EP0885991A1 - Process for monitoring the operation of a weft feeler on air jet looms - Google Patents
Process for monitoring the operation of a weft feeler on air jet looms Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0885991A1 EP0885991A1 EP98106022A EP98106022A EP0885991A1 EP 0885991 A1 EP0885991 A1 EP 0885991A1 EP 98106022 A EP98106022 A EP 98106022A EP 98106022 A EP98106022 A EP 98106022A EP 0885991 A1 EP0885991 A1 EP 0885991A1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- weft
- light barrier
- signal
- weaving machine
- sensor device
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D03—WEAVING
- D03D—WOVEN FABRICS; METHODS OF WEAVING; LOOMS
- D03D47/00—Looms in which bulk supply of weft does not pass through shed, e.g. shuttleless looms, gripper shuttle looms, dummy shuttle looms
- D03D47/28—Looms in which bulk supply of weft does not pass through shed, e.g. shuttleless looms, gripper shuttle looms, dummy shuttle looms wherein the weft itself is projected into the shed
- D03D47/30—Looms in which bulk supply of weft does not pass through shed, e.g. shuttleless looms, gripper shuttle looms, dummy shuttle looms wherein the weft itself is projected into the shed by gas jet
- D03D47/3066—Control or handling of the weft at or after arrival
- D03D47/3073—Detection means therefor
-
- D—TEXTILES; PAPER
- D03—WEAVING
- D03D—WOVEN FABRICS; METHODS OF WEAVING; LOOMS
- D03D51/00—Driving, starting, or stopping arrangements; Automatic stop motions
- D03D51/18—Automatic stop motions
- D03D51/34—Weft stop motions
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for monitoring the function of an output of the Weft insertion channel of a reed arranged weft monitor with at least a first and a second light barrier, the first light barrier having the correct Entry of a weft thread in the weft insertion channel of a reed and the second light barrier has an incorrect weft insertion, e.g. one too long Detects weft or a so-called weft break and the hit Findings are transmitted by electrical signals from an evaluation device.
- CH-PS 655 745 A5 is a method for determining a weft insertion error by means of a weft detection device arranged on a weaving machine, hereinafter referred to as weft monitor, after which a predetermined angle of rotation range per revolution of the main loom shaft is determined and the presence of a weft is determined within this angle of rotation range.
- the shot guard monitors both a first rotation angle range in which a shot is to be detected and a second rotation angle range lying outside the first rotation angle range, a signal about the presence of a properly entered shot being generated only in the first rotation angle range while another , signal not generated by a weft thread, a so-called false signal, is also detected in the second angle range and a signal is generated there that triggers a weaving stop.
- the signal generated in the second angle of rotation range is only perceived as a false signal when it occurs, for example, continuously over a certain number of revolutions of the main loom shaft.
- a device for monitoring a weft thread by sensors is known from EP 0 004 836 A2.
- the subject of this previously known document is that a monitoring device known per se with a first and a second sensor is assigned a third sensor which detects the weft thread in the event of a defect in one of the two sensors.
- This solution is also not based on a functional check of the sensors.
- the first light barrier can be operated in web mode by interference signals, e.g. due to cable break can come about, generate false reports in such a way that a signal for one correct weft entry is present even though the weft entry was incorrect. Such an error message or such a false signal can also occur in one Rotation angle range of the weaving machine main shaft are generated, which is not that Angle range corresponds to in which the weft after its entry in the Shed has reached the first light barrier.
- the second light barrier is only in because of rarely occurring thread breaks Take action, so give a signal when there is a weft break. A defect of the second light barrier is therefore not detectable during each weft insertion.
- the object of the invention is therefore, by continuously monitoring the Functionality of the light barriers at the exit of the weft insertion channel a reed of an air jet loom arranged weft monitor Exclude malfunctions in the course of a weaving process and consequently manufacture avoid defective tissue.
- Monitoring the functionality of the first light barrier of the weft monitor is that in a range of rotation angle ⁇ 2 of the main loom shaft, the corresponds to the angle of rotation range ⁇ 1 in which the arrival of the one Weft insertion nozzle inserted into the shed through the first Light barrier of an evaluation device is signaled, occurring faults, e.g. the Breakage of a signal line leading to the light barrier, as at least one electrical one Interference signal from the evaluation device is signaled.
