EP1484450A2 - Aseismic foundation - Google Patents

Aseismic foundation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1484450A2
EP1484450A2 EP04386019A EP04386019A EP1484450A2 EP 1484450 A2 EP1484450 A2 EP 1484450A2 EP 04386019 A EP04386019 A EP 04386019A EP 04386019 A EP04386019 A EP 04386019A EP 1484450 A2 EP1484450 A2 EP 1484450A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
plate
springs
ground
vertical
horizontal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP04386019A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1484450A3 (en
Inventor
Nikolaos Drougos
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Publication of EP1484450A2 publication Critical patent/EP1484450A2/en
Publication of EP1484450A3 publication Critical patent/EP1484450A3/en
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • EFIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E02HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
    • E02DFOUNDATIONS; EXCAVATIONS; EMBANKMENTS; UNDERGROUND OR UNDERWATER STRUCTURES
    • E02D27/00Foundations as substructures
    • E02D27/32Foundations for special purposes
    • E02D27/34Foundations for sinking or earthquake territories

Definitions

  • This invention is about an aseismic foundation, which fully absorbs the horizontal and vertical component forces of the earth shock.
  • the foundation consists of three plates of reinforced concrete (1, 2, 3). Plate (1) touches the ground (20). Between plate (1) and plate (2) there are rigid . metal spheres (4), and between plate (2) and plate (3) there are vertical compression-tension springs (6). Plate (2) is connected to a reinforced concrete anchor wall (8), which is fixed on the ground (20), by means of compression-tension springs (5), and is solid-webbed connected to plate (1).
  • the advantage of this invention is that the absorption of both the horizontal and vertical component forces of the shock, is practically 100%, while we exploit the earth shock itself for the springs' strain (5), (6).
  • the specifications of the springs (5) and (6) are calculated by mathematical formulas, based on the characteristics of the specific ground (20) and superstructure (19), such as the characteristic period and the weight respectively.
  • the aseismic foundation achieves one hundred percent absorption of the horizontal component force of the earth shock, and at the same time, the absorption of the kinetic energy of the construction, by the developed potential energy of the attached horizontal springs (5), which are strained because of the opposite horizontal component of the ground movement, in relation with the horizontal movement of the plate (2), by means of the metal spheres (4) that are placed in-between.
  • Figure 1 shows a diagram of the plate (1), the metal spheres (4), the plate (2), the horizontal spring (5), the anchor wall (8) and the ground (20).
  • FIG 10 shows a diagram of plate (3), the superstructure (19), plate (2), and the vertical compression-tension springs (6).
  • T ⁇ , ⁇ is the characteristic period of the vertical shock component
  • T k,c the characteristic period of the vertical movement of the system vertical springs (6) / plate (3) / superstructure (19)
  • Formula (11) is proved as follows: For any given ground mass that moves, and being connected to the adjacent masses, produces in relation to them a stiffness K.
  • T ⁇ , ⁇ 2 16 B/(g) (k).
  • T ⁇ , ⁇ is the characteristic period of the vertical shock component
  • B is the weight of the ground mass
  • is the percentage of the imposed acceleration on the gravitational constant
  • the positioning of the vertical springs (6) under the bearing elements (supports) (22), is made in accordance to the load of each support, so that we have the same uncompressed travel.
  • the springs are positioned within a frame of dimensions 1 x + 2d, 1 y + 2d, where 1 x , 1 y are the dimensions of the shoe (23).
  • Figure 7 shows an easy way of placing the spheres (4), which are enclosed in an elastic membrane frame (7) the height of which is 2 cm, and its dimensions (D-40)cm x (D-40)cm. The 20cm margin is necessary for the rolling of the sphere.
  • Figure 8 shows the form of the springs (5) and (6). They include two plates (22), one on each side, the anchoring lengths (14) and the anchoring reinforcements ⁇ 12 (15). For easier positioning at the construction site, it is best to prefabricate the springs in groups, using Montage reinforcements.
  • Figure 9 shows the distribution of the supports on two bases, in cases of multi-floored or extended plan buildings.
  • Figure 12 shows in detail the aseismic foundation in half-section. It includes plate (2), the metal spheres (4), the lower plate (1), which is placed on the ground (20) and is connected solid-webbed to the anchor wall (8). Plate (2) is connected to the anchor wall (8) through the horizontal springs (5), incorporated and founded to the ground (20). There is also the elastic sealer of the seam (9) and the wall (10), which isolates the entire foundation from the main construction. Finally, there is the membrane that encloses the spheres (4). Attached on the upper side of plate (1) and on the lower side of plate (2) are cast iron plates (11), 30mm thick.
  • plate (2) is connected to the anchor wall (8) with a contact plate (12), 5mm thick, attached to plate (2), and contact reinforcements ⁇ 8 (13) on the anchor wall. Also shown are the vertical springs (6), anchored on the upper side of plate (2), and on the lower side of plate (3).
  • the upper side of plate (3) is the foundation level of the superstructure (19).
  • the edges of the plate are shaped in a way that will allow the "reception-anchoring" of springs (5) ( Figure 13).
  • the selected spring (6) will have the following characteristics:
  • the aseismic foundation ensures perfect moisture insulation, due to the required seams and the metal spheres (4). Also, besides large-scale constructions (buildings, bridges, water towers, silos etc.), the aseismic foundation can be used for the protection of various fragile objects, instruments etc. In such cases, we use the characteristic period of the building where the foundation will be placed [with formula ( 5 )], taking also under consideration the respective absorption factor.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • General Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Mining & Mineral Resources (AREA)
  • Paleontology (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Buildings Adapted To Withstand Abnormal External Influences (AREA)
  • Vibration Prevention Devices (AREA)

