EP1613434B1 - Measuring froth stability - Google Patents
Measuring froth stability Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1613434B1 EP1613434B1 EP04719877A EP04719877A EP1613434B1 EP 1613434 B1 EP1613434 B1 EP 1613434B1 EP 04719877 A EP04719877 A EP 04719877A EP 04719877 A EP04719877 A EP 04719877A EP 1613434 B1 EP1613434 B1 EP 1613434B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- froth
- cell
- column
- stability
- measuring
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 37
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 30
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 24
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 18
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 5
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims description 12
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000003607 modifier Substances 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000002209 hydrophobic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000000691 measurement method Methods 0.000 abstract 1
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 11
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000009172 bursting Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004581 coalescence Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000009291 froth flotation Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 5
- 230000000717 retained effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229920005439 Perspex® Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000033558 biomineral tissue development Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003245 coal Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004926 polymethyl methacrylate Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010408 film Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000006260 foam Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229920001903 high density polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000004700 high-density polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000003002 pH adjusting agent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004886 process control Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002516 radical scavenger Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000630 rising effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000000926 separation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010409 thin film Substances 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/14—Flotation machines
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
- B03D1/028—Control and monitoring of flotation processes; computer models therefor
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
- B03D1/04—Froth-flotation processes by varying ambient atmospheric pressure
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B03—SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS USING LIQUIDS OR USING PNEUMATIC TABLES OR JIGS; MAGNETIC OR ELECTROSTATIC SEPARATION OF SOLID MATERIALS FROM SOLID MATERIALS OR FLUIDS; SEPARATION BY HIGH-VOLTAGE ELECTRIC FIELDS
- B03D—FLOTATION; DIFFERENTIAL SEDIMENTATION
- B03D1/00—Flotation
- B03D1/02—Froth-flotation processes
- B03D1/06—Froth-flotation processes differential
Definitions
- the present invention relates to recovering valuable material from mined minerals by means of froth flotation of a slurry of the mined materials.
- the present invention relates particularly to a method of measuring froth stability in a cell of a flotation circuit for recovering valuable material from a slurry of mined minerals containing valuable material and gangue material.
- the present invention also relates to an apparatus for measuring froth stability.
- the present invention also relates to a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell using froth stability as a control parameter for the method.
- a froth is a three phase structure comprising air bubbles, solids and water.
- the bubbles are defined by a thin water film or lamellae, which separates two bubbles, while the intersection of three lamellae results in the formation of a narrow water channel called a Plateau border.
- the entire froth is therefore made up of a continuous network of narrow water channels in which water and solid particles can flow.
- the solids contained in the froth are either valuable material attached to lamellae or a mixture of valuable material and gangue material contained freely within the Plateau borders.
- a froth is a highly dynamic system in which solids and water movement is governed by the following processes:
- froth stability is understood herein to mean the ability of bubbles in a froth to resist coalescence and bursting.
- a more stable froth will have less coalescence and bursting events, a smaller mean bubble size and may carry more water. All of these factors will ultimately determine the structure and volume of the froth (water, solids and air) carried over the cell weir into the concentrate launder and therefore the recovery of attached and unattached (carried in Plateau border) particles - in other words, the valuable material recovery and concentrate grade.
- GB 1 287 274 discloses an apparatus for controlling the thickness of froth material above the liquid slurry of a flotation cell comprising probe means movable in position relative to the froth layer such that a first signal is provided upon the probe means sensing a first predetermined surface of the froth layer and a second signal is provided upon the probe means sensing a second predetermined surface of the froth layer, and means for controlling the thickness of the froth layer in response to the first and second signals.
- WO 01/34304 discloses a method for detecting froth flow rate in a slurry-processing recovery apparatus such as a froth flotation cell whereby a sensor disposed along a froth flow path extending from an outlet of the apparatus is operated to determine location of froth-air interface along said froth flow path.
- the location of the froth-air interface or froth level is related to the rate of froth production and enables feedback control of operating parameters of the froth flotation cell to maintain cell operation in an optimal range.
