EP1704089B1 - Tilt-rotor aircraft - Google Patents
Tilt-rotor aircraft Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1704089B1 EP1704089B1 EP04806243A EP04806243A EP1704089B1 EP 1704089 B1 EP1704089 B1 EP 1704089B1 EP 04806243 A EP04806243 A EP 04806243A EP 04806243 A EP04806243 A EP 04806243A EP 1704089 B1 EP1704089 B1 EP 1704089B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- aircraft
- rotors
- rotor
- lift
- mode
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Not-in-force
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C39/00—Aircraft not otherwise provided for
- B64C39/04—Aircraft not otherwise provided for having multiple fuselages or tail booms
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B64—AIRCRAFT; AVIATION; COSMONAUTICS
- B64C—AEROPLANES; HELICOPTERS
- B64C29/00—Aircraft capable of landing or taking-off vertically, e.g. vertical take-off and landing [VTOL] aircraft
- B64C29/0008—Aircraft capable of landing or taking-off vertically, e.g. vertical take-off and landing [VTOL] aircraft having its flight directional axis horizontal when grounded
- B64C29/0016—Aircraft capable of landing or taking-off vertically, e.g. vertical take-off and landing [VTOL] aircraft having its flight directional axis horizontal when grounded the lift during taking-off being created by free or ducted propellers or by blowers
- B64C29/0033—Aircraft capable of landing or taking-off vertically, e.g. vertical take-off and landing [VTOL] aircraft having its flight directional axis horizontal when grounded the lift during taking-off being created by free or ducted propellers or by blowers the propellers being tiltable relative to the fuselage
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a convertiplane of the tiltable rotor type.
- convertiplanes As is known, there are many designs of aircraft, herein referred to as convertiplanes, seeking to combine the advantages of fixed-wing propeller aircraft and of helicopters, for example by use of tilt-rotors or by tilt-wings. Of these, arguably only the twin tilt- rotor designs are close to full production.
- V-22 Osprey a joint proposal by Bell and Boeing was approved for full-scale development for the US armed forces, achieving its first flight in 1989.
- the V-22 eventually entered low- rate initial production in 1999, but subsequently was grounded after two crashes in 2000; revised flight tests began in May 2002 and it is now in limited production.
- Patent publication No. US 2002/0100835 discloses an aircraft with a tiltable rotor at each end of the aircraft body and an aircraft with tiltable rotor at one end and tiltable turbojet at the other end of the aircraft body.
- the most recent twin tilt-rotor is the Bell Agusta BA 609, which made its maiden flight on 7 March 2003 as the world's first civil tilt-rotor and is configured generally as the V-22.
- rotor is to be construed broadly, to include not only an open (helicopter- type) rotor, but also a ducted fan or ducted rotor.
- the invention provides a tilt-rotor aircraft comprising a fuselage, wings for sustained forward flight, and a plurality of rotors, each rotor being independently and sequentially tiltable between a position above the aircraft providing lift and a position providing propulsion as a pusher propeller for forward flight.
- a tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a fuselage, wings for sustained forward flight, and at least one rotor tiltable between a position providing lift and a position providing propulsion for forward flight, the rotor or rotors being carried by supporting structure mounted on the fuselage and being disposed on or symmetrically about the longitudinal centre line of the aircraft.
- a tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a plurality of rotors carried by at least one tiltable nacelle on the longitudinal centre line of the aircraft.
- The, or each, nacelle may have a pair of contra-rotating rotors which are coaxial, or on parallel axes, or intermesh.
- a said nacelle or supporting structure may be mounted to pivot and optionally also translate about an axis extending transversely of an upper part of the aircraft fuselage.
- the nacelle may contain at least one engine.
- the engine (s) may be located elsewhere in the aircraft, and power may be delivered mechanically to the rotors or via a local power turbine, electric motor, hydraulic motor or other transmission.
- the rotors preferably are driven by a plurality of engines via a transmission such that all the rotors continue to be driven if an engine fails.
- the nacelle may be mounted to pivot and optionally also translate about an axis extending transversely of an upper part of the fuselage. At least inboard portions of wings of the aircraft maybe moveable so as to present leading edges to the airflow generated from the rotors in lift mode.
- a tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a tiltable rotor assembly on the longitudinal centre line of the aircraft moveable between a lift mode and a forward flight mode, inboard portions of the wings of the aircraft being moveable so as to present leading edges to the airflow generated by the rotors in lift mode.
- a said moveable portion may be rotatable and/or translatable transversely or longitudinally about a fixed beam projecting from the fuselage of the aircraft.
- the beam may extend to a fixed outboard portion of the wing.
- the fixed beam may be offset from the axis of tilt of the rotors either forwardly or rearwardly or vertically.
- each wing may have at least two substantially parallel moveable portions.
- a said moveable portion may be configured to act as a control surface when the aircraft is in lift mode and/or in transition between lift and forward flight modes, the aircraft also comprising control means for operating the control surface.
- the underside of the aircraft fuselage may be shaped to reduce download forces on the fuselage from the airflow generated by the rotor or rotors in lift mode.
- control surface on the fuselage operative when the aircraft is in a lift mode and/or in transition between lift and forward flight modes.
- a tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a tiltable rotor assembly moveable between a lift position and a forward flight position in front of or behind the fuselage.
- the aircraft is of a twin-boom layout, wherein booms extend rearwardly from the wings of the aircraft to support the aircraft's empennage, the rotor assembly being behind the fuselage and disposed between the booms when the aircraft is in forward flight mode.
- the preferred embodiments of the invention have all the powerplant, transmission and rotor components within a single rotornacelle, allowing some components such as cross-wing transmissions to be eliminated and others such as support structures to be simplified.
- the powerplant may be within the fuselage.
- the rotors are mounted on, or symmetrically about, the centre-line of the aircraft.
- the rotors may be mounted at an angle of inclination to the roll axis or to the pitch axis of the aircraft.
- the angle of inclination may be up to 45 degrees, for example between 12'/and 32'/2 degrees, and preferably being substantially twenty two and a half degrees.
- the angle of inclination may be variable.
- the aircraft may comprise rotors which are substantially in mesh.
- the aircraft may comprise a mechanism for varying the relative phase of the rotors to permit sequential tilting, preferably substantially in mesh.
- the mechanism may comprise a cross-shaft.
- the tilt axis of the rotors may be vertically or longitudinally offset from the point of convergence of a longitudinal axis of each rotor.
- the rotors may have a common cross-shaft.
- the gear ratios between the cross-shaft and the rotor shaft for a two bladed rotor design may be of a 2:3 ratio.
- the cross-shaft preferably includes a differential gearbox with means to input mesh phase correction.
- the flight positions are preferably to the rear of the fuselage and the lift positions are preferably substantially vertical, or tilted towards the front of the fuselage by up to ten degrees, preferably up to five degrees.
- the flight positions may be between ninety and one hundred degrees from the lift positions. Preferably the flight positions are substantially ninety five degrees from the lift positions.
- a tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a fuselage, wings for sustained forward flight, front and rear rotors mounted on the aircraft fuselage for providing lift at least one of the rotors being tiltable between a lift position and a position providing propulsion for forward flight.
- Both rotors may be tiltable between lift and propulsion positions.
- One rotor may be deployable to an autogyro configuration for forward flight, or can be folded in flight.
- the aircraft may be operable in three flight modes, a first of which is in use below a first air speed, a second of which is in use between the first airspeed and a second airspeed, and a third of which is in use above the second airspeed.
- the aircraft may comprise a controller which can automatically manage transitions between these flight modes.
- the aircraft may comprise means for sensing dynamic air pressure arising from air speed, the aircraft being operable in three flight modes determined with reference to dynamic pressure, the first-mode being used below a first dynamic pressure, the second mode between the first dynamic pressure and a second dynamic pressure and the third mode above the second dynamic pressure.
- the second flight mode is preferably a compound mode in which at least one of the rotors is in the flight position or at least one of the rotors is in the lift position.
- at least one of the rotors is substantially in the flight position and one of the rotors is substantially in the lift position in the second flight mode.
- the first air speed or first dynamic pressure may be sufficient for the wings to take substantially half of the aircraft lift, and the second air speed or second dynamic pressure may be sufficient for the wings to take substantially all of the aircraft lift.
- the rotors may be moveable into a feathered position so that they may be tilted between lift and flight positions or held in or between those positions more easily.
- a convertiplane 1 comprises a fuselage 2, a rotornacelle 3 attached above the fuselage 2, and a wing 4.
- the rotornacelle 3 supports two rotors 11 that rotate in opposite directions about the common axis A, so setting aside other influences, the force vector produced by the rotors 11 is aligned to axis A.
- the rotornacelle 3 houses the engines and known devices - not forming part of the present invention and therefore not shown - for transmitting power to and for controlling the cyclic and collective pitch of the rotors 11.
- the rotors are coupled through a differential gear to equalise the torque supplied to each, any imbalance relative to axis A manifesting itself as a torque reaction on the differential casing which is transmitted to the airframe.
- the rotornacelle 3 is attached to the fuselage 2 by two actuation devices 20, such as inter-connected geared-down electric motors.
- the two actuation devices 20 are used to rotate rotornacelle 3 about the axis B between a helicopter mode where axis A is substantially vertical, and an airplane mode where axis A is substantially horizontal.
- Each device 20 comprises a load bearing casing, electric motor, fail safe, devices, monitoring devices and a high torque output reduction gearbox.
- the devices are configured to provide high integrity rotary actuation capable of supporting the weight of the aircraft in hover mode and to achieve translation to and from forward flight in about ten seconds.
- the devices 20 may be arranged to provide translation as well as rotation, for example by interposing beams or pivot arms between the axis B and pivotal connections to the nacelle. This may allow a more compact movement between lift and forward flight positions. Differential control of the actuators in such arrangement can vector the rotor thrust, perhaps permitting cyclic pitch control to be omitted, or to assist in aircraft trimming, and aircraft CG balancing.
- Wing 4 has two halfwings 5, each having an outer portion 6 attached to two fixed beam elements 7, 8 that project from the fuselage 2, so that wing 4 is fixed relative to the fuselage 2 and the outer portions 6 are substantially outside the airflow of the rotornacelle 3.
- each halfwing 5 comprises two inner wing portions 9, 10 movable so as to rotate about the respective axes E1 and E2 of the fixed beam elements 7, 8.
