EP1255611B1 - Rotary mill - Google Patents

Rotary mill Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1255611B1
EP1255611B1 EP00900046A EP00900046A EP1255611B1 EP 1255611 B1 EP1255611 B1 EP 1255611B1 EP 00900046 A EP00900046 A EP 00900046A EP 00900046 A EP00900046 A EP 00900046A EP 1255611 B1 EP1255611 B1 EP 1255611B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
chamber
particles
impact
rotor
outlet
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP00900046A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1255611A1 (en
Inventor
G. Steed William
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Patent Applied Technology
Original Assignee
Patent Applied Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Patent Applied Technology filed Critical Patent Applied Technology
Publication of EP1255611A1 publication Critical patent/EP1255611A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1255611B1 publication Critical patent/EP1255611B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C13/00Disintegrating by mills having rotary beater elements ; Hammer mills
    • B02C13/02Disintegrating by mills having rotary beater elements ; Hammer mills with horizontal rotor shaft
    • B02C13/06Disintegrating by mills having rotary beater elements ; Hammer mills with horizontal rotor shaft with beaters rigidly connected to the rotor
    • B02C13/09Disintegrating by mills having rotary beater elements ; Hammer mills with horizontal rotor shaft with beaters rigidly connected to the rotor and throwing the material against an anvil or impact plate
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02CCRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C13/00Disintegrating by mills having rotary beater elements ; Hammer mills
    • B02C13/26Details
    • B02C13/288Ventilating, or influencing air circulation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus for ore milling. More specifically, the present invention relates to a rotary mill for impact reduction of ore.
  • US Patent 3,887,141 teaches a mill for the reduction of ore that uses an impact rotor for obtaining the first reduction. Initially, the material to be reduced in size is introduced into the swept area of the rotor. When the material contacts the rotor, a portion of the accumulated kinetic energy generated by the rotor is transferred to the material, forcing it to accelerate as well as change direction. The material will tend to resist this, so the energy transferred accumulates within the material. This in turn will cause any friable material to shatter along its natural fault lines and the resulting smaller particles will be accelerated away from the rotor.
  • this fluidizing rotor does not compensate for other flaws in the apparatus. Specifically, there is also a tendency for fine particles to collect within the apparatus in areas of low air pressure, as the airflow generated from the rotor is insufficient to carry all of the particles to the outlet. As these particles are naturally quite abrasive, considerable wear will occur in these areas.
  • weight is the only determining factor in this apparatus as to whether or not the particle passes on to the secondary reduction chamber and the fine particle outlet, the possibility exists that a particle of sufficient size could become lodged in this region of the apparatus.
  • this apparatus has the disadvantages of incurring considerable wear during operation and requiring frequent maintenance and cleaning.
  • An apparatus according to the preamble of claim 1 is known from AU-B-512623 .
  • an apparatus for fragmenting solid materials into particles comprising:
  • a rotor with greater exposed blade or hammer surface will move more air, although, as a consequence, this type of rotor is not very durable.
  • generation of airflow by the rotor is not a concern in the above-described apparatus because of the supplemental airflow generated by the exhaust fan.
  • the rotor is designed to impart as much accumulated kinetic energy to the incoming material as possible by having the largest mass possible within the swept area of the rotor.
  • the conveyor is positioned so that material is introduced into the rotor circle in a manner that imparts the maximum amount of the kinetic energy from the revolving rotor to the material with the least amount of strain on the rotor bearings.
  • the rotor serves only to bump or tip the incoming material and to direct the fractured particles into the shatter bars.
  • the position of the shatter bars is such that, following impact, the particles are directed back toward the rotor swept area and, in a continuous feed situation, these returning particles are met by new particles that have been produced by the rotor striking newly introduced material, thereby causing further attrition.
  • the particles are then swept around the fixed portion of the apparatus connecting the two impact chambers, following a specifically designed curve into the second impact chamber where they are thrown against the reduction means.
  • the reduction means provide the final particle size control as they form a restrictive path to the fine particle outlet.
  • the reduction means may take the form of staggered bars, perforated metal plates, wire screens or all of these combined.
  • the exhaust fan acts as a scavenger by creating a path of steadily moving air from the material intake to the fine particle outlet so that all material follows the desired path through the apparatus.
  • the supplementary airflow also reduces wear, as it prevents entrained particles from contacting the apparatus.
