EP1516733B1 - Capping device for an inkjet print head - Google Patents

Capping device for an inkjet print head Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1516733B1
EP1516733B1 EP20030103458 EP03103458A EP1516733B1 EP 1516733 B1 EP1516733 B1 EP 1516733B1 EP 20030103458 EP20030103458 EP 20030103458 EP 03103458 A EP03103458 A EP 03103458A EP 1516733 B1 EP1516733 B1 EP 1516733B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
capping
sealing lip
base structure
capping device
sealing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Fee Related
Application number
EP20030103458
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1516733A1 (en
Inventor
Paul c/o Agfa-Gevaert Wouters
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Agfa NV
Original Assignee
Agfa Graphics NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Agfa Graphics NV filed Critical Agfa Graphics NV
Priority to DE2003618055 priority Critical patent/DE60318055T2/en
Priority to EP20030103458 priority patent/EP1516733B1/en
Publication of EP1516733A1 publication Critical patent/EP1516733A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1516733B1 publication Critical patent/EP1516733B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Fee Related legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41JTYPEWRITERS; SELECTIVE PRINTING MECHANISMS, i.e. MECHANISMS PRINTING OTHERWISE THAN FROM A FORME; CORRECTION OF TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS
    • B41J2/00Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed
    • B41J2/005Typewriters or selective printing mechanisms characterised by the printing or marking process for which they are designed characterised by bringing liquid or particles selectively into contact with a printing material
    • B41J2/01Ink jet
    • B41J2/135Nozzles
    • B41J2/165Prevention or detection of nozzle clogging, e.g. cleaning, capping or moistening for nozzles
    • B41J2/16505Caps, spittoons or covers for cleaning or preventing drying out
    • B41J2/16508Caps, spittoons or covers for cleaning or preventing drying out connected with the printer frame