Abstract

The aseismic foundation consists of three plates (1,2,3) of reinforced concrete. Plate (1) touches the ground (20). Between plate (1) and plate (2) there are rigid metal spheres (4), and between plate (2) and plate (3), there are vertical compression-tension springs (6). Plate (2) is connected with horizontal compression-tension springs (5), to a reinforced concrete anchor wall (3), which is fixed to the ground (20) and solid-webbed attached to plate (1). Thus, the anchor wall (8) and plate (1) follow exactly the movement of the ground (20). The horizontal metal springs (5) are positioned symetrical and perimetrical on plate (1), having the same total elastic constant for both its vertical directions. The total elastic constant of spring (5) is such, that the characteristic period of the horizontal movement of the system plate (2), plate (3), springs (5) superstructure (19), is equal with the characteristic period of the horizontal component of the ground vibration. The vertical compression-tension springs (6) have a total elastic constant, which allows for the characteristic period of the vertical movement of the system plate (3), vertical springs (6), superstructure (19), to be double than the characteristic period of the vertical movement of the ground (20).

Description

  • This invention is about an aseismic foundation, which fully absorbs the horizontal and vertical component forces of the earth shock. The foundation consists of three plates of reinforced concrete (1, 2, 3). Plate (1) touches the ground (20). Between plate (1) and plate (2) there are rigid . metal spheres (4), and between plate (2) and plate (3) there are vertical compression-tension springs (6). Plate (2) is connected to a reinforced concrete anchor wall (8), which is fixed on the ground (20), by means of compression-tension springs (5), and is solid-webbed connected to plate (1).
  • Similar aseismic foundations - which use spheres (4), horizontal (5) and vertical (6) springs - are also mentioned in other inventions.
    However, the end result of such constructions is only limited to partial absorbing of the earth sock, and that's due to the difference between the characteristic frequencies of the ground (20) and the springs (5, 6). These are constructed without any prior calculations, and usually are all made the same way, regardless of the characteristics of the ground (20) and superstructure (19).
  • The advantage of this invention is that the absorption of both the horizontal and vertical component forces of the shock, is practically 100%, while we exploit the earth shock itself for the springs' strain (5), (6). The specifications of the springs (5) and (6) are calculated by mathematical formulas, based on the characteristics of the specific ground (20) and superstructure (19), such as the characteristic period and the weight respectively.
  • The aseismic foundation achieves one hundred percent absorption of the horizontal component force of the earth shock, and at the same time, the absorption of the kinetic energy of the construction, by the developed potential energy of the attached horizontal springs (5), which are strained because of the opposite horizontal component of the ground movement, in relation with the horizontal movement of the plate (2), by means of the metal spheres (4) that are placed in-between.
  • It also achieves one hundred percent absorption of the vertical component force of the earth shock, and the absorption of the kinetic energy of the plate (3) - superstructure (19) system, by the developed potential energy of the vertical springs (6), which are strained because of the opposite vertical component of the ground (20) movement, in relation with the vertical movement of plate (3) - superstructure (19). This happens because the characteristic period of the plate (3) - superstructure (19) system, is double than the characteristic period of the vertical component force of the shock.
  • The invention is described in the following pages, including mathematical analysis, diagrams and an example
  • Horizontal component of the earth shock