- the weaving machine drive stops the main shaft and an error message is generated, for example, on a display for the operating personnel. It is also essential to the invention that not every first interference signal resulting from the function monitoring in the rotation angle range ⁇ 2 or missing signal outside the rotation angle range ⁇ 1 must lead to a machine stop, but that more than one interference signal or missing signals can occur, and these signals by means of an algorithm for Determine the likelihood of a malfunction on the light barriers or, for example, in the course of the weaving process and only then the main drive is stopped.
- the functionality of the second light barrier is monitored by the fact that after the weft thread has been inserted into the weft insertion channel of the reed, the second light barrier is broken when the weft thread strikes the fabric edge, that is, it is broken even if there is no weft breakage. When the second light barrier is broken, it inevitably emits a signal to the evaluation device at each weft thread stop, which is used to monitor the functionality of the second light barrier. It has proven to be advantageous if the projection of a fabric table is used as a precaution, as is known from DE-PS 38 44 510.
- the rotation angle ranges ⁇ 1 and ⁇ 2, not shown here, of the total rotation angle of the Main loom shaft are related to one revolution of the main shaft.
- a weft thread 7 supplied by the thread store 15 is used transported by means of the entry nozzle 11 through the entry channel 5 of a reed 4 and its arrival at the light barrier 2 of the shot guard 1 detected and as an electrical Signal S1 transmitted to a signal evaluation device 8.
- the signal is recorded in an angle of rotation range ⁇ 1 of the main loom shaft. Outside of the angle of rotation range ⁇ 1, no signals are normally generated by the light barrier 2 because the weft thread 7 cannot arrive at the light barrier 2 in this region.
- the second light barrier 3 of the weft monitor 1 emits an electrical signal S2 to the evaluation device 8 when the weft thread 7 breaks through the light barrier 3 within the first rotation angle range ⁇ 1 of the main loom of the weaving machine. This is the case if, for example, there is a so-called shot break.
- the signal S2 triggers a stop of the drive 10 of the main shaft via the evaluation device 8 in the machine control 9.
- the second light barrier 3 will only come into action owing to the rarely occurring weft breaks, that is to say emit a signal if, for example, there is a weft break.
- a defect in the second light barrier 3, in contrast to the first light barrier 2, cannot be determined during each weft insertion.
- a defect in the second light barrier 3 can remain undetected over a longer period of time.
- the first light barrier 2 generates a signal S1, for example in the event of a shot break, but this signal S1 cannot be canceled by the signal S2 of the second light barrier 3.
- a defect in the light barrier 3 will result in a weft break being interpreted as a correctly inserted weft thread by the light barrier 2, that is to say a signal S1 is generated, although the signal S2 should have been generated.
- the second light barrier 3 is monitored for functionality according to the invention in that with each weft thread striking the binding point 13 of the fabric 14 through the reed 4, see also FIG. 2, the second light barrier 3 is broken through by a precaution outside the angle of rotation ⁇ 1 and thereby a signal S4 generated, which is different from the signal S2.
- the fabric table 12 of which has a projection 12 ' the with each weft thread stop between the light barriers 2, 3 in the entry channel 5 immersed projection 12 'in the light barrier 3 from the signal S4, which the Loom control 9 reports the functionality of the light barrier 3.
- the signals S3 and S4 are statistically in the Loom control 9 detected and by means of an algorithm, the probability the presence of a fault or a fault on the light barriers 2, 3 and a fault determined in the course of the weaving process by the weaving machine control 9.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Textile Engineering (AREA)
- Looms (AREA)
- Ignition Installations For Internal Combustion Engines (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft ein Verfahren zur Funktionsüberwachung eines am Ausgang des Schußfadeneintragkanals eines Webblattes angeordneten Schußfadenwächters mit wenigstens einer ersten und einer zweiten Lichtschranke, wobei die erste Lichtschranke den korrekten Eintrag eines Schußfadens in den Schußfadeneintragskanal eines Webblattes feststellt und die zweite Lichtschranke einen nicht korrekten Schußfadeneintrag, z.B. einen zu langen Schußfaden oder einen sogenannten Schußfadenbruch feststellt und die getroffenen Feststellungen durch elektrische Signale einer Auswerteeinrichtung übermittelt werden.The invention relates to a method for monitoring the function of an output of the Weft insertion channel of a reed arranged weft monitor with at least a first and a second light barrier, the first light barrier having the correct Entry of a weft thread in the weft insertion channel of a reed and the second light barrier has an incorrect weft insertion, e.g. one too long Detects weft or a so-called weft break and the hit Findings are transmitted by electrical signals from an evaluation device.
