EP1023570B1 - Simulator - Google Patents

Simulator Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1023570B1
EP1023570B1 EP98942919A EP98942919A EP1023570B1 EP 1023570 B1 EP1023570 B1 EP 1023570B1 EP 98942919 A EP98942919 A EP 98942919A EP 98942919 A EP98942919 A EP 98942919A EP 1023570 B1 EP1023570 B1 EP 1023570B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
mirror
image
scene
viewing station
station
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98942919A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1023570A1 (en
Inventor
Lewis Evan Treharne
Anthony Nordberg
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Thales Training and Simulation Ltd
Original Assignee
Thales Training and Simulation Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Thales Training and Simulation Ltd filed Critical Thales Training and Simulation Ltd
Publication of EP1023570A1 publication Critical patent/EP1023570A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1023570B1 publication Critical patent/EP1023570B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41GWEAPON SIGHTS; AIMING
    • F41G3/00Aiming or laying means
    • F41G3/26Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying
    • F41G3/2616Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device
    • F41G3/2622Teaching or practice apparatus for gun-aiming or gun-laying using a light emitting device for simulating the firing of a gun or the trajectory of a projectile
    • F41G3/2627Cooperating with a motion picture projector
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F41WEAPONS
    • F41JTARGETS; TARGET RANGES; BULLET CATCHERS
    • F41J9/00Moving targets, i.e. moving when fired at
    • F41J9/14Cinematographic targets, e.g. moving-picture targets

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station.
  • Simulators are well known in which an image of the scene to be simulated is viewed from a pre-determined viewing station via a mirror, the mirror, image and viewing station being positioned such that light reflected by the mirror to the viewing station from the image is substantially collimated.
  • Such displays may be used for example in infantry weapons training simulators.
  • back projection screens are positioned behind a fixed structure in front of which the trainee stands.
  • Image projectors also located behind the fixed structure project images onto the screens.
  • a concave mirror is located such that the image presented on the screens can be viewed via the mirror by the trainee.
  • the mirror can be of large dimension, for example having a height of the order of two metres and breadth of the order of six metres, such that the mirror subtends an angle in the horizontal direction of the order of 50° when viewed from the trainee viewing station.
  • Mirrors of such dimensions can be fabricated from a single film of reflective plastics material the edges of which are secured to an appropriately shaped frame, the space behind the film of plastics material being evacuated to suck the mirror into the desired geometrical shape.
  • Unfortunately is so large that it cannot be manoeuvred into position in many buildings in which displays are required.
  • a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station comprising at least one image source for presenting at least one image representing the scene, and a mirror positioned such that a reflection of the or each presented image can be viewed from a pre-determined viewing station, the mirror, the or each image source and the viewing station being arranged such that light reflected by the mirror to the viewing station from the or each image source is substantially collimated and represents the appearance of the scene from the viewing station, and at least one opaque and non-reflective object positioned on or immediately in front of the mirror, characterised in that the mirror is formed from at least two segments edges of which abut, the object being positioned to cover the abutting edges and having an appearance appropriate to the presented image so as to contribute to the scene.
  • the present invention relies upon the realisation that for certain scenes it is acceptable for objects to be relatively close to the viewing station. Providing those objects are positioned such that reflections of them cannot be perceived in the mirror, the overall perceived quality of the image is not significantly reduced. By positioning such objects so as to overlie portions of the mirror which do not have the optical characteristics necessary to reflect light in a manner consistent with the rest of the mirror surface, the perceived degradation of image quality resulting from edge effects between adjacent mirrors can be avoided.
  • the illustrated arrangement comprises a mirror 1 made up from four substantially identical mirror sections the abutting edges of which are represented by lines 2.
  • Each of the mirror sections comprises a frame 3 defining four curved edges to which a film of reflective plastics material is attached.
  • the frame and film together define an enclosure which is evacuated so as to stretch the plastics film which is sucked into a shape determined by the shape of the edges of the frame and the differential pressure across the plastics film.
  • the optical quality of sucked film mirrors of this type is relatively high except immediately adjacent the peripheral edges of the frame.
  • the mirror 1 is viewed from a viewing station in from of a fixed structure 4 which supports four projections screens 5. Images are projected onto the screens 5 from four projectors 6. The projectors 6, screens 5 and mirror 1 are located such that light reaching an observer at the viewing station appears to come from infinity.
  • Figure 3 represents one such object 7 having the appearance of a tree trunk.
  • the side of the object remote from the observer is either adhered to or very close to the surface of the mirror so that no reflection of that side of the object can be perceived by the viewing station.
  • the object is clearly very close to the observer but does not impair the perceived quality of the image providing its appearance as appropriate to that image, for example, in an infantry weapons training simulator it is possible for it to be reasonable in a simulated scene for an object such as a tree to be close to the observer station the view from which is to be simulated. Movement of the observer within the area of the viewing station will of course result in perceived movement between the object and the represented scene but this of course is consistent with what happens in reality when an observer moves his head to look behind an object placed in front of him. Thus the overall realism of the image is maintained.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Optical Elements Other Than Lenses (AREA)
  • Toys (AREA)
  • Projection Apparatus (AREA)
  • Transforming Electric Information Into Light Information (AREA)

