EP1255908B1 - Venetian blind-type sun protection device - Google Patents

Venetian blind-type sun protection device Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1255908B1
EP1255908B1 EP00944137A EP00944137A EP1255908B1 EP 1255908 B1 EP1255908 B1 EP 1255908B1 EP 00944137 A EP00944137 A EP 00944137A EP 00944137 A EP00944137 A EP 00944137A EP 1255908 B1 EP1255908 B1 EP 1255908B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sun protection
slats
protection device
top surface
light
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Revoked
Application number
EP00944137A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1255908A2 (en
Inventor
Franciscus Alphonsus Maria Taeymans
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Etap NV
Original Assignee
Etap NV
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=19769312&utm_source=***_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1255908(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Etap NV filed Critical Etap NV
Publication of EP1255908A2 publication Critical patent/EP1255908A2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1255908B1 publication Critical patent/EP1255908B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Revoked legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
    • E06—DOORS, WINDOWS, SHUTTERS, OR ROLLER BLINDS IN GENERAL; LADDERS
    • E06B—FIXED OR MOVABLE CLOSURES FOR OPENINGS IN BUILDINGS, VEHICLES, FENCES OR LIKE ENCLOSURES IN GENERAL, e.g. DOORS, WINDOWS, BLINDS, GATES
    • E06B9/00—Screening or protective devices for wall or similar openings, with or without operating or securing mechanisms; Closures of similar construction
    • E06B9/24—Screens or other constructions affording protection against light, especially against sunshine; Similar screens for privacy or appearance; Slat blinds
    • E06B9/26—Lamellar or like blinds, e.g. venetian blinds
    • E06B9/38—Other details
    • E06B9/386—Details of lamellae