Bekannt ist aus der CH-PS 655 745 A5 ein Verfahren zum Feststellen eines
Schußeintragfehlers durch eine an einer Webmaschine angeordnete Schußfeststellvorrichtung,
nachfolgend Schußwächter genannt, wonach ein vorbestimmter
Drehwinkelbereich pro Umdrehung der Webmaschinen-Hauptwelle festgelegt und die
Anwesenheit eines Schusses innerhalb dieses Drehwinkelbereiches festgestellt wird.
Durch den Schußwächter wird dabei sowohl ein erster Drehwinkelbereich, in welchem ein
Schuß festgestellt werden soll, als auch ein außerhalb des ersten Drehwinkelbereiches
liegender zweiter Drehwinkelbereich überwacht, wobei ein Signal über das Vorliegen eines
ordnungsgemäß eingetragenen Schusses nur im ersten Drehwinkelbereich erzeugt wird,
während ein anderes, nicht durch einen Schußfaden erzeugtes Signal, ein sogenanntes
Fehlsignal, auch im zweiten Drehwinkelbereich erfaßt wird und dort ein Signal erzeugt wird,
das einen Webstop auslöst.
Das im zweiten Drehwinkelbereich erzeugte Signal wird dabei erst dann als Fehlsignal
wahrgenommen, wenn es z.B. kontinuierlich über eine bestimmte Anzahl von Umdrehungen
der Webmaschinen-Hauptwelle auftritt.Known from CH-PS 655 745 A5 is a method for determining a weft insertion error by means of a weft detection device arranged on a weaving machine, hereinafter referred to as weft monitor, after which a predetermined angle of rotation range per revolution of the main loom shaft is determined and the presence of a weft is determined within this angle of rotation range. The shot guard monitors both a first rotation angle range in which a shot is to be detected and a second rotation angle range lying outside the first rotation angle range, a signal about the presence of a properly entered shot being generated only in the first rotation angle range while another , signal not generated by a weft thread, a so-called false signal, is also detected in the second angle range and a signal is generated there that triggers a weaving stop.
The signal generated in the second angle of rotation range is only perceived as a false signal when it occurs, for example, continuously over a certain number of revolutions of the main loom shaft.
Bekannt ist aus der US-PS 4,487,235 ferner ein Verfahren und eine Vorrichtung zum Detektieren eines in ein Webfach einer Düsenwebmaschine eingetragenen Schußfadens. Auf eine Funktionskontrolle der einzelnen Schußwächter, insbesondere des zweiten Schußwächters stellt das bekannte Verfahren nicht ab.From US Pat. No. 4,487,235 a method and an apparatus for is also known Detecting a weft inserted in a shed of a jet loom. On a functional check of the individual gunner, especially the second Gunner does not turn off the known method.
Des weiteren ist aus der EP 0 004 836 A2 eine Einrichtung zum Überwachen eines
Schußfadens durch Sensoren bekannt.
Gegenstand dieser vorbekannten Druckschrift ist, daß einer an sich bekannten
Überwachungseinrichtung mit einem ersten und einem zweiten Sensor ein dritter Sensor
zugeordnet ist, der im Falle eines Defekts eines der zwei Sensoren den Schußfaden detektiert.
Auf eine Funktionskontrolle der Sensoren stellt auch diese Lösung nicht ab.Furthermore, a device for monitoring a weft thread by sensors is known from EP 0 004 836 A2.
The subject of this previously known document is that a monitoring device known per se with a first and a second sensor is assigned a third sensor which detects the weft thread in the event of a defect in one of the two sensors. This solution is also not based on a functional check of the sensors.
In einer bekannten Luftdüsenwebmaschine, in der der Schußfadenwächter am Ausgang des Webblattes aus einer ersten und zweiten Lichtschranke besteht, ist die Überwachungsfunktion der Lichtschranken bis gegenwärtig nicht eindeutig gesichert.In a known air jet weaving machine, in which the weft monitor at the exit of the Webblattes consists of a first and second light barrier, is the Monitoring function of the light barriers has not yet been clearly secured.