  • the reduction means are staggered or offset so as to force the airflow to rapidly change direction so that any particles with too much mass to remain entrained are reflected back into the flow of material until they have been sufficiently reduced in size to remain in the airflow.
  • the addition of the exhaust fan represents a significant improvement over the prior art.
  • the airflow generated reduces wear and prevents build-up of particles throughout the apparatus.
  • the rotor construction is designed to impart the greatest force on incoming material, as creating airflow with the rotor is no longer a concern. This in turn means that the rotor can be of a more durable design.
  • the reduction means are arranged such that access to the fine particle outlet by oversized particles is restricted, thereby preventing clogs.
  • a balanced door is provided for automatically removing oversized particles that accumulate in the base of the apparatus.
  • a rotary mill 1 comprises a housing 10, a material delivery system 12 and an exhaust fan 14.
  • the housing 10 comprises a rotor 16, a primary reduction chamber 18, a secondary reduction chamber 20 and an outlet chamber 22, as shown in Figure 1.
  • the primary reduction chamber 18 comprises an inlet opening 24, an intake shaft 26 and a plurality of shatter bars 28.
  • the inlet opening 24 provides access to the interior of the housing 10 for incoming material and for airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14.
  • the inlet opening 24 is positioned beneath the material delivery system 12.
  • the intake shaft 26 is arranged to direct material from the inlet opening 24 into the swept area of the rotor 16.
  • the plurality of shatter bars 28 are arranged to further reduce particles deflected by the rotor 16 and direct these particles back toward the rotor 16 as described below.
  • the secondary reduction chamber 20 is connected to the primary reduction chamber 18 by a curved portion 30 as described below.
  • the secondary reduction chamber 18 includes reduction means 32 positioned between the secondary reduction chamber 20 and the outlet chamber 22, arranged such that particles above a given size are prevented from entering the outlet chamber 22.
  • the reduction means 32 may comprise staggered bars, perforated metal plates, wire screens or combinations thereof.
  • the outlet chamber 22 comprises a fan outlet 34, a fan control means 36 and a lower material outlet 38.
  • the fan outlet 34 comprises the exit from the housing 10 for fine particles and for airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 as described below.
  • the lower material outlet 38 comprises a balanced door 40 situated at the base of the outlet chamber 22 for removal of heavy particles. Specifically, once a mass of material equal to the balance weight has gathered, the balanced door 40 opens and expels the material from the housing 10.
  • the fan control means 36 comprises a movable baffle 42 located within the output chamber 22 for controlling airflow through the housing 10 so that the amount and size of particles drawn off at the fan outlet 34 and the lower material outlet 38 may be varied as described below.
  • the rotor 16 is arranged for rotation within the housing 10 and is driven by a motor, the details of which are not shown as these will be obvious to one skilled in the art.
  • the rotor 16 includes peripheral impact means 44 and is situated below the intake shaft 26. While a rotor that exposes more blade will move more air, durable construction and suitable mass for reducing incoming material conflict with ideal air moving capabilities. However, generation of airflow by the rotor 16 is not an important consideration due to the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14. Thus, the rotor 16 is arranged so that the impact means 44 have the largest mass possible within the swept area of the rotor 16. In this embodiment, the rotor 16 includes three impact means 44, although it is of note that the construction of the rotor 16 may vary greatly.
  • the exhaust fan 14 is arranged to produce an airflow through the housing. Specifically, the exhaust fan 14 is connected to the fan outlet such that the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 is drawn into the housing 10 via the inlet opening 24 and is drawn out of the housing 10 via the fan outlet 34.
  • the details of the exhaust fan 14 are not shown as these will be obvious to one skilled in the art.
  • the material delivery system 12 transports material to the rotary mill 1.
  • the material delivery system 12 comprises a conveyor 46.
  • the rotary mill 1 cannot be "chokeā€ loaded.
  • computerized control of the conveyor 46 may be used to provide a steady input volume regardless of input material size.
  • rotor speed and airflow may be monitored to determine loading efficiency and this information may be used to control the power source driving the conveyor 46.
  • the mass of material within the rotary mill 1 may be closely controlled so that attrition of material occurs at a steady rate.
  • the material to be reduced is transported by the conveyor 46 to the inlet opening 24.
  • the material passes therethrough onto the intake shaft 26 at a speed at or near free fall.
  • the intake shaft 26 directs the material into the swept area of the impact means 44 of the rotor 16.
  • the intake shaft 26 is positioned such that a maximum amount of the kinetic energy generated by the rotor 16 is transferred to the material with minimal strain on the rotor 16, so that the rotor 16 needs only to tip or bump the incoming material.