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a sun protection device of the Venetian blind type, comprising a number of spaced apart slats, of which slats the respective longitudinal axes are located substantially in one plane and extend substantially parallel to each other, and which slats are provided with a top surface and a bottom surface and are of reflective design at least at their top surface.
  • Such a sun protection device is known from EP-A-0 303 107.
  • the slats are concavely curved in upward direction.
  • the top surface of each of the slats is designed as a mirror. What is achieved with such a construction is that a considerable part of incident solar radiation is reflected, so that undesired heat concentration at the sun protection device is prevented.
  • a disadvantage of the known construction is that it may entail nuisance to those living in the neighborhood due to the uncontrollable reflection from the mirror surfaces of the slats.
  • the system may also entail a drawback for the users of the sun protection device, in that its use in a window may involve the slat-reflected light being in turn reflected from the pane in the window, which light, thus reflected twice, may have a disturbing effect in the space screened by the sun protection device.
  • light reflected directly from the top surface may also be highly objectionable in the inner space. Due to these phenomena, it is not properly possible to adjust the slats to any random angle.
  • FR-A-2 574 469 describes a sun protection device similar to EP-A-0 303 107, in which the top surface of the slats is designed as a flat or convex mirror surface.
  • This sun protection device has the same disadvantages as the sun protection device according to EP-A-0 303 107.
  • US-A-5 204 777 discloses a sun protection device according to the preamble of claim 1, in which the slats, at the top surface thereof, consist of mirror facets extending in longitudinal direction, with adjacent mirror faces of adjacent mirror facets including an angle of approximately 90° and having a stepped configuration viewed in cross section of the slat.
  • a disadvantage of this construction is that though the incident light is reflected back in one longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence, the direction in which this light exits in this plane, leaving aside the direction of the normal, deviates from the direction in which the light enters. Only when the direction of incidence in the longitudinal plane formed by the direction of incidence and the longitudinal axis corresponds with the normal to the local slat surface is the direction of incidence equal to the direction of exit. As a consequence, in the construction according to US-A-5 204 777 too, the light reflected back can also entail a nuisance to those living in the neighborhood.
  • DE-A-197 00 111 describes a similar sun protection device to US-A-5 204 777, in which the mirror elements extending in the longitudinal direction, in cross section of the slat, have a sawtooth configuration.
  • this sun protection device too light incident at an angle with respect to a normal plane extending in transverse direction of the slat exits mirrorwise with respect to the transverse normal plane.
  • the direction in which the light exits in the longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence, leaving aside the direction of the normal deviates from the direction in which the light enters. The light reflected back can therefore entail a nuisance to those living in the neighborhood in a similar manner as in US-A-5 204 777.
  • the invention contemplates a sun protection device of the type mentioned in the preamble, in which, while maintaining the advantages, the disadvantages mentioned are avoided.
  • each of the slats is of retroreflective design, such that, for every angle of incidence, light incident on the top surface is reflected back in the direction of incidence, is that incident light, regardless of the direction of incidence, is reflected back to the source, so that any nuisance to the environment is avoided.
  • the direction in which the light enters the longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence is equal to the direction in which the light exits in the plane, also when it deviates from the perpendicular direction.
  • the slats can have an upright, horizontal or oblique orientation, but preferably have their longitudinal axes extend virtually horizontally.
  • the plane in which the longitudinal axes of the slats are located can be at least partly curved, such as, for instance, a tunnel-shaped plane having a U-shaped cross section.
  • the plane in which the longitudinal axes are located can also be substantially flat, for instance vertical, horizontal or oblique.
  • the slats have their longitudinal axes located in a substantially vertical plane.
  • the sun protection device enables a relatively strong daylight entrance in a non-disturbing manner.
  • the light is transmitted in a selective and metered manner. This proceeds inter alia as follows.
  • a part of the light reflected by the slats in the direction of incidence will reflect from the window glass and pass between the slats in the direction of the ceiling.
  • Diffuse light coming from the blue sky or from a cloudy sky is reflected in a similar manner to the sunlight. Such light ends up at approximately the same place as the transmitted ground light.
  • the top surface of the slats is of retroreflective design through a layer or coating applied thereto, which contains transparent glass or plastic beads.
  • retroreflective material is, for instance, the material Scotchlite High Intensity Grade carried by the firm 3M.
  • the top surface ofthe slats is of retroreflective design by a layer or coating applied thereto which contains total-reflection prisms.
  • retroreflective material is, for instance, the material Scotchlite Diamond Grade VIP carried by the firm 3M.
  • the layer or coating is in the form of a self-adhesive film or self-adhesive tape.
  • retroreflective material on slats of a sun protection device is known per se from the above-mentioned European patent-A-0 303 107.
  • the underside of the slats is retroreflective. The purpose of that is to screen the workplace from possibly blinding radiation coming from the ground outside the building, without having to take recourse to blackening the underside of the slats.
  • a relatively strong daylight entrance, as described hereinabove for the sun protection device according to the invention, is not possible with slats having retroreflective undersides.
  • the sun protection device there are provided means for modifying the setting angle of each of the slats. Modifying the setting angle can contribute to an optimum screening.
  • the setting means are adapted for progressively modifying the setting angle of each of the slates in upward direction. This makes it possible to further optimize screening and light entrance.