- the two inner wing portions 9, 10 are held flush with the outer portion 6 to form a conventional wing.
- the helicopter mode and in the transition mode between airplane and helicopter, the two inner wing portions 9, 10 are aligned substantially to the local airflow so as to virtually eliminate the detrimental download forces of rotornacelle 3 airflow that otherwise would act on wing 4.
- the drag coefficient of an airfoil at right angles to the airflow may be as high as 2 but is reduced one hundredfold when substantially aligned to the airflow.
- the inner wing portions 9, 10 may be used as aircraft control surfaces to supplement or take-over from conventional secondary and primary surfaces which progressively lose their effectiveness due to lack of forward airspeed as the aircraft converts to helicopter mode.
- the inner wing portions 9, 10 will be aligned substantially to the local airflow i.e. to the wash resulting from the rotornacelle and air movement relative to the aircraft.
- helicopter and transition modes the purpose is to eliminate download (drag) forces on the wings; in the airplane mode the purpose is to provide lift with minimum drag.
- Using displacement from alignment also provides aircraft control forces and moments.
- the most important control uses are as airbrakes in transition mode and as high lift surfaces in slow airplane mode flight. Equally their differential positioning (wing to wing) produces a moment: In hover and transition this may be used for yaw control for example in an embodiment where differential collective pitch is not available. In airplane mode it may be used for roll control.
- the inner wing portions 9, 10 may be alternatively removed from the rotor downwash simply by translating them longitudinally (outwardly) of the wing along the beam elements 7, 8. Then they may be accommodated within or overlapping the outer wing portions, or may be deployed beyond them to lengthen the wings. When just the beam elements 7, 8 are exposed to the rotor downwash the downforce on the wing may be reduced tenfold.
- Panels set into the fuselage may be deployable for control purposes. For example, in search and rescue and other missions where rope or winch access is needed in hover, panels deployable as symmetrical diverters can be provided at the shoulders of the fuselage so as to disperse the downwash to give calmer air immediately beneath the fuselage.
- a fin is disposed along the length of the apex of faired portion 19, and is rotatable about an axis at the apex parallel to the longitudinal axis-of the aircraft to generate side forces when the aircraft is hovering in a side wind so that aircraft alignment is preserved for VTOL in constrained landing sites, or so that aircraft pointing may be retained for observation, aiming or weapon release purposes.
- Tricycle landing gear 22 is provided.
- a typical flight for convertiplane 1 is envisaged as take-off, climb to chosen altitude, cruise, descent from altitude, and landing.
- the pilot may choose to fly the convertiplane in any one of the helicopter, transitional, and airplane modes, subject to flight regulations and envelope.
- a flight plan will be assumed which starts with a conventional airplane runway take-off, climb and cruise, and then uses the transitional mode for descent, and lands using the helicopter mode.
- the rotornacelle 3 In preparation for take-off the rotornacelle 3 is aligned substantially horizontally and remains thus through take-off, climb and cruise.
- the rotornacelle 3 may be trimmed in this conventional airplane mode to optimise the aircraft's attitude for efficient flight and for CG balancing.
- Descent is entered by reducing forward speed to the point where the desired rate of descent is achieved; this may be by reducing engine power, use of air brakes or such other conventional airplane primary and secondary control surfaces as provided or by deployment of inner wing portions 9 or 10 as airbrakes, or a combination of all such.
- the engine power and the angle from horizontal of the rotornacelle 3 are steadily increased and forward speed further reduced, by means as just described, so entering the transitional mode.
- transition continues until the rotornacelle 3 is aligned substantially vertically, and the convertiplane has thereby entered the helicopter mode and is landed as such.
- the inner wing portions 9 or 10 are substantially aligned to the local airflow and are able by use of small deflections to produce significant forces to assist change of aircraft forward speed, change of wing lift and change for control and manoeuvring.
- the aircraft is of a high-wing twin-boom layout, booms 22 extending rearwardly from the inboard end of outer half-wings 6 to support the aircraft's twin empennage 24 and horizontal stabiliser 26.
- Moveable half wings 5 are provided as in the figure 1 embodiment.
- the rotornacelle 3 is pivotally mounted about a transverse axis C at the rear of the fuselage 2.
- tricycle undercarriage 28 with a tailwheel is provided for stability on the ground.
- the rotornacelle In lift (helicopter) mode the rotornacelle is pivoted so as to dispose the rotors below the fuselage as shown in figure 7 , the moveable inner wings being positioned to avoid obstructing the flow of air to the rotors.
- the rotornacelle During transition to forward flight the rotornacelle is rotated gradually into the position shown in figure 5 in which the rotors act as a pusher propeller between the booms 22.
- the moveable portions 9, 10 are progressively pivoted so as to offer minimum drag to the airflow passing through the rotors.
- the relatively high velocity of this flow over the half-wings assists in generating lift.
- the portions 9, 10 in this embodiment may in particular be used to control yaw, enabling the relatively complex differential control of collective pitch to be omitted, with attendant cost savings.
- a variant of this embodiment is to mount the rotornacelle above the fuselage on pylons or supports spaced wider than the width of the rotors (for example at junctions between the booms 22 and the wings 4), and sufficiently tall for the tilt axis C to be positioned for the rotornacelle to move from a lift position beneath the axis C but above the fuselage to a flight position behind it.
- the pylons may be pivotally connected both to the nacelle and to the boom junctions to enable the nacelle to be positioned lower in the forward flight position, with its thrust vector passing closer to the aircraft CG.
- the open rotors may be enclosed within a rim or very short duct to form ducted rotors with collective and cyclic pitch as already described.
- ducted fans with a larger number of blades of fixed or collective pitch may be used. Whilst the duct would bring a cost and weight penalty, a ducted rotor or fan would have less noise from blade vortex interference and possibly reduced susceptibility to vortex ring state.
- the contra-rotating rotors may be disposed on spaced axes side by side, so that viewed from the front the rotornacelle appears U-shaped, the engine and tilt axis forming the base and two side-by-side rotor masts forming the sides of the U.
- the masts would be just over a rotor radius apart and equally spaced about the aircraft centre line, the contra-rotating rotors being geared together so as to intermesh.
- the rotors may co-rotate provided the masts are of different heights or spaced more than a rotor diameter apart.
- a further variation is to employ contra-rotating intermeshing rotors with rotor masts close together but at a slight angle to each other symmetrically about the aircraft centre line, so that they present a V-shaped appearance viewed from the front.
- the rotor masts are canted outwards no more than is necessary for the blades to intermesh with adequate clearance.
- a large aircraft may have two separate tiltable contra-rotating rotors, one at the front and one at the rear, each being carried on a tiltable nacelle.
- each rotornacelle may have a pair of contra-rotating rotors.
- FIG. 9 to 11 A further embodiment is shown in Figures 9 to 11 , aircraft 101, configured as a gunship. Parts already described with reference to Figures 1 to 6 carry the same reference numerals.
- a fourth embodiment is shown in Figure 12 , aircraft 102, where the rotors are arranged in tandem rather than side-by-side.
- a version of aircraft 101 simplified wherever possible, can be used as a light civil aircraft, suitable for the general aviation and sports market.
- twin rotors 11 a, 11 b are mounted on separate pylons 30a, 30b, which are capable of tilting independently.
- the pylons 30a, 30b are pivotally mounted about a transverse axis F at the rear of the fuselage 2.
- the pylons are canted away from each other about a vertical axis G; a first pylon extending along an axis G1 and a second along an axis G2.
- the pylons are canted at approximately 45° relative to each other, each being inclined approximately 22.5° from the vertical axis G.
- the rotors 11 a, 11 b are driven in opposing directions from a common cross-shaft mounted aligned to the tilt axis F-F. At any identical tilt angle of the pylons 30a, 30b, the rotors turn at the same speed and in perfect mesh. As the relative tilt changes, the phase needed for perfect meshing changes non-linearly. The gear ratio of the cross-shaft to the rotor shaft compensates for some of the phase change, although linearly.
- the various modes of flight, and the transitions between them, are illustrated in Figure 13 .
- the pylons 3Qa, 30b are substantially vertical in the fore-and-aft (pitch) plane, or tilted forward a little, for example 85° from the horizontal for forward flight.
- dynamic pressure 0.5 ⁇ V 2 where ⁇ is the density of the fluid the aircraft is travelling through and V is its velocity
- the first rotor 11 a As dynamic pressure (0.5 ⁇ V 2 ) increases, the first rotor 11 a is rotated forward to 80° tilt where it takes over all the rotor lift and propulsion task, allowing 11 b to be feathered and rotated to 180° to takeover propulsion. Once dynamic pressure (0.5 ⁇ V 2 ) is sufficient for the wings to take all the aircraft lift, the first rotor 11 a is feathered, then tilted back, to share the pusher propeller duty.
- the aircraft remains in the wing mode, with the wings providing all the lift and the rotors acting as conventional pusher propellers, except that each remains inclined to the aircraft centre line so that the rotors continue to mesh and each rotor is clear of the mast of the other.
- the angle of inclination is generally as small as possible so that the component of rotor thrust which is orthogonal to the aircraft centre line is as small as possible.
- the angle of inclination can be made variable, and controlled so that any necessary relative phase changes are introduced to the rotors during variation of the angle of inclination.
- the principles and the methods of achieving it are basically similar to those applicable to variations in the relative tilt of the rotors.
- Variable rotor inclination may also be found advantageous in the hover mode, for example in a strong cross-wind in circumstances where it is not possible to turn the aircraft into the wind.
- dynamic pressure as a parameter for control purposes has the advantage of simplicity on two counts: sensing and application. It is simpler to sense because it is the true output of a Pitot-static probe (the difference between total and static pressure) requiring no compensation for air density or linearisation (as is needed to compute air speed from dynamic pressure). It is simpler to apply because a force or torque from a wing or control surface can be estimated from the simple product of the relevant aerodynamic coefficient times surface area times dynamic pressure.
- the output from this system can if preferred be used instead of dynamic pressure as a control parameter, first and second airspeeds being used instead of the first and second dynamic pressures above described.
- the rotor control of the aircraft is simplified by having no cyclic pitch; the flight control system is simplified by the surfaces being mechanically operated and the rotor tilt schedule is operated from a single lever, either mechanically or through an optional auto-tilt unit. Additionally, the tilt axis F-F is vertically offset upwards from the point of convergence of the axes G1 and G2 so that no differential gear-box may be required to ensure acceptable blade meshing for two, three or four blade rotors.
