EP0995073B1 - Systemes de protection du pied contre les mines antipersonnelles - Google Patents

Systemes de protection du pied contre les mines antipersonnelles Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0995073B1
EP0995073B1 EP98933419A EP98933419A EP0995073B1 EP 0995073 B1 EP0995073 B1 EP 0995073B1 EP 98933419 A EP98933419 A EP 98933419A EP 98933419 A EP98933419 A EP 98933419A EP 0995073 B1 EP0995073 B1 EP 0995073B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
protection system
foot
ground
engaging elements
frame
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98933419A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0995073A1 (fr
Inventor
Aristidis Makris
Richard J. L'abbe
Pierre Voisine
Gad Shaanan
Serge Dubeau
Charles De Gagne
Derek Hunziker
Harald Hermann Kleine
Benoit Orban
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Allen Vanguard Technologies Inc
Original Assignee
Med Eng Systems Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from CA002210868A external-priority patent/CA2210868A1/fr
Application filed by Med Eng Systems Inc filed Critical Med Eng Systems Inc
Publication of EP0995073A1 publication Critical patent/EP0995073A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0995073B1 publication Critical patent/EP0995073B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A43—FOOTWEAR
    • A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
    • A43B3/00—Footwear characterised by the shape or the use
    • A43B3/0026—Footwear characterised by the shape or the use for use in minefields; protecting from landmine blast; preventing landmines from being triggered

