EP1714301B1 - Mass spectrometer system - Google Patents

Mass spectrometer system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1714301B1
EP1714301B1 EP05701514A EP05701514A EP1714301B1 EP 1714301 B1 EP1714301 B1 EP 1714301B1 EP 05701514 A EP05701514 A EP 05701514A EP 05701514 A EP05701514 A EP 05701514A EP 1714301 B1 EP1714301 B1 EP 1714301B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chamber
membrane
pressure
mass spectrometer
vacuum
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP05701514A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1714301A2 (en
Inventor
Alan Finlay
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Microsaic Systems PLC
Original Assignee
Microsaic Systems PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Microsaic Systems PLC filed Critical Microsaic Systems PLC
Publication of EP1714301A2 publication Critical patent/EP1714301A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1714301B1 publication Critical patent/EP1714301B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/02Details
    • H01J49/04Arrangements for introducing or extracting samples to be analysed, e.g. vacuum locks; Arrangements for external adjustment of electron- or ion-optical components
    • H01J49/0495Vacuum locks; Valves
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/0022Portable spectrometers, e.g. devices comprising independent power supply, constructional details relating to portability
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/02Details
    • H01J49/04Arrangements for introducing or extracting samples to be analysed, e.g. vacuum locks; Arrangements for external adjustment of electron- or ion-optical components
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H01ELECTRIC ELEMENTS
    • H01JELECTRIC DISCHARGE TUBES OR DISCHARGE LAMPS
    • H01J49/00Particle spectrometers or separator tubes
    • H01J49/02Details
    • H01J49/04Arrangements for introducing or extracting samples to be analysed, e.g. vacuum locks; Arrangements for external adjustment of electron- or ion-optical components
    • H01J49/0422Arrangements for introducing or extracting samples to be analysed, e.g. vacuum locks; Arrangements for external adjustment of electron- or ion-optical components for gaseous samples
    • H01J49/0427Arrangements for introducing or extracting samples to be analysed, e.g. vacuum locks; Arrangements for external adjustment of electron- or ion-optical components for gaseous samples using a membrane permeable to gases