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a device for capping of a inkjet printhead during storage and transport.
  • the invention is related to the design of such a capping device.
  • inkjet printing systems are used in a wide array of apparatuses and in a wide array of applications such as fax, colour photo printing, industrial applications etc.
  • inks possibly of various colours, are ejected out of at least one array of nozzles located in a printhead to the receiving material.
  • a long known problem in inkjet printers is that the nozzles through which the ink is projected to the receiving material are blocked by clogging of ink inside the nozzles and on the printhead. This renders certain nozzles inoperable and results in a defective print or deteriorated print quality.
  • pigment based inks have been developed. These pigment-based inks have a higher solid content than the earlier dye-based inks. Both types of ink dry quickly, which allows inkjet printing mechanisms to forms high quality images.
  • UV curable inks exist to allow rapid hardening of inks by UV radiation after printing.
  • the inkjet printhead is capped during non-operational periods.
  • the printhead is thereby be sealed off from contaminants by a sealing enclosure. This also prevents the drying of the ink.
  • the capping unit usually consists of a rubber seal placed around the nozzle array.
  • an industrial inkjet printing apparatus usually has plural inkjet printheads. These inkjet printheads are tested on the manufacturing site and are shipped to the client with the ink or a special transport fluid in them.
  • the openings in the printhead for supplying ink and for enabling reflow of the ink to e.g. a header tank are closed off by plugs, but also the nozzles should be sealed of by a capping device in order to safely transport the printheads without risk of ink leakage and drying out of the ink, possibly rendering the printhead defective.
  • inkjet printheads are temporarily removed from a printer, e.g. having exchangeable printheads, and are to be stored for possibly a long time.
  • a capping pressing directly upon the nozzle array is used instead of anenclosing capping.
  • a capping pressing directly upon the nozzle array is used.
  • a very soft rubber is used optionally covered with a flexible film to seal the rubber from the ink.
  • the proposed capping arrangement however poses several problems :
  • a nozzle cap for capping a printhead and for applying a vacuum is described.
  • the capping arrangement comprises : a nozzle cap, enclosing the nozzle array, cap support, coil spring, cap seat and elastic film.
  • the nozzle cap and elastic film are preferably integrally made of same elastic material.
  • Elasticity is obtained by use of a soft rubber. Cappings comprising soft rubber however tend to be more susceptible to loss of vacuum. Soft rubbers exhibit due to the pressing force against the nozzle plate a creep deformation leading to change in pressing force. Application of vacuum causes horizontal movement of the seal lip contacting the printhead over the printhead, possible causing damage. When soft rubbers are exposed to forces over a long period they tend to further deform.
  • EP-A-0967081 a capping for multiple printheads is disclosed in which a portion of the lip support may collapse into a deflection cavity but may lead to sideway movement of the sealing lip over the nozzle plate due to assymetrical movement.
  • the problem to be solved is however to maintain the elasticity of the capping while using a harder rubber. Desired properties are :
  • a capping device comprising a deformable base structure determining the sealing pressure of the sealing lip provided on the deformable base structure.
  • Fig. 1 shows a general view of a capping 1 for a printhead according to the present invention.
  • a sealing lip 2 is provided for contacting the printhead.
  • the sealing lip is supported by a deformable base structure 3.
  • Fig 2. shows a section of a capping 1 along the line X in Fig.1 wherein the deformable base structure 3 is made from a soft rubber, while the sealing lip 2 is relatively rigid. This means that the sealing lip 2 on top of the base structure 3 exhibits no significant deformation when it is pressed on the printhead.
  • the soft rubber of the base structure 3 ensures that the pressure on the head is relatively low and remains constant over a long distance.
  • sealing pressure is determined by the geometry of the base structure 3.
  • this is caused by bending of the structures of the base layer 3.
  • Fig. 3 shows a detail of the section of a preferred embodiment a capping 1 wherein the deformation of the base structure 3 is enabled by the use of a cavity 4 underneath the sealing lip 2.
  • the rubber of the base structure 3 under the sealing lip 2 is relatively thin and can bend over a considerable distance when the sealing lip 2 is pressed to a printhead. This ensures a relative constant force of the sealing lip 2 on the printhead, independent from the compression distance of the capping 1 on the head.
  • Fig. 5 shows a possible convex structure 6 of the base structure 3 to ensure flexibility.
  • FIG. 6 an embodiment is shown wherein two oblique supporting walls 7 support the sealing lip 2.
  • the walls have preferably an angle of 15-90 degrees with the nozzle plate surface.
  • another important aspect of the geometry of the base structure 3 is that deformation of the base structure 3 does not lead to lateral displacement of the sealing lip 2 over the printhead.
  • the aim of the base structure 3 is to allow only displacement in a direction D transversal to the nozzle plate. Sideways movement is to be counteracted in order to avoid damage of the nozzle plate and to ensure long time good capping of the printhead.
  • this can be provided by having a perfect symmetrical geometry relative to the contact line of the sealing lip 2 indicated by the mirror plane P.
  • the advantage of a capping 1 according to the present invention are:
  • the hardness of the used rubbers preferably is about 40 shore A but may be even 100 shore A. Above this hardness the rubber connections and walls tend to be to thin giving rise to problems of breaking of the hinges and non reproducibility of the design properties. The rubber also exhibits not enough flexibility to be able to seal all surface irregularities of the printhead.
  • a capping 1 used during transport for a printhead is shown having the section as illustrated in Fig 3.
  • the capping 1 was fabricated using a rubber having a hardness of 60 shore A.
  • capping 1 is not intended to be used in overpressure or vacuum conditions, test were made to check if sealing was sufficient.
  • a capping was mounted upon a printhead whereby it was compressed about 0.5mm. and pressure or vacuum conditions were applied.

Landscapes

  • Ink Jet (AREA)

Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The present invention relates to a device for capping of a inkjet printhead during storage and transport.
  • More specifically the invention is related to the design of such a capping device.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • Nowadays inkjet printing systems are used in a wide array of apparatuses and in a wide array of applications such as fax, colour photo printing, industrial applications etc. In these printing systems inks, possibly of various colours, are ejected out of at least one array of nozzles located in a printhead to the receiving material.
  • A long known problem in inkjet printers is that the nozzles through which the ink is projected to the receiving material are blocked by clogging of ink inside the nozzles and on the printhead. This renders certain nozzles inoperable and results in a defective print or deteriorated print quality.
  • To improve the clarity and contrast of the printed image, recent research has been focused to improvement of the used inks. To provide quicker, more waterfast printing with darker blacks and more vivid colours, pigment based inks have been developed. These pigment-based inks have a higher solid content than the earlier dye-based inks. Both types of ink dry quickly, which allows inkjet printing mechanisms to forms high quality images.
  • In some industrial applications, such as making of printing plates using ink-jet processes, inks having special characteristics causing specific problems. E.g. UV curable inks exist to allow rapid hardening of inks by UV radiation after printing.
  • Different types of ink exist, having different chemical components. The combination of small nozzles and quick drying ink leaves the printheads susceptible to clogging, not only from dried ink and minute dust particles or paper fibres, but also from the solids within the new ink themselves.
  • Problems can be avoided by periodically cleaning the printhead by :
    • Spitting to clear the nozzles,
    • Vacuum assisted purging which helps to clear the nozzles,
    • Application of solvents to dissolve dried ink
    • Wiping to remove impurities
  • To prevent drying an external contamination the inkjet printhead is capped during non-operational periods. The printhead is thereby be sealed off from contaminants by a sealing enclosure. This also prevents the drying of the ink. The capping unit usually consists of a rubber seal placed around the nozzle array.
  • Another aspect of high end inkjet printing applications is that an industrial inkjet printing apparatus usually has plural inkjet printheads. These inkjet printheads are tested on the manufacturing site and are shipped to the client with the ink or a special transport fluid in them.
  • The openings in the printhead for supplying ink and for enabling reflow of the ink to e.g. a header tank are closed off by plugs, but also the nozzles should be sealed of by a capping device in order to safely transport the printheads without risk of ink leakage and drying out of the ink, possibly rendering the printhead defective.
  • A similar problem exists when inkjet printheads are temporarily removed from a printer, e.g. having exchangeable printheads, and are to be stored for possibly a long time.
  • It is clear that there is a need for a good capping device for use in a printer as well as for use in storage or transport of ink-laden inkjet printheads. Especially when there is a need for applying a vacuum to the nozzle plate capping has to be very efficient.
  • In US-B1-6 481 825 a capping arrangement is described used for storage and transport of printhead.
  • Instead of anenclosing capping, a capping pressing directly upon the nozzle array is used. In order to avoid damage to the nozzle arrays a very soft rubber is used optionally covered with a flexible film to seal the rubber from the ink.
  • The proposed capping arrangement however poses several problems :
    • The soft rubber is incompatible with certain ink compositions which may cause swelling of the rubber leading to uneven pressure on the nozzle array leading to defective capping and causing possible leaks of ink from the nozzles or drying of the ink on the nozzle plate.
    • The flexible film normally sealing the rubber is easily damaged leading to the above mentioned problems.
    • Because the use of direct pressure on the nozzle plate, damage of the nozzle plate is not unlikely, even when using a soft rubber for the capping.
    • The soft rubber deforms when being pressed on the nozzle plate leading to lateral expansion of the rubber and leading to friction forces on the nozzle plate.
    • When due to inefficient sealing the ink or transport fluids do dry, the capping can stick to the nozzle plate and when removing the soft rubber can tear so that the capping is damages and the printhead is defective due to the rubber adhered thereto.
  • In US 5 917 515 a nozzle cap for capping a printhead and for applying a vacuum is described. The capping arrangement comprises : a nozzle cap, enclosing the nozzle array, cap support, coil spring, cap seat and elastic film. The nozzle cap and elastic film are preferably integrally made of same elastic material.
  • Elasticity is obtained by use of a soft rubber. Cappings comprising soft rubber however tend to be more susceptible to loss of vacuum. Soft rubbers exhibit due to the pressing force against the nozzle plate a creep deformation leading to change in pressing force. Application of vacuum causes horizontal movement of the seal lip contacting the printhead over the printhead, possible causing damage. When soft rubbers are exposed to forces over a long period they tend to further deform.
  • In EP-A-0967081 a capping for multiple printheads is disclosed in which a portion of the lip support may collapse into a deflection cavity but may lead to sideway movement of the sealing lip over the nozzle plate due to assymetrical movement.
  • It is clear from the above description that there is a need for an improved design for a capping used for transport and for prolonged storage and which is compatible with different kinds on inks which can be used in an inkjet printhead.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • The above-mentioned advantageous effects are realized by a device having the specific features set out in claim 1. Specific features for preferred embodiments of the invention are set out in the dependent claims.
  • Further advantages and embodiments of the present invention will become apparent from the following description and drawings.
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • Fig. 1
    shows a general view of a capping according to the present invention for a.printhead.
    Fig. 2
    shows a section of a capping wherein the deformable base structure is made from a soft rubber.
    Fig. 3
    shows a section of a capping wherein the deformation of the base structure is enabled by the use of a cavities underneath the sealing lip.
    Fig. 4
    illustrates the use of a transversal bridge structure in the capping base.
    Fig. 5
    shows a possible convex structure.
    Fig. 6