  • the adjusting means can be computer-controlled means which are adapted for automatically controlling the setting angle of each of the slats based on a function of time and/or of the measured luminance.
  • the sun protection device according to the invention with the retroreflective top surfaces of the slats can suitably form part of a sun protection system for an (accommodation) space in a building, in which one or more sun protection devices according to the invention are arranged in a window or windows of the space in question and wherein there is provided an array of directed or directable reflectors mounted on or near the ceiling of the space on the side of the sun protection device(s) to direct light transmitted by the sun protection device(s) to the location of the array of reflectors, to a place in the space which it is desired to light additionally.
  • a metered quantity of the "directed sunlight” can be sent to a site of choice, for instance a workplace or to a wall which it is desired to illuminate additionally.
  • the preferred site for such a directed reflective optical system is close to the window in front of which the sun protection device according to the invention is located, since at that point virtually throughout the year, a reasonable amount of light becomes available.
  • the optical system can be integrated with the artificial lighting in the space in question, including a control system for metering the necessary amount of supplemental artificial light.
  • the invention is elucidated with reference to the drawing, in which the single figure is a schematic representation of a sun protection device according to the invention included in a sun protection system.
  • a sun protection device 1 of the Venetian blind type is represented in cross section.
  • the sun protection device 1 comprises a number of elongate slats 2.
  • the longitudinal axes of the spaced apart slats 2 extend in horizontal direction, are parallel to each other and are located in a vertical plane.
  • the sun protection device 1 comprises the conventional means (not shown) for varying the setting angle of the slats 2.
  • the sun protection device 1 is arranged along a pane 3 of a window in a space to be screened.
  • those slats 2, at least on the top surface or window side, are retroreflective in that those slats 2 on that side consist of retroreflective material. That material can be provided on the slats 2 as a layer.
  • a layer is in the form of a self-adhesive film or a self-adhesive band or tape.
  • Retroreflective material is material that reflects incident light, regardless of the angle of incidence, for the most part back to the light source.
  • Such material can be a material based on transparent glass or plastic beads, for instance as marketed by 3M under the name of Scotchlite High Intensity Grade.
  • Such material can also be a material based on total-reflection prisms, for instance as marketed by 3M under the name of Scotchlite Diamond Grade VIP.
  • Such genuine retroreflective material when applied to the top surface of the slats 2, has the advantage that the surroundings are not hindered by reflected light from, for instance, the sun, since the sunlight is exclusively reflected back in the direction of the sun.
  • the sun protection device affords the possibility of a relatively strong daylight admission in a non-disturbing manner.
  • the light is transmitted in a selective and metered manner. This proceeds in different ways, as follows.
  • a large part of the low-luminance lower hemispheric light coming from the ground 4 of the space outside the space to be screened is transmitted directly by the sun protection device 1, in that it can pass between the slats 2, as indicated by arrows 5 and 6 enclosing an angle ⁇ .
  • the luminance of ground or lawn can actually be more than 5,000 cd/m 2 .
  • the transmitted light is diffuse light ending up substantially on the ceiling 7 in the vicinity of the window 3.
  • Direct solar radiation is reflected by the slats 2 in the direction of the sun, as indicated by the double-headed arrow 8. A part of the reflected light will in turn be reflected from the window 3 in the direction of the ceiling 7. This is indicated by the arrow 9.
  • This directed component of the direct solar radiation reflected from the pane glass towards the ceiling can account for 5 to 8% of the total solar radiation. The higher the sun is in the sky, the steeper the angle at which this directed component enters the space to be screened and the closer to the window 3 the ceiling 7 is illuminated thereby.
  • the light travels as a homogeneous parallel beam and thus causes a homogenéous luminance of the ceiling 7 over the entire irradiated surface.
  • an additional optical system consisting of a series of reflectors 10 mounted on the ceiling 7 adjacent the window 3.
  • This additional system on the ceiling 7, a metered amount of the "directed sunlight” can be sent either to a workplace or deeper into the space to be screened, or to a wall which it is desired to illuminate additionally.
  • the additional optical system can, if desired, be integrated with the artificial lighting of the space to be screened and be coupled with a control system to meter the needed amount of supplemental artificial light.
  • Diffuse light coming from the blue or cloudy sky (having a luminance of sometimes more than 10,000 cd/m 2 ) is reflected, for each small area of the sky, in the same way as the sunlight, albeit that, obviously, a smaller amount of light is involved.
  • this diffuse light after retro-reflection from the slats 2, is likewise reflected by the window 3 and, after passing between the slats 2, reaches approximately the same position on the ceiling as the "transmitted ground light".
  • Investigation has revealed that if the sky is cloudy, this "reflected sky light” still amounts to about 50% of the "transmitted ground light". It may therefore be acceptable in some cases to use the sun protection according to the invention on the northern or western side of a building as well, for instance there where the luminance of the sky is too high for proper use of displays.
  • the retroreflective surface on the slats can be alternated with a non-retroreflective or less strongly retroreflective surface, so that a pattern, such as a logo, can be formed.
  • a pattern can be visible at night when, for instance, lights of oncoming traffic shine upon the sun protection.
  • a pattern may also be formed by setting the slats of some sun protection devices of a building in a non-reflecting position, by means of a control, while other sun protection devices are set in a reflecting position, for instance by angular displacement and/or raising or lowering the slats.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Blinds (AREA)
  • Non-Portable Lighting Devices Or Systems Thereof (AREA)
  • Circuit Arrangement For Electric Light Sources In General (AREA)
  • Time-Division Multiplex Systems (AREA)
  • Door And Window Frames Mounted To Openings (AREA)
  • Specific Sealing Or Ventilating Devices For Doors And Windows (AREA)