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a new or improved system to provide foot protection against anti-personnel land mines.
  • the invention is particularly intended for use by military specialists involved in mine clearance operations, although it is likewise suitable for use by other military and civilian personnel.
  • None of the prior proposals for protective footwear has been entirely satisfactory. Some proposals are too weighty and unwieldy while others do not provide a sufficient spacing of the feet of the operative above the ground in which a mine may be embedded, and still others do not provide sufficient stability for support of the operator. None of the prior protective footwear can avoid the possibility that the operative may tread on and thus detonate a mine located immediately underneath his foot.
  • the present invention provides a protection system to protect the foot of a user against anti-personnel mines and the like, said system comprising: a frame configured to receive and be attached to a user's footwear to support the foot in a location that is at a height of at least about 10 cm above a ground surface; said frame carrying ground-engaging elements that have overall extents in longitudinal and lateral directions that are sufficient to provide stable support for said frame on a supporting ground surface; said ground-engaging elements being discrete and spaced apart, and said frame having an underside that is spaced upwardly in relation to said ground-engaging elements so as to have clearance above the supporting ground surface.
  • at least parts of said system are compliantly deformable to accommodate irregularities in the supporting ground surface.
  • the system preferably also includes blast protecting material completely covering the underside of the foot location.
  • the ground-engaging elements of the system are spaced forwardly and rearwardly relative to the foot location so that they will not cause detonation of an undetected mine that is immediately below the foot of the operative.
  • the front ground-engaging elements are positioned between about 10 and 40 cm preferably between about 15 and 30 cm, and most preferably about 25 cm forwardly of the front of the foot location; the rear ground engaging elements are spaced to the rear of the foot location by similar amounts, and the front and rear ground-engaging elements are spaced apart longitudinally by at least about 20 cm, preferably between about 25 and 80 cm, and most preferably about 35 cm.
  • the ground-engaging elements may comprise forward and rearward pairs of laterally spaced pods which can provide a stable support for the system even upon irregular ground surfaces. These pods preferably have rounded undersides to engage the ground and are carried on arms that are somewhat resilient.
  • the ground-engaging elements preferably comprise resilient members that can include chambers filled with compressible gas as in a bellows, or foamed plastic to permit some ground surface versatility. In some cases, rigid contact points may also be used, dependent on the terrain.
  • the blast-protecting material on the underside of the foot location preferably has an underside that tapers convexly towards a rounded lower end presenting a downwardly angled outer surface that will have a deflecting effect upon fragments which may be hurled upwardly from an exploding mine.
  • the blast-protecting material preferably comprises multiple layers of foam plastic or other energy-absorbing materials having an overall thickness in the range 3 to 15 cm and preferably about 10 cm, although in some embodiments the thickness may be as little as 1 cm.
  • the protection system is lightweight and not excessively cumbersome to use.
  • the system supports the foot of the operative at a height of at least 10 cm and preferably about 12 cm, in some cases to provide enhanced protection this height may be 20 cm or more above the ground surface; this spacing together with the forward and rearward disposition of the ground engaging elements and the blast protecting material on the underside of the foot location combine to greatly reduce the likelihood of injury to the foot in the event that mine detonation is occasioned by the ground engaging elements, or otherwise occurs in the immediate vicinity of the feet of the operative.
  • a system that supports the foot 20 or more centimeters above the ground surface may be desirable from the safety standpoint, from the standpoint of usability, stability and cost, it is thought that many customers might prefer a system providing a height in the range 10 to 12 cm, with a thickness of blast protecting material on the underside of the foot location of from 1 to 5 cm.
  • the foot protection system shown in Figure 1 generally indicated at 10 comprises a framework 11 that is of inverted U-shape as seen in side view the framework comprising downwardly and forwardly curved front legs 12 and downwardly and rearwardly curved rear legs 13.
  • the lower end of these legs carry ground-engaging elements in the form of flat pods 14, 15 respectively, which are upwardly curved at their forward ends and which can pivot through at least a limited angular range about horizontal axes to accommodate to irregularities in the ground surface upon which the system may be placed.