    shows en embodiment having supporting oblique walls
    Fig. 7
    illustrates the symmetrical geometrical design of the supporting structure.
    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
  • While the present invention will hereinafter be described in connection with preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood that it is not intended to limit the invention to those embodiments.
  • The greatest drawbacks situate can be avoided by using a harder rubber contacting the printhead which is substantially chemical inert and exhibits no creep phenomenon.
  • The problem to be solved is however to maintain the elasticity of the capping while using a harder rubber. Desired properties are :
    • the pressure force of the capping seal has to be low and constant over the whole compression distance.
    • the sealing lip contacting the nozzle plate does not exhibit lateral movements over the nozzle plate. Not during capping and no movements due to creep caused by long periods of pressure forces or vacuum.
    • during capping the sealing lip contacting the printhead exhibits no expansion due to compression.
  • The objects of the present invention are met by a capping device comprising a deformable base structure determining the sealing pressure of the sealing lip provided on the deformable base structure.
  • This can be obtained by different methods.
  • Fig. 1 shows a general view of a capping 1 for a printhead according to the present invention. A sealing lip 2 is provided for contacting the printhead. The sealing lip is supported by a deformable base structure 3.
  • Fig 2. shows a section of a capping 1 along the line X in Fig.1 wherein the deformable base structure 3 is made from a soft rubber, while the sealing lip 2 is relatively rigid. This means that the sealing lip 2 on top of the base structure 3 exhibits no significant deformation when it is pressed on the printhead.
  • The soft rubber of the base structure 3 ensures that the pressure on the head is relatively low and remains constant over a long distance.
  • Pressure force remains relatively constant over the compression distance due to the composition of the base structure 3.
  • A more preferable possibility is that the sealing pressure is determined by the geometry of the base structure 3.
  • Due to the geometrical characteristics of the base structure 3, it is easily deformable.
  • Preferably this is caused by bending of the structures of the base layer 3.
  • Fig. 3 shows a detail of the section of a preferred embodiment a capping 1 wherein the deformation of the base structure 3 is enabled by the use of a cavity 4 underneath the sealing lip 2.
  • The rubber of the base structure 3 under the sealing lip 2 is relatively thin and can bend over a considerable distance when the sealing lip 2 is pressed to a printhead. This ensures a relative constant force of the sealing lip 2 on the printhead, independent from the compression distance of the capping 1 on the head.
  • In the embodiment of Fig. 4 the deformation of the base structure 3 and thus the pressure of the capping seal 2 on the printhead is regulated by a transversal bridge structure 5 in the capping base structure 3. When the capping 1 is pressed on the printhead, the bridges 5 bend and compression and tension forces are generated within the bridges 5.
  • Fig. 5 shows a possible convex structure 6 of the base structure 3 to ensure flexibility.
  • In. Fig. 6 an embodiment is shown wherein two oblique supporting walls 7 support the sealing lip 2. The walls have preferably an angle of 15-90 degrees with the nozzle plate surface.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 7, another important aspect of the geometry of the base structure 3 is that deformation of the base structure 3 does not lead to lateral displacement of the sealing lip 2 over the printhead. The aim of the base structure 3 is to allow only displacement in a direction D transversal to the nozzle plate. Sideways movement is to be counteracted in order to avoid damage of the nozzle plate and to ensure long time good capping of the printhead.
  • This can be ensured by making a capping 1 wherein the geometry of the base structure 3 under the sealing lip exhibits symmetrical behavior, relative to the plane through the sealing lip 2 and perpendicular to the nozzle plate, and the direction of movement of sealing lip 2 during capping is thereby restricted substantially normal to the nozzle plate surface.
  • As illustrated in Fig. 7 this can be provided by having a perfect symmetrical geometry relative to the contact line of the sealing lip 2 indicated by the mirror plane P. Depending upon the conditions wherein the capping 1 will be used, it may be necessary to take into account the extra forces acting upon the sealing lip 2 caused by the vacuum which is placed inside the sealing ring formed by the sealing lip 2. The aim is to ensure symmetrical behavior.
  • In order to ensure bending of the base structure 3 it is also possible to provide locally extreme thinning of the supporting structures forming rubber hinges. This enables the use of even rubber having a higher hardness.
  • The advantage of a capping 1 according to the present invention are:
    • The pressing force is constant over a relatively large distance during capping.
    • due to use of the bridges, no sideways movement are possible.
    • there is no need to used two or more different material for making the capping, resulting in a easier and cheaper fabrication of a capping.
    • hard rubbers can be used to avoid chemical damage of the capping 1 by the ink.
  • The hardness of the used rubbers preferably is about 40 shore A but may be even 100 shore A. Above this hardness the rubber connections and walls tend to be to thin giving rise to problems of breaking of the hinges and non reproducibility of the design properties. The rubber also exhibits not enough flexibility to be able to seal all surface irregularities of the printhead.
  • Example :
  • In Fig 1 a capping 1 used during transport for a printhead is shown having the section as illustrated in Fig 3. The capping 1 was fabricated using a rubber having a hardness of 60 shore A.
  • Due to the geometrical design the pressure upon the printhead does not remarkably vary when the capping 1 is pressed upon the printhead.
  • Although the capping 1 is not intended to be used in overpressure or vacuum conditions, test were made to check if sealing was sufficient.
  • A capping was mounted upon a printhead whereby it was compressed about 0.5mm. and pressure or vacuum conditions were applied.
  • No problems were encountered storing at relative pressures of +0.05 and -0.05 bar relative. It was further shown that a pressure of -0.5 was kept without leakage during 60 minutes. This indicates that sealing is sufficient.
  • After the tests no damage to the capping 1 or printhead could be detected.
  • Having described in detail preferred embodiments of the current invention, it will now be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous modifications can be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the appending claims.