- US 4,552,651 discloses a method for controlling the separation of coal from a mixture of coal and refuse in a froth flotation device by measuring the differential back pressure between two gas bubbler tubes immersed to different depths into the body of pulp in the device to produce a first control signal representative of the pulp density, and adjusting the rate of addition of a froth enhancement additive to the froth flotation device responsive to changes in said first signal; a second signal, produced by measuring back pressure of a single bubbler tube and representative of the pulp level in said device, can be corrected for changes in density by combining it with said first signal and then utilized to control liquid level in the cell by adjusting the rate of withdrawal of refuse therefrom.
- SU 1717237 discloses a floatation process regulation unit having a float with pulp level measuring electrode, whereby its shaft can interact with the position detector connected to the pulp level stabilization regulator, electrodes for froth thickness measuring, a regulator for thickness stabilization and froth mineralization.
- the unit is simplified by providing with relay slave mechanisms and transistor amplifiers.
- the froth thickness measuring electrodes are connected to transistor amplifiers bases, whose manifolds are connected to one of relay slave elements outlets, whose other outlets are connected to the pulp level measuring electrode.
- the slave elements are connected to the froth thickness stabilization and mineralization regulator.
- Each of these variables can change rapidly or gradually over time and can significantly influence froth stability and the overall flotation performance.
- the present invention provides such a method.
- a method of measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in a cell of a flotation circuit for a slurry of a mined mineral containing valuable material and gangue material which method includes a step of measuring one or more than one froth stability paremeter below using a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell.
- the froth stability parameter is any parameter that provides information on the stability of the froth in the cell that can (a) be measured directly by means of the column or (b) be derived from measurements made using the column.
- the method includes washing the column to collapse the froth in the column to the pre-determined starting height, for example the interface between the slurry and the froth, and thereafter repeating the above-described measurement step and measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter.
- an apparatus for measuring froth stability of a froth in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell which includes:
- a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell which includes the steps of:
- froth stability data is understood herein to mean data that is directly measured by means of the column or is derived from directly measured data.
- the method includes repeating the measurement of the froth stability during the course of the operation of the cell and adjusting operating conditions of the cell based on the froth stability data.
- the model may be any suitable model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance.
- the model may be a fundamental model derived from theoretical considerations.
- the model may be based on comparing measured froth stability data and data on the historical operation of the cell.
- One particular model is a model that is being developed by the applicant.
- the model relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade).
- the model is a fundamental model and is based on foam physics and interprets the effect of froth structure on flotation.
- the model links the flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water to froth structure.
- the mass flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water are related to the flow rate of bubble surface area and the total volumetric flow rate of Plateau borders overflowing the weir.
- testwork program carried out at the applicant's mine involved the use of a column 30cm square by 165cm high constructed of perspex.
- the objective of the program was to investigate how to measure froth stability parameters.
- the column was inserted into the pulp phase to a depth of 30cm and an operator manually recorded the level of the rising froth with time.
- Figure 1 shows a typical column froth height versus time curve generated during the testwork.
- the graph has raw data as well as a "fitted model" for the data.
- the fitted model is a separate model to the previously described model.
- the main, but not only, operating conditions that can be adjusted in response to froth stability measurements include reagents (frother, collector, pH modifier or other modifier), air rate, pulp density, particle size and ore blend.
- the apparatus includes a column (6) that is constructed from 300mm diameter perspex pipe with a wear resistant and replaceable HDPE extension piece (9) which, in use, is inserted into the pulp in a cell.
- the adjustable length tie down bars are required to minimise any bending of the column as a result of the pulp movement at the base.
- the froth height inside the column (6) is measured by an ultrasonic level sensor, although any other suitable means of continuously monitoring the froth level will suffice.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Paper (AREA)
- Lubricants (AREA)
- Degasification And Air Bubble Elimination (AREA)
- Emulsifying, Dispersing, Foam-Producing Or Wetting Agents (AREA)
- Addition Polymer Or Copolymer, Post-Treatments, Or Chemical Modifications (AREA)
- Anti-Oxidant Or Stabilizer Compositions (AREA)
- Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
Abstract
Description
- The present invention relates to recovering valuable material from mined minerals by means of froth flotation of a slurry of the mined materials.