Description

The present invention relates to a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station.
Simulators are well known in which an image of the scene to be simulated is viewed from a pre-determined viewing station via a mirror, the mirror, image and viewing station being positioned such that light reflected by the mirror to the viewing station from the image is substantially collimated. Such displays may be used for example in infantry weapons training simulators. Typically, back projection screens are positioned behind a fixed structure in front of which the trainee stands. Image projectors also located behind the fixed structure project images onto the screens. A concave mirror is located such that the image presented on the screens can be viewed via the mirror by the trainee.
It is often desirable to he able to train a group of trainees using a single simulator. In such circumstances it is highly advantageous if the mirror can be of large dimension, for example having a height of the order of two metres and breadth of the order of six metres, such that the mirror subtends an angle in the horizontal direction of the order of 50° when viewed from the trainee viewing station. Mirrors of such dimensions can be fabricated from a single film of reflective plastics material the edges of which are secured to an appropriately shaped frame, the space behind the film of plastics material being evacuated to suck the mirror into the desired geometrical shape. Unfortunately such a structure is so large that it cannot be manoeuvred into position in many buildings in which displays are required. Furthermore, it is relatively difficult to build mirrors of such dimensions with the necessary tight geometrical tolerances. Accordingly, large mirrors are usually assembled by abutting a series of relatively small mirrors edge to edge.
With available sucked mirror structures, it is not possible to maintain the necessary geometry of the reflective material right up to the mirror edge and therefore there is a very perceptible edge effect at the joint between two adjacent mirrors. This significantly reduces the perceived realism of a single image projected so as to overlap the abutting edges of two mirrors.
It is accepted wisdom in the simulator industry that the last thing one wants to consider is positioning anything between the trainee and the mirror surface. An object so positioned is visually very distinct from the image perceived via the mirror and can be expected to dramatically reduce the perceived realism of the viewed image.
It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate the problems outlined above.
According to the present invention, there is provided a simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station, comprising at least one image source for presenting at least one image representing the scene, and a mirror positioned such that a reflection of the or each presented image can be viewed from a pre-determined viewing station, the mirror, the or each image source and the viewing station being arranged such that light reflected by the mirror to the viewing station from the or each image source is substantially collimated and represents the appearance of the scene from the viewing station, and at least one opaque and non-reflective object positioned on or immediately in front of the mirror, characterised in that the mirror is formed from at least two segments edges of which abut, the object being positioned to cover the abutting edges and having an appearance appropriate to the presented image so as to contribute to the scene.
The present invention relies upon the realisation that for certain scenes it is acceptable for objects to be relatively close to the viewing station. Providing those objects are positioned such that reflections of them cannot be perceived in the mirror, the overall perceived quality of the image is not significantly reduced. By positioning such objects so as to overlie portions of the mirror which do not have the optical characteristics necessary to reflect light in a manner consistent with the rest of the mirror surface, the perceived degradation of image quality resulting from edge effects between adjacent mirrors can be avoided.
An embodiment of the present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
  • Figure 1 is a schematic perspective representation of components used in a known infantry weapons training simulator.
  • Figure 2 is a vertical section through the components showed in Figure 1; and
  • Figure 3 shows the positioning of an object on the surface of the mirror of Figures 1 and 2 so as to cover a portion of that mirror which is defined by abutting edges of two mirror sections.
  • Referring to Figures 1 and 2, the illustrated arrangement comprises a mirror 1 made up from four substantially identical mirror sections the abutting edges of which are represented by lines 2. Each of the mirror sections comprises a frame 3 defining four curved edges to which a film of reflective plastics material is attached. The frame and film together define an enclosure which is evacuated so as to stretch the plastics film which is sucked into a shape determined by the shape of the edges of the frame and the differential pressure across the plastics film.
    The optical quality of sucked film mirrors of this type is relatively high except immediately adjacent the peripheral edges of the frame.
    The mirror 1 is viewed from a viewing station in from of a fixed structure 4 which supports four projections screens 5. Images are projected onto the screens 5 from four projectors 6. The projectors 6, screens 5 and mirror 1 are located such that light reaching an observer at the viewing station appears to come from infinity.
    Highly realistic images can be viewed with the structure shown in Figures 1 and 2 except when the light reaching the viewer comes from a portion of the mirror immediately adjacent the abutting edges 2. The presented images are as a result perceived as being made up from four separate sections of high quality separated by regions of relatively low quality adjacent the abutting edges 2. These regions of low quality significantly reduce the perceived quality of the overall image.
    In accordance with the present invention, the problem described above resulting from the optical inaccuracies of the mirror adjacent the abutting edges 2 can be overcome by the simple expedient of placing an opaque object over the abutting edges of the four mirror sections. Figure 3 represents one such object 7 having the appearance of a tree trunk. The side of the object remote from the observer is either adhered to or very close to the surface of the mirror so that no reflection of that side of the object can be perceived by the viewing station. The object is clearly very close to the observer but does not impair the perceived quality of the image providing its appearance as appropriate to that image, for example, in an infantry weapons training simulator it is possible for it to be reasonable in a simulated scene for an object such as a tree to be close to the observer station the view from which is to be simulated. Movement of the observer within the area of the viewing station will of course result in perceived movement between the object and the represented scene but this of course is consistent with what happens in reality when an observer moves his head to look behind an object placed in front of him. Thus the overall realism of the image is maintained.

    Claims (2)

    1. A simulator for simulating the view of a scene from a pre-determined observer station, comprising at least one image source (5) for presenting at least one image representing the scene, and a mirror (1) positioned such that a reflection of the or each presented image can be viewed from a pre-determined viewing station, the mirror (1), the or each image source (5) and the viewing station being arranged such that light reflected by the mirror (1) to the viewing station from the or each image source is substantially collimated and represents the appearance of the scene from the viewing station, and at least one opaque and non-reflective object (7) positioned on or immediately in front of the mirror (1), characterised in that the mirror (1) is formed from at least two segments edges of which abut, the object being positioned to cover the abutting edges (2) and having an appearance appropriate to the presented image so as to contribute to the scene.
    2. A simulator according to claim 1, wherein the image source is a back projection screen (5) onto which the image is projected.
    EP98942919A 1997-09-16 1998-09-14 Simulator Expired - Lifetime EP1023570B1 (en)

    Applications Claiming Priority (3)

    Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
    GB9719590 1997-09-16
    GBGB9719590.3A GB9719590D0 (en) 1997-09-16 1997-09-16 Simulator
    PCT/GB1998/002783 WO1999014549A1 (en) 1997-09-16 1998-09-14 Simulator

    Publications (2)

    Publication Number Publication Date
    EP1023570A1 EP1023570A1 (en) 2000-08-02
    EP1023570B1 true EP1023570B1 (en) 2003-03-05

    Family

    ID=10819084

    Family Applications (1)

    Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
    EP98942919A Expired - Lifetime EP1023570B1 (en) 1997-09-16 1998-09-14 Simulator

    Country Status (6)

    Country Link
    EP (1) EP1023570B1 (en)
    CA (1) CA2304190A1 (en)
    DE (1) DE69811922T2 (en)
    GB (1) GB9719590D0 (en)
    IL (1) IL135094A (en)
    WO (1) WO1999014549A1 (en)