- the controls are mainly used conventionally to trim and manoeuvre the aircraft.
- the controls are in some respects different from those in conventional tilt rotor aircraft, as shown below: Helicopter Mode XV-15, V22, BA609 Aircraft 101 GA version of Aircraft 101 Pitch Longitudinal cyclic Longitudinal cyclic Tilt Thrust Collective Collective Collective Roll Differential collective and lateral cyclic Lateral cyclic Differential blocked wings Side Force Lateral cyclic Differential collective --- Yaw Differential longitudinal cyclic Differential longitudinal cyclic Differential wings
- the front portions 10 and the rear portions 9 of the wings are aligned substantially to the rotor downwash, ie the same angle of incidence.
- the term “Differential wings” means that to yaw to the left, the front and rear portions 9, 10 of the left wing are tilted back and the front and rear portions 9, 10 of the right wing are tilted forward.
- the term “Differential blocked wings” means that to roll to the left, the front and rear portions 9, 10 of the left wing are tilted towards each other, so blocking some of the rotor downwash.
- Wing Mode XV-15, V22, BA609 Aircraft 101 GA version of Aircraft 101 Pitch Elevators Elevators Elevators Thrust Collective Collective Roll Flaperons Differential wings Differential wings Yaw Rudder Rudder Rudder
- the front portions 10 and the rear portions 9 of the wings are aligned to form a normal single wing.
- the rear portions of the wings 12 can still be used as flaperons, which control is referred to in the table above as "differential wings".
- control In compound mode the control is unconventional in that while a rotor is tilted back to the 180° propeller position, its collective pitch is feathered to generate zero lift. Once 180° tilt is achieved, the collective pitch is set negative to generate useful forward thrust. Other controls can be washed in or out as appropriate to the tilt of the rotors.
- the first rotor 11 a tilted at 80°, is fully loaded and the second rotor 11 b is feathered.
- the angle of cant of the first pylon 30a means that the first rotor 11 a generates a side force to the right.
- the second rotor 11 b is feathered, it cannot counter this force, and the fins 5, 13, 15 must do so.
- the fins counter both torque and side-force.
- the fins can counter the torque only, and at the expense of adding to the side force. Therefore it is important to ensure that the fin area, the fin arm length and the direction of rotation of the rotors have been considered carefully in the design.
- the error in ideal meshing can be described by a function such as meshError° ⁇ ° ⁇ ° offxx offzz ⁇ °
- the twin rotors 11 c and 11 d of the aircraft are mounted above the fuselage center line separately on pylons 30c and 30d which are capable of tilting independently from a lift position as shown from above in Figure 12 , to a substantially horizontal flight position behind the fuselage.
- the pylons 30c, 30d tilt about axis F-F in the vertical plane along the fuselage center line. The tilting is controlled so that the difference in the tilt angles of the pylons 30c and 30d is never less than that required for safe meshing of the rotor blades.
- an aircraft is built in the style of a Boeing Chinook ® with a tiltable front tractor rotor and a tiltable rear pusher rotor, on the aircraft centre line.
- This may give an advantage in wing-borne cruise efficiency if one rotor (probably the pusher rotor) is stopped in flight and folded. Transition between rotor-borne and wing-borne flight is achieved by gradually tilting the front tractor rotor forwards to achieve sufficient air speed for the wings to take-over the lift function of the rear rotor which is gradually feathered and then either rotated rearwards then to share propulsion duties with the front rotor, or to be folded and stowed.
- the auto-rotating rotor it then is not necessary for the auto-rotating rotor to be fully deployable between lift and (substantially horizontal) propulsion positions. It need be tiltable no more than is necessary for deployment between a helicopter mode and an autogyro mode.
- Figures 16 and 17 show diagrammatically such a configuration, where advantage is taken of the autogyro mode to provide much of the lift during forward flight, although some lift is still provided by forward stub wings.
- the aircraft 50 is intended for heavy lifting duties; it has a very large rear rotor 52 having limited tilt capability and a smaller fully-tiltable front rotor 54.
- Figure 16 the aircraft is shown preparing for vertical take-off i.e. in helicopter mode.
- the front rotor is angled slightly about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft to provide a sideways thrust compensating for the torque reaction generated by the rear rotor.
- the front and rear rotors overlap and mesh according to the principles already described.
- the forward stub wings 56 are rotated about spanwise pivot axes is generally the same manner as described in connection with Figure 4 so as to present their leading edges to the downwash of the front rotor 54.
- Figure 17 shows the aircraft airborne and having transitioned to forward flight.
- the rotor 52 has been tilted backward and put into autogyro mode, in which auto rotation of the rear rotor provides lift; if desired means can be provided to decouple it from its engine.
- the front rotor 54 has been tilted forward to provide forward propulsion and the wings 56 have been pivoted to operate as lift-providing surfaces.
- the aircraft proceeds in forward flight supported by the rear rotor 52 and the wings 54.
- the aircraft is capable of conventional take-off as well as landing; indeed it is shown about to make a rolling landing. An improvement in cruise range and speed compared to a conventional Chinook may be obtainable.
- both rotors When both rotors are in helicopter mode they each can of course provide forward propulsion by being tilted slightly forward so that their thrust has a rearward as well as a major downward component. Alternatively, it may be sufficient to achieve forward propulsion by use of the cyclic pitch controls.
- a tilt-rotor aircraft comprising a pair of contra-rotating co-axial tiltable rotors on the longitudinal center line of the aircraft.
- the rotors may be tiltable sequentially and independently. They may be moveable between a lift position and a flight position in front of or behind the fuselage.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Aviation & Aerospace Engineering (AREA)
- Toys (AREA)
- Retarders (AREA)
Description
- The present invention relates to a convertiplane of the tiltable rotor type.
- As is known, there are many designs of aircraft, herein referred to as convertiplanes, seeking to combine the advantages of fixed-wing propeller aircraft and of helicopters, for example by use of tilt-rotors or by tilt-wings. Of these, arguably only the twin tilt- rotor designs are close to full production.
- Twin tilt-rotor designs have a long history. In
1934, US patent no. 1951817 was granted to Blount for his" airplane-helicopter". In 1958 the Bell XV-3 became the first tilt-rotor to convert to the aeroplane mode; a 15-year test programme proved that it could fly safely and smoothly throughout its flight envelope. The XV-3 was limited in speed by its use of blades designed for helicopter flight, and this was remedied in Bell's next project, the XV-15, by use of high twist blades. The first XV-15 was rolled out in 1976, and by 1986 the two prototypes had achieved an unofficial record for rotorcraft of 301 knots, had accumulated 530 flight hours and made 1,500 conversions. In that year a scaled-up version of the XV-15, a joint proposal by Bell and Boeing called the V-22 Osprey, was approved for full-scale development for the US armed forces, achieving its first flight in 1989. The V-22 eventually entered low- rate initial production in 1999, but subsequently was grounded after two crashes in 2000; revised flight tests began in May 2002 and it is now in limited production. - Patent publication No.
US 2002/0100835 discloses an aircraft with a tiltable rotor at each end of the aircraft body and an aircraft with tiltable rotor at one end and tiltable turbojet at the other end of the aircraft body. - The most recent twin tilt-rotor is the Bell Agusta BA 609, which made its maiden flight on 7 March 2003 as the world's first civil tilt-rotor and is configured generally as the V-22.
- This history from 1934 to the present day shows painfully slow progress for the twin tilt-rotor concept. Over the same timescale a wide variety of helicopter designs have achieved large-scale production and valuable service worldwide. But even that success for helicopters is modest compared to that of fixed wing aircraft which have achieved production quantities, utilisation, safety, reliability, speed, range and altitude performance that are far better and at much lower cost than helicopters of equivalent payload.
- The reasons for the relative success (or lack of it) of these three concepts lie in the economic cost of acquisition and operation.
- Firstly, comparing a propeller driven fixed wing design with a helicopter design of equal payload, fuel load and installed turbine power:
- ○ The weight of high cost machinery, ie. powerplant, transmission, rotor or prop blading etc needed by the fixed wing design is half that of the helicopter.
- ○ The fixed wing design would be expected to have twice the cruise speed and much greater range.
- ○ But the helicopter is VTOL capable, whereas the fixed wing design is not.
- Secondly, comparing a twin tilt-rotor design with the above two designs:
- ○ The twin tilt-rotor can be both CTOL and VTOL capable, the other two designs cannot.
- ○ The range of the twin tilt-rotor will be much better than the helicopter but significantly less than the fixed wing design.
- ○ However, in order to match the speed and CTOL capability of the fixed wing design and to match the VTOL capability of the helicopter, the twin tilt-rotor needs twice the installed turbine power.
- ○ The weight of high cost machinery, ie powerplant, transmission, rotor or prop is twice that of the helicopter and four times that of the fixed wing design.
- It is an object of at least the preferred embodiments of the present invention to provide a tilt-rotor aircraft in which the above disadvantages are reduced.
- The term "rotor" is to be construed broadly, to include not only an open (helicopter- type) rotor, but also a ducted fan or ducted rotor.
- In an aspect, the invention provides a tilt-rotor aircraft comprising a fuselage, wings for sustained forward flight, and a plurality of rotors, each rotor being independently and sequentially tiltable between a position above the aircraft providing lift and a position providing propulsion as a pusher propeller for forward flight.
- A tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a fuselage, wings for sustained forward flight, and at least one rotor tiltable between a position providing lift and a position providing propulsion for forward flight, the rotor or rotors being carried by supporting structure mounted on the fuselage and being disposed on or symmetrically about the longitudinal centre line of the aircraft.
- A tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a plurality of rotors carried by at least one tiltable nacelle on the longitudinal centre line of the aircraft.
- The, or each, nacelle may have a pair of contra-rotating rotors which are coaxial, or on parallel axes, or intermesh.
- A said nacelle or supporting structure may be mounted to pivot and optionally also translate about an axis extending transversely of an upper part of the aircraft fuselage.
- The nacelle may contain at least one engine. Alternatively the engine (s) may be located elsewhere in the aircraft, and power may be delivered mechanically to the rotors or via a local power turbine, electric motor, hydraulic motor or other transmission.