Abstract

A sun protection device of the Venetian blind type, comprising a number of spaced apart slats, of which slats the respective longitudinal axes are located substantially in one plane and extend substantially parallel to each other and which slats are of reflective design at least at their top surface, the top surface of each of the slats being of retroreflective design, so that, for any angle of incidence, light incident on that surface is reflected back in the direction of incidence.

Description

This invention relates to a sun protection device of the Venetian blind type, comprising a number of spaced apart slats, of which slats the respective longitudinal axes are located substantially in one plane and extend substantially parallel to each other, and which slats are provided with a top surface and a bottom surface and are of reflective design at least at their top surface.
Such a sun protection device is known from EP-A-0 303 107. In the sun protection device known from this publication, the slats are concavely curved in upward direction. The top surface of each of the slats is designed as a mirror. What is achieved with such a construction is that a considerable part of incident solar radiation is reflected, so that undesired heat concentration at the sun protection device is prevented. A disadvantage of the known construction, however, is that it may entail nuisance to those living in the neighborhood due to the uncontrollable reflection from the mirror surfaces of the slats. The system may also entail a drawback for the users of the sun protection device, in that its use in a window may involve the slat-reflected light being in turn reflected from the pane in the window, which light, thus reflected twice, may have a disturbing effect in the space screened by the sun protection device. Depending on the angular adjustment of the slats, light reflected directly from the top surface may also be highly objectionable in the inner space. Due to these phenomena, it is not properly possible to adjust the slats to any random angle.
FR-A-2 574 469 describes a sun protection device similar to EP-A-0 303 107, in which the top surface of the slats is designed as a flat or convex mirror surface. This sun protection device has the same disadvantages as the sun protection device according to EP-A-0 303 107.
Further, US-A-5 204 777 discloses a sun protection device according to the preamble of claim 1, in which the slats, at the top surface thereof, consist of mirror facets extending in longitudinal direction, with adjacent mirror faces of adjacent mirror facets including an angle of approximately 90° and having a stepped configuration viewed in cross section of the slat. With such a construction, light incident on the top surface is reflected back in a plane through the longitudinal axis of the mirror facet and the direction of incidence, regardless of the adjustment angle ofthe slats.
A disadvantage of this construction is that though the incident light is reflected back in one longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence, the direction in which this light exits in this plane, leaving aside the direction of the normal, deviates from the direction in which the light enters. Only when the direction of incidence in the longitudinal plane formed by the direction of incidence and the longitudinal axis corresponds with the normal to the local slat surface is the direction of incidence equal to the direction of exit. As a consequence, in the construction according to US-A-5 204 777 too, the light reflected back can also entail a nuisance to those living in the neighborhood.
DE-A-197 00 111 describes a similar sun protection device to US-A-5 204 777, in which the mirror elements extending in the longitudinal direction, in cross section of the slat, have a sawtooth configuration. In this sun protection device too, light incident at an angle with respect to a normal plane extending in transverse direction of the slat exits mirrorwise with respect to the transverse normal plane. In this sun protection device too, the direction in which the light exits in the longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence, leaving aside the direction of the normal, deviates from the direction in which the light enters. The light reflected back can therefore entail a nuisance to those living in the neighborhood in a similar manner as in US-A-5 204 777.
The invention contemplates a sun protection device of the type mentioned in the preamble, in which, while maintaining the advantages, the disadvantages mentioned are avoided.
The stated object is achieved, according to the invention, with a sun protection device according to claim 1. What is achieved because the top surface of each of the slats is of retroreflective design, such that, for every angle of incidence, light incident on the top surface is reflected back in the direction of incidence, is that incident light, regardless of the direction of incidence, is reflected back to the source, so that any nuisance to the environment is avoided. In this sun protection device, the direction in which the light enters the longitudinal plane defined by the longitudinal axis and the direction of incidence is equal to the direction in which the light exits in the plane, also when it deviates from the perpendicular direction.
The slats can have an upright, horizontal or oblique orientation, but preferably have their longitudinal axes extend virtually horizontally. The plane in which the longitudinal axes of the slats are located can be at least partly curved, such as, for instance, a tunnel-shaped plane having a U-shaped cross section. The plane in which the longitudinal axes are located, however, can also be substantially flat, for instance vertical, horizontal or oblique. Preferably, the slats have their longitudinal axes located in a substantially vertical plane.