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to mass spectrometer systems and in particular to a system incorporating a mass spectrometer device formed using MEMS components.
  • the invention more particularly relates to a system having a mass spectrometer device incorporated in a pre-established vacuum.
  • Mass spectrometer systems are well known and are used in the analysis of various materials. Miniature mass spectrometer systems are also known and have applications as field-portable devices for use in the detection of biological and chemical materials such as warfare agents, drugs, explosives and pollutants. They are also used in space exploration and as residual gas analysers. Many systems of reduced size have been developed and micro-engineering methods are increasingly being used in their construction. Mass spectrometer devices consist of three main subsystems; an ion source, an ion filter and an ion counter.
  • the mass spectrometer device operates within a vacuum so as to enable accurate detection of the required material, such that a complete system includes a mass spectrometer device which is provided in an arrangement that allows operation of the device within vacuum conditions.
  • a vacuum is easily generated using standard vacuum techniques. Further information on the make up of such systems may be found in GB2384908 coassigned to the assignees of the present invention.
  • mass spectrometer devices are also known to provide mass spectrometer devices as portable devices.
  • portable devices such as GB2026231 were known.
  • Such a device includes a power pack and a hand held probe, the probe comprising a gas inlet with a porous membrane, an ion source which can also function as an ion pump, a quadrupole ion filter, an ion detector and a chemical getter agent to provide a vacuum within the probe.
  • the spectrometer is intended for detecting chemicals in remote areas and does not require a conventional vacuum system.
  • the system uses the ion source to create the vacuum necessary for operation of the mass spectrometer such that in use as a detector the ion source is configured as a source and during regeneration of the required vacuum the source is configured as a pump.
  • Such modifications to the system that are required to provide the required vacuum necessary for the operation of the mass spectrometer device are cumbersome and complex.
  • the pressure within the evacuated chamber is less than 13.3mPa (10 -4 Torr), typically of less than 133 mPa (10 -6 Torr) and preferably about 1.33 mPa (10 -8 Torr).
  • the pressure within the second chamber is desirably reduced to about 13.3 Pa (10 -1 Torr).
  • the invention also provides a system substantially as hereinafter described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic arrangement of a mass spectrometer system 100
  • the device 100 includes a vacuum chamber 105 within which is mounted a mass spectrometer device 110.
  • the device 110 includes an ion source and an ion detector.
  • the mass spectrometer device is typically mounted at one end of the chamber, at an end distally located from an entrance port 150 of the chamber.
  • the device 110 is formed using MEMS technology and is mounted on a PCB board.
  • a pressure transducer may also be mounted on the PCB board, although again in this schematic it is not explicitly shown.
  • a pressure transducer may be used to monitor the pressure within the chamber, both for information purposes but also as a control system.
  • the pressure within the chamber raises above a certain minimum level, the operation of the system is not as satisfactory and it is therefore sometimes important to have an indicator of when this is occurring so as to change the operational parameters.
  • a getter material such as caesium may be provided within the chamber in the form of a tablet 115 or for example as an internal coating formed on the inner walls of the chamber, the choice of getter material being chosen to absorb suitable gases during storage and operation of the system.
  • the type of getter material is typically chosen for the specific application with which the mass spectrometer system will be used, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
  • a permeable membrane 120 is formed at an end of the chamber, remote from the positioned mass spectrometer device 110.
  • the membrane is provided across the entire inner diameter of the chamber and is adapted to enable a slow dissipation of the vacuum conditions within which the device 110 is disposed.
  • the membrane is provided between the spectrometer device and the entrance port.
  • the system is normally provided with a breakable seal, such that when sealed the vacuum conditions within the chamber are maintained and when broken, that the vacuum will slowly dissipate until the pressure within the chamber is the same as the pressure outside the chamber.
  • a breakable seal may be formed in variety of different ways such as a breakable glass member 125 sealed and mounted on the supporting flange 130. In use, the glass may be broken and the membrane 120 is then exposed to the ambient pressure outside the chamber and due to the pressure difference between the two sides of the membrane gases will percolate across the membrane where they interact with the spectrometer device and also lead to a resulting increase in the pressure within the chamber.
  • the seal is formed from a valve or some other sealing or closure means, and is provided in a normally closed position such that the evacuated conditions within the chamber are maintained. Once opened, sample material may percolate into the chamber, thereby raising the pressure within the chamber.
  • the seal is provided between the membrane and the entrance port.
  • connection or power leads 135 are provided through the walls of the vacuum chamber so as to provide the required power to the mass spectrometer device. Most of the leads are used for connecting low DC or RF components of the mass spectrometer device, but other components such as the detector require voltages of the order of a few thousand volts for operation.
  • the connection through the chamber is such so as to maintain the hermetically sealed conditions of the chamber. Such techniques will be well known to those skilled in the art of the manufacture of vacuum containers or chambers or hermetically sealed packages as found in the field of optoelectronics.
  • valves that can be opened when the device is to be used.
  • valves for vacuum systems tend to be large and it is difficult to provide sizes suitable for the device. While a specialist valve could be designed, this is unlikely to be a satisfactory solution, as a large valve closing area is required for low leaking, and thus a small valve would likely suffer from high leak rates.
  • a common method to block up containers with vacuum is to melt a glass container together. This is commonly done with CRT's. To unblock the seal, the glass could be melted, but this would not be desirable for commercial use and the high temperature needed to melt the glass if not done locally could be detrimental to the device and its containment.
  • a final method would be to have a "soft spot" such as a thin or different material in the containment that could be punctured.
  • a further preferred technique which was mentioned previously in the discussion of Figure 1 and which will be described now with reference to Figure 2 is to use a glass wall 125 which is mounted within the chamber and which can be broken. Even by just cracking the glass, sufficient gas will be able to traverse through into the containment.
  • the glass section can be designed such that a sharp blow could break it.
  • a possible method would be a metal pin 205 which could be brought down on the surface. During non-use of the system, the pin 205 would be covered by a cap 210, to ensure that the pin does not accidentally come into contact with the glass, thereby accidentally breaking the vacuum.