Die erste Lichtschranke kann im Webbetrieb durch Störsignale, die z.B. durch Kabelbruch zustande kommen können, Fehlmeldungen derart erzeugen, daß ein Signal für einen korrekten Schußfadeneintrag vorliegt, obwohl ein nicht korrekter Schußfadeneintrag erfolgte. Eine solche Fehlmeldung bzw. ein solches Falschsignal kann auch in einem Drehwinkelbereich der Webmaschinen-Hauptwelle erzeugt werden, der nicht dem Drehwinkelbereich entspricht, in welchem der Schußfaden nach seinem Eintrag in das Webfach die erste Lichtschranke erreicht hat.The first light barrier can be operated in web mode by interference signals, e.g. due to cable break can come about, generate false reports in such a way that a signal for one correct weft entry is present even though the weft entry was incorrect. Such an error message or such a false signal can also occur in one Rotation angle range of the weaving machine main shaft are generated, which is not that Angle range corresponds to in which the weft after its entry in the Shed has reached the first light barrier.
Die zweite Lichtschranke wird aufgrund von selten auftretenden Fadenbrüchen nur dann in Aktion treten, also ein Signal abgeben, wenn ein Schußfadenbruch vorliegt. Ein Defekt der zweiten Lichtschranke ist also nicht während eines jeden Schußfadeneintrags feststellbar.The second light barrier is only in because of rarely occurring thread breaks Take action, so give a signal when there is a weft break. A defect of the second light barrier is therefore not detectable during each weft insertion.
Aufgabe der Erfindung ist es daher, durch kontinuierliches Überwachen der Funktionstüchtigkeit der Lichtschranken eines am Ausgang des Schußfadeneintragkanals eines Webblattes einer Luftdüsenwebmaschine angeordneten Schußfadenwächters Fehlfunktionen im Ablauf eines Webprozesses auszuschließen und folglich das Herstellen von fehlerbehaftetem Gewebe zu vermeiden. The object of the invention is therefore, by continuously monitoring the Functionality of the light barriers at the exit of the weft insertion channel a reed of an air jet loom arranged weft monitor Exclude malfunctions in the course of a weaving process and consequently manufacture avoid defective tissue.
Erfindungsgemäß wird die Aufgabe durch die Merkmale des Patentanspruchs 1 gelöst.According to the invention the object is achieved by the features of
Die Überwachung der Funktionstüchtigkeit der ersten Lichtschranke des Schußfadenwächters besteht darin, daß in einem Drehwinkelbereich α2 der Webmaschinen-Hauptwelle, der nicht dem Drehwinkelbereich α1 entspricht, in dem die Ankunft des von einer Schußfadeneintragsdüse in das Webfach eingetragenen Schußfadens durch die erste Lichtschranke einer Auswerteeinrichtung signalisiert wird, auftretende Störungen, z.B. den Bruch einer zur Lichtschranke führenden Signalleitung, als wenigstens ein elektrisches Störsignal der Auswerteeinrichtung signalisiert wird.Monitoring the functionality of the first light barrier of the weft monitor is that in a range of rotation angle α2 of the main loom shaft, the corresponds to the angle of rotation range α1 in which the arrival of the one Weft insertion nozzle inserted into the shed through the first Light barrier of an evaluation device is signaled, occurring faults, e.g. the Breakage of a signal line leading to the light barrier, as at least one electrical one Interference signal from the evaluation device is signaled.
Im Falle, daß in dem vorgenannten Drehwinkelbereich α2 eine wie auch immer geartete
Störung an der ersten Lichtschranke auftritt, stoppt der Webmaschinenantrieb die Hauptwelle
und eine Fehlermeldung wird z.B. auf einer Anzeige dem Bedienpersonal generiert.
Erfindungswesentlich ist ferner, daß nicht jedes erste aus der Funktionsüberwachung
resultierende Störsignal in dem genannten Drehwinkelbereich α2 oder fehlende Signal
außerhalb des Drehwinkelbereichs α1 zu einem Maschinenstop führen muß, sondern daß
mehr als ein Störsignal oder fehlende Signale auftreten können, und diese Signale mittels
eines Algorithmus zum Feststellen der Wahrscheinlichkeit einer Funktionsstörung an den
Lichtschranken oder z.B. im Ablauf des Webprozesses verwendet werden und erst daraufhin
der Hauptantrieb gestoppt wird.In the event that a malfunction of any kind occurs at the first light barrier in the aforementioned angle of rotation range α2, the weaving machine drive stops the main shaft and an error message is generated, for example, on a display for the operating personnel.
It is also essential to the invention that not every first interference signal resulting from the function monitoring in the rotation angle range α2 or missing signal outside the rotation angle range α1 must lead to a machine stop, but that more than one interference signal or missing signals can occur, and these signals by means of an algorithm for Determine the likelihood of a malfunction on the light barriers or, for example, in the course of the weaving process and only then the main drive is stopped.