By the use according to the invention of slats having a retroreflective top surface, by which incident light is reflected back to the source, the heat load by solar irradiation is reduced to a still greater extent than in slats having a mirror surface. Also when the slats are only partly opened, a large part of the "upper hemispheric" incident light (sun, blue sky, luminous clouds) is reflected directly in the direction of incidence. As a consequence, fewer multiple reflections are obtained, which could otherwise give rise to heat generation.
The sun protection device according to the invention enables a relatively strong daylight entrance in a non-disturbing manner. The light is transmitted in a selective and metered manner. This proceeds inter alia as follows.
A large portion of the lower hemispheric light of relatively low luminance, coming from the ground outside, is transmitted directly. This is diffuse light, which, via the sun protection device, ends up especially on the ceiling of a space screened by the sun protection device, adjacent a window in front of which the sun protection device is placed.
A part of the light reflected by the slats in the direction of incidence will reflect from the window glass and pass between the slats in the direction of the ceiling. The higher the sun is in the sky, the steeper the direction of the reflected radiation, and the closer to the window the ceiling is lighted.
Diffuse light coming from the blue sky or from a cloudy sky is reflected in a similar manner to the sunlight. Such light ends up at approximately the same place as the transmitted ground light.
In a suitable embodiment of the sun protection device according to the invention, the top surface of the slats is of retroreflective design through a layer or coating applied thereto, which contains transparent glass or plastic beads. Such retroreflective material is, for instance, the material Scotchlite High Intensity Grade carried by the firm 3M.
In another suitable embodiment of the sun protection device according to the invention, the top surface ofthe slats is of retroreflective design by a layer or coating applied thereto which contains total-reflection prisms. Such retroreflective material is, for instance, the material Scotchlite Diamond Grade VIP carried by the firm 3M.
Preferably, in the above embodiments of the sun protection device according to the invention, the layer or coating is in the form of a self-adhesive film or self-adhesive tape.
It is to be noted that the use of retroreflective material on slats of a sun protection device is known per se from the above-mentioned European patent-A-0 303 107. In the sun protection device known from that publication, the underside of the slats is retroreflective. The purpose of that is to screen the workplace from possibly blinding radiation coming from the ground outside the building, without having to take recourse to blackening the underside of the slats. A relatively strong daylight entrance, as described hereinabove for the sun protection device according to the invention, is not possible with slats having retroreflective undersides.
In yet another embodiment of the sun protection device according to the invention, there are provided means for modifying the setting angle of each of the slats. Modifying the setting angle can contribute to an optimum screening. Preferably, the setting means are adapted for progressively modifying the setting angle of each of the slates in upward direction. This makes it possible to further optimize screening and light entrance. Suitably, further, the adjusting means can be computer-controlled means which are adapted for automatically controlling the setting angle of each of the slats based on a function of time and/or of the measured luminance.
The sun protection device according to the invention with the retroreflective top surfaces of the slats can suitably form part of a sun protection system for an (accommodation) space in a building, in which one or more sun protection devices according to the invention are arranged in a window or windows of the space in question and wherein there is provided an array of directed or directable reflectors mounted on or near the ceiling of the space on the side of the sun protection device(s) to direct light transmitted by the sun protection device(s) to the location of the array of reflectors, to a place in the space which it is desired to light additionally. With such a directed reflective optical system, a metered quantity of the "directed sunlight" can be sent to a site of choice, for instance a workplace or to a wall which it is desired to illuminate additionally. The preferred site for such a directed reflective optical system is close to the window in front of which the sun protection device according to the invention is located, since at that point virtually throughout the year, a reasonable amount of light becomes available. The optical system can be integrated with the artificial lighting in the space in question, including a control system for metering the necessary amount of supplemental artificial light.
The invention is elucidated with reference to the drawing, in which the single figure is a schematic representation of a sun protection device according to the invention included in a sun protection system.
In the figure, a sun protection device 1 of the Venetian blind type is represented in cross section. The sun protection device 1 comprises a number of elongate slats 2. The longitudinal axes of the spaced apart slats 2 extend in horizontal direction, are parallel to each other and are located in a vertical plane. The sun protection device 1 comprises the conventional means (not shown) for varying the setting angle of the slats 2. Preferably, there are provided means for changing the setting angle of the slats progressively in upward direction. Thus, optimum screening and optimum entrance of light can be achieved.