  • the choice of material used in the formation of the vacuum chamber 105 is very important.
  • the material must be capable of standing the pressure imposed by the vacuum, and must not be detrimental to the sustaining of it.
  • a suitable material is stainless steel.
  • Stainless steel grades 304 and 316 are recommended as both have excellent corrosion resistance in a wide range of conditions. Both are resistant to organic chemicals and a wide variety of inorganic chemicals, and can be readily cleaned. Both grades have very low magnetic permeability, and can be easily welded. Grade 316 is more resistant to pitting and crevice corrosion in warm chloride environments, compared to 304 and is often chosen for more aggressive environments such as sea-front buildings and fittings on wharves and piers.
  • the system of the present invention is adapted to be available as a ready to use package, which can be stocked for use as needed.
  • the shelf life should be reasonable, which is determined by the time taken to compromise the internal vacuum, so that the device can not operate (or operate for long enough).
  • the sources of gas in an enclosed vacuum system are; desorption, evaporation, diffusion/ permeation and leaks.
  • Leaks can be classified into two types of leak, virtual and true.
  • Virtual leaks occur when air is trapped, such as in between 2 welds or in an un-vented screw.
  • True leaks are actual paths from the atmosphere to the vacuum.
  • Evaporation results from the components within the vacuum vaporising in vacuum. Desorption is dependant on the material, treatment, temperature, and exposure time, and is mainly the result of evolution of gasses dissolved in the solid, or reduction of surface layers. It is a function of molecular binding energy, temperature of the surface and number of monolayers formed on the surface.
  • Diffusion or Permeation results from the passage of gas from the atmosphere through the vacuum wall material and into the vacuum chamber and can be considered as a 3 step process:
  • MIMS Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry
  • VOC's volatile organic compounds
  • Polysiloxanes have been extensively studied over many years, and are comprised of silicon atoms bonded to oxygen. Silicones are intermediates between organic and inorganic compounds, specifically between silicates and organic polymers. The compound is very stable - eg degradation of PDMS occurs after ⁇ 350 °C. The sudden pressure increase by allowing gasses to pass through into the interior portion of the vacuum container must be withstandable by the membrane. This may require support of the membrane to avoid deformation or associated problems.
  • polar compounds are also limited with polydimethylsiloxane, as the membrane is hydrophobic and polar compounds do not easily diffuse through it at room temperature.
  • a recently introduced technique - desorption chemical ionisation MIMS -combines Chemical Transport - Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry (CT- MIMS) and Chemical Ionisation (CI), making it possible to detect compounds with high boiling points, e. g. acids and other compounds.
  • CT- MIMS Chemical Transport - Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry
  • CI Chemical Ionisation
  • the choice of material used in the formation of the membrane may be chosen for specific applications of the mass spectrometer device. It will be understood that although certain materials may be used for the detection of polar compounds and others for identification of acids etc.. Also the provision of the membrane may be in one or more arrays or alternative combinations.
  • the material chosen for the membrane is specifically chosen to allow a slow percolation of material into the vacuum chamber with a resultant slow breakdown of the vacuum conditions, it will be appreciated that due to the large pressure gradient across the membrane that it is possible for the time between breaking the seal and the loss of the pressure gradient across the membrane can be reduced to a time of such short duration that it is not practical for analysis purposes.
  • membrane thickness has been investigated. Although a thicker membrane is easier to mount within the chamber and does result in slower percolation times, non- linearity effects are introduced. Also a thick membrane will reduce the response time of the system, as well as making it hard to detect VOC's and high boiling point temperature compounds (such as many acids). However, this may be acceptable for detection of VOC's.
  • PDMS material As a liquid on a semi porous surface and polymerise it on that surface.
  • Suitable semi-porous surfaces include silicon and metal meshes.
  • the supporting substrate may then be mounted directly to an inner wall of the chamber.
  • the membrane thickness could be increased, or alternatively the partial pressure difference ( ⁇ p) across the membrane could be reduced
  • the partial pressure difference, ⁇ p p2 - p1, where p2 is the pressure outside the vacuum chamber and p1 is the pressure within the chamber, As long as p2 >> p1, ⁇ p is substantially equivalent to p2. It will be appreciated that if the pressure difference is reduced that the device operation time will increase. At atmospheric pressure, p2 is 101.3 KPa (760Torr), while p1 is about 13.3m Pa (10 -4 Torr), so this holds true.
  • the system of Figure 1 is mounted within a sealed container 300 with an inlet 305 and outlet 310 tube or vent.
  • This sealed container 300 forms a second chamber of the system, the first being the evacuated chamber incorporating the mass spectrometer.
  • the inlet tube is adapted to enable a sample material from outside the container 300 to be introduced to the system, such that constituent material may be examined.
  • the tubes are desirably formed from a PTFE material or some other equivalent.
  • a pump 315 is provided so as to reduce the pressure within the container, and is desirably provided on the outlet vent 310.
  • the pump chosen is of the type known as a roughing pump.
  • the pump is a dry pump such that the operation of the pump does not infect the air quality thereby degrading the accuracy of the result of the system.
  • a pressure transducer is included within the vacuum chamber, the pressure transducer could be used to monitor the pressure and to effect an activation of the pump in the second chamber.
  • the operation of the system without a reduction in the external pressure is of about 10 minutes duration whereas if the pressure is reduced, that this time may be extended to 30 minutes or more.
  • the pressure within the chamber is reducing thereby reducing the efficacy of operation of the spectrometer device.
  • the device is adapted to perform multiple scans of the sample such that a time-performance relationship may be analysed.
  • the system may then be recycled by a reconditioning process.
  • a reconditioning process would involve the cleaning of all materials making up the device and the re-formation of a sealed vacuum within the chamber.
  • the formation of the vacuum conditions are provided by assembling the system within a low pressure environment and sealing the vacuum chamber prior to removal from this low pressure environment. This clean room assembly ensures that the accuracy of the samples detected by the spectrometer is increased.
  • a MEMS spectrometer device is formed in accordance with known techniques and mounted on a PCB board.
  • the board is then introduced, in vacuum conditions, into a steel chamber having an open entrance port at one end.
  • the PCB board is mounted to an end of the chamber distal from the open port.
  • a getter material is then introduced to the chamber.
  • the membrane is then mounted across the internal diameter of the chamber.
  • the open port is sealed by providing a removable or breakable seal or valve at the end of the chamber. Once the chamber is sealed it may then be removed from the vacuum conditions.