- The rotors preferably are driven by a plurality of engines via a transmission such that all the rotors continue to be driven if an engine fails.
- The nacelle may be mounted to pivot and optionally also translate about an axis extending transversely of an upper part of the fuselage.
At least inboard portions of wings of the aircraft maybe moveable so as to present leading edges to the airflow generated from the rotors in lift mode. - A tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a tiltable rotor assembly on the longitudinal centre line of the aircraft moveable between a lift mode and a forward flight mode, inboard portions of the wings of the aircraft being moveable so as to present leading edges to the airflow generated by the rotors in lift mode.
- A said moveable portion may be rotatable and/or translatable transversely or longitudinally about a fixed beam projecting from the fuselage of the aircraft.
- The beam may extend to a fixed outboard portion of the wing. The fixed beam may be offset from the axis of tilt of the rotors either forwardly or rearwardly or vertically.
- Preferably each wing may have at least two substantially parallel moveable portions.
- A said moveable portion may be configured to act as a control surface when the aircraft is in lift mode and/or in transition between lift and forward flight modes, the aircraft also comprising control means for operating the control surface.
- The underside of the aircraft fuselage may be shaped to reduce download forces on the fuselage from the airflow generated by the rotor or rotors in lift mode.
- Preferably there is a control surface on the fuselage, operative when the aircraft is in a lift mode and/or in transition between lift and forward flight modes.
- A tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a tiltable rotor assembly moveable between a lift position and a forward flight position in front of or behind the fuselage.
- Preferably in this aspect the aircraft is of a twin-boom layout, wherein booms extend
rearwardly from the wings of the aircraft to support the aircraft's empennage, the rotor assembly being behind the fuselage and disposed between the booms when the aircraft is in forward flight mode. - The preferred embodiments of the invention have all the powerplant, transmission and rotor components within a single rotornacelle, allowing some components such as cross-wing transmissions to be eliminated and others such as support structures to be simplified.
- In a preferred embodiment the powerplant may be within the fuselage.
- Preferably the rotors are mounted on, or symmetrically about, the centre-line of the aircraft.
- The rotors may be mounted at an angle of inclination to the roll axis or to the pitch axis of the aircraft. The angle of inclination may be up to 45 degrees, for example between 12'/and 32'/2 degrees, and preferably being substantially twenty two and a half degrees.
- The angle of inclination may be variable.
- Preferably the aircraft may comprise rotors which are substantially in mesh.
- The aircraft may comprise a mechanism for varying the relative phase of the rotors to permit sequential tilting, preferably substantially in mesh.
- Preferably the mechanism may comprise a cross-shaft.
- The tilt axis of the rotors may be vertically or longitudinally offset from the point of convergence of a longitudinal axis of each rotor.
- The rotors may have a common cross-shaft. The gear ratios between the cross-shaft and the rotor shaft for a two bladed rotor design may be of a 2:3 ratio. For a three or more bladed rotor design the cross-shaft preferably includes a differential gearbox with means to input mesh phase correction.
The flight positions are preferably to the rear of the fuselage and the lift positions are preferably substantially vertical, or tilted towards the front of the fuselage by up to ten degrees, preferably up to five degrees. The flight positions may be between ninety and one hundred degrees from the lift positions. Preferably the flight positions are substantially ninety five degrees from the lift positions. - A tilt-rotor aircraft may comprise a fuselage, wings for sustained forward flight, front and rear rotors mounted on the aircraft fuselage for providing lift at least one of the rotors being tiltable between a lift position and a position providing propulsion for forward flight.
- Both rotors may be tiltable between lift and propulsion positions.
- One rotor may be deployable to an autogyro configuration for forward flight, or can be folded in flight.
- The aircraft may be operable in three flight modes, a first of which is in use below a first air speed, a second of which is in use between the first airspeed and a second airspeed, and a third of which is in use above the second airspeed. The aircraft may comprise a controller which can automatically manage transitions between these flight modes.
- Alternatively the aircraft may comprise means for sensing dynamic air pressure arising from air speed, the aircraft being operable in three flight modes determined with reference to dynamic pressure, the first-mode being used below a first dynamic pressure, the second mode between the first dynamic pressure and a second dynamic pressure and the third mode above the second dynamic pressure.
- The second flight mode is preferably a compound mode in which at least one of the rotors is in the flight position or at least one of the rotors is in the lift position. Preferably at least one of the rotors is substantially in the flight position and one of the rotors is substantially in the lift position in the second flight mode.
- The first air speed or first dynamic pressure may be sufficient for the wings to take substantially half of the aircraft lift, and the second air speed or second dynamic pressure may be sufficient for the wings to take substantially all of the aircraft lift.
- The rotors may be moveable into a feathered position so that they may be tilted between lift and flight positions or held in or between those positions more easily.
- Any of the aspects of the invention described above may be combined with any other of the aspects of the invention to provide an improved tilt-rotor aircraft.
- Other advantages which may be achieved with various embodiments are the following:-
- ○ Co-axial, contra-rotating rotors enable gyroscopic forces and rotor torques to be balanced within the rotornacelle or at the fuselage rather than across the aircraft wing structure.
- ○ An aircraft having a single centrally mounted and aerodynamically symmetrical rotornacelle, is much less vulnerable to asymmetric airflow and asymmetric thrust. This is a particular concern in low speed and hovering flight. For example a twin-prop airplane that loses all thrust from one side becomes more difficult to manoeuvre or land or take off at low speed, where yaw problems can escalate into irrecoverable roll. Wing mounted twin tilt-rotor designs typically guard against this problem of asymmetric loss of power by the use of complex cross-wing transmissions between their engines, however this cannot compensate for major asymmetry of airflow from the rotor on one wing to the other. Such problems occur when one rotor enters or leaves the vortex ring state before the other, and when in ground effect the flow symmetry is destroyed by proximity to other aircraft disturbing the air or by physical discontinuities of the effective ground surface.
- ○ The aircraft wing design can be optimised without the restraints imposed by mounting engines, nacelles or rotors on the wings.
- ○ The aircraft can be designed for efficient lift in both transition and helicopter modes by minimising the download from the rotor airflow that acts on the fuselage and wing. This is achieved by ventral fairing of the fuselage, and by aligning the inboard portions of the wing to the airflow. Both methods also provide the possibility of use as control surfaces for the aircraft.
- ○ In "pusher" embodiments the field of view from the cockpit is unobstructed by the tilt rotors.
- Some preferred, non-limiting embodiments of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:-
-
Figures 1 and 2 show front and plan views of a convertiplane, in the airplane mode, of a non-claimed aspect; -
Figures 3 and 4 show front and plan views of the convertiplane offigure 1 in helicopter mode; -
Figures 5 and 6 show front and plan views of a second convertiplane in airplane mode, of a non-claimed aspect; -
Figures 7 and 8 show front and plan views of the convertiplane offigure 5 in helicopter mode; -
Figures 9 ,10 and11 show front, plan and side views of a convertiplane in accordance with the invention; -
Figure 12 shows a plan view of a convertiplane in accordance with the invention. -
Figure 13 shows schematic representations of the tilt as a function of dynamic pressure for left and right rotors; -
Figures 14 and 15 show graphs of the mesh error for different rotor blade meshing setup values; and -
Figures 16 and 17 show a further embodiment of the invention. - With reference to
FIGS. 1 to 4 , which show aspect of non-claimed subject matter, a convertiplane 1 comprises afuselage 2, arotornacelle 3 attached above thefuselage 2, and awing 4. - The
rotornacelle 3 supports tworotors 11 that rotate in opposite directions about the common axis A, so setting aside other influences, the force vector produced by therotors 11 is aligned to axis A. Therotornacelle 3 houses the engines and known devices - not forming part of the present invention and therefore not shown - for transmitting power to and for controlling the cyclic and collective pitch of therotors 11. In particular the rotors are coupled through a differential gear to equalise the torque supplied to each, any imbalance relative to axis A manifesting itself as a torque reaction on the differential casing which is transmitted to the airframe. This torque imbalance is cancelled by control of the relative collective pitch of the two rotors, and this also is employed to maintain yaw control of the aircraft in hover mode and at low airspeeds. For this reason it is unnecessary to provide the aircraft with a tail rotor or similar torque balancing system. - The
rotornacelle 3 is attached to thefuselage 2 by twoactuation devices 20, such as inter-connected geared-down electric motors. The twoactuation devices 20 are used to rotaterotornacelle 3 about the axis B between a helicopter mode where axis A is substantially vertical, and an airplane mode where axis A is substantially horizontal. Eachdevice 20 comprises a load bearing casing, electric motor, fail safe, devices, monitoring devices and a high torque output reduction gearbox. The devices are configured to provide high integrity rotary actuation capable of supporting the weight of the aircraft in hover mode and to achieve translation to and from forward flight in about ten seconds. - The
devices 20 may be arranged to provide translation as well as rotation, for example by interposing beams or pivot arms between the axis B and pivotal connections to the nacelle. This may allow a more compact movement between lift and forward flight positions. Differential control of the actuators in such arrangement can vector the rotor thrust, perhaps permitting cyclic pitch control to be omitted, or to assist in aircraft trimming, and aircraft CG balancing. -
Wing 4 has twohalfwings 5, each having anouter portion 6 attached to two fixedbeam elements 7, 8 that project from thefuselage 2, so thatwing 4 is fixed relative to thefuselage 2 and theouter portions 6 are substantially outside the airflow of therotornacelle 3. - The aircraft is configured to reduce the detrimental download forces that rotor airflow can create on the wing surfaces within its flow field. The inner part of each
halfwing 5 comprises twoinner wing portions beam elements 7, 8. In the airplane mode the twoinner wing portions outer portion 6 to form a conventional wing. In the helicopter mode, and in the transition mode between airplane and helicopter, the twoinner wing portions rotornacelle 3 airflow that otherwise would act onwing 4. The drag coefficient of an airfoil at right angles to the airflow may be as high as 2 but is reduced one hundredfold when substantially aligned to the airflow. Theinner wing portions - For all flight modes the
inner wing portions - The
inner wing portions beam elements 7, 8. Then they may be accommodated within or overlapping the outer wing portions, or may be deployed beyond them to lengthen the wings. When just thebeam elements 7, 8 are exposed to the rotor downwash the downforce on the wing may be reduced tenfold. - Translation of the
inner wing portions - Additionally, the download forces associated with air from the
rotornacelle 3 flowing downwards around thefuselage 2 are minimised by suitably fairing the underside of thefuselage 2 as shown at 19. Panels set into the fuselage may be deployable for control purposes. For example, in search and rescue and other missions where rope or winch access is needed in hover, panels deployable as symmetrical diverters can be provided at the shoulders of the fuselage so as to disperse the downwash to give calmer air immediately beneath the fuselage. In another example a fin is disposed along the length of the apex of fairedportion 19, and is rotatable about an axis at the apex parallel to the longitudinal axis-of the aircraft to generate side forces when the aircraft is hovering in a side wind so that aircraft alignment is preserved for VTOL in constrained landing sites, or so that aircraft pointing may be retained for observation, aiming or weapon release purposes.Tricycle landing gear 22 is provided. - A typical flight for convertiplane 1 is envisaged as take-off, climb to chosen altitude, cruise, descent from altitude, and landing. For each phase of the flight the pilot may choose to fly the convertiplane in any one of the helicopter, transitional, and airplane modes, subject to flight regulations and envelope. To illustrate operation of the convertiplane 1, a flight plan will be assumed which starts with a conventional airplane runway take-off, climb and cruise, and then uses the transitional mode for descent, and lands using the helicopter mode.
