EP1689918A1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur auftragssteuerung eines herstellungsprozesses für ein faserprodukt - Google Patents
Verfahren und vorrichtung zur auftragssteuerung eines herstellungsprozesses für ein faserproduktInfo
- Publication number
- EP1689918A1 EP1689918A1 EP04803289A EP04803289A EP1689918A1 EP 1689918 A1 EP1689918 A1 EP 1689918A1 EP 04803289 A EP04803289 A EP 04803289A EP 04803289 A EP04803289 A EP 04803289A EP 1689918 A1 EP1689918 A1 EP 1689918A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- control unit
- production
- actual
- target
- product
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
- D01D13/00—Complete machines for producing artificial threads
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
- D01D13/00—Complete machines for producing artificial threads
- D01D13/02—Elements of machines in combination
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
- D01D—MECHANICAL METHODS OR APPARATUS IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS
- D01D5/00—Formation of filaments, threads, or the like
- D01D5/08—Melt spinning methods
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for order control. a manufacturing process for a fiber product and a device for carrying out the method according to the preamble of claim 12.
- the manufacture of fiber products is largely determined by the quality specifications that the fiber product should have. Regardless of whether the fiber product is a single fiber or a flat pack, certain usage-specific properties are required.
- EP 0 580 071 A2 describes the production of a synthetic fiber, in which the quality of the fiber produced is continuously monitored during the process. In the event of deviations, a process change in the manufacturing process can be carried out in a targeted manner.
- the manufacturing process is usually monitored and controlled from a system control unit.
- the fiber products to be manufactured are determined by individual production orders. Every production lot for a fiber product is therefore based on a production order.
- the difficulty arises in particular in the manufacturing process of fiber products that, due to the complex processing steps for producing the fiber product, a large number of influencing variables mean that disruptions in the manufacturing process due to fluctuating quality of the fiber product or process interruptions are inevitable.
- the fiber product is divided into quality levels A, B and C.
- a production order with a target specification could be a certain product quantity of quality A can only be produced as efficiently as possible if the quality levels B and C are insignificant or not at all during the manufacturing process.
- a thread spool with the crimped yarn is already rated as B quality if, for example, a thread knot is contained within the thread spool, which is caused by the transition from a supply spool to a reserve spool. Therefore, planning to process several successive production orders is hardly possible or only with a lot of effort. Accordingly, it is an object of the invention to provide a method for order control of a manufacturing process for a fiber product and an apparatus for performing the method, with which planning for the execution of production orders is possible. Another object of the invention is to constantly monitor the manufacturing process with regard to the underlying production order.
- the object is achieved by a method having the features of claim 1 and by a device having the features of claim 12.
- the invention is characterized in that an intelligent connection between the business processes and the manufacturing processes is created. In this way, the current situation in the manufacturing process can be integrated when creating new production orders within the business process.
- an actual-target evaluation is carried out between that by a production order. predetermined target specification for the production of a fiber product and the respective actual state of the production process, which was triggered on the basis of the production order. there a deviation from the target specification is displayed, so that both the current production order in the manufacturing process and subsequent production orders can be adjusted.
- the device has a superordinate planning control unit, by means of which the actual / target evaluation can be carried out between the target specification predetermined by a production order and an actual state of the manufacturing process.
- the planning control unit is coupled to the system control unit via a data connection, so that the data required for determining the actual state are accessible to the planning control unit.
- the planning control unit enables automated planning for the production of a fiber product. Both individual synthetic fibers or natural fibers as well as intermediate products of these fibers or flat end products made of these fibers, such as woven, knitted or braided, can be considered as fiber products.
- the actual state of the production process is determined by a partial fiber product quantity completed per unit of time and that an order-related actual value for the fiber product is calculated from the partial fiber product quantity and a difference value is generated from the actual-target evaluation , a product quantity and / or a production time for the specified production order being determined by the target specification.
- control and planning of the production order can be carried out at an early stage using just a few parameters.
- the unit of time, which is decisive for the fiber product subset could be specified in coordination with the production time in hours, days, weeks or months.
- the cumulatively produced fiber product part quantity can be determined after each unit of time in the ongoing production process and used as a basis for the actual value calculation.