  • Figure 1 shows a diagram of the plate (1), the metal spheres (4), the plate (2), the horizontal spring (5), the anchor wall (8) and the ground (20).
  • Supposing that ε is the average percentage on the gravitational constant (g), of the horizontal acceleration component imposed on the constuction [horizontal plate (1) and upwards]. We will examine the movement in time t=T/4, where T is the period of this enforced horizontal vibration component.
  • The kinetic energy of the construction will be:
    Figure 00020001
    [B: the weight of the construction, g: the gravitational constant (g = 9,81m/sec2), v: the velocity at the end of time t].
    Also, the strain of spring (5) by X due to the shock, creates potential energy: Wδ=1/2. K.X2 K being the total elastic constant of spring (5). To achieve balance, the following formula must apply:
    Figure 00020002
  • However, the law d' Alembert applies: Fshock = B.ε, but Fshock = K.X [as a force that strains spring (5)], thus: B.ε =K.X, and X=B.ε/K According to formula (4), formula (3) becomes: (B/g).ε2.g2t2=K.B22/K 'Aρα : t =T/4=VB/(gK), so T=4 VB/(gK) But this period of the vibrating construction will be equal to the characteristic period of the horizontal shock component, which can be determined with test seismic inputs.
  • Therefore, with the formula (5) which includes the known parameters of the characteristic period of the horizontal shock component and the weight (B) of the construction [base (1) and upwards], we can calculate the required elastic constant K of the horizontal springs (5). We know that the direction of the earth shock is random. We shall prove that the symetrical, perimetric positioning of the horizontal springs (5) gives the same total elastic constant of the springs, for any random horizontal direction.
  • Supposing K is the total elastic constant to the direction x-x, and the same K is the total stiffness to the direction y-y. (Please note that per direction, half of springs (5) act as compression springs, and half as tension springs.) According to Figure 8, and because the triangles are approximately right-angled, due to the small angles  and ', the formulas for a random horizontal direction (α) seismic motion are:
  • Work absorbed by springs (5), by directions y and x: Wψ/=1/2.K(ε)α2cos2 ϕ+1/2.Kc.α2 sin2 ϕ Wx=1/2.K(ε)α2cos2 ϕ'+1/2.Kc.α2 sin2 ϕ' Thus: Wtotal = Wψ+Wχ = ½.K(ε).α2(cos2 ϕ+sin2ϕ) +1/2.Kc.α2 (cos2 ϕ'+sin2 ϕ') =1/2 α2 (Kε+Kc) (Kε = the elastic constant for compression - tension, and Kc the elastic constant in non-loaded conditions.
    Relation (8) is proved by Figure 3, as follows: B' A' X'=ϕ'+'=BAX BAX+=Π/2-ϕ, BAX=Π/2-ϕ- Formulas (9) and (10) give:
    ϕ'+ '=Π/2-ϕ-, ϕ'+ϕ=Π/2-(+')=Π/2, because  = ' = 0
    (approximately)
  • But because of the different characteristics of the ground (20), the characteristic period of the earth shock is also different for each direction. Therefore we suggest:
  • 1. To calculate the characteristic periods of the shock, for various directions in a radial configuration, and to use the average of these periods as the characteristic shock period of the ground (20).
  • 2. To build an underground construction like the one shown in Figures 4 and 5 (plan and cross section respectively), which because of its shape I call "reversed glass".
    This construction will consist of a closed-cylinder wall (17), its plate (16) and its shoe (18). In any earth shock, this construction will move with the same characteristic period at all horizontal directions, due to the relatively big difference in the stiffness between the shoe (18) and the wall (17), and due to the symmetry. This characteristic period will also be the characteristic period of the vibration of the ground, for the aseismic foundation above.
  • Vertical component of the earth shock
  • Figure 10 shows a diagram of plate (3), the superstructure (19), plate (2), and the vertical compression-tension springs (6). If Tκ,ε is the characteristic period of the vertical shock component and Tk,c the characteristic period of the vertical movement of the system vertical springs (6) / plate (3) / superstructure (19), which is calculated by formula (5), then, in order to achieve full absorption of the kinetic energy that will be developed in the system plate (3) / superstructure (19) [from the vertical movement of the ground (20) in the +z direction], by the respective potential energy of the spring (6) (strained in the direction -z), this formula must apply: Tκ,c = 2 Tκ,ε.