  • This transfer of kinetic energy shatters the material along natural fault planes, producing smaller particles.
  • the smaller particles are accelerated away from the rotor 16 and into the shatter bars 28 where further reductions occur as a result of collisions between the shatter bars 28 and the smaller particles.
  • the shatter bars 28 do not have to be of massive structure or unusual hardness because of the reduced size of the particles.
  • the shatter bars 28 also direct the smaller particles back towards the swept area of the rotor 16 where, in a continuous feed situation, the smaller particles encounter new particles produced by the impact means 44 of the rotor 16 striking newly introduced material and these secondary impacts between reflected material and recently shattered material result in further reduced particles.
  • the rotor 16 causes a localized increase in the pressure of the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14. This forces entrained particles, which are naturally quite abrasive, away from the housing 10, thereby drastically reducing scrubbing and wear on the rotary mill 1.
  • the reduced particles are swept by the airflow drawn through the housing by the exhaust fan 14 around the curved portion 30 into the secondary reduction chamber 20.
  • the curved portion 30 is arranged such that the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 directs the reduced particles toward the reduction means 32 in the secondary reduction chamber 20.
  • the reduction means 32 are arranged such that only particles below a given size, or fine particles, pass through the reduction means 32 and enter the outlet chamber 22 while oversized particles are directed back into the flow of reduced particles leaving the rotor path.
  • the reduction means 32 provide the final particle size control, forming a restriction in the path that material follows through the housing 10.
  • the close, staggered configuration of the reduction means 32 causes the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 to change direction rapidly several times before being drawn out of the secondary reduction chamber 20. This turbulent airflow prevents particle build-up from occurring on the reduction means 32.
  • the position and orientation of the reduction means 32 is not critical as they may be placed either vertically or horizontally with little or no change in their effectiveness.
  • the fine particles Upon entry into the outlet chamber 22, the fine particles remain in the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 and are drawn off through the fan outlet 34 while heavy particles fall to the lower material outlet 38 until a mass accumulates that equals the balance weight, which opens the balanced door 40 and releases the heavy particles.
  • the balanced door 40 ensures that air is drawn into the rotary mill 1 only through the inlet opening 24, thereby keeping a negative pressure on all parts of the housing 10 and serving as a form of dust control.
  • the position of the movable baffle 42 within the outlet chamber 22 may be altered to vary the intensity of the airflow, thereby varying the amount and size of the particles drawn off through the fan outlet 34.
  • the flow of fine particles may, for example, be blown into a bag house or cyclone or may be turned into a slurry by the addition of a water spray.
  • the heavy material which exits the lower opening can be fed into any suitable classification machinery for further processing.
  • this arrangement also serves as a simple means of material classification.
  • the position of the rotor 16 within the housing 10 is quite critical.
  • a clearance of 0.125 inches is optimum, wherein clearance refers to the ideal spacing between the rotor 16 and the housing 10 as well as the clearance between the impact means 44 and the housing 10. If too much clearance is allowed, turbulence occurs and entrained particles build up which greatly increase the wear on the rotary mill 1.
  • the importance of having a constant and steady flow of incoming material can be shown when a large particle is introduced and allowed to pass through the rotary mill 1 alone.
  • the resulting pile of reduced material consists of a light scattering of larger particles on the top and bottom of a cross section with the majority in the center finely pulverized, as there are few particles to carry out the attrition process.
  • there is a steady impingement between fractured particles and the particle size distribution is more even.
  • time of material residency is an important factor in the successful operation of the above-described rotary mill 1.
  • the tendency to return particles to the new product flow can cause a build-up of material in the system.
  • This has been overcome by the addition of a supplementary airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14.
  • the exhaust fan 14 creates a path of steadily moving air from the inlet opening 24 to the fan outlet 34.
  • the airflow overcomes turbulence created by the rotor 16 and ensures that all material continues to follow the desired path through the rotary mill 1.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Crushing And Pulverization Processes (AREA)
  • Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)
  • Supercharger (AREA)
  • Electrochromic Elements, Electrophoresis, Or Variable Reflection Or Absorption Elements (AREA)
  • Crushing And Grinding (AREA)