The sun protection device 1 is arranged along a pane 3 of a window in a space to be screened. Light from the free space outside the building, in which the space to be screened is present, falls onto the top surface (window side) of the slats 2. According to the invention, those slats 2, at least on the top surface or window side, are retroreflective in that those slats 2 on that side consist of retroreflective material. That material can be provided on the slats 2 as a layer. Preferably, such a layer is in the form of a self-adhesive film or a self-adhesive band or tape.
Retroreflective material is material that reflects incident light, regardless of the angle of incidence, for the most part back to the light source. Such material can be a material based on transparent glass or plastic beads, for instance as marketed by 3M under the name of Scotchlite High Intensity Grade. Such material can also be a material based on total-reflection prisms, for instance as marketed by 3M under the name of Scotchlite Diamond Grade VIP. Such genuine retroreflective material, when applied to the top surface of the slats 2, has the advantage that the surroundings are not hindered by reflected light from, for instance, the sun, since the sunlight is exclusively reflected back in the direction of the sun.
By retroreflection to the source itself, the heat load by solar radiation is reduced. Also when the slats 2 are partly opened, a large part of the "upper hemispheric" incident light (sun, blue sky or luminous clouds) is reflected in the plane of the direction of incidence or in the direction of incidence itself.
The sun protection device according to the invention affords the possibility of a relatively strong daylight admission in a non-disturbing manner. The light is transmitted in a selective and metered manner. This proceeds in different ways, as follows.
A large part of the low-luminance lower hemispheric light coming from the ground 4 of the space outside the space to be screened is transmitted directly by the sun protection device 1, in that it can pass between the slats 2, as indicated by arrows 5 and 6 enclosing an angle γ. The luminance of ground or lawn can actually be more than 5,000 cd/m2. The transmitted light is diffuse light ending up substantially on the ceiling 7 in the vicinity of the window 3.
Direct solar radiation is reflected by the slats 2 in the direction of the sun, as indicated by the double-headed arrow 8. A part of the reflected light will in turn be reflected from the window 3 in the direction of the ceiling 7. This is indicated by the arrow 9. This directed component of the direct solar radiation reflected from the pane glass towards the ceiling can account for 5 to 8% of the total solar radiation. The higher the sun is in the sky, the steeper the angle at which this directed component enters the space to be screened and the closer to the window 3 the ceiling 7 is illuminated thereby. The light travels as a homogeneous parallel beam and thus causes a homogenéous luminance of the ceiling 7 over the entire irradiated surface. This makes it possible to use an additional optical system, consisting of a series of reflectors 10 mounted on the ceiling 7 adjacent the window 3. By means of this additional system on the ceiling 7, a metered amount of the "directed sunlight" can be sent either to a workplace or deeper into the space to be screened, or to a wall which it is desired to illuminate additionally. Those skilled in the art will know how to design the reflectors and will be familiar with means to make such reflectors movable and adjustable. The additional optical system can, if desired, be integrated with the artificial lighting of the space to be screened and be coupled with a control system to meter the needed amount of supplemental artificial light.
Diffuse light coming from the blue or cloudy sky (having a luminance of sometimes more than 10,000 cd/m2) is reflected, for each small area of the sky, in the same way as the sunlight, albeit that, obviously, a smaller amount of light is involved. For a small part, this diffuse light, after retro-reflection from the slats 2, is likewise reflected by the window 3 and, after passing between the slats 2, reaches approximately the same position on the ceiling as the "transmitted ground light". Investigation has revealed that if the sky is cloudy, this "reflected sky light" still amounts to about 50% of the "transmitted ground light". It may therefore be acceptable in some cases to use the sun protection according to the invention on the northern or western side of a building as well, for instance there where the luminance of the sky is too high for proper use of displays.
It is noted that the retroreflective surface on the slats can be alternated with a non-retroreflective or less strongly retroreflective surface, so that a pattern, such as a logo, can be formed. Such a pattern can be visible at night when, for instance, lights of oncoming traffic shine upon the sun protection. A pattern may also be formed by setting the slats of some sun protection devices of a building in a non-reflecting position, by means of a control, while other sun protection devices are set in a reflecting position, for instance by angular displacement and/or raising or lowering the slats.
It is noted that the invention is not limited to the exemplary embodiments described here, but that many variants are possible. Such variants will be dear to those skilled in the art and are understood to fall within the scope of the invention as set forth in the following claims.