- The present invention relates particularly to a method of measuring froth stability in a cell of a flotation circuit for recovering valuable material from a slurry of mined minerals containing valuable material and gangue material.
- The present invention also relates to an apparatus for measuring froth stability.
- The present invention also relates to a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell using froth stability as a control parameter for the method.
- It has been long understood that the froth phase of a flotation cell has a significant influence on the overall performance of the flotation process.
- A froth is a three phase structure comprising air bubbles, solids and water. The bubbles are defined by a thin water film or lamellae, which separates two bubbles, while the intersection of three lamellae results in the formation of a narrow water channel called a Plateau border. The entire froth is therefore made up of a continuous network of narrow water channels in which water and solid particles can flow. The solids contained in the froth are either valuable material attached to lamellae or a mixture of valuable material and gangue material contained freely within the Plateau borders.
- A froth is a highly dynamic system in which solids and water movement is governed by the following processes:
- The flow of air bubbles from the pulp froth interface to the top surface of the froth. Typically, 5-10% of the air entering the froth is carried over a cell weir into a concentrate launder and the other 90-95% leaves the top of the froth as bubbles burst. As the bubbles flow upwards they carry valuable material which is directly attached to the bubble lamellae. The upward flow of bubbles also drags a portion of the water contained in Plateau borders upwards along with its load of entrained particles (both valuable material and gangue material).
- Bubble coalescence. Water contained in the thin film lamellae defining each bubble tends to flow towards the Plateau borders. As this takes place the lamellae become thin, and eventually break, resulting in the coalescence of two adjacent bubbles into a single larger bubble. The coalescence process releases attached particles into the Plateau borders. The thinning and rupture of lamellae at the top surface of the froth results in bubbles bursting. This results in loss of air from the froth and release of attached particles into the Plateau borders.
- The term "froth stability" is understood herein to mean the ability of bubbles in a froth to resist coalescence and bursting.
- A more stable froth will have less coalescence and bursting events, a smaller mean bubble size and may carry more water. All of these factors will ultimately determine the structure and volume of the froth (water, solids and air) carried over the cell weir into the concentrate launder and therefore the recovery of attached and unattached (carried in Plateau border) particles - in other words, the valuable material recovery and concentrate grade.
-
GB 1 287 274 -
WO 01/34304 -
US 4,552,651 discloses a method for controlling the separation of coal from a mixture of coal and refuse in a froth flotation device by measuring the differential back pressure between two gas bubbler tubes immersed to different depths into the body of pulp in the device to produce a first control signal representative of the pulp density, and adjusting the rate of addition of a froth enhancement additive to the froth flotation device responsive to changes in said first signal; a second signal, produced by measuring back pressure of a single bubbler tube and representative of the pulp level in said device, can be corrected for changes in density by combining it with said first signal and then utilized to control liquid level in the cell by adjusting the rate of withdrawal of refuse therefrom. -
SU 1717237 - It is evident from the above-described processes that a more stable froth will recover a greater amount of valuable material attached to bubbles and within the Plateau borders.
- It is also evident from the above that a more stable froth will also recover more gangue material.
- Accordingly, from a viewpoint of maximising recovery and concentrate grade, there is an optimum froth stability for any given flotation cell and any given operating conditions for that cell.
- The term "operating conditions" is understood herein to mean:
- (a)
- chemical conditions (frother, collector, pH and other modifiers or contaminants) of the cell;
- (b)
- grade of hydrophobic particles in the cell feed (valuable material and gangue material);
- (c)
- slimes and clay content in the cell feed;
- (d)
- particle size of the cell feed;
- (e)
- air rate for the cell; and
- (f)
- pulp density of the slurry supplied to the cell.
- Each of these variables can change rapidly or gradually over time and can significantly influence froth stability and the overall flotation performance.
- A method by which froth stability can be measured online in a flotation circuit for the purposes of process monitoring and control would add great value to any flotation operation.
- The present invention provides such a method.