Abstract

A rotary mill for reduction of ore to particles is described. The rotary mill comprises a primary reduction chamber (18), a secondary reduction chamber (20) and an outlet chamber (22). Material entering the primary reduction chamber (18) is deflected by an impact rotor (16), which shatters the material and sends the resulting particles into a plurality of shatter bars (28). The shatter bars (28) further reduce these particles and deflect them back towards the rotor so that the reduced particles encounter newly shattered material, causing further attrition. In addition, the rotary mill includes an exhaust fan (14) arranged to generate an airflow from the primary reduction chamber, through the secondary reduction chamber and into the outlet chamber. This airflow carries the reduced particles into the secondary reduction chamber (20) wherein the particles are thrown against reduction means (32). The reduction means (32) are positioned between the secondary reduction chamber (20) and the outlet chamber (22) such that only particles below a certain size enter the outlet chamber. Material of sufficiently reduced size enters the outlet chamber wherein it is separated into fine particles and heavier particles. Specifically, the heavier particles fall out of the airflow and gather at the base of the outlet chamber until a sufficient weight accumulates to open the balance door (40) which expels the heavy material from the rotary mill.

Description

  • The present invention relates to an apparatus for ore milling. More specifically, the present invention relates to a rotary mill for impact reduction of ore.
  • One method of removing desirable minerals from waste materials in an ore is to reduce the raw size of the ore. US Patent 3,887,141 teaches a mill for the reduction of ore that uses an impact rotor for obtaining the first reduction. Initially, the material to be reduced in size is introduced into the swept area of the rotor. When the material contacts the rotor, a portion of the accumulated kinetic energy generated by the rotor is transferred to the material, forcing it to accelerate as well as change direction. The material will tend to resist this, so the energy transferred accumulates within the material. This in turn will cause any friable material to shatter along its natural fault lines and the resulting smaller particles will be accelerated away from the rotor. These smaller particles are directed into a series of shatter bars mounted on the walls of the primary reduction chamber, which cause further reductions in the size of the particles upon impact. In theory, airflow from the rotor is supposed to carry sufficiently reduced particles into a secondary reduction chamber wherein they are reduced to fine particles and then collected at a fine particle outlet. However, during operation, material tends to pack in the bottom of the primary reduction chamber, clogging the apparatus. US Patent 4,037,796 teaches a modified version of the ore milling apparatus including a fluidizing rotor located in the base of the primary reduction chamber. This second rotor is supposed to slow the rate at which material settles into the base of the primary reduction chamber by improving the flow of the particles. However, this fluidizing rotor does not compensate for other flaws in the apparatus. Specifically, there is also a tendency for fine particles to collect within the apparatus in areas of low air pressure, as the airflow generated from the rotor is insufficient to carry all of the particles to the outlet. As these particles are naturally quite abrasive, considerable wear will occur in these areas. One area of low pressure, due to its proximity to the outlet, is the secondary reduction chamber. Over time, particles accumulate to such an extent so as to block access to the fine particle outlet. In addition, as weight is the only determining factor in this apparatus as to whether or not the particle passes on to the secondary reduction chamber and the fine particle outlet, the possibility exists that a particle of sufficient size could become lodged in this region of the apparatus. Clearly, this apparatus has the disadvantages of incurring considerable wear during operation and requiring frequent maintenance and cleaning.
  • An apparatus according to the preamble of claim 1 is known from AU-B-512623 .
  • It is an aim of the invention, therefore, to provide a rotary mill that overcomes the shortcomings of the prior art.
  • According to the invention there is provided an apparatus for fragmenting solid materials into particles, the apparatus comprising:
    • a housing;
    • a first impact chamber defined within the housing and having a feed opening;
    • a feed system positioned above the feed opening of the first impact chamber for feed of solid materials into the impact chamber;
    • a rotor having impact hammers at its periphery located within the first impact chamber for rotation about an axis of the rotor transverse to the feed opening, the rotor being positioned relative to the feed opening such that said impact hammers impact and deflect the solid materials entering through the feed opening, thereby fragmenting the solid materials to form particles;
    • a plurality of shatter bars located within the first impact chamber arranged such that the shatter bars contact the deflected solid materials, thereby further fragmenting the solid material into said particles;
    • a second impact chamber defined within the housing downstream of the rotor;
    • means for connecting the first impact chamber and the second impact chamber such that the particles pass from the first chamber to the second chamber under momentum from the rotor;
    • the rotor being arranged such that rotation thereof generates an air flow acting to carry the materials from the first impact chamber into the second impact chamber;
    • an outlet chamber connected to the second impact chamber for receiving the particles therefrom;
    • a plurality of reduction means located between the second impact chamber and the outlet chamber, positioned such that only particles below a predetermined size pass through the reduction means and into the outlet chamber;
    • a fine particle outlet duct connected to the outlet chamber and arranged to receive the particles therefrom;
    • a bottom discharge for allowing release of heavier particles from a bottom of the outlet chamber;
    • an exhaust fan connected to the fine particle outlet duct for generating an additional airflow through the feed opening into the first impact chamber and from the first impact chamber into the second impact chamber;
    • and a balanced flow control door which normally closes the bottom discharge such that substantially all air exiting the outlet duct passes into the first impact chamber through the feed opening and which is arranged such that it is opened under the weight of the heavier particles to allow said release of the heavier particles through the bottom discharge.
  • There are a number of methods in which material may be provided to the above-described apparatus, but the most common and efficient would be by conveyor. In this case, some method of sensing when the apparatus is loaded most efficiently must be provided, due to the fact that the machine cannot be "choke"-loaded. Preferably, computerized control of the conveyor is used to provide a steady input volume regardless of input material size. Rotor shaft RPM and airflow are monitored to indicate loading efficiency and the resulting information is used to control the power source driving the conveyor. In this manner, the mass of material within the apparatus is closely controlled and attrition occurs at a steady rate.