- In preparation for take-off the
rotornacelle 3 is aligned substantially horizontally and remains thus through take-off, climb and cruise. Therotornacelle 3 may be trimmed in this conventional airplane mode to optimise the aircraft's attitude for efficient flight and for CG balancing. Descent is entered by reducing forward speed to the point where the desired rate of descent is achieved; this may be by reducing engine power, use of air brakes or such other conventional airplane primary and secondary control surfaces as provided or by deployment ofinner wing portions rotornacelle 3 are steadily increased and forward speed further reduced, by means as just described, so entering the transitional mode. The transition continues until therotornacelle 3 is aligned substantially vertically, and the convertiplane has thereby entered the helicopter mode and is landed as such. Throughout transition and helicopter modes theinner wing portions - Vertical take-off and transition to forward flight is essentially the reverse of the forward flight to hover transition and vertical landing described above. In hover and in forward flight at helicopter speeds, cyclic pitch can be used to-keep the-rotor thrust vector passing through the aircraft CG. At aircraft flight speeds, the horizontal tail control surfaces take over this duty.
- Referring to
figures 5 and 6 , there is shown another non-claimed aspect of a convertiplane configured as a pilotless aircraft. Parts already described with reference tofigures 1 to 4 carry the same reference numerals. - The aircraft is of a high-wing twin-boom layout,
booms 22 extending rearwardly from the inboard end of outer half-wings 6 to support the aircraft'stwin empennage 24 andhorizontal stabiliser 26.Moveable half wings 5 are provided as in thefigure 1 embodiment. - The
rotornacelle 3 is pivotally mounted about a transverse axis C at the rear of thefuselage 2. For stability on the ground,tricycle undercarriage 28 with a tailwheel is provided. - In lift (helicopter) mode the rotornacelle is pivoted so as to dispose the rotors below the fuselage as shown in
figure 7 , the moveable inner wings being positioned to avoid obstructing the flow of air to the rotors. During transition to forward flight the rotornacelle is rotated gradually into the position shown infigure 5 in which the rotors act as a pusher propeller between thebooms 22. Themoveable portions portions - The transition from forward flight to helicopter mode is as described for the
figure 1 embodiment. - A variant of this embodiment is to mount the rotornacelle above the fuselage on pylons or supports spaced wider than the width of the rotors (for example at junctions between the
booms 22 and the wings 4), and sufficiently tall for the tilt axis C to be positioned for the rotornacelle to move from a lift position beneath the axis C but above the fuselage to a flight position behind it. The pylons may be pivotally connected both to the nacelle and to the boom junctions to enable the nacelle to be positioned lower in the forward flight position, with its thrust vector passing closer to the aircraft CG. - For example, the open rotors may be enclosed within a rim or very short duct to form ducted rotors with collective and cyclic pitch as already described.
- Alternatively ducted fans with a larger number of blades of fixed or collective pitch may be used. Whilst the duct would bring a cost and weight penalty, a ducted rotor or fan would have less noise from blade vortex interference and possibly reduced susceptibility to vortex ring state.
- Instead of being coaxial the contra-rotating rotors may be disposed on spaced axes side by side, so that viewed from the front the rotornacelle appears U-shaped, the engine and tilt axis forming the base and two side-by-side rotor masts forming the sides of the U. The masts would be just over a rotor radius apart and equally spaced about the aircraft centre line, the contra-rotating rotors being geared together so as to intermesh. Alternatively the rotors may co-rotate provided the masts are of different heights or spaced more than a rotor diameter apart. Some means of compensating for torque reaction on the airframe (eg. a tail rotor) then would be necessary.
- A further variation is to employ contra-rotating intermeshing rotors with rotor masts close together but at a slight angle to each other symmetrically about the aircraft centre line, so that they present a V-shaped appearance viewed from the front. The rotor masts are canted outwards no more than is necessary for the blades to intermesh with adequate clearance.
- A large aircraft may have two separate tiltable contra-rotating rotors, one at the front and one at the rear, each being carried on a tiltable nacelle. Alternatively each rotornacelle may have a pair of contra-rotating rotors.
- A further embodiment is shown in
Figures 9 to 11 ,aircraft 101, configured as a gunship. Parts already described with reference toFigures 1 to 6 carry the same reference numerals. A fourth embodiment is shown inFigure 12 ,aircraft 102, where the rotors are arranged in tandem rather than side-by-side. A version ofaircraft 101, simplified wherever possible, can be used as a light civil aircraft, suitable for the general aviation and sports market. - In the embodiments of
Figures 9 and11 ,twin rotors separate pylons pylons fuselage 2. The pylons are canted away from each other about a vertical axis G; a first pylon extending along an axis G1 and a second along an axis G2. In this embodiment, the pylons are canted at approximately 45° relative to each other, each being inclined approximately 22.5° from the vertical axis G. - The
rotors pylons - For example, for a configuration where F-F lies at the convergence of G1 and G2, which are canted at a relative angle of 45°, a gear ratio of 1:2 will give acceptable mesh angles for two-bladed rotors. Rotors with more precise meshing requirements may need a differential gearbox within the common cross-shaft to allow the input of further phase non-linearly with relative tilt.
- The various modes of flight, and the transitions between them, are illustrated in
Figure 13 . In lift (helicopter) mode, the pylons 3Qa, 30b are substantially vertical in the fore-and-aft (pitch) plane, or tilted forward a little, for example 85° from the horizontal for forward flight. When dynamic pressure (0.5 ρV2 where ρ is the density of the fluid the aircraft is travelling through and V is its velocity) is sufficient for the wings to take about half the aircraft lift, the compound flight mode is entered. As dynamic pressure (0.5 ρV2 ) increases, thefirst rotor 11 a is rotated forward to 80° tilt where it takes over all the rotor lift and propulsion task, allowing 11 b to be feathered and rotated to 180° to takeover propulsion. Once dynamic pressure (0.5 ρV2) is sufficient for the wings to take all the aircraft lift, thefirst rotor 11 a is feathered, then tilted back, to share the pusher propeller duty. - Above this dynamic pressure the aircraft remains in the wing mode, with the wings providing all the lift and the rotors acting as conventional pusher propellers, except that each remains inclined to the aircraft centre line so that the rotors continue to mesh and each rotor is clear of the mast of the other. The angle of inclination is generally as small as possible so that the component of rotor thrust which is orthogonal to the aircraft centre line is as small as possible. To this end the angle of inclination can be made variable, and controlled so that any necessary relative phase changes are introduced to the rotors during variation of the angle of inclination. The principles and the methods of achieving it are basically similar to those applicable to variations in the relative tilt of the rotors. Variable rotor inclination may also be found advantageous in the hover mode, for example in a strong cross-wind in circumstances where it is not possible to turn the aircraft into the wind.
- The use of dynamic pressure as a parameter for control purposes has the advantage of simplicity on two counts: sensing and application. It is simpler to sense because it is the true output of a Pitot-static probe (the difference between total and static pressure) requiring no compensation for air density or linearisation (as is needed to compute air speed from dynamic pressure). It is simpler to apply because a force or torque from a wing or control surface can be estimated from the simple product of the relevant aerodynamic coefficient times surface area times dynamic pressure.
- However, because the aircraft will in any event have means for computing its air speed, the output from this system can if preferred be used instead of dynamic pressure as a control parameter, first and second airspeeds being used instead of the first and second dynamic pressures above described.
- In the general aviation version of
Figures 9 to 11 , the rotor control of the aircraft is simplified by having no cyclic pitch; the flight control system is simplified by the surfaces being mechanically operated and the rotor tilt schedule is operated from a single lever, either mechanically or through an optional auto-tilt unit. Additionally, the tilt axis F-F is vertically offset upwards from the point of convergence of the axes G1 and G2 so that no differential gear-box may be required to ensure acceptable blade meshing for two, three or four blade rotors. - The angles of the pylons in the various modes of flight are summarised in the table below, where right and left are for the pilot:
Aircraft flight mode Helicopter Compound Wing Right pylon (11a) angle of tilt 85° 80° to 180° 180° Left pylon (11b) angle of tilt 85° 85° to 180° 180° - In the helicopter and wing modes the controls are mainly used conventionally to trim and manoeuvre the aircraft. However, the controls are in some respects different from those in conventional tilt rotor aircraft, as shown below:
Helicopter Mode XV-15, V22, BA609 Aircraft 101 GA version of Aircraft 101Pitch Longitudinal cyclic Longitudinal cyclic Tilt Thrust Collective Collective Collective Roll Differential collective and lateral cyclic Lateral cyclic Differential blocked wings Side Force Lateral cyclic Differential collective --- Yaw Differential longitudinal cyclic Differential longitudinal cyclic Differential wings - For the general aviation GA version of
aircraft 101, in helicopter mode, thefront portions 10 and therear portions 9 of the wings are aligned substantially to the rotor downwash, ie the same angle of incidence. - The term "Differential wings" means that to yaw to the left, the front and
rear portions rear portions rear portions Wing Mode XV-15, V22, BA609 Aircraft 101 GA version of Aircraft 101Pitch Elevators Elevators Elevators Thrust Collective Collective Collective Roll Flaperons Differential wings Differential wings Yaw Rudder Rudder Rudder - For both of these aircraft, in wing mode the
front portions 10 and therear portions 9 of the wings are aligned to form a normal single wing. However the rear portions of the wings 12 can still be used as flaperons, which control is referred to in the table above as "differential wings". - In compound mode the control is unconventional in that while a rotor is tilted back to the 180° propeller position, its collective pitch is feathered to generate zero lift. Once 180° tilt is achieved, the collective pitch is set negative to generate useful forward thrust. Other controls can be washed in or out as appropriate to the tilt of the rotors.
