 days at 37 0C. At the end of the infection period the monoinfection purity of the infected broth was checked by colony morphology and gram-staining.
Samples
The antimicrobial effect of bioactive glass mixtures were studied as a paste-like consistency, 2 g/ml of 0.9% NaCI. BAG stands for bioactive glass.
Comparative paste 1 comprised a mixture of bioactive glass having particle size < 25 μm; Test paste 1 comprised a mixture of bioactive glass having particle size < 25 μm and 5 weight-% of CaO2; Comparative paste 2 comprised bioactive glass having particle size < 45 μm; Test paste 2 comprised a mixture of bioactive glass having particle size < 45 μm and 5 weight-% of CaO2; Test paste 3 comprised a mixture of 50 mg bioactive glass having particle size < 45 μm and 10 weight-% of CaO2.
Ultracal XS, which is a known Ca(OH)2 containing agent for killing bacteria found in infected root canals including Enterococcus faecalis, produced by Ultracal Products Inc. was used as comparative example. It was a ready paste-like material.
The bacterial samples were taken at time points 3 and/or 7 days. Three parallel samples were used for each time point and each paste. Also three parallel positive and negative controls, comprising only 0.9% NaCI, were included for each time point. The test was made on cell culture plates having 24 wells.
Experiment Procedure
General method reference: Haapasalo M, Orstavik D. In vitro infection and disinfection of dentinal tubules. J Dent Res 1987;66: 1375-9.
The test pastes were used immediately after preparation. The test paste was applied first at the bottom of the well, on which the tooth block was then placed.
The root canal of the block was filled carefully with the aid of a probe and finally the whole block was covered with the paste. The control blocks were prepared in a similar way using 0.9% NaCI instead of the paste. The empty wells of the plate were filled with 0.9% NaCI to ensure the humidity of air being sufficiently high. Plates were sealed with paraffin and incubated at 37 0C for the chosen time periods.
After incubation period the test materials were removed from the blocks by rinsing with 0.9% NaCI and cleaning with a round bur ISO 023. The dentin samples were taken with burs ISO 025, 029 and 031. The burs and the material adhered to them were collected into test tubes containing 2 ml TSB. The samples were vortexed for
15-20 s and 100 μl of each sample was cultivated on tryptic soy agar, TSA, plate.
Plates were incubated at 37 0C over night. The growth was viewed the next day.
After the cultivation the rest of the samples were stored at 37 °C for five days and these enriched samples were then cultivated on TSA plates. The purity of the
Enterococcus faecalis cultures was checked by gram-staining.
The results are presented in tables 3a and 3b. Table 3a. Results of the experiments after incubation of 3 days. Explanations: - = no growth; + = 1 - 9 colonies; ++ = 10 - 100 colonies; +++ = >100 colonies; ++++ = >1OOO colonies. Numbers in parentheses indicate the exact number of the colonies.
Table 3b. Results of the enriched samples after incubation of 3 days. Explanations: - = no growth; + = growth Conclusions on basis of Tables 3a and 3b:
Both negative and positive control show expected results, i.e. no bacterial growth in the dentinal tubules for negative controls and for positive controls bacterial growth is found deep in the dentinal tubules.
Comparative sample shows that an increasing bacterial growth is present in the dentin tubules the deeper the sample is taken from.
Bioactive glass alone and combined with CaO2 appear to be an efficient antibacterial agent. However, the results from the enriched samples show that the test pastes 1 , 2 and 3 give slightly better antibacterial results over pure bioactive glass especially deeper in the dentin structure
When the particle diameter of bioactive glass was larger, comparative paste 2 and test paste 2, the antibacterial efficacy is almost the same without Caθ2 and with 5% of it. However, by increasing the amount of CaO2 up to 10%, test paste 3, a complete bactericidal effect was achieved.
The experiment shows that paste of bioactive glass in aqueous paste-like suspension is a better dentin disinfecting agent than the Ca(OH)2 containing commercial product Ultracal and that the efficacy of bioactive glass can be strengthened by addition of CaO2.
Experiment D
Preparation of spray dried microspheres
The used raw materials for sol preparation are 24.0 g HCI, 40.0 g H2O, 52.1 g tetra ethylene orthosilicate (TEOS). 2.32 g CaO2 powder is mixed with the ready made sol whereby a homogenous mixture is obtained. The mixture is spray dried and CaO2 comprising SiO2 microspheres are obtained as end product.