  • Generally, a rotor with greater exposed blade or hammer surface will move more air, although, as a consequence, this type of rotor is not very durable. However, generation of airflow by the rotor is not a concern in the above-described apparatus because of the supplemental airflow generated by the exhaust fan. As a consequence, the rotor is designed to impart as much accumulated kinetic energy to the incoming material as possible by having the largest mass possible within the swept area of the rotor.
  • The conveyor is positioned so that material is introduced into the rotor circle in a manner that imparts the maximum amount of the kinetic energy from the revolving rotor to the material with the least amount of strain on the rotor bearings. The rotor serves only to bump or tip the incoming material and to direct the fractured particles into the shatter bars. The position of the shatter bars is such that, following impact, the particles are directed back toward the rotor swept area and, in a continuous feed situation, these returning particles are met by new particles that have been produced by the rotor striking newly introduced material, thereby causing further attrition. The particles are then swept around the fixed portion of the apparatus connecting the two impact chambers, following a specifically designed curve into the second impact chamber where they are thrown against the reduction means. These are positioned such that only particles of the desired size can pass through and enter the fine particle outlet, while oversized particles are deflected back into the flow of particles, thereby causing yet further attrition. As a consequence, the oversized particles are further reduced in size until they can pass between the reduction means. Thus, the reduction means provide the final particle size control as they form a restrictive path to the fine particle outlet. As stated above, the reduction means may take the form of staggered bars, perforated metal plates, wire screens or all of these combined. Once past the reduction means, the fine particles are drawn off through the outlet while particles with greater weight fall to the outlet door where they accumulate until their weight equals that of the balance weight, at which time the door opens to allow their release. This door is balanced such that several pounds must collect in order for it to open. Once this accumulation has exited, the door closes again.
  • While the reflection of insufficiently reduced particles into the oncoming flow of material is necessary for further size reduction, a build-up can occur in the second impact chamber and cause clogging or undesirable restriction of material flow as noted in the description of the prior art. This has been overcome by the supplementary airflow generated by the exhaust fan. In this case, the exhaust fan acts as a scavenger by creating a path of steadily moving air from the material intake to the fine particle outlet so that all material follows the desired path through the apparatus. The supplementary airflow also reduces wear, as it prevents entrained particles from contacting the apparatus. Furthermore, the reduction means are staggered or offset so as to force the airflow to rapidly change direction so that any particles with too much mass to remain entrained are reflected back into the flow of material until they have been sufficiently reduced in size to remain in the airflow.
  • Clearly, the addition of the exhaust fan represents a significant improvement over the prior art. As stated above, the airflow generated reduces wear and prevents build-up of particles throughout the apparatus. As a result, the rotor construction is designed to impart the greatest force on incoming material, as creating airflow with the rotor is no longer a concern. This in turn means that the rotor can be of a more durable design. Furthermore, the reduction means are arranged such that access to the fine particle outlet by oversized particles is restricted, thereby preventing clogs. Lastly, a balanced door is provided for automatically removing oversized particles that accumulate in the base of the apparatus.
  • On embodiment of the invention will now be described in conjunction with the accompanying drawing in which:
    • Figure 1 is a side view in cross-section of the rotary mill.
  • A rotary mill 1 comprises a housing 10, a material delivery system 12 and an exhaust fan 14. The housing 10 comprises a rotor 16, a primary reduction chamber 18, a secondary reduction chamber 20 and an outlet chamber 22, as shown in Figure 1.
  • The primary reduction chamber 18 comprises an inlet opening 24, an intake shaft 26 and a plurality of shatter bars 28. The inlet opening 24 provides access to the interior of the housing 10 for incoming material and for airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14. In this embodiment, the inlet opening 24 is positioned beneath the material delivery system 12. The intake shaft 26 is arranged to direct material from the inlet opening 24 into the swept area of the rotor 16. The plurality of shatter bars 28 are arranged to further reduce particles deflected by the rotor 16 and direct these particles back toward the rotor 16 as described below.
  • The secondary reduction chamber 20 is connected to the primary reduction chamber 18 by a curved portion 30 as described below. The secondary reduction chamber 18 includes reduction means 32 positioned between the secondary reduction chamber 20 and the outlet chamber 22, arranged such that particles above a given size are prevented from entering the outlet chamber 22. The reduction means 32 may comprise staggered bars, perforated metal plates, wire screens or combinations thereof.
  • The outlet chamber 22 comprises a fan outlet 34, a fan control means 36 and a lower material outlet 38. The fan outlet 34 comprises the exit from the housing 10 for fine particles and for airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 as described below. The lower material outlet 38 comprises a balanced door 40 situated at the base of the outlet chamber 22 for removal of heavy particles. Specifically, once a mass of material equal to the balance weight has gathered, the balanced door 40 opens and expels the material from the housing 10. The fan control means 36 comprises a movable baffle 42 located within the output chamber 22 for controlling airflow through the housing 10 so that the amount and size of particles drawn off at the fan outlet 34 and the lower material outlet 38 may be varied as described below.
  • The rotor 16 is arranged for rotation within the housing 10 and is driven by a motor, the details of which are not shown as these will be obvious to one skilled in the art. The rotor 16 includes peripheral impact means 44 and is situated below the intake shaft 26. While a rotor that exposes more blade will move more air, durable construction and suitable mass for reducing incoming material conflict with ideal air moving capabilities. However, generation of airflow by the rotor 16 is not an important consideration due to the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14. Thus, the rotor 16 is arranged so that the impact means 44 have the largest mass possible within the swept area of the rotor 16. In this embodiment, the rotor 16 includes three impact means 44, although it is of note that the construction of the rotor 16 may vary greatly.
  • The exhaust fan 14 is arranged to produce an airflow through the housing. Specifically, the exhaust fan 14 is connected to the fan outlet such that the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 is drawn into the housing 10 via the inlet opening 24 and is drawn out of the housing 10 via the fan outlet 34. The details of the exhaust fan 14 are not shown as these will be obvious to one skilled in the art.
  • The material delivery system 12 transports material to the rotary mill 1. In this embodiment, the material delivery system 12 comprises a conveyor 46. For reasons that will become apparent, the rotary mill 1 cannot be "choke" loaded. As a result, computerized control of the conveyor 46 may be used to provide a steady input volume regardless of input material size. Specifically, rotor speed and airflow may be monitored to determine loading efficiency and this information may be used to control the power source driving the conveyor 46. In this manner, the mass of material within the rotary mill 1 may be closely controlled so that attrition of material occurs at a steady rate.
  • In operation, the material to be reduced is transported by the conveyor 46 to the inlet opening 24. The material passes therethrough onto the intake shaft 26 at a speed at or near free fall. The intake shaft 26 directs the material into the swept area of the impact means 44 of the rotor 16. Of note is that the intake shaft 26 is positioned such that a maximum amount of the kinetic energy generated by the rotor 16 is transferred to the material with minimal strain on the rotor 16, so that the rotor 16 needs only to tip or bump the incoming material. This transfer of kinetic energy shatters the material along natural fault planes, producing smaller particles. The smaller particles are accelerated away from the rotor 16 and into the shatter bars 28 where further reductions occur as a result of collisions between the shatter bars 28 and the smaller particles. Of note is that the shatter bars 28 do not have to be of massive structure or unusual hardness because of the reduced size of the particles. The shatter bars 28 also direct the smaller particles back towards the swept area of the rotor 16 where, in a continuous feed situation, the smaller particles encounter new particles produced by the impact means 44 of the rotor 16 striking newly introduced material and these secondary impacts between reflected material and recently shattered material result in further reduced particles. Of note is that the rotor 16 causes a localized increase in the pressure of the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14. This forces entrained particles, which are naturally quite abrasive, away from the housing 10, thereby drastically reducing scrubbing and wear on the rotary mill 1. Furthermore, the reduced particles are swept by the airflow drawn through the housing by the exhaust fan 14 around the curved portion 30 into the secondary reduction chamber 20.
  • As noted above, the curved portion 30 is arranged such that the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 directs the reduced particles toward the reduction means 32 in the secondary reduction chamber 20. As noted above, the reduction means 32 are arranged such that only particles below a given size, or fine particles, pass through the reduction means 32 and enter the outlet chamber 22 while oversized particles are directed back into the flow of reduced particles leaving the rotor path. Thus, the reduction means 32 provide the final particle size control, forming a restriction in the path that material follows through the housing 10. Furthermore, the close, staggered configuration of the reduction means 32 causes the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 to change direction rapidly several times before being drawn out of the secondary reduction chamber 20. This turbulent airflow prevents particle build-up from occurring on the reduction means 32. Of note is that the position and orientation of the reduction means 32 is not critical as they may be placed either vertically or horizontally with little or no change in their effectiveness.
  • Upon entry into the outlet chamber 22, the fine particles remain in the airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14 and are drawn off through the fan outlet 34 while heavy particles fall to the lower material outlet 38 until a mass accumulates that equals the balance weight, which opens the balanced door 40 and releases the heavy particles. The balanced door 40 ensures that air is drawn into the rotary mill 1 only through the inlet opening 24, thereby keeping a negative pressure on all parts of the housing 10 and serving as a form of dust control. Furthermore, the position of the movable baffle 42 within the outlet chamber 22 may be altered to vary the intensity of the airflow, thereby varying the amount and size of the particles drawn off through the fan outlet 34. In cases where this fine product has value, the flow of fine particles may, for example, be blown into a bag house or cyclone or may be turned into a slurry by the addition of a water spray. Furthermore, the heavy material which exits the lower opening can be fed into any suitable classification machinery for further processing. Thus, this arrangement also serves as a simple means of material classification.
  • Of note is that the position of the rotor 16 within the housing 10 is quite critical. In this embodiment, a clearance of 0.125 inches is optimum, wherein clearance refers to the ideal spacing between the rotor 16 and the housing 10 as well as the clearance between the impact means 44 and the housing 10. If too much clearance is allowed, turbulence occurs and entrained particles build up which greatly increase the wear on the rotary mill 1.
  • The importance of having a constant and steady flow of incoming material can be shown when a large particle is introduced and allowed to pass through the rotary mill 1 alone. The resulting pile of reduced material consists of a light scattering of larger particles on the top and bottom of a cross section with the majority in the center finely pulverized, as there are few particles to carry out the attrition process. However, with a constant, regulated flow of input material, there is a steady impingement between fractured particles and the particle size distribution is more even.
  • Clearly, time of material residency is an important factor in the successful operation of the above-described rotary mill 1. However, the tendency to return particles to the new product flow can cause a build-up of material in the system. This has been overcome by the addition of a supplementary airflow generated by the exhaust fan 14. The exhaust fan 14 creates a path of steadily moving air from the inlet opening 24 to the fan outlet 34. Furthermore, the airflow overcomes turbulence created by the rotor 16 and ensures that all material continues to follow the desired path through the rotary mill 1.

Claims (1)

  1. An apparatus for fragmenting solid materials into particles, the apparatus comprising:
    a housing (10);
    a first impact chamber (18) defined within the housing and having a feed opening (24);
    a feed system (12) positioned above the feed opening of the first impact chamber for feed of solid materials into the impact chamber;
    a rotor (16) having impact hammers (44) at its periphery located within the first impact chamber for rotation about an axis of the rotor transverse to the feed opening, the rotor being positioned relative to the feed opening such that the impact hammers impact and deflect the solid materials entering through the feed opening, thereby fragmenting the solid materials to form particles;
    a plurality of shatter bars (28) located within the first impact chamber arranged such that the shatter bars contact the deflected solid materials, thereby further fragmenting the solid material into said particles;
    a second impact chamber (20) defined within the housing downstream of the rotor;
    means (30) for connecting the first impact chamber and the second impact chamber such that the particles pass from the first chamber to the second chamber under momentum from the rotor;
    the rotor being arranged such that rotation thereof generates an air flow acting to carry the materials from the first impact chamber into the second impact chamber;
    an outlet chamber (22) connected to the second impact chamber for receiving particles therefrom;
    a plurality of reduction means (32) located between the second impact chamber and the outlet chamber, positioned such that only particles below a predetermined size pass through the reduction means and into the outlet chamber; and
    a fine particle outlet duct (34) connected to the outlet chamber and arranged to receive the particles therefrom; characterised by
    a bottom discharge (38) for allowing release of heavier particles from a bottom of the outlet chamber;
    an exhaust fan (14) connected to the fine particle outlet duct for generating an additional airflow through the feed opening into the first impact chamber and from the first impact chamber into the second impact chamber; and
    a balanced flow control door (40) which normally closes the bottom discharge such that substantially all air exiting the outlet duct passes into the first impact chamber through the feed opening and which is arranged such that it is opened under the weight of the heavier particles to allow said release of the heavier particles through the bottom discharge.
EP00900046A 2000-01-06 2000-01-06 Rotary mill Expired - Lifetime EP1255611B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/CA2000/000002 WO2001049417A1 (en) 2000-01-06 2000-01-06 Rotary mill

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1255611A1 EP1255611A1 (en) 2002-11-13
EP1255611B1 true EP1255611B1 (en) 2007-10-31

Family

ID=4143030

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00900046A Expired - Lifetime EP1255611B1 (en) 2000-01-06 2000-01-06 Rotary mill

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1255611B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE376883T1 (en)
AU (1) AU777743B2 (en)
CA (1) CA2396580C (en)
DE (1) DE60036964T2 (en)
ES (1) ES2295003T3 (en)
WO (1) WO2001049417A1 (en)

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, ā€  Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1737931A (en) * 1928-01-05 1929-12-03 Frank G Lugrin Coal pulverizer
CH269259A (en) * 1943-08-03 1950-06-30 Tortorelli Fratelli Hammer mill.
BE726597A (en) * 1968-02-27 1969-06-16
AU512623B2 (en) * 1973-05-30 1980-10-23 Verdun Barker Arnold Hammer mills
US3887141A (en) 1973-09-17 1975-06-03 Ind Mining Machinery Corp Impact-attrition mill utilizing air flow
US4361290A (en) * 1980-06-23 1982-11-30 Francis Peter M Adjustable rotary crusher
EP0341260A4 (en) * 1987-01-15 1990-12-19 Graziano Sirol A mill
US4848677A (en) * 1987-10-30 1989-07-18 Illabo Mining Equipment Company Comminution/recovery ore mill

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
ES2295003T3 (en) 2008-04-16
DE60036964D1 (en) 2007-12-13
DE60036964T2 (en) 2008-05-21
WO2001049417A1 (en) 2001-07-12
AU1853300A (en) 2001-07-16
CA2396580A1 (en) 2001-07-12
EP1255611A1 (en) 2002-11-13
AU777743B2 (en) 2004-10-28
ATE376883T1 (en) 2007-11-15
CA2396580C (en) 2008-01-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0102742B1 (en) Improvements in or relating to mineral breakers
US3887141A (en) Impact-attrition mill utilizing air flow
CA2898927C (en) Rotary mill
US5024754A (en) Separator
JPS5850139B2 (en) hammer crusher
JP7511007B2 (en) Crushing Equipment
US6039277A (en) Pulverizer
EP0568941A2 (en) Pulverizing apparatus
US3929293A (en) Shredder crusher material reducer
US4077574A (en) Impact pulverizing mill with an attrition chamber and a vertical airflow classification chamber
US4542856A (en) Hammer breaker
US4848677A (en) Comminution/recovery ore mill
US6045069A (en) Rotary mill
KR100923932B1 (en) Crusher for waste construction treatment using for vortex flow and chain type hammer
EP1255611B1 (en) Rotary mill
US4037796A (en) Rotary mill utilizing an impact reduction chamber and a vertical air flow classification chamber
KR100745173B1 (en) Apparatus for manufacturing recycled-aggregate made of crushed waste-concrete
AU2016213757B2 (en) Rotary mill
US20030111568A1 (en) Mill
US5988537A (en) Apparatus and method for controlled impact comminution of wood
JPH0318935B2 (en)
JP2759843B2 (en) Crushing fluid dryer installed in crushing fluidizing dryer
JPH06509739A (en) Method and apparatus for crushing crushed materials
AU2001231422B2 (en) A mill
RU2238148C1 (en) Grinding device

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020805

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20060831

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: PATENT APPLIED TECHNOLOGY

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: WILLIAM G. STEED

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 60036964

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20071213

Kind code of ref document: P

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2295003

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080131

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080131

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20080801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20080201

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080107

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080106

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120125

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20130218

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20150327

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140107

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 17

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140106

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170217

Year of fee payment: 18

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20180122

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20180119

Year of fee payment: 19

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20180928

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 60036964

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20190106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190801

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20190106