Die Überwachung der Funktionstüchtigkeit der zweiten Lichtschranke erfolgt dadurch, daß
nach dem Eintragen des Schußfadens in den Schußeintragskanal des Webblattes beim
Anschlagen des Schußfadens an die Gewebekante die zweite Lichtschranke durchbrochen
wird, also auch dann durchbrochen wird, wenn kein Schußfadenbruch vorliegt.
Mit dem Durchbrechen der zweiten Lichtschranke gibt diese zwangsläufig bei jedem
Schußfadenanschlag ein Signal an die Auswerteeinrichtung ab, das zur Überwachung der
Funktionstüchtigkeit der zweiten Lichtschranke verwendet wird.
Als vorteilhaft hat sich erwiesen, wenn als Vorkehrungen der Vorsprung eines Gewebetisches
verwendet wird, wie dieser aus der DE-PS 38 44 510 bekannt ist. The functionality of the second light barrier is monitored by the fact that after the weft thread has been inserted into the weft insertion channel of the reed, the second light barrier is broken when the weft thread strikes the fabric edge, that is, it is broken even if there is no weft breakage.
When the second light barrier is broken, it inevitably emits a signal to the evaluation device at each weft thread stop, which is used to monitor the functionality of the second light barrier.
It has proven to be advantageous if the projection of a fabric table is used as a precaution, as is known from DE-PS 38 44 510.
Die Erfindung wird nachfolgend anhand der in der Zeichnung dargestellten Ausführungsbeispiele erläutert.The invention is described below with reference to the drawing Exemplary embodiments explained.
Es zeigen:
Figur 1- eine schematische Darstellung der erfindungswesentlichen Elemente der Webmaschine in der Draufsicht und
Figur 2- eine Schnittdarstellung gemäß der Linie I-I in
Figur 1.
- Figure 1
- a schematic representation of the essential elements of the loom according to the invention in plan view and
- Figure 2
- 2 shows a sectional illustration along line II in FIG. 1.
Die hier nicht dargestellten Drehwinkelbereiche α1 und α2 des Gesamtdrehwinkels der Webmaschinen-Hauptwelle sind auf eine Umdrehung der Hauptwelle bezogen.The rotation angle ranges α1 and α2, not shown here, of the total rotation angle of the Main loom shaft are related to one revolution of the main shaft.
Im normalen Webbetrieb wird ein von dem Fadenspeicher 15 gelieferter Schußfaden 7
mittels der Eintragsdüse 11 durch den Eintragskanal 5 eines Webblattes 4 transportiert und
dessen Ankunft an der Lichtschranke 2 des Schußwächters 1 erfaßt und als elektrisches
Signal S1 einer Signalauswerteeinrichtung 8 übermittelt.In normal weaving operation, a weft thread 7 supplied by the
Die Signalerfassung erfolgt dabei in einem Drehwinkelbereich α1 der Webmaschinen-Hauptwelle.
Außerhalb des Drehwinkelbereiches α1 werden von der Lichtschranke 2 im Normalfall keine
Signale erzeugt, weil in diesem Bereich der Schußfaden 7 nicht an der Lichtschranke 2
ankommen kann.The signal is recorded in an angle of rotation range α1 of the main loom shaft.
Outside of the angle of rotation range α1, no signals are normally generated by the
Eine auftretende Störung an der Lichtschranke 2, z.B. durch Bruch der Signalleitung zur
Übertragung des Signals S1, löst im Drehwinkelbereich α2 ein Signal aus. Dieses Signal wird
mit S3 bezeichnet. Da aber das Signal S3 unterschiedlich zum Signal S1 ist, wird dieses nicht
unmittelbar nach dessen Erzeugung zum Auslösen eines Webstops verwendet, wie später
noch erläutert werden wird.An occurring fault on the
Die zweite Lichtschranke 3 des Schußwächters 1 gibt an die Auswerteeinrichtung 8 ein
elektrisches Signal S2 ab, wenn innerhalb des ersten Drehwinkelbereiches α1 der
Webmaschinen-Hauptwelle der Schußfaden 7 die Lichtschranke 3 durchbricht.
Das ist dann der Fall, wenn z.B. ein sogenannter Schußbruch vorliegt.