Abstract

A portable mass spectrometer system is described. The system includes a mass spectrometer device incorporated within an evacuated chamber. The chamber includes a permeable membrane located between the mass spectrometer device and an entrance port to the chamber. Located between the membrane and the entrance port is a valve. The valve is provided in an normally closed state and has an open state, such that, in use, the adoption of the open state allows the flow of the sample into the chamber through the membrane and into contact with the spectrometer device.

Description

    Field of the Invention
  • The present invention relates to mass spectrometer systems and in particular to a system incorporating a mass spectrometer device formed using MEMS components. The invention more particularly relates to a system having a mass spectrometer device incorporated in a pre-established vacuum.
  • Background Of The Invention
  • Mass spectrometer systems are well known and are used in the analysis of various materials. Miniature mass spectrometer systems are also known and have applications as field-portable devices for use in the detection of biological and chemical materials such as warfare agents, drugs, explosives and pollutants. They are also used in space exploration and as residual gas analysers. Many systems of reduced size have been developed and micro-engineering methods are increasingly being used in their construction. Mass spectrometer devices consist of three main subsystems; an ion source, an ion filter and an ion counter. It is also important that, in use, the mass spectrometer device operates within a vacuum so as to enable accurate detection of the required material, such that a complete system includes a mass spectrometer device which is provided in an arrangement that allows operation of the device within vacuum conditions. In conventional laboratory based equipment such a vacuum is easily generated using standard vacuum techniques. Further information on the make up of such systems may be found in GB2384908 coassigned to the assignees of the present invention.
  • It is also known to provide mass spectrometer devices as portable devices. In fact even before the development of miniaturised mass spectrometer devices, portable devices such as GB2026231 were known. Such a device includes a power pack and a hand held probe, the probe comprising a gas inlet with a porous membrane, an ion source which can also function as an ion pump, a quadrupole ion filter, an ion detector and a chemical getter agent to provide a vacuum within the probe. The spectrometer is intended for detecting chemicals in remote areas and does not require a conventional vacuum system. The system uses the ion source to create the vacuum necessary for operation of the mass spectrometer such that in use as a detector the ion source is configured as a source and during regeneration of the required vacuum the source is configured as a pump. Such modifications to the system that are required to provide the required vacuum necessary for the operation of the mass spectrometer device are cumbersome and complex.
  • A further arrangement is disclosed in US-A-5 155 357 which provides a system according to the preamble of claim 1. Such a device suffers in that there is a large pressure gradient across the membrane sealing the vacuum chamber. There is, therefore, a need to provide an alternative arrangement or system for establishing and operating a mass spectrometer device within a vacuum.
  • Summary Of The Invention
  • These and other problems are addressed in accordance with the teaching of the invention by a system according to claim 1. Advantageous embodiments are provided in the dependent claims.
  • In the normally closed position of the valve, the pressure within the evacuated chamber is less than 13.3mPa (10-4 Torr), typically of less than 133 mPa (10-6 Torr) and preferably about 1.33 mPa (10-8 Torr).
  • When provided with a pump, the pressure within the second chamber is desirably reduced to about 13.3 Pa (10-1 Torr).
  • The invention also provides a system substantially as hereinafter described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
  • Brief Description Of The Drawings
  • The present invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
    • Figure 1 is a schematic of a mass spectrometer device.
    • Figure 2 is a detail view of an arrangement for breaking the vacuum seal of the device of Figure 1.
    • Figure 3 is a schematic showing the incorporation of the device of Figure 1 into an external mating arrangement adapted to provide external operational conditions at a pressure less than ambient atmospheric pressure.
    Detailed Description Of The Drawings
  • The invention will now be described with reference to Figures 1 to 3.
  • Figure 1 is a schematic arrangement of a mass spectrometer system 100 The device 100 includes a vacuum chamber 105 within which is mounted a mass spectrometer device 110. Although not shown in this schematic the device 110 includes an ion source and an ion detector. The mass spectrometer device is typically mounted at one end of the chamber, at an end distally located from an entrance port 150 of the chamber. Desirably, the device 110 is formed using MEMS technology and is mounted on a PCB board. For most applications it is found that the use of ceramic-based PCB materials provides better results in that the ceramic material does not outgas during use of the system. A pressure transducer may also be mounted on the PCB board, although again in this schematic it is not explicitly shown. If incorporated a pressure transducer may be used to monitor the pressure within the chamber, both for information purposes but also as a control system. When the pressure within the chamber raises above a certain minimum level, the operation of the system is not as satisfactory and it is therefore sometimes important to have an indicator of when this is occurring so as to change the operational parameters.
  • For a mass spectrometer to operate the ions must move under the influence of magnetic or electric fields without frequent collisions with other ions or molecules. This means that a pressure of typically less than 13.3 mPa (10-4 Torr), must be maintained. 133 mPa (1 × 10-6 Torr), is considered to be normal practice, although with use of MEMS quadrupole mass spectrometer devices, with their smaller dimensions, higher pressures can be used.
  • A getter material, such as caesium may be provided within the chamber in the form of a tablet 115 or for example as an internal coating formed on the inner walls of the chamber, the choice of getter material being chosen to absorb suitable gases during storage and operation of the system. The type of getter material is typically chosen for the specific application with which the mass spectrometer system will be used, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
  • At an end of the chamber, remote from the positioned mass spectrometer device 110, a permeable membrane 120 is formed. The membrane is provided across the entire inner diameter of the chamber and is adapted to enable a slow dissipation of the vacuum conditions within which the device 110 is disposed. The membrane is provided between the spectrometer device and the entrance port.
  • The system is normally provided with a breakable seal, such that when sealed the vacuum conditions within the chamber are maintained and when broken, that the vacuum will slowly dissipate until the pressure within the chamber is the same as the pressure outside the chamber. Such a breakable seal may be formed in variety of different ways such as a breakable glass member 125 sealed and mounted on the supporting flange 130. In use, the glass may be broken and the membrane 120 is then exposed to the ambient pressure outside the chamber and due to the pressure difference between the two sides of the membrane gases will percolate across the membrane where they interact with the spectrometer device and also lead to a resulting increase in the pressure within the chamber. The seal is formed from a valve or some other sealing or closure means, and is provided in a normally closed position such that the evacuated conditions within the chamber are maintained. Once opened, sample material may percolate into the chamber, thereby raising the pressure within the chamber. The seal is provided between the membrane and the entrance port.