Claims (11)

  1. A capping device (1) for capping an inkjet printhead, having a nozzle plate with at least one nozzle array, by bringing the capping device in pressure contact with the nozzle plate surface comprising :
    - a deformable base structure (3),
    - a sealing lip (2) on said base structure provided for contacting the nozzle plate during capping,
    wherein the sealing pressure of the sealing lip (2) on the nozzle plate during capping is determined by the deformation of the base structure (3) and
    the capping device is characterized in that
    - the sealing lip is made of a material having a hardness between 60 and 100 Shore A.
  2. A capping device (1) according to claim 1 wherein the sealing lip is made of a material having a hardness of 60 shore A.
  3. A capping device (1) according to claim 1 or 2 wherein the sealing pressure is determined by the deflection of the base structure(3).
  4. A capping device (1) according to any of the preceding claims wherein underneath the sealing lip (2) at least one cavity (4) is provided within the base structure(3).
  5. A capping device (1) according to any of the preceding claims wherein the base structure further comprises an elastomeric bridge structure (5), supporting the sealing lip (2), and wherein the sealing pressure is determined by the deflection of the bridge structure.
  6. A capping device (1) according to any of the preceding claims wherein the base structure further comprises an elastomeric convex structure , supporting the sealing lip (2), and wherein the sealing pressure is determined by the deflection of the convex structure.
  7. A capping device (1) according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the base structure further comprises slanted walls, supporting the sealing lip (2), and wherein the sealing pressure is determined by the deflection of the slanted walls.
  8. The capping device (1) according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the base structure (3) and the sealing lip (2) are integrally made of the same material.
  9. A capping device (1) according to any one of the preceding claims wherein the base structure (3) under the sealing lip has a symmetrical geometry ,relative to a plane (p) through the sealing lip (2).
  10. Inkjet printer comprising a capping device (1) according to any one of the preceding claims.
  11. The use of a capping device (1) according to any one of the preceding claims for capping an inkjet printhead during storage or transport of an inkjet printhead.
EP20030103458 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Capping device for an inkjet print head Expired - Fee Related EP1516733B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE2003618055 DE60318055T2 (en) 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Covering device of an inkjet printhead
EP20030103458 EP1516733B1 (en) 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Capping device for an inkjet print head