Das Signal S2 löst über die Auswerteeinrichtung 8 in der Maschinensteuerung 9 einen Stop
des Antriebes 10 der Hauptwelle aus.
Die zweite Lichtschranke 3 wird aber, wie bereits eingangs erwähnt, aufgrund von selten
auftretenden Schußfadenbrüchen nur dann in Aktion treten, also ein Signal abgeben, wenn
z.B. ein Schußbruch vorliegt.
Ein Defekt der zweiten Lichtschranke 3 ist also, im Gegensatz zur ersten Lichtschranke 2,
nicht während eines jeden Schußeintrags feststellbar. Insofern kann ein Defekt an der zweiten
Lichtschranke 3 über einen längeren Zeitraum unerkannt bleiben. Die Folge ist, daß z.B. bei
einem Schußbruch die erste Lichtschranke 2 ein Signal S1 erzeugt, dieses Signal S1 jedoch
nicht durch das Signal S2 der zweiten Lichtschranke 3 aufgehoben werden kann. Insofern
wird ein Defekt an der Lichtschranke 3 dazu führen, daß ein Schußbruch als ein korrekt
eingetragener Schußfaden durch die Lichtschranke 2 interpretiert wird, also ein Signal S1
erzeugt wird, obwohl das Signal S2 hätte erzeugt werden müssen. Dadurch bleiben
Schußfehler im Gewebe zunächst unerkannt.
Hier setzt die Erfindung an.
Die zweite Lichtschranke 3 wird erfindungsgemäß dadurch auf Funktionstüchtigkeit
überwacht, daß mit jedem Schußfadenanschlagen an den Bindepunkt 13 des Gewebes 14
durch das Webblatt 4, siehe auch Figur 2, die zweite Lichtschranke 3 durch eine Vorkehrung
außerhalb des Drehwinkels α1 durchbrochen wird und dadurch ein Signal S4 erzeugt, das
unterschiedlich zu dem Signal S2 ist.The
This is the case if, for example, there is a so-called shot break.
The signal S2 triggers a stop of the drive 10 of the main shaft via the
However, as already mentioned at the beginning, the
A defect in the
This is where the invention comes in.
The
Bei einer Luftdüsenwebmaschine, deren Gewebetisch 12 einen Vorsprung 12' besitzt, löst der
bei jedem Schußfadenanschlag zwischen die Lichtschranken 2,3 in den Eintragskanal 5
eintauchende Vorsprung 12' in der Lichtschranke 3 das Signal S4 aus, das der
Webmaschinensteuerung 9 die Funktionstüchtigkeit der Lichtschranke 3 mitteilt.In an air jet loom, the fabric table 12 of which has a projection 12 ', the
with each weft thread stop between the
Im Hinblick auf das Auslösen eines Webstops durch das Signal S3 bei einer im
Drehwinkelbereich α2 auftretenden Störung an der ersten Lichtschranke 2 und bei einem im
Webprozeß an der Lichtschranke 3 nicht erzeugten Signal S4 außerhalb des
Drehwinkelbereiches α1 werden die Signale S3 und S4 statistisch in der
Webmaschinensteuerung 9 erfaßt und mittels eines Algorithmus wird die Wahrscheinlichkeit
des Vorliegens eines Fehlers bzw. einer Störung an den Lichtschranken 2,3 und einer Störung
im Ablauf des Webprozesses durch die Webmaschinensteuerung 9 festgestellt. With regard to triggering a web stop by signal S3 at an im
Angle of rotation range α2 occurring on the
- 0101
- SchußfadenwächterWeft guard
- 0202
- LichtschrankePhotoelectric barrier
- 0303
- LichtschrankePhotoelectric barrier
- 0404
- WebblattReed
- 0505
- EintragskanalEntry channel
- 0606
- LuftdüsenwebmaschineAir jet loom
- 0707
- SchußfadenWeft
- 0808
- AuswerteeinrichtungEvaluation device
- 0909
- WebmaschinensteuerungWeaving machine control
- 1010th
- Antriebdrive
- 1111
- EintragsdüseEntry nozzle
- 1212th
- GewebetischFabric table
- 12'12 '
- Vorsprunghead Start
- 1313
- BindepunktTie point
- 1414
- Gewebetissue
- 1515
- FadenspeicherThread storage
- 1616
- SpuleKitchen sink
- 1717th
- KettfadenWarp thread
- 1818th
- SchwingbewegungSwinging motion
- S0S0
- elektr. Signalelectr. signal
- S1S1
- elektr. Signalelectr. signal
- S2S2
- elektr. Signalelectr. signal
- S3S3
- elektr. Signalelectr. signal
- S4S4
- elektr. Signalelectr. signal
Claims (3)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE19716587A DE19716587C1 (en) | 1997-04-21 | 1997-04-21 | On=line supervisory control for weft monitoring system of air jet loom |
DE19716587 | 1997-04-21 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0885991A1 true EP0885991A1 (en) | 1998-12-23 |
EP0885991B1 EP0885991B1 (en) | 2000-11-29 |
Family
ID=7827140
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP98106022A Expired - Lifetime EP0885991B1 (en) | 1997-04-21 | 1998-04-02 | Process for monitoring the operation of a weft feeler on air jet looms |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6014991A (en) |
EP (1) | EP0885991B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JP3263026B2 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE197824T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE19716587C1 (en) |
ES (1) | ES2154066T3 (en) |