  • One or more connection or power leads 135 are provided through the walls of the vacuum chamber so as to provide the required power to the mass spectrometer device. Most of the leads are used for connecting low DC or RF components of the mass spectrometer device, but other components such as the detector require voltages of the order of a few thousand volts for operation. The connection through the chamber is such so as to maintain the hermetically sealed conditions of the chamber. Such techniques will be well known to those skilled in the art of the manufacture of vacuum containers or chambers or hermetically sealed packages as found in the field of optoelectronics.
  • It will be appreciated that the vacuum conditions provided within the chamber of the present invention may be destroyed by effecting a break in the seal at the end of the chamber. For use of the device there must be a way for gas to permeate the containment, and obviously, having a solid wall of metal will not allow this. One possibility is to have valves that can be opened when the device is to be used. There are a number of valve designs, ranging from bellows, diaphragm, gate and ball. However valves for vacuum systems, tend to be large and it is difficult to provide sizes suitable for the device. While a specialist valve could be designed, this is unlikely to be a satisfactory solution, as a large valve closing area is required for low leaking, and thus a small valve would likely suffer from high leak rates. Another idea would be to have an inlet pipe, which while in storage is "blocked" and is "unblocked" when required. A common method to block up containers with vacuum is to melt a glass container together. This is commonly done with CRT's. To unblock the seal, the glass could be melted, but this would not be desirable for commercial use and the high temperature needed to melt the glass if not done locally could be detrimental to the device and its containment. A similar idea would be to use a solder, which could be melted to remove the block, but again the heating and removal of the solder would have to be done carefully. A final method would be to have a "soft spot" such as a thin or different material in the containment that could be punctured. The use of a thin section of steel, which could be punctured, is possible, however to make it easily puncturable, the wall would have to be substantially thin (depending on area of puncture). A thick wall would require a lot of force, and a large area would result in substantial deformation before breaking. An alternative is to use a more brittle material for puncturing through.
  • A further preferred technique which was mentioned previously in the discussion of Figure 1 and which will be described now with reference to Figure 2 is to use a glass wall 125 which is mounted within the chamber and which can be broken. Even by just cracking the glass, sufficient gas will be able to traverse through into the containment. The glass section can be designed such that a sharp blow could break it. A possible method would be a metal pin 205 which could be brought down on the surface. During non-use of the system, the pin 205 would be covered by a cap 210, to ensure that the pin does not accidentally come into contact with the glass, thereby accidentally breaking the vacuum.
  • Material Chosen
  • It will be appreciated that the choice of material used in the formation of the vacuum chamber 105 is very important. The material must be capable of standing the pressure imposed by the vacuum, and must not be detrimental to the sustaining of it. A suitable material is stainless steel. Stainless steel grades 304 and 316 are recommended as both have excellent corrosion resistance in a wide range of conditions. Both are resistant to organic chemicals and a wide variety of inorganic chemicals, and can be readily cleaned. Both grades have very low magnetic permeability, and can be easily welded. Grade 316 is more resistant to pitting and crevice corrosion in warm chloride environments, compared to 304 and is often chosen for more aggressive environments such as sea-front buildings and fittings on wharves and piers.
  • The system of the present invention is adapted to be available as a ready to use package, which can be stocked for use as needed. To be viable, the shelf life should be reasonable, which is determined by the time taken to compromise the internal vacuum, so that the device can not operate (or operate for long enough). An assessment of the possible causes of vacuum compromising and their importance is detailed below.
  • The sources of gas in an enclosed vacuum system are; desorption, evaporation, diffusion/ permeation and leaks. Leaks can be classified into two types of leak, virtual and true. Virtual leaks occur when air is trapped, such as in between 2 welds or in an un-vented screw. True leaks are actual paths from the atmosphere to the vacuum. Evaporation results from the components within the vacuum vaporising in vacuum. Desorption is dependant on the material, treatment, temperature, and exposure time, and is mainly the result of evolution of gasses dissolved in the solid, or reduction of surface layers. It is a function of molecular binding energy, temperature of the surface and number of monolayers formed on the surface.
  • Diffusion or Permeation results from the passage of gas from the atmosphere through the vacuum wall material and into the vacuum chamber and can be considered as a 3 step process:
    1. 1. The gas adsorbs onto outer wall of vacuum
    2. 2. chamber. The gas diffuses through chamber
    3. 3. wall. Gas desorbs from interior of chamber wall.
      The determining step for the transfer of gas (at least for metals) is the diffusion through the solid.
  • Considering a vacuum chamber manufactured from steel, If it is assumed that the containment is in steady state, is manufactured well, and also the containment has been outgassed for a sufficient time, it can be assumed that leaks, both real and virtual can be discounted. Virtual leaks have been avoided, or have had time to become negligible in the vacuum. Real leaks are not accounted for. Evaporation can be neglected, as the vapour pressure of steel is extremely low, well below the pressure ranges being examined for the device. Desorption of surface layers or trapped gases will be negligible, ensured by the vacuum bakeout. Considering the permeation gas path only, and using Richardson's equations it can be shown that in an ideal containment chamber having pure steel walls and neglecting other sources of leaks, the pressure increase after a year is negligible, compared to the required system pressure of 1.33*10-8 Pa (10-8 Torr) and would give a shelf life of about 10 years. Although stainless steel is a preferred material it will be appreciated that this is exemplary of the type of material that may be used in the manufacture of such chambers and it is not intended to limit the manufacture of the chamber of the system of the present invention to any one type of material.
  • Membrane material