  • each side of the framework is telescopically adjustable so as to selectively change the longitudinal spacing between the front and rear pods 14, 15 within a limited range.
  • the outboard edges of the rear pods 15 are somewhat flattened and for ease of use, the overall width across the rear pods is less than that across the front pods by an amount of at least about 5 cm.
  • the framework 11 defines a foot location generally indicated at 18 which is designed to receive the foot of an operative and secure the protection system to the foot.
  • the foot location is designed to receive a foot that is shod in a boot or the like, but obviously could be modified to include built-in footwear (not shown).
  • the framework includes a front cross member 19 and a similar rear cross member (not shown) to provide structural rigidity.
  • a foot receptor sub-frame 21 is attached to the front cross member 19, such attachment including a pivotal connection to allow the sub-frame 21 a limited range of pivotal movement about a generally horizontal transverse axis at its forward end.
  • the foot protection system shown in Figure 1 is designed to receive the left foot of an operative, and therefore to provide a more natural foot attitude, the foot receptor is toed-out by a few degrees, e.g. between 5 and 10 degrees.
  • the underside of the foot location is shielded from the effects of a mine explosion by a shield 25 of lightweight blast absorbing material such as a lamination of med/high density and lower density polystyrene, polyethylene, polyurethane foams, having a thickness of 5 cm to 15 cm and densities in the range 10 to 130 kg/m 3 .
  • the shield 25 entirely covers the underside of the foot location providing continuous protection from side-to-side and from front-to-rear beneath the foot receptor 21.
  • the shield has front and rear upwardly curved extensions 26, 27 which provide protection to the foot location in the case of mine detonations that occur to the front and to the rear thereof. Also the shield can be extended outwardly and upwardly at the sides (not shown) of the foot location to add further protection.
  • the foot protection system disclosed in relation to Figure 1 provides a high degree of protection to the foot of an operative.
  • the fact that the front pods 14 and rear pods 15 are displaced longitudinally and do not lie immediately beneath the foot of the user, and that the foot location is displaced a substantial distance (i.e. at least 10 cm and as shown in Figure 1 20 cm) above the supporting ground surface combine to greatly attenuate the blast force upon the user's foot of any mine that is initiated through pressure exerted by the supporting pods 14, 15.
  • the foot protection system 10 should be as compact and as lightweight as is consonant with safe operation by mine clearance personnel. It should not be excessively heavy or unwieldy since it could be worn by individuals for shifts of several hours. Also the system 10 should preferably not be fabricated from magnetisable material since such could interfere with operation of metal detector equipment that is commonly employed in mine clearance operations.
  • the framework 11 is composed essentially of lightweight aluminum or aluminum alloy tubes or composite material structures, the pods 14 and 15 being of similar material.
  • the foot protection system 100 shown in these views comprises a platform 101 that is supported generally horizontally upon a ground surface by four outwardly and downwardly curved legs comprising two front legs 102 and two rear legs 103, each leg carrying a ground engaging pod 104.
  • the platform 101 has a horizontal area that can be larger than the footprint 105 of a boot, the footprint shown in Figure 4A representing a boot of overall length of about 32 cm, although for convenience in use the dimensions of the foot platform should not greatly exceed the physical dimensions of a wearer's boot.
  • the platform shown is intended to accommodate a wide range of boot sizes.
  • the front part of the platform 101 has fixed thereto a flexible sole plate 106, which is of uniform thickness and of a width and length just smaller than the top of the platform.
  • the sole plate is essentially flush with the side walls of the structure (101).
  • the sole plate supports the boot about 5 mm above the top of the platform 101 and extends under the sole and heel of the boot.
  • the sole plate 106 is attached to the platform 101 only at its forward end and can be pivoted by flexure about a transverse axis.
  • Each hook plate 112 is formed integrally with a corresponding side of the platform 101 and projects into the corresponding rectangular recess 116, the upper end of the hook plate having a detent 107 which projects laterally inwardly to cooperate with the upper side of the sole plate 106 to limit the range of upwards movement of the rear part of the sole plate 106 (and with it the heel of the boot 118) to correspond to the pivotal movement of the foot joint of the user as will occur in a normal walking motion.
  • the position of the detents 107 above the platform 101 will determine the maximum range of upwards movement of the heel. By providing for this movement the foot protection system will be found to be much more comfortable for use by the operator.