- an advantageous further development of the direction at least in the system control unit has a means by which a partial fiber product quantity completed per unit time can be determined.
- This means can advantageously be formed by a computing module, by means of which an evaluation of the state variables that are continuously recorded and transmitted to the system control unit can be carried out.
- a weight check of the completely wound bobbins could be recorded as state variables in a melt spinning process and summed up to a partial fiber product quantity per predetermined unit of time in the computing module.
- the planning control unit may have means which directly determine the required fiber product subsets from the state variables and carry out an actual value calculation.
- the difference value resulting from the actual target evaluation can advantageously be specified as a production time difference or as a product quantity difference.
- the product quantity specified by the target specification must be strictly adhered to in order to fulfill the production order
- the actual value is calculated from the unit of time, the phase product quantity and the product quantity.
- the actual value thus represents an expected end of production time, which leads to a difference in production time when the actual / target value is identical to the specified production time. This determined production time difference must therefore be taken into account in the planning for the completion of the production order and at the beginning of subsequent production orders.
- the difference value could be output as a product quantity difference.
- the actual value is calculated from the partial fiber product quantity, the time unit and the production time.
- the actual value thus represents an expected one Amount of product that can be created during production time.
- the order-related target specifications can advantageously be manually given by an operating unit.
- ERP control units Enterprise Resource Planning
- the target specifications can be directly automated and passed on at the business process level when a production order is created. It is therefore particularly advantageous to give up the order-related target specification by the ERP control unit.
- the planning control unit has an interface for connecting a manual operating unit and / or an interface for connecting an ERP control unit. This enables the calculated control values to be compared at any time between the calculated actual values and the target specification.
- the difference value can be displayed both by visualization on the operating unit or advantageously by a continuation to the ERP control unit.
- the effects on subsequent production orders can advantageously be implemented automatically in the ERP control unit, so that the business processes are updated in each case.
- an advantageous development of the device within the planning control unit has a means for generating a difference value. Assuming that the calculated actual value and the target specification on on the same basis, the difference value can already be calculated using a simple comparison module. The difference value can then be forwarded to the ERP control unit or to an operating unit via the interfaces of the planning control unit. The difference value could then trigger a change in the target specification of the production order currently working or a change in the target specification of the subsequent production orders.
- follow-up production orders can also be placed directly in the planning control unit, which, after comparing the target specification and the difference value, creates a machining plan that is coordinated with the follow-up orders.
- a machining plan could, for example, be given to the ERP control unit in order to be able to carry out detailed planning.
- This also advantageously offers the possibility of counteracting an impermissible deviation in the area of business processes in such a way that the target specification of the production order currently being processed or of the subsequent production orders can be changed.
- the new actual-target evaluation leads to a new machining plan, which can be coordinated with higher-level specifications within the business process level.
- the development of the device, in which the planning control unit has a means for determining a machining plan, is therefore particularly advantageous in order to provide suggestions for the further processing of the production orders.
- the provision of the preliminary products that are processed into the fiber product in the manufacturing process can be controlled in this way.
- the integration of the machining plans created by the planning control unit into the business processes enables a high degree of flexibility with regard to the execution and processing of a large number of production orders with one manufacturing process.
- the manufacturing process can also be divided into several sub-processes that run independently of one another. Due to the complex manufacturing processes, a large number of machines and product parameters affect the fiber product to be created. For example, a thread break within a rapid spinning process means that production in a spinning station is interrupted.
- the wound bobbins do not have the required bobbin weights or bobbin diameters at the time the thread breaks, these could only be taken into account, for example, only as C quality when determining the fiber product partial quantities.
- further condition variables for example determining the fiber quality.
- the method variant in which one or more state variables are recorded in relation to the fiber product and / or the machine carrying out the processing steps, is therefore particularly suitable in order to be able to carry out automated planning in complex manufacturing processes.
- the relevant fiber product subset is determined using the state variables.
- the process variant is preferably used, in which several production orders are continuously compared with the calculated actual values and, depending on the comparison, the provision of preliminary products of the following production orders is triggered depending on the comparison.
- special planning algorithms can be specified, by means of which, for example, priorities are specified.