Claims (9)

  1. A sun protection device (1) of the Venetian blind type, comprising a number of spaced apart slats (2), of which slats (2) the respective longitudinal axes are located substantially in one plane and extend substantially parallel to each other and which slats (2) are provided with a top surface and a bottom surface and are of reflective design at least at their top surface, characterised in that the top surface of each of the slats (2) is of retroreflective design, so that light incident on that surface, regardless of the direction of incidence, is for the most part reflected back in the direction of incidence.
  2. A sun protection device (1) according to claim 1, characterised in that the respective longitudinal axes of the slats (2) are located substantially in a vertical plane and extend virtually horizontally and substantially parallel to each other.
  3. A sun protection device (1) according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the top surface of the slats (2) is of retroreflective design through a layer or coating applied thereto, which contains transparent glass or plastic beads.
  4. A sun protection device (1) according to claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the top surface of the slats (2) is of retroreflective design through a layer or coating applied thereto, which contains total-reflection prisms.
  5. A sun protection device (1) according to claim 3 or 4, characterised in that the layer or coating is in the form of a self-adhesive film or self-adhesive tape.
  6. A sun protection device (1) according to any one of claims 1-5,
    characterised in that the sun protection device (1) comprises means for modifying the setting angle of each of the slats (2).
  7. A sun protection device (1) according to claim 6, characterised in that the adjusting means are arranged for modifying the setting angle of each of the slats (2) progressively in vertical direction.
  8. A sun protection device (1) according to any one of claims 6-7, characterised in that the adjusting means are computer-controlled means which are arranged for automatically controlling the setting angle of each of the slats (2) as a function of the time and/or the measured luminance.
  9. A sun protection system for a space in a building, characterised by one or more sun protection devices (1) according to any one of claims 1-8, which sun protection device(s) is or are arranged along a window in a window frame or window frames of the space in question and by an array of directed or directable reflectors mounted on or near the ceiling ofthe space on the side of the sun protection device(s) for directing light reflected by the sun protection device(s) via the window to the place of the array of reflectors, to a place in said space which it is desired to illuminate additionally.
EP00944137A 1999-06-04 2000-06-05 Venetian blind-type sun protection device Revoked EP1255908B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NL1012238 1999-06-04
NL1012238A NL1012238C2 (en) 1999-06-04 1999-06-04 Blinds of the blind type.
PCT/IB2000/000939 WO2001002687A2 (en) 1999-06-04 2000-06-05 Venetian blind-type sun protection device

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1255908A2 EP1255908A2 (en) 2002-11-13
EP1255908B1 true EP1255908B1 (en) 2004-01-14

Family

ID=19769312

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00944137A Revoked EP1255908B1 (en) 1999-06-04 2000-06-05 Venetian blind-type sun protection device

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1255908B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE257900T1 (en)
AU (2) AU5837100A (en)
DE (1) DE60007780T2 (en)
NL (1) NL1012238C2 (en)
WO (2) WO2001002687A2 (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
NL1016790C2 (en) * 2000-12-04 2002-06-05 Etap Nv Sun blind system for rooms in buildings, uses slats with reflective upper sides in combination with reflective surface on ceiling
DE20209365U1 (en) * 2002-06-15 2003-10-23 Hueppe Form Sonnenschutzsystem Slatted blinds and slats for slatted blinds
DE202005000415U1 (en) 2005-01-07 2005-05-04 Deutsche Post Ag shade
FR2922938B1 (en) 2007-10-31 2009-12-11 Somfy Sas METHOD FOR AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLING A SOLAR PROTECTION SCREEN INSTALLATION COMPRISING RETRO-REFLECTIVE BLADES.
EP2221442A1 (en) * 2009-02-20 2010-08-25 Kvadrat A/S Sun shield