  • the sole plate 106 carries a mounting support for a binding structure by means of which the assembly can be secured to the boot 118 of a user, the binding comprising an adjustable instep strap 120 which spans the sides of the sole plate 106 across the instep portion of the boot and has ends that are adjustably connected by suitable fasteners (not shown) at selected locations in the sides of the sole plate 106 so that the binding can be adapted to accommodate boots of various sizes.
  • the strap 120 is adjusted in length to snugly enclose the boot, and is secured by suitable means such as buckles, ratchet mechanisms, or Velcro fasteners for example.
  • An upper binding portion comprising a U-shaped ankle support 122 is adjustably pivotally attached at its sides to the top of the heel stopper 114 and also carries an adjustable strap 124 by means of which the apparatus can be snugly secured around the boot and the lower leg of the user. It will be understood that the ankle support 122 is pivotal relative to the heel stopper 114 to accommodate normal pivotal movement and adjustment of the lower leg with respect to the foot of the user.
  • the platform 101 is of overall canoe shape as is best seen in Figures 2, 3 and 4B, having a length and a width that are greater than those of any boot that will be accommodated, the sides of the platform tapering convexly in the downwards direction as seen in the drawings to present a somewhat wedge-like aspect towards the ground, as seen particularly in Figure 4B, this being important to provide a deflection laterally outwardly, or forwardly or rearwardly, of the pressure wave loading, as well as of solid particles and fragments hurled upwardly e.g. by the explosion of a land mine under the foot protection system.
  • the platform comprising a molded composite material shell fabricated of e.g. glass fibre, aramid fibre or plastic, enclosing a composite core of blast absorbing material comprising a lower core section 128 of low density foam plastic material and an upper core section 130 of a foam plastic material that is of much lower density than the lower section 128.
  • Suitable materials of the core sections are: lower section 128 polyethylene of density 65-130 kg/m 3 upper section 130 polyethylene based foam 25-45 kg/m 3 density
  • the damaging effects of blast pressure loading and fragmentation pieces hurled upwardly by an exploding mine can be very much diminished so that the danger of injury to the feet or lower limbs of the user is correspondingly reduced.
  • the blast wave loading on the foot itself is attenuated by the energy absorbing foam type materials beneath the foot platform and the possibility of damping of any relative motion between foot and platform.
  • a single core section may be used or more than two types or densities of core materials to attenuate the blast can be included.
  • the shell of the platform 101 is fabricated, e.g. by molding from a suitable composite plastic or non-ferrous metal material, and the core sections 128, 130 can be molded within the shell 101.
  • each of the legs 102, 103 comprises a hollow molded plastics section of somewhat triangular outline having convex lower sides 132, 134 which offer a downwardly oriented wedge-like profile to maximize blast deflection.
  • the pod 104 attached to the lower end of each leg 102, 103 is of soft construction and may be fabricated in a compressible lightweight foam plastic material, and has on its underside a tread rounded piece 136 having an array of projecting integral studs 136.1 thereon to provide improved traction between the pod and the ground surface.
  • the tread piece 136 can be provided in the form of a hollow rounded cover fabricated e.g. in polyethylene and fixed to the associated stud 104 in a secure manner, yet releasable when the tread piece has to be replaced.
  • each tread piece 136 enables the foot protection system to more readily adapt and find stable support upon irregular surfaces, and this effect is enhanced by providing a measure of height adjustability as between the different pods 104, such height adjustability being provided for by a somewhat resilient construction of the legs 102, 103.
  • the pod itself can perform the function of a spring or a bellows, or may serve as a rigid contact point with the ground.
  • the foot protection systems described herein counteract the effects of exploding mines upon the feet of operatives in two ways: the configuration of the platform 1 and the legs 102, 103 space the user's foot, represented by the boot 118, a substantial distance away from any mine that may be exploded by one of the pods 104, and the shape and construction of the legs 102, 103 and in particular of the lower side of the platform 101 help to deflect and/or to absorb the energy of the blast wave pressure and mine fragments.
  • the system supports the boot at a height H above the ground surface, and the pods 104 are spaced apart by a distance L in the longitudinal direction.
  • the protective effects of the system are enhanced with increases in both of the dimensions H and L, but these dimensions cannot be made too large or else the system will become unwieldy and unstable to the user. It will be understood that in mine clearance operations, the user will have to wear the foot protection system for many hours, and will also have to be able to move about in more or less unrestricted manner across the ground surface that is being cleared. Thus as a practical matter it has been determined that the dimension H should be within the range 10 to 40 cm, and preferably from about 10 cm to about 20 cm, and the dimension L should be within the range 25 to 80 cm and preferably about 50 cm.