  • For operation of the spectrometer device of the present invention, a supply of sample gas must be made available, without causing too high a leak rate to stop the device from operating. MIMS (Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry) uses a membrane to separate the gas source from the vacuum chamber, slowly allowing gas to permeate through it The most common membrane material is PDMS (polydimethylsiloxane), which is especially useful for measuring volatile organic compounds (VOC's) as the PDMS has a preferential affinity for these molecules compared to others such oxygen and nitrogen. This has the advantage that the gas mixture passing through is enriched, helping with the detection of compounds that would not be detectable otherwise. Polysiloxanes have been extensively studied over many years, and are comprised of silicon atoms bonded to oxygen. Silicones are intermediates between organic and inorganic compounds, specifically between silicates and organic polymers. The compound is very stable - eg degradation of PDMS occurs after ±350 °C. The sudden pressure increase by allowing gasses to pass through into the interior portion of the vacuum container must be withstandable by the membrane. This may require support of the membrane to avoid deformation or associated problems.
  • Unfortunately the measurement of polar compounds is also limited with polydimethylsiloxane, as the membrane is hydrophobic and polar compounds do not easily diffuse through it at room temperature. A recently introduced technique - desorption chemical ionisation MIMS -combines Chemical Transport - Membrane Introduction Mass Spectrometry (CT- MIMS) and Chemical Ionisation (CI), making it possible to detect compounds with high boiling points, e. g. acids and other compounds. It will be appreciated that the choice of material used in the formation of the membrane may be chosen for specific applications of the mass spectrometer device. It will be understood that although certain materials may be used for the detection of polar compounds and others for identification of acids etc.. Also the provision of the membrane may be in one or more arrays or alternative combinations.
  • Although the material chosen for the membrane is specifically chosen to allow a slow percolation of material into the vacuum chamber with a resultant slow breakdown of the vacuum conditions, it will be appreciated that due to the large pressure gradient across the membrane that it is possible for the time between breaking the seal and the loss of the pressure gradient across the membrane can be reduced to a time of such short duration that it is not practical for analysis purposes. The effect of membrane thickness has been investigated. Although a thicker membrane is easier to mount within the chamber and does result in slower percolation times, non- linearity effects are introduced. Also a thick membrane will reduce the response time of the system, as well as making it hard to detect VOC's and high boiling point temperature compounds (such as many acids). However, this may be acceptable for detection of VOC's. In order to provide a thinner membrane, which is easily mountable within the chamber it is possible to lay some PDMS material as a liquid on a semi porous surface and polymerise it on that surface. Suitable semi-porous surfaces include silicon and metal meshes. The supporting substrate may then be mounted directly to an inner wall of the chamber.
  • Changing the flow rates through the membrane
  • To reduce the flow through the membrane without sacrificing the area, the membrane thickness could be increased, or alternatively the partial pressure difference (Δp) across the membrane could be reduced The partial pressure difference, Δp = p2 - p1, where p2 is the pressure outside the vacuum chamber and p1 is the pressure within the chamber, As long as p2 >> p1, Δp is substantially equivalent to p2. It will be appreciated that if the pressure difference is reduced that the device operation time will increase. At atmospheric pressure, p2 is 101.3 KPa (760Torr), while p1 is about 13.3m Pa (10-4 Torr), so this holds true. If the high pressure side was reduced down to say 133 Pa (1 Torr), p2(1 Torr) is still far greater than 13.3 mPa (10-4 Torr), so the equality holds. Due to the proportionality of pressure and flow through rate, by reducing the pressure to 133 Pa (1 Torr), the time taken for the pressure to rise for a given membrane would be increased by 760 times. To reduce the pressure down to 132 Pa (1 Torr) - which is only a rough vacuum, is relativly simple, and does not require much hardware in comparison to high vacuums. Therefore it will be appreciated that rather than increasing the dimensions of the membrane it is possible to increase the operational time of the system by reducing the pressure gradient across the membrane. Figure 3 shows system according to the present invention to provide such a reduction in the pressure gradient.
  • In the embodiment of Figure 3, the system of Figure 1 is mounted within a sealed container 300 with an inlet 305 and outlet 310 tube or vent. This sealed container 300 forms a second chamber of the system, the first being the evacuated chamber incorporating the mass spectrometer. The inlet tube is adapted to enable a sample material from outside the container 300 to be introduced to the system, such that constituent material may be examined. The tubes are desirably formed from a PTFE material or some other equivalent. A pump 315 is provided so as to reduce the pressure within the container, and is desirably provided on the outlet vent 310. Suitably the pump chosen is of the type known as a roughing pump. Such pumps are available as both dry and wet varieties and due to the application within the context of the present invention it is preferable that the pump is a dry pump such that the operation of the pump does not infect the air quality thereby degrading the accuracy of the result of the system. If a pressure transducer is included within the vacuum chamber, the pressure transducer could be used to monitor the pressure and to effect an activation of the pump in the second chamber.
  • In tests it has been shown that the operation of the system without a reduction in the external pressure is of about 10 minutes duration whereas if the pressure is reduced, that this time may be extended to 30 minutes or more. At all times during the operation the pressure within the chamber is reducing thereby reducing the efficacy of operation of the spectrometer device. However, desirably the device is adapted to perform multiple scans of the sample such that a time-performance relationship may be analysed.
  • Once the internal pressure of the vacuum chamber is such that there is little or no pressure gradient across the membrane then the usefulness of the system is lost. The system may then be recycled by a reconditioning process. Such a process would involve the cleaning of all materials making up the device and the re-formation of a sealed vacuum within the chamber. Typically, the formation of the vacuum conditions are provided by assembling the system within a low pressure environment and sealing the vacuum chamber prior to removal from this low pressure environment. This clean room assembly ensures that the accuracy of the samples detected by the spectrometer is increased.
  • When assembling a system according to the present invention, desirably it is effected in one or more sequential steps. A MEMS spectrometer device is formed in accordance with known techniques and mounted on a PCB board. The board is then introduced, in vacuum conditions, into a steel chamber having an open entrance port at one end. The PCB board is mounted to an end of the chamber distal from the open port. A getter material is then introduced to the chamber. The membrane is then mounted across the internal diameter of the chamber. The open port is sealed by providing a removable or breakable seal or valve at the end of the chamber. Once the chamber is sealed it may then be removed from the vacuum conditions.
  • The words comprises/comprising when used in this specification are to specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps or components but does not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers , steps, components or groups thereof.