- During this process the other rotor and the wings provide continuity of lift and thrust for the aircraft, and the controls provide continuity of trim and manoeuvre.
- On entry into the compound flight mode the
first rotor 11 a, tilted at 80°, is fully loaded and thesecond rotor 11 b is feathered. The angle of cant of thefirst pylon 30a means that thefirst rotor 11 a generates a side force to the right. As thesecond rotor 11 b is feathered, it cannot counter this force, and thefins - The geometry of ideal, rigid tilting of rotors with blades of negligible chord and thickness can be described with the following reference points and parameters:
- α° the angle that the rotor masts are canted relative to each other
- J the point of convergence of the axes G1 and G2
- {x, y, z} airframe axes with origin at J
- tilt axis, F-F, through the offset point {offxx, 0, offzz}
- offxx rearwards and offzz upwards as a proportion of length, J to rotor hub
- β the angle of tilt of the rear rotor relative to the front rotor
- Ø° phase introduced by the common cross-shaft to the rotors
-
-
- One version of this function, for 45° of cant, the offset being vertically upwards with offzz = 0.6 and common gear ratio 9:13, gives the rigid geometry error shown in
Figure 14 . Depending on other design factors such as real blade chord and thickness, this should be suitable for two, three or four bladed rotors, without the use of a differential gearbox, and so particularly suitable for the above embodiments. - Where there is significant longitudinal offset offxx rearwards of the common drive shaft from the tilt axis, meshing errors are increased. For example, for offxx = 0.4, offzz = 0.125, common gear ration of 1:3 and a differential gearbox engaging a simple fixed ratio at β = 37°, the mesh error function shows a rigid geometry error which may be seen in
Figure 15 . - This would be suitable for two, three or four bladed rotors.
- In the embodiment shown in
Figure 12 , thetwin rotors pylons 30c and 30d which are capable of tilting independently from a lift position as shown from above inFigure 12 , to a substantially horizontal flight position behind the fuselage. Thepylons 30c, 30d tilt about axis F-F in the vertical plane along the fuselage center line. The tilting is controlled so that the difference in the tilt angles of thepylons 30c and 30d is never less than that required for safe meshing of the rotor blades. As with the embodiment offigures 9 to 11 in the forward flight position there is still an angle between the rotor axes, but if this is kept as small as possible the efficiency penalty due to part of the thrust of the rotors canceling-out is relatively small. In other respects, this aircraft follows the general principles described foraircraft 101 with details adjusted to suit its tandem arrangement. - In another embodiment an aircraft is built in the style of a Boeing Chinook® with a tiltable front tractor rotor and a tiltable rear pusher rotor, on the aircraft centre line. This may give an advantage in wing-borne cruise efficiency if one rotor (probably the pusher rotor) is stopped in flight and folded. Transition between rotor-borne and wing-borne flight is achieved by gradually tilting the front tractor rotor forwards to achieve sufficient air speed for the wings to take-over the lift function of the rear rotor which is gradually feathered and then either rotated rearwards then to share propulsion duties with the front rotor, or to be folded and stowed.
- Also some intermediate configurations are feasible. For example in cruise if one rotor is left in the auto-gyro position (with its axis substantially vertical but tilted slightly back to take advantage of the autorotation mode of the disk) then the other rotor, tractor or pusher, propels the aircraft. The auto-rotating rotor shares the lift duty with the wings, that share being reduced as forward speed increases.
- It then is not necessary for the auto-rotating rotor to be fully deployable between lift and (substantially horizontal) propulsion positions. It need be tiltable no more than is necessary for deployment between a helicopter mode and an autogyro mode.
-
Figures 16 and 17 show diagrammatically such a configuration, where advantage is taken of the autogyro mode to provide much of the lift during forward flight, although some lift is still provided by forward stub wings. - The
aircraft 50 is intended for heavy lifting duties; it has a very largerear rotor 52 having limited tilt capability and a smaller fully-tiltable front rotor 54. InFigure 16 the aircraft is shown preparing for vertical take-off i.e. in helicopter mode. The front rotor is angled slightly about the longitudinal axis of the aircraft to provide a sideways thrust compensating for the torque reaction generated by the rear rotor. The front and rear rotors overlap and mesh according to the principles already described. Theforward stub wings 56 are rotated about spanwise pivot axes is generally the same manner as described in connection withFigure 4 so as to present their leading edges to the downwash of thefront rotor 54. -
Figure 17 shows the aircraft airborne and having transitioned to forward flight. Therotor 52 has been tilted backward and put into autogyro mode, in which auto rotation of the rear rotor provides lift; if desired means can be provided to decouple it from its engine. Thefront rotor 54 has been tilted forward to provide forward propulsion and thewings 56 have been pivoted to operate as lift-providing surfaces. The aircraft proceeds in forward flight supported by therear rotor 52 and thewings 54. When configured as inFigure 17 the aircraft is capable of conventional take-off as well as landing; indeed it is shown about to make a rolling landing. An improvement in cruise range and speed compared to a conventional Chinook may be obtainable. When both rotors are in helicopter mode they each can of course provide forward propulsion by being tilted slightly forward so that their thrust has a rearward as well as a major downward component. Alternatively, it may be sufficient to achieve forward propulsion by use of the cyclic pitch controls. - While the present invention has been described in connection with certain preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that the subject matter encompassed by the present invention is not limited to those specific embodiments. On the contrary, it is intended to include all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents as can be included within the scope of the following claims.
- Each feature disclosed in this specification (which term includes the claims) and/or shown in the drawings may be incorporated in the invention independently of other disclosed and/or illustrated features.
- Statements in this specification of the "objects of the invention" relate to preferred embodiments of the invention, but not necessarily to all embodiments of the invention falling within the claims.
- The description of the invention with reference to the drawings is by way of example only. The text of the abstract filed herewith is repeated here as part of the specification.
- A tilt-rotor aircraft comprising a pair of contra-rotating co-axial tiltable rotors on the longitudinal center line of the aircraft. The rotors may be tiltable sequentially and independently. They may be moveable between a lift position and a flight position in front of or behind the fuselage.
Claims (15)
- A tilt-rotor aircraft (101, 102) comprising a fuselage (2), wings (4) for sustained forward flight, and a plurality of rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d), each rotor being independently and sequentially tiltable between a position above the aircraft providing lift and a position providing propulsion as a pusher propeller for forward flight.
- An aircraft according to claim 1 in which the rotors are substantially in mesh.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to claim 1 or claim 2 in which the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11 d) are mounted on or symmetrically about a centre line of the aircraft.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any one of claims 1 to 3 in which the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) are inclined to a roll axis of the aircraft, or to a pitch axis of the aircraft.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to claim 4 in which the angle of inclination is variable.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any one of claims 1 to 5 comprising a mechanism for varying the relative phase of the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) to permit sequential tilting.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any of claims 1 to 6 in which a tilt axis (F-F) of the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) is vertically or longitudinally offset from the point of convergence (J) of the rotational axes (G1, G2) of the rotors.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any of claims 1 to 7 operable in three flight modes, a first of which is used below a first air speed, a second of which is used between the first airspeed and a second airspeed, and a third of which is used above the second airspeed.
- An aircraft (102, 102) according to claim 8 in which the second flight mode is a compound mode, in which at least one of the rotors (11a, 11c) is in the lift position or at least one of the rotors (11b, 11d) is in the propulsion position.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any of claims 1 to 9 comprising means configured to feather the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) during transition between the lift and propulsion positions.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any preceding claim and wherein the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) are carried by supporting structure (30a, 30b, 30c, 30d) mounted on the fuselage (2), wherein each supporting structure is mounted to pivot about an axis (F-F) extending transversely of an upper part of the aircraft fuselage.
- A tilt-rotor aircraft (101, 102) according to any preceding claim being of a twin-boom layout, wherein booms extend from the wings (4) of the aircraft to support the aircraft's empennage (5, 13, 15), the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) being disposed between the booms when the aircraft is in forward flight mode.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any preceding claim wherein at least inboard portions (9, 10) of the wings (4) of the aircraft are moveable so as to present leading edges to the airflow generated from the rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) when in lift mode.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to claim 13 wherein a said moveable portion (9, 10) is configured to act as a control surface when the aircraft is in lift mode and/or in transition between lift and forward flight modes, the aircraft also comprising control means for operating the control surface.