- According to the present invention there is provided a method of measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in a cell of a flotation circuit for a slurry of a mined mineral containing valuable material and gangue material, which method includes a step of measuring one or more than one froth stability paremeter below using a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell.
- The froth stability parameter is any parameter that provides information on the stability of the froth in the cell that can (a) be measured directly by means of the column or (b) be derived from measurements made using the column.
- Two preferred froth stability parameters that are measured directly by means of the column are:
- (a)
- the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column from a pre-determined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column; and
- (b)
- the maximum height attained by the froth in the column.
- Preferably the method includes washing the column to collapse the froth in the column to the pre-determined starting height, for example the interface between the slurry and the froth, and thereafter repeating the above-described measurement step and measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter.
- According to the present invention there is also provided an apparatus for measuring froth stability of a froth in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell which includes:
- (a)
- a measurement column arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell; and
- (b)
- a means for measuring the above mentioned froth stability parameters directly by means of the column or indirectly from measurements made using the column; and
- (c)
- a means for processing data measured directly or indirectly from the column and adjusting one or more than one of the above mentioned operating conditions of the cell to optimize cell performance.
- According to the present invention there is also provided a method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell which includes the steps of:
- (a)
- measuring froth stability (as described herein) of a froth in the cell in accordance with the method described above;
- (b)
- inputting froth stability data into a model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance; and
- (c)
- adjusting one or more than one of the operating conditions of the cell (as described herein) to optimize cell performance.
- The term "froth stability data" is understood herein to mean data that is directly measured by means of the column or is derived from directly measured data.
- Preferably the method includes repeating the measurement of the froth stability during the course of the operation of the cell and adjusting operating conditions of the cell based on the froth stability data.
- The model may be any suitable model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance.
- The model may be a fundamental model derived from theoretical considerations.
- Alternatively, the model may be based on comparing measured froth stability data and data on the historical operation of the cell.
- One particular model is a model that is being developed by the applicant.
- The development of the model has been supported by testwork carried out by the applicant to determine how to measure selected froth stability parameters in a single laboratory batch flotation cell and along the rougher bank of a flotation circuit at one of the mines operated by the applicant.
- As indicated above, the model relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade).
- The model is a fundamental model and is based on foam physics and interprets the effect of froth structure on flotation. The model links the flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water to froth structure. The mass flow rate of valuable material, gangue material, and water are related to the flow rate of bubble surface area and the total volumetric flow rate of Plateau borders overflowing the weir. These last two parameters can be estimated through analysis of video images of the overflowing froth.
- The testwork program carried out at the applicant's mine involved the use of a column 30cm square by 165cm high constructed of perspex. The objective of the program was to investigate how to measure froth stability parameters.
- The column was inserted into the pulp phase to a depth of 30cm and an operator manually recorded the level of the rising froth with time.
- At the end of the test, when the froth had reached a stable maximum height, the data was entered into a spreadsheet and the appropriate parameters were calculated.
-
Figure 1 shows a typical column froth height versus time curve generated during the testwork. The graph has raw data as well as a "fitted model" for the data. The fitted model is a separate model to the previously described model. - Of significance is the close fit of the fitted model to the raw data.
-
-
Figure 2 and3 are graphs of column froth height versus time for selected operating conditions. - What is clear from
Figures 2 and3 is that alterations to operating conditions resulted in significantly different froth stability curves. These differences can be used to clearly explain differences in metallurgical performance, ie recovery and concentrate grade, of a cell. - An extension of the froth stability curves discussed above comes with consideration of the bursting fraction (1 - a) of the froth.
- If all of the air entering the froth from the pulp was retained in the froth then the rise velocity within the column would be equal to the superficial gas velocity Jg (where Jg equals the gas flow rate per unit area of the column). This would be the case if bubbles at the surface of the froth did not burst and release their contained air. This is obviously not the case with only a small fraction of the airflow retained in the froth.
- It may be expected that the value of α in the column and the value of α for the entire cell at a given froth depth will be different. The relationship between a in the column and the actual a achieved for the entire cell is the subject of current research.