Claims (12)

  1. A mass spectrometer system (100) comprising a first evacuated chamber including a mass spectrometer device (110) provided within said evacuated chamber (105), the first chamber having an entrance port (150) through which a sample may be introduced into the first chamber and into contact with the mass spectrometer device, the system additionally including a permeable membrane (120) located across the first chamber between the port and the spectrometer device and a valve (125) located between the membrane and the entrance port and having a normally closed state and an open state, such that, in use, the adoption of the open state allows the flow of the sample into the first chamber (105) through the membrane (120) and into contact with the spectrometer device (110), the system being characterised in that it includes a second evacuated chamber (300), the first evacuated chamber (105) being located within the second evacuated chamber (300), the pressure within the first evacuated chamber being less than that of the second evacuated chamber.
  2. The system as claimed in claim 1 wherein the spectrometer device is formed from a MEMS device.
  3. The system as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the valve is formed from a rupturable diaphragm sealing the first evacuated chamber, the rupturing of the diaphragm breaking the seal and allowing the flow of the sample into the chamber.
  4. The system as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the valve is formed from a breakable glass member and an actuator, the glass member being located across the chamber and sealing the chamber, and wherein, in use, the actuator is adapted to come into contact with the glass member, breaking the member and consequently the seal.
  5. The system as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the membrane is formed from a polydimethylsiloxane material.
  6. The system as claimed in claim 5 wherein the polydimethylsiloxane material is formed as a liquid layer on a substrate, a polymerisation of the material on the substrate forming the membrane.
  7. The system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the substrate is a metal mesh structure.
  8. The system as claimed in claim 6 wherein the substrate is a silicon based substrate.
  9. The system as claimed in any preceding claim wherein the second chamber includes an inlet (305) and an outlet tube (310), the inlet tube being adapted to enable an introduction of a sample from outside the second chamber into contact with the spectrometer device located within the first chamber, the outlet tube being adapted to enable a venting of gas from the second chamber.
  10. The system as claimed in claim 9 wherein a pump (315) is provided on the outlet tube, the pump adapted to effect a reduction in pressure of the second chamber.
  11. The system as claimed in any preceding claim wherein, in the normally closed position, the pressure within the first evacuated chamber is less than 13.3 mPa (10-4 Torr).
  12. The system as claimed in claim 11 wherein the pressure within the second chamber is reduced to about 13.3 Pa (10-1 Torr).
EP05701514A 2004-02-12 2005-01-13 Mass spectrometer system Not-in-force EP1714301B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GB0403122A GB2411046B (en) 2004-02-12 2004-02-12 Mass spectrometer system
PCT/EP2005/050132 WO2005078429A2 (en) 2004-02-12 2005-01-13 Mass spectrometer system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1714301A2 EP1714301A2 (en) 2006-10-25
EP1714301B1 true EP1714301B1 (en) 2008-04-02

Family

ID=32011792

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05701514A Not-in-force EP1714301B1 (en) 2004-02-12 2005-01-13 Mass spectrometer system

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US7750292B2 (en)
EP (1) EP1714301B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE391340T1 (en)
DE (1) DE602005005794T2 (en)
GB (1) GB2411046B (en)
WO (1) WO2005078429A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2435712B (en) 2006-03-02 2008-05-28 Microsaic Ltd Personalised mass spectrometer
US8299424B2 (en) * 2007-04-30 2012-10-30 Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Systems and methods for analyzing underwater, subsurface and atmospheric environments
GB2451239B (en) 2007-07-23 2009-07-08 Microsaic Systems Ltd Microengineered electrode assembly
GB0818342D0 (en) * 2008-10-07 2008-11-12 Science And Technology Facilities Council Mass discriminator
US8063362B1 (en) * 2009-07-09 2011-11-22 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Ionic liquid membrane for air-to-vacuum sealing and ion transport
US8438924B2 (en) 2011-02-03 2013-05-14 Inficon, Inc. Method of determining multilayer thin film deposition on a piezoelectric crystal
JP5771458B2 (en) * 2011-06-27 2015-09-02 株式会社日立ハイテクノロジーズ Mass spectrometer and mass spectrometry method
US8975573B2 (en) 2013-03-11 2015-03-10 1St Detect Corporation Systems and methods for calibrating mass spectrometers
CN105934277B (en) * 2013-09-13 2017-08-29 英飞康公司 Chemical analyzer with film
JP6805138B2 (en) 2014-07-07 2020-12-23 ナノテック・アナリシス・ソチエタ・ア・レスポンサビリタ・リミタータ・センプリフィカータNANOTECH ANALYSIS S.r.l.s. Devices for controlling gas flow, systems and methods that utilize the devices
US10229809B2 (en) 2014-07-07 2019-03-12 Nanotech Analysis S.R.L. Device for generating a composition-controlled and intensity-controlled ionic flow and related method
US9786478B2 (en) * 2014-12-05 2017-10-10 Purdue Research Foundation Zero voltage mass spectrometry probes and systems
US9831058B2 (en) * 2015-01-21 2017-11-28 Varex Imaging Corporation Vacuum assemblies and methods of formation
WO2016127177A1 (en) 2015-02-06 2016-08-11 Purdue Reserach Foundation Probes, systems, cartridges, and methods of use thereof

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5155357A (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-10-13 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Portable mass spectrometer