- Fig. 1 shows schematically a first embodiment of a manufacturing process for a fiber product with order control according to the invention
- 2 schematically shows an example for determining a difference value for a production order
- 3 schematically shows another example for determining a difference value for a production order
- FIG. 4 schematically shows a signal flow of an exemplary embodiment for monitoring a production order
- Fig. 5 shows schematically a signal flow of another embodiment for monitoring a production order
- Fig. 6 schematically shows a multi-stage manufacturing process for a fiber product with order control according to the invention.
- FIG. 1 the method according to the invention for order control and the device according to the invention for carrying out the method are described in more detail using an exemplary embodiment of a production process for melt-spun threads.
- thermoplastic material In the manufacturing process, a large number of threads made of a thermoplastic material are spun and wound into bobbins.
- the thermoplastic material is previously conditioned in a granulate preparation 1.
- the granulate preparation 1 essentially has a dryer 2 with a heater 3 and a metering 4.
- a machine controller 5.1 is provided for controlling the granulate preparation 1.
- the dried granulate is metered into a melt preparation 6.
- the melt preparation 6 essentially consists of an extruder 7, to which the granulate is fed via a filler neck 8. An extruder screw is driven within the extruder 7, so that the granulate is melted and discharged via a melt line 9 at the outlet of the extruder 7.
- the Melt preparation 6 is monitored and controlled via the machine control 5.2.
- a spinning device 10, a treatment device 15 and a winding device 17 are provided for melt spinning, treating and winding up the threads.
- the spinning device 10 has in detail a plurality of spinning pumps 11 which supply a plurality of spinning heads 12 with the melt.
- Each of the spinning heads 12 has a plurality of spinnerets, only one spinneret being shown in FIG. 1 for each spinning station.
- the freshly extruded fibers are then cooled by a cooling device 13 below the spinning head.
- the treatment device 15 is formed by two godet units 16.1 and 16.2, through which the threads are stretched.
- the winding device 17 has at least one winding spindle 18 per spinning station, on the circumference of which a plurality of bobbins 19 are formed at the same time. In this way, each thread 20 is wound into a bobbin 19.
- the spinning device 10, the treatment device 15 and the winding device 17 are monitored and controlled for each spinning station by a position controller 14.
- the majority of the position control 14 are coupled to a higher-level machine control 5.3 via a bus system.
- the machine controls 5.1, 5.2 and 5.3 are connected to a system control unit 22.
- the entire manufacturing process, from the preliminary product to the fiber end product, is controlled and monitored via the plant control unit 22.
- the sensor means used for monitoring the manufacturing process within the granulate preparation 1, the melt preparation 6, the spinning device 10, the treatment device 15 and the winding device 17 are not shown and explained here.
- From the DE 199 11 704 AI for example, describes a manufacturing process for a synthetic thread, from which monitoring of the product and machine parameters is known. In this respect, reference is made to the cited publication.
- the plant control unit 22 is connected to a higher-level planning control unit 23 via a data connection 24.
- the planning control unit 23 has an interface 25, through which an ERP control unit 26 is connected to the planning control unit 23.
- the ERP control unit 26 is used to map the business processes, for example to create and dispatch production orders. Common PPS software systems can be used here.
- a thread that is synthetically wound on bobbins is produced as the fiber product.
- the manufacturing process is based on a production order by which at least the amount of thread or bobbin to be produced is determined.
- Such production orders are created as a business process in the ERP control unit 26 and thus trigger the manufacturing process.
- the state variables of the manufacturing process that are given to the plant control unit 22 are used to determine an actual state of the respective production order with regard to the fiber products to be produced and to give it to the planning control unit 23.
- an actual value based on the production order is extrapolated from the actual state of the manufacturing process.
- the extrapolated actual value represents a comparison value with the target specification given by the ERP control unit 26.
- An actual-target evaluation carried out between the actual value and the target specification thus leads to a difference value, from which a fulfillment is immediate or non-fulfillment of the production order according to the specified target specifications.
- the by the planning control unit 23 Deviation determined according to stored algorithms is fed to the ERP control unit 26. This enables a comparison of the business processes and especially the production orders.
- the actual state of the production process is usually determined by a partial fiber product quantity completed per unit of time, since the target specification of the production order is usually specified in the form of information about the product quantity or alternatively a production time or by information about the product quantity and the production time.