-
- Given that the instantaneous rise velocity can be calculated from the froth stability curve and the superficial gas velocity can be measured, then the instantaneous bursting fraction (1-α) can be calculated for a given froth height.
- The result is a plot of alpha versus height shown in
Figure 4 . -
- at a froth height of zero.
-
- In summary, the above-described testwork determined how to measure two particular froth stability parameters, namely the maximum height attained by the froth in the column and the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column from a pre-determined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column.
-
Figure 5 is a conceptual diagram of an apparatus for measuring froth stability in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell. - The main, but not only, operating conditions that can be adjusted in response to froth stability measurements include reagents (frother, collector, pH modifier or other modifier), air rate, pulp density, particle size and ore blend.
- With reference to
Figure 5 , the apparatus includes a column (6) that is constructed from 300mm diameter perspex pipe with a wear resistant and replaceable HDPE extension piece (9) which, in use, is inserted into the pulp in a cell. - While the original column used in the testwork at the applicant's mine was square, it is anticipated that a circular column will provide better movement of the froth as there is no interference from the corners. Having said this, a square column would still suffice.
- The column (6) is constructed in a number of sections so the measurement height of the column can be reduced if necessary.
- The maximum height shown in
Figure 5 will allow for two metres of froth, which might typically be expected in a high grade rougher cell, whereas a shorter column might be used for a scavenger cell where less froth is generated. -
Figure 5 illustrates a gridmesh walkway above the cell on which to secure the column (6). This may not always be the case and an alternate securing arrangement may be required. The column (6) is secured to the gridmesh via a securing plate (7) and the depth that the column is inserted into the pulp can be adjusted slightly via the level adjustment bolts (8). - When the column (6) is used at its maximum height the adjustable length tie down bars are required to minimise any bending of the column as a result of the pulp movement at the base.
- If the column is used in a shortened form the tie down bars may not be required.
- In use, the froth height inside the column (6) is measured by an ultrasonic level sensor, although any other suitable means of continuously monitoring the froth level will suffice.
- In this case, the froth height data is monitored by a commercially available Citect monitoring and control system, which collects the data and performs the calculation of the froth stability parameters described previously.
- Any other suitable means of continuously logging and calculating the appropriate froth stability parameters for process control purposes will suffice.
- Froth stability data is supplied to the above-described model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) and the model assesses the cell performance and, if required, initiates adjustments to selected operating conditions of the cell to improve the cell performance.
- Once the froth stability parameters are calculated to a satisfactory level of accuracy in a first measurement cycle, a water solenoid valve (2) is actuated to wash down the froth. The measurement sequence, data input to the model, and adjustment of cell operating conditions is then repeated. Typically, the sequence requires a 20-60 minute period and can be repeated on a continuous or periodic basis during the operation of the cell. The measurement sequence period may be any suitable period.
Claims (7)
- A method of measuring froth stability of a froth in a cell of a flotation circuit for a slurry of a mined mineral containing valuable material and gangue material, which method includes a step of measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter including:a) the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column (6) from a predetermined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column (6);
and/orb) the stable maximum height attained by the froth in the column (6)
using a measurement column (6) extending downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell. - The method defined in claim 1 wherein the froth stability parameter is (a) measured directly by means of the column (6) or (b) be derived from measurements made using the column (6).
- The method defined in claim 1 includes washing the column (6) to collapse the froth in the column (6) to the pre-determined starting height at the end of a measurement step and thereafter repeating the measurement step and measuring one or more than one froth stability parameter.
- An apparatus for measuring froth stability of a froth in a flotation cell in a plant and for controlling operating conditions of a flotation cell which includes:(a) a measurement column (6) arranged to extend downwardly through the froth in the cell to a location below an interface between the froth and the slurry in the cell ; and(b) a means for measuring the rate or velocity of movement of froth up the column (6) from a predetermined starting height to a maximum height of the froth in the column (6); and/or
the stable maximum height attained by the froth in the column (6); and(c) a means for processing data measured directly or indirectly from the column (6) and adjusting one or more than one of the following operating conditions of the cell- chemical conditions (frother, collector, pH and other modifiers or contaminants) of the cell ;- grade of hydrophobic particles in the cell feed (valuable material and gangue material);- slimes and clay content in the cell feed ;- particle size of the cell feed;- air rate for the cell ; and- pulp density of the slurry supplied to the cell.