Claims

1. An implant comprising
- a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and
- a material selected from the group consisting of biodegradable and/or bioactive glass, sol-gel produced silica and mixtures thereof.
2. Implant according to claim 1, characterised in that said implant further comprises a biocompatible polymer.
3. Implant according to claim 1 , characterised in that said source of oxygen is selected from the group consisting of urea peroxide, calcium peroxide, magnesium peroxide, sodium percarbonate, potassium monopersufate and mixtures thereof.
4. Implant according to claim 1 , characterised in that said source of oxygen is obtained by subjecting a source precursor included in the material, such as calcium oxide, to a hydrogen peroxide treatment.
5. Implant according to claim 1 , characterised in that the composition of said bioactive glass is
Siθ2 in an amount of 53 - 60 wt-%,
Na2θ in an amount of 0 - 34 wt-%, K2O in an amount of 1 - 20 wt-%, MgO in an amount of 0 - 5 wt-%,
CaO in an amount of 5 - 25 wt-%, B2O3 in an amount of 0 - 4 wt-%,
P2O5 in an amount of 0,5 - 6 wt-%, provided that Na2θ + K2O = 16 - 35 wt-%
K2O + MgO = 5 - 20 wt-%, and MgO + CaO = 10 - 25 wt-%.
6. Implant according to claim 1 , characterised in that the composition of said bioactive glass is
Siθ2 is 53 wt-%, Na2θ is 23 wt-%,
CaO is 20 wt-% and P2O5 is 4 wt-%t.
7. Implant according to claim 1 , characterised in that it comprises bacteriosidic or bacteriostatic agents, or different additives, such as antibiotics or growth factors.
8. Implant according to claim 1 for use in the treatment and/or prevention of infections, such as infected dental root canals, infected chronic cutaneous wounds and ostitis, such as osteomyelitis.
9. Implant according to claim 1 for use in traumatology, dentistry, otorhinolaryngology, orthopedics, surgery and internal medicine.
10. Implant according to claim 1 for use in the promotion of tissue healing and/or regeneration.
11. Composition comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of biodegradable and/or bioactive glass, sol-gel produced silica gel and mixtures thereof, for use as a medicament or as a therapeutic device.
12. Use of a composition comprising a source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, and a material selected from the group consisting of biodegradable and/or bioactive glass, sol-gel produced silica gel and mixtures thereof, for the manufacture of an implant for treating and/or preventing infections.
13. Use according to claim 12, characterised in that infection comprises infections in dental root canals, infections in chronic cutaneous wounds and, preferably infections associated with necrosis or ostitis, such as osteomyelitis.
14. Method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, comprising the following steps:
- mixing a material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica or their mixture, the material comprising a source precursor with a chemical agent, - allowing the source precursor in the material and the chemical agent to react for a determined period under appropriate chemical and physical conditions whereby at least part of the source precursor is transformed into source of oxygen capable of releasing oxygen,
- washing and drying the obtained product and forming it to an implant.
15. Method according to claim 14, characterised in that the material is in form of granules, fibres, tubes, coatings or spheres.
16. Method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, comprising the following steps:
- mixing granulous material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass, sol-gel produced silica or their mixture with a source of oxygen, and
- forming the obtained product to an implant.
17. Method of producing an implant capable of releasing oxygen in the form of molecular oxygen or reactive oxygen species, comprising the following steps:
- mixing a source of oxygen to the matrix of a material selected from a group consisting of bioactive and/or biodegradable glass or sol-gel produced silica during the preparation process, and
- forming the obtained product to an implant.
EP07788720A 2006-06-28 2007-06-26 Implant containing a source of oxygen Withdrawn EP2032182A2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP07788720A EP2032182A2 (en) 2006-06-28 2007-06-26 Implant containing a source of oxygen

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US81686006P 2006-06-28 2006-06-28
EP06116209A EP1872806A1 (en) 2006-06-28 2006-06-28 Implant, its uses and methods for making it
PCT/FI2007/000178 WO2008000888A2 (en) 2006-06-28 2007-06-26 Implant containing a source of oxygen
EP07788720A EP2032182A2 (en) 2006-06-28 2007-06-26 Implant containing a source of oxygen

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2032182A2 true EP2032182A2 (en) 2009-03-11

Family

ID=38596664

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP07788720A Withdrawn EP2032182A2 (en) 2006-06-28 2007-06-26 Implant containing a source of oxygen