- FIG. 2 shows an exemplary embodiment for forming a difference value, as would be possible, for example, in the planning control unit 23 using appropriate means and stored algorithms.
- a time axis is plotted with the reference symbol t.
- the target specification that requires a production time t ⁇ .
- the target quantity defines the product quantity of the fiber product to be produced.
- the target specification refers to a production order and is given to the planning control unit.
- the instantaneous actual state of the manufacturing process with regard to the fiber products to be manufactured is determined at a point in time t; which is significantly shorter than the total production time TE.
- the data contained in the system control unit 22 are given to the planning control unit.
- the unit of time is the period from the start of the manufacturing process to time t ⁇ .
- the actual value is then extrapolated based on the production order.
- the partial production quantity that was created up to the point in time ti is compared with the total product quantity.
- the quotient of the product quantity and the partial product quantity multiplied by the time unit now gives an actual value for the production time.
- the actual value of the production time is identified in FIG. 2 by the reference symbol tsi st . It can be seen that in order to fulfill the production order, the production time ts cannot be adhered to, but by a difference value, in this case a production time difference is exceeded.
- the production time difference is fed from the planning control unit to the ERP control unit, so that business process optimization or a change in the target specification of the production order or a postponement of subsequent production orders can take place.
- FIG. 3 shows a further exemplary embodiment for monitoring and controlling the production order.
- a product quantity axis M is shown.
- the target specifications which take the form of a maximum product quantity and a production time, have been entered, the product quantity being identified by the reference sign ME.
- the finished fiber product part quantity Mi is determined as early as possible during the manufacturing process.
- the actual state of the manufacturing process is then increased in the planning control unit to an actual value based on the production order to be executed.
- the time unit assigned to the phase product subset is compared with the maximum production time. With the quotient of the production time and the time unit multiplied by the partial fiber product quantity, an actual value is obtained for the total product quantity.
- the actual value of the product quantity is entered with the reference symbol M E i st .
- the product quantity difference shows that the current actual state of the manufacturing process results in a smaller product quantity while observing the maximum production time.
- the product quantity difference is fed from the planning control unit to the ERP control unit.
- the planning control unit preferably has an interface in order to integrate an operating unit.
- the operating unit 27 is also shown in FIG. 1. The connection of the control unit 27 via a data connection is indicated by dashed lines.
- a first exemplary embodiment is shown schematically in FIG.
- the plant control unit 22 is connected via a bus connection 31 to the machine controls of the manufacturing process and via a data connection 24 to the planning control unit 23.
- the process, product and machine parameters transmitted via the bus connection 31 are shared within the system control unit 22.
- the process, product and machine parameters within the plant control unit are fed to a control module 32, by means of which the production process can be monitored and controlled.
- the other part of the parameters is passed on directly to the higher-level planning control unit 23.
- the parameters are given to a computing module 33, in which the current actual state of the manufacturing process is determined. From the current actual state of the manufacturing process, an extrapolation is carried out in the computing module 33 to form the actual value. The actual value is then fed to a comparison module 34 in order to be able to carry out an actual target evaluation. For this purpose, the order-related target specification is given to the comparison module 34. A difference value is formed from the actual-target evaluation and is supplied to an output unit 36.
- the output unit 36 can be combined with an ERP control unit or an operating unit.
- FIG. 5 shows a further exemplary embodiment of a signal flow for monitoring and controlling a production order.
- the embodiment according to FIG. 5 is essentially identical to the exemplary embodiment according to FIG. 4, so that only the differences are shown below.
- the plant control unit 22 has a control module 32 and a computing module 35. With the computer module 35, an actual state of the manufacturing process is determined from the product, machine and process parameters and given to the planning control unit 23.
- the planning control unit 23 contains a computing module 33 and a comparison module 34 in order to form a difference value from an actual-target evaluation.
- a planning module 37 is provided within the planning control unit 23. The difference value is fed to the planning module 37. The target specifications of one or more production orders stored in the planning module 37 are compared with regard to the current difference value by means of a specific planning algorithm and implemented and forwarded to a machining plan.
- the proposal for the machining plan can be implemented immediately within an ERP control unit or can be adapted to existing processes by changing the target specifications of the production orders.
- the specification of the preliminary products can be controlled particularly advantageously.