  • the pods 104 are spaced longitudinally away from the foot location, such spacing being represented by the dimensions C in Figure 3, C being in the range from 0 to 25 cm, preferably between 2 and 15 cm, and most preferably about 10 cm, dependent on the size of foot of the wearer.
  • H As has been noted above, from the point of view of safety, it is desirable to maximize the dimension H. However as H increases, the convenience of use and stability of the foot protection system are reduced, and thus while it is preferred that H should be 20 cm or more, it is thought that practical and useful embodiments of the foot protection system can be provided in which H is as little as about 10 to 15 cm.
  • the dimensions C and H are interrelated, and for the same protective effect, if the dimension C is increased, then the dimension H can be reduced and vice versa.
  • the lateral spacing between the pods 104 is represented by the dimension D
  • the overall lateral width of the system is represented by the dimension W.
  • the dimension W may be anywhere within the range 10 to 40 cm, but is preferably about 25 cm since for widths of 30 cm or more the system becomes a little unwieldy in requiring the user to maintain an uncomfortably large lateral spacing between the left foot and the right foot.
  • the lateral extent W of the rearmost pair of pods 104 may be slightly less (e.g.
  • the vertical thickness (T in Figure 3) of the foam filled platform 101 can likewise be varied within wide limits, and may be anywhere from 2 to 15 cm, and preferably about 5 cm.
  • the combined effects of the dimensions C and H are to ensure that there is a substantial spacing, S in Figure 3, between the pods and the closest adjacent part of the foot location, since this distance S and the deflection angle is critical factors in reducing injuries. It has been determined that the distance S should be not less than 10 cm, and for practical reasons no more than 40 cm, preferably in the range 15 to 30 cm and most preferably about 25 cm. Although not shown in Figure 3, it will be understood that a similar spacing S should be provided between the rear pods 104 and the heel of the boot of the user.
  • the dimensions C and S will vary somewhat according to the size of the boot 118, and the dimensions and ranges discussed are established in relation to a size 12 boot (length 30 cm). The vast majority of users will have boot sizes less than 12, so that an additional margin of protection is available.
  • FIG. 5 there is shown a framework 31 of a foot protection system which is equivalent in function to the framework 11 of Figure 1.
  • a framework 31 of a foot protection system which is equivalent in function to the framework 11 of Figure 1.
  • the foot receptor sub-frame and related parts are omitted from these figures. However these parts may be similar in function to those described in relation to Figures 1 and 2 to 4.
  • the framework 31 is of lightweight composite construction comprising an upper layer 32 of plastic or of composite materials (aramid, glass, carbon or polyethylene fibres) construction, at least one intermediate layer 33 (thickness 5 mm to 5 cm) of a rigid lightweight foam plastic material, and a lower layer 34 (thickness 5 mm to 15 mm) of blast protecting material.
  • the composite layered material may be fabricated in flat sections which are subsequently cut to shape and bent into the arched configuration as shown in Figure 5.
  • the framework may include an integrally molded toe cap 35. Forwardly of the toe cap the framework divides into two curved limbs 36 which terminate in a transverse ground-engaging pad assembly 37.
  • the pad assemblies 37, 39 have a generally rectangular footprint extending transverse to the length of the frame, and are fabricated to be of compliantly compressible structure.
  • the pad assemblies may constitute gas filled structures, or compressible foam.
  • the limbs 36 and 38 are of resiliently flexible composition, and this combined with the inherent compressibility of the pad (or foam) assemblies 37, 39 ensures that the framework 31 can readily accommodate itself to irregularities in the ground surface upon which it is supported.
  • the framework 41 shown here is similar in construction and configuration to that shown in Figures 2 to 5 and will not be described further.
  • the ground-engaging elements are formed by generally rectangular feet 42, 43 which are pivotally attached to the lower ends of the forward and rearward limbs 44, 45 respectively by pivot pins 46, 47 respectively received in rounded end pieces 48, 49 carried at the lower ends of the limbs 44, 45.
  • the feet 44, 45 have upwardly curved front ends and comprise a thin profiled traction pad 50a over a lightweight plastic backing piece 50b.
  • FIG. 7A, 7B and 7C there is shown a foot protection system framework 51 which is similar in construction and configuration to those discussed above in relation to Figures 5 and 6.
  • a pad assembly in the form of a somewhat rectangular air filled compartment 54, or readily compressible pod, e.g. of foam, attached to the lower end of the associated leg by an adhered backing piece 56 which is bonded to the top of the pod (air bag) 54 and to the corresponding leg 52, 53.