to optimize cell performance. - A method of controlling the operation of a flotation cell which includes the steps of:(a) measuring froth stability of a froth in the cell in accordance with the method defined in any one of claims 1 to 3;(b) inputting froth stability data into a model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance ; and(c) adjusting one or more than one of the following operating conditions of the cell- chemical conditions (frother, collector, pH and other modifiers or contaminants) of the cell ;- grade of hydrophobic particles in the cell feed (valuable material and gangue material);- slimes and clay content in the cell feed ;- particle size of the cell feed;- air rate for the cell ; and- pulp density of the slurry supplied to the cell.
to optimize cell performance. - The method defined in claim 5 includes repeating the measurement of the froth stability during the course of the operation of the cell and adjusting operating conditions of the cell based on the froth stability data.
- The method defined in claim 5 wherein the model is a model that relates froth stability and the performance of the cell (in terms of recovery of valuable material and concentrate grade) to assess the cell performance.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL04719877T PL1613434T3 (en) | 2003-03-13 | 2004-03-12 | Measuring froth stability |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AU2003901142A AU2003901142A0 (en) | 2003-03-13 | 2003-03-13 | Measuring froth stability |
PCT/AU2004/000311 WO2004080600A1 (en) | 2003-03-13 | 2004-03-12 | Measuring froth stability |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1613434A1 EP1613434A1 (en) | 2006-01-11 |
EP1613434A4 EP1613434A4 (en) | 2007-07-04 |
EP1613434B1 true EP1613434B1 (en) | 2011-05-18 |
Family
ID=31500186
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04719877A Expired - Lifetime EP1613434B1 (en) | 2003-03-13 | 2004-03-12 | Measuring froth stability |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1613434B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE509704T1 (en) |
AU (3) | AU2003901142A0 (en) |
DK (1) | DK1613434T3 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2371311T3 (en) |
PL (1) | PL1613434T3 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2004080600A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200507463B (en) |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB0719432D0 (en) * | 2007-10-04 | 2007-11-14 | Imp Innovations Ltd | Method of flotation control |
US9764258B2 (en) * | 2010-11-16 | 2017-09-19 | Technological Resources Pty. Limited | Controlling froth flotation |
GB2487344A (en) * | 2010-11-19 | 2012-07-25 | Imp Innovations Ltd | Controlling a froth flotation cell |
EP2658655B1 (en) * | 2010-12-28 | 2015-07-08 | Akzo Nobel Chemicals International B.V. | Amine-containing formulations for reverse froth flotation of silicates from iron ore |
GB2491134A (en) * | 2011-05-23 | 2012-11-28 | Imp Innovations Ltd | Method and apparatus for froth flotation control for optimising gas recovery |
AU2013262465A1 (en) * | 2012-05-14 | 2014-11-27 | Technological Resources Pty. Limited | Controlling froth flotation |
CN113393432B (en) * | 2021-06-09 | 2024-05-03 | 紫金智控(厦门)科技股份有限公司 | Intelligent froth flotation detection system |
Family Cites Families (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3474902A (en) * | 1968-09-26 | 1969-10-28 | Westinghouse Electric Corp | Froth height and liquid slurry level determination for a floatation cell |
AU548578B2 (en) * | 1981-08-28 | 1985-12-19 | Nauchno-Proizvodstvennoe Obiedinenie "Sojuztsvetmetavtomatica" | Froth flotation |
US4552651A (en) | 1983-11-14 | 1985-11-12 | Conoco Inc. | Control of froth cell performance through the use of differential bubbler tubes |
SU1717237A1 (en) | 1989-07-05 | 1992-03-07 | Институт Горной Механики Им.Г.А.Цулукидзе | Device for adjusting flotation |
FR2677768B1 (en) * | 1991-06-11 | 1994-08-05 | Agronomique Inst Nat Rech | DEVICE FOR CHARACTERIZING THE FOAMING PROPERTIES OF AN AT LEAST PARTIALLY SOLUBLE PRODUCT. |
AU1590901A (en) * | 1999-11-12 | 2001-06-06 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Froth flow measurement system |
EA004377B1 (en) * | 1999-11-24 | 2004-04-29 | Оутокумпу Ойй | Monitoring and control of a froth flotation plant |
-
2003
- 2003-03-13 AU AU2003901142A patent/AU2003901142A0/en not_active Abandoned
-
2004
- 2004-03-12 AT AT04719877T patent/ATE509704T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-03-12 AU AU2004218778A patent/AU2004218778A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2004-03-12 ES ES04719877T patent/ES2371311T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-03-12 WO PCT/AU2004/000311 patent/WO2004080600A1/en active Application Filing
- 2004-03-12 PL PL04719877T patent/PL1613434T3/en unknown
- 2004-03-12 EP EP04719877A patent/EP1613434B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-03-12 DK DK04719877.5T patent/DK1613434T3/en active