    Therefore, with the known parameters of the characteristic period of the vertical shock component and of Tκ,ε, and for Tκ,c = 2 Tκ,ε , we can calculate the required elastic constant of the vertical metal compression-tension springs (6), using formula (5).
    For the final selection of the vertical springs (6), we must make sure that after the imposing of the total static charge, the remaining uncompressed travel of the vertical springs (6) is at least equal to the expected maximum width of the vertical component of the earth shock. The following formula applies: zmax= Tκ,ε 2 16 . g where Tκ,ε is the characteristic period of the vertical shock component and g is the gravitational constant (g = 9,81m/sec2).
  • Formula (11) is proved as follows:
    For any given ground mass that moves, and being connected to the adjacent masses, produces in relation to them a stiffness K. Formula (5) gives: Tk,e = 4 B / g(k) . Thus: Tκ,ε 2 =16 B/(g) (k). However, the principle D'Alembert and the elastic strain equation (B.ε = K.z) also apply, therefore B/K = zmax (when ε=1).
    The combination of the above equations gives us: zmax = (Tκ,ε 2/16). G (11). (Note: for ε<1 we have Z = (Tκ,ε 2/16). g.ε, where Tκ,ε is the characteristic period of the vertical shock component, B is the weight of the ground mass, ε is the percentage of the imposed acceleration on the gravitational constant, and g is the gravitational constant (g = 9,81m/sec2).
  • The positioning of the vertical springs (6) under the bearing elements (supports) (22), is made in accordance to the load of each support, so that we have the same uncompressed travel. The springs are positioned within a frame of dimensions 1x + 2d, 1y + 2d, where 1x, 1y are the dimensions of the shoe (23).
  • Figure 7 shows an easy way of placing the spheres (4), which are enclosed in an elastic membrane frame (7) the height of which is 2 cm, and its dimensions (D-40)cm x (D-40)cm. The 20cm margin is necessary for the rolling of the sphere.
    Figure 8 shows the form of the springs (5) and (6). They include two plates (22), one on each side, the anchoring lengths (14) and the anchoring reinforcements Φ12 (15). For easier positioning at the construction site, it is best to prefabricate the springs in groups, using Montage reinforcements.
  • Figure 9 shows the distribution of the supports on two bases, in cases of multi-floored or extended plan buildings.
    Figure 12 shows in detail the aseismic foundation in half-section. It includes plate (2), the metal spheres (4), the lower plate (1), which is placed on the ground (20) and is connected solid-webbed to the anchor wall (8). Plate (2) is connected to the anchor wall (8) through the horizontal springs (5), incorporated and founded to the ground (20). There is also the elastic sealer of the seam (9) and the wall (10), which isolates the entire foundation from the main construction. Finally, there is the membrane that encloses the spheres (4).
    Attached on the upper side of plate (1) and on the lower side of plate (2) are cast iron plates (11), 30mm thick. Also, to avoid the loss of contact between the spheres (4) and plates (1) and (2), due to the vertical component of the shock, plate (2) is connected to the anchor wall (8) with a contact plate (12), 5mm thick, attached to plate (2), and contact reinforcements Φ8 (13) on the anchor wall.
    Also shown are the vertical springs (6), anchored on the upper side of plate (2), and on the lower side of plate (3). The upper side of plate (3) is the foundation level of the superstructure (19).
  • For the materials, we suggest:
  • 1. Spheres (4): steel, 10mm - 40mm diameter.
  • 2. Plates (1), (2) and (3): reinforced concrete.
  • 3. Springs (5), (6): Stainless, with any of the known methods.