  • the framework 61 shown in Figure 8A is of similar shape and construction to that shown in Figures 5, 6A and 7A, defining spaced pairs of front legs 62 and rear legs 63.
  • the ground-engaging feet 64 in Figures 8A to 8C are similar in construction to those of Figures 6A to 6C comprising traction pads adhered to lightweight plastic backing pieces.
  • the backing piece of each foot 64 is preferably of high density foam material, the bellows being of elastic configuration and therefore capable of a large range of pivotal deformation about any horizontal axis.
  • the framework 71 shown in Figure 9 is generally similar in shape and construction to the examples of Figures 5, 6A, 7A and 8A and may include any of the arrangements of traction pads, air chambers, bellows and the like as disclosed therein.
  • the Figure 9 embodiment however is further characterized by the provision of a rectangular platform 74 which is attached to the framework 71 and projects horizontally over the front and rear legs 72, 73.
  • the platform 74 can be made integral with the central part of the framework, and may incorporate a limited degree of resilience, the ends 76, 77 being spaced above the corresponding lower ends of the front and rear legs 72, 73. The platform thus provides added protection in the event that the legs 72, 73 are broken off by an exploding mine.
  • the platform although being structurally much lighter than the legs is nonetheless likely to be effective for the intended purpose by virtue of the fact that it is of resilient construction and is at a greater spacing above the ground surface than are the legs.
  • Suitable materials for the platform are composite materials similar to those used for the shell in Figs. 2-6 (e.g. comprised of aramid, glass or plastic fibres).
  • Figures 10 to 14 illustrate a foot protection system that is somewhat similar to that shown in Figures 2 to 4 but is designed to support the user's foot at a height of just over 13 cm above the supporting ground surface 80 (Fig. 12) and to incorporate a platform that is considerably thinner than the one shown in Figures 2 to 4.
  • the foot protection system 81 comprises a platform 82 on the upper side of which is a sole plate 83 similar in form to the sole plate 106 of Figures 2 to 4, the sole plate overlying and being substantially coextensive with the platform and being connected thereto by fastening means in the form of plastic screws 84 located at the mid sole or forwardly so that the rearward part of the sole plate is free to flex and pivot upwardly about the screws 84.
  • the sole plate 83 carries a binding structure 85 (similar to that described in relation to Figures 2 to 4) for securing a boot 118 therein, and may also include a detent structure (not shown) to limit the upwards movement of the heel portion of the boot and sole plate relative to the platform 82.
  • the platform 82 is relatively thin, having overall a general thickness of approximately 5 cm, although its protective effect is enhanced to some extent by the sole plate 83 which typically comprises a sheet of polyethylene or similar flexible plastic material of thickness 2.5 to 5 mm.
  • the lower portions 85.1 of the binding 85 can be molded integral with the sole plate 83.
  • the structure of the platform is most clearly seen in Figures 12 and 13 as comprising an outer shell or canoe 82.1 of molded plastic material of a thickness between 8 and 10 mm surrounding a foam interior 82.2, the upper edge of the shell 82.1 extending slightly above the sole plate 83.
  • the overall dimensions of the platform 82 are approximately 38 cm in length and 14.5 cm in width, the height of the upper surface of the sole plate above the ground surface 80 being approximately 13 cm.
  • the underside of the platform 82 is formed with a pair of generally V-shaped recesses 87, 88 to receive V-shaped front and rear leg assemblies 89, 90 which are secured in position by nylon fasteners 91 which connect each to the platform 82.
  • the leg assemblies 89, 90 include integral legs 93 each terminating in a screw-threaded stud 93.1 carrying pods 94, similar to the legs and pods as described in relation to the embodiment of Figures 2 to 4.
  • the pods 94 are threadedly attached to the studs 93.1 and can therefore be removed when required.
  • the leg assemblies 89, 90 may be formed as hollow roto-molded plastic components, and have upper sides molded to fit snugly within the recesses 87, 88 on the underside of the shell 82.1 so as to be rigidly and securely attached to the latter by means of the nylon fasteners 91.
  • the studded pods 94 are of molded polyurethane, having integrally formed attachment threading therein.
  • the foot protection system of Figures 10 to 14 is fabricated substantially entirely in lightweight plastic materials to minimize the amount of damage caused by parts which break free during an explosion.
  • an undetected mine could be triggered by contact by a front one of the pods 94, and explosion of the mine would most probably result in destruction of that pod and its associated leg 93, fragments of which would be hurled upwards.
  • the damage caused by such fragments is minimized because of their lightweight construction, and in any event destruction of the foot protection system does not produce any sharp edged metal fragments.