- An aircraft (101, 102) according to any preceding claim wherein the underside of the fuselage (2) is shaped to reduce download forces on the fuselage from the airflow generated by the rotor or rotors (11a, 11b, 11c, 11d) in lift mode.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
GB0400335A GB2409845A (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2004-01-08 | Tilt-rotor aircraft changeable between vertical lift and forward flight modes |
PCT/GB2004/005449 WO2005066020A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2004-12-23 | Tilt-rotor aircraft |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1704089A1 EP1704089A1 (en) | 2006-09-27 |
EP1704089B1 true EP1704089B1 (en) | 2012-09-26 |
Family
ID=31503581
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04806243A Not-in-force EP1704089B1 (en) | 2004-01-08 | 2004-12-23 | Tilt-rotor aircraft |
Country Status (4)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7584923B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1704089B1 (en) |
GB (1) | GB2409845A (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005066020A1 (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11724802B1 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2023-08-15 | Avx Aircraft Company | Lightweight rotor conversion systems for tiltrotor aircraft |
Families Citing this family (96)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6464166B1 (en) * | 2001-05-29 | 2002-10-15 | Romeo Yankee Ltd. | Ducted fan vehicles particularly useful as VTOL aircraft |
US7857253B2 (en) | 2003-10-27 | 2010-12-28 | Urban Aeronautics Ltd. | Ducted fan VTOL vehicles |
CN100503366C (en) * | 2004-07-29 | 2009-06-24 | 贝尔直升机泰克斯特龙公司 | Method and apparatus for flight control of tiltrotor aircraft |
WO2006072960A2 (en) | 2005-01-10 | 2006-07-13 | Urban Aeronautics Ltd. | Ducted fan vtol vehicles |
US7946528B2 (en) * | 2005-04-15 | 2011-05-24 | Urban Aeronautics, Ltd. | Flight control system especially suited for VTOL vehicles |
US7802754B2 (en) * | 2005-08-15 | 2010-09-28 | Abe Karem | Tilt outboard wing for tilt rotor aircraft |
BE1016960A3 (en) * | 2006-01-19 | 2007-11-06 | Rostyne Alexander Jozef Magdal | IMPROVED HELICOPTER. |
US8357023B2 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2013-01-22 | Silverlit Limited | Helicopter |
US8002604B2 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2011-08-23 | Silverlit Limited | Remote controlled toy helicopter |
US7883392B2 (en) | 2008-08-04 | 2011-02-08 | Silverlit Toys Manufactory Ltd. | Toy helicopter |
US7815482B2 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2010-10-19 | Silverlit Toys Manufactory, Ltd. | Helicopter |
US20070181742A1 (en) * | 2006-01-19 | 2007-08-09 | Silverlit Toys Manufactory, Ltd. | Flying object with tandem rotors |
US7662013B2 (en) | 2006-01-19 | 2010-02-16 | Silverlit Toys Manufactory Ltd. | Helicopter with horizontal control |
US20090047861A1 (en) * | 2006-01-19 | 2009-02-19 | Silverlit Toys Manufactory Ltd. | Remote controlled toy helicopter |
US8020804B2 (en) * | 2006-03-01 | 2011-09-20 | Urban Aeronautics, Ltd. | Ground effect vanes arrangement |
US7665688B2 (en) * | 2006-03-27 | 2010-02-23 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Convertible aerial vehicle with contra-rotating wing/rotors and twin tilting wing and propeller units |
US20080230656A1 (en) * | 2006-04-11 | 2008-09-25 | Moshe Kretchmer | Aircraft wings having hinged vanes and aircraft having said wings |
EP2021240A2 (en) * | 2006-05-03 | 2009-02-11 | Urban Aeronautics Ltd. | Ducted fan vtol vehicles |
US8271149B2 (en) * | 2006-08-21 | 2012-09-18 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Conversion system fault management system for tiltrotor aircraft |
US8833692B2 (en) * | 2006-11-27 | 2014-09-16 | Urban Aeronautics Ltd. | Wall effects on VTOL vehicles |
US8496200B2 (en) | 2007-05-02 | 2013-07-30 | Urban Aeronautics Ltd. | Control flows and forces in VTOL vehicles |
US8256704B2 (en) * | 2007-08-14 | 2012-09-04 | Lapcad Engineering, Inc. | Vertical/short take-off and landing aircraft |
CN100534863C (en) * | 2007-09-28 | 2009-09-02 | 深圳市艾特航模股份有限公司 | Four channel row two-bladed helicopter |
WO2009140042A1 (en) * | 2008-04-25 | 2009-11-19 | Abe Karem | Combination spar and trunnion structure for a tilt rotor aircraft |
EP2318273A4 (en) | 2008-09-02 | 2017-09-06 | Urban Aeronautics Ltd. | Vtol vehicle with coaxially tilted or tiltable rotors |
US8070090B2 (en) | 2008-09-05 | 2011-12-06 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy | Stop-rotor rotary wing aircraft |
US8459948B2 (en) | 2008-10-24 | 2013-06-11 | Esteban A. Caraballoso | Retractable composite rotor blade assembly |
US8496434B2 (en) | 2009-05-21 | 2013-07-30 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Differential pitch-control to optimize co-rotating stacked rotor performance |
WO2010134923A1 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2010-11-25 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Rotor blade spacing for vibration attenuation |
EP2432689B1 (en) | 2009-05-22 | 2013-07-17 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Co-rotating stacked rotor disks for improved hover performance |
CA2797028A1 (en) | 2010-04-22 | 2011-10-27 | Aerovironment, Inc. | Unmanned aerial vehicle and method of operation |
US8960594B2 (en) * | 2010-11-02 | 2015-02-24 | Groen Brothers Aviation, Inc. | Use of auxiliary rudders for yaw control at low speed |
US8876038B2 (en) | 2010-10-05 | 2014-11-04 | Urban Aeronautics Ltd. | Ducted fan for VTOL vehicles with system and method to reduce roll moments |
US8701381B2 (en) | 2010-11-24 | 2014-04-22 | Rolls-Royce Corporation | Remote shaft driven open rotor propulsion system with electrical power generation |
ITRM20120014A1 (en) * | 2012-01-17 | 2013-07-18 | Pavel Miodushevsky | CONVERTIPLANO MULTIPLE. |
EP2690012A1 (en) | 2012-07-27 | 2014-01-29 | Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH | Semi-convertible rotorcraft |
US8857755B2 (en) * | 2012-07-31 | 2014-10-14 | Utterfly Aircraft, Llc | Vertical/short take-off and landing passenger aircraft |
US9387939B2 (en) * | 2012-12-20 | 2016-07-12 | Lapcad Engineering, Inc. | VTOL—twin—propeller—attitude—control—air—vehicle |
CN103921933A (en) | 2013-01-10 | 2014-07-16 | 深圳市大疆创新科技有限公司 | Deformation structure of air vehicle and micro air vehicle |
KR101287624B1 (en) * | 2013-02-25 | 2013-07-23 | 주식회사 네스앤텍 | Unmanned aerial vehicle for easily landing |
US9376206B2 (en) * | 2013-03-12 | 2016-06-28 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Tiltrotor aircraft with inboard wing mounted fixed engine arrangement |
US9126678B2 (en) | 2013-03-13 | 2015-09-08 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Spindle mounted tiltrotor pylon with fixed engine arrangement |
EP2969603B1 (en) | 2013-03-15 | 2017-05-24 | Terrafugia, Inc. | Combined flying/driving vehicle with vertical takeoff and fixed-wing cruise capabilities |
JP6213713B2 (en) | 2013-05-16 | 2017-10-18 | 株式会社Ihi | Vertical take-off and landing aircraft |
US9809318B1 (en) | 2013-08-14 | 2017-11-07 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Tiltrotor aircraft having spherical bearing mounted pylon assemblies |
US9856029B2 (en) | 2013-08-14 | 2018-01-02 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Tiltrotor aircraft having tip rib mounted pylon assemblies |
US9663225B1 (en) | 2013-08-14 | 2017-05-30 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Maintaining drive system alignment in tiltrotor aircraft |
US9868541B2 (en) | 2013-08-14 | 2018-01-16 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Tiltrotor aircraft having journal bearing mounted pylon assemblies |
US9868542B2 (en) | 2013-08-14 | 2018-01-16 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Tiltrotor aircraft having pillow block mounted pylon assemblies |
US10611472B2 (en) * | 2013-10-15 | 2020-04-07 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Coaxial rotor yaw control |
CH709012B1 (en) * | 2013-12-20 | 2017-06-15 | Conca-Garcia Raphaël | VTOL aircraft. |
AU2015229860B2 (en) * | 2014-03-13 | 2018-12-06 | Endurant Systems, Llc | UAV configurations and battery augmentation for UAV internal combustion engines, and associated systems and methods |
US9481457B2 (en) * | 2014-04-02 | 2016-11-01 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Vertical take-off and landing aircraft with variable wing geometry |
US9567105B2 (en) | 2014-06-02 | 2017-02-14 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Aircraft with integrated single sensor |
EP3162704B1 (en) | 2014-06-26 | 2019-03-06 | SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. | An aerial vehicle and a signal line protection assembly thereof |
WO2016053408A1 (en) | 2014-10-01 | 2016-04-07 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Acoustic signature variation of aircraft utilizing a clutch |
US10822076B2 (en) | 2014-10-01 | 2020-11-03 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Dual rotor, rotary wing aircraft |
US10703472B2 (en) | 2015-02-04 | 2020-07-07 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Directional control for coaxial rotary wing craft |
FR3032687B1 (en) * | 2015-02-16 | 2018-10-12 | Hutchinson | AERODYNE VTOL WITH SOUFFLANTE (S) AXIALE (S) CARRIER (S) |
US10017278B2 (en) * | 2015-03-05 | 2018-07-10 | Thomas Norman Hesse | Gyroscopic orbiter with vertical takeoff and vertical landing capabilities |
US20170174342A1 (en) * | 2015-06-12 | 2017-06-22 | Deng Huang | Vertical Takeoff Aircraft and Method |
WO2017065858A2 (en) | 2015-09-02 | 2017-04-20 | Jetoptera, Inc. | Ejector and airfoil configurations |
US10464668B2 (en) | 2015-09-02 | 2019-11-05 | Jetoptera, Inc. | Configuration for vertical take-off and landing system for aerial vehicles |
US11001378B2 (en) | 2016-08-08 | 2021-05-11 | Jetoptera, Inc. | Configuration for vertical take-off and landing system for aerial vehicles |
WO2017043980A1 (en) * | 2015-09-09 | 2017-03-16 | Altus IP Limited | Systems and methods for stabilisation of aerial vehicles |
US9908615B2 (en) * | 2015-10-26 | 2018-03-06 | Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation | Rotor blown wing aircraft including a rotor blown wing having at least one selectively controllable control surface and a method of controlling a rotor blown wing aircraft |
RU2717119C1 (en) * | 2016-03-10 | 2020-03-18 | Йоав НЕЦЕР | Convertiplane |
EP3442815A1 (en) | 2016-04-15 | 2019-02-20 | Terrafugia, Inc. | Electronic gear shifter assembly for a dual-mode flying and driving vehicle |
RU2643063C2 (en) * | 2016-04-26 | 2018-01-30 | Дмитрий Сергеевич Дуров | Unmanned aircraft complex |
FR3055311B1 (en) | 2016-08-30 | 2018-08-17 | Airbus Helicopters | GIRAVION PROVIDED WITH A ROTARY VESSEL AND AN ORIENTABLE PROPELLER, AND A METHOD APPLIED BY THIS GIRAVION |