  • 4. Elastic seam sealer (9): It must have a small elastic constant, so that it does not affect the function of the mechanism.
  • The testing of springs (5) must be done with open maximum tension of the longitudinal and flexural strain. The calculation of the anchor wall (8) and springs (5) is made with the "short cantilever" method.
  • EXAMPLE
  • Assuming we have a five-storey apartment building, with a typical floor plan of 10mx10m2 (=100 m2). The pre-calculated total weight [plate (2) and above] is B1 = 850tn, and the net weight [w/o plate (2)] is B2 = 780tn. The test seismic input gave ground T for the horizontal component of the shock = 0.17sec, and ground T for the vertical component of the shock = 0.15sec. We will calculate the "Aseismic foundation".
  • CALCULATION OF THE SPHERES (4)
    (for the selected spheres: Φ40 mm)
  • Number of spheres : η = (1000-40)4 X (1000-40) 4 = 57.600
  • Average load on each sphere: 850.000/57.600 = 14.75Kρ (allowed).
  • CALCULATION OF HORIZONTAL SPRINGS (5):
    Formula (5) gives:
    T = 4 B/(gK) = 0,17, thus: 4 850(981K) = 0,17, gives K = 480,22 t/cm (required).
    Formula F=K.x = B.ε, with ε=1 (100%g), gives χ = 850/480.22 = 1.77cm, which is the lower limit of the required travel fn for springs (5).
    After a number tests, including the open total tension, the selected spring will have the following characteristics:
  • d==14mm, Ln=9,54cm
  • Dm=80mm L=13,17cm
  • i=5,5 Fn=807,31Kp
  • fn=3,63cm
  • From the calculation of the springs (5) we get:
  • Ktotal = Klongitudinal + Kflexural = 22,24 + 18,73 = 40,97 Kp/mm
  • Ktotal = the total elastic constant of springs (5)
  • Klongitudinal = the elastic constant of springs (5) for compression-tension Kflexural = the elastic constant of springs (5) for flexion.
  • Total open tension:
  • Tmax = 1,868χ + 2,627χ = 4,49 X 1,77 = 79,4Kp/mm2 (allowed).
  • Therefore, the number of springs (5) is calculated as follows:
    λ=480,22 / 0,4097 =1.172 springs in each direction (x-x), (y-y).
    That is, λ=586 springs (5) in each side of plate (2), which will be positioned in six rows, each having ten springs per meter.
  • The edges of the plate are shaped in a way that will allow the "reception-anchoring" of springs (5) (Figure 13).
  • CALCULATION OF VERTICAL SPRINGS (6):
    We must have:
  • Tk,c = 2 Tκ,ε
  • 4 B2/(g).(k) = 2X0,15 = 0,30 = 4 780/981.K
  • K (required) = 141,35 tn/cm. (required total ελκυστ
    Figure 00070001
    κ
    Figure 00070002
    (elastic?) constant) Formula (11) for Tκ,ε = 0,15sec gives: Ymax = (0,15)2 16 981 = 1,38cm, which is the maximum expected
    width of the vertical shock component for ε = 1 (100%.g).
  • The selected spring (6) will have the following characteristics:
  • d=16mm, Dm=125mm, Fn=756Kp, ln=98mm, fn=75mm, i= 5.5
  • K spring = 100,8Kp/cm.
  • Therefore, the number of springs (6) is calculated as follows:
    • λ= 141,35/0,1008 = 1402 springs (6).
    • The weight imposed on each spring (6) is: Bλ=780.000/1402 = 556,3Kp.
    The remaining uncompressed travel after the loads will be:
    • f'n = 7,5 - 556,3/100,8 = 1,98cm>1,38cm.
  • POSITIONING OF VERTICAL SPRINGS (6):
    Springs (6) are positioned under each support (22), in a frame with the following dimensions:
    Ix + 0,30, Iy + 0,30 [Ix and Iy are the dimensions of the shoe (23)].
    The number λi of springs is:
    λi = Pi (Kp) / 100,8 (kp/cm) X 5,5cm (Pi is the load of the support (22) in Kp, 100,8 is the elastic constant of each spring (6) in Kp/cm, and 5,5cm is the travel of springs (6) in cm).
    The entire base is shown in Figure 13.
  • Besides the protection of the superstructure (19) against earthquakes, the aseismic foundation, ensures perfect moisture insulation, due to the required seams and the metal spheres (4).
    Also, besides large-scale constructions (buildings, bridges, water towers, silos etc.), the aseismic foundation can be used for the protection of various fragile objects, instruments etc. In such cases, we use the characteristic period of the building where the foundation will be placed [with formula (5)], taking also under consideration the respective absorption factor.