- the preliminary products required in individual production orders could be provided via the machining plan. This enables a high utilization of the machine capacity to be achieved.
- FIG. 1 A further exemplary embodiment of a manufacturing process with order control according to the invention is shown schematically in FIG.
- the entire manufacturing process is formed by a total of three sub-processes.
- a thermoplastic granulate is produced in a first sub-process.
- the granule manufacturing process is identified by reference numeral 28.
- a spinning process 29 a large number of synthetic fibers are spun from the previously produced granulate.
- the so-called tire cord production process 30 the fibers are further processed by cabling to form a tire cord.
- tire cord fibers are used in manufacturing needed by tires.
- Each of the sub-processes 28, 29 and 30 are monitored and controlled by a system control unit 22.1, 22.2 and 22.3.
- the system control units 22.1, 22.2 and 22.3 are connected in parallel to the planning control unit 23 via the data connections 24.1, 24.2 and 24.3.
- the planning control unit 23 is coupled to an ERP control unit 26.
- the fiber product to be produced relates to a tire cord.
- the intermediate products of the first and the second sub-process being essential for the final product quantity of the fiber product. If it turns out, for example, that problems arise in the first sub-process that lead to poor quality of the required granules, the entire process chain is thus shifted, since for the spinning process, for example, only one granulate with quality level A is required.
- the planning control unit 23 is given a target specification for each sub-process and for the final fiber product.
- An actual-target evaluation can be carried out in the planning control unit 23 for each sub-process, so that the production order is first divided into individual sub-orders to be processed one after the other. An impact on the entire production order can then be determined from the actual-target evaluation for each sub-process, which is continued as a difference value. This makes it possible to execute overlapping production orders.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
- Preliminary Treatment Of Fibers (AREA)
- Multi-Process Working Machines And Systems (AREA)
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10357003 | 2003-12-05 | ||
PCT/EP2004/013420 WO2005054551A1 (de) | 2003-12-05 | 2004-11-26 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur auftragssteuerung eines herstellungsprozesses für ein faserprodukt |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1689918A1 true EP1689918A1 (de) | 2006-08-16 |
EP1689918B1 EP1689918B1 (de) | 2012-01-04 |
Family
ID=34638419
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04803289A Not-in-force EP1689918B1 (de) | 2003-12-05 | 2004-11-26 | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur auftragssteuerung eines herstellungsprozesses für ein faserprodukt |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7496421B2 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1689918B1 (de) |
CN (1) | CN1890410B (de) |
AT (1) | ATE540142T1 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2378546T3 (de) |
TW (1) | TWI346849B (de) |
WO (1) | WO2005054551A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN101646810B (zh) * | 2007-03-23 | 2012-07-04 | 欧瑞康纺织有限及两合公司 | 用于熔融纺造、处理和卷绕合成长丝的方法和设备 |
CH702009A1 (de) | 2009-10-02 | 2011-04-15 | Uster Technologies Ag | Verfahren zur Optimierung eines textilen Produktionsprozesses. |
WO2015135794A1 (de) * | 2014-03-08 | 2015-09-17 | Oerlikon Textile Gmbh & Co. Kg | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schmelzspinnen, verstrecken, kräuseln und aufwickeln mehrerer fäden |
US10530902B2 (en) * | 2017-11-30 | 2020-01-07 | Gregory Bullock | Method of operating a protocol translator |
CN108677415B (zh) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-06-01 | 襄阳信正纺织有限公司 | 一种纱线上浆方法 |
CN108677416B (zh) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-06-08 | 襄阳信正纺织有限公司 | 一种纱线加工方法 |
CN108677408B (zh) * | 2018-05-07 | 2021-03-16 | 襄阳信正纺织有限公司 | 一种纱线染整工艺 |
AT524002B1 (de) * | 2020-07-10 | 2023-10-15 | Engel Austria Gmbh | Verfahren zur automatischen Überwachung mindestens eines Produktionsprozesses |
Family Cites Families (23)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3622448A (en) * | 1968-02-16 | 1971-11-23 | Industrial Nucleonics Corp | System and method of process control, particularly papermaking processes in response to fraction defective measurements |
US3648035A (en) * | 1969-06-02 | 1972-03-07 | Industrial Nucleonics Corp | System and method for optimizing processor or equipment profit |