US10737801B2 (en) * | 2016-10-31 | 2020-08-11 | Rolls-Royce Corporation | Fan module with rotatable vane ring power system |
US10618667B2 (en) | 2016-10-31 | 2020-04-14 | Rolls-Royce Corporation | Fan module with adjustable pitch blades and power system |
EP3366586B1 (en) | 2017-02-27 | 2020-08-19 | AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUTSCHLAND GmbH | A thrust producing unit with at least two rotor assemblies and a shrouding |
US10421540B1 (en) * | 2017-03-02 | 2019-09-24 | Bell Textron Inc. | Tiltrotor aircraft having optimized hover capabilities |
JP7155174B2 (en) | 2017-06-27 | 2022-10-18 | ジェトプテラ、インコーポレイテッド | Aircraft vertical take-off and landing system configuration |
US11919629B2 (en) | 2017-08-18 | 2024-03-05 | Verdego Aero, Inc. | Vertical takeoff and landing aircraft configuration |
CN107472524B (en) * | 2017-09-15 | 2023-07-04 | 烟台锦泰焊接器材有限公司 | Aircraft rotor tilting mechanism |
US10836481B2 (en) * | 2017-11-09 | 2020-11-17 | Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. | Biplane tiltrotor aircraft |
US10696391B2 (en) | 2017-11-16 | 2020-06-30 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Extended range quad tiltrotor aircraft |
US10752352B2 (en) * | 2017-12-07 | 2020-08-25 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Dual rotor propulsion systems for tiltrotor aircraft |
EP3728028B1 (en) | 2017-12-22 | 2023-08-30 | Verdego Aero, Inc. | Wing and rotor vectoring system for aircraft |
US11148798B2 (en) * | 2018-06-22 | 2021-10-19 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Engine and rotatable proprotor configurations for a tiltrotor aircraft |
DE102018116147A1 (en) * | 2018-07-04 | 2020-01-09 | Dr. Ing. H.C. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft | aircraft |
US10913542B2 (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2021-02-09 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Conversion actuator and downstop striker fitting for a tiltrotor aircraft |
US10994839B2 (en) | 2018-07-31 | 2021-05-04 | Textron Innovations Inc. | System and method for rotating a rotor of a tiltrotor aircraft |
US11267579B2 (en) * | 2019-03-26 | 2022-03-08 | Textron Innovations Inc. | Compound helicopters having hybrid propulsion engines |
RU2712352C1 (en) * | 2019-04-24 | 2020-01-28 | Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "Инэнерджи" (ООО "Инэнерджи") | Unmanned aerial vehicle with fuel cell battery cooling system |
KR20220047338A (en) | 2019-08-14 | 2022-04-15 | 언맨드 에어로스페이스 엘엘씨 | aircraft |
US11097839B2 (en) * | 2019-10-09 | 2021-08-24 | Kitty Hawk Corporation | Hybrid power systems for different modes of flight |
CN110963028B (en) * | 2019-11-11 | 2021-09-03 | 彩虹无人机科技有限公司 | Coaxial dual-rotor applicable to tilt rotor aircraft |
WO2021201991A2 (en) * | 2020-02-10 | 2021-10-07 | Wisk Aero Llc | Aircarft with pusher propeller |
US11851172B1 (en) * | 2020-05-30 | 2023-12-26 | Piasecki Aircraft Corporation | Apparatus, system and method for a supplemental wing for a rotary wing aircraft |
CN111964538A (en) * | 2020-08-19 | 2020-11-20 | 航天科工通信技术研究院有限责任公司 | Guided missile attack system of autorotation rotor mechanism |
CN112498679B (en) * | 2020-12-14 | 2022-10-28 | 江西洪都航空工业股份有限公司 | Tilting composite power aircraft |
US11919631B2 (en) | 2021-02-08 | 2024-03-05 | Archer Aviation, Inc. | Vertical take-off and landing aircraft with aft rotor tilting |
CN114379774B (en) * | 2022-01-25 | 2023-09-19 | 天津斑斓航空科技有限公司 | Cross-structure aircraft and method thereof |
Family Cites Families (21)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1951817A (en) | 1933-08-02 | 1934-03-20 | Earle E Blount | Airplane-helicopter |
US2448392A (en) * | 1946-04-04 | 1948-08-31 | John C Quady | Convertible type aircraft |
GB607924A (en) * | 1946-04-27 | 1948-09-07 | Pieter Jacobus Van Poelvoorde | Improvements in and relating to helicopters |
CH388110A (en) * | 1959-10-28 | 1965-02-15 | Aero Consultor Ag | Propeller-driven conversion aircraft with fixed wing |
US3254725A (en) * | 1963-07-17 | 1966-06-07 | Boeing Co | Aircraft propulsion system |
DE1262127B (en) * | 1964-07-21 | 1968-02-29 | Ver Flugtechnische Werke Ges M | Vertical take off and landing propeller aircraft with a wing propeller unit or a propeller that can be pivoted from the hover position to the horizontal flight position |
US3666209A (en) * | 1970-02-24 | 1972-05-30 | Boeing Co | V/stol aircraft with variable tilt wing |
ES2008200A6 (en) * | 1987-09-02 | 1989-07-16 | Munoz Saiz Manuel | Lifting arrangement by direct thrust of the engine flow to vertical take-off aircraft |
US4979698A (en) | 1988-07-07 | 1990-12-25 | Paul Lederman | Rotor system for winged aircraft |
US5046684A (en) | 1989-02-09 | 1991-09-10 | Julian Wolkovitch | Airplane with braced wings and pivoting propulsion devices |
US5085315A (en) * | 1989-05-05 | 1992-02-04 | Sambell Kenneth W | Wide-range blade pitch control for a folding rotor |
US5863013A (en) * | 1991-11-20 | 1999-01-26 | Freewing Aerial Robotics Corporation | STOL/VTOL free wing aircraft with improved shock dampening and absorbing means |
US5381985A (en) * | 1992-04-23 | 1995-01-17 | Mcdonnell Douglas Helicopter Co. | Wingtip mounted, counter-rotating proprotor for tiltwing aircraft |
RU2028964C1 (en) * | 1992-05-28 | 1995-02-20 | Валерий Туркубеевич Пчентлешев | Vertical take-off and landing aeroplane |
DE4443731A1 (en) * | 1994-12-08 | 1996-06-13 | Conrado Dornier | Twin fuselage V/STOL aircraft |
EP0754620B1 (en) * | 1995-07-21 | 2001-04-04 | Freiherr von Wilmowsky, Kaspar | Tilt rotor helicopter |
US5758844A (en) * | 1996-05-28 | 1998-06-02 | Boeing North American, Inc. | Vertical/short take-off and landing (V/STOL) air vehicle capable of providing high speed horizontal flight |
IT1308096B1 (en) * | 1999-06-02 | 2001-11-29 | Finmeccanica Spa | TILTROTOR |
US6655631B2 (en) * | 2000-07-28 | 2003-12-02 | John Frederick Austen-Brown | Personal hoverplane with four tiltmotors |
AUPR345501A0 (en) | 2001-03-01 | 2001-03-29 | Kusic, Tom | Tandem tilt rotor aircraft |
BRPI0311741A2 (en) * | 2002-06-12 | 2016-06-28 | Thomas Sash | control of an aircraft as a pendulum driven by vertical, horizontal and all its transitional flight modes |
-
2004
- 2004-01-08 GB GB0400335A patent/GB2409845A/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2004-12-23 WO PCT/GB2004/005449 patent/WO2005066020A1/en active Application Filing
- 2004-12-23 US US10/585,505 patent/US7584923B2/en active Active
- 2004-12-23 EP EP04806243A patent/EP1704089B1/en not_active Not-in-force
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US11724802B1 (en) | 2020-06-15 | 2023-08-15 | Avx Aircraft Company | Lightweight rotor conversion systems for tiltrotor aircraft |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
GB2409845A (en) | 2005-07-13 |
EP1704089A1 (en) | 2006-09-27 |
GB0400335D0 (en) | 2004-02-11 |
US7584923B2 (en) | 2009-09-08 |
US20070158494A1 (en) | 2007-07-12 |
WO2005066020A1 (en) | 2005-07-21 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1704089B1 (en) | Tilt-rotor aircraft | |
EP1114772B1 (en) | VTOL aircraft with variable wing sweep | |
EP2690011B1 (en) | Compound helicopter | |
US7118066B2 (en) | Tall V/STOL aircraft | |
AU570969B2 (en) | Air jet reaction contrarotating rotor gyrodyne | |
US8376264B1 (en) | Rotor for a dual mode aircraft | |
US7143973B2 (en) | Avia tilting-rotor convertiplane | |
US8540184B2 (en) | Long-range aircraft with high forward speed in cruising flight | |
AU2018239445B2 (en) | Vertical takeoff and landing aircraft | |
US3142455A (en) | Rotary vertical take-off and landing aircraft | |
US3039719A (en) | Vertical take-off airplane | |
US11603191B1 (en) | Stowable lift rotors for VTOL aircraft | |
EP3299279B1 (en) | Aircraft with a fuselage-mounted engine and wing stow | |
US3744743A (en) | Helicopter power plant system | |
RU2653953C1 (en) | Unmanned high-speed helicopter-airplane | |
EP3838752B1 (en) | Convertiplane and associated folding method | |
US20230234703A1 (en) | Convertiplane with stopped rotors, and repositionable rotor blades | |
EP3838751B1 (en) | Convertiplane | |
RU215197U1 (en) | UNMANNED HIGH-SPEED ROTOR WING | |
RU222496U1 (en) | Vertical take-off and landing unmanned aerial vehicle | |
US20230322376A1 (en) | Aircraft with side body articulating propulsion | |
RU2141432C1 (en) | Vertical take-off and landing aircraft | |
CA1270801A (en) | Air jet reaction contrarotating rotor gyrodyne with thrust reversers and specific rotor air supply controls | |
CN117048822A (en) | Electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft with self-balancing tilting rotor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060719 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20110922 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 576907 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121015 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602004039494 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121122 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 576907 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120926 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D Effective date: 20120926 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120926 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121227 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130106 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130126 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20130128 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121231 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20121226 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20130627 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20130830 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602004039494 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130702 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602004039494 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130627 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130702 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121223 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121231 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121231 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130102 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120926 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041223 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20181231 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20181220 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20191223 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191223 Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20191223 |