Claims (3)

  1. The aseismic foundation consists of three plates (1, 2 and 3) of reinforced concrete. Plate (1) touches the ground (20). Between plate (1) and plate (2) there are rigid metal spheres (4), and between plate (2) and plate (3), there are vertical compression-tension springs (6). Plate (1) is connected with horizontal compression-tension springs (5), to a reinforced concrete anchor wall (3), which is fixed to the ground (20) and solid-webbed attached to plate (1). Thus, the anchor wall (8) and plate (1) follow exactly the movement of the ground (20). The horizontal metal springs (5) are positioned symetrical and perimetrical on plate (1), having the same total elastic constant for both its vertical directions. The total elastic constant of springs (5) is such, that the characteristic period of the horizontal movement of the system plate (2) / plate (3) / springs (5) / superstructure (19), is equal with the characteristic period of the horizontal component of the ground vibration. The vertical compression-tension springs (6) have a total elastic constant, which allows for the characteristic period of the vertical movement of the system plate (3) / vertical springs (6) / superstructure (19), to be double than the characteristic period of the vertical movement of the ground (20).
  2. Aseismic foundation, according to requirement 1, that is based on an underground construction that I call "reversed glass", which consists of a reinforced concrete closed-cylinder wall (17), covered with a reinforced concrete plate (16), and has a reinforced concrete shoe (18). This construction has the same characteristic period of movement to all horizontal directions, due to its symmetry.
  3. Aseismic foundation according to requirement 1, which has received symmetrical, concentric groutings (21) underneath plate (1), in efficient depth. The groutings homogenize the ground, giving to it approximately the same characteristic period with the horizontal component of the earth shock, to all horizontal directions.
EP04386019A 2003-06-02 2004-06-02 Aseismic foundation Withdrawn EP1484450A3 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
GR2003000248 2003-06-02
GR20030100248A GR1004897B (en) 2003-06-02 2003-06-02 Antiseismic seating base

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1484450A2 true EP1484450A2 (en) 2004-12-08
EP1484450A3 EP1484450A3 (en) 2006-08-23

Family

ID=33156156

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04386019A Withdrawn EP1484450A3 (en) 2003-06-02 2004-06-02 Aseismic foundation

Country Status (2)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1484450A3 (en)
GR (1) GR1004897B (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015145337A1 (en) * 2014-03-24 2015-10-01 Chiappini Massimo Composite foundations for seismic protection of building constructions

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60159227A (en) * 1984-01-31 1985-08-20 Kajima Corp Earthquake resisting foundation structure
JPH0989044A (en) * 1995-09-21 1997-03-31 Toshio Sagara Earthquake-resistant two-step floor
JP2000055117A (en) * 1998-08-05 2000-02-22 Ohbayashi Corp Base isolation device
JP2001280418A (en) * 2000-03-29 2001-10-10 Fujikura Rubber Ltd Vibration isolator