    Families Citing this family (1)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    DE102013225967A1 (en) * 2013-12-13 2015-06-18 Thales Deutschland Gmbh Method and weapon simulator for training the use and the use of firearms, central control unit of a weapon simulator and computer program for implementing the method

    Family Cites Families (3)

    * Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
    Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
    FR2537735A1 (en) * 1982-12-10 1984-06-15 Matra Wide-angle collimator for optical apparatus or simulator
    DE3637000A1 (en) * 1986-10-31 1988-05-05 Diehl Gmbh & Co TEST DEVICE, ESPECIALLY FOR THE SEARCH HEAD OF INTELLIGENT STEERING AMMUNITION
    GB9308663D0 (en) * 1993-04-27 1993-06-16 Link Miles Ltd Point of incidence detection

    Also Published As

    Publication number Publication date
    GB9719590D0 (en) 1997-11-19
    EP1023570A1 (en) 2000-08-02
    IL135094A0 (en) 2001-05-20
    IL135094A (en) 2005-12-18
    CA2304190A1 (en) 1999-03-25
    DE69811922T2 (en) 2003-12-18
    DE69811922D1 (en) 2003-04-10
    WO1999014549A1 (en) 1999-03-25

    Similar Documents

    Publication Publication Date Title
    US5257130A (en) Apparatus and method for creating a real image illusion
    US5685625A (en) Apparatus and method for creating optical illusion effects
    US5720123A (en) Depth image object/picture frame
    US5746599A (en) Modular video display system
    US6176584B1 (en) Curved surface, real image dome display system, using laser-based rear projection
    US4671625A (en) Optical apparatus for producing a natural, viewable and optically interactive image in free space
    US5582518A (en) System for restoring the visual environment of a pilot in a simulator
    US20060114171A1 (en) Windowed immersive environment for virtual reality simulators
    US5828495A (en) Lenticular image displays with extended depth
    JP2006135378A (en) Three-dimensional image display apparatus
    KR20070039878A (en) Method and arrangement for presenting a virtual landscape
    US5291297A (en) Illustion creating apparatus comprising a housing and a CRT
    CN107678267A (en) A kind of holographic imaging systems
    US5418579A (en) Multiplanar image display system with plural display units
    US20190244432A1 (en) Exhibition system arranged for presenting a mixed reality and a method of using said system
    EP1023570B1 (en) Simulator
    US5993005A (en) Video wall
    US4500088A (en) 3D Display
    JPH0535192A (en) Display device
    GB2091193A (en) Simulator for simulating, for example, aircraft flight
    EP0359804B1 (en) Screen simulator window
    US3776621A (en) Optical display system and method for creating a theatrical illusion
    US5589979A (en) Simulator arrangement
    AU635678B2 (en) Method of installing well conductors
    WO2007052261A2 (en) A screen projection system

    Legal Events

    Date Code Title Description
    PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

    17P Request for examination filed

    Effective date: 20000403

    AK Designated contracting states

    Kind code of ref document: A1

    Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

    17Q First examination report despatched

    Effective date: 20010111

    RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

    Owner name: THALES TRAINING AND SIMULATION LIMITED

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

    GRAA (expected) grant

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

    AK Designated contracting states

    Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: LI

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030305

    Ref country code: CH

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

    Effective date: 20030305

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: GB

    Ref legal event code: FG4D

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: EP

    REF Corresponds to:

    Ref document number: 69811922

    Country of ref document: DE

    Date of ref document: 20030410

    Kind code of ref document: P

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: CH

    Ref legal event code: PL

    ET Fr: translation filed
    PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

    Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

    STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

    Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

    26N No opposition filed

    Effective date: 20031208

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: GB

    Payment date: 20040908

    Year of fee payment: 7

    Ref country code: FR

    Payment date: 20040908

    Year of fee payment: 7

    PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Payment date: 20040909

    Year of fee payment: 7

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: IT

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20050914

    Ref country code: GB

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20050914

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: DE

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20060401

    GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

    Effective date: 20050914

    PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

    Ref country code: FR

    Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

    Effective date: 20060531

    REG Reference to a national code

    Ref country code: FR

    Ref legal event code: ST

    Effective date: 20060531