US3936665A (en) * | 1972-06-12 | 1976-02-03 | Industrial Nucleonics Corporation | Sheet material characteristic measuring, monitoring and controlling method and apparatus using data profile generated and evaluated by computer means |
US3847579A (en) * | 1973-03-22 | 1974-11-12 | Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp | Method of and apparatus for processing linear elements |
SU964030A1 (ru) * | 1979-12-17 | 1982-10-07 | Барнаульский Филиал Опытно-Конструкторского Бюро Автоматики | Способ контрол процесса производства химических нитей |
US4453404A (en) * | 1982-11-22 | 1984-06-12 | The Mead Corporation | Method and apparatus for determining statistical characteristics of sheet material |
US4819176A (en) * | 1987-02-06 | 1989-04-04 | Treasure Isle, Inc. | Process control and data collection system |
DE3824034C1 (de) * | 1988-07-15 | 1989-09-14 | Gustav 7290 Freudenstadt De Memminger | |
EP0580071B1 (de) | 1992-07-18 | 1999-11-10 | Barmag Ag | Verfahren zur Herstellung und/oder Behandlung sowie Aufwicklung eines endlose Materials aus thermopastischem Kunststoff mit Ausgabe eines Qualitätssignals sowie Aufnahmevorrichtung |
CN1047000C (zh) * | 1993-04-29 | 1999-12-01 | 巴马格股份公司 | 在合成长丝的生产程序中判断缺陷的方法 |
US5893055A (en) * | 1997-05-30 | 1999-04-06 | Abb Industrial Systems, Inc. | Two-dimensional web property variation modeling and control |
US6092003A (en) * | 1998-01-26 | 2000-07-18 | Honeywell-Measurex Corporation | Paper stock shear and formation control |
DE19911704A1 (de) | 1998-04-01 | 1999-10-07 | Barmag Barmer Maschf | Verfahren zur Herstellung eines synthetischen Fadens |
US6447639B1 (en) * | 2001-03-05 | 2002-09-10 | Sita Ruby Warren | Process for controlling a digester using real time measurement of moisture content and species of wood |
FI115081B (fi) * | 2001-10-19 | 2005-02-28 | Metso Automation Oy | Menetelmä ja laitteisto paperikoneen massaosaston toiminnan ohjaamiseksi |
DE10250442A1 (de) * | 2001-11-14 | 2003-05-22 | Barmag Barmer Maschf | Vorrichtung zur Herstellung und/oder Bearbeiten synthetischer Fäden sowie ein Verfahren zum Steuern einer derartigen Vorrichtung |
US7035877B2 (en) * | 2001-12-28 | 2006-04-25 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc. | Quality management and intelligent manufacturing with labels and smart tags in event-based product manufacturing |
US6901300B2 (en) * | 2002-02-07 | 2005-05-31 | Fisher-Rosemount Systems, Inc.. | Adaptation of advanced process control blocks in response to variable process delay |
JP3616067B2 (ja) * | 2002-04-02 | 2005-02-02 | 三菱レイヨン株式会社 | 繊維トウの繋ぎ部分検出センサー及び同センサーを用いた制御方法 |
CA2513091A1 (en) * | 2003-01-31 | 2004-08-19 | Fakhruddin T. Attarwala | Integrated optimization and control using modular model predictive controller |
US7204914B2 (en) * | 2003-08-13 | 2007-04-17 | Metso Automation Usa Inc. | System and method for controlling a processor including a digester utilizing time-based assessments |
CA2447098A1 (en) * | 2003-10-28 | 2005-04-28 | Centre De Recherche Industrielle Du Quebec | Method for estimating an optimal dosage of bleaching agent to be mixed with wood chips |
US7381303B2 (en) * | 2004-04-27 | 2008-06-03 | Honeywell International Inc. | System and method for controlling a thermo-mechanical wood pulp refiner |
-
2004
- 2004-11-19 TW TW093135662A patent/TWI346849B/zh not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-11-26 US US11/446,639 patent/US7496421B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-11-26 ES ES04803289T patent/ES2378546T3/es active Active
- 2004-11-26 AT AT04803289T patent/ATE540142T1/de active
- 2004-11-26 CN CN2004800361593A patent/CN1890410B/zh active Active
- 2004-11-26 EP EP04803289A patent/EP1689918B1/de not_active Not-in-force
- 2004-11-26 WO PCT/EP2004/013420 patent/WO2005054551A1/de active Application Filing
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005054551A1 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
TWI346849B (en) | 2011-08-11 |
ES2378546T3 (es) | 2012-04-13 |
EP1689918B1 (de) | 2012-01-04 |
CN1890410A (zh) | 2007-01-03 |
CN1890410B (zh) | 2010-04-21 |
WO2005054551A1 (de) | 2005-06-16 |
ATE540142T1 (de) | 2012-01-15 |
TW200525322A (en) | 2005-08-01 |
US7496421B2 (en) | 2009-02-24 |
US20070027565A1 (en) | 2007-02-01 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1771371B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur qualitätssteuerung bei herstellung eines strangförmigen polymerproduktes | |
EP0410429B1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Betrieb einer Spinnereilinie | |
EP3802927B1 (de) | Ringspinnanlage und verfahren zu ihrem betrieb | |
EP3760772B1 (de) | Optimierung des betriebes einer spinnmaschine | |
EP3672895B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum texturieren eines synthetischen fadens | |