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2032182A2 (en)
WO (1) WO2008000888A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20110223209A1 (en) * 2008-07-25 2011-09-15 Roel Kuijer Oxygen delivering scaffold for tissue engineering
FI20086161A0 (en) * 2008-12-04 2008-12-04 Tampereen Yliopisto Solu Ja Ku Biological regenerate for obliteration
WO2011001028A1 (en) 2009-06-29 2011-01-06 Bonalive Biomaterials Oy A bioactive glass for use in conditions relating to bone infections
US10676713B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-06-09 Corning Incorporated Bioactive borophosphate glasses
US10647962B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2020-05-12 Corning Incorporated Bioactive aluminoborate glasses
US20170342383A1 (en) 2016-05-27 2017-11-30 Corning Incorporated Lithium disilicate glass-ceramic compositions and methods thereof
US10751367B2 (en) * 2016-05-27 2020-08-25 Corning Incorporated Bioactive glass microspheres
GB201707153D0 (en) 2017-05-04 2017-06-21 Univ Ulster Therapy
EP3717427A1 (en) 2017-11-28 2020-10-07 Corning Incorporated High liquidus viscosity bioactive glass
CN111417601A (en) 2017-11-28 2020-07-14 康宁股份有限公司 Chemically strengthened bioactive glass-ceramics
CN111405913A (en) 2017-11-28 2020-07-10 康宁股份有限公司 Bioactive glass compositions and dentinal hypersensitivity repair
WO2019108557A1 (en) 2017-11-28 2019-06-06 Corning Incorporated Bioactive borate glass and methods thereof
CN115252890B (en) * 2022-07-26 2023-11-10 江西理工大学 Copper ferrite-MXene polymer composite antibacterial tracheal stent and preparation method thereof

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
SE464850B (en) * 1989-07-19 1991-06-24 Ellem Bioteknik Ab SET FOR PREPARATION OF AN IMPLANT BODY THROUGH TREATMENT WITH A WATER PEROXIDE SOLUTION
FI101129B (en) * 1995-01-13 1998-04-30 Vivoxid Oy New bioactive glasses and their use
FI972890A (en) * 1997-07-08 1999-01-09 Bioxid Oy New plastic-based composite and its use
JP2001509419A (en) * 1997-07-10 2001-07-24 ユーエスバイオマテリアルズ コーポレイション Moldable bioactive composition
FI110063B (en) * 1998-12-11 2002-11-29 Antti Yli-Urpo New bioactive product and its use
US6632412B2 (en) * 1999-12-01 2003-10-14 Timo Peltola Bioactive sol-gel derived silica fibers and methods for their preparation
US20030167967A1 (en) * 2002-03-01 2003-09-11 Timo Narhi Glass ionomers for enhancing mineralization of hard tissue
AU2003264666B2 (en) * 2002-10-03 2008-08-21 Vivoxid Oy Composition, use and manufacture of bioactive glass

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2008000888A3 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2008000888A3 (en) 2008-10-23
WO2008000888A2 (en) 2008-01-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20090324668A1 (en) Implant, its uses and methods for making it
EP2032182A2 (en) Implant containing a source of oxygen
Kaya et al. Mesoporous silica-based bioactive glasses for antibiotic-free antibacterial applications
Baino et al. Bioactive glasses: Special applications outside the skeletal system
Kargozar et al. Copper-containing bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics: From tissue regeneration to cancer therapeutic strategies
US20120164187A1 (en) bioactive glass for use in conditions relating to bone infections
Rahaman et al. Emerging developments in the use of bioactive glasses for treating infected prosthetic joints
ES2535006T3 (en) Composition of ready-mixed biological hydraulic cement paste and use thereof
Lian et al. A multifunctional electrowritten bi-layered scaffold for guided bone regeneration
Enkel et al. Bioactive materials in endodontics
US6482427B2 (en) Compositions and methods for repair of osseous defects and accelerated wound healing
Mouriño et al. Enhancing biological activity of bioactive glass scaffolds by inorganic ion delivery for bone tissue engineering
El-Sayed et al. Antibacterial, drug delivery, and osteoinduction abilities of bioglass/chitosan scaffolds for dental applications
Shayegan et al. Beta-tricalcium phosphate, white mineral trioxide aggregate, white Portland cement, ferric sulfate, and formocresol used as pulpotomy agents in primary pig teeth
Jung Bioactive borate glasses
CA2940280C (en) Implantable paste and its use
Xu et al. Noninvasive monitoring of bone regeneration using NaYF4: Yb3+, Er3+ upconversion hollow microtubes supporting PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel
Khalid et al. Bioactive Glasses and their Applications in Dentistry.
Seyedmajidi et al. Evaluation of antibacterial properties of hydroxyapatite/bioactive glass and fluorapatite/bioactive glass nanocomposite foams as a cellular scaffold of bone tissue
Awaid et al. Bioactive glasses with antibacterial properties: mechanisms, compositions, and applications
EP1872806A1 (en) Implant, its uses and methods for making it
Baino et al. Multifunctional Bioactive Glasses and Glass-Ceramics: Beyond ‘Traditional’Bioactivity
Makiishi et al. In vitro/in vivo evaluation of the efficacy of gatifloxacine-loaded PLGA and hydroxyapatite composite for treating osteomyelitis
Majumdar et al. Multifarious applications of bioactive glasses in soft tissue engineering
Wu et al. Nanographene oxide‐calcium phosphate to inhibit Staphylococcus aureus infection and support stem cells for bone tissue engineering

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20081218

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20090506

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: BONALIVE BIOMATERIALS OY

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20170103

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN