EP1143413A1 - Schätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignal mittels eines Durchschnitts- Abstands zwischen Spitzen - Google Patents

Schätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignal mittels eines Durchschnitts- Abstands zwischen Spitzen Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1143413A1
EP1143413A1 EP00610035A EP00610035A EP1143413A1 EP 1143413 A1 EP1143413 A1 EP 1143413A1 EP 00610035 A EP00610035 A EP 00610035A EP 00610035 A EP00610035 A EP 00610035A EP 1143413 A1 EP1143413 A1 EP 1143413A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pitch
estimate
peak
speech signal
peaks
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP00610035A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Cecilia Brandel
Henrik Johannisson
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Original Assignee
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB filed Critical Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson AB
Priority to EP00610035A priority Critical patent/EP1143413A1/de
Priority to PCT/EP2001/003495 priority patent/WO2001078062A1/en
Priority to AU2001258298A priority patent/AU2001258298A1/en
Priority to JP2001575427A priority patent/JP2003530605A/ja
Priority to MYPI20011652A priority patent/MY133806A/en
Priority to US09/827,280 priority patent/US6865529B2/en
Publication of EP1143413A1 publication Critical patent/EP1143413A1/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES OR SPEECH SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING TECHNIQUES; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00 - G10L21/00
    • G10L25/90—Pitch determination of speech signals

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method of estimating the pitch of a speech signal, said method being of the type where the speech signal is divided into segments, a conformity function for the signal is calculated for each segment, and peaks in the conformity function are detected.
  • the invention also relates to the use of the method in a mobile telephone. Further, the invention relates to a device adapted to estimate the pitch of a speech signal.
  • a well known way of estimating the pitch period is to use the autocorrelation function, or a similar conformity function, on the speech signal.
  • An example of such a method is described in the article D. A. Krubsack, R. J. Niederjohn, "An Autocorrelation Pitch Detector and voicingng Decision with Confidence Measures Developed for Noise-Corrupted Speech", IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 319-329, Febr. 1991.
  • the speech signal is divided into segments of 51.2 ms, and the standard short-time autocorrelation function is calculated for each successive speech segment.
  • a peak picking algorithm is applied to the autocorrelation function of each segment. This algorithm starts by choosing the maximum peak (largest value) in the pitch range of 50 to 333 Hz. The period corresponding to this peak is selected as an estimate of the pitch period.
  • pitch doubling or pitch halving can occur, i.e. the highest peak appears at either half the pitch period or twice the pitch period. The highest peak may also appear at another multiple of the true pitch period. In these cases a simple selection of the maximum peak will provide a wrong estimate of the pitch period.
  • the above-mentioned article also discloses a method of improving the algorithm in these situations.
  • the algorithm checks for peaks at one-half, one-third, one-fourth, one-fifth, and one-sixth of the first estimate of the pitch period. If the half of the first estimate is within the pitch range, the maximum value of the autocorrelation within an interval around this half value is located. If this new peak is greater than one-half of the old peak, the new corresponding value replaces the old estimate, thus providing a new estimate which is presumably corrected for the possibility of the pitch period doubling error. This test is performed again to check for double doubling errors (fourfold errors). If this most recent test fails, a similar test is performed for tripling errors of this new estimate. This test checks for pitch period errors of sixfold. If the original test failed, the original estimate is tested (in a similar manner) for tripling errors and errors of fivefold. The final value is used to calculate the pitch estimate.
  • this object is achieved in that the method comprises the steps of estimating an average distance between the detected peaks, and using this estimate of the average distance as an estimate of the pitch.
  • the method further comprises the steps of sampling the speech signal to obtain a series of samples, and performing the division into segments such that each segment has a fixed number of consecutive samples, an even less complex method is achieved because only a finite number of samples has to be considered.
  • the method further comprises the steps of estimating a set of filter parameters using linear predictive analysis (LPA), providing a modified signal by filtering the speech signal through a filter based on this estimated set of filter parameters, and calculating the conformity function of the modified signal, much of the smearing of the original speech signal is removed and thus the possibility of clearer peaks in the conformity function is improved, which results in a more precise estimation of the pitch period.
  • LPA linear predictive analysis
  • conformity function is calculated as an autocorrelation function.
  • other conformity functions may be utilized, such as e.g. a cross correlation between the original speech signal and the above-mentioned modified signal.
  • An improved method is achieved when the method further comprises the steps of calculating, for each peak in the conformity function, the difference between the position of the peak and the estimate of the average distance, and providing an improved estimate of the pitch by selecting as the improved estimate the position of the peak having the smallest value of said difference. In this way the position of an actual peak is used as the estimate and it is still assured that the correct peak is used. If, in this case, the peak having the smallest value of the difference is represented by a number of samples, the best estimate is achieved when the sample having the maximum amplitude of the conformity function is selected as the improved estimate of the pitch.
  • the method is used in a mobile telephone which is a typical example of a device having only limited computational resources.
  • the invention further relates to a device adapted to estimate the pitch of a speech signal.
  • the device comprises means for dividing the speech signal into segments, means for calculating for each segment a conformity function for the signal, and means for detecting peaks in the conformity function.
  • the device is further adapted to estimate an average distance between said peaks, and to use the estimate of said average distance as an estimate of the pitch, a device less complex than prior art devices is achieved, which also avoids the pitch halving situation.
  • the device further comprises means for sampling the speech signal to obtain a series of samples, and means for performing said division into segments such that each segment has a fixed number of consecutive samples, an even less complex device is achieved because only a finite number of samples has to be considered.
  • the device further comprises means for estimating a set of filter parameters using linear predictive analysis (LPA), means for providing a modified signal by filtering the speech signal through a filter based on this estimated set of filter parameters, and means for calculating the conformity function of the modified signal, much of the smearing of the original speech signal is removed and thus the possibility of clearer peaks in the conformity function is improved, which results in a more precise estimation of the pitch period.
  • LPA linear predictive analysis
  • conformity function is an autocorrelation function.
  • other conformity functions may be utilized, such as e.g. a cross correlation between the original speech signal and the above-mentioned modified signal.
  • An improved device is achieved when the device further comprises means for calculating, for each peak in the conformity function, the difference between the position of the peak and the estimate of the average distance, and means for providing an improved estimate of the pitch by selecting as the improved estimate the position of the peak having the smallest value of said difference. In this way the position of an actual peak is used as the estimate and it is still assured that the correct peak is used. If, in this case, the peak having the smallest value of the difference is represented by a number of samples, the best estimate is achieved when the sample having the maximum amplitude of the conformity function is selected as the improved estimate of the pitch.
  • the device is a mobile telephone, which is a typical example of a device having only limited computational resources.
  • the device is an integrated circuit which can be used in different types of equipment.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an example of a pitch detector 1 according to the invention.
  • a speech signal 2 is sampled with a sampling rate of 8 kHz in the sampling circuit 3 and the samples are divided into segments or frames of 160 consecutive samples. Thus, each segment corresponds to 20 ms of the speech signal. This is the sampling and segmentation normally used for the speech processing in a standard mobile telephone.
  • Each segment of 160 samples is then processed in a filter 4, which will be described in further detail below.
  • a speech signal is modelled as an output of a slowly time-varying linear filter.
  • the filter is either excited by a quasi-periodic sequence of pulses or random noise depending on whether a voiced or an unvoiced sound is to be created.
  • the pulse train which creates voiced sounds is produced by pressing air out of the lungs through the vibrating vocal cords.
  • the period of time between the pulses is called the pitch period and is of great importance for the singularity of the speech.
  • unvoiced sounds are generated by forming a constriction in the vocal tract and produce turbulence by forcing air through the constriction at a high velocity. This description deals with the detection of the pitch period of voiced sounds and thus, unvoiced sounds will not be further considered.
  • the filter has to be time-varying.
  • the properties of a speech signal change relatively slowly with time. It is reasonable to believe that the general properties of speech remain fixed for periods of 10-20 ms. This has led to the basic principle that if short segments of the speech signal are considered, each segment can effectively be modelled as having been generated by exciting a linear time-invariant system during that period of time.
  • the effect of the filter can be seen as caused by the vocal tract, the tongue, the mouth and the lips.
  • voiced speech can be interpreted as the output signal from a linear filter driven by an excitation signal.
  • This is shown in the upper part of figure 2 in which the pulse train 21 is processed by the filter 22 to produce the voiced speech signal 23.
  • a good signal for the detection of the pitch period is obtained if the excitation signal can be extracted from the speech.
  • a signal 26 similar to the'excitation signal can be obtained. This signal is called the residual signal.
  • the blocks 24 and 25 are included in the filter 4 in figure 1.
  • LPA linear predictive analysis
  • the estimation of the pitch is based on the autocorrelation of the residual signal, which is obtained as described above.
  • the output signal from the filter 4 is taken to an autocorrelation calculation unit 5.
  • Figure 3a shows an example of a 20 ms segment of a voiced speech signal and figure 3b the corresponding autocorrelation function of the residual signal. It will be seen from figure 3a that the actual pitch period is about 5.25 ms corresponding to 42 samples, and thus the pitch estimation should end up with this value.
  • the next step in the estimation of the pitch is to apply a peak picking algorithm to the autocorrelation function provided by the unit 5. This is done in the peak detector 6 which identifies the maximum peak (i.e. the largest value) in the autocorrelation function. The index value, i.e. the sample number or the lag, of the maximum peak is then used as a preliminary estimate of the pitch period. In the case shown in figure 3b it will be seen that the maximum peak is actually located at a lag of 42 samples. The search of the maximum peak is only performed in the range where a pitch period is likely to be located. In this case the range is set to 60-333 Hz.
  • this basic pitch estimation algorithm is not always sufficient. In some cases pitch doubling or halving may occur, i.e. due to distortion the peak in the autocorrelation function corresponding to the true pitch period is not the highest peak, but instead the highest peak appears at either half the pitch period or twice the pitch period. The highest peak could also appear at other multiples of the actual pitch period (pitch tripling, etc.) although this occurs relatively rarely.
  • a typical example where pitch doubling would arise is shown in figure 4 which again shows the autocorrelation function of the residual signal.
  • the correct pitch period would be around 42 samples, but the peak at twice the pitch period, i.e. around 84 samples, is actually higher than the one at 42 samples.
  • the basic pitch estimation algorithm would therefore estimate the pitch period to 84 samples and pitch doubling would thus occur. It will also be seen that two smaller peaks are located around half the pitch period, and in some cases one of these could be higher than the correct peak and pitch halving would occur.
  • the preliminary pitch estimate After the preliminary pitch estimate has been determined, it is checked in the risk check unit 7 whether there is any risk of pitch halving or pitch doubling. All peaks with a peak value higher than 75% of the maximum peak are detected and the further processing depends on the result of this detection. If only one peak is detected, i.e. the original maximum peak, there is no need to perform a process to avoid pitch doubling and pitch halving. In this situation the preliminary pitch estimate is used as the final pitch estimate. If, however, more than one peak is detected, there is a risk of pitch doubling or pitch halving, and a further algorithm must be performed to ensure that the correct peak is selected as the pitch estimate.
  • the procedure to avoid pitch doubling and pitch halving is based on the fact that the identified peaks show a periodic behaviour. Actually it can be said that the pitch period simply corresponds to the distance between the peaks. Index values, i.e. the lag, of the detected peaks are sorted into groups depending on how close to each other the indexes are. In many cases a peak can be represented by more than one index, i.e. more than one sample, resulting in several indexes around a peak being detected. Indexes with a distance of less than e.g. five samples are sorted into the same group.
  • the variance threshold can be set from watching probable differences between mean values and their variance.
  • level I shows the received indexes of the highest peaks.
  • indexes are sorted into groups and the mean values of the groups are calculated in level III.
  • the differences between mean values are shown in level IV and finally, the variance is calculated in level V.
  • the average distance may be used directly as the pitch estimate, or the method can be improved by subtracting the average distance from each of the average indexes representing different groups (level III).
  • the group in which the smallest result of this subtraction, i.e. the group closest to the average distance, is found is selected as the pitch estimate.
  • the variance is above the threshold, it means that the distances between peaks are too different to represent the periodic behaviour of the signal. In this case the method cannot be used and the preliminary pitch estimate is maintained as the best estimate.
  • an average of the previous pitch estimates from e.g. the last 15 segments is calculated. This value is then subtracted from the index values where the highest peaks in the autocorrelation function of the residual signal are located, which means that the differences between the index values of the highest peaks and the average of the previously detected pitch periods are calculated. Since the pitch period for a given person is relatively constant over time, a small difference between the correct pitch period of the current segment and the average of the previous pitch estimates is expected. Therefore, those values in the resulting vector of subtraction results that are below a given threshold, e.g. 10, are selected.
  • the use of the threshold is due to the fact that the pitch period may actually vary slightly while a person is talking, and therefore such a difference has to be accepted. The actual threshold can be set from watching probable examples.
  • the corresponding index value or lag is selected as the estimate of the pitch period. If more than one difference is below the threshold, the one with the highest amplitude in the autocorrelation of the residual signal is selected. If there are no differences below the threshold, this indicates that the pitch has changed drastically, as it may e.g. be the case when switching speakers. In such a case the preliminary pitch estimate is maintained as the best estimate.
  • This method utilizing previous estimates is considerably less complex than the other one based on the distance between the peaks, and therefore it should be used as soon as there are sufficient previous estimates in order to reduce the needed amount of computational resources.
  • one example of equipment in which the invention can be implemented is a mobile telephone.
  • the algorithm may also be implemented in an integrated circuit which may then be used in other types of equipment.
  • the autocorrelation function may be calculated directly of the speech signal instead of the residual signal, or other conformity functions may be used instead of the autocorrelation function.
  • a cross correlation could be calculated between the speech signal and the residual signal. It is also possible to repeat the autocorrelation, i.e. to calculate the autocorrelation of the result of the first autocorrelation, before detecting peaks.
  • sampling rates and sizes of the segments may be used.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computational Linguistics (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Acoustics & Sound (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)
EP00610035A 2000-04-06 2000-04-06 Schätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignal mittels eines Durchschnitts- Abstands zwischen Spitzen Withdrawn EP1143413A1 (de)