EP0090911A2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur zeitlichen Optimierung eines Arbeitsereignisses an einzelnen Arbeitsstellen von Textilmaschinen | |
EP0644282B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Qualitätssteuerung bei der Herstellung einer Vielzahl von Fäden | |
DE69408563T2 (de) | Verfahren zur überwachung eines laufenden fadens | |
DE102004052669A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Überwachung einer Spinnanlage zur Herstellung synthetischer Fäden | |
EP1238273B1 (de) | Verfahren zur steuerung einer texturiermaschine sowie eine texturiermaschine | |
EP1689918B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur auftragssteuerung eines herstellungsprozesses für ein faserprodukt | |
DE10039093A1 (de) | Steuereinrichtung | |
DE19911704A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Herstellung eines synthetischen Fadens | |
DE102018004773A1 (de) | Verfahren zur Steuerung eines Schmelzspinnprozesses sowie eine Schmelzspinnvorrichtung | |
EP1266270B1 (de) | System und verfahren zur ermittlung der optimalen betriebsgeschwindigkeit einer produktionsmaschine | |
EP2047015A2 (de) | Verfahren zur simulation eines visuellen erscheinungsbildes eines fadens und/oder eines aus dem faden gebildeten faserproduktes sowie verfahren und vorrichtung zur herstellung eines bcf-fadens | |
DE69104508T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überwachen einer Fadenspannung. | |
WO2005071150A1 (de) | Verfahren zum herstellen eines effektgarnes | |
EP4115009B1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur überwachung einer maschinenanlage zur herstellung oder behandlung von synthetischen fasern | |
DE4440206A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Beurteilen der Faserbandqualität in einer Textilmaschine | |
WO2014090617A1 (de) | Verfahren und einrichtung zur steuerung einer faserproduktionsmaschine | |
WO2020035415A1 (de) | Verfahren zur überwachung eines schmelzspinnprozesses und schmelzspinnvorrichtung | |
DE102022004857A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Ermitteln der Spulenqualität einer Sammelspule | |
EP1432855B1 (de) | Verfahren zur steuerung einer texturiermaschine sowie eine texturiermaschine | |
DE102020004467A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung einer Maschinenanlage zur Herstellung oder Behandlung von synthetischen Fasern |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060526 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: SEULEN, DIRK Inventor name: GROSS, JOERG Inventor name: MUEHLENMEISTER, REINHARD |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO. KG |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070820 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: OERLIKON TEXTILE GMBH & CO. KG |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 540142 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20120115 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 502004013204 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120223 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2378546 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20120413 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120504 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120404 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120405 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120504 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20121005 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 502004013204 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20121005 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20121121 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20121124 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20121126 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20130731 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121130 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121126 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 540142 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121130 Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20120104 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20121126 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20041126 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131126 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20150529 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20131127 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20161205 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20171120 Year of fee payment: 14 Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20171123 Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 502004013204 Country of ref document: DE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180602 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20181130 |