Family Cites Families (26)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3458699A (en) * 1966-10-12 1969-07-29 Universal Oil Prod Co Sample introduction apparatus
GB1224915A (en) 1967-07-20 1971-03-10 Universal Oil Prod Co Sample introduction system for mass spectrometer analysis
US3638401A (en) * 1969-03-24 1972-02-01 Varian Associates Vacuum connector for connecting replaceable evacuated devices to an evacuated system
US3992626A (en) * 1973-02-23 1976-11-16 Honeywell Inc. Test instrument
US4023398A (en) * 1975-03-03 1977-05-17 John Barry French Apparatus for analyzing trace components
GB2026231B (en) * 1978-05-30 1982-10-27 Emi Ltd Mass spectrometers
US4201913A (en) * 1978-10-06 1980-05-06 Honeywell Inc. Sampling system for mass spectrometer
JPS6477855A (en) * 1987-09-18 1989-03-23 Jeol Ltd Liquid chromatograph mass analyzer
US5313061A (en) * 1989-06-06 1994-05-17 Viking Instrument Miniaturized mass spectrometer system
US5019139A (en) * 1989-12-22 1991-05-28 The Dow Chemical Company Valve membrane combination
US5536939A (en) * 1993-09-22 1996-07-16 Northrop Grumman Corporation Miniaturized mass filter
US5703359A (en) * 1996-07-29 1997-12-30 Leybold Inficon, Inc. Composite membrane and support assembly
US5994696A (en) * 1997-01-27 1999-11-30 California Institute Of Technology MEMS electrospray nozzle for mass spectroscopy
JP2001155677A (en) * 1999-11-24 2001-06-08 Horiba Ltd Membrane inlet mass spectrometer
JP2001307673A (en) * 2000-04-19 2001-11-02 Horiba Ltd Membrane inlet mass spectrometer
AU2001263386A1 (en) * 2000-05-30 2001-12-11 The John Hopkins University Sample collection preparation methods for time-of-flight miniature mass spectrometer
JP2002357593A (en) * 2001-05-31 2002-12-13 Horiba Ltd Gas analyzer
GB2376562B (en) * 2001-06-14 2003-06-04 Dynatronics Ltd Mass spectrometers and methods of ion separation and detection
GB2384908B (en) 2002-02-05 2005-05-04 Microsaic Systems Ltd Mass spectrometry
EP1396713A1 (en) * 2002-09-09 2004-03-10 Kore Technology Limited Method and Apparatus for concentrating a gaseous substance
WO2004029602A2 (en) * 2002-09-27 2004-04-08 Honeywell International Inc. Phased micro analyser
JP4235429B2 (en) * 2002-10-17 2009-03-11 キヤノン株式会社 Method for measuring gas in sealed container, and method for manufacturing sealed container and image display device
AU2003297655B2 (en) * 2002-12-02 2007-09-20 Griffin Analytical Technologies, Inc. Processes for designing mass separators and ion traps, methods for producing mass separators and ion traps. mass spectrometers, ion traps, and methods for analysing samples
US7427750B2 (en) * 2003-01-17 2008-09-23 Griffin Analytical Technologies, L.L.C. Mass spectrometer assemblies, mass spectrometry vacuum chamber lid assemblies, and mass spectrometer operational methods
US7019289B2 (en) * 2003-01-31 2006-03-28 Yang Wang Ion trap mass spectrometry
US7385191B1 (en) * 2004-12-01 2008-06-10 Pacific Environmental Technologies, Llc High pressure membrane introduction for a mass spectrometer

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5155357A (en) * 1990-07-23 1992-10-13 Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Portable mass spectrometer

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1714301A2 (en) 2006-10-25
US20070278401A1 (en) 2007-12-06
GB2411046A (en) 2005-08-17
WO2005078429A3 (en) 2005-12-29
WO2005078429A2 (en) 2005-08-25
US7750292B2 (en) 2010-07-06
ATE391340T1 (en) 2008-04-15
DE602005005794D1 (en) 2008-05-15
DE602005005794T2 (en) 2009-04-30
GB2411046B (en) 2006-10-25
GB0403122D0 (en) 2004-03-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1714301B1 (en) Mass spectrometer system
Elsey Outgassing of vacuum materials-II
US8956696B2 (en) Ultra-thin membrane for chemical analyzer and related method for forming membrane
US20080202211A1 (en) Gas Sensor and Method For Operating a Getter Pump
US20080202212A1 (en) Methods and apparatus for test gas leak detection
TWI532984B (en) Pre-concentration device and mthod of pre-concentration in a gas analysis system, gas analysis system and method of analyzing gas
US20080202210A1 (en) Test gas leak detection using a composite membrane
CN107532965B (en) Leak detector and method of detecting leak
JPH0460539B2 (en)
JP7041665B2 (en) Gas barrier property evaluation device and gas barrier property evaluation method
JPH06241978A (en) Gas transmittance measuring device for film
US20220181709A1 (en) Tightness test of a liquid filled test object
AU2005205838A1 (en) Method for Operating Liquid in the Vacuum or Low-Pressure Environment and Observing the Operation and Device for the Operation and Observation
Alpert Production and measurement of ultrahigh vacuum
JP3951972B2 (en) Film sample fixing method, gas cell, and gas permeability measuring apparatus
EP3027989B1 (en) Sample transfer to high vacuum transition flow
JP3683740B2 (en) Gas analyzer for bubbles in liquid crystal cell and gas analysis method for bubbles in liquid crystal cell using the gas analyzer
JP2004279254A (en) Method for measuring water vapor permeability rate of sample
Ramesham Evaluation of non-evaporable getters for high vacuum hermetic packages
JP4398320B2 (en) Gas detector
CN105934277A (en) Chemical analyzer with membrane
WO2022219674A1 (en) Hydrogen leak detector
CN116964422A (en) Functional test of a leak detection device for leak testing a test sample filled with a liquid
JPWO2021023513A5 (en)
Jin et al. Research on micro/nano film getters for vacuum maintenance of MEMS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060816

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20061130

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005005794

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080515

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: LEMAN CONSULTING S.A.

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080702

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080713

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080903

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080802

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080702

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20090106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080703

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20081003

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20111013

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: MICROSAIC SYSTEMS PLC, GB

Effective date: 20111013

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005005794

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE BETTEN & RESCH, DE

Effective date: 20110929

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602005005794

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: MICROSAIC SYSTEMS PLC, GB

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: MICROSAIC SYSTEMS LTD., LONDON, GB

Effective date: 20110929

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20120206

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20120123

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20120123

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20130930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130801

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130131

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005005794

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130131