PT (1) | PT885991E (en) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102534953A (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2012-07-04 | 津田驹工业株式会社 | Ejection-period setting method for sub-nozzles in air jet loom |
Families Citing this family (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102010044127B3 (en) * | 2010-11-18 | 2011-12-29 | Lindauer Dornier Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung | Gripper head for the entry of weft threads on a rapier loom and a rapier loom with such a gripper head |
JP6372229B2 (en) | 2014-08-04 | 2018-08-15 | 株式会社豊田自動織機 | Weft detection device in jet loom |
JP7424234B2 (en) * | 2020-07-08 | 2024-01-30 | 株式会社豊田自動織機 | air jet loom |
Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3608590A (en) * | 1968-10-10 | 1971-09-28 | Sulzer Ag | Optical weft stop motion for a weaving machine |
US4041985A (en) * | 1975-05-07 | 1977-08-16 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Weft sensor system of sensing malfunction of a weaving loom |
EP0004836A2 (en) * | 1978-04-04 | 1979-10-17 | Tsudakoma Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Weft feeler mechanism for fluid jet looms |
CH655745A5 (en) * | 1979-11-07 | 1986-05-15 | Toyoda Automatic Loom Works | METHOD FOR DETECTING A SHOT ENTRY ERROR. |
EP0285872A2 (en) * | 1987-03-16 | 1988-10-12 | Tsudakoma Corporation | Method of discriminating and changing a yarn package |
JPH0533246A (en) * | 1991-07-30 | 1993-02-09 | Tsudakoma Corp | Weft-detection apparatus for loom |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS58208446A (en) * | 1982-05-31 | 1983-12-05 | 津田駒工業株式会社 | Weft yarn detection for jet loom |
DE3273230D1 (en) * | 1982-11-08 | 1986-10-16 | Sulzer Ag | Weaving machine |
DE3844510A1 (en) * | 1988-04-07 | 1989-12-28 | Dornier Gmbh Lindauer | Air-jet weaving machine |
DE3821725A1 (en) * | 1988-04-07 | 1989-10-26 | Dornier Gmbh Lindauer | AIR WAVING MACHINE |
DE19602513C1 (en) * | 1996-01-25 | 1996-10-02 | Dornier Gmbh Lindauer | Monitoring functioning of magnetic valves in looms |
DE19611320C2 (en) * | 1996-03-22 | 1999-05-20 | Dornier Gmbh Lindauer | Method and device for pneumatically supporting the insertion and tensioning of a weft thread in weaving machines |
-
1997
- 1997-04-21 DE DE19716587A patent/DE19716587C1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
1998
- 1998-04-02 PT PT98106022T patent/PT885991E/en unknown
- 1998-04-02 AT AT98106022T patent/ATE197824T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1998-04-02 DE DE59800353T patent/DE59800353D1/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-04-02 ES ES98106022T patent/ES2154066T3/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-02 EP EP98106022A patent/EP0885991B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1998-04-08 JP JP09576098A patent/JP3263026B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1998-04-21 US US09/064,043 patent/US6014991A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Patent Citations (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US3608590A (en) * | 1968-10-10 | 1971-09-28 | Sulzer Ag | Optical weft stop motion for a weaving machine |
US4041985A (en) * | 1975-05-07 | 1977-08-16 | Nissan Motor Company, Limited | Weft sensor system of sensing malfunction of a weaving loom |
EP0004836A2 (en) * | 1978-04-04 | 1979-10-17 | Tsudakoma Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Weft feeler mechanism for fluid jet looms |
CH655745A5 (en) * | 1979-11-07 | 1986-05-15 | Toyoda Automatic Loom Works | METHOD FOR DETECTING A SHOT ENTRY ERROR. |
EP0285872A2 (en) * | 1987-03-16 | 1988-10-12 | Tsudakoma Corporation | Method of discriminating and changing a yarn package |
JPH0533246A (en) * | 1991-07-30 | 1993-02-09 | Tsudakoma Corp | Weft-detection apparatus for loom |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 017, no. 333 (C - 1074) 24 June 1993 (1993-06-24) * |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102534953A (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2012-07-04 | 津田驹工业株式会社 | Ejection-period setting method for sub-nozzles in air jet loom |
CN102534953B (en) * | 2010-11-29 | 2014-09-17 | 津田驹工业株式会社 | Ejection-period setting method for sub-nozzles in air jet loom |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0885991B1 (en) | 2000-11-29 |
JP3263026B2 (en) | 2002-03-04 |
JPH10317261A (en) | 1998-12-02 |
ATE197824T1 (en) | 2000-12-15 |
ES2154066T3 (en) | 2001-03-16 |
US6014991A (en) | 2000-01-18 |
PT885991E (en) | 2001-04-30 |
DE19716587C1 (en) | 1998-09-03 |
DE59800353D1 (en) | 2001-01-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0530492B1 (en) | Method for detecting flaws in a textile web | |
DE68902750T2 (en) | YARN DELIVERY DEVICE FOR TEXTILE MACHINES. | |