Priority Applications (6)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP00610035A EP1143413A1 (de) 2000-04-06 2000-04-06 Schätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignal mittels eines Durchschnitts- Abstands zwischen Spitzen
PCT/EP2001/003495 WO2001078062A1 (en) 2000-04-06 2001-03-27 Pitch estimation in speech signal
AU2001258298A AU2001258298A1 (en) 2000-04-06 2001-03-27 Pitch estimation in speech signal
JP2001575427A JP2003530605A (ja) 2000-04-06 2001-03-27 音声信号におけるピッチ推定
MYPI20011652A MY133806A (en) 2000-04-06 2001-04-05 A method of estimating the pitch of a speech signal using an average distance between peaks, use of the method, and a device adapted therefor
US09/827,280 US6865529B2 (en) 2000-04-06 2001-04-05 Method of estimating the pitch of a speech signal using an average distance between peaks, use of the method, and a device adapted therefor

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP00610035A EP1143413A1 (de) 2000-04-06 2000-04-06 Schätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignal mittels eines Durchschnitts- Abstands zwischen Spitzen

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1143413A1 true EP1143413A1 (de) 2001-10-10

Family

ID=8174383

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP00610035A Withdrawn EP1143413A1 (de) 2000-04-06 2000-04-06 Schätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignal mittels eines Durchschnitts- Abstands zwischen Spitzen

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1143413A1 (de)

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0538877A2 (de) * 1991-10-25 1993-04-28 Micom Communications Corp. Sprachkodierer/-dekodierer und Kodierungs-/Dekodierungsverfahren
EP0712116A2 (de) * 1994-11-10 1996-05-15 Hughes Aircraft Company Robustes Verfahren zur Grundfrequenzschätzung und dieses für telefonische Sprache benutzende Vorrichtung

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0538877A2 (de) * 1991-10-25 1993-04-28 Micom Communications Corp. Sprachkodierer/-dekodierer und Kodierungs-/Dekodierungsverfahren
EP0712116A2 (de) * 1994-11-10 1996-05-15 Hughes Aircraft Company Robustes Verfahren zur Grundfrequenzschätzung und dieses für telefonische Sprache benutzende Vorrichtung

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CHILTON E ET AL: "The spectral autocorrelation applied to the linear prediction residual of speech for robust pitch detection", ICASSP 88: 1988 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING (CAT. NO.88CH2561-9),11-14 APRIL 1988, NEW YORK, NY, USA, IEEE, USA, PAGE(S) 358 - 361 VOL.1, XP002146623 *
CHILTON E H S ET AL: "PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF FIVE PITCH DETERMINATION ALGORITHMS ON THE LINEAR PREDICTION RESIDUAL OF SPEECH", EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON SPEECH TECHNOLOGY,GB,EDINBURGH, CEP CONSULTANTS, vol. CONF. 1, 1 September 1987 (1987-09-01), pages 403 - 406, XP000010751 *

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6865529B2 (en) Method of estimating the pitch of a speech signal using an average distance between peaks, use of the method, and a device adapted therefor
AU672934B2 (en) Discriminating between stationary and non-stationary signals
EP0548054B1 (de) Anordnung zur Feststellung der Anwesenheit von Sprachlauten
JP2738534B2 (ja) 異なる型の励起情報を有するディジタル音声符号器
US6954726B2 (en) Method and device for estimating the pitch of a speech signal using a binary signal
EP0653091B1 (de) Unterscheidung zwischen stationären und nicht-stationären signalen
EP0634041B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur kodierung/dekodierung von hintergrundgeräuschen
WO1997035301A1 (en) Vocoder system and method for performing pitch estimation using an adaptive correlation sample window
US20010029447A1 (en) Method of estimating the pitch of a speech signal using previous estimates, use of the method, and a device adapted therefor
US7343284B1 (en) Method and system for speech processing for enhancement and detection
Ney An optimization algorithm for determining the endpoints of isolated utterances
EP1143414A1 (de) Schätzung der Grundfrequenz in einem Sprachsignal unter Berücksichtigung vorheriger Schätzungen
JPH08221097A (ja) 音声成分の検出法
EP1143413A1 (de) Schätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignal mittels eines Durchschnitts- Abstands zwischen Spitzen
JP2002258881A (ja) 音声検出装置及び音声検出プログラム
EP1143412A1 (de) Abschätzung der Grundfrequenz eines Sprachsignales mit ein Zwischenbinärsignal
KR20000056371A (ko) 가능성비 검사에 근거한 음성 유무 검출 장치
KR20040073145A (ko) 음성인식기의 성능 향상 방법
JPH09247800A (ja) 左右音像方向抽出方法
CN116229988A (zh) 一种电力调度***人员声纹识别鉴权方法、***及装置
JPH0477798A (ja) 周波数包絡線成分の特徴量抽出方法
JPH03290700A (ja) 有音検出装置
JP2001022367A (ja) 音声判別装置及び音声判別方法
JPH09198098A (ja) 音声信号のピッチ検出方法および装置
NZ286953A (en) Speech encoder/decoder: discriminating between speech and background sound

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20020320

AKX Designation fees paid

Free format text: AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20050119

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20050729