-
2005
- 2005-09-28 ZA ZA200507463A patent/ZA200507463B/en unknown
-
2010
- 2010-08-24 AU AU2010212522A patent/AU2010212522B2/en not_active Ceased
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE509704T1 (en) | 2011-06-15 |
DK1613434T3 (en) | 2011-09-05 |
WO2004080600A1 (en) | 2004-09-23 |
EP1613434A1 (en) | 2006-01-11 |
EP1613434A4 (en) | 2007-07-04 |
ZA200507463B (en) | 2006-12-27 |
ES2371311T3 (en) | 2011-12-29 |
PL1613434T3 (en) | 2012-02-29 |
AU2010212522A1 (en) | 2010-09-16 |
AU2004218778A1 (en) | 2004-09-23 |
AU2010212522B2 (en) | 2013-10-24 |
AU2003901142A0 (en) | 2003-03-27 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
AU2010212522B2 (en) | Measuring froth stability | |
US20140110311A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for froth flotation control | |
US11506589B2 (en) | System and method for determining concentration | |
CA1258542A (en) | Control of froth cell performance through the use of differential bubbler tubes | |
RU2490071C2 (en) | Method of foam-flotation adjustment | |
AU2011330923B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for froth flotation control | |
US4804460A (en) | Column flotation | |
Wang et al. | Mechanism of the combined effects of air rate and froth depth on entrainment factor in copper flotation | |
US20150136664A1 (en) | Controlling froth flotation | |
Ross | The behaviour of particles in flotation froths | |
AU2011331910B2 (en) | Controlling froth flotation | |
Park et al. | Amenability testing of fine coal beneficiation using laboratory flotation column | |
Tshibwabwa | Measurement and modelling of bubble size in flotation froths | |
Bergh et al. | Economic impact of spargers degradation in flotation columns | |
Bhondayi | Measurements of particle loading on bubbles in froth flotation | |
Amelunxen et al. | The online determination of bubble surface area flux using the CiDRA GH-100 sonar gas holdup meter | |
Veijola | Start-up tests of OMS’s minipilot beneficiation plant and its applicability on the research use | |
Araya et al. | Characterization of frother effects on gas dispersion in a Jameson cell | |
Musara | Coal flotation: statistical comparison of a pilot flotation column and a batch mechanical cell | |
McKay et al. | Purposeful instrumentation for effective flotation control |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20050928 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
A4 | Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched |
Effective date: 20070605 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070730 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602004032727 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20110630 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: VDEP Effective date: 20110518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110919 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110819 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2371311 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 Effective date: 20111229 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20120221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110518 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602004032727 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20120221 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120312 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20110818 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120312 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20040312 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20160328 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20160225 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: DK Payment date: 20160329 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20160325 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20160325 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20160329 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20160328 Year of fee payment: 13 Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20160222 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DK Ref legal event code: EBP Effective date: 20170331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170312 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20170312 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170313 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20171130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170312 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20180703 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170313 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170312 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20170312 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230214 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20231206 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 602004032727 Country of ref document: DE |