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2574469A1 (en) * 1984-12-11 1986-06-13 Promovence Sarl Device for solar protection of glazed volumes
CH675015A5 (en) * 1986-09-15 1990-08-15 Peter A Balla
AT394882B (en) 1987-08-10 1992-07-10 Bartenbach Christian GLARE PROTECTION DEVICE
US5204777A (en) * 1992-01-23 1993-04-20 Sea Corporation Energy efficient skylight and blind
DE4215968A1 (en) * 1992-05-18 1993-12-02 Zumtobel Licht Light guiding structure for illuminating at least part of room with daylight - utilises daylight entering room through window assisted by elements located on wall or ceiling to reflect the light
DE19632684A1 (en) * 1996-08-14 1998-02-19 Idl Ind Und Licht Design Gmbh Lamella louvre blind
DE19700111C2 (en) * 1997-01-03 2003-02-06 Fraunhofer Ges Forschung Sun protection device in the manner of a blind

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2000077337A3 (en) 2002-10-17
ATE257900T1 (en) 2004-01-15
EP1255908A2 (en) 2002-11-13
WO2000077337A2 (en) 2000-12-21
DE60007780T2 (en) 2004-11-11
DE60007780D1 (en) 2004-02-19
NL1012238C2 (en) 2000-12-06
WO2001002687A2 (en) 2001-01-11
AU5837100A (en) 2001-01-22
WO2001002687A3 (en) 2002-09-06
AU5837000A (en) 2001-01-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
RU2666131C2 (en) Lighting device
AU643429B2 (en) Light deflecting system for lighting an indoor area
US6714352B2 (en) Mini-optical light shelf daylighting system
US10538959B2 (en) Window louver control system
US8624529B2 (en) Method for the automated control of a solar protection installation
CA2344385C (en) Optical components for daylighting and other purposes
US5802784A (en) Window apparatus for providing and directing glare-free sunlight to a room
JPS5873682A (en) Panel and method for illumination of solar light
US4634222A (en) Natural-light illumination enhancement assembly
EP2392032A1 (en) Fenestration system with solar cells
US6240999B1 (en) Stepped lamella for guiding light radiation
KR101400993B1 (en) Light Shelf Apparatus
EP1255908B1 (en) Venetian blind-type sun protection device
JPS5973801A (en) Illuminating method and device utilizing external light
JPH10317850A (en) Blind
KR101257291B1 (en) Smart blind system
JP2001060407A (en) Daylight utilizing system
JP4447303B2 (en) Solar lighting device and lighting condition setting program
NL1016790C2 (en) Sun blind system for rooms in buildings, uses slats with reflective upper sides in combination with reflective surface on ceiling
WO2006033090A1 (en) Multi-aperture light pipe
JP2004521464A (en) Lighting equipment
JPH11315673A (en) Blind
GB2324598A (en) LED display with shades to shield LEDs from external light
JP5478968B2 (en) Daylighting panel for residential fence and residential daylighting fence using the same
KR20130117539A (en) Venetian lightshelf manually operating

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020103

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

R17D Deferred search report published (corrected)

Effective date: 20020906

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20040114

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040114

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040114

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60007780

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20040219

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040414

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040414

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040414

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20040425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE SCHAAD, BALASS, MENZL & PARTNER AG

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040608

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20040114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040630

PLAZ Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLBA Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG

Effective date: 20040707

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG

ET Fr: translation filed
26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG

Effective date: 20040707

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNGDER ANGEWAND

Effective date: 20041004

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG

Effective date: 20040707

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN

Effective date: 20041004

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG DER ANGEWAN

Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20040605

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN

Opponent name: KOESTER LICHTPLANUNG

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PLAZ Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2

PLBA Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN

Effective date: 20041004

PLAZ Examination of admissibility of opposition: despatch of communication + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE2

PLBA Examination of admissibility of opposition: reply received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOPE4

PLBQ Unpublished change to opponent data

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS OPPO

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040614

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20080618

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20080506

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20080624

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20080416

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20080627

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20080618

Year of fee payment: 9

PLAB Opposition data, opponent's data or that of the opponent's representative modified

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009299OPPO

R26 Opposition filed (corrected)

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN

Effective date: 20041004

NLR1 Nl: opposition has been filed with the epo

Opponent name: FRAUNHOFER PATENTSTELLE FUER DIE DEUTSCHE FORSCHUN

RDAF Communication despatched that patent is revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREV1

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 20100101

RDAG Patent revoked

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009271

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: PATENT REVOKED

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20080425

Year of fee payment: 9

27W Patent revoked

Effective date: 20100117

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090605

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090605

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20120309

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20090630