Landscapes

  • Professional, Industrial, Or Sporting Protective Garments (AREA)
  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)

Claims (25)

  1. Un système de protection pour protéger le pied d'un utilisateur à l'encontre de mines antipersonnel et analogues, ce système comprenant :
    un cadre (11 ; 101 ; 31 ; 41 ; 51 ; 61 ; 71 ; 82) configuré pour recevoir et être attaché à une chaussure d'un utilisateur pour supporter le pied en un emplacement qui est à une hauteur (H) d'au moins environ 10 cm au dessus d'une surface de sol ;
    ce cadre portant des éléments de contact au sol pour procurer un support stable pour le cadre sur une surface de sol support ;
    caractérisé en ce que les éléments de contact au sol (14 ; 15 ; 104 ; 37 ; 39 ; 42 ; 43 ; 54 ; 72 ; 73 ; 94) sont discrets et espacés, et en ce que le cadre présente une sous-face qui est éloignée vers le haut par rapport à ces éléments de contact au sol afin de laisser subsister un espace au-dessus de la surface de sol support.
  2. Un système de protection selon la revendication 1, dans lequel au moins des parties (102, 103 ; 36, 38 ; 44, 45 ; 53 ; 62, 63, 66 ; 72, 73 ; 93) de ce système sont élastiquement déformables pour tenir compte des irrégularités de la surface de sol support.
  3. Un système protecteur selon la revendication 1 ou 2, comprenant en outre un matériau de protection contre les déflagrations (128, 130 ; 34) recouvrant complètement la sous-face de l'emplacement du pied.
  4. Un système protecteur selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel la sous-face du cadre est conformée aérodynamiquement (figure 4B) pour dévier les fragments et la charge d'onde de la déflagration.
  5. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel un avant extrême (14 ; 104 ; 37 ; 42 ; 54 ; 64 ; 72 ; 94) des éléments de contact au sol est situé en avant de l'emplacement du pied.
  6. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, dans lequel un arrière extrême (15 ; 104 ; 39 ; 43 ; 54 ; 64 ; 73 ; 94) des éléments de contact au sol est situé à l'arrière de l'emplacement du pied.
  7. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 6, dans lequel les éléments de contact au sol comprennent des paires de nacelles latéralement espacées (104 ; 42, 43 ; 54 ; 64 ; 72, 73 ; 94), ou un élément plus large unique (37,39) à la place d'une paire de nacelles.
  8. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 7, dans lequel l'emplacement du pied est défini par un réceptacle (106 ; 83) qui est mobile pour tenir compte d'un mouvement de balancement vers le haut du pied de l'utilisateur autour d'une monture (108 ; 94) située en partie avant de ce récepteur.
  9. Un système de protection selon la revendication 8, dans lequel le récepteur comprend une couche de matériau plastique flexible (106 ; 83) possédant une extrémité avant qui est reliée à la plateforme, cette couche étant dimensionnée pour s'étendre au-dessous du pied de l'utilisateur.
  10. Un système de protection selon la revendication 8 ou 9, dans lequel le réceptacle comprend en outre une structure de fixation (120, 122, 124 ; 85) configurée pour s'engager autour du pied et de la cheville de l'utilisateur.
  11. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 10, dans lequel le cadre est fabriqué à partir d'un matériau métallique, plastique ou composite léger.
  12. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 9, dans lequel le cadre est de construction composite comprenant une couche supérieure (83) de matériau plastique ou composite dur, une couche inférieure (186, 82) de matériau d'absorption de la déflagration et au moins une couche intérieure (128, 130) en mousse plastique légère, en aluminium en nid d'abeille, ou autre matériau composite qui puisse s'écraser facilement et absorber de l'énergie.
  13. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 12, dans lequel le cadre est de configuration avec une forme en voûte et présente une bifurcation à ses extrémités avant et arrière pour définir des paires de jambages latéralement espacés (102, 103 ; 36, 38 ; 72, 73 ; 89,90) possédant des extrémités inférieures qui portent les éléments de contact au sol.
  14. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 13, dans lequel les éléments de contact au sol comprennent un matériau en mousse de plastique légère (50b ; 64b) en partie.
  15. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 13, dans lequel il y a au moins deux des éléments de contact au sol qui sont configurés avec un espacement longitudinal qui n'est pas inférieur à la longueur de l'emplacement du pied.
  16. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 15, dans lequel le cadre est configuré pour supporter le pied de l'utilisateur à une hauteur d'environ 10 à 15 cm au-dessus de la surface de sol.
  17. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 15, dans lequel le cadre est configuré pour supporter le pied de l'utilisateur à une hauteur comprise entre environ 15 et 30 cm au-dessus de la surface de sol.
  18. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 17, dans lequel chacun des éléments de contact au sol (104 ; 94) possède une sous-face arrondie pour venir en contact avec la surface de sol support.
  19. Un système de protection selon la revendication 18, dans lequel les éléments de contact au sol comprennent des coquilles externes (94) qui y sont fixés à verrouillage, mais sélectivement amovibles pour le remplacement, chacune de ces coquilles étant de configuration arrondie et en un matériau plastique élastique.
  20. Un système de protection selon la revendication 19, dans lequel les tampons sont fabriqués à partir d'un matériau choisi parmi le polypropylène, le polyuréthanne, le silicone et le caoutchouc, et sont formés avec des saillies sur leurs surfaces extérieures pour améliorer le contact avec la surface de sol support.
  21. Un système de protection selon la revendication 19 ou 20, dans lequel les coquilles sélectivement amovibles des éléments de contact au sol sont fixées en place par des moyens de verrouillage (93.1) pour empêcher un retrait accidentel en cours d'utilisation.
  22. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 21, dans lequel les éléments de contact au sol sont portés aux extrémités de bras (102, 103 ; 93) qui sont reliés au cadre à la sous-face de celui-ci, chacun des jambages étant fabriqué en un matériau plastique et ayant un degré limité d'élasticité pour permettre au système de s'adapter aux irrégularités de la surface de sol support.
  23. Un système de protection selon la revendication 22, dans lequel les jambages sont disposés par paires avant et arrière, chaque paire ayant deux jambages qui sont formés monoblocs avec une configuration en V (89, 90) et sont fixés de manière libérable à la sous-face du cadre.
  24. Un système de protection selon l'une des revendications 1 à 23, présentant des dimensions comprises dans les plages suivantes :
    a) longueur total entre 30 et 80 cm ;
    b) largeur entre 10 et 40 cm ;
    c) distance entre l'avant de l'emplacement du pied et un élément de contact au sol avant dans la plage allant de 5 cm à 40 cm ;
    d) une distance de l'arrière de l'emplacement du pied à l'élément de contact au sol le plus en arrière entre 5 et 25 cm.
  25. Un système de protection selon la revendication 8 ou selon l'une des revendications 9 à 24 prise en dépendance de la revendication 8, dans lequel le réceptacle comprend un support de cheville qui est configuré pour s'adapter à une amplitude limitée de mouvement de pivotement par rapport au récepteur, délimitant ainsi l'amplitude du mouvement du pied autour de la cheville de l'utilisateur.
EP98933419A 1997-07-18 1998-07-17 Systemes de protection du pied contre les mines antipersonnelles Expired - Lifetime EP0995073B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002210868A CA2210868A1 (fr) 1997-07-18 1997-07-18 Systemes de protection des pieds contre les mines antipersonnel
CA2210868 1997-07-18
US63473 1998-04-20
US09/063,473 US6006646A (en) 1997-07-18 1998-04-20 Anti-personnel mine foot protection systems
PCT/CA1998/000694 WO1999004216A1 (fr) 1997-07-18 1998-07-17 Systemes de protection du pied contre les mines antipersonnel