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS60159227A (en) * 1984-01-31 1985-08-20 Kajima Corp Earthquake resisting foundation structure
JPH0989044A (en) * 1995-09-21 1997-03-31 Toshio Sagara Earthquake-resistant two-step floor
JP2000055117A (en) * 1998-08-05 2000-02-22 Ohbayashi Corp Base isolation device
JP2001280418A (en) * 2000-03-29 2001-10-10 Fujikura Rubber Ltd Vibration isolator

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 009, no. 326 (M-441), 21 December 1985 (1985-12-21) & JP 60 159227 A (KAJIMA KENSETSU KK), 20 August 1985 (1985-08-20) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 1997, no. 07, 31 July 1997 (1997-07-31) -& JP 09 089044 A (SAGARA TOSHIO), 31 March 1997 (1997-03-31) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 2000, no. 05, 14 September 2000 (2000-09-14) -& JP 2000 055117 A (OHBAYASHI CORP; DAIDO SEIMITSU KOGYO KK), 22 February 2000 (2000-02-22) *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 2002, no. 02, 2 April 2002 (2002-04-02) & JP 2001 280418 A (FUJIKURA RUBBER LTD), 10 October 2001 (2001-10-10) *

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2015145337A1 (en) * 2014-03-24 2015-10-01 Chiappini Massimo Composite foundations for seismic protection of building constructions
CN106460354A (en) * 2014-03-24 2017-02-22 马西莫·基亚皮妮 Composite foundations for seismic protection of building constructions
CN106460354B (en) * 2014-03-24 2020-09-01 马西莫·基亚皮妮 Composite foundation for earthquake-proof protection of building structure

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1484450A3 (en) 2006-08-23
GR1004897B (en) 2005-05-18
GR20030100248A (en) 2005-02-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Bachmann et al. Dynamics of rocking podium structures
ES2241634T3 (en) DEVICE FOR CUSHION MOVEMENTS OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND ARRIOSTRATION SYSTEM.
Kelly et al. Earthquake simulation testing of a stepping frame with energy-absorbing devices
Parajuli Determination of mechanical properties of the Kathmandu World Heritage brick masonry buildings
Otani Earthquake resistant design of reinforced concrete buildings past and future
Benavent‐Climent et al. Energy capacity and seismic performance of RC waffle‐flat plate structures under two components of far‐field ground motions: Shake table tests
Chandra et al. Friction-dampers for seismic control of La Gardenia towers south city, Gurgaon, India
Mualla et al. Enhanced response through supplementary friction damper devices
Bachmann et al. Experimental investigation of the seismic response of a column rocking and rolling on a concave base
US6256943B1 (en) Antiseismic device for buildings and works of art
Twigden et al. Dynamic testing of post-tensioned rocking walls
EP1484450A2 (en) Aseismic foundation
Fallahi et al. Microtremor measurements and building damage during the Changureh-Avaj, Iran earthquake of June 2002
Wang et al. Shaking table test and numerical research on seismic response of a CFST arch bridge for different soil grounds
Qin et al. Study of soil-structure interaction effect on ground movement using a laminar box
Biondini et al. Seismic behaviour of precast buildings with cladding panels
Liu Balancing the beneficial contributions of foundation rocking and structural yielding in moment-frame and frame-wall building systems
Sharma Field investigation and performance-based seismic design of rocking shallow foundations in cohesive soil
RU2062833C1 (en) Aseismic foundation (options)
Sonawane et al. Effect of base isolation in multistoried RC regular and irregular building using time history analysis
Luitel et al. State of Art on Rocking Foundation
Guerrini et al. Effect of an innovative isolation system on the seismic response of cultural heritage building contents
Özen COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF FIXED BASE AND ROCKING BUILDING FRAMES EQUIPPED WITH AN ENERGY DISSIPATION SYSTEM
Keshab Field investigation and performance-based seismic design of rocking shallow foundations in cohesive soil
Restrepo et al. The design and shake table testing of a full-scale 7-storey reinforced concrete cantilevered wall

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL HR LT LV MK

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20050606

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL HR LT LV MK

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: E04H 9/02 20060101ALI20060714BHEP

Ipc: E02D 27/34 20060101AFI20040903BHEP

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20070224