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP20030103458 EP1516733B1 (en) 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Capping device for an inkjet print head

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1516733A1 EP1516733A1 (en) 2005-03-23
EP1516733B1 true EP1516733B1 (en) 2007-12-12

Family

ID=34178591

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP20030103458 Expired - Fee Related EP1516733B1 (en) 2003-09-19 2003-09-19 Capping device for an inkjet print head

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1516733B1 (en)
DE (1) DE60318055T2 (en)

Families Citing this family (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5147232B2 (en) * 2006-12-26 2013-02-20 武蔵エンジニアリング株式会社 Inkjet head maintenance method, mechanism and apparatus
WO2011136788A1 (en) 2010-04-30 2011-11-03 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Capping for inkjet printers
JP6642396B2 (en) * 2016-12-02 2020-02-05 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 Ink jet recording device

Family Cites Families (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5517219A (en) * 1992-01-16 1996-05-14 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Ink jet recording apparatus having an improved capping mechanism
DE69307053T2 (en) * 1992-08-26 1997-04-17 Hewlett Packard Co Cover with a resilient lip for an inkjet printhead
US5635965A (en) * 1995-01-31 1997-06-03 Hewlett-Packard Company Wet capping system for inkjet printheads
US5757395A (en) * 1995-09-25 1998-05-26 Hewlett-Packard Company Color capable single-cartridge inkjet service station
US6220689B1 (en) * 1998-06-24 2001-04-24 Hewlett-Packard Company Unitary capping system for multiple inkjet printheads
US6609779B2 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-08-26 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Bellows capping system for inkjet printheads

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1516733A1 (en) 2005-03-23
DE60318055T2 (en) 2008-11-27
DE60318055D1 (en) 2008-01-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6921146B2 (en) Method and apparatus for removing excess ink from inkjet nozzle plates
JP3422614B2 (en) Service station for inkjet printhead and inkjet print mechanism
KR960029106A (en) Wet capping system for inkjet printheads
US7159962B2 (en) Wiper assembly for inkjet printer
CN100475539C (en) Ink-jet image forming apparatus having cap member
JP2007190818A (en) Ink-jet recorder
EP1516733B1 (en) Capping device for an inkjet print head
US7063403B2 (en) Coated wiper for inkjet printer
EP1366907B1 (en) Method and apparatus for removing excess ink from inkjet nozzle plates
US8025360B2 (en) Packing mechanism for filling a gap between an ejection head and cap member
TWI460080B (en) Microcapping of inkjet nozzles
JP3806092B2 (en) Snout enclosing capping device for inkjet print head
US20150273838A1 (en) Liquid discharge apparatus
US20040008236A1 (en) Capping apparatus for ink-jet printhead
JP2002160377A (en) Ink jet recorder
US20090147044A1 (en) Pressure capping of inkjet nozzles
EP1310369A1 (en) Method for cleaning an inkjet print head using a slanted wiper.
JP3473680B2 (en) Ink jet recording device
JP2009012384A (en) Fluid jet apparatus
US7393079B2 (en) Ink jet printhead garage configured to perform maintenance functions
JP2004001584A (en) Capping device and ink jet recorder using the same
JP2007144696A (en) Inkjet recording device
US20090085961A1 (en) Fluid ejecting apparatus
JP4735824B2 (en) Recording device
JPH02204042A (en) Liquid jet recorder

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050923

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: AGFA GRAPHICS N.V.

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60318055

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20080124

Kind code of ref document: P

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20080915

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20080919

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20090529

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080919

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230514