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0995073A1 EP0995073A1 (fr) 2000-04-26
EP0995073B1 true EP0995073B1 (fr) 2003-05-14

Family

ID=25679493

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98933419A Expired - Lifetime EP0995073B1 (fr) 1997-07-18 1998-07-17 Systemes de protection du pied contre les mines antipersonnelles

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0995073B1 (fr)
AU (1) AU8330098A (fr)
DE (1) DE69814640T2 (fr)
WO (1) WO1999004216A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CZ2009297A3 (cs) * 2009-05-14 2010-11-24 Zeman@Libor Ochranná obuv proti úcinkum nášlapných min s optimalizovanými konstrukcními soucástmi
US11433292B1 (en) * 2021-06-15 2022-09-06 Douglas Gay Padded overshoe assembly

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2720714A (en) 1952-08-15 1955-10-18 Herbert F Krohn Protective footpad assembly
US3516181A (en) 1959-05-05 1970-06-23 Us Navy Protective footgear
US3318024A (en) 1966-05-31 1967-05-09 Edwin S Fujinaka Blast protective footwear

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE69814640D1 (de) 2003-06-18
DE69814640T2 (de) 2004-03-25
AU8330098A (en) 1999-02-10
WO1999004216A9 (fr) 2000-03-16
EP0995073A1 (fr) 2000-04-26
WO1999004216A1 (fr) 1999-01-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6006646A (en) Anti-personnel mine foot protection systems
US6625820B1 (en) Protective headguard
CA1129603A (fr) Poitrail protecteur pour sports de contact
US3905135A (en) Boot for a foot cast
US6151714A (en) Protective athletic pads for joint surfaces
US20050273911A1 (en) Lightweight impact resistant helmet system
US5778449A (en) Wrist guard
CA2323565C (fr) Protecteur metatarsien coussine interne pour chaussures de securite et technique de fabrication de celui-ci
US20090090024A1 (en) Boots for minimizing injury from explosives
US10441008B2 (en) Protection device
US5235703A (en) Shock absorbing body protector
US3061951A (en) Blast attenuating footwear
US5337417A (en) Rib protector
US6725572B1 (en) Protective footwear against landmine
US3243898A (en) Protective footgear
EP0995073B1 (fr) Systemes de protection du pied contre les mines antipersonnelles
AU2811700A (en) Protective device against the effects of explosives
US4102062A (en) Safety boot with metatarsal protection
CA2290554C (fr) Systemes de protection du pied contre les mines antipersonnelles
US3531878A (en) Footwear incorporating a shin protection device
GB2191384A (en) Protective footwear
US20030009906A1 (en) Blast protective boot and overboot construction
CA2263028A1 (fr) Dispositif protecteur
WO2012137203A2 (fr) Système pour empêcher la détonation de mines
KR100484227B1 (ko) 대인지뢰 방호용 일체형 전투화

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000125

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20010613

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAG Despatch of communication of intention to grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAH Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): DE FR GB

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69814640

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20030618

Kind code of ref document: P

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20040217

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: RN

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: FC

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20110317 AND 20110323

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 69814640

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: ALLEN-VANGUARD CORP., OTTOWA, CA

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ALLEN-VANGUARD TECHNOLOGIES INC., OTTAWA, ONTARIO, CA

Effective date: 20110406

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20170726

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20170727

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20170727

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69814640

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20180716

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20180716