DE60106518T2 (en) | Method and device for fault detection in the field of a jacquard machine | |
EP0656437B1 (en) | Process for supplying and inserting weft in the fabric of a loom and supplying device | |
EP0885991B1 (en) | Process for monitoring the operation of a weft feeler on air jet looms | |
EP0816545B1 (en) | Defective weft insertion detection device on a gripper loom | |
EP2175058B1 (en) | Loom with yarn quality sensor | |
DE2204529C3 (en) | Method for monitoring the weft insertion in a weaving machine; Weft thread monitor to carry out the process | |
DE3110462C2 (en) | Electronic weft thread monitor | |
EP1899516A1 (en) | Method and device for maintaining a weft thread which is introduced into a weaving machine, in particular an air-jet weaving machine, after the starting process | |
CH655745A5 (en) | METHOD FOR DETECTING A SHOT ENTRY ERROR. | |
DE2509558A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING THE WEIGHT ENTRY OF A LOOM | |
DE69216027T2 (en) | Method for automatically removing a wrong weft thread from the shed of an air-jet weaving machine and pneumomechanical device used for this method | |
DE3315293A1 (en) | DEVICE FOR RECEIVING AND MONITORING THE WIFE ON PROTECTIVE WEAVING MACHINES WITH PNEUMATIC WIFE ENTRY | |
DE3411927C2 (en) | ||
DE3512063C2 (en) | ||
DE10115172C1 (en) | Process for monitoring weft insertion in air jet weaving machines and device for carrying out the process | |
DE3787242T2 (en) | Process for detecting adhering weft threads and weaving machine using this process. | |
CH681158A5 (en) | ||
DE2520478C2 (en) | Gunshot guard | |
DE3117751A1 (en) | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETECTING THE OPERATING CONDITIONS OF A Loom | |
CH620482A5 (en) | ||
EP2462268B1 (en) | Method and device for monitoring the thread arrival during the weft insertion of different weft threads on a weaving machine | |
EP1350878B1 (en) | Method for monitoring the weft thread in a loom | |
EP1371765A2 (en) | Method for monitoring warp yarns and warp stop motion for a weaving loom |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL PT SE |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Free format text: AL;LT;LV;MK;RO;SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19990129 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19990706 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Free format text: BE CH DE FR GB IT LI |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL PT SE |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL PT SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20001129 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 197824 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 20001215 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59800353 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20010104 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: DIPL.-ING. ETH H. R. WERFFELI PATENTANWALT |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: JACOBACCI & PERANI S.P.A. |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20010228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2154066 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) |
Effective date: 20010226 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20010126 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20050321 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20050404 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20050406 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20050421 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20060317 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20060320 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060402 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060402 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20060403 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20060403 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20060430 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20060727 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20061002 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: MM4A Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES Effective date: 20061002 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20060402 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20060403 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: *LINDAUER DORNIER G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20070430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20071101 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070430 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070430 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20070402 |